Master’s Acceptable Needs Work

Portfolio
Yes/No Rubric

Opening Cover ● Explanation of the Portfolio ● Lacking adequate

Page ● Acknowledgements explanation of portfolio
● Table of Contents (strands) ● No acknowledgements
● No Table of Contents
(strands)

Strand 1: ● Personal philosophy of teaching ● Personal philosophy of

Philosophy and education teaching and education
and Practice ○ Roughly 200 words lacks focus and does
● Problem of practice not meet length
○ Should be tied back to the requirement
philosophy statement. ● Problem of practice
Roughly 50-100 words ○ Does not tie
● Works of choice from previous back to
classes Philosophy
○ Have brief overview/ statement and
synopsis of works and fails to achieve
impact on teaching minimum length
practice requirement
● Key terms ● Works of choice from
○ 3-5 terms with citations previous classes
○ Missing
overview/synop
sis

Strand 2: ● Annotated Lit Review ● Lacking minimum

Scholarship ○ Minimum of 25 sources requirements
● Links to pertinent scholarly online ● Less than 5 links to
journals scholarly online
○ 5 or more journals
● Links to pertinent professional ● Less than 5
development opportunities for professional
problem of practice development
○ 5 or more opportunities for
problem of practice

Strand 3: ● Action Research Proposal (all ● Action Research

Professional parts present: Introduction,
Development Literature Review, Methods,
Results, Discussion)
● Call for Conference Proposal
Submission
incomplete or missing
one of the five parts.
● Incomplete Conference
Proposal
● Grant Proposal for
 ● Grant Proposal for Research Research Funding
Funding ○ Missing
narrative or
budget

Strand 4: ● Reflection on course work and ● Reflection on course

Reflection connections to problem of practice
● Reflection on course work and
changed practices
● Assessment rubric
● Further research
work does not relate to
problem of practice and
or is missing
● Reflection on course
work and changed
practices missing or
lacking information on
changed practices
● Assessment rubric
missing or lacking
explanations
● Further research does
not align with problem
of practice or is not
included