Pošteno o Presudama

POŠTENO O PRESUDAMA
- izbor tekstova sa portala focanskidani, flickr-a i facebooka

- sve fotografije su objavljene na facebooku, focanskidani, flickr-u ekranportal13, portalima...
- priredio:Kenan Sarač
1
2
Posted on 22 Decembra, 2019
FOĈANSKA JE TUGA PREGOLEMA : SVIREPO UBISTVO

UGLEDNOG DOKTORA AZIZA TORLAKA
3
…i taman kad bi se uĉinilo da će dobiti svoje definitivne obrise, doĊem drugi
dan i vidim da je hrpa još veća… – izjavila je Nataša Zimonjić – Ĉengić, o
genocidu u Foĉi 1941. – 1945., u jednom intervjuu. Tako, i ja, taman da
pomislim da nemam šta više napisati o genocidu u Foĉi 1992. – 1995. pojavi
se ĉlanak sa suĊenja ratnom zloĉincu Ratku Mladiću. I mnogi detalji isplivaše
na površinu…
Svirepo i okrutno ubistvo uglednog foĉanskog lijeĉnika, doktora Aziza Torlaka

oduzima dah.
Svjedok kaže da su u junu 1993. iz zloglasnog koncentracionog logora, KP

Doma, Miško Savić, Predrag Trivun, Zoran Samardžić i Miško Rašković odveli
u kuću u selu Varizi. Tu su mu vezali noge, i objesili ga tako vezanog da mu je
glava visila ka podu, a noge bile vezane za plafon. Ispod glave su naložili
vatru. Cijelo vrijeme su ga udarali i iživljavali se nad bespomoćnim, nevinim
ĉovjekom dok nije umro. Monstrumi. Krvoloĉne zvijeri.
628. In June 1993, Miško Savić, Predrag Trivun, Zoran Samardžić, and
Miško Rašković took Aziz Torlak, a Bosnian-Muslim doctor, from KP Dom to
a house in the village of Varizi, suspended him by his legs, lit a fire under
his head, and beat him for four hours until he died.
4
Nažalost, sliĉno doktoru, je nešto ranije, taĉnije u augustu 1992. stradao
Miralem Ahmić u selu Potpeće, od ruku drugih krvožednih zlikovaca…
Foĉanska je tuga pregolema…Neprebolna…
___
U istom poglavlju se spominje kako je presuĊeni ratni zloĉinac Dragan

Zelenović (umro) ubio Nedžiba, poznatog kao Điban, da je na Mostu
Stradanja, željeznom mostu, kod zloglasnog KP Doma, Milenko „Buši‟ Burilo –
taj je najozloglašeniji i najkrvoloĉniji zlikovac – od svih ĉuvara u KP Domu,
ubio Halima Konja, da su Sponu ubili već pomenuti presuĊeni ratni zloĉinac
Dragan Zelenović (umro) i (takoĊe) presuĊeni ratni zloĉinac Zoran Vuković. Da
su Munira Maĉka iz MeĊurjeĉja ubili presuĊeni ratni zloĉinac Zoran Vuković,
presuĊeni ratni zloĉinac Dragan Zelenović (umro) i neprocesuirani ratni
zloĉinac Janko Janjić (ubio se – raznio se bombom). TakoĊe se navodi da je
Adija ubio jedan pripadnik jedinice Brana Ćosovića – Ćose…
izvori/reference:
…ali kada sam ugledala te kosti… Puno ih je bilo, svuda razbacanih, u velikim i malim gomilama, ili kao
pojedinačni skeleti, neki su ležali u jednom komadu… Samo što ih i na ulici nisam sretala.
GENOCID NAD MUSLIMANIMA FOČE 1941. – 1945. : Smrt do smrti…Priča Nataše Zimonjid-Čengid
https://focanskidani.wordpress.com/2017/05/04/genocid-nad-muslimanima-foce-1941-1945-smrt-
do-smrtiprica-natase-zimonjic-cengic/
Skeleti pored Dehotine
Nataša nastavlja: “Sedam dana je trajalo sabiranje tih kostiju, koje smo odnosili na jedno mjesto
pored Dehotine… Slagali smo ih kao drva što se slažu… Hrpa se svaki dan povedavala, i taman kad bi
se učinilo da de dobiti svoje definitivne obrise, dođem drugi dan i vidim da je hrpa još veda…
FOČANSKI KRVAVI MOSTOVI 1941. – 1945.
https://focanskidani.wordpress.com/2018/09/16/focanski-krvavi-mostovi-1941-1945/
Okrutna i jeziva smrt Miralema Ahmida ne može niikoga ostaviti ravnodušnim. Miralem je živ spaljen
od strane četnika, kojima je zapovjedao Bore Ivanovid.
Foča četvrt stoljeda od genocida : Fočanske tužne priče iz 1992. godine
https://focanskidani.wordpress.com/2017/11/10/foca-cetvrt-stoljeca-od-genocida-focanske-tuzne-
price-iz-1992-godine/
FOČA:Koliko još ima neidentifikovanih i neispričanih priča?

https://focanskidani.wordpress.com/2016/01/09/focakoliko-jos-ima-neidentifikovanih-i-
neispricanih-prica/
SVJEDOČANSTVA O GENOCIDU U FOČI - od 312 do 372 strane - IT-09-92-T - 22.11.2017. - slučaj
Mladid ICTY
https://www.academia.edu/41397868/SVJEDO%C4%8CANSTVA_O_GENOCIDU_U_FO%C4%8CI_-
_od_312_do_372_strane_-_IT-09-92-T_-_22.11.2017._-_slu%C4%8Daj_Mladi%C4%87_ICTY
4.3 Foča Municipality, od 312 – 372 strane
https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/96f3c1/pdf/
[PDF]Mladic Judgment Part I – ICC Legal tools Database
5
http://www.legal-tools.org › doc › pdf
22. nov 2017. – named ‘Pike’ were under his command. 643. Brane Dosovid a.k.a. Dosa, who had
more than 100 soldiers under him, was the leader of Janko …
3.3. Kunarac et al. case - ICTY and Sexual Violence as a Crime Against Humanity
https://www.academia.edu/41397930/3.3._Kunarac_et_al._case_-
_ICTY_and_Sexual_Violence_as_a_Crime_Against_Humanity
3.3. Kunarac et al. case – ICTY and Sexual Violence as a Crime Against Humanity
http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=122469
Privatni izvori informacija
priredio:Kenan Saraĉ
fotografije:internet/screenshoot
design:Kenan Saraĉ
oprema teksta:focanskidani
6
PRAVDA U TRANZICIJI – BROJ 2
Tribunal u Hagu
POGLED IZ HAGA: KANCELARIJA HAŠKOG TRIBUNALA U BEOGRADU
http://www.tuzilastvorz.org.rs/pravda_u_tranziciji/SRP/SRP02/506.pdf
Činjenice o Foči
“Ono što dokazi pokazuju je da su muslimanske žene i devojke, majke i kderi zajedno, lišene i
poslednjih ostataka ljudskog dostojanstva”. Jedan od najvažnijih aspekata suđenja u predmetu
Kunarac i drugi jeste to što je po prvi put pred jednim međunarodnim sudom, seksualno
porobljavanje kažnjeno kao zločin protiv čovečnosti Dana 22. februara 2001, Dragoljub Kunarac,
Radomir Kovač i Zoran Vukovid dovedeni su u Sudnicu I Međunarodnog krivičnog tribunala za bivšu
Jugoslaviju kako bi čuli izricanje presude u postupku koji se vodio protiv njih. Sva trojica bili su
optuženi, između ostalog, za mučenje i silovanje. Predsedavajudi sudija pročitao je sažetak osuđujude
presude, u kojem se, između ostalog, navodi sledede: "...Ono što dokazi pokazuju jeste da su
pripadnici oružanih snaga bosanskih Srba silovanje koristili kao instrument terora. Taj im je
instrument stajao na raspolaganju da ga primene kada i protiv koga su hteli. Ono što dokazi pokazuju
jeste da su srpske snage mogle da uspostave i da vode zarobljenički centar za mnoštvo muslimanskih
žena, kao što je to bila sportska dvorana "Partizan" nadomak zgrade opštinske policije u Foči, odakle
su žene i mlade devojke redovno odvođene na druge lokacije radi silovanja. Ono što dokazi pokazuju
jeste da se vlasti, kao što je lokalna policija nad kojom su kontrolu preuzeli Srbi, nisu obazirale na
patnje žrtava, iako je trebalo da im pruže zaštitu. Umesto toga, vlasti su pomagale u stražarenju nad
ženama te su se čak uključivale u njihovo maltretiranje kada bi im se žene obratile za pomod protiv
svojih ugnjetavača.
Šta su dokazi tačno pokazali?
Dokazi su živo opisali teror nad muslimanskim stanovništvom u Foči, pri čemu je posebna pažnja
posvedena ženama. Neke od tih žena zapravo to još nisu ni bile – po svim standardima, one bi se
mogle nazvati devojkama ili devojčicama.
Uzmite u obzir priču o “AB”, dvanaestogodišnoj devojčici iz Foče. Dana 3. septembra 1992, “AB” je s
drugim devojkama izdvojena iz grupe žena koje su bile zarobljene u sportskoj dvorani “Partizan”. Te
su žene bile na putu za Goražde, gde je trebalo da budu razmenjene. Tokom tog putovanja, “AB” je
izvedena iz autobusa, odvojena od svoje majke koja je takođe bila u autobusu, i odvedena u jednu
kudu gde je podvrgnuta višestrukim silovanjima tokom perioda od nekoliko meseci. Ta kuda, koju su
7
držali vojnici koji su bili deo vojske bosanskih Srba (VRS), postala je jedna od najzloglašenijih kuda u
Foči, u kojoj su devojke i žene bile zarobljene i silovane. Osim toga, bile su prisiljene da obavljaju
kudne poslove kao što su pranje, kuvanje, pranje veša i čišdenje. Svaki od vojnika koji su bili tamo
prisvojio je po jednu devojku za sebe i te su devojke bile njihovo ‘vlasništvo’ za svo vreme dok su
tamo bile zarobljene. Žrtve su višestruko silovane, seksualno zlostavljane i često premladivane. Za
vreme dok je držana u toj kudi, “AB” je odvođena i na druge lokacije, gde je protiv volje bila zatvorena
i po deset dana i gde su je silovale grupe srpskih vojnika. Na kraju, devojke su odvedene u kudu
izvesnog Drageca, koji ih je iznajmljivao kao prostitutke drugim vojnicima i drugim ljudima. Na kraju,
“AB” je prodata jednom muškarcu za 200 nemačkih maraka. Od tada nikad više nije viđena. Njenu
priču ispričala je jedna druga devojka koja je bila zarobljena sa njom i koja je svedočila pred
Tribunalom na suđenju Kunarcu, Kovaču i Vukovidu. Nažalost, priča o “AB” nije i jedina.
Prema izveštaju organizacije Human Rights Watch iz 1998. godine, tokom 1992. i 1993. “mnoge žene
nesrpkog porekla su držane u logorima u kojima su vršena silovanja širom opštine Foča, gde su bile
sistematski seksualno zlostavljane.
” Kampanja rasprostranjenog terora
Foča je gradid smešten na jugoistoku Bosne i događaji koji su se tu desili od početka 1992. do sredine
1993. mogu se dovesti u vezu sa širom slikom događaja u Bosni i Hercegovini i sa ciljevima vođstva
bosanskih Srba. Foča je imala posebnu stratešku važnost za celokupni cilj ujedinjavanja srpskih
zemalja zbog toga što graniči s Crnom Gorom. Ona se nalazi na raskrsnici puteva koji vode do
Sarajeva, Pala i dalje do mora. Prema popisu stanovništva iz 1991. godine, opština Foča je pre rata
imala oko 40.513 2 stanovnika, od kojih su 52 procenta bili Muslimani. Na kraju sukoba ostalo je
samo desetak Muslimana. Metod koji je korišden za ostvarenje tog cilja sastojao se uglavnom od
progona terorom. Zato ne iznenađuje što je Tribunal podigao nekoliko optužnica u vezi sa
događajima u Foči, dok su se dva predmeta konkretno bavila kampanjom rasprostranjenog
progona: prvi je predmet Dragoljuba Kunarca, koji je bio komandant izviđačke jedinice vojske
bosanskih Srba, i Radomira Kovača i Zorana Vukovida, koji su bili zamenici komandanta vojne policije
vojske bosanskih Srba i pripadnici paravojne jedinice u Foči. Drugi predmet, koji je okončan, odnosi
se na Milorada Krnojelca, koji je bio upravik “Kaznenopopravnog doma” (KP Dom), nekadašnjeg
zatvora u Foči.
Događaji u ovom području takođe imaju veliki značaj i u optužnicama protiv Slobodana Miloševida,
Momčila Krajišnika, Biljane Plavšid i Radovana Karadžida. Predmet Radovana Stankovida, koji je
nedavno prosleđen Vedu za ratne zločine u Sarajevu, takođe sadrži konkretne optužbe za
porobljavanje i silovanje muslimanskih žena.
Na kraju, optužnice su takođe podignute protiv Gojka Jankovida, čiji predmet treba biti prosleđen
Bosni i Hercegovini, i Dragana Zelenovida, kojeg su vlasti Ruske Federacije uhapsile u septembru i koji
treba da bude prebačen u Hag.
Konkretno, na suđenju Dragoljubu Kunarcu, Radomiru Kovaču i Zoranu Vukovidu utvrđeno je da su
jedna od meta kampanje terora, osim muslimanskih oružanih snaga, bili civili Muslimani i, u ovom
predmetu, posebno muslimanske žene. Na ovom suđenju, MKSJ je utvrdio da su snage bosanskih
Srba koristile silovanje kao instrument terora: “Ono što dokazi pokazuju je da su muslimanske žene i
devojke, majke i kderi zajedno, lišene i poslednjih ostataka ljudskog dostojanstva, žene i devojke
prema kojima se postupalo kao prema svojini, kao da su stvari kojima slobodno raspolažu srpske
okupacijske snage - odnosno konkretnije - koje skaču na svaki mig trojice optuženih.”
Suđenje nije bilo o tome ko je počeo rat ili šta se dešavalo u Foči pre sredine aprila 1992. Tužilaštvo i
odbrana su se složili oko činjenice da su posle 17. aprila 1992. srpske vlasti imale kontrolu nad
Fočom. Ono što je ovo suđenje utvrdilo jeste da su, nakon preuzimanja kontrole, srpske snage
sprovodile kampanju progona.
Prve istrage Događaje koji su se desili u Foči tokom sukoba istraživali su mnogi međunarodni
posmatrači još pre nego što je osnovan MKSJ.
“Komisija eksperata” napisala je svoj Završni izveštaj u maju 1994. U tom izveštaju, Komisija daje
neke podatke o događajima koji su se desili u Foči počev od aprila 1992, uključujudi
bombardovanje i etničko čišdenje sela, maltretiranje i mučenje u zatočeničkim objektima,
8
pogubljenja, silovanje i postojanje nekoliko masovnih grobnica. U tom izveštaju navode se neki
bosanski Srbi iz tog kraja kao počinioci tih zločina. Taj materijal je predat Tribunalu. Tribunal je
takođe dobio materijal od raznih međunarodnih humanitarnih i nevladinih organizacija koje su
radile s izbeglicama i ljudima koji su napustili Bosnu i Hercegovinu. Jedan deo tog materijala
uključuje detaljne informacije o žrtvama, opise događaja, uključujudi razne vrste zločina, napada,
ubijanja i silovanja, kao i imena nekih počinilaca tih zločina. Tokom istrage, Tribunal je takođe
dobio opširan materijal od vlasti Bosne i Hercegovine u kojem se navode detalji zločina i
potencijalni svedoci. Pre 1996. godine, Tužilaštvo nije imalo pristup području Foče, pa se zbog toga
prvobitna istraga sastojala uglavnom od pregleda informacija koje su pružene Tribunalu i razgovora
sa onim svedocima do kojih su istražitelji mogli da dođu.
Takođe su činjeni napori da se dođe u kontakt sa svedocima Srbima kako bi se dobili detalji o tim
zločinima. Međutim, s te strane nije bilo nikakve saradnje. Što se tiče područja Foče, neki Bošnjaci i
Hrvati koji su bili isterani ili razmenjeni, razgovarali su sa bosanskim vlastima i raznim nevladinim
organizacijama i opisali događaje u Foči i okolnim selima u periodu od početka 1992. do kraja 1993.
Evidencija o ovim intervjuima takođe je predata Tužilaštvu. Kako bi utvrdilo da li su te informacije
tačne, Tužilaštvo je formiralo tim koji se sastojao od pravnika, istražitelja, analitičara i prevodilaca.
Tim je imao zadatak da utvrdi koji su se zločini desili u Foči, kao i identitet osoba za koje se veruje da
su odgovorne za te zločine. Na samom početku, tim se usredsredio 3 na grupna silovanja koja su
uključivala nekoliko žrtava i nekoliko počinilaca. Pošto su istrage počele nekoliko godina nakon što su
ti zločini počinjeni, bilo je jasno da de se one oslanjati na izjave svedoka.
Razgovori su obavljeni sa svedocima iz Foče i okolnih sela i opština, i ved u tim prvim razgovorima
pojavila su se imena Dragoljuba Kunarca, Radomira Kovača i Zorana Vukovida.
Utvrđivanje identiteta počinilaca
Utvrđivanje identiteta počinilaca bio je težak zadatak. Nekim ženama je bilo relativno lako
identifikovati počinioce, jer su neki od počinilaca živeli na tom području i žrtve su ih poznavale pre
rata. Za mnoge žene i devojke, međutim, taj zadatak je bio mnogo teži. One nisu od ranije poznavale
počionioce i po prvi put su ih videle tokom napastvovanja. Neke su čule kako počinioce zovu
nadimkom, a neke ni to. U takvim slučajevima, identitet počinioca mogao se utvrditi prema mestu
gde je zločin počinjen, prema fizičkom opisu počinioca ili prema tome ko je još bio prisutan kada su se
zločini desili.
U sudnici je od svakog svedoka zatraženo da sudijama pokaže počinioca, kao što se može videti iz
slededeg razgovora između tužioca i svedokinje “87”: P. Da li biste danas mogli prepoznati Žagu
Kunarca? O. Možda. P. Pogledajte, molim vas, uokolo po sudnici i recite nam da li ga vidite. O. Da. P.
Recite nam, molim vas, gde sedi i opišite kako je obučen. O. Sjedi na lijevoj strani, i drugi je čovjek
tamo. Mislim da ima tamnoplavi sako, bijelu košulju. Ima kravatu s nečim crvenkastim na njoj, nešto
tako. O. Molim da u zapisnik uđe da je svedokinja identifikovala optuženog Dragoljuba Kunarca.
Iako je Kunarac svedočedi u sudnici tvrdio da, ne samo da nije silovao svedokinju “87” ved da je želeo
da joj pomogne, Pretresno vede je utvrdilo da je Kunarac identifikovan van razumne sumnje i nije
prihvatilo da njegovo svedočenje može biti tačno.
Među dokaznim materijalom koji je korišden kako bi se utvrdila istinitost onoga što su svedoci
govorili bile su i fotografije glavnih lokacija na kojima su se zločini desili. Od svakog svedoka koji je
pozvan da svedoči zatraženo je da potvrdi da su upravo to ta mesta o kojima su govorili. U nekim
slučajevima, svedokinje su mogle pokazati određene prostorije u zgradi gde su bile silovane, čime su
njihova svedočenja nanovo potvrđena. Naravno, druga strana je imala priliku da svedoke unakrsno
ispita u sudnici i, iako su mnogim svedocima u ovom predmetu date zaštitne mere, svi učesnici u
postupku u sudnici – sudije, optužba, odbrana i optuženi, su znali pravi identitet svedoka.
Napad na civilno stanovništvo
Pretresno vede se uverilo van razumne sumnje da su srpske snage izvršile napad širokih razmera
uperen protiv muslimanskog civilnog stanovništva na području Foče, Gacka i Kalinovika. Kad su se
gradovi i sela potpuno našli u njihovim rukama, srpske snage - vojska, policija, paravojne jedinice, a
ponekad čak i srpski seljani - koristili su isti obrazac ponašanja: muslimanske kude i stanove
9
sistematski su pljačkali ili spaljivali, muslimanske seljane kupili i zarobljavali, a koji put ih pritom tukli
ili ubijali. Muškarce i žene su razdvajali, a mnoge muškarce zatvorili u zatvoru KP Dom.
Suđenje u predmetu Krnojelac konkretno se bavilo KP domom. Za vreme dok su bili u tom objektu,
muškarci su bili podvrgnuti dugotrajnom zatočenju, koje je bilo bez opravdanja. Neki su bili teško
maltretirani kada su zarobljeni, neki su ubijeni na licu mesta, često u prisustvu svojih porodica, ili tako
da su njihove porodice to mogle čuti. Među zarobljenicima je bilo mladih i starih, bolesnih, ranjenih,
invalida i fizički i psihički poremedenih osoba.
Ujutro 3. jula 1992, Srbi u kamuflažnim uniformama napali su sela Trošanj i Mješaja i nekoliko
muškaraca i žena je ubijeno iz vatrenog oružja dok su pokušavali da pobegnu. Preostale žene i deca
su zarobljeni i odvedeni peške u Buk Bijelu, bivše gradilište hidrocentrale, koje je korišdeno kao
objekat za zarobljavanje. Odatle su autobusima prebacivani u srednjoškolski centar u Foči, gde su
zatvoreni. Neki su kasnije odvedeni na druga mesta u Foči ili u okolini, kao što je sportska dvorana
"Partizan", nadomak policijske stanice, ili u privatne kude u Miljevini i Trnovačama. Tamo bi našli
žene i devojke iz druge dve opštine. Na svim ovim mestima teror je poprimio drugu, veoma ličnu,
dimenziju. Dok su tamo bili zarobljeni, pod izgovorom da ih treba ispitati, srpski vojnici su silovali
jedan broj žena i devojčica.
Tokom svedočenja o jednom drugom incidentu, svedokinja “50” je rekla da ju je Zoran Vukovid
silovao dok je bila zarobljena u Buk Bijeloj. Za vreme njenog kasnijeg zatočenja u sportkoj dvorani
Partizan, Pretresno vede je utvrdilo da su negde sredinom jula 1992. Zoran Vukovid i još jedan vojnik
došli da je traže. Vukovid ju je odveo u jedan stan gde ju je primorao na polni odnos, potpuno svestan
činjenice da ona na to ne pristaje. Pretresno vede je takođe konstatovalo da je prilikom tog incidenta
Zoran Vukovid silovao svedokinju “50” po drugi put u roku od dve nedelje. Vede je zaključilo da je on
znao za njenu situaciju, 4 odnosno da je ona Muslimanka, izbeglica, jer ju je video u Buk Bijeloj, a bio
je svestan i činjenice da je tada imala oko 16 godina jer joj je rekao da je približno istih godina kao i
njegova derka.
Fond za humanitarno pravo u saradnji sa Medjunarodnim Krivicnim Sudom za bivsu Jugoslaviju
organizuje 28 januara 2006. godine konferenciju na kojoj ce predstavnici MKSJ-a govoriti o svom radu
na procesuiranju ratnih zlocina pocinjenim u regionu Foce, a takodje ce i zrtve govoriti o svojim
iskustvima. Za dodatne informacije o ovom dogadjaju mozete kontaktirati Fond za humanitarno
pravo na: office@hlc.org.yu The Humanitarian Law Center in cooperation with the International
Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia is holding a conference on 28 January 2006 in Belgrade
where Tribunal representatives will talk about its work in prosecuting and trying crimes committed in
Foca, and victims will talk about their experiences. For further information on the event, please
contact office@hlc.org.yu.
Centri za protivpravno zatvaranje
Sportska dvorana “Partizan” služila je za zatvaranje jednog broja žena i devojčica tokom druge
polovine 1992. Uslovi su bili okrutni, hrana je bila oskudna i nisu je dobijali redovno, nije bilo
higijenskih uslova, niti lekarske njege. Za vreme dok su žene tamo bile zatvorene, okolo su obilazili
naoružani stražari koji su bili podređeni tadašnjem načelniku Sekretarijata unutrašnjih poslova (SUP)
Draganu Gagovidu. Sportska dvorana “Partizan” nalazi se blizu SUP-a i zgrade opštine, i ljudi koji su
radili u SUP-u lako su mogli videti šta se događa u sportskoj dvorani “Partizan”. Ono što dokazi
pokazuju jeste da se vlasti koje su trebale štititi žrtve, kao što je lokalna policija nad kojom su
kontrolu preuzeli Srbi, nisu obazirale na njihove patnje. Umesto toga, vlasti su pomagale u
stražarenju nad ženama i čak su se uključivale u njihovo maltretiranje kada bi im se žene obratile za
pomod.
Porobljavanje
Jedan od najvažnijih aspekata suđenja u predmetu Kunarac i drugi jeste to što je po prvi put pred
jednim međunarodnim sudom, seksualno porobljavanje kažnjeno kao zločin protiv čovečnosti.
Naravno, u presudi se prihvata da samo zatočenje i držanje neke osobe u zarobljeništvu obično ne
predstavlja porobljavanje. Međutim, vede je utvrdilo da u slučaju žena koje su držane u zatočeništvu
u Foči i okolini, postoji element porobljavanja, odnosno “kontrola nad nečijim kretanjem, kontrola
fizičke okoline, psihološka kontrola, mere preduzete za sprečavanje ili ometanje bekstva, sila, pretnja
10
silom ili prinuda, trajanje, ostvarivanje prava na ekskluzivnost, podvrgavanje okrutnom postupanju i
zlostavljanju, kontrola nad seksualnošdu i prisilni rad.” Na primer, odmah nakon što su žene stigle u
sportsku dvoranu, dolazili su naoružani stražari, često u grupama od po trojice ili četvorice, i nasilno
odvodili žene i devojčice u kude, stanove i hotel “Zelengoru” kako bi ih napastvovali i silovali. To se
događalo dugotrajno i dosledno, a žrtve su bile seksualno zlostavljane dan i nod tokom trajnog
procesa.
Svu strahotu tog neprestanog zlostavljanja najbolje opisuje jedna od žrtava u svom svedočenju pred
Tribunalom 4. aprila 2000: P. I šta bi vojnici radili kad bi došli u tu kudu? O. Obično bi izabrali jednu od
djevojaka i odveli je na drugi sprat. P. Koliko dugo su vas držali u Karamanovoj kudi? O. Ne sjedam se
tačno. Mjesec i po, možda dva mjeseca, mada nisam sasvim sigurna. P. Šta vam se dešavalo tokom
tog vremena koje ste proveli tamo? O. Mene, kao i sve ostale djevojke u Karamanovoj kudi, silovali su
srpski vojnici. Mislim da su poslije izvjesnog vremena dovedene još dvije djevojke ili možda tri. Ali, u
svakom slučaju, sve su bile silovane, bilo svake nodi ili svake druge nodi. Često. P. Da li može izbrojati
koliko puta su vas silovali u Karamanovoj kudi? O. Mislim da to nije mogude.
Tokom suđenja, odbrana je tvrdila da nije bilo porobljavanja jer su žrtve u svom svedočenju izjavile
da su imale slobodu kretanja, unutar i izvan stana, i da su, prema tome, mogle pobedi ili pokušati da
promene svoju situaciju.
Optuženi Kovač je tvrdio da je svedokinja “87” zapravo s njim bila u ljubavnoj vezi. Pretresno vede je
odbacilo ovakvu odbranu. Odnos između svedokinje 87 i Kovača okarakterisalo je na slededi način:
“Veza između svedokinje 87 i Kovača nije bio ljubavni odnos, kao što je odbrana sugerisala, ved surovi
oportunizam od strane Kovača, konstantno zlostavljanje i dominacija nad devojkom koja je u to
vreme imala samo 15 godina.” 5
Silovanje kao instrument terora

Prilikom donošenja odluke, Pretresno vede je prvo razmotrilo širi kontekst onoga što se događalo u
Foči, pre nego što se koncentrisalo na dela i propuste optuženih, kako bi utvrdilo njihovu
individualnu, direktnu odgovornost i odgovornost nadređenog.
O suđenju u predmetu Kunarac i drugi ponekad se govori kao o "predmetu logora za silovanje" jer je
to suđenje u kojem je Tribunal izrekao prvu osuđujudu presudu za silovanje kao zločin protiv
čovečnosti. To se suđenje navodi kao primer sistematskog silovanja žena druge nacionalnosti, koje
se koristilo kao "sredstvo za ratovanje". Prilikom čitanja sažetka presude, sudija Mumba rekla je
sledede: “Redi da se sistematsko silovanje koristilo kao "sredstvo za ratovanje” donekle može dovesti
u zabludu. Moglo bi se pomisliti da je oružanim snagama bosanskih Srba naređeno da u okviru svojih
borbenih aktivnosti u širem smislu reči siluju muslimanske žene. Pretresnom vedu nisu predočeni
dovoljni dokazi da bi se došlo do takvog nalaza. Ono što dokazi pokazuju jeste da su pripadnici
oružanih snaga bosanskih Srba silovanje koristili kao instrument terora. Taj im je instrument stajao
na raspolaganju da ga primene kada i protiv koga su hteli.” Osim toga, dokazi su pokazali da su srpske
snage mogle uspostaviti i voditi zatočenički centar za mnoštvo muslimanskih žena, odakle su žene i
mlade devojke redovno odvođene na druge lokacije radi silovanja. S obzirom na ono što se desilo u
njihovim selima gde su im muževi, brada i stričevi pobijeni, kude zapaljene, a imovina oduzeta,
svedokinje i žrtve su imale svaki razlog da veruju da je otpor beskoristan. Kao što je optužba u svojoj
završnoj reči i rekla: Setidete se reakcije svedokinje 95 kada ju je čak optužba pitala da li je seksualni
kontakt bio protiv njene volje. Odgovorila je s primerenin besom: “Molim vas, gospođo, ako tokom
perioda od 40 dana imate seksualne odnose ... s nekoliko osoba, zar stvarno mislite da je to vašom
voljom?”
Uporno negiranje zločina u Foči
I pored činjenice da je u suđenju u predmetu Kunarac i drugi dokazano van razumne sumnje da su
pripadnici oružanih snaga bosanskih Srba koristili silovanje kao instrument terora i da su optuženi
Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovač i Zoran Vukovid odigrali aktivnu ulogu u toj kampanji, neki i dalje
onima koji su patili uskraduju pravo na dostojan spomenik.
11
U oktobru 2004. godine, članice udruženja “Žena-žrtva rata” pokušale su položiti spomen ploču
ispred sportske dvorane “Partizan” kao sedanje na strašne zločine koji su se tu dogodili. Stotine
protestanata bosanskih Srba sprečili su ih u tome. Ovo je jako uznemirujude.
Sudije Tribunala utvrdile su van razumne sumnje da je svrha srpske kampanje u Foči bila, između
ostalog, “da se područje Foče očisti od Muslimana”. Vede je s ozbiljnošdu konstatovalo da je “u tome,
kampanja bila uspešna. Očišdeno je čak i ime grada. Foča je preimenovana u Srbinje i sada se nalazi
na teritoriji Republike Srpske. U Srbinju danas jedva da ima Muslimana. Jedna od meta te kampanje,
osim muslimanskih oružanih snaga, bili su civili Muslimani. U ovom predmetu to su posebno bile
muslimanske žene. Metoda koja je pritom primenjena sastojala se uglavnom od progona putem
terora.” Tribunal je do sada osudio četiri pojedinca za direktno učešde u tim događajima. U skladu sa
svojim mandatom, Tribunal može procesuirati samo mali procenat zločina koji su počinjeni na
području bivše Jugoslavije. Međutim, još mnogo drugih ljudi učestvovalo je u kampanjama terora,
kao što je ova sprovedena u Foči. Svi oni treba da budu izvedeni pred domade sudove kako bi
odgovarali za zločine koje su počinili. Tek de tada žrtve modi dobiti dostojan spomenik. Tek tada de
pošteni građani Foče, Srbi i drugi, konačno živeti u miru.
1 Izveštaj Human Rights Watch iz 1998, Svezak 10, br. 6 (D) Bosnia and Herzegovina “A Closed, Dark
Place”: Past and Present Human Rights Abuses in Foča / Bosna i Hercegovina “Zatvoreno, mračno
mesto”: Kršenja ljudskih prava u Foči u prošlosti i danas
2 Presuda, Tužilac protiv Kunarca i drugih, Broj predmeta: IT-96-23/1, 22. februar 2001. (dalje u
tekstu: Presuda Kunarcu i drugima), par. 47.
3 Sažetak presude, Tužilac protiv Kunarca i drugih, Broj predmeta: IT-96-23/1, 22. februar 2001.
4 Završni izveštaj Komisije eksperata Ujedinjenih nacija, S/1994/674
5 Tužilac protiv Kunarca i drugih, Broj predmeta: IT-96-23/1, svedočenje zaštidenog svedoka “87”
4. aprila 2000.
6 Tužilac protiv Kunarca i drugih, Broj predmeta: IT-96-23/1, svedočenje Dragoljuba Kunarca 11.
jula 6 2000.
7 Presuda Kunarcu i drugima, par. 658 i 661
8 Presuda Kunarcu i drugima, par. 570 i 574
9 Sažetak presude, Tužilac protiv Krnojelca, Broj predmeta: IT-97-25, 15. mart 2002.
11 Presuda Kunarcu i drugima, par. 817
16 Tužilac protiv Kunarca i drugih, Broj predmeta: IT-96-23/1, svedočenje zaštidenog svedoka “87”
4. aprila 2000.
17 Presuda Žalbenog veda, Tužilac protiv Kunarca i drugih, Broj predmeta: IT-96-23/1, 12. juni 2002,
par. 108
20 Tužilac protiv Kunarca i drugih, Broj predmeta: IT-96-23/1, završne reči optužbe, 20. novembra
2000.
PRAVDA U TRANZICIJI – BROJ 2
http://www.tuzilastvorz.org.rs/pravda_u_tranziciji/SRP/SRP02/506.pdf
12
13
14
15
16
17
Ubijanje Srpske - SLOBODA
https://slobodacg.me › Kolumne › Ubijanje Srpske
30. aug 2019. - U Foči nas dočekuje Brane Dosovid ratni komandant u trenutku ... Dosa obezbeđuje
dozvolu da devojčicu može napustiti Srpsku. Na toj krivini ...
000320it - ICTY
https://www.icty.org › cases › kunarac › trans
11 organisation known as Cosa's Guards, of which both the ...... 15 commanders: Lazar Kunarac,
Zoran Vukovic, Brane ..... 4 commanded by Brano Cosovic.".
https://www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/trans/en/000320it.htm
[PDF[
Mladic Judgment Part I - ICC Legal tools Database
www.legal-tools.org › doc › pdf
22. nov 2017. - named 'Pike' were under his command. 643. Brane Dosovid a.k.a. Dosa, who had more
than 100 soldiers under him, was the leader of Janko ...
18
4.3 Foča Municipality
4.3.1 Murder
Schedule A.2.1
603. According to the Indictment, the Accused is responsible for the killing of a number of people
hiding in the woods near Mješaja/Trošanj in Foča Municipality in early July 1992.2479 The Trial
Chamber notes that the Prosecution, in its Final Trial Brief, made more specific submissions on
Scheduled Incident A.2.1 insofar as it submits that: ‘*o+n 3 July 1992, TG Foča soldiers, including G.
Jankovič and R. Kovač (under B. Cosovid) attacked Muslim villagers in Mješaja/Trošanj, where
weapons had been surrendered earlier’, that ‘three villagers *were+ killed during the attack’ and that
‘*a+fter the attack, others *were+ killed, beaten, abused, arrested and detained’.2480 The Defence
submitted that Scheduled Incident A.2.1 fails to specify which crimes are alleged in this charge.2481
The Trial Chamber notes that in the Indictment, Scheduled Incident A.2.1 is limited to the killings of
people hiding in the woods near Mješaja/Trošanj. The Indictment is, however, not limited to the
Scheduled Incidents.2482 Accordingly the Trial Chamber has not disregarded evidence which might
fall outside the scope of Scheduled Incident A.2.1, and has dealt with all evidence of killing related to
the attack on Mješaja/Trošanj. The Trial Chamber took judicial notice of a number of Adjudicated
facts in relation to this incident. It also received evidence from Witness RM-070, a Muslim woman
from Foča Municipality,2483 and Ewa Tabeau, a demographer and statistician,2484 as well as
forensic documentary evidence, and finds that this evidence does not rebut the Adjudicated
Facts.2485
_ _ _ fussnote _ _ _
2479 Indictment, paras 39(a)(i), 47, 59(a)(i), 62(a), Schedule A.2.1.
2480 Prosecution Final Brief, Annex B, p. 6.
2481 Defence Final Brief, para. 1040.
2482 Further on this issue, see Appendix B.
2483 P2422 (Witness RM-070, witness statement, 18 November 1995), p. 1, para. 1; P2421
(Pseudonym sheet for Witness RM-070).
2484 Ewa Tabeau, T. 19307-19308; P2789 (Curriculum vitae of Ewa Tabeau, 5 November 2013).
2485 Witness RM-070: P2422 (Witness RM-070, witness statement, 18 November 1995), paras 9, 12-
14, 22-23, 25; P2423 (Witness RM-070, prior testimony), pp. 1376-1381, 1384-1385; Witness RM-
070, T. 17634-17638, 17659, 17662. Ewa Tabeau and forensic documentary evidence: P2797 (Ewa
Tabeau, annex to proof of death expert report, 24 July 2013), pp. 1-6; P4642 (Sarajevo Cantonal
Court record of exhumation and identification, 2 July 2001); P5284 (Record of identification for Sifet
Čolo, 30 July 2001); P5285 (Autopsy report for Sifet Čolo, 25 July 2001); P5286 (Record of
identification for Armin Pekaz, 30 July 2001); P5287 (Autopsy report for Armin Pekaz, 25 July 2001);
P5288 (Record of identification for Zijad Barlov, 30 July 2001); P5289 (Autopsy report for Zijad
Barlov, 25 July 2001); P5290 (Record of identification for Meho Barlov, 30 July 2001); P5291
(Autopsy report for Meho Barlov, 25 July 2001); P5292 (Record of identification for Husein Barlov, 30
July 2001); P5293 (Autopsy report for Husein Barlov, 25 July 2001); P5294 (Identification report for
Adem Čolo, 30 July 2001);
19
Case No.: IT-09-92-T 22
November 2017 `
604. On 24 April 1992, an agreement was reached between the Muslim representatives of the village
of Trošanj and the civilian authorities of the Serb municipality of Foča and the military authorities,
stating, inter alia, that all weapons, whether legal or illegal, owned by the Muslims in the area of the
village of Trošanj were to be surrendered and taken over by the representatives of the units of the
TO of the Serb municipality of Foča.2486 Witness RM-070 testified having heard at the end of May or
in the beginning of June 1992, that the ‘Serbs’ demanded the villagers of Mješaja/Trošanj to
handover their weapons and that, while Witness-RM-070’s family did not have any weapons, other
villagers complied.2487 605. In early July 1992, local Serb soldiers, including Gojko Jankovid and
Radomir Kovač, attacked the Muslim village of Mješaja/Trošanj.2488 At the time of the attack, some
Muslim villagers in Trošanj continued living in their houses but would sleep in the woods at night and
only return to their homes during daytime.2489 Witness RM-070 testified that there were no Muslim
soldiers in Mješaja/Trošanj in June and July 1992.2490 Three villagers were killed during the
attack.2491 Witness RM-070 testified that one of them was Izet Čolo, a member of the civilian
protection and the only one armed in the group, who returned fire and was killed.2492 Salima Pekaz
and Fadila Odobašid, who was carrying a three-year-old baby at the time, were also killed, while five
or six people were wounded.2493 The villagers begged the soldiers to stop the shooting and
promised to surrender because of the many children among them.2494 The villagers, consisting of a
group of about 50 Muslims, were violently forced towards a meadow and another two male villagers
were severely mistreated.2495 Serb soldiers hit
P5295 (Autopsy report for Adem Čolo, 25 July 2001); P5296 (Record of identification for Mujo Pekaz,
30 July 2001); P5297 (Autopsy report for Mujo Pekaz, 25 July 2001); P5298 (Sarajevo Cantonal Court
record of the exhumation and identification for Selima Pekaz, 2 July 2001); P5299 (Record of
identification for Selima Pekaz, 30 July 2001); P5300 (Autopsy report for Selima Pekaz, 25 July 2001);
P5301 (Record of identification for Izet Čolo, 26 March 2002); P5302 (Record of identification for
Fadila Odobašid, 2 November 2006). 2486 D576 (Agreement between Muslim Representatives of
Trošanj and the civilian and military Serb authorities in Foča, 24 April 1992). 2487 P2422 (Witness
RM-070, witness statement, 18 November 1995), para. 8; P2423 (Witness RM-070, prior testimony),
pp. 1374-1375; Witness RM-070, T.17635-17636. 2488 Adjudicated Facts I, no. 560. 2489 Adjudicated
Facts I, no. 558. 2490 Witness RM-070, T. 17633 2491 Adjudicated Facts I, no. 560. 2492 Witness RM-
070, T. 17635-17636. 2493 P2422 (Witness RM-070, witness statement, 18 November 1995), paras
10-11; P2423 (Witness RM070, prior testimony), pp. 1377-1379; Witness RM-070, T. 17638, 17661,
17664-17665. 2494 P2423 (Witness RM-070, prior testimony), p. 1378. 2495 Adjudicated Facts I, no.
561. 1
Case No.: IT-09-92-T 22 November 2017
20
the villagers with rifle butts and tree branches, kicking them, and calling them ‘Ustašas’.2496 Witness
RM-070 testified that the villagers were also called ‘Balijas’.2497 One of the Muslims lost an eye as a
result of the brutal beating.2498 After about half an hour the soldiers heard over their radios that
they were not supposed to do anything until they received specific orders.2499 At the meadow, the
soldiers separated the men from the women and the women were chased down a hill towards the
village of Trošanj.2500 Seven detained men were killed.2501 Witness RM-070 testified that her
father later told her that he saw all of the men’s dead bodies when he returned to the meadow:
Husein Barlov, Zijad Barlov, Meho Barlov, Sifet Čolo, Adem Čolo, Armin Pekaz, and Mujo Pekaz.2502
According to forensic evidence, six of them were found in civilian clothing and one in clothing partly
resembling military clothing.2503
606. Witness RM-070 testified that among the Serb soldiers that day were Janko Janjid (a.k.a. ‘Tuta’),
Gojko Jankovid, Slavo Ivanovid (a.k.a. ‘Jazavac’), Radomir Kovač (a.k.a. ‘Klamfa’), Dragan Zelenovid
(a.k.a. ‘Zelja’), and Vicko Miletid, whom the witness was able to identify since she knew them all,
except Kovač, from before the war.2504 The witness assumed that Gojko Jankovid was leading the
group since she overheard him giving orders on the radio and the soldiers referred to him as
‘major’.2505 She later learnt that Janko Janjid and Radomir Kovač also held superior positions.2506
2496 Adjudicated Facts I, no. 562. 2497 P2422 (Witness RM-070, witness statement, 18 November
1995), para. 12; P2423 (Witness RM-070, prior testimony), pp. 1378-1379, 1381; Witness RM-070, T.
17637. 2498 Adjudicated Facts I, no. 562. 2499 P2423 (Witness RM-070, prior testimony), p. 1381;
Witness RM-070, T. 17637. 2500 Adjudicated Facts I, no. 563. 2501 Adjudicated Facts I, no. 563. 2502
P2422 (Witness RM-070, witness statement, 18 November 1995), para. 22; P2423 (Witness RM-070,
prior testimony), p. 1385; Witness RM-070, T. 17657; P2424 (Proof of death chart listing victims of
the attack on Mješaja/Trošanj, 29 September 2013). 2503 P5284 (Record of identification for Sifet
Čolo, 30 July 2001); P5285 (Autopsy report for Sifet Čolo, 25 July 2001), p. 1; P5286 (Record of
identification for Armin Pekaz, 30 July 2001); P5287 (Autopsy report for Armin Pekaz, 25 July 2001),
p. 1; P5288 (Record of identification for Zijad Barlov, 30 July 2001); P5289 (Autopsy report for Zijad
Barlov, 25 July 2001), p. 1; P5290 (Record of identification for Meho Barlov, 30 July 2001); P5291
(Autopsy report for Meho Barlov, 25 July 2001), p. 1; P5292 (Record of identification for Husein
Barlov, 30 July 2001); P5293 (Autopsy report for Husein Barlov, 25 July 2001), p. 1; P5294
(Identification report for Adem Čolo, 30 July 2001); P5295 (Autopsy report for Adem Čolo, 25 July
2001), p. 1; P5296 (Record of identification for Mujo Pekaz, 30 July 2001); P5297 (Autopsy report for
Mujo Pekaz, 25 July 2001), p. 1; P5299 (Record of identification for Selima Pekaz, 30 July 2001);
P5300 (Autopsy report for Selima Pekaz, 25 July 2001), p. 1; P5301 (Record of identification for Izet
Čolo, 26 March 2002). 2504 P2422 (Witness RM-070, witness statement, 18 November 1995), paras
13-14; P2423 (Witness RM070, prior testimony), pp. 1381-1383. 2505 P2422 (Witness RM-070,
witness statement, 18 November 1995), para. 14; P2423 (Witness RM-070, prior testimony), p. 1384;
Witness RM-070, T. 17637-17638. 2506 P2422 (Witness RM-070, witness statement, 18 November
1995), para. 14. 1
Case No.: IT-09-92-T 22 November 2017 `
21
607. Based on the foregoing, the Trial Chamber finds that in early July 1992 local Serb soldiers, led by
Gojko Jankovid and including Radomir Kovač a.k.a. Klamfa, Janko Janjid a.k.a. Tuta, Slavo Ivanovid
a.k.a. Jazavac, Dragan Zelenovid a.k.a. Zelja, and Vicko Miletid attacked the Bosnian-Muslim village
of Mješaja/Trošanj. There were no Bosnian-Muslim soldiers in the village and only one man had a
weapon. Izet Čolo, who was dressed in civilian clothes and a member of the civilian protection,
returned fire and was killed. Two female villagers were also killed during the attack. One of these
women was carrying a three-year-old child when she was shot. A group of Bosnian-Muslim villagers
fled into the woods and were forced towards a meadow while being beaten with rifle butts and tree
branches, kicked and called ‘Ustašas’ and ‘Balijas’. One of the Bosnian Muslims lost an eye as a result
of the brutal beating. At the meadow, the local Serb soldiers separated the men from the women
and chased the women down a hill towards the village of Trošanj. The soldiers then shot and killed
seven Bosnian-Muslim men. Six wore civilian clothing. The Trial Chamber recalls its finding in chapter
3.1.2 that Gojko Jankovid and Janko Janjid, a.k.a. Tuta, headed their own sub-units under Marko
Kovač, Commander of the Foča TG. Radomir Kovač a.k.a. Klamfa and Dragan Zelenovid a.k.a. Zelja
were subordinates to Janko Janjid and Brane Dosovid respectively. Brane Dosovid also headed a unit
subordinated to Marko Kovač. The Trial Chamber will further consider the incident in relation to
Counts 1 and 3-6 of the Indictment in chapter 8, below.
Schedule B.5.1 608. According to the Indictment, the Accused is responsible for the killing of over 200
Bosnian Croat and Bosnian Muslim detainees at KP Dom Foča between June and December
1992.2507 The Defence argued, inter alia, that even if deaths occurred at KP Dom, no reliable
evidence demonstrates a connection with the Accused.2508 Scheduled Incident B.5.1 is limited to
killings between June and December 1992 at KP Dom. The Indictment is, however, not limited to the
Scheduled Incidents.2509 Accordingly, the Trial Chamber has not disregarded evidence which might
fall outside the scope of Scheduled Incident B.5.1, and has dealt below with all evidence of killings
related to
2507 Indictment, paras 39(a)(ii), 47, 53, 59(a)(ii), 62(b), Schedule B.5.1.
2509 Further on this issue, see Appendix B.
Case No.: IT-09-92-T 22 November 2017 `
22
KP Dom.2510 The Trial Chamber took judicial notice of Adjudicated Facts in relation to these
incidents. It also received evidence from Witness RM-013, Witness RM-046, Witness RM-063,
Witness RM-012, and Witness RM-086, all Bosnian Muslims from Foča detained at KP Dom;2511 as
well as Ewa Tabeau, a demographer and statistician;2512 and finds that this evidence does not rebut
the Adjudicated Facts.2513 The Trial Chamber also received evidence from Witness RM-019, a
member of the 11th Herzegovina Light Infantry Brigade from May 1992,2514 and Maida Čedid, a
Muslim woman from Trnovača in Foča Municipality.2515 A description of KP Dom, including the
authorities in charge and alleged incidents other than the alleged killing incidents described below,
appears in chapter 4.3.2 Schedule C.6.1. 609. During the months of June and July 1992, KP Dom
guards went to the rooms of the detainees after the roll call and called out from a list the names of
individuals to
2510 Killings unrelated to KP Dom, e.g. those having taken place at other detention facilities, are
dealt with in other sections in this chapter.
2511 P982 (Witness RM-013, witness statement, 22 October 1995), p. 1, para. 1; P983 (Witness RM-
013, witness statement, 20 May 1996), p. 1; P738 (Witness RM-046, witness statement, 20 April
1996), pp. 1- 2; Witness RM-046, T. 7006-7007; P737 (Pseudonym sheet for Witness RM-046, 18
November 2012); P531 (Witness RM-063, witness statement, 10 February 1996), pp. 1-2; P532
(Witness RM-063, witness statement, 25 September 1998), p. 1; P3155 (Witness RM-012, witness
statement, 19 April 1996), pp. 1- 3; P3156 (Witness RM-012, witness statement, 13 June 1996), p. 1;
P3157 (Witness RM-012, witness statement, 20 October 1998), p. 1; P2933 (Witness RM-086, witness
statements), witness statement of 22 October 1995, pp. 1-2. 2512 Ewa Tabeau, T. 19307-19308;
P2789 (Curriculum vitae of Ewa Tabeau, 5 November 2013). 2513 Witness RM-013: P982 (Witness
RM-013, witness statement, 22 October 1995), paras 19, 35-45, 47; P983 (Witness RM-013, witness
statement, 20 May 1996), paras 10, 13-15, 17-19; P984 (Corrections to witness statements of
Witness RM-013), paras 3-4; Witness RM-013, T. 8901-8902, 8946-8955, 8963, 8968-8969; P986
(Photograph of Room 11 in KP Dom); P987 (Chart containing Witness RM-013’s Comments Regarding
Names from KP Dom, 18 February 2013), pp. 1-2. Witness RM-046: P738 (Witness RM-046, witness
statement, 20 April 1996), pp. 6-8; P739 (Witness RM-046, witness statement, 20 October 1998), p.
4; Witness RM-046, T. 7015-7018; P741 (ICTY Information report of Witness RM046, 19 December
2012), pp. 1, 3; P747 (Chart containing comments of Witness RM-046 regarding names related to KP
Dom Foča, 18 January 2013), pp. 4, 7, 9, 15-16, 22, 31. Witness RM-063: P531 (Witness RM-063,
witness statement, 10 February 1996), pp. 6-7; P532 (Witness RM-063, witness statement, 25
September 1998), p. 3; Witness RM-063, T. 5430-5431, 5434, 5442; P535 (List of names and Witness
RM-063 comments, 19 November 2012), pp. 1-3; P536 (List of detainees at Foča KP Dom to be
exchanged, signed by Milenko Vukovid and approved by M. Kovač, 30 October 1992), p. 1. Witness
RM-012: P3155 (Witness RM-012, witness statement, 19 April 1996), pp. 3-4; P3156 (Witness RM-
012, witness statement, 13 June 1996), pp. 2-3. Witness RM-086: P2933 (Witness RM-086, witness
statements), witness statement of 22 October 1995, pp. 9-10, 12-13; P2934 (Witness RM-086,
Krnojelac transcript, 19 March 2001), pp. 4085-4086. Ewa Tabeau: P2791 (Ewa Tabeau, revised table
of names to the proof of death expert report, 30 August 2013), pp. 3-4; P2796 (Ewa Tabeau, proof of
death expert report, 24 July 2013), pp. 3, 23, 32-33; P2797 (Ewa Tabeau, annex to proof of death
expert report, 24 July 2013), pp. 318-387; Documentary evidence: All forensic documentation
relating to this scheduled incident admitted into evidence pursuant to the Trial Chamber’s bar table
decisions both dated 31 January 2014. The Trial Chamber considered minor inconsistencies between
witness accounts or between evidence and the Adjudicated Facts in relation to when and where
specific individuals died and finds that those inconsistencies do not affect the overall finding on the
charge. 2514 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), p. 1, paras 4, 6-8;
Witness RM-019, T. 5701-5706
23
accompany them for interrogations.2516 They were taken into one of the rooms near the staircase,
or into a room which was situated in the left wing of the administration building, or the next room,
where they were often beaten.2517 The beatings lasted well into the evening and the sounds of the
beatings and the screams of the victims could be heard by other detainees at KP Dom.2518 When
the beatings stopped, victims were sometimes taken to an isolation cell.2519 In other instances, the
sound of pistol shots was heard.2520 During and after the beatings, guards of KP Dom were seen
carrying blankets into the administration building and removing what appeared to be bodies in those
blankets.2521 Blood and bloodied instruments were seen in the rooms where the beatings
occurred.2522 The guards of KP Dom participated with the military in the killing of detainees at KP
Dom.2523
610. Specifically, between 28 June and 5 July 1992, Serb guards murdered 36 Muslims from the Foča
area at KP Dom.2524 Some died as a result of the acts of members of the military coming from
outside into KP Dom and of the guards of KP Dom.2525 On one occasion, some detainees were called
out of their rooms as a group and taken to the administration building and severely beaten by KP
Dom guards including Milenko Burilo, Zoran Matovid, Dragomir Obrenovid, Rade Vukovid, and
Pedrag Stefanovid. 2526 According to Witness RM-013, Dragan Masid was also among the guards
who beat these detainees.2527 According to Witness RM-012, the guard he believed to have been
responsible that night for taking out the detainees was called Milid. 2528 When the sounds of the
beatings died down, several detainees heard shots being fired and a person saw Matovid leaving the
administration building and coming
2515 P2939 (Maida Čedid, witness statement, 16 February 1996), pp. 1-2.
2516 Adjudicated Facts I, no. 683.
2525 Adjudicated Facts I, no. 690. These were Alija Altoka, Hamid ‘Salem’ Bico, Abdurahman
Čankušid, Refik Čankušid, Elvedin ‘Enko’ Cedid, Kemal Dželilovid, Ramo Džendusid, Adil Granov,
Mate Ivančid, Esad Kiselica, Halim Konjo, Adil Krajčin, Mustafa Kuloglija, Fuad Mandžo, Krunoslav
Marinovid, Nurko Nisid, Hamid Ramovid, Husein Rikalo, Mithat Rikalo, Zaim Rikalo, Ševal Šoro,
Kemal Tulek, Enes Uzunovid, Džemal Vahida, Munib Veiz, and Zulfo Veiz.
2526 Adjudicated Facts I, no. 691. These were Kemo or Kemal Dželilovid, Halim Konjo, Mustafa
Kuloglija, Mithat and Zaim Rikalo, and Munib Veiz.
2527 P982 (Witness RM-013, witness statement, 22 October 1995), para. 39; P983 (Witness RM-013,
witness statement, 20 May 1996), para. 18.
24
back carrying blankets. Shortly thereafter, this person heard a vehicle leaving KP Dom. When the
vehicle came back 10 or 15 minutes later, he saw men in green-grey uniforms cleaning it with
buckets and mops. None of the detainees ever returned, nor were they ever heard of again.2529
611. Witness RM-046 testified that from approximately 23 April 1992 until 8 August 1992 several
people were taken out of his room and killed.2530 Specifically, from 13 to 30 June 1992, the witness
counted 35 people being taken out of the detention rooms, all of whom went missing.2531 In June or
July 1992, brothers Halim and Halid Konjo were killed and a person called Ismet Čauševid was killed
between May and August 1992.2532 Witness RM-063 saw Omer Mujezinovid dying a few hours after
he had been beaten severely by KP Dom guard Milenko ‘Buši’ Burilo.2533 One detainee hanged
himself and another detainee died after guards had beaten him.2534 612. Besides those mentioned
above, Witness RM-013 named the following guards as having been involved in killing incidents at
the detention centre: Milenko Vladičid, Vlatko Pljevaljčid, Vitomir Mičevid, Risto Matovid, Nevenko
Blagojevid, Cvijetin Krunid, Jovo Savid, Rade Papovid, Mido Bogdanid a.k.a. Roko, Milomir Marid,
Zoran Vukovid, Momir Ristanovid, Milivoje Milutinovid, Milivoje Milid, Dragan Masid, Milovan
Vukovid, and Milenko Elčid a.k.a. Keli.2535 613. During the summer and fall of 1992, there were also
several detainees taken out of KP Dom and never seen again.2536 Many of the detainees alleged to
have been
2528 P3156 (Witness RM-012, witness statement, 13 June 1996), p. 3.

2530 P738 (Witness RM-046, witness statement, 20 April 1996), p. 5; P741 (ICTY Information report
of Witness RM-046, 19 December 2012), p. 3; P747 (Chart containing comments of Witness RM-046
regarding names related to KP Dom Foča, 18 January 2013), pp. 1-3, 6.
2531 P738 (Witness RM-046, witness statement, 20 April 1996), p. 6; P747 (Chart containing
comments of Witness RM-046 regarding names related to KP Dom Foča, 18 January 2013), pp. 4, 6,
8-10, 12-14, 16, 19-20, 23-24, 44.
2532 P741 (ICTY Information report of Witness RM-046, 19 December 2012), pp. 3-4; P744 (List of
people who are taken for release from Foča KP Dom because of their health situations and their ages,
7 May 1992); P747 (Chart containing comments of Witness RM-046 regarding names related to KP
Dom Foča, 18 January 2013), pp. 11-12.
2533 P531 (Witness RM-063, witness statement, 10 February 1996), p. 6.
2534 P531 (Witness RM-063, witness statement, 10 February 1996), p. 6; P532 (Witness RM-063,
witness statement, 25 September 1998), p. 3.
2535 P982 (Witness RM-013, witness statement, 22 October 1995), para. 44. With regard to Vitomir
Mičevid, see also P531 (Witness RM-063, witness statement, 10 February 1996), p. 6; P532 (Witness
RM-063, witness statement, 25 September 1998), p. 3.
2536 Adjudicated Facts I, nos 695-700. These included Mensud Pašovid (summer), Ševal Šoro, Haso
Selimovid (June 1992), Neško Rikalo (late June or early July 1992), Rasim Kajgana (September 1992),
and Azim Mesbur (September 1992).
25
murdered at KP Dom had been subject to earlier beatings or acts of torture. After their release, many
other detainees made contact with the families of the victims. The families informed them that they
had received no contact from those alleged to have been murdered, and they had been unable to
trace the victims.2537 Many detainees taken out of KP Dom for exchange simply disappeared.2538
614. The Trial Chamber will review the evidence and Adjudicated Facts of a number of such incidents
in chronological order. During his detention, in June and July 1992, Adnan Granov was repeatedly
beaten by unidentified individuals, KP Dom guards, and/or soldiers from outside KP Dom, including
military policemen, on the ground floor of the administration building.2539 He was accused of having
travelled to Germany before the war to obtain weapons and of having illegally transmitted radio
messages.2540 Granov was eventually taken away and disappeared.2541 615. Maida Čedid stated
that at 9:30 p.m. on 22 June 1992 all 15 adult men living in Trnovača were taken to KP Dom.2542 She
later learned from a statement by Esad Mujanovid on Radio Sarajevo that all men except Mujanovid,
who had jumped in the river, had been taken to the bridge over the Drina River and killed.2543
616. Witness RM-019 testified that he was told in July 1992, that a truck driver drove 40 detainees
out of the Foča prison to a location at Kremenik, about 25 kilometres south of Foča.2544 At this
location, Milenko Živanovid (known as Žuti), Dragan Zelenovid (known as Zelja), Gojko Jankovid,
Predrag Trivun, Miško Savid, Miško Raškovid, Zoran Samardžid, and a person known as Sarajlija,
executed around half of the detainees and buried them there.2545 The truck driver knew most of
the victims.2546 A hunter later told the witness that the remaining detainees were executed on the
road leading to Čelebidi.2547 According to the witness, Krnojelac, the Prison Director of Foča,

2542 P2939 (Maida Čedid, witness statement, 16 February 1996), p. 3.
2543 P2939 (Maida Čedid, witness statement, 16 February 1996), p. 4.
2544 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), para. 36; Witness RM-019, T.
5711- 5712, 5714. Based on the context, the Trial Chamber understood the term ‘Foča prison’ to be a
reference to Foča KP Dom.
5689, 5709, 5711-5712.
2546 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), paras 36-37.
2547 Witness RM-019, T. 5689, 5709, 5717.
26
had these prisoners executed as revenge for a landmine incident in which his son was badly
injured.2548 The witness was told that Krnojelac was contacted after the incident and asked to cover
the bodies with soil to help disguise the smell of decay.2549 The witness was also told about the
identity of the perpetrators and the burial of the victims.2550 The witness overheard radio
communications, two days after the incident, between Krnojelac and Kovač, during which Krnojelac
told Kovač to get a machine to cover ‘that dirt’, and Kovač responded it would be done soon.2551 A
few days later, the witness was told that Neđo Samardžid had gone to the incident site to cover the
bodies with a military bulldozer.2552 Later, the witness was shown the location of the mass grave,
which was marked by a nišan (a Muslim grave symbol).2553 In 2003, an investigator told the witness
that ten or eleven bodies had been exhumed from a Kremenik site.2554 617. According to Witness
RM-086, one detainee, Edhem Gradišid, was a physically disabled man who also had epilepsy.2555
On one occasion, Gradišid was beaten and taken into solitary confinement.2556 In July or August
1992, Gradišid was taken to the gate and did not return.2557 Witness RM-046 remembered that on 2
August 1992 Adil Krajčin and the brothers Hajrudin and Elmedin Džanko were taken out of KP Dom;
the remains of Krajčin were later exhumed from a mass grave, while the Džanko brothers were never
seen again.2558 On 29 or 30 August 1992, a group of 90 people was taken out and killed.2559
Mehmed Sofradžija was taken out of KP Dom and killed in August or September 1992.2560 During a
weekend in August 1992, Witness RM-063 saw some
2548 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), paras 26, 36.
5712, 5760.
2550 Witness RM-019, T. 5710-5712.
2552 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), para. 43.
5715, 5758.
2554 Witness RM-019, T. 5716.
2555 P2934 (Witness RM-086, Krnojelac transcript, 19 March 2001), pp. 4088-4089.
2556 P2934 (Witness RM-086, Krnojelac transcript, 19 March 2001), pp. 4090, 4092.
2557 P2934 (Witness RM-086, Krnojelac transcript, 19 March 2001), p. 4092.
2558 P741 (ICTY Information report of Witness RM-046, 19 December 2012), p. 3; P742 (Prosecution
Information report listing corrections to prior statements of Witness RM-046, 18 January 2013), p. 1;
P747 (Chart containing comments of Witness RM-046 regarding names related to KP Dom Foča, 18
January 2013), pp. 12, 27.
comments of Witness RM-046 regarding names related to KP Dom Foča, 18 January 2013), pp. 5, 17.
2560 P747 (Chart containing comments of Witness RM-046 regarding names related to KP Dom Foča,
18 January 2013), p. 40.
27
200 detainees being taken away from KP Dom in groups and noted that they never returned.2561
618. On at least one occasion, detainees were taken across a national border. A group of
approximately 55 men were taken for exchange in Montenegro around 30 August 1992, but Pero
Elez, a Bosnian-Serb soldier, intercepted the bus on which they were being transported in Nikšid,
Montenegro, sending the group back to KP Dom. The group was then divided in two with
approximately 20 younger men being taken away, possibly to Goražde and never seen again. The
remaining group of 35 men was taken to be exchanged in Rožaj in Montenegro.2562 Witness RM-
086 also gave evidence about this incident. He stated that on 30 August 1992, Mitar Rasevid and
Obren Obrenovid arrived at KP Dom and said that Karadžid had authorised the exchange of 55 of the
men detained at KP Dom.2563 Obrenovid said ‘*y+ou are going home. You have been pardoned by
Radovan Karadžid, and you are going to free territory’.2564 The following day, two buses arrived and
took one group for exchange to Rozaje, however many men from the second bus went missing.2565
In the period between 30 August and 15 September 1992, several other groups were taken out for
exchange, and 87 detainees went missing.2566 619. Around 17 or 18 September 1992, between 35
and 60 detainees were taken out of KP Dom in two groups, having been told that they were going to
pick plums.2567 Detainees were first asked to volunteer for plum-picking duty, but KP Dom guards
eventually selected detainees according to a list.2568 Those selected for the job were told by the
guards not to take their belongings.2569 Detainees who were taken away for plum picking did not
return to KP Dom and were never seen again.2570 The bodies of two of those detainees, Murat
Crneta and Halid Konjo, were later discovered close to the Goražde frontline near Previla in Bosnia-
Herzegovina in a mass grave.2571 According to Witness RM-086, Vlatko Pljevaljčid was the one who
had taken the men out and he

2563 P2933 (Witness RM-086, witness statements), witness statement of 22 October 1995, p. 13.
2565 P2933 (Witness RM-086, witness statements), witness statement of 22 October 1995, p. 13;
P2934 (Witness RM-086, Krnojelac transcript, 19 March 2001), pp. 4095-4096.
2566 P2933 (Witness RM-086, witness statements), witness statement of 22 October 1995, p. 13.
28
told them that they were supposed to do a ‘very difficult job’ and should not take any personal
belongings.2572 The witness was later told that the body of one of these men was found in Poljice
village near Jeleč. 2573 Witness RM-063 also learnt that the dead bodies of some of them were
found in Poljice.2574 620. Witness RM-019 provided evidence about one specific incident involving
detainees from the KP Dom. In October 1992, he saw a large army truck at the Miljevina Motel
guarded by four or five armed soldiers.2575 Zoran Samardžid, the Commander of the Miljevina
Military Police, ordered some soldiers to follow a convoy of about eight vehicles, including the truck,
to the Miljevina coal mine.2576 At the coal mine, a vehicle with Intervention Platoon soldiers
arrived.2577 The platoon was composed of volunteers from Serbia and Montenegro, formed part of
the Miljevina Battalion, and was commanded by Predrag Trivun a.k.a. Pedo or Pedolino.2578 Pero
Elez, commander of the Miljevina Battalion, was Trivun’s supervisor.2579 The platoon soldiers then
killed around 30 Muslim men with knives and shot one man in the leg first before Trivun killed him
with a knife.2580 Trivun killed one person with his knife by first cutting his throat. Zoran Samardžid
advised him to cut one side of the jugular and let him bleed to death in a slow and painful way.
Nikola Brčid killed a man by pushing a long piece of wooden fencing down the man’s throat.2581 In
addition to Trivun and Brčid, the perpetrators included Neđo and Zoran Samardžid, Zdravko
Ivanovid, Miško Savid, Miško Raškovid, and two men from Pljevlja in Montenegro, one of whom was
nicknamed Aba.2582 The witness recognised the Muslim men as being from Foča.2583 Pero Elez had
arrived alongside Predrag Trivun and passively observed the killing.2584

2572 P2933 (Witness RM-086, witness statements), witness statement of 22 October 1995, p. 12;
P2934 (Witness RM-086, Krnojelac transcript, 19 March 2001), pp. 4085-4086.
2573 P2933 (Witness RM-086, witness statements), witness statement of 22 October 1995, pp. 12-
13.
5704.
2580 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), paras 12, 14-16, 20; Witness
RM019, T. 5709.
2583 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), paras 16-18; Witness RM-019,
T. 5689.
29
Pero Elez and Trivun then ordered four persons to put the bodies into the truck.2585 The Muslim
men had been tied up with wire.2586 Then, Elez and Trivun ordered everyone but the execution
team and Alija Hrbinid, a Muslim truck driver, to leave the site.2587 The witness was later told that
the bodies were moved 200 to 300 metres away from the site and buried in a shallow grave.2588
621. According to the witness, based on the perpetrators bragging in cafés afterwards, the following
men were taken from Foča prison in 1992 and killed in Foča at different locations: Nedžib, a.k.a.
Điban, killed by Dragan Zelenovid 50 metres away from the witness’s house in Foča; Halim Konjo,
thrown into the Drina River from the iron bridge and killed by a prison guard called Burilo; Spona,
killed by Dragan Zelenovid and Zoran Vukovid; Munir Mačak, taken out of the prison by Zoran
Vukovid, Dragan Zelenovid, and Janko Janjid and later killed; and Adi, taken from the hospital,
beaten, thrown into the Drina River and killed by one of Brane Dosovid’s units.2589 According to
other persons who were working at the front line, Šujo was shot and killed after he had dug a hole on
the front line.2590 622. Witness RM-046 testified that on 8 December 1992, a group that mainly
consisted of people from the witness’s room was taken out of KP Dom and did not return.2591 The
witness was told that the group was going to be exchanged for a group of Serbs in Konjic. 2592 On 12
December 1992, a group of men was taken out of KP Dom to a mine field in Zebina Suma and
Witness RM-086 learned later that all of them had been killed.2593 623. Witness RM-019 testified
that in June 1993, Miško Savid, Predrag Trivun, Zoran Samardžid, and Miško Raškovid took Aziz
Torlak, a Muslim doctor, from the Foča prison to a house in the village of Varizi.2594 They
suspended him by his legs,
2587 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), paras 22, 24.
2589 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), paras 4, 69-75.
comments of Witness RM-046 regarding names related to KP Dom Foča, 18 January 2013), pp. 26,
28, 32, 35-36, 45.
2592 P738 (Witness RM-046, witness statement, 20 April 1996), p. 7.
2594 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), paras 59-60. With regard to the
ethnicity of Aziz Torlak, see P2937 (Witness RM-071, witness statement, 5 July 1995), p. 10.
30
lighting a fire under his head, beat him, and swung him over the fire for four hours.2595 Torlak died
as a result.2596 624. Sixty-two bodies were found and exhumed from a mass grave on Maluša
Mountain, Foča Municipality.2597 The bodies were male, were clad in civilian clothes, and a number
of them were identified as Muslims.2598 The limbs of almost every body had been tied and the
discovery of a large amount of spent infantry ammunition in the vicinity of the grave showed that the
persons were killed at that location.2599 The Muslim men had been detained at the time of their
killing.2600 625. Witness RM-046 testified that several mass graves contained the bodies of KP Dom
detainees, including those in Jama Piljak, Paunci, Buk Bijela, Previla, Miljevina, the Buk Bijela
tunnel, the Piljak pit, Dobro Polje, and the river Drina.2601 Witness RM012 estimated that about 50
detainees disappeared from KP Dom by being taken away and killed.2602 626. Based on the above,
the Trial Chamber finds that in June and July 1992, members of the military coming from outside into
KP Dom and guards of KP Dom, MoJ employees and VRS members as found in chapters 3 and 4.3.2
Schedule C.6.1, killed 36 Bosnian-Muslim detainees inside KP Dom. 627. Further, in the second half of
1992, hundreds of detainees were taken out systematically of KP Dom, including avowedly for
exchanges, disappeared. The families of detainees who disappeared never heard from the detainees
again. Several mass graves contained the bodies of those that had been detained at KP Dom. The
Trial Chamber recalls the conditions in which detainees were kept at KP Dom and the way the guards
treated the detainees (see chapter 4.3.2 Schedule C.6.1). Under these circumstances, the Trial
Chamber is satisfied that there is no reasonable alternative explanation to them having been killed
upon having been taken out. Furthermore, Witness RM-019 personally witnessed some of the
detainees being killed with knives, and in one instance with a piece of wooden fencing, after having
been taken out. During
2595 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), paras 58-60, 62.
2596 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), paras 58-60, 62.
2601 Witness RM-046, T. 7014-7015.
2602 P3155 (Witness RM-012, witness statement, 19 April 1996), p. 4; P3156 (Witness RM-012,
witness statement, 13 June 1996), pp. 3-4.
31
this killing incident, Zoran Samardžid advised Trivun to cut one side of the jugular of one of the
detainees and let him bleed to death in a slow and painful way. Accordingly, the Trial Chamber finds
that those taken out were killed by KP Dom guards, MoJ employees and VRS members as found in
chapters 3 and 4.3.2 Schedule C.6.1, and in some instances by Milenko Živanovid a.k.a. Žuti, Dragan
Zelenovid a.k.a. Zelja, Gojko Jankovid, Predrag Trivun a.k.a. Pedo or Pedolino, Miško Savid, Nikola
Brčid, Miško Raškovid, Janko Janjid, Zdravko Ivanovid, Zoran and Neđo Samardžid, a man nicknamed
Aba, Pero Elez, a man from Brane Dosovid’s units, and a man known as Sarajlija. Considering that the
detainees at KP Dom were exclusively non-Serbs and predominantly Bosnian Muslims, the Trial
Chamber finds that those killed were mostly Bosnian Muslims.
628. In June 1993, Miško Savid, Predrag Trivun, Zoran Samardžid, and Miško Raškovid took Aziz
Torlak, a Bosnian-Muslim doctor, from KP Dom to a house in the village of Varizi, suspended him by
his legs, lit a fire under his head, and beat him for four hours until he died.
629. The Trial Chamber finds that Zoran Samardžid, as Commander of the Miljevina Military Police,
was subordinated to Pero Elez who was the Commander of the Miljevina Battallion. Predrag Trivun
a.k.a. Pedo or Pedolino who commanded part of the Miljevina Battallion was also subordinated to
Pero Elez. The Trial Chamber recalls its finding in chapter 3.1.2 that Gojko Jankovid, Pero Elez and
Janko Janjid a.k.a. Tuta headed their own sub-units under Marko Kovač, Commander of the Foča
Tactical Group. Zoran Vukovid and Dragan Zelenovid a.k.a. Zelja were subordinates to Janko Janjid
and Brane Dosovid respectively. Brane Dosovid also headed a unit subordinated to Marko Kovač.
630. The Trial Chamber will further consider the above incidents in relation to Counts 1 and 3-6 in
chapter 8, below.
Schedule C and unscheduled murder incidents – killing of three Muslim women
631. In addition to Scheduled Incidents A.2.1 and B.5.1 discussed above, the Indictment charges that
the Accused is responsible for the killing of other Bosnian
32
Muslims and Bosnian Croats in Foča Municipality.2603 In this respect, the Trial Chamber received
evidence from Witness RM-019, a member of the 11th Herzegovina Light Infantry Brigade from May
1992.2604 He testified that around early spring of 1993, during a reconnaissance mission in the area
of Jeleč village in Foča Municipality, members of the 11th Herzegovina Light Infantry Brigade brought
three old Muslim women from a hamlet near Jeleč village, which was burned and destroyed by the
army in 1992, to Colonel Marko Kovač, Commander of the 11th Herzegovina Light Infantry
Brigade.2605 Kovač told the soldiers to ‘kill the scum’.2606 Neđo Samardžid used a Scorpion weapon
and Nikola Brčid used a Kalasnikov rifle to shoot and kill the three women on the spot.2607 632.
Based on the foregoing, the Trial Chamber finds that around early spring of 1993, Neđo Samardžid
and Nikola Brčid, upon the order of Marko Kovač, shot and killed three elderly Bosnian-Muslim
women in Foča Municipality in Kovač’s presence. The Trial Chamber recalls its finding in chapter 3.1.2
that Marko Kovač was the Commander of the Foča Tactical Group. Prior to the killing, Kovač had told
the soldiers to ‘kill the scum’. The Trial Chamber will further consider this incident in relation to
Counts 3-6 of the Indictment in chapter 8, below. 4.3.2 Unlawful detention and cruel or inhumane
treatment in detention facilities Schedule C.6.1 633. According to the Indictment, the Accused is
responsible for unlawful detention, torture, beating, abuse, rape, other acts of sexual violence, and
subjecting Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats to inhumane living conditions in KP Dom Foča
between at least 12 May and 31 December 1992.2608 The Defence argued that the evidence fails to
support the allegations and that the conditions of detention at KP Dom Foča were not
inhumane.2609 The Defence argued that that the alleged ‘bad acts’ were perpetrated by
2603 Indictment, paras 39 (a), 47, 52, 59 (a), 62.

2604 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), p. 1, paras 4, 6-8; Witness RM-
019, T. 5701-5706.
2605 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), paras 6, 33-34; Witness RM-
019, T. 5695.
2608 Indictment, paras 39(b)-(c), 47, 53, 59(b)-(d), (g), Schedule C.6.1.
2609 Defence Final Brief, paras 1528-1529
33
multiple unknown perpetrators around KP Dom.2610 The Defence further argued that KP Dom Foča
was under the control of the MoJ.2611 The Trial Chamber took judicial notice of a number of
Adjudicated Facts in relation to this incident.2612 It also received evidence from a number of
persons detained in KP Dom, namely Witness RM-012, Witness RM-046, Witness RM-071, Witness
RM-086, Witness RM-063, Witness RM-013, and Witness RM-050, all Bosnian Muslims from
Foča;2613 Witness RM-019, a member of the 11th Herzegovina Light Infantry Brigade from May
1992;2614 Božidar Krnojelac, a Serb member of the ‘village guards’ in Foča who was present at the
KP Dom facility daily from mid-April to mid-May 1992;2615 Veselinko Simovid, a marksman in the
5th Battalion from 15 April 1992 and later a member of the Dragan Nikolid Intervention Unit, both
TO formations in Foča which later became part of the VRS;2616 and Radojica Mlađenovid, a Bosnian
Serb who served as President of the Executive Committee of the Serbian Municipality of Foča and as
Vice-President of the Crisis Staff of the Serbian Municipality of Foča; 2617 and documentary
evidence, and finds that this evidence is consistent with the Adjudicated Facts.2618 The Trial
Chamber
2610 Defence Final Brief, paras 1529-1538.

2612 Adjudicated facts I, no. 693 is reviewed in chapter 4.3.1 Schedule B.5.1.
2613 P3155 (Witness RM-012, witness statement, 19 April 1996), pp. 1-3; P3156 (Witness RM-012,
witness statement, 13 June 1996), p. 1; P3157 (Witness RM-012, witness statement, 20 October
1998), p. 1. P738 (Witness RM-046, witness statement, 20 April 1996), pp. 1-2; Witness RM-046, T.
7006-7007; P737 (Pseudonym sheet for Witness RM-046, 18 November 2012). P2937 (Witness RM-
071, witness statement, 5 July 1995), pp. 1-2. P2933 (Witness RM-086, witness statements), witness
statement of 22 October 1995, pp. 1-2. P531 (Witness RM-063, witness statement, 10 February
1996), pp. 1-2; P532 (Witness RM-063, witness statement, 25 September 1998), p. 1. P982 (Witness
RM-013, witness statement, 22 October 1995), p.1, para. 1; P983 (Witness RM-013, witness
statement, 20 May 1996), p. 1. P2935 (Witness RM-050, witness statements), witness statement of
21 April 1996, pp. 1-2, witness statement of 21 October 1998, p. 1.
2614 P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3 September 2003), p. 1, paras 4, 6-8; Witness RM-
019, T. 5701-5706.
2615 D650 (Božidar Krnojelac, witness statement, 8 March 2014), p. 1, paras 1, 9; Božidar Krnojelac,
T. 25972.
2616 D583 (Veselinko Simovid, witness statement, 8 June 2014), p. 1, paras 1, 7; Veselinko Simovid,
T. 24372.
2617 D697 (Radojica Mlađenovid, witness statement, 8 June 2014), p. 1, paras 1, 3, 11-12; Radojica
Mlađenovid, T. 27034, 27037, 27060, 27072, 27084.
2618 Witness RM-012: P3155 (Witness RM-012, witness statement, 19 April 1996), pp. 3-5; P3156
(Witness RM-012, witness statement, 13 June 1996), pp. 2-4; P3157 (Witness RM-012, witness
statement, 20 October 1998), pp. 2, 4. Witness RM-019: P572 (Witness RM-019, witness statement, 3
September 2003), paras 25, 28, 33, 50-57; Witness RM-019, T. 5689, 5693; P573 (Sketch drawn by
Witness RM-019, 3 September 2003). Witness RM-046: P738 (Witness RM-046, witness statement,
20 April 1996), pp. 4-5, 7-9; P739 (Witness RM-046, witness statement, 20 October 1998), pp. 2-4;
P740 (Witness RM-046, Krnojelac transcript, 27 November 2000), p. 1283; P741 (ICTY information
report of Witness RM-046, 19 December 2012), p. 2; P742 (Prosecution information report listing
corrections to prior statements of Witness RM-046, 18 January 2013), p. 1; Witness RM-046, T. 7028,
7033, 7035- 7036, 7039-7040; P745 (Annotated floor plan of KP Dom Foča); D133 (Decision signed by
Minister of Justice Momčilo Mandid, appointing Milorad Krnojelac warden of Foča KP Dom, 17 July
1992). Witness
34
also received evidence from Trivko Pljevaljčid, a Bosnian Serb from Foča Municipality who was
commander of the 3rd Company of the 5th Battalion of the Foča Tactical Group and who worked in
KP Dom Foča in 1995.2619 634. Immediately after the Serb take-over of Foča Municipality,
restrictions were imposed on the non-Serb inhabitants.2620 Between 10 April 1992 and the
beginning of June 1992, large-scale arrests of non-Serb civilian men, mostly of Muslim ethnicity, were
carried out throughout the municipality.2621 Muslim men were rounded up in the streets, separated
from the women and children and from the Serb population.2622 Others were arrested in their
apartments or in the houses of friends and relatives, taken away from their workplaces, or dragged
from their hospital beds.2623 Serb soldiers referred to Muslims by the derogatory term ‘balija’, and
cursed them during arrests.2624 Veselinko Simovid testified that if maltreatment of Serbs was
reported, the Dragan Nikolid Intervention Unit would act in accordance with the law and take ‘them’,
regardless of their ethnicity or religious affiliation, to KP Dom. 2625 The unit would also sometimes
capture enemy soldiers during combat operations.2626 According to the witness, all units who took
soldiers as ‘POWs’ were duty-bound to hand them over to the military police, who would take them
to KP Dom or other institutions where ‘POWs’ were being
RM-071: P2937 (Witness RM-071, witness statement, 5 July 1995), pp. 7, 10, 12. Witness RM-086:
P2933 (Witness RM-086, witness statements), witness statement of 22 October 1995, pp. 9-14;
P2934 (Witness RM-086, Krnojelac transcript, 19 March 2001), pp. 4093-4094, 4104. Witness RM-
063: P531 (Witness RM-063, witness statement, 10 February 1996), pp. 3-7; P532 (Witness RM-063,
witness statement, 25 September 1998), pp. 2-3; Witness RM-063, T. 5424-5427, 5441-5442, 5447-
5448; P534 (Drawing of the KP Dom in Foča marked by Witness RM-063). Witness RM-013: P982
(Witness RM013, witness statement, 22 October 1995), paras 10-12, 20, 22-29, 34; P983 (Witness
RM-013, witness statement, 20 May 1996), paras 3-5, 7-9, 22, 24, 27; P984 (Corrections to witness
statements of Witness RM-013), para. 2; Witness RM-013, T. 8897, 8917, 8920, 8929-8930, 8966.
Božidar Krnojelac: D650 (Božidar Krnojelac, witness statement, 8 March 2014), paras 9, 15; Božidar
Krnojelac, T. 25957, 25961- 25963, 25972, 25985-25986, 25997-25998; D651 (Letter by Milorad
Krnojelac to the Foča Crisis Staff, 15 May 1992). Witness RM-050: P2935 (Witness RM-050, witness
statements), witness statement of 21 April 1996, pp. 9-10, witness statement of 21 October 1998,
pp. 2-3. Veselinko Simovid: Veselinko Simovid T. 24400-24402; P6685 (Handwritten list of war
prisoners who were discharged from KP Dom Foča, 8 December 1992). Radojica Mlađenovic: D697
(Radojica Mlađenovic, witness statement, 8 June 2014), para. 20; Radojica Mlađenovic, T. 27079,
27081, 27083. P2826 (Letter confirming release of Enes Zuko by Foča Municipality Crisis Staff, 21
May 1992).
2619 D706 (Trivko Pljevaljčid, witness statement, 10 July 2014), p. 1, paras 1, 4; Trivko Pljevaljčid, T.
27200, 27205, 27215-27216.
2621 Adjudicated Facts I, nos 565, 623, 682.
2625 Veselinko Simovid, T. 24375.
2626 Veselinko Simovid, T. 24379-24380.
35
held.2627 Subsequent to their arrest, the men were transferred to KP Dom.2628 On 17 April 1992, all
the male Muslim civilians detained at Livade were transferred to KP Dom, which had served as a
prison prior to the conflict.2629 At this time, soldiers from the Užice Corps in Serbia were running the
facility, the control of which was transferred to local Serbs during the course of the following few
weeks.2630 635. At its peak, in the summer of 1992, there were about 500 to 600 detainees at KP
Dom. The number decreased from the autumn of 1992 until 1993 when about 200 to 300 detainees
remained. Around October 1994, the last detainees, by then numbering less than 100, were
released.2631 Muslim civilian men were detained at KP Dom for periods lasting from four months to
more than two and a half years.2632 Some Serbs were also held there, having been convicted by
courts of law prior to the outbreak of the conflict or having been detained for military offences
during the conflict.2633 By contrast, the non-Serbs were not detained on any legal ground.2634 The
legality of their detention was never reviewed by the Serb authorities. 2635 None of these detainees
was ever actually charged, tried, or convicted for any crime before being detained or while detained
at KP Dom.2636 None of these detainees was ever advised of their procedural rights before or during
their detention.2637 These detained were not criminals under suspicion of having committed a crime
or ever accused of having committed a crime under national or international law.2638 They were,
inter alia, doctors and medical health workers, journalists, former KP Dom employees, managers,
police officers, and other persons of civilian status.2639 In addition to the mainly civilian population
at KP Dom, there were a small number of Muslim soldiers kept in isolation cells separately from the
civilian Muslim detainees.2640 Non-Serb men from Foča were detained because of their ethnicity.
The overwhelming majority of those detained were Muslim. No consideration was given to age, state
of health, or civilian status. The detainees ranged in age from 15
2627 Veselinko Simovid, T. 24400-24401.

2635 Adjudicated Facts I, nos 627-628.
2636 Adjudicated Facts I, nos 629, 682.
36
years to almost 80 years.2641 Apart from a short period at the beginning of their detention, Muslim
detainees were denied any contact with the outside world or with their families, and (for a long time)
with the Red Cross.2642 636. During the first two to four weeks after the start of the conflict, KP
Dom was ‘policed’ by military units.2643 Inside KP Dom, it was mainly members of the military who
supervised the Muslim detainees during their first weeks of captivity.2644 From about 18 or 19 April
1992 onwards, at around the same time that Krnojelac was appointed warden, former Serb guards
from KP Dom returned to carry out their work assignments.2645 As warden, Krnojelac was
responsible to the MoJ, and to a certain extent to the Military Command.2646 637. On 8 May 1992,
Commander Miro Stanid of the Foča Tactical Group requested the penal and correctional facility in
Foča to allocate rooms within the compound for the accommodation of POWs.2647 In May 1992,
Krnojelac granted the request and allocated the premises of the Foča penal and correctional
institution for the accommodation of POWs and detainees.2648 One important ramification of the
lease agreement, signed by Krnojelac as warden and leasing a part of KP Dom to the military for its
own use, was that it was the Military Command and, in particular, Commander Kovač and not the
MoJ who had power to make decisions concerning which non-Serb detainees would be detained in
and released from KP Dom.2649 In this respect, Krnojelac was obliged to forward requests for
release of these detainees to the Crisis Staff or the Foča Tactical Group.2650 The military did have an
obligation to ensure that Krnojelac was kept informed about who it decided was to be detained and
who was to be released, and Krnojelac did exercise some powers in this regard such as his proposal
that detainees held at Bileca prison be transferred to KP Dom.2651 The Military Command could also
make decisions about which persons would be permitted to enter KP Dom, and it had some power
over the appointment of persons to work assignments and the type of work

2647 P574 (Request for allocation of premises, commander Miro Stanid, 8 May 1992).
2648 P575 (Decision on allocation of premises, temporary warden Milorad Krnojelac, May 1992).
37
Veca Mašid
https://www.facebook.com/veca.masic
38
Veca Mašić
Veca Mašid
39
Veca Mašid
40
tuta i Veca Mašid
41
tuta i Veca Mašid
42
43
44
45
1.1 Grad i opština Foča nalaze se jugoistočno od Sarajeva, u Republici Bosni i Hercegovini, na granici
sa Srbijom i Crnom Gorom. Prema popisu iz 1991. godine, od 40.513 stanovnika u Foči bilo je 51,6%
Muslimana, 45,3% Srba i 3,1 % ostalih nacionalnosti. Političko i vojno preuzimanje opštine Foča
počelo je prvim vojnim akcijama u gradu, 7. aprila 1992. Srpske snage, uz podršku artiljerije i teškog
naoružanja, krenule su zauzimati dio po dio Foče. Okupacija Foče završena je 16. ili 17. aprila 1992.
Okolna sela su pod opsadom bila do sredine jula 1992.
1.2 Čim su srpske snage zauzele dijelove grada Foče, vojna policija, u pratnji lokalnih vojnika i vojnika
sa strane, počela je hapsiti Muslimane i Hrvate. Do sredine jula 1992. sakupljali su i hapsili
Muslimane, mještane okolnih sela u opštini. Srpske snage odvajale su muškarce od žena i nezakonito
zatvarale hiljade Muslimana i Hrvata u razne objekte za duži ili kradi pritvor, ili su ih praktično držali u
kudnom pritvoru. Tokom pritvora mnogi civili su ubijeni, tučeni ili seksualno zlostavljani.
1.3 Kazneno-popravni dom u Foči (u daljnjem tekstu: KP Dom), jedan od najvedih zatvora u bivšoj
Republici Jugoslaviji, bio je glavni pritvorski objekat za muškarce. Muslimanske žene, djeca i starci
pritvarani su po kudama, stanovima i motelima u Foči i okolnim selima ili u centrima za duži ili kradi
pritvor kao što su Buk Bijela, gimnazija u Foči i sportska dvorana "Partizan". Mnoge od zatočenih žena
podvrgnute su ponižavajudim i degradirajudim životnim uslovima, okrutnom batinjanju i seksualnom
zlostavljanju, uključujudi i silovanje.
1.4 Sportska dvorana "Partizan" (u daljnjem tekstu: Partizan) služila je kao centar za pritvor žena,
djece i staraca od 13. jula 1992 ili ranije, pa najmanje do 13. avgusta 1992. ili duže. U to vrijeme je u
Partizanu bilo najmanje 72 zatočenika. Sve su to bili civili, muslimanske žene, djeca i nekoliko starih
ljudi iz sela u opštini Foča.
1.5 Životni uslovi u Partizanu bili su okrutni. Pritvor se odlikovao neljudskim postupanjem,
nehigijenskim smještajem, prenatrpanošdu, izgladnjivanjem, fizičkim i psihološkim mučenjem,
uključujudi i seksualno zlostavljanje.
1.6 Odmah pošto su žene prebačene u Partizan, uspostavljen je režim seksualnog zlostavljanja. U
Partizan su, obično uveče, ulazili naoružani vojnici, uglavnom u grupama od po tri do pet, i izvodili
žene. Kad bi se žene opirale ili sakrivale, vojnici su ih tukli ili im prijetili, ne bi li ih primorali na
poslušnost. Vojnici su žene iz Partizana vodili u kude, stanove ili hotele, da bi ih tamo seksualno
zlostavljali i silovali.
1.7 Tri svjedokinje, označene pseudonimima FWS-48, FWS-95 i FWS-50, šesnaestogodišnja djevojčica,
bile su zatočene u Partizanu negdje od 13. jula do 13. avgusta 1992. Druge dvije svjedokinje,
označene pseudonimima FWS-75 i FWS-87, petnaestogodišnja djevojčica, bile su zatočene u
Partizanu negdje od 13. jula do 2. avgusta 1992. Gotovo svake nodi za vrijeme njihovog zatočeništva,
srpski vojnici izvodili su FWS-48, FWS-95, FWS-50, FWS-75 i FWS-87 iz Partizana i seksualno ih
zlostavljali (vaginalna i analna penetracija, te fellatio).
1.8 Negdje oko 13. avgusta 1992, vedina zatočenica iz Partizana puštene su i deportovane u Crnu
Goru. Ženama koje su otišle konvojem od 13. avgusta u Crnoj Gori je prvi put pružena medicinska
njega. Mnoge su od seksualnog zlostavljanja zadobile trajna ginekološka oštedenja. Bar jedna od žena
ne može više imati djece. Sve seksualno zlostavljane žene doživjele su psihološka i emotivna
oštedenja; neke su još uvijek pod traumom.
1.9 Opština Kalinovik nalazi se dvadesetak kilometara južno od Sarajeva i graniči se sa opštinom Foča.
Od sredine maja bila je pod kontrolom srpskih snaga. Nakon što je zauzeta, uslijedile su mjere
uperene protiv nesrpskog stanovništva, uključujudi i hapšenja. Dok je muško nesrpsko stanovništvo
46
zatočeno u vojnom skladištu Barotni, žene i djeca su zatočeni u Osnovnoj školi u Kalinoviku, koja se
nalazi u centru Kalinovika, blizu milicijske stanice. Krajem juna/početkom jula, u Osnovnoj školi su bili
zatočeni i stanovnici opštine Gacko uhapšeni dok su prolazili kroz opštinu Kalinovik bježedi u srednju
Bosnu.
OPTUŽBE
TAČKE 1 do 4
Silovanje FWS-48, FWS-50, FWS-75, FWS-87, FWS-95 i drugih žena u kudi u ulici Osmana Šikida br. 16
5.1 Nekoliko grupa počinilaca zlostavljalo je žene zatočene u Partizanu. Jednu grupu, pod
zapovjedništvom DRAGOLJUBA KUNARCA, činila je specijalna izviđačka jedinica sastavljena uglavnom
od srpskih vojnika iz Crne Gore. Ova grupa imala je štab u jednoj kudi u fočanskom naselju Aladža, u
ulici Osmana Đikida 16. Najčešde nodu, DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC je, u pratnji nekolicine svojih vojnika,
odvodio žene iz Partizana i vodio ih u kudu u ulici Osmana Đikida 16, znajudi da de ih vojnici pod
njegovom komandom tamo seksualno zlostavljati. Nakon što bi žene odveo u svoj štab, DRAGOLJUB
KUNARAC bi katkad tamo ostao, odveo neku od žena u jednu sobu, i lično je silovao. Čak i kada
DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC nije lično silovao neku od žena, često je ostajao u štabu ili ga je povremeno
obilazio dok su drugi vojnici u kudi silovali i seksualno zlostavljali žene.
5.2 Između 13. jula i 1. avgusta 1992, DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC je najmanje dvaput odvodio FWS-87 u
svoj štab u ulici Osmana Đikida 16. Oba puta su tamo bila prisutna dva crnogorska vojnika pod
komandom optuženog, koji su FWS-87 silovali.
5.3 DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC je nekoliko puta odvodio FWS-75 i D.B. u svoj štab u ulici Osmana Đikida
16 u naselju Aladža, gdje su bili smješteni njegovi vojnici. Negdje oko 16. jula 1992, DRAGOLJUB
KUNARAC i njegov zamjenik "GAGA" prvi put su u tu kudu doveli FWS-75 i D.B. Kada su stigle u štab,
tamo je čekala grupa vojnika. DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC odveo je D.B. u zasebnu sobu i tamo je
seksualno zlostavljao, dok je FWS-75 ostala sa drugim vojnicima. Tokom približno tri sata FWS-75 je
grupno silovalo najmanje 15 vojnika (vaginalna i analna penetracija i fellatio). Seksualno su je
zlostavljali na sve mogude načine. U drugim prilikama, u štabu su je naizmjenično silovali jedan do tri
vojnika.
5.4 Dana 2. avgusta 1992, DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC odveo je FWS-75, FWS-87, FWS-50 i D.B. u štab u
ulici Osmana Đikida 16. Prisutne su bile i neke žene iz ženskog logora u Kalinoviku. Tom prilikom,
DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC i tri druga vojnika silovali su FWS-87. Nekoliko vojnika silovalo je FWS-75
tokom cijele nodi. Jedan crnogorski vojnik silovao je FWS-50 (vaginalna penetracija) i prijetio joj da de
joj odrezati ruke i noge i odnijeti je u crkvu da je krsti.
5.5 Između 13. jula i 2. avgusta 1992, DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC je najmanje dvaput odvodio FWS-95 iz
Partizana u štab u ulici Osmana Đikida 16 radi silovanja. Prvi put je DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC odveo
FWS-95 u svoj štab skupa sa još dvije žene. Odveo ju je u jednu sobu i lično je silovao. Potom su FWS-
95 u istoj sobi silovala još trojica vojnika. Drugi put, nakon što ju je DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC odveo u
ulicu Osmana Đikida 16, FWS-95 su silovala dva ili tri vojnika, ali ne i optuženi lično.
5.6 Gornjim djelima i propustima u odnosu na svjedokinje FWS-50, FWS-75, FWS-87, FWS-95 i druge
žene o kojima je u gornjem tekstu bilo riječi, opisanim u paragrafima 5.1 do 5.5, DRAGOLJUB
KUNARAC je počinio:
Tačka 1:
ZLOČIN PROTIV ČOVJEČNOSTI kažnjiv prema članu 5 (f) (mučenje) Statuta Suda;
47
Tačka 2:
ZLOČIN PROTIV ČOVJEČNOSTI kažnjiv prema članu 5 (g) (silovanje) Statuta Suda;
Tačka 3:
KRŠENJE RATNIH ZAKONA I OBIČAJA kažnjivo prema članu 3 Statuta Suda i utvrđeno Zajedničkim
članom 3 (1) (a) (mučenje) Ženevskih konvencija;
Tačka 4:
KRŠENJE RATNIH ZAKONA I OBIČAJA kažnjivo prema članu 3 Statuta Suda i utvrđeno Dodatnim
protokolom II, član 4 (silovanje) Ženevskih konvencija.
TAČKE 5-8
Silovanje FWS-48
6.1 Negdje oko 13. jula 1992, DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC odveo je FWS-48 i još dvije žene u hotel
"Zelengora". FWS-48 je odbila da ide s njim i DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC ju je udario nogom i odvukao
napolje. U hotelu "Zelengora", FWS-48 su stavili u zasebnu sobu, gdje su je DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC i
lokalni vojni zapovjednik ZORAN VUKOVID silovali (vaginalna penetracija i fellatio). Oba počinitelja su
joj rekla da de roditi srpsku djecu.
6.2 Negdje oko 18. jula 1992, GOJKO JANKOVID, vojni zapovjednik jedne druge lokalne jedinice,
odveo je FWS-48, FWS-95 i još jednu ženu u jednu kudu u blizini autobuske stanice. Odatle je
DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC odveo FWS-48 u drugu kudu u naselju Donje Polje i tamo je silovao (vaginalna
penetracija i fellatio).
6.3 Gornjim djelima i propustima u odnosu na svjedokinju FWS-48, opisanim u paragrafima 6.1 i 6.2,
DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC je počinio:
Tačka 5:
ZLOČIN PROTIV ČOVJEČNOSTI kažnjiv prema članu 5 (f) (mučenje) Statuta Suda;
Tačka 6:
Tačka 7:
Tačka 8:
TAČKE 9 i 10
Silovanje FWS-87 u Karamanovoj kudi u Miljevini
7.1 Negdje oko 2. avgusta 1992, DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC je sa Perom Elezom, vojnim zapovjednikom
jedne srpske jedinice iz Miljevine u opštini Foča, prebacio FWS-75, FWS-87 i još dvije žene iz Partizana
u Miljevinu, gdje su zatočene u napuštenoj muslimanskoj kudi poznatoj kao Karamanova kuda, u kojoj
su boravili PERO ELEZ i njegovi vojnici.
48
7.2 Negdje u septembru ili oktobru 1992, DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC je posjetio Karamanovu kudu i
silovao FWS-87 (vaginalna penetracija).
7.3 Gornjim djelima u odnosu na svjedokinju FWS-87, opisanim u paragrafima 7.1 i 7.2, DRAGOLJUB
KUNARAC je počinio:
Tačka 9:
Tačka 10:
TAČKE 11-13
Silovanje FWS-183 i pljačka imovine
8.1 Jedne nodi, sredinom jula 1992, DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC i dvojica njegovih vojnika optužili su
svjedokinju FWS-183 da šalje poruke radio-vezom. Opljačkali su svjedokinjin stan i odveli je na obalu
rijeke Dehotine u Foči, blizu Velečeva. Tamo je optuženi ispitivao svjedokinju o novcu i zlatu koje u
njenom stanu drže ona i drugi Muslimani. Tokom ispitivanja, svjedokinji je prijedeno da de biti
ubijena, a njezin sin zaklan. Nakon prijetnji, svjedokinju su sva trojica vojnika vaginalno silovala. Za
vrijeme silovanja, DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC je svjedokinju ponižavao, govoredi da oni (vojnici) nikad
nede znati čiji je to sin. Vrativši svjedokinju u njezin stan, optuženi joj je opljačkao sav novac i zlato
koje je sakrila.
8.2 Gornjim djelima i propustima u odnosu na svjedokinju FWS-183, opisanim u paragrafu 8.1,
Tačka 11:
Tačka 12:
protokolom II, član 4 (silovanje) Ženevskih konvencija;
Tačka 13:
KRŠENJE RATNIH ZAKONA I OBIČAJA kažnjivo prema članu 3 (e) (pljačka privatne imovine) Statuta
Suda.
TAČKE 14 do 17
Porobljavanje i silovanje FWS-101
9.1 Dana 2. avgusta 1992, u prisustvu službenika opštine Kalinovik, DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC je, skupa s
Perom Elezom i nekolicinom njihovih vojnika, odveo FWS-101, FWS-186, FWS-191 i još 5 djevojaka i
žena iz Osnovne škole u Kalinoviku i odvezao ih u štab DRAGOLJUBA KUNARCA u ulici Osmana Đikida
16 u Foči. Tamo su žene i djevojke, od kojih su četiri bile iz Gackog, a četiri iz Kalinovika, pri čemu su
neke imale samo dvanaest ili petnaest godina, podijeljene među prisutnim vojnicima radi seksualnog
zlostavljanja. Dok su druge djevojke i žene iste nodi odvedene na različita mjesta, FWS-101 je ostala u
kudi u ulici Osmana Đikida 16.
49
9.2 Između 2. avgusta 1992. i 9. avgusta 1992, ako ne i duže, FWS-101, koja je u to vrijeme bila sedam
mjeseci trudna, bila je zatočena u štabu DRAGOLJUBA KUNARCA u ulici Osmana Đikida 16. Za sve
vrijeme svog zatočeništva u toj kudi, FWS-101 je stalno silovana. Pored toga, svjedokinju su i tukli.
Morala je i da čisti kudu i da se pokorava svim naređenjima optuženog i njegovih podređenih. Sa
FWS-101 se postupalo kao sa ličnim vlasništvom DRAGOLJUBA KUNARCA i njegove jedinice. Jedan
vojnik koji se na FWS-101 sažalio napokon ju je odveo u sportsku dvoranu Partizan, odakle je 13.
avgusta 1992. prebačena u Crnu Goru.
9.3 Gornjim djelima i propustima u odnosu na svjedokinju FWS-101, opisanim u paragrafima 9.1 i 9.2,
Tačka 14:
ZLOČIN PROTIV ČOVJEČNOSTI kažnjiv prema članu 5 (c) (porobljavanje) Statuta Suda;
Tačka 15:
Tačka 16:
Tačka 17:
članom 3 (1) (c) (povreda ličnog dostojanstva) Ženevskih konvencija.
TAČKE 18 do 21
Porobljavanje i silovanje FWS-186, FWS-191 i J.G.
10.1. Dana 2. avgusta 1992, optuženi DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC je, skupa sa svojim zamjenikom
"GAGOM" i GOJKOM JANKOVIDEM, zapovjednikom jedne druge fočanske jedinice, odveo FWS-186,
FWS-191 i J.G. iz kude u ulici Osmana Đikida 16 u napuštenu kudu Halida Čedida u Trnovačama. Tamo
su muškarci među sobom podijelili djevojke i iste nodi ih silovali. Tom prilikom je DRAGOLJUB
KUNARAC silovao FWS-191.
10.2 FWS-186 i FWS-191 držane su u ovoj kudi oko 6 mjeseci, dok je J.G. prebačena u Karamanovu
kudu u Miljevini radi silovanja. Za sve vrijeme dok je FWS-186 bila zatočena u Trnovačama, GOJKO
JANKOVID ju je stalno silovao, a optuženi DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC stalno je silovao FWS-191 barem dva
mjeseca. Na kraju je jedan drugi vojnik zaštitio FWS-191 od daljnjih silovanja. Nakon 6 mjeseci, taj je
vojnik obje svjedokinje odveo iz kude.
10.3 Sa FWS-186 i FWS-191 postupalo se kao sa ličnim vlasništvom DRAGOLJUBA KUNARCA i GOJKA
JANKOVIDA. Pored toga što su silovane i na drugi način seksualno zlostavljane, FWS-186 i FWS-191
morale su da obavljaju sve kudne poslove i izvršavaju sve zahtjeve.
10.4 Gornjim djelima i propustima u odnosu na svjedokinje FWS-186, FWS-191 i J.G., opisanim u
paragrafima 10.1 do 10.3, DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC je počinio:
Tačka 18:
ZLOČIN PROTIV ČOVJEČNOSTI kažnjiv prema članu 5 (c) (porobljavanje) Statuta Suda;
50
Tačka 19:
Tačka 20:
Tačka 21:
članom 3 (1) (c) (povreda ličnog dostojanstva) Ženevskih konvencija.
TUŽILAC SUDA PROTIV DRAGOLJUBA KUNARCA

IZMIJENJENA OPTUŽNICA
https://www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/ind/bcs/kun-1ai980713b.htm
TUŽILAC MEĐUNARODNOG SUDA PROTIV DRAGOLJUBA KUNARCA RADOMIRA KOVAČA

IZMIJENJENA OPTUŽNICA
https://www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/ind/bcs/kun-ai991201b.htm
Prvostepena presuda
https://www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/tjug/bcs/kun-010222b.pdf
PRESUDA ŽALBENOG VIJEDA

https://www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/acjug/bcs/kun-aj020612b.pdf
STARI TEKSTOVI » ADIL ZULFIKARPAŠIĆ: PUT U FOĈU 1942.

https://focanskidani.wordpress.com/2016/10/29/stari-tekstovi-adil-zulfikarpasic-put-u-focu-1942/
51
52
53
54
55
https://focanskidani.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/nena-fata-duric487-iz-foc48de-005.jpg
56
Ludwig Hans Fischer (Salzburg 1848–1915 Vienna)
In the mosque of Foca (Bosnia), titled “Foca”, signed Ludwig Hans Fischer
57
IGRE RIJEČIMA : Takav nam grah pao
focanskidani
2 godine ago
Samo da se zna da su mnoge izreke koje su se udomaćile u bosanskim domovima u

suprotnosti sa ISLAMOM.
58
Jedna priča o donacijama.Mogla bi biti i fočanska…Helem nejse…
 Čujem ti ja od tetka da se dijele nekakve donacije za povratak raseljenih. Kaže:

Idi bolan, dijele materijal, traktore, stoku, živinu. Uhar ti je ako ti sjekiru daju.
Čuo sam da je neka jaka donacija, imaš šanse. Ratni vojni invalid si, oni imaju
prednost.”
I nešto razmislih, što ne bih pokušao, lijepo bi se bilo vratiti na ono selo, nisam ti
ja za ove buke, ja sam čovjek u godinama. Bilo bi lijepo kakve kolibice da mi
naprave, ne tražim ja puno. Da imam se gdje zavudi preko nodi, ionako bi čitave
dane provodio po vrtu. A i kiriju ovu jedva saletim, da mi nije rodbine, šta bi?
Helem, predam ti ja dolje u ono ministarstvo, ili kako se ved zove. Ne znam ni
sam, Fehim me odveo do vrata. Rekoh nemam šta izgubiti.
-I šta bijaše dalje? Jesi li šta dobio?
-Ni eksera moj pobratime, ni eksera. A onom Kasimu, što mu je tetkić sad u
ministarstvu, kuću na dva sprata sazidali, a ni sam ne zna što će mu kad je u
Americi. Kaže eto neka je nek’ stoji, kad na ljeto doĎe da ima, da se malo odmori,
naporan mu posao. Sam mislim, pa gdje onda da se ja odmorim, je li to ja nisam
zaslužio malo odmora? Čitav život teglim k'o konj, a još mi svako solio pamet, a ja
šutim i trpim. Kad sam budala. Al neka.
-Jesi, kako nisi, ali šta češ, takav nam grah pao. Preko naših leĎa gaze prljavim
nogama do bogastva…Eh….
_____
Neke od bosanskih uzrečice koje sam imao priliku čuti, a i uspio pribilježiti…
“Takav nam grah pao“ – kad se pomirite sa svojom sudbinom.
“Ide ko halva.” – kad te nešto pravo hoće izraditi….
“Hrani sirotu na svoju sramotu.” – to je kada se zauzmeš za nekog, a on obruka i

tebe i sebe.
“Šta hodaš ko muha bez glave.” – ono kad od bunila ili ludila ne znaš gdje bi prije.
“Glava mu ko’ Cocin bubanj.” – osjećaj nevjerovatnog, ali ipak nestvarnog

oteknuća glave.
“Bolje bi bilo da sam kamen rodila.” – ekstremna izjava jako razočarane i

iznervirane majke.
“Šta si blehno k’o tele u šarena vrata.” – ono što čuješ kada se zamisliš i zagledaš
krajnje neprirodno.
59
“Vidi ga, brži mu jezik od pameti.” – kad ti je na drumu, što ti je na umu.
„Jesi tup ko ćuskija.“ – dežurna uvreda.
„Šta si stao, nije ti čača staklar“ – kad misliš da imaš super moć zvanu prozirnost.
„Zatvori vrata, nisi se rodio na čamcu“ – kud god poĎeš, kroz vrata proĎeš i
naravno,ne zatvoriš ih.
„Ko te ne zna, skupo bi te platio.“ – kad sija kao dijamant, a ti znaš da je cirkon.
„Ti si svakom loncu poklopac.“ – kad stekneš reputaciju da ne možeš nikom ništa
prešutiti.
„Jesi uzeo furseta.“ – kad se beli zafuraš i nafuraš i misliš da ti nema kraja.
„Jazuk je to baciti.“ – kad je šteta ne pokupiti i istreseš mrve poslije jela…
„Grom te ne ubio.“ – kad zabelajiš.
„Gluho i daleko bilo.“ – ono kad se zabrineš da bi se tebi moglo tako nešto desiti.
„Od oka.“ – u Bosni je uvijek bilo uzmi od oka ili uzmi frtalj nečega.
„Zdrav k’o drijen.“ – to je ono kad – „Može volu rep isčupati.“
„Pamet u glavu.“ – pozdravna fraza prije izlaska u grad.
„Bog te u šumu okreno.“ – kad te neko priziva pameti – „DoĎi tobe.“
„Kad na vrbi rodi grožĎe.“ – al’ – „Malo sutra.“
„Grdne rane moje.“ – dežurna žalopojka.
„Brigo moja preĎi na drugoga.“ – bolje da se drugi sikira, nego ja.
„Para na paru, uš na fukaru.“ – kad te zaobiĎe neki dobitak, a komšija vozi novog
Mercedesa.
“I ćorava koka zrno naĎe.”
_____
Ko nema u glavi ima u nogama.

Ružan k'o lopov.
Pojačano do daske.
Pis maca zdrava djeca.
Sluša l’ te babo?
Jok, eto ti si.
60
Da ne bi kop'o kanale.
Pričat’ ćemo kad doĎemo kući.
Njegovo maslo…
Ne smeta ti pameti!
_____
I na kraju malo o ovim RIJEČIMA: ” Tako mi pao grah. Takav mi horoskop ”

– Ove i ovakve izreke u najdirektnijoj su suprotnosti sa šestim imanskim šartom.
Naime, sve na svijetu se dešava po Allahovom odreĎenju, a ne zato što je tako grah
pao ili što tako stoji u horoskopu, neke trećerazredne novine napisanog od strane
trećerazrednog novinara, koji je za taj horoskop naplatio honorar kao i za bilo koji
drugi članak. (prof. Muhamed Fazlović)
▪Dvije su kuće u kojima se boravi. Ko bude dobra činio na ovom svijetu, imaće i
onaj svijet, a i na ovom svijetu će naći ono što mu je odreĎeno. A ko na dušu svoju
zaboravi – izgubio je i ovaj i onaj svijet.
(Hasan El Basri, rhm.)
Samo da se zna da su mnoge izreke koje su se udomaćile u bosanskim domovima u

suprotnosti sa ISLAMOM.
priredio:Kenan Sarač
61
62
63
64
vanja filipovic
In article <6cilgj$dni$1...@gte2.gte.net>, pri...@gte.net wrote:

Interesting that Boris is daring to mention Foca, a site of one of the
most bestial attacks against Bosniak people and their culture. Eight
65
indictments were issued by the International Criminal Tribunal in the
Hague for crimes committed in this town in Eastern Bosnia. You can read
full indictment at:
http://www.haverford.edu/relg/sells/indictments/gagovic.html
Below I will reproduce some parts of the indictment. But before that, I
wish to point out that one of the most beautiful mosques in that part of
European, the Colored (Aladza) mosque, built in 1551. In 1992, during the
campaign of ethnic cleansing of Foca, and the mass rape of the Bosniak
Women, one could hear from Aladza mosque Serb nationalist songs over loud
speakers. They pillaged the mosque, set it on fire, and finally destroyed
it with dynamite. To remove every trace that magnificent mosque ever stood
there, Serb nationalists bulldozed the area, and finally paved a bus
parking lot where this architectural wonder once stood.
You can see picture of Aladza and other mosques, before and after
destruction at the Community of Bosnia web-site:
http://www.students.haverford.edu/vfilipov or go directly to Foca pages,
www.haverford.edu/relg/sells/foca/foca.html
And here are the parts of the indictment against Gagovic and other
involved in killings, rape and torture of the Foca Bosniaks..
***** International Criminal Tribunal

For the Former Yugoslavia
Churchillplein, I.P.O. Box 13888
2501 EW The Hgue, Netherlands
Telephone: 31-70-416-5343
Fax: 31-70-416-5355
Indictment
Gagovic & Others

("Foca")
(26 June 1996)
Press and Information Office

Tel.: (31) 70-416-5343
Fax: (31) 70-416-5355
(Exclusive[y for the use of the media. Not an official document)
CC/PIO/093-E
The Hague, 27 June 1996
GANG RAPE, TORTURE AND ENSLAVEMENT OF MUSLIM WOMEN CHARGED IN ICTY'S

FIRST INDICTMENT DEALING SPECIFICALLY WITH SEXUAL OFFENSES
Muslim women in Foca (southeastern Bosnia and Herzegovina) were subjected

to a brutal regime of gang rape, torture and enslavement by
66
Bosnian Serb soldiers, policemen and members of paramilitary groups after
the takeover of the city in April 1992, according to a major
indictment issued by the International Tribunal dealing specifically with
sexual offenses.
The indictment charges Dragan GAGOVIC', Gojko JANKOVIC', Janko JANJIC',

Radornir KOVAC', Zoran VUKOVIC',
Dragan ZELENOVIC', Dragoljub KUNARAC' and Radovan STANKOVIC' with crimes
against humanity, grave breaches of the
Geneva Conventions and Violations of the Laws or Customs of War. It was
confirmed by Judge VOHRAH on 26 June 1996. Warrants for the
accused's arrest were issued on 26 June and were sent to the Federation of
Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska.
The indictment is of major legal significance as it is the first time that

sexual assaults have been diligently investigated for the purpose of
prosecution under the rubric of torture and enslavement as a crime against
humanity.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
According to the indictment, the municipality of Foca was taken over by

the Bosnian Serb Army, assisted by paramilitary units, including some
from Serbia and Montenegro, between April and July 1992. The soldiers
separated men and women.
The former were mostly detained in the Foca Kazneno-Popravni Dom (KP' Dom
Foca), one of the largest prison facilities in the former
Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
The KP' Dom Foca is one of several detention facilities mentioned in the
Karadzic and Mladic indictment of 25 July 1995 under Counts 1 to 2
(genocide and crimes against humanity).
Muslim women, children and elderly persons were detained in houses,

apartments and motels in the town of Foca or surrounding villages, and
in short and long-term detention centers, such as Buk Bijela, Foca High
School and Partizan Sports Hall. Additionally, several women were
held in houses and apartments, which were run in the manner of brothels,
by groups of mainly paramilitary soldiers
Many of the detained women, some as young as 12 years of age, endured

inhumane conditions of detention and were subjected to "humiliating
and degrading conditions of life, to brutal beatings and to sexual
assaults, including rapes (...)"
The detention and other abuses were carried out between April 1992 and
February 1993, with the active or passive knowledge of the local Chief
of Police, Dragan GAGOVIC, and other persons in positions of authority, as
sub-commanders of the military police. On at least one occasion,
GAGOVIC responded to a complaint about the ongoing sexual assaults by
later raping the woman who protested.
Among the purposes of the assaults were to extricate information from the
67
women about the whereabouts of their menfolk and the existence of
any armed resistance; to punish and intimidate them; and for reasons based
upon discrimination.
THE VICTIMS
The indictment charges crimes committed against at least 14 victims,

referred to in the indictment by code names and by initials.
These and other women were subjected to almost constant rape and sexual
assaults; torture; and other abuses. According to the indictment: "The
physical and psychological health of many female detainees seriously
deteriorated as a result of these sexual assaults. Some of the women
endured complete exhaustion, vaginal discharges, bladder problems and
irregular menstrual bleedings. The detainees lived in constant fear.
Some of the sexually abused women became suicidal. Others became
indifferent as to what would happen to them and suffered from depression
(...)"
"Many women suffered permanent gynecological harm due to the sexual

assaults. All the women who were sexually assaulted suffered
psychological and emotional harm; some remain traumatized."
ONE YOUNG GIRL'S ORDEAL: THE STORY OF FWS-87
While all of the women mentioned in the indictment suffered the horrendous
and unrelenting abuses, the ordeal endured by the young girl
referred to in the indictment as FWS-87 exemplifies the pattern of
violations experienced by these women.
Only 15-years of age when she was first detained in July 1992, the
Prosecutor has alleged that FWS-87 was subjected to at least eight months
of routine torture, including gang rape, and enslavement at the hands of
accused such as JANKOVIC', JANJIC', KOVAC', VUKOVIC,
ZELENOVIC', KUNARAC' and STANKOVICÕ' and countless other unidentified soldiers.
FWS-87 was first detained at the Buk Bijela complex on the River Drina on
or about 3 July 1992. There, she was interrogated by Dragan
ZELENOVIC' and three unidentified soldiers, each of whom raped her in
turn. One of the soldiers put a gun to her head as he raped her.
FWS-87 suffered severe pain during the attack, followed by heavy vaginal
bleeding.
Between 3 and 13 July 1992, FWS-87, together with at least 72 other Muslim
inhabitants of Foca, was transferred to Foca High School.
FWS-87 was one of several women who, from the second day of their
detention, were sexually assaulted, including gang-raped every evening,
by groups of soldiers, either in the class-rooms or in nearby apartments.
The soldiers consisted of members of the military police and referred to
themselves as "Cosa's Guards", after the local commander of the military
police, Cosovic. Amongst the perpetrators were the accused
JANKOVIC', ZELENOVIC', JANJIC' and VUKOVIC.
68
The soldiers threatened to kill the women if they refused to submit. Women
who tried to resist were beaten.
On or about 6 or 7 July 1992, FWS-87 was raped by VUKOVIC while other

detained women were simultaneously raped in the same room.
Between 8 and 13 July, the accused Dragan ZELENOVIC led a group of
soldiers that sexually abused FWS-87 and another young woman at
Foca High School on at least five occasions additional to the one
described above.
During this same period, FWS-87 was taken from Foca High School to a
nearby apartment owned by ZELENOVIC on at least five occasions.
There, she was raped by Zoran VUKOVIC and Dragan ZELENOVIC.
Around 13 July 1992, FWS-87 and the other detainees at Foca High School
were transferred to the Partizan Sports Hall. While being held
there, until about 2 August 1992, FWS-87and other female detainees were
continuously raped and otherwise sexually assaulted by innumerable
soldiers and by the accused Dragan ZELENOVIC, Zoran VUKOVIC and Dragoljub
KUNARAC with the actual or constructive knowledge of
the accused Dragan GAGOVIC. FWS-87 became suicidal as a result of these
sexual assaults.
FWS-87. alone with other Muslim women, was transferred on 2 August 1992 to
a house in Foca which was owned by a Muslim who lived in
Germany. Some of these women were as young as 12 years of age. The house
was run in the manner of a brothel by the accused Radovan
STANKOVIC. The women were kept there until 30 October 1992.
FWS-87 and the other women held at the house were not only treated as
sexual slaves but were also forced to work for the soldiers, including
washing uniforms, cooking and cleaning the house. FWS-87 was also forced
to clean and cook for other soldiers in other buildings. FWS-87's
suicidal feelings continued throughout this period. On or about 30 October
1992, FWS-87 together with other Muslim girls and women, was
moved back to Foca and shifted different houses. They were raped and
otherwise sexually assaulted on numerous occasions by the accused
Dragan ZELENOVIC, Gojko JANKOVIC' and Janko JANJIC.
Between 31 October 1992 and about 25 February 1993, FWS-87 was enslaved
Radomir KOVAC in an apartment block in Foca. She and other
detained women were not only frequently sexually assaulted, including by
the accused KOVAC', but were also forced to perform household
chores.
On 25 February 1993, FWS-87 was sold by Radomir KOVAC for 500 Deutschmarks
to two unidentified Montenegrin soldiers.
THE INVESTIGATION AND THE STRATEGY
The indictment made public today is the result of an investigation which
69
commenced in late 1994.
This indictment fully illustrates the OTP's strategy:
- to investigate the operation of detention facilities in connection with

the takeover of parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina by the Bosnian Serb
forces;
- to pay specific attention to gender-related crimes. As stated recently

by Justice Goldstone: "We have always regarded it as an important part of
our mission to to redefine md consolidate the place of these offences in
humanitarian law."
THE ACCUSED
The indictment (at pages 2-3) provides personal details of the eight
accused. The following should, however, be pointed out:
- the accused's ages range between 27 and 41 years;
- six held positions of authority as Chief of Police in Foca (Dragan

GAGOVIC) or sub-commanders of the military police (Gojko JANKOVIC';
Janko JANJIC'; Radomir KOVAC; Zoran VUKOVIC'; and Dragan ZELENOVlC).
- seven of them, including the six named above, were paramilitary leaders.
The eighth belonged to a Serb elite paramilitary group.
THE CHARGES
Today's indictment charges the eight accused with a total of 62 counts of

crimes against humanity; grave breaches; and violations of the laws
and customs of war. These charges specifically relate to the crimes: rape;
torture; outrages upon personal dignity; persecution on political, racial
and/or religious grounds; willfully causing great suffering; enslavement;
and inhuman treatment.
[...]
vanja filipovic
70
71
72
Suđenje Radovanu Paprici i Slavku Ognjenoviću za silovanje počinjeno na području
Foče počelo je čitanjem optužnice i uvodnom riječju Tužilaštva. (23.12.2019.)
Radovan Paprica zvani Papro i Slavko Ognjenović zvani Maĉak optuženi su da su,
sa osobom po imenu NeĊo, 9. juna 1992. “na grub naĉin silovali” svjedokinju A-1 u
mjestu Miljevina kod Foĉe.
Kako se navodi u optužnici Tužilaštva Bosne i Hercegovine, Ognjenović je izveo
oštećenu iz kuće u kojoj je bila u Staroj Koloniji i odveo je u prazan stan, gdje je prvo
silovao NeĎo. Dodaje se da se A-1 spremala da izaĎe kada je ušao Ognjenović, potrgao joj
odjeću i silovao je, uz nekoliko šamara i prijetnju da nikome ništa ne govori.
U optužnici stoji da je oštećena ponovo krenula da ode, ali da je naišao Paprica i naredio joj
da se vrati u stan, gdje ju je silovao, takoĎe je ošamarivši nekoliko puta. Paprica joj je, prema
optužnici, zaprijetio da ne smije nigdje ići, jer će ponovo doći, ali je oštećena uspjela pobjeći
skočivši kroz prozor.
Tužilac Behaija Krnjić je rekao da će odgovornost optuženih dokazati saslušanjem sedam
svjedoka i jednog vještaka, te materijalnim dokazima.
Odbrane su kazale da u ovoj fazi postupka neće iznositi uvodne riječi.
Paprica i Ognjenović su optuženi za zločin protiv čovječnosti. Na teret im je stavljeno da
su silovanje počinili u okviru širokog i sistematskog napada vojnih, paravojnih i
policijskih snaga Srpske Republike BiH odnosno kasnije Republike Srpske.
Saslušanje prvog svjedoka zakazano je za 13. januar.
73
74
75
Posted on 10 Novembra, 2017
Foča četvrt stoljeda od genocida : Fočanske tužne priče iz 1992. godine
https://focanskidani.wordpress.com/2017/11/10/foca-cetvrt-stoljeca-od-genocida-focanske-tuzne-
price-iz-1992-godine/
76
77
1992. godine
Ćehotina
78
Subota, 26. septembar 1992. godine
…
Srećem mnoge izbjeglice iz foĉanskog kraja. Fikreta K., izbjeglica iz Genša,
priĉa mi da je Momo Ĉanĉar iz Foĉe dolazio sa nekim Perišićem i još nekoliko
ĉetnika u Genše. Palili su kuće, a muškarce pohapsili i, navodno, otjerali u
KPD Foĉa. Niko pouzdano ne zna da li su oni uopće stigli do KPD Foĉa. MeĊu
uhapšenima je bio i njezin brat.
…
Na Potrkuši sam razgovarao sa B.B. sedamdesetogodišnjim starcem

iz Papratna, općina Foĉa, koji je bio svjedok straviĉnog zloĉina. Starac je
ispriĉao:
“U selo Vikoĉ iznenada su upali ĉetnici Bore Ivanovića iz Godijena i otvorili
paljbu na sve strane. Narod se prepao i poĉeo bježati, a sa njima i šezdesetak
momaka koji su trebali braniti mjesto. Ĉetnici su ubili ĉetvericu mladića,
79
a Miralema Ahmića (22 god.) živog su uhvatili.
Ja sam pred zloĉincima utekao u srpsko groblje i tako se spasio. Odatle sam
vidio šta su radili Miralemu. Prvo su ga dugo tukli i muĉili, a zatim svezali za
granu jedne kruške pred školom u Papratnu. Onda su pod tom kruškom
zapalili vatru. On je vrištao, jaukao. Njegovi urlici odjekivali su izmeĊu brda.
Ĉinilo mi se kao da nedoklan vo doziva kasapine da dovrše posao, a oni su
samo nekoliko metara dalje od njega svirali harmoniku, pili rakiju, pjevali i
izrugivali se njegovim mukama. Izdahnuo je, jadnik, najteže što insan može da
skonĉa. Vidio sam kad je do njih stigao neko u crvenoj “ladi”. Poslije toga su
prestali sa pjesmom.
Nakon dva dana u selo se vratio moj sin i još nekoliko mještana. Pokupili su
glavu i kosti rahmetli Miralema i sahranili. Cijelo Papratno popali su ĉetnici
Bore Ivanovića s Godijena, ĉetnici s Ĉelebića i iz Brusana.”
80
81
MeĊu izbjeglicama iz Foĉe doznao sam o još jednom zloĉinu foĉanskih ĉetnika
koji je poĉinjen na rejonu Osanice. U selu Ćurovićima Gornjim, ĉetnici su
silovali jednu trinaestogodišnju djevojĉicu. Kasnije su je izboli kamama i
ostavili. Njeno golo, unakaženo i beživotno tijelo našli su rodbina i komšije u
selu Ćurovići Gornji kad su ĉetnici odatle protjerani.
…
preuzeto iz knjige Grihota je ubijanje tvica – Mehmed Bradarid, stranice 275 i 276
fotografije:fb Putnik Namjernik/flickr ekranportal13
priredio:Kenan Sarač
_____
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
KORIŠTENI DOKUMENTI I PRESUDE:
SVJEDOČANSTVA O GENOCIDU U FOČI - od 312 do 372 strane - IT-09-92-T - 22.11.2017. - slučaj

Mladid ICTY
https://www.academia.edu/41397868/SVJEDO%C4%8CANSTVA_O_GENOCIDU_U_FO%C4%8CI_-
_od_312_do_372_strane_-_IT-09-92-T_-_22.11.2017._-_slu%C4%8Daj_Mladi%C4%87_ICTY
3.3. Kunarac et al. case - ICTY and Sexual Violence as a Crime Against Humanity
https://www.academia.edu/41397930/3.3._Kunarac_et_al._case_-
_ICTY_and_Sexual_Violence_as_a_Crime_Against_Humanity
SAMARDŽID NEĐO - PRVOSTEPENA P R E S U D A _7_04_2006

https://www.academia.edu/41397994/SAMARD%C5%BDI%C4%86_NE%C4%90O_-
_PRVOSTEPENA_P_R_E_S_U_D_A_7_04_2006
GAZDID JASKO - PRVOSTEPENA P R E S U D A - objavljena_9.11.2012. godine

https://www.academia.edu/41397975/GAZDI%C4%86_JASKO_-_PRVOSTEPENA_P_R_E_S_U_D_A_-
_objavljena_9.11.2012._godine
Ratko Bundalo - Neđo Zelaja - Causa-X-KR-07_419

https://www.academia.edu/41397901/Ratko_Bundalo_-_Ne%C4%91o_Zelaja_-_Causa-X-KR-07_419
Prvostupanjska P R E S U D A MITAR RAŠEVID i SAVO TODOVID

https://www.academia.edu/40357442/Prvostupanjska_P_R_E_S_U_D_A_MITAR_RA%C5%A0EVI%C4
%86_i_SAVO_TODOVI%C4%86
P R E S U D A MOMČILU MANDIDU
https://www.academia.edu/40320572/P_R_E_S_U_D_A_MOM%C4%8CILU_MANDI%C4%86U
ZLOČIN U FOČI - zloglasni KPD Foča

https://www.academia.edu/40319525/ZLO%C4%8CIN_U_FO%C4%8CI_-_zloglasni_KPD_Fo%C4%8Da
ZLOČIN U FOČI - zloglasni KPD Foča 2

https://www.academia.edu/40319476/ZLO%C4%8CIN_U_FO%C4%8CI_-
_zloglasni_KPD_Fo%C4%8Da_2
DOBA ISTINE
https://www.academia.edu/40357429/DOBA_ISTINE
FOČANSKI IZVJEŠTAJ : EKSHUMACIJE 1999. (FOTO)

https://www.academia.edu/40491985/FO%C4%8CANSKI_IZVJE%C5%A0TAJ_EKSHUMACIJE_1999._F
OTO_
99
100

Pošteno o Presudama

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pošteno o Presudama

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

POŠTENO O PRESUDAMA

- izbor tekstova sa portala focanskidani, flickr-a i facebooka

FOĈANSKA JE TUGA PREGOLEMA : SVIREPO UBISTVO

Svirepo i okrutno ubistvo uglednog foĉanskog lijeĉnika, doktora Aziza Torlaka

Svjedok kaže da su u junu 1993. iz zloglasnog koncentracionog logora, KP

Foĉanska je tuga pregolema…Neprebolna…

U istom poglavlju se spominje kako je presuĊeni ratni zloĉinac Dragan

FOČA:Koliko još ima neidentifikovanih i neispričanih priča?

Silovanje kao instrument terora

Case No.: IT-09-92-T 22 November 2017

Case No.: IT-09-92-T 22 November 2017 `

Case No.: IT-09-92-T 22 November 2017 `

2528 P3156 (Witness RM-012, witness statement, 13 June 1996), p. 3.

2537 Adjudicated Facts I, no. 704.

2561 P531 (Witness RM-063, witness statement, 10 February 1996), p. 7.

2571 Adjudicated Facts I, no. 703.

Schedule C and unscheduled murder incidents – killing of three Muslim women

2603 Indictment, paras 39 (a), 47, 52, 59 (a), 62.

2610 Defence Final Brief, paras 1529-1538.

2627 Veselinko Simovid, T. 24400-24401.

2641 Adjudicated Facts I, no. 633.

TUŽILAC SUDA PROTIV DRAGOLJUBA KUNARCA

TUŽILAC MEĐUNARODNOG SUDA PROTIV DRAGOLJUBA KUNARCA RADOMIRA KOVAČA

PRESUDA ŽALBENOG VIJEDA

STARI TEKSTOVI » ADIL ZULFIKARPAŠIĆ: PUT U FOĈU 1942.

Samo da se zna da su mnoge izreke koje su se udomaćile u bosanskim domovima u

 Čujem ti ja od tetka da se dijele nekakve donacije za povratak raseljenih. Kaže:

-I šta bijaše dalje? Jesi li šta dobio?

“Takav nam grah pao“ – kad se pomirite sa svojom sudbinom.

“Ide ko halva.” – kad te nešto pravo hoće izraditi….

“Hrani sirotu na svoju sramotu.” – to je kada se zauzmeš za nekog, a on obruka i

“Glava mu ko’ Cocin bubanj.” – osjećaj nevjerovatnog, ali ipak nestvarnog

“Bolje bi bilo da sam kamen rodila.” – ekstremna izjava jako razočarane i

„Jesi tup ko ćuskija.“ – dežurna uvreda.

„Jazuk je to baciti.“ – kad je šteta ne pokupiti i istreseš mrve poslije jela…

„Grom te ne ubio.“ – kad zabelajiš.

„Zdrav k’o drijen.“ – to je ono kad – „Može volu rep isčupati.“

„Pamet u glavu.“ – pozdravna fraza prije izlaska u grad.

„Bog te u šumu okreno.“ – kad te neko priziva pameti – „DoĎi tobe.“

„Kad na vrbi rodi grožĎe.“ – al’ – „Malo sutra.“

„Grdne rane moje.“ – dežurna žalopojka.

„Brigo moja preĎi na drugoga.“ – bolje da se drugi sikira, nego ja.

“I ćorava koka zrno naĎe.”

Ko nema u glavi ima u nogama.

I na kraju malo o ovim RIJEČIMA: ” Tako mi pao grah. Takav mi horoskop ”

Samo da se zna da su mnoge izreke koje su se udomaćile u bosanskim domovima u

In article <6cilgj$dni$1...@gte2.gte.net>, pri...@gte.net wrote:

***** International Criminal Tribunal

Gagovic & Others

(26 June 1996)

Press and Information Office

(Exclusive[y for the use of the media. Not an official document)

GANG RAPE, TORTURE AND ENSLAVEMENT OF MUSLIM WOMEN CHARGED IN ICTY'S

Muslim women in Foca (southeastern Bosnia and Herzegovina) were subjected

The indictment charges Dragan GAGOVIC', Gojko JANKOVIC', Janko JANJIC',

The indictment is of major legal significance as it is the first time that

According to the indictment, the municipality of Foca was taken over by

Muslim women, children and elderly persons were detained in houses,

Many of the detained women, some as young as 12 years of age, endured

The indictment charges crimes committed against at least 14 victims,

"Many women suffered permanent gynecological harm due to the sexual

ONE YOUNG GIRL'S ORDEAL: THE STORY OF FWS-87

On or about 6 or 7 July 1992, FWS-87 was raped by VUKOVIC while other