Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form ( IPCRF )

Name of Employee: LUKE PHILIP T. PILAPIL Name of Rater : PELILIA B. VELA

Position : TEACHER I Position : MASTER TEACHER 1
Review Period: Date of Review :
Bureau / Center / Service / Division : PASIG CITY

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCOR
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight ( Quality , Efficiency, Timeliness ) ACTUAL RESULTS
Q E T Ave. E
Per KRA

Teaching Executed daily lesson June 5% (5)Have completed DLL, TG, LM

Learning and activities as per 2015 and other references.
Process DepEd K-12 Curriculum to
(55%) with proper March (4) Have TG, LM, but no prepared
instructional material 2016 DLL

(3) No DLL, and no prepared

instructional materials

(2) Utilized chalk and board only

(1) No prepared at all

Attained the desired
Learning competencies
Observed learning in the
School by full participatio
n⁄interaction of pupils
*indicators
(pupil-pupil)
(pupil-teacher)
(pupil-material)
(peer tutoring)
Implement classroom rules
*indicators
-cleanliness⁄orderliness
-pupil’s discipline
-punctuality
-absenteeism
15% (5) Attained 100% based on the
approved budget of work
(4) Attained 90% based on the
approved budget of work
(3) Attained 80% based on the
approved budget of work
(2) Attained 70% based on the
approved budget of work
(1) Attained 60% based on the
approved budget of work
15% (5) All indicators were observed
(4) Only 3 indicators were
observed
(3) Only 2 indicators were
observed
(2) Only 1 indicator was observed
(1) No pupil interaction observed
10% (5) All indicators were followed
(4) Only 3 indicators were
followed
(3) Only 2 indicators were
followed
(2) Only 1 indicator was followed
(1) Classroom rules were not
followed
 Conducted Remedial 10% (5) All indicators were observed
Teaching after class (4) Only 3 indicators were
Observed
(3) Only 2 indicators were
observed
(2) Only 1 indicators was
observed
(1) Remedial Teaching were
observed

Pupils Maintained updated 10% (5) All school forms were

Outcomes pupil’s school records updated
(30%) (4) Only 3 school forms were
-FORM 138 updated
(3) Only 2 school forms were
updated
(2) Only 1 school forms were
Prepared test questions updated
for summative using the (1) School forms were not
following indicators. updated
- Followed the Budget
of Work
- Used cleared WHOLE 10% (5) All indicators were observed
directions YEAR (4) Only 3 indicators were
- Provided individual Observed
test materials (3) Only 2 indicators were
- Used variety of test observed
questions (2) Only 1 indicators was
observed
C. Administered pre-test (1) No indicators was observed
and post test every
grading period.
 WHOLE 10% (5) Post test was improved by 3.6
YEAR -4.9 % over pre-test
(4)Post test was improved by 2.6
-3.5 % over pre-test
(3)Post test was improved by 1.6
-2.5% over pre-test
(2) Post test was improved by
1.5% and below over pre-test
(1) There was no improvement in
the post test

Community A. Conducted periodic PTA JUN 3% (5)PTA meetings⁄conferences

Involvement meetings⁄conference to 2015- were conducted in all grading
report learners’ progress AUG periods
(5%)
-First Grading 2016 (4) Only 3 meetings⁄conferences
were conducted in all grading
periods
(3)Only 2 meetings ⁄conferences
were conducted in all grading
periods
(2)Only 1 meeting∕were
conducted in all grading periods
(1)No meetings⁄conferences were
conducted in all grading periods
 Visited at least 2 parents of
pupils needing academic
monitoring∕ follow-up within
the rating period
Professional Participated in Teacher’s
Growth and Quality Circle (TQC) every
Development month
(10%)
Engaged ∕served as a
lecturer∕member of a
committee in a professional
meeting∕SLAC
WHOLE 2% (5) More than 3 parents were
YEAR visited
(4) Only 3 parents were visited
(3) Only 2 parents were visited
(2) Only 1 parent was visited
(1) No visitation was done
WHOLE 4% (5)More than 3 TQC participated
YEAR (4)Only 3 TQC participated
(3)Only 2 TQC participated
(2)Only 1 TQC participated
(1)No TQC participated
WHOLE 3% (5)Engaged⁄served in 4
YEAR professional meeting⁄SLAC
(4) Engaged⁄served in 3
professional meeting⁄SLAC
(3) Engaged⁄served in 2
professional meeting⁄SLAC
(2) Engaged⁄served in 1
professional meeting⁄SLAC
(1)Did not engaged⁄served in
professional meeting⁄SLAC
 Attended training∕ WHOLE 3% (5)Attended more than 4
workshop⁄seminar∕ YEAR trainings⁄ workshop∕ seminar∕
camping within the camping within the school∕
school ⁄ division⁄ sports division
(4)Attended more than 3
trainings⁄ workshop∕ seminar∕
camping within the school∕
division
(3)Attended more than 2
trainings⁄ workshop∕ seminar∕
camping within the school∕
division
(2)Attended more than 1
trainings⁄ workshop∕ seminar∕
camping within the school∕
division
(1)Did not attend in any trainings⁄
workshop∕ seminar∕
camping within the school∕
division

OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

PELILIA B. VELA LUKE PHILIP T. PILAPIL WILMA P. SORIANO

Rater Ratee Approving Authority