Professional Documents
Culture Documents
May 2007
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
√ TIDAK TERHAD
Disahkan oleh
Signature : ....................................................
Name of Supervisor : Prof. Ir. Dr. Mohd. Azraai Kassim
Date : 2nd May 2007
ii
I declare that this project report entitled “Performance Study on Dissolved Air
Flotation (DAF) Unit and Process Performance Improvement Study in the Physico-
chemical Treatment of Wastewater” is the result of my own research except as cited
in the references. The project report has not been accepted for any degree and is not
concurrently submitted in candidature of any other degree.
Signature : ....................................................
Name : Lee Seng Chow
Date : 2nd May 2007
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This study would not have been completed without the assistance and support
of those who guided me in the course of my masters project. In preparing this thesis,
I was in contact with many people, academicians and practitioners. They have
contributed towards my understanding and thoughts. In particular, I wish to express
my sincere appreciation to my honorable supervisor, Professor Ir. Dr. Mohd. Azraai
Kassim, for encouragement, support, guidance, critics and friendship. Without his
continued support and interest, this thesis would not have been the same as presented
here.
Lastly but not least, I am grateful to my family members for their love, care,
support and encouragement.
v
ABSTRACT
From the time of the early 20th century, Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) had
been used in the separation process. In the DAF system, air is dissolved in the
wastewater under a pressure of several atmospheres, followed by release of the
pressure to the atmospheric level. In this case, the recycle flow system has been
studied. For this kind of system, a portion of the DAF effluent is being recycled,
pressurized and semi-saturated with air. The main study object is the DAF System in
HACO Asia Pacific Sdn. Bhd. In the first stage, process performance improvement
study was carried out to determine the most effective operating parameters and
conditions of the DAF. Then, a performance monitoring study was continued by
operating the DAF in the most effective and optimum condition. Samples were being
taken before and after the DAF treatment to determine its pollutant removal
efficiency. Results from the performance monitoring study showed that the DAF is
able to meet its original design specification of Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
removal efficiency up 85%-95%. At a later stage, an emerging design system known
as Band-pass Filter (BF) was brought in for a comparative performance study with
the DAF system. The BF is intended for mechanical filtering of wastewater in
situations where rejections of waste products in connection with processing plants
are required. To obtain optimum cleansing, the BF is tuned for the imminent
cleansing process. Results from the comparative performance study showed that the
BF can achieve a slightly higher average TSS and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
removal efficiency, with 93.9% and 49.6% respectively. On the other hand, DAF can
achieve a slightly higher average Oil and Grease (O&G) removal efficiency up to
91.9%.
vi
ABSTRAK
Oxygen Demand (COD)” yang lebih tinggi , iaitu 93.9% dan 49.6%. Manakala, DAF
dapat mencapai purata keberkesanan penyinggiran minyak dan gris yang lebih tinggi,
dengan bacaan sebanyak 91.9%.
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE i
DECLARATION ii
DEDICATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS viii
LIST OF TABLES xi
LIST OF FIGURES xii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xiv
LIST OF SYMBOLS xv
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 General Overview in the Environmental
Control of Industrial Wastewater 1
1.2 Physico-Chemical Treatment of
Industrial Wastewater 4
1.2.1 History and Concept of Flotation 5
1.2.1.1 Type of Flotation Process 6
1.2.2 History and Concept of Filtration 9
1.3 Problem Statements 11
1.4 Objectives of the Study 12
ix
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Coffee Production and Manufacturing
Factory Production Process Description 15
2.2 Wastewater Treatment Plant Design 19
2.2.1 Wastewater Treatment Plant
General Description 21
2.2.2 Wastewater Treatment Plant
Detailed Process Description 22
2.3 Chemical Treatment Process 28
2.3.1 pH Adjustment 30
2.3.2 Coagulation and Flocculation 31
2.4 Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) System 34
2.5 Band-pass Filter (BF) System 35
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Wastewater Treatment Plant Site Survey,
Study and Planning 39
3.2 Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) Unit 41
3.2.1 Site Operation Aspects of Installed DAF 45
3.2.2 Start-up of DAF 47
3.2.3 Shutting Down of DAF 49
3.3 Band-pass Filter (BF) Unit 50
3.3.1 Site Operation Aspects of BF Unit 53
3.3.2 Start-up of BF 54
3.3.3 Shutting Down of BF 55
3.4 Sampling at the Wastewater Treatment Plant 56
3.5 Analysis of Wastewater Samples 58
3.6 Jar Tests and Chemical Selection 59
3.7 Monitoring and Testing Design 59
3.7.1 Process Performance Improvement Study 60
x
REFERENCES 89
APPENDICES
Appendix A 92
Appendix B 95
Appendix C 97
Appendix D 100
Appendix E 102
Appendix F 104
Appendix G 106
xi
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
BF - Band-pass Filter
BOD5 - 5-days Biochemical Oxygen Demand
C&F - Coagulation and Flocculation
COD - Chemical Oxygen Demand
DOE - Department of Environment
DAF - Dissolved Air Flotation
IESWTR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
LT1ESWTR - Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
O&G - Oil and Grease
P&ID - Process and Instrumentation Diagram
SI - System International
SBR - Sequencing Batch Reactor
SWTR - Surface Water Treatment Rule
TSS - Total Suspended Solids
US - United States
USEPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency
WWTP - Wastewater Treatment Plant
xv
LIST OF SYMBOLS
% - Percent
g/d - Gram per day
3
g/m - Gram per cubic meter
gpd - Gallons per day
kg/d - Kilogram per day
lit. - Liter
lit./min - Liter per minute
2
lit./m /min - Liter per meter square per minute
lit./hr - Liter per hour
lit./d - Liter per day
mm - Millimeter
m - Meter
m2 - Meter square
3
m - Cubic meter
m3/hr - Cubic meter per hour
m3/d - Cubic meter per day
mg/l - Milligram per liter
mL/mg - Milliliter per Milligram
o
C - Degree of Celsius
sec - Seconds
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Malaysia. In the United States, the discharge of process wastewater from this kind of
food and beverage industry has fully emphasized on the removal of constituents that
may cause long-term health effects and environmental impacts since 1980. In here,
the important US federal regulation that govern the control of wastewater issues, and
have brought about the changes in the planning and design of wastewater treatment
facilities in the US are as follows:
As one of the fast developing countries, Malaysia has also planned and
implemented its environmental protection management policy and activities in the
control of the industrial wastewater discharge by referring to the control strategies as
presently adopted in the US. In Malaysia, the achievements and progress in the
works of pollution abatement and control is mainly via the enforcement of pollution
control and regulations under the Environmental Quality Act, 1974 carried out by the
Department of Environment (DOE). The enforcement of the existing environmental
laws and legislation is essential and has been stepped up so as to ensure the
capability of the industrial sector, in particular to control the production of
3
More concerted efforts are needed to curb down pollution problems resulting
from all these manufacturing industries. With stricter enforcement of the Environ-
mental Quality (Sewage and Industrial Effluents) Regulations 1979, it is envisaged
that the river pollution problems can be minimized. Strict revision on the issuance of
contravention licenses made under the Section 22(1) and Section 25(1) of the
Environmental Quality Act, 1974 will help to facilitate further the compliance to
these regulations. In addition, factors that aggravate or increase non-compliance,
such as the incompetence of some waste management consultants in designing
effective treatment systems, have been recognized, and efforts initiated to address
and resolve these problems. The implementation and enforcement of the mandatory
environmental impact assessment (EIA) procedure and requirements under the
Environmental Quality (Prescribed Activities)(Environmental Impact Assessment)
Order 1987 have been stepped up in tandem with the country's increasing rate of
development and inclination to industrialize (Laws of Malaysia, 2003)
4
Premises other than those prescribed (crude palm oil and raw natural rubber
mills) i.e. largely manufacturing industries, are subjected to the Environmental
Quality (Sewage and Industrial Effluents) Regulations 1979, the Environmental
Quality (Clean Air) Regulations 1978 and the Environmental Quality (Scheduled
Wastes) Regulations 1989 (Laws of Malaysia, 2003). As a coffee production and
manufacturing factory that have a great production capacity, HACO Asia Pacific Sdn.
Bhd. should be categorized under a general term known as “Food & Beverages”
manufacturing industries.
some kind of filtration system known as the Band-pass Filter can even breakthrough
the cost constraints and is beginning to be adopted in the primary treatment stage for
small WWTP. The main focus of this study is on the DAF which is operated based
on the concept of flotation. At the latter part of this thesis, a preliminary study on the
BF which functions based on the concept of filtration is also included.
Over 2000 years ago, the ancient Greeks used a flotation process to separate
the desired minerals from the gangue, the waste material (Gaudin, 1957). Crushed
ore was dusted onto a water surface, and mineral particles were retained at the
surface by surface tension while the gangue settled. In 1860, Haynes patented a
process in which oil was used for the separation of the mineral from the gangue
(Kitchener, 1984). The mineral floated with the oil when the mixture was stirred in
water.
In 1905, Salman, Picard, and Ballot developed the froth flotation process by
agitating finely divided ore in water with entrained air. A small amount of oil was
added, sufficient enough to bestow good floatability to the sulfide grains (Kitchener,
1984). The air bubbles, together with the desired mineral, collected as foam at the
surface while the gangue settled. The first froth flotation equipment was developed
by T. Hoover in 1910 (Kitchener, 1984), and except for size, it was not much
different than the equipment used today.
6
Elmore suggested in 1904 the use of electrolysis to produce gas bubbles for
flotation. This process, although not commercially used at that time, has been
developed into electrolytic flotation (Bratby, 1976). Elmore also invented the
dissolved-air (vacuum) flotation (DAF) process, whereby air bubbles are produced
by applying a vacuum to the liquid, which releases the air in the form of minute
bubbles (Kitchener, 1984). The original patent for the dissolved-air pressure flotation
process was issued in 1924 to Peterson and Sveen for the recovery of fibers and
white water in the paper industry (Lundgren, 1976).
i. Electrolytic Flotation:
The basis of electrolytic flotation, or electrolytic flotation, is the
generation of bubbles of hydrogen and oxygen in a dilute aqueous
solution by passing a DC current between two electrodes (Barrett, 1975).
7
The bubble size generated in electrolytic flotation is very small, and the
surface loading is therefore restricted to less than 4 m/h (13.3 ft/h). The
application of electrolytic flotation has been restricted mainly to sludge
thickening and small wastewater treatment plants in the range 10 to 20
m3/h (50,000 to 100,000 gpd).
Figure 1.1: Dispersed-air flotation unit. Air is induced and dispersed into the liquid
by pumping action of the inductors. (Courtesy Eimco) (Tchobanoglous et al, 2003).
Filters have been used to clarify water for thousands of years. Medical lore
written in India, dating to perhaps 2000 BC, mentions filtration through sand and
gravel as a method of purifying water. Venice, Italy, used rainwater stored in cisterns
as a freshwater supply but drew the water from wells in sand that surrounded the
cisterns (Baker, 1948). In 1852, the first regulation mandating filtration was passed,
required all river water supplied by the Metropolitan District of London to be filtered.
The regulation was prompted by rampant pollution in the Thames River and
suspicions that cholera was transmitted by water (Fuller, 1933), a suspicion
confirmed by Dr. John Snow in his famous investigation of a cholera outbreak in
London just 2 years later.
In 1880, rapid filtration had its origin in the United States. Elements of
modern design, such as mechanical or hydraulic systems to assist with cleaning the
media during backwashing, appeared during that decade. The first municipal plant
employing coagulation and other critical elements of rapid filtration was in
Somerville, New Jersey, in 1885 (Fuller, 1933). Both slow sand and rapid filters
were common in early filter installations (Fuller, 1933), but by the middle of the
twentieth century, rapid filters were commonplace and slow sand filters were rarely
used.
By the latter part of the twentieth century, most surface water was filtered
before municipal distribution. Nevertheless, the Surface Water Treatment Rule
(SWTR), passed in 1989, was the first regulation in the United States requiring
widespread (but not universal) mandatory filtration of municipal water (U.S. EPA,
1989), with the recognition that chemical disinfection alone was ineffective for
protozoa such as Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum. Rapid filters were
used in almost all cases (99 percent), but the SWTR caused a resurgence of interest
in slow sand filter, particularly among small utilities that had unfiltered water
11
Since passage of the SWTR and more recently the Interim Enhanced SWTR
(IESWTR) (U.S. EPA, 1998) and Long Term 1 Enhanced SWTR (LT1ESWTR)
(U.S. EPA, 2002), finished water turbidity requirements have become more stringent
and the remaining utilities with unfiltered surface water supplies have been under
increasing pressure to install filtration. In short, filtration is and will continue to be a
central feature in surface water treatment plants.
At the later stage of the study, a newly invented equipment, the Band-pass
Filter (BF) test unit will be tested out for its performance. This test unit performs the
same functions as DAF and had been brought in by CST from Denmark. A
comparative performance study shall be carried out between the DAF and the BF
due to the availability of the facility at the site.
At the later stage of the study, a BF test unit shall be brought to HACO Asia
Pacific S/B, Shah Alam. A comparative performance study was carried out between
the DAF and the BF to compare the removal efficiencies of COD, O&G and TSS.
In the portion of the process improvement study, the results from the study can
be used to operate the DAF more effectively and always in the peak performance.
These effective operating parameters shall be determined and adjusted during the
performance monitoring works.
14
At the later stage of the study, the BF offers a very good opportunity to study
an emerging design from overseas. It will give an alternative choice that can be
adopted in the WWTP design. More importantly, the results from the comparative
performance study between the DAF and BF are very helpful for the project design
and management team of CST Engineering Sdn. Bhd. in the WWTP design decision
making.
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
sieve and vacuum system (de-stoner). The cleaned coffee beans are
stored in compartment silos or big bags.
In here, process (2) to process (6) is the major processes that waste materials
to the environment. Gas emissions discharge to the atmosphere is normally
contributed by process 2, 3, 4 and 6. In terms of the solids waste generation, it is
purely generated by process 3. However, in terms of the waste water generation, it is
mainly contributed by process 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Although the main scope of study in this thesis is focused on the DAF, it is
better to understand the whole process design of the WWTP before going into details
of DAF. The proposed treatment plant is designed to produce secondary effluent of a
quality that will meet the requirements of the Malaysian Government for discharge
according to DOE Standard B provided that the influent is having the wastewater
characteristics shown in Table 2.1.
20
-
Flow Rate (m3/day) 600
BOD5 ( mg/L)
1000 - 2200 < 50
pH 4–7 6–9
First of all, the industrial wastewater from the factory is discharged into the
pump sump and consequently, pumped to the WWTP. In the WWTP, the proposed
treatment process comprises of the following main steps, namely physical, chemical
and biological treatment:
i. Physical Treatment:
In this section, the detailed process design of the WWTP will be explained.
By referring to the WWTP flow diagram as shown in Figure 2.2, a better conceptual
understanding can be obtained when reading through the process description as
follows:
i. Pump Sump:
This sump receives different wastewater sources from the processing
plant. The wastewater will then be pumped by submersible pumps into
subsequent high load damping system and equalization tank
respectively after passing a screening system for solid and particle
removal, depending on the effluent quality from the processing plant.
This unit has two chambers with a volume of 20 m3 for normal load
and 5 m3 for high load wastewater.
LI
NORMAL LOAD
LI
TS
TANK REACTOR TANK
ADT
TANK HYDROLYSIS/
HIGH LOAD
INTERMEDIATE
LI
RAW WW SUMP
POLYMER
TANK
FINAL MI
TS
CONDITIONING
LI AZUD FILTERHOLDING TANK
DEWATERED
FINAL
TANK MI
FILTRATION
TS
PROPOSED
FEED TANK
`T’ OFF FOR
The SBR cycle will be structured so that filling of the reactor will be
done mostly during high flow periods. Aeration (REACT phase) will
26
be carried out for most of the FILL phase and for a short period after
filling has stopped.
Other than the aeration, the SBR can also provide an anoxic period for
the Denitrification system during the operating cycle. Hence, the NO3-
generation from the Nitrification system during aeration can be
reduced to required standard. For nitrification, SBR aerobic react times
may range from 1.0 to 3.0 h (WEF, 1998). A submersible mixer will be
27
Filtrate and from the filter press and excess water in sludge bin will be
drained back to the equalization tank for further treatment.
Before going into details about the DAF and the BF, it is important to first
understand the chemical treatment process. It is vital and important because the
wastewater will be treated chemically first before it goes through the 2 process unit
for separation purpose. Chemical processes, in conjunction with various physical
operations, have been developed for the complete secondary treatment of untreated
(raw) wastewater, including the removal of either nitrogen or phosphorus or both.
Chemical processes have also been developed to remove phosphorus by chemical
precipitation, and are designed to be used in conjunction with biological treatment.
Other chemical processes have been developed for the removal of heavy metals and
29
for specific organic compounds and for the advanced treatment of wastewater
(Tchobanoglous et al, 2003), in case, chemical pretreatment prior to filtration is more
critical to success than the physical facilities at one plant. This was fully agreed and
reported by Cleasby et al (1989) who recommended that the plant staff used a well-
defined coagulant chemical control strategy that considers variable raw-water quality
(Cleasby et al, 1989).
floc structure. It is sometimes called a “coagulant aid”. Flocculants are often used to
increase filter performance (they may be called “filter aids” in this context) and to
increase the efficiency of a sludge dewatering process. In any case, depending on
how and where it is used and at what dosage, a coagulant is sometimes a flocculant
and vice versa.
2.3.1 pH Adjustment
Alkaline wastes are less of problem than acid but nevertheless often require
treatment. If acidic waste streams are not available or are not adequate to neutralize
alkaline waste, sulfuric acid is commonly employed. In some treatment plants,
carbon dioxide in the form of flue gas had been used to neutralize alkaline
wastewater.
how the flocs formation during coagulation and flocculation, refer to Figure 2.3 and
Figure 2.4).
Figure 2.3: Small flocs formation during the coagulation process at the
coagulation reaction tank.
34
Figure 2.4: Bigger flocs formation during the floculation process at the
flocculation reaction tank..
2.4 Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) System
DAF is a unit operation for the separation of solids and semisolid (floc)
particles from a liquid phase that has been used for the clarification of potable water
for over 40 years (Edzwald, 1995). Besides potable water, this concept is also widely
applicable in wastewater treatment. In here, air bubbles are introduced near the
bottom of the basin containing the water to be treated. As the bubbles move upward
through the water, they become attached to the particulate matter and floc particles,
and the buoyant force of the combined particles and air bubbles will causes the
particles to rise to the surface.
On the other hand, for the treatment of industrial waste and concentration of
solids, recycle-flow pressurized system is being considered and utilized in here and it
is shown in Figure 2.5. In this kind of system, a portion of the DAF effluent is
recycled, pressurized and semi-saturated with air. The recycled flow is mixed with
the un-pressurized main stream just before admission to the flotation tank, with the
35
result that the air comes out of solution in contact with particulate matter at the
entrance to the tank. A pressure release device is being utilized in here to control the
entrance of the pressurized recycle water. Here, the pressure is reduced to
atmospheric pressure, releasing the air in the form of fine bubbles (10 to 100µm in
diameter). The air bubbles attach themselves to the flocs, and the aggregates float to
the surface. The floated material (the float) is removed from the surface, and the
clarified water is taken from the bottom of the flotation tank.
Figure 2.5: DAF system with recycle, in which only the recycle flow is pressurized.
(Tchobanoglous et al, 2003).
.
2.5 Band-pass Filter (BF) System
Figure 2.7.
Like DAF, the BF consists of a chemical treatment system at the front side.
The chemical treatment system in here basically consists of pH adjustment,
coagulation and flocculation reactor aiming in the formation of good floc. In other
words, the chemical treatment system acts as a separate stage from filter and is to
obtain a floc “designed” to be retained by the filter.
.
The concept of filtration is strictly connected to an idea of clearness, which in
turn is connected with a subjective sensory perception. The instruments commonly
employed to measure the turbidity of water are ineffective in providing objective
values of immediate application. This is the reason for the necessity to know the
concentration of suspended solids and the distribution of particle sizes. For instance,
the comparison between the turbidity value in formazine turbidity units (FTU) and
the concentration of suspended matter can provide useful information which is
known as “fitness coefficient”, i.e., the colloidal degree of suspension. Rather than
turbidity itself, this factor makes it possible to anticipate the coagulant quantity to be
employed for the treatment, thus rendering “Direct Filtration” feasible (Brathy, 1980).
STUDY METHODOLOGY
Planning at the site has been carried out to determine the most suitable study
methods and set-up procedure for the equipment. Figure 3.1 shows the WWTP
Layout Plan. In here, the most important study object would be the DAF and it is
represented by S1 in Figure 3.1. It has already been constructed at the site and it was
used back during the study. For the BF study, the test unit was brought to the site and
being located at C09- Filtration Feed Tank, near the V4- Azud Filter. It is shown in
red color in Figure 3.1.
The purified effluent is discharged in the bottom of the flotation tank and
passed on to an outlet collection basin attached to the DAF. By means of overflow
control, the water level can be adjusted in the flotation tank. Both flotation tank and
outlet basin are made of stainless steel. Wastewater in the flotation tank can be
emptied by opening a bottom drain valve.
The dispersed fluid is injected into the flotation tank forming microscopic air
bubbles, which would carries flocs to the surface. Sludge layer is formed on the
46
47
surface and is scrapped intermittently to the sludge compartment. During the study
periods, the DAF was operated with parameters shown in Table 3.1.
During the time of performance study, start-up of the DAF system needed to
be done and the following procedure had been carried out as followed:
iv. Recirculation pump was started and the pressure vessel was filled
v. Air pressure for the pressure vessel was being set to the ranges from
2.0 bars to 4.0 bars.
vi. Flotation manual feed valve and recirculation pump suction valve
were being adjusted until the desired flow rate approximately 10 -50%
of the main flow rate.
vii. Pressure reducing valve and the manual gate valve were adjusted until
the desired fine bubble.
viii. Dosage of coagulant and flocculant were adjusted as per Jar Test
results.
ix. When the flotation tank was filled, the water level was adjusted by
adjusting the overflow of the discharge collection basin (refer Figure
3.9).
bottom drain off valve should the water overflow to the air line
system.
Figure 3.9: Overflow adjustment valve located at the discharge collection basin.
Shutting down of the system needed to be carried out by our own self if the
operator is not in at that moment. These procedures were followed during the shut-
off time:
50
v. The recirculation pump for the pump to be serviced was shut off.
vi. Pressurized air or fluid in the pressure vessel was released if the air
pressure in the vessel build up beyond design pressureduring shut
down.time
viii. Recirculation feed valve was shut off after the recirculation pump was
switch off.
x. In servicing the Pressure vessel, the air pressure in the vessel was
release until it reaches zero, and the water in the vessel was being
drain out using bottom drain off line.
The BF fulfill the requirements of the laws of the Member States on the
safety of the machines 98/37/EEC. In operational condition, the requirements of the
51
laws of the Member States on electrical equipment 73/23/EEC and the laws of the
Member States on Electromagnetic compatibility 89/336/EEC are fulfilled.
During the actual site operation, Table 3.2 shows the recommended operating
condition.
54
3.3.2 Start-up of BF
ii. Then, the feed pump flow rate, BF rotational speed, flocculation
mixer speed and chemical dosing rate was set manually according to
the recommended operating condition.
55
iii. Water is filled into the system and water jet systems that utilize
the water to flush the BF roller filter all the while is turned on.
vi. Influent valve is adjusted until the recommended influent flow rate
is achieved.
vii. Dosing rate of coagulant and flocculant is adjusted as per Jar Test
results.
viii. The BF rotational speed is adjusted until the observed flocs removal
capacity and clear water is achieved.
3.3.3 Shut-down of BF
Shutting down of the system in here is very straight forward. We just needed
to turn off all the equipment at that moment except the BF filter roller and let it to
run for a while to clear the balance flocs inside the tank. Then, the discharge valve
can be opened at the bottom of the C & F reactor tank. Finally, the water jetting
systems that clean the BF roller filter can be turned off when the appearance of the
band-pass filter roller was clean at that moment.
56
For all these 3 sampling points, we were collecting the sample based on composite
sampling methods, in which 4 samples would be collected during an operational
testing of 4 hrs and then mixed together before sending to the laboratories.
57
For the temperature reading, it can be directly recorded from the monitoring screen
of the Eutech pH controller that is equipped with a built-in temperature sensor installed at
the coagulation tank. Meanwhile, the pH at the Equalization tank and after the DAF
treatment can be measured directly with a portable HANNA pH Tester- model no: HI
96107 (pHep®). For the other parameters, it was tested when the entire wastewater sample
was sent to the third party laboratory and all the analysis on the wastewater was done in
accordance with Standard Methods (APHA, 1998).
59
The purpose of the jar test is to simulate, to the extent possible, the expected or
desired conditions in the coagulation-flocculation facilities. Refer to the American Society
for Testing and Materials procedure (ASTM, 1976) for a review of the experimental
protocols. Generally, the test consists of a rapid-mix phase (high mixing intensity) with
simple batch addition of the coagulant or coagulants followed by a slow-mix period to
stimulate flocculation. Normally, flocs were allowed to settle and samples would be taken
from the supernatant. But in our case, since the operating equipment is a DAF, jar test was
to be simulated like DAF, in which air bubbles were being injected into the water at the
moment to ensure that all the flocs formed are floated to the surface of the beaker (Zakariya,
1998). The jar test was carried out by the water treatment chemical supplier.
Design of the testing and study would be firstly focused on the process performance
improvement study. By getting the optimum operating parameters, it was then possible to
carry out the performance monitoring study of the DAF by operating the DAF under
optimum conditions. Lastly and finally, the comparative performance study between the
DAF and the BF was designed to determine the superior removal functions of each
equipment.
60
Before any testing was carried out, the original design based on the original design
input was first reviewed back. Then, based on the actual condition, a design calculation
simulation was carried out. From this, a general idea on what to focus in the process
performance improvement study can be obtained.
In the aspect of the mechanical tuning of the DAF, variation of the recycle system
pressure on the DAF performance was studied. In here, the valve after the recycle pump
was adjusted to obtain the required pressure during the study. Performance of the DAF at
every different recycle pressure can be observed from the appearance of the effluent from
the DAF. To confirm about the observation results, 15 wastewater samples before and after
the DAF treatment were collected for analysis during the 3 days testing and commissioning
study.
In the aspect of the chemical tuning adjustment, it was mainly focused on the
chemical dosing pump capacity adjustment to determine the most effective and efficient
operating condition. The optimum pH condition would be based on the jar test results.
During the process performance improvement study, it was strictly required to vary
the studied operating parameters and maintain the other operating parameters as usual
(constant) (Ng, et al, 1988)
61
This monitoring and study work was carried out at the WWTP of HACO Asia
Pacific Sdn. Bhd. and the WWTP layout plan is shown in Figure 3.1. The wastewater will
be pumped from the Equalization Tank into the DAF as what was happening during the
normal operation periods. Then, the operating parameter of the DAF being set according to
the optimum operating parameter obtained from the process performance improvement
study. Sample of wastewater was collected from the Equalization Tank and after the DAF
treatment. This sampling activity had to be carried out once every week during the
operation of the DAF and the sample taken will be sent out to a third party laboratory for
analysis. The sampling method was based on composite sampling during the operation of
the DAF for a period of 4 hrs. In this way, performance of the DAF can be monitored every
week.
The BF was transported to the site and located near the Filtration Feed Tank
(C09)(Its location is shown in Figure 3.1). Then, a submersible pump was temporary
installed at the Equalization Tank and connected with a rubber hose to the BF. Test runs of
the BF ware carried out before the actual comparative study until the best treated water
condition was obtained. After that, the actual comparative study can be carried out. In this
study, the BF was operated to match the design flow of 1m3/hr, with the flocculation mixer
set to 80rpm to get the best flocs. Meanwhile, rotational speed of the band-pass filter roller
was set to 6m/min. (maximum speed of the system is 7m/min). For the DAF, it was
62
operated with 15m3/hr, and the other operating parameters were set to match the optimum
operating parameter determined during the process performance improvement study.
In the chemical dosing part, the 2 process units were operated with the same
chemical concentration based on their own operational flow rate.
CHAPTER 4
When we compare the 2 results from Table 4.1 and Table 4.2, color,
temperature and pH characteristics are almost the same. However, results in
Appendix B show a lower COD, TSS and O&G readings. After our detailed studies,
we found that the differences are due to the different sampling timing.
For the results in Table 4.1, the sample was taken every Wednesday for a
period of 12 weeks. Meanwhile, samples in Appendix B were only taken for testing
65
for a period of two weeks time and it was taken on Thursday, Friday and Saturday.
From the statistical point of view, results in Appendix A are more accurate due to a
longer sampling duration.
Table 4.3: Range of values for the incoming wastewater characteristics at the
equalization tank (Results abstracted from Appendix A & B):
Wastewater testing Unit Reading
parameters (Average Value)
1. Color - Dark brown
o
2. Temperature C 28 - 31
3. pH - 3.8 - 4.3
4. COD mg/l 9,873 - 15,048
5. BOD5 at 20oC mg/l 2,180 - 6,100
6. TSS mg/l 650 - 3,105
7. O&G mg/l 94 - 663
Jar tests ware being carried out by the chemical supplier and the
recommended chemicals are:
Jar test results for the wastewater characteristics before chemical treatment
and after chemical treatment are shown in Table 4.4 as follows:
For the pH adjustment chemical and coagulant, it can be dosed directly by the
chemical dosing pump. But for flocculant, it appears in solids form and preparation
of flocculant solution is required. Polyacrylamine solution of concentration 0.3%
needs to be prepared from 100% polyacrylamine in solids form.
From the calculations above, the amount of chemical dosage determined from
the Jar test is: - 3.75 lit./hr caustic solution (50%)
- 30 lit./hr Coagulant(Polyaluminum hydroxide Chloride solution
(15%))
- 100 lit./hr of Flocculants (Polyacrylamine solution (0.3%))
flow rate and 200mg/l TSS. And the design output from Appendix F can be
summarized as follows:
Equation showing the relationship between A/S ratio and the solubility of air,
the operating pressure, and the concentration of solids for a system in which
there is a pressurized recycle flow(Tchobanoglous et al, 2003):
Where,
A/S = air to solids ratio, mL (air)/ mg (solids)
sa = air solubility, mL/L
f = fraction of air dissolved at pressure P, usually 0.5
P = pressure, atm.
= (p + 101.35)/ 101.35 (SI Unit)
= (p + 14.7)/ 14.7 (US customary unit)
p = gage pressure, kPa (ib/in2 gage)
Sa = influent suspended solids, g/m3 (mg/l)
R = pressurized recycle, m3/d
Q = mixed-liquor flow, m3/d
For a better understanding of the formula, kindly please refer to Metcalf &
Eddy- Chapter 5. Besides that, additional information about the use of flotation for
treating oily wastewater can be found in Eckenfelder (2000).
74
Before carrying out the mechanical and chemical tuning adjustment, advice
was sought from the Chief Designer who recommended us to maximize the
performance of the system by tuning adjustment of the recycle system pressure and
chemical dosage.
TSS Removal Efficiency (%) in relation to the Differences in Recycle System Operating Pressure
(bar)
100.00%
90.00%
.
80.00%
70.00%
TSS Removal Efficiency (%)
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Recycle System Operating Pressure (bar)
Figure 4.1: TSS removal efficiency in relation to the difference in recycle system
pressure.
The graph trend show a remarkable increase in the TSS removal efficiency
when there is a substantial increment in the recycle system operating pressure from
1.8 bar to 2.6 bar. Nevertheless, the increments in TSS removal efficiency tend to be
stabilized from 3.0 bars to 3.2 bars.
of solids from the water, and leads to a higher total suspended solids removal rate
(Ng at al, 1988).
Although it is known that the best TSS removal efficiency at the recycle
system can be obtained at an operating pressure of 3 bars, the recycle pump was still
operated at 2.6 bars only due to the fast clogging effects of the recycle pump. This
condition can actually be improved by installing a Y-strainer at the suction sides of
the pump or the system can be improved by installing filtration units just before the
recycled water flow into the pump.
Based on on-site observation, it was found that the air compressor capacity
was unable to cater for the DAF air requirement when there is a sudden air
requirement being acquired by the filter press during the “Air Blowing” cycle. As
such, DAF always faced “Carry Over” problem when the filters press “Air Blowing”
cycle is taking over. As such, it is strongly recommended that an additional air
compressor to be installed.
Jar tests show that the best floc formation is in the pH range of 4.3 to 4.8.
When this result was adopted in the actual plant operation, a very good floc can be
gotten. By using this information of pH, optimum coagulant and flocculant dosage
can be determined.
77
In the coagulant dosage study, the results ware tabulated in Appendix D and a
graph drawn by referring to these data. For the graph in Figure 4.2, it showed that an
optimum dosage of 2000mg/l to 2500mg/l of coagulant can help to achieve TSS
removal efficiency up to 93%.
100.00%
90.00%
.
80.00%
70.00%
Total Su spend ed So lid s Rem oval Efficiency (%)
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Coagulant Dosage (mg/l)
90.00%
.
80.00%
70.00%
Total Suspended Solids Removal Efficiency (%)
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Polymer Dosage (mg/l)
Based on the data points plotted on the graph in Figure 4.2, it is very obvious
that stability in the TSS removal efficiency is achieved when the coagulant dosage
concentration reached 2,000 mg/l. The optimum dosage of the coagulant matches
with the Jar Test results. Nevertheless, the plotted data shows that there is a slight
decrease in the TSS removal rate when the coagulant concentration is more than
2,500 mg/l. This is because of the sudden increment of the dosage causing the charge
on the surface of the precipitate to become increasingly positive, and this change
tends to destabilize the component particles and make them disperse.
shown in Figure 4.3. The same general trend that was observed in Figure 4.2 can also
be seen in Figure 4.3. It also shows that stability in TSS removal efficiency is
achieved when the concentration of flocculant reaches 24ppm. When this is
compared to the jar test results, it can be seen that 20 mg/l of polymer dosage is
needed to achieve the desired floc and TSS removal rate. It means that the actual
plant operation require a higher dosage of flocculant.
In the other aspect, it is strongly believed that the polymer dosage can be
reduced if the condition of the flocculation tank’s mixer rotational speed is improved.
This is because the mixer is having a very high rotational speed as it is operated with
a speed of 295rpm. This high rotational speed will break the floc and caused a higher
flocculant requirement. As such, the mixer is recommended to be modified to operate
with a rotational speed of 50-100rpm.
For a better comparison of all the data, the average characteristics and
removal efficiency for pH, COD, BOD5, TSS and O&G will once again be
summarized in Table 4.5 as follows:
Table 4.5: Average characteristics and removal efficiency for pH, COD, BOD5,
TSS and O&G.
Testing Unit Influent Effluent Average
parameters Characteristics Characteristics Pollutant
before DAF after DAF Removal
treatment treatment Efficiency
(%)
1. pH - 4.1 4.5 -
2. COD mg/l 13,281 7,147 45.98
3. BOD5 mg/l 3,759 1,981 45.11
4. TSS mg/l 1,896 188 90.01
3. O&G mg/l 429 27 91.28
The results above showed that the DAF is performing very well for TSS and
O&G removal. However, it showed a very much lower COD and BOD5 removal
efficiency. This is mainly because the total colloidal particles and emulsified organic
pollutants which contribute to the BOD5 and COD are not high. As a result, removal
of high level of TSS and O&G did not contribute to a high percentage of COD and
BOD5 reduction. But what is interesting here is that the DAF is able to meet its
design specification of 85% - 95% TSS removal although the incoming wastewater is
having a higher pollutant concentration, as well as higher pollutant loading.
81
100.00%
90.00%
80.00%
.
70.00%
60.00%
Pollutant Removal Efficiency (%)
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
13 Dec. 20 Dec. 26 Dec. 10 Jan. 17 Jan. 24 Jan. 31 Jan. 7 Feb. 14 Feb. 28 Feb. 7 14
2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 March. March.
2007 2007
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Date
Figure 4.4: Wastewater pollutant removal efficiency (%) vs. time for the 12 weeks
samples.
This graph shows clearly the trend of the pollutant removal efficiency (which
consists of COD removal efficiency, BOD5, TSS removal efficiency and O&G
removal efficiency) from 13 December 2007 until 14 March 2007. It shows that the
DAF has a high and constant TSS and O&G removal rates. However, it was rather
odd that low TSS and O&G removal efficiencies were detected separately on 24 Jan.
2007 and 28 Feb. 2007 respectively.
83
On the other hand, the line diagram of Figure 4.4 shows that the COD
removal efficiency is quite constant. But for BOD5, the removal efficiency is very
inconsistent. This might be due to the inconsistency in the biodegradability of the
different batch of wastewater during the analysis.
Before the comparative performance study was carried out, a trial run on the
BF showed that a lower concentration of flocculant (20ppm) based on 1m3/hr of
wastewater flow rate is able to achieve an equal or better floc condition when
compared to DAF. Nevertheless, this comparative study was still based on the
coagulant dosage of 2000ppm and flocculant dosage of 24ppm (that is the chemical
dosage that was applied during the operation of DAF).
84
COD, TSS and O&G Removl Efficiency After DAF and BF Treatment Vs. Date
100.00%
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
.
60.00%
R em o v al E f ficie n c y ( % )
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
14 Dec. 2006 15 Dec. 2006 16 Dec. 2006 1 Mar. 2007 2 Mar. 2007 3 Mar. 2007
1 2 3 4 5 6
Date
COD- After DAF Treatment - Removal Efficiency (%) COD- After BF Treatment - Removal Efficiency (%)
TSS- After DAF Treatment - Removal Efficiency (%) TSS- After BF Treatment - Removal Efficiency (%)
O&G- After DAF Treatment - Removal Efficiency (%) O&G- After BF Treatment - Removal Efficiency (%)
Figure 4.5: Wastewater pollutant removal efficiency (%) of DAF and BF vs. date
From Figure 4.5, the BF showed a higher COD and TSS removal efficiency
than the DAF when we compared the results on a daily basis. Overall, the BF had an
average COD and TSS removal efficiency of 49.6% and 93.9% respectively, and the
DAF had an average COD and TSS removal efficiency of 47.1% and 89.8%
respectively. In contrast, the DAF had a higher oil & grease removal rate than the BF.
85
On the whole, the DAF showed an average O&G removal efficiency of 91.9% and
the BF showed a value of 90.9%.
The high suspended solids removal rate of the BF is mainly due to the good
retaining and filtering effects of the 130-µm polyethylene filter utilized in the BF
than the air utilized in the DAF. It is believed that the higher COD removal
efficiency of BF is because of the contributory effects from the suspended solids to
COD is greater than the contributory effects from oil & grease to COD. As such, the
BF had a higher COD removal rate. On the other hand, the DAF had a better oil &
grease removal efficiency. This is mainly because of the original floating
characteristics of the oil & grease matching the designed concept of DAF that
pressurized dissolved air is utilized in DAF to lift up floc and oil and grease to the
surface of the flotation tank. As a result, it makes the removal by DAF even easier.
From the operation point of view, both the BF and DAF had their advantages
and disadvantages. For DAF, it normally requires extra doses of polyelectrolyte to
re-flocculate and strengthen the floc. Furthermore, a high degree of operator skill is
required to operate DAF. Theses two points above are not merely by observation; bur
had been confirmed by site personnel (Beaumont, 1994). As for the BF, additional
costs are required to replace the BF’s filter roller.
CHAPTER 5
From the performance improvement study that was carried out on the DAF,
the DAF was finally able to be operated in the most optimum condition and success
to achieve the designed removal efficiency. A comparative performance between the
DAF and BF was also carried out. All the outcomes drawn out as conclusions with
respect to the objectives of the study are as follows:
ii. From the study, it was found that the current air compressor and
flocculation mixer is disrupting the performance of the DAF. Both
systems should be upgraded.
iii. During the performance monitoring study of the DAF, average COD,
BOD5, TSS and O&G removal efficiencies of 45.98%, 45.11%, 90.01%
and 91.28% can be achieved respectively. All these results showed that
the DAF is meeting its design specification of 85% - 95% TSS removal
rate.
iv. In this study, the BF showed a higher average COD and TSS removal
efficiencies up to 49.6% and 93.9% respectively. On the other hand, the
DAF was showed a better average O&G removal efficiency of 91.9%.
iii. Referring back to the treated water quality after the DAF, the current
plant design which utilize a secondary biological sequencing batch
reactor is still facing difficulty in knocking down the COD level. As
such, a study on the different process application in reducing pollutant
loads up to DOE Std. B should be carried out.
89
REFERENCES
Abu Bakar Jaafar, KMN (1992). Environmental Quality Report 1992, Department of
Environment, Ministry of Sciences, Technology and Environment.
APHA (1998). Standard Method for Water and Wastewater Examination. 20th ed.
Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
ASTM (1976). Standard Recommended Practice for Coagulation-Flocculation Jar
Test of Water, in ASTM 1976 Annual Book of Standards, Part 31, ASTM
D2035-74, WASTR, Phildelphia.
Baker, M.N. (1948). The Quest for Pure Water; The History of Water Purification
from the Earliest Records to the Twentieth Century, American Water Works
Association, New York.
Barrett, F. (1975). “Electroflotation- Development and application.” Water Pollution
Control, 74:59
Beaumont, F. (1994). Use of Dissolved Air Flotation, Case Study at Parit Treatment
Plant,paper presented to the Malaysian Water Association “Innovation in
Water and Waste Water Treatment”.
Bratby, J. (1976). Dissolved-Air Flotation in Water and Waste Treatment. Doctoral
dissertation, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South African.
Brathy,J. (1980). Coagulation and Flocculation, Upland Press, Croyden, England.
Camp, T.R., (1955). “Flocculation and flocculation basins” Am. Soc. Civil Eng.
Trans., 120, 1-16
Cheremisinoff, N.P. (2003). Wastewater and Biosolids Treatment Technologies- The
Comprehensive Reference for Plant Managers and Operators, ABS
Consulting, Government Institute.
Cleasby, J.L., Dharmarajah, A.H., Sindt, G.L. and Baumann, E.R. (1989). Design
and Operation Guidelines for Optimization of the High-Rate Filtration
90
Processes: Plant Survey Results, Final project report. Denver, CO: AWWA
and AWWA Research Foundation.
Crittenden, J.C., Trussell, R.R., Hand, D.W., Howe, K.J. and Tchobnoglous, G..
(2005). Water Treatment Principles and Design, 2nd edition, MWH, John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
CST Engineering Sdn. Bhd. (2007). Glemanrie Industrial Park, Shah Alam, Malaysia,
Sources gotten from the project engineering department.
Eckenfelder, W.W., Jr. (2000). Industrial Water Pollution Control, McGraw-Hill,
New York.
Edzwald, J.K. (1995). “Principle and Application of Dissolved Air Flotation,” Water
Sci. Technol., 31, 3/4, 1-23.
Fuller, G.W. (1933). “Progress in Water Purification,” J.AWWA, 25, 11, 1566-1576.
Gaudin (1957). A.M.Flotation, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hemming, M.L., Cottrell, W.T.R. and Oldfelt, S. (1977). “Experience in the
treatment of domestic sewage by the micro-flotation process.” In Paper and
Proceedings of the Water Research Centre Conference on Flotation for Water
and Waste Treatment, J.D.Melbourne and T.F.Zabel, eds.Medmenham,
U.K.:Water Research Centre.
Higbie, R. (1935). “The Rate of Absorption of Pure Gas into a Still Liquid during
Short Periods of Exposure,” Transaction American Institute of Chemical
Engineers, vol.31, p.365
Janssens, J.G., Ceulemans, J., and Dirickx, J. (1985). Experiences with direct
filtration: plant-scale evaluation and pilot-scale investigation, Proc. 5th Asia
Pacific Regional Water Supply Conf., Water Seoul’85, Seoul, SS6-4,1
Kitchener, J.A. (1984). “The froth flotation process: Past, present and future-in
brief.” In The Scientific Basis of Flotation, K.J.Ives, ed. NATO ASI Series.
The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Kitchener, J.A., and Gochin, R.J. (1981). “The mechanism of dissolved-air flotation
for potable water: Basic analysis and a proposal.” Water Research, U.K., 15,
585.
LaMer, V.K. (1964), “Coagulation symposium introduction.” Jour. Colloid Sci., 19,
291
Laws of Malaysia (2003), Environmental Quality Act and Regulation, Malaysia,
MDC Publisher Sdn. Bhd.
91
Lundgren, H. (1976). “Theory and practice of dissolved-air flotation.” Journal Filtration and
Separation, 13(1):24.
Ng, W.J., Anthony Goh, C.C. and Tay, J.H. (1988). Palm oil mill effluent treatment-
Liquid-solid Separation with Dissolved Air Flotation, Biological Wastes 25,
257-268.
Sherfold, H.L. (1984). “Flotation in Mineral Processing.” In the Scientific Basis of
Flotation, NATO ASI Series, K.J.Ives, ed. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus
Nijhoff Publishers.
Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F.L. and Stensel, H.D. (2003). Wastewater Engineering,
Treatment and Reuse, Fourth Edition, 2003. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., New York:
McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.
U.S. EPA (1989) "National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Filtration and
Disinfection; Turbidity, Giardia lamblia, Viruses, Legionella, and Hiteria;
Final Rule," Federal Register, 54,124, 27486.
U.S.EPA (1997). 1996 Clean Water Needs Survey Report to Congress, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 832-R-97-003, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA (1998). "National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Interim Enhanced
Surface Water Treatment: Final Rule," Federal Register, 63, 241, 69478-
69521.
U.S. EPA (2002). "National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Long Term 1
Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule; Final Rule," Federal Register, 67,9,
1812.
Vigneswaran, S. and Aim, R.B. (1989). Water, Wastewater and Sludge Filtration,
CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida.
WEF (1998). Design of Wastewater Treatment Plants, 4th ed., Manual of Practise
no.8, Water Environment Federation.
Zabel, T.F., and Melbourne, J.D. (1980) “Flotation.” In Development in Water
Treatment, vol.1, W.M.Lewis, ed.London, U.K.: Applied Sciences Publishers
Ltd.
Zakariya Bin Khamis. (1998). Kaedah Rawatan Air Menggunkan Sistem Dissolved
Air Flotation, Skudai, UTM.
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107