Professional Documents
Culture Documents
asyadi
Atomic Force
Microscopy
1
2
Motivation
• Digitally image a topographical surface
• Determine the roughness of a surface sample or
to measure the thickness of a crystal growth
layer
• Image non-conducting surfaces such as proteins
and DNA
• Study the dynamic behavior of living and fixed
cells
3
History
• The Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM) was
invented by G. Binnig and H. Rohrer, for which
they were awarded the Nobel Prize in 1984.
• A few years later, the first Atomic Force
Microscope (AFM) was developed by G. Binnig,
Ch. Gerber, and C. Quate at Stanford University
by gluing a tiny shard of diamond onto one end
of a tiny strip of gold foil.
• Currently, AFM is the most common form of
scanning probe microscopy.
4
How the AFM Works
• The AFM brings a probe in
close proximity to the
surface
• The force is detected by
the deflection of a spring,
van der Waals force curve
usually a cantilever (diving
board)
• Forces between the probe
tip and the sample are
sensed to control the
distance between the the
tip and the sample.
5
Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)
deflection
sensor
cantilever
feedback
probing tip
regulator
sample
high voltage
xy-piezo (lateral position) amplifier
z-piezo
(tip-sample distance)
Negative feedback keeps the force constant by adjusting the z-piezo such
6
that the up-down bending angle of the thin cantilever remains constant.
Atomic Force Microscopy
• Operates by measuring forces between sample and
probe tip. Force depends on nature of sample,
probe geometry, spring constant of probe, distance
between probe & sample, and any contamination on
surface.
• An atomically sharp tip is scanned over surface with
feedback mechanisms that enable the piezoelectric
scanners to maintain the tip at a constant height (to
obtain force info) above the sample surface.
• Tip is brought close enough to surface to detect
repulsive force between atoms in tip and sample.
7
Atomic Force Microscopy
10
Two Modes
Repulsive (contact)
• At short probe-sample
distances, the forces are
repulsive.
Attractive Force (non-
contact)
• At large probe-sample
distances, the forces are
attractive.
The AFM cantilever can be
used to measure both
attractive force mode and
repulsive forces. 11
Contact Mode
• Contact mode operates in the
repulsive regime of the van
der Waals curve
• Tip attached to cantilever with
low spring constant (lower
than effective spring constant
binding the atoms of the
sample together).
• In ambient conditions there is
also a capillary force exerted
by the thin water layer
van der Waals force curve
present (2-50 nm thick).
12
Non-Contact Mode
• Uses attractive forces to
interact surface with tip
• Operates within the van
der Waal radii of the atoms
• Oscillates cantilever near its
resonant frequency (~ 200
kHz) to improve sensitivity
• Advantages over contact: no
lateral forces, non-
van der Waals force curve
destructive/no contamination
to sample, etc.
13
Biological Applications: AFM Images of Cells
Contact mode image of human red blood cells - note cytoskeleton is
visible. blood obtained from Johathan Ashmore, Professor of Physiology Red Blood Cells
University College, London. A false color table has been used here, as Shao, et al., : http://www.people.virginia.edu/~js6s/zsfig/random.html
professorial blood is in fact blue. 15µm scan courtesy M. Miles and J.
Ashmore, University of Bristol, U.K.
http://www.people.virginia.edu/~js6s/zsfig/DNA.html
16
AFM vs. STM
1) The probe makes a direct contact with the surface or
calculates the incipient chemical bonding in AFM. The
STM images indirectly by calculating the quantum degree
tunneling between the probe and sample.
2) The tip in AFM touches the surface gently touches the
surface whereas in STM, the tip is kept at a short distance
from the surface.
3) AFM resolution is better than the STM. This is why AFM is
widely used in nano-technology.
4) When STM is only applicable to conductors, the AFM is
applicable to both conductors and insulators.
5) The AFM suits well with liquid and gas environments
whereas STM operates only in high vacuum. 17
CASE STUDY
18
19
20
21