You are on page 1of 443

STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 1

CHAPTER ONE

STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND


CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD
1.1. STABILITY OF STRUCTURES:
Before deciding the determinacy or indeterminacy of a structure we should first of all have a structure
which is stable. The question of determinacy or indeterminacy comes next. We shall now discuss 2-D or
single plane structures. (Defined and accommodated in a single plane).

1.1.1. STABLE STRUCTURE:


A stable structure is the one, which remains stable for any conceivable (imaginable) system of loads.
Therefore, we do not consider the types of loads, their number and their points of application for deciding
the stability or determinacy of the structure. Normally internal and external stability of a structure should be
checked separately and if its overall stable then total degree of indeterminacy should be checked.

1.2. ARTICULATED STRUCTURES:


This may be defined as “A truss, or an articulated structure, composed of links or bars, assumed to be
connected by frictionless pins at the joints, and arranged so that the area enclosed within the boundaries of
the structure is subdivided by the bars into geometrical figures which are usually triangles.”

1.3. CONTINUOUS FRAME:


“ A continuous frame is a structure which is dependent, in part, for its stability and load carrying capacity
upon the ability of one or more of its joints to resist moment.” In other words, one or more joints are more
or less rigid.

1.4. DETERMINACY:
A statically indeterminate structure is the one in which all the reactive components plus the internal forces
cannot be calculated only from the equations of equilibrium available for a given force system.These
equations, of course, are

∑ H = 0, ∑ V = 0 and ∑ M = 0

The degree of indeterminacy for a given structure is, in fact , the excess of total number of reactive
components or excess of members over the equations of equilibrium available.

It is convenient to consider stability and determinacy as follows.


a) With respect to reactions, i.e. external stability and determinacy.
b) With respect to members, i.e. internal stability and determinacy.
c) A combination of external and internal conditions, i.e. total stability and determinacy.
2 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

1.4.1. EXTERNAL INDETERMINACY:


A stable structure should have at least three reactive components, (which may not always be sufficient) for
external stability of a 2-D structure, which are non-concurrent and non-parallel.

Fig. 1.1. Stable & determinate.

000

Fig. 1.2. Stable & determinate.


External indeterminacy is, in fact, the excess of total number of reactive components over the equations of
equilibrium available.

3 + 2 =5
Fig. 1.3.

No. of reactions possible = 5


No. of Equations of equilibrium available = 3
Degree of External indeterminacy = 5 − 3 = 2

3 + 3 =6

Fig. 1.4
Stable & Indeterminate to 2nd degree. (Fig. 1.3)
Fig. 1.4. Stable & externally indeterminate to 3rd degree.

2 2 =4
Fig. 1.5.
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 3

Stable & Indeterminate to Ist degree. (Fig. 1.5)

3 + 1 + 2 + 2=8
Fig. 1.6.

Stable & externally indeterminate to 5th degree. (Fig. 1.6)

Remove any five suitable redundant reactions to make it statically determinate.

1.4.2. INTERNAL INDETERMINACY:


This question can be decided only if the minimum number of reactive components necessary for
external stability and determinacy are known and are acting on the structure. This type of
indeterminacy is normally associated with articulated structures like trusses. We assume that the
structure whose internal indeterminacy is being checked is under the action of minimum reactive
components required for external stability at the supports.

The basic form of the truss is a triangle.

To make the truss, add two members and one joint and repeat.

Fig 1.7
Let us assume that
j = Total number of joints.
b = Total number of bars.
r = Minimum number of reactive components
required for external stability/determinacy.

b + r = 2j
total number of total number of
unknowns. equations available (at joints).
4 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

1. If b+r = 2j Stable & internally determinate. Check the arrangement of


members also.

2. If b+r > 2j Stable & internally indeterminate.


(degree of indeterminacy would be
decided by the difference of these
two quantities).
3. If b+r < 2j Unstable.

A structure is said to have determinacy or indeterminacy only if it is stable. Now we consider some
examples.

4 8
y

2 3 5 7 9 11

x
1 6 10

Fig. 1.8.
b = 11
r = 3 (Minimum external reactions required for external stability/determinacy)

j = 7
b + r = 2j
11 + 3 = 2 × 7
14 = 14
This truss of fig. 1.8 is stable and internally determinate.

4 8 12

1 3 5 13 15
7 9 11

2 6 10 14

Fig. 1.9.
b = 15
r = 3
j = 9
b + r = 2j
15 + 3 = 2 × 9
18 = 18
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 5

The truss of fig. 1.9 is stable and internally determinate.

4 6 12 15

10
1 3 5 7 9 14 16 18
11

2 8 13 17

Fig. 1.10.
b = 18
r = 3
j = 10
b + r = 2j
18 + 3 = 2 × 10
21 > 20

This truss of fig. 1.10 is stable & internally indeterminate to 1st degree.

2 6 10 13

17
1 3 5 7 16
9 12 14

4 8 11 15

Fig. 1.11.

b = 16
r = 3
j = 10
b + r = 2j
17 + 3 = 2 × 10
20 = 20

This truss is Unstable by inspection although the criterion equation is satisfied. The members in
indicated square may get displaced and rotated due to gravity loads.
Always inspect member positions. Insert one member in the encircled box or manage prevention of
sliding by external supports to make it stable.

NOTE:- The difference between the internal and the external indeterminacy is only in the definition of ‘r’
1.4.3. TOTAL INDETERMINACY
The question of total indeterminacy is of little interest and we have got different equations for
different types of structures. For example, the previous equation, i.e., b + r = 2 j can be used to
check the total degree of indeterminacy of an articulated structure like truss by slightly modifying
the definition of “ r ” which should now be considered as the “total number of reactive
components available”.
6 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

b + r = 2j

where b = Total number of bars.


r = Total number of reactive components available.
j = Total number of joints
Example No. 1: Determine the external and internal conditions of stability and determinateness for the
following structures:-

2
3
9

4
1
7 8

5 6

Fig. 1.12

(i) External Stability And Determinacy:-


Number of reactive components available = 2
Number of equations of equilibrium available = 3
∴ Unstable. (Visible also)
(ii) Internal Stability And Determinacy
b = 9
r = 3
j = 6
b + r = 2j
9 + 3 = 2×6
12 = 12
Degree of Indeterminacy = D = 12 − 12 = 0
∴ Stable and Internally Determinate, if arrangement is improved to have Σ = 3.
Example No. 2:
Link

Fig. 1.13.
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 7

* In this case the presence of a pin at each end of the link makes one additional type of movement
possible if reaction components are removed. Two condition equations are therefore provided by
the link in terms of algebraic sum of moments equal to zero at the joints of link.

External Stability and Determinacy.


Number of reactive components = 5
*
Number of equations of equilibrium available = 3 + 2 = 5
Degree of indeterminacy = 5 − 5 = 0
∴ Stable and Externally Determinate. (Structure of fig. 1.13.)
Example No. 3:

1 2 3
14 18 19
11 15 22
7 8 9 10
13 12 16 20
17 21
4 5 6
00

Fig. 1.14.
(i) External Stability and Determinacy:−
Number of reactions = 3
Number of equations = 3
D=3−3= 0
∴ Externally Stable and Determinate
(ii) Internal Stability and Determinacy:-
b = 22
r = 3
j = 11
b + r = 2j
D = (b+r)−2j
= ( 22 + 3 ) − ( 2 × 11 )
= 25 − 22
D = 3 where D = Degree of indeterminacy.
∴ Stable and indeterminate to 3rd degree.
Example No. 4:

Continuous frame
Fig. 1.15.
External Stability and Determinacy:-
Number of reactions = 9
Number of equations = 3
D = 9−3= 6
∴ Stable and Indeterminate to 6th degree. (fig. 1.15).
8 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Example No. 5:
3

2 4

1 5

Fig 1.16
(i) External Stability And Determinacy :-
Number of reactions = 6
Number of equations = 3
Degree of indeterminacy = 6 − 3 = 3
∴ Stable and externally Indeterminate to 3rd degree.
(ii) Internal Stability and Determinacy :-
b = 6
r = 3, where r is the minimum reactive components required for external
j = 6 stability and determinacy.

Degree of indeterminacy of rigid jointed structure. (Fig. 1.16)


D = (3b + r ) − 3 j
D = (3×6+3)−(3×6)
D = 21 − 18
D = 3
∴ Stable and indeterminate to 3rd degree.
Example No. 6:
(i) External Stability and Determinacy :-
4
20 21
3 5
19 18
17
16 15

2
6
13 14
12
11 10

1 7
9
8

Fig. 1.17.
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 9

Number of reactions = 4
Number of equations = 3
D = 4−3= 1
∴ Stable and indeterminate to Ist degree.

(ii) Internal Stability and Determinacy :-


b = 21
r = 3
j = 11
D= (b+r)−2j
= ( 21 + 3 ) − 2 × 11
D = 24 − 22 = 2
∴ Stable and indeterminate to 2nd degree.

Note: In case of a pin jointed structure, there is one unknown per member and in case of rigid jointed
structure there are three unknowns at a joint.
Example No. 7:

oo

Fig. 1.18.

(i) External Stability and Determinacy :-


Number of reactions = 3
Number of equations = 3
D = 3−3=0
∴ Stable and Determinate.

(ii) Internal Stability and Determinacy :-


b = 38
r = 3
j = 20
D= (b+r)−2j
= (38 + 3) − 2 × 20
= 41 − 40
D = 1
∴ Stable and indeterminate to Ist degree. (Fig. 1.18)
Example No. 8:

oo

Fig. 1.19.
10 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

(i) External Stability and Determinacy :-


Number of reactions = 3
Number of equations = 3
D = 3−3 =0
∴ Stable and Determinate.

(ii) Internal Stability and Determinacy :-


b = 54
r = 3
j = 25
b+r = 2j
54 + 3 > 2 × 25
57 > 50
D = 57 − 50 = 7
∴ Stable and indeterminate to 9th degree. (Fig. 1.19)
Example No. 9:
1 2

10 14 17
7
3 4

8 11 15 18
5 13 6

9 12 16 19

Fig. 1.20.

(i) External Stability and Determinacy :-


Number of reactions = 12
Number of equations = 3
D = 12 − 3 = 9
∴ Stable and indeterminate to 9th degree.
(ii) Internal Stability and Determinacy :-
b = 19
r = 3
j = 16
D = (3b+r) =3j
= ( 3 × 19 + 3 ) = 3 × 16
= 60 > 48
D = 60 − 48 = 12
∴ Stable and Internally Indeterminate to twelfth degree. (Fig. 1.20)
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 11

Example No. 10:

10 1

9 11
4 2

7 8

6 5 3

Fig. 1.21.

(i) External Stability and Determinacy :-

Number of reactions = 6
Number of equations = 3
D = 6−3=3
∴ Stable and Indeterminate to 3rd degree.
(ii) Internal Stability and Determinacy : -

b
= 11
r
= 3
j
= 9
= (3b+r) −3j
D
= ( 3 × 11 + 3 ) − 3 × 9
= 36 − 27
D = 9
∴ Stable and indeterminate to 9th degree. (Fig. 1.21)

Example No. 11:

9 10

1 3 5
7 8

2 4 6

Fig. 1.22.
12 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

(i) External Stability and Determinacy :-


Number of reactions = 6
Number of equations = 3
D = 6−3= 3
∴ Stable and indeterminate to 3rd degree.
(ii) Internal Stability and Determinacy :-
b = 10
r = 3
j = 9
D= (3b+r)−3j
= ( 3 × 10 + 3 ) − 3 × 9
D = 33 − 27
D= 6
∴ Stable and indeterminate to 6th degree. (Fig. 1.22)
Example No. 12:

12

13 11
5 4

6 3

14 7 1 2 10

oo
8 9 oo
Fig. 1.23.

(i) External Stability and Determinacy :-


Number of reactions = 2
Number of equations = 3
∴ Unstable Externally. (Visible also)
(ii) Internal Stability and Determinacy :-
b = 14
r = 3
j = 8
D= (b+r)−2j
= ( 14 + 3 ) − 2 × 8
D= 1
∴ Stable and Internal Indeterminacy to Ist degree.
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 13

Example No. 13:

W
M=0
4 7 10 12 15
6 9 14 16 19
3 5 11 17
13
8
1
20
18
2

Fig. 1.24.

(i) External Stability and Determinacy :-


Number of reactions = 4
Number of equations = 3 + 1 = 4
D= 4−4 =0
∴ Stable and Determinate.
(ii) Internal Stability and Determinacy :-
b = 20
r = 4 (Note this. A roller at either support will create instability)
j = 12
(b+r)= 2j
( 20 + 4) = 2 × 12
24 = 24
D = 24 − 24 = 0
(Here minimum r is 4 for internal stability and determinacy.)
∴ Stable and determinate.
Example No. 14:
1 5 9 13 22 26 30
6 10 27
2 4 14 17 19 25 31
8 12 16 21 23 29 32
7 15 20 33
3 11 18 24 28

M=0 M=0 34 35
W
W

36
r=1 r=1 37
38 39 40
41
42 43

Fig. 1.25.
14 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

(i) External Stability and Determinacy :-


Number of reactions = 6
Number of equations = 3 + 2 = 5
D= 6−5 = 1
∴ Stable and Indeterminate to Ist degree.
(ii) Internal Stability and Determinacy :-
b = 43
r = 3 + 2 = 5 (take notice of it). Two pins where ΣM = 0
j = 24
b + r = 2j
43 + 5 = 2 × 24
48 = 48
D = 48 − 48 = 0
∴ Stable and Determinate. (Fig. 1.25)

Example No. 15:

M=0
M=0

M=0
M=0
M=0
Fig. 1.26.

(i) External Stability and Determinacy :-


Number of reactions = 8
Number of equations = 8 = (3 + 5)
D = 8−8=0
∴ Stable and Determinate.
(ii) Internal Stability and Determinacy :-
b = 42
r = 3 + 5 = 8. There are 5 joints where ΣM = 0
j = 25
b + r = 2j
42 + 8 = 2 × 25
50 = 50
D = 50 − 50 = 0
∴ Stable and Determinate.
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 15

Example No. 16:

2 16 3

14 15
13
12
8 9

1 4
11
10
7

6 oo 5 oo

(i) External Stability and Determinacy :-


Number of reactions = 4
Number of equations = 3
D = 4−3 = 1
∴ Stable and Indeterminate to Ist degree.
(ii) Internal Stability and Determinacy :-
b = 16
r = 3
j = 9
D= (b+r)−2j
= ( 16 + 3 ) − 2 × 9
= 19 − 18
D= 1
∴ Stable and Indeterminate to Ist degree.
In the analysis of statically determinate structures, all external as well as internal forces are completely
known by the application of laws of statics.Member sizes do not come into the picture as no compatibility
requirements are to be satisfied. However, in the analysis of indeterminate structures we should have
member sizes, sectional and material properties before doing the analysis as member sizes would be
involved in the determination of deflections or rotations which are to be put in compatibility equations
afterwards. Now we discuss methods for finding deflection and rotations.

1.5. METHODS FOR FINDING DEFLECTION AND ROTATION;-


Usually following methods are used in this classical analysis of structures..
--- Unit - load method. (Strain energy method).
--- Moment - area method.
--- Conjugate beam method (a special case of moment - area method).

1.5.1. MOMENT AREA THEOREM (1) ;-


The change of slope between tangents drawn at any two points on the elastic curve of an originally
straight beam is equal to the area of the B.M.D between these two points when multiplied by 1/EI
(reciprocal of flexural stiffness),
16 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Elastic curve
A B

θAB= ---
1 (Area of B.M.D.
EI
between A & B)

Tangent at A
θAB
1 (AREA)
θAB= ---
EI AB
Tangent at B

Signs of Change of Slope:-


Elastic curve
Tangent at A
A B

θAB
Tangent at B

θAB Elastic curve


Tangent at A

A B
Fig 2.1(a)
Tangent at B Fig 2.1 (b)

(a) Positive change of slope, θAB is counterclockwise from the left tangent. (Fig. 2.1a)
(b) Negative change of slope, θAB is clockwise from the left tangent. (Fig. 2.1b)

1.5.2. MOMENT AREA THEOREM (2) :-


“The deviation of any point on elastic curve from the tangent drawn at some other point on the
1
elastic curve is equal to multiplied by the moment of the area of the bending moment diagram
EI
between these two points”. The moment may generally be taken through a point where deviation is
being measured.

A B
Elastic curve.

t BA = Deviation of point B w.r.t


t BA = 1 (Area) X AB tangent at A
EI AB B

Fig 2.2 tangent at A

tangent at B
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 17

1.5.3. SIGN CONVENTION FOR DEVIATIONS:-


A
B

t BA=Deviation of point B on elastic curve w.r.t.


tangent at point A on elastic curve
Fig 2.2 (a) Positive deviation

tangent at A
t BA=Deviation of point B on elastic curve w.r.t.
tangent at point A on elastic curve

A Elastic curve B

Fig 2.2 (b) Negative deviation

(a) Positive Deviation:- B located above the reference tangent. (Tangent at A; Fig. 2.2a)
(b) Negative Deviation:- B located below the reference tangent. (Tangent at A; Fig. 2.2b)

1.5.4. INEQUALITY OF tBA AND tAB


Depending upon loading, these two deviations tab and tba may not be equal if loading is
unsymmetrical about mid span of the member.

Elastic curve
B
A

t t
AB BA

t t
AB BA
Reference tangent at B Reference tangent at A

Fig. 2.3

1.6. BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM BY PARTS:


In order to compute deviations and change of slope by moment area method, bending moment
diagram may be drawn in parts i.e. one diagram for a particular load starting from left to right.
Same sign convention would be followed for bending moment and shear force as have been
followed in subjects done earlier. Bending moment would be positive if elastic curve resembles
sagging i.e. compression at top fibers and tension at the bottom fibers while shear force would be
18 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

positive at a section of a portion being considered as a free body when left resultant force acts
upwards and right resultant force acts downwards. Negative bending moment and shear force
would be just opposite to this.

1.6.1. SIGN CONVENTIONS FOR SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT

Compression L
R
Positive B.M. Positive Shear Force

Tension
L R

Tension

Negative Shear Force


Negative B.M.
Compression
R
L
L R
Fig 2.4
Consider the following loaded beam. Start from faces on LHS and move towards RHS. Construct
BMS due to all forces encountered treating one force at a time only.
P1 P2

A B
C D
oo
Ra Rb
L/4 L/4 L/2

B.M.D. due to Ra = Ra x L
+

- B.M.D. due to P1
3 L
P1 x ---
4
B.M.D. due to P
- L 2
P2 x ---
2

- B.M.D. due to U.D.L.


WL2
(L/2) = ___
W x (L/2) x ___
2 8
We observe that the moment effect of any single specified loading is always some variation of the general
equation. Like
y = kXn (1)
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 19

This Relationship has been plotted below. While drawing bending moment diagrams by parts and starting
from left, for example, Ra is acting at A. Imagine that Ra is acting while support at A has been removed and
beam is fixed adequately at B ( just like a cantilever support), the deflected shape whether sagging or
hogging will determine the sign of B.M.D. Similar procedure is adopted for other loads.

x x

where k = constant
n = degree of
curve of
B.M.D A

n h
y=kX

y
i.e. y=PX k=P, n=1
2
y = wx
2 k = w/2, n=2
y X

X dx

b
Fig. 2.6
Generalized variation of B.M. w.r.t. x


Xd A
In general X =
A

Area of the strip = ydX = kXn dX by putting value of y.


b
Total area = A = ∫ kXn dX
o
n+1 b
A =
kX 
 n + 1 o

Kb(n+1)
A =
(n + 1)

We want to find the total area under the curve in terms of ‘b’ and ‘h’ and for that the constant ‘k’ has to be
evaluated from the given boundary conditions.

At X = b , y = h
Put this in (1) , y = kX n
we get h = kb n
h
or k = n Put this in equation for A above.
b
20 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

h bn+1
A = n Simplifying
b (n+1)

h bn . b
=
bn (n+1)
bh
So A= (2)
(n+1)
Now its centroid would be determined with reference to fig. 2.6..


X = ∫ X Ad A

= ∫ X (ydX)
A
Put y= kXn

∫ X kXA dX
n
=
b
k Xn+1 dX h bh
= ∫ Now put k= and A= we have
o A bn (n+1)
b
h/bn (X)n+1 dX
=∫
o bh/(n+1)
b
h (Xn+1) dX(n+1)
= ∫ simplifying step by step
o hbn+1
b
(n + 1)
= ∫ Xn+1dX
b n+1 o
b
(n + 1)  Xn+2 
=
b n+1 (n+2)o
(n + 1) bn+2
=
b n+1 (n+2)
(n + 1) bn+1 . b
= .
b (n+1) (n+2)

__ b (n+1)
X = (n+2) (3)


X is the location of centroid from zero bending moment
From above figure 2.6, we have
− /
X + X = b

/ −
∴ X = b − X

b (n + 1)
= b − Simplify
(n + 2)
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 21

b (n + 2) − b (n + 1)
=
(n + 2)

bn + 2b − bn − b
=
(n + 2)

/ b
X = (4)
(n+2)

This gives us the location of centroid from the ordinate of B.M.D

bh
A= (2)
(n+1)

Note:- While applying these two formulae to calculate the deflection and the rotation by moment area
method and with diagrams by parts, it must be kept in mind that these two relationship assume zero

slope of the B.M. Diagram at a suitable point. It may not be applied to calculate A & X within
various segments of the B.M.D where this condition is not satisfied. Apply the above equations for
area and centroid to the following example.

Tangent of elastic curve at A.

B
A
θab Cantilever under u.d.l

Elastic curve
L
L
x = ---
4

0
(-)
B.M.D

WL2
2nd degree curve 2
3
A = WL
Fig 2.7 6
22 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Tangent at A on
P Elastic curve.

A L B
ab
= t AB
a
Eleastic
curve

A
B.M.D

X = 2/3L
PL

X = L/3

Fig. 2.8
(−ve) sign in the deflection of diagram below does not mean that area is (−ve) but ordinate of BMD is
(−ve). For loads the fig. 2.7.

1 
A× 
3L
∆a =
EI  4

1 -WL3 3L
= ×
EI  6 4

−WL4
=
8EI

1.7. FIRST THEOREM OF CONJUGATE BEAM METHOD :−


In simple words the absolute slope at any point in the actual beam is equal to the shear force at the
M
corresponding point on the conjugate beam which is loaded by diagram due to loads on actual
EI
beam.

1.7.1. SECOND THEOREM OF CONJUGATE BEAM METHOD :-


The absolute deflection at any point in the actual beam is equal to the B.M at the corresponding
M
point on the conjugate beam which is loaded by diagram.
EI

The reader is reminded to draw conjugate beams for actual beams under loads very carefully by
giving due consideration to support conditions of actual beam. In general for a fixed and free end
of actual beam, the corresponding supports would be free and fixed in conjugate beam
respectively. Deflection ∆ at any point on actual beam is associated with the bending moment at
corresponding point on conjugate beam while rotation θ at any point on actual beam is associated
with shear force at corresponding point on conjugate beam. At an actual hinge support ∆ is equal
to zero and θ is there indicating non development of moment at the support (Shear force present,
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 23

bending moment zero). The corresponding support conditions in conjugate beam would be such
where bending moment is zero and shear force may be there i.e., a hinge is indicated. See the
following example.

EXAMPLE :- Calculate the central deflection by the conjugate beam method:

A L/2 B
EI=Constt. C Actual beam
under load
PL/4 P/2
P/2

+
1
A = --- x L x PL
--- B.M.D/EI
2 4EI
2
PL
= ---- PL/8EI
8EI

θa = θb = -----
2
PL
16EI Conjugate beam
under M/EI diagram
+ as a load
A/ C
/
B/
L/6
PL2 PL2
PL 2
16EI PL2
16EI
16EI 16EI

Fig. 2.9

PL2 L PL2 L
∆C = Mc′ = × − × (considering forces on LHS of
16EI 2 16EI 6
PL3 PL3 3PL3 − PL3 2EPL3
= − = = point C of shaded area)
32EI 96EI 96EI 96EI
3
PL
∆C =
48EI

1.8. STRAIN ENERGY :-


“The energy stored in a body when it undergoes any type of deformation (twisting, elongation,
shortening & deflection etc.) under the action of any external force is called the strain energy.” If
this strain energy is stored in elastic range it is termed as elastic strain energy. All rules relating to
strain energy apply. The units of strain energy are the same as that of the work i.e., joule (N − mm,
N − m).
24 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

1.8.1. TYPES OF STRAIN ENERGY :-


1.8.1.1 STRAIN ENERGY DUE TO DIRECT FORCE :-

L
P

AE = Axial Stiffness

Fig. 2.10

Work done by a gradually increased force ‘P’ is equal to area of load − deflection diagram = P/2 ∆.
(From graph)
… Stress ∝ Strain (Hooke’s Law)

So f ∝ ∈
f = Constt . ∈
f = E.∈
P ∆
= E×
A L
PL 1
so ∆ = Strain energy will be P∆ from above. So putting it we have.
AE 2
P  PL 
⇒ U = , where U is the internal strain energy stored.
2 AE
2
PL
U = (for single member)
2AE
2
PL
U =Σ (for several members subjected to axial forces)
2AE

1.8.1.2. STRAIN ENERGY DUE TO BENDING, SHEAR FORCE AND TORSION :-


L
M2 dX
(1) U = ∫ . This is elastic strain energy stored due to bending.
O 2 EI
L
Q2 ds
(2) Strain Energy Due to shear force:- U = ∫ where Q is shear force and G is shear modulus
O 2AG
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 25

L
T2 ds
(3) Strain Energy Due to Torsion:- U = ∫ (Consult a book on strength of Materials). Where
O 2GJ
T is Torque and J is polar moment of inertia.

1.9. CASTIGLIANO’S THEOREM :-


In 1879, Castigliano published two theorems connecting the strain energy with the deformations
and the applied loads.

1.9.1 CASTIGLIANO’S FIRST THEOREM :-


The partial derivative of the total strain energy stored with respect to a particular deformation
gives the corresponding force acting at that point.

Mathematically

P
M

∂U
= P Where U is strain energy stored in bending
∂∆

∂U
and = M. Here ∆ is connected with loads and θ with moment.
∂θ

1.9.2. CASTIGLIANO’S SECOND THEOREM :-


The partial derivative of the total strain energy stored with respect to a particular force gives the
corresponding deformation at that point.

Mathematically,
∂U
=∆
∂P
∂U
and = θ Here ∆ is connected with loads and θ with moment.
∂M

1.10. CONSISTENT DEFORMATION METHOD :-


This method may be termed as redundant force method or simply a force method. In this method,
the statically indeterminate structure is idealized as a basic determinate structure under the action
of applied loads plus the same structure under the action of redundant forces considered one by
one. The deformations produced at the points of redundancy are calculated in the above-mentioned
basic determinate structures and then these calculated deformations are put into compatibility
requirement for the structure. Normally these are satisfied at a joint.
26 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Now for a given beam, various possible Basic determinate structures (BDS) would be given. A
clever choice of BDS for a given structure can reduce the amount of time and labour.

1. First
alternative

θ
θ is present
θ is present

An indeterminate structure can be made determinate in several ways and the corresponding
quantities may be calculated very easily. However, we will notice that a clever choice of making a basic
determinate structure will reduce the time of our computations tremendously. In Figs. 2.11 and 2.12 various
options regarding choice of BDS are given while Figs. 2.13 and 2.14 illustrate how to make conjugate beam
for a given beam using the guidelines stated earlier. Consider another loaded beam in Fig. 2.15.
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 27

P P
A B
Ma
Ra
Fig. 2.15

P P
A
B
Rb has been chosen
B as redundant.

Basic determinte structure


under applied loads only.
B/
Fig. 2.15 a

where ∆B is the deflection at point B due to the applied loads.

1
A B

B.D.S. under unit


redundant force at B.
bb

Fig. 2.15 b

So compatibility of deformation at B requires that


∆B + Rb × δbb = 0 (Deflection Produced by loads Plus that by redundant should
where ∆B = Deflection at B due to applied loads in a BDS. be equal to zero at point B)
δbb = deflection at B due to redundant at B in a BDS.
∆B
or Rb = − (sign is self-adjusting)
δbb

P P

A
θa B Ma has been
considered as
redundant force.

Fig. 2.16

θa = Slope at point. A due to applied loads only in a BDS.


The other option of a simple beam as BDS is shown in fig. 2.16.
28 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

A ∝a a B

M=1

B.D.S. under unit redundant moment at A.


where aa = slope at A due to unit redundant moment at A.

Fig 2.16a

Compatibility equation θ a + Ma . ∝ aa = 0 (Slope created by loads + slope created by redundant


moment should be zero)
θa
or Ma = −
∝aa
“In consistent deformation method (force method ), there are always as many conditions of geometry as is
the number of redundant forces.”

1.11. Example No. 1:- Analyze the following beam by the force method. Draw S.F. & B.M. diagrams.

SOLUTION :-
P
Ma
L/2 L/2
B
A

EI = Constt.
Rb
Ra
Fig2.17

Number of reactions = 3
Number of equations = 2
Degree of Indeterminacy = 3 − 2 = 1
Indeterminate to Ist degree.

SOLUTION: (1) Chose cantilever as a basic determinate structure.

P 1
L/2 L/2 B
+ L B

EI = Constant B bb
B
Fig 2.17a Fig 2.17b B

δbb=Deflection of point B due to unit load at B


B.D.S. under applied loads. B.D.S. under unit redundant
force at B.
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 29

Therefore, now compatibility requirement is


∆B + Rb × δbb = 0 ( Deflection created by actual loads + deflection
created by redundant Rb should be equal to zero at support B)
∆B
or Rb = − → (1)
δbb
Therefore, determine these deflections ∆B and δbb in equation (1) either by moment area method
or by unit load method.

1.11.1. DETERMINE ∆B AND δbb BY MOMENT - AREA METHOD :-


P
A
L/2 L/2 B
PL
2 B
P
EI = Constant
/
PL PL2 B
Area of BMD = 1 x L x BDS under
2 2 2 = 8 applied loads

o BMD due to
applied loads.

2
PL/8
PL/2
L/6 L/3 L/2

I  PL2 L L
∆B = − +
EI  8  2 3 
I  PL2 5L
= − ×
EI  8 6
3
5PL
∆B = −
48EI
I
A L B
L
bb
I Fig 2.18 a
BDS under unit
redundant at B

o o
1 xLxL L2
=
2 2

BMD due
2/3 L Unit redundant
L=Lx1

I  L2 2L
δbb = − ×
EI  2 3
30 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

L3
δbb = − , Putting ∆B and δbb in equation (1)
3EI

 5PL2 L 3
Rb = − −
 48EI / −3EI  By putting ∆B and δbb in compatibility equation

5PL3 3EI 5P
= − × 3 =−
48EI L 16

The (− ve) sign with Rb indicates that the direction of application of redundant force is actually
5P
upwards and the magnitude of redundant force Rb is equal to . Apply evaluated redundant at point B.
16

P
3PL
Ma =
16
L/2 L/2
y

x
5P
11P
16 16

Fig. 2.19

∑fy = 0

Ra + Rb = P

5P 11P
Ra = P − Rb = P − = . Now moment at A can be calculated.
16 16

5P L 5PL PL
Direction of applied moment at A = ×L−P. = −
16 2 16 2

5PL − 8PL
=
16

3 PL
= −
16
3 PL
The (−ve) sign with indicates that the net applied moment about ‘A’ is clockwise. Therefore, the
16
reactive moment at the support should be counterclockwise (giving tension at top). Apply loads and
evaluate redundant on the given structure.
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 31

P
Ma = 3PL
16
L/2 L/2
EI = Constant Rb = 5P
11P 16
16

11P
16
+
0 0 S.F.D

5P
5PL 16
32
+
0 0 B.M.D
(-ve) B.M

3PL 8
X= L
16 11

Fig. 2.20

LOCATION OF POINT OF CONTRAFLEXURE :-

− P X −  = 0
5 PX L
MX =
16  2

5 PX PL
= − PX + = 0
16 2

11PX PL
= − + = 0
16 2

PL 11PX
= =
2 16
8L
X=
11
Note:- In case of cantilever, moment − area method is always preferred because slope is absolute
everywhere.

P
L/2 L/2 B
A
EI = Constant

Elastic curve
Fig. 2.21
32 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Solution: (2) As a second alternative, Chose Simply Supported Beam as a basic determinate structure.

BDS under BDS under


loads unit redundant

Fig. 2.21a Fig. 2.21b


1
B.M.D due
to unit redundant +
moment at A

diagram on
conjugate beam

L
2 2
6
2 2 L/3EI
(by 1st moment
Fig. 2.21c area theorem)
Fig 2.21d

L
∝ aa =
3EI
PL2
θa = (by 1st moment area theorem)
16EI
For fixed end, there is no rotation. Therefore compatibility equation becomes
θ a + Ma ∝ aa = 0 (slope at A created by loads + slope at A created
θa
So Ma = − by redundant should be zero).
∝aa
θ a & ∝ aa are the flexibility co−efficients. Putting these in compatibility equation
PL2 3EI
we have, Ma = − ×
16EI L
3PL
Ma = −
16
The (−ve) sign with Ma indicates that the net redundant moment is in opposite direction to that
assumed. Once Ma is known, Ra and Rb can be calculated.
3PL
16 P
L/2 L/2 B
A
EI = Constant

Ra= 11P Rb= 5P


16 16
Fig. 2.22
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 33

To calculate Rb, ∑Ma = 0

L 3PL
Rb × L − P × + = 0
2 16

PL 3PL
Rb × L = −
2 16

8 PL − 3 PL
=
16

5PL
Rb × L =
16

5P
Rb =
16
∑fy = 0
Ra + Rb = P so Ra = P − Rb
5P
= P −
16
11P
Ra =
16

Note:- In case of simply supported beam, conjugate beam method is preferred for calculating slopes and
deflections.
1.12. Example No. 2:- Analyze the following beam by the force method. Draw S.F. and B.M. diagrams.

SOLUTION :-

WKN/m Mb
Ma
A B
EI = Constant

Ra Rb
No. of reactions = 4
No. of equations = 2
Degree of Indeteminacy = 4 - 2 = 2
Indeterminate to 2nd degree.

Fig. 2.23

Choosing cantilever with support at A as BDS. Vertical reaction at B and moment at B will be
redundants. To develop compatibility equations at B regarding translation and rotation at B, we imagine the
BDS under applied loads and then under various redundants separately.
34 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

WKN/m
B
A

B
B
L b
Fig. 2.23a B.D.S under loads tangent at B

1
+
B
A

EI = con bb
st ant
L B
bb

Fig. 2.23b B.D.S. under redundant unit


vertical force at B
1
+
B
A
EI=con
sta nt bb

B
L bb

Fig. 2.23c B.D.S. under unit redundant


moment at B
Compatibility Equations

∆B + Vb × δbb + Mb × δ′bb = 0 → (1) For vertical displacement at B

θB + Vb × ∝′ bb + Mb × ∝bb = 0 → (2) For redundant moment at B


Notice that rotation produced by Unit load at B (α'bb) and deflection produced by unit moment of B (δ'bb)
are denoted by dash as superscript to identify them appropriately.
In matrix form

δbb δ′bb  Vb  = - ∆B


∝′bb ∝bb Mb - θB 
↑ ↑ ↑
Structure flexibility Column vector Column vector of
matrix. of redundants. flexibility coefficients.

Vb  = δbb δ′bb  - ∆B


Mb ∝′bb ∝bb - θB 
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 35

Now we evaluate ∆B, θb, δbb, α'bb, δ'bb and ∝bb with the help of moment area theorems
separately, where ∆ = Deflection at B in BDS due to applied loads
θb = Rotation at B in BDS due to applied loads.

WKN/m
WL2 B
2 A

WL
L
B.D.S. under loads
Fig. 2.24a
B.M.S. due to 3L
applied loads. X = L/4 4

0 0

B.M.D
3
WL
WL 2 6
2

Calculate area of BMD and fix its centroid

bh L × (− WL2) WL3
A = = = − b = width of BMD.
(n+1) (2+1) 6
h = ordinate of BMD.

b L L
X′ = = = By applying second theorem of moment area, we have
n+2 (2 + 2) 4

1  WL3 3  WL4
∆B = − × L = −
EI  6 4  8EI

1  WL3 WL3
θb = − = −
EI  6  6EI
36 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

1
L B
A

L
Fig. 2.24b B.M.D. due to unit redundant force at B

1 x L x L = L2
2 2
0 0

L L/3 2L/3

B.D.S. under unit redundant force at B.

1  L2 2  L3
δbb = − × L = − ; δbb = Deflection at B due to unit redundant at B
EI  2 3  3EI

1  L2 L2
α′bb = − = − ; α′bb = Rotation at B due to unit redundant at B
EI  2  2EI

1 1
A B
δbb
/
B α′bb
L
Fig. 2.24c B.D.S under unit redundant
moment at B
Lx1=L

L/2
0 0
B.M.D
1 1

1  L2
−L×  = −
L
δ′bb =
EI  2 2EI

1 L
∝bb −L = −
EI [ ]
=
EI
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 37

Normally BMD’s are plotted on the compression side of beam.

Putting values in first equation, we have


WL4 L3 L2
− − Vb × − Mb = 0 (1) multiply by 24 and simplify to get
8EI 3EI 2EI
equation (3)

Putting values in second equation, we have (2) multiply by 6 and simplify to get
WL3 Vb x L2 L x Mb
− − − = 0 equation (4)
6EI 2EI EI

− 3 WL4 − 8 L3 × Vb − 12 L2 × Mb = 0 (3)

or 3 WL4 + 8 L3 Vb + 12 L2 Mb = 0 (3)

− WL3 − 3 L2 Vb − 6 L Mb = 0 (4)

or WL3 + 3 L2 Vb + 6 L Mb = 0 (4)

Multiply (4) by 2 L & subtract (4) from (3)

3 WL4 + 8 L3 Vb + 12 L2 Mb = 0 (3)

2 WL4 + 6 L3 Vb + 12 L2 Mb = 0 (4)

WL4 + 2 L3 Vb = 0
WL4 = − 2 L3 Vb
WL4
Vb = −
2L3
WL
Vb = −
2

The (−ve) sign with Vb shows that the unit redundant load at B is in upward direction.( Opposite
to that assumed and applied)
Putting the value of Vb in (3)

3 WL4 + 8 L3 − WL + 12 L2 Mb = 0
 2 
or 3 WL4 − 4 WL4 + 12 L2 Mb = 0
WL4 = 12 L2 Mb
WL4
Mb =
12L2
WL2
Mb =
12
The ( +ve) sign with Mb indicates that the assumed direction of the unit redundant moment at B
is correct. Now apply the computed redundants at B and evaluate and apply reactions at A.
38 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

WKN/m
2
Ma= WL Mb= WL
2
12 A B
12

Va=WL/2 L Vb=WL/2
Fig. 2.25
WL2
24

0 0

B.M.D
WL2 WL2
12 12
0.789 L

0.211L 0.578L 0.211L

Points of Contraflexure : -

B as origin :- write moment expression

WL WL2 WX2
Mx = X − − = 0
2 12 2

12
Multiply by and re-arrange.
W

6 X2 − 6 LX + L2 = 0

6L ± 36 L2 − 4 × 6 × L2
X = +
2×6

6L ± 36 L2 − 24 L2
=
12

6L ± 12 L2
=
12

6L ± 2 3 L2
=
12

6 L ± 3.464 L
=
12
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 39

9.464 L 2.536 L
= ,
12 12

X = 0.789 L , 0.211 L Location of point of contraflexure


From both ends.
X = 0.211 L
Same can be done by taking A as origin and writing moment expression : −
WLX′ WL2 WX′2
Mx′ = − − = 0
2 12 2

6 WLX′ − WL2 − 6 WX′2 = 0 Simplify

L2
LX′ − − X′2 = 0
6

L2
X′2 − LX′ + = 0
6

L2
L± L2 − 4 × 1 ×
6
X′ =
2×1

2 L2
L ± L2 −
3
=
2

L2
L ±
3
=
2

1 2
L ± .L
3
=
2

L ± 0.577 L
X′ =
2

X′ = 0.789 L , 0.211 L Location of points of contraflexure.

X′ = 0.211 L
We get the same answer as before.
This is a flexibility method and was written in matrix form earlier. The matrix inversion process is
given now for reference and use.
40 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

1.13. MATRIX INVERSION : -


These co-efficients may also be evaluated by matrix Inversion so basic procedures are given.
Adjoint of matrix
Inverse of matrix =
Determinant of matrix

Adjoint a matrix = Transpose ( Interchanging rows & columns) of matrix of


co-factors.
Co-factors of an element = (− 1)i+j × minor of element.where i = Row number in which
that element is located and j = Column number in which that element is located.
Minor of element = Value obtained by deleting the row & the column in which that
particular element is located and evaluating remaining determinant.
Let us assume a matrix :
1 3 7 
A = 4 5 9 
8 10 11

Determinant of matrix A = 1 (5 × 11 − 10 × 9 )− 3 (44 − 72) + 7 ( 4 × 10 − 8 × 5 )


= − 35 + 84 + 0
= 47
MINORS OF MATRIX :-
Find out the minors for all the elements of the matrix. Then establish matrix of co-factors.

-35 -28 0 
Matrix of Minors= -37 -45 -14
-8 -19 -7 

-35 28 0
Matrix of co-factors = 37 -45 14
-8 19 -7 

-35 37 -8
Adjoint of matrix A = 28 -45 19 
0 14 -7 

1 
-35 37 -8
Inverse of matrix =
49 28 -45 19 
0 14 -7 

-0.71 0.755 -0.163 


A-1 = 0.571 -0.918 0.387
0 0.286 -0.143
1 0 0
A x A−1 = I = 0 1 0 Check for correct matrix inversion
0 0 1
Aij x Bjk = Cik
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 41

1 3 7 −0.71 0.755 −0.163


A A−1 = 4 5 9 0.571 −0.918 0.387 
8 10 11 0 0.286 −0.143 

−1×0.71+3×0.571+7×0 1×0.755−3×0.918+7×0.286 −1×0.163+3×0.387 −7×0.143


=  0 1 0 
 0 0 1 
1 0 0 
AA−1 = 0 1 0 Proved.
0 0 1
1.14. 2ND DEGREE INDETERMINACY :-
Example No. 3:
Solve the following continuous beam by consistent deformation method.

40 kN

A B C D

3m 4m 5m
EI = constant
Fig. 2.26
In this case, we treat reaction at B and C as redundants and the basic determinate structure is a
simply supported beam AD.

40 kN

A D
B C

Fig. 2.26 a
Bending under applied loads

1
A B C D
bb cb
Fig. 2.26 b
Bending under unit redundant force at B

A B C D
bc cc
Fig. 2.26 c
Bending under unit redundant force at C
42 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Compatibility equations are as follows:


∆B + δbb × Rb + δbc × Rc = 0 → (1) For compatibility at B
∆C + δcb × Rb + δcc × Rc = 0 → (2) For compatibility at C
Evaluate the flexibility co-efficients given in equation (1) and (2). Using Conjugate beam method.
40 KN
A 5m 7m D
16.67 KN
23.33 KN 23.33
+ 0 S.F.D.
∑ MD=0 16.67
RAx12 - 40x7=0 116.67 KN
RA=23.33 KN
∑ FY=0 B.M.D.
+
RA+RD=40
RD=16.67 KN 116.67
70/EI EI 83.35/EI
3 5

A B C D’
M diagram
5.67 6.33 EI

369.455 291.675 700.02 408.345 330.565


EI EI EI EI EI
In general for a simple beam loaded as below,
the centroid is a shown

W
a b
L

Wab
M=
L

L+a L+b
3 3

Fig. 2.27

∑MD′ = 0, Calculate RA'


291.675  1  408.345 2 x 7
RA′ × 12 =
EI 7 + 3 5 + EI 3 
2527.85 1905.61
= +
EI EI

369.455
RA′ =
EI

∑Fy = 0
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 43

369.455 700.02
RA′ + RD′ = + RD' =
EI EI
700.02 369.455
RD′ = −
EI EI

330.565 M
RD′ = . Now ordinates of diagram are determined by comparing
EI EI
Similar triangles.

116.67 Y 70
= ⇒ Y=
5 EI 3 EI

Now by using conjugate beam method (theorem 2)

∆B =
1 369.455 × 3 − 1 × 3 × 70 × 3
EI  2  3
1003.365
∆B = KN − m3
EI

Determine
116.67 Y
=
7 5
Y = 83.34
1 
330.565 × 5 −  × 5 × 83.34 × 
1 5
∆C =
EI  2  3
1305.575
∆C = KN − m3
EI

Now apply unit redundant at B.

1
A 3m B 4m C 5m D
bb cb
Fig. 2.28
2/3 1/3

2.25/EI
1.25/EI

A B C D

13.5
5 7

7.875/EI Conjugate beam under M/EI 5.625/EI


44 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Computing Co-efficients by Conjugate beam method. (Theorem 2)


1
MB' = δbb = [ 7.875 × 3 − 3.375 × 1 ]
EI
20.25
δbb = KN − m3
EI
2.25 Y
Determine ordinate =
9 5
1.25
Y =
EI
1 
5.625 × 5 − 3.125 × 
5
MC' = δcb =
EI  3
22.92
δcb = KN − m3
EI
Now apply unit redundant at C.
I

bc cc
1x7x5
2.92 12
=2.92

2.92
EI

bc cc
A D
B C

8.28 9.24
EI 6.33 m 5.67 m

17.52
EI
Fig. 2.29 Conjugate beam under M/EI

Moment at B’ in conjugate beam gives


1 
8.28 x 3 − x 1.25 x 3 x 1
1
MB' = δbc =
EI  2 
22.965
MC' = δbc = KN − m3 (δbc = δcb ) PROVED.
EI
1 
9.24 x 5 − x 2.92 x 5 x 
1 5
δcc =
EI  2 3
34.03
δcc = KN − m3.
EI
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 45

Inserting evaluated Co-efficients in equation (1) and (2)


1003.365 20.25 22.965
+ Rb + Rc = 0 (1)
EI EI EI

1003.365 + 20.25 Rb + 22.965 Rc = 0 (3) Canceling 1/EI throughout

1305.575 22.92 34.03 1


+ Rb + Rc = 0 (4) Cancelling throughout
EI EI EI EI
1305.575 + 22.92 Rb + 34.03 Rc = 0 (4)

Multiply (3) by 22.92 and (4) by 20.25 & subtract (4) from (3)

22997.1258 + 464.13 Rb + 526.357 Rc = 0 (3)


26437.8938 + 464.13 Rb + 689.1075 Rc = 0
(4)
− 3460.768 − 162.75 Rc = 0

Rc = − 21.264 KN Putting this in equation (3)

1003.365 + 20.25 Rb − 22.963 × 21.264 = 0

Rb = − 25.434 KN

The ( −ve) signs with the values of the redundants are suggestive of the fact that the directions of
the actual redundants are in fact upwards. Now apply loads and evaluated redundants to original beam
calculate remaining reaction.

A B C D
3m 4m 5m

Fig. 2.30

∑Fy = 0 Considering all upwards at this stage as Ra and Rd are unknown.


RA + RD + 25.434 + 21.264 − 40 = 0
RA + RD = −6.698 → (1)

∑MD = 0 Considering all upward reactions


RA × 12 + 25.454 × 9 − 40 × 7 + 21.264 × 5 = 0
RA = − 4.602 KN . It actually acts downwards.
RD = − RA − 6.698
= 4.602 − 6.698
RD = − 2.096 KN All determined reactions are shown in figure 2.30
above sketch SFD and BMD.
46 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Elastic curve

Fig. 2.31

S.F.D.

B.M.D.

LOCATION OF POINTS OF CONTRAFLEXURE :- These are in Span BC.

A as origin. Write moment expression and equate to zero.

MX1 = − 4.602 X1 + 25.434 ( X1 − 3 )

− 4.602 X1 + 25.434 X1 − 76.302 = 0

X1 = 3.663 m from A.

D as origin. Write moment expression and equate to zero.

MX2 = − 2.096 X2 + 21.264 ( X2 − 5 ) = 0

− 2.096 X2 + 21.264 X2 − 106.32 = 0

19.168 X2 − 106.32 = 0

X2 = 5.547 m.

These locations are marked above in BMD.


STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 47

1.15. 3RD DEGREE INDETERMINACY :-


Example No. 4:
Solve the frame shown below by consistent deformation method.
outer sides

inner sides
outer sides outer sides

B.M is +ve for


Fig. 2.32 Tension on inner sides
1.15.1. SOLUTION:
Sign convention for S.F. and B.M. remains the same and are shown above as well. In this case, any
force or moment which creates tension on the inner side of a frame would be considered as a (+ve)
B.M. Removing right hand support to get BDS. The loads create three defermations as shown.

Fig. 2.33 (a) Fig. 2.33 (b)


Note: ∆DH = Deflection of point D in horizontal direction due to applied loads on BDS.
∆DV = Deflection of point D in vertical direction due to applied loads on BDS.
θ D = Rotation of point D due to applied loads on BDS.
B C
4m
4m
6m
D 1
ddv
1
1
dd ddh
A
m -Diagram

Fig. 2.33c B.D.S. under unit vertical Fig. 2.33d B.D.S. under unit rotational
redundant force at D redundant moment at D
48 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Where (See mH diagram Fig. 2.33b)


δddh = Deflection of point D due to unit load at D in horizontal direction acting on BDS.
δ'ddv = Deflection of point D, in vertical direction due to unit load at D in horizontal direction.
α'ddh= Rotation of point D, due to unit load in horizontal direction at D acting on BDS.

(See mV diagram Fig: 2.33c)


δddv = Deflection of point D due to unit load at D in vertical direction.
δ'ddh = Deflection of point D (in horizontal direction) due to unit vertical load at D.
α'ddv = Rotation of point D due to unit vertical load at D.

(See mθ diagram Fig: 2.33d))


α'ddh = Horizontal deflection of point D due to unit moment at D.
α'ddv = Vertical deflection of point D due to unit moment at D.
αdd = Rotation of point D due to unit moment at D.

Compatibility equations :-
∆DH + HD × δddh + VD × δ′ddv + MD × ∝′ddh = 0 (1) Compatibility in horizontal direction at D.
∆DV + HD × δ′ddh + VD × δddV + MD × ∝′ddV = 0 (2) Compatibility in vertical direction at D.
θD + HD × ∝′ddh + VD × ∝′ddv + MD × ∝dd = 0 (3) Compatibility of rotation at D
Now evaluate flexibility co-efficients used in above three equations. We know that

∫ EI
1
∆ or θ = ( Mmdx )
There are 12 co-efficients to be evaluated in above three equations.

M × mH
So ∆ DH = ∫ EI
dx (1)

(mH)2 dx
δddh = ∫ EI
(2)


mH mv dx
δ′ddh = (3)
EI

M × (mv ) dx
∆ Dv = ∫ EI
(4)

(mH × mv ) dx
δ′ddv = ∫ EI
(5)

(mv)2 dx
δ ddv = ∫ EI
(6)

mv × mθ
∝′ddv = ∫ EI
dx (7)
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 49

∫ ( M ) ( m θ ) dx
1
θD = (8)
EI

1
EI ∫
∝′ddh = ( mH ) ( m θ ) dx (9)

∫ ( mv ) ( mθ ) dx
1
∝′ddv = (10)
EI


1
∝dd = ( mθ )2 dx (11)
EI
Multiplying the corresponding moment expressions in above equations, we can evaluate above
deformations. Draw M-diagram.
10KN
B 2m 2m C
F
4m
3m

20 KN
E

D
3m

x
80 KN-m
A 20KN

M - Diagram
10KN

M = 10 x 2 + 20 x 3 = + 80KN-m
Fig. 2.34 B.D.S under applied loads
M – Diagram by parts
10KN
20KN-m 10KN
x x
20KN-m B C
B F
2m 2m C
x 3m
4m
10KN
20KN
E
x D
3m

80KN-m
x 20KN
M=20 x 6-20 x 3 - 80 = 20KN-m
A

10KN
50 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

4
4 B F C
B C 1 1
4m +
B 4
1 1 C

4m

E 6m
1 D 1
D

A 2
A
2
1 1

MH - Diagram

Fig. 2.34a Fig 2.34b

4 1
1 1
B C 1 B C
F C F 1
B 4 B
1 1 C
1

E E
D 1

D
1
A A
4 1
1 mv-diagram (by parts) m -diagram (by parts)

Fig 2.34c Fig 2.34d

Moments expressions in various members can now be written in a tabular form.


Portion Origin Limits M mH mv MO
AE A 0−3 20X − 80 X−2 −4 −1
BE B 0−3 − 20 −X+4 −4 −1
BF B 0−2 10X − 20 4 X−4 −1
CF C 0−2 0 4 −X −1
CD D 0−4 0 X 0 −1
Put these moment expressions, integrate and evaluate co-efficients
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 51


1
∆DH = M ( mH ) dX
EI
1  
3 3 2

EI o
∆DH = ∫ (20X − 80) (X − 2) dX + ∫ (−X+4) (−20) dX + ∫ (10X − 20) 4 dX + 0 + 0
o o 
1  
3 3 2

EI o
= ∫ (20X2 − 80X − 40X + 160 ) + ∫ (20X − 80 )dX+∫ ( 40X − 80 ) dX
o o 
1 20X3 80X2 4X2 
3 3 4
20X2 40X2
 + 160X + − 80X | + 
=
EI  3

2

2 o 2 o  2 − 80 X o
1 20 × 33
= − 40 × 32 − 20 × (3)2 + 160 × 3 + (10 × 9 − 80 × 3) + (20 × 4 − 80 × 2)
EI  3  
110
∆ DH = −
EI

∫ ( mH )
1
δ ddh = 2
dX
EI

1  
3 3 2 2 4

EI o
= ∫ (X − 2)2 dX +∫ (−X + 0)2dX +∫ 16 dX +∫ 16 dX + ∫ X2 dX
o o o o 
1  
3 3 2 2 4

EI o
δddh = ∫ (X − 4X + 4) dX + ∫ (16 − 8X + X2) dX + ∫ 16 dX + ∫ 16 dX + ∫ X2 dX
o o o o 
1 X3 4X2 X3 
3 3 2 2 4
8X2 X3
= 
EI  3

2
+ 4X | +16X −
2
+
3 o
| + 16X | + 16X | +   
3 o
o o o
3 3
(4)3
=  − 2 (3)2 + 4 × 3 + 16 × 3 − 4 × 9 +  + (16 × 2) + (16 × 2) +  − 0
1 3 3
EI  3   3  3 

109.33
δddh =
EI

∫ ( mH ) ( mv ) dX
1
δ'ddV =
EI

1  
3 3 2 2

EI o
= ∫ (X − 2) ( − 4 ) dX + ∫ (−X + 4 ) (−4 ) dX + ∫ ( 4 ) (X−4 ) dX + ∫ 4 (−X ) dX + 0
o o o 

1  
3 3 2 2

EI o
= ∫ (− 4X+8 ) dX +∫ (4X − 16 ) dX + ∫ (4X−16 ) dX + ∫ − 4XdX
o o o 

1  4X2 4X2 
3 3 2 2
4X2 4X2
= −
EI  2
+ 8X | +  −16X | +  − 16X | +  −
2  
o 2 o 2 o o
52 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

1
 − 2 × (3)2 + 8 × 3  + (2 × 32 − 16 × 3 ) + ( 2 × 22 − 16 × 2 ) + ( − 2 × 22 )]
EI [
=

56
δ′ddV = −
EI

∫ ( mH ) ( mθ ) dX
1
∝′ddh =
EI
1  
3 3 2 2 4

EI o
= ∫ (−1 ) (X − 2) dX + ∫ (−1) (−x + 4) dX + ∫ − 4 dX + ∫ − 4 dX + ∫ − XdX
o o o o 

1  X2 X2 
3 3 2 2 4
X2
= −
EI  2
+ 2X | + 
2
−4X | +  − 4X | +  − 4X | +  −  
2 o
o o o o

1  9 42
− + 2 × 3 +  − 4 × 3 + (− 4 × 2) + (− 4 × 2) + − − 0
9
=
EI  2  2   2 
30
α′ddh = −
EI

∫ M ( mθ ) dX
1
θD =
EI
1  
3 3 2

EI o
= ∫ − (20X − 80 ) dX + ∫ 20 dX + ∫ (−10X + 20 ) dX + 0 + 0
o o 

1  20X2 
3 3 2
10X2
= 
EI 
− + 80X | +  20X | +  − + 20X | 
2 o o 2 o
1
=
EI [
(−10 × 3 + 80 × 3) + (20 × 3) + (− 5 × 4 + 20 × 2)
2
]
230
θD =
EI

∫ M ( mv ) dX
1
∆ Dv =
EI
1  
3 3 2

EI o
= ∫ (20X − 80) (−4) dX + ∫ (−20) (−4) dX + ∫ (10X − 20) (X − 4) dX + 0 + 0
o o 

1  
3 3 2

EI o
= ∫ (− 80X + 320) dX + ∫ 80 dX + ∫ (10X2 − 20X − 40X + 80) dX
o o 

1  
3 3 2
X2 X3 60X2
= 
EI 
− 80 + 320X | +  80X | +  10 − + 80X | 
2 o o 3 2 o
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 53

1 
(−40 × 9 + 320 × 3) + (80 × 3) +  × 8 − 30 × 4 + 80 × 2
10
=
EI  3 

906.67
∆Dv =
EI

∫ ( mH ) ( mv ) dX
1
δ′ddh =
EI
1  
3 3 2 2

EI o
= ∫ (X−2) (−4) dX + ∫ (−X + 4) (−4) dX + ∫ 4 (X−4) dX + ∫ − 4XdX + 0
o o o 

1  
3 3 2 2

EI o
= ∫ (−4X + 8)dX + ∫ (4X − 16) dX + ∫ (4X − 16) dX + ∫ − 4XdX
o o o 

1  4X2 4X 
3 3 2 2
4X2 4X2
=  −
EI  2
+ 8X | + 
2
− 16X | + 
2
− 16X | +  
2 o
o o o
1
=
EI [
(−2 × 9 + 8 × 3) + (2 × 9 − 16 × 3) + (2 × 4 − 16 × 2) + (−2 × 4) ]
56
δ′ddh = −
EI

∫ ( mv ) dX
1
δddv = 2
EI

1  
3 3 2 2

EI o
= ∫ 16 dX + ∫ 16 dX + ∫ (X − 4)2 dX + ∫ (−X)2dX + 0
o o o 

1  
3 3 2 2

EI o
= ∫ 16 dX+∫ 16 dX+∫ (X2 − 8X +16)dX+∫ + X2 dX
o o o 

1  X3 
3 3 2 2
X3 8X2
= 
EI 
16X | +  16X | + 
3

2
+ 16X | + | +  
3 o
o o o

1 
(16 × 3 ) + ( 16 × 3 ) +  − 4 × 4 + 16 × 2 + + 
8 8
=
EI  3   3

117.33
δddv =
EI
54 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

∫ mv × mθ dX
1
∝′ddv =
EI

1  
3 3 2 2

EI o
= ∫ + 4 dX + ∫ + 4 dX + ∫ (−X + 4) dX + ∫ XdX
o o o 

1  X2 
3 3 2 2
X2
= 4X | +  4X | +  −
EI  o 2
+ 4X | + |  
2 o
o o

1  22
= (4 × 3) + (4 × 3) + (−2 + 4 × 2) +  
EI   2 

32
∝′ddv =
EI

∫ ( mθ )
1
∝dd = 2
dX
EI

1  
3 3 2 2 4

EI o
= ∫ (−1)2 dX + ∫ (−1)2 dX + ∫ (−1)2 dX + ∫ (−1)2 dX + ∫ (−1)2 dX
o o o o 

1  
3 3 2 2 4

EI 
=  X | +  X | +  X | +  X | +  X |
o o o o o

=
1
EI
[3 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 4 ]
14
∝dd =
EI

Putting all values of evaluated co-efficients, equations 1,2 and 3 become


110 109.33 56 30
− + × HD − × VD − MD = 0 (1)
EI EI EI EI

906.67 56 117.33 32
and − × HD + × VD + M = 0 (2)
EI EI EI EI D

230 30 32 14
and − × HD + × VD + M = 0 (3) Simplifying
EI EI EI EI D

−110 + 109.33 HD − 56 VD − 30 MD = 0 → (1)


906.67 − 56 HD + 117.33 VD + 32 MD = 0 → (2)
230 − 30 HD + 32 VD + 14 MD = 0 → (3)
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 55

From Eq (1)
−110 + 109.33 HD − 56 VD
MD = = −3.67 + 3.64 HD − 1.86 VD → (4)
30

Putting in Eq (2)
906.67 − 56 HD + 117.33 VD + 32 (−3.67 + 3.64 HD − 1.86 VD) = 0
906.67 − 56 HD + 117.33 VD − 117.44 + 116.5 HD − 59.52 VD = 0
789.23 + 60.5 HD + 57.81 VD = 0
HD = −13.045 − 0.95 VD → (5)

Putting the value of HD in Eq (4)


MD = −3.67 + 3.64 (−13.045 − 0.95 VD) − 1.86 VD
MD = −51.15 − 5.32 VD → (6)

Putting the values of MD & HD in Eq (3)


230 − 30 (−13.045 − 0.95 VD) + 32 VD + 14 (−51.15 − 5.32 VD) = 0
230 + 391.35 + 28.5 VD + 32 VD − 716.1 − 74.5 VD = 0
−14 VD − 94.75 = 0
VD = −6.78 KN

Putting in (5) & (6)


HD = −6.61 KN, MD = −15.08 KN−m

From any equation above. We get

VD = − 12.478 KN

Apply the evaluated structural actions in correct sense on the frame. The correctness of solution
can be checked afterwards by equilibrium conditions.

10KN
B C
2m 2m

3m 4m
20KN
15.08KN=m
D
6.61KN
3m
Ma=1.8 KN 12.478 KN
A Ha=13.39 KN

Va = 2.478 KN

Fig. 2.35 shows all reactions after Evaluation


56 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

∑Fx = 0
20 − Ha − 6.61 = 0

Ha = 13.39 KN

∑Fy = 0
Va + 12.478 − 10 = 0 (asuming Va upwards)

Va = − 2.478 KN
0
Ma+ 20 × 3 + 10 × 2 − 12.478 × 4 − 6.61 × 2 − 15.08 = 0 (assuming Ma
clockwise)

Ma = − 1.8 KN-m
ΣMa = 0 12.478 × 4 + 15.08 + 6.61 × 2 + 1.8 − 20 × 3 − 10 × 2 = 0 Proved.

1.16. ANALYSIS OF STATICALLY EXTERNALLY INDETERMINATE TRUSSES :-


A truss may be statically indeterminate if all external reactive components and internal member
forces may not be evaluated simply by the help of equations of equilibrium available. The
indeterminacy of the trusses can be categorized as follows :-

(1) Trusses containing excessive external reactive components than those actually required
for external stability requirements.

(2) Trusses containing excessive internal members than required for internal stability
requirements giving lesser the number of equations of equilibrium obtained from various
joints.

(3) A combination of both of the above categories i.e. excessive external reactions plus
excessive internal members.

INTERNAL INDETERMINACY:-
b + r = 2j
There are two equations of equilibrium per joint where
b = number of bars or members.
r = minimum number of external reactive components required for
external stability (usually 3).
j = number of joints.
The above formula can also be used to check the total indeterminacy of a truss if we define ‘r’ as
the total number of reactive components which can be provided by a typical support system.
1.17. METHOD OF MOMENTS AND SHEARS :
A simple method is presented to evaluate axial member forces in parallel chord trusses. For other
types of trusses method of joints, method of sections or Maxwell’s diagram may be used. For determining
forces in members of trusses, this method has been used throughout this text. To develop the method,
consider the truss loaded as shown below:
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 57

2P 3P

E F G H

A D
7 B C
RA = 3 P
3@ a 8
RD = 3 P
Fig. 2.36 A typical Truss under loads
Consider the equilibrium of L.H.S. of the section. Take ‘D’ as the moment centre: we find Ra
Ra × 3a = 2P × 2a + 3 P × a
7Pa 7P
Ra = =
3a 3
∑ Mc = 0 and assuming all internal member forces to be tensile initially, we have
Ra x 2a − 2P × a + SFG × h = 0 (considering forces on LHS of section)
Ra × 2a − 2 Pa
or SFG = − 
 h 
The ( −ve ) sign indicates a compressive force. Or

SFG = Ra × 2a − 2 Pa = Mc where numerator is Mc. Therefore


 h  h
The force in any chord member is a function of bending moment.
“To find out the axial force in any chord member, the moment centre will be that point where other
two members completing the same triangle meet and the force will be obtained by taking moments about
that point and dividing it by the height of truss. The signs of the chord members are established in the very
beginning by using an analogy that the truss behaves as a deep beam. Under downward loads, all upper
chord members are in compression while all lower chord members are in tension.
MF
Similarly, SBC = (using the guide line given in the above para)
h
Consider the equilibrium of left hand side of the section and
∑Fy = 0
Ra − 2P − SFC Cos θ = 0

SFC = Ra − 2P where Ra − 2P is equal to shear force V due to applied loads at
 Cos θ 
the section. So in general the force in any inclined member is a
function of shear force.
V
SFC =
Cosθ

The general formula is :


± (V)
S =
± (Cos θ)
58 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Where V is the S.F. at the section passing through the middle of inclined member and ‘θ‘ is the
angle measured from “the inclined member to the vertical” at one of its ends. Use (+ve) sign as a pre-
multiplier with the Cosθ if this angle is clockwise and (−ve) sign if θ is anticlockwise. Take appropriate
sign with the S.F also. This treatment is only valid for parallel chord trusses.
The force in the vertical members is determined by inspection or by considering the equilibrium of
forces acting at the relevant joints. To illustrate the method follow the example below.
1.17.1: EXAMPLE :− Analyze the following truss by the method of moment & shear.
SOLUTION:- Determine reactions and Draw SFD and BMD.
P P P
I J K L M N O

h
A H
P B C D E F G

1.5P 8@a
1.5P
Given Truss under loads
1.5 P

0.5P
0 0
S.F.D.
0.5P
1.5 P

4.5 Pa 5 Pa 4.5 P
3 Pa
1.5Pa 3 Pa
1.5 Pa
B.M.D.
0

Fig. 2.37
TOP CHORD MEMBERS.
Considering the beam analogy of truss, all top chord members are in compression. Picking bending
moment, at appropriate moment centers, from BMD and dividing by height of Truss.
3 Pa
Sij = −
h
3 Pa
Sjk = −
h
5 Pa
Stl = −
h
5 Pa
Slm = −
h
3 Pa
Smn = −
h
3 Pa
Sno = − Negative sign means compression.
h
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 59

BOTTOM CHORD MEMBERS.


All are in tension. Taking appropriate moment point and dividing by height of Truss.
1.5 Pa
Sap = Spb = +
h
4.5 Pa
Sbc = Scd = +
h
4.5 Pa
Sde = Sef = +
h
1.5 Pa
Sfg = Sgh = +
h
INCLINED MEMBERS.
±V
The force in these members has been computed by the formula. . Follow the guidelines.
±(Cosθ)
1.5 P
Sai =
− Cosθ
1.5 P
Sib = Length AI = a2 + h2
+ Cosθ
(if a and h are given, length and Cos θ will have also
late values)
1.5 P h
Sbk = Cos θ =
− Cosθ a2 + h2
0.5 P
Skd =
+ Cosθ
− 0.5 P 0.5 P
Sdm = =
− Cosθ Cosθ
− 1.5 P
Smf =
+ Cosθ
− 1.5 P 1.5 P
Sfo = =
− Cosθ Cosθ
− 1.5 P
Soh =
+ Cosθ
VERTICAL MEMBERS.
For all vertical members of trusses in this book, member forces have been determined by Inspection or by
Equilibrium of joints. So
Sip = Sbj = Sck = Sem = Sfn = Sgo = 0
Sld = − P ( If a and h values are given, all forces can be numerically evaluated)
1.18. EXTERNALLY REDUNDANT TRUSSES – FIRST DEGREE
EXAMPLE 5 :- Analyze the following truss by the force method. (consistent deformation method). The
following data is given.
E =200 × 106 KN/m2
A=5x10−3m2 for inclineds and verticals,
A=4x10−3m2 for top chord members,
A=6x10−3m2 for bottom chord members
60 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

SOLUTION:-
36KN 72KN

F G H I J

1.8m

A E
B C D

4 @ 1.8m
Fig. 2.38 Given Truss under loads

TOTAL INDETERMINACY :-
b+r = 2j where r = total reactions which the supports are capable of providing.
17 + 4 ≠ 2 × 10
21 ≠ 20
D = 21 − 20 = 1
Indeterminate to Ist degree.
Apply check for Internal Indeterminacy :-
b + r = 2j where r = Minimum number of external reactions required for stability.
17 + 3 = 2 × 10
20 = 20
This truss is internally determinate and externally indeterminate to 1st degree, therefore, we select
reaction at point “C” as the redundant force. Remove support at C, the Compatibility equation is :
∆ C + δcc × Rc = 0 (Deflection at C due to loads plus due to redundant
should be zero.)
∆c
or Rc = − . Now we have to calculate ∆c and δcc to get Rc.
δcc
F′ UL
where ∆c = ∑ where F' = Force induced in members due to applied loads
AE
acting on BDS.
2
U L
δcc = ∑ U = Forces in members due to Unit load applied in direction
AE
of applied loads, at external redundant support in BDS.
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 61

36K 72K

F G H I J

1.8m

A E
B C C D
4 @ 1.8m
.
(F-Diagram)

G H J
F

A C E
B cc 1 D

Fig 2.39b B.D.S under unit Vertical Redundant at C


(U-Diagram)
Analyze the given truss by the method of moments and shears as explained already for F' and U forces in
members.
36KN 72KN
F G H I J

1.8m

A E
B C D
4 @ 1.8m Re = 45 KN
1
Ra = 63 /
(F -Diagram)

63
27
+
0
0
S.F.D.
45 45
113.4 162

81
B.M.D.

0 0
62 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Determine forces in all members of trusses loaded as shown in this question and enter the results in a tabular
form. (using method of moments and shears, F' and U values for members have been obtained).

F G H I J

A E
B C 1 D

½ U=Diagram
½

+ S.F.D.

1.8
0.9 0.9
+
B.M.D.

Fig 2.41 B.D.S under Unit redundant force at C

Member F′ U Ax L F′UL U2L Fi = Fi′ −


× 10 −3 × 10−3
(KN) 10−3 (m) AE AE Rc × U1
(m)2 (m) (m) (KN)
FG 0 0 4 1.8 0 0 0
GH − 90 −1 ″ ″ 0.2025 2.25 × 10−3 + 2.5
HI − 90 −1 ″ ″ 0.2025 2.25 × 10−3 + 2.5
IJ 0 0 4 ″ 0 0 0
AB +63 +0.5 6 1.8 0.04725 0.375 × 10−3 +16.75
BC +63 +0.5 ″ ″ 0.04725 0.375 × 10−3 +16.75
CD +45 +0.5 ″ ″ 0.03375 0.375 × 10−3 − 1.25
DE +45 +0.5 ″ ″ 0.03375 0.375 × 10−3 − 1.25
AG − 89.1 −0.707 ″ 2.55 0.16063 1.275 × 10−3 − 23.7
GC +38.2 GC 5 ″ 0.06887 1.275 × 10−3 − 27.2
CI +63.64 +0.707 ″ ″ 0.11473 1.275 × 10−3 − 1.76
IE −63.64 −0.707 ″ ″ 0.11473 1.275 × 10−3 +1.76
AF 0 0 ″ 1.8 0 0 0
BG 0 0 ″ ″ 0 0 0
HC − 72 0 ″ ″ 0 0 − 72
ID 0 0 ″ ″ 0 0 0
JE 0 0 ″ ″ 0 0 0
F′UL U2L
∑ = 1.02596 ∑ =11.1
AE AE
× 10−3 × 10−6
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 63

F′ UL
∆C= ∑ = 1.02596 × 10−3 = 1025.96 × 10−6 m
AE
U2 L
δ cc = ∑ = 11.1 × 10−6 m . Putting these two in original compatibility equation
AE
∆C −1025.96 × 10−6
Rc = − =
δcc 11.1 × 10−6
Rc = − 92.5 KN.
The (−ve) sign with Rc shows that the assumed direction of redundant is incorrect and Rc acts upward.
If Fi is net internal force due to applied loading and the redundants, acting together, then member forces an
calculated from
Fi = Fi′ − Rc × Ui
The final axial force in any particular member can be obtained by applying the principle of superposition
and is equal to the force in that particular member due to applied loading ( ± ) the force induced in the
same member due to the redundant with actual signs.
Apply the principle of superposition and insert the magnitude of redundant Rc with its sign which has been
obtained by applying the compatibility condition to calculate member forces.
1.19. SOLUTION OF 2ND DEGREE EXTERNALLY INDETERMINATE TRUSSES:-
Example-6 : Solve the following truss by consistent deformation method use previous
member properties.
36KN 72KN

F G H I J

1.8m

A E
B C D

4 @ 1.8m

Fig 2.42 Given Truss

36KN 72KN

1.8m

C D
63KN 45KN
/
(F -diagram)
0 63 S.F.D.
45

0
B.M.D.
0 162
113.4 81
+
0
Fig 2.42a B.D.S under loads
64 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

cc 1 dc
1
1 (U1 diagram) 2
2
+
1 S.F.D.
1.8 2
0.9 0.9
(+)
0 0 B.M.D.
+

cd dd
0.25 0.75
1
(U2 diagram)
0.25
(+)
0 0
(-) S.F.D.
0.75
1.35
0.9
0.45 (+)
B.M.D.
0 0

Fig 2.42 c B.D.S under unit redundant at D

Compatibility equations are:


∆C + Rc. δcc + Rd × δcd = 0 (1) Compatibility of deformations at C
∆D + Rc . δdc + Rd . δdd = 0 (2) Compatibility of deformations at D
δcd = δdc by the law of reciprocal deflection.
δcc = deflection of point C due to unit load at C.
δdc = deflection of point D due to unit load at C.
δdd = deflection of point D due to unit load at D.
δcd = deflection of point C due to unit load at D.
Flexibility coefficients of above two equations are evaluated in tabular form (Consult the attached table)
F′U1L
∆C = ∑ = 1026.2 × 10 −6 m
AE
F′U2L
∆D = ∑ = 579.82 × 10−6 m
AE
U12L
δcc = ∑ = 11.1 × 10−6 m
AE
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 65

U22L
δdd = ∑ = 9.3565 × 10−6 m
AE
U1U2L
δcd = ∑ = 6.291 × 10−6 m
AE
U1U2L
δdc = ∑ = 6.291 × 10−6 m Put these in equations 1 and 2
AE
1026.2 × 10 + 11.1 × 10 Rc + 6.291 × 10−6 Rd = 0
−6 −6
→ (1)
579.82 × 10−6 + 6.291 × 10−6 Rc + 9.3565 × 10−6 Rd = 0 → (2)
Simplify
1026.2 + 11.1 Rc + 6.291 Rd = 0 → (3)
579.82 + 6.291 Rc + 9.3565 Rd = 0 → (4)
From (3)
−1026.2 − 6.291 Rd
Rc =  → (5)
 11.1 
Put Rc in (4) & solve for Rd
−1026.2 − 6.291 Rd
579.82 + 6.291 
 11.1  + 9.3565 Rd = 0

− 1.786 + 5.791 Rd = 0

Rd = + 0.308 KN

So, from (5), ⇒ Rc = −1026.2 − 6.291 × 0.308


 11.1 

Rc = − 92.625 KN
∴ Rc = − 92.625 KN
Rd = + 0.308 KN
These signs indicate that reaction at C is upwards and reaction at D is downwards.
By superposition, the member forces will be calculated as follows
Fi = Fi + Rc × U1 + Rd × U2 which becomes.
Fi = Fi − Rc × U1 + Rd × U2. It takes care of (−ve) sign with Rc.
Equilibrium checks:−

0.308

1.082 1.082

0.308

Joint D
∑ Fx = 0
∑ Fy = 0
Equilibrium is satisfied. Only check at one joint has been applied. In fact this check should be
satisfied at all joints.
66 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Table 79−A
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 67

36KN 72KN
F 0 G 2.471 H 2.471 I 0 J
23.722 27.178 72 1.519
1.954 0.308 0
0 0
A 1.082 1.082 E
16.765 B16.765 C D

16.965KN 92.625KN 0.308KN 1.082KN

Fig 2.43 Result of analyzed Truss

Now find remaining reactions Ra and Re.


∑Fy = 0
Ra + Re + 92.625 − 0.308 − 36 − 72 = 0
Ra + Re = 15.683 → (1)

∑MA = 0
Re × ∆ × 1.8 − 0.308 × 3 × 1.8 + 92.625 × 2 × 1.8 − 72 × 2 × 1.8 − 36 × 1.8 = 0

Re = − 1.082 KN

As Ra + Re = 15.863
So Ra = 15.863 + 1.082

Ra = 16.945 KN

Now truss is determinate. Calculate member forces and apply checks in them.
Joint (C)
∑Fx = 0

27.178 72 1.954

16.765 1.082

92.625
− 1.082 − 16.765 − 1.954 × 0.707 + 27.178 × 0.707 = 0
− 0.0136 = 0
0 ≅0 equilibrium is satisfied.

∑Fy = 0
− 72 + 92.625 − 1.954 × 0.707 − 27.178 × 0.707 = 0
0.0286 = 0
0≅0 equilibrium is satisfied
68 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Joint (E)
∑Fy = 0

1.519

1.082

1.082

1.519 × 0.707 − 1.087 = 0


0=0

∑Fx = 0
082 − 1.519 × 0.707 = 0
0=0 equilibrium is satisfied.

1.20. Example–7:- SOLUTION OF 3RD DEGREE EXTERNALLY INDETERMINATE TRUSSES:-


Now we solve the following truss by consistent deformation method. Choosing reaction of B, C
and D as redundant.
SOLUTION:-
First step. Choose BDS Draw BDS under loads and subsequently under applied unit loads at points
of redundancy also.
36KN 72KN
F G H I J

1.8m
A E
B C D
4 @ 1.8m

Fig 2.44 Given 3rd degree externally


indeterminate truss under loads

=
36 KN 72 KN
F G H I J

1.8m

A E
B B C C D
D

Fig 2.44(a) B.D.S under loads

+
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 69

bb cb
1 db
Fig 2.44(b) B.D.S under redundant unit load at B
(U1 diagram)

F G H I J

1
A E
B bc cc D dc
C
1
Fig 2.44(c) B.D.S under redundant unit load at C
(U2 diagram)

+
F G H I J

1
A E
B bd C cd D dd
1
Fig 2.44(d) B.D.S under redundant unit load at D
(U3 diagram)

Step No.2: Compatibility equations are:


∆B + Rb.δbb + Rc.δbc + Rd x δbd = 0 For joint B → (1)
∆C + Rb.δcb + Rc.δcc + Rd x δcd = 0 For joint C → (2)
∆D + Rb.δdb + Rc.δdc + Rd x δdd = 0 For joint D → (3)
70 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Step No.3: Evaluation of Flexibility co-efficients


F′U1L F′U2L F′U3L
∆B = ∑ ∆C = ∑ ∆D = ∑
AE AE AE

U12L U1U2L U1U3L


δbb = ∑ δbc = ∑ δbd = ∑
AE AE AE

U1U2L U22L U2U3L


δcb = ∑ δcc = ∑ δcd = ∑
AE AE AE

U1U3L U2U3L U32L


δdb = ∑ δdc = ∑ δdd = ∑
AE AE AE

By law of reciprocal deflections :-


We know that
δbc = δcb
δbd = δdb
δcd = δdc

In order to find member forces due to applied forces in BDS, consider.

36 KN 72KN

F G H I J

B.D.S under loads


E (F’ diagram)
A
B C D 45
63
63
63 27 S.F.D.
27
0 0
45 45
162

173.4 81
+
B.M.D.

The above SFD and BMD are used to calculate member forces by method of moments and shears. Finally
∆B, ∆C and ∆D due to applied loads on BDS are calculated in a tabular form as given below:
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 71

Table 84−A
72 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

B.D.S under unit load at B


for calculating δbb, δcb and δdb
(U1 - diagram)
1.0
0.75 0.25
0.75 0.75
(+) S.F.D.
0 0
0.25 (-) 0.25

1.3
0.9
(+) 0.45
B.M.D.

B.D.S under unit load at C


for calculating δcc, δbc and δdc
U2 - diagram
1
0.5 0.5
0.5
0 + 0 S.F.D.
0.5
1.8
0.9 0.9
+
B.M.D.

U3 diagram for δbd, δcd and δdd

Same as above
0.25 1 0.75
0.25
(+)
(-) SDF

1.3 0.75

(+)
BMD

From the previous table we have the values of all flexibility co-efficients as given below:
∆B=391.65 × 10−6 m
∆C=1026.2 × 10−6 m
∆D=692.42 × 10−6 m

δbb = 9.3616 × 10−6 m, and δcc = 11.1 × 10−6 m, δdd = 9.3565 × 10−6 m
δbc = δcb = 6.417 × 10−6 m
δbd = δdb = 3.517 × 10−6 m
δcd = δdc = 6.291 × 10−6 m
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 73

Putting the values of flexibility co-efficients into compatibility equations we have.


391.65 × 10−6 +9.3616 × 10−6 Rb+6.292 × 10−6 Rc+3.517 × 10−6 Rd= 0 → (1)
1026.2 × 10−6 +6.292 × 10−6 Rb+11.1 × 10−6 Rc + 6.291 × 10−6 Rd = 0 → (2)
579.82 × 10−6 +3.517 × 10−6 Rb+6.291 × 10−6 Rc+9.3565 × 10−6Rd = 0 → (3)
Step No. 4
Simplify equation (1), (2) and (3), we have
391.65 +9.3620 Rb+6.292 Rc+3.517 Rd = 0 → (4)
1026.2 + 6.292 Rb + 11.1 Rc + 6.291 Rd = 0 → (5)
579.82 + 3.517 Rb + 6.291 Rc+9.357 Rd = 0 → (6)
Multiply (4) by 6.291 & (5) by 3.517 & subtract (5) from (4)
391.65 × 6.291+9.362 × 6.291Rb+6.292 × 6.291 Rc+3.517 × 6.291Rd=0
1026.2 × 3.517+6.292 × 3.517 Rb+11.1 × 3.517 Rc+3.517 × 6.291Rd=0
− 1145.275 + 36.767 Rb + 0.544 Rc = 0 → (7)
Multiply (5) by 9.357 & (6) by 6.291 & subtract (6) from (5) :-
1026.2 × 9.357+6.292 × 9.357 Rb+11.1 × 9.357 Rc+6.291 × 9.357Rd=0
579.82 × 6.291+3.517 × 6.291Rb+6.291 × 6.291 Rc+6.291 × 9.357Rd=0
5954.506 + 36.749 Rb + 64.286 Rc = 0 → (8)

1145.275 − 0.544 Rc


From (7), Rb = 
 36.767 
Put Rb in (8) & solve for Rc
1145.275 − 0.544 Rc
5954.506 + 36.749 
 36.767  + 64.286 Rc = 0
5954.506 + 1144.71 − 0.544 Rc + 64.286 Rc = 0
7099.22 + 63.742 Rc = 0

Rc = − 111.374 KN

Put this value in equation (7) and solve for Rb


1145.275 − 0.544 × 111.374
Rb = 
 36.767 

Rb = +32.797 KN
Put Rb and Rc values in equation (4) to get Rd.

391.65 + 9.362 × 32.797 + 6.292 × (111.374) +3.517 Rd = 0


Rd = + 0.588 KN
74 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

After reactions have been calculated, truss is statically determinate and member forces can be easily
calculated by Fi = Fi/ + RbU1 + RcU2 + RdU3 as given in table. Apply checks on calculated member forces.

Step No. 5: Equilibrium checks.

Joint (C)
72
51.814 3.828

32.058 2.047

111.374
∑ Fx = 0
− 2.047 − 32.058 − 3.828 × 0.707 + 51.814 × 0.707 = 0
− 0.179 ≅ 0
0=0
∑ Fy = 0
111.374 − 72 − 3.828 × 0.707 − 51.814 × 0.707 = 0
0.035 ≅ 0
0 = 0 (satisfied) Solution is alright.
1.21: ANALYSIS OF 3-DEGREE REDUNDANT FRAMES
Example No. 8: Analyze the following frame by consistent deformation method.
96KN
B 3m 6m
C
F 3I
3m
2I
36KN
E
3m I 7.5m
A

D
SOLUTION :-
The given frame is statically indeterminate to the 3rd degree. So that three redundants have to be
removed at support D or A. Consider HD, VD & MD as the redundants
96KN
B 3m 6m C
F 3I
3m
2I
36KN
E
3m I 7.5m
A

=
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 75

96KN
B 3m 6m C
3m 3I
36KN E
2I I 7.5m
2m
36KN
396KN-m
D DH
A
96KN Dv
D

Fig. 2.45 B.D.S under loads

B 3m F 6m C B 9m C B 3m 6m C

3m F 3m F

E E 6m
7.5m
7.5m + 3m
3m
1.5 A
A 1 1
1.5m
9 1 D
1 dh d
1 dvdv dhdv dvd
1
D 1
dvdh d d
dh dh d dv

d dh

mH-Diagram mV-Diagram m -diagram

(BDS under redundants)


Compatibility Equations:-

∆DH + HD × δdh.dh + VD × δdhdv + MD × αdhdθ =0 (1) compatibility in horizontal direction at D.

∆DV + HD × δdv.dh + VD × δdvdv + MD × αdvdθ =0 (2) compatibility in vertical direction at D.


θD + HD × αdθ.dh +VD × αdθdv + MD × αdθdθ =0 (3) rotational compatibity at D.

We have to determine the following flexibility co-efficients.


∆DH = Horizontal deflection of point D due to applied loads.
∆DV = Vertical deflection of point D due to applied loads.
θD = Rotation of point D due to applied loads.
δdhdh = Horizontal deflection of point D due to unit horizontal redundant force at D
76 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

δdhdv = Horizontal deflection of point D due to unit vertical redundant force at D


αdθdh = angular deflection of point D due to unit angular redundant force at D
δdvdh = Vertical deflection of point D due to unit horizontal redundant force at D
δdvdv = Vertical deflection of point D due to unit vertical redundant force at D
αdθdv = Rotation deflection of point D due to unit vertical redundant force at D
αdhdθ = Horizontal rotation of point D due to unit rotation at pt D
αdvdθ = Vertical rotation of point D due to unit rotation at pt D
αdθdθ = Rotation rotation of point D due to unit rotation at pt D
δdvdh = δdhdv ( reciprocal deformations)
αdθdh = αdhdθ ( reciprocal deformations)
αdθdv = αdvdθ ( reciprocal deformations)
Now these flexibility co-efficients can be evaluated by following formulae.

M × mH
∆DH = ∫ EI
dX

M × mV
∆DV = ∫ EI
dX


M x mθ
θD = dX
EI

(mH)2 dX
δdhdh = ∫ EI

(mv)2 dX
δdvdv = ∫ EI

mH × mθ
αdθdh = αdhdθ = ∫  EI 
dX

mv × mH
δdhdv = δdvdh = ∫  EI 
dX from law of reciprocals deformations

mv × mθ
αdθdv = αdvdθ = ∫  EI 
dX

m2θ
αdθdθ = ∫ EI
dX
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 77

ESTABLISH MOMENT EXPRESSIONS BY FREE BODY DIAGRAMS:


Note: Moments giving compression on outside and tension on inside of frame (sagging) will be positive.
288KN-m 96KN

B 3m 6m C
96KN
F
96KN
C
B 288KN-m
3m
36KN E
7.5m
3m
36KN
A
396KN-m
D
96KN
Fig 2.46 B.D.S under loads (M-diagram)

ΣMb = 0
Mb + 36 × 6 − 396 − 36 × 3 = 0
Mb = + 288 KN − m.
ΣMc = 0
Mc + 96 × 9 − 288 − 96 × 6 = 0
Mc + 0 = 0
Mc = 0
Free body m − Diagrams

7.5 7.5 9
1 B C B 3m 6m C
1 1 1
B 3m F 6m 7.5 F
1
1 C 1
7.5 9 C
3m 3m

E E
7.5m 7.5m
3m
1.5 3m
1
9
A D
D 1
M 1 1
Fig. 2.46a mH-Diagam Fig. 2.46b
M mv-diagram
78 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

B 3m F 6m C
1 1
B 1 C
1
3m
E
7.5m
3m

1 D

Fig. 2.46 m diagram


Write moment expressions alongwith limits in a tabular form
Portion Origin Limits M MH Mv Mθ I
AE A 0−3 36X−396 X + 1.5 −9 −1 2I
BE B 0−3 − 288 −X + 7.5 −9 −1 2I
BF B 0−3 96X−288 + 7.5 +X−9 −1 3I
CF C 0−6 0 + 7.5 −X −1 3I
CD D 0 −7.5 0 +X 0 −1 I
It may be done in a tabular form or may be directly evaluated.
CALCULATIONS OF FLEXIBILITY CO-EFFICIENTS:-

∫ M × mH dX
1
∆DH =
EI
3 3 3 6 7.5
1 1 1
= ∫ (36X −396)(X+1.5 )dX+ ∫ (−288)(−X+7.5) dX + ∫ (96X−288)(7.5)dX + ∫ 0 + ∫ 0
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o o o
3 3 3
1 1 1
= ∫ (36X2+54X −396X − 594) dX + ∫ (288X−2160) dX + ∫ (720X − 2160) dX
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o
3 3
1 1
= ∫ (36X2 −54X−2754) dX + ∫ (720X − 2160)dX , (First two integrals have been combined)
2EI o 3EI o
3 3
1 36X3 54X2 2
− 2754 X + 720X − 2160X
1
= −
2EI  3 2 o 3EI  2 o

1 
× 32 − 2754 × 3 +
54 1 720  4090.5 1080
12 × 33 −
 3EI  2 × 3 − 2160 × 3 − EI − EI
2
=
2EI  2

51.705
∆DH =
EI
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 79

∫ mH dX
1
δdhdh = 2
EI

3 3 3 6 7.5
1 1 1 1 1
= ∫ (X + 1.5)2dX + ∫ (−X+7.5)2dX + ∫ (7.5)2dX + ∫ (7.5)2dX + ∫ X2dX
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o 3EI o EI o
3 3 3 6 7.5
1 1 1 1 1
= ∫ (X2+3X+2.25)dX+ ∫ (X2−15X+56.25)dX+ ∫ 56.25 dX+ ∫ 56.25 dX+ ∫ X2 dX
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o 3EI o EI o
3 3 3 6 7.5
1 X3 3X2 1 X3 15X2 1 X3
+ 2.25X + +56.25X + 56.25X | +  
1 1
= + − 56.25X | +
2EI  3 2 o 2EI  3 2 o 3EI o 3EI o EI 3 o
3 3
1 3 3 2 1 7.53
× ×3 +2.25×3 +  − ×32+56.25×3+
1 3 15 1 1
= (56.25×3) + (56.25×6) +
2EI  3 2  2EI 3 2  3EI 3EI 3EI 3 
14.625 55.125 56.25 112.5 140.625
= + + + +
EI EI EI EI EI

379.125
δdhdh = +
EI

∫ (mH × mθ) dX
1
αdhdθ =
EI

3 3 3 6 7.5
1 1 1 1 1
αdhdθ = ∫ (X+1.5)(−1)dX+ ∫ (−X+7.5)(−1)dX+ ∫ (7.5)(−1)dX+ ∫ (7.5)(−1)dX+ ∫ (X)(−1)dX
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o 3EI o EIo

3 3 3 6 7.5
1 1 1 1 1
= ∫ (−X−1.5)dX + ∫ (X−7.5)dX + ∫ (−7.5)dX + ∫ (−7.5)dX + ∫ (−X)
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o 3EI o EI o

3 3 6 7.5
1 1 1 1
= ∫ (−9)dX + ∫ (−7.5)dX + ∫ (−7.5)dX + ∫ (−X)dX
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o EI o

3 3 6 7.5
1 X2
−7.5X | + - 
1 1 1
= −9X | + −7.5X | +
2EI o 3EI o 3EI o EI  2 o
1 (7.5)2
(−7.5 × 6) + −
1 1 1
= (−9 × 3) + (−7.5 × 3) +
2EI 3EI 3EI EI  2 

64.125
αdhdθ = −
EI

∫ (M × mv) dX
1
∆Dv =
EI
3 3 3
1 1 1
∆Dv = ∫ (36X − 396 )(−9 ) dX + ∫ (−288 )(−9 ) dX + ∫ (96X − 288) (X−9)dX + 0 + 0
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o
80 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

3 3 3
1 1 1
= ∫ (−324X+3564) dX + ∫ 2592 dX + ∫ (96X2−864X −288X + 2592) dX
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o
3 3
1 1
= ∫ (−324X + 6156) dX + ∫ (96X2 − 1152X + 2592) dX
2EI o 3EI o
1 −324X2
3 3
+ 6156X +
1 96X3 1152X2 
=
2EI  2 o 3EI  3 − 2 + 2592Xo
1 1
= (−162 × 32 + 6156 × 3) + (32 × 33 − 576 × 32 + 2592 × 3)
2EI 3EI
8505 1152
= +
EI EI
9657
∆Dv =
EI

∫ (mv) dX
1
δdvdv = 2
EI
3 3 3 6 7.5
1 1 1 1 1
= ∫ (−9 )2 dX + ∫ (−9 )2 dX + ∫ (X−9 )2 dX + ∫ (−X)2 dX + ∫ ( 0 ) dX
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o 3EI o EI o
3 3 6
1 1 1
= ∫ 162 dX + ∫ (X2 −18X + 81) dX + ∫ X2 dX
2EI o 3EI o 3EI o
3 3 6
1 X2 18X2 1 X3 
+ 81X +
162
= X | + −
2EI o 3EI  3 2 o 3EI  3 o
1 33 1 63
− 9 × 32 + 81 × 3 +
81(3)
= +
EI 3EI  3  3EI  3 

324
δdvdv = +
EI

∫ (mv × mθ) dX
1
αdvdθ =
EI
3 3 3 6
1 1 1 1
αdvdθ = ∫ 9 dX + ∫ 9 dX + ∫ (−X + 9) dX + ∫ × dX + 0
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o 3EI o
3 3 2 3 2 6
=
1
9X | +
1
9X | +
1 −X + 9X| + 1 X 
2EI o 2EI o 3EI  2 o 3EI  2 o
1 −9
+ 9 × 3 +
1 1 1 36
= (9 × 3) + (9 × 3) +
2EI 2EI 3EI  2  3EI  2 

40.5
αdvdθ = +
EI
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 81

∫ (mθ ) dX
1
αdθdθ = 2
EI

3 3 3 6 7.5
1 1 1 1 1
αdθdθ = ∫ 1dX + ∫ 1dX + ∫ 1dX + ∫ 1dX + ∫ 1dX
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o 3EI o EI o
3 3 6 7.5
1 1 1 1
= X| + X| + X| + X|
2EI o 3EI o 3EI o EI o

1 1 1 1
= (3) + (3) + (6) + (7.5)
EI 3EI 3EI EI

13.5
αdθdθ = +
EI

∫ (M x mθ) dX
1
θD =
EI

3 3 3
1 1 1
= ∫ (−36X +396) dX + ∫ 288 dX + ∫ (−96X + 288) dX
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o
3 3
1 1
= ∫ (−36X + 684) dX + ∫ (−96X + 288) dX
2EI o 3EI o
3 3
1  X2 X2
+ 684X +
1 
= −36 −96 + 288X
2EI  2 o 3EI  2 o
1 1
= (−18 × 9 + 684 × 3) + (− 48 × 9 + 288 × 3)
2EI 3EI

1089
θD = +
EI

∫ (m
1
δdhdv = H × mv ) dX
EI

3 3 3 6
1 1 1 1
δdhdv = ∫ (−9X − 13.5)dX + ∫ (+9X − 67.5)dX + ∫ (7.5x − 67.5)dX + ∫ (−7.5X) dX +0
2EI o 2EI o 3EI o 3EI o

3 3 6
1 1 1
= ∫ (− 81)dX + ∫ (7.5X − 67.5) dx + ∫ (− 7.5X) dX
2EI o 3EI o 3EI o
82 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

3 3 6
1 7.5X2 1  7.5X2
− 67.5X| +
1
−81X | +
=
2EI o 3EI  2 o 3EI − 2 o

1 7.5 1  −7.5 
× 9 − 67.5 × 3 +
1
(−81 × 3) +
=
2EI 3EI  2  3EI − 2 × 36

222.75
δdhdv = −
EI

Putting above evaluated flexibility co−efficients in compatibility equations , we have.


(1) ⇒ −5170.5 + 379.125 HD − 222.75 VD − 64.125 MD = 0 → (4)
(2) ⇒ +9657 − 222.75 HD + 324 VD + 40.5 MD = 0 → (5)
(3) ⇒ + 1089 − 64.125 HD + 40.5 VD + 13.5 MD = 0 → (6)
Multiply (4) by 222.75 & (5) by 379.125 Then add (4) & (5) to eliminate HD
− (5170.5 × 222.75) +(379.125 × 222.75)HD−(222.75)2VD−(64.125 × 222.75)MD =0
+(9657×379.125)− (379.125×222.75)HD+(324×379.125)VD+(40.5×379.125) MD=0
2509481.25 + 73218.9375 VD +1070.72 MD = 0 → (7)

Multiply (5) by 64.125 & (6) by 222.75 & subtract (6) from (5) to eliminate HD again
619255.125 − 14283.84 HD + 20776.5 VD + 2597.06 MD = 0
− 242574.75 − 14283.84 HD + 9021.375 VD + 3007.125 MD= 0
376680.375 + 11755.125 VD − 410.065 MD = 0 → (8)
Now equation (7) and (8) are in terms of VD and MD

From (7), VD = −1070.72 MD − 2509481.25 → (9)


 73218.9375 
Put VD in (8) to get MD
−1070.72 MD − 2509481.25
376680.375 + 11755.125 
 73218.9375  − 410.065MD = 0

376680.375 − 171.90 MD − 402891.20 − 410.065 MD = 0

− 26210.83 − 581.965 MD = 0

MD = − 45.04 KN−m, put this in (9) to get VD

VD = −1070.72 × (45.04) − 2509481.25


 73218.9375 
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 83

VD = − 33.62 KN. Now put values of VD and MD in (4) to get HD

− 5170.5+379.125 × HD+222.75 × 33.62 + 64.125 × 45.04 = 0

379.125 HD + 5205.44 = 0

HD = − 13.73 KN

HD = − 13.73 KN

VD = − 33.62 KN

MD = − 45.64 KN − m

These reactions are applied to frame which becomes statically determinate now and shear force and moment
diagram can be sketched (by parts) now.

96
3m 6m
B C
3I
3m 2I
36KN E

3m
I 7.5m
A HA=22.27KN
Ma=68.98Kn-m
VA =62.38KN D 45.04KN-m
13.73KN

Fig. 2.47 33.62KN

Applying condition of equilibrium at A, reactions can be obtained.


∑ FX = 0
36 − HA − 13.73 = 0

HA = 22.27 KN

∑Fy = 0
VA + 33.62 − 96 = 0

VA = 62.38 KN
84 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

∑M =0
MA + 45.04 − 13.73 × 1.5 + 33.62 × 9 − 96 × 3− 36 × 3 = 0
MA − 68.98 = 0

MA = 68.98 KN-m Applying these reactions to frame, various free-body diagrams


can be drawn and moments expressions can be set-up for
determining combined deflections of any point due to applied
loads and reactions (at supports) acting simultaneously.

43.36KN-m 96KN 57.94KN-m


13.73KN B 3m 6m C 13.73KN
F
62.38KN 62.38KN 6m
33.62KN 33.62KN
43.36KN-m 57.94KN-m
E B 13.73KN C
13.73KN
3m
36KN E
7.5m
3m

A 22.27Kn D 13.73Kn
68.98KN-m 45.04KN-m
62.38Kn 33.62KN

Mb = 0 , Mb+22.27 x 6-68.98-36 x 3 = 0 Mc=0 , M+62.38 x 9-43.36-96x 6=0


Mb = 43.36 KN-m Mc=57.94 KN-m (for beam)

BENDING MOMENT AND SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAMS :−


For beam BC
43.36KN-m 96KN 57.94KN-m
3m 6m C
B
62.38KN 33.62KN
62.38
+ S.F.D.
0 0
33.62 -
33.62
m 143.78
x=0.695 x=1.723m

0 0 B.M.D.

43.36 57.94

Mx = −45.04 + 13.73x = 0
x = 3.28 m
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 85

FOR COLUMN AB
(Seen rotated at 90°)

36KN
43.36KN-m
68.98KN-m 3m
A 3m B
22.27KN
13.73KN
22.27 + S.F.D.
0 0
13.73

0 0

68.98 2.17 43.36

FOR COLUMN DC
(Seen rotated at 90°)
45.04KN-m 57.94KN-m
7.5m
D C
13.73KN 13.73KN

13.73 13.73
+
0 0 S.F.D.

X=3.28m + 57.94
+
0 0 B.M.D.
45.04
Mx=-45.04+13.73x = 0
x = 3.28m

143.78 62.38

+ 13.73
57.94
43.36 13.73 33.62
43.36 57.94
+ S.F.D.

2.17
B.M.D. + +

22.27

68.98 13.73
Composite S.F.D. for analysed frame
45.04 Fig. 2.48
86 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Elastic Curve:-

1.22: Analysis of Continuous Beams


Example No. 9:
Analyze the following beam by consistent deformation method. Check the results by the method of
least work.
SOLUTION:-
10KN 5KN E1=Constt
15m 10m

A 30m B 40m C 40m D 30m E


Number of reactions=5
number of equations=2
Fig. 2.56
Step No.1:
In this structure, we treat reactions at B, C & D as redundants and the B.D.S. is a simply supported
beam AE.
10KN 5KN
15m
B C 10m D
A E
B D
C

140m
B.D.S. Under applied loads.
Fig. 2.56a

1
B C D E
A
bb x Vb cb x Vb dbxVb
D

B.D.S. Under Unit redundant load at B.


Fig. 2.56 b

A B C D E
bc x Vc cc x Vc dc x Vc

B.D.S. under Unit redundant load at C.


U
Fig. 2.56c
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 87

1
A B C D E
bd x Vd cd x Vd dd xVd

B.D.S. under Unit redundant load at D.


U
Fig. 2.56d
Step No.2: Compatibility Equations.

∆B + Vb × δbb + Vc × δbc + Vd × δbd = 0 → (1) Compatibility of deformations at B


∆C + Vb × δcb + Vc × δcc + Vd × δcd = 0 → (2) Compatibility of deformations at C
∆D + Vb × δdb + Vc × δdc + Vd × δdd = 0 → (3) Compatibility of deformation at D

M
Sketch BDS, Draw SFD, and diagram for use in conjugate beam method.
EI

65 m

10KN 5KN
15m C
B D E
A
Fig. 2.57
10x 125 5x60
RA = x
140 140
80m 60m 3.93KN = RE
140m
= 11.07KN
11.07
+ 1.07 S.F.D.
0 1.07 0
+
3.93
235.8/EI
166.05/EI M/EI diagram over
A3
conjugate beam
A1 A2 A4
A E
B C D
11631.161/E1 9748.339/E1

M
Splitting above in 4 parts as shown, calculate areas of these portions.
EI
1 166.05 1245.375
A1 = × 15 × =
2 EI EI

166.05 10793.25
A2 = × 65 =
EI EI
88 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

1 69.75 2266.875
A3 = × × 65 =
2 EI EI

1 7074
A4 = × 235.8 × 60 =
2 EI

21379.5
A1+A2+A3+A4 =
EI
∑ M′E =0

1
1245.375 125+ +10793.25 60+ +2266.875 60+ +7074  ×60
15 65 65 2
RA′ x 140 =
EI  3  2  3 3 
11631.161
RA′ =
EI

21379.5 11631.161
RE′ = −
EI EI
9748.339
RE′ =
EI
M
Isolating the upper part of diagram between two loads.
EI

235.8
C
15 B
y1YYy2
166.05/EI
55
65
y2 235.8
= By conjugate beam method, ∆B would be moment at B' of conjugate beam
55 65
M
loaded with diagram.
EI
y2 = 199.52
y1 = 54.4

1 
11631.161×30−1245.375 15+  − (166.05×15) × 7.5 − 54.42×  ×  
15 15 15
∆B =
EI   3  2   3 
303080.955
= KN−m3
EI

Moment at C' of conjugate beam


1 
11631.161×70−(1245.375)  +55−(166.05×55)  − ×100.52×5.5× ×55
15 55 1 1
∆C =
EI  3   2  2  3 
387716.812
= KN−m3
EI
STABILITY, DETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES AND CONSISTENT DEFORMATIONS METHOD 89

235.8
D 30
y3 = 117.9/EI
Y y3

60m
M
Isolating the portion of diagram between right support and 5 KN load.
EI
Moment at D' of conjugate beam
1 
9748.339 × 30 −  × 117.9 × 30 × 
1 30
∆D =
EI  2  3
274765.17
∆D = KN−m3
EI
M
If we construct diagram for above figures 2.56b, 2.56c and 2.56d and place them over conjugate beam,
EI
we have δcb= 34501.88, δcc= 57166.66, δcd= 34501.88 on similar lines as above. From conjugate beam
for fig: 2.56b, you will have
1 
982.086 × 30 − (353.565)   =
30 25926.93
δbb =
EI   
30 EI
1 
667.884 × 70 −  × 15 × 70   =
1 70 34501.88
δcb =
EI  2   3  EI
1 
667.884 × 30 −  × 6.423 × 30   =
1 30 19073.07
δdb =
EI  2   3  EI
We already know from law of reciprocal deflections that
δcb = δbc
δbd = δdb
δcd = δdc
From conjugate beam for fig: 2.5d, you will have
15 × 70 70 34501.88
= 667.884 × 70 − 
1
δcd
EI   2   3  = EI
1 
982.086 × 30 −  × 23.571 × 30   =
1 30 25926.93
δdd =
EI  2  EI  EI

Putting above flexibility co-efficients in compatibility equations, we have


303080.955 + 25926.93 Vb + 34500 Vc + 19073.07 Vd = 0 → (1)
387716.812 + 34501.88 Vb + 57166.67 Vc + 34501.88 Vd = 0 → (2)
274765.17 + 1907307 Vb + 34500 Vc + 25926.93 Vd = 0 → (3)
Solving above three linear – simultaneous equations, we have

Vd = − 14.30 KN

Vc = 12.98 KN

Vb = 18.44 KN
90 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Now the continuous beam has become determinate. Apply loads and redundants reactions, other
support reactions can be determined.

10KN 5KN
15m 10m
A B C D E

Va 18.44KN 12.98KN 14.30KN Ve

∑ME = 0
Va × 140 − 10 × 125 − 18.44 × 110 − 12.98 × 70 − 5 × 60 + 14.3 × 30 = 0

Va = 28.9 KN

∑ Fy = 0
gives Ve = 3.22 KN upwards

Now shear force and BMD can be plotted as the beam is statically determinate now.
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 91

CHAPTER TWO

METHOD OF LEAST WORK


The method of least work is used for the analysis of statically indeterminate beams, frames and
trusses. Indirect use of the Castigliano’s 2nd theorem is made and the following steps are taken.
(1) The structure is considered under the action of applied loads and the redundants. The
redundants can be decided by choosing a particular basic determinate structure and the
choice of redundants may vary within a problem.
(2) Moment expressions for the entire structure are established in terms of the applied loads
and the redundants, which are assumed to act simultaneously for beams and frames.
(3) Strain energy stored due to direct forces and in bending etc. is calculated and is partially
differentiated with respect to the redundants.
(4) A set of linear equations is obtained, the number of which is equal to that of the
redundants.Solution of these equations evaluates the redundants.

NOTE:−
Special care must be exercised while partially differentiating the strain energy expressions and
compatibility requirements of the chosen basic determinate structure should also be kept in mind.
For the convenience of readers, Castigliano’s theorem are given below:

2.1. CASTIGLIANO’S FIRST THEOREM:−


“The partial derivative of the total strain energy stored with respect to a particular deformation
gives the corresponding force acting at that point.”

Mathematically this theorem is stated as below:


∂U
= P
∂∆
and
∂U
= M
∂θ
It suggests that displacements correspond to loads while rotations correspond to moments.

2.2. CASTIGLIANO’S SECOND THEOREM :−


“The partial derivative of the total strain energy stored with respect to a particular force gives the
corresponding deformation at that point.”
Mathematically,
∂U
= ∆
∂P
and
∂U
= θ
∂M
92 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

2.3. STATEMENT OF THEOREM OF LEAST WORK.


“In a statically indeterminate structure, the redundants are such that the internal strain energy
stored is minimum.” This minima is achieved by partially differentiating strain energy and setting it to zero
or to a known value. This forms the basis of structural stability and of Finite Element Method.

2.4. Example No.1: 1st Degree Indeterminacy of Beams.


Analyze the following loaded beam by the method of least work.

wKN/m
Ma x
A B

L
Ra Rb
Number of reactions = 3
n
Number of equations = 2

The beam is redundant to first degree.


In case of cantilever, always take free end as the origin for establishing moment expressions.
Choosing cantilever with support at A and Rb as redundant. Apply loads and redundant simultaneously to
BDS.

WwKN/m
Ma
x
A B

Ra Rb
L

Taking B as origin (for variation of X)


wX2
MX = RbX − 0< X<L
 2 
L
1
U = ∫ M2 dX. A generalized strain energy expression due to moments.
2EI o

Therefore, partially differentiating the strain energy stored w.r.t. redundant, the generalized form is:
L
∂U ∂M
∫ M   dX
1
= Where R is a typical redundant.
∂R EI o  ∂R 

Putting moment expression alongwith its limits of validity in strain energy expression.
L
wX22
∫ RbX −
1
U = dX
2EI o  2 

Partially differentiate strain energy U w.r.t. redundant Rb, and set equal to zero.
L
∂U wX2
= ∆b = 0 = ∫ RbX −
1
So (X) dX, because at B, there should be no deflection.
∂Rb EI o  2 
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 93

L
1  wX3
0= ∫ RbX2 − dX
EI o  2 

L
1 RbX3 wX4
0= −
EI  3 8 o

RbL3 wL4
Or =
3 8
and

+3
Rb = wL
8

The (+ve) sign with Rb indicates that the assumed direction of redundant Rb is correct. Now calculate Ra.

∑ Fy = 0
Ra + Rb = wL
Ra = wL − Rb
3
= wL − wL
8
8 wL − 3 wL
=
8

5
Ra = wL
8

3
Put X = L and Rb = wL in moment expression for MX already established before to get Ma.
8
3 wL2
Ma = wL .L −
8 2

3 wL2
= wL2 −
8 2

3 wL2 − 4 wL2
=
8

wL2
Ma = −
8

The (−ve) sign with Ma indicates that this reactive moment should be applied such that it gives us tension
at the top at point A.
94 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Example No.2: Solve the following propped cantilever loaded at its centre as shown by method of least
work.
Ma x
P x
A B
C

Ra L Rb

B.D.S.is a cantiever supported at A.


I
Rb is a redundant as shown.

Ma x
P x
A B
C

Ra L Rb

L/2

BDS under loads and redundant. Taking point B as origin.

L
Mbc = RbX 0 < X <
2
= RbX − P x −
L L
and Mac < X < L. Now write strain energy expression.
 2 2

L/2 L 2
∫ RbX − PX −  dX. Partially differentiate
1 1 L
U = ∫ (RbX)2 dX +
2EI o 2EI L/2   2 
w.r.t redundant Rb.
L/2 L
∂U
∫ Rbx − PX −  [X] dX
1 1 L
= ∆b = 0 = ∫ [RbX] [X] dX +
∂Rb EI o EI L/2   2 

L/2 L
∫ RbX2 dX + ∫ RbX2 − PX2 + P X dX
1 1 L
0 =
EI o EI L/2  2 

L/2 L
1  X3  1 RbX3 PX3 PL 2
0 = Rb. + − + X
EI  3 o EI  3 3 4  L/2. Put limits

1 RbL3 1 RbL3 PL3 PL3 RbL3 PL3 PL3


− 0 + 
0 =
EI  24  EI  3 − 3 + 4 − 24 + 24 − 16 
1 RbL3 RbL3 RbL3 PL3 PL3 PL3 PL3 
0 = + − − + + −
EI  24 3 24 3 4 24 16 

1 RbL3 − 16PL3 + 12PL3 + 2PL3 − 3PL3


0 = +
EI  3  48 
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 95

RbL3 5PL3
0 = −
3 48
RbL3 5PL3
Or =
3 48
+5P
Rb =
16
The (+ve) sign with Rb indicates that the assumed direction of redundant Rb is correct. Now Ra
can be calculated.

∑ Fy = 0
Ra + Rb = P
Ra = P − Rb
5P 16P − 5P
Ra = P − =
16 16
11P
Ra =
16
5P
Put X = L and Rb = in expression for Mac to get Ma.
16
5P L
Ma = L − P
16 2
5 PL − 8 PL
=
16
− 3 PL
Ma =
16
The (−ve) sign with Ma indicates that this reactive moment should be acting such that it gives us
tension at the top.

2.5. 2ND DEGREE INDETERMINACY:−


EXAMPLE NO. 3: Analyze the following fixed ended beam loaded by Udl by least work method.
WwKN/m
Mb
Ma
A B

L
Ra Rb

B.D.S. is chosen as a cantilever supported at A. Rb and Mb are chosen as redundants.


WwKN/m Mb
Ma x
A B

Ra L Rb

BDS UNDER LOADS AND REDUNDANTS


96 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

wX2
Mx = RbX − − Mb 0<X<L Choosing B as origin.
2
Write strain energy expression.
L 2
1  wX2
U = ∫ RbX − − Mb dX
2EI o  2 
Differentiate strain energy partially w.r.t. redundant Rb and use castigations
theorem alongwith boundary condition.
L
∂U 1  wX2
= ∆b = 0 = ∫ RbX − − Mb [X] dX
∂Rb EI o  2 
L
1  wX2
0 = ∫ RbX − − Mb dX
EI o  2 
L
1  X3 wX4 MbX2
0 = Rb − −
EI  3 8 2 o

1  L3 wL4 MbL2
0 = Rb − −
EI  3 8 2 

L3 wL4 MbL2
0 = Rb − − → (1)
3 8 2

As there are two redundants, so we require two equations. Now differentiate strain energy
expression w.r.t. another redundants Mb. Use castigations theorem and boundary condition.

L
∂U 1 2
RbX − wX − Mb ( −1) dX
= θb = 0 = ∫
∂Mb EI o  2 
L
1  wX2
0 = ∫ − RbX + + Mb dX
EI o  2 
L
1  RbX2 wX3
0 = − + + MbX
EI  2 6 o

Rb L2 wL3
0 = − + + MbL.
2 6

Rb L2 wL3
− = MbL
2 6

RbL wL2
So Mb = − → (2) Put Mb in equation 1, we get
2 6

RbL3 wL4  RbL − wL  L


2 2
0 = − −
3 8  2 6  2
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 97

RbL3 wL4 RbL3 wL4


0 = − − +
3 8 4 12

RbL3 wL4
0 = −
12 24
wL
Rb =
2
Put Rb value in equation 2, we have
wL2
Mb =  
wL L

2 2 6

+wL2
Mb =
12

The (+ve) value with Rb and Mb indicates that the assumed directions of these two redundants
are correct. Now find other reactions Ra and Mb by using equations of static equilibrium.

∑ Fy = 0
Ra + Rb = wL
Ra = wL − Rb
wL
= wL −
2
wL
Ra =
2

wL wL2
Put X = L , Rb = & Mb = in MX expression to get Ma
2 12

wL wL2 wL2
Ma = .L− −
2 2 12

wL2
Ma = −
12
The (−ve) sign with Ma indicates that this moment should be applied in such direction that it
gives us tension at the top.

Example No. 4: Solve the same previous fixed ended beam by taking a simple beam as B.D.S.:−
Choosing Ma and Mb as redundants.

Ma WwKN/m
x Mb

A B

Ra L Rb
BDS UNDER LOADS AND REDUNDANTS
B.D.S. is a simply supported beam , So Ma and Mb are redundants.
98 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

∑ Ma = 0
wL2
Rb × L + Ma = Mb +
2
wL2
Rb × L = (Mb − Ma ) +
2

Rb =  
Mb Ma wL
 L  + 2 So taking B as origin. Write MX expression.

wX2
MX = RbX − Mb − 0<X<L
2
Put Rb value
Mb − Ma + wL X − wX − Mb
2
MX = 0 < X < L. Set up strain energy
 L  2  2
expression.
L
 Mb − Ma wL
2
∫  
2
1 wX
 + 2  X − 2 − Mb dX. Differentiate w.r.t. Ma first.
U = 
2EI o  L
Use castigations theorem and
boundary conditions.

L
∂U  Mb − Ma wL
= θa = 0 = ∫  − Mb −  dX. In general R.H.S.
1 wX2 X
+ X−
∂Ma EI o  L  2 2   L
1
is ∫ N.m.dX.
EI
L
1 MbX MaX wL wX2
− Mb −  dX
X
0 = ∫ − + X−
EI o  L L 2 2   L
L
1  MbX2 MaX2 wX2 wX3 MbX 
0= ∫ − + − + + dX . Integrate it.
EI o  L2 L2 2 2L L 

L
1  Mb X2 Ma X3 wX3 wX4 MbX2 
0= − + 2 − + + . Simplify it.
EI  L2 3 L 3 6 8L 2L o

MbL MaL wL3


0= + − → (1)
6 3 24
Now differentiate U Partially w.r.t. Mb. Use castiglianos theorem and boundary conditions.

L
∂U  Mb − Ma wL
= θb = 0 = ∫  − Mb  − 1 dX
1 wX2 X
+ X−
∂Mb EI o  L  2 2  L 

L
1 MbX MaX wL wX2
− Mb  − 1 dX
X
0 = ∫ − + X−
EI o  L L 2 2  L 
L
MbX2 MaX2 wLX2 wX3 MbX MbX MaX wLX wX2
0 = ∫ − + − − − + − + + MbdX
o L 
2
L2 2L 2L L L L 2 2
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 99

L
MbX3 MaX3 wX3 wX4 MbX2 MbX2 MaX2 wLX2 wX3
0 = 
 3L2 − 3L2 + 6 − 8L − 2L − 2L + 2L − 4 + 6 + MbXo
Put limits now.
3 3 3 4 2 2 2 2 3
0= MbL2 − MaL2 + wL − wL − MbL − MbL + MaL − wLL + wL + MbL
 3L 3L 6 8L 2L 2L 2L 4 6 
Simplifying we get.

MbL MaL wL3


0= + −
3 6 24
MbL MaL wL3
or =− +
3 6 24

wL2 Ma
so Mb = − (2), Put Mb in equation (1) we get.
8 2

wL2 Ma L MaL wL3


0=
 8 − 2  6 + 3 − 24 Simplify to get Ma.

wL3 MaL MaL wL3


0= − + −
48 12 3 24

wL2
Ma =
12
Put Ma in equation (2) , we have
wL2 wL2 1
Mb = − ×
8 12 2

wL2 Ma + Mb + wL


or Mb = ; Now Rb = Putting Ma and Mb we have.
12  L  2
2 2
wL − wL 
 12 12  wL
Rb = +
L 2
wL
Rb = , Calculate Ra now.
2
∑ Fy = 0
Ra + Rb = wL Put value of Rb.
Ra = wL − Rb
wL
Ra = wL −
2
wL
Ra =
2
We get same results even with a different BDS. The beam is now statically determinate. SFD and
BMD can be drawn. Deflections at can be found by routine methods.
100 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

2.6. 2ND DEGREE INDETERMINACY OF BEAMS:−


Exmaple No. 5: Solve the following loaded beam by the method of least work.

W W

A C
B

L/2 L/2
EI=Constant

B.D.S. is a cantilever supported at A. Rb &


Rc are chosen as redundants.

x
Ma W W
x
A C
B
Ra Rb Rc

L/2 L/2
BDS UNDER LOADS AND REDUNDANTS

Choosing C as origin, Set-up moment expressions in different parts of this beam.


wX2 L
Mbc = Rc.X − 0<X<
2 2

L wX2
Mab = Rc.X + Rb X −
L
− < X < L . Write strain energy expression for entire
 2 2 2
structure.
L/2 2 2 L 2
wX2 
∫ Rc.X −
wX 
∫ Rc.X + Rb X −  −
1 1 L
U= dX + dX
2EI o  2  2EI L/2   2 2 
Partially differentiate it w.r.t. redundant Rc first. Use castiglianos theorem and boundary
conditions.

L/2 L
∂U 1 2
Rc.X − wX  [X]dX + 1 ∫ Rc.X + Rb X − L − wX  [X] dX
2
= ∆c = 0 = ∫
∂Rc EI o  2  EI L/2  2 2 

L/2 3 L 3
0=
1
∫ Rc.X2 − wX  dX + 1 ∫ Rc.X2 + Rb.X2 − Rb.LX − wX  dX . Integrate it.
EI o  2  EI L/2  2 2 

L/2 L
1  X3 wX 4  X3 X3 RbLX2 wX 4 
+ Rc.
1
0= Rc. − + Rb. − .− . Insert limits and
EI  3 8 o EI  3 3 4 8 L/2
simplify.

Rc.L3 5Rb.L3 wL4


0 = + − → (1)
3 48 8
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 101

Now partially differentiate strain energy w.r.t. Rb. Use Castiglianos theorem and boundary conditions.
L/2 L
∂U wX2  wX2 
= ∆b = 0 = ∫ Rc.X − (0) dX + ∫ Rc.X + Rb X −  − X −  dX
1 1 L L
∂Rb EI o  2  EI L/2  2 2  2

L
RbLX wX3 Rc.L.X RbL.X Rb.L2 wL.X2
∫ Rc.X2 + RbX2 −
1
0 = 0+ − − − + + dX.
EI L/2  2 2 2 2 4 4 
Integrate.
L
1 Rc.X3 Rb.X3 Rb.L.X2 wX4 Rc.L.X2 Rb.LX2 Rb.L2.X wL.X3 
0 = + − − − − + + .
EI  3 3 4 8 4 4 4 12 L/2
Put limits

Rc.L3 Rb.L3 Rb.L3 wL4 Rc.L3 Rb.L3 Rb.L3 wL4 Rc.L3 Rb.L3
0 = + − − − − + + − −
3 3 4 8 4 4 4 12 24 24

Rb.L3 wL4 Rc.L3 Rb.L3 Rb.L3 wL4


+ + + + − −
16 128 16 16 8 96

Simplify to get
2 17
Rc. = − Rb. + wL → (2) Put this value of Rc in equation ( 1), to get Rb
5 40

L3 5 wL4
0 = − wL +
2 17
Rb. + Rb.L3 − (1)
 5 40  3 48 8

2 17 5 wL4
0 = − Rb.L3 + wL4 + Rb.L3 −
15 120 48 8
Simplify to get

12
Rb. = wL
21

Put value of Rb in equation (2) and evaluate Rc,

2 12 17
Rc = − × wL + wL
5 21 40

11
Rc = wL
56
The (+ve) signs with Rb & Rc indicate that the assumed directions of these two redundants are correct.
Now calculate Ra.
∑ Fy = 0

Ra + Rb + Rc = wL

or Ra = wL − Rb − Rc . Put values of Rb and Rc from above and simplify.


102 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

12 11 wL
= wL − wL −
21 56

373
Ra = wL
1176
91
Ra = wL
392
Putting the values of these reactions in Mx expression for span AB and set X = L, we have

L wL2
Ma = Rc.L + Rb. − . Put values of Rb and Rc from above and simplify.
2 2

11 wL 12 L wL2
= .L + wL × −
56 21 2 2

21
Ma = − wL2
1176

7
Ma = − wL2
392

The (−ve) sign with Ma indicates that this reactive moment should be applied in such a direction that gives
us tension at the top. Now the beam has been analyzed and it is statically determinate now.
2.7. INTERNAL INDETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES BY FORCE METHOD :−
The question of internal indeterminacy relates to the skeletal structures like trusses which have discrete line
members connected at the ends. The structures which fall in this category may include trusses and skeletal
frames.
For fixed ended portal frames, the question of internal indeterminacy is of theoretical interest only.
1 2

Relative displacement
of horizontal number =

Consider he truss shown in the above diagram. If this truss is to be treated as internally indeterminate, more
than one members can be considered as redundants. However, the following points should be considered
for deciding the redundant members.
(1) The member which is chosen the redundant member is usually assumed to be removed or cut. The
selection of redundant should be such that it should not effect the stability of the remaining
structure.
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 103

(2) The skeletal redundant members will have unequal elongations at the two ends and in the direction
in which the member is located. For example, if a horizontal member is chosen as redundant, then
we will be concerned with the relative displacement of that member in the horizontal direction
only.
(3) Unequal nodal deflection (∆1 − ∆2 ) of a typical member shown above which is often termed as
relative displacement is responsible for the self elongation of the member and hence the internal
force in that member.

2.7.1. FIRST APPROACH: WHEN THE MEMBER IS REMOVED :−


With reference to the above diagram, we assume that the redundant member (sloping up to left) in the
actual structure is in tension due to the combined effect of the applied loads and the redundant itself. Then
the member is removed and now the structure will be under the action of applied loads only.

B2
Together
B1
Apart
B C

A D

Due to the applied loads, the distance between the points B and D will increase. Let us assume that point B
is displaced to its position B2. This displacement is termed as ∆ apart. Now the same structure is considered
under the action of redundant force only and let us assume that point B2 comes to its position B1 (some of
the deflections have been recovered). This displacement is termed as ∆ together. The difference of these
two displacements ( ∆apart − ∆together) is infact the self lengthening of the member BD and the
compatibility equation is
∆apart − ∆together = self elongation.

2.7.2. 2ND APPROACH


We assume that the member is infact cut and the distance between the cut ends has to vanish away when
the structure is under the action of applied loads and the redundant. In other words, we can say that the
deformation produced by the applied loads plus the deformation produced by the redundant should be equal
to zero.
B C B C

A D A D

F-Diagram U-Diagram
104 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

n 2
Total Deflection produced by redundants ∆ × R = ∑ UiLi × X
i=1 AiEi

n
FiUiLi
Total Deflection produced by loads ∆×L = ∑
i = 1 AiEi
If deflection is (+ve), there is elongation. If deflection is (−ve), there is shortening.
P2L
Now U = Elastic strain energy stored due to axial forces
2AE

P
L AE

P
PROOF:−
Work done = 1/2 P.∆ = shaded area of P − ∆ diagram.
Now f α ∈ (Hooke’s Law)

P ∆
or α (For direct stresses)
A L

P ∆
= E where E is Yung’s Modulus of elasticity.
A L

PL
∆ =
AE

P∆ 1 PL
Therefore work done = = P. ( Shaded area under P−∆ line __ By putting value of ∆)
2 2 AE

P2L
Work done = (for single member)
2AE

P2L
Work done = ∑ (for several members)
2AE

We know that Work done is always equal to strain energy stored.


METHOD OF LEAST WORK 105

EXAMPLE NO 6:
Analyze the truss shown below by Method of Least work. Take
(1) Member U1L2 as redundant.
(2) Member U1U2 as redundant. Number in brackets ( ) are
areas × 10−3 m2. E = 200 × 106 KN/m2

U1 (24) U2
L0U1 = 7.5m
Cos = 0.8 (1.8)
Sin = 0.6 (3.0) (3.0)
6m
(1.2) (1.8)

L0 L3
(2.4) L1 (2.4) L2 (2.4)

3 @ 4,5m
48KN

Note: In case of internally redundant trusses, Unit load method (a special case of strain energy method)
is preferred over direct strain energy computations followed by their partial differentiation.
SOLUTION: Case 1 – Member U1L2 as redundant

L0 U1=7.5m U1 U2
Cos = 0.8
Sin = 0.6
3.0 3.0
6m
1.2 1.8 1.2
L0 2.0 L3
2.4 L1 2.4 L2
3@4.5m
48KN
F-Diagram

(1) U1L2 is redundant.: STEPS

1− Remove this member. (See – diagram)


2− Assume that tensile forces would be induced in this member.
3− Analyze the structure without U1L2 (B.D.S.) or F' diagram.
4− Displacement of members due to redundant + that due to loads should be equal
to zero. OR
∆×L + ∆×R= 0
5− Analyze the truss with unit tensile force representing U1L2 or U−diagram.
106 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

F′UL U2L
Condition: ∆ apart = ∑81 ∆ together= ∑81 × PU1 L2
AE AE

U1 2.4 U2
1.8
3.0 1.2 1.2 3.0 6m

L0 2.4 L
L1 L2 3

3@4.5m
48
/
(BDS under loads) F - diagram
16
+
0 0
SFD
32
144
72
+
0 0 B.M.D.
+
We shall determine member forces for F/ - diagram by method of moments and shears as
explained earlier. These are shown in table given in pages to follow. Member forces in U-diagram are
determined by the method of joints.

U1 0.60 U2
.0
+1
1
1 Cos
L
o L3
O L1 L2 o
Sin
(BDS under) U-diagram redundant unit force.
JOINT (L2)
1 U2 L 2

L1 L2

∑FX = 0
1 × Sinθ + L1L2 = 0
L1L2 = − Sinθ = − 0.60
∑ Fy = 0
U2L2 + 1 × Cosθ = 0
U2L2 = − Cosθ = − 0.80
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 107

Joint (L1)
U1 L1

L1U2
L1L 2
0.6

∑ FX =0

L1U2 Sinθ − 0.6 = 0

0.6
L1U2 = =+1
0.6

∑ Fy = 0

L1U2 × 0.80 + UL1 = 0 ⇒ U1L1 = −0.80

Now Book F/ forces induced in members as determined by moments and shears method and U
forces as determined by method of joints in a tabular form.

Member A × 10-3 F′UL U2L Fi=Fi′


L Ui ×10-3 × 10-3
Fi′ AE AE +UiX
(m2) (m) (KN) (m) (m) (KN)
U1U2 2.4 4.5 − 12 −0.6 +0.0675 3.375×10-3 − 25.15
LoL1 2.4 4.5 +12 0 0 0 +12
L1L2 2.4 4.5 +24 −0.6 − 0.135 3.375×10-3 +10.84
L2L3 2.4 4.5 +24 0 0 0 +24
LoU1 3.0 7.5 − 20 0 0 0 − 20
L1U2 4.8 7.5 − 20 +1.0 − 0.416 20.83×10-3 + 1.93
U2L3 3.0 7.5 − 40 0 0 0 − 40
U1L1 1.2 6.0 +16 −0.8 − 0.32 16×10-3 − 1.54
U2L2 1.2 6.0 +48 −0.8 − 0.96 16×10-3 +30.456
U1L2 1.8 7.5 0 +1.0 0 20.83×10-3 +21.96
∑−1.7635× ∑ 80.91 ×
10−3 10−6

Compatibility equation is
∆×L+∆×R=0
n
F′UL
∆×L=∑
1 AE

n
U2L
∆×R=∑ .X Putting values from above table in compatibility equation. Where R = X = force
1 AE
in redundant Member U1L2
108 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

− 1.7635 × 10-3 + 80.41 × 10-6. X = 0


or − 1.7635 × 10-3 + 0.08041 × 10-3. X = 0
− 1.7635 + 0.08041 × X = 0
0.08041 X = 1.7635
1.7635
X =
0.08041

X = + 21.93 KN (Force in members U1L2)

Now final member forces will be obtained by formula Fi = Fi' + Ui X. These are also given in above table.
Apply check on calculated forces.

Check on forces
Joint Lo
20

12

16
Note: Tensile forces in above table carry positive sign and are represented as acting away from joint.
Compressive forces carry negative sign and are represented in diagram as acting towards the joint.
∑ Fx = 0
12 − 20 Sin θ = 0
12 − 20 × 0.6 = 0
0 = 0

∑ Fy = 0
16 − 20 Cos θ = 0
16 − 20 × 0.8 = 0
0 =0 Checks have been satisfied showing correctness of solution.

EXMAPLE NO. 7:
CASE 2: Analyze previous loaded Truss by taking U1 U2 as Redundant

U1 U2
Cos = 0.8
40 Sin = 0.6
F/ =Diagram
20 40
32 20 64

L0 L3
L1 36 L2 24
16 48 32
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 109

In this case member forces in BDS (F/ diagram) have been computed by method of joints due to
obvious reasons.)
Joint Lo:-
LoU1

LoL1
16

∑ Fy = 0
16 + LoU1 × Cosθ = 0
16
LoU1 = − = − 20
0.8
∑ FX = 0
LoL1 + LoU1 Sinθ = 0
LoL1 + LoU1 × 0.6 = 0
LoL1 − 20 × 0.6 = 0
LoL1 = + 12
Joint U1

20
U1 L1

U1 L2
∑ FX = 0
20 Sinθ+ U1L2 Sinθ = 0
20 × 0.6 + U1L2 × 0.6 = 0
U1L2 = − 20
∑ Fy = 0
20 × 0.8 − U1L1 − U1L2 × 0.8 = 0
20 × 0.8 − U1L1 + 20 × 0.8 = 0
U1L1 = 32

Joint L1:
32
L1 U2
12
L1 L2

∑ Fy = 0
L1U2 Cosθ + 32 = 0
110 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

32
L1U2 = −
0.8

L1U2 = − 40

∑ FX = 0
L1L2 + L1U2 Sinθ − 12 = 0
L1L2 − 40 × 0.6 − 12 = 0
L1L2 = 36

Joint U2

U2 L3
40 U2 L2

∑ FX = 0
40 Sinθ + U2L3 Sinθ = 0
40 × 0.6 + U2L3 × 0.6 = 0
U2L3 = − 40
∑ Fy = 0
40 Cosθ − U2L3 Cosθ − U2L2 = 0
40 × 0.8 − ( − 40) × 0.8 − U2L2 = 0
U2L2 = 64

Joint L2

20 64

36 L2 L3

48
∑ FX = 0
L2L3 + 20 Sinθ − 36 = 0
L2L3 + 20 × 0.6 − 36 = 0
L2L3 − 24 = 0
L2L3 = 24
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 111

Joint L3 (Checks)
40

24
32

∑ FX = 0
40 Sinθ − 24 = 0
40 × 0.6 − 24 = 0
0 = 0
∑ Fy = 0
32 − 40 Cosθ = 0
32 − 40 × 0.8 = 0
0 = 0 Checks are satisfied. Results are OK and are given in table at page to follow:
Now determine member forces in U diagram.

U1 1 1 U2

1.66
0 1.328 1.328 0
1.66
L0
L3
0 L1 1 L2 0

U-Diagram
(BDS under unit redundant force)

Joint U1

U1 L2
U1 L1

∑ FX = 0
1 + U1L2 × Sinθ = 0
1 + U1L2 × 0.6 = 0
112 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

U1L2 = − 1.66
∑ Fy = 0
U1L1 +U1L2 × Cosθ = 0
U1L1 + ( − 1.66) × 0.8 = 0
U1L1 = 1.328

Joint L1 :-
1.328 L1 U2

L1 L2

∑ Fy = 0
1.328 + L1U2 × 0.8 = 0
1.328
L1U2 = − = − 1.66
0.8

∑ FX = 0

L1L2 + L1L2 × 0.6 = 0

L1L2 − 1.66 × 0.6 = 0

L1L2 = +1

Entering results of member forces pertaining to F/ diagram and U diagram alongwith member
properties in a tabular form.

Mem- A× L Fi′ U1 F′UL U2L Fi=Fi+UiX


× 10-3 × 10-3
ber 10-3 (m) (KN) AE AE (KN)
(m) (m) (m)
U1U2 2.4 4.5 0 +1 0 9.375 × 10-3 −25.34
LoL1 2.4 4.5 +12 0 0 0 + 12
L1L2 2.4 4.5 + 36 +1 +0.3375 9.375 × 10-3 +10.66
L2L3 2.4 4.5 +24 0 0 0 + 24
LoU1 3.0 7.5 − 20 0 0 0 − 20
L1U2 1.8 7.5 − 40 −1.66 +1.383 57.4 × 10-3 +2.06
U2L3 3.0 7.5 − 40 0 0 0 − 40
U1L1 1.2 6.0 + 32 1.328 1.0624 44.09 × 10-3 + 65.65
U2L2 1.2 6.0 + 64 1.328 2.1248 44.09 × 10-3 + 97.65
U1L2 1.8 7.5 − 20 −1.66 0.691 57.4 × 10-3 − 62.06
∑ 5.6 × 10-3 ∑221.73 × 10-6
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 113

Compatibility equation is
∆ × L + ∆ × R = 0 Putting values of ∆ × L and ∆ × R due to redundant from above table.
56 × 10-3 + 221.73 × 10-6 X = 0 , where X is force in redundant member U1U2.

or 5.6 × 10 -3 + 0.22173 × 10-3 X = 0

5.6 × 10-3
X =
0.22173 × 10-3

X = − 25.34 KN. Therefore forces in truss finally are as follows.


(by using formula (Fi = Fi' + UiX and are given in the last
column of above table)
FU1 U2 = 0 + Ui.x = 0 − 25.34 × 1 = − 25.34
FLoL1 = 12 − 25.34 × 0 = + 12
FL1L2 = 36 − 25.34 × 1 = + 10.66
FL2L3 = 24 − 0 = + 24
FLoU1 = − 20 − 0 × 25.34 = − 20
FL1U2 = − 40 + 1.66 × 25.34 = + 2.06
FU2L3 = − 40 + 0 × 25.34 = − 40
FU1L1 = + 32 + 1.328 × 25.34 = + 65.65
FU2L2 = + 64 + 1.328 × 25.34 = + 97.65
FU1L2 = − 20 − 1.66 × 25.34 = − 62.06. Now based on these values final check can be applied.
Joint Lo.
20

12

16
∑ FX = 0
12 − 20 Sinθ = 0
12 − 20 × 0.6 = 0
0=0
∑ Fy = 0
16 − 20 Cosθ = 0
16 − 20 × 0.8 = 0
16 − 16 = 0
0=0 Results are OK.
114 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

2.8. STEPS FOR TRUSS SOLUTION BY METHOD OF LEAST WORK.


Now instead of Unit load method, we shall solve the previous truss by direct use of method of
least work.

(1) Consider the given truss under the action of applied loads and redundant force X
in member U1L2

(2) The forces in the relevant rectangle will be a function of applied load and
redundant force X. (As was seen in previous unit load method solution)

(3) Formulate the total strain energy expression due to direct forces for all the
members in the truss.

(4) Partially differentiate the above expressions with respect to X.

(5) Sum up these expressions and set equal to zero. Solve for X.

(6) With this value of X, find the member forces due to applied loads and redundant acting
simultaneously (by applying the principle of super positions).

EXAMPLE NO. 8 :-
Analyze the loaded truss shown below by least work by treating member U1L2 as redundant.
Numbers in ( ) are areas × 10-3 m2 . E = 200 × 106 KN/m2.

SOLUTION:-

48 x 4.5 48
= 16KN 32

b = 10
r =3
j =6
b+r =2j
10 + 3 = 2 × 6
13 = 12
D = 13 − 12 = 1
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 115

Stable Indeterminate to 1st degree.

16
48
32

F − Diagram (Truss under loads and redundant)

NOTE: Only the rectangle of members containing redundant X contains forces in terms of X as has been
seen earlier. Now analyze the Truss by method of joints to get Fi forces.
JOINT L0
L0U1

L0L1

16KN

∑ Fy = 0
LoU1 Cosθ + 16 = 0
− 16
LoU1 =
Cosθ
− 16
=
0.8
LoU1 = − 20 KN
∑ FX = 0
LoL1 + LoU1 Sinθ = 0
LoL1 + (−20) × 0.6 = 0
LoL1 − 12 = 0
LoL1 = 12 KN
Joint U1

U1 U2
20

U1L1 X
∑ FX = 0
U1 U2 + X Sinθ + 20 Sinθ = 0
116 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

U1 U2 + X × 0.6 + 20 × 0.6 = 0

U1 U2 = − (0.6 X +12)
∑ Fy = 0
− U1 L1 − X Cosθ + 20 Cosθ = 0
− U1 L1 − X × 0.8 + 20 × 0.8 = 0
U1 L1 = − 0.8 X + 16
U1L1 = − (0.8 X − 16)

Joint L1 :-

0.8X - 16
L1U
2

12 L1 L2

∑ Fy = 0
− (0.8X − 16) + L1 U2 Cosθ = 0
L1U2 × 0.8 = 0.8 X − 16

L1U2 = (X − 20)
∑ FX = 0
L1L2 + L1U2 Sinθ − 12 = 0 Put value of L1U2.
L1L2 + (X − 20 ) × 0.6 − 12 = 0
L1L2 + 0.6 X − 12 − 12 = 0

L1 L2 = − (0.6X − 24)

Joint U2

(0.6X+12)

(X-20) U2 L3
U2 L2

∑ FX = 0
(0.6 X + 12) + U2L3 Sinθ − (X − 20) Sinθ = 0
0.6 X + 12 + U2L3 × 0.6 − (X − 20) × 0.6 = 0
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 117

0.6 X + 12 + 0.6U2L3 − 0.6 X + 12 = 0


− 24
U2L3 =
0.6

U2L3 = − 40 KN

∑ Fy = 0
− U2L2 − (X − 20) Cosθ − U2L3 Cosθ = 0
− U2L2 − (X − 20) × 0.8 − (− 40) × 0.8 = 0
− U2L2 − 0.8 X + 16 + 32 = 0
− 0.8 X + 48 = U2L2

U2L2 = − (0.8X − 48)


Joint L2:-

0.8 X - 48
X

L2 L3
0.6 X -24

48
∑ FX = 0
L2L3 + 0.6 X − 24 − X Sinθ = 0
L2L3 = − 0.6 X + 24 + 0.6 X

L2L3 = 24 KN

∑ Fy = 0
− (0.8X − 48) − 48 + X Cosθ = 0
− 0.8X + 48 − 48 + 0.8X = 0
0 = 0 (Check)
Joint L3 :-
At this joint, all forces have already been calculated. Apply checks for corretness.
40

24

32
118 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

∑ FX = 0
40 Sinθ − 24 = 0
40 × 0.6 − 24 = 0
24 − 24 = 0
0 =0 O.K.

∑ Fy = 0
− 40 Cosθ + 32 = 0
− 40 × 0.8 + 32 = 0
− 32 + 32 = 0 O.K. Checks have been satisfied.
0 =0
This means forces have been calculated correctly. We know that strain energy stored in entire
Fi2L
Truss is U = ∑
2AE
∂Fi
∑ Fi . Li
∂U ∂X
So, = ∆ = 0 =
∂X AE
∂Fi
∑ Fi . Li
∂X
= 0 = 80.41 × 10−6X − 1764.17 × 10−6 Values of Fi and Li for various
AE
members have been picked up from table annexed.
0 = 80.41 X − 1764.17
or 80.41 X = 1764.17
1764.17
X=
80.41
X = 21.94 KN

Now putting this value of X in column S of annexed table will give us member forces.

Now apply equilibrium check on member forces calculated. You may select any Joint say L1.
Joint L1 :-
15.5
1.74

12 10.84

∑ FX = 0,
10.84 − 12 + 1.94 Sinθ = 0
or 10.84 − 12 + 1.94 × 0.6 = 0 ,
or 0 = 0 (Check) It means that solution is correct.
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 119

Insert here Page No. 138−A


120 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

EXAMPLE NO. 9:- By the force method analyze the truss shown in fig. below. By using the forces in
members L1U2 and L2U3 as the redundants. Check the solution by using two different members as the redundants.
E = 200 × 10 6 KN/m2
SOLUTION:-
L0U1 = 7.5m U1 (1.8) U2 (1.8) U3
Cos = 0.8 (1.2)
Sin = 0.6 (2.4) 0 0 (1.2)
6m
(0.90) (1.2) (1.2) (0.60) (0.90)
L0 (1.5) (1.5) (1.5) (1.5) L4
L1 L2 L3 48x4.5 + 96x9
48KN 96KN 72KN 18 18
48+96+72- 4@4.5m + 72x13.5 = 114KN
114 = 102KN
F - Diagram 18

(2.4) (1.2) (1.2) loads only.


(0.90) (1.2)(0.60) (1.2)(0.90)(2.4) 6m Or F-Diagram
(1.5) (1)(1.5) (2)(1.5) (1.5) L4
L0 L1 L2 L3 L4
102KN 48KN 96KN 72KN 114KN

4@4.5m
+
102KN 54KN
S.F.D.
0 0
42KN
-
114KN
459 KN-m 702KN-m
513KN-m
+ B.M.D.
0 0
0.6 0

0 0.8 0 6m U1-Diagram for redundant X1


0.8 0
L0 0
L4
0 L1 L2 0 L3
0 0.6
0 0
0 6m U2-diagram for redundant X2
0 0.8 0.8

L0 0 L1 0 L2 0.6 L3 0 L4
Compatibility equations are:
∆X1L + ∆X1R1 + ∆X1R2 = 0 → (1) Change in length in member 1 due
to loads and two redundants should be zero.
∆X2L + ∆X2R1 + ∆X2R2 = 0 → (2) Change in length in member 2 due to loads
and two redundants should be zero.
Here R1 = X1
R2 = X2
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 121

∑.F′U1 L
Where ∆X1L = = Deflection produced in member (1) due to applied loads.
AE
U12L
∆X1R1 = Deflection produced in member (1) due to redundant R1 = ∑
 AE  . X1
∆x1R2 = Deflection produced in member (1) due to redundant R2 = ∑
U1U2L
 AE  . X2
F′U2L
∆x2L = Deflection produced in member (2) due to loads = ∑
AE
∆x2R1 = Deflection produced in member (2) due to redundant R1 = ∑
U1U2L
 AE  . X1
U22L
∆x2R2 = Deflection produced in member (2) due to redundant R 2 = ∑
 AE  . X2
From table attached, the above evaluated summations are picked up and final member forces can be seen
in the same table. All member forces due to applied loads (Fi' diagram) have been determined by the
method of moments and shears and by method of joints for U1 and U2 diagrams.
Evaluation of member forces in verticals of F′ − Diagram :-
Forces in verticals are determined from mothod of joints for different trusses shown above.
(Joint L1)
U1 L1

76.5 76.5

48
∑ Fy = 0
U1L1 − 48 = 0

U1L1 = 48

(Joint U2)

117 85.5

52.5
U2 L2
∑ Fy = 0
− U2L2 + 52.5 Cosθ = 0
− U2L2 + 52.5 × 0.8 = 0
U2L2 = 52.5 × 0.8

U2L2 = + 42
122 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

(Joint U3)
85.5

142.5
U3 L3
∑ Fy = 0
− U3L3 + 142.5 Cosθ = 0
U3L3 = 142.5 × 0.8

U3L3 = + 114

Evaluation of forces in verticals of U1 − Diagram:-


(Joint L1)
U1 L1
1

L1 L2

∑ FX = 0
L1L2 + 1 Sin θ = 0

L1L2 = − 0.6

∑ Fy = 0
U1L1 + 1 Cos θ = 0

U1L1 = − 0.8

(Joint U1 )

U1 U2

U1 L2
0.8
∑ FX = 0
U1U2 + U1L2 Sinθ = 0
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 123

∑ Fy = 0
+ 0.8 − U1L2 Cos θ = 0
0.8 = U1L2 × 0.8
U1L2 = 1
so U1U2 + 1 × 0.6 = 0 Putting value of U1L2 in ∑ FX.
U1 U2 = − 0.6

Now from the table, the following values are taken.


∆X1L = − 0.671 × 10 -3
∆X1R1 = 125.7 × 10−6X1 = 0.1257 × 10-3X1
∆X1R2 = 32 × 10-6 X2 = 0.032 × 10-3X2
∆X2L = − 6.77 × 10-3
∆X2R1 = 0.032 × 10-3 X1
∆X2R2 = 125.6 × 10-6X2 = 0.1256 × 10−3X2
Putting these in compatibility equations, we have.
− 0.671 × 10−3+0.1257 × 10−3X1+0.032 × 10−3X2 = 0 → (1)
− 6.77 × 10−3+0.032 × 10−3 X1+0.1256 × 10−3X2 = 0 → (2)

dividing by 10−3
− 0.671+0.1257X1 + 0.032X2 = 0 → (1)
− 6.77 + 0.032X1 + 0.1256X2 = 0 → (2)
0.671 − 0.032X2
From (1), X1 = → (3)
0.1257
Put X1 in (2) & solve for X2
0.671 − 0.032X2
− 6.77 + 0.032 
 0.1257  + 0.1256X2 = 0
− 6.77 + 0.171 − 8.146 × 10-3X2 + 0.1256X2 = 0
− 6.599 + 0.1174X2 = 0
0.1174X2 = 6.599

X2 = 56.19 KN

0.671 − 0.032 × 56.19


From (3) X1 =
0.1257
X1 = − 8.96 KN

After redundants have been evaluated, final member forces can be calculated by using the formula shown
in last column of table. Apply checks on these member forces.
124 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

CHECKS:-
(Joint Lo)
127.5

76.5

102

∑ FX = 0
76.5 − 127.5 Sinθ = 0
76.5 − 127.5 × 0.6 = 0
0=0

∑ Fy = 0
102 − 127.5 Cosθ = 0
102 − 127.5 × 0.8 = 0
0=0

The results are O.K. Follow same procedure if some other two members are considered redundant.
See example No. 12.
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 125

Insert Page No. 143−A


126 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

2.9. SIMULTANEIOUS INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL TRUSS REDUNDANCY


EXAMPLE NO. 10: Determine all reactions and member forces of the following truss by using
castiglianos theorem or method of least work. Consider it as:
(i) internally redundant;
(ii) internally and externally redundant.
Nos. in ( ) are areas in × 10-3m2. E = 200 × 106 KN/m2
20KN 20KN
3KN C (4) D

(3) 8m
(3)
(2)
6KN B (4) E
(2)
(5)
(5) 8m
(2)
A F
6m
SOLUTION:
DEGREE OF INDETERMINACY :-
D = (m + r ) − 2 j = (10 + 4 ) − 2 × 6 = 2
Therefore, the truss is internally statically indeterminate to the 2nd degree. There can be two
approaches, viz, considering two suitable members as redundants and secondly taking one member
and one reaction as redundants for which the basic determinate structure can be obtained by
cutting the diagonal CE and replacing it by a pair of forces X1 − X1 and replacing the hinge at F
by a roller support with a horizontal redundant reaction HF = X2. Applying the first approach and
treating inclineds of both storeys sloping down to right as redundants.

(I) WHEN THE TRUSS IS CONSIDERED AS INTERNALLY REDUNDANT :-


20KN 20KN
3KN C (4) D
X1
(3) 8m
(3)
(2)
6KN B (4) X1
E
(2)
(5)
(5) 8m
X2 (2)
A F
6m

Applying method of joints for calculating member forces.


METHOD OF LEAST WORK 127

Consider Joint (C) and all unknown forces are assumed to be in tension to begin with , acting away from
the joint. Length AE= 10 m , cos θ = 0.6 , sin θ = 0.8
Joint (C)
20KN

3KN
SCD

X1
SBC
∑ FX = 0
Scd + 3 + X1 Cos θ = 0
Scd = − (3 + 0.6 × X1)
∑ Fy = 0
− Sbc − X1 Sin θ − 20 = 0
Sbc = − ( 20 + 0.8 X1 )
Joint (D)
20KN

(3+0.6X1)

S BD
SDE
∑ FX = 0
3 + 0.6X1 − SBD × 0.6 = 0
SBD = ( 5 + X1 )
∑ Fy = 0
− SDE − 20 − SBD Sinθ = 0
− SDE − 20 − ( 5 + X1 ) × 0.80 = 0
SDE = − ( 24 + 0.8X1 )
Joint (B)
(20+0.8X1)

(5+X1)
6KN
SBE

X2
SAB
∑ FX = 0
SBE + (5+X1) × 0.6 + X2 × 0.6 + 6 = 0
SBE = − ( 9 + 0.6 X1 + 0.6 X2)
∑ Fy = 0
128 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

− SAB − X2 Sinθ − (20 + 0.8 X1) + (5+X1) Sinθ = 0


− SAB − 0.8 X2 − 20 − 0.8 X1 + 4 + 0.8 X1 = 0
SAB = − (16 + 0.8 X2 )
Joint (E)
(24 + 0.8 x 1)
X1

9+0.6X1 + 0.6X2

SAE
SEF
∑ FX = 0
9 + 0.6 X1 + 0.6 X2 − X1 x 0.6 − SAE × 0.6 = 0
9 + 0.6 X2 = SAE × 0.6
SAE = ( 15 + X2 )
∑ Fy = 0
− SEF − 24 − 0.8 X1 + X1 × 0.8 − (15 + X2 ) × 0.8 = 0
SEF = − 24 − 0.8 X1 + 0.8 X1 − 12 − 0.8 X2 = 0
SEF = − 36 − 0.8 X2
SEF = − (36 + 0.8 X2 )
Enter Forces in table. Now applying Catiglianos’ theorem and taking values from table attached.
∂S L
∑S. . = 0 = 485.6 + 65.64X1 + 2.7X2 = 0 (1)
∂X1 AE
and
∂S L
∑ S. . = 0 = 748.3 + 2.7X1 + 62.94 X2 = 0 (2)
∂X2 AE

or 485.6 + 65.64 X1 + 2.7 X2 = 0 → (1)


748.3 + 2.7 X1 + 62.94 X2 = 0 → (2)
From (1)
X2 = − 
485.6 + 65.64 X1
 2.7  putting in (2)

748.3 + 2.7 X1 − 62.94 


485.6 + 65.64 X1
→ (2)
 2.7 =0
748.3+2.7X1 −11319.875 − 1530.141X1 − 10571.575 − 1527.441 X1 = 0 → (3)

X1 = − 6.921 KN
485.6 − 65.64 × 6.921
From (3) X2 = − 
 2.7 
X2 = − 11.592 KN
Now put values of X1 and X2 in 5th column of S to get final number forces SF as given in last
column of table. Apply equilibrium check to verify correctness of solution.
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 129

Insert Page No. 148−A


130 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

EQUILIBRIUM CHECKS :-

Joint (A)
6.726KN

3.408KN
HA

4KN

∑ FX = 0
3.408 Cosθ − HA − 0

HA = 2.045 KN

∑ Fy = 0
−6.726 + 4 + 3.408 Sinθ = 0
0 = 0 Check is OK.

Joint (F)

26.726KN
11.592KN

HF

36KN

∑ FX = 0
− HF + 11.592 Cosθ = 0

HF = + 6.955 KN

∑ Fy = 0
36 − 27.726 − 11.592 × Sinθ = 0
0 = 0 (check)

It means solution is correct. Now calculate vertical reactions and show forces in diagram.
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 131

20KN 20KN

3KN C 1.153
D
6.921
14.463 18.463 8m
1.921
4.426
6KN E
B

6.726 26.726 8m
11.592
HF=6.955KN
HA=2.045Kn 3.408 F
A
VA=4KN VF=+36KN
6m

ANALYZED TRUSS
∑ MA = 0
VF × 6 − 20 × 6 − 3 × 16 − 6 × 8 = 0

VF = + 36 KN

∑ Fy = 0
VA + VF = 40 KN

VA = + 4 KN

EXAMPLE NO. 11:


CASE II : When the Truss is considered as both externally & internally redundant.
Taking SCE & HF as redundants. Now Truss is determinate and calculate vertical reactions.

20KN 20KN
3kn
C D Fy = 0
X VA + VF = 40
8m MA = 0
Cos =0.6
VFx6 - 3x16-20x6-6x8=0
6KN X
B E VF = 36KN
Sin 0.8
=0.8 and VA = 4KN
8m

(9-HF) F HF
A

4KN 36Kn
6m
Fig. 2.51
132 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Compatibility Equations are:


∂S L
∑ S. . = 0 (1) Partial differentiation of strain energy w.r.t. HF = ∆H = 0.
∂HF AE
(Pin support)
∂S L
∑ S. . = 0 (2) Partial differentiation of strain energy w.r.t. X = elongation of
∂X AE
member CE due to X = 0.
As before determine member forces Si in members by method of joints.

Joint (A)

SAB

S AE

(9-HF)

4
∑FX = 0
SAE Cosθ − (9 − HF) = 0
SAE × 0.6 − (9 − HF) = 0
9 − HF
SAE = 
 0.6 

SAE = 15 − 1.67 HF

∑ Fy = 0
4 + SAB + SAE Sinθ = 0
4 + SAB + (15 − 1.670 HF ) × 0.8 = 0
4 + SAB + 12 − 1.33 HF = 0
SAB = − 16 + 1.33 HF

SAB = − (16 − 1.33 HF )

Joint (F)
S BF SEF

HF

36
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 133

∑ FX = 0
− HF − SBF Cosθ = 0
− HF − 0.6 SBF = 0
− HF = 0.6 SBF

SBF = − 1.67 HF
∑ Fy = 0
36 + SEF + SBF Sinθ = 0
36 + SEF − 1.67 HF × 0.8 = 0
SEF = − (36 − 1.33 HF)

Joint (E)
SDE
X

SBE

(36 - 1.33HF)
(15-1.67HF)
∑ FX = 0
− SBE − X Cosθ − (15 − 1.67 HF) Cosθ = 0
− SBE − 0.6X − ( 15 − 1.67 HF ) × 0.6 = 0
− SBE − 0.6X − 9 + HF = 0
HF − 0.6X − 9 = SBE

SBE = (HF − 0.6 X − 9)

∑ Fy = 0
SDE +36 − 1.33 HF + X Sinθ − (15 − 1.67HF ) Sinθ = 0 by putting Sinθ = 0.08
SDE + 36 − 1.33 HF + 0.8X − 12 + 1.33 HF = 0
SDE = − 0.8X − 24

SDE = − ( 24 + 0.8X)

Joint (C)
20KN

3KN
S CD

X
SBC
134 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

∑ FX = 0
SCD + 3 + X Cosθ = 0

SCD = − ( 3 + 0.6X)

∑ Fy = 0
− 20 − SBC − X Sin θ = 0
− 20 − SBC − 0.8X = 0

SBC = − ( 20 + 0.8 X )

Joint (D)
20KN

(3+0.6X)

SBD
(24+ 0.8X)

∑FX = 0
3 + 0.6X − SBD Cosθ = 0
3 + 0.6X − 0.6 SBD = 0

SBD = ( 5 + X)

∑ Fy = 0
− 20 + 24 + 0.8X − SBD Sinθ = 0
− 20 + 24 + 0.8X − ( 5 + X ) 0.8 = 0
− 20 + 24 + 0.8X − 4 − 0.8X = 0
0 = 0 (check)

Calculation of HF & X :−
From the attached table, picking up the values of summations, we have.
∂S L
∑. S. . = 0 = (−1247.03 + 175.24 HF − 4.5 × X) 10−6
∂HF AE
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 135

∂S L
and ∑. S. . = 0 = (460.6 − 4.5 HF + 65.64X) 10-6
∂X AE

−1247.03 + 175.24 HF − 4.5X = 0 → (1)


+ 460.6 − 4.5 HF + 65.64X = 0 → (2)

From (1)
− 1247.03 + 175.24 HF
X= → (3)
 4.5 
Put in (2) to get HF
− 1247.03 + 175.24 HF
460.6 − 4.5 HF + 65.64 
 4.5  = 0

460.6 − 4.5 HF − 18190.01 + 2556.17 HF = 0


−17729.41 + 2551.67 HF = 0

HF = 6.948 KN Put this value in 3 to get X.

−1247.03 + 175.24 × 6.948


X= (3)
 4.5 

or X = − 6.541 KN Now calculate number Forces by putting the values of X and


HF in S expressions given in column 5 of the attached table.
These final forces appear in last column for SF.

20KN 20KN
3KN 0.925
C D
1.541
14.762 18.767
6.641 8m

6KN 1.873
B E
3.392
6.759 26.759 8m
11.603
2.052Kn A F 6.948KN

4kn 36KN
6m

Fig 2.52 ANALYZED TRUSS


136 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Insert Page No. 153−A


METHOD OF LEAST WORK 137

Equilibrium checks for the accuracy of calculated member Forces:-


Joint (A)
6.759
3.397

2.052

4
∑ FX = 0
3.397 Cosθ − 2.052 = 0
0 = 0 Check
∑ Fy = 0
− 6.759 + 4 + 3.397 × 0.8 = 0
0 = 0 Check
Joint (F)
11.603 26.759

6.948

36
∑ FX = 0
− 6.948 + 11.603 × 0.6 = 0
0 ≅ 0 Check
∑ Fy = 0
36 − 26.759 − 11.603 × 0.8 = 0
0 ≅ 0 Check
Joint (C)
20

3 0.925

14.767 6.541
∑ FX = 0
0.925 − 6.541 × 0.6 + 3 = 0
0 = 0 Check
∑ Fy = 0
14.767 − 20 + 6.541 × 0.8 = 0
0 = 0 Check. This verifies correctness of solution.
138 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

EXAMPLE NO. 12:-


By the unit load−method analyze the internally indeterminate truss shown below. Take the forces
in members L1U2 and U2L3 as the redundants.

Note: The same truss has already been solved in Example No. 9, by taking L1 U2 and L2 U3 as
redundants.
E = 200 × 106 KN/m2

SOLUTION:-
U1 (1.8) U2 (1.8) U3
LoU1 = 7.5 m
Cos = 0.8
(2.4) (1.2) (1.2) (0.90)(2.4) 6m
Sin = 0.6 0.90 (1.2) F-Diagram
(1.2)
L0 (1.5) (1.5) (1.5) (1.5) L4
L1 L2 L3

48KN 96KN 72KN


102KN 114KN
4@4.5m

U1 U2 U3
B.D.S. Under applied
load only.
Or F/-Diagram
L0 L4
L1 L2 L3
48KN 96KN 72KN
102KN 114KN
102
54
+
0
S.F.D.
42 114
702
459 513
+
B.M.D.
U1 0.6 U2 0 U3
1
0.8 0 0 U1 -Diagram
0
0.8
L0 0.6 L4
0 L1 L2 0 L3 0
U1 0 U2 0.6 U3

0
0 0.8 0.8 0 U2-Diagam
0
L0 L4
0 L1 0 L2 0.6 L3 0
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 139

Compatibility equations are :


∆X1 + ∆X1 R1 + ∆X1R2 = 0 → (1) Here X1 = R1
X2 = R2
Deflection created by applied loads and redundants shall be zero.
∆X2L + ∆X2R1 + ∆X2R2 = 0 → (2)

F′U1L
∆X1L = ∑. (Change in length of first redundant member by applied loads)
AE

U12L
∆X1R1 = ∑
 AE  X1 (Change in length in first redundant member due to first redundant force)

∆X1R2 = ∑
U1U2L
 AE  . X2 (Change in length in first redundant member due to second redundant force)

F′U2L
∆X2L = ∑ (Change in second redundant member due to applied load.)
AE

∆X2R1 = ∑ 
U1U2L
 AE  . X1 (Change in length of second redundant member due to first redundant force.)
U22L
∆X2R2 = ∑ 
 AE  . X2 (Change in length of second redundant member due to redundant force in it.)
Picking up the above deformations from the table (158−A) and calculate final member forces by following
formula.
F = F' + U1X1 + U2X2

Forces in chord members and inclineds are determined by the method of moments and shears as explained
already, while for verticals method of joints has been used.
Evaluation of force in verticals of F′ − Diagram
(Joint L2)
U2 L2
67.5
52.5

76.5 85.5

96

∑ FX = 0
85.5 − 76.5 + 52.5 Sinθ − 67.5 Sinθ = 0
85.5 − 76.5 + 52.5 × 0.6 − 67.5 × 0.6 = 0
0 = 0 (Check)

∑ Fy + 0
U2L2 + 52.5 Cosθ + 67.5 Cos θ − 96 = 0
U2L2 = − 52.5 × 0.8 − 67.5 × 0.8 + 96 = 0

U2L2 = 0
140 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Insert Page No. 158−A


METHOD OF LEAST WORK 141

Picking the following values from attached table (Table for example No.12)
∆X1L = + 1.009 × 10−3
∆X1R1 = + 125.7 × 10−6 X1 = + 0.1257 × 10−3 X1
∆X1R2 = + 32 × 10−6 X2 = + 0.032 × 10−3 X2
∆X2L = − 0.171 × 10−3
∆X2R1 = + 32 × 10−6 X1 = + 0.032 × 10−3 X1
∆X2R2 = + 125.7 × 10−6 X2 = + 0.1257 × 10−3 X2

Putting these in compatibility equals.


1.009 × 10−3+0.1257 × 10−3 X1+0.032 × 10−3 X2 = 0 (1)
− 0.171 × 10−3+0.032 × 10−3X1+0.1257 × 10−3X2 = 0 (2)
Simplify
1.009 + 0.1257 X1 + 0.032 X2 = 0 → (1)
− 0.171 + 0.032 X1 + 0.1257X2 = 0 → (2)

−1.009 − 0.032 X2 
From (1) X1 =  → (3)
 0.1257 
Put in (2) & solve for X2
−1.009 − 0.032 X2 
− 0.171 + 0.032 
 0.1257  + 0.1257 X2 = 0

− 0.171 − 0.257 − 8.146 × 10−3 X2 + 0.1257X2 = 0


− 0.428 + 0.1176 X2 = 0

0.428
X2 =
0.1176

X2 = 3.64 KN Put this in equation (3) to get X1

(3) ⇒ X1 =  −1.009 − 0.032 × 3.64


 0.1257 

X1 = − 8.95 KN

So final forces in members are calculated by the following given formula.


F = F′+ U1 X1 + U2 X2
FLoL1 = 76.5 + 0 + 0 = + 76.5 KN
FL1 L2 = 76.5 + ( − 0.6) ( − 8.95) + 0 = + 81.87 KN
FL2 L3 = 85.5 + 0 + 3.64) (− 0.6) = + 83.32 KN
FL3 L4 = 85.5 + 0 + 0 = + 85.5 KN
FU1 U2 = −117 + (− 0.6) (− 8.95) + 0 = − 111.63 KN
FU2 U3 = −117 + o +(− 0.6) (3.64) = − 119.18 KN
FU1 L1 = + 48 + (− 0.8) (− 8.95) + 0 = + 55.16 KN
FU2 L2 = 0 + (− 0.8) (− 8.95) + (− 0.8) (3.64) = + 4.25 KN
142 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

FU3 L3 = + 72 + 0 + (− 0.8) (3.64) = + 69.09 KN


Flo U1 = − 127.5 + 0 + 0 = − 127.5 KN
FU1 L2 = + 67.5 + (1) (− 8.95) + 0 = 58.55 KN
FL1 U2 = 0 + (1) (− 8.95) + 0 = − 8.95 KN
FU2 L3 = 0 + 0 + (1) (3.64) = + 3.64 KN
FL2 U3 = 52.5 + 0 + (1) (3.64) = + 56.14 KN
FU3 L4 = − 142.5 + 0 + 0 = − 142.5 KN
CHECK ON FORCE VALUES
We may apply check at random at any joint. If solution is correct, equilibrium checks will be
satisfied at all joint.
Joint Lo.

127.5

76.5

102
∑ FX = 0
76.5 − 127.5 Sinθ = 0
76.5 − 127.5 × 0.6 = 0
0=0

∑ Fy = 0
102 − 127.5 × 0.8 = 0
0=0 OK. Results seem to be correct.

The credit for developing method of least work goes to Alberto Castiglianos who worked as an engineer in Italian
Railways. This method was presented in a thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of diploma
engineering of associate engineer. He published a paper for finding deflections which is called Castiglianos first
theorem and in consequence thereof, method of least work which is also known as Castiglianos second theorem.
Method of least work also mentioned earlier in a paper by an Italian General Menabrea who was not able to give a
satisfactory proof. Leonard Euler had also used the method about 50 years ago for derivation of equations for
buckling of columns wherein, Daniel Bernolli gave valuable suggestion to him.
Method of least work or Castiglianos second theorem is a very versatile method for the analysis of
indeterminate structures and specially to trussed type structures. The method does not however, accounts
for erection stresses, temperature stresses or differential support sinking. The reader is advised to use some
other method for the analysis of such indeterminate structures like frames and continuos beams.
It must be appreciated in general, for horizontal and vertical indeterminate structural systems, carrying various
types of loads, there are generally more than one structural actions present at the same time including direct forces,
shear forces, bending moments and twisting moments. In order to have a precise analysis all redundant structural
actions and hence strain energies must be considered which would make the method laborious and cumbersome.
Therefore, most of engineers think it sufficient to consider only the significant strain energy. The reader should
know that most of structural analysis approaches whether classical or matrix methods consider equilibrium of
forces and displacement/strain compatibility of members of a system.
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 143

The basis of the method of consistent deformation and method of least work are essentially the same. In
consistent deformation method, the deformation produced by the applied loads are equated to these
produced by the redundants. This process usually results in the evolution of redundants. However, in the
method of least work, total strain energy expression of a structural system in terms of that due to known
applied loads and due to redundants is established. Then the total strain energy is partially differentiated
with respect to redundant which ultimately result in the evolution of the redundant. It must be appreciated
that, for indeterminate structural system like trusses, the unknown redundants maybe external supports
reaction or the internal forces or both. And it may not be very clear which type of redundants should be
considered as the amount of work involved in terms of requisite calculation may vary. Therefore, a clever
choice of redundants (or a basic determinate structure as was the case with consistent deformation method)
may often greatly reduce the amount of work involved.

There is often a debate going on these days regarding the utility or justification of classical structural
analysis in comparison to the computer method of structural analysis. It is commented that in case of
classical methods of structural analysis the student comes across basic and finer points of structural
engineering after which a computer analysis of a complex structure maybe undertaken.

In the absence of basic knowledge of classical structural analysis, the engineer maybe in a difficult position
to justify to computer results which are again to be checked against equilibrium and deformation
compatibility only.

EXAMPLE NO. 13:


The procedure for analysis has already been given. Utilizing that procedure, analyze the following
truss by the method of least work. Areas in ( ) carry the units of 10−3 m2 while the value of E can
be taken as 200 × 106 KN/m2.

E 4 F

4 4 4.5m
2 2 2 2
A 2 2 2 D
B C
15 kN
3@4.5m

where i = total degree of indeterminacy


b = number of bars.
r = total number of reactive components which the support can provide.
b + r = 2j
10 + 3 > 2 × 6 13 > 12 so i= 1 . First degree internal indeterminancy.
F2L
U = Strain energy due to direct forces induced due to applied loads in a BDS Truss.
2 AE
∂U ∂F L
= F. . = 0
∂X ∂X AE
144 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Note:− We select the redundants in such a way that the stability of the structure is not
effected. Selecting member EC as redundant.

E F
x
x 4.5m
A D
B C 15KN
5KN 10KN
F-diagram B.D.S. under the action of applied loads & redundant.

5 S.F.D. due to applied


+ load only.
10
45
22.5
+ load only.

Method of moments and shears has been used to find forces in BDS due to applied loads. A table
has been made. Forces vertical in members in terms of redundant X may be determined by the method of
joints as before. From table.

∂F L
∑ F. . = 0 = − 331.22 × 10−6 + 51.49 × 10−6X
∂x AE
or − 331.22 + 51.49X = 0

X = + 6.433 KN

The final member forces are obtained as below by putting value of X in column 5 of the table.

Member Force (KN)

AB +5
BC +5.45
CD + 10
EF − 9.55
BE + 0.45
CF + 10.45
CE + 6.43
BF − 0.64
AE − 7.07
DF − 14.14
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 145

Insert page No. 164−A


146 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

CHECK.

Joint A.

∑ FX = 0
5 − 7.07 Cosθ = 0
5 − 7.07 × 0.707 = 0
0 = 0

∑ Fy = 0
− 7.07 × 0.707 + 5 = 0
0 = 0 Check is OK.

EXAMPLE NO. 14:− Analyze the following symmetrically loaded second degree internally
indeterminate truss by the method of least work. Areas in ( ) are 10−3m2 . The value of E can be
taken as 200 × 106 KN/m2

D 4 E 4 F

3 3
2 2 2 2 3 3m

A 4 4 C
B
15KN
2@3m

Selecting member BD and Before as redundants.

D E F
X1
X2
3m
X1 X2
A C
B 15KN
BDS under loads
7.5KN 7.5KN and redundants.
2@3m
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 147

SOLUTION:

Note :− By virtue of symmetry, we can expect to have same values for X1 and X2. It is known before hand.

7.5 S.F.D.
+
7.5

22.5

+ B.M.D.

SFD and BMD in BDS due to applied loads are shown above.
As in previous case determine member forces in BDS due to applied loads by the method of
moments shears while method of joints may be used to determine member forces due to redundants acting
separately. Apply super position principal. Then these are entered in a table given.

Summation of relavant columns due to X1 and X2 gives two equations from which these can be calculated.
Putting values from table and solving for X1 and X2.
[−2.65 × 10−3 (7.5 − 0.707X1 ) − 2.65 × 103 (− 0.707X1 ) −3.53 × 10−3 (− 0.707X1 )
−3.53 × 10−3(15 − 0.707X1 − 0.707X2 ) +10.6 × 10−3 (−10.6+X1 ) + 10.6 × 10−3 (X2 ) ]10−3 = 0

− 19.875 + 1.874X1 + 1.874 X1 + 2.450 X1 − 52.45 + 2.50 X1 + 2.5 X2 − 112.36 + 10.6 X1 + 10.6 X1 = 0
29.898 X1 + 2.50 X2 − 185.185 = 0 → (1) ( ∑ col 8 )

− 2.65 × 10−3(7.5−0.707 X2) − 2.65 × 10−3 (− 0.707 X2) − 3.53 × 10−3 (15−0.707 X1 − 0.707 X2)
− 3.53 × 10−3 (− 0.707 X2 ) + 10.6 × 10−3 (−10.6+X2) + 10.6 × 10−3 X2 = 0

− 19.875+1.874 X2+1.874 X2−52.95+2.50 X1+2.50X2+2.450 X2−112.36+10.6X2+10.6 X2 = 0

2.50 X1 + 29.898 X2 − 185.185 = 0 → (2) ( ∑ col 9 )

185.185 − 2.50 X2


From (1), X1 =  → (3) Put in 2 above
 29.898 

185.185 − 2.50 X2


(2) ⇒ 2.50 
 29.898  + 29.898X2 − 185.185 = 0

15.465 − 0.21 X2 + 29.898 X2 − 185.185 = 0


29.689 X2 − 169.7 = 0

X2 = + 5.716 KN
Put X2 in equation 3 to get X1. The final member forces are given in last column. These are
obtained by putting values of X1 and X2, whichever is applicable, in column 5 of the table.
148 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Insert Page No. 166−A


METHOD OF LEAST WORK 149

185.185 − 2.50 × 5.716


Then X1 = 
 29.898 

X1 = + 5.716 KN
Equilibrium Check.
4.04
4.884

3.459

7.5

∑ FX = 0
3.459 − 4.884 × Cosθ = 0
3.459 − 4.884 × 0.707 = 0
0 = 0

∑ Fy = 0
7.5 − 4.04 − 4.884 × 0.707 = 0
0 = 0 Checks are satisfied. Results are OK.

EXAMPLE NO. 15:− Analyze the following internally indeterminate truss by the method of least
work. Areas in ( ) are 10−3m2 . The value of E can be taken as 200 × 10 6 KN/m2.

SOLUTION:−
b = 13 , r = 3 , j = 7 so degree of indeterminacy I =( b + r ) –2j =2
Choosing members EB and BG as redundants, forces due to loads have been determined by the method of
moments and shears for the BDS and are entered in a table. While forces due to redundants X1 and X2.

E F G

X1 X2
X1 X2 3m

A D
B 15KN C

10KN 3@3m 5KN


10
S.F.D +
0 0
5
30
15
B.M.D +
0 0
150 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

E F G
X2
X1
X1 X2 3m

A D
B 15KN C

10KN 3@3m 5KN


10
S.F.D +
0 0
5
30
15
B.M.D +
0 0
Member Forces Due to Redundants Only.
Please number that due to separate action of redundants X1 and X2 member forces will be induced
only in the square whose inclineds are X1 and X2. There will be no reaction at supports.
Joint D:−
DG

CD
∑ Fy = 0
DG Sinθ − 0

DG = 0
∑ FX = 0
DG Cos θ + CD = 0

CD = 0
Joint G :−
FG

X2
CG
∑ FX = 0
− FG − X2 Cos θ = 0

FG = − 0.707 X2

∑ Fy = 0
− CG − X2 Sin θ = 0

CG = − 0.707 X2
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 151

Joint C :−
0.707X2
CF

BC
∑ Fy = 0
CF Sin θ − 0.707 X2 = 0
0.707 X2
CF =
0.707

CF = + X2

∑ FX = 0
− BC − CF Cos θ = 0

BC = −0.707 X2
Joint B.
X1 BF X2

AB 0.707X2

∑ FX = 0
− 0.707 X2 − AB + X2 Cos θ − X1 Cos θ = 0

AB = − 0.707 X1

∑ Fy = 0
X1 Sin θ + X2 Sin θ + BF = 0

BF = − 0.707X1 − 0.707X2

Joint A.

AE
AF

0.707X1

∑ FX = 0
− 0.707 X1 + AF Cos θ = 0

AF = X1
152 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

∑ Fy = 0
AE + AF Sin θ = 0

AE = − 0.707X1
Joint E.
EF

X1
0.707 X1

∑ FX = 0
EF + X1 Cos θ = 0

EF = − 0.707 X1

∑ Fy = 0
0.707 X1 − 0.707 X1 = 0
0 = 0 (Check)
Entering the values of summations from attached table, we have.

∂F L
∑ F. . = 0 = − 229.443 × 10−6 +29.848 × 10−6 X1+2.45 × 10−6X2
∂X1 AE

∂F L
∑ F. . = 0 = −168.9 × 10−6 +2.45 × 10−6 X1+29.848 × 10−6 X2
∂X2 AE

Simplifying
− 229.443 + 29.848 X1 + 2.45 X2 = 0 → (1)
− 168.9 + 2.45 X1 + 29.848 X2 = 0 → (2)
From (1)
− 2.45 X2 + 229.443
X1 =  → (3)
 29.848 
Put in (2) & solve for X2
− 2.45 X2 + 229.443
− 168.9 + 2.45 
 29.848  + 29.848 X2 = 0
− 168.9 − 0.201 X2 + 18.833 + 29.848 X2 = 0
− 150.067 + 29.647 X2 = 0
150.067
X2 =
29.647

X2 = + 5.062 KN
METHOD OF LEAST WORK 153

Insert page No. 170−A


154 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

− 2.45 × 5.062 + 229.443


So X1 = by putting value of X2 in (3)
29.848

X1 = + 7.272 KN

EQUILIBRIUM CHECKS :−

5.141 F 8.579 G
E
6.87 2.000
6.28 5.662 7.07
5.141
1.421
7.272
A D
4.859 B 6.421 C 5
15KN
10KN 5KN

Joint B:−
7.272 6.28
5.062

4.859 6.421

15

∑ FX = 0
6.421 + 5.062 Cosθ − 7.272 Cosθ − 4.859 = 0
0 = 0
∑ Fy = 0
6.28 − 15 + 5.062 Sinθ + 7.272 Sinθ = 0
0 = 0 The results are OK.

Joint C:−

1.421
2.008

6.421 5

∑ FX = 0
5 + 2.008 Cosθ − 6.421 = 0
0 = 0

∑ Fy = 0
1.421 − 2.008 Sinθ = 0
0 = 0 Results are OK.
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 155

CHAPTER THREE

INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES


3.0. TWO-HINGED ARCHES:-
The following issues should be settled first.
− Definition.
− Types.
− Basic Principle and B.M.
− Linear Arch.
− Mathematical Generalized Expressions.
− Segmental Arches.
Some information is contained elsewhere where determinate arches have been dealt.

3.1. DEFINITION OF AN ARCH.


“An arch can be defined as a humped or curved beam subjected to transverse and other loads as
well as the horizontal thrust at the supports.” An efficient use of an arch can be made only if full horizontal
restraint is developed at the supports. If either of the support allows some movement in the horizontal
direction, it will tend to increase the B.M. to which an arch is subjected and arch would become simply a
curved beam.
The B.M., in arches due to the applied loads is reduced due to the inward thrust. Analysis is
carried out to find the horizontal thrust and also to find the B.M., to which an arch is subjected.
Beam action Vs arch action :
P P P
Mo
A B
One reaction at support only
Simple beam subjecte to applied
Va Vb
transverse loads.

P P P
Support,
abutments or
springing. y M=Mo-Hy
H A B H

Two reactions at supports


Va x Vb
Arch carrying vertical loads & horizontal
thrust
The above beam and arch carry similar loadings.
If Mo = B.M. due to applied loads at a distance X on the simple span of a simple beam where rise is y.
then bending moment in the arch is, MX = Mo ± Hy

where MX is the B.M., in the arch at a distance x . H is the horizontal thrust at the springings & y
is the rize of the arch at a distance. ‘x’ as shown in the diagram. The ( ± ) sign is to be used with care and a
(−) sign will be used if the horizontal thrust is inwards or vice versa. In later case it will behave as a beam.
156 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

P P P

H A B H

Va Vb

Under transverse loads, the horizontal thrust at either of the springings abutments is equal. In the
arch shown above, the degree of indeterminacy is one and let us consider the horizontal thrust at support B
as the redundant. The above loaded arch can be considered equal to the following two diagrams wherein a
BDS arch is under the action of loads plus the same BDS arch under the action of inward unit horizontal
load at the springings.
=
P P P

B
A B

Va Vb
BL

B.D.S. under applied loads (loads try to flatten the arch)


∆BL stands for displacement of point B due to applied loads in a BDS arch..
+

1
A B

BR

(Flattened arch recovers some of horizontal displacement at B due to unit horizontal loads and will recover
fully if full horizontal thirst is applied at B.)
(Arch flattens out under the action of applied loads because freedom in the horizontal direction has been
provided at point B.) and all due to full redundant value. This forces the basis of compatibility.
∆BR stands for displacement of point. B (in the direction of force) due to unit horizontal redundant force at B.
Remember that a horizontal reactive component cannot be realized at the roller support. However, we can
always apply a horizontal force at the roller.
3.2. Compatibility equation.
∆BL − ( ∆BR ) H = 0 ( If unit load is applied in opposite sense so that it also produces
flettening, +ve sign may be used in the equation and the final sign with H will be self adjusting.)
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 157

∆BL displacement at B due to loads


or H = =
∆BR displacement at B due to unit horizontal redundant

We will be considering strain energy stored in bending only.The modified expression for that for
curved structural members is as follows.

M2ds
U=∫
2EI
Where ds is the elemental length along the centre line of the arch and U is the strain energy stored
in bending along centre-line of arch. The bending moment at a distance x from support is

MX = Mo − Hy (Horizontal thrust is inwards). (1)

Where Mo = Simple span bending moment ( S.S.B.M.) in a similar loaded simple beam.

M2 ds
U = ∫ 2EI
If H is chosen as redundant, then differentiating U w.r.t. H , we have

∂U ∂M
. M.   ds

1
= ∆BH = 0 = Put M= Mo – Hy and then differentiate.
∂H EI  ∂H 

∂U

1
= ∆BH = 0 = . (Mo − Hy)(−y) ds by putting M from (1)
∂H EI

(Hy2 − Mo y) ds
0= ∫ EI
Simlifying

H y2 ds
∫ ∫
Mo y ds
− =0
EI EI

H y2 ds
∫ ∫
Mo y ds
=
EI EI
or
Moy.ds

EI
H =
y2ds

EI


Mo y ds
Applying Castigliano’s 2nd theorem, ∆BL becomes =
EI

y2 ds
and ∆BR = ∫ EI
158 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

The algebraic integration of the above integrals can also be performed in limited number of cases
when EI is a suitable function of S ( total curved arch length), otherwise, go for numerical integration.
For prismatic (same cross section) members which normally have EI constant, the above
expression can be written as follows:

∫ Mo y ds
H =
∫ y2ds

3.3. TYPES OF ARCHES :−


The arches can be classified into a variety of ways depending mainly upon the material of
construction and the end conditions.

(1) Classification Of Arches Based On Material of Construction :−

The following arches fall in this particular category:


a) Brick masonary arches.
b) Reinforced concrete arches.
c) Steel arches.
The span of the arches which can be permitted increases as we approach steel arches from the
brick masonary arches.

(2) Classification Of Arches Based On End Conditions :−

The following arches fall in this particular category:


a) Three hinged arches.
b) Two hinged arches.
c) Fixed arches.

In the ancient times, three hinged arches have been used to support wide spans roofs. However,
their use is very rare in bridge construction since the discontinuity at the crown hinge is communicated to
the main deck of the bridge. In three hinged arches, all reactive components are found by statical
considerations without considering the deformations of the arch rib. Therefore, they are insensitive to
foundation movements and temperature changes etc., and are statically determinate. These are covered as a
separate chapter in this book.

The Romans exploited the potential of arches to a great extent. However, their emperical analysis
approach became available in the early 18th century.

3.4. LINEAR ARCH :−


This is just a theoretical arch at every X−section of which the B.M. is zero.
M = Mo − Hy = 0
or Mo = Hy (The B.M. due to applied loads is balanced by Hy).
Mo
therefore, y =
H
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 159

This is the equation for the centre line of a linear arch. With the change in position and the number
of loads on the arch, the corresponding linear arch would also change as Mo keeps on changing. Therefore,
there are infinite number of such arches for every load pattern and position on the actual arch.
EXAMPLE NO. 1:
3.5. ANALYSIS OF TWO – HINGED SEGMENTAL ARCHES
We develop the method for indeterminate arches starting with the simplest cases of segmental arches. Solve the
following segmental arch by using the basic principles of consistent deformation method and by treating horizontal
thrust at support D as the redundant. The segmental arches could be used in tunnels and in water ways.

20KN/m
B C

4m EI=Constant

Ha=20 kN D
A

2m 4m 2m
8m
40 kN 40 kN
20KN/m
B C

4m EI=Constant

Ha=20 kN D
A

2m 4m 2m
8m
40 kN 40 kN
(Ha will occur only point D is a hinge support)
M − Diagram. Due to applied loads. Similarly reactions due to supermetrical loading.

B C

1 A D 1

DR
m − Diagram. Due to unit redundant at D.
(X is varied along length of members). Find Cosθ and Sinθ.
cos θ = 0.4472 , sin θ = 0.8944.
160 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

−40
Sab sin θ + 40 =0 so Sab= = − 44.722. Consider equilibrium of joint A and project forces
0.8944
in y-direction. (M-diagram)

Consider same diagram with roller at D. Now consider joint A and Project forces in X direction to
evaluate Ha. Sab Cosθ + Ha = 0 or –44.722 x 0.4472 + Ha = 0
or Ha= 20KN
Compatibility equation

∆DL − ∆DR. H = 0
∆DL Horizontal displacement of D due to loads
Or H = =
∆DR Horizontal displacement of D due to redundants


Mmdx
∆DL =
EI
Applying Unit load method concepts,

m2 dx
∆DR =
EI∫
Now we attempt the evaluation of these integrals in a tabular form. X is measured along member
axis.

Mem Origin. Limits. M m


ber
AB A 0 − 4.472 40 X Cosθ +1.XSinθ=+0.894X
=40X0.477= 17.88X
BC B 0−4 40(2+X)−10X2= +4
80 + 40 X−10 X2
CD D 0 − 4.472 17.88 X + 0.894 X

4.472 4


MmdX 1 1
∆DL = = ∫ (17.88X)(+0.894X)dX + ∫ 80+40X −10X)(+4) dX
EI EI o EI o

4.472
1
+ ∫ (17.88 X)(+0.894 X) dX
EI o

4.472 4
2 1
= ∫ (+15.985 X2)dX + ∫ (+320+160X − 40X2) dX Integrate and put limits
EI o EI o

3 4.472 4
+31.969 X  1  160X2 40X2 
= + +320X + −
EI  3 o EI  2 3 o

1 
× 16
+10.656 40
= ( 4.4723 − 0) + +320 × 4 +80 × 16 −
EI EI  3 
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 161

+ 2659.72
∆DL =
EI

4.472 4 4.472
m2dX

1 1 1
∆DR = = ∫ (+ 0.894X)2 dX + ∫ 16 dX + ∫ (+ 0.894X)2 dX
EI EI o EI o EI o
4.472 4
2 16
= ∫ 0.799 X2 dX + ∫ dX
EI o EI o
4.472 4
1.598  X3  16
= + X
EI  3  o EI o
0.533 16
= [(4.472)3 − 0] + (4 − 0)
EI EI
111.653
∆DR =
EI
∆DL
H =
∆DR
2659.72/EI
=
111.653/EI
H = 23.82 KN
EXAMPLE NO. 2:− Solve the following arch by using consistent deformation method.

20KN/m
40KN B C

4m EI-Constt

A D

2m 4m 2m
The above redundant / segmental arch can be replaced by the following similar arches carrying loads
and redundant unit load.
20KN/m
40KN B C
x
X is varied along
member lengths.
4m

40KN
A D
2m 4m 2m
DL
Ra=20KN
Rd=60KN
M-Diagram

BDS UNDER LOADS


162 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

ΣMa = 0 ; Rd × 8 = 20 × 4 × 4 + 40× 4
∴ Rd = 60 KN so Ra = 20 KN

+
B C
x X is varied along
member lengths.

1 A D 1

DR
m − Diagram

BDS UNDER UNIT REDUNDANT AT D

Compatibility equation is
∆DL − ∆DR.H = 0

Where ∆DL = Horizontal deflection of D in BDS due to applied loads.


∆DR = Horizontal deflection at D due to Unit redundant.
H = Total Horizontal redundant.
∆DL
Or H =
∆DR


MmdX
and ∆DL =
EI

m2 dX
∆DR = ∫ EI

Member Origin Limits M m EI


AB A 0−4.472 20X Cosθ+40X Sinθ XSinθ=0.894X Constt.
20X ×0.447+40X × 0.894
= 44.72X
BC B 0−4 20(2+X)+40 × 4 −10X2 Constt.
40+20X +160 − 10X2 = +4
−10X2 + 20X + 200
CD D 0−4.472 60X Cosθ=60X × 0.447 0.894X Constt.
= 26.82 X

4.472 4


MmdX 1 1
∆DL = = ∫ (+44.72X)(0.894X) dX + ∫ (−10X2 +20X − 200 ) 4 dX
EI EI o EI o
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 163

4.472
1
+ ∫ (26.82X ) (0.894X)dX
EI o

2 × 23.977  X3  4  −10X3 20X2


4.472 4
 + 200X 
3 
1.33X = + +
EI o  EI  3 2 o
 4.472  + 4  −10 × 43 + 10 × 42 + 200 × 4 = +4893.8
3
63.97
∆DL =
EI  3  EI  3  EI

4.472 4 4.472
m2 dX

1 1 1
∆DR = = ∫ (0.894X)2 + ∫ 16dX + ∫ (0.894X)2
EI EI o EI o EI o
4.472 4
2 16
= ∫ 0.799X2 dX + ∫ dX
EI o EI o
4.472 4
1.598  X3  16
= + X
EI  3 o EI o

0.533 16
= [ (4.472)3 − 0 ] + ( 4 − 0)
EI EI
111.653
∆DR =
EI
∆DL
∴ H =
∆DR
+ 4893.8/EI
=
111.653/EI

So H = + 43.83 KN

EXAMPLE NO. 3:- Determine the horizontal thrust for the for following loaded segmental arch. Take EI
equal to constant.

P P

C G D

3m

B E

4m
A F
3m 4m 5m 4m 3m
164 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

SOLUTION :−
P X P
C G
D
X X is varied along
member length

B E

A F

P P
Now consider a BDS under Loads and redundant separately for the same arch and evaluate integrals.
An inspection of the arch indicates that it is symmetrical about point G and is indeterminate to the first
degree choosing horizontal reaction at F as the redundant, we draw two basic determinate structures under
the action of applied loads and the redundant horizontal thirst at support F.

P P
X
C G D

B
E

A F
3m 4m 5m 4m 3m
P P
M-Diagram (BDS under loads)

C E

B E

1 F 1
A
B.D.S. under unit horizontal
redundant load at F.
m-Diagram
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 165

Because of symmetry, Moments and hence


strain energy is computed for half frame.
Portion Origin Limits M m

AB A 0−5 PX Cosθ = X0.6 PX 0.8 X

BC B 0−5 P (3+0.8X) 4 + 0.6X

CG C 0 − 2.5 P (7+X) − PX = 7 P 7

5 5 2.5
(0.6 PX)(0.8X) P(3+0.8X)(4+0.6X) 49 P
∆FL = 2 ∫ dX + 2 ∫ dX+ 2 ∫ dX
o EI o EI o EI

5 5 2.5
=
2P
EI
[ ∫ 0.48 X dX + ∫ (0.48 X +5X+12)dX + ∫ 49 dX]
o
2
o
2
o

2P 0.48X35+ 0.48 X3+ 5 X2 + 12X 5| +49X 2.5 


=  3   3  2 | 
EI  o o o 

 0.48 × 53 + 0.48 × 5 + 5 × 5 + 12 × 5 + 49 × 2.5 


3 2
2P
=
EI  3 3 2 
570 P
∆FL = (deflection of point F due to loads)
EI

5 5 2.5
2 2 2
∆FR = ∫ (0.8X)2dX + ∫ (16 + 0.36X2 + 4.8X) dX + ∫ 49dX
EI o EI o EI o

 0.64X3 + 16X + 0.36X3 + 4.8X2  + 49X | 


5 5 2.5
2
=  3   2 o 
EI  o 3 o 

 0.64 × 5 + 16 × 5 + 0.36 × 53 + 4.8 × 5 + 49 × 2.5 


3 2
2
=
EI  3 3 2 

608.33 ∆FL
∆FR = , H =
EI ∆FR

570 P
H =
608.32

So H = 0.937 P
166 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

NOTE :− Compatibility equation is


∆FL − ∆FR × H = 0
∆FL = ∆FR × H
∆FL
H =
∆FR
We take compression on outer side & tension on inner side +ve in case of M and m-diagram.
EXAMPLE NO. 4 :− Determine the horizontal thrust provided that EI = Constt for the following
loaded segmental arch.:
SOLUTION:
P P
X
C D
X

3m
B 1 E
P
X
4m

A F
3m 4m 5m 4m 3m

Ra Rf

Taking horizontal reaction at F as redundant. ΣMa=0


Rf. 19 = P . 12 + P .7 + 4. P , So
Rf = 1.211 P

and therefore Ra is,


Ra = 2P − 1.211 P
Ra = + 0.789 P

P P
X

P 1
X

P
3m 4m 5m 4m 3m

M-Diagram
0.789 P 1.211 P
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 167

C D

3m
B E

4m
1 1
A F
3m 4m 5m 4m 3m

m-diagram (Unit redundant at F)

Portion Origin Limits M m


AB A 0−5 0.789 PX Cosθ+PX Sinθ 1 × X Cos θ
= 0.4734 PX + 0.8 PX = 0.8X
= 1.2734 PX
BC B 0−5 0.789 P(3 + XCosθ1) 1(4 + X Sinθ1)
+P(4 + XSinθ1) − PX Sinθ1 = 4 + 0.6X
= 0.6312 PX+6.367 P
CD C 0−5 0.789P (7+X)+P×7−P×3−PX +7
= − 0.211 PX + 9.523 P
DE E 0−5 1.211 P(3+X Cosθ1) 1(4 + X Sinθ1)
= 3.633 P + 0.9688 PX = 4 + 0.6X
EF F 0−5 1.211 PX Cos θ= 0.7266 PX X Sin θ = 0.8X
Determine Sines and Cosines of θ and θ1.

5 5
∆FL =
1
EI
[ ∫ (1.2734 PX)(0.8 X)dX + ∫ (0.6312 PX + 6.367 P)
o o
5
(4 + 0.6X) dX + ∫ (− 0.211 PX + 9.523 P)(7)dX
o
5 5
+ ∫ (3.633 P + 0.9688 PX)(4 + 0.6X) + ∫ (0.7266PX (0.8X) dX
o o
]
5 5
=
P
EI
[ ∫ 1.01872X dX + ∫ (2.5248X + 0.37872X + 25.468 + 3.8202 X) dX
o
2
o
2

5 5
+ ∫ (− 1.477X + 66.661) dX + ∫ (14.532 + 2.1798X
o o
5
+ 3.8752X + 0.58128X2 ) dX + ∫ 0.58128X dX . Simplifying we get.
o
5
P
= ∫ (1.97872X2 + 11.50428X + 106.661) dX
EI o
5
P  X3 X2
∆FL = 1.97972 + 11.50428 + 106.661X 
EI  3 2 o
168 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

P  53 52
= 1.97872 × + 11.50428 × + 106.661 × 5 
EI  3 2 
759.56 P
∆FL =
EI
5 5
∆FR =
1
EI
[ ∫ (0.8X) dX + ∫ (16+0.36X + 4.8X) dX
o
2
o
2

5 5 5
+ ∫ 49 dX + ∫ (16+0.36X2+4.8X) dX + ∫ 0.64 X2 dX
o o o
]
5
1  0.64X3 X3 X2 X3 4.8X2 0.64X3 
= + 16X + 0.36 + 4.8 + 49X + 16X + 0.36 + +
EI  3 3 2 3 2 3 o

0.36 × 5 4.8 × 5 3 2
=
1
EI
[ 0.64
3
× 5 + 16 × 5 +
3
3
+
2
+ 49 × 5

+ 16 × 5 +
0.36
3
× 53 +
4.8
2
× 52 +
0.64
3
× 53 ] . Simplifying
608.33
∆FR = . Compatibility equation remains the same. Putting values of integrals, we have
EI
∆FL
H =
∆FR

759.56 P 608.33
=
EI EI

H = 1.2486 P Now all reactions are shown.

P P
C D

B E
P

0.2486P F 1.2486P
A

0.789P 1.211P

ANALYZED SEGMENTAL ARCH

Check : ∑ Mc = 0
0.789P × 7 − 0.2486 P × 7 − P × 3 + P × 5 + 1.2486 P × 7 − 1.211P × 12 = 0
0 = 0 O.K.
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 169

3.6. ANALYSIS OF TWO HINGED CIRCULAR ARCHES :−

P P
X C
F E yc
A y B
D
L

R
R

The circular arches are infact a portion of the circle and are commonly used in bridge construction.
From the knowledge of determinate circular arches, it is known that the maximum thrust and the vertical
reactions occur at the springings. Therefore, logically there should be a greater moment of inertia near the
springings rather than that near the mid−span of the arch. The approach is called the secant variation of
inertia and is most economical. However, to establish the basic principles, we will first of all consider
arches with constant EI. The following points are normally required to be calculated in the analysis.
(1) Horizontal thrust at the springings.
(2) B.M. & the normal S.F. at any section of the arch.
Usually, the span and the central rise is given and we have to determine;
(i) the radius of the arch;
(ii) the equation of centre line of the circular arch.
Two possible analysis are performed.
(1) Algebraic integration.
(2) Numerical integration.

After solving some problems, it will be amply demonstrated that algebraic integration is very
laborious and time consuming for most of the cases. Therefore, more emphasis will be placed on numerical
integration which is not as exact but gives sufficiently reliable results. Some researches have shown that if
arch is divided in sixteen portions, the results obtained are sufficiently accurate. In general, the accuracy
increases with the increase or more in number of sub−divisions of the arch.

We will be considering two triangles.


1 − ∆ ADO
2 − ∆EFO

By considering ∆ ADO

OB2 = OD2 + BD2


170 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

R2 = (R−yc)2 + (L /2 )2
R2 = R2 − 2Ryc + yc2 + L2/4
0 = yc ( yc − 2 R) + L2/4
or yc ( yc − 2 R) = − L2/4
− yc ( yc − 2 R ) = L2/4

L2
yc (2R − yc) = (1)
4
By considering ∆ EFO
OF2 = OE2 + EF2
R2 = ( R − yc + y )2 + X2
R − X2 = ( R − yc + y )2
2

R − yc + y = R2 − x2
S

2 R

y = R2 − X2 − (R − yc) (2)
The detailed derivation of this equation can be found in some other Chapter of this book.
In this case, S = R ( 2 θ ) where θ is in radiains. S is the total length along centre line of the arch.
∫ Myds
H= as before obtained By eliminating EI as we are considering EI = Constt
∫y2ds
EXAMPLE NO. 5:−
A two− hinged circular arch carries a concentrated force of 50 KN at the centre. The span & the
rise of the arch are 60m & 10m respectively. Find the horizontal thrust at the abutments.
SOLUTION :− The arch span is divided in ten equal segments and ordinates are considered at the centre of
each segment.

30m 50KN
(3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
(2) (10)
(1) 10
A B
D

60m

R=50m

0
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 171

L2 yc
R = + , where R = Redious, yc = Central rise and L = Span of arch.
8yc 2

(60)2 10
= +
8 × 10 2

R = 50 m

30
Sinα = = 0.6 . Now compute angle α is radians.
50

α = 36.87° , we know π rad = 180°

180° = π rad

π
1° = rad
180

π
So 36.87° = × 36.87 radians
180

36.87° = 0.6435 rad = α


α = 0.6435 rad
S = R (2 α) = 50 (2 × 0.6435) , Where S is length of arch along its centre-line
For circular arches. X is varied from centre to abutments.

S = 64.35 m
50KN
C
x E yc=10m
A y B
30-x D 25KN
25KN
R

R=50m

0
∫ Myds
H =
∫y2ds
where M = Simple span ( S.S ) B.M. in the arch due to applied loads only.

Mbc = Mac = 25 ( 30 − X ) in two portions at a distance X from mid span.


OE = R Cos θ
172 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

OD = R − yc = 50 − 10 = 40 m

y = OE – OD [Since OC = OD + CD = 50 and CD = 10 = Yc]

y = R Cos θ − 40
and ds = Rdθ
X = R Sin θ
Evaluation of Numerator :−
Mx = 25 (30 − X), ds = Rdθ, y = RCosθ − 40
α
∫ Myds = 2 ∫ [25 (30 − R Sinθ)] [R Cosθ−40] [Rdθ], By putting X, y and ds from above. Also put
o
value of α which is in radians.

0.6435
= 50 R ∫ (30 − R Sinθ)(R Cosθ − 40) dθ, we know, 2Sinθ Cosθ = Sin 2θ.
o

0.6435
= 50R ∫ (30R Cosθ Cosθ − R2Sinθ Cosθ − 1200 + 40R Sinθ) dθ
o

0.6435
= 50R  30R Sinθ + − 1200 θ − 40R Cosθ 
R2 Cos 2θ
. Put limits now
 2 2 o

502
= 50 × 50 30×50×0.6+ ×1+ 40 × 50 ×1
2500
× 0.28−1200×0.6435−40×50×0.8 −
 4 4 
= + 194500
∫ Myds = 194.5 × 103

Evaluation of Denominator :−
1
We know Cos2θ = (1 + Cos2θ)
2
1
and Sin2θ = (1 − Cos2θ)
2
0.6435
∫y2ds = 2 ∫ (RCosθ − 40)2 (Rdθ)
o

0.6435
= 2R ∫ (R2 Cos2 θ − 80R Cosθ + 1600) dθ
o

0.6435 2
= 2R ∫ R (1 + Cos 2θ) − 80 R Cos θ + 1600 dθ Integrate
o 2 
0.6435
= 2R  θ +
Sin 2θ 
− 80R Sin θ + 1600 θ
R2
Put limits now
2  2  o
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 173

502 
= 2 × 50 
0.96 
 2 0.6435 + 2  − 80 × 50 × 0.6 + 1600 × 0.6435
= 3397.5

∫y2ds = + 3.3975 × 103


194.5 × 103
H =
3.3975 × 10-3
H = 57.2 KN
EXAMPLE NO. 5: BY NUMERICAL INTEGRATION :−
The values of X, y and M are determined at the mid ordinates of the segments. The basic
philosophy is that if we consider a very small arc length that would be regarded as a straight line and
therefore we tend to average out these values.
y = R2 − X2 − (R − yc)

or y = 502 − X2 − (50 − 10 )

or y = 502 − X2 − (40) (1) See segments of Example 5 about 4 page before.

For section (1)


X1 = 27, from (1), y1 = 502 − 272 − (40) = 2.08 m

For section (2)


X2 = 21 from (1), y2 = 502 − 212 − (40) = 5.738 m and so on.

M = 25 ( 30 − X ) = (750 − 25X) 0 < X < 30 as before

Now do numerical integration in a tabular form as under.

Section. X y. M My y2
1 27 2.08 75 156.00 4.33
2 21 5.380 225 1210.50 28.94
3 15 7.69 375 3883.75 59.14
4 9 9.18 525 4819.50 84.27
5 3 9.91 675 6689.25 98.21
6 3 9.91 675 6689.25 98.21
7 9 9.18 525 4819.50 84.27
8 15 7.69 375 2883.75 59.14
9 21 5.380 225 1210.50 28.94
10 27 2.08 75 156.00 4.33
∑31518 ∑549.78
S = 64.35 m
64.35
and ds =
10
ds = 6.435 m
174 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

∫ Myds ∑ Myds
H= =
∫ y2ds ∑ y2ds
31518 × 6.435
= ( Note:- ds cancels out )
549.78 × 6.435

H = 57.33 KN

A result similar to that already obtained from algebraic solution

3.7. ARCHES WITH SECANT VARIATION OF INERTIA :−


If Io is the second moment of area of arch rib at the crown: Then secant variation of inertia means.

I = Io sec. α and
ds Cos α =dX

ds
dy

dx

Or ds = dX Sec α


Myds
EI
H =
y2ds
∫ EI

If it is built of the same material, then E would cancel out:


Myds
I
H = Put I= Io sec α
y2ds
∫ I

My dX Sec α
∫ Io Secα
H =
y2dX Sec α
∫ Io Sec α

∫ MydX
H =
∫ y2 dX
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 175

If we utilize the above expression for horizontal thrust, it may be kept in mind that integration can
now take place in the Cartesian coordinate system instead of the polar coordinate system.

3.8. BY SECANT VARIATION USING ALGEBRAIC INTEGRATION :−


EXAMPLE NO. 6: Analyze the arch in Example No. 5:

We know, y = R2 − X2 − (R − yc)

y = 502 − X2 − 40

Mac = Mbc = 25 ( 30 − X ) 0 < X < 30

30
∫ MydX = 2 ∫ 25 (30 − X)[ 502 − X2 − 40 ] dX
o

30 30 30 30
= 50 [ 30 ∫ 502 − X2 . dX − ∫ 1200dX − ∫ 502 − X2 . XdX + 40 ∫ XdX ]
o o o o

30 30 30 30
= 1500 ∫ 502 − X2 dX − 1200 × 50 ∫ dX − 50 ∫ 502 − X2 XdX + 2000 ∫ XdX
o o o o
Put X = 50 Sin θ= R sinθ
dX = 50 Cosθ dθ
At X= 0 θ=0
At X = 30 θ = 0.6435
Now Evaluate integrals
Substitutions
Cos2θ
Cos2θ = 1 +
2
θ Sin2
θ
∫Cos2θ = +
2 4
Cos3θ
∫Cos2θ Sinθdθ = −
3
by letting X = Cosθ
dX = −Sin θdθ

0.6435 30
∫ MydX = 1500 ∫ 502 (1 − Sin2θ) (50 Cosθdθ ) − 60000  X 
o o
(502 − X2 )3/2
30 30
+ 25 
X2 
+ 2000 
 3/2 o  2 o
0.6435
(1 + Cos2θ)
= 1500 × 502 ∫ dθ − 6 × 104 (30)
o 2
176 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

50
+ [(502 − 302)3/2 − (302) + 1000 (302 )]
3

0.6435
= 187.5 × 104 θ +
Sin 2θ
− 180 × 104 − 1016666.666 + 90 × 104
 2 o

Sin(2 × 0.6435)
∫ MydX = 187.5 × 104 0.6435 +
 2  − 1916666.666

= 2106561.918 − 1916666.666

∫ MydX = 189895.252

30
∫ y2dX = 2 ∫ (502 − X2 +402 − 80 502 − X2 ) dX
o

30
= 2 ∫ (4100 − X2 − 80 502 − X2 ) dX
o

Substitutions:
X = 50 Sin θ
dX = 50 Cosθdθ
1 − Sin2θ = Cos2θ

30 30 0.6435
= 8200 ∫ dX − 2 ∫ X2 dX − 160 ∫ 502 Cos2 θ dθ
o o o
0.6435
160 × 502
30 30
X3
= 8200 X | − 2   − ∫ (1 + Cos 2θ)dθ
o  3 o 2 o

160 × 502 
0.6435
2 Sin 2θ
= 8200 (30) − (303) − θ+
3 2  2 o

160 × 502  Sin(2 × 0.6435)


= 228000 −
2 0.6435 + 2 

= 228000 − 224699.938
∫y2dX = 3300.062

∫ MydX
H =
∫ y2dX

189895.252
=
3300.062
H = 57.543 KN
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 177

EXAMPLE NO. 7:- A circular arch carries a uniformly distributed load on its left half, calculate the
horizontal thrust.

10KN/m

C
yc=10m
A B
D
60m

SOLUTION :− Determine Vertical Support reactions as usual and write moment expressions due to
applied loads only without considering horizontal thrust.

10KN/m

C
y x E x
yc=10m B
A D
75KN
60m
225KN

From diagram, X = R Sinθ


Mac = 225 (30 − R Sinθ) − 5 (30 − R Sin θ)2, in other words. Mac = Va ( 30 – X ) – w X2/2
where X = R sinθ

and Mbc = 75 (30 − R Sinθ)

OD = OC − CD = 50 − 10 = 40 m
y = OE − OD = R Cosθ − 40
∫ Myds
so H =
∫ y2ds
178 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Evaluation of Numerator.
0.6435
∫ Myds = ∫ [225 (30 − R Sinθ) − 5(30 − R Sinθ)2 ] [ R Cosθ − 40] (Rdθ)
o

0.6435
+∫ [75(30 − R Sinθ)] [R Cosθ − 40 ] [Rdθ ]. This consists of two integrals.
o
Evaluate First Integral
0.6435
= I1 = R ∫ [6750 − 225 R Sinθ − 4500 − 5 R2 Sin2 θ + 300 R Sinθ] [R Cos θ − 40]
o

0.6435
I1 = R ∫
o
[2250 + 75 R Sinθ − 5 R Sin θ][R Cos θ − 40] dθ
2 2

0.6435
=R∫
o
[2250 R Cos θ + 75 R Sin θ Cosθ −5 R Sin θ Cosθ
2 3 2

− 90000 − 3000 R Sin θ + 200 R2 Sin2 θ ] dθ


0.6435
=R∫
o
[2250 R Cos θ + 75 R Sin θ Cos θ − 5 R Sin θ Cos θ
2 3 2

Let X = Sinθ
dX = cosθ dθ
X3 Sin3θ
So ∫Sin2θ Cosθ dθ = ∫X2 dX = =
3 3
1 − Cos2θ
− 90000 − 3000 R Sinθ + 200 R2  ]
 2  dθ
75 2 Cos2 θ R3 Sin3θ
=R  2250 R Sin θ −
2
R
2
−5
3
− 90000 θ

Sin2 θ 
0.6435
200 2 
+ 3000 R Cosθ + R θ− |
2  2 o

= 50 [ 2250 × 50 × 0.6 − 754 × 2500 × 0.28 − 5 × 50 × 0.216


3
3

× 502 0.6435 −
200 0.96
− 90000 × 0.6435 + 3000 × 50 × 0.8 +
2  2 

+
75
4
× 2500 × 1 − 3000 × 50 × 1 ]
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 179

= 50 [ 67500 − 13125 − 45000 − 57915 + 120000 + 160875


− 120000 + 46875 − 150000 ]

= 50 ( 9210 )
I1 = 460.5 × 103
Now Evaluate
0.6435
2nd Integral = I2 = R ∫ (2250 − 75 R Sin θ)(R Cos θ − 40) ( dθ ) multiply two expressions.
o

0.6435
I2 = R ∫ 2250 R Cos θ − 75 R2 Sin θ Cos θ − 90000 + 3000 R Sin θ) dθ Integrate now.
o
0.6435
75 2 Cos 2θ
= R 2250R Sin θ + R − 90000 θ − 3000R Cosθ |
2 2 o

75
= 50 (2250 × 50 × 0.6 + × 2500 × 0.28 − 90000 × 0.6435
4

75
− 3000 × 50 × 0.8 − × 2500 × 1 + 3000 × 50 × 1)
4

I2 = 291.75 × 103
Add these two integrals (I1 and I2) of ∫Myds.
∫ Myds = I1 + I2
= 460.5 × 103 + 291.75 × 103
or ∫ Myds = 752.25 × 103
Now Evaluate
0.6435
∫ y2ds =2∫ (R Cosθ − 40)2 ( R dθ )
o
0.6435
1+Cos2θ
=2R∫ (R2Cos2θ + 1600 − 80 R Cosθ)dθ ; We know that Cos2θ =
o 2
0.6435
R2
=2R∫ (1 + Cos2θ) + 1600 − 80 R Cosθ dθ
o 2
0.6435
R2 
θ + Sin  + 1600 θ − 80 R Sinθ |

=2R
2  2 o

2
= 2 × 50 [502 0.6435+0.96
2 
+1600 × 0.6435 − 80 × 50 × 0.6], So ∫ y ds=3.3975×10
2 3
180 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

∫ Myds
H =
∫ y2ds

752.25 × 103
H =
3.3975 × 103

H = 221.42 KN

EXAMPLE NO. 8: Analyze the same problem by numerical Integration.


Write moment expression for segments in portions AC and BC due to applied loading only for a simple
span.
For segments 1 – 5, Mac = 225 (30 − X) − 5 (30 − X)2 as before but in Cartesian co-ordinate system.
For segments 6 – 10, Mbc = 75 (30 − X)

10KN/m

C
(3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)(9)
(2) (10)
(1)
A B
D

225KN 60m 75KN

R=50m

Note: X is measured for mid span and y is corresponding rise. Now attempt in a tabular form.

Section X y M My y2
1. 27 2.08 630 1310.4 4.33
2 21 5.38 1620 8715.6 28.94
3 15 7.69 2250 17302.5 59.14
4 9 9.18 2520 23133.6 84.27
5 3 9.91 2430 24081.3 98.21
6 3 9.91 2025 20067.75 98.21
7 9 9.18 1575 14458.5 84.27
8 15 7.69 1125 8651.25 59.14
9 21 5.38 675 3624.75 28.94
10 27 2.08 225 468 4.33
∑121813.65 ∑549.78
S = R (2 α )
= 50 × 2 × 0.6435
S = 64.35 m
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 181

64.35
so ds = = 6.435 m , (Because S has been divided in Ten Segments)
10

∫ Myds
H =
∫ y2ds

∑ Myds
=
∑ y2ds

121813.65 × 6.435
= ( Note: ds cancels out )
549.78 × 6.435

H = 221.57 KN
Same answer as obtained by algebraic integration.

EXAMPLE NO. 9: Analyze the previous arch for by assuming secant variation of inertia.
Integrate along the x − axis by considering arch to be a beam.
Mac = 225 (30 − X) − 5 (30 − X)2 0 < X < 30
Mbc = 75 (30 − X) 0 < X < 30

y = 502 − X2 − 40

30
∫ MydX = ∫ [225 (30 − X) − 5 (30 − X)2 ] [ 502 − X2 − 40] dX
o
30
+ ∫ [75 (30 − X)] [ 502 − X2 − 40] dX , By taking y expression common, we have
o

30
∫ MydX = ∫ [6750 − 225X − 5 (900 − 60X + X2 ) +2250 − 75X] [ 502 − X2 − 40)] dX
o

30
= ∫ (− 5X2 + 4500)[ 502 − X2 − 40] dX X terms cancel out
o

Let X = 50 sinθ, then dX = 50 cosθ dθ, So (502 – X2 ) = 50 Cosθ. Putting these we


have.
0.6435
= ∫ ( 4500 – 12500 sin2θ ) ( 50 cosθ − 40 ) ( 50 cosθ) dθ
o
Note : In solving the above expression , the following trignometrical relationships are used.
1. Sin2θ = 1− cos2θ and ∫ cos2θ = θ/2 + sin 2θ/4
2. ∫cos3θ = sinθ − sin3θ/3
3. ∫cos4θ = 3θ/8 + sin2θ/4 + sin4θ/32
182 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

By using the above formulas and solving the integral, we get the value as follows.

∫MydX = 730607.23 . Now evaluate ∫y2dX.

30
∫y2dX =2∫ [ (502 − X2) − 40]2 dX. By evaluating on similar lines as stated above; we have.
o

= 3322.0

∫ MydX
H =
∫ y2 dX
730607.23
=
3322.0

H = 220.0 KN

The same may be solved by numerical integration


3.9. TWO HINGED PARABOLIC ARCHES

yc
A B

L
Equation of the centre line of a parabolic arch with either abutment as origin is

y = CX (L − X) → (1)

L
At X= y = yc Putting
2
L 
L− 
L
yc = C ×
2  2
L L
yc = C.
2 2
C. L2
yc =
4
4 yc
C= 2
L

Putting the value of ‘C’ in equation (1), we have.

4 yc
y= X (L − X)
L2
4 yc X
y= (L − X), rated for 0<X<L
L2
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 183

dy 4 yc
and = 2 (L − 2X) 0<X<L
dX L
∫ MydX
So H =
∫ y2dX
In parabolic arches, origin for X is usually their supports.

EXAMPLE NO. 10:− A two−hinged parabolic arch with secant variation of inertia is subjected to the
loads at 3rd points as shown in the diagram. Determine the horizontal thrust at abutments & plot the B.M.D.

Verify your answer by numerical integration.

SOLUTION:−

40KN 40KN
20m D 20m
C
yc
A B
D
40KN X
60m 40KN

It is a symmetrically loaded arch. So moment expression on simple span in portions AC and CD may be
found and corresponding integrals may be evaluated and multiplied by 2.
Mac = 40 X 0 < X < 20

Mcd = 40 X − 40 (X − 20) = 800 20 < X < 30


4 yc X
y = (L − X) , Put value of yc and L for simplification purpose.
L2

4 . 10 . X
= (60 − X)
602

or y = 0.011 X (60 − X) = 0.011 × 60 X − 0.011 X2

20
∫ MydX = 2 ∫ (40 X)(0.011 × 60 X − 0.011 X2)dX
o

30
+2 ∫ 800(0.66 X − 0.011X2 ) dX
20

Simplifying
20 30
= 2 ∫ (26.4 X2 − 0.44 X3 ) dX + 2 ∫ (528X − 8.8X2)dX
o o

20 30
26.4 X3 0.44 X4 528 X2 8.8 X3
=2 − + 2
 3 4 o  2 − 3 20
184 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

=2 4 528 3
26.4 0.44 2 8.8 528 8.8
 3 × 20 − 4 × 20  + 2 2 × 30 − 3 × 30 − 2 × 20 + 3 × 20 
3 3 2

= 105600 + 152533.33

= 258133.33

∫ MydX = 258.133 × 103 .


Now evaluate ∫ y2dX.

60
∫ y2dX = ∫ (0.011 × 60 X − 0.011 X2 )2 dX
o

60
= ∫ [(0.66)2 X2 + (0.011)2 X4 − 2 × 0.66 × 0.011 X3]dX
o

60
= ∫ (0.4356 X2 + 1.21 × 10−4 X4 − 0.01452 X3) dX
o

0.4356 X3 1.21 × 10-4 X5 0.01452 X4


60
= + −
 3 5 4 o

0.4356 1.21 × 10-4 0.01452


= × 603 + × 605 − × 604
3 5 4

= 3136.32
∫ y2dX = 3.136 ×103

∫ MydX
H =
∫ y2dX

258.133 × 103
=
3.136 × 103

H = 82.3 KN

M = Mo − Hy , y = 0.001 X (60 − X) , at X = 20, y = yE


yc = 0.011 × 20 (60 − 20 ) = 8.8 m = yE
Mc = 40 × 20 − 82.3 × 8.8 = 75.76 KN−m
MD = (40 × 30 − 40 × 10) − 82.3 × 10 = − 23 KN
ME = 40 × 20 − 82.3 × 8.8 = 75.76 KN
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 185

Now BMD can be plotted.

40KN 40KN
20m 20m
C D
10m 8.8m
8.8m
A B

40KN 40KN
60m

823
800
800 linear arch
8.0 parablic (2nd degree)
924.24
724.2

0 0

Note:− The length of the segment should be even multiple of span. More than 5 or 6 segments will give
slightly improved answer.

3.10. EDDY’S THEOREM:− The difference between the linear arch and the actual arch is the BMD at that
point.

EXAMPLE NO. 11:- Analyze the following loaded two hinged arch by numerical integration method.

40kN 40kN
20m 20m
C D E
y=10m
c
1 2 3 4 5 6
A B

40KN L=60m 40KN

Mac = 40 X 0 < X < 20

Mcd = 40 X − 40(X − 20) = 800 20 < X < 40

Meb = 40 X − 40(X − 20) − 40(X − 40) = 2400 − 40X 40 < X < 60

and y = 0.011 × (60 − X) = 0.66X − 0.011 X2 ( As before ) solving in a


tabular forces.
186 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Section X y M My y2
1 5 3.025 200 605 9.15
2 15 7.425 600 4455 55.13
3 25 9.625 800 7700 92.64
4 35 9.625 800 7700 92.64
5 45 7.425 600 4455 55.13
6 55 3.025 200 605 9.15
∑25520 ∑313.84
60
L = 60 m , dX = = 10 m
6
∑ MydX
H=
∑y2dX
25520 × 10
=
313.84 × 10

H = 81.31 KN

Almost similar result was obtained by algebraic integration earlier.


EXAMPLE NO. 12:- A two−hinged parabolic arch with secant variation of inertia is subjected to a
uniformly distributed load on its left half. Determine the horizontal thrust at abutments and plot the
B.M.D. Verify your answer by numerical integration.
SOLUTION :−

10KN/m

yc=10m
A B

225KN L=60m 75KN

Mac = 225X − 5 X2 0 < X < 30


Mbc = 75X 0 < X < 30
4yc X
y = (L − X)
L2

4 . 10 . X
= (L − X)
602

= 0.011 X (60 − X)
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 187

dy
y = 0.66 X − 0.011 X2 and = 0.66 − 0.022X = Tanθ
dX

30 30
∫ MydX = ∫ (225X − 5 X2) (0.66 X − 0.011 X2) dX + ∫ 75 X (0.66 X − 0.011 X2) dX
o o

30 30
= ∫ (148.5 X2 − 2.475 X3 − 3.3 X3 + 0.055 X4) dX + ∫ (49.5 X2 − 0.825 X3) dX
o o

30 30
148.5 X3 2.475 X4 3.3 X4 0.055 X5 49.5 X3 0.825 X4
= − − +
 3 4 4
+
5 o  3 − 4 o

148.5 × 303 − 2.475 × 30 − 3.3 × 30 + 0.055 × 30  + 49.5 × 30 − 0.825 × 30 


4 4 5 3 4
=
 3 4 4 5   3 4 
= 712800.0174

∫ MydX = 712.8 x 103


60
∫ y2dX = ∫ (0.66 X − 0.011 X2)2 dX
o

60
= ∫ [(0.662) X2 + (0.011)2 X4 − 2 . 0.66 . 0.011 X3] dX
o
60
X3 X5 X4
= (0.66)2 + (0.011)2 − 2 . 0.66 . 0.011 
 3 5 4 o
−3
= 3.136 × 10
712.8 103
H =
3.136 103

H = 227.30 KN

EXAMPLE NO. 13:- Now Analyze the previous example. BY NUMERICAL INTEGRATION :−
10KN

(3) C (4)
(2) (5)
(1) (6)
A B

225KN 60m 75KN


Mac = 225X − 5 X 2
0 < X < 30
Mcb = 225X − 300 (X − 15) 30 < X < 60
y = 0.66 X − 0.011 X2 (same as before). Attempt in a tabular form.
188 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Section X y M My y2
1 5 3.025 1000 3025 9.15
2 15 7.425 2250 16706.25 55.13
3 25 9.625 2500 24062.5 92.64
4 35 9.625 1875 18046.875 92.64
5 45 7.425 1125 8353.125 55.13
6 55 3.05 375 1134.375 9.15
∑71328.125 ∑313.84
71328.125 . 10
H =
313.84 . 10
H = 227.28 KN
WE GET THE SAME ANSWER AS WAS OBTAINED BY ALGEBRAIC INTEGRATION.
y15 = 0.66 X 15 − 0.011 (15)2 = 2.425 m
y45 = 7.425 m
10KN/m

7.425m 10m 7.425m


A B

225KN 60m 75KN

2250 2250
1125
+ Mo-diagram
2273
1687.7 1687.7

Hy-diagram
2273 2250
1687.7

1125
M-diagram

29.99m

Point of contraflexure. Write a generalized Mx expression and set that to zero.


Mx = 225X − 5X2 − 227.30 + [0.011 X (60 − X)] = 0
225X − 5X2 − 150.02X + 2.50X2 = 0
− 2.5X2 + 74.98X = 0
− 2.5X + 74.98 = 0

X = 29.99 m
Insert this value back in Mx expression to find M max in the arch.
EXAMPLE NO. 14:- Analyze the following arch by algebraic and numerical integration. Consider :

A. the arch to be parabolic and then circular.


B. moment of inertia constant and then with secant variation.
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 189

2 KN/m
5KN
20m

6m

70m

Generally arches have been used by the engineers and architects dating back to old roman buildings,
Mughal and Muslim architecture. Main applications are in bridges, churches, mosques and other buildings.
Arch behaviour is dependent upon stiffness of supports, commonly called abutments or springings so that
horizontal reaction develops.

SOLUTION :−
A. PARABOLIC ARCH AND ALGEBRAIC INTEGRATION

2KN/m

5KN
x C 20m
D

70x52.5 5x20 A B
+ = 53.93 70m
70 70
53.93KN 21.07KN
Determine simple span bending moments.

Mac = 53.93 X − X2 0 < X < 35


Mcd = 53.93X − 70(X − 17.5) 35< X < 50
= 53.93X − 70X + 1225
= − 16.07X + 1225
Mdb = 53.93X − 70(X−17.5) −5 (X−50) 0 < X < 70
= 53.93X − 70X + 1225 − 5X + 250
= −21.07X + 1475
4YcX
Y = (L − X)
L2

4.6.X
= ( 70 − X)
702

= 4.898 . 10−3 X ( 70 − X )
Y = 0.343X − 4.898 . 10−3 X2
35
∫ MydX = ∫ (53.93X − X2 ) (0.343X −4.898 × 10−3 X2 ) dX
o
190 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

50
+ ∫ (−16.07X + 1225) (0.343X − 4.898 × 10−3 X2
) dX
35

70
+ ∫ ( −21.07X + 1475 ) (0.343X −4.898 × 10−3 X2 ) dX Multiply the expressions
50

35
= ∫ (18.498X2 − 0.264X3 − 0.343X3 + 4.898 × 10−3 X4 ) dX
o

50
+ ∫ (−5.512X2 + 0.079X3 + 420.175X − 6X2 ) dX
35

70
+ ∫ (−7.227X2 + 0.103X3 + 505.925X − 7.225X2 ) dX re-arranging we get
50

35
= ∫ (4.898 × 10−3 X4 − 0.607X3 + 18.498X2 ) dX
o

50
+ ∫ (0.079X3 − 11.512 X2 + 420.175 X) dX
35

70
+ ∫ (0.103X3 − 14.452X2 + 505.925X) dX
50

5 4 35 50
X3 X4 X3 X2
= 4.898 × 10-3 + 18.498  + 0.079 + 420.175 
X X
− 0.607 − 11.512
 5 4 3 o  4 3 2 35
70
X4 X3 X2
+ 0.103 − 14.452 + 505.925  . Insert limits and simplify
 4 3 2 50

= 88097.835 + 46520.7188 + 14251.3336


∫ MydX = 148869.8874 . Now calculate ∫y2dX
70
∫ y2dX = ∫ (0.343X − 4.898 × 10−3 X2 )2 dX
o
70
= ∫ ( 0.118X2 + 2.399 × 10−5 X4 − 3.360 × 10−3 X3) dX
o
70
0.118X3 X5 X4
∫ y dX = 
2
+ 2.399 × 10-5 − 3.360 × 10-3 
 3 5 4 o
= 1386.932
∫ MydX
H = 2
∫y dX
148869.8874
=
1386.932

H = 107.34 KN
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 191

B. SOLUTION OF SAME PARABOLIC ARCH BY NUMERICAL INTEGRATION:−

We know Mac = 53.93X − X2 0 < X < 35


Mcd = 53.93X − 70 (X − 17.5) 35 < X < 50
Mdb = 53.93X − 70 (X − 17.5) −5 (X − 50) 50 < X < 70
y = 0.343X − 4.898 . 10−3 X2 . Solve in a tabular form.
SECTION X Y M MY Y2

1 3.5 1.14 176.51 201.22 1.30


2 10.5 3.06 456.02 1395.42 9.36
3 17.5 4.50 637.53 2868.89 20.27
4 24.5 5.46 721.04 3936.88 29.35
5 31.5 5.94 706.55 4196.91 35.34
6 38.5 5.94 606.31 3601.48 35.34
7 45.5 5.46 493.82 2696.26 29.85
8 52.5 4.50 368.83 1659.74 20.27
9 59.5 3.06 221.34 677.29 9.36
10 66.5 1.14 73.85 84.18 1.30
∑ 21318.27 ∑ 192.24

∫ MydX
H =
∫ y2dX

21318.27 × 7
=
192.24 × 7
H = 110.89 KN Accuracy can be increased by increasing the number of
segments. Now BMD is drawn.

2Kn/m 5kN
20m
C

110.98KNA 4.50 6m 4.50 D 110.98KN


70m
53.93KN 706.55 21.07 KN
634.53 421.4
368.83 Mx-Diagram
0 0

499.00 676.74 499.00


Hy-Diagram
0 0
706,5 706.8
637.53
676.74
499.00 499.00
368.83 M-Diagram
192 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

C. CONSIDERING IT TO BE A CIRCULAR ARCH WITH ALGEBRAIC INTEGRATION

2KN/m 5KN
x C x 20m
6m D
y B
A 70M
D
53.93KN 21.07KN
R

R=105.08m

L2 yc
R = +
8yc 2

702 6
R = +
8X6 y

R = 105.08 m

dy −X
y = R2 − X2 − (h − yc) and = tan θ =
dX 105.082 − X2

y = 105.082 − X2 − (105.08 − 6 )

y = 105.082 − X2 − 99.08 . Establishment expressions.


Mac = 53.93 ( 35 − X) − ( 35 − X)2 0 < X < 35
Mbd = 21.07 (35 − X) 0 < X < 20
Mdc = 21.07 ( 35 − X) − 5 (15 − X) 20 < X < 35

[53.93 (35 − X) − (35 − X) ][ ]


35
∫ My dX = ∫ 2
105.082 − X2 −99.08 dX
o

[ ]
20
+ ∫ 21.07 (35 − X) 105.082 − X2 − 99.08 dX
o

[ 21.07( 35 − X) −5 (15 − X)] [ ]


35
+∫ 105.082 − X2 −99.08 dX
o
∫ My dX = I1 + I2 + I3
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 193

( Where I1 , I2 and I3 are 1st , 2nd and 3rd integrals of above expression respectively). These are
evaluated separately to avoid lengthy simultaneous evaluation of above ∫ My dX expression.

[53.93 × 35 − 53.93X − (35 + X −70X)] [ ]


35
Evaluation of I1 = ∫ 2 2
105.082 − X2 − 99.08 dX
o

[ ]
35
= ∫ (662.55 + 16.07X − X2) 105.082 − X2 − 99.08 dX
o

[662.55
35
= ∫ 105.082 − X2 + 16.07 X 105.082 − X2
o

− X2 105.082 − X2 − 65645.454 − 1592.216X + 99.08X2 dX ]


35 35
16.07
= 662.55 ∫ 105.082 − X2 dX − ∫ 105.082 − X2 (−2X)dX .
o 2 o
Taking constants out.
35 35
1
∫ X 105.082 − X2 (− 2X)dX − 65645.454 ∫ dX −1592.216
2o o

35 35
∫ XdX + 99.08 ∫ X2dX
o o
Put X = 105.08 Sinθ
and dX = 105.08 Cosθ dθ
At X = 0 , θ = 0
At X = 35 , θ = 0.3396 radians = 19.4°
0.3396
I1 = 662.55 ∫ 105.082 − 105.082 × Sin2 θ(105.08)Cosθdθ
o

 + 1 X 105.08 − X   − ∫ 105.08 − X  .dX


3/2 35 35
16.07 105.082 − X2 2 2 3/2 35 2 2 3/2

2  3/2  o 2   3/2  o o  3/2  
35 35 35
X 2 X 3
− 65645.454 X | − 1592.216  + 99.08
o  2 o  3 o
0.3396
16.07
= 662.55 × 105.082 ∫ Cos2 θ dθ − [(105.082 − 352 )3/2
o 3
35
1 35
− (105.082 )3/2 ] + [ (105.082 − 352 )3/2 − ∫ (105.082 − X2 )3/2 dX]
3 o
194 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

353
(352 ) + 99.08 
1592.216
− 65645.454 (35 − 0) −
2  3 
0.3396
1+Cos θ dθ +1005048.922 + 11347550.55
2
I1 = 7315748.83 ∫
o  2 
0.3396
1
− ∫ 105.084 Cos4 θdθ − 1856804.857
3o

Sin2 θ
0.3396
7315748.83  1
= θ+ − (105.08)4
2  2 o 3

0.3396
∫ Cos2 θ (1− Sin2 θ)dθ + 10495794.62
o

7315748.83  Sin (2 × 0.3396)


I1 =
2 0.3396 + 2  + 10495794.62
0.3396

1
× (105.08)4 ∫ 1 + Cos 2θ 1−Cos 2 θ dθ
3 o  2  2 
0.3396
1 105.084  Sin 2θ
= 12886893.66 − × θ+
3  2   2 o

0.3396
1
+ × (105.08)4  (1 − Cos2 2θ) dθ
12 o

Sin (2 × 0.3396)
× (105.8)4 0.3396 +
1
= 12886893.66 −
6  2 ]
0.3396
+
1
× (105.08)4 ∫ 1 − 1 + Cos 4 θ dθ
12 o   2 
0.3396
= 12886893.66 − 13283049.35 +
1
× (105.08)4 ∫ 1 − 1 Cos 4 θ dθ
12 o 2 2 
0.3396
(105.08)4 θ −
1 Sin 4θ
= − 396155.69 +
24  4 o

Sin (4 × 0.3396) 
0.3396
(105.08)4 0.3396 −
1
= − 396155.69 +
24  4 o

= − 396155.69 + 483712.6275
= 87556.9375
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 195

[ ]
20
I2 = ∫ 21.07 (35 − X) 105.082 − X2 − 99.08 dX
o

[ ]
20
= ∫ (737.45 − 21.07X) 105.082 − X2 − 99.08 dX
o

[737.45
20
= ∫ 105.082 − X2 − 73066.546
o

− 21.07X (105.08)2 − X2 + 2087.6162 ] dX


Put X = 105.08 Sin θ
dX = 105.08 Cos θ dθ
At X = 0 θ=0
At X = 20 θ = 0.1915
0.1915 20
21.07
I2 = 737.45 ∫ (105.08)2 Cos2 θ dθ + ∫ 105.082 − X2
o 2 o

26 20
(−2X) dX − 73066.546 ∫ dX + 2087.616 ∫ XdX
o o

0.1915
1+Cos 2θ dθ + 21.07 (105.08) − X  
2 2 3/2 20
= 8.143 × 106 ∫
o  2  2  3/2  o
26 20
X2
− 73066.546 | X | + 2087.616  
o  2 o

8.143 × 106 
0.1915
Sin 2θ 21.07
=
2 θ + 2 o +
3
[{(105.08)2 − (20)2}3/2 − (105.08)2x3/2 ]

2087.616
− 73066.546 (20) + (400 )
2

8.143 × 106  Sin (2 × 0.1915)


=
2 0.1916 +
2  − 438772.215
I2 = 58247.385

[ ] dX
35
I3 = ∫ (662.45 − 16.07X) 105.082 − X2 − 99.08
20

35
= ∫ [662.45 105.082 − X2 − 65635.546
20

− 16.07 × 105.082 − X2 + 1592.216X] dX


196 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

0.3396 35
= 662.45 ∫ 105.082 Cos2 θ dθ − 65635.546 | X |
0.1915 20

35 35
X2
+ 1592.216   +
16.07
∫ 105.082 − X2 (−2X) dX
 2 20 2 20
0.3396
= 662.45 × 105.082 ∫ 1 + Cos 2 θ dθ − 65635.546 × 15
0.1915  2 

16.07 (105.082 − X2 )3/2


35
1592.216
+ (352 − 202 ) +
2 2  3/2 20

662.45 × 105.082  Sin 2 θ


0.3396
=
2 θ + 2 0.1915 − 65635.546 × 15

1592.216 16.07
+ (352 − 202) + [(105.082 − 352 )3/2 − (105.082 − 202 )3/2 ]
2 3

662.45 × 105.082  Sin (2 × 0.3396) Sin (2 × 0.1915)


= 0.3396 − 0.1915 + −
2  2 2 
1592.216 16.07
− 65635.546 × 15 + (352 −202 ) + [(105.082 −352 )3/2 − (105.082 − 202)3/2 ]
2 3

I3 = 8838.028 . Adding values of three integrals. We have

MydX = 87556.9375 + 58247.385 + 8838.028

= 154642.3505 . Now calculate ∫y2dX

[ ] dX
35 2
∫y2 dX = 2 ∫ 105.082 − X2 − 99.08
o

[105.08 − X + 99.08 − 2X99.08 ] dX


35
= 2∫ 2 2 2
105.082 − X2
o

35
= 2 ∫ (20858.653 − X2 − 198.16 105.082 − X2 ) dX
o
35 0.3396
2 3 35
= 2 × 20858.653 | X | − | X | − 198.16 × 2 ∫ 105.082 Cos2 θ dθ
o 3 o
0.3396
1+Cos θ dθ
2
2
= 2 × 20858.653 (35) − (353 ) − 198.16 × 2 × 105.082 ∫
3 o  2 
198.16 × 2 × 105.082 
0.3396
2 Sin 2θ
= 2 × 20858.653 × 35 − + 353 − θ+
3 2  2 o
INTRODUCTION TO TWO-HINGED ARCHES 197

∫y2d X = 1229.761

∫MydX
H =
∫y2dX

154642.3505
=
1239.761

H = 125.75 KN

D. CIRCULAR ARCH BY NUMERICAL INTEGRATION:- As you have seen algebraic integration is


lengthy, laborious and time consuming. so it is better to store such question by numerical integration.
5KN
20m
(5) (6) (7)
(3) (4) (8)
(2) (9) (10)
A (1) B
70m

53.93KN 21.07KN

y = 105.082 − X2 − 99.08
Mac = 53.93 (35 − X) − (35 − X) 20 < X < 35
Mbd = 21.07 (35 − X) 0 < X < 20
Mdc = 21.07 (35 − X) − 5 (15 − X) 29 < X < 35
Attempting in a tabular form
Section X Y M MY Y2
1 31.5 1.167 176.505 205.981 1.362
2 24.5 3.104 456.015 1415.47 9.635
3 17.5 0.533 637.525 2889.901 20.548
4 10.5 5.474 721.035 3946.446 29.965
5 3.5 5.942 760.545 4198.29 35.307
6 3.5 5.942 606.205 3602.07 35.307
7 10.5 5.474 493.715 2702.596 29.965
8 17.5 4.533 368.725 1671.430 20.548
9 24.5 3.104 221.235 686.713 9.635
10 31.5 1.167 73.745 86.060 1.362
∑21405.157 ∑193.634
198 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

S = 105.08 (2 × 0.3396) = 71.370 m


71.37
dS = = 7.137 m
10
∑Myds 21405.157 × 7.137
H = =
∑y2ds 193.634 × 7.137

H = 110.54 KN , Accuracy can be increased by taking more segments.

For secant variation of inertia follow the same procedures established already in this
Chapter.

Space for taking Notes:


SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 199

CHAPTER FOUR
4. SLOPE – DEFLECTION METHOD
This method is applicable to all types of statically indeterminate beams & frames and in this
method, we solve for unknown joint rotations, which are expressed in terms of the applied loads and the
bending moments. By inspection, the degree of indeterminacy is checked and the corresponding number of
unknown joint rotations are calculated from the slope – deflections equations.

4.1. SIGN CONVENTION:–


(1) ROTATIONS:– Clockwise joint rotations are considered as (+ve).
(2) END MOMENTS:– Counterclockwise end moments are considered as (+ve).

4.2. PROCEDURE:–
The procedure is as follows:
(1) Determine the fixed end moments at the end of each span due to applied loads acting on span by
considering each span as fixed ended. Assign ± Signs w.r.t. above sign convention.

w (u.d.l)
2 2
+WL
____ A B -WL
____
12 L 12

+WL2 -WL2
Mf ab = ____ MFba = ____
12 12

P
a b
A B
L
2 2
Mf ab =
+ Pa b MFba = -____
Pa b
2 2
L L

(2) Express all end moments in terms of fixed end moments and the joint rotations by using slope –
deflection equations.
(3) Establish simultaneous equations with the joint rotations as the unknowns by applying the
condition that sum of the end moments acting on the ends of the two members meeting at a joint
should be equal to zero.
(4) Solve for unknown joint rotations.
(5) Substitute back the end rotations in slope – deflection equations and compute the end moments.
(6) Determine all reactions and draw S.F. and B.M. diagrams and also sketch the elastic curve
200 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

4.3. DERIVATION OF SLOPE – DEFLECTION EQUATION:–


Consider a generalized beam under the action of applied loads and end moments as shown at (i).

(i) (ii)
Fig: (i) can be equated to a fixed ended beam carrying applied loads which produce fixing
moments plus two simple beams carrying end moments [figs (iii) and (iv)]

(iii) (iv)
Draw moment diagrams. Determine their areas and centroid locations.

M
(Assuming these diagrams are placed on conjugate beams)
EI
Equating relevant rotations in above four diagrams according to sign conventions

θa = 0 − θa1 + θa2 = − θa1 + θa2


and θb = 0 + θb1 − θb2 = θb1 − θb2 (1) Compatibility on rotations
During the same for moments.
So Mab = Mfab + Ma′
Mba = Mfba + Mb′ (2) Compatibility on moments
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 201

Where Ma′ and Mb′ are the additional moments required to produce the joint rotations at ends A
and B respectively and Mfab & Mfba are the fixed ended moments which hold the tangents at points A and
B straight.Conjugate beam theorem states that “ rotation at a point in actual beam is equal to the shear force
at the corresponding point in the conjugate beam ). Applying it we have.

2 LMa′ LMa′
θa1 = =
3  2EI  3EI

1 LMa′ LMa′
θb1 = =
3  2EI  6EI

1 LMb′ LMb′
θa2 = =
3  2EI  6EI

2 LMb′ LMb′
θb2 = =
3  2EI  3EI

Putting the values of θa1, θa2, θb1 & θb2 in equation (1) and solve for Ma′ & Mb′.

LMa′ LMb′ L Ma' LMb'


θa = − + = − + → (3)
3EI 6EI 3 EI 6EI

Ma'L LMb' L Ma/ L Mb/


and θb = − = − → (4)
6EI 3EI 6 EI 3 EI

LMa' LMb'
Equation (3) becomes θa + = OR
3EI 6EI

6EIθa + 2LMa′ LMb′


=
6EI 6EI

6EIθa + 2 LMa′ = LMb′

6EI
Mb′ = θa + 2 Ma′ → (5)
L

Ma ′L L 6EIθa + 2Ma'
From (4), θb = − by putting Mb/ from (5)
6EI 3EI  L 

Ma ′L 2LMa′
θb = − 2 θa −
6EI 3EI

Ma ′L 2LMa′
θb + 2 θa = −
6EI 3EI

Ma′L − 4 LMa′
θb + 2θa =
6EI
202 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

− 3LMa′
θb + 2θa =
6EI

− LMa′
So θb + 2θa = From here Ma' is
2EI

− 2EI
Ma′ = (2θa + θb )
L

2EI
or Ma′ = ( − 2θa − θb) → (6)
L

6EI θa 4EI
From(5) Mb′ = + (− 2 θa − θb ) By putting value of Ma’ from 6 in 5 and simplifying
L L

6EI θa 8EI θa 4EI


Mb′ = − − θb
L L L

− 2EI θa 4EI
Mb′ = − θb
L L

2EI
or Mb′ = (− θa − 2 θb ) → (7)
L

Putting the values of Ma′ and Mb′ from equations 6 and 7 in equation (2), we have.

2EI
Mab = Mfab + (− 2θa−θb)
L
2EI
Mba = Mfba + (−θa− 2θb)
L

2EI
Absolute values of are not required in general except for special cases and we use relative
L
2EI
values of in cases without settlement..
L

I
Where, K = if absolute stiffness (rotation) is not required.
L

Where K = relative stiffness


Slope − deflection equation for members without settlement.
2EI
Mab = Mfab + (− 2θa − θb )
L

2EI
Mba = Mfba + (− 2 θb − θa )
L
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 203

2EI
without absolute value of , above equations become
L

Mab = Mfab + Kab (− 2θa − θb )

Mba = Mfba + Kab (− 2 θb − θa )

Where Kab = relative stiffness of member ab

2EIab
Kab = 
L
Now we apply the method to various indeterminate structures.

EXAMPLE NO.1::− Analyze the continuous beam shown by slope − deflection method. Draw shear &
moment diagram and sketch the elastic curve.

SOLUTION :−
2KN 2KN/m 4KN
1m 2m

A B C D
2I 4I 3I
4m 6m 4m

Step 1: Calculation of Relative Stiffness :−

I
Member. I L Krel.
L

2
AB 2 4 × 12 6
4

4
BC 4 6 × 12 8
6

3
CD 3 4 × 12 9
4

Step 2: Calculation of Fixed End Moments :− Treat each span as fixed ended.

P
a b - (any generalized span
L carrying a single load)
Pb2a 2
Pa b
L2 L2

Mfab = Mfba = 0 (there is no load acting on span AB)


2×6 2
Mfbc = = + 6 KN−m (According to our sign convention)
12
204 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Mfcb = − 6 KN−m (According to our sign convention)


4×2 ×22
Mfcd = = + 2 KN−m
42
Mfdc = − 2 KN−m
Step 3: Establish simultaneous equations :−
Mab = Mfab + Kab (−2 θa − θb) (General form–Put values of FEMs & relative stiffnesses)

Mab = 0 + 6 ( − 2θa − θb) = − 12 θa − 6 θb


Mba = 6 (− 2θb − θa) = − 12 θb − 6 θa
Mbc = 6 + 8 (− 2 θb − θc) = 6 − 16 θb − 8 θc
Mcb = − 6 + 8 (− 2 θc − θb) = − 6 − 16 θc − 8 θb
Mcd = 2 + 9 (− 2θc − θd) = 2 − 18 θc − 9 θd
Mdc = − 2 + 9 (–2θd – θc) = – 2 – 18 θd – 9 θc
Step 4: Joint Conditions :–
at A : Mab – 2=0 or Mab = 2 KN–m
B Mba + Mbc = 0
C: Mcb + Mcd = 0
D: Mdc = 0
Put these joint conditions in the linear simultaneous equations set up in step
No. (3).
Mab = 2, so – 12 θa – 6 θb = 2
– 12 θa – 6 θb – 2 = 0 → (1)
Mba + Mbc = 0
so – 12 θb – 6 θa + 6 – 16 θb – 8 θc = 0
– 6 θa – 28 θb – 8 θc + 6 = 0 → (2)
Mcb + Mcd = 0
so – 6 – 16θc – 8 θb + 2 – 18 θc – 9 θd = 0
– 8θb – 34 θc – 9 θd – 4 = 0 → (3)
Mdc = 0
– 2 – 18 θd – 9 θc = 0
– 9 θc – 18 θd – 2 = 0 → (4)

– 12 θa – 6 θb – 2 = 0
– 6 θa – 28 θb – 8 θc + 6 = 0 ( Symmetrical about θa and θd diagonal )
0 – 8 θb – 34 θc – 9 θd – 4 = 0
0 −0 – 9 θc – 18 θd– 2 = 0
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 205

If the linear simultaneous equations are established and are arranged in a sequence of joint
conditions, we will find that the quantities on the leading diagonal are dominant in that particular equation
and off diagonal quantities are symmetrical as far as the magnitude of rotations is concerned. This is a
typical property of the stiffness method, which you will study later in matrix methods of structural analysis.

From (1) θa = –2 – 6θb → (5)


 12 

From (4) θd = – 2 – 9 θc → (6)


 18 

Putting these values in equations (2) & (3), all deformations are expressed in terms of θb & θc.
Therefore, we get two linear simultaneous equations in terms of θb & θc. Hence, their values can be
calculated.

Put θa from equations (5) in equation (2)

–6
–2 – 6θb
– 28 θb – 8 θc + 6 = 0
 12 

+ 1 + 3 θb – 28 θb – 8 θc + 6 = 0

or – 25 θb – 8 θc + 7 = 0 → (7)

Put θd from equation (6) in equation (3)

– 2 – 9 θc
– 8 θb – 34 θc – 9  – 4 =0 Simplifying
 18 

– 8 θb – 34 θc + 1 + 4.5 θc – 4 = 0

– 8 θb – 29.5 θc – 3 = 0 → (8)

From (7) θb = – 8 θc + 7 → (9)


 25 

– 8 θc + 7
–8
Put in (8)
 25  – 29.5 θc – 3 = 0

or 2.56 θc – 2.24 – 29.5 θc – 3 = 0

– 26.94 θc – 5.24 = 0

–5.24
θc =
26.94

θc = – 0.1945 Radians
206 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Put value of θc in equation (9) , we get

θb = 
–8 ( – 0.1945) + 7
 25 

θb = + 0.3422 radians.

Put θb in equation (5)

–2 – 6 × 0.3422
θa = 
 12 

θa = – 0.3378 radians.

Put θc in equation (6)

–2 – 9 . (– 0.1945)
θd =
18

θd = – 0.0139 radians.

Putting these values of rotations in simultaneous equations set up in step (3) & simplifying we get
the values of end moments as under:

Mab = 2 KN–m These two values should be the


Mba = – 2.08 KN–m the same but with opposite signs to satisfy equilibrium at that
Mbc = + 2.08 KN–m joint.

Mcb = – 5.63 KN–m


Mcd = + 5.63 KN–m (Same comment)
Mdc = 0

As the end moments have been calculated and they also satisfy the joint conditions, therefore, the
structure is statically determinate at this stage. Reactions, shear force diagrams, B.M. diagrams & elastic
curves can now be sketched.

NOTE:–
In slope – deflection method, the actual deformations are the redundants and stiffness matrix is
symmetrical. In force – method, we can chose any redundant and therefore flexibility matrix is not
generally symmetrical about leading diagonal.

Now we can draw shear force and bending moment diagrams and sketch elastic curve. Free body diagrams
of various spans are drawn.
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 207

2KN 2KN/m 4KN


1m 2 2.08 2.08 5.63 5.63
2m
A
A 4m B B 6m C C 4m D

+2 0 0 +6 +6 +2 +2 reactions due to applied loads

-0.02 +0.02 -0.592 +0.592 +1.408 -1.408 reactions due to end moments
+2 -0.02 +0.02 +5.408 +6.592 + 3.408 +0.592
adding values on both sides of a support

+1.98 +5.428 +10

2KN Elastic curve 2KN/m 4KN


1m 2m

A 4m B 6m C 4m D

1.98KN 5.428KN 10KN 0.592KN

5.408 3.408 3.408


+
+ 0 S.F.D.
0 0.02
0.02 X 0.592
2.0 0.592
=2.704m 6.592
6-X
X =0.417m /
X =1.008m
1.184
+
0 + 0 B.M.D.
2 2.08 2.08

5.63
a=1.652m

Find the location of points of contraflexure & find the maximum +ve B. M. in portion BC by
setting the relevant moment expression equal to zero and by setting the concerned S.F. expression equal to
zero respectively.

To Find Max B.M. in Portion BC :–


X 6–X
=
5.408 6.592

6.592 X = 6 × 5.408 – 5.408 X

X = 2.704m
208 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

2
So Mbc = – 2.08 + 5.408 × 2.704 – × (2.704)
2

Mbc = 5.237 KN–m

Points of Contraflexure :–

Near B:–
– 2.08 + 5.408 X – X2 = 0
X2 – 5.408 X + 2.08 = 0

5.408 ± (5.408)2 – 4 × 1 × 2.08


X=
2×1

X = 0.417 m, 4.991 m

X = 0.417 m

Near C :– In span CB
– 5.63 + 6.592 X' – X'2 = 0
X′2 – 6.592 X′ + 5.63 = 0

6.592 ± (6.592)2 – 4 × 1 × 5.63


X′ =
21

6.592 ± 4.575
X′ =
2

X′ = 5.584 , 1.008

X′ = 1.008 m

1.184 5.63
= in span CD.
2−a a

1.184 a = 5.63 × 2 – 5.63 a

a = 1.652 m

These can be put in bending moment diagram and sketch elastic curve.
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 209

EXAMPLE NO. 2:– Analyse the continuous beam shown by slope –deflection method. Draw S.F.D. &
B.M.D. Also sketch the elastic curve.
SOLUTION :–
4KN

A 2m 2m B
C
6m
EI = Constt. EI = Constt.
Step 1: Calculation of Relative Stiffness :–

I
Member I L Krel.
L
1
AB 1 4 × 12 3
4
1
BC 1 6 × 12 2
6

Step 2: Calculation of Fixed End Moments :– Mab = Mfab + Krel (−2ba − θb)
4 × 22 × 2
Mfab = = + 2 KN–m
42
Mfba = – 2 KN–m
Mfbc = 0
Mfcb = 0 ( As there is no load in portion BC )

Step 3: Establish Simultaneous Equations :–


Mab = 2 + 3 ( – 2 θa – θb )
Mba = – 2 + 3 ( – 2 θb – θa )
Mbc = 0 + 2 ( – 2 θb – θc)
Mcb = 0 + 2 ( – 2 θc – θb )

Step 4: Joint Conditions :–


A: θa = 0 ( Being a fixed joint )
B: Mba + Mbc = 0
C: θc = 0 (Being a fixed end)

Putting these joint conditions in the linear simultaneous equations set up in step No. (3)

Put θa = θc = 0 in above equations. The only equation is obtained from joint B. That becomes.
– 2 – 6 θb – 3 θa – 4 θb – 2 θc = 0
– 2 – 6 θb – 0 – 4 θb – 0 = 0
– 2 – 10 θb = 0

θb = – 0.2 radians.
210 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Put these values of rotations i.e., θa = θc = 0 and θb = −0.2 in simultaneous equations set up in
step (3) & get the values of end moments.
Mab = 2 + 3 ( – 2 × 0 + 0.2) = 2.6 KN–m
Mba = – 2 + 3 (– 2 × (– 0.2) – 0) = – 0.8 KN–m.
Mbc = 0 + 2 [ – 2 × (–0.2) – 0] = + 0.8 KN–m
Mcb = 0 + 2 ( 0 + 0.2) = + 0.4 KN–m . Now Draw SFD and BMD.
4KN 0.4KN-m
2m 2m
A C
B 6m
2.6KN-m
1.75KN
2.45KN 0.2KN

2.45 2.45
+ 0.2 0.2
+
0 0 S.F.D.
1.55 1.55

2.3
X=1.061m
+ 0.4
+
0 B.M.D.
(2-X)
(2-X)
X 0.8

(6-a) a=2m
2.6 =0.516m

As the end moments have been calculated and they satisfy the joint conditions, therefore, the structure is
statically determinate at this stage. Reactions, S.F. diagram, B.M. diagram & elastic curve have now been
sketched.

LOCATION OF POINTS OF CONTRAFLEXURE :–


Near A :–
2.6 2.3
=
X 2−X

2.6 × 2 – 2.6 X = 2.3 X

X = 1.061 m

X′ 2– X′
Near B :– =
0.8 2.3
2.3 X′ = 2 × 0.8 – 0.8 X′
X′ = 0.516 m
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 211

= 
a 6 – a
Near C :−
0.4  0.8 

0.8 a = 6 × 0.4 – 0.4 a

a=2m There have been shown on BMD.

EXAMPLE NO. 3:– Analyze the continuous beam shown by slope – deflection method. Draw S.F.D &
B.M.D. Also sketch the elastic curve.

SOLUTION:–

2KN 2KN/m 4KN


2m

A B C D

1m 4m 6m 4m

2I 4I 3I

Step 1: Calculation of relative stiffness :–

I
Member. I L Krel.
L
2
AB 2 4 × 12 6
4
4
BC 4 6 × 12 8
6
3
CD 3 4 × 12 9
4

Step 2: Calculation of Fixed End Moments :–


Mfab = Mfba = 0 (no load over span AB)
2 × 62
Mfbc = = + 6 KN–m
12

Mfcb = – 6 KN–m

4 × 22 × 2
Mfcd = = + 2 KN–m
42

Mfdc = –2 KN–m
212 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Step 3: Establish simultaneous equations :– Put values of fixing moments and Krel.
Mab = 0 + 6 (–2 θa – θb) = – 12 θa – 6 θb
Mba = 0 + 6 ( – 2 θb – θa ) = – 12 θb – 6 θa
Mbc = 6 + 8 ( – 2 θb – θc) = 6 – 16 θb – 8 θc
Mcb = – 6 + 8 ( – 2 θc – θb) = – 6 – 16 θc – 8 θb
Mcd = 2 + 9 ( – 2 θc – θd) 2 – 18 θc – 9 θd
Mdc = – 2 + 9 (– 2 θd – θc) = – 2 – 18 θd – 9 θc

Step 4: Joint Conditions :–


A: : Mab – 2 = 0 or Mab = 2 KN–m
B: Mba + Mbc = 0
C: Mcb + Mcd = 0
D: θd = 0
Putting these joint conditions in the linear simultaneous equations set up in step No. (3)

– 12 θa – 6 θb = 2 ∴ Mab = 2
– 12 θa – 6 θb – 2 = 0 → (1)
Mba + Mbc = 0
– 12 θb – 6 θa + 6 – 16 θb – 8 θc = 0
– 6 θa – 28 θb – 8 θc + 6 = 0 → (2)
Mcb + Mcd = 0
– 6 – 16 θc – 8 θb + 2 – 18 θc – 9 θd = 0
– 8 θb – 34 θc – 9 θd – 4 = 0 → (3)

θd = 0 (4) Simplifying we get.

– 12 θa – 6 θb – 2 = 0 → (1)
– 6 θa – 28 θb – 8 θc + 6 = 0 → (2)
– 8 θb – 34 θc – 9 θd – 4 = 0 → (3)
θd =0 → (4)

Putting the value of θd in equation (3)

– 8θb – 34 θc – 0 – 4 = 0
– 8 θb – 34 θc – 4 = 0 → (5)
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 213

– 6 θb – 2
From (1) θa =  → (6)
 12 

– 6 θb – 2
–6
Put in (2)
 12  – 28 θb – 8 θc + 6 = 0

+ 3 θb + 1 – 28 θb – 8 θc + 6 = 0

– 25 θb – 8 θc + 7 = 0 → (7)
–34 θc – 4
From (5) θb =  → (8)
 8 

–34 θc – 4
– 25
Put in (7)
 8  – 8 θc + 7 = 0

or 106.25 θc + 12.5 – 8 θc + 7 = 0

98.25 θc + 19.5 = 0

θc = – 0.1985 radians.

θb = 
–34 (– 0.1985) – 4
From (8) by putting value of θc
 8 

θa = 
– 6 x 0.3435 – 2
From (6)
 12 

θb = + 0.3435 radians.

θa = – 0.3384 radians.

Finally θa = – 0.3384
θb = + 0.3435
θc = – 0.1985
θd = 0

Putting these values of rotations in simultaneous equations set up in step # (3) & getting the values
of end moments as follows.
Mab = –12x (–0.3384) – 6 × 0..3435 = 1.9918 = + 2 KN–m
Mba = – 12x (+0.3435)– 6x(– 0.3384) = – 2.092 KN–m
Mbc = 6 – 16(+0.3435)–8 (– 0.1985) = + 2.092 KN–m
Mcb = – 6 – 16(– 0.1985) – 8(+0.3435) = – 5.572 KN–m
Mcd = 2 – 18 (– 0.1985) – 9 × 0 = + 5.573 KN–m
Mdc = – 2 – 18 x 0 – 9 (– 0.1985) = – 0.214 KN–m.
214 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

As the end moments have been calculated and they satisfy the joint conditions. Therefore, the
structure is statically determinate at this stage. Reactions, S.F.D., B.M.D. & elastic curve can now be
sketched.

2KN 2KN/m 4KN


2 2 2.092 2.092 5.572 5.573 0.214
A B C D
1m 4m 6m 2m 2m
+2 0 0 +6 +6 +2 +2 reactions due to
applied loads
0 -0.023 +0.023 -0.58 +0.58 +1.34 -1.34 reactions due to end moments
+2 -0.023 +0.023 +5.42 +6.58 +3.34 +0.66 final reactions

+1.977 +5.443 +9.92

Elastic curve 2KN/m 4KN


2KN
1m
A B C D 0.214
4m 6M 4m
+1.977KN +5.443KN 9.92KN 0.66KN

5.42 3.34
(6-a) +
+ 0 S.F.D.
0 -
- - 0.66
2 0.023 0.023
a
5.25

X X 1.106
X X
+ B.M.D.
+ 0
0
- -
2
2.092
5.572

TO LOCATE THE MAX. B.M. IN PORTION BC :–

5.42 6.58
=
a (6 − a)

5.42 × 6 – 5.42.a = 6.58 a


a = 2.71 m
Mbc = – 2.092 + 5.42 × 2.71 – × 2.712 = + 5.252 KN–m
2
 2 
= 5.25 KN−m
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 215

LOCATION OF POINTS OF CONTRAFLEXURE :–

Near B :– (Span BC )
– 2.092 + 5.42 X – X2 = 0
X2 – 5.42 X + 2.092 = 0

5.42 ± (5.42)2 – 4 × 1 × 2.092


X=
2

5.42 ± 4.583
X =
2

= 0.418 , 5.002 , So X = 0.418 m

Near C :– Span BC

5.572 + 6.58 X′ – X′2 = 0


X′2 – 6.58 X′ + 5.572 = 0

+ 6.58 ± (6.58)2 – 4 × 1 × 5.572


X′ =
2

6.58 ± 4.583
=
2

X′ = 0.998 , 5.582 X′ = 0.998 m

Near C : ( Span CD )

5.573 + 3.34 X"= 0

X" = 1.669 m

Near D :– ( Span CD )
0.214 + 0.66 X = 0

X = 0.324 m

These have been shown on BMD.


216 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

4.4. ANALYSIS OF INDETERMINATE BEAMS DUE TO MEMBER AXIS


ROTATION (SETTLEMENT OF SUPPORTS) :–

R= B
L R

Consider a generalized fixed ended beam settling differentially at B. The angle R is measured
from the original members axis to the displaced member axis and will be +ve if it is clockwise. The
2EI
absolute values of with consistent units are to be used in the settlement problem and the final slope –
L
deflection equation to be used for settlement problems is as follows:–

2EI
Mab = Mfab + (– 2 θa – θb + 3 R)
L

2EI
Mba = Mfba + (– 2 θb – θa + 3 R).
L

The above equation is general and can be used to find the end moments due to applied loading and
due to sinking of supports simultaneously. However, it is a common practice to consider end moments
induced due to applied loading separately from those induced due to settlement. The superposition principle
can then be applied afterwards and the final end moments can be obtained.

If all supports of a continuous structure like beams and frames settle by the same amount, no
additional end moments will be induced due to sinking. These will be induced only whenever there is a
differential sinking of supports like the following case. Where support C sinks by ∆ w.r.t supports B and D.

A B L1 C L2 D
R R

R R
/
C

(Sign of R is the same if determined at the two ends of a span ). So


Rab = 0 ( Both supports of span AB are at the same level )


Rbc = ( Clock–wise angle is positive )
L1


Rcd = – ( Counterclock–wise angle is negative )
L2
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 217

The following points are to be strictly followed :

(1) Consideration and computation of values of ‘R’ in the span


effected by the settlement.
(2) Use proper sign for R keeping in view the corresponding sign convention.
(3) The units of the R.H.S. of the slope–deflection equation should be
those of the B.M. (KN–m).

EXAMPLE NO. 4:– Analyze the continuous beam shown due to the settlement of support B by slope-
deflection method. Draw shear and moment diagrams and sketch the elastic curve.

A B C
D

E=200X106 KN/m2 15mm

I=400X10-4m4
/
B
1m 4m 5m 4m
2I 4I 3I

SOLUTION:–
Step 1: Calculation of F.E.M :–
2EI
Mab = Mfab + (– 2 θa – θb + 3 R). where R is in radians
L
As there is no applied loading on the beam, therefore all fixed end moments terms in the slope –
deflection equation will be equal to zero.

2EI
Step 2: Calculation of R and terms for various spans :–
L

Span AB.

0.015
R=+ = + 3.75 × 10–3 rad
4

2EI 2x(200 × 106 ) × (2 × 400 × 10–6 ) KN/m2xm4


=
L 4 m

= 80,000 KN–m

Span BC :–
0.015
R=– = – 3 × 10–3 rad
5

2EI 2 (200 × 106 ) (4 × 400 × 10–6)


=
L 5

= 128,000 KN–m
218 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Span CD :–
R=0
2EI 2x (200 × 106) × (3 × 400 × 10–6)
=
L 4
= 120,000 KN–m

Step 3: Write Slope–deflection Equation in terms of Joint Rotations & R.


Mab = 0 + 80,000 (– 2 θa – θb + 11.25 × 10–3)
Mba = 0 + 80,000 (– 2 θb – θa + 11.25 × 10–3)
Mbc = 128,000 (– 2 θb – θc – 9 × 10–3)
Mcb = 128,000 (– 2 θc – θb – 9 × 10–3)
Mcd = 120,000 (– 2 θc – θd)
Mdc = 120,000 (– 2θd – θc)

Step 4: Joint Conditions (Conditions of Equilibrium + geometry) :–


Joint A:– Mab = 0 (Pin support) → (1)
Joint B :– Mba+Mbc=0 (Continuous support) → (2)
Joint C :– Mcb + Mcd=0 (Continuous support) → (3)
Joint D :– θd = 0 (Fixed support) → (4)

Step 5: Simultaneous Equations :–


Putting joint conditions in slope – deflection equations
– 160,000 θa – 80,000 θb + 0 + 900 = 0 ∴ Mab = 0 → (1)
– 160,000 θb – 80,000 θa + 900 – 256,000 θb –128,000 θc – 1152 = 0
– 80,000 θa – 416,000 θb –128,000 θc–252=0 ∴ Mba + Mbc = 0 → (2)
– 256,000 θc – 128,000 θb – 1152 – 240,000 θc–0=0 Mcb + Mcd = 0 → (3)
– 128,000 θb – 496,000 θc – 1152 = 0 Simplifying, finally
– 160,000 θa – 80,000 θb + 0 + 900 = 0 → (1)
– 80,000 θa – 416,000 θb – 128,000 θc – 252=0 → (2)
– 128,000θb – 496,000θc–1152=0 → (3)

Solve the above three linear simultaneous equations to get the values of θa, θb & θc which will be
put in the original slope–deflection equations to determine the final end moments.

900 – 80000 θb


From (1) θa = 
 160000 

or θa = 5.625 × 10–3 – 0.5 θb → (4)


SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 219

–128000 θb – 1152
From (3) θc = 
 496000 

so θc = – 0.258 θb – 2.32 × 10–3 → (5)

Put (4) and (5) in (2) , we have.

– 80,000 [ 5.625 × 10–3 – 0.5 θb] – 416,000 θb – 128,000


[– 0.258 θb – 2.32 × 10–3] – 252 = 0

– 450 + 40,000 θb – 416,000 θb+33,024 θb+296.96–252=0

–405.04
θb =
342976

θb = – 1.181 × 10–3 radians.

Put θb in (1) because θa is dominant there.

– 160,000 θa – 80,000 (–1.181 × 10–3) + 900 = 0

900 – 80000 (– 1.181 × 10–3)


θa = 
 160000 

θa = + 6.215 × 10–3 radians.

Put θb in (3) because θc is dominant there, we get.

–128000 (– 1.181 × 10–3 ) – 1152


θc =
496000

θc = – 2.018 × 10–3 red.


θa = + 6.215 × 10–3 red.
θb = – 1.181 × 10–3 red.
θc = – 2.018 × 10–3 red.
θd = 0 red.

Step 6: End Moments :– Putting values of rotations in generalized slope – deflection equation.
Mab = 80,000 (–2 × 6.215 × 10–3+1.181 × 10–3 + 11.25 × 10–3) = 0 KN−m (Check)

Mba = 80,000 (+2 × 1.181 × 10–3 – 6.215 × 10–3 + 11.25 × 10–3) = + 592 KN–m

Mbc = 128,000 (+ 2 × 1.181 × 10–3 +2.018 × 10–3 – 9 × 10–3 ) = – 592 KN–m


( Note: Mba = Mbc Check is OK )
220 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Mcb = 128,000 (+2 × 2.018 × 10–3 + 1.181 × 10–3 – 9 × 10–3) = – 485 KN–m

Mcd = 120,000 (+2 × 2.018 × 10–3 – 0 ) = + 485 KN–m

Mdc = 120,000 (0+2.018 × 10–3 ) = + 242 KN–m

Note:- A great care should be exercised while putting the direction of end moments in the free body
diagrams and then drawing the composite B.M.D. e.g., a (+ve) end moment would mean that
it is counterclockwise at that particular joint or vice versa. After putting the correct
directions according to the sign convention, we will decide by the nature of B.M. strictly by
keeping in view the sign convention for B.M. (tension at a bottom means +ve B.M.).

592 592 485 485 242

A 4m B B 5m C C 4m D

Reactions due to
+148 -148 -215.4 +215.4 +181.75 -181.75 and moments at supports
148KN 363.4KN 397.15KN 181.75KN Final reaction

242KN-m
A B C D
Elastic curve
15mm
397.15KN
148KN 181.75KN
1m 4m 5m 4m
363.4KN

181.75 `81.75
148 148
+ + +
0 0 S.F.D. (KN)
-

215.4
592(tension at the X
bottom).
+ 242
+ +
0 0 B.M.D. (KN-m)
-
X=2.75m

485 (Tension at the top)


SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 221

POINTS OF CONTRAFLEXURES:–
Near B. Span BC

Let it be X.
MX = 592 – 215.4 X = 0
X = 2.75 m
Near D. Span DC
Let it be X′
MX′ = 242 – 181.75 X′ = 0
X′= 1.33 m

EXAMPLE NO. 5:- Analyze the following beam by slope – deflection method. Draw shear and moment
diagrams. Sketch elastic curve.

Take I = 400 × 10–6m4


and E = 200 × 106 KN/m2.
SOLUTION :– Consider each span fixed end and compute fixed ended moments. This is a case of
continuous beam carrying loads and subjected to settlements.
3KN/m 10KN 5KN
4m 2m
B C D
A
Rab Rbc Rcd
20mm 10mm

3I 10I 2I
6m 8m 8m

3KN/m

A B
6m

10KN

B 4m 4m
C

5KN
C D
6m 2m
222 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Step 1: FIXED END MOMENTS


Mfab = 3 × 62 / 12 = 9 KN–m , Mfba = – 9 KN−m
Mfbc = 10 × 42 × 4 / 82 = 10 , Mfcb = –10 KN−m
Mfcd = 5 × 2 × 6/ 8 = 1.875
2 2
, Mfdc = –5 × 62 × 2/82 = –5.625 KN−m

Step 2: CALCULATION OF R & 2EI/L TERMS FOR VARIOUS SPANS :–


SPAN AB :–
+ 0.020
R = = + 3.33 × 10–3 rad.
6

2EI 2 × 200 × 106 × (3 × 400 × 10–6 )


= = 80,000 KN–m
L 6

SPAN BC :–
– 0.02 0.01
R = + = – 1.25 × 10–3 rad
8 8

2EI 2 × 200 × 106 × (10 × 400 × 10–6 )


= = 200,000 KN–m
L 8

SPAN CD:–
– 0.01
R = = –1.25 × 10–3 rad
8

2EI 2 × 200 × 106 × (2 × 400 × 10–6)


= = 40,000 KN–m
L 8

Step 3: SLOPE – DEFLECTION EQUATIONS:–


Put values of fixed ended moments, Krel and R, we get.
Mab = 9 + 80,000 (–2θa – θb + 10 × 10–3).
Mba = –9 + 80,000 (–2θb – θa + 10 × 10–3 )
Mbc = 10 + 200,000 (–2θb – θc – 3.75 × 10–3 ).
Mcb = –10 + 200,000 (–2θc – θb – 3.75 × 10–3 ).
Mcd = 1.875 + 40,000 (–2θc – θd – 3.75 × 10–3 ).
Mdc = –5.625 + 40,000 (–2θd – θc – 3.75 × 10–3 ).
Step 4: JOINT CONDITIONS :–
Joint A ⇒ θa = 0 (Fixed support)
Joint B ⇒ Mba + Mbc = 0 (Continuous support)
Joint C ⇒ Mcb + Mcd = 0 (Continuous support)
Joint D ⇒ Mdc = 0 (Pin support)
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 223

Step 5: SIMULTANEOUS EQUATIONS :–


Putting values of Mba, Mbc, Mcb , Mcd and Mdc in terms of θ
– 9 –160,000 θb+800+ 10 – 400,000 θb –200,000 θc – 750 = 0 Mba + Mbc = 0 and θa = 0
– 560,000 θb – 200,000 θc + 51 = 0 → (1)
– 10 – 400,000 θc – 200,000 θb –750 + 1.875 – 80,000 θc – 40,000 θd – 150 = 0
– 200,000 θb – 480,000 θc – 40,000 θd – 908.125=0 Mcb + Mcd = 0→ (2)
– 5.625 – 80,000 θd – 40,000 θc – 150 = 0 Mdc = 0
– 40,000 θc – 80,000 θd – 155.625 = 0 → (3) Writing again
– 560,000 θb – 200,000 θc + 51 = 0 → (1)
– 200,000 θb – 480,000 θc – 40,000 θd – 908.125 = 0 → (2)
– 40,000 θc – 80,000 θd – 155.625 = 0 → (3)

51 – 200000 θc
From (1) θb =  → (4)
 560000 

–155.625 – 40000 θc


From (3) θd =  → (5)
 80000 

51 – 200000 θc
Put θb and θd in equ. – 200,000 
(2)
 560000  – 480,000 θc

–155.625 – 40000 θc


− 40,000 
 80000  – 908.125 = 0 Simplifying

– 18.2143 + 71428.5714 θc – 480,000 θc + 77.8125 + 200000 θc – 908.125 = 0

– 388571.4286 θc – 848.5268 = 0 we get θc = −21.8371 rad. From (4) and (5)


θb and θd are calculated.

θc = – 21.8371 × 10–4 rad.


θb = + 8.7097 × 10–4 rad.
θd = – 8.5346 × 10–4 rad.

Step 6: END MOMENTS :–


Mab = 9+80,000 (–8.7097 × 10–4+10 × 10–3 ) = +739.32 KN–m
Mba =–9+80,000 (–2 × 8.7097 × 10–4 +10 × 10–3 ) = +651.64 KN–m
Mbc = 10+200,000 (–2 × 8.7097 × 10–4+21.8371 × 10–4–3.75 × 10–3) = –651.64 KN–m
Mcb = –10+200,000 (+2 × 21.8381 × 10–4–8.7097 × 10–4–3.75 × 10–3) = –60.71 KN–m
Mcd = 1.875+40,000 (+2 × 21.8371 × 10–4+8.5346 × 10–4 –3.75 × 10–3) = + 60.71 KN–m
Mdc = –5.625+40,000 (+2 × 8.5346 × 10–4+21.8371 × 10–4 –3.75 × 10–3 ) = 0 KN−m
224 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Step 7: SUPPORT REACTIONS:– By applying loads and end moments on free-body diagrams.
3KN/m
10KN 5KN
651.64KN-m 60.71KN-m
739.32 651.64KN 4m 2m
60.71KN-m
A BB -m CC D
6m 8m 8m
3.84
84.04 8.84
222.83 =+1.25+7.59 =+3.75-7.59
240 =+5-89.04 94.04
=+9+231.83 =+9-231.83 =89.04+5

Net reactions, shear force and bending moment diagrams can now be plotted
Step 8: S.F & B.M. DIAGRAMS & ELASTIC CURVE :–

3KN/m
739.32KN-m 10KN 5KN
651.64KN-m
4m 60.71KN-m 2m
A D Elastic curve
C
-222.83 -84.04 94.04 +8.84
240.83KN 20mm 3.84KN
31 B 101 102.88Kn
21
6m 8m 8m
306.87KN

240.83 222.83

+ 8.84
3.84
+ + +
0 0 S.F.D. (KN).
84.04 -
94.04
651.64

X=3.13m /
X = 0.646 m
+
+
0 - - 0 B.M.D. (KN-m)
60.71
739.32

Step 9: POINTS OF CONTRAFLEXURE :–


NEAR A: Let it be at X from A in Span AB
MX = –739.32 + 240.83X – 1.5X2 = 0
1.5X2 – 240.83X + 739.32 = 0
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 225

+ 240.83 ± (–240.83)2 –4 × 1.5 × 739.32


X=
2 × 1.5
240.83 ± 231.44
=
3
= 3.13 , 157.42
X = 3.13 m
NEAR C: Let it be at X′ from C in Span BC − 60.71 + 94.04 X' = 0, X' = 0.646 m

EXAMPLE NO.6:– Analyze the continuous beam shown due to settlement of support B by slope–
deflection method. Draw S.F. & B.M. diagrams & sketch the elastic curve.

SOLUTION –
3KN/m 24KN 12KN
A B C
2.5 m 1m
D
1m 4m 5mm 5m 4m E=200X106
2I 4I 3I KN/m2
4
I = 400X10 -6m
B

3KN/m
A B
4m

24KN
B C
2.5m 2.5m

12KN
3m 1m
C D

Step 1: FIXED END MOMENTS


Mfab = 3 × 42/12 = 4 KN–m , Mfba = – 4 KN−m
Mfbc = 24 × 2.52 × 2.5/52 = 15 , Mfcb = – 15 KN−m
Mfcd = 12 × 12 × 3/42 = 2.25 , Mfdc = – 12 × 32 × 1/42 = – 6.75 KN−m

2EI
Step2: CALCULATION OF R & TERMS FOR VARIOUS SPANS:–
L
Span AB :–
0.015
R=+ = 3.75 × 10–3 rad
4

2EI 2(200 × 106) (2 × 400 × 10–6)


= = 80,000 KN–m
L 4
226 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Span BC :–
0.015
R=– = – 3 × 10–3 rad.
5

2EI 2 (200 × 106) (4 × 400 × 10–6)


=
L 5
= 128,000 KN–m

Span CD :–
R=0
2EI 2 × (200 × 106) (3 × 400 × 10–6)
=
L 4
= 120,000 KN–m

Step 3: SLOPE – DEFLECTION EQUATIONS.


2EI
Putting values of fixed end moments, and 3R we have.
L
Mab = 4 + 80,000 (– 2 θa – θb + 11.25 × 10–3)
Mba = – 4 + 80,000 (– 2 θb – θa + 11.25 × 10–3)
Mbc = 15 + 128,000 ( – 2 θb – θc – 9 × 10–3)
Mcb = – 15 + 128,000 (– 2θc – θb – 9 × 10–3)
Mcd = 2.25 +120,000 (– 2θc – θd)
Mdc = – 6.75 + 120,000 (– 2 θd – θc)
Step 4: JOINT CONDITIONS :–
Joint A ; Mab = 0 (Pin support) → (1)
Joint B ; Mba + Mbc = 0 (Continuous support) → (2)
Joint C ; Mcb + Mcd = 0 (Continuous support) → (3)
Joint D ; θd = 0 (Fixed end)

Step 5: SIMULTANEOUS EQUATIONS :–


4 – 160,000 θa – 80,000 θb + 900 = 0 ∴ Mab = 0
– 160,000 θa – 80,000 θb + 904 = 0 → (1)
– 4 – 160,000 θb – 80,000 θa + 900 + 15–256,000 θb– 128,000 θc – 1152 = 0
Mba + Mbc = 0
– 80,000 θa – 416,000 θb– 128,000 θc – 241=0 → (2)
– 15 –256,000 θc –128,000 θb –1152 + 2.25 –240,000 θc– 120,000 θd = 0 → (3)
Mcb + Mcd = 0
– 128,000 θb – 496,000 θc – 120,000 × 0 – 1164.75 = 0
or – 128,000 θb –496,000 θc – 1164.75 = 0 Putting θd = 0 → (3)
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 227

Finally the equations become


– 160,000 θa – 80,000 θb + 904 = 0 → (1)
– 80,000 θa – 416,000 θb – 128,000 θc – 241 = 0 → (2)
– 128,000 θb – 496,000 θc – 1164.75 = 0 → (3)
904 – 80000 θb
From (1) θa =  → (4)
 160000 

–1164.75–128000 θb
From (3) θc =  → (5)
 496000 

Put θa & θc from (4) and (5) in (2)

904 – 80000 θb


–80,000 
 160000  – 416,000 θb – 128,000

–1164.75 – 128000 θb – 241 = 0


 496000 

– 452 + 40,000 θb – 416,000 θb + 300.58 + 33032.26θb – 241=0


– 342967.74 θb – 392.42 = 0
θb = – 1.144 × 10–3 radians
904 + 80000 × 1.144 × 10–3
From (4) θa = 
 160000 

θa = + 6.222 × 10–3 rad.

– 1164.75 + 128000 × 1.144 × 10–3


From (5) θc =  −3
 496000  = − 2.053 × 10 radians.

θc = – 2.053 × 10–3 rad.


θa = +6.222 × 10–3 rad.
θb = – 1.144 × 10–3 rad.
θc = – 2.053 × 10–3 rad.
θd = 0 rad.

Step 6: END MOMENTS –


Putting the values of Fixed end moments, relative stiffness, and end rotations (θ values)
in slope-deflection equations, we have.
Mab = 4 + 80,000 (– 2 x 6.222 × 10–3 + 1.144 × 10–3+ 11.25 × 10–3) = 0 KN-m
Mba = – 4 + 80,000 (+ 2 × 1.144 × 10–3 – 6,222 × 10–3+ 11.25 × 10–3) = + 581 KN-m
Mbc = 15 + 128,000 (+2 × 1.144 × 10–3 + 2.053 × 10–3– 9 × 10–3 ) = –581 KN-m
Mcb = – 15 + 128,000 (+ 2 × 2.053 × 10–3 + 1.144 × 10–3– 9 × 10–3) = – 495 KN-m
228 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Mcd = 2.25 + 120,000 (+ 2 × 2.053 × 10–3)= + 495 KN-m


Mdc = – 6.75 + 120,000 (+2.053 × 10–3) = −495 KN-m

Now plot SFD, BMD and sketch elastic curve by applying loads and end moments to
free-body diagram.

3KN/m 24KN 12KN


581 581 2.5m495 495 1m 240

A 4m B B 5m C C 4m D

+145.25 -145.25 -215.2 +215.2 +183.75 -183.75 reaction due to end moments (KN)
+6 +6 +12 +12 +3 +9 reaction due to applied loads (KN)

+151.25 =139.25 -203.2 +227.2 +186.75 -174.75 final reactions (KN)

-342.45 +413.95

Note: Reactions due to loads and end moments have been calculated separately and then added up
appropriately.
3KN/m 24KN 12KN
2.5m 1m
A B C
D Elastic curve.

151.25KN 413.95KN 174.75KN


1m 4m 5m 4m
342.45KN

174.75
139.25 186.75 174.75KN
151.25 + +
+ 0 S.F.D. (KN)
0
203.2 227.2
227.2
581 1.37m
/
X = 1.37 m
+
+ +
0 240
X
B.M.D. (KN-M)
=2.86m 995

POINTS OF CONTRAFLEXURES :–
Near B :– Span AB
Let it be ‘X’
MX = 581 – 203.2 X = 0
X = 2.86 m
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 229

Near D :– Span CD
Let it be X′
Mx′ = 240 – 174.75 X′ = 0
X′ = 1.37 m These have been shown on BMD.

EXAMPLE NO. 7:– Analyze the continuous beam shown due to the settlement of support B alone by
slope–deflection method. Draw S.F. & B.M. diagrams & sketch the elastic curve.

SOLUTION :–

A B C D

15mm E=200X106 KN/m2


I=400X10-6 m4
1m 4m 5m 4m
2I B 4I 3I

Step 1: FIXED END MOMENTS :–


2EI
Mab = Mfab + (– 2 θa – θb + 3 R) __
A generalized slope–deflection equation.
L

As there is no applied loading on the beam, therefore, all fixed end moment terms in the slope–
deflection equation will be equal to zero.

2EI
Step 2: CALCULATION OF R AND TERMS FOR VARIOUS SPANS
L
Span AB :–

0.015
R=+ = + 3.75 × 10–3 rad.
4

2EI 2(200 × 106 ) (2 × 400 × 10–6 )


= = 80,000 KN–m
L 4

Span BC :–

0.015
R=– = – 3 × 10–3 rad.
5

2EI 2(200 × 106 )(4 × 400 × 10–6)


= = 128,000 KN–m
L 5

Span CD :–
R=0 rad. (Both points C and D are at the same level)

2EI 2(200 × 106 )(3 × 400 × 10–6 )


= = 120,000 KN–m
L 4
230 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Step 3: SLOPE–DEFLECTION EQUATIONS :–


2EI
Putting and 3R values, we have.
L
Mab = 80,000 (– 2θa – θb – 11.25 × 10–3 )
Mba = 80,000 (– 2 θb – θa + 11.25 × 10–3 )
Mbc = 128,000 ( – 2 θb – θc – 9 × 10–3 )
Mcb = 128,000 (– 2 θc – θb – 9 × 10–3 )
Mcd = 120,000 (– 2 θc – θd)
Mdc = 120,000 (– 2 θd – θc )
Step 4: JOINT CONDITIONS :–
Joint A ; Mab = 0 (Pin support)
Joint B ; Mba + Mbc = 0 (Continuous support)
Joint C ; Mcb + Mcd = 0 (Continuous support)
Joint D ; Mdc = 0 (Pin support)

Step 5: SIMULTANEOUS EQUATIONS :–


Putting joint conditions in Slope – deflection equation, we have
(Mab = 0)
– 160,000 θa – 80,000 θb + 900 = 0 → (1)
(Mba + Mbc = 0)
– 160,000 θb – 80,000 θa + 900 – 256,000 θb –128,000 θc – 1152 = 0
– 80,000 θa – 416,000 θb – 128,000 θc–252=0 → (2)

(Mcb + Mcd = 0)
– 256,000 θc – 128,000 θb – 1152 – 240,000 θc – 120,000 θd = 0
– 128,000 θb – 496,000 θc – 120,000 θd – 1152=0 → (3)

(Mdc = 0)
– 240,000 θd – 120,000 θc = 0
– 120,000 θc – 240,000 θd = 0 → (4)
Re-writing
– 160,000 θa – 80,000 θb + 0 + 0 + 900 = 0 → (1)
– 80,000 θa – 416.000 θb – 128,000 θc + 0 – 252 = 0 → (2)
0 – 128,000 θb – 496,000 θc–120,000 θd–1152 = 0 → (3)
0 + 0 – 120,000 θc – 240,000 θd + 0 = 0 → (4)

900 – 80000 θb


From (1) θa =  → (5)
 160000 
– 120000 θc
From (4) θd =
240000
θd = – 0.5 θc → (6)
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 231

Put (5) in (2)


900 – 80000 θb
– 80,000 
 160000  – 416,000 θb – 128,000 θc –252 =0

– 50 + 40,000 θb – 416,000 θb – 128,000 θc–252 = 0

– 376,000 θb – 128,000 θc – 702 = 0 → (7)


Put (6) in (3)

– 128,000 θb – 496,000 θc – 120,000 ( – 0.5 θc) – 1152 = 0

– 128,000 θb – 436,000 θc – 1152 = 0 → (8)

From (7)
–702 – 128000 θc
θb =  → (9)
 376000 

Put θb from equation (9) in (8), we have.

– 702 – 128000 θc


– 128,000 
 376000  – 436,000 θc –1152 = 0

238.98 + 43574.47 θc – 436,000 θc – 1152 = 0


– 392,425.53 θc – 913.02 = 0
θc = – 2.327 × 10–3 radians.
– 702 + 128000 × 2.327 × 10–3 
from (9) θb = 
 376000 

θb = – 1.075 × 10–3 rad. Now calculate other rotations from equations.

900 + 80000 × 1.075 × 10–3


from (5) θa = 
 160000 

θa = + 6.162 × 10–3 rad.

from (6)
θd = – 0.5 (– 2.327 × 10–3)
θd = + 1.164 × 10–3 rad.
Final values of end rotations are:
θa = + 6.162 × 10–3 rad.
θb = – 1.075 × 10–3 rad.
θc = – 2.327 × 10–3 rad.
θd = + 1.164 × 10–3 rad.
232 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Step 6: END MOMENTS :–


Putting values of rotations in slope-deflection equations.
Mab = 80,000 (– 2 × 6.162 × 10–3 +1.075 × 10–3+11.25 × 10–3 = 0 KN-m
Mba = 80,000(+2 × 1.075 × 10–3 – 6.162 × 10–3+11.25 × 10–3 ) = +579 KN-m
Mbc = 128,000 (+2 × 1.075 × 10–3 +2.327 × 10–3 – 9 × 10–3 ) = –579 KN-m
Mcb = 128,000 (+2 × 2.327 × 10–3 +1.075 × 10–3 – 9 × 10–3 ) = – 419 KN-m
Mcd = 120,000 (+2 × 2.327 × 10–3 – 1.164 × 10–3 ) = + 419 KN-m
Mdc = 120,000 (–2 × 1.164 × 10–3 + 2.327 × 10–3 ) = 0 KN-m

579 579 419 419

A 4m B B 5m C C 4m D

Reaction due to
+144.75 -144.75 -199.6 +199.6 +104.75 -104.75 end moments

144.75KN 344.35 KN 304.35 KN 104.75KN Final reaction

A B C D
104.75KN
304.35KN
144.75KN

344.35KN
1m 4m 5m 4m
144.75 104.75
144.75 104.75
+ + +
0 S.F.D. (KN)
199.6
579 199.6

+
+
0 B.M.D. (KN-m)

X=2.9m
419

Near B :– Span BC

Let it be at ‘X’ from B.


MX = 579 – 199.6 X = 0
X = 2.9 m
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 233

4.5. APPLICATION TO FRAMES (WITHOUT SIDE SWAY):–

Centre line

Lateral Loads Unsymmeterical 2I 2I


Load
(Side sway Present)

Load is symmetrical and


(i) side sway present (ii) I is same but support conditions
are different (side sway present)

The side sway (relative displacement of two ends of a column) or the horizontal movement of the
structure may become obvious once the structure and the loading is inspected in terms of inertia, E values and
support conditions etc. However, following are the rules and guide lines which may be followed for deciding
whether side sway is present or not.

(1) In case of symmetrical frames subjected to symmetrical loading, the side sway may
be neglected for columns having equal inertia values if support conditions are same.

(2) If a force is applied in horizontal direction to a symmetrical frame where no arrangement


exists for preventing horizontal movement, the side sway must be considered.(with
reference to all these diagrams).

(3) An unsymmetrical frame subjected to symmetrical loading might be considered to have


side sway.

4.6. UNSYMMETRICAL FRAME :–

“An unsymmetrical frame is that which has columns of unequal lengths and different end conditions
and moment of inertia the load may be symmetrical or unsymmetrical.”

4.7. STIFFNESS :–

“Stiffness can be defined as the resistance towards deformation which is a material, sectional and
support parameter.” More is the stiffness, less is the deformation & vice versa. Stiffness attracts loads /
stresses.

The stiffness is of various types :


(1) Axial stiffness (AE).
(2) Flexural stiffness (EI).
(3) Shear stiffness (AG).
(4) Torsional stiffness (GJ).
234 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

EXAMPLE NO. 8:– Analyze the rigid frame shown by slope–deflection method.

10KN 2KN/m
2m 3m C
A B 2I
3I
4m
2I 3m

SOLUTION :– Examining loads and support conditions, horizontal moment is not possible.
Step 1: Relative Stiffness :–
I
Member I L Krel.
L
3
AB 3 5 × 30 18
5
2
BC 2 4 × 30 15
4
2
BD 2 3 × 30 20
3

Step 2: Fixed End Moments :–


10KN
A 2m 3m B

2KN/m
B C
4m

Mfab = 10 × 32 × 2/52 = 7.2 KN–m , Mfba = – 10 × 22 × 3/52 = –4.8 KN-m


Mfbc = 2 × 42/12 = 2.67 KN-m, Mfcb = – 2.67 KN-m
Mfdb = Mfdb = 0 (There is no load acting within member BD)

Step 3: Generalized Slope – deflection Equation :–


Put values of fixed end moments.
Mab = 7.2 + 18(–2 θa – θb) = 7.2 – 36 θa – 18 θb
Mba = – 4.8 + 18 (– 2 θb – θa)= – 4.8 – 36 θb – 18 θa.
Mbc = 2.67 + 15 (– 2 θb – θc) = 2.67 – 30 θb – 15 θc.
Mcb = – 2.67 + 15 (–2 θc – θb) = – 2.67 – 30 θc – 15 θb
Mbd = 0 + 20 (– 2 θb – θd) = – 40 θb – 20 θd
Mdb = 0 + 20 (– 2 θd – θb) = – 40 θd – 20 θb.
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 235

Step 4: Joint Conditions:–


Joint A : θa = 0 (Being fixed end)
Joint B : Mba + Mbc + Mbd = 0 → (1) Continuous joint
Joint C : Mcb = 0 (Pin end) → (2)
Joint D : θd = 0 (Fixed end)
Step 5: Simultaneous equations
Putting above joint conditions in slope deflection equations, we have.
– 4.8–36 θb –18 θa+2.67 30 θb –15 θc – 40θb–20 θd = 0 → (1)
Mba + Mbc + Mbd = 0
Put θd = 0 and θa = 0.
– 4.8 – 36 θb – 0 + 2.67 – 30 θb – 15 θc – 40θb – 0 = 0
–106 θb – 15 θc – 2.13 = 0 → (1)
(Mcb = 0)
– 2.67 – 30 θc – 15 θb = 0 → (2)
– 15 θb – 30 θc – 2.67 = 0 → (2)
– 106 θb – 15 θc – 2.13 = 0 → (1)
– 15 θb – 30 θc – 2.67 → (2)

Multiply (1) by 2 and subtract (2) from (1)

– 212 θb – 30 θc – 4..26 = 0
 15 θb  30 θc  2.67 = 0
– 197 θb – 1.59 = 0

θb = – 8.07 × 10–3 rad.

From (1) ⇒ – 106 (– 8.07 × 10–3 ) – 15 θc – 2.13 = 0


θc = – 84.96 × 10–3 rad.
θa = 0 rad.
θb = – 8.07 × 10–3 rad.
θc = – 84.96 × 10–3 rad.
θd = 0 rad.

Step 6: End moments.


Putting values of FEM and rotations in slope-deflection equations.
Mab = 7.2 – 36 (0) – 18(–8.07 × 10–3 )= + 7.345 KN–m
Mba = – 4.8 – 36(– 8.07 × 10–3 )– 18 (0) = – 4.509 KN–m
Mbc = 2.67–30(–8.07×10–3 )–15 (–84.96 × 10–3 ) = + 4.187 KN–m
Mcb =– 2.67 – 30 (–84.96 × 10–3 ) – 15 (– 8.07 × 10–3 ) = 0
Mbd = – 40(–8.07 × 10–3 ) – 20 (0) = + 0.323 KN–m
Mdb = – 40(0) – 20 (–8.07 × 10–3 ) = + 0.161 KN–m
236 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Draw SFD , BMD and sketch elastic curve.

10KN 2 KN/m
7.345 4.509 4.187
0.16
A 2m 3m
B B C
8.48 4m
+6 +4 +4 +4
0.33
+0.57 -0.57 +1.05 -1.05
B
6.57 3.44 0.16 5.05 2.95

3m
0.16
D
0.161
8.48
7.345KN 10KN 2KN/m
4.187KN-m
A 2m 3m B B C
4m
6.57KN 2.96KN
5.05KN
3.43KN
4.509 KN-m
Vx=2.96-2X=0
x=2.96-2x=0
Mx=2.96x1.48 5.04 1.48
6.57 6.57 -1.48 X= S.F.D. (KN)
S.F.D. (KN) + + =2.190W-m +
0 +
0 - 0 0
3.43 -
3.43
Point of contraflexure 2.96
X=1.12M Mx=2.96x-x=0
5.795
X(2.96-X)=0
X=1.12m X=1.31m 2.190
+ Mx=4.509x3.43Either x=0
+ B.M.D. (KN-m)
B.M.D. (KN-m) 0 + +
0 0
4.509 - X
7.34
X=1.31m 4.187 =2.96m
B.M.D. (KN-m)
0 S.F.D. (KN)
0.323KN-m

0.16KN

0.323
0.16
+

+
0
D

+
3m
0.16KN
0.161KN-m

X=1m
B

0
0.161
0
0.16
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 237

6.57
5.04
+ 0.16 C
A B
3.43 0.43
2.96
S.F.D.

5.795
2.19
+ 0.523 B + C
A -
4.5 4.187
7.345
B.M.D.

ELASTIC CURVE D

EXAMPLE NO. 9:– Analyze the rigid frame shown by slope–deflection method
10KN
B 2m 2m C
2I 3I
1.5m
5KN

2I 1.5m

A
238 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

SOLUTION:– Inspecting loads and support conditions, horizontal displacement is not possible.

Step 1: Relative Stiffness :–


I
Member I L Krel.
L
2
AB 2 3 × 12 8
3
3
BC 3 4 × 12 9
4

Step 2: Fixed End Moments :–

5 × 1.52 × 1.5
Mfab = = + 1.875 KN–m
32

Mfba = – 1.875 KN–m

10 × 22 × 2
Mfbc = = + 5 KN–m
42

Mfcb = – 5 KN–m

Step 3: Generalized Slope–deflection Equations :–


Put values of fixed end moments and Krel.
Mab = 1.875 + 8 (– 2 θa – θb)
Mba = – 1.875 + 8 (– 2 θb – θa )
Mbc = 5 + 9 (– 2 θb – θc)
Mcb = – 5 + 9 (– 2 θc – θb)
Step 4: Joint Conditions :–
Joint A : θa = 0 Being fixed End.
Joint B : Mba + Mbc = 0 Continuous end.
Joint C : θc = 0 Being fixed End.

Step 5: Simultaneous Equations :–


Put θa = θc = 0 in the joint condition at B.
Mba + Mbc = 0
– 1.875 – 16 θb – 0 + 5 – 18 θb – 0 = 0
3.125 – 34 θb = 0
θb = + 0.092 radians.
θa = 0
θc = 0
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 239

Step 6: End moments.


Put values of rotations in slope-deflection equations.
Mab = 1.875 + 8 (0 –0.092) = + 1.140 KN–m
Mba = – 1.875 + 8 (– 2 x 0.092 – 0 ) = – 3.346 KN–m
Mbc = 5 + 9 (– 2 x 0.092 – 0 ) = + 3.346 KN–m
Mcb = – 5 + 9 ( 0 – 0.092) = – 5.827 KN–m
Now draw SFD , BMD and sketch elastic curve. Doing it by-parts for each member.

10KN 5.827
3.346
3.235 2m 2m 3.235

+5 +5
-0.620 +0.620
4.380 KN 5.62 KN

4.38

3.346
+2.5
+0.735
1.5m
3.235 KN
5KN

1.5m
+2.5
1.140 -0.735
1.765 KN
4.38

SHEAR FORCE AND B.M. DIAGRAMS

3.346KN-m 10KN 5.827KN-m 1.14KN.m 5KN


3.346KN-m
2m 2m 1.5m 1.5m
B C A B
4.380KN 1.765KN
5.62KN 3.235KN

4.38 4.38 1.765


Mx=3.346 + +
0 0
+4.38X=0
0 S.F.D. 0 S.F.D.
X=0.764m 5.62 3.235
5.62
Mx=5.62X
-5.827=0 5.414
X=1.037m /
X=0.764m X =1.037m 1.508
+ +
0 0 0 0
B.M.D.
3.346
1.14 3.346
240 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

S.F.D BMD

4.38
5.414
+
B C
+
3.235 1
1 5.62 3.346 5.827
3.346

1.508 + Elastic Curve


+

1.765 A 1.14

4.8. FRAMES WITH SIDE SWAY – SINGLE STOREY FRAMES :–


For columns of unequal heights, R would be calculated as follows:

C
B
2I L3
Rab =
L1 L2
4I I Rcd
P Rab
Rcd =
L2
L1
Hd

HA D
A

To show the application to frames with sidesway, let us solve examples.

EXAMPLE NO. 10:– Analyze the rigid frame shown by slope–deflection method.

5KN

B 2m 5m C
4I

3m I I 3m

A D
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 241

SOLUTION:–
Step 1: Relative Stiffness :–

I
Member I L Krel.
L

1
AB 1 3 × 21 7
3
4
BC 4 7 × 21 12
7
1
CD 1 3 × 21 7
3
Step 2: Relative Values of R :–

Rab = Rcd = = Rrel or R (columns are of 3m length)
3
Mab = Mfab + Krelab (– 2 θa – θb + Rrel)
Mba = Mfba + Krelab (– 2 θb – θa + Rrel)
Other expressions can be written on similar lines.

NOTE :– In case of side sway, R values are obtained for columns only because the columns are supposed
to prevent (resist) side sway not beams.

Step 3: Fixed End Moments :–

5 × 52 × 2
Mfbc = = 5.10 KN–m
72

−5 × 22 × 5
Mfcb = = – 2.04 KN–m
72

All other F.E.M. are zero because there are no loads on other Spans.

i.e. Mfab = Mfba = 0


& Mfcd = Mfdc = 0

Step 4: Slope – deflection Equations :– Putting values of FEM’s while R will now appear as unknown.

Mab = 0 + 7 (– 2θa – θb + R)
Mba = 0 + 7 (– 2 θb – θa + R)
Mbc = 5.1 + 12 (– 2 θb – θc)
Mcb = – 2.04 + 12 ( – 2 θc – θb)
Mcd = 0 + 7 (– 2 θc – θd + R)
Mdc = 0 + 7 (– 2 θd – θc + R)
242 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Step 5: Joint Conditions :–


Joint A : θa = 0 (Fixed joint)
Joint B : Mba + Mbc = 0 (Continuous joint) → (1)
Joint C : Mcb + Mcd = 0 (Continuous joint) → (2)
Joint D : θd = 0 (Fixed joint)
Step 6: Shear Conditions :–

Mba Mcd
B C

3m 3m

Mab + Mba Mdc + Mcd


A Ha = D Hd =
3 3
Mab Mdc
Fx=0
Ha + Hd = 0

NOTE: Shear forces are in agreement with direction of ∆. The couple constituted by shears is balanced by
the direction of end moments. (Reactive horizontal forces constitute a couple in opposite direction to that of
end momens).
∑ Fx = 0
Ha + Hd = 0
Write in terms of moments.
Mab + Mba + Mdc + Mcd = 0 → (3)
Apply equations (1), (2) & (3) and solve for θb, θc & R. Equation (3) is also called shear condition.
Step 7: Simultaneous Equations :–
Put θa and θd equal to zero in joint conditions for B and C in terms of end moments.
Mba + Mbc = 0
so – 14 θb + 7 R + 5.1 – 24 θb – 12 θc = 0 → (1)
Mcb + Mcd = 0
– 38 θb – 12 θc + 7 R + 5.1 = 0
– 2.04 – 24 θc – 12 θb – 14 θc + 7 R = 0
or – 12 θb – 38 θc + 7 R – 2.04 = 0 → (2)
Mab + Mba + Mdc + Mcd = 0
– 7 θb + 7 R – 14 θb + 7 R – 7 θc + 7 R – 14 θc + 7R=0
– 21 θb – 21 θc + 28 R = 0
or – 3 θb – 3 θc + 4 R = 0 → (3)
re-writing the equations again.
– 38 θb – 12 θc + 7 R + 5.1 = 0 → (1)
– 12 θb – 38 θc + 7 R – 2.04 = 0 → (2)
– 3 θb – 3 θc + 4 R = 0 → (3)
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 243

Subtract (2) from (1)


– 38 θb – 12 θc + 7 R + 5.1 = 0
– 12 θb – 38 θc + 7 R – 2.04 = 0

– 26 θb + 26 θc + 7.14 = 0 → (4)

Multiply (2) by 4 & (3) by 7 & subtract (3) from (2)


– 48 θb – 152 θc + 28 R – 8.16 = 0 → (2)
 21 θb  21 θc ± 28 R = 0 → (3)
– 27 θb – 131 θc – 8.16 = 0 → (5)

From (4)
26 θc + 7.14
θb = put in ( 5) and solve for θc
26
26 θc + 7.14
– 27 – 131 θc – 8.16 = 0 → (6)
26
– 27 θc – 7.415 – 131 θc – 8.16 = 0
– 158 θc – 15.575 = 0
θc = – 0.0986 rad.

– 26 × 0.0986 + 7.14
From (6), θb =
26

θb = + 0.1760 rad.
From (1)
– 38 (0.1760) – 12 (–0.0986)+7R+5.1 = 0
R = + 0.0580
So finally, we have.
∴ θa = 0
θb = + 0.1760
θc = – 0.0986
θd = 0
R = + 0.0580
END MOMENTS :–
Putting above values of rotations and R in slope deflection equations, we have.
Mab = 7 (0– 0.176 + 0.058) = – 0.826 KN–m
Mba = 7 (– 2 × 0.176 – 0 + 0.058) = – 2.059 KN–m
Mbc = 5.1 + 12 (– 2 × 0.176 + 0.0986) = + 2.059 KN–m
Mcb = – 2.04 + 12 (+ 2 × 0.0986 – 0.176) = – 1.786 KN–m
Mcd = 7 (+ 2 × 0.0986 – 0 + 0.058) = + 1.786 KN–m
Mdc = 7 ( 0 + 0.0986 + 0.058) = + 1.096 KN–m
Draw SFD , BMD and sketch elastic curve.
244 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

SHEAR FORCE & B.M. DIAGRAMS :– By Parts


5KN
2.059 1.786
0.962 B 2m 5m C 0.962

3.61 +3.571 +1.429 1.39


+0.039 -0.039
2.059 3.61 1.39 1.786
B
C
+0.962 +0.961

3m 3m

-0.962
1.096
A 0.826 D
3.6 1.39

5KN
2.059KN-m 1.786KN-m
B 2m 5m C
3.61KN
1.39KN

3.61 3.61
Mx=-2.059
+3.61X=0 +
X=0.57m S.F.D.
Mx=-1.786 1.39
/
+1.39X =0 1.39 0.962
/
X =1.28m
5.161
X=0.57m X=1.28m
+ 0.862
0 0 B.M.D.
1.786
2.059
0.962 KN

B.M.D.
2.059KN-m

2.059
0.962

Mx=0.826-0.962X=0
B

X=0.86 m
0.962 KN

X=0.86m
3m
0.826 kN-m

0.826
+
0
A
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 245

1.096KN-m

0 B.M.D.
0.961KN
D

1.096
0.961
0

+
3m
1.786KN-m

0.961KN

-
0.961

1.786
0

0
C
Super impositing member SFD’s and BMD’s.
5.161

2.059 + 1.786
3.61 C
B
+ 1.786
C 1
B 2.059
0.962 0.961 1
1

S.F.D. B.M.D.
1

+
0.862 + +
0.962
A D A D 1.096
SFD BMD
ELASTIC CURVE:-
246 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

EXAMPLE NO. 11:– Analyze the rigid frame shown by slope–deflection method.

20 KN
A B 2m
C
2I 2I

3m I
5m I I 5m

E
D F
7m 7m

SOLUTION:–

Step 1: FIXED END MOMENTS :–

20 × 22 × 5
Mfbc = = + 18.16 KN–m
72

20 × 52 × 2
Mfcb = = – 20.41 KN–m
72

Mfad = Mfda = 0 |
Mfbe = Mfeb = 0 |
Mfab = Mfba = 0 | As there are no loads on these spans.
Mfcf = Mffc = 0 |

Step 2: RELATIVE STIFFNESS:–


I
Member I L Krel.
L
2
AB 2 7 × 105 30
7
2
BC 2 7 × 105 30
7
1
AD 1 5 × 105 21
5
1
BE 1 3 × 105 35
3
1
CF 1 5 × 105 21
5
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 247

Step 3: RELATIVE VALUES OF R :–


Member ∆ L Rrel.
L

AB 0 7 0 0
BC 0 7 0 0

AD ∆ 5 × 15 3R
5

BE ∆ 3 × 15 5R
3

CF ∆ 5 × 15 3R
5

Step 4: SLOPE–DEFLECTION EQUATIONS :–


Putting the values of fixed end moments.

Mab = 0 + 30 (– 2 θa – θb) = – 60 θa – 30 θb
Mba = 0 + 30 (– 2 θb – θa) = – 60 θb – 30 θa
Mbc = 8.16 + 30 (– 2 θb – θc) = 8.16 – 60 θb – 30 θc
Mcb = – 20.41 + 30(– 2 θc – θb) = – 20.41–60 θc–30 θb
Mad = 0 + 21 (– 2 θa – θd + 3 R) = – 42 θa + 63 R
Mda = 0 + 21 (– 2 θd – θa + 3 R) = – 21 θa + 63 R
Mbe = 0 + 35 (– 2 θb – θe + 5 R) = – 70 θb + 175 R
Meb = 0 + 35 (– 2 θe – θb + 5 R) = – 35 θb + 175 R
Mcf = 0 + 21 (– 2 θc – θf + 3 R) = – 42 θc + 63 R
Mfc = 0 + 21 (– 2 θf – θc + 3 R) = – 21 θc + 63 R

Step 5: JOINT CONDITIONS :–


Joint A : Mad + Mab = 0 (Continuous joint) → (1)
Joint B : Mba + Mbc + Mbe = 0 (Continuous joint) → (2)
Joint C : Mcb + Mcf = 0 (Continuous joint) → (3)
Joint D : θd = 0 (Fixed end)
Joint E : θe = 0 (Fixed end)
Joint F : θf = 0 (Fixed end)
248 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Step 6: SHEAR CONDITIONS :–

Mad Mbe Mcf


A B C

3m
5m E Meb 5m
Meb+Mbe Mfc+Mcf
He= Hf=
3 5
D Mda+Mad F
Hd=
5
Mda Mfc

∑ FX = 0
Hd + He + Hf = 0, Now put Hd, He and Hf in terms of end moments. We have
Mda + Mad Meb + Mbe Mfc + Mcf
+ + =0
5 3 5

or 3 Mda + 3 Mad + 5 Meb + 5 Mbe + 3 Mfc + 3 Mcf = 0 → (4)

Step 7: SIMULTANEOUS EQUATIONS :–

Putting end conditions in above four equations. We have


(Mad + Mab = 0)
so – 42 θa + 63 R – 60 θa – 30 θb = 0
– 102 θa – 30 θb + 63 R = 0 → (1)
Mba + Mbc + Mbe = 0
so – 60 θb – 30 θa + 8.16 – 60 θb – 30 θc – 70 θb + 175 R = 0
– 30 θa – 190 θb – 30 θc + 175 R + 8.16 = 0 → (2)
Mcb + Mcf = 0
so – 20.41 – 60 θc – 30 θb – 42 θc + 63 R = 0
– 30 θb – 102 θc + 63 R – 20.41 = 0 → (3)
3Mda + 3Mad + 5Meb + 5Mbe + 3Mfc + 3Mcf = 0
so, 3(–21 θa+63 R)+3(–42 θa+63 R) +5(–35 θb+175 R – 70 θb+175 R) +3(–21 θc+63 R – 42 θc+63 R)=0
–63 θa + 189 R – 126 θa + 189 R – 175 θb + 875 R – 350θb + 875 R – 63 θc + 189 R – 126 θc + 189 R = 0
– 189 θa – 525 θb – 189 θc + 2506 R = 0 → (4)
(not a necessary step). Writing in a matrix form to show that slope-deflection method is a stiffness method.
We get a symmetric matrix about leading diagonal.
– 102 θa – 30 θb + 0 + 63 R + 0 =0
– 30 θa – 190 θb – 30 θc + 175 R + 8.16 =0
0 – 30 θb – 102θc + 63 R – 20.41 = 0
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 249

–189 θa – 525 θb – 189θc + 2506 R =0


–102 θa – 30θb + 63 R =0 → (1)
–30θa – 190θb – 30θc + 175 R + 8.116 =0 → (2)
–30θb – 102θc + 63 R – 20.41 =0 → (3)
–189θa – 525θb – 189θc + 2506 R =0 (4)

Solve the above equations, find end moments and hence draw, S.F, B.M, elastic curse diagrams.
Solving aboving 4 equations, following values, are obtained.
θa = –0.024924, θb = 0.0806095, θc = –0.225801, R = –0.00196765.( use programmable calculator or
Gausian elimination)
Putting these values in step 4, nodal moments may be calculated as follows:
Mab = 0 + 30 (–2θa – θb) = –60θa – 30θb
= –60(–0.024924) –30 (0.0806095)
= 0.923 KN-m.
Mba = –60θb – 30θa = –60(.0806095) –30(–0.024924) = –4.089 KN-m.
Mbc = 8.16–60 (.0806095) –30 (–0.225801) = 10.097 KN-m.
Mcb = –20.41 – 60 (–.225801) –30 (0.0806095) = 0.928 KN-m.
Mad = –42 (–.024924) +63 (–.00196765) = 0.923 KN-m.
Mda = –21(–.024924) +63 (–.00196765) = 0.3994 KN-m.
Mbe = –70 (.0806095) +175 (–.00196765) = –5.987 KN-m.
Meb = –35(0.0806095) + 175 (–.00196765) = 3.166 KN-m.
Mef = –42(0.225801) +63 (–.001968) = –9.60 KN-m.
Mfc = –21 (–0.2258) +63 (–.00197) = 4.12 KN-m.

SFD, BMD and elastic curve can be sketched now as usual.

4.9. DOUBLE STOREYED FRAMES WITH SIDE SWAY( GENERALIZED TREATMENT)


FOR R VALUES.
P1 C 1 D 1

Hb HE
L1 L1
1 1
2
P2 B 2
E
2 2 L3
L2
HF
A F
Ha

∆ 1 – ∆2
Rbc = Red =
L1
∆2 ∆2
Rab = Ref =
L2 L3
If L1 = L3
∆2 ∆2
Then Rab = , Ref =
L2 L1
250 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

4.9.1. SHEAR CONDITIONS FOR UPPER STOREY :–

Mcb Mde

P1 C D

L1 L1

Hb He Med+Mde
Mbc+Mcb He=
B Hb= E L1
L1
Mbc Med
P1-Hb-He=0
ΣFX = 0 Hb and He can be written in terms of end moments as above. Applied load upto Section-1-1.
4.9.2. SHEAR CONDITIONS FOR LOWER STOREY :–

Mba Mef
P2 B E

L2 L3

Mba+Mab Mef+Mfe
(P1 + P2) - Ha - Hf=0 A Ha= HF=
L2 F L3

Mab Mfe
ΣFX = 0 Applied shear is to be considered upto Section 2-2. To demonstrate the
application, let us solve the following question.
EXAMPLE NO. 12:- Analyze the following frame by slope – deflection method. Consider:
I = 500 × 10–6m4 ,
E = 200 × 106 KN/m2
It is a double story frame carrying gravity and lateral loads.
24KN/m

10KN C D
1
5I
1 24KN/m
6m 2I 2I

B 2
5I E
2
2I 6m
2I
8m
F

A
8m
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 251

SOLUTION :–

Step 1: Relative Stiffness:–


I
Member I L Krel
L
2
AB 2 8 × 24 6
8
2
BC 2 6 × 24 8
6
5
CD 5 8 × 24 15
8
2
DE 2 6 × 24 8
6
2
EF 2 6 × 24 8
6
5
BE 5 8 × 24 15
8
Step 2: Relative Values of R.
For upper story columns
∆1 – ∆2
Rbc = Rde = = R1 (Say)
6

∆2 ∆2
Rab = × 24 Ref = × 24
8 6

Rab = 3 R 2 (say) Ref = 4 R2 (Say)


Because lower story columns have different heights.

Step 3: F.E.M :–

F.E.M.s are induced in beams only as no loads act within column heights.

24 × 82
Mfbe = Mfcd = = + 128 KN–m
12

Mfeb = Mfdc = – 128 KN–m

Step 4: Slope – Deflection Equations :– Put values of FEM’s and R Values for columns.

MAB = 0 + 6 ( –2θa – θb + 3 R2)


MBA = 0 + 6 ( – 2θb – θac + 3 R2)
MBC = 0 + 8 (–2θb– θc + R1)
252 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

MCB = 0 + 8 (–2θc – θb + R1)


MCD = 128 + 15 ( – 2θc – θd )
MDC = – 128 + 15 (– 2θd – θc)
MDE = 0 + 8 ( – 2θd – θe + R1)
MED = 0 + 8 ( – 2θe – θd + R1)
MEF = 0 + 8 ( – 2θe – θf + 4R2 )
MFE = 0 + 8 ( – 2θf – θe + 4R2 )
MBE = 128 + 15 (– 2θb – θe)
MEB = – 128 + 15 ( – 2θe – θb)

Step 5: Joint Conditions :–


Joint A: θa = 0 (Fixed joint)
Joint B: MBA + MBC + MBE = 0 → (1)
Joint C: MCB + MCD = 0 → (2)
Joint D: MDC + MDE = 0 → (3)
Joint E: MED + MEB + MEF = 0 → (4)
Joint F: θf = 0 (Fixed joint)

Step 6: Shear Conditions :–

For Upper Storey :–

MCB M DE
10
C D
Hc Hd

6m 6m

M BC M ED
B Hb E He

MBC+MCB MED+MDE
HB = HE =
6 6

ΣFX = 0, 10 – Hb –He =0 putting values of Hb and He interms of end moments and simplifying, we get.
60 – MBC – MCB – MED – MDE = 0 → (5)
SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 253

For Lower Storey.

M BA M EF

B E
Hb He

8m 6m

Ha Hf
A F
MAB MFE

M AB+MBA MFE+MEF
HA = HF =
8 6
Σ FX = 0, 10 – Ha – Hf = 0
Putting the values of Ha and Hf in terms of end moments and simplifying, we get.
480 – 6 MAB – 6 MBA – 8 MFE – 8 MEF = 0 → (6)
Now we have got six equations and Six unknowns. (θb, θc, θd, θe, R1, R2)

Step 7: Simultaneous Equations :–


Putting joint conditions in slope deflection equations we have.
Mba + Mbc + Mbe = 0, – 12θB+18 R2 – 16θB – 8θC+8R1+128 – 30θB –15θE = 0
or – 58θB – 8 θC – 15θE + 8R1 + 18R2 + 128 = 0 → (1)
Mcb + Mcd = 0
– 16θC – 8θB + 8R1 + 128 – 30θC – 15θD = 0
or – 8θB – 46θC – 15θD + 8R1 + 128 = 0 → (2)
Mdc + Mde = 0
– 128 – 30θD – 15θC – 16θD – 8θE + 8 R1 = 0
or – 15θC – 46θD – 8θE + 8 R1 – 128 = 0 → (3)
Med + Meb + Mef = 0
– 16θE – 8θD + 8 R1 – 128 – 30θE – 15θB – 16θE + 32R2 = 0
or – 15θB – 8θD – 62θE + 8 R1 + 32R2 – 128 = 0 → (4)
Putting expressions of end moments in equations 5 and 6 , we have.
60 – (–16θB–8θC + 8 R1 – 16θC – 8θB + 8R1) – (– 16θE – 8θD + 8R1 – 16θD – 8θE + 8R1) = 0
or 60 + 16θB + 8θC – 8R1 + 16θC + 8θB – 8 R1 + 16θE + 8θD – 8R1 + 16θD + 8θE – 8R1 = 0
or 24θB + 24θC + 24θD + 24θE – 32R1 + 60 = 0 → (5)
480 – 6( – 6θB + 18R2 – 12θB + 18R2) – 8(–16θE + 32R2 – 8θE + 32R2) = 0
or 480 + 108θB – 216 R2 + 192 θE – 512 R2 = 0
or 108 θB + 192 θE – 728 R2 + 480 = 0 → (6)
Solving above six equations, we have.
θb=2.721 rad, θc=3.933 rad, θd= –3.225 rad, θe= –1.545 rad, R1=3.289 rad, R2=0.656 rad.
Putting these in slope deflection equations, the values of end moments are.
Mab= –4.518, Mba= –20.844, Mbc= –48.688. Mcb= –58.384, Mcd=58.384, Mdc=–90.245, Mde=90.272,
Med= 76.816, Mef=45.696, Mfe=33.344 , Mbe= 69.53, Meb = –122.495 KN-m
Now SFD, BMD and elastic curve can be sketched as usual.
254 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

EXAMPLE NO. 13:– Analyze the rigid frame shown by slope–deflection method.

SOLUTION: It is a double storey frame carrying gravity loads only. Because of difference in column
heights, it has become an unsymmetrical frame.

3 KN/m
1 D
C 1
5I
4m 2I 3 KN/m 2I 4m
2 E 2
B
5I
2I
2I 4m
5m F
A

5m

Step 1: RELATIVE STIFFNESS.

I
Member I L Krel
L

4
AB 2 5 × 10 8
5
2
BC 2 4 × 10 5
4
5
CD 5 5 × 10 10
5
2
DE 2 4 × 10 5
4
2
Ef 2 4 × 10 5
4
5
BE 5 5 × 10 10
5

Step 2: F.E.M :–

F.E.Ms. are induced in beams only as they carry u.d.l. No loads act within column
heights.
3 × 25
Mfbe = Mfcd = = + 6.25 KN–m
12

Mfeb = Mfdc = – 6.25 KN–m.


SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 255

Step 3: RELATIVE VALUES OF R :–


Member ∆ L Krel
L

∆2
AB ∆2 5 × 20 4 R2
5

∆1 – ∆2
BC (∆1–∆2) 4 R1
4

CD 0 5 0 0

∆1 – ∆2
DE (∆1–∆2) 4 R1
4

∆2
EF ∆2 4 × 20 5 R2
4

BE 0 5 0 0
∆1 − ∆2
∆2 terms have been arbitrarily multiplied by 20 while has been taken equal to R1.
4
Step 4: SLOPE – DEFLECTION EQUATIONS :–
By putting FEM’s and Krel Values.
Mab = 0 + 8 (– 2 θa – θb + 4 R2) = – 8 θb + 32 R2
Mba = 0 + 8 (– 2 θb – θa + 4 R2) = – 16 θb + 32 R2
Mbc = 0 + 5 (– 2 θb – θc + R1) = – 10 θb – 5 θc + 5 R1
Mcb = 0 + 5 (– 2 θc – θb + R1) = – 10 θc – 5 θb + 5 R1
Mcd = 6.25 + 10 (– 2 θc – θd) = 6.25 – 20 θc – 10 θd
Mdc = – 6.25 + 10 (– 2 θd – θc) = – 6.25 – 20 θd – 10 θc
Mde = 0 + 5 (– 2 θd – θe + R1) = – 10 θd – 5 θe + 5 R1
Med = 0 + 5 (– 2 θe – θd + R1) = – 10 θe – 5 θd + 5 R1
Mef = 0 + 5 (– 2 θe – θf + 5 R2) = – 10 θe + 25 R2
Mfe = 0 + 5 (– 2 θf – θe + 5 R2) = – 5 θe + 25 R2
Mbe = 6.25 + 10 (– 2 θb – θe) = 6.25 – 20 θb – 10 θe
Meb = – 6.25 + 10 (– 2 θe – θb) = – 6.25 – 20 θe – 10 θb
Step 5: JOINT CONDITIONS :–

Joint A : θa = 0 (Fixed joint)


Joint B : Mba + Mbc + Mbe = 0 → (1)
256 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Joint C : Mcb + Mcd = 0 → (2)


Joint D : Mdc + Mde = 0 → (3)
Joint E : Med + Meb + Mef = 0 → (4)
Joint F : θf = 0 (Fixed joint)

Step 6: SHEAR CONDITIONS :– Upper Storey

Mcb Mde
C D
Hc Hd

4m 4m

B Hb E He
Mbc Med
Mbc+Mcb
Hb=
4
Med+Mde
He=
4

ΣFX = 0, Hb + He = 0 , Now putting their values → (5)

Mbc + Mcb + Med + Mde = 0 Simplify


 4   4 

Mbc + Mcb + Med + Mde = 0 → (5)

MBA MEF

B E

4m
5m

F HF
A HA
MFE
MAB

Shear Condition: Lower Storey.


ΣFX = 0, Ha + Hf = 0

Ha = 
Mab + Mba Mfe+Mef
 5  , Hf =  4  Simplify

4 (Mab + Mba) + 5 (Mfe + Mef) = 0 → (6)


SLOPE __ DEFLECTION METHOD 257

Step 7: SIMULTANEOUS EQUATIONS :–


Putting joint and shear conditions in above six equations and simplify.
Mba + Mbc + Mbe = 0
or – 16 θb + 32 R2 – 10 θb – 5 θc +5 R1 + 6.25 –20 θb–10θe = 0
– 46 θb – 5 θc – 10 θe + 5 R1 + 32 R2 + 6.25 = 0 → (1)
Mcb + Mcd = 0
or – 10 θc – 5 θb + 5 R1 + 6.25 – 20 θc – 10 θd = 0
– 5 θb – 30 θc – 10 θd + 5 R1 + 6.25 = 0 → (2)
Mdc + Mde = 0
or – 6.25 – 5 θd – 10 θc – 10 θd – 5 θe + 5 R1 = 0
– 10 θc – 30 θd – 5 θe + 5 R1 – 6.25 = 0 → (3)
Med + Mcb + Mef = 0
or – 10 θe – 5 θd + 5 R1 – 6.25–20 θe–10 θb–10 θe + 25 R2 = 0
– 10 θb – 5 θd – 40 θe + 5 R1 + 25 R2 – 6.25 = 0 → (4)
Mbc + Mcb + Med + Mde = 0
or – 10 θb – 5 θc + 5 R1 – 10 θc – 5 θb + 5 R1 – 10 θd
– 5 θe + 5 R1 – 10 θe – 5 θd + 5 R1 = 0
– 15 θb – 15 θc – 15 θd – 15 θe + 20 R1 = 0 → (5)
4(Mab + Mba) + 5 (Mfe + Mef) = 0
or 4 (–8 θb + 32 R2 – 16 θb + 32 R2 ) +5(–10 θe + 25 R2 – 5 θe + 25 R2) = 0
– 96 θb – 75 θe + 506 R2 = 0 → (6)

Solving above six equations (by programmable calculator) we have.


θb=0.141, θc=0.275, θd= –0.276, θe= –0.156, R1=0.01224, R2=0.003613.
By Putting these in slope deflection equations, the values of end moments are.
Mab = –1.012, Mba = –2.14, Mbc = –2.846, Mcb = –3.5162, Mcd = 3.51, Mdc = –3.48, Mde = 3.52,
Med = 2.8788, Mef = 1.65, Mfe = 0.87, Mbe = 4.99, Meb = –4.54
Now SFD, BMD and elastic curve can be sketched as usual.
258 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

CHAPTER FIVE

5. THE MOMENT − DISTRIBUTION METHOD


5.1. Introduction :−
Professor Hardy Cross of University of Illinois of U.S.A. invented this method in 1930. However,
the method was well-established by the end of 1934 as a result of several research publications which
appeared in the Journals of American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In some books, the moment-
distribution method is also referred to as a Hardy Cross method or simply a Cross method.

The moment-distribution method can be used to analyze all types of statically indeterminate
beams or rigid frames. Essentially it consists in solving the linear simultaneous equations that were
obtained in the slope-deflection method by successive approximations or moment distribution. Increased
number of cycles would result in more accuracy. However, for all academic purposes, three cycles may be
considered sufficient.

In order to develop the method, it will be helpful to consider the following problem. A propped
cantilever subjected to end moments.

Ma
A a B M EI = Constt, aa = rotation at end A due
b
to moment at A.

L
Ma
A B B.D.S. under redundant Ma, ba = rotation at B due
aa ba to moment at A.
Ma MaL
EI 2EI Ma Diagram Over Conjugate - beam
EI
+
0 0
+

ab bb Mb
B
B.D.S. under redundant Mb, ab = rotation at A due
0 0 to moment at B.
MbL
2EI
Mb
EI (
Mb
EI
Diagram Over Conjugate - beam )bb = rotation at B due
to moment at B.
Note: Counterclockwise moment are considered (+ve)
Geometry requirement at B :−
θb = 0, or θba − θbb = 0 and (1) θb = θba − θbb =0 (Slope at B).
Now calculate all rotations shown in diagram by using conjugate beam method.
MaL × 2 L
 2EI  3
θaa = ( By conjugate beam theorem)
L
MaL
θaa =
3EI
THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 259

MbL × L
 2EI  3
θab = ( By conjugate beam theorem)
L

MbL
θab =
6EI

MaL × L
 2EI   3 
θba = ( By conjugate beam theorem)
L

MaL
θba =
6EI

MbL × 2L
 2EI   3 
θbb = ( By conjugate beam theorem)
L
MbL
θbb =
3EI

Put θba & θbb in (1)


MaL MbL
=
6EI 3EI

Ma
or Mb = (3)
2

If Ma is applied at A, then Ma/2 will be transmitted to the far end B.


Also, θa = θaa − θab Geometry requirement at A. (2)
Put values of θaa and θab, we have,
Ma.L Mb.L
θaa = −
3EI 6EI

Ma.L Ma.L Ma
= − (by putting Mb = for above)
3EI 12EI 2

3 Ma.L
θaa =
12EI

Ma.L
or θaa = . It can be written as
4EI

θaa = Ma 
L
4EI

or Ma = 4EI θaa (4)


L
260 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

5.2. STIFFNESS FACTOR :− The term 4EI/L is called the stiffness factor “stiffness factor is defined as
the moment required to be applied at A to produce unit rotation at point A of the propped cantilever beam
shown.”

5.3. CARRY-OVER FACTOR:− The constant (1/2) in equation 3 is called the carry-over factor.
Ma
Mb =
2
Mb 1
=
Ma 2
“Carry-over factor is the ratio of the moment induced at the far end to the moment applied at near end for a
propped cantilever beam.” Now consider a simply supported beam carrying end moment at A.
Ma
A B
aa L

EI = Constt:
MaL
Ma 2EI
EI
(M/EI Diagram)
+
2
L
MaL 3 MaL 3θaa EI
θaa = × = or Ma =
2EI L 3EI L
Compare this Ma with that for a propped cantilever beam. We find that
Stiffness factor of a simple beam is 3/4th of the cantilever beam. So propped cantilever beam is more stiff.

5.4. DISTRIBUTION FACTOR :−


Let us consider a moment applied at joint E as shown. Values shown are the stiflnesses of the
members.
B

10,000
M
4000 E 4000 C
A

10,000
D
Consider a simple structure shown in the diagram which is under the action of applied moment M.
For the equilibrium requirements at the joint, it is obvious that the summation of moments ( ∑ M ) should
be zero at the joint. This means that the applied moment ‘M’ will be distributed in all the members
meeting at that joint in proportion to their stiffness factor. (This called stiffness – concept)

Total stiffness factor = 28,000 = 10,000 + 10,000 + 4,000 + 4,000


4000 1
So Mae = Mec = ×M= M
2800 7
10000 5
Mbe = Med = × M = M. Therefore,
2800 14
“ Distribution at any end of a member factor is the ratio of the stiffness factor of the member being
considered to the sum of the stiffnesses of all the members meeting at that particular continuous
joint.”
THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 261

EXAMPLE NO. 1:- Now take the continuous beam as shown in the figure and analyze it by moment
distribution method.
5 KN/m 20KN
5m
A B 4I C
3I

10m 10m

FIXED END MOMENTS :−

41.67 41.67 25 25
A B B C
3/7 4/7

41.67 16.67
Locking moment = reactive moment

Locking 25
moment 41.67 25
A C
41.67
B 16.67= net moment at B
7.14
B C
A B 9.53
16.67
5 × 102
Mfab = = + 41.67 KN−m
12
Mfba = − 41.67 KN−m
20 × 52 × 5
Mfbc = = + 25 KN−m
102
Mfcb = − 25 KN−m
M = 16.67 is to be distributed. (Net moment at B support)
Total stiffness of members of joint B = 7
3 3
so Mab = × M = × 16.67 = 7.14 KN−m
7 7
4 4
and Mbc = × M = × 16.67 = 9.53 KN−m
7 7
The distribution factor at joint A is obviously equal to zero being a fixed joint. In the above
diagram and the distribution factor at point C is infact 1 being an exterior pin support. (If we apply moment
to the fixed support, same reactive moment will develop, so re−distribution moment is not created for all
fixed supports and if a moment is applied at a pin support, we reactive moment develops.)

Fixed ended moments are sometimes referred to as the restraining moments or the locking
moments. “The locking moments are the moments required to hold the tangents straight or to lock
the joints against rotation”.
262 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Consider the above diagram. Joint A is fixed joint. Therefore, the question of release of this joint
does not arise. Now let us release joint to the net locking moments acting at joint B is 16.67 in the
clockwise direction. After releasing the joint B, the same moment (16.67) will act at joint B in the
counterclockwise direction. This net released moment will be distributed to various members framing into
the joint B w.r.t. their distribution factors. In this case, 7.14 KN−m in the counterclockwise direction will
act on member BA and 9.53 KN−m in the counterclockwise direction will act on member BC.

Now we hold the joint B in this position and give release to joint ‘C’. The rotation at joint ‘C’
should be such that the released moment at joint ‘C’ should be 25 KN−m. The same procedure is repeated
for a desired number of cycles. The procedure explained above corresponds to the first cycle.

5.5. STEPS INVOLVED IN MOMENT DISTRIBUTION METHOD:−


The steps involved in the moment distribution method are as follows:−
(1) Calculate fixed end moments due to applied loads following the same sign
convention and procedure, which was adopted in the slope-deflection method.
(2) Calculate relative stiffness.
(3) Determine the distribution factors for various members framing into a
particular joint.
(4) Distribute the net fixed end moments at the joints to various members by
multiplying the net moment by their respective distribution factors in the first cycle.
(5) In the second and subsequent cycles, carry-over moments from the far ends of the same
member (carry-over moment will be half of the distributed moment).
(6) Consider this carry-over moment as a fixed end moment and determine the
balancing moment. This procedure is repeated from second cycle onwards till
convergence
For the previous given loaded beam, we attempt the problem in a tabular form..
I 3
K= = × 10 = 3
L 10
4
and × 10 = 4
10

Joints. A B C
Members. AB BA BC CB
K 3 3 4 4
Cycle No. D. Factor 0 0.428 0.572 1
F.E.M. + 41.67 − 41.67 + 25 − 25
1 Balancing
moment. 0 + 7.14 + 9.53 + 25
2 COM. + 3.57 0 + 12.5 + 4.77
Bal. 0 − 5.35 − 7.15 − 4.77
3 COM. − 2.67 0 − 2.385 − 3.575
Bal. 0 + 1.02 + 1.36 + 3.575
∑ + 42.57 − 38.86 + 38.86 0
THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 263

NOTE:- Balancing moments are, in fact, the distributed moments.


Now draw SFD , BMD and hence sketch elastic curve as usual by drawing free-body diagrams.

5 KN/m 20KN
42.57 38.86 38.86

A 10m B B 10m C
+25 +25 +10 +10 __ due to applied loads
+0.371 -0.371 +3.886 -3.886 __ due to end moments

25.371 +24.629 +13.886 6.114

Ra Rc __ net reaction at support


38.515 considering both sides of a joint.
Rb

A 5 KN/m B 5m C

10m 10m

25.371 38.515 6.114

25.371 13.886

+ +
SFD

24.629 6.114

1.973m 30.570

2.8
+ +
B.M.D

2.12m
38.86
42.57

POINTS OF CONTRAFLEXURES :−
Near A: Span AB
MX = 25.371 X − 42.57 − 2.5 X2 = 0 See free-body diagram
2.5 X − 25.371 X + 42.57 = 0
2

25.371 ± (25.371)2 − 4 × 2.5 × 42.57


X=
2 × 2.5
X = 2.12 m
264 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Near B :−
Mx′ = − 38.86 + 24.629 X′ − 2.5 X′2 = 0
2.5 X′ 2 − 24.629 X′ + 38.86 = 0

24.629 ± (24.629)2 − 4 × 2.5 × 38.86


X′ =
2 × 2.5

X′ = 1.973 m
Span BC (near B)

MX// = − 38.86 + 13.886X// = 0

X// = 2.8 m

EXAMPLE NO. 2:− Analyze the following beam by moment-distribution method. Draw S.F. & B.M.
diagrams. Sketch the elastic curve.

SOLUTION :−

3KN/m 6KN/m 36KN

A 2m 2m D
5m B 8m C
EI = Constt:

Step 1: FIXED END MOMENTS :−

3 (5)2
Mfab = + = + 6.25 KN−m
12
Mfba = − 6.25 KN−m
6 × 82
Mfbc = + = + 32 KN−m
12
Mfcb = − 32 KN−m
36 × 22 × 2
Mfcd = + 18 KN−m
42
Mfdc = − 18 KN−m

Step 2: RELATIVE STIFFNESS :−

I
Member. I L Krel.
L
1
AB 1 5 × 40 8
5
1
BC 1 8 × 40 5
8
1
CD 1 4 × 40 10
4
THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 265

STEP (3) DISTRIBUTION FACTOR :−

Joint. D.F. Member.


A 0 AB
8
B = 0.615 BA
13
5
B = 0.385 BC
13
5
C = 0.333 CB
15
10
C = 0.667 CD
15
D  10  = 1 DC
10+0
Attempt and solve the problem now in a tabular form by entering distribution .factors and FEM’s.

Joint A B C D
Members. AB BA BC CB CD DC
K 8 8 5 5 10 10
Cycle No. D.F. 0 0.615 0.385 0.333 0.667 1
1 F.E.M + 6.25 −6.25 +32 − 32 + 18 − 18
Bal. 0 −15.836 −9.914 +4.662 +9.338 + 18
2 Com. − 7.918 0 +2.331 −4.957 +9 +4.669
Bal. 0 −1.433 −0.897 −1.346 −2.697 −4.669
3 Com. − 0.7165 0 −0.673 −0.4485 −2.3345 −1.3485
Bal. 0 +0.414 +0.259 + 0.927 +1.856 +1.3485
∑ − 2.385 −23.141 +23.11 −33.16 +33.16 0

Usually for academic purposes we may stop after 3 cycles.


Applying above determined net end moments to the following segments of a continuous beam, we can find
reactions easily.

3KN/m 6KN/m
2.38 23.11 23.11 33.16 33.16 36KN
A B B C C D
5m 8m

+7.5 +7.5 +24 +24 +18 +18 __ reaction due to applied load
-5.098 +5.098 -1.261 +1.261 +8.29 -8.29 __ reaction due to end moment

2.402 +12.598 + (22.739) +25.261 +26.29 9.71 __ net reaction of a support

Final Values considering both


35.337 51.551 sides of a support.
266 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

3KN/m 6KN/m 36KN


2.38KN B C
2m 2m D
A

2.402 35.337KN 51.557KN 9.71KN


22.739 26.29 26.29

a =0.8m +
+
2.40
0 0 S.F.D.
b=3.79m
9.71 9.71

15.598 Va=2.402-3a=0
19.42 a = 2.402 = 0.8m
3
X X X X Vb=22.739-6b=0
3.34 + b=3.79m
0
0
2.380 23.11 BMD
33.16

POINTS OF CONTRAFLEXURES :−
Span AB (near A)
MX = 2.38 + 2.402 X − 1.5 X2 = 0
1.5 X2 − 2.402 X − 2.38 = 0
2.402 ± (2.402)2 + 4 × 1.5 × 2.38
X=
2 x 1.5
X = 2.293 m
Span BC (near B)
MX′ = − 23.11 + 22.739 X′ − 3 X′2 = 0
3 X′2 − 22.739 X′ + 23.11 = 0

22.739 ± (22.739)2 − 4 × 3 × 23.11


X′ =
2x3
X′ = 1.21 m
Span BC (near C)
MX" = − 33.16 + 25.261 X" − 3 X"2 = 0
3 X" 2 − 25.261 X" + 33.16 = 0

25.261 ± (25.261)2 − 4 × 3 × 33.16


X" =
2x3
X" = 1.63 m
Span CD (near C)
MX"′= − 33.16 + 26.29 X"′ = 0
X"′ = 1.26m
THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 267

5.6. CHECK ON MOMENT DISTRIBUTION :−


The following checks may be supplied.
(i) Equilibrium at joints.
(ii) Equal joint rotations or continuity of slope.
General form of slope-deflection equations is
Mab = Mfab + Krel ( − 2 θa − θb ) → (1)

Mba = Mfba + Krel (− 2 θb − θa) → (2)

From (1)
− ( Mab − Mfab)
θb = − 2 θa → (3)
Krel

Put (3) in (2) & solve for θa.

2 (Mab − Mfab)
Mba = Mfba + Krel  + 4 θa − θa
 Krel 

Mba = Mfba + Krel 2 (Mab − Mfab) +3 θa Krel


 Krel 

(Mba − Mfba) = 2 (Mab − Mfab) + 3 θa Krel

3 θa Krel = (Mba − Mfba) − 2 (Mab − Mfab)

(Mba − Mfba) − 2 (Mab − Mfab)


θa = → (4)
3 Krel

(Mba − Mfba) − 2 (Mab − Mfab)


or θa = → (5)
Krel

Change at far end − 2 (Change at near end)


θa =
Krel

2 ( Change at near end) − (Change at far end)


or θa =
−Krel

(Change at near end)−1/2(change at far end)


θa =
− Krel

Put (4) in (3) & solve for θb.

(Mab − Mfab) 2 (Mba − Mfba) 4(Mab−Mfab)


θb = − − +
Krel 3 Krel 3 Krel
− 3 Mab + 3 Mfab − 2 Mba + 2 Mfba+4 Mab−4 Mfab
=
3 Krel
268 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

(Mab − Mfab) − 2 (Mba − Mfba)


=
3 Krel

2 (Mba − Mfba) − (Mab − Mfab)


=
− 3 Krel

(Mba − Mfba) − 1/2 (Mab − Mfab)


=
− 3/2 Krel

(Mba − Mfba) − 1/2 (Mab − Mfab)


=
− 1.5 Krel

(Mba − Mfba) − 1/2 (Mab − Mfab)


=
− Krel

(Change at near end) − 1/2(Change at far end)


θb =
− Krel

These two equations serve as a check on moment – Distribution Method.

EXAMPLE NO. 3:− Analyze the following beam by moment-distribution method. Draw shear force and
B.M. diagrams & sketch the elastic curve.
SOLUTION :−

1.2KN/m 8KN
3KN 2m

A B C D

1m 4m 5m 4m
2I 4I 3I

Step 1: FIXED END MOMENTS :−

Mfab = Mfba = 0 ( There is no load on span AB)

+ 1.2 × 52
Mfbc = = + 2.5 KN−m
12

Mfcb = − 2.5 KN−m

8 × 22 × 2
Mfcd = = + 4 KN−m
42

Mfdc = − 4 KN−m
THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 269

Step 2: RELATIVE STIFFNESS (K) :−

I
Span I L Krel
L
2
AB 2 4 × 20 10
4
4
BC 4 5 × 20 16
5
3
CD 3 4 × 20 15
4
Moment at A = 3 × 1 = 3 KN−m. (Known from the loaded given beam according to our sign convention.)

The applied moment at A is counterclockwise but fixing moments are reactive moments.

Step 3: D.F.
Joint D.F. Members.
A 1 AB
10
B = 0.385 BA
26

16
B = 0.615 BC
26

16
C = 0.516 CB
31

15
C = 0.484 CD
31

D  4 =1 DC
4 + 0
Now attempt the promlem in a tabular form to determine end moments.

3KN 1.2KN/m 8KN


3 3 0.38 0.38 4.94 4.94 2m
A B B CC D
1m 4m 5m 4m
+3 0 0 +3 +3 +4 +4 (due to applied loads)

0 +0.845 -0.845 -1.064 +1.064 +1.235 -1.235


(due to end moments)
+3 +0.845 -0.845 +1.936 +4.064 +5.235 2.765

3.845 1.091 9.299 2.765 (net reaction)


270 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Insert Page No. 294-A


THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 271

1.2KN/m 8KN
3KN 2m
A B C D
1m
4m 5m

3.845 KN 1.091KN 9.299KN 2.765KN

5.235
1.936
0.845 0.845 +
+ +
0 0 S.F.D.
2.765
3 3 X=1.61m 2.765
4.064

1.936 - 1.2 x X = 0
5.53
X=1.61 m for B in portion BC 0.38 1.94 X X +
+
0 0 B.M.D.

3 X
4.94
LOCATION OF POINTS OF CONTRAFLEXURES :−
MX = − 0.845 X +0.38 = 0
X = 0.45 m from B. in portion BA.
MX′ = 4.064 X′ − 4.94 − 0.6 X′2 = 0
0.6X′2 − 4.064 X′ + 4.94 = 0
4.064 ± (4.064)2 − 4 × 0.6 × 4.94
X′ =
2 x 0.6
= 1.59 m from C in span BC
MX" = − 4.94 + 5.235 X" = 0
X" = 0.94 m from C in span CD
5.7. MOMENT−DISTRIBUTION METHOD (APPLICATION TO SINKING OF SUPPORTS) :−
Consider a generalized differential sinking case as shown below:
L

EI Constt:
B
MFab A R
B

MFba
LMFab
4 EI
MFab LMFba
Bending moments are EI
induced due to differential 4 EI
sinking of supports. +
0 0 B.M.D.
L/2
MFba
5/6L EI
272 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

(1) Change of slope between points A and B (θab) = 0 ( First moment−area theorem )

L L
(1) Mfab − Mfba = 0
4EI 4EI

or Mfab = Mfba

Mfab  L − L
L 5 L
(2) ∆ =
4EI 6  4EI Mfab  6  ( Second moment area theorem ), simplify.

5L2 Mfab − L2 Mfab


6EI ∆ =
4
4 L2 Mfab
=
4

6EI ∆ = L2Mfab
6EI ∆ ∆
or Mfab = Mfba = , where R=
L2 L
6EI R
Mfab = Mfba =
L
Equal FEM’s are induced due to differential sinking in one span.

The nature of the fixed end moments induced due to the differential settlement of the supports
depends upon the sign of R. If R is (+ve) fizingmment is positive or vice versa. Care must be exercised in
working with the absolute values of the quantity 6EIR/L which should finally have the units of B.M.
(KN−m). Once the fixed end moments have been computed by using the above formula, these are
distributed in a tabular form as usual.

EXAMPLE NO.4:− Analyse the continuous beam shown due to settlement at support B by moment −
distribution method. Apply usual checks & draw S.F., B.M. diagrams & hence sketch the elastic curve take
E = 200 × 106 , I = 400 × 10−6 m4

A B C D
2I 4I 3I

15mm

1m 4m B 5m 4m

SOLUTION :−
Step (1) F.E.M. In such cases, Absolute Values of FEM’s are to be calculated
6EI∆ 6(200 × 106 )(2 × 400 × 10−6 )(+0.015)
Mfab = Mfba = 2 =
L 42

= + 900 KN−m (positive because angle R = is clockwise).
L
THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 273

6 (200 × 106) (4 × 400 × 10−6)(−0.015)


Mfbc = Mfcb =
52
= − 1152 KN−m (Because angle is counter clockwise)
Mfcd = Mfdc = 0
Step 2: RELATIVE STIFFNESS (K) :−
I
Members. I L Krel.
L
2
AB 2 4 × 20 10
4
4
BC 4 5 × 20 16
5
3
CD 3 4 × 20 15
4
Step 3: D.F :− (Distribution Factors)
Joint D.F. Members.
A 1 AB
B 0.385 BA
B 0.615 BC
C 0.516 CB
C 0.484 CD
D 1 DC
We attempt and solve the problem in a tabular form as given below:
Joint A B C D
Members AB BA BC CB CD DC
K 10 10 16 16 15 15
Cycle D.F. 1.0 0.385 0.615 0.516 0.484 0
1 FEM. + 900 + 900 − 1152 − 1152 0 0
BAL. − 900 + 97.02 +154.98 + 594.43 + 557.57 0
2 COM. + 48.51 − 450 + 297.22 + 77.49 0 + 278.79
BAL. − 48.51 + 58.82 + 93.96 − 39.98 − 37.51 0
3 COM. + 29.41 − 24.255 − 19.99 + 46.98 0 − 18.75
BAL. − 29.41 + 17.03 + 27.21 − 24.24 − 22.74 0
4 COM. + 8.515 − 14.705 − 12.12 + 13.605 0 − 11.37
BAL. − 8.515 + 10.328 + 16.497 − 7.020 − 6.585 0
5 COM. + 5.164 − 4.258 − 3.51 + 8.249 0 − 3.293
BAL. − 5.164 + 2.991 + 4.777 − 4.256 − 3.493 0
End Moment. 0 + 592.97 − 592.97 − 486.74 + 486.74 +245.38
(change) near end. − 900 − 307.03 + 559.03 + 665.26 + 486.74 + 245.38
−1/2(change) far end. + 153.515 + 450 − 332.63 − 279.515 − 122.69 − 243.37
∑ − 746.485 + 142.97 + 226.4 + 385.745 +367.05 + 2.01
∑ + 74.65 − 14.30 − 14.15 − 24.11 − 24.47 − 0.134
θ rel =
−K
θ checks have been satisfied. Now Draw SFD , BMD and sketch elastic curve as usual yourself.
274 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

5.8. APPLICTION TO FRAMES (WITHOUT SIDE SWAY) :−


The reader will find not much of difference for the analysis of such frames.
EXAMPLE NO. 5:− Analyze the frame shown below by Moment Distribution Method.

16KN
B 2m 2m
C
1.5m 3I
8 KN
2I
1.5m

SOLUTION :−

Step 1: F.E.M :−

8 × 1.52 × 1.5
Mfab = + = + 3 KN−m
32

8 × 1.52 × 1.5
Mfba = − = − 3 KN−m
32

16 × 22 × 2
Mfbc = + = + 8 KN−m
42

Mfcb = − 8 KN−m

Step 2: RELATIVE STIFFNESS (K) :−

I
Members. I L Krel
L

2
AB 2 3 × 12 8
3
3
BC 3 4 × 12 9
4

Step 3: D.F :− (Distribution Factors)

Joint. D.F., Member.


A 0 AB
B 0.47 BA
B 0.53 BC
C 0 CB
THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 275

Example is now solved in a tabular form as given below:


Joint A B C
Members AB BA BC CB
K 8 8 9 9
Cycle D.F. 0 0.47 0.53 0
1 Fem. +3 −3 +8 −8
Bal. 0 −2.35 −2.65 0
2 Com. −1.175 0 0 −1.325
Bal. 0 0 0 0
3 Com. 0 0 0 0
Bal. 0 0 0 0
∑ +1.175 −5.35 +5.35 −9.325
(Change) near end −1.825 −2.35 −2.65 −1.325
−1/2(change)far end +1.175 +0.5875 +0.6625 +1.325
Sum 0 −1.7625 −1.9875 0
θrel=Sum/(−K) 0 +0.22 +0.22 0
θ Checks have been satisfied.
DETERMINATION OF SUPPORT REACTIONS, SFD AND BMD.
7.006
5.35 9.325
16KN
5.35 B 2m 2m C
B
+4 +8
1.5m +1.175 +8
-0.994 -0.994
8KN 5.175 8.994
7.006
+4
1.5m - 1.175
1.825 2.825
A

7.006
B,M. & S.F. DIAGRAMS :−
5.35KN-m 16KN
9.325 KN-m
2m 2m
B C
7.006KN
8.994KN

7.006

Mx=7.006X-5.35=0 + S.F.D.
0 0
x=0.764m
Mx=8.994 X-9.325=0 8.994 8.994
x=1.057 m

8.662

X + X
0 0 B.M.D.
5.35
9.325
276 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

(rotated member) A B

Note: It is a column rotated through 90.


7.006
+ C
S.F.D. B
5.175 8.994

3.825 +

5.35 9.325
+ + C
BMD B
8.662

1.825

ELASTIC CURVE
THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 277

EXAMPLE NO.6:− Analyze the frame shown in the fig. by Moment Distribution Method.

20KN 20KN
A 2m 4m B 4m 2m C
5I 5I

4m 2I 2I 4m
6m 2I

D
F
E

6m 6m

SOLUTION :−
Step 1: F.E.M :−

+ 20 × 42 × 2
Mfab = = + 17.778 KN−m
62
− 20 × 22 × 4
Mfba = = − 8.889 KN−m
62
+ 20 × 22 × 4
Mfbc = = + 8.889 KN−m
62
− 20 × 42 × 2
Mfcb = = − 17.778 KN−m
62
Mfad = MFda = 0
Mfbe = Mfeb = 0 There are no loads on these spans.
Mfcf = Mffc = 0
Step 2: RELATIVE STIFFNESS (K) :−

I
Members. I L Krel
L
5
AB 5 6 × 12 10
6
5
BC 5 6 × 12 10
6
2
AD 2 4 × 12 6
4
2
BE 2 6 × 12 4
6
2
CF 2 4 × 12 6
4
278 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Step 3: Distribution Factor (D.F):−

Joint Member D.F.

A AD 0.375
A AB 0.625
B BA 0.417
B BE 0.166
B BC 0.417
C CB 0.625
C CF 0.375
F FC 0
E EB 0
D DA 0

Now we attempt the problem in a tabular form. Calculation table is attached

Draw SFD, BMD and sketch elastic curve now.

6.667 20KN 14.447 14.447 20KN 6.667


2.5 A 2m 4m B 2.5 2.5 B 4m 2m C 2.5

13.33 +6.67 +6.67 13.33


- 1.296 +1.296 + 1.296 - 1.296
12.034 7.966 7.966 12.034

12.034 15 12.034
A 6.667 B C 6.667
2.5
+2.5

4m 6m 4m

2.5
+2.5
3.334 E 3.334
D F
12.034 15 12.034
THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 279

Insert Page No. 304-A


280 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

B.M. & SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAMS :−


20KN 14.444
6.667
2m 4m
A B
12.034KN
7.966KN
12.034
Mx=12.034 x-6.667= 0 + + S.F.D. (KN)
x=0.554m 0 0

Mx=7.966 x -14.444= 0 7.966


x=1.813 m
17.401
X X
+ +
0 0 B.M.D. (KN-m)
6.667
14.444
20KN
14.444 6.667
4m 2m
B C
7.966KN
12.034KN

7.966
+ + S.F.D. (KN)
0 0

12.034

0.554m
1.813m
+ +
0 0 B.M.D. (KN-m)

14.444 6.667
6.667
F
6.667
D

2.5
6.667
2.5

0
0
6.66

B
+
+

6m
3.334
3.334

2.5
2.5

3.334
X
3.334

3.334
0

0
2.5
0

E
2.5

C
A

Mx=3.334 - 2.5 x=0


x=1.334m
THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 281

A B C

D
F
E
Elastic Curve

EXAMPLE NO. 7:- Analyze the following frame by Moment Distribution Method.

SOLUTION:− This is a double story frame carrying gravity and lateral loads and hence would be able to
sway both at upper and lower stories.

2KN/m

C D

3m
2I 2KN/m 2I

3KN/m B
I E

2I 2I 3m

A 5m

Step 1: F.E.Ms Due to applied loads :−

3 × 32
Mfab = = + 2.25 KN−m
12
Mfba = − 2.25 KN−m
3 × 32
Mfbc = = + 2.25
12
Mfcb = − 2.25 KN−m.
2.52
Mfbe = Mfcd = = + 4.167 KN−m
12
Mfeb = Mfdc = − 4.167 KN−m
Mfde = Mfcd = 0
Mfef = Mffe = 0
282 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Step 2: Relative Stiffness :−


I
Member I L Krel
L
2
AB 2 3 × 15 10
3
2
BC 2 3 × 15 10
3
2
DE 2 3 × 15 10
3
2
EF 2 3 × 15 10
3
1
CD 1 5 × 15 3
5
1
BE 1 5 × 15 3
5

Step 3: F.E.Ms. Due to side Sway of upper storey:−

1 D 1
C
5m

R I R

B E

2I 3m

A F

+ 6EI ∆ + 6E(2I ) ∆
Mfbc = Mfcb = = × 900 = + 1200 (Note: 900 value is an arbitrary multiplier)
L2 32
+ 6 EI ∆ + 6 E(2 I) ∆
Mfde = Mfed = = × 900 = + 1200 (Because R is clockwise)
L2 32
Step 4: F.E.Ms. Due To Side Sway Of Lower Storey :−

C I D
5m

3m 2I -R -R
2 2
B E
R R
3m 2I

A F
THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 283

− 6E(2I) ∆
Mfbc = Mfcb =Mfde = Mfed = × 900 = − 1200
9
(R is counter clockwise so negative)
+ 6EI(2I) ∆
Mfab = Mfba = × 900 = + 1200 (R is clockwise, So positive)
9

+ 6EI(2I) ∆
Mfef = Mffe = × 900 = + 1200 (R is clockwise, So positive)
9

Determination Of Shear Co-efficients (K1, K2) for upper and lower stories :−

Upper Storey: M CB M DE
C D

3m 3m
3KN/m

M BC E M ED
B HB HE
MBC+MCB MED+MDE
HB = 4.5+ HE =
3 3

Shear Conditions :
1. Upper story Hb + He =0 (1) where Hb and He values in terms of end
moments are shown in the relavant diagram.
2. Lower storey Ha + Hf = 0 (2)

Lower Storey MBA M EF


B E

3m 3m
3KN/m

HA A F HF
M AB MFE
MBA MFE+MEF
4.5+ MAB+ HF =
HA = 3 3

Where Ha and Hf values in terms of end moments are shown in the relavant diagram
Now we attempt the problem in a tabular form. There would be three tables , one due to loads(Table−A),
other due to FEMs of upper story (Table−B) and lower story (Table−C).
Insert these three tables here. Now end moment of a typical member would be the sum of moment due
284 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

to applied loads ± K1 × same end moment due to sway of upper story ± K2 × same end moment due to
sway of lower story. Picking up the values from tables and inserting as follows we have.
Mab = 1.446 − K1(143.66) + K2 (1099 .625).
Mba = − 3.833 − K1 (369.4) + K2 (1035.46)
Mbc = − 0.046 + K1 (522.71) − K2 (956.21)
Mcb = − 4.497 + K1 (314.84) − K2 (394.38).
Mcd = + 4.497 − K1 (314.84) + K2 (394.38)
Mdc = − 3.511 − K1 (314.84) + K2 (394.38)
Mde = + 3.511 + K1 (314.84) − K2 (394.38)
Med = + 2.674 + K1 (522.71) − K2 (956.29).
Mef = + 1.335 − K1 (369.4) + K2 (1035.46)
Mfe = + 0.616 − K1 (193.66) + K2 (1099.625).
Mbe = + 3.878 − K1 (153.32) − K2 (79.18)
Meb = 4.009 − K1 (153.32) − K2 (79.18)

Put these expressions of moments in equations (1) & (2) & solve for K1 & K2.

− 0.046 + 522.71 K1 − 956.21 K2 − 4.497 + 314.84 K1 − 394.38 K2


+2.674+522.71 K1 −956.29 K2+3.511+314.84 K1 −394.38 K2 = 13.5
1675.1 K1 − 2701.26 K2 − 11.858 = 0 → (3)

1.446 − 143.66 K1 + 1099.625 K2 − 3.833 − 369.4 K1 + 1035.46 K2


+0.646−193.66 K1+1099.625 K2+1.335−369.4K1+1035.46K2 = 40.5
− 1076.12 K1 + 4270.17 K2 − 40.936 = 0 → (4)
From (3)
1675.10 K1 − 11.858
K2 =  → (5)
 2701.26 
Put K2 in (4) & solve for K1
1675.10 K1 − 11.858
− 1076.12 K1 + 4270.17 
 2701.26  − 40.936 = 0

− 1076.12 K1 + 2648 K1 − 18.745 − 40.936 = 0

1571.88 K1 − 59.68 = 0

K1 = 0.03797

1675.1 (0.03797) − 11.858


From (5) ⇒ K2 =
2701.26

K2 = 0.01915
THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 285

Putting the values of K1 and K2 in above equations , the following end moments are obtained.
FINAL END MOMENTS :−

Mab = 1.446 − 0.03797 x 143.66 + 0.01915 x 1099.625 = + 17.05KN−m


Mba = + 1.97 KN−m
Mbc = + 1.49 KN−m.
Mcb = − 0.095 KN−m.
Mcd = + 0.095 KN−m
Mdc = − 7.91 KN−m
Mde = + 7.91 KN−m
Med = + 4.21 KN−m
Mef = + 7.14 KN−m
Mfe = + 14.32 KN−m
Mbe = − 3.46 KN−m
Meb = − 11.35 KN−m

These values also satisfy equilibrium of end moments at joints. For simplicity see end
moments at joints C and D.

Space for notes:


286 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Insert Page No. 309−A−B


THE MOMENT __ DISTRIBUTION METHOD 287

Insert Page No. 309−C


288 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

CHAPTER SIX

6. KANIS METHOD OR ROTATION CONTRIBUTION


METHOD OF FRAME ANALYSIS
This method may be considered as a further simplification of moment distribution method wherein
the problems involving sway were attempted in a tabular form thrice (for double story frames) and two
shear co-efficients had to be determined which when inserted in end moments gave us the final end
moments. All this effort can be cut short very considerably by using this method.
→ Frame analysis is carried out by solving the slope − deflection equations by successive
approximations. Useful in case of side sway as well.
→ Operation is simple, as it is carried out in a specific direction. If some error is
committed, it will be eliminated in subsequent cycles if the restraining moments and
distribution factors have been determined correctly. Please note that the method does not give
realistic results in cases of columns of unequal heights within a storey and for pin ended columns both of
these cases are in fact extremely rare even in actual practice. Even codes suggest that RC columns framing
into footings or members above may be considered more or less as fixed for analysis and design purposes.
Case 1. No side sway and therefore no translation of joints derivation.
Consider a typical member AB loaded as shown below:
Tangent at B

Mab P1 P2 Mba
b
A B
a
Elastic Curve
Tangent at A
L
A GENERAL BEAM ELEMENT UNDER END MOMENTS AND LOADS

General Slope deflection equations are.


2EI
Mab = MFab + ( − 2θa − θb ) → (1)
L
2EI
Mba = MFba + ( − θa −2θb ) → (2)
L
equation (1) can be re-written as
Mab = MFab + 2 M′ab + M′ba → (3) where MFab = fixed end moment
at A due to applied loads.
EI
and M′ab = rotation contribution of near end A of member AB = − (2θa)
L

2EI θa
→ (4) where k1=
I1 
=− = − 2E k1 θa
L  L1
/
M ba = rotation contribution of for end B of member AB.
2 EI θb
So M/ba = − = − 2Ek1 θb → (5)
L
KANIS METHOD OF FRAME ANALYSIS 289

Now consider a generalized joint A in a frame where members AB, AC, AD.........meet. It carries a
moment M.
B

k1

M
k3
E C
A k2

k3

For equilibrium of joint A, ∑Ma = 0

or Mab + Mac + Mad + Mae..................= 0 Putting these end moments in form of eqn. (3)

or ∑MF (ab, ac, ad) + 2 ∑M′ (ab, ac, ad ) + ∑M′ (ba, ca, da) = 0

Let ∑MF (ab, ac, ad) = MFa (net FEM at A)

So MFa + 2 ∑M′ (ab, ac, ad) + ∑M′ (ba, ca, da) = 0 → (6)

1
From (6), ∑M′ (ab, ac, ad) = − [(MFa + ∑M′ (ba, ca, da)] → (7)
2

From (4), ∑M′ (ab, ac, ad) = − 2Ek1 θa − 2 Ek2 θa − 2 Ek3 θa + ...............

= − 2 Eθa ( k1 + k2 + k3)

= − 2 Eθa (∑k), ( sum of the member stiffnesses framing in at joint A)

∑M′ (ab, ac, ad)


or θa = − → (8)
2E (∑k)

From (4), M′ab = − 2 Ek1 θa. Put θa from (8), we have

∑M′ (ab, ac, ad)


M′ab = − 2E k1 −
k1
= [ ∑M′ (ab, ac, ad)]
 2E (∑k)  ∑k

From (7), Put ∑M′ (ab, ac, ad)


k1  1
So M′ab = − (MFa + ∑M′ (ba, ca, da))
∑k  2 
290 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

1 k1
or M′ab = − [ MFa + ∑M′ (ba, ca, da)]
2 ∑k

1 k2
on similar lines M′ac = − [ MFa + ∑M′ (ba, ca, da)]
2 ∑k

1 k3
and M/ad = − [ MFa + ∑M′ (ba, ca, da)]
2 ∑k

 
rotation contribution of near sum of the rotations contributions of far
end of member ad. ends of members meeting at A.

Sum of rotation factors at near end of members ab, ac, ad is

=− 
1 k1 1 k2 1 k3 1 k1 + k2 + k3 + ......... 
− − −
2 ∑k 2 ∑k 2 ∑k 2 ∑k 

=−
1
2
[
, sum of rotation factors of different members meeting at a

joint is equal to –
1
2
]
Therefore, if net fixed end moment at any joint along with sum of the far end contribution of
members meeting at that joint are known then near end moment contribution can be determined. If
far end contributions are approximate, near end contributions will also be approximate. When Far
end contributions are not known (as in the first cycle), they can be assumed to be zero.

6.1. RULES FOR CALCULATING ROTATION CONTRIBUTIONS :__ Case-1: Without sides way.

Definition: “Restrained moment at a joint is the algebraic sum of FE.M’s of different members
meeting at that joint.”

1. Sum of the restrained moment of a joint and all rotation contributions of the far ends of
members meeting at that joint is multiplied by respective rotation factors to get the
required near end rotation contribution. For the first cycle when far end contributions
are not known, they may be taken as zero (Ist approximation).

2. By repeated application of this calculation procedure and proceeding from joint to joint
in an arbitrary sequence but in a specific direction, all rotation contributions are known.
The process is usually stopped when end moment values converge. This normally happens after
three or four cycles. But values after 2nd cycle may also be acceptable for academic.
6.2. Case 2:__ With side sway (joint translations)

In this case in addition to rotation contribution, linear displacement contributions ( Sway


contributions ) of columns of a particular storey are calculated after every cycle as follows:
KANIS METHOD OF FRAME ANALYSIS 291

6.2.1. For the first cycle.

(A) → Linear Displacement Contribution ( LDC) of a column = Linear displacement factor (LDF) of a
particular column of a story multiplied by [storey moment + contributions at the ends of columns
of that story]
3
Linear displacement factor (LDF) for columns of a storey = −
2
3 k
Linear displacement factor of a column = − Where k=stiffness of the column being
2 ∑k
considered and Σk is the sum of stiffness of all
columns of that storey.
1
6.2.2. (B) → Storey moment = Storey shear x of storey height.
3

6.2.3. (C) → Storey shear : It may be considered as reaction of column at horizontal beam / slab
levels due to lateral loads by considering the columns of each sotrey as simply supported beams in
vertical direction. “If applied load gives + R value (according to sign conversion of slope
deflection method), storey shear is +ve or vice versa.”

Consider a general sway case.

R
h
R

6.3. SIGN CONVENSION ON MOMENTS:− Counter-clockwise moments are positive and


clockwise rotations are positive.

For first cycle with side sway.


(D) Near end contribution of various = respective rotation contribution factor × [Restrained moment +
members meeting at that joint. far end contributions]
Linear displacement contributions will be calculated after the end of each cycle for the columns only.

FOR 2ND AND SUBSEQUENT CYCLES.


(E) → Near end contributions of various = Respective rotation contribution factor × [Restrained
members meeting at a joint. moment + far end contributions + linear displacement
contribution of columns of different storeys meeting
at that joint].
292 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

6.4. Rules for the Calculation of final end moments (sidesway cases)

(F) For beams, End moment = FEM + 2 near end contribution + Far end contributions.

(G) For columns, End moment. = FEM + 2 near end contribution + Far end contribution +
linear displacement contribution of that column for the latest cycle.

6.5. APPLICATION OF ROTATION CONTRIBUTION METHOD (KANI’S METHOD)


FOR THE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS BEAMS

Example No.1: Analyze the following beam by rotation contribution method. EI is constant.

36K
7k/ft 6k/ft

A
B C D
16 24 12
EI = constt.

Note. Analysis assumes continuous ends with some fixity. Therefore, in case of extreme hinged
supports in exterior spans, modify (reduce) the stiffness by 3/4 = (0.75).for a hinged end.

Step No. 1. Relative Stiffness.


I
Span I L Krel K modified.
L
1
AB 1 16 × 48 3 3
16
1
BC 1 24 2 2
24
1
CD 1 12 4 x (3/4) 3
12
(exterior or discontinuous hinged end)
Step No.2. Fixed end moments.

wL2 3 × 162
Mfab = + = + = + 64 K-ft.
12 12
Mfba = − 64
6 × 242
Mfbc = + = + 288
12
Mfcb = − 288
Pa2b + 36 × 62 × 6
Mfcd = + 2 = = + 54
L 122
Mfdc = − 54
KANIS METHOD OF FRAME ANALYSIS 293

Step No.3. Draw Boxes, enter the values of FEMs near respective ends of exterior boxes and rotation
contribution factors appropriately (on the interior side).
restraining moment =
algebraic sum of FEM
meeting at that joint is extend
in inner box..

B C D

FEMs
+64 -64 -0.5( 3 ) +288 -288 -234 +54 -54 -0.5( 3 )
A 3+2 +224 3 -54
0 * -67.2 -0.3* * -44.8 +55.76 * * +83.64 -14.82 *-0.5
-0.2 -0.2 -0.3
0 -83.92 -55.95 +60.95 +91.43 -18.71
0 -84.48 -57 +61.94 +92.9 -19.45

* = Distribution factors.

A C( Far end contribution) B D( Far end contributions)


FIRST CYCLE ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Joint B: − 0.3 (+224 + 0 + 0) = − 67.2 (Span BA) Joint C: − 0.2(− 234 − 44.8 + 0) = +55.76 (Span CB)
and − 0.2 ( 224 + 0 + 0) = − 44.8 (Span BC) and − 0.3(− 234 − 44.8 + 0) = +83.64 (Span CD)

Joint D: − 0.5(− 54 +83.64) = − 14.82 (Span DC)

2nd cycle:
A C ( Far end contributions) B D (far end contributions)
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Joint B. − 0.3 (+ 224+0 +55.76) = − 83.92 Joint C: − 0.2 (− 234 − 55.95 − 14.82) = 60.95
− 0.2 (+224+0 +55.76) = − 55.85 − 0.3 (− 234 − 55.95 − 14.82) = 91.43

Joint D. − 0.5 ( − 54 + 91.43) = − 18.715

3rd cycle: Singular to second cycle procedure. We stop usually after 3 cycles and the answers can be
further refined by having another couple of cycles. (Preferably go up to six cycles till difference in moment
value is 0.1 or less). The last line gives near and far end contribution.
Step No. 4. FINAL END MOMENTS
For beams. End moment = FEM + 2near end cont. + Far end contribution.
Mab = + 64 + 2 x 0 − 84.48 = − 20.48 k − ft.
Mba = − 64 − 2 x 84.48 + 0 = − 232.96 k − ft.
Mbc = + 288− 2 x 57 + 61.94 = +235.9 k − ft.
Mcb = − 288 + 2 x 61.94 − 57 = − 221.12
Mcd = + 54 + 2 x 92.9 − 19.45 = + 220.35
Mdc = − 54 − 2 x 19.45 + 92.9 = zero
The beam has been analyzed and we can draw shear force and bending moment diagrams as usual.
294 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

6.6. Rotation Contribution Method: Application to frames without side sway.


Example No 2:
Analyze the following frame by Kanis method ( rotation Contribution Method )

9K
1 k/ft
6 10 C
A 3I B 2I

2I 10

D 12

Step No. 1 Relative Stiffness.

I
Span I L Krel K modified.
L

3
AB 3 16 × 240 45 45
16

40  
2 3
BC 2 12 × 240 30 (Exterior hinged end)
12 4
2
BD 2 10 × 240 48 48 .
10
∑103
Step No.2. FEM’s
9 × 6 × 102
Mfab = = + 21.1 K-ft
162
9 × 10 × 62
Mfba = = − 12.65
162
1 × 122
Mfbc = = + 12
12
Mfcb = − 12

Mfbd = Mfdb = 0 ( No load within span BD)


KANIS METHOD OF FRAME ANALYSIS 295

Step No. 3. Draw Boxes, enter values of FEM’s, rotation contribution factors etc.
B C

+21.1 -12.65 +12 -12


A 0* +0.119 * -0.65 * +0.079 +5.96 * -12
-0.183 -0.122 -0.5
-0.97 -0.647 +6.32
-1.03 * -0.69 +6.345
-0.195
* rot. cont. +0.126 0
factor. -1.03
-1.10

FEM's

*
0 0

D
(rotation contribution factor)
Apply all relevant rules in three cycles. Final end moments may now be calculated.
For beams. End moment = FEM + 2 x near end contribution. + Far end contribution
For Columns : End moment = FEM + 2 x near end contribution + Far end contribution + Linear
displacement contribution of that column. To be taken in sway cases only.
Mab = 21.1 + 2x0 –1.03 = + 20.07 K−ft
Mba = −12.65 –2 x 1.03 + 0 = −14.71
Mbc = +12 –2 x 0.69 + 6.345 = 16.965
Mbd = 0 – 2x1.1 +0 = −2.2
Mcb = −12 + 2x 6.345 –0.69 = 0
Mdb = 0 + 2x0−1.10 = −1.10
Equilibrium checks are satisfied. End moment values are OK. Now SFD and BMD can be drawn as usual.
Example No. 3: Analyse the following frame by rotation Contribution Method.
SOLUTION:-
It can be seen that sway case is there.
16k
5 15
B C
4I

10 I I

A
20
296 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Step No. 1. Relative Stiffness.


I
Member. I L Krel
L
1
AB 1 10 × 10 1
10
4
BC 4 20 × 10 2
20
1
CD 1 10 × 10 1
10
Step No. 2. FEM’s
+ 16 × 5 × 152
MfBC = = + 45
202
− 16 × 5 × 15
2
MfCB = = − 15
202
All other fixing moments are zero.
Step No.3 Draw Boxes, enter FEM’s and rotation Contribution factors etc. Apply three cycles.
B C

* +45 -15 *
+45
-0.333 -14.98 -0.333 -15
+9.98
-18.93 +10.67
* -19.57 +10.47 *
-0.167 -0.167
0 +5.0 0
-7.51
+5.35 LDC
-9.49 LDC +5.25
-9.80
+1.8825
-0.75 +3.105
-3/2(1/2)=
+3.41
-0.75
LDF
Linear disp. FEMs
factors * = rotation factors.

*
0 0
*
0 0 D
A Rotation factor
Rotation factor

See explanation of calculations on next page.


Note: After applying the first cycle as usual, calculate linear displacement contribution for columns of all
storeys. Repeat this calculation after every cycle.
Linear displacement contribution (LDC) of a column=Linear displacement factor [ story moment +
contribution of column ends of that storey)
Storey moment is zero because no horizontal load acts in column and there is no storey shear.

After 1st cycle: Linear Disp. Cont = − 0.75 [ 0 + 5.0 − 7.5 + 0 + 0] = + 1.8825
→ For 2nd cycle onwards to calculate rotation contribution, apply following Rule:−
Rotation contribution = rotation contribution factor [restrained moment + far end contributions +
linear displacement contribution of columns. of different. storeys meeting at that joint.]
KANIS METHOD OF FRAME ANALYSIS 297

2nd cycle.

A C( Far ends)
↓ ↓
Joint B. − 0.167 [ +45 + 0 + 9.98 + 1.8825 ] = − 9.49 (Span BA)
and − 0.333 [ −−−−−−− do −−−−−−−− ] = − 18.93 (Span BC)

Joint C. − 0.333 [ − 15 − 18.93 + 0 + 1.8825 ] = + 10.67 (Span CB)

and − 0.167 [ −−−−−−−− do −−−−−−−− ] = + 5.35 (Span CD)

After 2nd cycle. Linear displacement contribution is equall to


storey moment.

= − 0.75 [ 0 − 9.49 + 0 + 5.35 + 0 ] = + 3.105

After 3rd cycle.

After 3rd cycle , linear displacement. contribution of columns is equall to


storey moment.

= − 0.75 [ 0 − 9.80 + 5.25 + 0 + 0 ] = 3.41

Calculate end moments after 3rd cycle.

For beams: End moment = FEM + 2 near end contribution. + Far end contribution.

For columns. End moment = FEM + 2 near end contribution + Far end contribution.
+ linear displacement. contribution of that column.

Applying these rules


Mab = 0 + 0 − 9.80 + 3.41 = − 6.3875 k.ft.
Mba = + 0 − 2 × 9.80 + 0 + 3.41 = + 16.19
Mbc = + 45 − 2 × 19.57 + 10.47 = + 16.33
Mcb = − 15 + 2 × 10.47 − 19.57 = 13.63
Mcd = 0 + 2 × 5.25 + 0 + 3.41 = 13.91
Mdc = 0 + 2 × 0 + 5.25 + 3.41 = 8.66

By increasing number of cycles the accuracy is increased.


298 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Example No 4 : Solve the following double story frame carrying gravity and lateral loads by rotation
contribution method.

2 KN/m
C D
(I)
2I 2I 3m 2I
2 KN/m
3 KN/m B E
(I)
2I 2I 3m 2I
A F
5m
I

SOLUTION :−
If this is analyzed by slope-deflection or Moment distribution method, it becomes very lengthy and
laborious. This becomes easier if solved by rotation contribution method.
Step 1: F.E.Ms.
+ 3 × 32
Mfab = = + 2.25 KN−m
12
Mfba = − 2.25 KN−m
Mfbc = + 2.25 KN−m
Mfcb = − 2.25 KN−m
2 × 52
Mfcd = = + 4.17 KN−m
12
Mfdc = − 4.17 KN−m
Mfbe = + 4.17 KN−m
Mfeb = − 4.17 KN−m.
Mfde = Mfed = 0
Mfef = Mffe = 0

Step 2: RELATIVE STIFFNESS :−

I
Span I L K
L
2
AB 2 3 × 15 10
3
2
BC 2 3 × 15 10
3
KANIS METHOD OF FRAME ANALYSIS 299

1
BE 1 5 × 15 3
5
1
CD 1 5 × 15 3
5
2
DF 2 3 × 15 10
3
2
EF 2 3 × 15 10
3

LINEAR DISPLACEMENT FACTOR = L.D.F. of a column of a


particular storey.

3 K
L.D.F. = −
2 ∑K

Where K is the stiffness of that column & ∑K is the stiffness of columns of that storey. Assuming columns
of equal sizes in a story. ( EI same)

3 10
L.D.F1 = − × = − 0.75 (For story No. 1)
2 (10 + 10)
3 10
L.D.F2 = − × = − 0.75 (For story No. 2)
2 (10 + 10)

Storey Shear :−
This is, in fact, reaction at the slab or beam level due to horizontal forces. If storey shear causes a
(−ve) value of R, it will be (−ve) & vice versa.

For determining storey shear the columns can be treated as simply supported vertical beams.

(1) Storey shear = − 9 KN ( For lower or ground story. At the slab level of ground story)
(2) Storey shear = − 4.5 ( For upper story ). At the slab level of upper story root)

Storey Moment ( S.M) :−

S.M. = Storey shear + h/3 where h is the height of that storey.


3
SM1 = − 9 × = − 9 ( lower story )
3
3
S.M2 = − 4.5 × = − 4.5 ( Upper story )
3

Rotation Factors

The sum of rotation factors at a joint is − ½. The rotation factors are obtained by dividing the
value − ½ between different members meeting at a joint in proportion to their K values.
300 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

1 k1
µab = −
2 ∑k

1 k2
µac = − etc.
2 ∑k

Rotation Contributions:−

The rule for calculating rotation contribution is as follows.


Sum the restrained moments of a point and all rotation contribution of the far ends of the members
meeting at a joint. Multiply this sum by respective rotation factors to get the required rotation
contribution. For the first cycle far end contribution can be taken as zero.

Span K Rotation factor.

AB 10 0 (Being fixed end)

1 10
BC 10 − = − 0.217
2 23

− 0.5   = − 0.065
3
BE 3
23

− 0.5   = − 0.217
10
BA 10
23

CB 10 − 0.385

CD 3 − 0.115

DC 3 − 0.115

DE 10 − 0.385

ED 10 − 0.217

EB 3 − 0.065

EF 10 − 0.217

FE 10 0 (Being fixed end)


Now draw boxes, enter FEMs values, rotation factors etc. As it is a two storeyed frame, calculations on a
single A4 size paper may not be possible. A reduced page showing calculation is annexed.
KANIS METHOD OF FRAME ANALYSIS 301

Restraining cd= F.E.M.= +4.17 -4.17=F.E.M.


dc= -4.17 D
C Moment -0.115 -0.115
R.C. R.C.
1.92 -0.12 0.49
-0.25
-0.52 0.13 de=-0.385
cb = -0.385
-0.76 -0.11
-0.95 -0.3
R.C.=Rotation Con- -1.09 R.C. F.E.M. = 0
-0.45
tribution. -1.19 1.65
-0.39 -0.56 0.45
-1.26
-0.89 -0.64 -0.35
-1.74 Linear Displacement Contribution -0.7 -1.00 L.D.C.
-2.55 L.D.C. -1.50 2.7
Linear Dis- -3.18 2.7 -1.87 6.71 L.D.F.
placement -3.65 -2.14
6.71 9.87 = -0.75
factor(L.D.F) -3.99 -2.34
-0.75 -4.23 9.87 12.25
12.25 14.00
-4.93
14.00 15.30
-4.69
-6.50 15.3 16.21
-6.30 -4.37
16.21 16.21
-6.00 -3.88
16.21 -3.23
-5.61
-5.05 -2.33
-4.24 -1.1
-2.46 0.55
-0.9
F.E.M. = +2.25 R.C. F.E.M. = 0
R.C.
R.C. F.E.M. = 0

bc=-0.217 ed=-0.217

be F.E.M. = -4.17
F.E.M. = +4.17 eb=
B 4.17 =-0.065 -4.17 E
-0.065
R.C.
R.C.
-0.27 0.16 ef=-0.217
ba=-0.217
-0.89 -0.33
-1.27 -0.70
R.C. F.E.M. = -2.25 R.C. F.E.M. = 0
-1.51 -0.97
-0.9 0.55
-1.68 -1.16
-2.96 -1.1
-4.24 L.D.C. -1.89 -1.31
-1.95 -2.33
-5.05 7 -1.41 L.D.C.
L.D.F.= -1.95 3.23
-5.61 9.8 -1.48 7
-0.75 -3.88
-6.00 11.68
-4.37 9.8 L.D.F.
-6.30
12.96 11.68 = -0.75
-6.50 -4.69
13.87 -4.93 12.96
14.53 13.87
14.99 14.53
15.00 14.99
15.00

F.E.M. = 0
F.E.M. = +2.25
F
A
Double – storey frame carrying gravity and lateral loads – Analysed by Rotation Contribution Method.
302 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

First Cycle :−

Near end contribution = Rotation factor of respective member (Restrained moment +


far end contributions).

Joint B = R.F. ( 4.17 )

C = R.F. ( 1.92 − 0.9 )

D = R.F. (− 4.17 − 0.12)

E = R.F. (− 4.17 + 1.65)

After First Cycle :−

Linear Displacement Contribution :−= L.D.F.[Storey moment + Rotation contribution at the end
of columns of that storey].

L.D.C1 = − 0.75 (− 9 − 0.9 + 0.55) = 7

L.D.C2 = − 0.75 ( 4.5 − 0.9 − 0.39 + 0.55 + 1.65) = 2.7

For 2nd Cycle And Onwards :−

Near end contribution = R.F.[Restrained moment + Far end contribution + Linear displacement
contributions of columns of different storeys meeting at that joint]
Joint B= R.F. (4.17 + 0.16 − 0.39 + 7 + 2.7 )
C= ″ (1.92 + 0.49 − 2.96 + 2.7)
D= ″ (− 4.17 − 0.25 + 0.55 + 2.7)
E= ″ (− 4.17 + 0.45 − 0.89 + 2.7 + 7 ).
After 2nd Cycle :−

L.D.C1 = − 0.75 (− 9 − 2.96 − 1.1) = 9.8

L.D.C2 = − 0.75 (− 4.5 − 2.96 − 0.83 − 1.1 + 0.45) = 6.71

3rd Cycle :−

Joint B= R.F. ( 4.17 − 0.33 − 0.83 + 9.8 + 6.71)


C= ″ ( 1.92 + 0.13 − 4.24 + 6.71 )
D= ″ (− 4.17 − 1.1 − 0.52 + 6.71)
E= ″ (− 4.17 − 1.27 − 0.35 + 9.8 + 6.71)
KANIS METHOD OF FRAME ANALYSIS 303

After 3rd Cycle :−

L.D.C1 = − 0.75 (− 9 − 4.24 − 2.33) = 11.68

L.D.C2 = − 0.75 (− 4.5 − 1.74 − 4.24 − 0.35 − 2.33) = 9.87

4th Cycle :−

Joint B= R.F. ( 4.17 − 0.70 − 1.74 + 11.68 + 9.87)


C= ″ ( 1.92 − 0.11 − 5.05 + 9.87)
D= ″ (− 4.17 − 0.76 − 2.33 + 9.87 )
E= ″ (− 4.17 − 1 − 1.51 + 9.87 + 11.68).

After 4th Cycle :−

L.D.C1 = − 0.75 (− 9 − 5.05 − 3.23) = 12.96

L.D.C2 = − 0.75 (− 4.5 − 5.05 − 2.55 − 1.00 − 3.23) = 12.25

5th Cycle :−

Joint B= R.F. (4.17 − 0.97 − 2.55 + 12.25 + 12.96)


C= ″ ( 1.92 − 0.3 − 5.61 + 12.25)
D= ″ (− 4.17 − 0.95 − 3.23 + 12.25 )
E= ″ (− 4.17 − 1.5 − 1.68 + 12.25 + 12.96)

After 5th Cycle :−

L.D.C1 = − 0.75 (− 9 − 5.61 − 3.88) = 13.87 (ground storey)

L.D.C2 = − 0.75 (− 4.5 − 5.61 − 3.18 − 1.5 − 3.88 ) = 14 (First Floor)

6th Cycle :−

Joint B = R.F. (4.17 − 1.16 − 3.18 + 14 + 13.87 )


C = ″ (1.92 − 0.05 − 6 + 14)
D = ″ (− 4.17 − 3.88 − 1.09 + 14)
E = ″ (− 4.17 − 1.87 − 1.68 + 14 + 13.87)
304 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

After 6th Cycle :−

L.D.C1 = − 0.75 ( − 9 − 6 − 4.37) = 14.53

L.D.C2 = − 0.75 (− 4.5 − 6 − 3.65 − 1.87 − 4.37) = 15.3

7th Cycle :−

Joint B = R.F. (4.17 − 1.31 − 3.65 + 15.3 + 14.53)


C = ″ (1.92 − 0.56 − 6.30 + 15.3)
D = ″ (− 4.17 − 1.19 − 4.37 + 15.3)
E = ″ (− 4.17 − 1.89 − 2.14 + 15.3 + 14.53)

After 7th Cycle :−

L.D.C1 = − 0.75 (− 9 − 6.30 − 4.69 ) = 14.99


L.D.C2 = − 0.75 (− 4.5 − 6.3 − 3.99 − 2.14 − 4.69 ) = 16.21
8th Cycle :−

Joint B = R.F. (4.17 − 1.41 − 3.99 + 16.21 + 14.99)


C = ″ (1.92 − 6.5 − 0.64 + 16.21)
D = ″ (− 4.17 − 4.69 − 1.26 + 16.21)
E = ″ (− 4.17 − 2.34 − 1.95 + 16.21 + 14.99)

After 8th Cycle :−

L.D.C1 = − 0.75 (− 9 − 6.5 − 4.93) ≅ 15


L.D.C2 = − 0.75 (− 4.5 − 6.5 − 4.23 − 4.93 − 2.34).≅ 16.21

FINAL END MOMENTS :−

(1) Beams or Slabs :−

= F.E.M + 2 (near end contribution) + far end contribution of that particular


beam or slab.
(2) For Columns :−

= F.E.M + 2 (near end contribution) + far end contribution of that particular


column + L.D.C. of that column. Applying these rules we get the following end
moments.
KANIS METHOD OF FRAME ANALYSIS 305

END MOMENTS :−

Mab = 2.25 + 2 × 0 − 6.5 + 15 = + 10.75 KN−m


Mba = − 2.25 − 2 (6.5) − 1 + 15 = − 0.25 ″
Mbc = 2.25 − 2 × 6.5 − 4.23 + 16.21 = + 1.23 ″
Mbe = 4.17 − 2 (1.95) − 1.48 = − 1.21 ″
Mcb = − 2.25 − 2 × 4.23 − 6.5 + 16.21 = −1 ″
Mcd = 4.17 − 2 × 1.26 − 0.7 = + 0.95≅+1 ″
Mdc = − 4.17 − 2 × 0.7 − 1.26 = − 6.83 ″
Mde = 0 − 2 × 2.34 − 4.93 + 16.21 = + 6.60 ″
Med = 0 − 2 × 4.93 − 2.34 + 16.21 = + 4.01 ″
Meb = − 4.17 − 2 × 1.48 − 1.95 = − 9.08 KN−m
Mef = 0 − 2 × 4.93 + 15 = + 5.14 ″
Mfe = 0 − 2 × 0 − 4.93 + 15 = + 10.07 ″

Now frame is statically determinate and contains all end moments. It can be designed now.

Space for notes:


306 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

CHAPTER SEVEN

7. INTRODUCTION TO COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD


The column analogy method was also proposed by Prof. Hardy Cross and is a powerful technique
to analyze the beams with fixed supports, fixed ended gable frames, closed frames & fixed arches etc.,
These members may be of uniform or variable moment of inertia throughout their lengths but the method is
ideally suited to the calculation of the stiffness factor and the carryover factor for the members having
variable moment of inertia. The method is strictly applicable to a maximum of 3rd degree of indeterminacy.
This method is essentially an indirect application of the consistent deformation method.
The method is based on a mathematical similarity (i.e. analogy) between the stresses developed on
a column section subjected to eccentric load and the moments imposed on a member due to fixity of its
supports. *(We have already used an analogy in the form of method of moment and shear in which it was
assumed that parallel chord trusses behave as a deep beam). In the analysis of actual engineering structures
of modern times, so many analogies are used like slab analogy, and shell analogy etc. In all these methods,
calculations are not made directly on the actual structure but, in fact it is always assumed that the actual
structure has been replaced by its mathematical model and the calculations are made on the model. The final
results are related to the actual structure through same logical engineering interpretation.
In the method of column analogy, the actual structure is considered under the action of applied
loads and the redundants acting simultaneously on a BDS. The load on the top of the analogous column is
usually the B.M.D. due to applied loads on simple spans and therefore the reaction to this applied load is
the B.M.D. due to redundants on simple spans considers the following fixed ended loaded beam.

P1 P2 WKN/m

Ma A
B MB
L
EI=Constt. (d) Loading on top of
(a) Given beam analogous column,
under loads Ms diagram, same as(b).

0 0 1 (Unity)
(b) B.M.D. due to
applied loads, on simple span L
plotted on the
compressin side. (e) X-section of analogous
column.
0 0

MB Mb
MA (c) B.M.D. due to Ma
(f) Pressure on bottom of
redundants, plotted analogous column,
on the compression Mi diagram.
side on simple span
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 307

The resultant of B.M.D’s due to applied loads does not fall on the mid point of analogous column
section which is eccentrically loaded.
Msdiagram = BDS moment diagram due to applied loads.
Mi diagram = Indeterminate moment diagram due to redundants.

If we plot (+ve) B.M.D. above the zero line and (−ve) B.M.D below the zero line (both on
compression sides due to two sets of loads) then we can say that these diagrams have been plotted on the
compression side.

(The conditions from which MA & MB can be determined, when the method of consistent
deformation is used, are as follows). From the Geometry requirements, we know that

(1) The change of slope between points A & B = 0; or sum of area of moment diagrams between
A & B = 0 (note that EI = Constt:), or area of moment diagrams of fig.b = area of moment diagram
of fig..c.

(2) The deviation of point B from tangent at A = 0; or sum of moment of moment diagrams between A
& B about B = 0, or Moment of moment diagram of fig.(b) about B = moment of moment diagram
of fig.(c) about B. Above two requirements can be stated as follows.

(1) Total load on the top is equal to the total pressure at the bottom and;

(2) Moment of load about B is equal to the moment of pressure about B),
indicates that the analogous column is on equilibrium under the action of applied loads
and the redundants.
7.1. SIGN CONVENTIONS:−
It is necessary to establish a sign convention regarding the nature of the applied load (Ms −
diagram) and the pressures acting at the base of the analogous column (Mi−diagram.)

1. Load ( P) on top of the analogous column is downward if Ms/EI diagram is (+ve) which means that
it causes compression on the outside or (sagging) in BDS vice-versa. If EI is constant, it can be
taken equal to units.

Outside

C
Inside T

2. Upward pressure on bottom of the analogous column ( Mi − diagram) is considered as (+ve).

3. Moment (M) at any point of the given indeterminate structure ( maximum to 3rd degree) is given by
the formula.
M = Ms − Mi,

which is (+ve) if it causes compression on the outside of members.


308 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

EXAMPLE NO. 1:− Determine the fixed−ended moments for the beam shown below by the method of
column analogy.
SOLUTION:
Choosing BDS as a simple beam. Draw Ms diagram. Please it on analogous column.

W/Unit length.

A B
EI=Constt.
L 2 Ms-diagram
WL
8 (B.M.D. due to applied
loads on B.D.S.)
+
Loading on top of
0 0 analogous column.
WL3
12 WL3
12
X-section of
1 analogous column
Mi-diagam
L 2
WL Pressure on bottom of
2 analogous column.(uniform as
WL 0 12
12 resultant falls on the mid point of
analogous column section
2 WL2 /24
WL + 2
12 0 WL (Final BMD) M = Ms - Mi
12

P
Pressure at the base of the column =
A
A = L × I (area of analogous column section).
WL3
=
12(Lx1)
WL2
Mi = . In this case, it will be uniform as resultant of Ms
12
diagram falls on centroid of analogous column)
(MS)a = 0 , (Ms at point A to be picked up for M-s diagram)

Ma = (Ms − Mi)a , (net moment at point A)


WL2
= 0−
12
WL2
Ma = −
12
WL2 −WL2
Mb = (Ms−Mi)b = 0 − =

12  12
WL2 WL2
Mc = (Ms − Mi)c = −
8 12
3 WL2 − 2 WL2 WL2
Mc = = . Plot these values to get M = Ms − Mi diagram.
24 24
The beam has been analyzed.
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 309

EXAMPLE NO. 2:- SOLVING THE PREVIOUS EXAMPLE, IF B.D.S. IS A CANTILEVER


SUPPORTED AT ‘A’.

W/unit-length

A B
EI=Constt.
L
3
WL
L/4 6 3/4L

0 0 Ms-diagram
(It creates hagging so load acts upwards)
The resultant of Ms diagram does not fall on
2 the centroid of analogous column.
WL
2
L/4 L/2
3
WL yo
6 M X-section of
1 3
analogous column. Carrying eccentric load of WL /6
L 3
yo Eccentric load wL /6 acts on centre of
Centroidal axis analogous column x-section with an
associated moment as well
(Eccentric load = Concentric load plus accomprying moment)
bh L × WL2 WL3
Area of Ms diagram A = = =
(n+1) 2(2+1) 6

b L L
X′ = = = (from nearest and)
(n+2) (2+2) 4
Alternatively centroid can be located by using the following formula)
∫ MXdX
X =
∫ MdX

L L
WX2 W X3 WL3
∫ MdX = ∫ − dX = −  | = − ( Same as above)
o  2  2 3 o 6

L L
WX2 WX3
∫ MXdX = ∫ − XdX = ∫ − dx
o  2  o 2

L
W X4 WL4
= −  | = −
2 4 o 8
− ∫ MXdX
X =
∫ MdX
310 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

− − WL4 6 3
X = × = L. (from the origin of moment
8 (−WL3) 4
expression or from farthest end)
NOTE : Moment expression is always independent of the variation of inertia.
Properties of Analogous Column X−section :−

1. Area of analogous column section, A = L × 1 = L


L3
2. Moment of inertia, I yo yo =
12
L
3. Location of centroidal column axis, C =
2
3 4
A e’=M =  WL   L = WL , ( L is distance between axis yo− yo and the centroid of Ms diagram
 6  4 24 4
where the load equal to area of Ms diagram acts.)

P Mc
(Mi)a = ± (P is the area of Ms diagram and is acting upwards so negative
A I
L L3
C= and I = )
2 12

−WL3 WL4 . L . 12
= − (Load P on analogous column is negative)
6.L 24 . 2 . L3

− WL2 WL2
= − ( Reaction due to MC/I would be having the same
6 4
direction at A as that due to P while at B these
−2WL2 − 3 WL2
= two would be opposite)
12

−5
= WL2
12

− WL2
(Ms)a =
2
Ma = (Ms − Mi)a

− WL2 5
= + WL2
2 12

− 6 WL2 + 5 WL2
=
12

− WL2
Ma =
12
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 311

Mb = (Ms − Mi)b

P Mc
(Mi)b = ±
A I

− WL3 WL4 × L × 12
= +
6×L 24 × 2 × L3

−WL2 WL2
= +
6 4

− 2WL2 + 3 WL2
=
12
WL2
=
12
(Ms)b = 0
WL2 WL2
Mb = (Ms − Mi)b = 0 − =−
12 12
Same results have been obtained but effort / time involved is more for this BDS).

EXAMPLE NO. 3:− Determine the F.E.Ms. by the method of column analogy for the following loaded
beam.
3.1 SOLUTION:− CASE 1 ( WHEN BDS IS A SIMPLE BEAM )

a b

L
Pab
L

+ Ms-diagram

L+b
L+a 3
1 (Pab) Pab
3 xL= 2
2 L
e
Pab
2
M
1 x-section of analogous column
L
L L + a 3 L − 2 L − 2a L − 2 a
e = − = =  ( The eccentricity of load w.r.t
2  3  6  6 
mid point of analogous column)
Pab L − 2 a Pab
M=
 2   6  = 12 (L − 2a)
312 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Properties of Analogous Column X − section


.
1. A =L×1=L

L3
2. I =
12

L
3. C =
2

P Mc
(Mi)a = ±
A I

Pab Pab L × 12
= + (L − 2a) ×
2L 12 2 × L3

Pab Pab
= + (L − 2a)
2L 2 L2

PabL + PabL − 2 Pa2b


=
2 L2

2 PabL − 2 Pa2b
=
2 L2

PabL − Pa2b
(Mi)a =
L2

Pab (L − a)
= ∴a+b=L
L2
b=L−a
Pab . b
=
L2

Pab2
(Mi)a =
L2

(Ms) a = 0

Net moment at A = Ma = (Ms − Mi) a

Pab2
=0−
L2

Pab2
Ma = −
L2
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 313

The (−ve) sign means that it gives us tension at the top when applied at A.

P MC
(Mi)b = ±
A I

Pab Pab L × 12
= − (L − 2a) ×
2L 12L2 2 × L3

Pab Pab
= − (L − 2a)
2L 2L2

PabL − PabL + 2Pa2b


=
2L2

2Pa2b
=
2L2

Pa2b
(Mi)b =
L2

(Ms)b = 0
Pa2b
Mb = (Ms − Mi)a = 0 −
L2
− Pa2b
Mb =
L2

The minus sign means that it gives us tension at the top.


EXERCISE 3.2:- If B.D.S. is a cantilever supported at A:−
We solve the same exercise 3.1 but with a different BDS.

A a b
EI=Constt B
L
1 Pa(a) =
2
Pa 2
2 0 Ms-diagram (load equal to area of
0
Ms diagram acts upwards)

Pa The upper eccentric load has been now


placed on centroid axis of analogous column
L a e 2 section plus accompaying moment.
Pa
2 3 2
M
1 x-section of analogous column under
load and accompaying moment at column
L
centroidal aixis.
L/2
314 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

3L − 2a
= 
L a
e = −
2 3  6 

Pa2 3L − 2a Pa2 (3L − 2a)


Pe = M = =
2  6  12

L3 L
Properties of Analogous Column section :− A = L , I = 12 , C = 2

P MC
(Mi)a = ±
A I

− Pa2 Pa2 (3L − 2a) . L . 12


= − (Due to upward P= Pa2/2, reaction at A
2L 12 . 2 . L3
and B is downwards while due to moment,
− Pa2 Pa2 (3L − 2a)
= − reaction at B is upwards while at A it is
2L 2L2
downwards. Similar directions will have

−Pa2L − 3Pa2L + 2Pa3


= the same sign to be additive or vice−versa)
2L2

−4 Pa2L + 2Pa3
=
2L2

−2Pa2L + Pa3
=
L2

Pa2 (a − 2L)
=
L2

−Pa2 (2L − a)
= , We can write 2L − a = L + L − a = L + b
L2

−Pa2 (L + b)
(Mi)a =
L2

(Ms)a = − Pa

Ma = (Ms − Mi)a

Pa2(L + b)
= −Pa +
L2

− PaL2 + Pa2 L + Pa2b


=
L2
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 315

− PaL (L − a) + Pa2 b
=
L2

− PabL + Pa2 b
=
L2

− Pab (L − a)
=
L2

− Pab . b
=
L2

− Pab2
Ma = ( Same result as was obtained with a different BDS)
L2

P MC
(Mi)b = ±
A I

− Pa2 Pa2 (3L − 2a)


= +
2L 2L2

− Pa2 L + 3Pa2L − 2Pa3


=
2L2

2 Pa2 L − 2Pa3
=
2L2

Pa2 L − Pa3
=
L2

+Pa2 (L − a )
=
L2

Pa2 b
(Mi)b =
L2

(Ms)b = 0

Mb = (Ms − Mi)b

Pa2 b
=0−
L2

− Pa2 b
Mb = ( Same result as obtained with a different BDS)
L2
316 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

EXAMPLE NO.4:− Determine the F.F.Ms. by the method of column analogy for the following loaded beam.
SOLUTION:−
Choosing cantilever supported at B as BDS.
w/unit length

A B
L/2 L/2
EI = Constt WL3
If B.D.S. is 48 L
a cantilever
8
supported 0 0
at b.
Ms-diagram = WL x L
2 4
2
WL
WL3
8
48
e=3/8 L
M

1
Analogous column
L section.

L L 4L − L 3L
Eccentricity = e= − = =
2 8 8 8
WL3 3L WL4 WL3  bh 
Moment = Pe = M = × = Where P = Area of Ms diagram= =
48 8 128 48 n+1
Properties of Analogous column section.
L3 L
A = L, I = and C =
12 2
Step 1: Apply P= Area Of BMD(Ms diagram ) due to applied loads in a BDS at the center of analogous
column section i.e. at L/2 from either side.
Step 2: The accompanying moment Pe, where e is the eccentricity between mid point of analogous column
section and the point of application of area of Ms diagram, is also applied at the same point along
with P.
Step 3: Imagine reactions due to P and M=Pe. At points A and B, use appropriate signs.
P MC
(Mi)a = ± ( Subtractive reaction at A due to P)
A I
− WL 3
WL × L × 12
4
= + ( P is upwards, so negative. Reactions due to this P
48.L 128 × 2 × L3
at A and B will be downwards and those due to
moment term will be upward at A and downward
− WL2 3WL2
= + at B. Use opposite signs now for A)
48 64
− 4WL2 + 9WL2
=
192
+ 5 WL2
=
192
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 317

(Ms)a = 0 ( Inspect BMD drawn on simple determinate span)


Ma = (Ms − Mi)a
5WL2
= 0−
192
5WL2
Ma = −
192
P MC Mc Comment [A1]:
(Mi)b = ± ( Additive reactions at B as use negative sign with term)
A I I
4WL − 9WL
2 2
=−
192
13 WL2
=−
192
WL2
(Ms)b = −
8
Mb = (Ms − Mi)b
WL2 13 WL2 −24 WL2 + 13 WL2
=− + =
8 192 192
−11 2
Mb = WL
192
The beam is now statically determinate etc.

EXAMPLE NO. 5:− Determine the F.E. M’s by the method of column analogy for the following loaded beam.
SOLUTION:−
W/Unit length

A B
L/2 L/2
bh EI=Constt:
A= n+1 WL4
192
L WL3
x L
2 24 WL4 10 0
A= = 0
4 192
b 3
X=
n+2
Ms-diagram ( 1xWxL
2 2) 3 2
x L (L) = WL
24
L
= 4
2(3+2) WL
192
L
X= e
10 M

1 Analogous column section

L L 5L − L 4L 2
e= − = = = L
2 10 10 10 5
4 5
M=
WL  2 L WL
 192  ×  5  = 480
318 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Properties of Analogous column section.


L3 L
A=L, I= , C=
12 2
P MC
(Mi)a = ±
A I

− WL4 WL5 × L × 12
(Mi)a = + (Downward reaction at A due to P and upward reaction at A due to M)
192L 480 × 2 × L3

− WL3 WL3
= +
192 80

− 80WL3 + 192 WL3


=
15360

112 WL3
= ( Divide by 16)
15360

7 WL3
(Mi)a =
960

(Ms)a = 0

Ma = (Ms − Mi)a

7 −7
Ma = 0− WL3 = WL3
960 960

P MC
(Mi)b = ±
A I

WL3 WL3
= − −
192 80

− 80 WL3 − 192 WL3


=
15360

− 272 WL3
=
15360

− 17 WL3
=
960
− WL3
(Ms)b =
24

Mb = (Ms − Mi) b
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 319

− WL3 17
= + WL3
24 960

− 40 WL3 + 17 WL3
=
960

− 23 WL3
Mb =
960

Note : After these redundant end moments have been determined, the beam is statically
determinate and reactions , S.F, B.M, rotations and deflections anywhere can be
found.

7.2. STRAIGHT MEMBERS WITH VARIABLE CROSS − SECTION.

EXAMPLE NO. 6:− Determine the fixed−end moments for the beam shown by the method of column analogy
SOLUTION:__ BDS is a simple beam.

90kn
3kn/m 4m
A B
6m 10m
I=2 I=1
2
3x16 = 96
P2 8
b90
Ms dia. due 3.83m 3kn/m
EI to U.D.L. 45
0
0a (reactions due to UDL)
only. 0
C
8m 8m 24kn 6m 10m 24kn
P4 P1 90x12x4 M=24x6-3 x (6)2
135 16 2 90kn
Ms dia due = 270 =90kn-m
EI to point 4m 67.5 4m
(reactions due to
12m
concentrated load)
load only. 67.5kn
yo 16+4
P3 90x4 =22.5kn
3 =6.67m
x 16
M=22.5x6 =135kn-m
1/2 M 1
Analogous
9.15m 6.85m column
x-section.

Ms
The above two diagrams will be taken full first and then load corresponding to areas of these
EI
diagrams on left 6m distance will be subtracted. (P2 and P4 will be subtracted from P1 and P3 respectively).

In this solution, two basic determinate structures are possible.


(1) a simply supported beam.
(2) a cantilever beam.
320 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

This problem is different from the previous one in the following respects.

(a) Ms − diagram has to be divided by a given value of I for various portions of span.

(b) The thickness of the analogous column X − section will also vary with the variation of
inertia. Normally, the width 1/EI can be set equal to unity as was the case in previous
problem, when EI was set equal to unity.

(c) As the dimension of the analogous column X − section also varies in this case, we will have
to locate the centroidal axis of the column and determine its moment of inertia about it.

(1) SOLUTION:- By choosing a simple beam as a B.D.S.


2
P1 = × 16 × 96 = 1024 KN ( Load corresponding to area of entire BMD due to UDL)
3

6
∫ MdX = ∫ (24X − 1.5 X2) dX (Simply supported beam moment due to UDL of left 6/ portion)
o

6
= 12X2 − 0.5X3 | = 12 × 36 − 0.5 × 216 = 432 − 108 = 324
o
area of abc = 324

6
∫ MXdX = ∫ (24X − 1.5X2) XdX
o

6
= ∫ (24X2 − 1.5X3) dX
o

6
24 3 1.5 4 1.5
= X − X | = 8 × 63 − × 64
3 4 o 4
= 1242
∫ MxdX 1242
X = = = 3.83 m from A. (of left 6/ portion of BMD)
∫ MdX 342

1 324
P2 = ( area abc) = = 162 KN( To be subtracted from Ms diagram )
2 2

1
P3 = × 16 × 270 = 2160 KN ( Area of BMD due to concentrated Load)
2

1
P4 = × 6 × 67.5 = 202.5 KN ( To be subtracted from Ms diagram )
2
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 321

Properties of Analogous column x − section.


1
Area = A = 1 × 10 + × 6 = 13 m2
2

∫XdA (1 × 10) 5 + (1/2 × 6 × 13)


X = = from R.H.S.
A 13

= 6.85 m ( From point B) . It is the location of centroidal axis Yo−Yo.

1 × 103 0.5 × 63
Iy0 y0 = + 10(1.85)2 + + (0.5 × 6) × (6.15)2 = 240 m4
12 12
by neglecting the contribution of left portion about its own centroidal axis.

Total load to be applied at the centroid of analogous column x − section.

= P 1 + P3 − P2 − P4

= 1024 + 2160 − 162 − 202.5

= 2819.5 KN

Applied Moment about centroidal axis = M = + 1024 (1.15) − 2160 (0.18) − 162 (5.32) − 202.5 (5.15)
= − 1116 KN−m , clockwise (Note: distance 5.32 = 9.15 − 3.83 (and 5.15 = 9.15 − 4)

The (−ve) sign indicates that the net applied moment is clockwise.
P MC
(Mi)a = ± ( subtractive reactions at A)
A I

2819.5 1116 × 9.15 Mc


= − , (Preserve at A due to is downwards so negative).
13 240 I
= + 174.34 KN−m
(Ms)a = 0

Ma = (Ms − Mi)a = 0 − 174.34


= − 174.34 KN−m

2819.5 1116 × 6.85


(Mi)b = + , ( Note the difference in the values of C for points A and B.)
13 240
= + 248.74 KN−m
(Ms)b = 0
Mb = (Ms − Mi)b
= 0 − 248.74
= − 248.74 KN−m
The −ve sign with Ma & Mb indicates that these cause compression on the inside when applied of these points.
322 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

EXAMPLE NO.7:− Determine the F.E.Ms. by the method of column analogy.


SOLUTION:−
1. Choosing a simple beam as a B.D.S.
90kn
3kn/m 4m
A B
2IC IC 2IC
3m 6m 2
3x13
P2 8 =63.4
45 54 P3
1.95 d 2.58
b
m 27 m
2.25 Ms diagram due to U.D.L.
e EI
a f
c 6.5 m
P1 90x9x4 =249.23
13
P5
249.23 P6 Ms diagram due to point load.
2m 83 2.67
124.62 EI
41.5 m
yo (13+4)
P
175.9kn 4 3 =5.67m

x
877.6kn-m
½ 1 1/2 Analogous column
x-section
6.34m 6.66m
yo
3KN/m
(BDS under UDL)
19.5 13m 19.5

(M3)L = 19.5 × 3 − 1.5(3)2 = 45 KN−m ( 3m from A )


3
(M4)R = 19.5 × 4 − (4)2 = 54 KN−m ( 4m from B)
2

90

(BDS under point load)


9m 4m
27.69 62.307

(M3)L = 27.69 × 3 = 83 KN−m ( 3m from A)


( M4)R = 62.307 × 4 = 249.22 (4m from B)

3
∫ MdX = area abc = ∫ (19.5 X − 1.5 X2) dX
o
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 323

3
19.5 2 1.5 3
= X − X | = 74.25
2 3 o

3 3
19.5 3 1.5 4
∫ MXdX = ∫ (19.5 X2 − 1.5 X3) dX =  X − X |
o 3 4 o

= 145.12

145.12
X = = 1.95.m ( From point A as shown )
74.25

4
Area def = ∫ MdX = ∫ (19.5X − 1.5 x2) dX = 124
o

4
∫ MXdX = ∫ (19.5 X2 − 1.5 x3) dX
o

4
19.5X3 1.5 4
= − X |
3 4 o

= 320

320
X = = 2.58 m ( From point B )
124

2
P1 = × 63.4 × 13 = 549.5 KN( Due to entire BMD due to UDL )
3

1 1
P2 = (area abc) = (74.25) = 37.125 KN ( To be subtracted )
2 2

1 1
P3 = (area def) = (124) = 62 KN ( To be subtracted )
2 2

1
P4 = × 249.23 × 13 = 1620 KN ( Entire area of BMD due to point load)
2

1
P5 = × 41.5 × 3 = 62.25 KN ( To be subtracted )
2

1
P6 = × 4 × 124.62 = 249.23 KN ( To be subtracted )
2
324 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Properties of Analogous column x − section.


1 1
A = × 4 + 1 × 6 + × 3 = 9.5m2
2 2

(0.5 × 4) × 2 + (1 × 6) × 7 + (0.5 × 3) × (11.5)


X =
9.5
X = 6.66 ( From point B) meters

0.5 × 43 1 × 63
Iyoyo = + (0.5 × 4)(4.68)2 + + (1 × 6)(0.34)2
12 12

0.5 × 32
+ + (1.5)(4.84)2
12

= 101.05

Total concentric load on analogous column x – section to be applied at centroidal column axis )

P = P1 − P2 − P3 + P4 − P5 − P6 = 549.5 − 37.125 − 62 + 1620 − 62.25 − 249.23


= 1759 KN

Total applied moment at centroid of analogous column due to above six loads is

= 549.5 (0.16) + 37.125 (4.39) − 62(4.08) + 1620 (0.99) + 62.25 (4.34) − 249.2 (3.99)
= + 877.6 clockwise.

P MC
(Mi)a = ± ( Reactions due to P and M are subtractive at A)
A I

1759 877.6 × 6.34


= −
9.5 101.05

= + 130 KN−m

(Ms)a = 0
Ma = (Ms − Mi)a = 0 − 130 = − 130 KN−m

P MC
(Mi)b = ±
A I

1759 877.6 × 6 × 6.66


= + ( Reactions due to P and M are additive at B)
9.5 101.05

= + 243 KN−m

(Ms)b = 0
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 325

Mb = (Ms − Mi)b

= 0 − 243

Mb = − 243 KN−m
Now the beam has become determinate.
EXAMPLE NO. 7:- (2) Choosing cantilever supported at B as a B.D.S. Let us solve the loaded beam
shown below again.

3KN/m 90KN
A B
2I I 2I
3m 6m 4m

P1=1098.5
bh 2.25m 3.25m
A = n+1 b d
13x253.5 a f
P1 = 60.79
3
C
=1098.5 P2= 13.5 126.75
6.75 e121.5
b 13 P3= 367 3x 13x13/2
X' = = Ms/EI diagram due to u.d.l
n+2 4 =3.25 (2nd degree curve)
g =253.5

bh 4x360 1.33m
P4 = A= n+1 = 2
=720 P4 = 720

b 4
X' = = =1.33 Ms/EI diagram due to point load 180
n+2 3
1/2 yo 360
1089.75Kn Ps=360KN 1.33m

1 3894KN-m
1/2

6.34m 6.66m
yo
Analogous column section

3KN/m 4m
A B
BDS under UDL
10m 253.5
3m 39

3
Area abc = ∫ MdX = ∫ −
3 2
o  2 X dX
326 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

3
X3
= − 1.5 | = 0.5 × 33 = − 13.5 ( Upwards to be subtracted)
3 o
3 43
1.5X
∫ MXdX = ∫ (1.5X3)dX = − |
o 4 o
= − 30.375
Location of centroidal axis from B: ( 1/2 × 3 + 1 × 6+1/2 × 4)X′ =(1/2 × 4 × 2+1 × 6 × 7+1/2 × 3 × 11.5)
9.5X’= 63.25 0r X’ = 6.66m from B or 6.34 m from A. (already done also)

− 30.375
location of centroid of area abc = X = = 2.25 m ( From A)
− 13.5

4
Area defg = ∫ MdX = ∫ (39X − 253.5 − 1.5X2)dX
o

Moment expression taken from B considering BDS under UDL.


4
X2 1.5 3
= 39 − 253.5 X − X |
2 3 o

= − 734 (Area is always positive).

4
∫ MXdX = ∫ (39X2 − 253.5X − 1.5X3)dX
o

4
39X3 253.5X2 1.5X4
= − − |
3 2 4 o

= − 1292

− 1292
X =
− 734

X = + 1.76 m From B (Centroid of area defg)

P1 = 1098.5 KN ( Area of entire BMD due to UDL )

1 1
P2 = (area abc) = (13.5) = 6.75 K( To be subtracted)
2 2

1 1
P3 = ( area defg) = (734) = 367 KN( To be subtracted )
2 2

P4 = 720 KN( Area of entire BMD due to point Load )

1
P5 = × 180 × 4 = 360 KN
2
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 327

Total concentric load on analogous column X − section is

P = P1 + P2 + P3 − P4 + P5

= − 1098.5 + 6.75 + 367 − 720 + 360


= − 1084.75 KN( It is upward so reactions due to this will be downward)
Total applied moment at centroid of column

= − 6.75 (6.34 − 2.25) + 1098.5 (6.66 − 3.25)


− 367 (6.66 − 1.76) + 720 (6.66 −1.33) − 360 (6.66 − 1.33)
= 3894 KN−m (anticlockwise)

Properties of Analogous column X − section.


1 1
A= × 4 + 1 × 6 + × 3 = 9.5
2 2

X = 6.66 meters From B as in previous problem.

Iyoyo = 101.05 m4 as in previous problem.

P MC
(Mi)a = ± ( Reactions are subtractive at A)
A I

− 1084.75 3894 × 6.34


= +
9.5 101.05

(Mi)a = + 130 KN−m ( Same answer as in previous problem )

(Ms)a = 0
Ma = (Ms − Mi)a

Ma = ( 0 − 130) = − 130 KN−m

P MC
(Mi)b = ± ( Reactions are additive at B )
A I

− 1084.75 3894 × 6.66


= −
9.5 101.05
= − 370.83 KN−m

(Ms)b = − 253.5 − 360 = − 613.5 KN−m

Mb = (Ms − Mi)b = − 613.5 + 370.83


Mb = − 243 KN−m
Now beam is determinate. Please note that the final values of redundant moments at supports
remain the same for two BDS. However, amount of effort is different.
328 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

7.3. STIFFNESS AND CARRYOVER FACTORS FOR STRAIGHT MEMBERS


WITH CONSTANT SECTION:__
For the given beam, choose a simple beam as BDS under Ma and Mb

Ma=K a Mb=(COF)Ma
A B
A a B Ma
b BDS under Ma
EI=Constt:
L
A B
Mb
Ma BDS under Mb
EI +
0 L/3 2/3L 0
1 M/EI Loading on the
xLx Ma = MaL conjugate beam for a
2 EI 2EI
single BDS.
MbL
2/3L 2EI L/3 Reaction on the
0 __ 0 Mb conjugate
EI beam.
a
aL/2
a 1 Analogous
EI column
L section.

By choosing a B.D.S. as simple beam under the action of Ma and Mb, we can verify by the use of
conjugate beam method that θb = 0. In this case, we are required to find that how much rotation at end A is
required to produce the required moment Ma. In other words, θa (which is in terms of Ma and Mb can be
considered as an applied load on the analogous column section). The moments computed by using the
P MC
formula ± will give us the end moments directly because in this case Ms diagram will be zero.
A I
So, M = Ms − Mi = 0 − Mi = − Mi.

Properties of analogous column section:−


L 1 L3 L3
A= , I= =
EI EI 12 12EI
factor
Downward load on analogous column = θa at A.

L
Accompanying moment = θa × ( About centroidal column axis )
2

L
and C= for use in above formula.
2
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 329

P MC
Ma = +
A I

θa EI θa × L × L × 12EI
= + ( Reactions are additive at A and are upwards)
L 2 × 2 × L3

θa EI 3θa EI
= +
L L

4 EI
Ma = θa
L

4 EI
Where = Ka
L

Where Ka = stiffness factor at A.

P MC
Mb = ± ( Reactions are subtractive at B)
A I

θa EI 3θa EI
= −
L L

− 2θa EI
=
L

− 2EI
= . θa
L

The (−ve) sign with Mb indicates that it is a (−ve) moment which gives us tension at the top or
compression at the bottom.

Mb 2 1
(COF) a → b Carry−over factor from A to B = = =+
Ma 4 2

“BY PUTING θA EQUAL TO UNITY , MA & MB WILL BE THE STIFFNESS FACTORS AT


THE CORRESPONDING JOINTS”. STIFFNESS FACTOR IS THE MOMENT REQUIRED TO
PRODUCE UNIT ROTATION.

In the onward problems of members having variable X-section, we will consider θa = θb = 1


radians and will apply them on points A & B on the top of the analogous column section. The resulting
moments by using the above set of formulas will give us stiffness factor and COF directly.
330 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

EXAMPLE NO. 8:− Determine the stiffness factors at A & at B and the carry-over factors from A to B
and from B to A for the straight members with variable X-sections shown in the figure below..
SOLUTION:−
Draw analogous column section and determine its properties.

A B
2I I 2I
4m 6m 6m

1 1 1 1 rad
A= x6+ x6+ x4
2EI EI 2EI
1 rad
3 6 2 7.73
= + +
EI EI EI B
11 1 A 1 1
Analogous column section
= EI 2EI EI 2EI

Centroidal axis
7.73m 8.27m

Taking moments of areas about point B.


(0.5 × 6) × 3 + (6 × 1) × 9 + (4 × 0.5) × 14
X =
11

X = 8.27 meters from B.

0.5 × 63 1 × 63
I = + (0.5 × 6) × (5.27)2 + + (1 × 6) ×
12 12

0.5 × 43
(0.73)2 + + (0.5 × 4) × (5.73)2
12
181.85
I =
EI

Consider loads acting at centroid of analogous column and determine indeterminate moments at A and B.
P MC
Ma = ±
A I

P MC 1 × EI 7.73 × 7.73 × EI
= + = +
A I 11 181.85

EI
Ma = 0.419 EI = 0.419 × 16 , (by multiplying and dividing RHS by L)
L
EI
Ma = 6.71
L

Ka = 6.71
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 331

EI 7.73 × 8.27 × EI 16
Mb = − × (by multiplying and dividing by L)
11 181.85 L

EI
= − 4.17
L

Mb 4.17
(COF)A→B = = = 0.62
Ma 6.71

(COF)A→B = 0.62

Now applying unit radian load at B. This eccentric load can be replaced by a concentric load Plus
accompanying moment.

1 rad
1 rad
8.27

7.73 8.27

Considering eccentric 1 rad load to be acting at centroid of section alongwith moment.

EI (8.27 × 7.73 × EI) 16


Ma =  −
11 181.85 L , (multiplying and dividing by L)

EI
Ma = − 4.17
L

EI (8.27 × 8.27 × EI) 16


Mb =  + (multiplying and dividing by L)
11 181.85 L
EI
Mb = 7.47
L

Kb = 7.47

Ma 4.17
(COF)b→a Carry−over factor from B to A = =
Mb 7.47

(COF)b→a = 0.56
332 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

7.4. APPLICATION TO FRAMES WITH ONE AXIS OF SYMMETRY:−


EXAMPLE NO. 9:- Analyze the quadrangular frame shown below by the method of column analogy.
Check the solution by using a different B.D.S.

SOLUTION:−
Axis of Symmetry w.r.t. geometry

B C
12KN 5I

6m 2I 2I 6m

A D

10m
The term “axis of symmetry” implies that the shown frame is geometrically symmetrical (M.O.I. and
support conditions etc., are symmetrical) w.r.t. one axis as shown in the diagram. The term does not include
the loading symmetry (the loading can be and is unsymmetrical).

Choosing the B.D.S. as a cantilever supported. at A.

B C
12KN 5I

6m 2I 2I 6m

A D
72 kN-m

10m
Ms-diagram
B 5I C
12 kN-m

6m 2I
6m 2I
Force=108
2 EI
36 D
A EI
Ms - Diagram
EI
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 333

Ms
According to our sign convention for column analogy, the loading arising out of negative giving tension
EI
on outside will act upwards on the analogous column section. Sketch analogous column section and place
load.
B C 1
5
y=2.27m 5m 5m
Mxx
x x

3.73m 108
EI Myy
2m
D
A
1 y 1/2
2

(1) Properties of Analogous Column Section:−

A = 1 × 6 × 2 + 1 × 10 = 8
2  5 EI

5 × 10 × 10 + 2 2 × 6 × 3 EI


1 1 1 1
y =   = 2.27 m about line BC. (see diagram)
8
 EI 
0.5 × 63 1 10 × (1/5)3
Ixx = 2  + × 6 x (0.73)2 + + (0.2 × 10) × (2.27)2
 12 2   12

31.51 4
= m
EI

0.2 × 103 6 × 0.53


+ 2 2
Iyy =
12  12 + (6 × 0.5) × (5) 
167 4
= m
EI
187
Mxx = 108 × 1.73 = clockwise.
EI
540
Myy = 108 × 5 = clockwise.
EI
Applying the formulae in a tabular form for all points. Imagine the direction of reactions
at exterior frame points due to loads and moments.
Ma = ( Ms− Mi)a
P Mx y My X
( Mi)a = ± ±
A Ix Iy
334 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

POINT Ms P/A Mx y My X Mi M=
Ix Iy Ms−Mi
A − 72 − 13.5 − 22.14 − 16.17 − 51.81 − 20.19
B 0 − 13.5 + 13.47 − 16.17 − 16.20 + 16.20
C 0 − 13.5 + 13.47 + 16.17 + 16.14 − 16.14
D 0 − 13.5 − 22.14 + 16.17 − 19.47 + 19.47

Note: Imagine the direction of reaction due to P, Mx and My at all points A, B, C and P. Use
appropriate signs. Repeat the analysis by choosing a different BDS yourself.

EXAMPLE NO. 10:− Analyze the quadrangular frame shown by the method of column analogy.

B 3KN/m
C

5I

6m 2I 2I 6m

A D

10m

Choosing B.D.S. as a cantilever supported at A.

3KN/m

B C

150K n-m

A D

30
BDS under loads
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 335

Draw Ms−diagram by parts and then superimpose for convenience and clarity.

Free Body Diagrams


150 3 KN/m
30
B C

150
30 B C C
B 150

150

A
150
D
150
30

3KN/m
150
B C

150

A 150 D
Ms-Diagram

100
2.5
B 75 C

30 For Portion BC
450
bb 10 × 30 300
Ms - Diagram Area = = = = 100
6m n+1 2+1 3
EI
b 10 10
3m X' = = = = 2.5 from B.
n+2 2+2 4
75
A D
10m

Note: As BMD on portions BC and AB are negative the loads equal to their areas will act upwards.
M
Now sketch analogous column section carrying loads arising from contributions.
EI
336 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

100 y
2.25m
C
B
450 1/5
2.275m Mx
X X
6m 0.725m
My
3.725
3m
D
1/2 1/2
10m
Analogus colmun section
y

Properties of analogous column section:−

A = 2  × 6 + × 10 =
1 1 8
(as before)
2  5 EI

1 × 10 × 1 + 2 6 × 1 × 3
5  10  2 
y = = 2.275 about line BC (as before)
8

1 3
Ix = 2  × 63 +  × 6 × (0.725)2 + 10 ×   + 10 ×  × (2.275)2
1 1 1
2 2    5  5 
31.51 4
= m (as before)
EI

6 × 0.53 0.2 × 103


Iy = 2  2
 12 + (6 × 0.5) × 5  + 12

166.79 4
= m (as before)
EI

Mx = 450 × 0.725 − 100 × 2.275 = 95.75 KN−m Clockwise

My = 450 × 5 + 100 × 2.75 = 2525 KN−m clockwise.

P = 100 + 450 = 550 KN

Now this eccentric load P and MX and My are placed on column centroid.

Applying the formulae in a tabular form.

Ma = ( Ms− Mi)a
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 337

P Mx y My x
and ( Mi)a = ± ±
A Ix Iy

POINT Ms P/A Mx . y My . x Mi M=
Ix Iy Ms−Mi
A − 150 − 68.75 − 11.32 − 75.69 − 155.76 5.76
B − 150 −68.75 + 6.91 − 75.69 − 137.53 −12.47
C 0 −68.75 + 6.91 + 75.69 13.85 −13.85
D 0 −68.75 −11.32 + 75.69 −4.38 4.38

EXAMPLE NO. 4:− Determine stiffness factors corresponding to each end and carry-over factors in both
directions of the following beam.

SOLUTION:−
A B

5I 2I 4I I 3I
2m 1.5m 2m 1m 2m

Sketch analogous column section.


o

1/5 ½ ¼ 1/EI 1/3EI

4.74m 3.76m
yo

Properties of Analogous Column Section :−


1 1 1 1
A= × 2 + × 1.5 + × 2 + 1 × 1 + × 2
5 2 4 3

3.32
A=
EI

Taking moment about B of various segments of column section.

1 1 1 1
× 2 × 1 + 1 × 1 × 2.5 + × 2 × 4 + × 1.5 × 5.75 + × 2 × 7.5
3 4 2 5
X =
3.32

12.4725
X =
3.32

X = 3.76 m from B.
338 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

1 23 1 1 × 13
Iyoyo = × + × 2 × (2.76)2 + + (1 × 1)(2.26)2
3 12 3  12

1 × (2)3 1 × (1.5)3


4 2
+  × 2(0.24) +
1 2
+
12 4  12
1 × (2)3
5
+  × 1.5 (1.99)2 + +  × 2(3.74)2
1 1
2  12 5 
19.53
=
EI

1. Determination of stiffness factor at A (ka) and carry-over factor from A to B. Apply unit load at
A and then shift it along with moment to centroidal axis of column as shown below:

1 rad

A 8.5m B

1 =

A 4.74 B

4.74 3.76
P MC
Ma = ±
A I
EI EI
=1× + 4.74 × 4.74
3.32 19.53
= 1.45 EI , multiply and divide by L
EI EI
Ma = 1.45 × 8.5 × = 12.33
L L
Ka = 12.33
EI 4.74 × 3.26 × EI
Mb = −
3.32 19.53
EI EI
= − 0.61 EI = − 0.61 × 8.5 × = − 5.19 (multiply and divide by L)
L L
EI
Mb = − 5.19
L
Mb 5.19
(COF)a → b = = = 0.42
Ma 12.33

(COF)a → b = 0.42
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 339

2. Determination of stiffness factor at B (Kb) and carry-over from B to A. Apply a unit load at B and
them shift it along with moment to centroidal axis of column as shown below:

P Mc
Ma = ±
A I

1 rad

A 8.5m B

1 =

A 3.76 B

4.74 3.76

EI 3.76 × 4.74 × EI
Ma = −
3.32 19.53

= −0.61EI , multiply and divide by L.

EI EI
= − 0.61 × 8.5 × = −5.19
L L

P Mc
Mb = ±
A I

EI 3.76 × 3.76 × EI
= +
3.22 19.53

EI
=1..03 EI = 1.03 × × 8.5 , multiply and dividing by L.
L
EI
Mb = 8.76
L

Kb = 8.76

Ma 5.19
(COF)b → a = = = 0.6
Mb 8.76

(COF) b → a = 0.6
340 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

EXAMPLE NO.12:− Analyze the following gable frame by column analogy method.
SOLUTION :−
3 kN/m

B C D 3m
3I 3I

7m
I I

A E
14 m

Choosing a simple frame as BDS


3kN/m

C
7 .62
B D
73.5 73.5
7

C
B 7.62 D

A E

21 21 A E
B.D.S under loads Ms-diagram
2.8

24.5 24.5
6

C
x
B 6 D
6 2.8
4.7

4.375

A Ms diagram E
EI
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 341

Taking the B.D.S. as a simply supported beam.

MX = 21X – 1.5X2 , taking X horizontally.

MX = Mc at X = 7m

Mc = 21 × 7 – 1.5 X 72

= 73.5 KN−m

3
Sin θ = = 0.394
7.62

7
Cos θ = = 0.919
7.62

2
P1 = P2 = × 24.5 × 7.62 = 124.46
3

P = P1 + P2 = 248.92

7 7
∫ MX dX = ∫ (21 X − 1.5X2) dX =  X2 −
21 1.5 3
X = 343
o 2 3 o
7 7
∫ (MX)X dX = ∫ (21 X2 − 1.5X3)dX =  X3 −
21 1.5 4
X
o 3 4 o

1.5
= 7 × 73 − × 74 = 1500.625
4

∫ (MX) X dX 1500.625
X = =
∫ MX dX 343

X = 4.375 Horizontally from D or B. Shift it on the inclined surface.

4.375
Cos θ =
a

4.375 4.375
a= =
Cos θ 0.919

a = 4.76
342 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Now draw analogous column section and place loads on top of it.

124.46
124.46
2.8
3m 6
B 4.7
6
C
2.17 m
D
1/3
X
X
Mx
4.83 m

A
E
1
1

PROPERTIES OF ANALOGOUS COLUMN SECTION


A = 2 (1 × 7) + 2  × 7.62= 19.08 m2
1
3 
2[(1 × 7) × 3.5] + 2 1  
3 × 7.62 × 8.5 49 + 43 − 18
Y = =
19.08 19.08
Y = 4.83 m from A or E
1 × 73
Ix = 2  2
 12 + (1 × 7) (4.83 − 3.5) 

 1 × (7.62)3 
+2
 3 1 
× ( 0.394 )2 + (7.62) ( 1.5 + 2.17)2 ,
 12 3 
bL3
the first term in second square bracket is Sin2θ
12
= 154.17
So Ix ≅ 154 m4
7 × 13
Iy = 2  2
Now
 12 + (7 × 1) × 7 

1 × (7.62)3 
+2
3 
× (0.919 )2 +  × 7.62 × (3.5)2 ,
1
 12 3  
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 343

bL3
the first term in second square bracket is Cos2θ
12
=770.16
So Iy ≅ 770 m4

Total load on centroid of analogous column

P = P1 + P2 = 124.46 + 124.46 = 248.92 KN

Mx = 2 × [124.46 × 4.05 ] , 4.05 = 2.17 + 4.76 Sinθ = 2.17 + 4.76 × 0.394.


Mx = 1007 (clockwise).
My = 0 (because moments due to two loads cancel out)
Applying the general formulae in a tabular form for all points of frame.
Ma = ( Ms− Mi)a
P Mx y My X
( Mi)a = ± ±
A Ix Iy

Point Ms P/A Mx .Y My .X (B)=Mi M=


(A) (1) Ix Iy (1)+(2) Col (A)−(B)
(2) (3) +(3)
A 0 + 13.05 − 31.58 0 − 18.53 + 18.53
B 0 + 13.05 + 14.19 0 + 27.24 − 27.24
C + 73.5 + 13.05 + 33.81 0 + 46.86 +26.64
D 0 + 13.05 + 14.19 0 + 27.24 − 27.24
E 0 + 13.05 − 31.58 0 − 18.53 + 18.53

EXAMPLE NO. 13:- Analyze the frame shown in fig below by Column Analogy Method.

10kN
B C
3I

2kN/m 4m
2I 2I

A D
3m

Choosing the B.D.S. as a cantilever supported at A.


344 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

4
MA = 10 x 1.5 + 2 x 4 x
2
MA = 31 KN−m

10 kN
B C

2kN/m

A D
8
31 B.D.S
10

Draw Free Body Diagrams and sketch composite BMD:−


10
15
1.5 1.5
10
B C
15 10
C
15
B
15
2kN/m
4m no B.M.D

A
8
31 31 D

10
10 10
15 7.5

15 5

,
31 15.5
Ms-diagram Ms diagram
EI
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 345

Properties Of Analogous Column Section :−


Sketch analogous column section and show loads on it. BMD along column AB is split into a rectangle and
other second degree curve.

A =  × 4 × 2 +  × 3 = 5 m2
1 1
2  3 
3 × 1 × 1 + 2 1 × 4 × 2
 3 6 2  
Y =
5
Y = 1.63 m From line BC

1 3 3
0.5 + 4 + (0.5 × 4) × (0.37)2
3× 
  1 
3  12 
Ix = + × 3 × (1.63)2 + 2
12 3   12 
= 8.55 m4

4 × 0.53
Iy =   × (3)3 + 2  2
1
3  12 + (4 × 0.5) × (1.5) 
= 9.83 m4

P1 y
0.5 1.0

B C
1/3

1,63 m

P2

4m
X 0.37 X

P3

2.37 m

I
D

½ ½

y
3m
346 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Total load on top of analogous column section acting at the centroid.


P = 3.75 + 30 + 10.67 = 44.42 KN upward.
1 4 × 7.5
P1 = × 1.5 × 5 = 3.75, P2 = 7.5 × 4 = 30, P3 = = 10
2 2+1
4
X' = = 1 meters for A.
4
MX = − 3.75 x 1.63 + 30 x 0.37 + 10.67 x 1.37
= 19.61 KN-m clockwise.
My = 10.67 × 1.5 + 30 × 1.5 + 3.75 × 1 = 64.76 clockwise.
Applying the general formulae in a tabular form for all points of frame.
Ma = ( Ms− Mi)a
P Mx y My X
( Mi)a = ± ±
A Ix Iy

Point Ms P/A Mx My Mi M
.y .X
(1) Ix Iy (1)+(2) Ms − Mi
(2) (3) + (3)
A − 31 −8.88 − 5.44 − 9.88 − 24.2 − 6.8
B − 15 − 8.88 + 3.74 − 9.88 −15.02 + 0.02
C 0 − 8.88 + 3.74 + 9.88 + 4.74 − 4.74
D 0 − 8.88 − 5.44 + 9.88 − 4.44 + 4.44

EXAMPLE NO. 14:- Analyze the following beam by column analogy method.
SOLUTION :−
Choosing B.D.S as cantilever supported at B

10kN
3kN/m

3I 1.5I I

Ms-diagram
due to u.d.l. only

96
4m 2m 2m
(a)
(b)
6
( c)
24
32 72
1m 96
1.33
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 347

40 Ms diagram due to concentrated load only


Slectch analogous column section and determine its proteins
P1 2.14
a b d
2c
1.5m 6 16
e 24
P2=1.33 24
72
3.21m
P3=18.67 Ms-diagram
EI due to u.d.l

P4=80
1.33

40
MS diagram due to point load.
EI
Slectch analogous column section and determine its properties.
P2 P3
o P6
1.5 2.14
P4 Analogous
1/3 1/1.5 1 column
section
4.78 3.22 1.33
yo
3.21
24 × 4 48 × 4
P1 = + + 24 × 4 = 224 KN. Corresponding to full Ms diagram, due to u.d.l.
3 2
Location of P1 from B
224 × X = 96 × 1.33 + 96 × 2 + 32 × 5
X = 2.14 meters
1
P4 = × 4 × 40 = 80 KN, Corresponding to full Ms diagram due to point load.
2
Note: Area of 32 and its location of Ms diagram due to u.d.l. has been calculate d by formula e used in
moment – area Theorems.
2
− 1.5 X3
2
area (abc) = ∫ MXdX = ∫ −1.5X2 dX =  = −4
o  3  o
2
− 1.5 X4
2
∫(MX) X dX = ∫ −1.5X3dX = 
o  4 o = − 6
−6
X = = 1.5m from A
−4
4 2
area (bcde) = ∫ (MX) dX = ∫ − 1.5X2dX − ∫ − 1.5 X2 dX
o o
348 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

4 2
X3  X3
= − 1.5 − − 1.5  = − 28
 3 o  3 o
4 2
∫ (MX)X dX = ∫ − 1.5 X3dX − ∫ − 1.5 X3dX = − 90
o o
−90
X =
−28

= 3.21 meters from A (centroid of area bcde)

1 1 1 1
P3 = (area bcde) = (28) = 18.67 KN , P2 = area abc = × 4 = 1.33
1.5 1.5 3 3

P4 = 80 KN

Total concentric load on analogous column section.

P = − P1 + P2 + P3 − P4

= − 224 + 1.33 + 18.67 − 80

= − 284 KN (upward)

Total applied moment = M = − 224 × 1.68− 80 × 1.89 − 18.67 × 1.57 − 1.33 × 33 × 3.28

= − 426.79 KN-m (It means counter clockwise)

This total load P and M will now act at centroid of analogous column section.

Properties of Analogous Column Section.


1 1
A= ×2+ ×2+1×4=6
3 1.5

(1 × 4) × 2 + 2 ×
1
× 5 +  × 2 × 7
1
 1.5 3 
X =
6

= 3.22 from B.

 1  × 23
1 × 43 1.5
+ 
1
+ (1 × 4)(1.22) +
1.5 × 2 (1.78)
2 2
Iyoyo =
12 12
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 349

1 × 23
3  1 
+ + × 2 (3.78)2
12 3 
12
= 25.70 m4

P Mc
(Mi)a = ±
A I

− 284 426.79 × 4.78


= +
6 25.7

= + 32.05 KN-m

(Ms)a = 0

Ma = (Ms − Mi)a = 0 − 32.05

Ma = − 32.05 KN−m

P Mc
(Mi)b = −
A I

− 284 426.79 × 3.22


= −
6 25.7

= − 100.81

(Ms)b = − 72 − 40 = − 112

Mb = (Ms − Mi)b

= − 112 + 100.81

Mb = − 11.19 KN−m

The beam has been analyzed. It is now statically determinate.


350 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

CHAPTER EI GHT

8. PL ASTI C ANAL YSI S OF STEEL STRUCTURES


8.1. I ntr oduction:
Although the terms Plastic analysis and design normally apply to such procedures for steel
structures within the yield flow region, at almost constant stress, however the Idea may also be applied to
reinforced concrete structures which are designed to behave elastically in a ductile fashion at ultimate
loads near yielding of reinforcement.
The true stress-strain curve for a low grade structural steel is shown in fig. 1 while an idealized
one is shown in fig. 2 which forms the basis of Plastic Analysis and Design.

E
B
F (B,C) Plastic D
f
f C D Stress
AB-Elastic
Stress BC-Yeild points
CD-Plastic Strain flow Elastic
DE-Strainhardening
EF-Failure

A Strain A
Strain
Fig 1: Fig 2:
8.2. Advantages of Plastic Analysis
1. Relatively simpler procedures are involved.
2. Ultimate loads for structures and their components may be determined.
3. Sequence and final mode of failure may be known and the capacity at relevant stages may be
determined.
8.3. Assumptions in Plastic bending
1. The material is homogeneous and isotropic.
2. Member Cross-section is symmetrical about the axis at right angles to the axis of bending.
3. Cross-section which were plane before bending remain plane after bending.
4. The value of modulus of Elasticity of the material remains the same in tension as well as in
compression.
5. Effects of temperature, fatigue, shear and axial force are neglected.
6. Idealized bi-linear stress-strain curve applies.
8.4. Number of Plastic Hinges
“ The number of Plastic Hinges required to convert a structure or a member into a mechanism is
one more than the degree of indeterminacy in terms of redundant moments usually. Thus a determinate
structure requires only one more plastic hinge to become a mechanism, a stage where it deflects and
rotates continuously at constant load and acquires final collapse.
So Mathematically
N = n+ 1
where N = Total number of Plastic hinges required to convert a structure into a mechanism.
and n = degree of indeterminacy of structure in terms of unknown redundant moments.
PLASTIC ANALYSIS METHOD 351

8.5. Plastic Hinge.


It is that cross-section of a member where bending stresses are equal to yield stresses
σ= σy= fy. It has finite dimensions.
My MpC Mp
From bending equation σ = or σy = or σy = so Hp = Zp σy
I I Zp
σ M σI I
From elastic bending = or = M where = Z
y I y y
So M= σZ and Z is elastic section modules and is equal to the first moment of area about N.A
Z = ∫A ydA.

8.6. Plastic moment of a r ectangular section.


Consider a simple rectangular beam subject to increasing bending moment at the centre. Various
stress-strain stages are encountered as shown below.

B
< y ∈<∈y = y ∈=∈y = y ∈>∈y = y ∈>>∈y
C C
2D
D 3
D
2

T T

case A: M<My
= y
case B: M=My case C
> y = y ∈>>∈y
case D
Var ious Str ess-str ain distr ibutions
Case A - Stresses and strains are within elastic range.
Case B - Stresses and strains at yield levels only at extreme fibers
Case C - Ingress of yielding within depth of section.
Case D - Full plastification of section.
On the onset of yielding σ = σy and M = My = σy.Z.
On full plastification σ = σy and M = Mp = σy.Zp.
or Zp = ∫A yda (First moment of area about equal area axis).

All compact sections as defined in AISC manual will develop full plastification under increasing
loads realizing Mp. However local buckling of the compression flange before yielding has to be avoided
by providing adequate lateral support and by applying width / thickness checks as was done during the
coverage of subject of steel structures design.

Case B. Str esses and Str ains at yield at extr eme fibr es only.
Consult corresponding stress and strain blocks.
M = Total compression × la = Area × σ × la
where Area = Area in compression (from stress block).
σ = Average compression stress.
la = Lever arm i.e. distance b/w total compressive and tensile forces.
σy + o
=   
BD 2
So M
2  2  . 3 D
352 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

In general
M = Cjd or Tjd , where C and T are total compressive and tensile forces respectively
which have to be equal for internal force equilibrium.

Z= Elastic Section modules = I = BD ÷ D


3
BD2 BD2
or My = σy , but =Z
6 6  C 12 2
BD2
So My = σy.Z. =
6
Case D: Full plastification, σ = σy upto equal ar ea axis.

M = Cla = B. D (σy) D where la is lever arm


 2 2
BD2 BD2
= σy . or Zp = , where ZP = Plastic section Modules.
4 4
A
or Mp = σy . Zp or Zp = [y1 + y2] (first moment of areas about equal area axis)
2
and y1 + y2 = D/2 (distance from equal area axis to the centroids of two portions of area.)

Case C: M oment Capacity in Elasto - Plastic r ange. Extreme fibres have yielded and the yielding
ingresses in the section as shown by the stress – distribution.

1 C1
D where
2 2 la1 = lever axis b/w C1 and T1
Z C2 la2 = lever axis b/w C2 and T2
C1 = Av.stress X area of element No.1
la2 la1 C2 = Av-stress acting on element No.2 x
area of element 2.

D Z
2 T2
2

1
T1

y
case C : Stress-Distribution

 D−Z 
M
 2
= [ C1la1 + C2 . la2 ] (A) , la1= Z+
 D
2 = +Z
 2  2
2
= (σy) B  − Z la2 =  × Z × 2 = × Z
D 2 4
C1
2  3  3

C2 = σy + o Z . B = σy ZB and so, putting values of C1 , C2 la1 and la2 in equation A above.
 2  2
PLASTIC ANALYSIS METHOD 353

= σy . B   D  Z.B
D 4
M
 2 − Z  2 + Z + σy  2  x 3 Z , Simplifying

= σy . B  2
D2 2
M
4 −Z + 3
σy BZ 2

= σy . B 
D2 2 2
4 −Z + Z
2
3 

= σy . B  − 
D2 Z 2
Mr , where M r is moment of resistance.
4 3 

Mp = M r = σy . B 3D2 − 4Z 2 __
For rectangular section.
 12 
Calculating on similar lines, Plastic moment for various shapes can be calculated.

8.7. Shape Factor (γ)


It is the ratio of full plastic moment Mp to the yield moment My. It depends on the shape of
Cross-section for a given material.
Mp σy . Zp Zp
Shape Factor = γ = = or γ = (Ratio of Plastic section modulus to
My σy . Z Z
Elastic Section Modulus).
8.8. Calculation of Shape Factor for differ ent Sections.

B B

D/2 dy
(1)
y1 y
D
(2) y2

8.8.1 For r ectangular section.


BD3 I D
I = , = Z , C=
12 C 2
BD3 × 2 BD2
So Z = =
12 × D 6
A BD D D
Zp =
2
[y1 + y2] =
2 4
+
4
or alternatively, Zp = ∫ A ydA.
D/2
BD2
=
4
= 2 ∫ y . Bdy
o
D/2
Zp BD2 × 6 6
γ = = = = 1.5 = 2B ∫ ydy.
Z 4 × BD2 4
o
BD2
γ = 1.5 so [Mp is 1.5 times My] or Zp =
4
354 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

8.8.2 For Cir cular Cr oss-section


πD4 π 2
I = , A = D
64 4
I πD4 2 πD3
Z = = × = ,
C 64 D 32
A
Zp = [y1 + y2]
2

dy

(a) Cross-Section (b) Strain (c) Stress at full


Distribution plastification Distribution
πD2 2D 2D D 4r 4×D 2D
= + , r= , y1 = = =
8  3π 3π  2 3π 3π × 2 3π
D3 Zp D × 32
3
32
Zp = γ = = = ≅ 1.7
6 Z 6 × πD3 6π
γ = 1.7 , [Mp is 1.7 times My]
8.8.3 Hollow Cir cular Section

2D 2d
3 3
D d
d

π
I = (D4 − d4)
64
I π 2
= Z min = (D4 − d4) .
C 64 D
π
Z min = (D4 − d4)
32D
A
Zp = [ y1 + y2] , putting values. putting values Ay = A 1y1 + A 2y2
2
π 2 2 (D3 − d3) π πD2 2D πd2
(D − d2) 2 ×
2d
= (D2 − d2) y = . − ×
8  3π (D2 − d2)  8 8 3π 8 3π

Zp = D3 − d3 π
(D2 − d2) y =  − 
D3 d3
 6  8  I2 12
PLASTIC ANALYSIS METHOD 355

γ = D3 − d3 × 32D 8 (D3 − d3)


 6  (D4 − d4) π Putting Z and Z p y =
12π (D2 − d2)
32 D(D3 − d3) 2 (D3 − d3)
γ = y =
6π (D4 − d4) 3π D2 − d2
for N-A or equal area axis.
For D = 10”
d = 8”
γ = 1.403

For I - Section:

B
y
C1

b/2 C2
la
2
D d
la
1 T2

T1
stress strain
distribution distribution

I D
As = Z = and C =
C 2
(BD3 − bd3) (BD3 − bd3)
I = , My = σy . Z = σy , Putting value of Z from (1)
12 6D
I (BD − bd ) 2
3 3
Z = = Mp = C1 la1 + C2 la2
C 12 D
BD3 − bd3
=  la1=  + 
d D-d½
Z (1)
 6D  2  2   2 = (D+ d)/2,
la2 =  − 
D D−d½ d
 2  2  × 2= 2
(D − d) (D + d) d d
Mp= σy . B + σy . (B − b)
2 2 2 2

Mp = σy  (D2 − d2) + (B − b)


B d2
4 4 

σy(BD2 − bd2) BD2 − bd2


σy 
Mp BD
γ = = × Mp =
My 4 σy(BD3 − bd3)  4 
3D (BD2 − bd2)
γ = if B = 4”
2 (BD3 − bd3)
b = 3.75”
D = 8” , shape factor γ = 1.160
d = 7.5”
356 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Similarly for T-section, Equilateral Triangle and hollow rectangular section the values of shape-
factor are 1.794, 2.343 and 1.29 respectively. For diamond shape its value is 2.0.

8.9. Significance of Shape Factor


Zp is First moment of area about equal area axis.
1. It gives an indication of reserve capacity of a section from on set of yielding at extreme fibres
to full plastification.
2. If My is known,, Mp may be calculated.
3. A section with higher shape factor gives a longer warning before collapse.
4. A section with higher shape factor is more ductile and gives greater deflection at collapse.
5. Greater is the γ value, greater is collapse load factor λc

8.10. Collapse load of a str uctur e.


Collapse load is found for a structure by investigating various possible collapse mechanisms of
a structure under conceivable load systems. For any given mechanism, possible plastic hinge locations
are determined by noting the types of loads and support conditions remembering that under increasing
loads, the plastic hinges would form in a sequence defined by corresponding elastic moments at the
possible plastic hinge locations. “ Collapse loads ar e usually the applied loads multiplied by collapse
load factor λc . λc is defined as the r atio of the collapse load to the wor king load acting on any
str uctur e / element” . The value of λc may indicate a margin of safety for various collapse mechanisms
and steps can be taken in advance to strengthen the weaker structural elements before erection. Benefit of
` strength reserve’ is obtained due to increased moments of resistance due to plastification. The reserve
of strength is large if the section widens out near the vicinity of neutral surface.

8.11. Assumptions made in Plastic Theor y.


The plastic analysis is primarily based on following assumptions.
1. For prismatic members,, the value of Mp is independent of magnitude of bending moment.
2. The length of plastic hinge is limited to a point.
3. Material is very ductile and is capable of undergoing large rotations / curvatures at the
constant moment without breaking.
4. The presence of axial force and shear force does not change the value of Mp.
5. The structure remains stable until the formation of last plastic hinge and serviceability would
not be impaired till such time.
6. Loads acting on structure are assumed to increase in proportion to each other.
7. Continuity of each joint is assumed.

8.12. Fundamental Theor ems of Plastic Collapse.


When degree of redundancy increases beyond 2 or 3 in situations where collapse mechanism is
not very clear, we try to pick up collapse load with the help of three fundamental theorems.
a. Lower bound theorem or static theorem.
b. Upper bound theorem or kinematic theorem.
c. Uniqueness theorem.
PLASTIC ANALYSIS METHOD 357

8.12.1 Lower Bound theor em


“ A Load computed on the basis of bending moment distribution in which moment nowhere
exceeds Mp is either equal to or less than the true collapse load” .

8.12.2 Upper bound theor em


“ A load computed on the basis of an assumed mechanism is either equal to or greater than true
collapse load” . When several mechanisms are tried, the true collapse load will the smallest of them.

8.12.3. Uniqueness theor em


“ A load computed on the basis of bending moment distribution which satisfies both plastic
moment and mechanism conditions is true plastic collapse load” .

Moment

Kinematic
Theorems.

True
Mp

Static
Theorems.

Curvature.

8.13. M ethods of analysis


Basically there are two methods of analysis.
a. Equilibrium Method.
b. Mechanism Method.
8.13.1. Equilibr ium M ethod
Normally a free bending moment diagram on simple span due to applied loads is drawn and
B.M.D due to reactants is superimposed on this with due regard to their signs leaving the net moment
distributed. Then by making the moment values equal to Mp values at the known potential plastic hinge
locations, a revised diagram can be drawn. Then by splitting the simple span moment due to applied
loads in terms of relevant Mp, the values of collapse load can be determined.
8.13.2. M echanism M ethod
In this approach, a mechanism is assumed and plastic hinges are inserted at potential plastic
hinge locations. At plastic hinges the corresponding rotations and deflections are computed to write work
equations which may be written as follows.
Work done by external loads = Actual loads x Average displacements = Work absorbed at
Plastic hinges (internal work done) = Mp. θ
358 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Typically Σ W. δ = Σ Mp . θ.
In both methods, the last step is usually to check that M < Mp at all sections.

8.14. Values of Collapse loads for differ ent loaded str uctur es.

Beam Under loads Collapse load Pc or Wc

P
L/2 Mp
4
L

L/2 P
Mp
8
L

W Mp
16
L2

P
2/3L Mp
9
L

L/2 P
Mp
6
L

L P Mp
1
L

W Mp
11.65
L2

Mp
8
L2

L/ P P
3 Mp
6
L

P
L/3 Mp
6
L
PLASTIC ANALYSIS METHOD 359

8.15. I n or der to explain the above pr ocedur e, L et us solve examples.


Analysis of a Continuous beam by M echanism M ethod.
EXAM PL E NO. 1:- Consider the beam loaded as shown. Three independent possible collapse
mechanisms along with potential plastic hinge locations are shown.
SOL UTI ON: degree of indeterminacy in terms
of moments = n = 2 ( moments at A and B)
No of Plastic hinges required = 2 + 1 = 3
20K 20K 20K

4 4 B 4 C
A

12 8
First possible beam mechanism for span AB.
/2

1.5

Second possible beam mechanism for span AB.

8
3

Possible beam mechanism for span BC

Real Hinge

Write work equations for all mechanisms and find corresponding Mp values.

M echanism (1)
θ
20 × 4 θ + 20 × 2θ = Mp . θ + Mp.1.5θ + Mp
2
120 θ = 3 Mp θ
Mp = 40 K-ft.
M echanism (2)
20 × 4 θ + 20 × 8 θ = Mp . θ + Mp.3θ + Mp . 2θ
360 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

240 θ = 6 Mp θ
Mp = 40 K-ft
M echanism (3)
20 × 4 θ = Mp. θ + Mp . 2 θ + 0 × θ
80 θ = 3 Mp . θ
Mp = 26.67 K-ft.
Minimum Collapse load or Max. Mp will be the collapse mechanism
So Mp = 40 K-ft.( Corresponding to mechanisms 1 and 2)
8.16. EXAM PL E NO.2:-Find the collapse load for the following continuous beam loaded as shown.
SOL UTI ON: Do elastic analysis by three moment equation to find Mb and Mc. Apply the equation
twice to spans AB and BC and then BC and CD. (In this case, noting symmetry and concluding that
Mb = Mc, only one application would yield results).

2T/m
B C D
A

8m 6m 8m

16 9 16

85.33 36 85.33

4m 3m
(Simple span B.M.D. due to loads)
By using three-moment equation
8 Ma + 2Mb 8 + 6 + Mc 6 = − 6 × 85.33 × 4 − 6 × 36 × 3
I  I I  I  8 6
Ma = 0 , 34 Mb = 364 So Mb = Mc = 10.70 T − m ( By symmetry)
8.17. Maximum bending moment in a member car r ying UDL
ML W=wL
M
R

A C B
L/2 L/2

R R2
1

ML M
R
Mc Mmax B.M.D

yo

xo zo
Consider a general frame element subjected to Udl over its span alongwith end moments plot BMD.
PLASTIC ANALYSIS METHOD 361

After derivation we find the location of maximum moments X o, Y o and M C.


In some books, plastic huge is stated to form in the centre of span. However, the formulae given below
are very precise and give correct location of plastic huges due to u.d.l.
Where, ML = Moment at left of element
MR = Moment at right of element
MC = Moment at centre of element
X o , Z o , yo = Location of max. moment from left, right and centre respectively as shown on BMD.
MR − ML 10.70 − o
yo = = = 0.6687 m (1)
WL 2x8
WL 2 (M R − M L ) 2(8)2 10.70
MC = + = +
8 2 8  2 
MC = 21.35 T− m (2)
WL . yo 2
2 × 8 (0.6687) 2
M max = Mc + = 21.35 +
2L 2x8
M max = 21.79 T − m
4M C − 3M R − M L 4 (21.35) − 3 (10.7) − 0
Xo = = = at 3.313 m from A and D.
WL 2×8
Plastic hinges would form first at a distance X o = 3.313 m from points A and D and then at
points B and C.
Now determine collapse load by mechanism method.
SOL UTI ON: No internal work is absorbed at real hinges.
362 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

B 2T/m C D
A

8m 6 8m

First possible collapse mechanism of span AB.

Real Hinge 3.13m

3.13
0.707

1.707

Second possible collapse mechanism of span AB.

For fir st M echanism

3.313 θ
(2 × 8) = Mp × 1.707 θ + 0.707 θ Mp + 0
2
So Mp = 10.98 T − m

For second M echanism


Mp . θ + Mp . θ + Mp . 2 θ = (2 × 6) 
30
 2
Mp = 4.5 T − m
Mp
So Mp = 10.98 T − m or Load factor λ =
10.98
8.18. Types of Collapse

Three types of collapses are possible as described below.


1. Complete collapse
2. Partial collapse
3. Over complete collapse.

8.18.1. Complete Collapse

If in a structure, there are R redundancies and collapse mechanism contains (R + 1) plastic


hinges, it is called a complete collapse provided the structure is statically determinate at collapse.
PLASTIC ANALYSIS METHOD 363

8.18.2. Par tial Collapse:

If in a structure, the number of plastic hinges formed at collapse do not render the structure as
statically determinate it is called a partial collapse.

8.18.3. Over Complete Collapse

If in a structure there are two or more mechanisms which give the same value of collapse load
(or collapse load factor λc) then this type of collapse is known as overcomplete collapse.

8.19. Analysis of Fr ames


In portal frames, three types of mechanisms are possible.
1. Beam Mechanisms (due to gravity loads)
2. Sway Mechanisms (due to lateral loads).
3. Combined Mechanisms (both loads).

Step 1:
Draw frame in thickness in two lines i.e., solid lines and broken lines. Solid lines are “ outside”
of frame and broken lines are “ inside” of frame.

Step 2: Nodal moments creating compression on out sides are positive or vice-versa.

Outside Inside Outside

Step 3: Hinge cancellation at joints occur when rotations of different signs are considered and
mechanisms are combined.

EXAM PL E NO. 3:- Analyse the frame shown below


SOL UTI ON:
1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are possible plastic Hinge locations. Three independent mechanisms are possible
Beam mechanisms, Sway mechanisms and Combined mechanisms are possible.
364 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

20
2 5 5 15

3 4

5
1
1. Beam M echanism
Write work equation ( Fig A )
20 λ.5 θ = M2 (− θ) + M3 (2 θ) + M4 (− θ)
100 λ = − M2 + 2M3 − M4 by taking θ as common above. (1)
Remember that wor k is always positive.
putting M2 = Mp M3 = Mp M4 = Mp in equation (1), we have
100 λ = 4 Mp or [λ = 0.04 Mp]

20
2 4
5
3 2

1 5
(a) Beam mechanism of element 2-4

20
5 5
4
2 4 15
+
3

+
1 5

(b) Sway Mechanism of Columns


PLASTIC ANALYSIS METHOD 365

20
5 5
-2
2 15
5
3 2

+
1 5

(c) = a + b combined mechanism

2. Sway M echanism:
15 λ.5 θ = M1(− θ) + M2 θ + M4 ( − θ) + M5 (θ)
75 λ = − M1 + M2 − M4 + M5 (2)
M1, M2, M4 and M5 are all equal to Mp
75 λ = 4 Mp or [ λ = 0.053 Mp]

3. Combined M echanism:
20 λ . 5 θ + 15 λ . 5 θ = M1 (−θ) + M2 (0) + M3 (2 θ) + M4 ( − 2 θ) + M5 (θ)
175 λ = − M1 + 2M3 − 2 M4 + M5 (3)
all these moments are equal to Mp
175 λ = 6 Mp , [ λ = 0.034 Mp ] or Mp = 29.15 λ.

Keeping in mind the definition of a true mechanism [one giving highest value of Mp in terms of
Pc or lowest value of Pc in terms of Mp or λ ]
Combined mechanism is the true collapse mechanism.

So λc = 0.0343 Mp

It will be a complete collapse if the structure is statically determinate and moment anywhere
does not exceed Mp value since there are n + 1 plastic hinges in the true collapse mechanism
Note: “ M oment checks ar e nor mally applied at those plastic hinge positions which ar e
not included in the tr ue collapse mechanism” . In the true collapse mechanism which is combined
mechanism in this case, moments at points 1, 3, 4 and 5 are equal to Mp, we need to find and check
moment value at point 2 only in this case.
The generalized work equations 1 and 2 in terms of moments may be used for the purpose
alongwith their signs.
100 λ = − M2 + 2M3 − M4 (1)
75 λ = − M1 + M2 − M4 + M5 (2) Noting that λ = 0.0343 Mp
eqn (1) becomes
100 × 0.0343 Mp= − M2 + 2Mp + Mp so M2 = − 0.431 Mp < Mp − O.K.
eqn (2) becomes
75 (0.0343 Mp) = + Mp + M2 + Mp + Mp so M2 = − 0.42755 Mp < Mp − O.K.
Net value of M2 = algebraic sum of equations 1 and 2 as combined mechanism is
combination of case A and case B.
366 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

M2 = ( − 0.431 − 0.427 ) Mp = − 0.858 Mp < Mp − O.K.


If at this stage a higher load factor is specified by the designer, there is no need to revise the
frame analysis and following formula can be applied to get increased Mp value.

specified new collapse load factor


(Mp) new = x (Mp Present)
present calculated collapse load factor
8.20. EXAM PL E NO. 4:- Par tial or incomplete collapse:
Find collapse load factor for the following loaded frame. Mp is 80 KN-M for all members.

37.5 12.5
7.5m 3 7.5m 4
2

5m
Mp=80KN-m

1 5

SOL UTI ON: Draw three possible independent collapse mechanisms. Write work equation and find 1, 2,
3, 4 and 5 possible plastic hinge locations.

1. Beam M echanism:
(35.5 λ) 7.5 θ = − M2 θ + M3 2 θ + M4 (−θ)
281.25 λ = − M2 + 2M3 − M4 (1)
moment at 2, 3 and 4 is equal to Mp. so
281.25 λ = 4 Mp (work is always + ve)
or λ = 1.1377
2. Sway M echanism:
(12.5 λ) 5 θ = + M1 (− θ) + M2 (θ) + M4 (−θ) + M5 (θ)
62.5 λ = − M1 + M2 − M4 + M5 (2), Moment at 1,2,4 and 5 is Mp.
4
62.5 λ = 4 Mp or λ = × 80 = 5.12
62.5
λ = 5.12

37.5 37.5
5 5
7.5 7.5 -2
2 4 4 12.5
2
2 3 2
3

+
1 5

(c) Combined mechanism


(a) Beam mechanism (b) Sway Mechanism

3. Combined M echanism:
(37.5 λ) (7.5θ)+ (12.5 λ) (5θ)= M1 (−θ) + M2 × 0 + M3 (2θ) + M4 (−2θ) + M5 (θ)
343.75 λ = − M1 + 2M3 − 2M4 + M5 (3) Moment at 1,3,4 and 5 is Mp
PLASTIC ANALYSIS METHOD 367

6 x 80
343.75 λ = 6 Mp or λ = = 1.396
343.75
λ = 1.396.
Therefore, according to kinematic theorem, beam mechanism containing 3 Plastic hinges (one
less than required) is the collapse mechanism for this frame with 3 redundancies. (N= n+ 1)= 3+ 1= 4
are required.;
Note: In partial or incomplete collapse, only a part of the structure becomes statically
determinate.
Check moments at locations (1) and (5) with λ = 1.1377 , M2 , M3 , M4 = Mp
substituting is eqn (2).
62.5 λ = −M1 + M2 − M4 + M5 or 62.5 (1.1377) = − M1 + Mp + Mp + M5
− 88.937 = M5 − M1 (4) or M1 − M5 = 88.937 (4)
Putting same values in eqn (3)
343.75 (1.137) = − M1 + 2Mp + 2Mp + M5
= − M1 + M5 + 4 × 80
70.84 = M5 − M1 (5)
Values of M1 and M5 cannot be found from either of equations (4) and (5) as this is incomplete
or partial collapse. Instead of a unique answer on values of M1 and M5 which do not violate yield
criteria, different pairs of possible values of M1 and M5 can be obtained satisfying equations 4 and 5.
Therefore, according to Uniqueness theorem beam mechanism is the true collapse mechanism. It is a
partial collapse case.

8.21. EXAM PL E NO. 5:- Over complete collapse


Determine λc for the following loaded frame.

36 24
3m 3 3m 4
2

63

6m 42 42 Mp

1 5
SOL UTI ON: Sketch possible independent collapse mechanisms. Notice that locations where beam and
column meets, plastic huge is formed in weaker member near the joint.
368 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

36
3
2 4
3 2

(a) Beam mechanism (b) Sway mechanism

6( + )
36
6 5
3 3 +2 )
2 24
+
2 4
3 -2
2

+
1 5 -( + ) +( + )
(c) Combined mechanism (d) Another Combined mechanism
(a + b) (b+c)

1. Beam M echanism: Fig A

(36λ) 3φ = − M2 φ + M3 (2φ) − M4 φ
108 λ = − M2 + 2M3 − M4 (1) All are equal to respective Mp. Putting values.
108 λ = 42 + 2 x 63 + 42
λ = 1.944

2. Sway M echanism Fig B.

(24λ) 6θ = M1 (−θ) + M2 (θ) + M4 (−θ) + M5(θ)


144 λ = − M1 + M2 − M4 + M5 (2)
144 λ = 42 + 42 + 42 + 42 or λ = 1.166

3. Fir st Combined M echanism Fig C

(24 λ) (6φ) + (36λ) (3φ) = M1 (−φ) + M2 (0) + M3 (2φ) + M4 (−2φ) + M5 (φ)


252 λ = − M1 + 2M3 − 2M4 + M5 (3)
294
λ = λ = 1.166
252

4. Second Combined M echanism Fig D

(36 λ)3φ+ 24λ (θ+ φ)6= M1 (−θ −φ)+ M2 (θ)+ M3 (2φ) + M4 (θ + 2φ) + M5 (θ + φ) φ ≅ θ
396 λ = − M1 + M2 + 2M3 − 2M4 + 2M5
396 λ = 2(42) + 42 + 2(63) + 3 x 42 + 2 x 42
PLASTIC ANALYSIS METHOD 369

462
λ = = 1.166
396
λ = 1.166.

Note: In overcomplete collapse, more than one mechanism give the same value of collapse load
factor. Any or both of the collapse mechanisms can contain extra number of plastic hinges than those
required for complete collapse. So in this case fig c and d mechanisms give the same value. This was
the case of over complete collapse.

Space for notes:


THE THREE MOMENT EQUATION 369

CHAPTER NI NE

9. THE THREE M OM ENT EQUATI ON


Most of the time we are concerned with the classical analysis of statically determinate structures.
In this chapter we shall consider the analysis of statically indeterminate (externally) beams due to applied
loads and due to settlement of supports. It must be remembered that supports for beams may be walls or
columns. As we know that for the analysis of statically indeterminate systems, compatibility of
deformations is also essential requirements in addition to considerations of equilibrium and statics. By
compatibility it is understood that deformations produced by applied loads should be equal to those
produced by redundants. It has been already mentioned that reactions occur at supports in various
directions if
(i) There is some action (applied load) in that direction.
(ii) There is restraint offered by support in that directions
Action and reactions are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. In the structural analysis it
is sometimes customery to think that rotations are generally associated with moments and deflections or
translations are associated with loads. It must also be kept in mind that we never analyze actual structural
systems or sub-systems, it is only the idealized ones which are analyzed. Representing beams and
columns by just a straight line located on their centroidal axis is also a sort of idealization on the
structural geometry. Reactions and loads are, therefore, also idealized and are shown by a sort of line
loads acting on a point.
The three-moment equation is a good classical analysis tool in which support moments produced
by the loads as well as by the differential settlements can be easily calculated by using second-moment
area theorem which states that
“ The deviation of a point A on the elastic curve w.r.t any other point B on the elastic curve is
1
equal to multiplied by the moment of area of B.M.D’ s between those two points.” The moments of
EI
B.M.D’ s are taken about a line passing through the point of loaded beam where deviation is being
measured.
The method is essentially based on continuity (equality) of slopes on the either side of a support
by reducing an indeterminate system to its determinate equivalents as follows by using supperposition.

= +

An indeterminate beam under applied loads and redundant moments is equated to corresponding
detemrinate system carrying these two effects separately. Let-us derive the three-moment equation.
Consider a generalized two-span beam element under the action of applied loads and redundant
support moments acting on BDS.
370 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

A/ C/

ha A1 hc

θb B
A C
θb
Fig (a)
C1
Tangent at B

I1 I2

L1 L1

BMD due to A1 A2
Fig (b)
applied loads
on simple spans
a1 a2

Mb

Ma A4 A5 Mc
Generalized
redundant moment A3 A6 Fig ( c)
diagram

L1/3 L2/3
2/3 L1 2/3 L2

Fig(a) is an indeterminate beam subjected to applied load (udl in this case) which has shown
settlement such that support B is at a lower elevation than support at A and C and difference of elevation
w.r.t intermediate support B is ha and hc. The angle θB on either side of support B must be equal. Fig(b)
is B.M.D. due to applied load on simple spans where A 1 is Area of B.M.D. on span L 1 and A 2 is area of
B.M.D. on span L 2. a1 and a2 are the locations of centroids of B.M.D’ s on L 1 and L 2 from left and right
supports respectively. So invoking continuity of slopes and knowing that for small angels θ = tanθ.

AA 1 CC1
=
L1 L2
THE THREE MOMENT EQUATION 371

Evaluate AA 1 by second Moment Area Method. We know that

AA 1 = AA / − A 1A /

= ha − deviation of point A / on the elastic curve from the tangent drawn at


point B on the elastic curve.

1 
+ A 4 × L 1
L1 2
= ha − A 1a1 + A 3 ×
EI 1  3 3 

expressing A 3 and A 4 in terms of moments

1 
× MaL 1 + L 1 × MbL 1
L1 1 2 1
AA 1 = ha − A 1a1+
EI 1  3 2 3 2 

1  MaL 12 MbL 12


= ha − A 1a1 + + divide by L 1
EI 1  6 3 

AA 1 ha 1 A 1a1 MaL 1 MbL 1


= − + + (1)
L1 L 1 EI 1  L 1 6 3 

CC1
Now evaluate on similar lines. We have from geometry
L2

CC1 = C1C/ − CC/


= (deviation of point C/ from tangent at B) − hc

1 
A 2a2 + A 5 × L 2 + A 6 ×  − hc
2 L2
=
EI 2  3 3

expressing A 5 and A 6 in terms of Moments

1 
× MCL 2 − hc
2 1 L2 1
CC1 = A 2a2 + L 2 × MbL 2 +
EI 2  3 2 3 2 

1 
+ MC  − hc divide by L 2
L 22 L 22
= A 2a2 + Mb
EI 2  3 6

CC1 1 A 2a2 Mb L 2 MC L 2 hc
= + + − (2)
L2 EI 2  L 2 3 6  L2

Equating (1) and (2), we have

ha

1 A 1a1 + Ma L 1 + Mb L 1 = 1 A 2a2 + Mb L 2 + Mc L 2 − hc
L 1 EI 1  L1 6 3  EI 2  L 2 3 6  L2
372 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Multiply by 6E and simplify, we have after re-arrangement

Ma 
L 1 L 1 L 2 L 2 6 A 1a1 6 A 2a2 6 Eha 6 Ehc
 I 1  + 2Mb  I 1 + I 2  + Mc  I 2  = − I 1L 1 − I 2L 2 + L 1 + L 2
The above equation is called three-moment equation.

9.1. Analysis of Continuous Beams by thr ee-M oment Equation.


We apply three moment equation to two spans at a time which gives us one equation. With the
successive applications, the required member of equations are obtained and are solved simultaneously.

EXAM PL E: Analyze the continuous beam shown below by three-Moment equation.


Take E = 20 × 106 KN/m2 and I c = 40 × 10-6 m4.

12 KN 32 KN
A B 9.6 KN/m C D
3m
Do
Lo

2m 6m 8m 6m Io =
2Ic 4Ic 2Ic Lo

Fig (a)

2
9.6 x 8 32 x 6
= 76.8 = 48
8 4

BMD
A1 = 0 A2 A3
Fig (b)
4m 3m
409.6 144

SOL UTI ON:


When a fixed support at either end is encountered, an imaginary hinged span of length L o and
Interia I o = ∞ is added to conform to acted support conditons and to make the method applicable in
similar situations.

The same has already been done in Fig(a). Fig (b) is the BMD’ s on simple spans, their Areas
and its locations.
Apply three-moment equation to spans AB and BC at a time. We have

6 × 409.6 × 4
Ma 
6 6 8 8
2Ic + 2Mb 2Ic + 4Ic + Mc 4Ic = − 6 × 0 − 4Ic × 8

Simplify and multiplying by Ic both sides of equation, we get.


3Ma + 10 Mb + 2 Mc = − 307.2 put Ma = − 24 KN-m
10 Mb + 2 Mc = − 235.2 divide by 10
Mb + 0.2 Mc = − 23.52 (1)
THE THREE MOMENT EQUATION 373

Now apply three-moment equation to spans BC and CD


6 × 409.6 × 4 6 × 144 × 3
Mb   + 2 Mc 
8 8 6 6
4Ic 4Ic + 3Ic + MD 3Ic = − 4Ic × 8 − 3Ic × 6
Simplify and multiply by Ic, we have,
2 Mb + 8 Mc + 2 MD = − 307.2−144 = − 451.3 divide by 2
Mb + 4 Mc + MD = − 225.625 (2)
Now apply three-moment equation to spans CD and DDO
6 × 144 × 3
Mc   + 2 MD 
6 6 Lo Lo
3Ic 3Ic + ∞  + Mdo  ∞  = − 3Ic × 6
Simplify and multiply by Ic both sides of equation.
2 Mc + 4 MD = − 144 divide by 2
Mc + 2 MD = − 72 (3)

We have obtained three equations from which three-Unknowns Mb, Mc and MD can be calculated.
Subtract equation (2) from (1)

Mb + 0.2 Mc = − 23.52
Mb + 4 Mc + MD = − 225.625
− 3.8 Mc − MD = 202.105 (4)
Multiply equation (4) by (2) and add in equation (3)
− 7.6 Mc − 2MD = 404.21
Mc + 2 MD = − 72
− 6.6 MC = 332.21

So Mc = − 50.3 KN-m

put Mc in equation (1), we get Mb = − 13.46 KN-m

put Mc in (3), we get MD = − 10.85 KN-m.


Finally
Mb = − 13.46 KN-m
Mc = − 50.3 KN-m
MD = − 10.85 KN-m

Checks:
The above calculated values of moments are correct if they satisfy the continuity of slope
requirements. Slopes at any intermediate support point can be calculated from the two adjacent spans by
using conjugate beam method. While applying checks, it is assumed that reader is well conversant with
the conjugate beam method. Before we could apply checks, it is necessary to plot reactant moment
diagram (support-moments) to get their contribution in slope calculation. Here is the statement of
conjugate beam theorem number one again.
M
“ The shear force at any point on the conjugate beam loaded with diagram is the slope at the
EI
corresponding point in the actual beam carrying applied loads.” In applying the conjugate -beam method,
we must use the original sign convention for shear force as applied in strength of Materials subject. (i.e.,
“ left up, right-down, positive)
374 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

2m 6m 8m 6m

A4 A6 A8

A B C D
O O
A5 13.45 10.85

24
A7 A9
Fig ( c)
BMD divided into convenient shapes.

50.3

Fig(c) is the reactant moment diagram


The areas of positive BMD’ s act as loads in downward direction to which reactions are
upwards. The areas of negative BMD’ s act as loads in upward direction to which support reactions are
downwards. The direction of reaction is accounted for in the signs appropriately.
8(50.3 − 13.45)
A4 = 13.45 × 6 = 80.7 A7 = = 146.2
2
6(24 − 13.45)
A5 = = 31.65 A8 = 10.85 × 6 = 65.1
2
6(50.3 − 10.85)
A6 = 13.45 × 8 = 107.6 A9 = = 118.35
2

Checks. SPAN AB
1 − 80.7 2
− × 31.65
1  A4 2 
S.F at A = θa = − − A5 =
EI  2 3  2EIc  2 3 

30.725
θa = − (There is no check on this value as, it is not a continuous support)
EIc

1 A4 1  1 80.7 31.65


θb = + A5 = +
2EIc  2 3  2EIc  4 3 

25.45
= Clockwise.
EIc

SPAN BC
1 A2 A6 1  1 409.6 107.3 1
θb = − − A7 = − − × 147.5
4EIc  2 2 3  4EIc  2 2 3 

25.46
θb = Clockwise
EIc
THE THREE MOMENT EQUATION 375

1 − A2 A6 2  1 − 409.6 107.3 2
θc = + + A7 = + + × 147.5
4EIc  2 2 3  4EIc  2 2 3 

− 13.18
θc =
EIc

SPAN CD

1 A3 A8 2  1 144 65.1 2


θc = − − A9 = − − × 118.33
3EIc  2 2 3  3EIc  2 2 3 

13.16
θc = −
EIc

1  A3 A8 1  1  144 65.1 118.33


θD = − + + A9 = − + +
3EIc  2 2 3  3EIc  2 2 3 

θD = 0 (Fixed end)

All slope values have been satisfied. This means calculated support moment values are correct.
Now beam is statically determinate we can construct SFD and BMD very easily. We have seen that
numerical values of E and I are required in this case only if one is interested in absolute values of θ.
However, these values are required while attempting a support settlement case. Determine reactions and
plot SFD and BMD.
376 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

12 KN 32 KN
A B 9.6 KN/m C D
3m

2m 6m 8m 6m

13.76 32.031 KN 69.203 5.806

33.79 26.194 KN

1.76
O o

SFD 5.806
12 3.52m

43.009

BMD

13.44 10.856
-24
50.308

EXAM PL E-2: Analyze the continuous beam shown below by three moment equation if support at B
sinks by 12 mm. Take E = 20 × 106 KN/m2; Ic = 40 × 10-6 m4.

A B C D
Do

12mm

6m 8m 6m Lo
2Ic 4Ic 3Ic Io =
/
B

2.0 A3 0.8

A A1
A2 C
O O

A4 A5
Fig (b) -1.6
Reactant moment diagram
A1 to A5 are areas of adjusted BMD.
THE THREE MOMENT EQUATION 377

SOL UTI ON:


As the extreme right support is fixed, an imaginary Hinged span of length Lo and Ic = ∞ has
already been added to make the method applicable and to conform to the support characteristic at D.
Now it is a sort of continuous support. Only analysis due to differential settlement at B is required. Had
there been some applied loads also, those could have been considered at the same time also.
Now EI = 20 × 106 × 40 × 10−6 = 800 KN-m2.
we also know that Ma = 0 and MDO = 0 being extreme hinge supports.

Spans AB and BC

When we consider these spans and compare them with the derivation, we find that situation is
similar so both ha and hc terms are positive and equal to 12 mm using three-moment equation.

6E × 12 × 10-3 6E × 12 × 10−3
Ma 
6
+ 2Mb 
8
+ Mc   =
6 8
+ +
2Ic 2Ic 4Ic 4Ic 6 8

put Ma = 0, simplify and multiply by Ic

2Mb (3+ 2) + Mc (2) = EI C × 12 × 10-3 + 0.75 EI C × 12 × 10-3

put EI = 800

10 Mb + 2 Mc = 9.6 + 7.2 = 16.8 divide by 10


Mb + 0.2 Mc = 1.68 (1)

Spans BC and CD

Comparing these two spans with the derivation, we notice that ha term is equal to − 12mm and
hc term is zero.

6E(− 12 × 10-3)
Ma 
8
+ 2Mc 
6
+ Md   =
8 6
+ + 0
4Ic 4Ic 3Ic 3Ic 8

Simplify and multiply by Ic

2 Mb + 8 Mc + 2 Md = − 7.2 divide by 2
Mb + 4 Mc + Md = − 3.6 (2)

Spans CD and DDO

There is no load and settlement on these two spans so right handside of equation is zero

Mc 
6  6 Lo Lo
3Ic + 2Md 3Ic + ∞  + Mdo  ∞  = 0
378 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Lo
We know that Mdo = 0; = 0

Simplify and multiply by Ic

2 Mc + 4 Md = 0 divide by 2
Mc + 2 Md = 0 (3)

Above three linear simultaneous equations which are solved. Subtract (2) from (1)

Mb + 0.2 Mc = 1.68
Mb + 4 Mc + Md = − 3.6
− 3.8 Mc − Md = 5.26 (4)

Now multiply equation (4) by 2 and add to equation (3)

− 7.6 Mc − 2 Md = 10.56
Mc + 2 Md = 0
− 6.6 Mc = 10.56

Mc = − 1.6 KN-m

Mc
Md = − = + 0.8
2

Mb = 2 KN-m

Plot end moment diagram. Add and subtract equal areas on spans BC and CD and apply
conjugate beam method.

1
A1 = ×6×2= 6
2
1
A2 = ×8×2= 8
2
1
A3 = × 6 × 0.8 = 2.4
2
1
A4 = × 8 × 1.6 = 6.4
2
1
A5 = × 6 × 1.6 = 4.8
2
Compute slopes at supports.

θa = Slope due to settlement (configuration) + due to end moments


12 × 10−3 1 A1 12 × 10−3 1 6
= + = + = 3.25 × 10−3 rad.
6 2EIc  3  6 1600 3
Span AB
THE THREE MOMENT EQUATION 379

12 × 10−3 1  2  12 × 10−6 1  2
θb = + − A1 = + − × 6
6 2EIc  3  6 1600  3 

= -5 × 10−4 rad.

Span BC
12 × 10−3 1 2 12 × 10−3
A2 − A4 = 2 × 8 − 1 × 6.4
1 1
θb = + +
8 4EIc 3 3  8 4 × 800 3 3 

θb = − 5 × 10−4 rad.

12 × 10−3 1  1
− A2 + A4
2
θc = +
8 4EIc  3 3 

θc = − 1 × 10−3 rad.

Span CD
1 1
A3 − A5 = 1 × 2.4 − 2 × 4.8
2 1
θc = 0 +
3EIc 3 3  3 × 800 3 3 

θc = −1 × 10−3 rad.

1  2
− A3 + A5 = 0 + −2 × 2.4 + 1 × 4.8
1 1
θd = 0 +
3EIc  3 3  3 × 800  3 3 

θd = 0 (Fixed end)
Checks on slopes have been satisfied so computed moment values are correct. Now beam is
determinate. SFD and BMD can be plotted.

Resolve same problem, for a differential sinking of 12 mm at support C. we get the following equations.

Mb + 0.2 Mc = − 0.72 (1)


Mb + 4 Mc + Md = 8.4 (2)
Mc + 2 Md = − 4.8 (3)

Solution gives
Mc = + 3.49
Md = − 4.145
Mb = − 1.418

apply continuity checks and plot SFD and BMD.

Unsolved Examples:
Solve the following loaded beams by three-moment equations.
380 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

70 KN
3m
A B C
8m 12m
EI = Constt.

Final equations:
Ma + 0.5 Mb = − 90.312 (1)
Ma + 5 Mb + 1.5 Mc = − 213.12 (2)
Mb + 2 Mc = 0 (3)

End Moment Values:


Mc = 16.41
Mb = − 32.82
Ma = − 73.91
60 KN
6m 72 KN 24 KN
24 KN/m 16 KN/m
4m
A Lo E

B C D

6m 12m 6m
3Ic 10Ic 2Ic 1.5 m

Final Equations:
2 Ma + Mb = − 216 (1)
2 Ma + 6.4 Mb + 1.2 Mc = − 1555.2 (2)
1.2 Mb + 8.4 Mc = − 1495.2 (3)
End moment values:
Ma = − 0.361 KN-m
Mb = − 215.28 Kn-m
Mc = − 147.25 Kn-m

A B C D

15 mm E = 200 x 106 KN/m2


-6 4
Ic = 400 x 10 m

3Ic 10Ic 2Ic

6m 12m 6m

Final Equations:
2 Ma + Mb = − 600 (1)
2 Ma + 6.4 Mb + 1.2 Mc = 1800 (2)
THE THREE MOMENT EQUATION 381

1.2 Mb + 8.4 Mc = − 600 (3)

End moment values:


Ma = − 537.69 KN-m
Mb = 475.38
Mc = − 139.34 KN-m

15 KN 3 KN/m 20 KN
A B C

5m 8m 8m 3m
2I I I 2I

End moment values:


Ma = − 75 KN-m
Mb = 21.75
Mc = − 60 KN-m

12 KN 9.6 KN/m 32 KN
2m A B C 3m D

6m 8m 6m
2I 4Ic 3Ic
Final equations:
10 Mb + 2 Mc = − 235.2 (1)
2 Mb + 8 Mc = − 451.2 (2)

End moment values:


Ma = − 24 KN-m
Mb = − 12.88
Mc = − 53.18
Md = 0

12 KN 9.6 KN/m 32 KN
2m A B C 3m D

6m 8m 6m
2I 4Ic 3Ic
382 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Final equations:
10 Mb + 2 Mc = − 235.2 (1)
2 Mb + 8 Mc + 2 MD = − 451.2 (2)
2 Mc + 4 MD = − 144 (3)

End moment values:


Ma = − 24 KN-m
Mb = − 13.455
Mc = − 50.33
Md = − 10.835

A B C 3m D

4.5 mm

2m 6m 8m 6m
2Ic 4Ic 3Ic

Final equations:
10 Mb + 2 Mc = 6.3 (1)
2 Mb + 8 Mc + 2 Md = − 2.7 (2)
2 Mc + 2 MD = 0 (3)

End moment values:


Ma = 0
Mb = 0.7714
Mc = − 0.707
Md = 0.707

64 KN
A 3 3m B C

9m
EI = Constt.

Final equations:
2 Ma + Mb = − 144 (1)
2 Ma + 10 Mb + 3 Mc = − 288 (2)
Mb + 2 Mc = 0 (3)

End moment values:


THE THREE MOMENT EQUATION 383

Mb = -19.2
Mc = 9.6
Ma = − 62.4

A B C 3m D

3 mm
4.5 mm
E = 200 x 106 KN/m2
-6 4
Ic = 400 x 10 m

6m 8m 6m
2Ic 4Ic 3Ic

Final equations:
Mb + 0.2 Mc = 5.4 (1)
Mb + 4 Mc + MD = − 1.5 (2)
Mc + 2 MD = − 12 (3)

End moment values:


Ma = 0
Mb = 5.45
Mc = − 0.27
MD = − 5.86
INFLUENCE LINES 383

CHAPTER TEN

10. I NFL UENCE L I NES


This is also another very useful technique in classical structural analysis. Influence lines are
plotted for various structural effects like axial forces, reactions, shear forces, moments and thrust etc. As
structural members are designed for maximum effects, ILD’ s help engineer decide the regions to be
loaded with live load to produce a maxima at a given section.
“ An influence line is a graphical representation of variation of a particular structural effect at a
given section for all load positions on its span.”
Two methods, viz, static method and virtual displacement method are used for the construction
of ILD’ s. Mostly it is the later method which is prefered. All structures in general and Railway and
Highway bridges in particular are frequently subjected to various types of moving loads. As influence
lines describe variation at a particular section for all load positions on span, the effects of moving loads
can be calculated very easily. It must be remembered that a system of moving loads moves as a unit. For
Railway bridges standard cooper’ s E-60 and E-72 loadings are used whereas for highway bridges
AASHTO lane loadings and truck loadings or sometimes tank loadings are used. When dealing with
calculations regarding moving loads the problem is how to place the system so as to produce maximum
effects at a given section. Sometimes mathematical criteria are used for the live load purpose and
sometimes simple inspection is made. In each case influence lines help us simplify the things.
10.1. Statical M ethod of Constr ucting I nfluence L ines
In this method, a load may be placed at several positions within span/(s) and a mathematical
expression for a particular structural effects at a section is set-up. By placing limits of X (the distance),
the shape and ordinates of influence lines (called influence co-efficients also) can be determined.
For example consider the cantilever loaded below and let moment at fixed end A be represented
by its influence line.
For a generalized load position as defined by distance X in the diagram, moment at A is.

P
X

A B

l
I.L.D. for Ma
L

Ma = − P (L − X) 0< X < L
Minus sign with P shows a negative moment at A for all load positions (consider sign
convention for moments)
384 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

For X = 0 (load at point B) moment at A is − PL. Influence co-efficient is L at B. If X = L


load is at A so moment at A is zero. Influence co-efficent is zero. In between A and B, moment at A
varies linearly, joining the points, ILD for Ma is obtained. Now even if several loads are placed on the
cantilever, Ma is simply the sum of all loads when multiplied by corresponding ordinates.
If a cantilever supports a ud.l, the above I.L.D for Ma is applicable. Consider a strip of width
dX located at a distance X from free end,

wdX
b
w
A
L-X X
dX

y
L

b b
Ma = ∫ WydX = w ∫ ydX
o o

b
Where ∫ ydX is area of I.L.D between limits zero to b.
o
10.2. I nfluence L ines for beam Reactions:
ILD’ s for reactions in case of simple beams and compound beams (determinate beams resting
over several supports) can be drawn by using the already described procedure. Consider a simple beam
with a single load sitting at any moment of time as shown
From statics it can be shown that

P
X

A B
L

PX P(L - X)
Ra = Rb =
L L
X/L

l
yi I.L.D. for Ra

(L - X)
L
yi l
I.L.D. for Rb

L − X
and Rb = P 
PX
Ra = 0< X < L
L  L 
INFLUENCE LINES 385

When X = 0 (load at B); Ra = 0 and Rb = P (by putting limits in above expressions)


When X = L (load at A); Ra = P and Rb = 0 (by putting limits in above expressions)
Instead of maximum co-efficients equal to P it is costomary to have them equal to 1 so that these
could be evaluated by the product of loads and respective ordinates and these diagrams become valid for
several loads. So algebraically
Ra = ∑ Pi yi
Rb = ∑ Pi yi
10.3. Pr incipal of Vir tual Displacements:
Consider a simple beam under the action of load P as shown. Ra can be found by virtual
displacements by imagining that support at A has been removed and beam is under the action of load P
and Ra. Under the action of Ra, beam is displaced as A / B. The virtual work equation is

/
A
P
X
y
A B
L

Ra

Ra × AA / − Py = 0 (Force × displacement)
Py
So Ra = where y is the displacement due to Ra under P.
AA /
If AA / = 1, Ra = Py A result already obtained.
This procedure of drawing ILDs’ is more useful for the complicated cases.
10.4. Reactions for Compound Beams:
A beam resting over several supports which has been made determinate by the availability of
inserted hinges at suitable points is called a compound beam. The following Rules must be kept in mind
while constructing ILD’ s for such cases.
1. Points of I.L.D corresponding to supports should show zero displacement except where
virtual displacement is given (in case of reactions).
2. Portion of the beam between hinges which are straight before virtual displacements should
remain straight after virtual displacement.
3. If a beam is continuous over two consecutive support and there is a hinge after these two
supports, that portion of beam behaves a unit in case the virtual displacement is given
elsewhere.
4. Portions of beam between pins which is straight before virtual displacement, shall remain
386 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

straight after virtual displacement.


Considering these guidelines given, draw influence lines for reactions for the following beam.

A F B G C H D E

I +
I. L. D for Ra

+ I

I. L. D for Rb

+ I

I. L. D for Rc

+ I
+
I. L. D for Rd

+ I
+
I. L. D for Re

If positive areas of above diagrams are loaded, upward reactions at corresponding support will
occur or vice-versa.
Construct Influence lines for reactions for the following compound beam by virtual
displacements.
INFLUENCE LINES 387

A G B H C I D E J F

I +
I. L. D for Ra

+ I

I. L. D for Rb

+ I

I. L. D for Rc

I +
+
I. L. D for Rd

I +
+
I. L. D for Re

I. L. D for R f

Evaluation of maximum upward and down reaction due to concentrated loads and udl can be
done by using the basic principles described already.
If several moving loads, from right to left direction, approach left hand support of a simple
beam, the left reaction continues to increase and becomes maximum till leading wheel is at the left
support. This corresponding first maxima will decrease immediately if the load falls off and leaves the
span from left upon further advance, reaction at left support will start increasing and will become
maximum again when second wheel is at the left support. So there will be as many maxima as is the
number of loads.
Evaluation of reactions due to live load udl is rather simple as the span portion required to be
loaded for maximum upward and downward support reactions are obvious by the simple inspection. Of
course positive areas if loaded will give maximum upward reactions and vice-versa.
388 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

10.5. I nfluence L ines for Shear For ce:


In structural analysis, normally we develop the methods by considering simple cases and some
generalized conclusions are drawn which can then be applied to more complicated cases. So consider the
following simple beam wherein a moving load (right to left) occupies the position shown at any instant of
time.
Using left-up and write-down as sign convention for positive shear force.

P
X
C
A B

a b

Ra Rb

For all load positions to right of point C, the shear force for at C (Vc) is equal to + Ra.
Vc = Ra
It means that for load position between point B and C, the Shape of ILD for SF at C will be the
same as the shape of ILD for + Ra.
For all load positions to left of point C, the shear force at C (Vc) is equal to − Rb.
Vc = − Rb
It means that for load position between point A and C, the shape of ILD for SF at C will the
same as shape of ILD for −Rb. Knowing that positive ILD is drawn above the reference line and negative
ILD is drawn below the reference line, we obtain the ILD for Vc as shown below with the help of ILD’ s
for reactions (+ Ra1 − Rb)

P
X
C
A B

a b
L
Ra Rb

I. L. D. for + Ra
l b/L + I. L. D. for Vc

a/L l

I. L. D. for - Rb
INFLUENCE LINES 389

Mathematically
PX
Ra = 0< X < L
L
(L − X)
Rb = P 0< X < L
L
Pb b
At X= 0, load is at B and Vc is zero. At x= b, load is at C and Vc = + Ra = or if P= 1.
L L
a b
The ordinates and can be obtained by using similar triangles. Now inspect the ILD for Vc.
L L
For a right to left advance of load system, Vc keeps on increasing till the “ leading load is at the
section” , when leading load just crosses the section, Vc drops by the magnitude of load and this process
continues. So we can write that for maximum SF at a section, “ the load should be at that section” . This
is the first criterion of calculation of Vmax. Now the question comes to mind that which load among the
moving load system should be placed at the section? To address this question, we have noted, that change
in SF at a section, ∆V, is equal to change in Ra (∆Ra) minus the load leaving the Section. (Pn)
So, ∆V = ∆Ra − Pn
If W is sum of all the loads on the span L before advance of a, it can be shown that
Wa
∆Ra =
L
Wa
So, ∆V = − Pn
L
Any load which reverses this expression, should be brought back and placed at that section to
realize the maximum SF at that section. So a change in the sign of above expression can be regarded as
the second criterion for maximum shear force at a section.
It can also be shown that loads entering or leaving the span as a result of any particular advance
do not affect the above expression very significantly.
The above method is called the statical method. The same shape of ILD for Vc can be obtained
by virtual displacement method also.

C
A B
a b
V V

Ra L Rb

b/L + I. L. D. for Vc

a/L
390 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Now imagine that resistance to vertical displacement at C has been destroyed (imagine a sort of
cut at the section) and the vertical shear force as shown (opposite to sign convention for positive shear
force). The area enclosed between the original position before virtual displacement and the deformed
position after virtual displacement is the ILD for Vc.
10.6. I nfluence L ine Diagr ams for Bending M oment:
Again we consider the simple beam under the action of a simple moving load as shown. Let it be
required to construct ILD for Mc.
P
X
C
A B

a b
L
Ra Rb

xb
Rb
fo r
ILD
b

ILD for R
axa
a
+ ab/L
I. L. D. for Mc

If the load is between points B and C.


PX
Mc = Ra × a = ×a 0< X < b
L
at X = 0; load at B, Mc = 0.
If X = b;
Pab  ab
Mc = = if P = 1
L  L 

It means that for portion BC, the shape of ILD for Mc is the same as the shape of ILD for Ra
multiplied by distance a.
If the load is between points A and C
P(L − X)
Mc = Rb × b = ×b b< X < L
L
At X = b, load is at C; , Mc = Rb × b
Pab  ab
So Mc = = if P = 1
L  L 
INFLUENCE LINES 391

It means that for portion AC, the shape of ILD for Mc is the same as the shape of ILD for Rb
multiplied by b.
At X = L;
Load at A; Mc = 0
The same shape of ILD for Mc can be obtained by virtual displacements also.

P
X
C
A B

a b
Ra Rb

b
M M

a
y I. L. D. for Mc

M M

dx

Idealized section at C Section at C after virtual


before virtual displacements displacement

The virtual work equation is


work done by loads = work done by the moments.
P × y = M × δθ.
Py
Or M =
δθ

So, if δθ = 1; the moment at Section C for a single load system will be load multiplied by
corresponding influence ordinate (influence co-efficient) while constructing ILD’ s by virtual
displacements, loads are not considered. Now construct ILD for Mc by virtual displacements.
At Section C, we imagine that the beam resistance to moments which produce rotations has been
destroyed while resistance to shear and axial loads is intact. This situation is obtained by considering that
at Section C; there is a sort of hinge (one degree of freedom system). On this hinge the moments are
392 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

applied on two sides of hinge as shown alone. The segments of beam rotate and the displaced beam
position is ILD for Mc.
The one-degree of freedom system such as a hinge is further explained in diagrams shown which
illustrate the movement. This procedure can now be applied to more complicated cases where statical
approach may be laborious.

The method of virtual displacements can be applied to more complicated cases like compound
beams etc., by considering the basic ideas established in this chapter.

1 2 3
A E B C F D

1 2 3

ILD for M1 - 1 +

ILD for M2 - 2 + +

ILD for M3 - 3 +

10.7. Evaluation of M max at a Section

In case of a simple beam supporting a moving load system, the maximum moment at a section is
obtained when
1. One of the loads is at the section.

2. In case of several moving loads, that load shall be placed at the Section, for producing
maximum moment at that Section, which reverses the average loading on two portions of
span adjacent to Section.
INFLUENCE LINES 393

sum of all loads on that portion


Average loading on any portion =
length of portion

10.8. Absolute M aximum bending M oment


In case of a series of moving loads traverse on a beam, the absolute maximum bending moment
occurs near the mid span under the adjusted position of that load which gave us maximum bending
moment at mid span. Procedure is as follows:
1. Apply the criteria of maximum bending moment at mind span to find the load which is to
be placed at mid span.

2. For this position of loads find the position of resultant of all loads on span.

3. Move the system slightly so that mid-span is bisected by the resultant of all loads on span
and the load which gives us maximum bending moment at mid-span.

4. Find absolute maximum bending moment. It will occur under displaced position of that
load which gave us maximum bending moment at mid-span.

Considering that invariably loads would be magnified for design purpose and appreciating that
the numerical difference between the values of maximum mid-span bending moment and absolute
maximum bending moment is insignificant, evaluation of absolute maximum bending moment for a given
moving load system appears to be of theoretical interest only. How interested students can evaluate it for
only moving load system by considering the above four points and guidelines contained in this chapter.
10.9. Gir der s with Floor beams (Panelled gir der s)
Normally in bridge construction, moving loads are hardly applied to the main girders directly
but instead following arrangement is used for the load transfer.

The moving load system comes on the stringers which transfer it to the main girder through
floor beams in form of concentrated loads (Reactions of floor beams). So main girder is subjected to
concentrated loads only. For large spans the main girder may be of steel, poured in-situ reinforced
concrete or pre-stressed concrete. Points a, b, c, …. F are called panel points and the distance between
any two panel points is called a panel.
With the above mentioned load-transfer mechanisms, it can be easily seen that ILD’ s for main
reactions remain same as that for a simple beam as discussed already.
394 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

As there will be no load on the main girder except floor beam reactions, it is stated that for a
given load position, the shear force within a panel remains constant so we can talk of shear force in
panels rather that shear force at a section (panel and becomes a section). Let us now construct ILD’ s
for shear force for various panels of girder already shown.
INFLUENCE LINES 395

4/5 ILD for + Ra

(+)

ILD for Vab

(-)
I ILD for Vef
ILD for + Ra
ILD for - Rb

0.4

(+)
ILD for Vcd

(-)

I
0.4

ILD for - Rb

d x 4d b
bx
5d for R
IL D

ILD fo
r Ra x
a
b
3a/5
b/5
a

yb + yc ILD for Mmn

6 2d x 3d
d =
5 5d

ILD for Mc

A five panels main girder is shown for which various ILD’ s have been sketched.
396 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

10.10. I L D For Vab (I L D for shear in end panel)


If a load P is placed at a distance X from panel point b, then reactions at panel points a and b
PX P(d − X)
will be and respectively.
d d
Px
Pa = Panel point load at a or reaction of floor beam at a = , 0< X < d
d
P(d − X)
Pb = Panel poiint load at b or reaction of floor beam at b = 0 < X < d.
d
if X = 0, load P will be at b, then Pa = 0 and Pb = P
if X = d, load P will be at a, then Pa = P and Pb = 0 So, V ab ≡ 0
In between a and b, shear force varies linearly.
Now inspect the shape of ILD for V ab, it resembles with the shape of ILD for moment at point b
considering the panelled girder as a simple beam. So to evaluate (V ab)max, criteria of max bending
moment at a section b (reversal of average loading expression) will be applied.
10.11. I L D for V ef (I L D for shear in other end panel)
The construction of ILD for V ef is same as that for V ab and same arguments apply. Inspecting
this diagram, it is clear that the shape resembles with ILD for bending moment at e if panelled girder
was treated as a simple beam. So to evaluate (V ef)max, the criteria for maximum bending at point e shall
be applied.
10.12. I L D for V ed (I L D for shear in inter mediate panel)
Considering the load P on panel cd acting at a distance X from panel point d.
P(d − X)
Pd = Panel point load at d or floor-beam reaction at d = , 0 < X < d.
d
P(X)
Pc = Panel point load at c or floor-beam reaction at c = , 0 < X < d.
d
If load is to right of d; V cd = + Ra So, ILD for V cd for this region will be the same as that for
Ra. If load is to left of C, V cd = − Rb. So for this region shape of ILD for V cd will be the same as the
shape of ILD for − Rb. Now third possibility is load actinig on span CD itself as shown.
Inspecting the expressions for panel point loads at d and c stated above, we observe that the
shear Vcd within the panel varies linearly. So joining the ordinates under points C and D by a straight
line will complete ILD for V cd.
10.13. Evaluation of (V cd)max (M aximum shear for ce in inter mediate panel)
If a moving load is advanced at point d in a direction from right to left, considering W/ is
resultant of all loads on span CD, the following criteria can be easily developed as a consequence of
variation of shear force is panel CD due to an advance.
W W/
>
L d
Any load which reverses the above criteria shall give (V cd)max.
INFLUENCE LINES 397

10.14. I L D for M mn
Section mn is located within panel bc. Same technique can be applied for constructing ILD for
M mn. If load P is to right of panel point C.
M mn = Ra × a.

It means that if load is between points c and f, the shape of ILD for M mn will be the same as
shape of ILD for Ra multiplied by a. If load P is to left of panel point b, then.
M mn = Rb × b.

It means that if load is between points a and b, then shape of ILD for M mn will be the same as
shape of ILD for Rb multiplied by b. Now consider load within panel bc with P acting at a distance
X from c.

PX P(d − X)
Pb = and Pc = 0 < X < d.
d d

PX P(d − X)
then M mn = Pb yb + Pc yc = yb + yc 0 < X < d.
d d

So between the panel, the moment varies linearly. Therefore joing the ordinates of ILD for M mn
at b and c by a straight line, we complete the ILD for M mn.

Now it is understood that SF is generally maximum near the support while moment is generally
maximum near the mid-span. So ILD for M mn can also be used to evaluate corresponding maxima. If
criteria of maximum bending moment is applied at a section corresponding to bigger ordinate, then
(M mn)max can be calculated for a moving load system.

10.15. I L D for M c
At the panel points, the load is directly transmitted to the main girder and the panel girder
behaves as a simple beam at the panel points. So ILD for Mc will be drawn considering the girder as a
simple beam.

10.16. I nfluence L ines for axial for ces in Tr uss M ember s:


As before, let us consider a simple case of parallel chord truss carrying loads at its lower chord.
The conclusions obtained are general and can be extended to non-parallel chord trusses.
398 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

1 D

4
2
θ
θ
h

3
A
G C F E B

(-)

(+)

(+)

(-)

(+)

I L D for S1
When a moving load system traverses the bottom chord of this trussed bridge, it is known that
forces in top chord members will be compressive in nature while that in bottom chord will be tensile in
nature. The forces in chord members are a function of moment divided by truss height. For a chord
member take “ moment at the point where other two members completing the same triangle meet divided
by height of truss.” This has already been established in this book when discussing method of moments
and shears. So applying this S1 is a compressive force, so assigned a negative sign, equal to moment at C
divided by the height of truss. So considering the truss as a simple beam, draw an ILD for Mc and divide
it by the height of Truss. (S1)max can be evalutated by applying the criteria of maximum bending moment
(Average loadings) at point C considering the truss as a simple beam.
INFLUENCE LINES 399

I L D for S3
It is a tensile force equal to moment at D divided by height of Truss. (S3)max can be evalauted by
applying the criteria of maximum bending moment at point D.
I L D for S2
±V
It is known that axial force in an inclined member is . Minus before Cosθ shall be taken
± Cosθ
if the angle “ between inclined member and vertical” is counterclockwise. Now if the load is right of D,
SF applicable to member 2 is + Ra. So corresponding portion of ILD for + Ra is taken. This is divided
by − Cosθ. If the load is to left of C, SF applicable to member 2 is − Rb. So corresponding portion of
ILD for − Rb is taken. This is again divided by − Cosθ. In between the panel SF varies linearly so we
can join the corresponding points.
The shape of ILD for S2 resembles with the shape of ILD for intermediate panel shear in a
panelled girder. So (S2)max can be evaluated by applying the criteria of maximum intermediate panel
shear.
I L D for S4
If the load is at E or right of E, Force in member 4 is zero and if load is at or to left of point C,
again the force in member 4 is zero. If the load is at F, the same will be the tensile force in member.
Using these boundary conditions, ILD for S4 is constructed. Now inspect its shape. It resembles with the
shape of ILD for moment at F (or D) in an equivalent simple beam of span CE. So (S4)max can be
evaluated by applying the criteria of maximum bending moment (average loading criteria) at F (or D).
10.17. I nfluence lines for moment and hor izontal thr ust in a thr ee hinged ar ch.
µc
We know that H = and
yc
Mx = µx − Hy.
Where y will be the rise of arch at a distance X from origin (usually a support).
400 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

y yc

A x B
H H

L
L
Va 4yc Vb

(+)

ILD for H

x(L - x) Ly
L 4yc

(-)
(+) Shaded area

(+)

ILD for Mx

Influence line for any structural effect can be drawn by following the formula for that structural
effect.
10.17.1. I L D for hor izontal thr ust H
Horizontal thrust H is developed at the springings (supports) of an arch. Examine the formula
µc
for H H = . So ILD for H will be obtained if ILD for moment at centre is drawn, considering the
 yc
L
arch to be a simple bam, and is then divided by yc. The peak ordinate of ILD for H will be . (H)max
µyc
due to a moving load system can be obtained by applynig the criteria of maximum bending moment at the
centre.
10.17.2. I L D for M oment in the ar ch
From the Eddy’ s theorem we know that bending moment in the arch at a distance x from
support is
M x = µx − Hy
where µx = simple span bending moment at a distance X.
INFLUENCE LINES 401

So as a first step, we construct ILD for simple span bending moment at a distance X. Then we
subtract the ILD for Hy. The net area between these two diagrams is the ILD for moment in the arch as
shown.
10.18. Standar d L eadings
For the design of Railway bridges standard Cooper’ s E-60 and E-72 loadings consisting of two
locomotives each weighing 213 tons on 18 axles each followed by infinite udl representing compartments
is considered. Structural affects obtained for a E loading can be used to get the same for another E
loading by simply multiplying them with the ratio of E loadings.
Original E-60 or E-72 loadings are in kip-ft. system as follows:

3/ft
15 30 30 30 30 4 of 19.5 15 4 of 30 4 of 19.5
↓ 8/ ↓ 5/ ↓ 5/ ↓ 5/ ↓ 9/ ↓ 5 ↓ 6 ↓ 5 ↓ 8/ ↓ 8/ ↓ 5/ ↓ 5/ ↓ 5/ ↓ 9/ ↓ 5/ ↓ 6/ ↓ 5/ ↓ 5/
Above wheel loads are in kips per rail or tonnes per track. (1 Ton = 2 Kips ; small ton)
Converting E-72 loading in SI Units we have IK = 5 KN approximately.
80 KN 4 of 160 KN 4 of 104 KN 80
↓ 2.44 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 2.74 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.83 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 2.44 ↓ 2.44

4 of 104 KN 4 of 104 KN 53 KN/m


↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 2.42 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.83 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.52

Cooper’ s E-72 loading in SI-units is shown above and E-60 below:


66.75 4 of 133.5 KN 4 of 86.77 KN 66.75
↓ 2.44 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 2.74 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.83 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 2.44 ↓ 2.44

4 of 133.5 KN 4 of 86.77 KN 43.8 KN/m


↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 2.74 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.83 ↓ 1.52 ↓ 1.52
Distance between loads is in meters.
For highway bridges AASHTO HS24-44 loading is internationally considered and it consists of
a Tractor and Semi-trailer with three axles carrying 0.2W, 0.4W and 0.4W respectively. These loads
when converted into kips are 16k, 32k and 32k. Standard AASHTO lane loading is probably 100 lbs/ft2.
However, in our country, due to circumstances 70 ton tank loading or Truck-train loading
described in Pakistan Highway code can be used.
We shall use railway loadings only. Let us solve some typical problems now.
Example No.1: In a girder with Floor beams having five equal panels of length 9 meters each.
Determine (a) Maximum positive and negative end panel shears. (b) Maximum Shear in the first
intermediate panel from left hand end. The live load is Coopers E-72 loading.
402 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

0.80

(+)

ILD for Vab

ILD for Vef

(-)

0.6 0.80

(+)

ILD for Vbc


(-)

0.2

SOL UTI ON: 1. Maximum positive End Panel Shears (V ab)max


W/ W
Advance loads at section B and use criteria <
d L
Portion ab Portion bf
80 2498.87
< after 1st advance.
9 45
240 2338.87
< after 2nd advance
9 45
400 2178.87
< after 3rd advance
9 45
560 2018.87
> after 4th advance.
9 45
It means that once 3rd load of 160 KN crosses point b, the criterion is reversed so for maximum
end panel shear, 3rd load of 160 KN should be placed at point b. Now place the system of loads
accordingly and compute corresponding ordinates.
INFLUENCE LINES 403

4 of 160 4 of 104 4 of 160 4 of 104


80 80

3.52 2.44 1.52 1.52 1.52 2.74 1.52 1.83 1.52 2.44 2.44 1.52 1.52 1.52 2.44 1.52 1.83 1.52 1.52

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 8.6 m

0.8

y4

y1 ILD for Vab


y19

Or dinates Under L oads:


y1 = 0.3128 y2 = 0.5297 y3 = 0.6648

y4 = 0.80 y5 = 0.766 y6 = 0.7053

y7 = 0.6715 y8 = 0.6308 y9 = 0.597

y10 = 0.5428 y11 = 0.488 y12 = 0.4548

y13 = 0.421 y14 = 0.387 y15 = 0.333

y16 = 0.299 y17 = 0.2586 y18 = 0.2248

y19 = 0.191

(Vab)max = 80 × 0.3128 + 160 (0.5297 + 0.6648 + 0.8 + 0.766)


+ 104 (0.7053 + 0.6715 + 0.6308 + 0.597)
+ 80 × 0.5428 + 160 (0.488 + 0.4548 + 0.421 + 0.387)
1
+ 104 (0.333 + 0.299 + 0.2586 + 0.2248) + × 8.6 × 0.191 × 53
2
= 25.024 + 441.68 + 271.62 + 43.42 + 280.128 + 116 + 43.52
= 1221.4 KN.
Similarly (Vef)max = -1145 KN (Do the Process yourself)
We have to observe a similar Process for evaluation of (Vef)max as was used for (Vab)max. The
loads will be advanced at point e and average loadings on portions ae and ef will be compared. The
404 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

load which produces reversal after advance should be brought back and placed at section e for (Vef)max.
Evaluation of (Vbc)max
4 of 160 4 of 104 4 of 160 4 of 104
80KN 80

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

0.6

y14
y4 y5
c
+
d y18
a b y1 e
f
(-)
ILD for Vbc 0.82m
I.L.D for Vbc
0.2
2.25 6.75m

Once loads are advanced from right to left at C, the following criteria shall be used to evaluate
maximum intermediate panel shear (Vbc)max
W W/
>
L d
Portion bc portion cf
80 2064
< after 1st advance.
9 45
240 2168
< after 2nd advance
9 45
400 2272
< after 3rd advance
9 45
560 2315.46
> after 4th advance.
9 45
So maximum positive SF in panel bc will be obtained when 3rd wheel of 160 KN is placed at
point c. Now place loads as shown above and determine corresponding ordinates of ILD. Multiply loads
and ordinates by giving due care to signs of ILD, we obtain (Vbc)max.
Now from similar triangles, influence co-efficients y1,...... y18 are:
y1 = 0.113 y2 = 0.33 y3 = 0.465
y4 = 0.6 y5 = 0.566 y6 = 0.505
y7 = 0.472 y8 = 0.431 y9 = 0.397
y10 = 0.343 y11 = 0.289 y12 = 0.255
y13 = 0.221 y14 = 0.187 y15 = 0.126
INFLUENCE LINES 405

y16 = 0.093 y17 = 0.052 y18 = 0.018


So, (Vbc)max = 80 × 0.113 + 160 (0.33 + 465 + 0.6 + 0.566)

+ 104 (0.505 + 0.472 + 0.431 + 0.397) + 80 × 0.343

+ 160 (0.289 + 0.255 + 0.221 + 0.187)

+ 104 (0.126 + 0.093 + 0.052 + 0.018)

(Vbc)max = 720.34 KN

EXAM PL E NO.2: Determine the maximum bending moment at a cross-section 9.1m from left hand for
a beam of span 27.3m. The moving live load is 117 KN/m having a length of 6m.

SOL UTI ON:

Sketch ILD for moment at the indicated section.

Now let us assume that the given position of Udl gives us(Mc)max at a distance X from C as
shown. Determine Ra for this position

∑Mb = 0

Ra × 27.3 = 702 (3 + 12.2 + X)


406 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Ra = 390.84 + 25.71 X

117 X 2
Moment at C = Mc = Ra × 9.1 −
2

117 X 2
Mc = (390.84 + 25.71) 9.1 −
2

Simplify

Mc = 3556.64 + 233.96 X − 58.5 X 2

If BM at C is maximum, then

d Mc
= Vc = 0
dX

233.96 X − 2 × 58.5 X = 0

X = 2m

Now compute y1 and y2 from similar triangles of ILD

18.2 y1
= → y1 = 4.733 m
27.3 7.1

9.1 y2
= → y2 = 4.733 m
27.3 14.2

So (Mc)max = ud.l × area of ILD Under UDL

1
= 117 (6 × 4.733 + × 6 × 1.327)
2

= 3788.3 KN-m
INFLUENCE LINES 407

EXAM PL E NO. 3:
Calculate maximum bending moment at Section mn and pq of a five panel bridge. Each panel is
of 9m.
Five loads of 160 KN each spaced at 1.52m travel from right to left.

160 160 160 160 160

1.52 1.52 1.52 1,52

8.1

6.3
y1 y4
y2 y3

ILD for Mmn

5 of 160

9 9

ILD for Mpq

Evaluation of (M mn)max
It is recommended that criteria of maximum bending moment be applied at maximum ordinate of
8.1 corresponding to Panel point C. Now comparing average loadings on portion ac and cf, we find that
3rd load reverses the criterion as it crosses. So it must be placed at point C. Determine ordinates
408 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

8.1 y3
= → y3 = 7.644, y4 = 7.188, y1 = 6.3 + 1.496 = 7.796
27 25.48
y2 = 6.3 + 1.192 = 7.492
(M mn)max = 160 (7.492 + 7.796 + 8.1 + 7.644 + 7.188) = 38.22 × 160
= 6115.2 KN-m
The reader is also suggested to calculate (Mmn)max. by coinciding the resultant of moving load
system with the maximum ordinate. Place the loads accordingly. Compute influence co-efficients and
multiply loads with respective ordinates to compute (Mmn)max. Compare this value with the previous one.
(M pq)max
As ILD for Mpq is symmetrical about centre-line (mid span), Arrange the loads such that the
resultant falls on mid-span. All five loads shall be accommodated and will have an ordinate of 9.
(M pq)max = 160 (9 + 9 + 9 + 9 + 9) = 7200 KN-m
I mpor tant:
The instructor is advised to work with lesser number of loads, usually five to seven, in the class
and Establish the procedure. The students can then be given assignments involvinig standard trains etc.,
for clarification of their concepts.
EXAM PL E NO. 4:
A simple beam has a clear span of 27.5 m. Construct ILD for SF at a section 6.1m from left
support. How should Coopers-E-60 loading be placed to calculate maximum shear force at this section?
SOL UTI ON:
Draw ILD for Vc. Advance the loads at section C. We shall show the load position required for
(Vc)max only.

4 of 133.5 4 of 86.77 3 of 133.5 1.28 m


66.75 66.75

A C B

6.1 m 21.4 m
0.778
y9
y12
y2 ( + )

y1
(-) ILD for Vc

0.222

Computing influence co-efficients y1......y12 from similar triangles.


INFLUENCE LINES 409

y1 = − 0.133, y2 = 0.722, y3 = 0.667,

y4 = 0.612, y5 = 0.512 y6 = 0.4566,

y7 = 0.3901, y8 = 0.335, y9 = 0.246,

y10 = 0.157 y11 = 0.10, y12 = 0.0466

In order to have (Vc)max, at least one load should be at C. To decide which load should be placed
at C, reversal in the sign of following equation is sought.

Wa
∆V = − Pn
L

W = Sum of all the loads on span before advance.

a = any particular Advance

L = Span

Pn = magnitude of Load crossing the section due to an advance.

____
For the first advance

1281.58 × 2.44
∆V = − 66.75 = + 46.96 KN.
27.5

It shows that SF at C has increased due to 1st advance.

____
For second advance.

1415 × 1.524
∆V = − 133.5 = − 55.08 KN.
27.5

It shows that if second advance at C is made, Vc decreases. So for (Vc)max, position


before 2nd advance (after 1st advance) is required. For this position above influence co-efficients have
been computed.

(Vc)max = 66.75 (− 0.133) + 133.5 (0.778 + 0.722 + 0.667 + 0.612)

+ 86.77 (0.512 + 0.4566 + 0.3901 + 0.335)

+ 66.75 (0.246) + 133.5 (0.157 + 0.1 + 0.046)

= 567.37 KN

EXAM PL E NO. 5:- Calculate the maximum bending moment at the points C and D if five loads of
410 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

160 KN each spaced at 1.52 m cross-the bean from right to left.

5 of 160 KN

1.52 1.52 1.52 1.52 1.52


A C D B

7m 7m 14 m

5.25

(+)
y1 y2 y3 y4 y5

ILD for Mc

(+)
y1 y2 y3 y4 y5

ILD for Md

M CM ax
Line-up all loads upto point C (theoretically slightly to right of C). Give advances at point C and
compare average loading in portion AC and BC due to various advances.
Portion Ac Portion Bc
160 4 × 160
< after 1st advance.
7 21
2 × 160 3 × 160
> after 2nd advance.
7 21
So, as the second load of 160 KN crosses ponit C, reversal is obtained. So for (Mc)max, this load
INFLUENCE LINES 411

should be brought back and placed at C (position before 2nd advance or after 1st advance). Compute
influence co-efficients.

y1 = 4.11, y2 = 5.25, y3 = 4.87

y4 = 4.49, y5 = 4.11

(Mc)max = 160 (4.11 + 5.25 + 4.87 + 4.49 + 4.11) = 3652.8 KN-m

(M d)max

This section is mid span of beam. Clearly applying the criteria of maximum bending moment at
D (comparing Average loadings on AB and BD), we get

Span AD Span BD

160 4 × 160
< after 1st advance
14 14

2 × 160 3 × 160
< after 2nd advance
14 14

3 × 160 2 × 160
> after 3rd advance.
14 14

So position before 3rd advance (or after 2nd advance) will give us (Md)max. Place the loads
accordingly and compute influence co-efficients.

y1 = y5 = 5.48 y2 = y4 = 6.24 y3 = 7

So, (Md)max = 160 (5.48 + 6.24 + 7 + 6.24 + 5.48)

= 4870.4 KN-m

EXAM PL E NO.6:

Calculate maximum axial forces induced in members 1, 2, 3 and 4 of truss already shown if five
loads of 150 KN each spaced at 1.52m corsses at the bottom chord from right to left. Take h = 2m and
span = 5d = 10 meters.
412 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

SOL UTI ON:


The corresponding ILD’ s for S1.....S4 have already been plotted. Now we will use those
diagrams to calculate maxima. See the Truss of article 9.16.

5 of 160 KN

1.52 1.52 1.52 1.52

5 of 160 KN

1.52 1.52 1.52 1.52

(+)

1m (+)

1m
(-)

160
+0.565

1.52 1.53

y1 (+) y3
INFLUENCE LINES 413

S1max.
The shape of ILD for S1 resembles with the shape of ILD for Mc in an equivalent simple beam.
So giving advances at C (now forget the truss and play with ILD’ s only). Apply the criterion for
maximum moment at C.
Portion Ac Portion Bc
160 4 × 160
< after 1st advance.
4 6
2 × 160 3 × 160
= after 2nd advance.
4 6
Considering equality as a reversal, S1max will be obtained for position before second advance (or
after 1st advance). Place loads accordingly and compute influence co-efficients.
y1 = .744, y2 = 1.2 y3 = 0.896
y4 = 0.592 y5 = 0.288
So, S1max = 160 (0.744 + 1.2 + 0.896 + 0.592 + 0.288)
= − 595.2 KN (It is a compressive force)
S3max
Inspect the shape of ILD for S3. It resembles with the shape of ILD for moment at D
considering the truss to be a simple beam. So apply the criterion of maximum moment at D.
Portion AD Portion BD
160 3 × 160
< (last load not on span) after 1st advance.
6 4
2 × 160 3 × 160
< After 2nd advance.
6 4
3 × 160 2 × 160
= After 3rd Advance.
6 4
So for S3max, position before 3rd advance is valid (After second advance). Place the loads
accordingly and compute influence co-efficients.
y1 = 0.592, y2 = 0.893, y3 = 1.2,
y4 = 0.744, y5 = 0.288
(S3)max = 160 (0.592 + 0.893 + 1.2 + 0.744 + 0.288)
= 594.72 KN (It is a tensile force).
S2max
Inspect the shape of ILD for S2. It resembles with the shape of ILD for as shear force in a
intermediate panel of a panelled girder. So for evaluating S2max, we apply the criterion of maximum
intermediate panel shear. Advance is made at D or F.
W/ W
<
d L
160 5 × 160
= after 1st advance.
2 10
So for S2max, the leading load should be placed at maximum ordinate, only three loads will be
414 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

acting on portion BD.


y1 = − 0.565 y2 = − 0.3503 y3 = − 0.1356
(S2)max = 160 (− 0.565 − 0.3503 − 0.1356)
= − 168.144 KN (It is a compressive force)
S1max
y1 = y3 = 0.24 y1 = 1
S1max = 160 (0.24 + 1 + 0.24)
= 236.8 KN (It is a tensile force)
10.19. I nfluence L ines for Statically I ndeter minate Str uctur es:
The same procedure can be adopted for constructing ILDs’ for indeterminate structures.
However, compatibility and redundants have to be considered as demonstrated earlier.
INFLUENCE LINE DIAGRAM FOR INDETERMINATE BEAMS (By method of virtual displacement)
I nfluence line diagr am for Shear .
In virtual work for shear the B.M. does not do any work only shear force does the work.
Case 1: Let us investigate ILD at a section of a simple beam. The section is at a distance a from A and
at b from B support. This has already been done.
INFLUENCE LINES 415

v P = 1.0
a
A B
c c b

//
C

b 2*
*
2

1 * c

a *
1
Ra Rb
/
C

C// This is ordinate of ILD under load A

b/L
y
* = 1/L
c
RA RB
a/L
* = 1/L /
C

By Vir tual Wor k:


Both the lines are parallel therefore, its work done by Moment is equal to zero.
θ* 1 = θ* 2 = θ
Va θ* + Vb θ*
Vir tual Wor k:
(Vir tual displacement)
(i) total displacement equal to 1 unit.
aθ* + bθ* = 1
(ii) total B.M. equal to zero.
V(aθ* + bθ* ) − Mθ* + Mθ* − Py* = 0 put aθ + bθ = 1
V(1 ) − Py = 0
* *

If we take P = 1
V = y*
1
Or θ =
L
Case 2: I.L.D for bending moment at the same section. Write work equation and equate to zero.
Mθ* 1 + Mθ* 2 − Va θ* 1 + Vb θ* 2 − Py* = 0
416 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

or M (θ* 1 + θ* 2) − 0 − Py* = 0
Py
M (θ* ) = Py* or M = . If P = 1 and θ = 1 radian.
θ
than M = y*
So aθ* 1 = bθ* 2 Or θ* 1 + θ* 2 = 1
a * b
⇒ θ* 1 + θ1 = 1 ⇒ θ* 1 =
b L
a
θ* 2 =
L

V
P=1

RA M RB
b

C// * = 1 rad
/
C
a

yw
y
w
2* = a/L
* = b/L
1
A B
C C
a 1* = b 2*

b/L a/L

RA RB

We have obtained I L D for B.M at X in a simple beam


Let us now consider the shown conjugate beam.
INFLUENCE LINES 417

2m 4m

1.0 = P
A C D B

Ra 6m Rc 6m Rb

4m 6m

Applying same concepts we get following ILD

0.6 0/10
0/10 0/10 2/40 B

C
0.4

2/10
D
418 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Consider a propped cantilever


P=1
MB
X (L - X)

A B

RA RB

If support at A is removed,
this will be deflected shape.

aL

1/3 (L - x)

L-x B.M.D due to load on


BDS as cantilever
supported at B.

Applying moment area thereon, deflection at part A due to loads is

∆XL =
1 P (l − X)2 l − 1 (l − X)
EI 2  3 

fXX
Now consider load under
redundant Ra = 1
(deflected shape) of BDS
Ra = 1

L B.M.D. for Ra = 1
(+) 2
L /2

L/3

Applying moment area thereon, deflection at A due to Ra = 1

fXX = EI 2 (l )2  3  = 3EI
1 1 2l l3
  
Equation for compatibility
∆al − fXX Ra = 0 because A is a support. Net deflection should be zero.
INFLUENCE LINES 419

Sal P(l − X)2 (2l + X)


Ra = , Ra = after putting values of Sal and fxx
fxx 2l 3

Rb = 1 − Ra (equilibrium requirement)

X(3l 2 − X 2)
So we get Rb =
2l 3

We know
Mb = Ra × L − P (l − x) . Put value of Ra and simplify

PX(l 2 − X 2)
Mb = This expression will help in plotted ILD for Mb
2l 2

I L D for Ra
Mb
P=1
X (L - X)

A B

Ra Rb
10m

P(l − X)2 (2l + X)


Ra =
2l 3
When X = 0 ⇒ Ra = 1.0 (put in above equation for Ra)
5
When X = 5 ⇒ Ra = (put in above equation for Ra)
16

ILD for Ra 1.0 3rd-degree curve

5/16
O

Simplify ILD for Rb can be plotted as below:


Rb

1.0
ILD for Rb

Putting boundary conditions in the Mb expression ILD for Mb is obtained.


420 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

3/16 l

2 2
PX (l - X )
Mb = 2
2l

I L D for M b
Ral − P(l − X) + Mb = 0
Mb = 1(l − X) − Ral
10.20. I L D for shear at Section mn:
Mb
P
X

m
Load to right of A B
mn, Vmn = Ra x a
it mean ILD for Vmn
will be same as ILD n
for Ra multiplied by Ra Rb
a for this portion a = 4m 10m b = 6m
m
Mb

1.0 m
A B
Vmn c
n
Ra Rb
Load on left of mn I.L.D. for Ra x a

1.0
Vmn = Rb x b
for this portion, ILD for (+)
Vmn is same is ILD
for Rb x b
I.L.D. for Ra x b
1.0

10.21. I L D for M mn
Consider a hinge where ILD for moment desired.
P=1

A B C

10m 6m
INFLUENCE LINES 421

P=1
X

B
A C

Ra Rb Rc
L1 L2

X P=1

Primary structure or BDS B


under load P = 1 State-I
and redundant Rb at B. Rb

X
Compatibility equation at point B.

Rb δbb − Py = 0 y
P= 1 State-II
y
Rb = Rb = 1.0
δbb

a b

1.0
C
B
y
Rb Ra
l l

X //
C
δbb

Pab
l
//
B

We know this is ILD for PbX


moment at B in a
simple beam.
( l )
422 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

PbX 2
y = (l − b2 − X 2) (X = 0 − a)
6EI l
PaX 2
y = (l − a2 − X 2) (X = 0 − b)
6EI l
l 2X(l 2 − l 22 − X 2)
y =
6EI l
l 2X (l 2 − l 22 − l 12)
δbb =
6EI l
l 12 l 22
δbb =
3EI l

Rb = X (l − l21 − X )
2 2 2
and
 2l 1 l 2 
X = 0 − l1 with Origin at A
X (l − l − X )
2
1
2 2
Rb = 2 2 X = 0 to l 2
(2l l ) 1 2

Origin at C
INFLUENCE LINES 423

Now assume same values of spans and re-calculate.

P=1
B
A C

We know L1 = 10m L2 = 6m
l1 + l2 = L
I.L.D for Rb

1.0

P=1

B
A C

Compatibility at A

Ra δaa − Py = 0 1.0
(+)
y
Ra = y
δaa
B
A C
1.0

1.0
B

l2
l

I.L.D. for Ra 1.0


+

X (l 2 − l 22 − X 2) X (162 − 62 − X 2)
Rb = = by putting values of L 1l 1 and l 2
(2 × l 12 × l 2) 2 × 102 × 6
424 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

X Rb Ra Rc

0 0

1 0.1825

2 0.36

3 0.5275

4 0.68

5 0.8125

6 0.92

7 0.997 Calculate Calculate

8 1.04 yourself yourself

10

0 Calculate

1 yourself

ILD for Ra can be obtained from ILD for Rb. Taking moments about C is equality to zero.
Ral + Rb × l 2 − P(l − X) = 0
l − X
Ra = P 
Rb l 2
So
 l  − l
(l 1 − X)
and Rb = (2l 1 l − l 1 X − X 2)
2l 12 l
INFLUENCE LINES 425

Ma Mb
P = 1.0
A B

Ra X (L - X) Rb

Ma Mb
P BDS under
A B State-I redundant
moment.

Ra Rb

1.0
At fixed support,
θa = 0 θaa y
A B State-II

4EI 1.0 2EI


l l

4EI (-)
l

2EI
(+) l

1 rad

1 rad
424 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

CHAPTER EL EVEN

11. THREE HI NGED ARCHES


These are Curved Structures which are in use since ancient times. These were mostly used in
buildings and the abatements used to be very thick. As our analysis capacity increased due to faster
computers, it is now possible to understand behaviour of arches for various support, load and material
conditions. These days arch bridges either in Reinforced concrete or the pre-stressed concrete are
becoming a common sight due to asthetics of curved surfaces.
Arches when loaded by gravity loads, exhibit appreciable compressive stresses. At supports,
horizontal reaction (thrust) is also developed which reduces the bending moment in the arch.
Aches can be built in stone, masonry, reinforced concrete and steel. They can have a variety of
end conditions like three hinged arches, two hinged arches and find arches. Considering the geometry
these can be segmental, parabolic and circular. An arch under gravity loads generally exhibits three
structural actions at any cross-section within span including shear force, bending moment and axial
compressive force. The slope of centerline of arch keeps on varying along span so above mentioned
three structural actions also vary along span.
11.1. Eddy’ s theor em:
The bending moment at any point on the arch is the difference between simple span bending
moment and product Hy” .
Where H is the horizontal thrust at supports (springings), y is the rise of arch at a distance X
from the origin.
Shape of simple span bending moment diagram due to applied loads is also called linear arch.
Hy may also be termed as equation of centerline of actual arch multiplied by a constant (H).
Consider the following arch carrying the loads P1, P2 and P3. The shaded area is the BMD.
P2

a P1 P3 linear arch

y Hy
A B
H given arch y H
X

Va Vb

Bending moment at X is
M X = VaX − Hy − P1(X − a)
M X = µX − Hy. (Eddy’ s theorem)
THREE HINGED ARCHES 425

Where µz = Va × x − P1(X − a) = Simple span bending moment considering the arch to be a


simple beam.
The inclined axial force (normal thrust) also contributes towards vertical shear force in addition
to applied loads and reactions.
11.2. Thr ee-hinged ar ch:
If an arch contains three hinges such that two hinges are at the supports and the third one anywhere
within span, it is called a three hinged arch. This type of arch is statically determinate wherein reactions,
horizontal thrust and all internal structural actions can be easily determined by using the laws of equilibrium
and statics. If the third hinge is provided at the highest point, it is called crown of the arch.
Consider a three hinged arch with third hinge at the crown, then
C

M X = µX − Hy (1) becomes at center


A B
Mc = µc − Hyc = 0 H

µc
SO H = (2)
Yc

V
Cutting the arch as shown, and projecting forces P 2 I
along axis 1−1 and 2−2 and putting V = V a − P1 θ
we have. H

I 2
P = H Cosθ + VSinθ (3) along 1−1
H
Q = H Sin θ − Vcos θ (4) along 2 − 2

Va

11.3. Par abolic Ar ch


If a three-hinged parabolic arch carries udl over its span, the arch will carry pure compression
and no SF or BM. This is because the shape of linear arch (BMD due to loads) will be the same as shape
of actual arch.
For a parabolic arch having origin at either of springings, the equation of centre line of arch at
a distance X from origin where rise is y will be.
y = C.X (L − X) (5) constant C will be evaluated from boundary conditions.
L
at X = , y = yc. we get
2
L L 4 yc
Y c = C. . or C=
2 2 L2
4 yc
So y = . X (L − X) (6)
L2
426 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

The slope θ can be calculated from


dy 4 yc
= tan θ = (L − 2X) (7)
dX L2
11.4. Cir cular Ar ch:
If arch is a part of Circle, it is convenient to have origin at the centre.
C

Consider triangle OEF E


F
OE2 = EF2 + OF2
y
Or R2 = X 2 + (R −yc + y)2 (8) A
D
B
X

and we also have from triangle ADO L


L2
+ (R − yc)2 = R2
4 R R
θ
L2
yc (2R − yc) = (9)
4

As span and central rise are usually known, Radius


of arch R can be calculated from (9) O

Equation (8) can bge written as y = R2 − X 2 − (R − yc)


Now once the basic equations for parabolic and circular arches have been established, let us
solve some numericals.
EXAM PL E NO. 1
Analyze a three-hinged arch of span 20m and a central rise of 4m. It is loaded by udl of 50
KN/m over its left half. Calculate maximum positive and negative moments if
(i) The arch is parabolic
(ii) The arch is circular
SOL UTI ON: 1. Ar ch is Par abolic 50 KN/m

C
∑ Ma = 0
Vb × 20 = 50 × 10 × 5 4m
y
2500 H=312.5 A B H=312.5
Vb = = 125 KN
20 X

V a + V b = 50 × 10 = 500 KN Ra
20
So V a = 500 − V b = 500 − 125 Va=375 Vb=125

= 375 KN
THREE HINGED ARCHES 427

µc 125 × 10 and Rb = Vb2 + H2= 1252 + 312.52


H= = = 312.5 KN
yc 4
H = 312.5 KN Rb = 15625 + 97656.25

Ra = Va2 + H2 Rb = 113281.25 = 336.57 KN

= 3752 + 312.52 = 140625 + 9765.25

= 238281.25 = 488.14 KN Vb 125


Tanθb = = = 0.4
H 312.5
Va 375
Tanθa = = = 1.2
H 312.5
θa = 50.19o θb = 21.800
M aximum positive M oment
It is expected in portion AC. Write generalize M X expression.
50X 2
M X = 375X − − 312.5y
2
4yc 4×4
Now y = (L − X) = X(20 − X) = 0.04 (20X − X 2)
L2 202
y = 0.8 − 0.04X 2
So
M X = 375X − 25X 2 − 312.5 [0.8X − 0.04X 2]
= 375X − 25X 2 − 250X + 12.5X 2 Simplifying
M X = 125X − 12.5X 2
dM X
= V X = 0 = 125 − 25X
dX
X = 5m from A. Putting Value of X in M X expression above.
So
M max = 125 × 5 − 12.5 × 52
= 625 − 312.5
M max = 312.5 KN-m
M aximum negative moment:
It would occur in portion BC at a distance x from B.
M X = 125X − 312.5y , Putting equation of y.
= 125X − 312.5 (0.8X − 0.04X 2)
M X = 125X − 250X + 12.5X 2
M X = − 125X + 12.5X 2
dMx
= V X = 0 = − 125 + 25X
dX
428 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

X = 5m from B.
So putting value of X in M X expression above.
M max = − 125 × 5 + 12.5(5)2
= − 625 + 312.5
M max = − 312.5 KN−m
SOL UTI ON: Considering Circular Arch
EXAM PL E NO.2: Now or Solve the following loaded thr ee hinged Cir cular Ar ch

50 KN/m

y
4m

H=312.5 A X B H=312.5
20m

Va=375 Vb=125

Step 1. Reactions:
As before reactions are same.
Step 2. Equation of Cir cular Ar ch
The general equation is (X − h)2 + (y − k)2 = r 2
h and k are co-ordinates at the centre and r is radius of Circle. There are three unknown in
above equation, Viz, h, k and r and these can be determined from the following boundary conditions.
Origin is at point A.
Boundar y conditions
1. At X = 0, y= 0 It gives (−h)2 + (−k)2 = r 2
h2 + k2 = r 2 (1)
2. At X= 20, y= 0 It gives (20 − h) + (−k2) = r 2
2

400 + h2 − 40h + k2 = r 2 (2)


3. At X= 10, Y= 4 It gives (10 − h) + (4 − k) = r
2 2 2

100 + h2 − 20h + 16 + k2 − 8k = r 2
116 + h2 − 20h + k2 − 8k = r 2 (3)
Subtract (1) from (2) we get
400 − 40h = 0
Or h = 10
THREE HINGED ARCHES 429

Put value of h in (1) and 3


100 + k2 = r 2 (1)
116 + 100 − 200 + k2 − 8k = r 2 (3)
or 16 + k2 − 8k = r 2 (3)
16 + k2 − 8k = 100 + k2 (by putting Value of r 2 from 1)
8k = 16 − 100 = − 84
−84
k= = − 10.5
8
Putting k = − 10.5 in (3) we get
r 2 = 16 + (− 10.5)2 + 8 x 10.5
= 16 + 110.25 + 84 = 210.25
So r = 14.5 meters.
Putting Values of h, k and r in general equation, we get
(X − 10)2 + (y + 10.5)2 = 14.52 Simplify it, we get.

y = − 10.5 + 14.52 − (X − 10)2

(y + 10.5)2 = 14.52 − (X − 10)2

= − 10.5 + 210.25 − X 2 − 100 + 20X

y = − 10.5 + 110.25 − X 2 + 20X (4)


2
L
We know, yc (2r − yc) = (5)
4
and
2

y= r2 − L − X  − (r − yc) (6) These equations are same as were


2 
used in derivation earlier.
Alternatively to avoid evaluation of constants each time, equations (5) and (6) can be used.
Equation (6) is the equation of Centre-line of Circular arch.
Step 3: Calculation of Maximum moment.
Maximum positive moment occurs in span AC. Write M X expression
50X 2
M X = 375X − − 312.5 y put y from (4) above.
2

[
= 375X − 25X 2 − 312.5 − 10.5 + 110.25 − X 2 + 20X ]
M X = 375X − 25X 2 + 3281.25 − 312.5 110.25 − X 2 + 20X
430 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Now maximum moment occurs where shear force is zero. So


dM X 312.5 (− 2X + 20)
= V X = 375 − 50X − = 0
dX 2 110.25 − X 2 + 20X
312.5 (−X + 10)
375 − 50X = divide by 50
110.25 − X 2 + 20X
6.25 (10 − X)
7.5 − X = multiply by − 1, We get
110.25 − X 2 + 20X
6.25 (X − 10)
X − 7.5 =
110.25 − X 2 + 20X

(X − 7.5) 110.25 − X 2 + 20X = 6.25 (X − 10) square both sides


(X − 7.5) (110.25 − X + 20X) = 6.25 (X − 10)
2 2 2 2
Simplify
(X 2 − 15X + 56.25) (110.25 − X 2 + 20X) = 39.0625 (X 2 − 20X + 100)
or 110.25X 2 − X 4 + 20X 3 − 1653.75X + 15X 3 − 300X 2 = 39.0625X 2 − 781.25X + 3906.25
+ 6201.56 − 56.25X 2 + 1125X
Simplifying
− X 4 + 35X 3 − 285.0625X 2 + 252.5X + 2295.3125 = 0
or X 4 − 35X 3 + 285.0625X 2 − 252.5X − 2295.3125 = 0
Now it is considered appropriate to solve this equation by Modified Newton – Raphson iteration
solutions which in general is
f (xn)
X n+ 1 = X n + (A)
f / (X n)
So f (X) = X 4 − 35X 3 + 285.0625X 2 − 252.5X − 2295.3125
And differentiate, f / (X) = 4X 3 − 105X 2 + 570.125X − 252.5
In general, it is recommended that first root X n should be always taken at 1 because it
converges very fast. However, knowing that B. M will be maximum near the middle of portion AC, we
take X n = 2 (to reduce number of iterations possibly) and solve in the following tabular form. Evaluate
f(X) and f / (X n) expressions.

Iteration Number Xn f(X n) f / (X n) X n+ 1 from A above


1 2 −1924.06 499.75 5.85
2 5.85 147.251 290.1629 5.3425
3 5.3425 − 30.3142 406.3845 5.417
4 5.417 − 0.58794 390.546 5.418
THREE HINGED ARCHES 431

So we get X n and X n + 1 as same after 4th iteration.


So X = 5.418 m put this in MX expressions

M max = 375 (5.418) − 25 (5.418)2 + 3281.25 − 312.5 110.25 − 5.4182 + 20 × 5.418


= 280.066 KN-m

M aximum negative moment in the ar ch


Let us assume that it occurs in portion BC at a distance X from A (10 < X < 20)

M X = 125 (20 − X) − 312.5 (− 10.5 + 110.25 − X 2 + 20X ) Simplify

= 2500 − 125X + 3281.25 − 312.5 110.25 − X 2 + 20X

or M X = 5781.25 − 125X − 312.5 110.25 − X 2 + 20X

Maximum moment occurs where SF is zero, So differentiate M X expression w.r.t. X.

dM X 312.5 (− 2X + 20)
= 0 = − 125 −
dX 2 110.25 − X 2 + 20X

+ 312.5(X − 10)
or 0 = − 125
110.25 − X 2 + 20X

125 110.25 − X 2 + 20X = 312.5 (X − 10) squaring both sides. We have,

15625 (110.25 − X 2 + 20X) = 97656.25 (X 2 − 20X + 100) Simplify

110.25 − X 2 + 20X = 6.25 (X 2 − 20X + 100)


0 = 7.25X 2 − 145X + 514.75 dividing by 7.25
X 2 − 20X + 71 = 0 Solve this quadretic equation.

20 ± 400 − 284
X=
2

20 ± 10.77
X= = 15.385m from A Put this value of X in M X expression above.
2

So M max = 5781.25 − 125 × 15.385 − 312.5 110.25 − (15.385)2 + 20 (15.385)

= 5781.25 − 1923.125 − 312.5 181.257 = − 349.115KN.m


432 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

11.5. Der ivation for center -line of a par abolic ar ch with suppor ts at differ ent levels.

yc
A

h
y

B
X

L/2 L/2

The general form of a parabola is

y = aX 2 + bX + c

Evaluate constants a, b and c by putting boundary conditions in above equation

At X = o; Y = o, (Point B) So C = o (1)

At X = L; Y = h, (Point A) So h = aL 2 + bL (2)

L Y = yc + h, (Point C) aL 2 bL
At X = ; So yc + h = + (3) multiply by 4
2 4 2

h = aL 2 + bL (2)

Equation (3) can also be written as


4(yc + h) = aL 2 + 2bL (3) Subtract (3) from (2), we have

h − 4(yc + h) = − bL or 4 h
b= (yc + h) −
L L

Put this value of b in (2) and solve for a


2 h − 4(yc + h)
h = aL 2 + 4 (yc + h) − h or a = )
L2
−2 h − 4yc
a=
L2
THREE HINGED ARCHES 433

Now all constant have been evaluated in general terms. Put Values of a, b and c in general
equation; we have
− 2X 2 (h + 2yc) X (4yc + 3h)
y = 2 + . This is the generalized equation for a parabolic arch
L L
with supports at different levels. Test this derived equation and see whether boundary conditions are
satisfied.
− At X = o; y = o, put this in above equation. It is satisfied
− At X = L, y = h, put this in above equation. It is satisfied
L
− At X = , y = h + yc, put this in above equation. It is also satisfied.
2
If supports are at the same level, h = o Put this in above equation, we get
− 4ycX 2 4 ycX 4ycX
y= + or y = (L − X), after simplification.
L2 L L2

dy 4yc
and = 2 (L − 2X)
dX L
These two equations have already been used. Now we solve some Example.

EXAM PL E NO.3:-
Solve the following 3 hinged parabolic loaded arch with supports at different levels as shown.
40 KN/m

yc = 9m
A
H

Va h = 3m

B
H

yc is the distance between hinges at A and C.


Vb
45m 45m

∑Fy = 0
V A + V b = 40 (45) = 1800 KN (1)

∑Mc = O , VA (45) − 9 H − 40 (45) 45 = 0 (2) Moments at C of forces on its left.


2
45V A − 9H − 40500 = 0
45V b − 12H = 0 (3) Moment at C of forces on its right
Divide Equation (2) by 9
5VA − H − 4500 = 0 (2)
434 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Multiply this Equation by 12 and subtract equation (3) from it.


60 V A − 12H − 54000 = 0 (2)
45V B − 12H = 0 (3)
_______________________________
60 V A − 54000 − 45V B = 0 (4)
Multiply Equation (1) by 45 and add in equation (4)
45V A + 45V B = 81000 (1)
60 V A − 45V B = 54000
Adding we get.
105 V A = 135000
135000
or VA =
105
VA = 1285.7 KN , put this value in equation (1)
so VB = 514.3 KN
We know, 45V B − 12H = 0 (3) , from this
45 × V B
H =
12
= 1928.63 KN (after putting value of V b)
H = 1928.63 KN
New calculate (M ac)max and (M bc)max
Keeping “ B” as origin , at a distance X from B in portion AC moment expression is
40
(M ac) = Va (90 − X) − H(y) − (90 − X)2
2
X (4yc + 3h) 2X 2 (3 + 18)
y= − . This equation was derived in previous article.
L 902
X 7X 2 X2
If h = 3m , y = − (A) If h = 0 , y = 0.4X − (B)
2 1350 225

0.4X − X  − 20 (90 − X)2 − (i)


2
(M ac) = 1285.7 (90 − X) − 1928.63
 225
after putting values of h and yc in above equation for y.
= 115713 − 1285.7X − 771.45X + 8.57X 2 − 20 (8100 + X 2 − 180X)
dMac
= 0 = −1285.7 − 771.45 + 17.14X − 40X + 3600 Simplify
dX
0 = + 1542.85 − 22.86X
X = 1542.85/22.86 = 67.5m (This value should be more than 45)
THREE HINGED ARCHES 435

Putting this Value in Equation (i)

(Mac)max = 1285.7 (22.5) − 1928.63 (27 − 20.25) − 20 (22.5)2

= 5785 KN-m

(M bc)max = 514.3X − 1928.63 × y . Moment at a distance X from B.

X − 7X  (After putting equation for y) and values


2
= 514.3X − 1928.63 ×
 2 1350
of yc, h and L and using equation A.

= 514.3X − 964.315X + 10X 2

dM bc
= 0 = 514.3 − 964.315 + 20X
dX

= 20X = 450

X = 22.5m , M bc = −5062.68 KN−m (after putting value of X above)


11.6. Development of Gener alized equation of thr ee hinged cir cular ar ch with suppor t at differ ent
levels.
C

A yc=9m

y = 3m
y

B
X

L/2 = 45 L/2 = 45

General Equation of Circle is


(X − h)2 + (y − k)2 = R2

at X = 0, y = 0 ~ h2 + k2 = R2 − (1)

at X = 45 , y = yc + δ = 12

Putting (45 − h)2 + (12 − k)2 = R2 Simplifying it.

2025 − 90h + h2 + 144 − 24k + k2 = R2


436 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

2025 + 144 − 90h − 24k + h2 + k2 = R2 (2) Simplifying


2169 − 90h − 24k + h2 + k2 = R2 (2)
at X = 90 , y = 3 [ point A ]
(90 – h)2 + (3 – k)2 = R2 Simplifying
Put these values, 8100 − 180h + h + 9 + k − 6k = R2
2 2

8109 − 180h − 6k + h2 + k2 = R3 (3)


Equating (1) with (2) and multiply resulting equation by 2 and then equation (1) and (3)
2 [2169 − 90h − 24k = 0] ~ (4) or 4338 − 180h − 48k = 0 (4)
8109 − 180h − 6k = 0 ~ (5)
Subtract (4) from (5), we have
3771 + 42k = 0
− 3771
k =
42
k = − 89.79
Put in Eq (4)
2169 − 90h – 24 (− 89.79) = 0
4323.86
h =
90
h = 48.04
Now from (1)
(48.04)2 + (−89.79)2 = R2
R = 101.83m
Now write equation of center-line of arch.

y= R2 − (X − h)2 + k

= (101.83)2 − (X − 48.04)2 + (− 89.79)

y = (10369.35 − X 2 − 2307.84 + 96.08X) – 89.79 (A)

Point B: At X = 0 , y = 0 (see diagram now)

Point C: At X = 45 , y = 12

Point A: At X = 90 , y = 3

So Eq ,(A) has been correctly derived.


THREE HINGED ARCHES 437

EXAM PL E NO. 4: Calculate maximum moments in portion AC & BC for the following 3-hinged
loaded Circular each.
40 KN/m

9m
1928.63 A

y
3m
1285.7
1928.63
X B

514.3

SOL UTI ON: Reactions will be same as Previous.


1. Calculation of (Mac)max.
Write moment expression for use previously developed equation. Consider forces on left of section.
40
M X = 1285.7 (90 − X) − (90 − X)2 − 1928.63 ( 10369.35 − X 2 − 2307.84 + 96.08X − 89.79)
2

M X = 115713−1285.7X−20(8100−180X+ X 2)+ 173171.7−1928.63 (10369.35−X 2−2307.84+ 96.08X)

M X = 126884.69 − 20X 2 + 2314.3X − 1928.63 (8061.51 − X 2 + 96.08X)½- (B) differentiate w.r.t.


dM X 964.315 (−2X + 96.08)
= 0 = − 40X + 2314.3 −
dX (8061.51 − X 2 + 96.08X)½
(40X − 2314.3) (8061.51 − X 2 + 96.08X)½ = 964.315 (2X − 96.08)
(40X − 2314.3)2 (806151 − X 2 + 96.08X) = [1928.63 (X − 48.04)] 2

Squaring and simplifying, we get.


(1600X 2+ (2314.3)2−185144X) (8061.51−X 2+ 96.08X)= 1928.6322 (X 2+ 2307.84−96.08X) Simplifying
1298416X 2 − 1600X 4 + 153728X 3 + 4.32 × 1010 − 5355984.5X 2 + 514602989.8X
−1.49254021×109X+ 185144X 3−17.78863×106X 2= 3719613.68X 2+ 8.5843×109−357380482.1X Simplifying

− 13965812.2X 2 − 1600X 4 + 338872X 3 − 620556738X + 3.46157 × 1010= 0


8728.63X 2 + X 4 − 211.8X 3 + 387848X − 2163412.5 = 0
f(X) = X 4 − 211.8X 3 + 8728.63X 2 + 387848X − 21634812.5 differentiate it.
f / (X) = 4X 3 − 635.4X 2 + 17457.26X + 387848
To cut-short, Let X = 55 (Because it is portion AC and X has to be more than 45)
438 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

So f(X) = (55)4 − 211.8 × (55)3 + 8728.63 × (55)2 + 387848 (55) − 21634812.5


= 1333.25
f / (X) = 4(55)3 − 635.4(55)2 + 17457.26(55) + 387848
= 91412.3
fx
Xn − = X n+ 1
f / (x)
13333.25
= 55 −
91412.3
= 55 − 0.146
= 54.85
Now X = 54.85 (use this update value now)
f(X) = −560.16
f / (X) = 93833.35
f(n)
X n+ 1 = Xn −
f / (n)
(−560.16)
= 54.85 −
93833.35
X n+ 1 or X = 54.855969. The value of X has converged now.
Putting this value of X in Equation B to find (Mac)max
(Mac)max = 126884.69 − 20 (54.855969)2 + 2314.3 (54.855969)
− 1928.63 (8061.51 − (54.855969)2 + 96.08 × 54.855969)½
(Mac)max = 193552.7 KN−m
(M bc)max. Wor king on similar lines (M bc)max can be calculated now.
MX = 514.3X − 1928.63 y putting equation of center line of arch y.

= 514.3X − 1928.63 [ 10369.35 − X 2 − 2307.84 + 96.08X − 89.79] (C)


dM X 1928.63 (−2X + 96.08)
= 0 = 514.3 − × = 0
dX 2 (10369.35 − X 2 − 2307.84 + 96.08X)½
1928.63 (X − 48.04)
or 514.3 + = 0 ,
(8061.51− X 2 + 96.08X)½
− 514.3 (8061.51 − X2 + 96.08X)1/2 = 1928.63 (X − 48.04)
Squaring both sides of equation.
264504.5 [ (8061.51 − X 2 + 96.08X)1/2] 2 = [1928.63 (X − 48.04)] 2
we get.
THREE HINGED ARCHES 439

264504.5 (8061.51 − X 2 + 96.08X) = (1928.63)2(X 2 + 2307.84 − 96.08X) Simplifying


2132305672 − 264504.5X 2 + 25413592.36X= 3719613.68X 2 + 8584273228 − 357380482.1X
− 6451967556 − 3984118.18X 2 + 382794074.1 on further simplification, we get
− X 2 + 96.08X − 1619.422 = 0 (after dividing by 3984118.18)
or X − 96.08X + 1619.422 = 0
2
solving this quadretic equation where.
a = 1, b = −96.08, C = 1619.422

−b ± b2 − 4ac
X =
2a

96.08 ± (96.08)2 − 4(1) (1619.422)


X =
2
96.08 ± 52.47
=
2
96.08 + 52.47 96.08 − 52.47
X = Or
2 2
= 74.24 or 1.80
Therefore, (X = 74.24 is not applicable so not accepted as a root.
X = 21.80m
Put this value of X in equation (C), we have (Mbc)max.
Putting in (c)

(Mbc)max = 514.3X − 1928.63 10369.35 − X 2 − 2307.84 + 96.08X + 173171.69


= 11211.74 − 189698.0911 + 173171.69
= − 5314.67 KN-m
We have solved some representative problems. Using the guidance given in this chapter a
student should be able to solve any problem on three hinged parabolic or circular arches, whether
supports are at the same level or not.

You might also like