Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CBR Model
CBR Model
CLIENT :
CONTRACT :
Contract No. :
N f
15 0.606
16 0.612
17 0.617
50 18 0.623
19 0.629
20 0.635
21 0.641
45 22 0.647
23 0.654
24 0.660
25 0.667
40 26 0.673
27 0.680
28 0.687
29 0.694
35 30 0.702
31 0.709
32 0.717
33 0.725
30 34 0.733
Row 22 35 0.741
25
20
15
10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
NUMBER OF TAPS
Tested by (Lab):
Print Name Signature Date
Engineer (Consultants):
Print Name Signature Date
1) Screen analysis
Accum Mass Retained (g)
Sieve size (mm) % Retained % Passing
Normal Macro
75.0
63.o
53.0
37.5
26.5
19.0
<19.0
TOTAL
13.2
9.5
6.7
4.75
2.00 a
0.425 b
0.075 c
<0.425
TOTAL c =[f x (b/100)]
2)
Tested by (Lab):
name signature Date
Engineer (Consultants):
name signature Date
DRY DENSITY
Mould No:
a)Mass of Mould + Wet Soil (g)
b)Mass of Mould (g)
c).Mass of Wet Soil [a-b] (g)
d).Volume of Mould (m3)
e).Wet Density [(c/d)*1000] kg/m3
f).Apprx Dry Density
MOISTURE CONTENTS
Container No:
g)Mass of Container + Wet Soil (g)
h).Mass of Container + Dry Soil (g)
j)Mass of Container (g)
k).Mass of Wet Soil [g-j] (g)
l).Mass of Dry Soil [h-j] (g)
m).Mass of Water [k-l] (g)
n).Moisture Content [(m/l)*100] (%)
o)Hydroscopic Moisture [n-v] %
Axis Title
0.9 33
30
0.8
10 27 1
24 Linear
0.7
21 (1)
8 2
0.6 18
Linear
15 (2)Row 54
0.5
6 12 3 Polynomial Row
(Row 54)
0.4 9 Linear 85
6 (3)
0.34
3 4
0.2
0
0 6 2 8 4 MOULDING
3 6 MOISTURE
2 8 4 CONTENT
6 6 (%) 2 8 4 9 6
2
0. 1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 4. 5. 6. 7. 7. 8. 9.
0.1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
00
00 0.1 2 0.2 0.3 4 0.4 6 0.5 0.6 8 0.7 10
0.8 0.9 12 1
MOULDING MOISURE
MOULDING CONTENT
MOISTURE (%)
CONTENT (%)
Tested by (Lab):
Print Name Signature Date
Engineer (Consultants):
Print Name Signature Date
Site: Manzini - Mbhadlane Highway Lot 1 Contact Number: SZ 005 Date: 23/06/2017
Cumulative %
Sieve size Mass retained % Mass retained % Passing Specification
retained
75,0
63,0
53,0
37,5
26,5 100 100 100
19,0 436.5 23.64 76.4 76 85 - 100
13,2 1214 65.74 10.61 11 0 - 30
9,5 160.1 8.67 1.96 2 0-5
6,7 17.5 0.95 1 1
4,75 6.7 0.36 0.64
2,36
2.00
1,18
0,600
0.425
0,300 a)
0.250
0,150 b)
0,075 c)
<0,075 or PAN ** 12 0.65 Not applicable
TOTAL
Initial Sample Mass = 1846.8 g Grading Modulus (300-[a+b+c])/100 =
** Dry mass of total sample before washing minus mass of fraction >0.075 mm after washing and drying.
2) Flakeness Index Test Sample Size g
Engineer (Consultants):
Print Name Signature Date
53,0 100
37.5 100
26.5 84-94
19.0 71-84
13.2 59-75
4.75 36-53
2.00 23-40
0.425 11-24
0.075 4-12
Passing 0.075
Flakeness Index
Sieve Size (mm) 63 53 37.5 26.5 19 13.2 9.5 6.7
d Flakeness index
e % Retained on screen
f Product d x e
Grading Modulus = %
Tested by (Lab):
Print Name Signature Date
Engineer (Consultants):
Print Name Signature Date
Verified by:
name signature Date
Ref:IRB/______480____________/______E_________
Relative Density Req No
Location:
Container/Flask No: B
I TEMPERATURE ( C)O
SG = [E/H]*1000kg/m3 = ________________kg/m3
Container/Flask No: C
I TEMPERATURE ( C)O
SG = [E/H]*1000kg/m3 = ________________kg/m3
Average = kg/m
Tested By:
name signature date
Checked By:
name signature date
Location:
CONTAINER/BUCKET NO
CONTAINER NO
Tested by (Lab):
Print Name Signature Date
TMH1-A10(a)
Class of
Date Time Slump mm Truck No. Structure Remarks
concrete
Tested by:
name signature date
Verified by:
name signature date
% Mass Cumulative %
Sieve size Mass retained % Passing Specification
retained retained
9.5
6.7
4.75
2.36
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.300
0.150
0.075
Pan **
TOTAL
Initial Sample Mass = g
** Difference between mass of original sample and residue after washing plus mass passing 0.075 sieve when sieved dry.
Finess Modulus =(adding of cumulative % of material retained on the standard sieve sizes 0.150 and coarser and dividing
the sum by 100)
Silt content = =
X 60 Weight %
Tested by:
name signature Date
Verified by:
name signature Date
Delivery
Note No:
Delivery: 1 st truck 2 nd truck 3 rd truck 4 th truck 5 th truck 6 th truck 7 th truck 8 th truck 9 th truck 10 th truck
Time
Slump 6 0
Testing:
Date made: 0 6 / 0 Time: Temperature: 2 3^ o
Slump Average
Cube No Date tested Age (days) (mm) Mass (kg) Max. Force (Kn) Strength (Mpa) strength (Mpa)
6 0 7 8 6 8 3 7 0. 2 5 6. 4
6 0 7 9 3 2 3 6 7. 0 3
. 4
Tested by (Lab):
Print Name Signature Date
Engineer (Consultants):
Print Name Signature Date
Concrete
Cube Class Slump Max. Force Density Strength
Marking Location/Structure (Mpa) Date Made Date tested Age (days) (mm) Mass (kg) (Kn) (kg/m3) (Mpa)
Total Avg
Material Type : LIGHT BROWN GRAVEL Optimum Moisture Content (OMC): 7.0 %
Mod.AASHTO### 2031 Standard Density Count: 2325
Tested by (Lab):
Print Name Signature Date
Concrete cube bath temperatures are to be checked twice daily, once in morning and once in
the afternoon.
c). Max. Dry Density: 1755 kg/m3 g). Moisture to Add: 10 % (d -a)
d). Optimum Moisture Content: 10.6 % h). Mass of Dry Soil: 17845 g.[(f/100+a)*100]
e). Max Wet Density: 1941 kg/m3 [(c*(100+d)/100] j). Water Addition: ml. [h*g/100]
Compaction Data:
Expansion Data:
Mould No
Days 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Dial Gauge Reading
Initial Dial Gauge Reading
Swell
% Swell (Expansion)
Penetration Data
Mould No
Penetration/Depht (mm) Load Reading (KN)
0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.635 0.12 0.08 0.04
1.270 0.14 0.10 0.06
1.905 0.20 0.14 0.08
2.540 W 0.31 0.16 0.1
3.175 0.36 0.21 0.14
3.810 0.39 0.31 0.16
4.445 0.46 0.4 0.2
5.080 y 0.57 0.44 0.24
5.715 0.64 0.51 0.29
6.350 0.7 0.58 0.32
6.985 0.73 0.69 0.36
7.620 z 0.81 0.72 0.42
8.255 0.91 0.77 0.57
8.889 0.99 0.82 0.64
9.525 1.02 0.86 0.70
CBR (%)
Tested by (Lab):
Print Name Signature Date
Engineer (Consultants):
Print Name Signature Date
Prepared by: Thuthuka Dlamini Issue Date: 09 September 2014 Page: 1 of 2
Inyatsi Zambia. Doc No.: ZR10-QA-SP-002-A00 Doc Status: Approved
CBR CURVE DATA
BEARING RATIO AT
CURVE AVERAGE CBR %
2.54 mm 5.08 mm 7.62 mm
[100*(w/13.344)] [100*(y/20.016)] [100*(z/25.354)]
A
2.32 2.85 3.19 2.789 2.32
B
1.20 2.20 2.84 2.079 1.20
C
0.75 1.20 1.66 1.202 0.75
A
1.20
1.00
0.80
Axis Title
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
0.000 2.000 4.000 6.000
Axis Title
8.000 10.000 12.000
i).Mass of Tin & Wet Soil (g) vii).Mass of Tin & Wet Soil (g)
ii).Mass of Tin & Dry Soil (g) viii).Mass of Tin & Dry Soil (g)
v).Mass of Dry Soil [ii-iii] (g) xii).Mass of Dry Soil [viii-x] (g)
vi).% Water of [(iv/v)*100] (%) xiii).% of Water [(xi/xii)*100] %
Avrg Air Dry Moisture Cont (%) a) Avrg Moisture Cont (%) b)
Preparation Data:
c). Max. Dry Density:……………………………..kg/m3 f). Mass of Air Dry Material:…………………………..g
Mould No
h).Mould Volume/Factor kg/m3
j).Mass of Wet Material to Fill Mould (e*h)*% comp g
k).Mass of Air Dried Soil g
Air Dry Moisture Content (Hydroscopic) %
m).Mass of Dry Soil (100*j)/100+a) g
Type of Stabilizer
n).Stabilising Content %
o).Mass of Stabilizing Content to Add [m*(n/100)] g
Mass of Water to Added (k+o)*g/(100+a) ml
Compaction Data:CBR
Tested By:
name signature date
Verified by:
name signature date
TMH1-MTHD A14
A B C AVERAGE CBR %
BEARING RATIO AT
2.54 mm [100*(w/13.344)]
5.08 mm [100*(y/20.016)]
2.54 mm [100*(z/25.354)]
CBR CURVE
LOAD (KN)
0 I I I I I I I I I I I I
(A) 0 0.635 1.27 2.54 3.81 5.08 6.35 7.62 8.89
(B) 0 0.635 1.27 2.54 3.81 5.08 6.35 7.62 8.89
(C ) 0 0.635 1.27 2.54 3.81 5.08 6.35 7.62 8.89
TMH1-MTHD A8
300 300
200 200
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
50 50
40 40
CBR
30 30
20 20
10 10
9 9
8 8
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1
1
DRY DENSITY (kg/m3)
CBR @ 100% CBR @ 98% CBR @ 97% CBR @ 95% CBR @ 93% CBR @90%
Mass of Tin & Wet Soil (g) Mass of Tin & Wet Soil (g)
Mass of Tin & Dry Soil (g) Mass of Tin & Dry Soil (g)
Avrg Air Dry Moisture Cont (%) a) Avrg Moisture Cont (%) b)
Preparation Data:
Kg/m3
c). Max. Dry Density:……………………………..kg/m3
f). Mass of Air Dry Material:…………………………..g
d). Optimum Moisture Content:……………………% g). Moisture to Add:……………………….% (d -a)
e). Max Wet Density:……………………kg/m3 [(c*(100+d)/100]
Mould No
Type of Stabiliser
n).Stabilising Content %
Compaction Data:UCS
Mould No
Compaction % (100*j)/100+a) %
Tested by (Lab):
Print Name Signature Date
Engineer (Consultants):
Print Name Signature Date
Test Results:UCS
Compactive Effort Dry Density Moisture Compaction Surface Area of Individual Average
Force (KN)
(kg/m3) Content (%) (%) Mould kg/m3 (Kpa) (Mpa)
Curve Data:
UCS @ 100%
UCS @ 98%
UCS @ 97%
UCS @ 95%
UCS @ 93%
UCS @ 90%
UCS GRAPH
COMPRESSIVE STRENGH
Tested by (Lab):
Print Name Signature Date
Engineer (Consultants):
Print Name Signature Date
Site: Date:
PROPERTY
Chainage
Depth (mm)
Liquid Limit
ATTERBER
G LIMITS
Plastic Limit
Plasticity Index
Linear Shrinkage
Nominal Sive Size (mm) % Passing
53.0
37.5
26.5
GRADING
19.0
13.2
4.75
2.00
0.425
0.075
Grading Modulus (GM)
Max Dry Density (MDD)
Optimum Moisture Content (OMC)
CBR @ 100%
CBR @ 95%
CBR @ 93%
Swell
STRENGHT
UCS @ 100%
UCS @ 98%
UCS @ 97%
USC @ 95%
UCS @ 93%
UCS @ 90%
Type of Material/Class
Tested by (Lab):
Print Name Signature Date
Engineer (Consultants):
Print Name Signature Date
Description:
SKETCH:
Link/Taxiway
Apron
F. Apron
extension
Engineer (Consultants):
Print Name Signature Date
Description:
SKETCH:
Tested by(lab)
name signature date
Details of Works Section / Location / Structure / Stockpile etc to be sampled & tested:
Date: Date:
Time: Time:
White :Original to Production
Copy:Remain in book at Lab
Ref:IRB /________________/______________
Laboratory Test Request Req No Section
Details of Works Section / Location / Structure / Stockpile etc to be sampled & tested:
0 0.075 0.15 0.30 0.60 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.50 13.20 19.00 26.50 37.50 53.00
Percentage Passing Lower
Spec
Percentage Passing Upper
P e rc e n ta g e s p a s s in g
Percentage Passing
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 .0 7 5
0 .1 5 0
0 .3 0 0
0 .6 0 0
2 .3 6 0
4 .7 5 0
9 .5 0 0
1 3 .2 0
2 6 .5 0
5 3 .0 0
1 .1 8 0
1 9 .0 0
3 7 .5 0
0
0
Opening of sieves
100
###
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
75,0
63,0
53,0
37,5
26.5
19,0
13,2
9,50
6,70
4,75
SIEVE SIZE (mm)
2,36
2,00
1,70
1,180
0,600
0,425
0,300
0,250
0,150
0,075
0,053
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
###
CUMULATIVE % PASSING
0. 7 5
10
75.0
63.0
53.0
37.5
31.5
26.5
13.2
109.5
6.7
0.
4.75
2.0
1. 8 Column
CZ
1 Column
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10 CZ
0.60
0.50
0.425
19.0
0.30
0.20
0.50
0.1
0.08
0 . 07 5
0. 53
0. 1
0.5
1060.466
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2123 2041 1997
TOTAL 8.87
Engineer (Consultants):
Print Name Signature Date
Prepared by: Thuthuka Dlamini Issue Date: 09 September 2014 Page: 1 of 1
Inyatsi Zambia. Doc No.: IZM-QA-SP-004-A00 Doc Status: Approved
4
California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Untreated Soils & Gravels Test Sheet Req No section
c). Max. Dry Density: 1755 kg/m3 g). Moisture to Add: 10 % (d -a)
d). Optimum Moisture Content: 10.6 % h). Mass of Dry Soil: 17845 g.[(f/100+a)*100]
e). Max Wet Density: 1941 kg/m3 [(c*(100+d)/100] j). Water Addition: ml. [h*g/100]
Compaction Data:
Expansion Data:
Mould No
Days 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Dial Gauge Reading
Initial Dial Gauge Reading
Swell
% Swell (Expansion)
Penetration Data
Mould No
Penetration/Depht (mm) Load Reading (KN)
0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.635 0.12 0.08 0.04
1.270 0.14 0.10 0.06
1.905 0.20 0.14 0.08
2.540 W 0.31 0.16 0.1
3.175 0.36 0.21 0.14
3.810 0.39 0.31 0.16
4.445 0.46 0.4 0.2
5.080 y 0.57 0.44 0.24
5.715 0.64 0.51 0.29
6.350 0.7 0.58 0.32
6.985 0.73 0.69 0.36
7.620 z 0.81 0.72 0.42
8.255 0.91 0.77 0.57
8.889 0.99 0.82 0.64
9.525 1.02 0.86 0.70
CBR (%)
Tested by (Lab):
Print Name Signature Date
Engineer (Consultants):
Print Name Signature Date
Prepared by: Thuthuka Dlamini Issue Date: 09 September 2014 Page: 1 of 2
Inyatsi Zambia. Doc No.: ZR10-QA-SP-002-A00 Doc Status: Approved
CBR CURVE DATA
BEARING RATIO AT
CURVE AVERAGE CBR %
2.54 mm 5.08 mm 7.62 mm
[100*(w/13.344)] [100*(y/20.016)] [100*(z/25.354)]
A
2.32 2.85 3.19 2.789 2.32
B
1.20 2.20 2.84 2.079 1.20
C
0.75 1.20 1.66 1.202 0.75
d). Optimum Moisture Content: 10.6 % h). Mass of Dry Soil: g.[(f/100+a)*100]
e). Max Wet Density: kg/m3 [(c*(100+d)/100] j). Water Addition: ml. [h*g/100]
Compaction Data:
Mould No
Days 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Swell
% Swell (Expansion)
Penetration Data
Mould No