This document is a quality evaluation form used to assess crew safety during tasks. It rates crews on assigning clear tasks with proper information, conducting pre-task discussions and hazard identification, and documenting risks and controls. The form contains ratings and weights to calculate an overall score for crew safety performance.
This document is a quality evaluation form used to assess crew safety during tasks. It rates crews on assigning clear tasks with proper information, conducting pre-task discussions and hazard identification, and documenting risks and controls. The form contains ratings and weights to calculate an overall score for crew safety performance.
This document is a quality evaluation form used to assess crew safety during tasks. It rates crews on assigning clear tasks with proper information, conducting pre-task discussions and hazard identification, and documenting risks and controls. The form contains ratings and weights to calculate an overall score for crew safety performance.
Crew Assigned to a Vague, difficult to Clear, but not Clear review with all Task Clear review with location without pre- clearly identify task reviewed with all crew members, tested 1 0 Assignment all crew members discussion on task or exact location crew members for understanding Conducted or started Information All required info avail. without all required 1 0 Availability - Permit, dwgs., etc. information Discussion outside of Discussion outside of Discussion at the Location work location without work location with work location with 1 0 pre inspection pre inspection pre inspection of area Discussion without all All crew members crew members present All crew members Most crew members Interactive Discussion with most present, with a good, - One person writing, present, no group present, with group 2 0 Discussion crew members present interactive group others missing or discussion discussion discussion engaged elsewhere Excellent hazard ID w/ Generic items only: Good hazard ID with interactive discussion - PPE interactive discussion - What could go wrong Hazard Generalized discussion - Slips & falls - What could go wrong related to work steps 5 0 Identification related to work activities - Weather related to work steps - Other trade impacts - Pinch points - Operations impacts - Worse case scenario Specific hazards Mostly generic: clearly identified and - H2S/Toxics Somewhat generic but Documented documented. - PPE some distinct hazards 5 0 Risks - Slips & Falls included - "What if" - "Worst case" - Pinch points - "If this happens" Some attempt to document risk control. Clear "instructional" Somewhat generic but Documented - Wear H2S monitor controls documented some distinct controls 5 0 Controls - Watch footing which could include documented - Watch pinch points "stop and reevaluate" - Wear PPE Score: 0 Evaluator: Don Coop Date:
Team Evaluated: Company: Brieser Construction Company
Comments:
Work Area: Exelon-Dresden Midwest Generation Caterpillar-Joliet Exxon Pipeline
Stepan Chemical Lyondell Chemical Aux Sable BP Pipeline Other _______________________