Running Head: RESEARCH METHODS

Research Methods

[Name of Institute]

[Name of Student]

[Date]
 Research Methods 2

Table of Contents

Introduction...............................................................................................................................................3
Purpose......................................................................................................................................................3
Methods.....................................................................................................................................................4
Direct observation..................................................................................................................................4
Open-ended surveys...............................................................................................................................4
Focus group...........................................................................................................................................4
In-depth interviews................................................................................................................................5
Oral history............................................................................................................................................5
Participant observation..........................................................................................................................5
Ethnographic observation......................................................................................................................5
Content analysis.....................................................................................................................................5
Pros and Cons............................................................................................................................................6
Data sources..............................................................................................................................................7
Data quality...............................................................................................................................................7
Rough sleeping in London: an overview...................................................................................................8
Number of rough sleepers......................................................................................................................8
Conclusion.................................................................................................................................................9
References...............................................................................................................................................10
 Research Methods 3

Research Methods

Introduction

Qualitative research is a type of social research that collects and processes statistical

statistics to determine the importance of information that helps to understand public activity by

searching for specific residents or places (Lune). Berg, 2016). People are responsible for this, as

opposed to quantitative studies that use numerical data to identify size changes and use measurable

tasks to determine the cause and effect of the relationship between factors. In mankind, quantitative

research focuses on broad patterns and miracles, but qualitative research focuses on less social co-

operation than daily events (O'Sullivan et al., 2016).

Purpose

Qualitative research has a long history in the humanities and has been used for a long time.

Sociologists have long been involved in this type of research. It allows researchers to study people's

behavior, behavior, and interaction with others (Tracy, 2019). Quantitative research helps establish

relationships such as the relationship between need and racial contempt, but qualitative research

finds this connection as a source: revealing justification for the individual himself. You can (Smith,

2019).

Qualitative studies are designed to demonstrate results that confirm efficacy or outcome,

which are usually evaluated by quantitative studies. In this way, qualitative researchers explore

correlations between results, understanding, imagination, practice, and general activity. This type of

research provides interesting information that researchers must identify with detailed and thought-

provoking methods for translating, coding, and exploring patterns and materials (Veal, 2017). As a

qualitative part of daily existence and knowledge of the individual, qualitative research into new

hypotheses is infiltrated with an inductive strategy that can be tested with subsequent research.
 Research Methods 4

Methods

Qualitative researchers use eyes, ears, and ideas to capture intelligence and reveal

populations, places, and opportunities inside and outside (Bryman, 2016). The results are

summarized in different ways and scientists regularly use two or more methods at the same time to

create a qualitative report.

Direct observation

With direct observation, scientists notice people without approaching, participating, or

harassing them. This type of human research is not sufficiently clear and in this role they need to

focus on open spaces where people do not need adequate protection. For example, scientists may

notice that strangers gather in the sun as they rush to observe the party (Hennink et al., 2020).

Open-ended surveys

Many programs are aimed at gathering quantitative information, but many are open research

that takes into account qualitative and age-related information research. For example, voting can be

used to survey political voters who voted in their own words, regardless of the reason for the

election (Ghauri et al., 2020).

Focus group

At the Annual General Meeting, the scientists hold small community meetings to discuss

and gather relevant information on the research questions. The meeting group can contain 5 to 15

members. Sociologists often use it to consider such events and patterns in special networks. It is

often found in statistical surveys (Bell, etc., 2018).

 Research Methods 5

In-depth interviews

Scientists manage the meetings from top to bottom by talking to partners in an individual

setting. In some cases, the researcher attends a prearranged meeting of a series of questions or

topics, but still allows the discussion to take place beforehand, depending on how the member

responds. On several occasions, the researcher has pointed out certain problems, but does not have

a traditional discussion guide, but is guided by the member (Ghauri, et al., 2020).

Oral history

An oral history program is used to temporarily record events, meetings, or networks, and

generally involves holding indoor and outdoor meetings with some members during a participation

period (Veal, 2017).

Participant observation

This technique is like a perception, however, with this method the scientist also participates

in activities or opportunities to follow others and participates directly in the framework (Tracy,

2019).

Ethnographic observation

Ethnological perception is the most serious observation technique indoors and outdoors.

Starting with human research, using this technology, the researcher has fully immersed himself in

the research environment and lived among the members for months and years. In doing so, the

scientist strives to find daily information from the perspective of those who are focused on creating

archives on the Internet, occasions, or observed patterns from top to bottom (Ghauri, et al., 2020).

Content analysis

Sociologists use this policy to disrupt public activities by discrediting words and images

from archives, movies, production, music, and other social media and media. Scientists reflect on
 Research Methods 6

how words and images are used and the environment in which they are based on the foundations of

the underlying culture. Research into the content of computer material, especially that created by

Internet users throughout their lives, has become familiar with sociological methods (Veal, 2017).

While much of the information generated by qualitative research is only coded and

disaggregated by the eyes and minds of research, the use of hyphens to perform these actions is

gradually becoming known within sociology. Such a program query is useful when the information

is abnormally overwhelming to the people you are dealing with, but the lack of a human mediator is

a typical analysis of application usage (Tracy, 2019).

Pros and Cons

Qualitative research has two advantages and disadvantages.

 In addition, it provides an internal and external vision of the perspectives, practices,

collaborations, opportunities and social practices related to normal daily life. By working as

such, social scientists can see how everyday life affects things throughout the community,

such as social structure, social demand, and diverse social power.

 This set of technology also has the advantage of being adaptable and effective with many

facets of changes in research conditions and, as a general rule, can be based on negligible

costs.

 One of the shortcomings of qualitative research is that scaling is really limited, so its results

are by no means widely available to summarize.

 Scientists must also use advocacy through these methods to ensure that they do not

influence information in a way that completely changes them and that they do not have a

disproportionately unique tendency to understand their understanding of the results.

 Fortunately, qualitative scientists are preparing thoroughly to avoid or reduce this type of

research choice.
 Research Methods 7

Data sources

The CHET database was the basic data source that NatCen received. To sharpen the strictest

management data sets, Broadway has provided data from a variety of sources:

• Refinement House (CH) Facts: for previously uncomfortable sleeping accommodations that have

been helpful over long distances that were originally fenced off for acute anesthesia as part of the

Rough Sleep Initiative

• Information on the current administrative services of CLG Support Information, Resource

Information Service (RIS), CLG Financial Reform Information (HCIP).

Data quality

The nature of the information in the CHAIN database has improved over time. Information

gathering started in 1996 as part of the Outreach Directory project. In 2001, the Rough Sleep

Register made an exception to this. Information from the two companies was transferred to the

KETTA mailbox when it was launched in December 2001. Information on KETNA is currently

listed for each of these parties (O'Sullivan, et al., 2016).

Several material information queries show a significant improvement in the quality of

information 2001/02. And again 2004/05. A variety of information changes in quality during the

observation period. Therefore, the data entered in the report is identified by different time limits:

we try to use as much data as possible without including incomplete or missing data. The data is

recorded during the financial years. This is consistent with other KETNAs that discovered the

experiments and allowed additional information to be included in the test, i.e. From the first three

months of 2008, based on the fact that the survey started in April 2008. A special case where the

information center administration information (RIS) is housed. Host catalogs appear very quickly

in the last part of current billing (Smith, 2019).

 Research Methods 8

Rough sleeping in London: an overview

London's unfavorable population has changed from 2000-01 to 2007/08 over the eight-year

period. We reviewed the data in the CHAIN database and sampled the number of uncomfortable

thresholds and formatted the first acute thresholds (Bryman, 2016).

Number of rough sleepers

There are several methods to test how sharp the dose is. CLG's philosophy is to track

changes in the amount of acute sleep through elevations, demonstrating an overnight sleepless

vacation. The National Audit Office reports that highway inspections are "the most accurate part of

the total size [of uncomfortable sleep] and change after a while (Ghauri, et al., 2020)." The number

of people who have registered as uncomfortable on the road has dropped from 1,850 from 1998 to

483 a year, indicating real and achievable reductions in naps over the past decade. This report

analyzes in detail the number of people who have had an unpleasant nap in KETNA, that is. Strong

peace that workers in London observe at different times.

Legally, this data does not closely resemble road information, despite the fact that the data

is later reviewed at KJN. The number of people workers who contacted them watched closely has

changed during the eight-year perception period, from a peak of 3,395 since 2000/01 (Bell, et al.,

2018). Until 2579 from 2003/04. In 2004/05. The data shows a slight and constant increase in the

number of uncomfortable thresholds in the last four years, with more than 2,500 since 2004/05.

Maximum 3,000 as of 2007/08. Part of this expansion could reflect more conflicts over time (i.e.

more conflicts leading to more contact with uncomfortable sleeping people), despite the fact that no

power adjustments are being made and would not account for all the climb (Tracy, 2019).

The moral structure of the first and awkward sleepover in London also changed over a

period of eight years. The level of anger among national institutions among London's beautiful old

dormitories is steadily declining, from 80 percent in 2000/01. 63 percent in 2007/08. At the same

time, the number of people uncomfortable sleeping other than dark or dark British has increased
 Research Methods 9

from 13% to 20%, and the proportion of Chinese or mixed populations has increased from just 4%

to 7.5%. The largest increase was reported in the uncomfortable Asian or Asian-British sleep base,

which was less than one percent of London's acute sleep in 2000/01, compared to exactly five

percent in 2007/08 (O'Sullivan, et al., 2016).

Citizenship data suggests that the number of dormitories in the UK, Asia is low: many of

those living in the slums to show long distance citizens of British citizens in hard rooms in London.

This is especially considered if we change our minds before 2004/05. In 2005/06. To ban missing

data (shown in italics and then given a calendar. The data also shows a significant increase in the

number of acute sleep stories from Poland and Eritrea (each representative of approximately one of

the top 10 sleeping products awkward signed 2007/08) and Eastern European (EEC) mountain and

mountain hikers, who banned Poland, remained around 5 percent of all early gliders in London

between 2006/07 and 2007/08 (Bell, et al., 2018).

Conclusion

Employees and staff at the time of sudden bed rest encompass the needs of the customer and

the institutional history of KETTA. Examination of these CURRENT data and increasingly

extensive documentation experiments show that reported REPORTS are reliably comparable to

substance abuse, but can reduce psychological well-being problems.6 It should be considered

emotionally good to be a generally accepted practice of a recognized practice. the reported

problem; In reality, the problem of obtaining a diagnosis of perceived emotional well-being is the

problem that employees have with external teams.

 Research Methods 10

References

Bell, E., Bryman, A. and Harley, B., 2018. Business research methods. Oxford university press.

Bryman, A., 2016. Social research methods. Oxford university press.

Ghauri, P., Grønhaug, K. and Strange, R., 2020. Research methods in business studies. Cambridge

University Press.

Hennink, M., Hutter, I. and Bailey, A., 2020. Qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications

Limited.

Lune, H. and Berg, B.L., 2016. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson

Higher Ed.

O'Sullivan, E., Rassel, G., Maureen, B. and Taliaferro, J.D., 2016. Research methods for public

administrators. Taylor & Francis.

Smith, M., 2019. Research methods in accounting. SAGE Publications Limited.

Tracy, S.J., 2019. Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis,

communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.

Veal, A.J., 2017. Research methods for leisure and tourism. Pearson UK.