Running Head: DISCOURSES

Why We Still Talking About Race 2020? Critical Analysis of Donald Trump
Discourses
[Name of Institute]
[Name of Student]
[Date]
 Discourses 2

ABSTRACT
Donald J. Trump is the president who has questioned the characteristics of the
media around the world. Where did the story start? What's going on in this article,
authors try to answer these questions with a view to critical discourse analysis. The
process of defining the "discourse" is distorted with regard to ideological rhetoric.
Racial discrimination, immigrants and Trump's "basic" portrait are not ignored. As
one of the common areas of communication, language strength and philosophy, the
analysis of critical discourses can be used to examine outstanding language points
for social and social reasons with increasing numbers. The central discourse
analysis is based on Hariday's basic usage language, a practicable strategy for
examining the discourse. Political rhetoric as a type of rhetorical manipulation,
including belief systems and speaker goals, can also be explored through analysis of
critical rhetoric. Therefore, this article analyses Donald Trump's first speech, mainly
in terms of transit, methodology, personal perception, and clarity, reveals the
speaker's political expectations, understands the meaning of the language, and is
important. Analysis that helps develop awareness and skills. This document
indicates that Trump uses various language constructs to incorrectly convey, modify,
and maintain the crowd's philosophy. At the same time, it has a positive effect on
improving the analysis of critical discourses.
 Discourses 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................2
CHAPTER-1: INTRODUCTION...................................................................................5
Euphemistic Terms....................................................................................................7
Principle of equality...................................................................................................9
Racism.......................................................................................................................9
Aims and Objectives................................................................................................10
CHAPTER-2: CRITICAL RACE THEORY- Ian Haney Lopez..................................11
Two False Narratives..............................................................................................12
All Terrorists Are Muslim.........................................................................................13
No White People Are Terrorists..............................................................................13
Notion of critique.....................................................................................................14
Discourse.................................................................................................................15
Critical Discourse Analysis......................................................................................16
Thematic..................................................................................................................17
Syntaxes style.........................................................................................................17
Persuasion...............................................................................................................17
Macrostructures of the text......................................................................................18
Syntaxes style.........................................................................................................19
Defining Ideology.....................................................................................................20
Social, Political and Economical Dynamics............................................................22
Cultural World..........................................................................................................24
2016 Campaign.......................................................................................................24
Discursive psychology and positioning...................................................................25
Interpreted Meanings..............................................................................................27
Securitisation Theory...............................................................................................28
“Actors” and “Audiences” in Securitisation Theory..............................................29
METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................................31
Critical Discourse Analysis......................................................................................31
Data Collection Design............................................................................................32
Data Collection........................................................................................................32
Sampling..................................................................................................................32
Trustworthiness.......................................................................................................33
 Discourses 4

Research Ethics......................................................................................................34
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS.................................................................................35
Dog-whistling and Figleaves...................................................................................35
Trump’s Ideology “Trumpism”.................................................................................36
Racism in Trump’s Discourse.................................................................................37
Africans in Trump’s Discourse................................................................................37
Media and Stereotype.............................................................................................38
Sexism.....................................................................................................................39
Islamophobia...........................................................................................................40
Van Dijk’s terminology.............................................................................................44
Race and Racism....................................................................................................46
Black Citisenship.....................................................................................................47
Theoretical Framework............................................................................................47
Systemic Functional Linguistics..............................................................................48
Psychology and positioning.....................................................................................50
Post-Civil Rights Norms..........................................................................................51
Political Correctness................................................................................................53
Case Study..............................................................................................................54
McKay Coppins on the conservatives trying to ditch fake news..........................54
CONCLUSION............................................................................................................56
REFERENCES...........................................................................................................59
 Discourses 5

CHAPTER-1: INTRODUCTION
Political discourse analysis is considered an educational field that focuses on
the study of political correspondence with the public, regardless of content, speech,
pictures, labels, pictures or various fingerprints. It plans to address specific issues,
including “How does political discourse work? In addition, is it often pointed out that it
is capable of buying, legalizing and retaining strength?” The analysis of political
rhetoric is about the destruction of the voting organisation, its implementation,
expansion, the cluster, influence and response. It is important that political discourse
analysis is a comprehensive field of study that includes government,
correspondence, brain sciences, humanities and more(Wodak and Krzyżanowski,
2017).
In this way, it is possible to consider the idea, impact or attitude of an
identified person or political, monetary or social entity that is disseminated or
disseminated by any policy, for example broad communication, to address a specific
goal of to reach an individual or organisation. What political rhetoric recognises is
that its understanding depends on where the rhetoric is being sent. It is usually not
about coordination of effects, but is based on uncertainty, deliberation and deviations
that help achieve relevance by influencing and persuading the user(Gounari, 2018).
Elite decision making in different countries has used many tools from the beginning
to announce their plan. Political speeches were one of the most important tools and
methods. In this way, the political discourse became an idea and received many
messages for various meetings. She tries to reach her destinations, spread her
messages and get help from the political first-class open policy and its addresses.
Political debate about power is a compelling tool because it governs the
writings, arrangements and political options defined in relations with the region and
the world as a result of intense decision-making by the state(Murrell, 2016). As can
be seen in its essence and goals, it is a good source of ideological, scientific and
political approach used by government agencies to justify their abilities and to
encourage family members to pay attention when they get over it in real life told. For
example, on December 6, 2017, US President Donald Trump announced that
elections in recognition of the American Association of Jerusalem are the capital of
Israel, another forum in his political speech program that occasionally appears in the
media to stimulate international speculation about the plans and objectives of the
 Discourses 6

new agency. The conversation must therefore be read extensively and collapse
politically(Goldfarb, 2017).
As part of their statement, theologians investigate political headlines to
explore ideas such as religious beliefs, social views, and power. The CDA appears
to identify the relationship between strength, agility, imbalance and management
conveyed through the language, with or without a clear message(Goldfarb, 2017).
Because the controls are operated, they can be considered one-sided from the start.
However, this willingness does not undermine the government’s treatment plan. The
CDA focuses on social issues, especially by pretending to create and multiply the
abuse of power and control(Bell, 2018).
The ability of politicians to convince their fans is one of the most important
factors in deciding to achieve their goals and win an open deal in a constant battle
for power. In the light of Titenin, the master of the open group is placed where
language, words, concepts and typical formulation depend on truth and the frame is
characterised by legitimate speeches. This multi-layered idea is in a zigzag shape
and requires an in-depth understanding of critical education and knowledge to
recognise what it really is and how to get around it with fragile and difficult
language(Khalil and Abbas, 2018). A critical analysis of rhetoric is the best possible
subject to discover the controversial structure of hadiths, operas or copyrights, to
discover the hidden philosophies that exist there. An important part of the speech
analysis confirms that CDA emphasizes the requirements for interdisciplinary work to
gain an understanding of how language skills are formed and information conveyed
in corporate organisation screening. This requires a list of bold links between
content, conversation, community, and culture(Lindau, 2019).
This article critically criticizes recipient Donald Trump, who identifies the
presence of jihadist attackers as a methodology to promote the idea of American
security. That speech was delivered at the 2016 US Presidential Summit because it
was used as a tool to win the President’s political decision. Using Van Dyck’s
structure, this study examines Donald Trump’s public belief system behind his
receiver, called Making America Security, and how he can use philosophy to
convince crowds. Critical word search controls the mysterious belief system within
the language. Van Dijk supports this thinking and emphasizes that CDA emphasizes
the main goals of the Creator and the speakers, including the language of the
offensive and philosophical past(Sun, 2018). At the time, this hypothesis is being
 Discourses 7

implemented as a social-intellectual analysis dealing with topics other than social

structure, power management, social understanding, and various aspects of speech.
This analysis comprises three measures: content, social perception and
analysis of social frameworks. The content of the main perspective and the speech
process used to promote the topic. In addition, social insight is analysed with the
individual consciousness of the author on the way to transfer hadith.

Euphemistic Terms
Ideological control systems have emerged in various ways, including a double
arrangement of derogatory and indirect expressions. Hornby describes
‘underestimation’ as decisive behavior towards others or ashamed, but ‘blades’ are
words or circular terms that individuals often use to wave something insulting or
unfavorable to look increasingly worthy of what is real. In this announcement, Rahimi
and Sahargard describe the term “double peak” as words and vocabulary used to
diminish or diminish the truths of ideas expressed to the people, whilst describing the
word “negative” as a means of demonstrate critical or unpleasant behavior. Double
letters are words and phrases used to hide or diminish the truth of ideas sent to
people(Khoirunisa and Indah, 2017). Widespread aspects of language and language
use are also needed. Individuals from different communities and networks use
indirect expressions to speak or explain the insulting miracles(Fuchs, 2017).
Another use of the double strand is to increase or advance the condition.
However, it is regularly used to talk circularly about things where clear representation
is particularly inappropriate. The reference to the word Myriam Webster describes
the word Euphemism as “a nice or harmless common replacement for someone who
could offend or recommend something unacceptable; plus: supporter. Describes a
similar term as” a nice or round word, or a more detailed one expression of a person
considered to be cruel or very weak when referring to something that is
unacceptable or offensive, for example, “shrink” as a code for the word
“cut”(Wahyuningsih, 2018). ‘Skepticism’ is characterised by ‘getting a second
degree, laughing’ at the international English dictionary and ‘exchanging letters with
someone or something with a free dictionary. Some examples are: arrogance,
contempt, support as correspondence that shows respect for users; to black people;
minors such as the East and the East who are members of the Eastern race(Bonilla,
2016).
 Discourses 8

Asians find this term hostile. In addition, words with standard suggestions in
educational circles are anything but unknown. Check out the terms in the
instructions: “dropout” = “early delay,”“show water display” = “conventional
screenings”, “repeat study” = “parrot-like study” = “meaningless study”, “rower return”
= ‘crazy’ and so on. They decimate in this way(Schubert, 2017). Prejudice and
cruelty are important side effects of the media that occur in figurative and avoidance.
Looking at American history, foreigners have repeatedly emphasized it as the
basis for the branding of American culture. In times of social weakness, they were
viewed with suspicion about issues such as high unemployment, a contraction in
monetary policy and a feeling of poor national security(Fuchs, 2017). Although real
immigrants have made a great financial and social contribution to this country, they
are regularly seen as terror and fear, “a threat to national solidarity and social
integrity.” In addition to being founded by foreigners, the United States has long
since established an unresolved relationship with those who settled here from
different countries. The number of immigrants moving to the United States has
grown steadily since the 1960s and speaks of “sunken” that corresponds to or
exceeds most of history(Bonilla, 2016).
Before the 1960s, many foreigners settled in the United States from European
countries. Today, however, “Asian and Latin American workers are the largest
population of newcomers,” with many immigrants moving to the United States from
Africa and the Middle East. This rapid change in the clothes of the people of the
country has led to great weakness, especially since it is influencing the emergence
of “common ideas about citisenship and agreement about what America is talking
about”. In addition, he grew the dark-colored mass here and there (Sun, 2018). A
widespread sense of unrest and vulnerability in a standardised ruling society - often
described as a white European Christian legacy - and to spread hostility to decision-
making and modern immigration. Unleash the inconvenience of viewing fleeting
American content, along with the nervousness of financial security and patriotism,
being brought up, or those with excellent ‘foreigners’ views seeking access to
improve their own position through the occasional National Xenophobia Account
support - occasional unimaginable and unreported restrictive allegations , and it is
also harmful to use gradually hidden and evolving immigration imaging
events(Rahmi, 2019).
 Discourses 9

These systems can actually be used polarised and charged, and the main
way is that they can be an equal fraction of a known choice. For example, this is the
main observation method used in these interpretative methods. What cannot easily
be overlooked as exclusive and incomplete is that it is consistent with what has been
created by much of society, but as mutually accepted immigration
standards(Wahyuningsih, 2018). These vile and graphic structures go beyond any
deep tendency that defines workers as risky.

Principle of equality
The United Nations General Assembly emphasizes that anyone who has
moved to the world is free and equal to nobles and rights and can contribute
productively to the progress and well-being of their social systems. In the latter
goals, the General Assembly affirmed that all racial education was false, morally
condemned, socially disgusting, dangerous outcomes that should be rejected, along
with speculation trying to establish the existence of independent races. The United
Nations has been concerned from the outset about this issue and the limitation of
divorce policies in all major human rights instruments. It imposes obligations on
states and undertakes to murder helpless people in public and private circles.
Likewise, the Balancing Directive assumes that states will take unusual measures to
eradicate situations that cause or help to maintain a separation policy(Lindau, 2019).

Racism
This article takes into account the effects of sweat reduction on a person’s
daily presence. It raises a number of important questions related to the possible
outcomes of prejudice about the dimension, which are part of the normal
presentation of individuals. This is particularly uneven when respondents deny the
tolerance they face and have difficulty naming bias when this happens, which is
rather unreasonable and unethical. Late writing has been helpful in increasing our
understanding of how we control races through full-size silence, but it does not
provide a clear understanding of how individuals experience it in their daily lives or
how individuals can deal with or resist it(Khoirunisa and Indah, 2017). This article
attempts to fill this gap by analysing how serenity affects individuals’ lives and how in
these unique circumstances it is possible to counter disapproval on both the
standard and individual levels.
 Discourses 10

More importantly, it reveals to us how the path to calm extends to suffocated

horisons to discuss intolerance. Honestly, this shows that without a modern breed it
is difficult to state tolerance by respondents in their accounts, as one respondent
unambiguously says, “We are no different.” The enemy is believed to be bigotry, but
he therefore does not fulfill this skill by failing to recognise variability in
meaning(Bonilla, 2016). The sense of universal humanity is expected to emphasize
parity. What is evolving, however, is to reject the difference in understanding and
reality of intolerance. Criticism Sweat culture corresponding to density activity is not
understood(Sun, 2018). This is noticeable when we understand how bias is rejected
in the data presented here whilst showing excellence, including a very clear form of
intolerance. It is very clear when respondents recommend that name intolerance is
inherently superior or narrow-minded. Respondents, however, refuse to take bribes
and tolerant positions when rejected.
When they do that, they repeat an understanding of fanaticism that has
nothing to do with control. This does not mean that they are not aware of these
relationships, but that they only work within those aspects of national calls that are
accessible with understandable accounts. This is a feature of morality that has
hindered the understanding of prejudice. They have expressed an interest in offering
a study here(Rahmi, 2019). What is the reason for rejecting large amounts? Or for
what reason is it difficult to explain? This study not only shows that sweating makes
it difficult for people prone to prejudice, but also feels the pressure to effectively
reject these measures so that they are considered part of the social norm. The
mention of fanaticism goes against the idea of a “liberal state” due to racial prejudice
that, according to respondents, was fragmented.

Aims and Objectives

The aim of this study is to analyse the disclosure of Donald Trump. The basic
objectives of the study are as follows:
 To investigate the debates and racist talks done by Donald trump
 To identify the critical factors obtained during the Critical Disclosure Analysis
(CDA)
 Discourses 11

CHAPTER-2: CRITICAL RACE THEORY- Ian Haney Lopez

Critical Race Theory (CRT), the belief that the law and legitimate foundations
are inappropriately arrogant and that the race itself, rather than organic and right, is
a socially developed concept by which whites promote their financial and political
interests at the expense of minorities. Ian Haney Lopez grew up in Hawaii. His father
Terence Hani comes from Washington (Sun, 2018). His mother, Maria Lopez Hani,
comes from El Salvador. Ian changed his last name from honey to honey Lopez
whilst a student respected the Latin convention of using his people's names at
Princeton University whilst presenting the "clear white" (Golchehr, 2019).
Against the minority. Achieved He is one of the main authors in the Critical
Race Theory category. Legal Emphasis on Whites: The Legal Construction of the
Race This book, which was used until 1952, is said to be "white" to individuals and to
remove the legal need to increase naturalized citisenship. He then distributed racism
to the court: Chikana's struggle for justice, police atrocities perpetuated and
developed Mexican-American activists in the late 1960s, and non-white Tikans It
recorded how the character's progress was promoted (Scott, 2016). Haney Lopez is
also carefully reviewing the Supreme Court's translation of the sacred command
"Unification". In an article, he explains the roots of the "partial blindness" principle of
the court. According to this principle, a national activity in which the race is explicitly
observed is often considered to be synonymous with racial discrimination and is
therefore declared unconstitutional (Hora, 2019).
The basic model is government policy towards a minority of society based on
the fact that these projects make racism undeniable. In another article, Hanilopez
adopted the principle of expectation. Under this rule, governance that is not legally
racial is not considered racist, as is routinely accepted (Sun, 2018). However, since
the age of social equality, practically every abuse of non-white people and women
has been implicitly misused without fully taking race or sexual orientation into
account. With few visions, government policies towards social minorities increase
racism, but in fact any non-white oppression is perfectly justified (Golchehr, 2019).
Hani Lopez made a fundamental change in spring 2004 to teach a training
course in critical race theory. This workshop focused on Latin Americans and late
law writing. This course explored further improvements in this area that are familiar
with tests with differences based on critical race theory and focused on personality
and Latin law issues (Scott, 2016). The CRT has initiated an examination of the anti-
 Discourses 12

discrimination law and has responded to important legal inquiries. These scientific
implications are based on topics such as: The nature and subordination of racism.
Racism and the origin of racism in anti-discrimination laws are above all modern
demands, especially for the visually impaired (Hora, 2019). And the importance of
the way in which opinion rights are discussed in the struggle of ethnic
communication. The CRT's attention to the relationship between race and law is
gradually drawing links between race and other social indicators such as sexual
orientation, class and status of foreigners (Sun, 2018). These concerns have been
raised, for example, in questions of race, sexual orientation and fundamentalism.
The last third of the chapter focused on certain legal and Latin issues, including
issues such as personality, language, imperialism, race, ethnicity, and national roots.
Critical race theorists reject the possibility that "races" have different
references. Instead, it is the result of intensive social action. They call for the
achievement of race as a result of social practices, not the innate nature of the
individual. Legal changes must treat forgotten practices exactly as intended because
there is no forgotten memory and no practice aimed at developing ethnic situations,
generalizations, or practices (Golchehr, 2019). The discovery and destruction of
advantages that are not common amongst whites is an important contact for the
Critical Race Grant. In the case of immigrants and citisenship, Ianhani Lopez
teaches how the implicit assumption about white teaches the Supreme Court's
important option to distinguish between white and non-white (Hora, 2019). Richard
Delgard of how guilt feelings followed non-egg pictures, although there was
measurable evidence that egg behavior was becoming more dangerous, more
natural, and more frightening. Richard Ford used shaded lines to examine urban and
rural areas for real estate, land use, dense government, and suffrage (Scott, 2016).

Two False Narratives

It is not difficult to discover two existing reports of psychological oppression in
the United States. First, there is a possibility that “all terrorists are Muslims”, which
occasionally changes to “all Muslims are terrorists”. Another reason is that “whites
are never terrorists”. Despite these differences, they determine the general size of
these accounts. There is no general meaning of psychological oppression. This
dissertation follows (without significant support) the meaning of the US PATRIOT
Act, which characterises “terrible oppression” as the hideous activity that is
 Discourses 13

supposed to intimidate or oppress the community or to influence the government. It

is evil in the United States, which seeks to instill fear and is driven by a religious
system rather than money(Hora, 2019).

All Terrorists Are Muslim

The possibility that terrorists are Muslims is inevitable in the United States.
Before September 11, observers could claim that “the views of the Arabs as
terrorists are open and creative.” There is a long history of “orientalism” that Arabs
and Muslims call unusual, wild and risky “others”. Obviously, “Middle Easter” and
“Muslims” are not commercial terms. In fact, in the United States, most Arabs are not
Muslims and most Muslims are not Arabs. However, 9 terrorists are usually
associated with a rationalization called “Muslim”, including Muslims and people
portrayed as Arabs or the Middle East. Islam itself dares to be “rough, unusual and
internally inaccessible”. No evidence is known that Muslims in the United States are
constantly responsible for attacks(Golchehr, 2019).

No White People Are Terrorists

Another fundamental narrative is that white Christian radicals resistant to
psychological warfare are not terrorists. There are exceptions. Mostly, white bombing
in Oklahoma is seen by a white Christian as a sign of fear-based oppression.
Despite the fact that he was there, the attack was originally attributed to Muslim
hangouts. In general, “scarecrow” is not a word used by a white Christian
responsible for the attack on Quebec City(Scott, 2016). He is also not the only one
who, as a psychological warrior, remains at a strategic distance from personal
creation. And in this decline there are white Christians, often white Supremacists,
who have philosophically forced them to attack women, police officers, public Jewish
and Sikh shrines. It includes white Christian fanaticism as successful nine Africans in
a church in Charleston, South Carolina, in 2015, who largely see it as injustice rather
than fear-based oppression. But as former Attorney General Loretta Lynch noted:
“Violations of the opposition are the first psychological wars on the ground.” Even so,
the name fear of fear is usually used when Muslims commit cruelty(Golchehr, 2019).
The study looked at critical discourse that was promoted substantially by
examining the relationship between language, power and religious systems. He drew
attention to the fact that it can be distributed by the useful language organisation
 Discourses 14

Holliday, which is a practical strategy for the analysis of hadith. In his research, he
sought to disprove forms of rhetoric, focusing on analysing political rhetoric as a form
of rhetoric in the mill, including religious and rational systems, with a focus on
analysing President Donald Trump’s speech as president of the United States. He
attempted to explore the goals of a political spokesperson to help executives
understand the importance of speech and build their logical abilities(Sun, 2018).
The question indicated that Trump could easily have used characteristic
language planning to help him properly discuss and influence his audience. At the
same time, he concentrated on analysing the language of political rhetoric,
explaining that the first stage of any modern analysis was to determine if his
language is a class communication tool and that the material is effective and
downright effective. So the creator asked questions when his test turned into political
rhetoric and most importantly: do we discuss government issues through language
or do we discuss legislative issues(Rahmi, 2019). If there are three meetings in the
Hadith circle: the sender and the recipient and the message in between. What are
the questions, do these influences move between these groups? Who breaks this
balance? And when? Are you breaking up? Or is the criterion for performance level
again? Each of these questions suggests that the relationship between the three
parties is reliable and that the essence of governance is “reliable communication”.

Notion of critique
Van Dijk emphasized that it was important for critical researchers to have
clear social and political norms and to explain their beliefs, goals and norms they
trusted. He believed that their important exams should not be reduced and that their
ultimate goal should be in the public interest, not just in the structure of the hadith.
Each of these criteria helped the expert to break Ronald Trump’s speech and focus
on his views, ideas, goals, and psychological and individual circumstances regarding
our test questions. In political theories and general systems, scientists have come up
with ideas for political rhetoric because they are fundamental. These ideas are
grouped into two groups, according to analysts(Rahmi, 2019). The main group was
able to talk about politics that characterise politicians because it was determined by
the ability to bring the ideas, rules and methodology of the country to individuals.
Moreover, it is one of the most important capacities of civil servants where the value
of correspondence between pioneers and individuals is insufficient. Likewise, the
 Discourses 15

ability to communicate with the use of interpretive language, including clues,

directions, and images that affect the minds of individuals, is strongly indicated.
The Second Parliament realized that political rhetoric was considered a state
mission(Lindau, 2019). The pioneers of this modern political group see themselves
as the message of a declared state or a semi-formal offer of what the government
wants to achieve in its phase. Since the announcement, it has become a mandatory
element where pioneers lose value if their guarantees are misused(Wahyuningsih,
2018). Political rhetoric is recognised from different rhetoric because it influences
users and has methods by which it can acquire this opinion. It guides it: it strives for
the most important issues inside and out and has the place and influence of the
country’s most famous expert and makes it countless convincing within the network.
They are concerned about the issues that contribute to the resolution of effective
options for public opinion, as they remain relevant to the public and attractive events
in the public and political spheres(Khoirunisa and Indah, 2017).
They fluctuate on social and political conditions and factors, just as ideas
thwart them, from one group to the next, trying to deal with situations in which the
individual lives in the common language. It is intentional and contains unusual
messages that you need to feel good. It is not unlimited in this way and regulates
matters from the point of view of authority. Thus, the credibility of the hadith is
determined by the authority of the state. Political talk is determined by its relative
relationship and demonstration. To understand this relationship, political rhetoric
masters three interpretive perspectives defined in the political sphere(Murrell, 2016).
These views take place with Max Weber, Hannah Ardent and Georges Habermas.
Max Weber agreed that political power was linked to cruelty and power. Thus,
human relationships depend on the relationship between the controlling and the
slaves(Bell, 2018). Power inflicts evil on its power that is authentic and willful over
various subordinates. Hannah Arendt experienced the opposite, because her
political position stems from people’s consent to live. This means that relationships
depend on the organisation that will organise their behavior.

Discourse
There are a few meanings of that have been explained in many notebooks,
and each definition is expected to give a special meaning to speech. At the same
time, the meaning of speech varies depending on the views that each expert uses.
 Discourses 16

The term talk comes from the Latin root of “rhetoric,” which includes discussion or
speech. So in basic visuals, it can be a kind of social discourse that can be
connected or created with the language(Gounari, 2018). Moreover, as Collins
English Dictionary / Collinsdiction.org notes, oral correspondence or speech in
spoken language can be an expression of discussion. In addition, Montollo argued
that the term talk has been described as a measure of socio-cultural connection that
promotes social development. This definition is very broad because the term talk has
no major obstacles. Each talk, on the other hand, is part of a socio-cultural process,
but not the whole social measure of speech. Whilst introducing the explanation of
talk, Brown described the ability to talk about content through content, so he
classified talk as author-related content and content(Bell, 2018).
Van Dijk’s other definition clearly explains the meaning of speech, namely
that speech is the type of language or open conversation, or generally to promote
languages or a way of speaking. So Van Dijk adopted the word “conversation” in any
language that talents depend on social and spoken environments. Then many
speakers use language to express and express their ideas or opinions during
meetings, such as meeting potential employees or other specific discussions with a
specific point. With all this in mind, the conversation is author or speaker and each
speaker is used individually. Likewise, speech can be thought and the speaker’s
beliefs and the speaker’s belief system, because speaking through a speaker
mediates the use and motivation of the language(Wodak and Krzyżanowski, 2017).

Critical Discourse Analysis

A critical word search analysis examines the relationship between language
use and social environment and social variability. Much of the criticism of critical
discourse analysis has related to social inequalities and has included religious
beliefs, sexual orientation and various religious systems. Likewise, a critical word
search analysis revolves around how political speech is constructed through some
psychology to convince and empower the public arena(Boling, 2019). Critical
discourse analysis is characterised by features such as social practices, compulsory
religious systems, social affairs income and relationships. Furthermore, there is a
critical analysis of the ratio as a tool to break connections within a social context.
Critical word search analysis can be a way to deal with the discovery of social power
and power in social development(Khalil and Abbas, 2018).
 Discourses 17

Thematic
In his book, Van Dijk explains that location is the most important structure to
be taken into account in Van Dijk’s general analysis structure. It also explains the
historical basis of the theme derived from the Greek terms tithenai you want to find.
Although the subject of literature is the main concern a writer or speaker needs. The
topic was regularly associated with the topic of conversation, as it revealed the key
details of the speakers. The topic clarifies the problem, the prevailing idea and the
target speaker in the conversation. Then, to discover the content of the content, the
specialist must understand the entire content. Each talk / content has its own content
to discuss a headline in open conversation with the speaker. To gain an
understanding of the content, the world must also know the social status of
discussion.

Syntaxes style
According to some findings, the earlier hypothesis of Van Dijk is looked at.
Language methods are used in politics using expressions, using powerful and
passive expressions, clarity and conscience. Use the clarity the speaker uses to
understand the audience about the opportunities presented in the conversation. For
example, the conclusion that “persuading managers to hire more minorities in this
way” might be that migrant workers have less work(Gounari, 2018). Another element
is the first name used to master the language by creating an innovative network.
Another model widely regarded as reflecting critical rhetoric is “fitting”. The speaker
uses the “right” excuse to explain where the article will be posted online. There are
different types of language that a critical language analyst must share and explore in
sentences, phrases, and expressions(Kenny, 2017).

Persuasion
The effect of a sentence can vary by using an inactive sentence in the hadith,
but it should be noted that not all sentences are considered convincing. Another
effect is repetition, which can be a sign of the importance of the content as it affects
the uniform organisation of different location data. It is often activated with
paraphrased data in the talk. Each content has its own program of advice and
interest in how the speaker is conveyed, the effects used to find out exactly who the
 Discourses 18

thought is, how and where. The effect of just the repeat effect of the current
sentences does not appear afterwards, as shown in the table of contents. For
example, when a speaker created similar situations, he conveyed the message
differently(Khalil and Abbas, 2018).
Macrostructures of the text
The general part of the content structure is the main part that is expected to
break down the content. The basic idea of the general plan is that each sentence
cannot be mastered with this structure, but a full understanding of the content must
be explored to get the specific point that moves the speaker. When analysing the
overall layout, the main theme to be explained is the current content layout. The
current analysis is the most important analysis of critical discourse analysis in the
Van’s hypothesis. There are two accents to consider in the analysis today, the
subject and the subject of talk(Murrell, 2016).
After the level of speech understanding, scholars here analyse each letter to
get to the main topic and topic of discussion. Three letters from Donald J. Trump
have been selected to investigate: Jerusalem is the capital of Israel and the fear of
repression is based on national security, national security and protection. The first
sermon, Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, was delivered on December 6, 2017. This
letter reflects the main theme that welcomes Israel, as this nation in Jerusalem was
understood as the capital that came into being when this sermon was formed(Wodak
and Krzyżanowski, 2017). The specialist has found the point we have seen and now
points to this question. The subject of the speech is supported by the speaker’s
items:

“Israel is a sovereign nation with the right, like every other sovereign nation ,
to determine its own capital. Acknowledging this is a fact is a necessary condition for
achieving peace. It was 70 years ago that the United States under President Truman
recognised the state of Israel. Ever since then, Israel has made its capital in the city
of Jerusalem, the capital the Jewish people established in ancient times. Today,
Jerusalem is the seat of the modern Israeli government. It is the home of the Israeli
Parliament, the Knesset, as well as the Israeli Supreme Court. It is the location of
the official residence of the prime minister and the president. It is the headquarters
of many government ministries”.
 Discourses 19

The topic supporting the case was Israel’s reputation in Jerusalem. These
sentences can be considered the main sentence and the subject that the speaker
will convey from his or her speech after the speaker is greeted. A spokesperson
began questioning America’s previous demonstration of Israel for more than 70
years before their organisation(Khoirunisa and Indah, 2017). The speaker
understands the value of managing Israelis who have been in Jerusalem for over 70
years by looking at how Jerusalem is the language of the legal debate.
At this point, as a basis and accuracy, the speaker provides more information
about the Israelites and the glory of Jerusalem that we need to understand. From the
above quote, Donald J. Trump is trying to remain an American greatness, where the
American’s sense of fear and psychological warfare must be restored. In general, all
Donald Trump’s speeches attempt to incorporate an enthusiastic connection that has
previously benefited from America’s prosperity and strength. In addition, the subject
of the last speech was to warn Americans of enemies(Schubert, 2017). This was
done by photographing the opponent who saw the speaker. According to a concept
speech, Donald J. Trump tries to ignore the hostile images in a way that many are
not aware of. In addition to the speech, Donald Trump also convinces him to be the
recipient in accordance with his disputes and to use interconnected facts and
motivational communication(Lindau, 2019).

Syntaxes style
Analysis of the structure of the microscope building began with an analysis of
a sample of camel buildings containing four basic components: impact, prediction,
impression, attachment and conscience. The types of language structure are
explained, which means that the expert should focus on sentences without looking at
another social topic and the preparation behind the problem. The world has now
discovered 41 terms that the speaker has put forward to express his thoughts to the
recipient that he can think of for grammatical analysis. There are a total of 3
contacts, 11 clauses, 10 words showing management, 3 guilds and 14 first
names(Fuchs, 2017).
Mehan discovered that speech systems, more clearly a code of conduct that
the parties define themselves, can yield significant results. For example, the use of
the term “refugees against” unemployed workers “encompasses images of terrifying,
terrifying, outsiders and even aliens - of” we “versus” them. “This measure, along
 Discourses 20

with the use of compelling travel histories for employment and CDA, conflicts with
different parts of the origin as it does not include a fixed-term search strategy Wodak
can better understand CDA as a “neat issue for the development of multidisciplinary
research that encompasses different approaches” with the aim of investigating “toxic,
potency , abuse, misuse and policy changes “in the public or social outlook(Bonilla,
2016). The increased legitimacy and importance of this study was used by Corpus
Linguistics to help monitor and measure some of its findings.
The Hardt-Mautner CDA is presented as a” comprehensive, fundamental way
of participating in content such as talking / for the community concerns “achieved
through computers. In addition, systematic use in Corpus linguistics involves a
computer supported by the preparation and analysis of vast informative clues -
“amount of degradation content.”Whilst some methods of dealing with CDA analysis
provide incredible depth, you may now need some leeway, as it is difficult to
implement such a comprehensive methodology on massive data media(Khoirunisa
and Indah, 2017). At the same time, the CL approach itself is almost capable of
performing any kind of detailed self-analysis that a human examiner can complete.
He also conducted self-analysis and emphasized material related to their tests.
Hardt-Mautner conducted a call analysis in which the European Commission and the
European Union used interoperability and other CL methods. CL assisted the
researcher in assessing and substantiating observations and instincts related to
information. Hardt-Mautner reports that “even the most rigorous acoustic measures
can be useful in exploring speech from an important point of view”(Sun, 2018).

Defining Ideology
Philosophy is ideas. This requires a philosophical premise that needs a
personal sector that can represent relevant ideas and religious frameworks.
Individuals of social artists share this framework of social condemnation. They act as
portraits for portraits, interview methods, activities, cultural location and social
interests. Philosophy is a general, unique spiritual framework consisting of social
perspectives. Clearly, philosophy controls opinion, that is, the social feelings
individuals share with the community. For CDA, philosophy is considered an
important part of building and maintaining asymmetric power relationships. Likewise,
this type of research examines social environments in which symbolic structures are
used and transferred(Wodak and Krzyżanowski, 2017).
 Discourses 21

An inspector eagerly decides whether these structures build or maintain

administrative relationships. It has been agreed on all speculation that “there are
open and old reasons why individuals feel, think, want and perceive them as they
do.” People cannot follow deliberate attitudes and perspectives that flow from a belief
system(Gounari, 2018). They can cultivate deeply in their thoughts and languages.
People can deal with it or even compare it. Ideological status can be obscured by
words. One of the main ways that CDA comes to an end is by expressing those parts
of the philosophy that support social media. Incidentally, belief systems were limited
between the cultural and brain structures of social individuals(Boling, 2019). They
enable on-screen social persons to interpret their social characteristics, including
their personality, subject and place, in information and opinions that are powerful
models of their daily encounters; Psychological representation of their people.
Activities and groceries.
As Van shows, a multidisciplinary or multidisciplinary approach is required,
which includes various factors and measures, such as social and psychological
variables. Vocabulary is a large and prominent area of ideological expression.
Chauvinism is coordinated or used around women, it communicates directly and
links to abuse based on liberal philosophy. In fact, Van Dyck describes hadith as a
philosophical analysis, in which ‘philosophy is usually disseminated and refined in
hadith and correspondence’. His methodology for investigating religious systems
consists of three parts: social, self and hadith analysis(Kenny, 2017). Although social
analysis is about looking at ‘general cultural structures’, the analysis of hadith is
largely based on reports.
For Van Dijk, social perception - social perception and individual perception -
interferes with society and dialogue. He describes social consciousness as “a
program of spiritual images and procedures for collecting individuals.” Now, Van
Dyck, “religious systems are usually unique spiritual frameworks that form socially
shared beliefs(Goldfarb, 2017). In this way, religious systems influence a person’s
perception. Individuals’ in his presentation to understand the conversation between
different activities and associations and to describe psychological images. According
to him, during these social activities and associations people are ‘role models’ who
show control over the behavior, speech or construction of individuals or how it works.
understands the social actions of others(Wodak and Krzyżanowski, 2017).
 Discourses 22

Social, Political and Economical Dynamics

Social scientists have thought differently about how President Trump’s victory
will be due to a combination of political, social and financial factors, targeting, for
example, the “revenge” of white workers going down and feeling overwhelmed by the
powerful elite; response to international competition, with undocumented Mexican
foreigners as an alternative(Khalil and Abbas, 2018). All of these statements are a
worrying part of the moral boundaries where white American workers in different
groups are connected: the first layer. Strict ethnic and eastern minority groups,
women and sexual orientation. When we think about it together, these divergent
statements point to the transformation of symbolic constraints in Trump’s
election(Kenny, 2017).
We analyse these boundaries with a detailed analysis of Trump’s formal
public talks; we show that these users also speak to employees’ desire to express
what they approve of, which is their legitimate representation of the national click
request. Trump has accomplished this by raising concerns about “individuals above”
who have drawn good and reliable boundaries towards illegal and Islamic exile;
aimed at the work of ordinary working men as advocates of homosexual women and
individuals. Many of these workers are seen as an insignificant and inconceivable
backbone of the community, which supports the American economy but deserves
recognition(Gounari, 2018). They accept that they “understand better” and are willing
to see the nation realize its value and obligations. During the 2016 presidential
election, many of these workers were in opposition and anger to follow the man who
secured his rights after tacit abuse for too long. Manza and Crowley argued that
Trump’s victory `` was strongly encouraged by their meeting . to voters with
qualifications and pay well beyond the national and base(Bell, 2018).
Indeed, most of Trump’s supporters were unions. However, most researchers
agree that ordinary white American workers have helped influence the situation: 67
percent of white voters without graduate education voted for a Republican
candidate(Khalil and Abbas, 2018). After looking at all the things, it’s worth looking at
the analysis of Trump’s conspiracy for this match. Lamont outlined the moral
boundaries of ordinary American workers through summits aimed at white and dark
male professionals in and around the suburbs of New York in the mid-1990s. Five
aspects of these typical boundaries, for example the men’s boundaries have shifted
to the lady or “higher individuals” have generally remained stable in recent decades;
 Discourses 23

stable discoveries are usually merged and confirmed with initial discoveries. At the
same time, restrictions on migrant workers are becoming increasingly apparent
today. We claim that Trump has benefited from limiting his workers’ parcels, as well
as imposing stricter limits on undocumented immigrants, expulsions and Muslims,
clusters that have truly taken on an incredible nature for the past decade, and the
common war in Syria(Kenny, 2017).
Our illustrations of the plight of ordinary Trump workers are dual concepts of
“resonance” and “social power” invented by Griswold. These creatures capture
situations that form a story or a political conversation that they engage in because of
different qualities, such as ‘recovery’with which they legitimately agreed to submit the
appropriate national click request to these groups. In addition, Trump abused the
types created by workers after the general fall of 2008 when everything was said,
because of reduced susceptibility to home loss and increased competition(Boling,
2019). These questions, along with the sense of increasing influence of radical
psychological warfare in Islam, have given workers a sense of helplessness and
willingness to underline what they consider a legitimate position in the national click
requirement(Khalil and Abbas, 2018). In addition, this article seems binding by
proposing a limited approach to working on social change. In the main section, we
quickly explore this methodology and its benefits. In the next section, we will show
the limited work done by common American white workers on “individuals above”
and “individuals below.”
This allows us to build on the attitude of white experts towards different
groups, as explained in their previous work. In the third part, we focused on how
Trump agreed to his arbitrary work with ordinary workers by presenting himself as
his voice and lawyer, removing the mistakes of his diversity and emphasizing
globalization as a fundamentally negative society. their position and how it has set
limits on “individuals above”whilst distinguishing itself from ordinary, wealthy and
prominent lawmakers(Goldfarb, 2017). Finally, we get the most out of his work with
immigrants, Africans and Hispanics, as well as gay women and individuals. We
argue that Trump’s talks have focused on cutting down the current job in the past
few decades, but they have also brought new choices that have been notable in
recent times. When our analysis centers around Trump’s conspiracy against white
workers, we sometimes talk about the ingredients that made him so attractive to any
American expert(Wodak and Krzyżanowski, 2017).
 Discourses 24

Cultural World
Sociologists have repeatedly found that ordinary American workers have a
moral sense of their value. Within open, thin doors of versatility and financial
performance, these employees gain confidence in their ability to support a world of
moral demand, as evidenced by their work and ability to get through difficult
situations, manage and manage their cards(Murrell, 2016). keep his youth in peace,
and think of others. Undoubtedly, after work meetings in the mid-1990s, Lamont
described “self-taught” as white and ordinary dark-haired men who usually do work
and difficult tasks, maintain family responsibilities, and do business. Whilst some
employees are realistic and set extremely ethical goals regarding the requirements
for regular daily attendance, the image shows strong dissatisfaction with individuals
with `` good low standards ‘‘(Bell, 2018). For the small subgroup, strict beliefs,
including those with preterm birth and homosexuality, gradually increase the
traditional good perspective.
Study confirms that white men of ordinary men build a moral network that
increases their value for “individuals above” and “individuals below.” The attitude that
ordinary American workers need for “individuals above” is contradictory(Khalil and
Abbas, 2018). On the one hand, ordinary workers repeatedly spoke of financial
success in the 1990s, and when potential saints were asked, Donald Donald’s
numbers came closer because of the belief that “enrichment” was evidence of
insight. At the same time, Lamont found that 75 percent of respondents criticize the
moral quality of “individuals above,” who are considered narcissistic and fired,
genuinely affected, and not sufficiently “concerned about individuals.” This hostility to
the individuals above could be Respond by developing inequality and the ability to
limit public transportation by public workers; studies have found that the number of
young people earning more than their parents has fallen from 92 percent of the
predictions in 1942 to 50 percent of the predictions in 1984(Kenny, 2017).

2016 Campaign
First, Donald Trump’s assistance in the 2016 Crusade is unambiguously
defined by intolerance, sexual discrimination, and xenophobia. Whilst some viewers
have shown Trump’s progress in financial nervousness, the information shows that
the enemy of immigrant hypothesis, intolerance and sexual discrimination is
 Discourses 25

unambiguously identified with Trump’s help(Wodak and Krzyżanowski, 2017). Trump

talked a lot about the benefits of wrong education voting with uneducated white men.
In depicting gender bias and prejudice, the difference in practice between whites in
the 2016 political decision has emerged from the normal grades of previous races
since 2000. Trump has not been particularly good with uneducated whites compared
to several Republicans. He did particularly well with whites who expressed a
chauvinistic view of women and denied intolerance(Murrell, 2016).
Even more contemplative is the unambiguous relationship between the Trump
crusaders and the conciliatory cruelty. Information from the FBI shows that since
Trump’s political decision, there has been an unusual increase in hate errors
transferred to areas where Trump has worked with greater benefits(Bell, 2018). This
was the second largest increase in abuse in 25 years that is accessible, and the
second after a significant increase since September 11, 2001. Despite the fact that
violence is usually the center of visitation, 2016 was the highest in the past quarter.
This new high degree of malice continued in 2017. Trump’s relationship to mass
crimes isn’t just tied to the political decision itself(Khalil and Abbas, 2018).
Another study, in light of the data collected by the Assembly Department,
found that the districts that facilitated the Trump Crusade in 2016 experienced more
than twice the inconvenience of crimes compared to similarly uninhabited areas. The
above information analysis deals with relationships; it reminds us of Trump’s
relationship and attitude and arrogance, but doesn’t really show one pushing the
other. However, there are similar causal points to point out. In tests, the emergence
of Trump’s perception of choice is expanding(Sun, 2018). In the 2017 review,
analysts randomly introduced a number of respondents to the President’s sharp
comments, such as, “When Mexico sends their relatives, they don’t send the best”.

Discursive psychology and positioning

Likewise, we will pursue a policy of long-term brain science based on the
social model that has a cause; the idea that language is a kind of social platform
“that shapes the social world, including personality, social communication and
understanding of the world.” We chose the third view of the Hadith analysis
presented by Jørgensen and Phillips because of its diverse nature(Fuchs, 2017).
The third view remains uninterrupted as it recognises the contemporary opportunity
as a target outside of the individual, but it is a hypothesis that further emphasizes
 Discourses 26

that speech must define, define and appropriate the work of the people who created
it, including their personality and home through the language.
Within this long-term view of brain science, an idea by Potter and Weatherel is
known as ‘explanatory groups’, which they describe as ‘a series of concepts,
expressions and interesting expressions that regularly collect similar or striking
images’(Sun, 2018). They also emphasized that these groups are “used effectively
by individuals as a flexible way to achieve social and written forms of social
activity”(Lindau, 2019). The concept of interpreting groups is somewhat similar to
Bronwen Davis’ idea of Roma Harry’s idea of ’academic plans’, which they present
as’ permanent groups that occur primarily in the psyche of any master or expert, as
belonging to a person.’ Both groups of scientists have constructed these ideas. to
identify them based on the theoretical meaning of hadith. We will use the term
“statement group” in our analysis instead of “calculated plan” because we don’t feel
safe in the sense that these groups are “fixed”(Wahyuningsih, 2018).
People are the product of our social environment where language and social
relationships form the basis for the progress of our personalities and groups.
“Digestor healers see the mind and soul piling up because of the disruption of social
camaraderie.” The ideology or convincing attitudes and attitudes of our declining
youth associations influence the way we use our groups. With these collections
collected and developed in a person’s life, individuals can creatively choose better
ways to recreate the world or replicate preventive forms from the real world. Within
each group there are words and phrases that can be drawn to attract or separate
and interact with each other, understand and view environmental aspects, convey
and participate in their thoughts, feelings and thoughts to our community network in
general(Wodak and Krzyżanowski, 2017).
The social and social history of each influences the scope of the museum and
thus the limitation of the words they pass on to understand their reality and position
in it. We can expect individuals to use words and often rely on disturbed
acquaintances with others for life. Another device we’ll be using is an idea from
Bronwyn Davis and Rom Harry, known as GPS(Khalil and Abbas, 2018). The
concept of location was an attempt to establish a link between a speech act that can
be explored in a personality plan and social office. Davis and Harry shed precise
light on our “long-standing internal practices,” as socially determined as we are in all
aspects and creators of the conversation, and shape our own emotional
 Discourses 27

circumstances and each other that now “control” the real world. Written by Dr.
Elizabeth Fraser, “Understanding and experiencing the on-screen personality screen
for their social personality, the social world and their place in it is well built(Murrell,
2016).” Therefore, categories that are created by intermittent and accessible
influences or that hinder the possible results of the development of our nature and
our understanding of the world by embracing places.
The situation can be considered as a spiritual perspective in which the
individual learns about the world, himself and others. Davis and Harry rely on
“selfishness,” which indicates that in our person we can have many positions or
“positions”at the same time that can be obscured or rejected. Christianity, especially
who is the father of gay youth, can be fundamental in a variety of situations(Gounari,
2018). Occasionally, depending on the socially accepted impact of talking about an
overlapping group of situations, such as ‘Christians’, as parents and homosexuals, it
can be a cover that a parent can tolerate in these circumstances, although now and
again, these are incompatible beliefs that rely on convincing and socially
recommended consequences for homosexual and Christian speeches(Goldfarb,
2017).

Interpreted Meanings
Within these next questions, we will explore prominent speeches about the
March Trump election and analyse how Trump uses language to convince and
position himself amongststst his audience. Under the CDA’s Fairclough policy, this
section should focus on training and in line with that, we’ll see how Trump values
and how crowds respond and destroy his behavior. As has been proven recently,
Trump uses a bit of direct language that allows him to present himself as a
“legitimate” individual and connect with the masses. We can accept that by using
informal language, including appropriate and honest words for the group, it can
create an image that extends to fairness and fairness(Gounari, 2018).
In his conversation, he talks to his audience and remembers his unique
relationship with them during the walk. It views the audience as “you” and its use
depends on “us” in general, as we wrote in the last section. In addition, he addresses
directly to police officers confirming the agreement(Boling, 2019). On the other hand,
it has the advantage of modern legislative procedures that participate in “traditional”
political discourse, as it participates in its position and vision, as described above, in
 Discourses 28

the standard political context and the “standard” discourse it embraces. with
Communication directly and directly. In the absence of large portraits, we could call
this another ‘political’ conversation. Trump benefits from reciprocity by multiplying
previous rhetoric, for example, by brief references to monetary input with the
exchange rate, with neoliberal discourse within his political debate(Kenny, 2017).
“The hatred in this country is incredible, the divisiveness is incredible and
we’re gonna end it/ we’re gonna, we’re gonna do things/ we are gonna end it”
Here, his goal of total contempt and disorganisation in the nation is clear, but
it does not lead to conflict - but let the public fill their lost words with their own ideas.
Using “things” has many important potentials, and individuals can absorb content
that fits their own emotional understanding, allowing Trump to integrate multiple
religious systems at once(Bell, 2018). It allows viewers to place particular emphasis
on highly nonspecific advertising such as “fix things” and decipher his fourth
speeches according to his own interpretive groups relying on known and previously
known actual messages. Since creating importance is based on accessible letters
that show the social and economic well-being and location of the individual, it is
necessary to know the differentiation and capacities of each within their
groups(Khalil and Abbas, 2018).
This is based on the fact that our groups consist of speeches that form their
opinions and ideas, and in addition build the ability to know or understand words
Trump has given. For supporters, Trump can be seen as“real” and “legitimate” as he
speaks to some extent according to their qualities and beliefs. For example, singing
out loud to a group when it describes “focus on our nation” is evidence that points to
the point with which much of the group is associated(Lindau, 2019). The power of
what Trump says is not just in his words, but in the purpose of the session, as the
words each person spoke orally are challenging. Smart talk knows the audience and
speaks where necessary.

Securitisation Theory
The securitisation theory is trying to figure out how and why a particular
miracle is limited and recognised as an existential threat and how and why some are
sought and approved to deal with these obvious threats(Belair, 2017). Whilst there is
varying competition for the importance of “securitisation”, the main reason is that
problems cause “on-screen securitisation” to “convince the” crowd “that a particular
 Discourses 29

open case has enough” threatening composition “ Use a specific (usually unusual or
new) approach to respond appropriately to the threat. The historical background to
securitisation dates back to the late 1980s, when a group of scientists called “Kaup”
to add to the feeling of security increase targeted threats and
applications(TjinLiepShie, 2019).
The Copenhagen School, led by like-minded Barry Buzan, Ole Waber and
Jaap de Wilde, argued that an open case could become a security problem if
“presented as an existential threat to an assigned referral,” says definition, “a
Security threat “not really military, but it can also be natural, monetary, cultural or
political. This security source consists of several parts: First, there are stockbrokers
who act as “actors who recognise this by providing a point of reference to the people
at risk of extinction”(Jeffery and McAuliffe, 2020). A lucrative entertainer has
traditionally been government, political power, or other political gravity. Reference
articles are therefore characterised as “things that are viewed as threatening” and
are largely supported by the basic component of society, for example country,
philosophy, economy, overall identity or earth. In addition, there are a large number
of people “whose understanding is important to indicate a transversal threat” and
who usually have material or political means to improve lucrative entertainment and
acquire their preferred technology. to suppress the benchmark(Lewis, 2017).

“Actors” and “Audiences” in Securitisation Theory

Using a securitisation hypothesis that describes certain open issues as
“security concerns”, this plan is intended to define how many policy makers have
contributed to the prolongation of the pandemic since 9 September. Since the reform
in the 1990s, securitisation has become one of the main ideas in research into the
definition and use of security mechanisms. Despite its knowledge, securitisation
theory has generally been explored on the basis of an incomplete hypothesis of what
it calls “actors” and “viewers”(Golchehr, 2019). According to the organisers of the
theory, Buzan, Waever and de Wilde (1998), a securitisation should be found if the
securitisation (strategically) convinces imaginary stakeholders to recognise that a
particular open matter threatens to promote quick access (Jeffery and McAuliffe,
2020). Whilst the resulting researchers generally don’t agree who exactly contains
the person’s effects or stack of screens, the main idea is that whilst safe actors
perform a specific and powerful task to identify a particular problem as a security
 Discourses 30

problem Others Take a Job is committed to understanding and increasing the value
of entertainment to implement the proposed security management policy. As I want
to see, it is extremely difficult to identify stock market traders and isolate them from
viewers when it comes to understanding the US mobility(Lewis, 2017).
The U.S. government’s institutional plan with the confusing distribution of
police violence, which is divided between public and public departments in different
areas and relates to neighboring and national ones, is a particular problem for
scientists investigating recovery securitisation. When setting up “different bosses”
there is usually no institutional player who has no clear control(Bahler, 2018).
Therefore, it would be difficult to hold an entertainer accountable. As we will see
below, different and overlapping forces in American politics are an important test to
teach the securitisation theory of the polarisation of a variety of entertainers(Hora,
2019). As can be seen from this theory, in a series of sovereign systems, many
important stakeholders can over time do tempting work, create policies and permits,
create jobs, or change jobs. I sent Leonard and Kaunertova (2011) the revised
securitisation of the triple flow model as an increasingly systematic and active
computer system to understand the connection between complex aid management
systems and the different actors, including the President and the Department of
Justice (DOJ)(TjinLiepShie, 2019).
 Discourses 31

METHODOLOGY
To investigate these studies, the study will use Norman Ferclo’s critical
vocabulary analysis as a guide to conducting this study. A hypothesis analysis is
used to understand the causes and status of advanced controllers (Hora, 2019). The
expert also wants to clarify the best way to deal with the research presented earlier
in the study. However, CDA is by no means an impeccable research technology or
implies it, its qualitative nature raises potential questions that the expert might
encounter. Whilst you study you have a CDA review but there is no protection using
this methodology to answer my research question. It may be necessary to
understand the benefits and limitations of such a methodology to succeed at the
appropriate level (Belair, 2017). Likewise, it is important for professionals and moral
influences to study them. In this case, the study was embroiled in a political struggle,
acquiring new sections of the Presidential Crusade that residents may not know or
consider important. Still, you think he has an extra opponent for Sener’s Democratic
enemy, which also suggests a tendency against him (Golchehr, 2019).

Critical Discourse Analysis

Since the CDA isolates itself from other methods of speech recognition, it is
recognised that `` the standard study is considered an individual measure or record
of each social practice in the dialectic with different images of social practice. By not
working like Post Structure List 4, for example Laclau and Mouffe, CDA claims that
rhetoric can replicate or shape different parts of our social world and those parts of
the community can also influence ‘long-term measurement’(Scott, 2016). “The
characteristics of content and dialogue and what is generally called a special state,
that is, different characteristics of social or media situations that can systematically
influence content or discourse.
Attitude to know how” leading “language of deception and abuse of to use
convicts this way of dealing with rhetoric is appropriate for the tacit inclination of
presidential candidates who want to talk to “individuals.” CDA wants to continue to
understand the concept of social authority and control a see ideas for improving
importance to dissemination. Political discourse’s role is to “bring multiplication and
mastery of itself and it’s legitimate.”So it’s not common for government policy experts
to use SDA content (Moursi, 2018).
 Discourses 32

Data Collection Design

The “Chronicle of Higher Education” is the premier news source for high
school professionals with online traffic of over 12.8 million pages per month, with 1.9
million exceptions seen by visitors. A printed and developed system is offered, with
43 editions of the course distributed annually to 51,000 supporters and 215,000
users. This news source therefore speaks the most important in creating the social
development of religion, perspectives and practices within the college. Currently,
articles are included on facts related to a trusted pioneer or senior management
executives. Note that in the case of verbal analysis, data is collected rather than co-
created as with other qualitative methods. I have detailed zigzag practices in the
articles to distinguish whether these are common, common examples or whether
contemporary material has been developed. The information contained self-
promoted content, including press releases or opinions of others (Hoffmann, 2019).

Data Collection
As an example of this test, 47 articles were distributed in The Chronicle of
Higher Education between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017. 91 articles were found
by an internet researcher using catch targets and terms. The articles that were
distributed were distributed in the areas of leadership, governance and governance.
Changed works were removed and articles moving the pioneers or authorities
trained in the article, for example, only the summoned titles. Book inquiries, stamps
and letters have been submitted to the editor-in-chief, reviews and articles
discussing employees’ understanding and authority. In addition, transcribed
interviews were distributed and articles were distributed because this rich, fine
information was not provided about the long-term development required for testing,
but instead the speech was limited to the opinion of managers with their own
reporting (Nwaogu, 2017).

Sampling
Before we determine the sampling criteria, it is worth knowing why the
interviews were usually selected as content. Race discussion is an essential part of
the crusades. They provide insight into the title of the creditors, the battle they are in
and what would be natural for the supporters, just as they fit into the crusade.
Moreover, martial arts are a kind of direct correspondence between “pioneers” and
 Discourses 33

“individuals”. These instant messages become frustrating when looking at

informational messages, such as meetings or discussions: “The term” interruption
“also includes the concept of multiplayer messaging via multiplayer (El Broul, 2018).
Features that affect the concept of correspondence.”, Printed exams for this test
project have been selected for their general interest in the 2016 presidential
campaign. License applicants are simply the main opportunity to get to know voters.
It lays the foundation for developing their personalities.
Due to the number of states and divisions being thrown in one day, this racer
is often kicked out of the race because they have not won enough representatives
(Binka, 2019). The final decision is made by speeches from Indiana Elementary This
moment was chosen for two reasons: , the latest attack by Trump’s main rival, and
his unhappiness led Trump to become the Republican Party, moreover, Senate
Senator Bernie Sanders was not expected to win the state, but he won the state.
However, it was abnormally long to measure the records in each of these letters for
this project. It also emphasizes the contents of the letters rather than including
different media views for this analysis. The deliberate use of sampling to guide the
selection process for this specialist has ensured that selected literature “thoroughly
examines and understands the concerns and issues the world wants to learn
about”(Zuckerman, 2018).

Trustworthiness
Qualitative methodology is evaluated for lack of objectivity. However, the
legitimacy of qualitative research does not fit into a quantitative and situated idea.
Assessment of human understanding and observation shows that the general reality
cannot be analysed or evaluated and that different confidence levels are becoming
increasingly relevant for qualitative research. A qualitative research involves a
constructive view of the world with many facts, so that a qualitative scientist does not
look for competence but for variability. Descriptive can be described as an echo of
beneficence that the discoveries are great emotionally. For example, this critical
analysis of rhetoric revealed that the challenges of courageous governance are
common in the history of higher education. Whilst this finding may be user-friendly, it
is not recommended that this content be the norm in all settings and in all
discussions (Wilz, 2019). The result may be transferable, but not general.
 Discourses 34

Research Ethics
Ethical perceptions of qualitative research stand out as “influencing powerless
residents, unbalanced power, and endangering members.” test I could not determine
my own opinion from the data. In the print media, columnists, 54 persons, can
optionally occupy different positions. Accordingly, different ethical perspectives must
be stated to properly provide the data. Moreover, the pioneers shown in the facts are
not one dimension, nor are the articles really alive. The author has chosen and
restricted the content and according to these rules the population is unprotected. But
this study will not judge the ability or personality of the pioneers, but how the
pioneers are described in the speech (Hurt, 2019).
 Discourses 35

DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The feelings of the spread of the American nation return to World War II.
America stood still and could not endure much more decay than Europe. Mainly
because of the separation of territory and how the United States ended the war with
one drop of nuclear bomb. For this real reality, American leaders had a strong sense
of power. Europe’s greatest confidence has long been the dominance of the white
race over every other race. DT’s sense stems from unequivocal strength and
disregard for Europe’s longstanding attitude: the so-called “Arius breed” white breed
(Lewis, 2017).
Initially, Islam and Muslims are constantly depicted as terrorists. What the
media wants to do is distort the essence of Islam by addressing issues such as
fearful oppression and the opposite. DT does not pronounce the word Muslim
without including “radical Islam”, “unjustified for fear” or “jihadist”. However, this
cannot stop the President from going to Saudi Arabia to talk about suppressing
extremist Islam and that all countries should seek peace. Numerous experts have
reported that DT can free up wealth in the Middle East. At the very least, Tumps’
ideology stems from rhetoric and tolerance from one of the fundamental beliefs - the
spread of white America. In addition, the media, as advertiser and broadcaster, play
a major role in spreading “Islamophobia”(Giles, et al., 2018).

Dog-whistling and Figleaves

Jenny Saul has a strange article about the Huffington Post about Donald
Trump and the miracle that she marks with “racist insults”(Bahler, 2018). A large
number of us are aware of the political use of “dog whistles” - unpretentious political
messages that aim to take wishes into account without focusing specifically on these
tendencies or occasionally speaking to stakeholders without such stakeholder
interest. recognise that these are not targeted. Regardless, if Jenny warns, Trump’s
conversation is far from the nuance of flute politics:
“Donald Trump is no dogwhistler: he proudly tosses around racial terms, paired with
the most hideous stereotypes. And he rises, and rises, and rises in the polls. Does
this mean that the Norm of Racial Egalitarianism is no longer in place? I’m not so
sure. Some of Trump’s supporters clearly reject this norm, openly advocating white
supremacy. But there is no reason to believe that this group of voters ever accepted
it–the norm was widely accepted, but not universal. So what of the other supporters?
 Discourses 36

It seems to me that two important things are happening: First, Trump is employing
another technique in place of a dogwhistle, one which still allows supporters to
believe that he (and so they) are not racist. And second, he’s revealing just what a
shallow and limited norm Racial Egalitarianism is. The technique Trump has been
employing is one I’ll call the racial figleaf. It involves uttering what would otherwise
be clearly a racist claim, and then following up with something that just barely covers
it. On some level, we all know what’s there–something you’re not supposed to show
in public–but the figleaf lets us avoid acknowledging it”.

Saul represents the idea of ”fig leaves”, which differs from natural dog
emulsions: whilst the dog poem is aimed at prominent viewers whose encrypted
messages go through the greater part of the population, the leaves have a clear
endurance element. terrible, what is obvious, everything that is taken into account
changes the thresholds(Belair, 2017). The Saul model used to describe that the
famous statue of the Mexican outsider Donald Trump brought “drugs” to the United
States. They bring injustice. They are rapists “- and then he publishes his photo, the
condition of” going out “:” And some of them, I think, are authorised persons. This
idea seems to apply to the “holiday” crusade and the ongoing outbursts of superior
behavior in Britain(Jeffery and McAuliffe, 2020).

Trump’s Ideology “Trumpism”

As a result of the analysis, DT not only seemed fanatical, but also expressed
arrogance about achieving what he endorsed as the ultimate goal: “Make America
incredible again.” DT’s ideology, however, stems directly from its rhetoric,
nationalism. Currently, in the Oxford Online Dictionary, either patriotism “promotes or
supports the political independence of a particular country or individual.” This means
that a national individual will do his best to reach an agreement and to seek and
achieve his or her goals. The DT trip is complicated by fighting, the Mexican, African
people and Muslims. Matt Iglesias wrote that DDT has an ideology. He has the
motive. The Trump Center is “a renewed and shy American nationalist who will
represent US interests abroad, but will protect the everyday origins of the US state at
home.”In light of the different tribes, the intention of DT is only to ‘cast’ them,
certainly even badly (Bahler, 2018).
 Discourses 37

Racism in Trump’s Discourse

Tolerance is perhaps the clearest indication of the separation of different
races. This miracle is easy to recognise because it contains sensible language,
including the formulation of tolerance and subliminal messages. As the analysis
shows, DTT will generally succeed. This makes it a language that uses the current
and password-free language. For example, he added a hatred of foreigners through
the media: the fear of different communities and individuals. He portrayed the
fugitives as “foreigners” as the case was a national matter. Johnson states that
“intolerance works by establishing closed, typical boundaries between breed-related
species.” In other words, the language and images DDT chose reflect his highly
political views that convey the theme of intolerance. DT has been mentioned in many
events that express questionable interpretation.
For example, a former insider in DT says he has information about him with
the word “n”(London, 2020). However, these allegations of bias are not the first time
we have heard the allegations of intolerance, so we have also heard this against this
president. In 1989, NBC also revealed through Donald D.T. that glowing darkness
had little free space in a huge white favorite spot as shining as the Activity Show
(Sultana and Dovchin, 2019). That said, black people may feel like they don’t get a
chance to work or improve the future. In addition, the liquidating government in the
1980s, 1970s, saw DT organise the country to prevent residents from renting out to
African-American homes. In addition, former DT casino employees have confirmed
that special white workers have received special treatment (Van Den Eede, 2020).

Africans in Trump’s Discourse

The president assured his family that he had made America unusual again,
and he also stated that the things that make America weak are that individuals are
afraid to say what they think. He made it clear that individuals must be able to
express their thoughts. Because otherwise he would have stopped ISIS and the
unification of the divisions, but the marches had calmed down and the fight against
him had angered him so much that he paid the insane group on February 1 (Jeffery
and McAuliffe, 2020). He told me, you guarantee me and I will believe in you. “When
you see someone preparing to toss tomatoes, you take a chair out of it, okay?
Actually. Get them out. I guarantee that I will pay the legal fees. I
 Discourses 38

guarantee.’However, D.T., who expresses this rhetoric, seeks reassurance and

encourages boldness and tolerance.
Not long after, the group of black protesters chased out of the room, and the
columnist reported that a dark person had only been punched in the face when she
died. Moreover, under such circumstances it is difficult that the President does not
consider himself an extraordinarily “superior” when he refers to African states as
“unclean” countries (London, 2020). People who accept DDT cannot be mistaken
about intolerance. In addition, if the President doesn’t use the word “n” to refer to
darkness, it doesn’t mean he can’t. For example, because he used strong
expressions, he “won” and acknowledges that dark individuals are happier than
whites (Bahler, 2018).
The President does not only despise those who hinder him or those who
verbally restrict him. For example, he said, “I apologize for the failure and hate, but
my intelligence index is one of the highlights - and you know it all! Please don’t feel
stupid or insecure, this is not your fault. “This, of course, means that DT’s speech is
so expressive that it gets fanatical. Again, it’s not possible to limit fanatics in the
shadows of the skin, but with a shot that shamefully tries to find the individual type of
person that indicates we now have the president and his followers, so DT
categorised himself as creative and underestimated other people he thinks are
“stupid” right now and said “this is not your disadvantage” meaning you are involved
this way to the world In order to see gradually you need to learn more about DT’s
philosophy (TjinLiepShie, 2019).

Media and Stereotype

With the development of the internet and social websites, the density of the
media has become very important in recent decades. For example, Van Dyck
passed the exam in 1991; he discovered that the media is the perfect advertiser for
individuals who want to publish a specific image of specific individuals. He said that
“ethnic minority groups are secretly surrounded by excessive negative language in
media rhetoric,” a miracle called Van Dijk “global bias,” where elites are in a position
“that allows them to hold global positions that are much better than public’. DT used
Twitter as a means to promote their national and vital views (Jeffery and McAuliffe,
2020). First, D.T legitimately and unambiguously responds to people who criticize
him via Twitter. To represent in May 2013, DT tweeted to individuals who were
 Discourses 39

against him, “Unfortunately intelligence for the mistakes and hatred is one of the
most important values.”
Second, DT’s goal is to prevent illegal immigrants from entering the country
by developing a visitor barrier between Mexico and the United States. Post your
opinion on Twitter. “I have created an incredible rift for our southern visitor (Ramirez
and Peterson, 2020).” But every time he refers to this project, he tells how the
Mexicans have wronged and poisoned them. This is how the media promote
stereotypes about a particular group of individuals or ethnic groups: When we know
anything about Mexico, we will generally consider injustice, drugs and deception.
Thirdly, the method of defiling ‘their’ image with Muslims and Islam has been
completed (Van Den Eede, 2020).
Since the September 11 incident and George W. Bush’s popular rhetoric of
Muslims, Islam has once again changed. D.T uses a similar process to spread
contempt and rejection. He said, “I think Islam hates us.” It shows that Muslims are
individuals who “speak” and describe the media as they want, but it has not
“changed”. It is best to say that the media also encourages customers like DT, who
show their alleged opponents if necessary. Mastering an open image and
associating negative relationships with ‘Islam and Muslims’ and ‘Mexicans and
Mexicans’, and anyone who finds a way to reach their fanatics, wants to make ‘white’
Americans great again (London, 2020).

Sexism
Sexual prejudice is the use of language to suppress women and to condemn
and underestimate these exercises for women. Sexism is characterised by “habits in
which a person becomes more sexual whilst it may not be the most intriguing factor.”
at specific locations and properties. Likewise, sexual prejudice is a list of continuous
relationships between people. For example, an ad describing women as industrious
animals is considered chauvinistic because it describes women as weak and tied to
emotions rather than brains. When they look at everything, they are offended and
ashamed by the male manager (Bahler, 2018). Other hate ads are based on the
assumption that any movement related to women is insignificant or complementary
to that of the men-related exercises, for example: “women in tennis receive lower
wages in Wimbledon because the game is less active,” live sexual prejudices not in
specific words and expressions, but living in the belief that women are different from
 Discourses 40

men. For her, the language of hatred of women cannot be considered the world from
a single male perspective. It is best seen as a multiple miracle that occurs in various
complex image processing frameworks (TjinLiepShie, 2019).
The study claims that harmful language is a term used to represent a wide
range of all other aspects of the use of traditional pronouns, such as “him” when
used as a clue to men and women, abuse of sentences, etc. But the concept of
sexual prejudice is also used to organise many vulgar opinions about women that
cannot be identified by specific means of semantics or notoriety. According to
Vetterling-Braggin, the ad is chauvinistic when it adds, enables, protests or leads to
the abuse of women. For activist Robin Lacoff, for example, sexual prejudice
generally reflects a group of women in public (Van Den Eede, 2020). Likewise, Mills’
sexual preference. The first type is a type of practice that can be clearly identified by
using derivative clues or by analysing concepts related to the flow of offensive
feelings towards women, and indicates to listeners that women are seen as a
different group of groups.

Islamophobia
The term Islamophobia is derived from the word “Islam” by the word “fear”,
which means “fear of Islam,” or ultimately “contempt for Muslims.” Evolve
emphasized that Islamophobia dates back to the seventh century because of the
‘Orientalist’ views in the Arab world. However, in the United States, the term
“Islamophobia” has become one of the most common beggars in the post-9/11 era
(Scott, 2016). Bazian, on the other hand, pointed out that Islamophobia was caused
by a “clash of civilizations” and that it could be closely related to Huntington’s idea of
”Islamic extremism”. It is true that Islamophobia is an inappropriate hostility to the
Muslim community. Weikar, on the other hand, claimed that Islamophobia was one
of the major forms of intolerance and separation. Likewise, the concept of “fear of
Islam” may highlight various prejudices, separation, intolerance and contempt for
Westerners and Muslims (Belair, 2017).
All of the issues discussed in the debate on Islamophobia were those of the
global government related to negative discrimination and stereotypes of Islam and
Muslims with the critical help of the world media. Finally, in a broader context, Islam
has hinted that Islamophobia is an umbrella term that can refer to or see individuals
or related assets related to Islam and Muslims (Hora, 2019).
 Discourses 41

Recently, Islamophobia has become the best political idea that can be used in
countless stools and feeds. Many experts have used this term to change the roots,
conclusions, scope, history and powers of Islam and Islamic views and opinions.
Moreover, it is a creative idea in sociology because it is called a ubiquitous, limited
and vague idea that changes time and time again. Currently, scientists consider
social fear and concern for Islam and Muslim communities around the world, whilst
some consider it a separation from Islam due to burning and interconnected fears.
Funnel on a loose surface (Hoffmann, 2019).
In addition, Asmati argued that Islamophobia is about fear of Muslims and fear
of Islamists’ confidence. It is a widespread rhetoric consisting of asymmetrical
decisions that Islam is an opponent and therefore without risk. At the time,
Islamophobia was a negative source of Islam and Muslims, which Europeans say
were cruel (Jeffery and McAuliffe, 2020).
In an ongoing report, Terman emphasized that the general press in the United
States has constantly emphasized the idea that Muslim women hate and are
particularly fanatical. According to this study, there is a rapidly growing tension and
misleading judgment about Islam’s resemblance to the West, especially regarding
American characteristics such as correspondence, class and flexibility. Another
study also found that the US media described a group of Muslims as clearly sexual,
dishonest, cruel and threatening to build American qualities (TjinLiepShie, 2019).
The Pew Research Center, on the other hand, reported that the U.S.’s attitude
toward Muslims is fundamentally less positive compared to other minorities in the
country, due to their association with the events of September 11 and the
development of psychological oppression around the world (London, 2020).
In addition, Laevardi and Oskooii emphasized that Islam and Muslims have
linked important media and political perspectives and are regularly shielded from
various American networks. All that can be seen is clear that the fear of Islam in the
United States is clear. There are only about 37 meetings that take place with internal
fear of Islam and 32 outside meetings where the center cannot promote prejudice
against Islam and Muslims, but also participates in supporting anti-Islam issues in
Umma(Van Den Eede, 2020).
Muslims immediately closed their speech on political promises within the
nation when the 2016 presidential race in the United States began. Donald Trump is
calling for a complete shutdown of Muslim workers, and Ted Cruz, a Republican
 Discourses 42

voted one of the 2016 races, has gained a strong belief in greater security, including
overshadowing Muslims after the attacks in Brussels (DeSante and Smith, 2019).
Kazi emphasized that Islamophobia is the trademark of the 2016 race, which is
largely part of Trump’s crusade. His Islamic Movement of the Islamic Movement has
received high acclaim from its supporters, despite the fact that the leaders of the
party have refused his announcement. NihadAwad, chairman of the Council on
American-Islamic Relations, revealed in a report by the Council on US-Islamic
Relations that anger and anger about American Muslims has now shifted from the
brink of American culture to government and standard media (Golchehr, 2019).
Returning to the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump is expected to have
consistently deployed Muslim enemies throughout his long crusade, often targeting
his Republican competitors in Muslim affairs. Basically, the Republican that Dr. Ben
Carson argued that Islam was “totally incompatible” with the United States
Constitution, and therefore no Muslim should be elected President of the United
States. Louisobby Gov. Bobby Jindal also made a dubious statement - “Let’s face it,
Islam is in trouble.” Since another great story about Islamophobia during the decision
period was the horror of “creeping Sharia,” the Islamic law or lifestyle, which caused
some countries to introduce a new enemy to Sharia (Hora, 2019).
In addition, Hillary Clinton, the democratic candidate for the 2016 political
decision, had no objection to Muslim commentary. Earlier, he enthusiastically
intensified his conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria. As Secretary of State
and Senate, she supported the war against the Islamic world. Additionally, in 2016,
after Orlando was murdered in a gay dance club, Hillary Clinton urged Americans to
get closer and return to the “9/11 spirit,” a generally moderate term after the 9/11.
disaster, which strengthened the national movement that primarily offers an
institutionalized victim statement to victims of Muslims, aliens, Arabs and South
Asians based on organised Islamophobia. “Spirit of 9/11” includes arrangements to
address fears of racist hatred, nationalism, anti-Islam and Muslim abuse and the
spread of cruelty to Muslims in the United States (London, 2020).
However, in the 2016 elections, Trump openly criticized Islam by saying that
‘Muslims understand better’. In the 2016 political race, I decided to focus on the
allegations that extremist jihadism and radical Islamism were harmful. She
responded to the mother of three Muslim American children during the presidential
 Discourses 43

debate, stating that Donald Trump and Ted Cruz’s statements against Islam and
against the American features were disgraceful (Wilz, 2019).
Donald Trump’s nomination is made possible in large part by his stance on
Islamophobia, or what some call it “the transformation of Islam,” which means that
the Muslim community has been accused of leading the public with insufficient
financial and political security. During his political career, Donald Trump described
the United States as a country full of refugees and immigrants around the world,
including Muslims. Relying on a binding couple, he argued that “Islam hates us” and
focused on American Muslims as fanatics and fear of oppressors. In addition, Trump
has generally emphasized issues and concerns that are harming the United States,
such as increased commitment and subpoenas, ISIS risks and unlimited letters to
Mexico and no agreement to exchange with China and unacceptable agreements
with the Muslim world, including Psychologically persecuted but white people happen
to ignore the large number of years because of the outflow of foreigners (Wilz, 2019).
Abdullah Al-Shami endorsed an article on Al-Jazeera International confirming
that fears of Islamophobia in the United States have been very strong since Trump’s
development and that the system of authors, pastors, founders and legislators in
Islamophobia provides the right conditions not to choose Trump (Nwaogu, 2017).
Furthermore, the Council on US-Islamic Relations also released a report stating that
Muslims’ aversion to Muslim factors increased by 57 percent from 2014 to 2016
against Muslim disasters, which increased by 65 percent.
Islam’s enemy Trump has also been everywhere archaic against Muslim
opinion. In a CNN meeting with Anderson Cooper, Trump again stated that “I think
Islam hates us,” with an emphasis on Muslim and Islamic participation. His actress
Katrina Pearson also expressed the idea that “Islam is a religion of harmony” as an
inappropriate publication. So Fox Business declared Trump, “I will definitely keep
mosques closed in the US.” After fearless attacks in Paris on November 13, 2015,
Trump announced to MSNBC that he would strongly consider closing mosques. He
told CBS News, “If you are people who leave mosques with contempt and death in
their eyes and brains, we will achieve something (Lewis, 2017).” In addition, after
Obama chose not to bury Supreme Court Antonin Scalia, Trump tweeted, “I wonder
if President Obama would commemorate Judge Scalia if he stayed in the mosque?
Sad after the Brussels attack, Trump reveals Fox’s job that caused America to face
 Discourses 44

significant Muslim problems, and US lawmakers arrested new Muslims in New

Jersey following the September 9 incident (Belair, 2017).

Van Dijk’s terminology

According to Van Dijk, Trump can be seen as an on-screen person who has
repeatedly targeted and accused Muslims. After looking at all the problems, Trump
states that Muslims should not go to the United States. Because of this, he used
power as a long-term policy, called himself an influential man, and focused on his
American future. That’s right, the entire center is fully supported by our technology
compared to their long polarisation methodology. It uses the polar system because it
holds Muslims responsible for the devastating and catastrophic events of 9/11 and
all psychological repression since 9/11 in America (Sultana and Dovchin, 2019). By
doing this, he appropriately set up Muslims as a treacherous group engaged in
intrepid exercises. In addition, Trump has used speculation technology here and
blames all Muslims for being capable and responsible for the wide range of changes
and unrest on the planet. The reflection system is particularly successful because it
usually blames the entire group rather than the people within the group and thus
speaks to everyone as an outside group (TjinLiepShie, 2019).
Donald Trump also stressed that the United States must have strong
insurance against Muslims. Trump has blocked anti-reality policies and said it is
important to prevent Muslims from entering America because “we have to choose
between limited options” and avoid them, otherwise they may be a real threat to
American life. This makes Muslims a credible threat to American security. Using data
from the Pew Research Center to justify their controversy with power and evidence,
Trump used the speculative system at the time before “large parts of the Muslim
population” despised the Americans (DeSante and Smith, 2019). The said sections
or the number of referred Muslims cannot be explained.
This is a particularly powerful system in which speculation classifies all
Muslims as extensive external gatherings. He often emphasizes that the essence of
molding Muslims against Trump is a clear anti-Islamic regime and emphasizes how
he intended to achieve a complete rejection of Muslim practices in the United States.
According to experts, this is characterised by another and unambiguous part of Van
Dyck’s concept of ideological landscape, which is ‘a negative burden for
them’(Jeffery and McAuliffe, 2020). Today, Muslims imagine a paradoxically
 Discourses 45

widespread speculation, “It is the Americans’ shameful contempt for the tremendous
crimes committed by Muslims.” Therefore, we argue that by blocking the positive part
of Muslims through and through, the interpretations referred to in the center also
reflect the fourth part of the Van Dycks model as “a positive part to eliminate
stress”(London, 2020).
“Excerpt Most recently, a poll from the Center for Security Policy released
data showing 25% of those polled agreed that violence against Americans here in
the United States is justified as a part of the global jihad and 51% of those polled,
agreed that Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according
to Shariah. Shariah authorises such atrocities as murder against non-believers who
won’t convert beheadings and more unthinkable acts that pose great harm to
Americans, especially women”.
At this time, when discussing a Center for Security Policy report, Mr. Trump
actually used two methods to define numbers and power plays. The survey now
shows that 25% of members agree that global jihad is the source of cruelty and
conflict against Americans, and 51% of respondents believe that Muslims in America
should be given the freedom to spend their lives according to the sharia.
Interestingly, Trump does not focus on most respondents’ response to Muslim rights
(Jeffery and McAuliffe, 2020). He was told the truth and decided to focus on how
Sharia poses a threat to the Americans. Here, Trump uses the polarisation method
by assuming that Sharia gives Muslims the opportunity to do something harmful to
Muslims.
Likewise, Trump’s assertion of Sharia is a prerequisite to make a true
assumption that Americans who have implemented Sharia law against Muslims do
not know to what extent Sharia has been damaged, but that Trump himself is wary
(London, 2020). Moreover, there is a certain premise that Islam is naturally biased.
He emphasized that Americans and women face many problems and problems
caused by the psychological injustice committed by Muslims. Now Trump is familiar
with the basic method of the comparative procedure, in which he speaks to Muslims
as strict fanatics. In these sentences, Islamic hatred of Trump is specifically
mentioned and it clearly shows a prejudice against jihad and Sharia. In this way, this
focal point in Trump’s interpretation of Muslims encompasses other elements of the
Van Dijk model and the fear of Muslim hostility at the same time, highlighting their
opposite reaction since they entered America (Bahler, 2018). In addition, it included
 Discourses 46

the fourth part of the model, called “removing the focus on the positive parts of it,” in
which Trump rejected and neglected all the useful and useful parts of the “Muslim
community in America”(Giles, et al., 2018).

Race and Racism

This project aims to understand the closeness and consequences of racial
hatred related to the knee. As such, this has long been consistent with racial
prejudice in the United States. Race is a social development dating back to the
sixteenth century, as a European creation of a magical and racial system created in
pseudo-organic science, which supports the superiority of whiteness and darkness of
the black racial realm and the Atlantic (Lewis, 2017). This pseudoscience, or “logical
bias,” originated in the legalization of dishonest beliefs about “others,” especially
black people, to legalize world power and slavery, making white people obscure and
suspicious and as such less willing to review. , everything has European standards.
For the time being, the white spread is required under the “other” system. According
to white people, raw darkness was built as a child. After the end of the 400-year
suppression of racial hatred in the United States, race and bigotry continued as a
form of strength despite everything related to our factual, regular aspects (Hurt,
2019).
The government’s intolerance has led to wickedness against black people,
often with brutal killings, isolation, voter discontent, housing, banking, layoffs, and
government issues related to criminal equality, as well as a number of different
structures and acts. In addition, fanatics with racial contempt assumed emotional
conditions. Shame should be viewed as wrongful oblivion or denial of racial prejudice
by black individuals or “white rage” when necessary and well-grounded, not as an
individual or self-affirming report of hatred or prejudice (Wilz, 2019). Finally, “if [racial
prejudice] activities are completely destroyed by physical, geological, and political
contexts, prejudice can be considered a global miracle for advocates of” oppositional
fanatics. This agency leads us to the next part of this review, which represents the
illusion of black citisenship in the U.S. voting system and how Kaybernick’s
opposition can be defined as black in its context (Zuckerman, 2018).
 Discourses 47

Black Citisenship
Swedish economist Gunnar Myrdal made an outrageous trip to the United
States in the 1930s, citing important objective facts about what he described in
America as “black language,” characterised by the precarious position of black
citisenship(Binka, 2019). From Myrdala’s perspective, American racism has been
fueled by controversy and a good problem between the strong white American
commitment to show America’s faith and their continued violation of this belief in
anti-dark divorce policies. Whilst the Civil and Voting Rights Act of 1964 and 1965
provides for full citisenship benefits for Africans and the nomination of America’s first
black president in 2008, which can be traced to the development of national
progress, black Americans are still today , still subject to substandard citisenship or
when Alexander questions the value of black citisenship by examining racial biases
that focus on African American practices and lives, such as the war on poverty and
state aid, both of which are often black and synonymous learning, the racism of
these curricula is practiced with coded language linking the race to certain negative
practices (Nwaogu, 2017).
In addition, Mohammed emphasizes black earthquake citisenship in 4
assessments of precise technology synonymous with black and guilt, or “the
community in question,” with extensive and misleading crime investigations taking
place, as well as embarrassing, gruesome conversations. black. This “dark
distraction from the rhetoric” of civil servants, sociologists and honest scientists
provides the legitimacy of modest police behavior, but it has created a sense of fear
and danger in the black community, usually fulfilled by the murder of unarmed black
individuals and the mere fact of it (Hoffmann, 2019). Also, the current state of social
projects, racial hatred of racial prejudice and widespread prejudice targeting the lives
and balance of black people is “a fundamental value despite all neglect of facilitating
the full integration of African citisens into the national network”(Moursi, 2018).

Theoretical Framework
The modern hypothesis of the CDA system has shown how important a
political analysis of rhetoric has been from the time democracy came into being and
the beginning of governance issues we are likely to know. In addition, it was
interesting to look at political rhetoric and it is very important to do this to show the
intentions behind politicians’ semantics (Golchehr, 2019). Modernist analysis has
 Discourses 48

proven successful in analysing prominent issues of Donald Trump’s political

personality. After repeatedly reviewing Trump’s ratings i.e. The ‘accident’ and
‘believe me’ instead of the ‘good’ that came under the dubious twist, it was possible
to paint a portrait of American political leaders in their struggle for governance as a
competitor who used the recording process to get a positive face (Scott, 2016). The
result of the action Trump used could be linked to his profile as an open shape and
the image he wanted to show in an open circle. According to the analysis presented,
Donald Trump’s political figure speaks to voters in the 2016 contest that his semantic
methodology, amongstst many other non-verbal elements, has helped him build an
acceptable character for the huge chunk of the country (Belair, 2017).
Trump’s semantic style, described by spoken witnesses, simplified sentences
and clear quotes in the discussions, just as his open conversations say, are signs of
his personality that make him unusual in the political circle. At the same time, Trump
manages to build a picture of his derivative abilities. Likewise, Trump’s ability to use
language to support him in the presidential campaign confirms his speech, which the
applicant wants to present the determination to fulfill his full responsibilities (Hora,
2019). In general, my theory is that there is a process behind Trump’s bizarre use of
political rhetoric for the analysis and how he can link his linguistic methodology to
Ventura’s appointment as city president in 1998 because Ventura used a similar
system that voters might consider Trump concentrated shortly afterwards addressed
the problem. The purpose of Trump’s defined discourse method is to secure a
pioneer ready to rule the country. Later, Trump’s speech influenced his political
personality and style that shaped the revolutionary image of much of the American
nation (Nwaogu, 2017).

Systemic Functional Linguistics

In light of Halliday’s useful structure for modern English, the practical basic
phonograph is described as a peculiar structure of the revised case as a sociological
framework. It is believed that language was developed to serve special social
opportunities. To meet these possibilities, the language was created using an
important trilogy called print, relational and experimental (Hoffmann, 2019). Literary
actions reflect these implications of linking content and having an important role in
developing and binding. When this study deals with the evolution of reality and the
presentation of theories, the literary influence has gone beyond the scope of this
 Discourses 49

article and will therefore not be further analysed. Relational activity reflects the
leading effects that occur between the speaker, the audience or the audience. These
effects are identified through questions, requests, bids and interpretations and to
support the interactions in the delivery or feedback of data, products and projects
(Golchehr, 2019).
When preparing the book, the speaker uses relational effects to embrace a
particular speech action and focus on the mindset, social attitudes, and personality
of the people. Likewise, relational effects can be expressed by the language of
judgment or by methodology or balance, as is the case with lexical determination.
The experimental effects coincide with the proclamation of the world and give the
hypothesis of a frame transformation to show the whole manifestation. Separation of
transport provisions into procedures, articles and conditions (Hoffmann, 2019). The
importance of the experiment focuses on the procedure and determines the types
and relationships of the members with each other and the procedure itself. The third
unit, the case, provides “base level” data. The template accompanying Trump’s
speech addresses these elements:

This is now a method that focuses on the condition. “I” and “China” play the
organ, but “I” is the performer of the action and “China” is the user of the action. The
situation “continuously” organises the judgment by indicating when the operation will
take place. The actions of members can vary in content and depend on the type of
procedure with which the organ is protected. By analysing variability, these organ
functions are discussed based on six main categories of methods: material, spiritual,
oral, social, behavioral and existential. Physical practices understand this and are
regularly experienced as a gym (Scott, 2016).
These activities can be innovative because the artist or goal has become a
reality or transformative, as the current character or screen being decoded changes
as the action recognises insight, discrimination, effect and coding of spiritual
activities rather than physical words. as a real word (Belair, 2017). For real speech,
which can be expressed as a straight or round letter, distinguish two types: attribute
and specificity. Social attribute attributes apply attributes called vectors to their
partners. Proportional 11 is familiar with shapes and effects on a different sign, as a
 Discourses 50

result of renaming a unique organ into different expressions, conveying the

characteristics of mental and physical actions, and analysing human physiological
actions. After all, habits of existence are something that exists (Hora, 2019).
Experimental importance is achieved by linking the above procedures and
actions to different social figures on the screen and temporary designs that show
how the world’s vision develops through rhetoric. By viewing all images of each type
of action and viewing the types of control frequency, one can discover how content
selects views and opportunities (Sultana and Dovchin, 2019). For example, a
physical action book may gradually focus on individual actions and appropriately,
although content that prefers further spiritual and verbal actions is increasingly
concerned with individual responses and events. By rearranging the examples of
individuals or groups of social artists, several examples can be developed. For
example, photographing a social artist or get-together can show ideological
situations that can be a bit vague.
One of these systems for understanding the ethos depicting social artists is
the casual Van Leeuwen community of on-screen characters, which allows on-
screen social figures to evoke a design that may not be visible during transit
(DeSante and Smith, 2019). With this system, there may be examples of revealing
Donald Trump’s ethics and revealing his home to the public. In exchange for this
scenario, the following video shows the social network and ethics of Van Leeuwen in
which social status recognises ideology.

Psychology and positioning

Likewise, the study will include a long-term research strategy that came into
being in social construction for good reason; the idea that language is a kind of
social practice “that shapes the social world, including personality, social interaction
and understanding of the world.” We chose the third viewpoint to analyse the
discourses of Jorgensen and Philips because of their diverse nature (Jeffery and
McAuliffe, 2020). The third view remains in a continuum in which it recognises the
possibility of speech dynamics as the target force outside the individual, but it is a
hypothesis that also emphasizes speech as the compelling and logical use of the
people who created it and the characters and incorporates the world through
language (TjinLiepShie, 2019). In this perspective of discursive brain research, an
idea by Potter and Weatherel is known as “interpretive groups,” which they describe
 Discourses 51

as “a series of concepts, observations, and expressions often understood

comprehensively by similar images or clear images.” They also affirm that these
groups are “effectively used by individuals as a flexible way of attaining the types of
social activities of writing and talks (Bahler, 2018).”
The concept of interpretative groups somewhat resembles the ‘calculated
plan’ of Bronwen Davis and Rom-Roma Harry, which they say are ‘permanent
groups that are mainly in the brains of almost all masters of science or scientists who
belong to a person’ . Both groups of scientists have constructed these. ideas to
identify them based on the unique external importance of the ratio. We will use the
term “explanatory group” in our analysis, not “action plans” because we do not feel
safe in the sense that these groups are “fixed”(London, 2020). People are the result
of our social environment because language and social cooperation are the basis of
the progress of our personalities and groups. “Innovative healers see the brain and
soul built up by disturbed social camaraderie.” The ideology or persuasive attitude
and desires of our long-term participation in young people influence how we use our
groups (Sultana and Dovchin, 2019).
With these collections collected and developed in a person’s life, individuals
can creatively choose better ways to recreate the world or mimic previously
implemented real-world experiences (Van Den Eede, 2020). Within each group are
words and phrases that can be drawn to attract or separate them and to bring
forward, understand and explore environmental aspects and to convey their
reflections, feelings and ideas and for the greatest share our participation in our
community. The social and social history of each influences the scope of their group
and thus the limitation of the words they cross to understand their reality and position
in it. We can accept that individuals use words and otherwise depend on their lives in
their desire to meet others (TjinLiepShie, 2019).

Post-Civil Rights Norms

President Trump agrees that the decent model of financial diversity is
sufficient for the issue of the American race and therefore consistent with the
majority. Certainly, the President repeatedly points to his list of dark unemployment -
“Unemployment in Africa, America is in our country at all times” - as a great victory in
the struggle for national justice (Wilz, 2019). After Kanye West and several blacks
tweeted about Trump’s support for the African American regime, President Trump
 Discourses 52

tweeted, “Kanye West has provided incredible support to the black community - big
things and eyes have been opening for decades - Legacy Stuff thanks just as much
as Chance and Dr. Darrell Scott, they really got it. President Trump’s interpretation of
his diverse financial model can solve the entire race and improve our race system by
describing the race as a matter of financial importance. In the past, I have argued
that three other national civil rights issues cannot be America: financial, socio-legal
and social culture (Bahler, 2018).
Trump’s diverse financial model has both social and legal implications and
socio-social implications 38, but he has no direct control over these issues to the
extent that his ideology of decent diversity is limited by the number of racist
America’s face (Bahler, 2018). Nevertheless, it is instructive to examine its financial
prospects. The primary way in which President Trump deals with financial issues is a
conventional approach. Traditionalism is one of the four hypotheses or processes of
racial progress reported by African Americans and various social freedom advocates
from the end of Jim Crow, it is the beginning of time after social freedom (London,
2020).
In the conflicts with the traditionalists are reformers, critics and limited
separators. Cultivated entirely elsewhere, four assumptions of social freedom can be
summarised as follows. Traditionalists essentially agree that despite tolerance for
everything in the audience, it is not enough to prevent African Americans from
sharing their progress and individual satisfaction (Scott, 2016). In this respect,
competition is no longer important. As a result, ordinary people have placed these
varieties in a partial legal framework; methods that justified the standard of racial
exclusion. Likewise, reformers fully agree with the opposite: race is nevertheless
important, and therefore legislative policy must be so gender-aware that it is
important to promote a consensus on nationality (Golchehr, 2019). Race critics
argue that white power is paramount and race issues are inextricably linked to
governance. In light of the vision of this center, race critics draw up governance
plans designed to influence social change (Hora, 2019). Finally, the limited
separators believe that darkness or personal consensus is paramount and that the
best place to find help is by hand. In doing so, they support management strategies
that help darken the property or acquire a ‘black’ personality (El Broul, 2018).
Whilst many of Trump’s arrangements must no doubt be subject to rhetoric, I
think it is good to subject his diverse, diverse model to submission, as Trump’s way
 Discourses 53

of dealing with decent diversity and perspectives is consistent with tradition. What
Trump considers to be the classic, our assessment of the message rejects the
premise that we often turn to the views of allegedly large corporations (Hoffmann,
2019). Trump’s model of multifaceted diversity is well regarded, as traditionalists, like
other equality experts, have quite an intellectual process - a desire for racial
progress is a necessity. In this way, if the diverse model of the Trump classic varies
flat, he does not do so on the grounds that he is distinctive or eliminated as a fanatic,
but has since had a deliberate discussion (Belair, 2017).
The rhetoric of the offer is related to supportive cooperation between the
President’s views on diversity and the general right-wing stories that challenge this
view. All hands at hand. Contrary to popular belief, these are crosses and hybrids
that contain a decent collection of nationalist views. These deals give Trump a good
spark. Namely, the president sits at the reserved table and will seek those who seek
social freedom to seek the truth. At this table, Trump’s speculation is not deliberately
justified as fanatical barriers or unilateral fanatical views. Instead, they consciously
agreed (El Broul, 2018).

Political Correctness
Jeffrey Hughes notes that “political justice” entered the popular American
vocabulary in the late 1980s because of open school discussions, with many
lawmakers, ingenious, open-minded people, and the understanding of something to
do with the concept of conversation. The real dispute against “political justice” was
the limitation and the idea that social criteria leading to what is perceived as
conscious, inclusive and sufficient language use destroy useful conversations on
problematic issues(Belair, 2017). There are also legitimate concerns about who gets
the option to choose what is considered “politically correct” language. Because of
these concerns, well-known news media questioned the idea of ”political accuracy”.
Richard Bernstein wrote in the New York Times about what some feared a “hidden
curriculum in ultra-high schools,” driven by “liberal integration,” which calls for
change, including, for example, minority groups and main women’s activists
(TjinLiepShie, 2019).
In addition, scientists took part in the debate, including Peter Drucker, who
testified that political accuracy based on its history is “just a source idea,” intended to
suppress thought, but that it does not yield political points for people of great
 Discourses 54

influence. Trump agreed with this idea in the same way as previously. As is clear
from the statements, Trump often points out that he is a “political right” that cannot
use the language to use a language that involves different groups of people and that
recognises basic fraud, but the fragile bureaucracy that underlies hides - convince
residents of political affairs (Jeffery and McAuliffe, 2020). Even the development of
the term “political justice” seems to predict the difference between justice or telling
the truth and political justice or the representation of political growth.
To defy lawmakers like Trump, there seems to be no room for widespread
and powerful speech yet. You can say that unpublished statements of “political
justification” have gone far beyond the progress of one thought (Bahler, 2018). He
expresses his growing concern about the possibility of “political justification”, which
“includes a meaning where very honest and appropriate thoughts, such as sexual
correspondence and ideas that the vast majority now consider valuable, are
somehow disproportionately misguided , and turned into something immense has no
grace and a dictator (TjinLiepShie, 2019). “
Whilst political rigor can in principle be used by people who have a strong
influence on silent, flammable meditations, study agree with McRobbie and state that
the current view of Trump’s political justification suggests that rational ideas, similar
contradictions and Sexuality similarities in the field of sexuality, as it has become
terrifying and defamatory, Trump’s advice on ‘political mistakes’ and white truths is
closely linked to harassment and the start of reconciliation, the start of undervalued
meetings - which are still unauthorised - at night against computer police. Trump’s
culture of “political rigor” cannot spark a new debate, but has made significant
progress in his campaign for the government (Lewis, 2017).

Case Study
McKay Coppins on the conservatives trying to ditch fake news
On election day, anonymous chat messages direct voters to inappropriate
polling stations or may be subject to gossip about security threats. The roots of
elected democracies that use racist insults are cut faster than online communities
can place them on the Internet. When messages are sent to fix bugs, Twitter hosts
respond with the spread and threat of messages(TjinLiepShie, 2019). In the
meantime, Trump’s struggle has spent the last days of the race typing Facebook
promotions so fast that no one can decide what gets into the bloodstream. After the
 Discourses 55

first round of the vacation poll has been emptied, you will see an image area in the
polling station that shows unusual outsiders documented on the outside. Trump has
started targeting voter extortion and recommends sending immigration and customs
officials to checkpoints. are illegal in the elections? View Kiron Fox News. Are the
Russians behind false images? requires MSNBC. At this point, the votes have not
yet been confirmed, and much of the nation is ready to vote(TjinLiepShie, 2019).
When broadcast announcements were first announced a year ago, some
media observers found that this was a way to protect Republicans from Donald
Trump. Both Goldberg and its main sponsor Stephen Hayes - former associate
professor on the deadly Weekly Standard governing body - have served as strong
presidents(Bahler, 2018). The hiring was mostly traditionalists, including David
French, a renowned national review expert. But in my conversations with the
Dispatch editor, they didn’t dare to tune into the characters they consider automatic
Never Trumpers. As soon as I received some information about The Bulwark -
another GOP-controlled message - he told me that he appreciated his job, but found
the topic “too much compared to Trump to my taste”(Lewis, 2017). It also does not
refer to the specific diversity of moderate professionals who refrain from Trump’s
election. “I didn’t fill Jen Rubin or Max Boot,” said Goldberg, referring to two
Washington Post authors. “Nobody caught me and climbed up when I looked at all
the previous positions.” (The boat said, “I want him to send all successes to Earth.
Rubin said,” This is just sad. I thought the coordinator’s hand showed more. “)
Goldberg argued in prominent publications when good editors published their
ideological feelings of obscene Trumpism(Golchehr, 2019). “With Donald Trump’s
help, people are passed out to discover something that fits their scientific self-image
and to reduce ugliness,” he told me. Other branches have everything, unless they
state the actual reporting methods. “In places like Breitbart that are still in the
swamp,” said Goldberg, “you can only do things as long as people are crazy enough
to touch them(Bahler, 2018).”
 Discourses 56

CONCLUSION
The current survey examined the content of intolerance in Donald Trump’s
tweets based on critical analysis of rhetoric as a methodological methodology. The
newspaper lists three main destinations. The main goal is to gain an understanding
of how to propose intolerance in Trump’s speech. For the next purpose, the analyst
sought to discover the momentum behind the pursuit of excellence. The third goal is
to show how people in the test group talk about ‘Muslims, Mexicans and Africans’,
for example. Likewise, this test is based on Faircloughh’s model of media discourse,
which emphasizes the relationship between language, community and power. The
group’s printed analysis found that Trump’s use of tariffs, however, could not be of
significance and ideology. For example, the re-use of the word “radical oppression
and fear” is a symbol of visitation and is unified when Muslims refer. His sentence
and sense are almost short sentences.
All things are investigated, coordinated and stored away from the confusion
and since Twitter limits the number of words used. In addition, Trump’s use of meth
is more obvious than anonymous to show his attitude of strength and power.
According to the next section, Trump’s speech is arbitrary to address those he
accepts as unknown documents as the leading source of crime in the United States.
To prevent illegal immigrants from entering the United States, he vowed to build a
barrier for isolationists between Mexico and America. Moreover, Trump’s views on
Islam and Muslims have not changed in recent decades, as he and his broad
relationships nevertheless describe Muslims as “psychological activists” and Islam
as “radical Islam.” Trump’s strong attitude leads to bias and cruelty toward anyone
who verbally opposes him.
CDA includes the term “critical” because it includes an important angle of
critical linguistic research. It has “vocabulary analysis” instead of “semantics”
because it is no longer limited to the traditional system of phonetic analysis. In fact, it
has recently become a field in which multimedia types are used to understand open
projects, meaning the language cannot focus on itself, allowing us to explore a larger
website and see if it matters. These include situations such as verbal
communication, appearance, Trump’s position on the ground and no semantic form
of correspondence. But with the ability to rely on multimedia information systems, the
focus will at least be on rhetoric. The critical angle of the CDA stems from
discovering the relationship between language, speech, speech, and social
 Discourses 57

structures and understanding how social structures negatively affect and find
examples of rhetoric, relationships, and ideology.
Not only can relationships and social dimensions be identified, but they also
need to be critically explored and discussed with the general public, increasing
exposure - and similarly presenting key methodological areas of interest. In addition,
based on specific CDA standards for caring for social issues and their recognition of
influencing long-term relationships and history, as well as the underlying discourse of
community, culture and action that plays the discourse in spreading ideology, CDA
source of hypothesis analysis. to gain a deeper understanding of the miracles we
want to study. We will now use the word ideology as a discourse presented as a
catalyst for “photo frames” through world classification, human-to-human feeling, and
“social development”. Likewise, we will rely on a critical view of ideology, whilst the
effects of categories and views are on density management.
This article seeks to clarify the president’s tendency towards diversity and
decent thinking and to push him out of heavenly demands or outright bias towards
the ultimate goal of greater dedication. By repeatedly polluting competitive norms of
social freedom and recognising multiplication, the discourse of surrender has all the
necessary qualities. Trump’s Diversity Model is set in a traditional view of decent
diversity in finance with an emphasis on employment and training. Traditioners
record a race regardless of their location in the Jim Crow community. Later, race-
related financial practices, whether private or open, overwhelming the race and white
and American part-time, undermine the integrity of ensuring equality by describing
African-Americans as a gruesome treatment of serious victims. . As such, it is not
treated with your egg equivalent, so how can you make sure you are egg equivalent?
Nontraditional scholars criticize Trump’s diverse and sweet model.
The reformers, critics of Trump and nationalist separatists, have condemned
Trump for playing with personal law, claiming he couldn’t. They claim that Trump
rejects one type of personality - the ethnic or minority group - for another type of
person - a white person. Reformists who embrace racial prejudice are the path to
good financial diversity and, for various reasons, have partial doubts about the bias
in Trump’s methodology. They defy Trump’s case that low dark unemployment whilst
Trump was under control is a departure from the previous pattern. Likewise, the
reformers agree that Trump is misrepresenting the issue of the financial race by
removing slavery, Jim Crow and other racial barriers from his model of decent
 Discourses 58

diversity, and so his model’s diversity may not be enough to be overly large Most
Americans are of American descent. Like reformers, limited and critical nationalists
have denied Trump’s decent diversity model for not focusing on the need for racial
progress.
 Discourses 59

REFERENCES

Bahler, B., 2018. How Levinas Can (and Cannot) Help Us with Political
Apology in the Context of Systemic Racism. Religions, 9(11), p.370.
Bartolucci, V., 2019. The Discourse on Terrorism of Donald Trump.
In Reading Donald Trump (pp. 127-147). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Bay, M., 2018. Weaponising the haters: The Last Jedi and the strategic
politicization of pop culture through social media manipulation. First
Monday.
Belair, A.H.P., 2017. Print media and social media, the coexistence and new
strategies (Doctoral dissertation).
Bell, J., 2018. A presidential mouthpiece: How Fox News reflect Donald
Trump and his government’s stance on North Korea within their online
discourse.
Binka, D.E., 2019. Hidden Voices in Transnationalism: International Post-
Secondary Student Experiences of Precariousness and Belonging in
Ottawa (Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University).
Boling, K.S., 2019. # ShePersisted, Mitch: a memetic critical discourse
analysis on an attempted Instagram feminist revolution. Feminist
Media Studies, pp.1-17.
Bonilla, J.F.G., 2016. A critical-cognitive analysis of Donald Trump’s discourse
across time: Trump as a businessman versus Trump as a president.
In Actas do XIII CongresoInternacional de LingüísticaXeral (pp. 409-
416).
Brewer, M., 2019. From the Ground, to the Ballot, to the System: The
(Critical) Interpersonal Reproduction of Masculinity within Homosocial
Friendships of Male Donald Trump Supporters. Southern Illinois
University at Carbondale.
Chen, W., 2018. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’s Inaugural
Speech from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Grammar. Theory
and Practice in Language Studies, 8(8), pp.966-972.
Darweesh, A.D. and Abdullah, N.M., 2016. A Critical Discourse Analysis of
Donald Trump’s Sexist Ideology. Journal of Education and
Practice, 7(30), pp.87-95.
 Discourses 60

DeSante, C.D. and Smith, C.W., 2019. Racial stasis: The millennial

generation and the stagnation of racial attitudes in American politics.
University of Chicago Press.
El Broul, D., 2018. Taking root without taking over: Two case studies on the
micropolitics between art, gentrification, and agency.
Fuchs, C., 2017. Donald Trump: A critical theory-perspective on authoritarian
capitalism. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open
Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 15(1),
pp.1-72.
Giles, D.C. and Giles, D.C., 2018. Twitter as ‘Fundamental’: The Obligatory
Use of Social Media by Celebrities’, Twenty-First Century Celebrity:
Fame In Digital Culture (pp. 77-104). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Golchehr, S., 2019. Data for design: Adopting data-driven approaches for
long term citisen participation and social sustainability in design for the
public realm (Doctoral dissertation, Royal College of Art).
Goldfarb, A., 2017. @ Realdonaldtrump and Power: A Corpus and Critical
Discourse Analysis. Hofstra University.
Gounari, P., 2018. Authoritarianism, discourse and social media: Trump as
the ‘American agitator’. Critical theory and authoritarian populism,
pp.207-227.
Hoffmann, A.J., 2019. The City As a Trap: 20th and 21st Century American
Literature and the American Myth of Mobility.
Hora, M., 2019. Art Therapy and Social Action: Creative Expression as a
Feminist Act: An Ethnographic, Art-Based Research (Doctoral
dissertation, Hofstra University).
Hurt, A.E. ed., 2019. Student Debt. Greenhaven Publishing LLC.
Jeffery, G. and McAuliffe, D., 2020. Interview with Henry A. Giroux. The
SAGE Handbook of Critical Pedagogies, p.352.
Kenny, M., 2017. Back to the populist future?: understanding nostalgia in
contemporary ideological discourse. Journal of Political
Ideologies, 22(3), pp.256-273.
Khalil, H.H. and Abbas, N.F., 2018. Iraq in the American presidential debate
discourse: A critical discourse analysis. International Journal of English
Linguistics, 8(2), pp.260-278.
 Discourses 61

Khoirunisa, A. and Indah, R.N., 2017. Argumentative statements in the 2016

Presidential Debates of the US: a critical discourse analysis. Journal of
English Education and Linguistics Studies, 4(2), pp.155-173.
Lewis, G., 2017. Questions of presence. Feminist Review, 117(1), pp.1-19.
Lindau, I., 2019. Manipulating the public?: A critical discourse analysis of
Donald Trump’s 2016 Immigration speech.
London, G., 2020. Hanging by a Thread.
Mohammadi, M. and Javadi, J., 2017. A critical discourse analysis of Donald
Trump’s language use in US presidential campaign, 2016. International
Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(5), pp.1-10.
Moursi, S.S., 2018. Saudi Female Graduate Studying Abroad: Their
Challenges, Coping Mechanism, and the Type of Support They Need.
New Mexico State University.
Murrell, K., 2016. ‘Call me Daddy’: The Politics and Rhetoric of Donald
Trump’s Homonationalist Discourse in the Wake of Orlando.
Nwaogu, P.O., 2017. Politics And Political Behavior: Nigeria In Focus. Book
Venture Publishing LLC.
Rachman, A. and Yunianti, S., 2017. Critical discourse analysis in Donald
Trump presidential campaign to win American’s heart. Tell
Journal, 5(2), pp.8-17.
Rahmi, R.R., 2019. THE ANALYSIS OF IDEOLOGIES IN DONALD TRUMP’S
POLITICAL SPEECHES ON NATIONAL SECURITY: A CRITICAL
DISCOURSE ANALYSIS. E-Journal English Language and
Literature, 8(1).
Ramirez, M.D. and Peterson, D.A., 2020. Ignored racism: White animus
toward Latinos. CAMBRIDGE University Press.
Schubert, C., 2017. Constructing Mexican stereotypes: Telecinematic
discourse and Donald Trump’s campaign rhetoric. Critical Approaches
to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 8(2), pp.37-57.
Scott, D., 2016. Buddhism in current China-India diplomacy. Journal of
Current Chinese Affairs, 45(3), pp.139-174.
Sultana, S. and Dovchin, S., 2019. Relocalization in digital language practices
of university students in Asian peripheries: Critical awareness in a
language classroom. Linguistics and Education, p.100752.
 Discourses 62

Sun, W., 2018. A Critical Discourse Analysis of “Minority Women for Trump”
Campaigns on Social Media. In Reconceptualizing new media and
intercultural communication in a networked society (pp. 303-327). IGI
Global.
TjinLiepShie, L., 2019. How can we see polarisation expressed through the
securitisation of immigration by right wing visual media outlets and
desecuritisation of immigration by left wing visual media outlets and
their portrayal of the other in this discourse? (Master’s thesis).
Van Den Eede, Y., 2020. The Purpose of Theory: Why Critical Constructivism
Should “Talk” and Postphenomenology Should “Do”. Techné:
Research in Philosophy and Technology.
Wahyuningsih, S., 2018, July. A Discourse Analysis: Personal Pronouns in
Donald Trump’s Inauguration Speech. In English Language and
Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp.
346-350).
Wilz, K., 2019. Resisting Rape Culture Through Pop Culture: Sex After#
metoo. Lexington Books.
Wodak, R. and Krzyżanowski, M., 2017. Right-wing populism in Europe &
USA: Contesting politics & discourse beyond
‘Orbanism’and‘Trumpism’. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4),
pp.471-484.
Zuckerman, C., 2018. Good Gambling: Meaning and Moral Economy in Late-
Socialist Laos (Doctoral dissertation).