Professional Documents
Culture Documents
398
IFAC BIOROBOTICS 2018
Beijing, China, July 13-15, 2018 Hu Yongguang et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 51-17 (2018) 397–401 399
That was mostly ranging in 4, 5 and 6 inch for all tube wells Figure 2 is RS data and GS data for the year 2014-2015. It
in the study area. The head range was also calculated for shows the relationship between them for the whole year
each tube well. The head range is the distance of outlet pipe from April to next March. In April the groundwater
to the impeller of each pump. This was a measure for each abstraction was very little and RS data was increasing in
and every tube well was visited. The information about the April and May, and then decreased from June to September.
total cost of installation per tube well that very concerning RS data increased until October and then reduced to zero in
the brand use was also gathered during field visits. The November and December. After that it rose again till
discharge of each tube well used for ground water January and then decreased to zero in March. This graph
abstraction was also calculated by using float method. shows that the RS data is giving more values that of ground
water survey. The trend line shows the data is as excellent
2.4 Groundwater abstraction calculation as R2=0.8725, which is close to the original data.
The ground water abstraction of both distributaries was The data of Mungi distributary for the year 2014-2015 is
calculated in terms of depth (mm) by using the formula shown in Figure 3. Nearly the same variation happened for
(Utilization Factor). GS and RS data. And the trend line shows a good
relationship between the two correspondents as R2= 0.951.
Depth=pumping hours (hr)*Discharge(m3/hr)*1000
/Total area (m2)
Where,
Pumping hours=hours for which the tube well is irrigating
the field crop (Kharif and Rabi);
Discharge=Discharge rate of each tube well (m3/hr);
Total area=Total CCA of the distributary;
Total volume=Discharge(m3/hr)*Total pumping hours (hr);
Total depth=(Total volume(m3)/CCA of whole
distributary(m2))*1000
3. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
Fig. 2. Comparison of ground survey and remote sensing
3.1 Groundwater abstraction calculation of Mungi and data (Khurianwala).
Khurianwala distributary
3.2 Comparison of ground survey and remote sensing The trend line between two correspondence groundwater
and canal water shows a perfect relationship between the
The comparison of ground survey (GS) and remote sensing two as the R2=0.8687 which is in an excellent range.
(RS) data for Khurianwala and Mungi distributaries are
shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
399
IFAC BIOROBOTICS 2018
400
Beijing, China, July 13-15, 2018 Hu Yongguang et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 51-17 (2018) 397–401
400
IFAC BIOROBOTICS 2018
Beijing, China, July 13-15, 2018 Hu Yongguang et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 51-17 (2018) 397–401 401
canal water in a large-scale irrigation system. Irrigation Yaseen, S.M. and M.I. Rao. (2002). Skipped irrigation at
Advisory Services and Participatory Extension in critical growth stages and its effect on crop yields and
Irrigation Management Workshop organized by FAO- soil salinity. Journal of Drainage and Water
ICID. Management, 6(1):37-44.
401