You are on page 1of 42

Underground Raceway

Systems

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems


Raceway Systems

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 2
Cable Derating Analysis
• Determines the proper size of cables to carry
the specified loads for new systems.

• Calculates maximum cable ampacities for


specific scenarios.

• Examines cable temperatures and


ampacities for existing systems to determine
operating and emergency limits.

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 3
Cable Derating Analysis
•NEC Accepted -
Neher-McGrath Method
•IEC 287 Method
Steady-state temperature calculation

Uniform-ampacity cable ampacity calculation

Uniform-temperature cable ampacity calculation

Cable sizing

Transient temperature calculation

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 4
Cable Ampacity
Fundamentals
Cable Ampacity is the current a conductor can carry
continuously under the conditions of use without
exceeding its temperature rating.

Heat is generated when current is carried by a


conductor since it must pass through the electrical
resistance of the conductor.

Watts = I2R

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 5
Cable Ampacity
Fundamentals
Various thermal barriers:

1. Conductor insulation
2. Air inside a duct
3. Duct wall
4. Soil surrounding an underground duct
5. Additional thermal insulation applied such as
polyurethane

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 6
Cable Ampacity
Fundamentals
Heat Transfer Equation
The rate of heat transfer is directly dependent on the difference
in temperature between the conductor (Tc) and the ambient
temperature (Ta)
Tc Ta (I 2 R).RHO

RHO is thermal resistance in degrees Centigrade-cm/watt

Rearranging the terms for I: ( TC TA )


I
( R RHO)

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 7
Heat Flow Model

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 8
Heat Flow Model
(Generalized)

Installation under an isolated


condition

Installation of groups of three


or six circuits

RHO of Soil = 90

Ta = 20 oC

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 9
Heat Transfer Problem
Ultimate Unchanged Surrounding Environment

Adjustment Factor

Heat Flow
Immediate Surrounding Environment
(Actual Installation Conditions)

In actual practice, the surrounding medium in which the cables


are to be installed rarely match those conditions under which
the stated ampacities apply.
© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 10
Adjustment Factor
Cable Derating is based on a concept of an adjustment
(multiplying) factor that is applied against base ampacity.

The multiplying factor takes into account the differences in the


cable’s actual installation conditions from the base conditions.

I' F x I
I’ = Allowable cable ampacity for the actual installation conditions
F = Cable Ampacity Adjustment Factor
I = Base Ampacity specified by cable manufacturer or NEC under an
isolated condition with a soil thermal resistively (RHO) of 90 and a
specified ambient temperature

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 11
Adjustment Factor
Composition
F Ft x F x Fg
th
Ft = Adjustment factor to account for the
differences in the ambient and
conductor temperatures from the
base case
Fth = Adjustment factor to account for the
difference in the soil thermal
resistivity from RHO of 90
Fg = Adjustment factor to account for
cable grouping

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 12
Duct Bank Example
I = 375 Amps 350 MCM
I = 450 Amps 500 MCM

Ft = 0.82 Ta from 20 C to 30 C
Tc from 90 C to 75 C
Fth = 0.9 RHO of 90 to 120
Fg = 0.479 350 MCM Cable
Fg = 0.478 500 MCM Cable

350 MCM
F = 0.82 x 0.90 x 0.479 = 0.354

500 MCM
F = 0.82 x 0.90 x 0.478 = 0.354

I’ = 375 x 0.354 = 133 Amps


I’ = 450 x 0.353 = 159 Amps

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 13
Neher-McGrath Equation

Tc (Ta ΔTd)
I = Ampacity (kA) I
Tc = Conductor temperature (Deg C) Rdc (1 Tc) Rca'
Ta = Ambient Temperature (Deg C)
Δ Td = Conductor temperature rise due to dielectric loss (Deg C)
Rdc = Conductor dc resistance (μΩ/ft)
Tc = Loss increment due to conductor skin & proximity effects
Rca’ = Thermal resistance between conductor & ambience (Ω-ft)

(1+Tc) is a multiplier used to convert direct current resistance (Rdc) to


alternating current resistance or impedance. For wire sizes smaller than No. 2,
this term becomes insignificant.
Δ TD compensates for heat generated in the jacket and insulation for higher
voltages. It is insignificant for voltages below 2kV.

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 14
Neher-McGrath Example

Calculate ampacity of 3/C concentric stranded XHHW insulated copper


cable enclosed in a 1 inch steel conduit. Ta = 40 C
t = insulation thickness From N-M Table VII
From N-M Table VII
2t = 2 x 0.045 in. = 0.09 in. [NEC Table 310-13] a 3.2
b 0.19
DC 0.292 [NEC Table 8, Chapter 9]
1 Inch Rigid Steel Conduit ID = 1.049 in.
DI 0.09 0.292
OD 1.315
DI 0.382
DI From N-M Table VII
Ri 0.012 400 log
DC
Ds 2.16 DI
Ri 0.56
Ds 0.825

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 15
Neher-McGrath Example

( n a) Rca Ri Rsd RE
Rsd
Ds b
Rca 17.071
Rsd 9.457 Rdc75 194
Emissivity ( 234.5 90)
E 0.95 Emissivity Rdc90 Rdc75
( 234.5 75)
Ds2 1.315 Conduit OD
Emissivity Rdc90 203.402
9.5 ( n)
RE ( 90 40)
[ 1 1.7 Ds2 ( E 0.41) ] I
RE 7.054 ( 203.5 Rca)

I 0.12 kA with Ta = 30, I = 131 Amps


(Table 310-16 lists 130 Amps, Ta=30)

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 16
Cable Sizing
Determines the minimum size for each cable that will carry the
specified load current without violating the cable temperature
limit.

The sizing calculation is an


iterative process involving
adjustment of the cable size
and temperature.

Able to ‘lock-in’ specific


cable sizes that cannot be
changed.

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 17
Cable Sizing Example
1. Load WKSHOP-EX4
2. Run Load Flow
3. Update Cable Load Amp
(Study Case)

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 18
Cable Sizing Based Voltage Drop

Set Voltage Drop = 2%


Operating Current = 140 A
Optimal Size is Calculated
One Size Smaller is Displayed

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 19
Cable Sizing Based on Ampacity

Operating Current = 140 A

Optimal Size is Calculated


One Size Smaller is Displayed

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 20
New UGS Presentations
• Project Editor – Presentation – Underground
Raceways - Right-Click – Create New

Double-click
to change
presentation
properties

• Select UGS Mode – Click ‘New Presentation’

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 21
UGS Presentation

• UGS presentation is
conceptually a cross-section
of cable raceways.
• Each UGS presentation is a
different cross-section of the
underground system.
• If you delete a raceway from a UGS presentation
into the Dumpster, the raceway can be added to
other UGS presentations as an existing raceway.
• In UGS, each presentation acts independently from
each other.
© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 22
UGS Edit Toolbar

Existing Heat Sources New Heat Sources


Existing Cables New Cables
Existing Duct Bank RWs New Duct Bank RWs
Existing Direct Buried RWs New Direct Buried RWs
New Conduits for New Locations for
Duct Banks RWs Direct Buried RWs
Display Options

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 23
UGS Components

Heat Source

New Duct Bank – RW1

Existing Cable - Pump Cable

Cable 5 cannot fit inside this


conduit and is placed outside
the conduit

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 24
Inserting Cables
• Three main methods for adding cables to the existing
conduits:

1. Drag the cable from OLV


using Ctrl+Shift Key
2. Use the Existing Cable button
from the UGS Toolbar
3. Use the Routing Page from
the Cable Editor

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 25
Cable Representation

3 Conductor / Cable and


3 Conductor / Phase
Symbol: 1, 2 and 3
1 Conductor / Cable and
1 Conductor / Phase
Symbol: 1A, 1B, 1C
Single Phase Cable
Symbol: 1F, 1R
DC Cable
Symbol: 1P, 1N

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 26
UGS Example
Duct Bank
X and Y = 30
Width = 15 Height = 8
Conduit
Conduit Size = 4
Y = 3.35
Pump Cable
From OLV
New Cable
5 kV Kerite 1/C
Operating Load = 200 Amps
Run Steady-State Temp Calc

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 27
UGS Large Example

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 28
Steady-State Calculation
Calculation Pre-Requisite: All cables have been carrying the specified load
long enough that the heat flow has reached its steady-state and no more
changes of temperature will occur throughout the raceway system.

The cable temperature calculated is dependent on raceway system


configuration, cable loading, and the location of each particular cable.

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 29
Alarms and Warnings

Calculated 88.3 C is greater


Calculated 109 C is greater

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 30
Multiple Presentations

Same Cables and Heat Source

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 31
Uniform Ampacity -
Ampacity Calculation
Approach is based on the equal loading criterion for ampacity calculations.

Calculations determine the maximum allowable load currents when all the cables in
the system are equally loaded to the same percentage of their base loading.

Calculation Procedure
1. Determine initial loading level based on base ampacity.
2 Calculate cable temperature as in steady-state temperature calculation.
3. Check cable temperature values against the cable temperature limit.
If the temperature of the hottest cable is within close range of the temperature limit, the solution has been
reached. If not, adjust the cable loading uniformly at the same percentage, either increasing or decreasing
the loading in order to make the highest cable temperature come closer to the temperature limit. Then go
to back to step 2 to recalculate cable temperature.

The cable allowable current is updated by the calculated ampacity.

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 32
Uniform Temperature -
Ampacity Calculation
Approach is based on the equal temperature criterion for ampacity calculations.

Determines the maximum allowable load currents when all the cables in the system have their
temperature within a small range of the temperature limit.

In the case where these conductors are not located in the same conduit/location, they may not have the
same temperature. When this situation occurs, the temperature of the hottest conductor in this cable
branch will be used to represent this cable branch.

Calculation Procedure
1. Determine an initial loading level based on the base ampacity from the Cable Library and using cable
derating factors for the given configuration.
2. Calculate cable temperature as in the steady-state temperature calculation.
3. Check cable temperature values against the cable temperature limit.

If temperature values of all cables are within close range of temperature limit, the solution has been
reached. If not, load change required for the cable temperature to approach the temperature limit based
on the gradient of cable temperature change is determined.

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 33
Cable Sizing Calculation
• The Cable Sizing Calculation determines the minimum size of each
cable that will carry the specified load current without violating the cable
temperature limit.

• Only the ‘available’ cable sizes within


the cable library for each selected
conductor will be considered.

• Cables may be excluded if the potential


size of the cable cannot vary.

• The calculation is an iterative process;


adjusting the cable size and then calculating
cable temperatures.

• Once a solution is reached, calculation results will be reported in the


output report. Cables will automatically be changed to the new sizes if
the Update Size option is checked in the Study Case.
© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 34
Transient Temperature Calculation

Calculates and then plots cable temperature variations as a function of time in accordance to load changes.
(Table of Ampacity versus Time)

Provides a tool to verify operation conditions of the


raceway systems against the cable short-time or
emergency temperature limits.
Transient temperature calculations can be used to
determine the cable peak temperatures during a short-
time interval (usually less than a day), and compare
them against maximum allowable temperatures,
resulting in a more flexible and economical design of
your raceway systems.

The transient temperature calculations are based upon a dynamic thermal model of the raceway system,
constructed mainly from thermal resistance, thermal capacitance, and heat sources.

Thermal resistance is used to represent different thermal layers from cable conductor to ambient soil.

Thermal capacitance is used to represent the capability of each layer to absorb heat.

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 35
Example From NEC

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 36
NEC Duct Bank (Detail 2)
Depth= 30 in
Fill RHO = 60
1kV NEC Rubber2
1/C CU 3-phase
Magnetic
Class = 100%
Size = 350 AWG
Load = 284.5 Amps
per phase

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 37
NEC Duct Bank (Detail 3)
Depth = 30 in
Fill RHO = 60
1kVNEC Rubber2
1/C CU 3-phase
Magnetic
Class = 100%
Size = 750 AWG
Load = 334.9Amps
per phase

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 38
(Detail 2) in ETAP

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 39
Results for Detail 2

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 40
NEC (Detail 3) in ETAP

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 41
Results for Detail 3

© 1996-2009 Operation Technology, Inc. - Workshop Notes: Underground Raceway Systems Slide 42

You might also like