You are on page 1of 343

ADAMA SCIENCE AND

TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY

STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE


BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

In Partial Fulfillment of B.Sc. Degree in Civil Engineering

Advisors :

Yohannes Lisanework

Belayneh Mengistu

DATE June, 2012


STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

GROUP 14

NO GROUP MEMBERS ID

1 GUTU ABEYA R/0299/00

2 HELEN TAFESSE R/0103/00

3 IMAN ABDO R/0294/00

4 R/0063/00
LIYOUWORK BEKELE
5 MATIAS MULATU R/0292/00

6 SOFIA NESRU R/0191/00

7 TSEGA FANTAHUN R/0230/00

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) II


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE


BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

APROVED BY ____________________________________________

DATE ______________________ SIGNATURE__________________

DEPARTMENT HEAD________________________________________

DATE ______________________ SIGNATURE__________________

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) III


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Our greatest thanks from the depth of our heart is to God for endowing us with the
courage, strength as well as health through-out our school time and for the successful
accomplishment of this project.

Next we would like to express our deepest gratitude to our project advisors Ato
Yohannes Lisanework and Ato Belayneh Mengistu for his valuable advice and in
providing relevant hint and his encouragement for the completion of this work.

We also extend our recognitions to all staff of civil engineering department, librarians,
administrative staffs of the faculty and our friends for their contributions from the
beginning to the completion of our work.

Last but not the least, we would like to thank to our parents for giving their countless
material & moral support.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) IV


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

ABSTRACT
Now a days construction industry plays a great role for the development of a nation in
all aspects. As we all agree, behind every construction activity there must have a
structural analysis and design, from this consideration directly or indirectly structural
analysis and design have a huge application in the development of a nation.

Our team has planned to work on structural analysis and design for G+4 with Basement
floor multipurpose building and software development on slab design using Ethiopian
Building Code of Standard (EBCS 1995) for senior project. The thesis will have an
objective to develop new skill, strength our capacity on structural analysis and design as
well as integrate different discipline for specified and justified problem. Beside this, it will
create awareness for others to develop this project idea for civil engineering profession.

The project will contain detail structural analysis of the building, structural design, detail
working structural drawing, slab design software documentation and comparison of
results between our software and manually computed output.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) V


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Contents
PART ONE ................................................................................................................ XVIII

INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1

CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................................................... 4

GENERAL ....................................................................................................................... 4

CHAPTER TWO .............................................................................................................. 7

2 ROOF ANALYSIS AND DESIGN.............................................................................. 7

2.1 Wind load ........................................................................................................... 7

2.2 Design load ...................................................................................................... 16

2.3 Design of Purlin ................................................................................................ 17

2.4 Truss Analysis and Design ............................................................................... 21

2.4.1 Loading .......................................................................................................................... 21


2.4.2 Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 24
2.4.3 Design ............................................................................................................................ 35
CHAPTER THREE ........................................................................................................ 40

3 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF SLAB ....................................................................... 40

3.1 DESIGN PROCEDURE.................................................................................... 40

3.2 GROUND FLOOR SLAB DESIGN ................................................................... 40

3.3 Basement Floor Slab Design............................................................................ 88

CHAPTER 4 .................................................................................................................. 90

4 STAIR CASE DESIGN ............................................................................................ 90

4.1 STAIR SECTION A-A ....................................................................................... 92

4.2 STAIR SECTION B-B ..................................................................................... 105

4.3 STAIR SECTION C-C .................................................................................... 116

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) VI


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CHAPTER FIVE .......................................................................................................... 130

5 FRAME ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 130

5.1 Wind load on structure ................................................................................... 130

5.2 Earth quake analysis ...................................................................................... 135

5.2.1 Base Shear Determination ............................................................................................ 136


5.2.2 Distribution of base shear force to each story ............................................................... 138
5.2.3 Calculation of Weights Structure .................................................................................. 139
5.2.4 Determination of center of mass .................................................................................. 146
5.2.5 Determination of center of stiffness ............................................................................. 150
CHAPTER 6 ................................................................................................................ 182

6 BEAM DESIGN ..................................................................................................... 182

CHAPTER SEVEN ...................................................................................................... 206

7 COLUMN DESIGN ............................................................................................... 206

7.1 Determination of Sway or Non-sway condition of substitute frame ................ 211

7.2 Determine Slenderness of a column .............................................................. 222

7.3 Determination of total eccentricity .................................................................. 223

7.4 Reinforcement Design .................................................................................... 228

7.5 Design of column for shear ............................................................................ 229

CHAPTER EIGHT ....................................................................................................... 253

8 Design of shear wall ............................................................................................. 253

8.1 Determination of vertical load ......................................................................... 258

8.1.1 Depth determination .................................................................................................... 258


8.1.2 Load calculation ........................................................................................................... 259
8.1.3 Check depth required for strength ................................................................................ 260
8.1.4 Area of Reinforcement ................................................................................................. 260
8.2 Design for shear ............................................................................................. 261

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) VII


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

8.2.1 Load transfer ................................................................................................................ 263


8.3 Design of shear wall (individual wall) ............................................................. 264

8.3.1 Design the wall basement floor to ground floor ............................................................ 265
8.3.2 Design for shear........................................................................................................... 266
CHAPTER NINE.......................................................................................................... 268

9 FOUNDATION DESIGN ....................................................................................... 268

9.1 Design of Isolated Footing.............................................................................. 270

9.2 Combined Footing Design .............................................................................. 276

9.3 Mat Foundation Design under shear wall ....................................................... 282

ANNEX ............................................................................................................................ 1

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) VIII


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

List of Tables

Table 2.1 Area of each zone ........................................................................................ 10

Table 2.2 pressure coefficients for each zone ............................................................... 11

Table 2.3 Exposure for external pressure for each zone ............................................... 11

Table 2.4 Area of each zone ......................................................................................... 13

Table 2.5 pressure coefficient for each zone ................................................................. 14

Table 2.6 Exposure coefficient for external pressure .................................................... 14

Table 2.7 Net pressure coefficient θ = 00 ...................................................................... 15

Table 2.8 Net pressure coefficient θ = 1800 .................................................................. 15

Table 2.9 Net pressure coefficient θ = 900 .................................................................... 16

Table 2.10 Self weight of vertical member of the truss .................................................. 24

Table 2.11 Self weight of diagonal member of the truss................................................ 25

Table 2.12 Self weight of rafter member of the truss ..................................................... 25

Table 2.13 Self weight of horizontal member of the truss .............................................. 25

Table 2.14 Summerized table for member force using force method o analysis ........... 30

Table 2.15 Truss type1 Member for under pressure ................................................... 31

Table 2.16 Truss type1 Member force for under suction .............................................. 32

Table 2.17 Truss type2 Member force under suction and pressure case ...................... 33

Table 2.18 Truss type3 Member force under suction and pressure case ...................... 34

Table 3.1 determination of slab type ............................................................................. 40

Table 3.2 Ground floor panels effective depth ............................................................... 43

Table 3.4 ground floor panels partition load .................................................................. 46

Table 3.6 moment adjustment ....................................................................................... 60

Table 3.7 Ground floor slab reinforcement .................................................................... 68

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) IX


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Table 3.8 Ground floor slab load transfer ....................................................................... 79

Table 3.9 LL load transfer to frame system ................................................................... 83

Table 3.10 LL load transfer to frame system ................................................................. 85

Table 3.11 Load transfer from strip method analysis..................................................... 88

Table 5.1 Weight of structure ...................................................................................... 145

Table 5.2 Strory shear ................................................................................................. 145

Table 5.3 Center of mass ............................................................................................ 150

Table 5.4 center of stiffness ........................................................................................ 154

Table 5.5 D value determination ................................................................................. 159

Table 5.6 Center of stifness ........................................................................................ 160

Table 5.7 computation of eccentricity .......................................................................... 160

Table 5.8 Computation of frame shear ........................................................................ 170

Table 7.1 sway frame .................................................................................................. 221

Table 7.2 slender frame .............................................................................................. 223

Table 7.3 axial force and moments ............................................................................. 223

Table 7.4 moment calculation ..................................................................................... 228

Table 7.5 Reinforcement Design ................................................................................. 228

Table 7.6 column category .......................................................................................... 249

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) X


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

List of figures

Figure 2.1 wind direction at =0 .................................................................................... 10

Figure 2.2 When θ = 00 ................................................................................................. 12

Figure 2.3 When θ = 1800 ............................................................................................. 12

Figure 2.4 Wind direction =90...................................................................................... 13

Figure 2.5 External wind pressure loaded on the roof ................................................... 14

Figure 2.6 Purlin ............................................................................................................ 18

Figure 2.7 Loading for load combination 2 .................................................................... 20

Figure 2.8 Loading for load combination 1 .................................................................... 20

Figure 2.9 Loading for load combination 3 .................................................................... 21

Figure 2.10 Truss type -1 Loading................................................................................. 21

Figure 2.11 Truss type -2 loading .................................................................................. 22

Figure 2.12 Truss type -3 loading .................................................................................. 22

Figure 2.13 Truss type -1 Loading................................................................................. 23

Figure 2.14 Truss type -2 loading .................................................................................. 23

Figure 2.15 Truss type -3 loading .................................................................................. 23

Figure 2.16 principle of super position........................................................................... 26

Figure 3.3 Slab moments .............................................................................................. 46

Figure 3.4 panel 12 layout ............................................................................................. 49

Figure 3.5 plan view of slab strips for basic case .......................................................... 50

Figure 3.6 plan view of slab strips for actual case ......................................................... 53

Figure 3.7 Analyzed moments of ground floor ............................................................... 60

Figure 3.8 adjusted moment of ground floor.................................................................. 65

Figure 4.1 Stair Lay out ................................................................................................. 90

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) XI


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 4.2 Section view of stair A-A .............................................................................. 92

Figure 4.3 Loads on stair A-A........................................................................................ 95

Figure 4.4 Max. Moment determination for stair A-A ..................................................... 96

Figure 4.5 Shear force determination for stair A-A ...................................................... 101

Figure 4.6 shear force diagram for stair A-A ............................................................... 102

Figure 4.7 DL transfer ................................................................................................. 103

Figure 4.8 LL transfer .................................................................................................. 104

Figure 4.9 Section view of stair B-B ............................................................................ 105

Figure 4.10 Loads on stair B-B.................................................................................... 107

Figure 4.11 Max. Moment determination for stair B-B ................................................. 108

Figure 4.12 Shear force determination for stair B-B .................................................... 113

Figure 4.13 shear force diagram for stair A-A ............................................................. 114

Figure 4.14 DL transfer ............................................................................................... 115

Figure 4.15 LL transfer ................................................................................................ 116

Figure 4.16 Section view of stair C-C .......................................................................... 116

Figure 4.17 Loads on stair C-C ................................................................................... 119

Figure 4.18 Max. Moment determination for stair B-B ................................................. 120

Figure 4.19 Shear force determination for stair C-C .................................................... 126

Figure 4.20 shear force diagram for stair C-C ............................................................. 126

Figure 4.21 DL transfer ............................................................................................... 128

Figure 4.22 LL Transfer ............................................................................................... 129

Figure 5.1 3D frame .................................................................................................... 180

Figure 5.2 Deformed Shape ........................................................................................ 181

Figure 5.3 Moment ...................................................................................................... 181

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) XII


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 7.1 substitute frame ......................................................................................... 220

Figure 8.1 Axial, shear and BM dialgram .................................................................... 264

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) XIII


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

OBJECTIVE

As we stated earlier, this team has planned to work on different disciplines that have a
good effort both in the development of new skill for our self and putting some tangible
contribution for our profession. This thesis has wide objectives which are classified into
two categories. Bearing in mind, it may have more objectives than we try to state here.

Based on the Knowledge we gained

Since all the team members are the future responsible civil engineers, this project has
an objective;

 Getting basic structural design knowledge


 Strengthen and accomplishment of different capacity of structural Analysis and
design philosophy
 Relating theoretical knowledge to the actual site condition
 Development of new skills such as development of software and applying
existing software
 Using the courses that we took for required purpose
 Integrating different disciplines

Based on putting some contribution to the profession

The project also has an objective to create an important contribution in the civil
engineering profession.

 To develop software by applying Ethiopian Building codes of Standard(EBCS


1995)
 Creating an awareness for others to develop such kind of idea for either B.Sc
or M.Sc thesis
 Creating a good integration between our profession and computer programing

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) XIV


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Technical Information

The thesis presents structural analysis and design of a multipurpose building. The
building is G+4 with a basement.

The structure is composed of architectural and structural components.

Computation of structural analysis follows static analysis calculates the effects of stead
loading conditions of structure, while ignoring inertia and damping effects such as those
caused by time-varying load. The analysis finally comes up with lateral loads and
vertical loads which have significant effect on the structure and to obtain shear, moment
and deflection.

Structural design involves the determination of different cross sections of the skeletal
part of the building to make it economical, stable and sustainable throughout its design
life with the prime objective of design is safety and serviceability.

Self-weight of structure, imposed load, wind load and earthquake are expected loads on
structure.

Wind load have considerable effect on vertically standing walls, column and beam. The
analysis becomes essential for height of building greater than seven meter. The
influence can be easily studied on roof structures.

The proposed location for the building is in Adama town. The town is placed under a
category of zone 4 according to EBCS 8, 1995. Hence, analysis for the earth quake
becomes vital and the building shall be earth quake resistant which provides an
adequate energy dissipation capacity to the structure without substantial reduction of its
overall resistance against horizontal and vertical loading. Shear wall system is also
provided to stiffen the structure in addition to the frame system.

The overall design of a building includes design of roof, design of slab, design of beam
and column, design of shear wall, design of foundation.

The analysis will be compute using applicable softwares either ETABS V9.0.7

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) XV


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Structural design and analysis

Component of structural analysis and design

Roof design

In this part we do have a task base on the required requirement


 Wind load analysis
 Roof analysis and design
 Purlin design
 Truss Analysis and Design
 Design of truss members

SLAB AND STAIR CASE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

 Slab design using coefficient method analysis


 Design of slab using strip method of analysis
 Design of ribbed slab
 Design of stair case
 Load transfer to frames
 Vertical loads
 Horizontal loads (Earthquake)

FRAME ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

 Beam Analysis and Design


 Beam design and analysis for flexure
 Shear Reinforcement
 Column Analysis and design

FOUNDATION DESIGN

Specification and code

Design requirements are provided based on Ethiopian Building Code of Standard,


EBCS1995 by applying limit state design approach.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) XVI


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Software Development

In addition to structural analysis and design, our team has planned to develop analysis
software which specifically targeted on slab design. Obviously, this task needs a lot of
effort and knowledge on others profession. Especially, it needs programing and
software development knowledge. As we all know, we had got an introduction
programing knowledge (C++) in our curriculum which is a starting point for us to go
forward and solving our problem.

We planned to use Visual studio 2010, visual C# programing language for our
program which has a close relationship with C++ programing language.

Component of software development

SLAB ANALYSIS AND DESIGN


In this section we try to state clearly the basic EBCS slab design philosophy and
procedures including all the dependent and independent variables and functions.

PROGRAM ALGORISM

Creating the program algorithm or flow chart which is clearly show how the program
works or execute the task using simple self-explanatory chart.

ENTERING THE CODES AND DEVELOPING THE APPLICATION


All the codes and development of the application working procedure is specified in this
section.

Manual preparation
Prepared manual will be provide in order to everyone use our window application
software easily and genuinely.

Examples
Showing different examples of slab design using our window application software

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) XVII


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

PART ONE
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) XVIII


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this project is to examine the integrated techniques used in the design
of a building. Now a day’s it is being practical to choose types of structural members for
different criteria especially economy after assuring safety. This project deals about the
structural analysis and design of a G+4 building with a basement floor considering all
the external effects according to EBCS, 1995.

The structural design of this typical building involves design of floor slabs, stairs, beams,
columns, foundation, shear wall and analysis of frames for lateral loads.

The building is composed of solid slab for the floors.

Live load and dead load analysis are made according to the provisions of EBCS-1,
1995. After the minimum depth of slab for serviceability limit state was determined, the
slabs were designed for partition load, floor finish using self-weight load and live loads
according to EBCS-1, 1995. The ground floor slab is designed using coefficient & strip
method according to EBCS-2-1995. Stairs and landings were designed as one-way
slab.

A structural design is executed in such a way that the building will remain fit with
appropriate degrees of reliability and in an economic way. It should sustain all the
actions and influences during execution and use. Therefore, structural design focuses
on structural safety and serviceability with due durability. It must also optimize the cost
expended in building the structure and maintenance.

This structural design is executed based on the Ethiopian Building Code of Standard
(EBCS) prepared in 1995 E.C. This code follows the Limit State design approach.

Limit state is a state beyond which the structure no longer satisfies the design
performance requirements. It consists of two states namely Ultimate Limit and
serviceability Limit states.

Ultimate Limit states are conditions related with collapse or states prior to structural
failure. Its main concern is the safety of structure and people. Serviceability Limit states
are those associated to conditions beyond which a structure does not accomplish

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 1


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

specified service requirements. It is mainly concerned about the function of construction


works, comfort of people, and appearance.

The objective of design is structural safety and serviceability. In case the structure fails,
it must be in such a way it will minimize risks. It must extend the time for evacuation of
people inside a building

This requirement of structural design is accomplished by the principle called ductility.

Ductility allows yielding of steel reinforcement prior to the collapse of the building.
Yielding of steel bars warns the start of failure of a structure or its part. Therefore,
structures are designed to be under reinforced by certain percent to assure ductility
mode of failure if it happens.

Design criteria for building

To analyze or design a structure, it is necessary to establish criteria for determining


whether a given structure is acceptable for use in a specified circumstance or for use
directly as a design objective that must be met.

Design consideration

Safety:

Safety implies the likelihood of partial or total collapse of the structure is acceptably low
not only under normal expected loads (service loads), but also under abnormal but
probable overloads (such as due to earthquake or extreme wind). Collapse may occur
due to various possibilities such ad exceeding the load bearing capacity, overturning,
sliding, buckling, fatigue etc.

Serviceability:

Serviceability implies satisfactory performance of the structure under service loads,


without discomfort to the user due to excessive deflection, cracking, vibration etc. Other
considerations that come under the preview of serviceability are durability, acoustic and
thermal insulation, etc.

The structure must be able to carry the design load safely without excessive material

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 2


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

distress and with deformations with in an acceptable range. The ability of a structure to
carry loads safely and without material distress is achieved by using safety factors in the
design of the element. By altering the size, shape, and choice of material, stresses in a
structure can be maintained at safe levels and such that material distress.

The design of beams and columns is done for the critical moment’s shears and axial
loads obtained from the live load combinations of the selected axis. Beams were
designed according to EBCS-2, 1995 provisions.

To simplify the design procedure calculation is done using designed Excel spread
sheets.

The size of the footing was determined from the bearing capacity of the soil; the
thickness of the footing is determined from punching and wide beam shear.

For the analysis of frames, the restrained conditions at the foundation level are
assumed fixed. Loads acting on beams from slab reactions and walls directly resting on
beams and lateral load acting on the frame were added to self-weight of beams to find
total load acting on beams. All the significant loads are inserted and analyzed for five
load combinations using ETABS Nonlinear V9.7.0

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 3


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CHAPTER 1

GENERAL

The design of any structure is categorized in to functional design and structural design.

Functional design: the structure to be constructed should primarily serve the basic
purpose for which it is to be used and must have a pleasing look.

Structural design: it is an art and science of understanding the behavior of structural


members subjected to loads and designing them with economy and elegance to give a
safe, serviceable and durable structure.

Design situations

The severe conditions which can be foreseen to occur in the life time of the building
include:

1. Persistent and transient situations

2. Seismic situations

3. Accidental situation

Design Considerations and material property

Concrete

The main measure of structural quality of concrete is its compressive strength. Our code
EBCS2 -1995 recommends concrete grade based on a test of 150mm cube at the age
of 28 days in terms of its characteristic compressive strength (fcu).

Class I workmanship and ordinary loading condition is used. In which values are
measured by weight and using mixer. It requires less safety factor.

Concrete grade C-25 C denotes the characteristic compressive strength in MPa.

Partial safety factor c =1.5

Compressive strength:

fck = 0.8*25 = 20MPa where fck is the characteristic compressive strength of cylinder

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 4


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

tests.

fcd = = 11.33Mpa where the design characteristic compressive strength of


cylinder tests.

Characteristic tensile strength

As it is difficult to obtain accurate data because of hardening problems empirical


relations are used to obtain tensile strength.

fctk= 0.21(fck)2/3

=1.5 MPa

fctd = 0.21 (fck)2/3/c

= 0.21* (20)2/3/1.5 = 1.03Mpa

Where: fctk = tensile strength of concrete

: fck = characteristic cylindrical compressive strength in MPa.

The ultimate stress in concrete for design purpose is:

fcu = 0.85fck

The ultimate strain in concrete for design purpose is taken as 0.0035

The unit weight of concrete is 24 KN/m3

Reinforcement steel

Characteristic properties of reinforcement bar is expressed using its yielding strength fyk
and is given as:

Steel grade S-300 where S = characteristic strength of steel in MPa.

Partial safety factor: s=1.15

fyk = 300Mpa where f yk is characteristic tensile strength of steel.

fyd = fyk/s = 300/1.15 = 260.87MPa.

Where fyd is the design tensile strength of steel.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 5


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Es = 200GPa where Es = Modulus of elasticity of steel.

Maximum spacing

Smax = minimum of {

Design load

Partial safety factor for actions in building structure for persistent and transient design
situation is taken for unfavorable condition. Factor of safety for permanent and variable
loading condition are 1.3 and 1.6 respectively (EBCS 2 table 3.3).

Design method

Design of a certain structure involves determination of cross sectional dimensions, area


of steel and their distribution and the area and spacing of transverse bars satisfying all
strength and service equipment.

Design is needed for:

- Fitness for purpose- no restriction for use of structure for which it is built.

- Safety- assured by different codes for loading, materials and design constriction

- Durability – by selecting the right material and consideration in design process

- Good value for money

- External appearance and

- User comfort

For this typical project Limit state design philosophy is adopt.

A limit state is a state of impending failure, beyond which a structure ceases to perform
its intended function satisfactorily, in terms of either safety or serviceability i.e. it either
collapses or become unserviceable.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 6


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CHAPTER TWO

2 ROOF ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

In the design of roof the major loads which are applied on roof are wind load and live
load. The action of wind can be of the type of suction or pressure to our structures both
externally or internally. However these effects are more magnified for structures with
more openings and large surface areas. Therefore our focus is on the most sensitive
part of the building that is the roof.

Our roof type is Monopich roof and under category- IV Urban Area from table
3.3[EBCS2, 1995] since our building is located in Adama town. There for the
characteristic dead load is

Qk=1KN , qk = 0.25KN/m2
2.1 Wind load

According to EBCS1, Art 3.5.2, the wind pressure acting on the external surface of a
structure shall be:

We=qref*Ce(Ze)*Cpe

And the internal pressure acting on the internal surfaces becomes,

Wi=qref*Ce(Zi)*Cpi

Where: qref=reference mean wind velocity

Ce(Ze)= exposure coefficients for external pressure

Ce(Zi)=exposure coefficients for internal pressure

Ze,Zi= reference height defined in Appendix A of


EBCS1


qref  Vref 2
2
Where: ρ= air density in Kg/m3

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 7


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Vref = reference wind velocity

For Ethiopia Vref= 22m/s

Cdir=Ctemp=Calt=1

Vref=Cdir*Ctemp*Calt*Vref=22m/s

For altitude of 1600 m, ρ=0.988 Kg/m3 (Adama)

0.988
qref  * 22 2  239.096 N / m2  0.2391KPa
2
The exposure coefficients Ce(Z) can be simply read from table 3.5 of EBCS 1.

Ze= h =18.10 m

Where h – building height

For Z= 18.1 m >Zmin = 16m category- IV Urban Area from table 3.3[EBCS2, 1995]
since our building is located in Adama town, the roughness coefficient C r (Z) become

Cr Z

0.67 16m
x=0.693
X 18.10
Cr = 0.693
0.82 30m

Topography coefficient (Ct) becomes

Ct=1 for ø<0.05

For category IV building (table 3.5 of EBCS-1) for Ct=1

Ce Z

1.56 16m

X 18.10

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 8


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

2.04 30m

x=1.632

Ce = 1.632 (by linear interpolation).

Calculation of Cpe and Cpi

The roof type is Mon pitch roof type

I. CASE 1: Wind direction at Ө = 00

e=b or 2h whichever is smaller

e=min (40.1, 2*18.1) = min. (40.1, 36.2) =36.2m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 9


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 2.1 wind direction at =0

Zones Area of each zone(m2)

F 9.05*3.62= 32.761

G 22*3.62= 79.04

H 8.18*40.1= 328.018

Table 2-1 Area of each zone


All zone areas are greater than 10 m2

The pressure coefficients for each zone are given in Table A-4 EBCS-1, 1995

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 10


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Peach Zone θ = 00 Zone θ = 1800


angle
F G H F G H
α

Cpe10 Cpe1 Cpe10 Cpe1 Cpe1 Cpe1 Cpe10 Cpe1 Cpe10 Cpe1 Cpe10 Cpe1

50 -1.7 -2.5 -1.2 -2.0 -0.6 -1.2 -2.3 -2.5 -1.3 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2

-1.29 - -0.99 - - -
2.25 1.75 0.45 0.75
10.10 -2.40 - -1.3 -2.0 -0.85 -1.2
2.65
+0.102 +0.102 +0.102

-0.9 -2.0 -0.8 -1.5 -0.3 -0.3 -2.5 -2.8 -1.3 -2.0 -0.9 -1.2

150
+0.2 +0.2 +0.2 - - -

Table 2-2 pressure coefficients for each zone

Zone θ = 00 Zone θ = 1800

Zone F G H F G H

-1.292 -0.996 -0.447 -2.402 -1.3 -0.851

Cpe
+0.102 +1.02 +0.102 - - -

Table 2-3 Exposure for external pressure for each zone


Both +ve and -ve values are given for zones F,G and H, the most critical value should
be selected when considering combinations with internal pressure coefficients.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 11


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 2.2 When θ = 00

Figure 2.3 When θ = 1800

II. CASE 2: Wind direction at Ө = 900

e=b or 2h whichever is smaller

e=min (11.8 , 2*18.1) = min. (11.8, 36.2) =11.8m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 12


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 2.4 Wind direction =90

Zones Area of each zone(m2)

F 3.9 * 1.18 = 6.962

G 5.9 * 1.18 = 6.962

H 4.72 * 11.8 = 55.692

I 34.2 * 11.8 = 403.56

Table 2-4 Area of each zone

Peach Zone θ = 900


angle α
F G H I

Cpe10 Cpe1 Cpe10 Cpe1 Cpe1 Cpe1 Cpe10 Cpe1

50 -1.6 -2.2 -1.8 -2.0 -0.6 -1.2 +0.5

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 13


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

10.10 -1.447 -2.098 -1.851 -2.255 -0.702 -1.2 -0.112 -0.367

150 -1.3 -2.0 -1.9 -2.5 -0.8 -1.2 -0.7 -1.2

Table 2-5 pressure coefficient for each zone


The pressure coefficients for each zone are given in Table A-4 EBCS-1, 1995

Zone θ = 900

Zone F G H I

Cpe -2.098 -2.255 -0.702 -0.112

Table 2-6 Exposure coefficient for external pressure

Figure 2.5 External wind pressure loaded on the roof


Internal pressure

For closed buildings with internal partitions and openings

Cpi = 0.8 or –0.5

Net pressure = W net= W e-W i

=qref*Ce(z)*[Cpe-Cpi]

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 14


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

=0.2391*1.632*(Cpe-Cpi)

= 0.390*(Cpe-Cpi)

Zone for wind direction θ = 00

Zone F G H

Cpe -1.292 0.102 -0.996 0.102 -0.447 0.102

Cpi 0.8 -0.5 0.8 -0.5 0.8 -0.5

Cpe -Cpi -2.092 0.602 -1.796 0.602 -1.247 0.602

NET P, -0.816 0.235 -0.7 0.235 -0.486 0.235

Table 2-7 Net pressure coefficient θ = 00


Zone for wind direction θ = 1800

Zone F G H

Cpe -2.402 -1.3 -0.851

Cpi 0.8 0.8 0.8

Cpe -Cpi -3.202 -2.1 -1.651

NET P, -1.249 -0.819 -0.644

Table 2-8 Net pressure coefficient θ = 1800

Zone for wind direction θ = 900

Zone F G H I

Cpe -2.098 -2.255 -0.702 -0.122

Cpi 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 15


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Cpe -Cpi -2.898 -3.055 -1.502 -0.912

NET P, -1.13 -1.191 -0.586 -0.356

Table 2-9 Net pressure coefficient θ = 900


Maximum suction pressure& positive pressure will be taken for design. The critical
suction wind pressure is found to be when the wind is at Ө=180 0

W net (-ve) = -1.249KN/m2

And critical positive wind pressure is found to be when the wind is at Ө=00

W net (+ve) = 0.235KN/m2

2.2 Design load

The loads consider in the design of purlins and truss member are Wind load (suction &
pressure), Self weight of the roof covering (sheet), Self weight of purlin, Self weight of
truss and Live load.

I. Wind load;
Maximum suction=1.249KN/m2 and
Maximum pressure=0.235KN/m2
II. Self-weight of the roof covering, we select EGA-300 & thickness=0.0004m
Weight = 3.14 Kg/m or 0.0314KN/m
To determine per area load, the weight is divided by width of the sheet
= 0.0314 KN/m /0.823m
=0.0382 KN/m2
II. Self-weight purlins member we select truss for our purline and trial section is
ST 25 with 2mm thickens for horizontals member and ST 14 for other with 2mm
thickens.
ST 25 – Weight =1.36 kg/m or 0.01334 KN/m
ST 14 – Weight =0.45 kg/m or 0.0044 KN/m

Point load calculation and determination of purloin spacing

By looking into the wind pressures and referring “MANUAL OF COLD FORMED

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 16


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

WELDED STRUCTURAL AND FURNITURE STEEL TUBING “(from kaliti steel

Industry) for selected EGA-300 with thickness of 0.4mm,

The possible loads on purloin

DL=0.0382KN/m2, LL=0.25KN/m2

Case-1 wind load (+ve pressure)

WL=0.235KN/m2* cos10.1=0.23 KN/m2

Load combination

Pd=1.3DL + 1.6LL + WL

Pd=1.3(0.0382) + 1.6(0.25) + 0.23 =0.679 KN/m2

So from table taking this load and thickness of EGA the purloin spacing is found to be

= 1.75 m

Case-2 Wind load (-ve) (suction)

Pd=1.3(0.0382) + 1.6(0.25) – 1.249KN/m2 *cos10.1

= -0.7799 KN/m2

From table for this loading purloin spacing will be 1.9m

Use purloin spacing of 1.75m.

2.3 Design of Purlin

Purlin c/c spacing = 1.75 m

Truss c/c spacing = 6.0 m

13 @ 0.41 m 14 x 14 (ST 14)

25 x 25 (ST 25)

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU)6.0 m 17


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 2.6 Purlin

Loading
 Dead load of EGA-300 sheet
=0.0382 KN/m2 x purlin spacing x EGA sheet width /2
=0.0382 KN/m2 x1.75 m x 0.41m
=0.027 KN

Load parallel to the rafter


=0.027 KN x Cos 10.10 = 0.0266 KN
Load perpendicular to the rafter
=0.027 KN x Sin 10.10 = 0.0047 KN
 Dead load of purlin
At each joint on purline, the dead load will be
= (0.01334 KN/m x 0.41 m) + (0.0044 KN/m x 2*(0.45m/2))
=0.0075 KN/m

Load parallel to the rafter

=0.0075 KN x Cos 10.10 = 0.0074 KN

Load perpendicular to the rafter

=0.0075 KN x Sin 10.10 = 0.0013 KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 18


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

 Uniformly distributed live load


=0.25 KN/m2 x purlin spacing x EGA sheet width /2
=0.25 KN/m2 x 1.75 m x 0.41m
=0.179 KN

Load parallel to the rafter

=0.179 KN x Cos 10.10 = 0.176 KN

Load perpendicular to the rafter

=0.179 KN x Sin 10.10 = 0.03 KN


 Concentrated live load

Load parallel to the rafter

=1 KN x Cos 10.10 = 0.985 KN

Load perpendicular to the rafter

= 1 KN x Sin 10.10 = 0. 175KN


 Wind load

Suction pressure

=-1.249KN/m2x 1.75m x 0.41m = -0.896 KN

Positive pressure

=0.235KN/m2x 1.75m x 0.41m = 0.169 KN

Load combination

There are three loads combination for the analysis and design of purlin and truss
member

i. Load combination - 1

Pd =1.3(Dead load) + 1.6(Distributed Live load) + Wind load

=1.3(0.0266 + 0.0074) + 1.6(0.176) + 0.169

=0.495KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 19


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

ii. Load combination - 2

Pd =1.3(Dead load) + 1.6(Concentrated Live load) + Wind load

=1.3(0.0266 + 0.0074) + 0.169

=0.213 KN with 1.576KN concentrated load

iii. Load combination -3

Pd =1.3(Dead load) + 1.6(Live load) - Suction pressure

=1.3((0.0266 + 0.0074) + 1.6(0.176) +(-0.896)

= -0.57 KN

0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495

0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074

6.0 m

Figure 2.8 Loading for load combination 1

0.213 0.213 0.213 0.213 0.213 0.213 0.213 1.789 0.213 0.213 0.213 0.213 0.213 0.213 0.213

0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074

6.0 m
Figure 2.7 Loading for load combination 2

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 20


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

-0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57

0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074 0.0074

6.0 m

Figure 2.9 Loading for load combination 3


Maximum results

Compression = -3.27 KN

Tension = 10.934 KN

Reaction force which is transferred to truss =5.608 KN down ward

Reaction force which is transferred to truss =12.06 KN up ward

2.4 Truss Analysis and Design

Reaction forces from purlin: Maximum reaction forces transferred to truss join are;
5.608KN down ward and 12.06KN upward

2.4.1 Loading
A. Lading for pressure case
 Vertical force = 5.608 KN *Cos10.10 = 5.52 KN
 Horizontal force =5.608 KN *Sin10.10 = 0.983KN

We do have three type of truss

Figure 2.10 Truss type -1 Loading

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 21


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 2.11 Truss type -2 loading

Figure 2.12 Truss type -3 loading

B. Loading for suction pressure


 Vertical force = 12.06KN *Cos10.10 = 11.87KN
 Horizontal force =12.06 KN *Sin10.10 = 2.11 KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 22


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 2.13 Truss type -1 Loading

Figure 2.14 Truss type -2 loading

Figure 2.15 Truss type -3 loading

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 23


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

2.4.2 Analysis

I. Truss type -1

Pressure case

By taking the trial section for vertical and diagonal member 50x50x3RHS and for rafter
and horizontal member 60x60x3RHS, the dead load for each members are calculated
below

A) Vertical member

Member Length(m) Unit Weight (KN)


Weight(kg/m)

DK 0.16 4.25 0.00667

EL 0.47 4.25 0.0196

FM 0.77 4.25 0.032

GB 1.07 4.25 0.0446

HN 1.37 4.25 0.057

IO 1.68 4.25 0.07

JC 2.1 4.25 0.0875

Table 2-10 Self weight of vertical member of the truss


B) Diagonal member

Member Length(m) Unit Weight (KN)


Weight(kg/m)

DL 1.59 4.25 0.066

EM 1.68 4.25 0.07

FB 1.8 4.25 0.075

GN 1.95 4.25 0.081

HO 2.13 4.25 0.088

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 24


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

IC 2.33 4.25 0.097

Table 2-11 Self weight of diagonal member of the truss

C) Rafter member

Member Length(m) Unit Weight (KN)


Weight(kg/m)

AD 1.24 5.34 0.065

Other .
member 1.75 5.34 0.092

Table 2-12 Self weight of rafter member of the truss


D) Horizontal member

Member Length(m) Unit Weight (KN)


Weight(kg/m)

AK 1.24 5.34 0.065

Other .
member 1.75 5.34 0.092

Table 2-13 Self weight of horizontal member of the truss


All members Design dead load are added to each joint by dividing each member dead
load into two and transferred to each adjacent joint. Here is the final load diagram for
analysis

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 25


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

The analysis is done using Force Method of Analysis

Principle of super position

The structural indeterminacy can be checked by

DI = (m + r ) – (2j)

Where; DI – Degree of indeterminacy

m – No of members

r – No of reaction

j – No of joint

DI = (27 + 4) – (2*15) =1

Therefore, 1

Figure 2.16 principle of super position

Compatibility Equation

These equation is find out the displacement or rotation at a point where there is a
redundant force or moment and should be expressed in terms of unknown redundant

∆B = 0

Using Castigliano’s theorem for truss

Where; ∆ - External joint displacement of truss

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 26


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

N- Internal force in a member caused by both the force P and the load on the truss

L- Length of member

A-Cross section area of the member

P – External force applied to the truss joint in the direction ∆

External force; external force P in our case will be By in the direction of displacement

Internal force; the method of joint is used to determine the force N to each truss
member and finally the required data are summarized in table form.

∑Fy = 0,

Ay + By + Cy =
(1.92+3.8+3.831+3.836+3.845+3.85+3.855+3.864+3.868+3.877+3.882+1.948+0.054

+0.077+0.083+0.0865+0.091+0.0975+0.1065+0.11+0.12+0.124+0.101)

Ay + By + Cy = 47.27KN

Ay + By = 47.27KN – Cy………………………… (1)

∑Fx = 0, Cx = 0.335*2 + 0.669*11

=8.03 KN

∑MB = 0,

By*5.25 + Ay*11.8 = ((0.173 + 5.696)*1.75 +( 5.685 + 0.161)*3.5 +(5.675+0.152)*5.25


+(5.664 +0.143)*7 +(5.657+0.135)*8.75 + (5.60+0.125)*10.5 +(2.83)*11.8 + 0.16*0.492
+(0.47+0.77+1.07+1.37+1.38)*0.983+ 2.1* 0.492

Ay =21.38 -0.44By……………………… …… (2)

Substituting Equation (2) to Equation (1),

Ay +By = 47.27 – Cy

Cy = 25.89 – 0.56By

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 27


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Joint A

∑Fy = 0, Ay = NAD Sin 10.10

NAD = 121.92 – 2.51By

∑Fx = 0, NAD Cos10.10= NAK

NAK = 120.03 – 2.47 By

Joint K

∑Fy = 0, NKD = 0.125

∑Fx = 0, NKA = NKL

NKL = 120.03 – 2.47 By

Joint D

∑Fy = 0, NDE Sin10.10 + NKD + NDL Sin 5.20 = NDA Sin 10.10

0.175 NDE +0.125+ 0.087 NDL = 21.173 –0.418By…..(1)

∑Fx = 0, 5.60 + NDA Cos10.10 + NDL Cos 5.20 = NDE Cos 10.10

0.985 NDE – 0.996 NDL =125.63 – 2.47By……… (2)

Using simultaneous equation,

NDE = 124.92– 2.53 By

NDL=-6.68+0.03By

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 28


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Joint L

∑Fy = 0, NLD Sin 10.10 + NLE = 0.135

NLE = 1.31 – 0.00525By

∑Fx = 0, NLD Cos 10.10 + NLK = NLM

NLM = 113.45 – 2.44By

All member force is summarized on the following table

A(10-
Member Member force δN/δBy (L/AE)(δN/δBy) N(L/AE)(δN/δBy)
Length(m) E(106) 4
)

AD 121.92 -2.51 By 1.3 200 6.61 -2.51 9.380E-06 1.144E-03 -2.354E-05 By

AK 120.03 -2.47 By 1.3 200 6.61 -2.47 9.380E-06 1.126E-03 -2.317E-05 By

KL 120.03 -2.47 By 1.75 200 6.61 -2.47 1.324E-05 1.589E-03 -3.270E-05 By

KD 0.125 0 By 0.16 200 5.41 0 1.479E-06 1.848E-07 0.000E+00 By

DL -0.068 0.03 By 1.59 200 5.41 0.03 1.470E-05 -9.993E-07 4.409E-07 By

DE 124.92 -2.53 By 1.75 200 6.61 -2.53 1.324E-05 1.654E-03 -3.349E-05 By

-
LE 1.31 0.0053 By 0.47 200 5.41 -0.01 4.344E-06 5.690E-06 -2.280E-08 By

LM 113.45 -2.44 By 1.75 200 6.61 -2.44 1.324E-05 1.502E-03 -3.230E-05 By

EF 109.69 -2.518 By 1.75 200 6.61 -2.52 1.324E-05 1.452E-03 -3.333E-05 By

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 29


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

EM -16.55 0.0122 By 1.68 200 5.41 0.012 1.553E-05 -2.570E-04 1.894E-07 By

MB 97.463 -2.43 By 1.75 200 6.61 -2.43 1.324E-05 1.290E-03 -3.217E-05 By

MF 4.446 -0.003 By 0.77 200 5.41 -0 7.116E-06 3.164E-05 -2.135E-08 By

FG 93.64 -2.513 By 1.75 200 6.61 -2.51 1.324E-05 1.240E-03 -3.327E-05 By

FB -18.25 0.0053 By 1.8 200 5.41 0.005 1.664E-05 -3.036E-04 8.817E-08 By

BN 80.673 -2.425 By 1.75 200 6.61 -2.43 1.324E-05 1.068E-03 -3.210E-05 By

BG 7.452 -1.002 By 1.07 200 5.41 -1 9.889E-06 7.369E-05 -9.909E-06 By

GH 77.532 -1.224 By 1.75 200 6.61 -1.22 1.324E-05 1.026E-03 -1.620E-05 By

GN -19.92 1.4933 By 1.95 200 5.41 1.493 1.802E-05 -3.590E-04 2.691E-05 By

NH 10.52 0.742 By 1.37 200 5.41 0.742 1.266E-05 1.332E-04 9.395E-06 By

NO 63.741 -3.694 By 1.75 200 6.61 -3.69 1.324E-05 8.438E-04 -4.890E-05 By

HI 61.197 -2.009 By 1.75 200 6.61 -2.01 1.324E-05 8.101E-04 -2.659E-05 By

HO -21.67 -0.981 By 2.13 200 5.41 -0.98 1.969E-05 -4.266E-04 -1.931E-05 By

OC 46.66 4.467 By 1.75 200 6.61 4.467 1.324E-05 6.177E-04 5.913E-05 By

OI 13.52 0.567 By 1.68 200 5.41 0.567 1.553E-05 2.099E-04 8.804E-06 By

IC -23.64 -0.691 By 2.33 200 5.41 -0.69 2.153E-05 -5.091E-04 -1.488E-05 By

IJ 44.868 -4.201 By 1.75 200 6.61 -4.2 1.324E-05 5.939E-04 -5.561E-05 By

CJ 14.72 -2.01 By 2.1 200 5.41 -2.01 1.941E-05 2.857E-04 -9.728E-05 By

∑= o analysis 1.484E-02
Table 2-14 Summerized table for member force using force method -4.598E-04 By

( ) 0.01484 -4.598 x 10-4 By = ∆B = 0

Therefore, 0.01484 -4.598 x 10-4 By = 0

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 30


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

By = = 32.27 KN

The entire member force can be found by substituting By to each equation and the
following result is obtained.

Member Member force Member Member force

AD 40.92 BN 2.42

AK 40.32 BG -24.88

KL 40.32 GH 38.03

KD 0.13 GN 28.27

DL 0.90 NH 34.46

DE 43.28 NO -55.46

LE 1.14 HI -3.63

LM 34.71 HO -53.33

EF 28.43 OC -97.49

EM -16.16 OI 31.82

MB 19.05 IC -45.94

MF 4.35 IJ -90.70

FG 12.55 CJ -50.21

FB -18.08

Table 2-15 Truss type1 Member for under pressure

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 31


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Member Member force Member Member force

AD -57.46 BN -40.79

AK 57.51 BG -45.74

KL 56.55 GH 10.49

KD -1.09 GN 48.01

DL -28.86 NH -26.72

DE -25.12 NO -0.70

LE 4.71 HI -2.61

LM 26.26 HO 19.46

EF 12.83 OC 14.18

EM -35.19 OI -12.39

MB -7.78 IC 0.88

MF 10.55 IJ -1.08

FG 49.02 CJ -5.91

FB -36.84

Table 2-16 Truss type1 Member force for under suction

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 32


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

II. Truss type -2

By taking the same trial section and analysis procedure with truss type 1, the following
final analysis output obtained:

Member force Member force


Member Under pressure Under suction
case (KN) case (KN)

BN 1.21 -0.77
GB -10.59 10.87
GH -9.34 8.27
GN 8.83 -6.96
HI -7.95 6.95
HO -2.74 4.25
IC -11.62 12.64
IJ 0.18 -0.92
JC -3.61 6.13
NH -4.29 6.56
NO 8.82 -7.15
OC 6.00 -3.14
OI 2.64 -0.38

Table 2-17 Truss type2 Member force under suction and pressure case

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 33


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

C) Truss type -3

Member Member Member Member force


Member force under force under Member force under under
pressure(KN) suction(KN) pressure(KN) suction(KN)

AD -90.55 117.28 GN -20.59 40.10

AK 88.06 -113.16 HI -15.63 30.68

BN 43.89 -85.54 HN 11.66 -22.01

DE -82.47 100.88 HO -22.47 43.58

DK -1.29 2.87 IC -24.61 47.42

DL -10.55 21.24 IJ 0.90 -1.00

EF -65.15 126.07 IO 14.72 -27.88

EL 2.23 -3.96 JC -3.02 6.00

EM -17.69 34.87 KL 89.82 -116.36

FB -18.97 37.19 LM 78.15 -102.93

FG -48.63 94.59 MB 61.04 -95.17

FM 5.50 -10.22 NO 26.70 -51.98

GB 8.58 -16.20 OC 9.50 -18.52

GH -32.13 62.56

Table 2-18 Truss type3 Member force under suction and pressure case

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 34


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

From the six loading on trusses the maximum and compression form the axial force
diagrams are selected as:

2.4.3 Design
1. Rafter and Horizontal member Design

P = 126.07 KN (Tension), P = -116.36 KN (Compression)

Trial section of the rafter: 60x60x3 SHS Kaliti steel

A = 6.61 cm2 r = 2.28 cm

I =35.14 cm4 Iz =56.4 cm4

Wpl = 13.95 cm3 Ct = 17.65 cm3

Wel = 12.2 cm2 Weight = 5.19 Kg/m

I. Class of section

Referring to table 4.1 of EBCS-3, 1995, for web with neutral axis at mid-depth

√ ⁄ √ ⁄

⁄ = ⁄

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 35


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

II. Check for Buckling

The design buckling resistance of a compression member is given in section 4.5.4.2 of


EBCS-3, 1995.

The values of can be obtained using relevant buckling curve and the non-dimensional
slenderness ratio calculated as:

̅ ( )√

,
=1.015

̅ ( )√

For cold formed hollow section, the appropriate curve is curve ‘b’, as indicated in table
4.1 of EBCS-1, 1995.

For , the value of the reduction factor ( ) is found on curve ‘b’ and is equal to

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 36


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

III. Check for Tension

( ) ( )

2. Vertical and Diagonal member Design

P = 48.01 KN (Maximum Tension), P = -45.74 KN (Maximum Compression)

Trial section of the rafter: 50x50x3 SHS Kaliti Steel

A = 5.41 cm2 r = 1.9 cm

I =19.5 cm4 Iz =56.4 cm4

Wpl = 9.39 cm3 Ct = 11.8 cm3

Wel = 7.79 cm3 Weight = 4.25 Kg/m

I. Class of section

Referring to table 4.1 of EBCS-3, 1995, for web with neutral axis at mid-depth

√ ⁄ √ ⁄

⁄ = ⁄

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 37


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

II. Check for Buckling

The design buckling resistance of a compression member is given in section 4.5.4.2 of


EBCS-3, 1995.

The values of can be obtained using relevant buckling curve and the non-dimensional
slenderness ratio calculated as: -

̅ ( )√

=1.3

̅ ( )√

For cold formed hollow section, the appropriate curve is curve ‘b’, as indicated in table
4.1 of EBCS-1, 1995.

For , the value of the reduction factor ( ) is found on curve ‘b’ and is equal to

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 38


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

III. `Check for Tension

( ) ( )

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 39


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CHAPTER THREE

3 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF SLAB

3.1 DESIGN PROCEDURE

There are two types of slabs based on the load transferring mechanisms. These are
one way and two way slabs. If Ly/Lx>2 one way and Ly/Lx≤2 two way where Ly is
longer span and Lx is shorter span.

One way slab transmit their load in one direction while two way slabs resist applied load
in two directions.

These types of slabs are composed of rectangular panels supported at all four edges by
beams and are stiff enough to be treated as unyielding.

The reinforcement bar, in one way slab, main steel is provided along with short span
only and the load is transferred to two opposite supports and in two-way slab, main
steel is provided in both directions.

3.2 GROUND FLOOR SLAB DESIGN

In the ground floor there are:


- Slabs with four side support
- Slab with hole
Determination of slab whether the slab is one way or two-way
panel No. Ly Lx Ly/Lx SLAB TYPE
P1 6.50 5.00 1.30 Two way
P2 6.50 6.00 1.08 Two way
P3 6.50 6.00 1.08 Two way
P4 6.00 3.10 1.94 Two way
P5 6.50 6.00 1.08 Two way
P6 6.50 6.00 1.08 Two way
P7 5.00 5.00 1.00 Two way
P8 6.00 5.00 1.20 Two way
P9 6.00 5.00 1.20 Two way
P10 6.00 5.00 1.20 Two way
P11 6.00 5.00 1.20 Two way Table 3-1 determination of slab type

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 40


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 3.1 Ground floor Slab layout

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 41


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Panel 12 is a slab with hole and is treated using strip method. other slabs are treated
using coefficient method of analysis according to EBCS.

A. Determination of depth for deflection for two way panels.

( )

Where d = minimum depth for deflection in mm

βa= the appropriate constant which is a function of the boundary


condition and span ratio. It is given on table 5.1 of EBCS-2 1995

fyk = the characteristic strength of the reinforcement bar (Mpa)

Le = the effective span, for two way slab the shorter span (m)

Figure 3.2 Slab section view

simply
member End span Interior Span Cantilever
supported
Beam 20 24 28 10
slab
a. span ratio 2:1 25 30 35 12
b. span ration 1:1 35 40 45 10
EBCS 2 -1995 Table 5.1

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 42


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Effective depth determination for ground floor slabs

Panel No. Le Span ratio Span Type βa Effective Depth (mm)


P1 5000 1.3 End span 33 128.79
P2 6000 1.08 End span 30.8 165.58
P3 6000 1.08 End span 30.8 165.58
P4 3100 1.935 End span 39.36 66.95
P5 6000 1.08 End span 30.8 165.58
P6 6000 1.08 End span 30.8 165.58
P7 5000 1 End span 30 141.67
P8 5000 1.2 End span 32 132.81
P9 5000 1.2 End span 32 132.81
P10 5000 1.2 End span 32 132.81
P11 5000 1.2 End span 32 132.81
dmax= 165.58

Table 3-2 Ground floor panels effective depth


Assume ɸ10 in both directions. To satisfy requirements for durability provide adequate
cover to reinforcement. EBCS recommends 15mm thick concrete cover for building of
normal habitat.

Overall depth

D= dmax + ɸavg + concrete cover

= 165.58+10+15

= 190 mm

Use D= 200mm

d= 200-15-10=175mm

B. Load calculations

The slab is loaded with both DL and LL. Dead load comes from self-weight of slab, floor
finish, cement screed, plastering and partition load. Live loads are either movable or
moving load without any acceleration or impact.

Dead and live loads are calculated depending on the service of the slabs and self-
weight. Ignoring any localized effects caused by concentrated load, the partition loads

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 43


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

are distributed over the area of the slab. The design loads are factored according to the
following formula.

Where

Pd =total factored design load

DL = total dead load on slab

LL= total live load on slab

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 44


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Live
Panel No. service of panel load Dead load (KN/m2)
(KN/m2)
16cm thick RC slab = 0.16*24=3.84
2cm thick plastering in one side = 0.02*23= 0.46
1, 2 ,3 shoping area 5 3 cm thick cement screed = 0.03*23= 0.69
3 cm thick marble floor finish= 0.03*27 = 0.81
total DL = 5.8
Design load = (1.3*5.8)+(1.6*5) = 15.54 KN/m2
16cm thick RC slab = 0.16*24=3.84
2cm thick plastering in one side = 0.02*23= 0.46
5&6 bank 5 3 cm thick cement screed = 0.03*23= 0.69
3 cm thick marble floor finish= 0.03*27 = 0.81
total DL = 5.8
Design load = (1.3*5.8)+(1.6*5) = 15.54 KN/m2
16cm thick RC slab = 0.16*24=3.84
2cm thick plastering in one side = 0.02*23= 0.46
4 & 10 public corridor 3 3 cm thick cement screed = 0.03*23= 0.69
3 cm thick marble floor finish= 0.03*27 = 0.81
total DL = 5.8
Design load = (1.3*5.8) + (1.6*3) =12.34 KN/m2
16cm thick RC slab = 0.16*24=3.84
2cm thick plastering in one side = 0.02*23= 0.46
3 cm thick cement screed = 0.03*23= 0.69
public corridor & 3 cm thick marble floor finish= 0.03*27 = 0.81
7 ,8 ,9 5
shop partition load= max
(((25KN/m3*12.075m2*0.004m)/25m2))+((27*0.056m2*38.4
4m)/25m2)) , 1.5) = max(0.28, 1.5) = 1.5 KN/m2
total DL= 7.3
Design load =(1.3*7.3)+(1.6*5) = 17.49KN/m2
16cm thick RC slab = 0.16*24=3.84
2cm thick plastering in one side = 0.02*23= 0.46
3 cm thick cement screed = 0.03*23= 0.69
public corridor & 3 cm thick marble floor finish= 0.03*27 = 0.81
11 ,12 5
bank partition load= max
(((25KN/m3*14.433m2*0.004m)/25m2))+((27*0.056m2*44.3
7m)/25m2)) , 1.5) = max(0.3277, 1.5) = 1.5 KN/m2
total DL = 7.3
Design load =(1.3*7.3)+(1.6*5) = 17.49KN/m2
Table 3-3 dead load and live load on ground floor panels

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 45


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Check if the partition wall load is greater than 20%

If the total load on a typical panel is greater than 20% analysis is computed using strip
method this results to economical section and reinforcement bar.

For panel from P 7-11 provided partition load is 1.5KN/m2 the rest panels we don’t have
partition load.

panel panel Total Partition


no area DL(KN/m2) DL(KN) Area DL(KN/m2) Total PL(KN) percent condition
7 25 5.8 145 12.13 1.5 18.1965 12.55
8 30 5.8 174 12.13 1.5 18.1965 10.46
9 30 5.8 174 12.13 1.5 18.1965 10.46 <20%
10 30 5.8 174 14.49 1.5 21.7335 12.49
11 30 5.8 174 14.49 1.5 21.7335 12.49
Table 3-4 ground floor panels partition load
Since all the partition loads are less than 20%, all panels are analyzed and designed
using coefficient method of analysis.

C. Analysis of Individual panels

Slab analysis using Coefficient method.

Slab moments

Figure 3.1 Slab moments

M= αipdLx2

Support and field moment analysis computed in the following table.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 46


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

support span Bending moment coeficients Bending Moments


Panal Pd Lx2
condition ratio αxs αxf αys αyf Mxs mxf Mys Myf

1 1.3 15.54 25 0.069 0.051 0.047 0.036 26.81 19.81 18.26 13.99

2 1.08 15.54 36 0.043 0.032 0.039 0.029 24.06 18.01 21.82 16.22

3 1.08 15.54 36 0.043 0.032 0.039 0.029 24.06 18.01 21.82 16.22

3 1.08 15.54 36 0.054 0.041 0.047 0.036 30.32 22.83 26.29 20.14

4 1.935 12.34 9.61 0.087 0.066 0.039 0.03 10.34 7.79 4.62 3.56

5 1.08 15.54 36 0.054 0.041 0.047 0.036 30.32 22.83 26.29 20.14

5 1.08 15.54 36 0.043 0.032 0.039 0.029 24.06 18.01 21.82 16.22

6 1.08 15.54 36 0.054 0.041 0.047 0.036 30.32 22.83 26.29 20.14

7 1 17.49 25 0.047 0.036 0.047 0.036 20.55 15.74 20.55 15.74

8 1.2 17.49 25 0.056 0.042 0.039 0.03 24.49 18.36 17.05 13.12

9 1.2 17.49 25 0.056 0.042 0.039 0.03 24.49 18.36 17.05 13.12

10 1.2 12.34 25 0.056 0.042 0.039 0.03 17.28 12.96 12.03 9.26

11 1.2 17.49 25 0.056 0.042 0.039 0.03 24.49 18.36 17.05 13.12

Table 3-5 ground floor Support and field moment

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 47


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

For panel 3 and 5 the following two cases are considered

Case 1 case 2

Field moments are provided by considering case 1 and support moments are provided
using case 2.

Same principle is adopted for panel 5.

Analysis of Panel 12 using Strip Method

Strip method

It is a lower bound approach based on satisfaction of equilibrium requirements


everywhere in the slab. By the strip method (sometimes referred to as the equilibrium
theory) a moment field is first determined that fulfills equilibrium requirements, after
which the reinforcement in the slab at each point is designed for this moment field. If a
distribution of moments can be found that satisfies both equilibrium and boundary
conditions for a given external loading and if the yield moment capacity of the slab is
nowhere exceeded, then the given external loading will represent a lower bound of the
true carrying capacity.

The analysis applys Hillerborg’s theory.

Lower bound theorem : if , for external loads, it is possible to find a distribution of


moments that satisfies equilibrium requirements, with the moment not exceeding the yield
moment at any location, and if the boundary conditions are satisfied then the given load is a
lower bound of the true carrying capacity.

 It gives result on the safe side which is certainly preferable in practice


 It is a design method by which the needed reinforcement can be calculated.
 It encourages the designer to the reinforcement in a local way, leading to an
economical arrangement in a logical way
 It is simple to use, even for slab with holes.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 48


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 3.2 panel 12 layout

A. Depth for deflection

( )

βa for end span and 1:1.2 span ration is 38 which is obtained by interpolation.

d≥ (0.4 + 0.6(300/400))*5000/38

≥ 111.8mm

Use ɸ10 and concrete cover 15mm.

D= 111.8+10+15 =131.8mm

Use over all depth of slab same as other panels; D=200mm

B. `Loading

Half of panel is bank and half of panel serves as corridor. LL= 5KN/m 2

Partition load = 0.3277<1.5 thus use 1.5KN/m2

Total dead load= 5.8+1.5= 7.3 KN/m2

Total design load = (1.3*7.3) + ( 1.6*5) = 17.49 KN/m2

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 49


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

C. Analysis /Moment calculation

CASE 1: BASIC CASE

moments for the ‘Basic case’ without hole will be calculated and later used as a guide in
selecting moments for the actual slab with hole.

Figure 3.3 plan view of slab strips for basic case

In order to get a suitable relation between the support and span moment, α should be
chosen.

Hillerborg recommended that α shall be chosen in the range of 0.35 to 0.39 which gives
corresponding ratios of negative to positive moments from 2.45 to 1.45.

Let’s take α=0.35

Moment in X- direction

Middle strip

Mxf= =

= 6.69KN.m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 50


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Mxs =

= 16.39KN.m

(16.39)/ (6.69) = ((1-2*0.35)/0.352)

2.45 = 2.45 …………………….OK!

Edge strip

Mxf=

= (0.352)*(17.49)(52)/16

= 3.347KN.m

Mxs=

= (1-2*0.35)(17.49*52)/16

= 8.2KN.m

Moments in x-direction edge strip are ½ of middle strip because the load is half as
greater.

Moment in Y- direction

Middle strip

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 51


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

= (0.352*17.49*52)/2

= 26.78KN.m

= (1-2*0.35)*(17.49*52)/2

= 65.58KN.m

(65.58/26.78) = (1-2*0.35/0.352)

2.45= 2.45…………OK!

Edge Strip

Myf=

= (0.352*17.49*52)/16

= 3.35KN.m

Mys=

= ((1-2*0.35)*17.49*52)/16

= 8.2KN.m

Moment in Y direction edge strips are 1/8 of middle strip.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 52


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CASE 2: ACTUAL CASE

Figure 3.4 plan view of slab strips for actual case

STRIP E-E

Same as Y direction Edge strip of basic case

STRIP F-F

Same as Y direction Middle strip of basic case

STRIP A-A

Restraint moment at the support edge will be taken to be the same as the basic case
hence:

Take X-direction edge strip Mxs = 8.2 KN.m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 53


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

(8.745*1.625*1.625/2)-8.2= w*1.5(0.75+0.875+1.625)

w= 1.03 KN/m2

Location of zero shear (Mmax)

8.745(x) = 1.03(1.5)

X = 0.177m

Mxf + (8.745*0.177*0.177/2) = 1.03*1.5(0.75+0.875+0.177)

Mxf + 0.137 = 2.78

Mxf = 2.65 KN.m

STRIP B-B

Take moment of X- direction middle strip Mxs = 16.39KN.m

(17.49*1.625*1.625/2)-16.39 = (w2*1.5)*(0.75+0.875+1.625)

W 2 = 1.37 KN/m2

Location of zero shear (Mmax)

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 54


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

17.49(x) = 1.37(1.5)

X = 0.117m

Mxf + (17.49*0.117*0.117/2) = (1.37*1.5)*(0.75+0.875+0.117)

Mxf = 3.48 KN.m

STRIP G-G

Take moment of Y- direction middle strip Mys = 65.58KN.m

65.58 + (w3*0.5)*(0.25+2.29) = (17.49*2.29*2.29/2)

W3 = -15.53 KN/m2

The negative value indicates that the cantilever strip are serving as supports for strip K-
K and in turn for the strong bands in Y-direction, which is hardly a reasonable
assumption. Instead, a discontinuity line will be assumed 2.29m from the support
terminating the cantilever and leaving the 0.5m strip K-K along the edge of the opening
in the x direction to carry its own load. It follows that the support moment in the
cantilever strip is:

Mys

= (17.49*2.292)/2

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 55


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Mys = 45.86 KN.m

STRIP H-H

Take moment of Y- direction Edge strip Mys= 8.2 KN.m

(8.745*1.625*1.625/2) = (w4*0.5)*(0.5+0.665+1.625) + 8.2

W4 = 2.4KN/m2

Location of zero shear (Mmax)

8.745(x) = (2.4*0.5)

X = 0.137m

Myf + (8.745*0.137*0.137/2) = (2.4*0.5)*(0.25+0.665+0.15)

Myf = 1.2KN.m

STRIP C-C

(17.49*0.875*0.875/2) = (w5*1.5)*(0.75+0.625+0.875)

W 5 = 2.975KN/m2

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 56


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Location of zero shear (Mmax)

17.49(x) = (2.975*1.5)

X = 0.255m

Mxf+ (17.49*0.255*0.255/2) = (2.975*1.5)*(0.75+0.625+0.255)

Mxf = 6.705KN.m

STRIP D-D

(8.745*0.875*0.875/2)= (w6*1.5)*(0.75+0.625+0.875)

W6 = 1.49KN/m2

Location of zero shear (Mmax)

8.745(x) = 1.49(1.5)

X = 0.255m

Mxf + (8.745*0.255*0.255/2) = (1.49*1.5)*(0.75+0.625+0.255)

Mxf = 3.35KN.m

STRIP I-I

Strip I-I is strong band to resist moment which comes from strip H-H. Strip G-G can
resist the load by its own as expressed above.

Load on this strip is design load plus load from strip H-H, load of strip G-G is not added

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 57


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

17.49 + 2.4 = 19.89KN/m2

(19.89*0.875*0.875/2) = (w7*1.5)*(0.75+0.625+0.875)

W7 = 2.26KN/m2

Location of zero shear (Mmax)

19.89(x) = 2.26(1.5)

X = 0.17m

Mxf + (19.89*0.17*0.17/2) = (2.26*1.5)*(0.75+0.625+0.17)

Mxf = 4.95KN.m

STRIP J-J

Strip J-J is strong band to resist load from strip D-D, C-C, I-I, B-B and strip A-A. There
is also a stair which transfers its load to this band. (The analysis of stair is found in the
next chapter)

Load from stair

From reaction A = 35.36KN

The strong band has a width of 1.5m and length of 2.21m.

Dividing the reaction to the strip area gives a distributed load of 10.67 KN/m2.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 58


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Design load plus load from strip D-D: 17.49+1.49 = 18.98KN/m2

Design load plus load from strip C-C: 17.49+2.975 = 20.465KN/m2

Design load plus load from strip I-I, strip B-B and strip C-C:
17.49+2.26+2.975+1.37=24.095 KN/m2

Design load plus strip B-B and load from stair gives : 17.49+1.37+10.67 = 29.53KN/m2

Design load plus strip A-A and load from stair gives: 17.49+1.03+10.67=29.19KN/m2

Analysis using SAP2000 V14 gives

Mys = 59.53KN.m

Myf = 36.26KN.m

D. Moment Adjustment

For each support over which the slab is continuous there will thus generally be two
different support moments. The difference may be distributed between the panels on
either side of the support to equalize their moments, as in the moment distribution
method for frames.

Two methods of differing accuracy are given here for treating the effects of this
redistribution on moments away from the support.

EBCS 2, 1995 article A.3.3.1 No.3 and 4

When differences between initial support moments are less than 20 percent of the
larger moment

EBCS 2, 1995 article A.3.3.2 No.1

Support adjustment:

M = (MR – ML)/MR * 100

If M≤20% use averaging on adjacent moments (MR+ML)/2

If M>20% use moment distribution or distribute based on relative stiffness.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 59


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

M = MR- KR/ (KR+KL) *M……… considering the right moment

M = ML+ KL/ (KR+KL) *M……… considering the left moment

Where k= 1/Lx

panel method of finding adjusted


between MR ML (MR-ML)/MR adjusted moment moment
1 and 2 26.81 24.06 10.3 average 25.435
2 and 3 24.06 24.06 0.0 no adjustment 13.17
3 and 4 24.06 4.62 80.8 moment distribution 10.22
4 and 5 24.06 4.62 80.8 moment distribution 11.57
5 and 6 30.32 24.06 20.6 moment distribution 19.855
1 and 7 20.55 18.26 11.1 average 16.525
2 and 8 24.49 21.82 10.9 average 17.075
3 and 9 24.49 21.82 10.9 average 17.9
4 and 10 17.28 10.34 40.2 moment distribution 14.995
5 and 11 24.49 21.82 10.9 average 16.115
7 and 8 20.55 17.05 17.0 average 17.075
8 and 9 17.05 17.05 0.0 average 17.64
9 and 10 17.05 12.03 29.4 moment distribution 23.2
10 and 11 17.05 12.03 29.4 moment distribution 21.38

Table 3-6 moment adjustment


Analyzed moment (unadjusted)

Figure 3.5 Analyzed moments of ground floor

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 60


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Between P1 and P2

(1/2)*(26.81-24.06) = 25.435KNm.

Between P3 and P4

M = MR- KR/ (KR+KL) *M……… considering the right moment

= (24.06) – (1/3.1)/((1/3.1)+(1/3.1))*(24.06-4.62) = 14.34KNm.

M = ML+ KL/ (KR+KL) *M……… considering the left moment

= (4.62) + (1/3.1)/((1/3.1)+(1/3.1))*(24.06-4.62) = 14.34KNm.

Between P4 and P5

M = MR- KR/ (KR+KL) *M……… considering the right moment

= (24.06) – (1/3.1)/((1/3.1)+(1/3.1))*(24.06-4.62) = 14.34KNm.

M = ML+ KL/ (KR+KL) *M……… considering the left moment

Where k= 1/Lx

= (4.62) + (1/3.1) / ((1/3.1) + (1/3.1))*(24.06-4.62) = 14.34KNm.

Between P5 and P6

(1/2)*(30.32+24.06) = 27.19KN.m

Between P1 and P7

(1/2)*(20.55+18.26) = 19.4KN.m

Between P2 and P8 = between P3 and P9

= (1/2)*(24.49+21.82)

= 23.155KN.m

Between P4 and P10

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 61


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

M = MR- KR/ (KR+KL) *M……… considering the right moment

= (17.28) – (1/6)/((1/6)+(1/6))*(17.28-10.34) = 13.81KNm.

M = ML+ KL/ (KR+KL) *M……… considering the left moment

= (10.34) + (1/6)/((1/6)+(1/6))*(17.28-10.34) = 13.81KNm.

Between P5 and P11

= (1/2) * (24.49+21.82)

= 23.155KN.m

Between P7 and P8

= (1/2) * (20.55+17.05)

= 18.8KN.m

Between P9 and P10, P10 and P11

M = MR- KR/ (KR+KL) *M……… considering the right moment

= (17.05) – (1/6)/((1/6)+(1/6))*(17.05-12.03) = 14.54KNm.

M = ML+ KL/ (KR+KL) *M……… considering the left moment

= (12.03) + (1/6)/((1/6)+(1/6))*(17.05-12.03) = 14.54KNm.

Field adjustment

If the support moment is decreased, the span moments Msf and Myf are increased
allow for the changes of support moments.

Mxd = Mxf + CxM’

Mdxf = Mxf + CxM’

Mdyf = Myf + CyM’

Cx and Cy are obtained from EBCS 2-1995 Appendix 1 table A.2

Panel 1

Moment decrease in longer direction

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 62


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Take the value of Cx and Cy which is a function of Lx/Ly

Cx = 0.373 Cy = 0.35

Mdxf = 19.81+ (0.373)(26.81-25.435) = 20.32KN.m

Mdyf = 13.19 + (0.35)(26.81-25.435) = 13.67KN.m

Panel 2

Don’t need adjustment because the support moment increased

Panel 3

Support moment is decreased on longer side

Cx = 0.3608 Cy = 0.232

Mdxf = 22.83+ (0.3608)*(24.06-14.34) = 26.337KN.m

Mdyf = 20.14 + (0.232)*(24.06-14.34) = 22.395KN.m

Panel 4

Don’t need adjustment because the support moment increased

Panel 5

Support moment decreased on longer side

Cx = 0.3608 Cy = 0.232

Mdxf = 22.83 + (0.3608)(24.06-14.34) = 26.337KN.m

Mdyf = 20.14 + (0.232)(24.06-14.34) = 22.395KN.m

Panel 6

Support moment decreased on longer side

Cx = 0.3608 Cy = 0.232

Mdxf = 22.83 + (0.3608)( 30.32-27.19) = 23.96KN.m

Mdyf = 20.14+ (0.232)(30.32-27.19) = 20.87KN.m

Panel 7

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 63


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Support moment decreased on shorter side

Cx = 0.38 Cy = 0.28

Mdxf = 15.74 + (0.38)(20.55-18.8) = 10.467KN.m

Mdyf = 15.74+ (0.28)(20.55-18.8) = 16.21KN.m

Panel 8

Support moment decreased in longer direction

Cx = 0.344 Cy = 0.364

Mdxf = 18.36 + (0.344)(24.49-23.155) = 18.82KN.m

Mdyf = 13.43 + (0.364)(24.49-23.155) = 13.58KN.m

Panel 9

Moment decreased in short direction

Cx = 0.338 Cy = 0.172

Mdxf = 18.36 + (0.338)(17.05-14.54) = 19.21KN.m

Mdyf = 13.12+ (0.172)(17.05-14.54) = 13.551KN.m

Panel 10

Support moment decreased in longer direction

Cx = 0.344 Cy = 0.364

Mdxf = 12.96+ (0.344)(17.28-13.81) = 14.15KN.m

Mdyf = 9.26+ (0.364)(17.28-13.81) = 10.52KN.m

Panel 11

Support moment decreased in the shorter direction

Cx = 0.338 Cy = 0.172

Mdxf = 18.36+ (0.338)(17.05-14.57) = 19.2KN.m

Mdyf = 13.12 + (0.172)(17.05-14.57) = 13.55KN.m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 64


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Adjusted Moments

Figure 3.6 adjusted moment of ground floor

For the slab analyzed using strip method, we provide reinforcement with the existing
moment without adjusting since strip method by itself is safe and economical.

E. Check depth of slab for flexure

Considering maximum moment: M = 59.85KN.m

[ √ ]

2.5/28.78 = 0.08686

2f
cd

= (0.32*28.782*11.33) = 3003.04

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 65


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

[ √ ]

ρ = (0.08686 0.0703)

ρ = 0.0785 or ρ = 0.00828

ρmin =

Thus use ρ=0.00828 which is in between ρmin and ρmax

Design depth is 175mm which is equal to depth for deflection which is 175mm thus the
depth is safe for flexure.

F. Reinforcement provision

Provide φ10

As = (1/4) (D2)

= (1/4*3.14*102)

= 78.5 mm2

For panels having larger spacing than the specified one provide φ8 reinforcement bars.

Maximum pacing

Smax = {

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 66


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Adjusted
Panel Moment Km Ks As S calculated S provided
moment
Mxf 20.32 27.32 4.021 605.17 130 ɸ10 c/c 130
Myf 13.67 22.41 3.973 402.27 195 ɸ10 c/c 190
1
Mxs 25.44 30.57 4.056 764.17 103 ɸ10 c/c 100
Mys 19.40 26.69 4.011 576.40 136 ɸ10 c/c 130
Mxf 18.01 25.72 3.999 533.50 147 ɸ10 c/c 140
Myf 16.22 24.41 3.986 478.91 164 ɸ10 c/c 160
2
Mxs 24.06 29.73 4.048 721.44 109 ɸ10 c/c 100
Mys 23.16 29.16 4.014 688.48 114 ɸ10 c/c 110
Mxf 26.34 31.10 4.062 792.35 99 ɸ10 c/c 90
Myf 22.40 28.68 4.036 669.53 117 ɸ10 c/c 110
3
Mxs 14.34 22.95 3.976 422.38 186 ɸ10 c/c 180
Mys 23.16 29.16 4.041 693.19 113 ɸ10 c/c 110
Mxf 7.79 16.92 3.950 227.93 344 ɸ10 c/c 200
Myf 3.56 11.44 3.950 104.16 482 ɸ8c/c 200
4
Mxs 13.81 22.52 3.974 406.53 124 ɸ10c/c 120
Mys 14.34 22.95 3.976 422.34 186 ɸ10 c/c 180
Mxf 26.34 31.10 4.061 792.26 99 ɸ10 c/c 90
Myf 22.40 28.68 4.036 669.53 117 ɸ10 c/c 110
5
Mxs 27.19 31.60 4.066 818.92 96 ɸ10 c/c 90
Mys 23.16 29.16 4.041 693.11 113 ɸ10 c/c 110
Mxf 23.96 29.67 4.047 718.21 109 ɸ10 c/c 100
6 Myf 20.87 27.69 4.024 622.08 126 ɸ10 c/c 120
Mys 59.85 46.89 4.330 1919.63 59 ɸ12 c/c 60
Mxf 16.21 24.40 3.986 478.62 164 ɸ10 c/c 160
7 Myf 10.47 19.61 3.954 306.57 256 ɸ10 c/c 200
Mys 18.80 26.28 4.006 557.87 141 ɸ10 c/c 140
Mxf 18.82 26.29 4.006 558.47 141 ɸ10 c/c 140
8 Myf 13.58 22.33 3.973 399.60 196 ɸ10 c/c 190
Mys 17.05 25.03 3.999 505.06 155 ɸ10 c/c 150
Mxf 19.21 26.56 3.974 565.45 139 ɸ10 c/c 130
9 Myf 13.55 22.31 3.972 398.70 197 ɸ10 c/c 190
Mys 14.54 23.11 3.977 428.34 183 ɸ10 c/c 180
Mxf 14.15 22.80 3.976 416.71 188 ɸ10 c/c 180
10 Myf 10.52 19.66 3.954 308.15 163 ɸ8 c/c 160
Mys 14.54 23.11 3.977 428.38 183 ɸ10 c/c 180
Mxf 19.20 26.56 3.882 552.11 142 ɸ10 c/c 140
11 Myf 13.55 22.31 3.972 398.67 197 ɸ10 c/c 190
Mys 14.97 23.45 3.980 441.30 178 ɸ10 c/c 170
Panel Moment Value Km Ks As S calculated S provided
I-I Mxf 4.13 15.05 3.950 120.84 416 ɸ 8 c/c 200

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 67


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Table 3-7 Ground floor slab reinforcement


Reinforcement provision for slab analyzed using strip method

Moments are taken from actual case and basic case

Strip A-A

Moment from basic case Mxf = 3.347KN.m

Moment from actual case Mxf = 2.65KN.m

Total field moment = 3.34 + 2.65 = 5.99KN.m

Total support moment = 8.2KN.m

Field reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =18.13

Ks= 3.95 from EBCS 2 PART2 table no.1a

= (3.95*5.99/0.135) =175.26 mm2/m

Provide 3ɸ10 c/c 200

Support reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =21.21

Ks = 3.965 from EBCS 2 PART2 table no.1a

= (3.965*8.2/0.135)240.83 mm2/m

Provide 3 ɸ10 c/c 200mm

Strip B-B

Moment from basic case Mxf = 6.69KN.m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 68


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Moment from actual case Mxf = 3.48KN.m

Total field moment = 6.69+3.48 = 10.17KN.m

Total support moment = 16.39KN.m

Field reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =23.62

Ks =3.9788 from EBCS 2 PART2 table no.1a

= (3.9788*10.17/0.135) =299.74mm2/m

Provide 4ɸ10 c/c 200mm

Support reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =29.998

Ks = 4.0438 from EBCS 2 PART2 table no.1a

= (4.0438*16.39/0.135) = 490.95mm2/m

Provide 7ɸ10c/c150mm

Strip C-C

Moment from basic case Mxf = 6.69KN.m

Moment from actual case Mxf = 6.705KN.m

Total field moment = 6.69 + 6.705 = 13.4KN.m

Total support moment = 16.39KN.m

Field reinforcement

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 69


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =27.116

Ks = 4.015

= (4.015*13.4/0.135) = 398.53 mm2/m

Provide 5ɸ10c/c 190mm

Support reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =29.998

Ks = 4.0438

= (4.0438*16.39/0.135) = 490.95mm2/m

Provide 7ɸ10c/c150mm

Strip D-D

Moment from basic case Mxf = 3.347KN.m

Moment from actual case Mxf = 3.35KN.m

Total field moment = 3.347 + 3.35 = 6.697KN.m

Total support moment = 8.2KN.m

Field reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =19.17

Ks =3.95

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 70


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

= (3.95*6.697*/0.135) = 195.95mm2/m

Provide3ɸ10c/c200mm

Support reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =21.21

Ks = 3.965

= (3.965*8.2/0.135) = 240.83 mm2/m

Provide 3ɸ10c/c200mm

Strip E-E

Moment from basic case Myf = 3.35KN.m

Total field moment = 3.35KN.m

Total support moment = 8.2KN.m

Field reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =13.56

Ks = 3.95

= (3.95*3.35/0.135) = 98.01

Provide 2ɸ10c/c200mm

Support reinforcement

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 71


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =21.21

Ks = 3.965

= (3.965*8.2/0.135) = 240.83 mm2/m

Provide ɸ10c/c200mm

Strip F-F

Moment from basic case Myf = 26.78KN.m

Total field moment = 26.78KN.m

Total support moment = 65.58KN.m

Field reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =38.33

Ks = 4.142

= (4.142*38.33/0.135) = 1176.07mm2/m

Provide 11ɸ12 c/c 90mm

Support reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =59.99

Ks = 4.71

= (4.71 * 65.58/0.135) = 2280mm2/m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 72


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Provide 15ɸ14 c/c60mm

Strip G-G

Moment from basic case Myf = 26.78KN.m

Total field moment = 26.78KN.m

Support moment = 45.86KN.m

Field reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =38.33

Ks =4.142

= (4.142 * 26.78/0.135) = 821.68mm2/m

Provide 11ɸ10c/c90mm

Support reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= = 50.16

Ks = 4.414

= (4.414*45.86)/0.135 =1499.4mm2/m

Provide 14ɸ14 c/c 70

Strip H-H

Moment from basic case Myf = 3.35KN.m

Moment from actual case Myf = 1.2KN.m

Total field moment = 3.35 + 1.2 = 4.55KN.m

Total support moment = 8.2KN.m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 73


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Field reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= = 15.8

Ks = 3.95

= (3.95*4.55/0.135) = 133.13mm2/m

Provide 2ɸ10 c/c 200

Support reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =21.21

Ks = 3.965

= (3.965*8.2/0.135) = 240.83 mm2/m

Provide ɸ10c/c200mm

Strip I-I

Moment from basic case Mxf = 6.69KN.m

Moment from actual case Mxf = 4.95KN.m

Total field moment = 6.69 + 4.95 =11.64KN.m

Total support moment = 16.39KN.m

Field reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= = 25.27

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 74


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Ks =3.993

= (3.993*11.64/0.135) = 344.28mm2/m

Provide 5ɸ10 c/c 200

Support reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= =29.998

Ks = 4.0438

= (4.0438*16.39/0.135) = 490.95mm2/m

Provide 7ɸ10c/c150mm

Strip J-J

Moment from basic case Myf = 26.78KN.m

Moment from actual case Myf = 36.26KN.m

Total field moment = 26.78 + 36.26 = 63.04KN.m

Total support moment = 59.53

For strong band (field reinforcement)

Strip J-J has maximum moment which is 63.04KN.m so check the value of ρ

ρb =

εs =

= = 0.0013

εc = 0.0035

ρb = ( )

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 75


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

= 0.0253

ρmax = 0.75ρb

= (0.75*0.0253)

ρmax = 0.019

ρmin = =

ρmin = 0.00167

⟦ √ ⟧

C1 =

m= =

C1 =

C2 = 0.32m2fcd

= (0.32*28.782*11.33)

= 30003.04

⟦ √ ⟧

= 0.0668]

=0.0768 or = 0.01

ρ is in between ρmax and ρmin, thus use ρ=0.01 to determine area of reinforcement.

As = ρbd

= 0.01*1500*135 = 2025 mm2

Provide φ14

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 76


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Spacing s= 1500 as/As

= (1500*153.86)/2025

= 114mm

Use φ14 c/c 110mm

Number of bar = As/as

= 2025/153.86 = 13.16 bars

Use14 φ14 c/c 110mm

Support reinforcement

√⁄ √ ⁄
= = 57.15

Ks = 4.679

= (4.679*59.53/0.135) = 2063.48mm2/m

Provide 14ɸ14c/c 70mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 77


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

G. Load transfer

Support Span
Panel Shear pd Lx BVx Bvy Vx Vy 0.92Vx 0.92Vy
condition ratio
Vx1 0.33 25.641 23.59
Vx2 0.5 38.85 35.742
1 1.3 15.54 5
Vy1 0.26 20.202 18.5858
Vy2 0.4 31.08 28.5936
Vx1 0.384 35.804 32.94
Vx2 0.384 35.804 32.94
2 1.08 15.54 6
Vy1 0.24 22.378 20.5874
Vy2 0.36 33.566 30.8811
Vx1 0.384 35.804 32.94
Vx2 0.384 35.804 32.94
3 Vy1 1.08 15.54 6 0.24 22.378 20.5874
Vy2 0.36 33.566 30.8811
Vx1 0.375 14.353 13.205
Vx2 0.558 21.347 19.639
4 1.94 12.34 3.1
Vy1 0.36 13.771 12.6697
Vy2 0.36 13.771 12.6697
Vx1 0.384 35.804 32.94
Vx2 0.384 35.804 32.94
5 Vy1 1.08 15.54 6 0.24 22.378 20.5874
Vy2 0.36 33.566 30.8811
Vx1 0.432 40.28 37.057
Vx2 0.284 26.48 24.362
6 1.08 15.54 6
Vy1 0.26 24.242 22.303
Vy2 0.4 37.296 34.3123
Vx1 0.4 34.98 32.182
Vx2 0.26 22.737 20.918
7 1 17.49 5
Vy1 0.26 22.737 20.918
Vy2 0.4 34.98 32.1816
Vx1 0.44 38.478 35.4
Vx2 0.29 25.361 23.332
8 Vy1 1.2 17.49 5 0.36 31.482 28.9634
Vy2 0.36 31.482 28.9634
Vx1 0.44 38.478 35.4
Vx2 0.29 25.361 23.332
9 Vy1 1.2 17.49 5 0.36 31.482 28.9634
Vy2 0.36 31.482 28.9634

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 78


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Vx1 0.44 27.148 24.976


Vx2 0.29 17.893 16.462
10 1.2 12.34 5
Vy1 0.36 22.212 20.435
Vy2 0.36 22.212 20.435
Vx1 0.44 38.478 35.4
Vx2 0.29 25.361 23.332
11 1.2 17.49 5
Vy1 0.36 31.482 28.9634
Vy2 0.36 31.482 28.9634

Table 3-8 Ground floor slab load transfer


H. Check Shear Resistance

According of EBCS-2, 1995, Art 4.5.3.1 .The shear force Vc carried by the concrete is
members without significant axial forces shall be taken as

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

fctd = 1.03Mpa

K1 = 1 + 50ρ ≤2

ρ = 0.009456

ρmin = 0.5/fyk = 0.5/300 = 0.0016

ρ > ρmin

Using ρactual

K1 = 1 + 50 ρ

= 1 + (50*0.009456) = 1.47 ≤2 ……………..safe

K2 = 1.6 – d >1 where d is in meter

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 79


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

= 1.6 - 0.165 = 1.435 >1 ………………… .….safe

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

= 0.25*1.03*1.47*1.435*1000*0.165= 89.62KN

Using ρmin

K1 = 1 + 50 ρ

= 1 + (50*0.00167) = 1.08 ≤2 ……………..safe

K2 = 1.6 – d >1

= 1.6 - 0.165 = 1.435 >1 ………………………….safe

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

= 0.25*1.03*1.08*1.435*1000*0.165= 65.84KN

Vd obtained from analysis = 35.742KN

Vc>Vd ………………………Safe and it is not necessary to add reinforcement for


shrinkage

I. Development length for longitudinal reinforcement

All reinforcement shall be properly anchored for each end with due consideration for
the effect of arch action and shear cracks. To prevent bond failure the tension or
compression in any bar at any section due to ultimate loads shall be developed on each
side of the section by an appropriate embedment length or end anchorage or a
combination. Therefore hooks may be used in developing bars in tension.

The basic anchorage length lb for a bar of diameter F

   f yd  [EBCS-2, 1995 Art 7.1.6]


l b    
 4 
 f bd

f bd  2 f ctd

2 * 1.03 = 2.06MPa

F 10 is used

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 80


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

lb = (10/4) * (260.87/2.06) = 316.59mm

Ascal
lbnet  alb  lb min
Aseff

a = 1.0 for straight bar anchorage in tension or compression.

Where:- As, cal = theoretical area of reinforcement required by the design

As, eff = the area of reinforcement actually provided

A =1 straight bar anchorage in tension or compression

lb, min = the min. anchorage length

For bars in tension

lb ,min  0.3lb  10 ....or...  200mm


 lb ,min  0.3 * 326.1  10 * 8......or..  200mm
lb ,min  97.81mm.....or...  80mm....or...  200mm

lbmin {

Therefore lb, min = 200mm

HENCE lbnet > lbmin

Required anchorage length

As ,cal
l b , net  1* 260.87 *  200mm
As ,eff
As ,cal
l b , net  260.87 *  200mm
As ,eff
1919.63
l b , net  260.87 *  200mm
1921.68
l b , net  260.6mm  200mm

Therefore provide effective anchorage length of at least 200 mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 81


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

J. Load transfer to frame system

Un-factored dead and live loads are loaded for analysis to transfer loads to the frame
system.

Load Transfer By Applying LL

Support Span
Panel Shear LL Lx BVx Bvy Vx Vy 0.92Vx 0.92Vy
condition ratio
Vx1 0.33 8.25 7.59
Vx2 0.5 12.5 11.5
1 1.3 5 5
Vy1 0.26 6.5 5.98
Vy2 0.4 10 9.2
Vx1 0.384 11.52 10.5984
Vx2 0.384 11.52 10.5984
2 1.08 5 6
Vy1 0.24 7.2 6.624
Vy2 0.36 10.8 9.936
Vx1 0.384 11.52 10.5984
Vx2 0.384 11.52 10.5984
3 1.08 5 6
Vy1 0.24 7.2 6.624
Vy2 0.36 10.8 9.936
Vx1 0.375 3.4894 3.21021
Vx2 0.558 5.1898 4.77459
4 1.94 3 3.1
Vy1 0.36 3.348 3.0802
Vy2 0.36 3.348 3.0802
Vx1 0.384 11.52 10.5984
Vx2 0.384 11.52 10.5984
5 1.08 5 6
Vy1 0.24 7.2 6.624
Vy2 0.36 10.8 9.936
Vx1 0.432 12.96 11.9232
Vx2 0.284 8.52 7.8384
6 1.08 5 6
Vy1 0.26 7.8 7.176
Vy2 0.4 12 11.04
Vx1 0.4 10 9.2
Vx2 0.26 6.5 5.98
7 1 5 5
Vy1 0.26 6.5 5.98
Vy2 0.4 10 9.2
Vx1 0.44 11 10.12
Vx2 0.29 7.25 6.67
8 1.2 5 5
Vy1 0.36 9 8.28
Vy2 0.36 9 8.28
Vx1 0.44 11 10.12
Vx2 0.29 7.25 6.67
9 1.2 5 5
Vy1 0.36 9 8.28
Vy2 0.36 9 8.28

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 82


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Vx1 0.44 6.6 6.072


Vx2 0.29 4.35 4.002
10 1.2 3 5
Vy1 0.36 5.4 4.968
Vy2 0.36 5.4 4.968
Vx1 0.44 11 10.12
Vx2 0.29 7.25 6.67
11 1.2 5 5
Vy1 0.36 9 8.28
Vy2 0.36 9 8.28

Table 3-9 LL load transfer to frame system

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 83


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Load Transfer By Dead Load

Support Span
Panel Shear DL Lx BVx Bvy Vx Vy 0.92Vx 0.92Vy
condition ratio
Vx1 0.33 9.57 8.8044
Vx2 0.5 14.5 13.34
1 1.3 5.8 5
Vy1 0.26 7.54 6.9368
Vy2 0.4 11.6 10.672
Vx1 0.384 13.363 12.2941
Vx2 0.384 13.363 12.2941
2 1.08 5.8 6
Vy1 0.24 8.352 7.6838
Vy2 0.36 12.528 11.526
Vx1 0.384 13.363 12.2941
Vx2 0.384 13.363 12.2941
3 1.08 5.8 6
Vy1 0.24 8.352 7.6838
Vy2 0.36 12.528 11.526
Vx1 0.375 6.7461 6.20641
Vx2 0.558 10.034 9.23087
4 1.94 5.8 3.1
Vy1 0.36 6.4728 5.955
Vy2 0.36 6.4728 5.955
Vx1 0.384 13.363 12.2941
Vx2 0.384 13.363 12.2941
5 1.08 5.8 6
Vy1 0.24 8.352 7.6838
Vy2 0.36 12.528 11.526
Vx1 0.432 15.034 13.8309
Vx2 0.284 9.8832 9.09254
6 1.08 5.8 6
Vy1 0.26 9.048 8.3242
Vy2 0.4 13.92 12.806
Vx1 0.4 14.6 13.432
Vx2 0.26 9.49 8.7308
7 1 7.3 5
Vy1 0.26 9.49 8.7308
Vy2 0.4 14.6 13.432

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 84


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Vx1 0.44 16.06 14.7752


Vx2 0.29 10.585 9.7382
8 1.2 7.3 5
Vy1 0.36 13.14 12.089
Vy2 0.36 13.14 12.089
Vx1 0.44 16.06 14.7752
Vx2 0.29 10.585 9.7382
9 1.2 7.3 5
Vy1 0.36 13.14 12.089
Vy2 0.36 13.14 12.089
Vx1 0.44 12.76 11.7392
Vx2 0.29 8.41 7.7372
10 1.2 5.8 5
Vy1 0.36 10.44 9.6048
Vy2 0.36 10.44 9.6048
Vx1 0.44 16.06 14.7752
Vx2 0.29 10.585 9.7382
11 1.2 7.3 5
Vy1 0.36 13.14 12.089
Vy2 0.36 13.14 12.089

Table 3-10 LL load transfer to frame system


Load transfer from panel computed using strip method

LL = 5KN/m2

DL = 7.3KN/m2

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 85


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Load transfer using basic case


By applying Dead load
Direction Location Loading Reaction (KN)
A B

x middle 11.87 6.38

x edge 5.925 3.2

y middle 23.725 12.775

y edge 5.93 3.19

Load transfer using actual case


Direction Strip Loading Reaction(KN)
A B

x A-A 5.93

x B-B 11.86

y G-G 16.7

y H-H 5.39

x C-C 5.148

x D-D 2.36

x I-I 7.14

y J-J 38.36 33.79

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 86


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Load transfer using basic case


By applying Live load
Direction Location Loading Reaction (KN)
A B

x middle 12.5 4.37

x edge 4.06 2.19

y middle 16.25 8.75

y edge 4.05 2.2

Load transfer using actual case


Direction Strip Loading Reaction(KN)
A B

x A-A 4.06

x B-B 8.125

y G-G 11.45

y H-H 4.06

x C-C 3.524

x D-D 1.76

x I-I 5.216

y J-J 31.19 29.46

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 87


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Table 3-11 Load transfer from strip method analysis


3.3 Basement Floor Slab Design

Design of slabs resting on the ground

Since the ground floor slab rests on the ground directly, no bending moment is created
and therefore, no structural design is required.

But minimum reinforcement in both directions is provided to prevent shrinkage of the


slab, stress due to temperature variation and crushing of slab due to concentrated
loads.

Depth Determination:

Use D = 100mm

Reinforcement provision

0.5
 min  [BCS-2, 1995] Art 7.2.2.2]
f yk

0.5

300
 0.00167

F8 diameter reinforcement

25 mm clear cover

d = 100-25-4

= 71 mm

As min   min bd

 0.00167 *1000 * 71

 118.3mm2

as * b
Spacing (s) 
As min

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 88


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

  * 82 
  *1000
 4 

118.3

2 D  200mm
 424.8   [EBCS-2, 1995 Art 7.2.2.2]
350mm

Use F8 c/c 200mm in both directions.

Other floor slabs are computed using excel template and are attached in the appendix

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 89


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CHAPTER 4

4 STAIR CASE DESIGN

Stair case analysis and design is similar to slabs. It involves the analysis steps followed
for slabs. The inclined configuration is analyzed by projecting the loads on a horizontal
plane. The stair contains three flights with the same configuration and other single stair.

Figure 4.1 Stair Lay out


There are three types of stairs in this particular view.

We design for

- Stair type 1 for section A-A

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 90


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

- Stair type 2 for section B-B

- Stair type 3 for section C-C

DESIGN PROCEDURE

Determination of depth for deflection: which is a function of design tensile strength of


steel, effective span length of the shortest span in which more load is expected to
transfer and support condition

Loading: which determines the total load in the stair and landing

Analysis: determines moment and shear forces based on the analyzed moment

Check depth for flexure: this step helps to cross check the design depth as it is safe for
flexure or not, if not revise the depth determined in step 1 and also the loads.

Reinforcement provision: using the computed moments, number and area of


reinforcement bars determined.

Detailing: the arrangement of reinforcement bars and their length are determined and
drawn.

Material properties

Steel grade fyk = 300MPa

Concrete class fck = 25MPa

Class one work is used.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 91


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

4.1 STAIR SECTION A-A

1.6 1.2 2.8

0.17
0.30
1.1
0.83

30° 0.22

Figure 4.2 Section view of stair A-A

1.6 1.2 2.8

Effective length Le = 5.6m

βa = for simply supported 25

Number of riser = 5

Number of tread = 4

Width of tread = 30cm

Height of riser = 17cm

Check whether the load is transferred to one way or in two ways

Ly/Lx = 5.6/1.5 = 3.73 >2 which is one way

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 92


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

A. Determination of depth for deflection

SECTION A-A

( )

≥ 0.85* 5600/25 = 190.4mm

To provide same depth for all types of stairs compare overall depth and take maximum
of all sections.

SECTION B-B

( )

≥ 0.85* 5160/25 = 175.44mm

SECTION C-C

( )

≥ 0.85* 5450/30 = 154.12mm

Assume φ12

Concrete cover = 15mm

Overall depth = d + + concrete cover

= 190.4 + 6 + 15 = 211.4mm

Use D = 220mm

d = 220 – 6 – 15 = 199mm

- Determination of angle of inclination

Section A-A

= 0

Section B-B

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 93


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

= 0

Section C-C

= 0

SECTION A-A

B. Loading by taking 1m width


 Dead load on stair

- Reinforced concrete slab (inclined) = =

- Due steps =
- Floor Finishing
3cm thick marble floor finish 0.03 * 27 = 0.81KN/m2
3cm thick cement screed (inclined) (0.03 * 23)/1.2 = 0.575KN/m
2 cm thick Plastering (inclined) (0.02 * 23)/1.2 = 0.383KN.m

- On tread


- On riser

Total dead load on stair = 6.42 + 2.04 + 0.383 + 1.5 + 1.06

= 11.4 KN/m

 Load on landing

Reinforced concrete slab = 0.22 * 1 * 24 = 5.28 KN/m

Plastering on both sides = 2(0.02*23) = 0.92 KN/m

Cement screed on both sides = 2(0.03*23) = 1.38KN/m

Marble floor finish = 0.03*27 = 0.81KN/m

Total dead load on landing = 5.28 + 0.92 + 1.38 + 0.81 = 8.39KN/m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 94


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Live load for stair = 3KN/m2 (according to EBCS 2 1995 table 2.1)

Design Load

Design load on stair

Pd1 = (1.3*DL) + (1.6LL)

= (1.3*11.4) + (1.6*3) = 19.62KN/m

Design load on landing

Pd2 = (1.3*8.39) + (1.6*3)

= 15.7KN/m

C. Analysis

Figure 4.3 Loads on stair A-A


And where clockwise moment is positive

R2 (5.6) = (7.85*1.6*1.6/2) + ((19.62*1.2)((1.2/2)+1.6) + ((15.7*2.8)((2.8/2)+1.2+1.6)

R2 = (10.048 + 51.8 + 184.632)/5.6

R2= 44KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 95


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

R1 + R2 = 80.06KN

R1 = 80.06KN - 44KN = 36.06KN

Moment calculation

Figure 4.4 Max. Moment determination for stair A-A

M=

M = 57.7 + 36.06x - 9.81x2 - 10.05 - 12.56x

M = -9.81x2 + 23.5x + 47.65

@ V = 0 moment is maximum

V = 23.5 – 19.62x

X = 1.2m

At x = 1.2m, v = 0 which is a location of Mmax.

Hence M = (-9.81*1.22) + (23.5*1.2) + (47.65)

=61.72KN.m

D. Check depth for flexure

Considering maximum moment: M = 61.72KN.m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 96


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

[ √ ]

2.5/28.78 = 0.08686
2
fcd

= (0.32*28.782*11.33) = 3003.04

[ √ ]

ρ = (0.08686 0.07394)

ρ = 0.0804 or ρ = 0.00646

ρmin =

Thus use ρ=0.00646 which is in between ρmin and ρmax

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 97


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Design depth is 199mm which is equal to depth for deflection which is 199mm thus the
depth is safe for flexure

E. Reinforcement Provision

Longitudinal reinforcement

As = where Ks = steel grade capacity

M = moment taken from analysis result

d = minimum depth for deflection

√ √
K*m = =

Ks = 4.161 from table (EBCS 2-1995 part 2 by linear interpolation)

As = mm2

Asmin = where fyk = characteristic yield strength

b = width

d = depth

= mm2

As >Asmin ……Ok

Provide ɸ12

Spacing = 1000as/As

= (1000*113.04) / 1290.67

= 87.6mm

Smax = min{

Min (2*220 = 440mm or 350 mm)

Provide ɸ12 c/c 80mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 98


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Development length for longitudinal reinforcement

   f yd 
l b    
 4 
 f bd

a = 0.7 for hook anchorage

a=1 for straight anchorage

lb = (ɸ/4)*(fyd/fbd)

f bd  2 f ctd

= 2 * 1.03 = 2.06MPa

lb = (12/4) * (260.87/2.06) = 379.908mm

Assume straight anchorage

Ascal
lbnet  alb  lb min
Aseff

a = 1.0 for straight bar anchorage in tension or compression.

Where: - As, cal = theoretical area of reinforcement required by the

design

As, eff = the area of reinforcement actually provided

a =1 straight bar anchorage in tension or compression

lb, min = the min. anchorage length for bars in tension

lbnet = (1 * 379.908 * 1013.4) / (1017.4)

= 378.4mm provide 380mm

lbnet ≥ lbmin

lbmin {

Therefore lb, min = 200mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 99


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Hence 378.4 > 200 …….. l bnet ≥ lbmin

lbnet > lbmin

Required anchorage length

As ,cal
lb ,net  1* 260.87 *  200mm
As ,eff
As ,cal
lb ,net  260.87 *  200mm
As ,eff
1290.67
lb ,net  260.87 *  200mm
1356.48
lb ,net  248.2mm  200mm

Therefore provide effective anchorage length of at least 200 mm

Minimum reinforcement

Asmin = ρmin.bd

ρmin =

= (0.4/300) = 0.00133

Asmin = 0.00133*1000*199 = 265.3mm2

S = 1000*50.24/265.3 = 189.3mm

Thus provide ɸ8 c/c180mm

Transverse reinforcement

According to EBCS 2, Sec7.2.2.1 the ratio of secondary reinforcement to main


reinforcement shall be at least equal to 0.2.

20 % (1290.67) = 258.134mm2

Provide ɸ10

Spacing = 1000 *as/As

= (1000*78.5) / 258.134

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 100


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

= 304.1 use 300mm

Smax = min{

Min (2*220 = 440mm or 350 mm)

Hence provide ɸ10 c/c 300mm.

The spacing of transverse reinforcement is provided according to EBCS 2-sec7.2.2 (3-4)

The spacing between main bars for slabs shall not exceed the smaller of 2h or 350 mm.
The spacing between secondary bars shall not exceed 400 mm.

Shear reinforcement

Checking flexural shear at a distance d from the face of the support

Figure 4.5 Shear force determination for stair A-A

36.06 + V = (7.85*1.6) + (19.62*x)

V = 19.62x + 12.56 – 36.06

V = 19.62x -23.5

Location of zero shear is at V = 0

19.62x – 23.5 = 0

X = 1.2m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 101


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 4.6 shear force diagram for stair A-A


Vu = 44KN

The shear force Vc carries the concrete in members without significant axial forces shall
be taken as

Vc  0.25 f ctd K1 K 2 bw d [EBCS-2, 1995 Art4.5.3.1]

As 1442.3
K1  (1  50 )  2.0  
bd 1000 *199
 0.007248

 (1  50 * 0.007248)  2.0

=1.362 < 2

K1 = 1.362

K 2  1.6  d  1.0

 1.6  0.199  1.0


 1.4  1
K 2  1.4
2
3
0.3 * 25 * 0.7
f ctd  = 1.032 Mpa
1.5

Vc = 0.25 * 1.03 * 1.362 * 1.4 * 1000 * 199

=94.62KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 102


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Because Vc > Vu, no shear reinforcement is required. But it is recommended to use F 8


c/c 300 mm to hold the main reinforcement.

Stair load is transferred to the corresponding beam separately as dead and live load.
Finding the reaction using un-factored moment gives:

Reaction by applying Dead load

Total dead load on stair w=11.4KN/m

Total dead load on landing w2=8.39KN/m

Figure 4.7 DL transfer

R1 + R2 = (4.195*1.6) + (11.4*1.2) + (8.39*2.8)

R1 + R2 = 43.884

R2 (5.6) = (4.195*1.6*1.6/2) + (11.4*1.2*(1.2/2+1.6)) + (8.39*2.8*(2.8/2+1.2+1.6))

R2 = 23.95KN

R1 = 43.884 – 23.95KN

R1 = 19.93KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 103


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Reaction by applying Live load

Figure 4.8 LL transfer


R1 + R2 = (1.5*1.6) + (3*1.2) + (3*2.8) = 21KN

R2(5.6) = (1.5*1.6*1.6/2) + (3*4*(2+1.6)

R2 = 8.065 KN

R1 = 12.93 KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 104


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

4.2 STAIR SECTION B-B

1.5 2.1 1.5

0.17
0.30 1.6
1.4

28°
0.22

Figure 4.9 Section view of stair B-B

1.5 2.1 1.6

1.3

Le = 5.16m

βa = for simply supported 25

Number of riser = 8

Number of tread = 7

Concrete characteristic

C25

S-300 and class I work is used

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 105


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Width of tread = 30cm

Height of riser = 17cm

Check whether the load is transferred to one way or in two ways

Ly/Lx = 5.16/1.5 = 3.44 >2 which is one way

Use D = 220mm

d = 220 – 6 – 15 = 199mm

Determination of angle of inclination

Section B-B

= 0

Loading by taking 1m width

Dead load on stair



- Reinforced concrete slab (inclined) = =

- Due steps =
- Floor Finishing
3cm thick marble floor finish 0.03 * 27 = 0.81KN/m2
3cm thick cement screed (inclined) (0.03 * 23)/2.1 = 0.326KN/m2
2 cm thick Plastering (inclined) (0.02 * 23)/2.1 = 0.219KN.m

- On tread


- On riser

Total dead load on stair = 6.42 + 2.04 + 0.219 + 1.5 + 0.97

= 11.15KN/m

Load on landing

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 106


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Reinforced concrete slab = 0.22 * 1 * 24 = 5.28 KN/m

Plastering on both sides = 2(0.02*23) = 0.92 KN/m

Cement screed on both sides = 2(0.03*23) = 1.38KN/m

Marble floor finish = 0.03*27 = 0.81KN/m

Total dead load on landing = 5.28 + 0.92 + 1.38 + 0.81 = 8.39KN/m

Live load for stair = 3KN/m2 (according to EBCS 2 1++5 table 2.1)

Design Load

Design load on stair

Pd1 = (1.3*DL) + (1.6LL)

= (1.3*11.15) + (1.6*3) = 19.3KN/m

Design load on landing

Pd2 = (1.3*8.39) + (1.6*3)

= 15.7KN/m

Figure 4.10 Loads on stair B-B


and where clockwise moment is positive

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 107


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

R2 (5.16) = (7.85*1.5*1.5/2) + ((19.3*2.1)((2.1/2)+1.5) + ((7.85*1.56)( 1.56/2+2.1+1.5)

R2 = (8.83 + 103.35+ 53.67)/5.16

R2= 32.135KN

R1 + R2 =64.551KN

R1 = 64.551KN – 32.135KN = 32.416KN

Moment calculation

Figure 4.11 Max. Moment determination for stair B-B

M=

M = 48.62 + 32.416x - 9.81x2 – 8.83 – 11.775x

M = - 9.81x2 + 20.64x + 39.79

@ V = 0 moment is maximum

V = 20.64 – 19.62x

X = 1.05m

At x = 1.05m, v = 0 which is a location of Mmax.

Hence M = (-9.81*1.052) + (20.64*1.05) + (39.79)

= 50.64KN.m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 108


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Check depth for flexure


Considering maximum moment: M = 50.64KN.m

[ √ ]

2.5/28.78 = 0.08686
2
fcd
= (0.32*28.782*11.33) = 3003.04

[ √ ]

ρ = (0.08686 0.0764)
ρ = 0.0816 or ρ = 0.00523

ρmin =

Thus use ρ=0.00523 which is in between ρmin and ρmax

198.73 mm < 199 mm thus the depth is safe for flexure


Reinforcement Provision

Longitudinal reinforcement

As = where Ks = steel grade capacity

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 109


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

M = moment taken from analysis result

d = minimum depth for deflection

√ √
k*m = =

Ks = 4.102 from table (EBCS 2-1995 part 2 by linear interpolation)

As = mm2

Asmin = where fyk = characteristic yield strength

b = width

d = depth

= mm2

As >Asmin ……Ok

Provide ɸ12

Spacing = 1000as/As

= (1000*113.04) / 1043.84

= 108.29mm

Smax = min{

Min (2*220 = 440mm or 350 mm)

Provide ɸ12 c/c 100mm

Development length for longitudinal reinforcement

   f yd 
l b    
 4 
 f bd

a = 0.7 for hook anchorage

a=1 for straight anchorage

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 110


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

lb = (ɸ/4)*(fyd/fbd)

f bd  2 f ctd

= 2 * 1.03 = 2.06MPa

lb = (12/4) * (260.87/2.06) = 379.908mm

Assume straight anchorage

Ascal
lbnet  alb  lb min
Aseff

a = 1.0 for straight bar anchorage in tension or compression.

Where:- As, cal = theoretical area of reinforcement required by the

design

As, eff = the area of reinforcement actually provided

A =1 straight bar anchorage in tension or compression

lb, min = the min. anchorage length for bars in tension

lbnet = (1 * 379.908 * 1043.84) / (1130.4)

= 350.82mm

lbnet ≥ lbmin

lbmin {

Therefore lb, min = 200mm

Hence 350.82 > 200 …….. l bnet ≥ lbmin

HENCE lbnet > lbmin

Required anchorage length

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 111


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

As ,cal
lb ,net  1 * 260.87 *  200mm
As ,eff
As ,cal
lb ,net  260.87 *  200mm
As ,eff
1043.84
lb ,net  260.87 *  200mm
1130.4
lb ,net  240.9mm  200mm

Therefore provide effective anchorage length of at least 200 mm

Minimum reinforcement

Asmin = ρmin.bd

ρmin =

= (0.4/300) = 0.00133

Asmin = 0.00133*1000*199 = 265.3mm2

S = 1000*50.24/265.3 = 189.3mm

Thus provide ɸ8 c/c180mm

Transverse reinforcement

According to EBCS 2, Sec7.2.2.1 the ratio of secondary reinforcement to main


reinforcement shall be at least equal to 0.2.

20 % (1442.3) = 288.46mm2

Provide ɸ10

Spacing = 1000 *as/As

= (1000*78.5) / 288.46

= 272 use 270mm

Smax = min{

Min (2*220 = 440mm or 350 mm)

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 112


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Hence provide ɸ10 c/c 270mm.

The spacing of transverse reinforcement is provided according to EBCS 2-sec7.2.2 (3-4)


The spacing between main bars for slabs shall not exceed the smaller of 2h or 350 mm.
The spacing between secondary bars shall not exceed 400 mm.

Shear reinforcement

Checking flexural shear at a distance d from the face of the support

Figure 4.12 Shear force determination for stair B-B

32.416 + V = (7.85*1.5) + (19.3*x)

V = 19.3x + 11.775 – 32.416

V = 19.3x -20.64

Location of zero shear is at V = 0

19.3x – 20.64 = 0

X = 1.07m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 113


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 4.13 shear force diagram for stair A-A


Vu = 32.42KN

The shear force Vc carries the concrete in members without significant axial forces shall
be taken as

Vc  0.25 f ctd K1 K 2 bw d [EBCS-2, 1995 Art4.5.3.1]

As 1043.84
K1  (1  50 )  2.0  
bd 1000 *199
 0.005245

 (1  50 * 0.005246)  2.0

=1.26 < 2

K1 = 1.26

K 2  1.6  d  1.0

 1.6  0.199  1.0


 1.4  1
K 2  1.4
2
3
0.3 * 25 * 0.7
f ctd  = 1.032 Mpa
1.5

Vc = 0.25 * 1.03 * 1.26 * 1.4 * 1000 * 199

=90.39KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 114


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Because Vc > Vu, no shear reinforcement is required. But it is recommended to use F 8


c/c 300 mm to hold the main reinforcement.

Stair load is transferred to the corresponding beam separately as dead and live load.
Finding the reaction using un-factored moment gives:

Reaction by applying Dead load

Total dead load on stair w=11.15KN/m

Total dead load on landing w2=8.39KN/m

Figure 4.14 DL transfer

R1 + R2 = (4.195*1.5) + (11.15*2.1) + (4.195*1.56)

R1 + R2 = 36.25

R2 (5.16) = (4.195*1.5*1.5/2) + (11.15*2.1*(2.1/2+1.5)) + (4.195*1.56*(1.56/2+2.1+1.5))

R2 = 18.04

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 115


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

R1 = 36.25– 18.04KN

R1 = 18.2KN

Reaction by applying Live load

Figure 4.15 LL transfer


R1 + R2 = (3*1.5) + (3*2.1) + (3*1.56) = 15.48KN

R2(5.16) = (3*1.5*1.5/2) + (3*2.1*(2.1/2+1.5)+(3*1.56*(1.56/2+2.1+1.5))

R2 = 7.74 KN

R1 = 7.74 KN

4.3 STAIR SECTION C-C

1.5 1.8 2.15

0.17
0.30
1.4
1.2

28°
0.22

Figure 4.16 Section view of stair C-C

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 116


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

1.5 1.8 2.2

1.4

Le = 5.45m

Βa = for end span 30

Number of riser = 7

Number of tread = 6

Concrete characteristic

C25

S-300 and class I work is used

Width of tread = 30cm

Height of riser = 17cm

Check whether the load is transferred to one way or in two ways

Ly/Lx = 5.45/1.5 = 3.63 >2 which is one way

1. Determination of depth for deflection

( )

≥ 0.85* 5450/30 = 154.12mm

Assume φ12

Concrete cover = 15mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 117


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Overall depth = d + + concrete cover

= 154.2 + 6 + 15 = 211.4mm

Use D = 220mm

d = 220 – 6 – 15 = 199mm

Determination of angle of inclination

= 0

Loading by taking 1m width

Dead load on stair



- Reinforced concrete slab (inclined) = =

- Due steps =
- Floor Finishing
3cm thick marble floor finish 0.03 * 27 = 0.81KN/m2
3cm thick cement screed (inclined) (0.03 * 23)/1.8 = 0.383KN/m2
2 cm thick Plastering (inclined) (0.02 * 23)/1.8 = 0.255KN.m

- On tread


- On riser

Total dead load on stair = 6.42 + 2.04 + 0.255+ 1.5 + 0.99

= 11.2 KN/m

Load on landing

Reinforced concrete slab = 0.22 * 1 * 24 = 5.28 KN/m

Plastering on both sides = 2(0.02*23) = 0.92 KN/m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 118


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Cement screed on both sides = 2(0.03*23) = 1.38KN/m

Marble floor finish = 0.03*27 = 0.81KN/m

Total dead load on landing = 5.28 + 0.92 + 1.38 + 0.81 = 8.39KN/m

Live load for stair = 3KN/m2 (according to EBCS 2 1995 table 2.1)

Design Load

Design load on stair

Pd1 = (1.3*DL) + (1.6LL)

= (1.3*11.2) + (1.6*3) = 19.3665KN/m

Design load on landing

Pd2 = (1.3*8.39) + (1.6*3)

= 15.7KN/m

Figure 4.17 Loads on stair C-C

Applying a principle applied in the strip method of slab design: provide moment which is
obtained from slab analysis for the fixed end support.

and where clockwise moment is positive

R2 (5.45) = (7.85*1.6*1.6/2) + ((19.62*1.2)((1.2/2)+1.6) + ((15.7*2.8)( 2.8/2)+1.2+1.6)

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 119


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

R2 = (10.048 + 51.8 + 184.632)/5.45

R2= 44KN

R1 + R2 = 80.06KN

R1 = 80.06KN - 44KN = 36.06KN

Moment calculation

Figure 4.18 Max. Moment determination for stair B-B

M=

M = 54.09 + 36.06x - 9.65x2 – 8.83 – 11.775x

M = -9.65x2 + 24.28x + 45.26

@ V = 0 moment is maximum

V = 23.5 – 19.3x

X = 1.22m

At x = 1.22m, v = 0 which is a location of Mmax.

Hence M = (-9.81*1.222) + (24.28*1.22) + (45.26)

=60.28KN.m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 120


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Check depth for flexure


Considering maximum moment: M = 60.28KN.m

[ √ ]

2.5/28.78 = 0.08686
2
fcd
= (0.32*28.782*11.33) = 3003.04

[ √ ]

ρ = (0.08686 0.0743)
ρ = 0.0806 or ρ = 0.00628

ρmin =

Thus use ρ=0.00628 which is in between ρmin and ρmax

199mm < 199mm thus the depth is safe for flexure


Reinforcement Provision

Longitudinal reinforcement

Span reinforcement

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 121


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

As = where Ks = steel grade capacity

M = moment taken from analysis result

d = minimum depth for deflection

√ √
K*m = =

Ks = 4.153 from table (EBCS 2-1995 part 2 by linear interpolation)

As = mm2

Asmin = where fyk = characteristic yield strength

b = width

d = depth

= mm2

As >Asmin ……Ok

Provide ɸ12

Spacing = 1000as/As

= (1000*113.04) / 1258.05

= 89.85mm

Smax = min{

Min (2*220 = 440mm or 350 mm)

Provide ɸ12 c/c 80mm

Support reinforcement

As = where Ks = steel grade capacity

M = moment taken from analysis result

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 122


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

d = minimum depth for deflection

√ √
K*m = =

Ks = 3.95 from table (EBCS 2-1995 part 2 by linear interpolation)

As = mm2

Asmin = where fyk = characteristic yield strength

b = width

d = depth

= mm2

As >Asmin ……Ok

Provide ɸ10

Spacing = 1000as/As

= (1000*78.5) / 377.73

= 207.8mm

Smax = min{

Min (2*220 = 440mm or 350 mm)

Provide ɸ10 c/c 200mm

Development length for longitudinal reinforcement

   f yd 
l b    
 4 
 f bd

a = 0.7 for hook anchorage

a=1 for straight anchorage

lb = (ɸ/4)*(fyd/fbd)

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 123


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

f bd  2 f ctd

= 2 * 1.03 = 2.06MPa

lb = (12/4) * (260.87/2.06) = 379.908mm

Assume straight anchorage

Ascal
lbnet  alb  lb min
Aseff

a = 1.0 for straight bar anchorage in tension or compression.

Where:- As, cal = theoretical area of reinforcement required by the

design

As, eff = the area of reinforcement actually provided

A =1 straight bar anchorage in tension or compression

lb, min = the min. anchorage length for bars in tension

lbnet = (1 * 379.908 * 377.73) / (392.5)

= 365.6mm

lbnet ≥ lbmin

lbmin {

Therefore lb, min = 200mm

Hence 365.6 > 200 …….. l bnet ≥ lbmin

HENCE lbnet > lbmin

Required anchorage length

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 124


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

As ,cal
lb ,net  1* 260.87 *  200mm
As ,eff
As ,cal
lb ,net  260.87 *  200mm
As ,eff
377.73
lb ,net  260.87 *  200mm
392.5
lb ,net  251.05mm  200mm

Therefore provide effective anchorage length of at least 200 mm

Transverse reinforcement

Minimum reinforcement

Asmin = ρmin.bd

ρmin =

= (0.4/300) = 0.00133

Asmin = 0.00133*1000*199 = 265.3mm2

S = 1000*50.24/265.3 = 189.3mm

Thus provide ɸ8 c/c180

According to EBCS 2, Sec7.2.2.1 the ratio of secondary reinforcement to main


reinforcement shall be at least equal to 0.2.

20 % (377.73) = 75.546mm2

Provide ɸ8

Spacing = 1000 *as/As

= (1000*50.24) / 377.73

= 133use 130mm

Smax = min{

Min (2*220 = 440mm or 350 mm)

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 125


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Hence provide ɸ8 c/c 130mm.

The spacing of transverse reinforcement is provided according to EBCS 2-sec7.2.2 (3-4)


The spacing between main bars for slabs shall not exceed the smaller of 2h or 350 mm.
The spacing between secondary bars shall not exceed 400 mm.
Shear reinforcement

Checking flexural shear at a distance d from the face of the support

Figure 4.19 Shear force determination for stair C-C

36.06 + V = (7.85*1.5) + (19.3*x)

V = 19.3x + 11.775 – 36.06

V = 19.3x -24.285

Location of zero shear is at V = 0

19.63x – 24.285 = 0

X = 1.2m

Figure 4.20 shear force diagram for stair C-C


Vu = 44KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 126


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

The shear force Vc carries the concrete in members without significant axial forces shall
be taken as

Vc  0.25 f ctd K1 K 2 bw d [EBCS-2, 1995 Art4.5.3.1]

As 377.73
K1  (1  50 )  2.0  
bd 1000 *199
 0.001898

 (1  50 * 0.001898)  2.0

=1.095 < 2

K1 = 1.095

K 2  1.6  d  1.0

 1.6  0.199  1.0


 1.4  1
K 2  1.4
2
3
0.3 * 25 * 0.7
f ctd 
1.5 = 1.032 Mpa

Vc = 0.25 * 1.03 * 1.095 * 1.4 * 1000 * 199

=78.55KN

Because Vc > Vu, no shear reinforcement is required. But it is recommended to use F 8


c/c 300 mm to hold the main reinforcement.

Stair load is transferred so a reaction is loaded separately as dead and live load.
Finding the reaction using un-factored moment gives:

Reaction by applying Dead load

Total dead load on stair w=11.2KN/m

Total dead load on landing w2=8.39KN/m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 127


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 4.21 DL transfer

R1 + R2 = (4.195*1.5) + (11.2*1.8) + (8.39*2.15)

R1 + R2 = 44.49KN

R2 (5.45) = (4.195*1.5)(1.5/2) + (11.2*1.8)(1.8/2+1.5) + (8.39*2.15)(2.15/2+1.8+1.5)

R2 = 24.3 KN

R1 = 20.17KN

Reaction by applying Live load

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 128


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 4.22 LL Transfer


R1 + R2 = (1.5*1.5) + (3*(1.8+2.15)) = 14.1KN

R2 = ((1.5*1.5)(1.5/2) + (3*3.95)(3.95/2+1.5) - 14.34)/5.45

R2 = 5.23KN

R1 = 8.86 KN

RAMP DESIGN

The ramp is seated on the ground level. We have only one underground basement,

For this case the only caution to be considered is on the compaction of the natural soil.
The building is located in Adama and the type of soil is stiff clay hence there is no need
of additional borrow material.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 129


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CHAPTER FIVE

5 FRAME ANALYSIS

The proposed building is going to construct in Adama town. Adama is located at altitude
of about 8033’ and longitude 39017’. The town is on the great rift valley of east Africa.
The average elevation of the town is about 1600m a.m.s.l.

The analysis is computed both for earth quake and wind load and the severe case will
be taken for further calculation and design.

5.1 Wind load on structure

External pressure = ………….EBCS1995, Art 3.1

Internal pressure = …………..EBCS1995

Where: - = = reference wind pressure

= = Exposure coefficient

= & = External and Internal pressure coefficient respectively.

i) ……………EBCS 1,1995 Art 3.7.1

Where: - =Air density ……….EBCS-1,1995 page 55 table 3.1

=Reference wind velocity (22m/sec)

…………For a site located at an altitude less than 2000m


(1600m AMSL)

=242 N/ =0.242N/

ii) Exposure coefficient

Where :- = is the exposure coefficient as defined in section 3.8.5 of


EBCS -1

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 130


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

= is the roughness coefficient as defined in section 3.8.3 of


EBCS -1
= is the topographic coefficient as defined in section 3.8.4 of
EBCS -1
Our building is not affected by topography. There fore =1
= at height Z is defined by

, For

, For Z
Where:- = is the terrain factor
= is the roughness length
= is the minimum height
= 0.24 (urban areas in which at least 15% of the surface is covered with
buildings and their average height exceeds 15m)

=1m…………EBCS-1 1995 page 58 table 3.2

= 16…….... EBCS-1 1995 page 58 table 3.2

=18.76m

Since is 18.76m =16m , is given by:-

= 0.24

= 0.704

Therefore,

= 1.69

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 131


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

PLAN

d= 11.5m h= 19m

b= 40m
E

Buildings, whose height h is less than b, shall be considered to be one part …….EBCS-
1, 1995 section a.2.2

ELEVATION

19m

Pressure Coefficient

For vertical wall of rectangular plan building, table A-1 and fig A.3 page 71 EBCS-1,
1995. As a function of aspect ratio d/h

b= 40m, 2h =2*19=38m and d= 11.5

e= min (b or 2h)

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 132


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

e =min (40 or 38m)

e=38m >11.5m

Case d < e EBCS-1, 1995 Fig A.3 page 71

e/5 = 38/5 =7.6

7.6m 3.9m

19m
A B

e/5

Zones Area(m2)

A 7.6*19=144.4

B* 3.9*19=74.1

D 19*40 =760

E 19*40 =760

d/h=11.5/40=0.29, and A>10m2

From EBCS-1, 1995 table A.1 external pressure for vertical walls of rectangular plan
building.

Cpe A = -1

Cpe B* = -0.8

Cpe D =0.8

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 133


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Cpe E = -0.3

For Z =18.76m

We =

We = 0.242*1.69*

We =0.409 kN/m2

Zone (A) Zone (D)

We = 0.409*-1 = -0.409 kN/m2 We = 0.409*0.8 =0.3272 kN/m2

Zone (C) Zone (E)

We =0.409*-0.8 = -0.3272 kN/m2 We =0.409*-0.3 =-0.1227 kN/m2

Internal Wind Pressure

For closed building with internal partitions and opening windows the extreme values

Cpi = 0.8 Cpi = -0.5

The mean height of the opening can be take Ze =18.76m with homogeneous distribution
of height of the dominant opening.

Suction

Wi =

=0.242*1.69*-0.5

=-0.2045 kN/m2

Pressure

Wi =

= 0.242*1.69*0.8

=0.3272 kN/m2

Wnet =We- Wi

The critical condition is when the wind is moving into large surface area.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 134


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

The unfavorable combinations are

For zone A = -0.409-0.3272 = -0.7362 kN/m2

B* = -0.3272- 0.3272 = - 0.6544 kN/m2

D = 0.3272 –(-0.2045) =0.5317 kN/m2

E = -0.1227 –(-0.2045) =0.0818 kN/m2

Lateral wind forces on the zones D and E are critical, for different floor level are

computed as below . Here while calculating the forces the area is taken half from the

above floor and half from below.

Floor level Area(m2) Lateral force on Lateral force on


zone D(kN) (P*A) zone E(kN)(p*A)

Roof 523.74 278.47 42.84

4th 523.74 278.47 42.84

3rd 576 306.26 47.12

2nd 523.74 278.47 42.84

1st 449.72 239.12 36.79

Ground 213.985 113.77 17.51

5.2 Earth quake analysis

Assumptions:

- Earth quake causes impulsive ground motion, which is complex and irregular in
character, changing in period and amplitude each lasting for small duration.
Therefore resonance of the type as visualized under steady-state sinusoidal
excitations will not occur as it would need time to build up such amplitudes.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 135


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

- Earth quake is not likely to occur simultaneously with wind or maximum flood or
maximum sea waves.
- The value of elastic modulus of materials, wherever required, may be taken as
per elastic analysis.

The whole structure of the building is resisted from Earth quake by its frame system.
The buildings lateral load distribution is computed as follows.

Adama is located under a category of Zone 4

5.2.1 Base Shear Determination

The base shear is given by the following formula

fb = Sd (T) W

Where,

fb = base shear force

W = Total weight of the building

Sd (T) = ordinate of the design spectrum at period T which is given by

Sd (T) = αβγ

Where,

α= ratio of the design bed rock acceleration to the acceleration of gravity, g. It is


given by

α=

Where,

= The bed rock acceleration ratio for the site and depends on the seismic
zone.

=0.1 for earth quake zone-4 (EBCS-1995, table 1-1)

I=Importance factor of the structure

I=1.2 (EBCS-8, 1995 table 2-4)

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 136


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

α = 0.1*1.2 = 0.12

Is the design response factor for the site and is given by

Where,

S=site coefficient based on soil type

S=1.2 (for sub soil class B, EBCS-8, 1995, table1-2)

T1= the fundamental period of vibration of the structure (in seconds) for translational
motion in the direction of the motion. For structures up to 80m height, the value of T 1
may be approximated by

T1=C1

Where,

H=Height of the structure above the base in meter=23.76m

C1=0.075 for RC moment resisting frames and eccentrically braced steel frame.

T1=0.807sec

= 1.66 ≤ 2.5……………………..OK!

γ is the behavior factor to account for energy dissipation capacity

γ= ≤ 0.7

Where,

= basic type of behavior factor, dependent on the structural type (EBCS-8, 1995,
table 3-2)

= 0.2 (For frame system)

KD=factor reflecting the ductility class

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 137


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

=1.5 (medium ductility, according to EBCS-8, Ductility class “M” corresponds to


structure designed, dimensioned and detailed according to specific earthquake resistant
provisions, enabling the structure to enter well within the inelastic range under repeated
reversed loading, without suffering brittle failures.)

KR=factor reflecting the structural regularity in elevation

=1 (regular structure)

=factor reflecting the prevailing failure mode in the structural system with wall

=1 (frame system)

γ = 0.2*1.5*1*1 = 0.3 < 0.7 ………………..OK!

Therefore, (T1) = αβγ

= 0.12*1.66*0.3 = 0.0598

Design spectrum implies the horizontal force is 5.98% of the weight of structure.

Hence, the base shear force Fb is:

Fb = Sd (T).W

= 0.0598 * 29725.48

= 1777.709

5.2.2 Distribution of base shear force to each story

Distribution of base shear over the height of structure

The concentrated lateral force acting on floor i is given by the formula

( Fb  Ft )Wi hi
Fi  n

W h
i 0
i i

Ft = the concentrated force at the top, which is in addition to Fn (this is to


consider the ignorance of higher modes) and is given by:

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 138


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

T1=0.807sec > 0.7sec thus

Where - Ft = concentrated force at the top

- Ti = fundamental period of vibration

- Fb = base shear force

Ft = (0.07* 0.807134834*1777.709)

= 100.439

5.2.3 Calculation of Weights Structure

The following tables give the mass of each element (column, beam, slab, partition walls,
roof, stair and shear wall). They also give the x and y – coordinates of each elements

The lumped mass at each floor level was calculated by taking half portion from above
and half from below of the floor

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 139


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Basement
Unit Height or
Width (m) Volume
Designation weight Length Area (m2) Weight (KN)
(m3)
(KN/m3) (m) Lx Ly
Column
C1 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C2 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C3 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C4 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C5 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C6 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C27 24 2.75 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.55 13.2
C28 24 2.75 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.55 13.2
C17 24 2.75 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.55 13.2
C18 24 2.75 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.55 13.2
C7 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C8 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C9 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C14 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C16 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C20 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C21 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C22 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C23 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
C26 24 2.75 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.66 15.84
sum 306.24
Circular Column
diameter
C10 24 2.75 0.6 0.2826 0.77715 18.6516
C11 24 2.75 0.6 0.2826 0.77715 18.6516
C12 24 2.75 0.6 0.2826 0.77715 18.6516
C13 24 2.75 0.6 0.2826 0.77715 18.6516
C14 24 2.75 0.6 0.2826 0.77715 18.6516
C15 24 2.75 0.6 0.2826 0.77715 18.6516
C24 24 2.75 0.6 0.2826 0.77715 18.6516
C25 24 2.75 0.6 0.2826 0.77715 18.6516
sum 149.2128

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 140


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Grade beam
Axis
A 24 40.4 0.3 0.35 0.105 4.242 101.808
B 24 40.4 0.3 0.35 0.105 4.242 101.808
C 24 40.4 0.3 0.35 0.105 4.242 101.808
c' 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
1 24 11.5 0.3 0.35 0.105 1.2075 28.98
2 24 11.5 0.3 0.35 0.105 1.2075 28.98
3 24 11.5 0.3 0.35 0.105 1.2075 28.98
4 24 11.5 0.3 0.35 0.105 1.2075 28.98
5 24 11.5 0.3 0.35 0.105 1.2075 28.98
6 24 11.5 0.3 0.35 0.105 1.2075 28.98
7 24 13.6 0.3 0.35 0.105 1.428 34.272
8 24 13.6 0.3 0.35 0.105 1.428 34.272
sum 562.968
partition wall
BP1 12 23 0.05 1.5 0.075 1.725 20.7
sum 20.7

Shear wall
sw1 24 2.75 0.15 0.25 0.0375 0.103125 2.475
sw2 24 2.75 0.15 2 0.3 0.825 19.8
sw3 24 2.75 0.15 2.1 0.315 0.86625 20.79
sw4 24 2.75 0.15 2.15 0.3225 0.886875 21.285
sw5 24 2.75 0.15 0.65 0.0975 0.268125 6.435
sum 70.785
HCB wall
MW1 20 2.75 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.53 50.6
MW2 20 2.75 0.2 6.05 1.21 3.3275 66.55
MW3 20 2.75 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.53 50.6
MW4 20 2.75 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.53 50.6
MW5 20 2.75 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.08 61.6
MW6 20 2.75 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.08 61.6
MW7 20 2.75 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.08 61.6
MW8 20 2.75 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.08 61.6
MW9 20 2.75 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.08 61.6
MW10 20 2.75 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.53 50.6
MW11 20 2.75 0.2 6.05 1.21 3.3275 66.55
MW12 20 2.75 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.08 61.6
MW13 20 2.75 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.53 50.6
MW14 20 2.75 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.08 61.6
MW15 20 2.75 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.53 50.6
MW16 20 2.75 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.53 50.6
sum 918.5

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 141


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Stair case
Flight 1 24 0.13 1.5 2.15 3.225 0.41925 10.062
Flight 2 24 0.2 1.5 2.1 3.15 0.63 15.12
Flight 3 24 0.21 1.5 2 3 0.63 15.12
Landing 1 24 0.2 1.4 1.6 2.24 0.448 10.752
Landing 2 24 0.21 1.5 1.56 2.34 0.4914 11.7936
sum 62.8476

total weight of basement floor 2091.2534

Ground Floor
Column
C9 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C10 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C11 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C27 24 3.1 0.4 0.3 0.12 0.372 8.928
C28 24 3.1 0.4 0.3 0.12 0.372 8.928
C17 24 3.1 0.4 0.3 0.12 0.372 8.928
C18 24 3.1 0.4 0.3 0.12 0.372 8.928
C12 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C13 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C14 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C15 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C16 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C19 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C20 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C21 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C22 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C23 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C24 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C25 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C26 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
Sum 273.792
Circular Column
diameter
C1 24 3.1 0.6 0.2826 0.87606 21.02544
C2 24 3.1 0.6 0.2826 0.87606 21.02544
C3 24 3.1 0.6 0.2826 0.87606 21.02544
C4 24 3.1 0.6 0.2826 0.87606 21.02544
C5 24 3.1 0.6 0.2826 0.87606 21.02544
C6 24 3.1 0.6 0.2826 0.87606 21.02544
C7 24 3.1 0.6 0.2826 0.87606 21.02544
C8 24 3.1 0.6 0.2826 0.87606 21.02544
sum 168.20352

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 142


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Ground Floor Beam


Axis
A 24 35 0.25 0.35 0.0875 3.0625 73.5
B 24 35 0.25 0.35 0.0875 3.0625 73.5
C 24 35 0.25 0.35 0.0875 3.0625 73.5
c' 24 6 0.25 0.35 0.0875 0.525 12.6
1 24 11.5 0.25 0.35 0.0875 1.00625 24.15
2 24 11.5 0.25 0.35 0.0875 1.00625 24.15
3 24 11.5 0.25 0.35 0.0875 1.00625 24.15
4 24 11.5 0.25 0.35 0.0875 1.00625 24.15
5 24 11.5 0.25 0.35 0.0875 1.00625 24.15
6 24 11.5 0.25 0.35 0.0875 1.00625 24.15
7 24 13.6 0.25 0.35 0.0875 1.19 28.56
8 24 13.6 0.25 0.35 0.0875 1.19 28.56
sum 435.12
partition wall
GP1 Floor Area 402.5 m2
Partition load 1.5KN/m2 603.75
sum 603.75
Ground Floor Slab
P1 24 0.2 5.13 6.65 34.1145 6.8229 163.7496
P2 24 0.2 6 6.65 39.9 7.98 191.52
P3 24 0.2 6 6.65 39.9 7.98 191.52
P4 24 0.2 3.63 6 21.78 4.356 104.544
P5 24 0.2 6 6.65 39.9 7.98 191.52
P6 24 0.2 6 6.65 39.9 7.98 191.52
P7 24 0.2 5.13 5.25 26.9325 5.3865 129.276
P8 24 0.2 5.25 6 31.5 6.3 151.2
P9 24 0.2 5.25 6 31.5 6.3 151.2
P10 24 0.2 5.25 6 31.5 6.3 151.2
P11 24 0.2 5.25 6 31.5 6.3 151.2
P12 24 0.2 5.25 6.15 32.2875 6.4575 154.98
Sum 1923.4296
Shear wall
sw1 24 3.1 0.15 0.25 0.0375 0.11625 2.79
sw2 24 3.1 0.15 2 0.3 0.93 22.32
sw3 24 3.1 0.15 2.1 0.315 0.9765 23.436
sw4 24 3.1 0.15 2.15 0.3225 0.99975 23.994
sw5 24 3.1 0.15 0.65 0.0975 0.30225 7.254
sum 79.794

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 143


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Stair case
Flight 1 24 0.13 1.5 2.15 3.225 0.41925 10.062
Flight 2 24 0.2 1.5 2.1 3.15 0.63 15.12
Flight 3 24 0.21 1.5 2 3 0.63 15.12
Landing 1 24 0.2 1.4 1.6 2.24 0.448 10.752
Landing 2 24 0.21 1.5 1.56 2.34 0.4914 11.7936
sum 62.8476
Wall
W1 14 3.1 0.2 6 1.2 3.72 52.08
W2 14 3.1 0.15 6 0.9 2.79 39.06
W3 14 3.1 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.852 39.928
W4 14 3.1 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.852 39.928
W5 14 3.1 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.472 48.608
W8 14 3.1 0.15 6 0.9 2.79 39.06
W10 14 3.1 0.2 1.7 0.34 1.054 14.756
W11 14 3.1 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.472 48.608
W12 14 3.1 0.2 1.7 0.34 1.054 14.756
W13 14 3.1 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.472 48.608
W15 14 3.1 0.15 6 0.9 2.79 39.06
W16 14 3.1 0.15 6 0.9 2.79 39.06
W20 14 3.1 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.472 48.608
W21 14 3.1 0.2 6 1.2 3.72 52.08
W22 14 3.1 0.2 6 1.2 3.72 52.08
W24 14 3.1 0.2 2.3 0.46 1.426 19.964
W25 14 3.1 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.0695 14.973
W26 14 3.1 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.0695 14.973
W27 14 3.1 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.0695 14.973
W28 14 3.1 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.0695 14.973
W29 14 3.1 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.0695 14.973
W30 14 3.1 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.0695 14.973
W31 14 3.1 0.2 4.5 0.9 2.79 39.06
sum 765.142

total weight of Ground floor 4312.07872

The weight of other structures are attached in the annex

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 144


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Total weight of structure

Storey Storey weight LL (KN) 25%(LL) Total (Weight)


Basement floor 2091.25 _ 2091.25
Ground floor 4312.08 1921.57 480.39 4792.47
1st Floor 4526.43 2208.20 552.05 5078.48
2nd Floor 4893.43 2640.00 660.00 5553.43
3rd Floor 5054.23 2640.00 660.00 5714.23
4th Floor 4776.69 2640.00 660.00 5436.69
Access room and roof 1144.66 311.76 77.94 1222.60
roof slab 329.98 25.98 6.50 336.47
total weight of the building 30225.62

Table 5-1 Weight of structure


The concentrated lateral force acting on floor i is given by

( Fb  Ft )Wi hi
Fi  n

W h
i 0
i i

xi yi
S TORY Height(hi) Dead load(Wi) geometric center geometric center Wihi Fi
slab roof 24.5 336.47 3 4.32 8243.5395 38.82052
access room and roof 21.5 1222.60 20 5.9 26285.814 123.8
4th floor 18.3 5436.69 20 7.94 99491.486 468.5
3rd floor 15.1 5714.23 20 7.94 86284.861 406.3
2nd floor 11.9 5553.43 20 7.94 66085.807 311.2
1st floor 8.7 5078.48 20 5.9 44182.762 208.1
ground floor 5.5 4792.47 20 5.9 26358.592 124.1
basement 2.5 2091.25 20 5.9 5228.1335 24.6
30225.62 362160.99

Table 5-2 Strory shear

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 145


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

5.2.4 Determination of center of mass

LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS


US ING EBCS -8 1995

Weight & Centroid of Basement Floor


Column
Thickness Weigth Distance, Distance,
W*Xi W*Yi
Description Length (L) Width (D) (H) (Wi) Xi Yi
C1 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 0.20 11.85 3.17 187.70
C2 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 5.20 11.85 82.37 187.70
C3 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 11.20 11.85 177.41 187.70
C4 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 17.20 11.85 272.45 187.70
C5 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 23.20 11.85 367.49 187.70
C8 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 40.20 11.85 636.77 187.70
C9 2.75 0.50 0.40 13.20 17.20 13.95 227.04 184.14
C10 2.75 0.50 0.40 13.20 23.20 13.95 306.24 184.14
C11 2.75 0.50 0.40 13.20 17.42 8.86 229.92 116.95
C12 2.75 0.50 0.40 13.20 23.01 8.86 303.72 116.95
C13 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 0.20 5.30 3.17 83.95
C20 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 40.20 5.30 636.77 83.95
C21 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 0.20 0.25 3.17 3.96
C22 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 5.20 0.25 82.37 3.96
C23 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 11.50 0.25 182.16 3.96
C24 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 17.20 0.25 272.45 3.96
C25 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 23.20 0.25 367.49 3.96
C26 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 29.20 0.25 462.53 3.96
C27 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 35.20 0.25 557.57 3.96
C28 2.75 0.60 0.40 15.84 40.20 0.25 636.77 3.96
C6 circular 2.75 0.60 18.65 29.20 11.80 544.63 220.09
C7 2.75 0.60 18.65 35.20 11.80 656.54 220.09
C14 2.75 0.60 18.65 5.20 5.30 96.99 98.85
C15 2.75 0.60 18.65 11.20 5.30 208.90 98.85
C16 2.75 0.60 18.65 17.20 5.30 320.81 98.85
C17 2.75 0.60 18.65 23.20 5.30 432.72 98.85
C18 2.75 0.60 18.65 29.50 5.30 550.22 98.85
C19 2.75 0.60 18.65 35.20 5.30 656.54 98.85
Total weight (KN)
455.45
Wi.Xi 9278.34
Wi.Yi 2961.29
Grade beam
A 40.40 0.30 0.35 101.81 20.20 0.20 2056.52 20.36
B 40.40 0.30 0.35 101.81 20.20 5.30 2056.52 539.58
B' 6.40 0.30 0.35 15.12 20.20 8.86 305.42 133.96
C 40.40 0.30 0.35 101.81 20.20 11.90 2056.52 1211.52
c' 6.00 0.30 0.35 15.12 20.20 14.00 305.42 211.68
1.00 11.50 0.30 0.35 28.98 0.20 6.05 5.80 175.33
2.00 11.50 0.30 0.35 28.98 5.20 6.05 150.70 175.33
3.00 11.50 0.30 0.35 28.98 11.20 6.05 324.58 175.33
4.00 11.50 0.30 0.35 28.98 29.20 5.85 846.22 169.53
5.00 11.50 0.30 0.35 28.98 35.20 5.85 1020.10 169.53
6.00 11.50 0.30 0.35 28.98 40.20 6.05 1165.00 175.33
7.00 13.60 0.30 0.35 34.27 17.20 7.10 589.48 243.33
8.00 13.60 0.30 0.35 34.27 23.20 7.10 795.11 243.33
Total weight (KN)
578.09
Wi.Xi 11677.38
Wi.Yi 3644.15

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 146


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

HCB WALL
MW1 2.75 4.60 0.20 50.60 2.70 12.03 136.62 608.47
MW2 2.75 6.05 0.20 66.55 0.08 8.56 4.99 569.83
MW3 2.75 4.60 0.20 50.60 0.08 2.76 3.81 139.78
MW4 2.75 4.60 0.20 50.60 2.70 0.08 136.62 3.80
MW5 2.75 5.60 0.20 61.60 8.20 0.08 505.12 4.73
MW6 2.75 5.60 0.20 61.60 14.20 0.08 874.72 4.62
MW7 2.75 5.60 0.20 61.60 20.20 0.08 1244.32 4.62
MW8 2.75 5.60 0.20 61.60 26.20 0.08 1613.92 4.62
MW9 2.75 5.60 0.20 61.60 32.20 0.07 1983.52 4.29
MW10 2.75 4.60 0.20 50.60 40.33 2.76 2040.45 139.78
MW11 2.75 6.05 0.20 66.55 40.33 8.56 2683.63 569.83
MW12 2.75 5.60 0.20 61.60 14.20 12.03 874.72 740.74
MW13 2.75 4.60 0.20 50.60 17.32 11.36 876.64 574.82
MW14 2.75 5.60 0.20 61.60 20.20 14.10 1244.32 868.56
MW15 2.75 4.60 0.20 50.60 23.08 11.36 1167.60 574.84
MW16 2.75 4.60 0.20 50.60 20.23 8.80 1023.52 445.28
Total weight (KN)
918.50
Wi.Xi 16414.51
Wi.Yi 5258.61
partiotion load
BP1 23.00 1.50 0.05 20.70 23.70 10.10 490.59 209.07
Total weight (KN)20.70
Wi.Xi 490.59
Wi.Yi 209.07
Stair
Flight 1 2.15 1.50 0.13 10.06 19.97 13.25 200.98 133.32
Flight 2 2.10 1.50 0.20 15.12 18.15 11.48 274.43 173.58
Flight 3 2.00 1.50 0.21 15.12 19.84 9.65 299.98 145.91
Landing 1 1.60 1.40 0.20 10.75 18.15 13.28 195.15 142.79
Landing 2 1.56 1.50 0.21 11.79 18.12 9.65 213.70 113.81
Total weight (KN)62.85
Wi.Xi 1184.24
Wi.Yi 709.40

total weight 2035.59


Wi.Xi 39045.05
Wi.Yi 12782.52

center of massX(m) 19.18


Y(m) 6.28

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 147


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Weight & Centroid of Ground Floor


Column
Length Width Thickness Weigth Distance, Distance,
W*Xi W*Yi
Description (L) (D) (H) (Wi) Xi Yi
GC1 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 0.20 11.85 2.98 176.33
GC2 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 5.20 11.85 77.38 176.33
GC3 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 11.20 11.85 166.66 176.33
GC4 3.10 0.50 0.40 8.93 17.20 11.85 153.56 105.80
GC5 3.10 0.50 0.40 8.93 23.20 13.95 13.95 124.55
GC6 3.10 0.50 0.40 8.93 17.42 8.86 155.51 79.10
GC7 3.10 0.50 0.40 8.93 23.01 8.86 205.43 79.10
GC8 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 29.00 11.50 431.52 171.12
GC9 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 35.20 11.75 523.78 174.84
GC10 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 40.20 11.85 598.18 176.33
GC11 3.10 0.50 0.40 14.88 0.20 5.30 2.98 78.86
GC12 3.10 0.50 0.40 14.88 5.20 5.25 77.38 78.12
GC13 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 11.20 5.25 166.66 78.12
GC14 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 17.20 5.25 255.94 78.12
GC15 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 23.20 5.25 345.22 78.12
GC16 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 29.20 5.25 434.50 78.12
GC17 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 35.20 5.25 523.78 78.12
GC18 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 40.20 5.30 598.18 78.86
GC27 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 17.20 11.85 255.94 176.33
GC28 3.10 0.60 0.40 14.88 23.20 11.85 345.22 176.33
GC19 (circular) 3.10 0.60 21.03 0.20 0.25 4.21 5.26
GC20 3.10 0.60 21.03 5.20 0.25 109.33 5.26
GC21 3.10 0.60 21.03 11.20 0.25 235.48 5.26
GC22 3.10 0.60 21.03 17.20 0.25 361.64 5.26
GC23 3.10 0.60 21.03 23.20 0.25 487.79 5.26
GC24 3.10 0.60 21.03 29.20 0.25 613.94 5.26
GC25 3.10 0.60 21.03 35.20 0.25 740.10 5.26
GC26 3.10 0.60 21.03 40.20 0.25 845.22 5.26
Total weight (KN)
442.00
Wi.Xi 8732.40
Wi.Yi 2460.97
Ground floor beam
A 35.00 0.30 0.40 73.50 20.20 0.20 1484.70 14.70
B 35.00 0.30 0.40 73.50 20.20 5.30 1484.70 389.55
B' 6.40 0.30 0.40 15.12 20.20 8.86 305.42 133.96
C 35.00 0.30 0.40 73.50 20.20 11.90 1484.70 874.65
c' 6.00 0.30 0.40 12.60 20.20 14.00 254.52 176.40
1.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 24.15 0.20 6.05 4.83 146.11
2.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 24.15 5.20 6.05 125.58 146.11
3.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 24.15 11.20 6.05 270.48 146.11
4.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 24.15 29.20 5.85 705.18 141.28
5.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 24.15 35.20 5.85 850.08 141.28
6.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 24.15 40.20 6.05 970.83 146.11
7.00 13.60 0.30 0.40 24.15 17.20 7.10 415.38 171.47
8.00 13.60 0.30 0.40 24.15 23.20 7.10 560.28 171.47
Total weight (KN)
441.42
Wi.Xi 8916.68
Wi.Yi 2799.18

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 148


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

shear wall
sw1 3.10 0.15 0.15 2.79 18.97 11.45 52.93 31.95
sw2 3.10 0.15 0.15 22.32 19.98 12.43 445.84 277.33
sw3 3.10 0.15 0.15 23.44 19.98 10.48 468.13 245.49
sw4 3.10 0.15 0.15 23.99 20.98 12.23 503.27 293.33
sw5 3.10 0.15 0.15 7.25 20.98 10.88 152.15 78.89
Total weight (KN)79.79
Wi.Xi 1622.33
Wi.Yi 926.98
partiotion load
GP1 1.5KN/m2 603.75 17.70 2.58 10686.38 1557.68
Total weight (KN)603.75
Wi.Xi 10686.38
Wi.Yi 1557.68
Stair
Flight 1 2.15 1.50 0.13 10.06 19.97 13.25 200.98 133.32
Flight 2 2.10 1.50 0.20 15.12 18.15 11.48 274.43 173.58
Flight 3 2.00 1.50 0.21 15.12 19.84 9.65 299.98 145.91
Landing 1 1.60 1.40 0.20 10.75 18.15 13.28 195.15 142.79
Landing 2 1.56 1.50 0.21 11.79 18.12 9.65 213.70 113.81
Total weight (KN)62.85
Wi.Xi 1184.24
Wi.Yi 709.40
Ground Floor Slab
P1 6.65 5.13 0.19 155.56 2.64 8.60 410.03 1337.83
P2 6.65 6.00 0.19 181.94 8.20 8.60 1491.94 1564.72
P3 6.65 6.00 0.19 181.94 14.20 8.60 2583.60 1564.72
P4 6.00 3.63 0.19 99.32 20.13 7.07 1999.21 702.17
P5 6.65 6.00 0.19 181.94 26.14 8.60 4755.23 1564.72
P6 6.65 6.00 0.19 181.94 32.30 8.60 5876.79 1564.72
P7 5.25 5.13 0.19 122.81 2.64 2.63 323.71 322.47
P8 6.00 5.25 0.19 143.64 8.20 2.63 1177.85 377.16
P9 6.00 5.25 0.19 143.64 14.20 2.63 2039.69 377.16
P10 6.00 5.25 0.19 143.64 20.20 2.63 2901.53 377.16
P11 6.00 5.25 0.19 143.64 26.20 2.63 3763.37 377.16
P12 6.15 5.25 0.19 147.23 32.20 2.63 4740.84 386.58
Total weight (KN)
1827.26
Wi.Xi 32063.79
Wi.Yi 10516.55
Wall
W1 3.10 6.00 0.20 52.08 0.22 8.50 11.51 442.68
W2 3.10 6.00 0.15 39.06 5.22 8.50 203.89 332.01
W3 3.10 4.60 0.20 39.93 2.70 11.70 107.81 467.16
W4 3.10 4.60 0.20 39.93 8.20 11.72 327.41 467.96
W5 3.10 5.60 0.20 48.61 14.22 11.70 691.21 568.71
W8 3.10 6.00 0.15 39.06 11.20 8.50 437.47 332.01
W10 3.10 1.70 0.20 14.76 17.22 12.85 254.10 189.61
W11 3.10 5.60 0.20 48.61 20.12 13.90 977.99 675.65
W12 3.10 1.70 0.20 14.76 23.22 12.85 342.65 189.61
W13 3.10 5.60 0.20 48.61 26.19 11.75 1272.80 571.14
W15 3.10 6.00 0.15 39.06 17.22 8.50 672.61 332.01
W16 3.10 6.00 0.15 39.06 23.22 8.50 906.97 332.01
W20 3.10 5.60 0.20 48.61 32.20 11.75 1565.18 571.14
W21 3.10 6.00 0.20 52.08 35.20 8.50 1833.22 442.68
W22 3.10 6.00 0.20 52.08 40.20 8.50 2093.62 442.68

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 149


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

W24 3.10 2.30 0.20 19.96 0.22 3.73 4.39 74.47


W25 3.10 2.30 0.15 14.97 5.20 3.70 77.86 55.40
W26 3.10 2.30 0.15 14.97 11.20 3.70 167.70 55.40
W27 3.10 2.30 0.15 14.97 17.20 3.70 257.54 55.40
W28 3.10 2.30 0.15 14.97 23.20 3.70 347.37 55.40
W29 3.10 2.30 0.15 14.97 29.20 3.70 437.21 55.40
W30 3.10 2.30 0.15 14.97 35.20 3.70 527.05 55.40
W31 3.10 4.50 0.20 39.06 40.20 3.70 1570.21 144.52
Total weight (KN)
765.14
Wi.Xi 15087.76
Wi.Yi 6908.46

total weight
4222.2072
Wi.Xi 78293.582
Wi.Yi 25879.225

center ofX(m)
mass 18.54328
Y(m) 6.129312
Computation of center of mass for other floors is attached in the annex.

mass center xi yi
basement 19.18 6.28
ground 18.54 6.13
first 20.18 6.29
second 19.73 6.13
third 19.73 6.13
fourth 20.27 6.22
access and roof 10.84 4.28
slab roof 7.47 3.66

Table 5-3 Center of mass

5.2.5 Determination of center of stiffness

Center of stiffness ( ) is a point where the stiffness or strength of the floor is


concentrated.

Xs 
D x iy i
; Ys 
D y
ix i
Where Dix= and Diy=
D iy D ix

Iy hb 3 I x bh 3
Kx   ; Ky  
L 12 L L 12 L

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 150


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Shear center (Xi, Yi): a point where the center of stiffness (shear center) of the i th shear
wall or column is located.

a
k
for general case ; Where k
k beam
for general case
2k 2k c

a
0.5  k
for fixed column base k
k beam
for fixed column base
2k kc

0.5k
a for pin sup ported columns
1  2k

Dix =D-value in the X-direction Diy = D-value in the Y-direction

Beam stiffness

Kb=Ib/L= bh3/ (12L)



Based on the above discussion concepts calculation of Kc, Kb, k , a, ∑D was undertaken
and the results are given below in their respective frames.

Center of stiffness

Xs 
D x iy i
Ys 
D yix i
…………..Varginon’s theorem
D iy D ix

Where:

Xs,Ys are center of stiffness

Dix, Diy are lateral stiffness of a particular frame element

k is total sum of stiffness ratio of beam and column

a is a factor depending on boundary condition

Column stiffness

First story

Column height = 2m

Kxc = b3h/12L = (503*40) / (12*200) = 2083.33

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 151


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Kyc = bh3/12L = (50*403) / (12*200) = 1333.33

Second story

Column height = 3m

Kxc = b3h/12L = (503*40) / (12*300) = 1388.89

Kyc = bh3/12L = (50*403) / (12*300) = 888.89

Third story

Column height = 2.96m

Kxc = b3h/12L = (503*40) / (12*296) = 1407.66

Kyc = bh3/12L = (50*403) / (12*296) = 900.91

Fourth, Fifth, Sixes and Seventh stories

Column height = 3.2m

Kxc = b3h/12L = (503*40) / (12*320) = 1302.08

Kyc = bh3/12L = (50*403) / (12*320) = 833.33

Eighth story

Column Height = 3m

Kxc = b3h/12L = (403*30) / (12*300) = 533.33

Kyc = bh3/12L = (40*303) / (12*300) = 300

For circular column

Moment of inertia = I = /4*(r4)

Determine Kbar, a, and D values

Kbar represents the total sum of stiffness ratios of beams above and below the column
divided by 2Kc.

Where D is the lateral force required to cause unit deflection

Kc = column stiffness

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 152


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

a = factor depending on boundary conditions.

Beam Stiffness

Beam Length(cm) Kb
500 214.38
215 498.55
Basement
600 178.65
650 121.15
500 320.00
215 744.19
Ground
600 266.67
650 246.15
500 320.00
215 744.19 Dimension
1st Floor
600 266.67
650 246.15
500 320.00
215 744.19
2nd Floor 40
600 266.67 30
650 246.15
500 320.00

3rd Floor
215 744.19 30 30
600 266.67
650 246.15
500 320.00
4th Floor 215 744.19
600 266.67
650 246.15
215 261.63
650 86.54
Access room and roof
500 112.50
600 93.75
215 261.63
slab roof 650 86.54
600 93.75
cantilever 215 868.2170543

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 153


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Column Stiffness

Storey Length(cm) Kxc Kyc


Footing 250 2880 1280
Basement (rectangular)
275 2618.181818 1163.64 Dimension
Basement (Circular) 275 2119.5 2119.5
Ground ( Rectangular)310 2322.580645 2322.58
Ground (Circular) 310 2148.141892 1035.948
40
1st Floor 320 1000 2250.00 60
2nd Floor 320 1302.083333 2250.00
3rd Floor 320 1302.083333 2250.00 40
4th Floor 320 1302.083333 2250.00 40
Access 300 622.222 476.39

stair column

Storey Length(cm) Kxc Kyc r


Footing 250 1666.666667 1066.666667
Basement (rectangular)
275 1515.151515 969.6969697
Ground ( Rectangular)310 860.2150538 1344.086022
1st Floor 320 833.3333333 1302.083333
2nd Floor 320 833.3333333 1302.083333
3rd Floor 320 833.3333333 1302.083333
4th Floor 320 833.3333333 1302.083333
Access 300 833.3333333 1302.083333
Table 5-4 center of stiffness

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 154


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Determination of D-values of frames

Along Axis 1-1 and 8-8


Roof 164.90 214.38
Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00
Kbar= 0.09 Kbar= 0.21 Kbar 0.12 Diy
a= 0.04 a= 0.10 a= 0.06 438.27
4th D= 98.28 246.15 D= 213.89 320.00 D= 126.11
Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00
Kbar= 0.11 Kbar= 0.25 Kbar 0.14
a= 0.05 a= 0.11 a= 0.07 517.51
3rd D= 116.69 246.15 D= 251.44 320.00 D= 149.38
Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00
Kbar= 0.11 Kbar= 0.25 Kbar= 0.14
a= 0.05 a= 0.11 a= 0.07 517.51
2nd D= 116.69 246.15 D= 251.44 320.00 D= 149.38
Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00
Kbar= 0.11 Kbar= 0.25 Kbar= 0.14
a= 0.05 a= 0.11 a= 0.07 517.51
1st D= 116.69 246.15 D= 251.44 320.00 D= 149.38
Kc= 2322.58 Kc= 2322.58 Kc= 1035.95
Kbar= 0.11 Kbar= 0.24 Kbar= 0.31
a= 0.05 a= 0.11 a= 0.13 507.80
Ground D= 116.88 246.15 D= 252.32 320.00 D= 138.59
Kc= 1163.64 Kc= 1163.64 Kc= 1163.64
Kbar= 0.16 Kbar= 0.39 Kbar= 0.23
a= 0.07 a= 0.16 a= 0.10 393.78
Basement D= 85.11 121.15 D= 188.84 214.38 D= 119.84
Kc= 1280.00 Kc= 1280.00 Kc= 1280.00
Kbar= 0.09 Kbar= 0.26 Kbar= 0.17
a= 0.28 a= 0.34 a= 0.31 1188.80
Footing D= 363.38 D= 431.24 D= 394.18

//////////////////// //////////////////// ////////////////////

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 155


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

D value determination

Along Axis 2-2 and 3-3


Roof 86.54 112.50
Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33
Kbar= 0.67 Kbar= 0.35 Kbar= 0.72 Diy
a= 0.25 a= 0.15 a= 0.26 552.66
4th 868.22 D= 209.53 164.90 D= 123.20 214.38 D= 219.92 868.22
Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33
Kbar= 1.24 Kbar= 0.46 Kbar= 1.30
a= 0.38 a= 0.19 a= 0.39 801.52
3rd 868.22 D= 318.89 164.90 D= 154.48 214.38 D= 328.15 868.22
Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33
Kbar= 1.24 Kbar= 0.46 Kbar= 1.30
a= 0.38 ` a= 0.19 a= 0.39 801.52
2nd 868.22 D= 318.89 164.90 D= 154.48 214.38 D= 328.15 868.22
Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33
Kbar= 0.72 Kbar= 0.46 Kbar= 0.78
a= 0.26 a= 0.19 a= 0.28 608.23
1st D= 220.32 164.90 D= 154.48 214.38 D= 233.42
Kc= 1344.09 Kc= 1344.09 Kc= 1035.95
Kbar= 0.12 Kbar= 0.28 Kbar= 0.21
a= 0.06 a= 0.12 a= 0.09 341.01
Ground D= 77.69 164.90 D= 166.19 214.38 D= 97.14
Kc= 969.70 Kc= 2119.50 Kc= 969.70
Kbar= 0.20 Kbar= 0.23 Kbar= 0.30
a= 0.09 a= 0.10 a= 0.13 433.21
Basement D= 87.51 219.87 D= 218.10 373.33 D= 127.59
Kc= 1066.67 Kc= 1066.67 Kc= 1066.67
Kbar= 0.21 Kbar= 0.56 Kbar= 0.35
a= 0.32 a= 0.41 a= 0.36 1167.95
Footing D= 341.41 D= 440.72 D= 385.82

//////////////////// //////////////////// ////////////////////

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 156


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

D value determination

Along Axis 4-4 and 5-5


Roof 261.63 86.54
Kc= 281.25 Kc= 476.39 Kc= 476.39
Kbar= 0.93 Kbar= 0.73 Kbar= 0.30 Diy
a= 0.32 a= 0.27 a= 0.13 278.87
Access R D= 89.29 261.63 D= 127.49 86.54 D= 62.09 112.50
Kc= 281.25 Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33
Kbar= 1.20 Kbar= 0.56 Kbar= 0.35 Kbar= 0.45
a= 0.38 a= 0.22 a= 0.15 a= 0.18 562.21
4th D= 105.67 415.46 D= 181.56 164.90 D= 123.20 214.38 D= 151.78 415.46
Kc= 281.25 Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33
Kbar= 2.95 Kbar= 0.70 Kbar= 0.46 Kbar= 0.76
a= 0.60 a= 0.26 a= 0.19 a= 0.27 765.98
3rd D= 167.71 415.46 D= 215.23 164.90 D= 154.48 214.38 D= 228.55 415.46
Kc= 281.25 Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33
Kbar= 1.48 Kbar= 0.70 Kbar= 0.46 Kbar= 0.76
a= 0.42 a= 0.26 a= 0.19 a= 0.27 717.74
2nd D= 119.48 415.46 D= 215.23 164.90 D= 154.48 214.38 D= 228.55 415.46
Kc= 281.25 Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33
Kbar= 1.48 Kbar= 0.70 Kbar= 0.46 Kbar= 0.51
a= 0.42 a= 0.26 a= 0.19 a= 0.20 657.60
1st D= 119.48 415.46 D= 215.23 164.90 D= 154.48 214.38 D= 168.40
Kc= 290.32 Kc= 1344.09 Kc= 1344.09 Kc= 1035.95
Kbar= 1.57 Kbar= 0.46 Kbar= 0.28 Kbar= 0.21
a= 0.44 a= 0.19 a= 0.12 a= 0.09 643.72
Ground D= 127.86 498.55 D= 252.53 164.90 D= 166.19 214.38 D= 97.14
Kc= 327.27 Kc= 969.70 Kc= 2119.50 Kc= 969.70
Kbar= 2.09 Kbar= 0.90 Kbar= 0.23 Kbar= 0.30
a= 0.51 a= 0.31 a= 0.10 a= 0.13 814.52
Basement D= 167.16 868.22 D= 301.66 219.87 D= 218.10 373.33 D= 127.59
Kc= 360.00 Kc= 1066.67 Kc= 1066.67 Kc= 1066.67
Kbar= 2.41 Kbar= 1.02 Kbar= 0.56 Kbar= 0.35
a= 0.66 a= 0.50 a= 0.41 a= 0.36 1601.01
D= 237.60 D= 536.88 D= 440.72 D= 385.82

//////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// ////////////////////

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 157


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

D value determination

Along Axis 6-6 and 7-7


Roof 164.90 214.38
Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00
Kbar= 0.71 Kbar= 0.21 Kbar= 0.74  Diy
a= 0.26 a= 0.10 a= 0.27 1407.82
4th 2777.78 D= 588.64 246.15 D= 213.89 320.00 D= 605.28 2777.78
Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00
Kbar= 1.34 Kbar= 0.25 Kbar= 1.38
a= 0.40 a= 0.11 a= 0.41 2073.11
3rd 2777.78 D= 904.29 246.15 D= 251.44 320.00 D= 917.37 2777.78
Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00
Kbar= 1.34 Kbar= 0.25 Kbar= 1.38
a= 0.40 a= 0.11 a= 0.41 2073.11
2nd 2777.78 D= 904.29 246.15 D= 251.44 320.00 D= 917.37 2777.78
Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00 Kc= 2250.00
Kbar= 0.73 Kbar= 0.25 Kbar= 0.76
a= 0.27 a= 0.11 a= 0.28 1470.36
1st D= 599.64 246.15 D= 251.44 320.00 D= 619.27
Kc= 2322.58 Kc= 2322.58 Kc= 1035.95
Kbar= 0.11 Kbar= 0.24 Kbar= 0.31
a= 0.05 a= 0.11 a= 0.13 507.80
Ground D= 116.88 246.15 D= 252.32 320.00 D= 138.59
Kc= 2119.50 Kc= 2119.50 Kc= 1163.64
Kbar= 0.09 Kbar= 0.21 Kbar= 0.23
a= 0.04 a= 0.10 a= 0.10 411.60
Basement D= 88.01 121.15 D= 203.75 214.38 D= 119.84
Kc= 1280.00 Kc= 1280.00 Kc= 1280.00
Kbar= 0.09 Kbar= 0.26 Kbar= 0.17
a= 0.28 a= 0.34 a= 0.31 1188.80
Footing D= 363.38 D= 431.24 D= 394.18

//////////////////// //////////////////// ////////////////////

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 158


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Along Axis C' -C'


Roof slab 93.75
Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33
Kbar= 0.11 Kbar= 0.11  Dix
a= 0.05 a= 0.05 88.76
Access room D= 44.38 93.75 D= 44.38
Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33
Kbar= 0.22 Kbar= 0.22
a= 0.10 a= 0.10 162.62
4th D= 81.31 266.67 D= 81.31
Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33
Kbar= 0.32 Kbar= 0.32
a= 0.14 a= 0.14 229.89
3rd D= 114.94 266.67 D= 114.94
Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33
Kbar= 0.32 Kbar= 0.32
a= 0.14 a= 0.14 229.89
2nd D= 114.94 266.67 D= 114.94
Kc= 833.33 Kc= 833.33
Kbar= 0.32 Kbar= 0.32
a= 0.14 a= 0.14 229.89
1st D= 114.94 266.67 D= 114.94
Kc= 860.22 Kc= 860.22
Kbar= 0.31 Kbar= 0.31
a= 0.13 a= 0.13 230.88
Ground D= 115.44 266.67 D= 115.44
Kc= 1515.15 Kc= 1515.15
Kbar= 0.15 Kbar= 0.15
a= 0.07 a= 0.07 207.42
Basement D= 103.71 178.65 D= 103.71
Kc= 1666.67 Kc= 1666.67
Kbar= 0.11 Kbar= 0.11
a= 0.29 a= 0.29 960.50
Footing D= 480.25 D= 480.25

//////////////////// ////////////////////

Table 5-5 D value determination

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 159


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Center of stiffness is determined as follows

center of stiffness
number of number of
axis along axis along
storey X Y Diy.Xi Dix.yi Diy Dix Xs Ys
Basement 8.00 4.00 212685.26 123588.00 10634.26 21047.26 20.00 5.87
Ground 8.00 4.00 82950.75 27748.30 4144.05 4744.51 20.02 5.85
First 8.00 4.00 104555.67 32610.46 5227.78 5575.35 20.00 5.85
Second 8.00 4.00 188193.70 29068.93 9409.68 4944.61 20.00 5.88
Third 8.00 4.00 241629.94 32366.06 12081.50 5544.09 20.00 5.84
Fourth 8.00 4.00 248995.83 32366.06 12449.79 5544.09 20.00 5.84
access room and8.00
roof 4.00 173911.02 27503.61 8695.55 4709.60 20.00 5.84
slab roof 3.00 2.00 3605.39 3768.52 1201.80 627.09 3.00 6.01

Table 5-6 Center of stifness

computation of eccentricity
No Floor Xs Ys Xm Ym ex ey
1.00 basement 20.00 5.87 19.18 6.28 0.82 -0.41
2.00 ground 20.02 5.85 18.54 6.13 1.47 -0.28
3.00 first 20.00 5.85 20.18 6.29 -0.18 -0.44
4.00 second 20.00 5.88 19.73 6.13 0.27 -0.25
5.00 third 20.00 5.84 19.82 6.12 0.18 -0.29
6.00 fourth 20.00 5.84 20.27 6.22 -0.27 -0.38
7.00 access and roof20.00 5.84 10.84 4.28 9.16 1.56
8.00 slab roof 3.00 6.01 7.47 3.66 -4.47 2.35

eli 0.05Li
elx 0.05(40) 2.00
ely 0.05(16.05) 0.80

Design Eccentricity
No Floor ex ey edx1 edx2 edy1 edy2 edx edy
1.00 basement 0.82 -0.41 2.82 -1.18 0.39 -1.21 2.82 0.39
2.00 ground 1.47 -0.28 3.47 -0.53 0.52 -1.08 3.47 0.52
3.00 first -0.18 -0.44 1.82 -2.18 0.36 -1.24 1.82 0.36
4.00 second 0.27 -0.25 2.27 -1.73 0.55 -1.06 2.27 0.55
5.00 third 0.18 -0.29 2.18 -1.82 0.52 -1.09 2.18 0.52
6.00 fourth -0.27 -0.38 1.73 -2.27 0.42 -1.18 1.73 0.42
7.00 access room and9.16
roof 1.56 11.16 7.16 2.36 0.76 11.16 2.36
8.00 slab roof -4.47 2.35 -2.47 -6.47 3.16 -3.27 -2.47 3.16

Table 5-7 computation of eccentricity

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 160


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

COMPUTATION OF FRAME SHEAR


Force in Y-direction
Axis Floor Diy Diy V Qi (Fix)
1 Basement 1188.802 24.620 2.752
2 Basement 1188.802 24.620 2.752
3 Basement 1188.802 24.620 2.752
4 Basement 1750.726 24.620 4.053
10634.263
5 Basement 1750.726 24.620 4.053
6 Basement 1188.802 24.620 2.752
7 Basement 1188.802 24.620 2.752
8 Basement 1188.802 24.620 2.752
1 Ground 393.785 124.128 11.795
2 Ground 408.697 124.128 12.242
3 Ground 408.697 124.128 12.242
4 Ground 857.945 124.128 25.698
4144.054
5 Ground 857.945 124.128 25.698
6 Ground 411.600 124.128 12.329
7 Ground 411.600 124.128 12.329
8 Ground 393.785 124.128 11.795
1 First 507.801 208.066 20.210
2 First 507.801 208.066 20.210
3 First 507.801 208.066 20.210
4 First 1090.488 208.066 43.401
5227.783
5 First 1090.488 208.066 43.401
6 First 507.801 208.066 20.210
7 First 507.801 208.066 20.210
8 First 507.801 208.066 20.210
1 Second 517.514 311.212 17.116
2 Second 1470.361 311.212 48.630
3 Second 1470.361 311.212 48.630
4 Second 1246.607 311.212 41.230
9409.685
5 Second 1246.607 311.212 41.230
6 Second 1470.361 311.212 48.630
7 Second 1470.361 311.212 48.630
8 Second 517.514 311.212 17.116
1 Third 517.514 406.333 17.405
2 Third 2073.110 406.333 69.724
3 Third 2073.110 406.333 69.724
4 Third 1377.015 406.333 46.313
12081.497
5 Third 1377.015 406.333 46.313
6 Third 2073.110 406.333 69.724
7 Third 2073.110 406.333 69.724
8 Third 517.514 406.333 17.405
1 Fourth 517.514 468.526 19.476
2 Fourth 2073.110 468.526 78.018
3 Fourth 2073.110 468.526 78.018
4 Fourth 1561.162 468.526 58.752
12449.791
5 Fourth 1561.162 468.526 58.752
6 Fourth 2073.110 468.526 78.018
7 Fourth 2073.110 468.526 78.018
8 Fourth 517.514 468.526 19.476
1 Rood and access 438.272 123.785 6.239
2 Rood and access 1407.817 123.785 20.041
3 Rood and access 1407.817 123.785 20.041
4 Rood and access 1093.871 123.785 15.572
8695.551
5 Rood and access 1093.871 123.785 15.572
6 Rood and access 1407.817 123.785 20.041
7 Rood and access 1407.817 123.785 20.041
8 Rood and access 438.272 123.785 6.239

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 161


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

1 Roof slab 38.821


2 Roof slab 38.821
3 Roof slab 38.821
4 Roof slab 600.899 38.821 19.410
1201.797
5 Roof slab 600.899 38.821 19.410
6 Roof slab 38.821
7 Roof slab 38.821
8 Roof slab 38.821

force in X-direction
Axis Floor Dix Dix V Qi (Fiy)
A Basement 6695.58 24.62 7.83
B Basement 6695.58 24.62 7.83
21047.26
C Basement 6695.58 24.62 7.83
C' Basement 960.50 24.62 1.12
A Ground 1522.98 124.13 39.84
B Ground 1499.28 124.13 39.22
4744.51
C Ground 1514.84 124.13 39.63
C' Ground 207.42 124.13 5.43
A First 1762.87 208.07 65.79
B First 1804.53 208.07 67.34
5575.35
C First 1777.07 208.07 66.32
C' First 230.88 208.07 8.62
A Second 1571.58 311.21 98.91
B Second 1571.58 311.21 98.91
4944.61
C Second 1571.58 311.21 98.91
C' Second 229.89 311.21 14.47
A Third 1771.40 406.33 129.83
B Third 1771.40 406.33 129.83
5544.09
C Third 1771.40 406.33 129.83
C' Third 229.89 406.33 16.85
A Fourth 1771.40 468.53 149.70
B Fourth 1771.40 468.53 149.70
5544.09
C Fourth 1771.40 468.53 149.70
C' Fourth 229.89 468.53 19.43
A Roof and access 1504.40 123.79 39.54
B Roof and access 1504.40 123.79 39.54
4709.60
C Roof and access 1504.40 123.79 39.54
C' Roof and access 196.42 123.79 5.16
A Roof slab
B Roof slab 232.87 38.82 14.42
627.09
C Roof slab 232.87 38.82 14.42
C' Roof slab 161.35 38.82 9.99

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 162


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

SHEAR CORRECTION FACTOR


basement floor
Axis Diy Xbar i Diy*(Xbar i)^2 Dix ybar i Dix*(ybar i)^2
1 1188.802 20.000 475520.686
2 1188.802 15.000 267480.386
3 1188.802 9.000 96292.939
4 1750.726 3.000 15756.538
5 1750.726 -3.000 15756.538
6 1188.802 -9.000 96292.939
7 1188.802 -15.000 267480.386
8 1188.802 -20.000 475520.686
A 6695.585 5.872 230860.781
B 6695.585 0.872 5090.391
C 6695.585 -5.628 212083.844
960.502 -7.778 58108.832
sum 1710101.098 sum 506143.848

Jr 2216244.947

Ground Floor
Axis Diy Xbar i Diy*(Xbar i)^2 Dix ybar i Dix*(ybar i)^2
1 393.785 20.017 157778.935
2 408.697 15.017 92163.078
3 408.697 9.017 33228.258
4 857.945 3.017 7808.298
5 857.945 -2.983 7635.194
6 411.600 -8.983 33215.159
7 411.600 -14.983 92402.533
8 393.785 -19.983 157249.255
A 1522.977 5.849 52093.435
B 1499.277 0.849 1079.419
C 1514.842 -5.651 48383.163
207.416 -7.801 12624.031
sum 581480.710 sum 114180.048

Jr 695660.758

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 163


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

First Floor
Axis Diy Xbar i Diy*(Xbar i)^2 Dix ybar i Dix*(ybar i)^2
1 507.801 20.000 203120.455
2 507.801 15.000 114255.256
3 507.801 9.000 41131.892
4 1090.488 3.000 9814.395
5 1090.488 -3.000 9814.395
6 507.801 -9.000 41131.892
7 507.801 -15.000 114255.256
8 507.801 -20.000 203120.455
A 1762.874 5.849 60310.109
B 1804.532 0.849 1300.826
C 1777.068 -5.621 56149.406
230.880 -7.801 14050.217
sum 736643.995 sum 131810.558

Jr 868454.553

Second Floor
Axis Diy Xbar i Diy*(Xbar i)^2 Dix ybar i Dix*(ybar i)^2
1 517.514 20.000 207005.490
2 1470.361 15.000 330831.145
3 1470.361 9.000 119099.212
4 1246.607 3.000 11219.467
5 1246.607 -3.000 11219.467
6 1470.361 -9.000 119099.212
7 1470.361 -15.000 330831.145
8 517.514 -20.000 207005.490
A 1571.576 5.879 54316.141
B 1571.576 0.879 1214.015
C 1571.576 -5.621 49656.527
229.885 -7.771 13882.722
sum 1336310.629 sum 119069.404

Jr 1455380.033

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 164


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Third Floor
Axis Diy Xbar i Diy*(Xbar i)^2 Dix ybar i Dix*(ybar i)^2
1.000 517.514 20.000 207005.490
2.000 2073.110 15.000 466449.738
3.000 2073.110 9.000 167921.906
4.000 1377.015 3.000 12393.134
5.000 1377.015 -3.000 12393.134
6.000 2073.110 -9.000 167921.906
7.000 2073.110 -15.000 466449.738
8.000 517.514 -20.000 207005.490
A 1771.402 5.838 60372.073
B 1771.402 0.838 1243.775
C 1771.402 -5.662 56789.248
229.885 -7.812 14029.494
sum 1707540.536 sum 132434.590

Jr 1839975.126

Fourth Floor
Axis Diy Xbar i Diy*(Xbar i)^2 Dix ybar i Dix*(ybar i)^2
1.000 517.514 20.000 207005.490
2.000 2073.110 15.000 466449.738
3.000 2073.110 9.000 167921.906
4.000 1561.162 3.000 14050.459
5.000 1561.162 -3.000 14050.459
6.000 2073.110 -9.000 167921.906
7.000 2073.110 -15.000 466449.738
8.000 517.514 -20.000 207005.490
A 1771.402 5.838 60372.073
B 1771.402 0.838 1243.775
C 1771.402 -5.662 56789.248
C' 229.885 -7.812 14029.494
sum 1710855.185 sum 132434.590

Jr 1843289.775

Access Room and Roof


Axis Diy Xbar i Diy*(Xbar i)^2 Dix ybar i Dix*(ybar i)^2
1.000 438.272 20.000 175308.620
2.000 1407.817 15.000 316758.745
3.000 1407.817 9.000 114033.148
4.000 1093.871 3.000 9844.835
5.000 1093.871 -3.000 9844.835
6.000 1407.817 -9.000 114033.148
7.000 1407.817 -15.000 316758.745
8.000 438.272 -20.000 175308.620
A 1504.396 5.840 51306.552
B 1504.396 0.840 1061.248
C 1504.396 -5.660 48195.925
C' 196.416 -7.810 11980.934
sum 1231890.697 sum 112544.659

Adama Science &Technology University


Jr (ASTU) 1344435.356 165
Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Slab Roof
Axis Diy Xbar i Diy*(Xbar i)^2 Dix ybar i Dix*(ybar i)^2
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000 600.899 3.000 5408.088
5.000 600.899 -3.000 5408.088
6.000
7.000
8.000
A
B 232.868 6.010 8410.008
C 232.868 -0.490 56.010
C' 161.351 -2.640 1124.920
sum 10816.176 sum 9590.938

Jr 20407.113

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 166


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

SHEAR CORRECTION FOR TORSION


CORRECTION IN Y-DIRECTION

Basement Floor
Axis Qi X bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
1 2.752 20.000 1.030 0.987 1.030 2.836
2 2.752 15.000 1.023 0.990 1.023 2.815
3 2.752 9.000 1.014 0.994 1.014 2.790
4 4.053 3.000 1.007 0.997 1.007 4.080
5 4.053 -3.000 0.993 1.003 1.003 4.065
6 2.752 -9.000 0.986 1.006 1.006 2.768
7 2.752 -15.000 0.977 1.010 1.010 2.778
8 2.752 -20.000 0.970 1.013 1.013 2.787

Ground Floor
Axis Qi X bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
1 11.795 20.017 1.039 0.994 1.039 12.259
2 12.242 15.017 1.031 0.995 1.031 12.617
3 12.242 9.017 1.018 0.997 1.018 12.467
4 25.698 3.017 1.013 0.998 1.013 26.030
5 25.698 -2.983 0.987 1.002 1.002 25.748
6 12.329 -8.983 0.982 1.003 1.003 12.363
7 12.329 -14.983 0.969 1.005 1.005 12.386
8 11.795 -19.983 0.961 1.006 1.006 11.865

First floor
Axis Qi X bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
1 20.210 20.000 1.021 0.974 1.021 20.640
2 20.210 15.000 1.016 0.981 1.016 20.532
3 20.210 9.000 1.010 0.989 1.010 20.404
4 43.401 3.000 1.007 0.992 1.007 43.698
5 43.401 -3.000 0.993 1.008 1.008 43.759
6 20.210 -9.000 0.990 1.011 1.011 20.443
7 20.210 -15.000 0.984 1.019 1.019 20.598
8 20.210 -20.000 0.979 1.026 1.026 20.727

Second Floor
Axis Qi X bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
1 22.983 20.000 1.022 0.984 1.022 23.480
2 38.630 15.000 1.027 0.979 1.027 39.684
3 38.630 9.000 1.016 0.988 1.016 39.262
4 55.362 3.000 1.008 0.994 1.008 55.795
5 55.362 -3.000 0.992 1.006 1.006 55.691
6 38.630 -9.000 0.984 1.012 1.012 39.110
7 38.630 -15.000 0.973 1.021 1.021 39.430
8 22.983 -20.000 0.978 1.016 1.016 23.360

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 167


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Third Floor
Axis Qi X bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
1 24.853 20.000 1.018 0.985 1.018 25.291
2 56.093 15.000 1.030 0.975 1.030 57.769
3 56.093 9.000 1.018 0.985 1.018 57.099
4 66.128 3.000 1.007 0.994 1.007 66.594
5 66.128 -3.000 0.993 1.006 1.006 66.518
6 56.093 -9.000 0.982 1.015 1.015 56.933
7 56.093 -15.000 0.970 1.025 1.025 57.492
8 24.853 -20.000 0.982 1.015 1.015 25.219

Fourth Floor
Axis Qi X bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
1 27.461 20.000 1.014 0.982 1.014 27.844
2 61.980 15.000 1.024 0.969 1.024 63.443
3 61.980 9.000 1.014 0.981 1.014 62.858
4 82.841 3.000 1.006 0.992 1.006 83.364
5 82.841 -3.000 0.994 1.008 1.008 83.530
6 61.980 -9.000 0.986 1.019 1.019 63.137
7 61.980 -15.000 0.976 1.031 1.031 63.908
8 27.461 -20.000 0.986 1.018 1.018 27.966

Access room and roof


Axis Qi X bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
1 8.099 20.000 1.096 1.062 1.096 8.875
2 16.331 15.000 1.145 1.093 1.145 18.699
3 16.331 9.000 1.087 1.056 1.087 17.752
4 21.132 3.000 1.038 1.024 1.038 21.925
5 21.132 -3.000 0.962 0.976 0.976 20.623
6 16.331 -9.000 0.913 0.944 0.944 15.420
7 16.331 -15.000 0.855 0.907 0.907 14.812
8 8.099 -20.000 0.904 0.938 0.938 7.601

slab roof
Axis Qi X bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
1
2
3
4 19.410 3.000 0.788 0.445 0.788 15.302
5 19.410 -3.000 1.212 1.555 1.555 30.177
6
7
8

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 168


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CORRECTION IN X-DIRECTION

Basement Floor
Axis Qi y bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
A 7.832 5.872 1.007 0.979 1.007 7.887
B 7.832 0.872 1.001 0.997 1.001 7.840
C 7.832 -5.628 0.993 1.021 1.021 7.993
C' 1.124 -7.778 0.999 1.004 1.004 1.128

Ground Floor
Axis Qi y bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
A 39.845 5.849 1.007 0.986 1.007 40.111
B 39.225 0.849 1.001 0.998 1.001 39.262
C 39.632 -5.651 0.994 1.013 1.013 40.160
C' 5.427 -7.778 0.999 1.003 1.003 5.440

First Floor
Axis Qi y bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
A 65.788 5.849 1.004 0.985 1.004 66.073
B 67.343 0.849 1.001 0.998 1.001 67.386
C 66.318 -5.621 0.996 1.014 1.014 67.265
C' 8.616 -7.801 0.999 1.003 1.003 8.638

Second Floor
Axis Qi y bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
A 98.914 5.879 1.005 0.991 1.005 99.375
B 98.914 0.879 1.001 0.999 1.001 98.983
C 98.914 -5.621 0.996 1.009 1.009 99.762
C' 14.469 -7.771 0.999 1.002 1.002 14.494

Third Foor
Axis Qi y bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
A 129.430 5.862 1.004 0.992 1.004 129.960
B 129.430 0.862 1.001 0.999 1.001 129.508
C 129.430 -5.638 0.996 1.008 1.008 130.433
C' 18.042 -7.788 0.999 1.001 1.001 18.069

Fourth Floor
Axis Qi y bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
A 149.241 5.862 1.003 0.991 1.003 149.744
B 149.241 0.862 1.000 0.999 1.000 149.315
C 149.241 -5.638 0.997 1.008 1.008 150.495
C' 20.804 -7.788 0.999 1.002 1.002 20.837

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 169


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Access room and roof


Axis Qi y bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
A 39.445 5.859 1.020 1.006 1.020 40.219
B 39.445 0.859 1.003 1.001 1.003 39.558
C 39.445 -5.641 0.981 0.994 0.994 39.202
C' 5.450 -7.791 0.996 0.999 0.999 5.444

Slab Roof
Axis Qi y bar i αi.y1 αi.y2 αiy Fi
A
B 14.365 6.038 1.225 0.769 1.225 17.599
C 14.365 -0.462 0.983 1.018 1.018 14.619
C' 10.091 -2.612 0.932 1.070 1.070 10.800

Table 5-8 Computation of frame shear

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 170


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

D value determination

Along Axis 1-1 and 8-8


Roof 8.88

4th 27.84

3rd 25.29

2nd 23.48

1st 20.64

Ground 12.26

Basement 2.84

Footing

//////////////////// //////////////////// ////////////////////

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 171


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

D value determination

Along Axis 2-2 and 3-3


Roof 18.70

4th 63.44

3rd 57.77

2nd 39.68

1st 20.53

Ground 12.62

Basement 2.81

Footing

//////////////////// //////////////////// ////////////////////

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 172


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

D value determination

Along Axis 4-4 and 5-5


Roof 30.18 93.75 261.63

Access R 21.92

4th 83.36

3rd 66.59

2nd 55.80

1st 43.70

Ground 26.03

Basement 4.08

//////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// ////////////////////

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 173


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

D value determination

Along Axis 6-6 and 7-7


Roof 15.42

4th 63.91

3rd 57.49

2nd 39.43

1st 20.60

Ground 12.39

Basement 2.78

Footing

//////////////////// //////////////////// ////////////////////

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 174


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

D value determination

Along Axis A-A


Roof 40.22

4th 129.96

3rd 129.96

2nd 99.38

1st 66.07

Ground 40.11

Basement 7.89

Footing

//////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// ////////////////

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 175


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

D value determination

Along Axis B-B


Roof 17.60

Access room 39.56

4th 149.31

3rd 129.51

2nd 98.98

1st 67.39

Ground 39.26

Basement 7.84

Footing

//////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// ///////

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 176


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

D value determination

Along Axis C-C


Roof 14.62

Access room 39.20

4th 150.49

3rd 130.43

2nd 99.76

1st 67.26

Ground 40.16

Basement 7.99

Footing

//////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// ////////////////////

Figure 5.1 lateral loads

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 177


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Along Axis C' -C'


Roof slab 10.80

Access room 5.44

4th 20.84

3rd 18.07

2nd 14.49

1st 8.64

Ground 5.44

Basement 1.13

Footing

//////////////////// ////////////////////

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 178


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Analysis out of ETABS v 9.7.0

3D frame analysis is held using ETABS for computation of shear force and moment.

The following load combinations are considered:

Combo 1: 1.3DL + 1.6LL

Combo 2: 0.75(1.3DL + 1.6LL) + EQX

Combo 3: 0.75(1.3DL + 1.6LL) - EQX

Combo 4: 0.75(1.3DL + 1.6LL) + EQY

Combo 5: 0.75(1.3DL + 1.6LL) - EQY

Combo 6: DL+LL

Combo 7: Envelope

Envelope: This Combo maximum is the maximum of all of the maximum values for each
of the included analysis cases. Similarly, the Combo minimum is the minimum of all of
the minimum values for each of the included analysis cases.

For analysis we apply combo 7 to get a combination which has a maximum effect.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 179


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 5.1 3D frame

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 180


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 5.2 Deformed Shape

Figure 5.3 Moment

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 181


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CHAPTER 6

6 BEAM DESIGN

DESIGN FOR FLEXURAL RINFORCEMENT

Fourth floor Beam

Axis B-B

Check for T – section and Γ –section or rectangular beam


span 1 be

150

400
300+5000/10 =800mm

or
300 ½*5000 =2500mm

Therefore, be =800mm

[ √ ]

[ √ ]

=1/2[0.087 ]

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 182


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

=0.0845 OR 0.0026

Therefore, the section is rectangular

300+6000/5 =1500mm

or

½*1500+1/2*5000 =3250mm

Therefore, be =1500mm

[ √ ]

[ √ ]

=1/2[0.087 ]

=0.085 OR 0.00215

Therefore, the section is rectangular

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 183


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

300+6000/5 =1500mm

or

½*1500+1/2*5000 =3250mm

Therefore, be =1500mm

[ √ ]

[ √ ]

=1/2[0.087 ]

=0.0849 OR 0.0021

Therefore, the section is rectangular

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 184


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

300+6000/5 =1500mm

or

½*1500+1/2*5000 =3250mm

Therefore, be =1500mm

[ √ ]

[ √ ]

=1/2[0.087 ]

=0.085OR 0.00185

Therefore, the section is rectangular

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 185


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

300+6000/5 =1500mm

or

½*1500+1/2*5000 =3250mm

Therefore, be =1500mm

[ √ ]

[ √ ]

=1/2[0.087 ]

=0.085 OR 0.00185

Therefore, the section is rectangular

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 186


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

300+6000/5 =1500mm

or

½*1500+1/2*5000 =3250mm

Therefore, be =1500mm

[ √ ]

[ √ ]

=1/2[0.087 ]

=0.085 OR 0.00195

Therefore, the section is rectangular

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 187


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

300+5000/10 =800mm

or

½*5000 =2500mm

Therefore, be =800mm

[ √ ]

[ √ ]

=1/2[0.087 ]

=0.0845 OR 0.0025

Therefore, the section is rectangular

1. Check for Doubly reinforced or singly reinforced

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 188


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Support-A

Md =135.41kN

√ √

---------------------ρ=1.00

Therefore, use 6Ø20mm at the top

Therefore, use 1Ø20mm at the bottom

Span -1

Md =66.05kNm

√ √

ρ=1.00

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 189


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Therefore, use 3Ø20mm at the bottom

Support-B

Md =188.17kNm

√ √

ρ=1.02

Therefore, use 8Ø20mm at the top

Therefore, use 3Ø20mm at the bottom

Span -2

Md =104.02kNm

√ √

ρ=1.00

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 190


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Therefore, use 5Ø20mm at the bottom

Support-C

Md =208.57kNm

√ √

ρ=1.02

Therefore, use 9Ø20mm at the top

Therefore, use 3Ø20mm at the bottom

Span -3

Md =102.36kNm

√ √

ρ=1.00

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 191


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Therefore, use 5Ø20mm at the bottom

Support-D

Md =203.86kNm

√ √

ρ=1.02

Therefore, use 9Ø20mm at the top

Therefore, use 4Ø20mm at the bottom

Span -4

Md =90.14kNm

√ √

ρ=1.00

Therefore, use 4Ø20mm at the bottom

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 192


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Support-E

Md =184.36kNm

√ √

ρ=1.02

Therefore, use 8Ø20mm at the top

Therefore, use 3Ø20mm at the bottom

Span -5

Md =90.28kNm

√ √

ρ=1.00

Therefore, use 4Ø20mm at the bottom

Support-F

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 193


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Md =181.27kNm

√ √

ρ=1.02

Therefore, use 8Ø20mm at the top

Therefore, use 3Ø20mm at the bottom

Span -6

Md =94.41kNm

√ √

ρ=1.00

Therefore, use 4Ø20mm at the bottom

Support-G

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 194


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Md =170.59kNm

√ √

ρ=1.01

Therefore, use 8Ø20mm at the top

Therefore, use 2Ø20mm at the bottom

Span -7

Md =64.11kNm

√ √

ρ=1.00

Therefore, use 3Ø20mm at the bottom

Support-H

Md =134.96kNm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 195


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

√ √

ρ=1.00

Therefore, use 6Ø20mm at the top

Therefore, use 1Ø20mm at the bottom

SHEAR RINFORCEMENT DESIGN

Diagonal compression resistance of concrete

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 196


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Concrete shear strength

Shear reinforcement

Maximum spacing(Smax) ( )

( )

Therefore, Smax = 251.2 250mm

For Span -1

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 197


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Therefore, provide Ø8 C/C 250mm

Location of Vc

For Span -2

Therefore, provide Ø8 C/C 250mm

Location of Vc

For Span -3

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 198


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Therefore, provide Ø8 C/C 250mm

Location of Vc

For Span -4

Therefore, provide Ø8 C/C 250mm

Location of Vc

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 199


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

For Span -5

Therefore, provide Ø8 C/C 250mm

Location of Vc

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 200


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

For Span -6

Therefore, provide Ø8 C/C 250mm

Location of Vc

For S pan -7

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 201


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Therefore, provide Ø8 C/C 250mm

Location of Vc

Design for Inclined stair Beam

1.05 m

1.625 m 1.575 m

Weight on inclined beam =

20.72 KN/m
4.54 KN/m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 202


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

( )

= -27.36-17.25+3.2RB =0

= RB = 13.94KN

= RA =26.88

M max

At V=0, moment is maximum

Therefore,

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 203


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Using , <

Therefore, provide 2Ø12

The rest of beam are designed using Excel Template and are listed below.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 204


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

1 Conrete Steel Constants concrete cover 25 Beam section


fck= 25 Mpa fyk= 300 Mpa m= 28.77 Initial bar 12
fcd= 11.33 Mpa fyd= 260.87 Mpa c1= 0.087 Stirrup 8 350 mm
fctd= 1.197 ρb = 0.0253 Mpa c2= 3002.34
ρmax = 0.019 ρmin = 0.002 d= 311 mm 300 mm
Minimum c/c Spacing 5 m

axis - A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Basement Floor
Length 5 6 6 6 6 6 5
Moment(KN.m) -22.47 10.93 -30.87 15.53 -30.78 15.4 -31.43 15.43 -31.69 15.41 -32.09 16.00 -30.77 2.62 -10.35
ρcalc 0.0031 0.0015 0.0043 0.0021 0.0043 0.0021 0.0044 0.0021 0.0044 0.0021 0.0045 0.0022 0.0043 0.0003 0.0014
ρused 0.0031 0.002 0.0043 0.0021 0.0043 0.0021 0.0044 0.0021 0.0044 0.0021 0.0045 0.0022 0.0043 0.002 0.002
∅ 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12

Asteel 283.65 183 393.45 192.15 393.45 192.15 402.6 192.15 402.6 192.15 411.75 201.3 393.45 183 183
2.51 1.62 3.48 1.70 3.48 1.70 3.56 1.70 3.56 1.70 3.64 1.78 3.48 1.62 1.62
# 3 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 2

Maximum Shear = 31.27 KN Shear capacity of cocrete,Vc


Design Shear k1 = 1.225 Vc = 44.09 KN OK!
k2 = 1.289 Shear reinforcement ∅ c/c
Check for diagonal compression,V RD ∅ Vs = 0.00 KN
VRD = 264.35 KN OK! 8 Smin = 311 mm
Provide ∅ 8 c/c 310
2 Conrete Steel Constants concrete cover 25 Beam section
fck= 25 Mpa fyk= 300 Mpa m= 28.77 Initial bar 14 hf = 200 mm
fcd= 11.33 Mpa fyd= 260.87 Mpa c1= 0.087 Stirrup 8 400 mm
fctd= 1.197 ρb = 0.0253 Mpa c2= 3002.34
ρmax = 0.019 ρmin = 0.002 d= 360 mm 300 mm

axis - A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Ground Floor
Length 5 6 6 6 6 6
Moment(KN.m) -52.00 26.05 -78.44 41.40 -82.64 40.66 -81.46 30.33 -59.98 18.80 -36.58 5.10 -15.40
be 300 1300 300 1500 300 1500 300 1500 300 1500 300 1500 300
ρcalc 0.0055 0.0026 0.0086 0.0043 0.0091 0.0042 0.009 0.0031 0.0064 0.0019 0.0038 0.0005 0.0015
ρused 0.0055 0.0026 0.0086 0.0043 0.0091 0.0042 0.009 0.0031 0.0064 0.002 0.0038 0.002 0.002
0.8 *x 45.58 21.54 71.26 35.63 75.41 34.80 74.58 25.69 53.03 16.57 31.49 16.57 16.57
Section Type Rec Rec Rec Rec Rec Rec Rec Rec Rec Rec Rec Rec Rec
∅ 20 16 20 16 20 20 20 16 20 14 14 14 14

Asteel 572.55 273.78 895.26 452.79 947.31 437.22 936.9 326.43 666.24 211.8 402.42 211.8 211.8
1.82 1.36 2.85 2.25 3.02 1.39 2.98 1.62 2.12 1.38 2.61 1.38 1.38
# 2 2 3 3 4 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2

Maximum Shear = 76.57 KN Check for diagonal compression,V RD


Design Shear k1 = 1.455 VRD = 306.00 KN OK!
k2 = 1.240
Shear capacity of cocrete,Vc
Vc = 58.31 KN Failure
Shear reinforcement Vs = 18.26 KN
∅= 8 Smin = 200 mm ∅8 c/c 200

The rest of beam calculation is attached in the annex

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 205


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CHAPTER SEVEN

7 COLUMN DESIGN

Columns are upright members which carry the loads from beams and slabs dawn to the
foundation and therefore they are primary compression members, although they may
also have to resist bending forces due to some eccentricity or due to the continuity of
the structure.

For the purpose of design calculations, structural members may be classified as Sway
or Non-sway depending on their sensitivity to second order effect due to lateral
displacements.

According to EBCS 2 1995 section 4.4.4.2

1. A frame may be classified as non-sway if its response to in-plane horizontal


forces is sufficiently stiff for it to be acceptably accurate to neglect any additional
internal forces or moments arising from horizontal displacements of its nodes.
2. Any other frame shall be classified as a sway frame and the effects of horizontal
displacements of it nodes shall be taken in to account in its design
3. A frame may be classified as non-way for a given load case if the critical load
ratio Nsd/Ncr for that load case satisfies the criterion:
Nsd/Ncr ≤0.1
Where Nsd is design value of the total vertical load
Ncr is its critical value for failure in a sway mode
4. Beam and column type plane frames in building structures with beams
connecting each column at each story level may be classified as non-sway for a
given load case, when first- order theory is used, the horizontal displacements in
each story due to the design loads (both horizontal and vertical), plus the initial
sway imperfection satisfy the criterion of the following equation.

Where: is the horizontal displacement at the top of story, relative to the bottom of
the story

L is the story height

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 206


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

H is the total horizontal reaction at the bottom of the story

N is the total vertical reaction at the bottom of the story

DESING PROCEDURE

1. To design a column in a particular frame first the frame is classified weather it is


sway or non-sway.
2. To determine the nature of the frame we substitute the beams and columns by
one substitute frame.
3. The value of the axial force on each substitute frame column is obtained by
adding the axial load each column for the story including self-weight.
4. The value of the stiffness coefficients of the substitute frame is given by
For beam = 2*Kbi
For column =Kci
Where: Kbi = stiffness coefficient of beam
Kci = stiffness coefficient of column
5. The effective length of the substitute frame is computed for each story assuming
as sway frame as shown below.

The effective length buckling L e of a column in a given plane is obtained from the
following approximate equation provided that certain restriction is compiled with.

a. Non-sway mode

Le/L = (αm + 0.4) / (αm + 0.8) ≥ 0.7

b. Sway mode

Le/L = √ ≥ 1.15

Where αm of a stiffness coefficient which will be discussed using the following


theoretical model

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 207


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Where Kc1 and Kc2 are column stiffness coefficients (EI/L)

Kc is the stiffness coefficient of the column being designed

α = 1.0 if opposite end elastically or rigidly restrained

α = 0.5 if opposite ends are free to rotate

α = 0 for cantilever beam

The above approximate equation for effective length calculation is applicable for values
of α1 and α2 not exceeding 10.

If a base shear is designed to resist the column moment may be taken as 1.0

6. The dimension of the substitute column is computed to find the moment of inertia
of the section (Ic)
7. The amount of reinforcement required by the substitute column is computed and
the moment of inertia of the reinforcement with respect to the centroid of the
concrete section is determined.
The first order moment, Mdl, at critical section of the substitute may be
determined using:
Mdl =

Where: H = the total horizontal reaction at the bottom of the story

L = the story shear

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 208


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

8. The buckling load of a story may be assumed to be equal to that of the substitute
Beam-column frame and may be determined as:

Ncr =

Where: EIe is the effective stiffness of the substitute column designed


Le is the effective length

For more accurate determination, the effective stiffness of a column may be taken as:

EIe = 0.2EcIc + EsIs

Where: Ec = 1100fcd

Es is the modulus of elasticity of steel

Ic, Is are the moment of inertia of the concrete and reinforcement sections,
respectively of the substitute column, with respect to the centroid of the concrete
section.

According to EBCS 2, 1995 section 4.4.12 a substitute frame may be assumed to be


equal to that of the substitute beam and column frame. The equivalent column
dimensions of the substitute column may be taken as shown below in the figure.
Circular columns may be replaced by square columns of the same cross sectional area.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 209


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Slenderness

 = Le/i

Where Le = effective buckling length

i = radius of gyration of the gross concrete section in the plane of buckling.

i = I/A

LIMITS OF SLENDERNESS

According to EBCS 2 1995 section 4.4.6

1. the slenderness ratio of concrete column shall not exceed 140


2. the second order effects in compressive members need not be taken in t account
in the following cases:

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 210


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

a. for sway frames, the greater of


 ≤ 25

≤ Where d= Nsd / fcdAc


b. for non-sway frames


 ≤ 50-25

Where: M1 and M2 are the first order (calculated) moments at the ends, M2 being
always positive and greater in magnitude than M1, and M1 being positive if member is
bent in single curvature and negative if bent is double curvature

- For this particular design we select 2 types of columns for design 1 from edge
and one from middle, designated as C19 and C10 in the architectural drawing.

The folowing dimensions are safe in the analyisi using ETABS Nonlinear v9.7.0

Floor column Dimension (mm)

Footing and Basement 400*500

Ground, First and second 400*400

Third and fourth 300*300

Circular 500

Stair column 300*300 and 350*350

Columns at the intersection of Axis-1 and Axis-C and the intersection of Axis-2 and
Axis-B has been selected for design.

CALCULATION

7.1 Determination of Sway or Non-sway condition of substitute frame

Axis 1 and Axis 2 Dimensions of frame elements

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 211


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Basement Beam Slab Beam TT Beam column 2

0.3
0.35 Ib= 0.00107 0.4 Ib= 0.0016 0.25 Ib= 0.000326 Ic= 0.000675

0.25
0.3
0.3 0.3

Column 40*50 Column 1 Column 3 column 2

Ic= 0.00416667 Ic= 0.002133333 0.3 Ic= 0.000675


0.5 0.4
Ic= 0.01

0.3
0.4 0.4
D= 0.6

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 212


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Axis 1

0 0 0

Acceses 0

0
Ac= 0 5.01E-05 6.5104E-05 0.000230369
0.00021

0.00021

0.00021

0.00063
4th

Ac= 0.27 0 0.000246 0.00032 0 0.001132308


0.0002

0.0002

0.0002

0.0006
3rd

Ac= 0.27 0 0.000246 0.00032 0 0.001132308


0.0021

0.0021

0.0021

0.0064
nd
2

Ac= 0.48 0 0.000246 0.00032 0 0.001132308


0.0021

0.0021

0.0021

1st 0.0064

Ac= 0.48 0.000246 0.00032 0.001132308

Ground
0

Ac= 0.6826 0.000246 0.00032 0.001132308


0.0014

0.0014

0.0014

0.0042

Basemen

Ac= 0.6 0.000165 0.00021438 0.000758558


0.0021

0.0021

0.0021

0.0063

Found. Found.
1
Ac= 0.6

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 213


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Axis alond Y-Y


Level α1 α2 αm H L Le Nsd HL Mdl v μ ω
Foundation 27.46 0.01 13.74 121.23 2.00 6.93 3,798.86 242.46 21.82 0.56 0.0041 min
Basement 57.13 27.46 42.29 118.39 3.00 17.71 3,579.42 355.17 119.44 0.53 0.0227 min
Ground 61.07 57.13 59.10 106.13 3.20 22.23 2,881.49 339.62 164.41 0.37 0.0257 min
1st 22.61 61.07 41.84 85.49 3.20 18.79 2,150.52 273.57 195.45 0.40 0.0519 min
nd
2 12.42 22.61 17.52 62.01 3.20 12.40 1,441.55 198.43 123.85 0.27 0.0329 min
rd
3 2.24 12.42 7.33 36.72 3.20 8.38 832.55 117.50 87.72 0.27 0.0233 min
th
4 5.49 2.24 3.86 8.88 3.20 6.47 150.22 28.42 10.84 0.05 0.0068 min
Roof 0.00 5.49 2.75 0.00 3.00 5.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000 min

As Φ Is Ic EIe Ncr Nsd/Ncr Condition


4800.00 11Φ24 6.13E-05 4.17E-03 2.26E+04 4,654.38 0.82 Sway
4800.00 11 Φ24 6.13E-05 4.17E-03 2.26E+04 712.09 5.03 Sway
5460.80 12 Φ24 6.88E-05 4.17E-03 2.41E+04 481.36 5.99 Sway
3840.00 13 Φ20 4.77E-05 2.13E-03 1.49E+04 415.05 5.18 Sway
3840.00 13 Φ20 6.87E-05 2.13E-03 1.90E+04 1,221.75 1.18 Sway
2160.00 7Φ20 8.48E-05 6.75E-04 1.86E+04 2,616.30 0.32 Sway
2160.00 7Φ20 8.48E-05 6.75E-04 1.86E+04 4,388.27 0.03 Non sway
0.00 0.00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00 0.00 Non sway

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 214


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Axis 2:

0 0 0

Acceses
0

0
Ac= 0 5.01E-05 0.000326 0.000751
0.000211

0.000211

0.000211

0.000633
th
4

Ac= 0.27 0.000821 0.000246 0.00032 0.000821 0.004414


0.0002109

0.0002109

0.0002109

0.0006328
3rd

Ac= 0.27 0.000821 0.000246 0.00032 0.000821 0.004414


0.0013021

0.0013021

0.0013021

0.0039063
2nd

Ac= 0.48 0.000821 0.000246 0.00032 0.000821 0.004414


0.00130208

0.00130208

0.00130208

0.00390625
1st

Ac= 0.48 0.000246 0.00032 0.001132


0.0130208

0.0130208

0.0280287
0.001987

Ground

Ac= 0.683 0.000246 0.00032 0.001132


0.00138889

0.00138889

0.00489728
0.0021195

Basemen

Ac= 0.683 0.000165 0.000214 0.000759


0.0021

0.0021

0.0021

0.0063

Found.
1
Ac= 0.6

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 215


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Level α1 α2 αm H L Le Nsd HL Mdl v μ ω


Foundation 29.39 0.01 14.70 215.55 2.00 7.14 8,344.87 431.10 36.68 1.23 0.0070 min
Basement 58.16 29.39 43.77 212.74 3.00 18.00 8,163.22 638.22 220.98 1.06 0.0346 min
Ground 56.41 58.16 57.28 200.12 3.20 21.90 6,592.71 640.38 324.84 0.85 0.0508 min
1st 3.54 56.41 29.97 179.59 3.20 15.99 4,918.63 574.69 517.70 0.90 0.1374 min
nd
2 2.06 3.54 2.80 139.91 3.20 5.76 3,477.88 447.71 252.49 0.64 0.0670 min
rd
3 0.57 2.06 1.31 82.14 3.20 4.58 1,937.18 262.85 154.01 0.63 0.0409 min
th
4 1.68 0.57 1.13 18.70 3.20 4.41 152.65 59.84 25.89 0.05 0.0163 min
Roof 0.00 1.68 0.84 0.00 3.00 3.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000 min

As Φ Is Ic EIe Ncr Nsd/Ncr Condition


4800.00 11 Φ24 6.13E-05 4.17E-03 2.26E+04 4,373.35 1.91 Sway
4800.00 11 Φ24 6.13E-05 4.17E-03 2.27E+04 688.96 11.85 Sway
5460.80 12 Φ24 6.13E-05 4.17E-03 2.26E+04 465.64 14.16 Sway
3840.00 9 Φ24 6.86E-05 2.13E-03 1.90E+04 733.59 6.70 Sway
3840.00 9 Φ24 6.86E-05 2.13E-03 1.90E+04 5,658.33 0.61 Sway
2160.00 7 Φ20 8.05E-05 6.75E-04 1.78E+04 8,339.49 0.23 Sway
2160.00 7 Φ20 8.05E-05 6.75E-04 1.78E+04 8,990.95 0.02 Non Sway
0.00 0.00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00 0.00 Non Sway

Axis B and Axis C Dimensions of frame elements

column 40*50 column 1 column 3 column 2

0.5 Ic = 0.003 0.4 Ic= 0.0021 Ic = 0.006359 0.3 Ic= 0.000675

0.6 0.3
0.4 0.4

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 216


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Basement Beam Slab beam TTB

0.35 Ib= 0.0011 0.4 Ib= 0 Ib= 0.0003


0.25

0.3 0.3 0.25

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 217


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

AXIS B-B

5E-05 0

0.00023

0.00023

0.00045
AC C ES S

Ac= 0.4 6.5E-05 5E-05 5.4E-05 5E-05 5.43E-05 5.43E-05 6.51E-05 0


0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.0016875
4th

Ac= 1.6 0.00032 0.0003 0.00027 3E-04 0.000267 0.000267 0.00032 0


0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.0016875
3rd

Ac= 1.6 0.00032 0.0003 0.00027 3E-04 0.000267 0.000267 0.00032 0


0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.005333
2n d

Ac= 1.92 0.00032 0.0003 0.00027 3E-04 0.000267 0.000267 0.00032 0


0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.005333
1st

Ac= 1.92 0.00032 0.0003 0.00027 3E-04 0.000267 0.000267 0.00032 0


0.0008333

0.0008333

0.0008333

0.0008333

0.0008333

0.0008333

0.0008333

0.0008333

0.0066667
GRO UND

Ac= 1.92 0.00032 0.0003 0.00027 3E-04 0.000267 0.000267 0.00032 0


0.00088889

0.00088889

0.01449478
0.0021195

0.0021195

0.0021195

0.0021195

0.0021195

0.0021195
BAS EMENT

Ac= 1.92 0.00021 0.0002 0.00018 2E-04 0.000179 0.000179 0.000214 0


0.001333333

0.001333333

0.001333333

0.001333333

0.001333333

0.001333333

0.001333333

0.001333333

0.010666667
FO UNDATIO N

Ac= 1.92
//////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// ////////////////////

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 218


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

AXIS B
Level α1 α2 αm H L Le Nsd HL Mdl m w
Foundation 19.03 0.02 9.53 549.45 2.00 5.87 25542.78 1098.90 132.52 0.00 1.17 0.03
Basement 10.72 19.03 14.88 541.61 3.00 10.78 25075.94 1624.83 1001.21 0.03 1.15 0.09
Ground 6.08 10.72 8.40 502.35 3.20 8.89 20852.45 1607.52 967.39 0.03 0.96 min
First 5.41 6.08 5.74 434.96 3.20 7.57 15130.77 1391.87 722.83 0.02 0.70 min
Second 3.56 5.41 4.48 355.98 3.20 6.85 10210.45 1139.14 639.89 0.02 0.47 min
Third 1.71 3.56 2.63 206.47 3.20 5.64 5733.30 660.70 384.52 0.02 0.32 min
Fourth 5.32 1.71 3.52 57.16 3.20 6.25 688.11 182.91 66.10 0.00 0.04 min
Access 8.29 5.32 6.81 17.60 3.00 7.62 176.06 52.80 22.40 0.01 0.04 min

As  Is Ic Eie Ncr Nsd/Ncr condition


2501.66 8ɸ20 0.00 0.00 15144.04 4329.55 5.90 Sway
7504.98 17ɸ24 0.00 0.00 18920.73 1606.47 15.61 Sway
12800.00 28ɸ24 0.00 0.00 18956.54 2363.71 8.82 Sway
10240.00 23ɸ24 0.00 0.00 19075.41 3282.95 4.61 Sway
10240.00 23ɸ24 0.00 0.00 19075.41 4005.58 2.55 Sway
5760.00 13ɸ24 0.00 0.00 24878.27 7709.06 0.74 Sway
5760.00 13ɸ24 0.00 0.00 24878.27 6280.95 0.11 Sway
1440.00 6ɸ20 0.00 0.00 17770.58 3019.49 0.06 Non sway

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 219


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

AXIS C-C

5.43E-05

0.00023

0.00023
AC C ES S

Ac= 0.4 6.51E-05 5.43E-05 5.43E-05 5.43E-05 5.4E-05 5.43E-05 6.51E-05


0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094
4th

Ac= 1.6 0.00032 0.000267 0.000267 0.000267 0.00027 0.000267 0.00032


0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094

0.00021094
3rd

Ac= 1.6 0.00032 0.000267 0.000267 0.000267 0.00027 0.000267 0.00032


0.0006667

0.0006667

0.0006667

0.0006667

0.0006667

0.0006667

0.0006667

0.0006667
2n d

Ac= 1.92 0.00032 0.000267 0.000267 0.000267 0.00027 0.000267 0.00032


0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667

0.000667
1s t

Ac= 1.92 0.00032 0.000267 0.000267 0.000267 0.00027 0.000267 0.00032


0.00083333

0.00083333

0.00083333

0.00083333

0.00083333

0.00083333

0.00083333

0.00083333
GRO UND

Ac= 1.92 0.00032 0.000267 0.000267 0.000267 0.00027 0.000267 0.00032


0.00088889

0.00088889

0.00088889

0.00088889

0.00088889

0.00088889
0.0021195

0.0021195
BAS EMENT

Ac= 1.92 0.000214 0.000179 0.000179 0.000179 0.00018 0.000179 0.0002144


0.001333333

0.001333333

0.001333333

0.001333333

0.001333333

0.001333333

0.001333333

0.001333333
FO UNDATIO N

Ac= 1.92
//////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// //////////////////// /////////

Figure 7.1 substitute frame

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 220


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

AXIS C
Level α1 α2 αm H L Le Nsd HL Mdl m w
Foundation 15.31 0.02 7.67 535.29 2.00 5.34 15481.92 1070.58 151.64 0.01 0.71 min
Basement 8.23 15.31 11.77 527.73 3.00 9.68 15027.90 1583.19 981.34 0.03 0.69 min
Ground 6.08 8.23 7.16 487.14 3.20 8.30 12792.35 1558.85 861.86 0.03 0.59 min
First 5.41 6.08 5.74 491.88 3.20 7.57 9919.27 1574.02 817.42 0.03 0.46 min
Second 3.56 5.41 4.48 320.12 3.20 6.85 6758.05 1024.38 575.43 0.02 0.31 min
Third 1.71 3.56 2.63 189.69 3.20 5.64 3833.83 607.01 353.27 0.02 0.21 min
Fourth 5.32 1.71 3.52 39.20 3.20 6.25 374.46 125.44 45.33 0.00 0.02 min

As  Is Ic Eie Ncr Nsd/Ncr condition


12800.00 28ɸ24 0.000062 0.00 18956.54 6551.25 2.36 Sway
12800.00 28ɸ24 0.000062 0.00 18956.54 1993.86 7.54 Sway
12800.00 28ɸ24 0.000062 0.00 18956.54 2714.46 4.71 Sway
10240.00 23ɸ24 0.000069 0.00 19075.41 3282.95 3.02 Sway
10240.00 23ɸ24 0.000069 0.00 19075.41 4005.58 1.69 Sway
5760.00 18ɸ20 0.000081 0.00 17789.42 5512.43 0.70 Sway
5760.00 18ɸ20 0.000116 0.00 24894.55 6285.06 0.06 Non Sway

Table 7-1 sway frame

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 221


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Column on Axis 1-C


X -direction
Level Nsd v L α1 α2 αm Le i λ λ < Max(15/Sqr v,25) Condition
Foundation 1079.9 0.48 2.00 9.12 0.00 4.56 4.31 0.1154701 37.35 25.00 Slender
Basement 1006.77 0.44 3.00 4.86 9.12 6.99 7.70 0.1154701 66.71 25.00 Slender
Ground 802.61 0.35 3.20 4.17 4.86 4.51 6.87 0.1154701 59.51 25.20 Slender
1st 380.7 0.21 3.20 4.17 4.17 4.17 6.66 0.2886751 23.08 32.73 Non slender
nd
2 271.37 0.15 3.20 2.74 4.17 3.45 6.21 0.1154701 53.76 38.77 Slender
rd
3 152.18 0.15 3.20 1.32 2.74 2.03 5.18 0.2886751 17.96 38.83 Non slender
th
4 31.84 0.03 3.20 3.24 1.32 2.28 5.38 0.0866025 62.09 84.89 Non slender
Y -direction
Level Nsd v L α1 α2 αm Le i λ λ < Max(15/Sqr γ,25) Condition
Foundation 1079.9 0.48 2.00 18.53 0.00 9.27 5.80 0.1154701 50.24 25.00 Slender
Basement 1006.77 0.44 3.00 8.35 18.53 13.44 10.28 0.1154701 89.07 25.00 Slender
Ground 802.61 0.35 3.20 5.42 8.35 6.88 8.16 0.1154701 70.69 25.20 Slender
1st 380.7 0.21 3.20 5.42 5.42 5.42 7.39 0.2886751 25.60 32.73 Non slender
nd
2 271.37 0.15 3.20 3.57 5.42 4.49 6.86 0.1154701 59.39 38.77 Slender
rd
3 152.18 0.15 3.20 1.71 3.57 2.64 5.64 0.2886751 19.55 38.83 Non slender
th
4 31.84 0.03 3.20 4.21 1.71 2.96 5.87 0.0866025 67.84 84.89 Non slender
7.2 Determine Slenderness of a column

Column on Axis 2-B


X-Direction
Level Nsd n L α1 α2 αm Le i l=sqrt(Le/I) l=15/sqrtn l<Max(15/Sqrt.n) , 25) condition
Foundation 3836.37 1.69 2.00 5.16 1.00 3.08 3.72 0.07 50.96 11.53 50.96 Non-slender
Basement 3792.97 1.18 3.00 5.08 5.16 5.12 6.77 0.07 101.57 13.78 101.57 Non-slender
Ground 2975.08 1.31 3.20 4.69 5.08 4.88 7.09 0.10 71.12 13.09 71.12 Non-slender
First 1553.92 0.86 3.20 2.36 4.69 3.52 6.25 0.06 96.85 16.20 96.85 Non-slender
Second 1098.68 0.61 3.20 1.55 2.36 1.95 5.12 0.06 79.35 19.27 79.35 Non-slender
Third 616.85 0.60 3.20 0.75 1.55 1.15 4.43 0.05 91.54 19.29 91.54 Non-slender
Fourth 40.27 0.04 3.20 0.88 0.75 0.81 4.11 0.05 84.94 75.48 84.94 Non-slender

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 222


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Y-Direction
Level Nsd n L α1 α2 αm Le i l=sqrt(Le/I) l=15/sqrtn l<Max(15/Sqrt.n) , 25) condition
Foundation 3836.37 1.69 2.00 7.77 1.00 4.39 4.25 0.07 58.16 11.53 58.16 Non-Slender
Basement 3792.97 1.18 3.00 5.75 7.77 6.76 7.60 0.07 113.94 13.78 113.94 Non-Slender
Ground 2975.08 1.31 3.20 4.52 5.75 5.14 7.23 0.10 72.58 13.09 72.58 Non-Slender
First 1553.92 0.86 3.20 2.27 4.52 3.40 6.17 0.06 95.60 16.20 95.60 Non-Slender
Second 1098.68 0.61 3.20 1.50 2.27 1.88 5.07 0.06 78.50 19.27 78.50 Non-Slender
Third 616.85 0.60 3.20 0.72 1.50 1.11 4.39 0.05 90.77 19.29 90.77 Non-Slender
Fourth 40.27 0.04 3.20 0.85 0.00 0.43 3.71 0.05 76.55 75.48 76.55 Non-Slender

Table 7-2 slender frame

Action Forces and Moments on C-19


Axial load (KN) Moments in Y-Z Moments in X-Z plane
Story Top Bottom Top Bottom
Fourth 45.1 8.84 -10.33 -10.36 29.79
Third 228.23 63.12 -60.27 -70.05 52.51
Second 422.17 45.09 -46.58 -67.81 67.63
First 611.6 62.73 -68.83 -68.56 81.73
Groung 802.61 56.55 -70.02 -63.52 84.69
Basement 1006.99 57.15 -85.06 -61.32 100.86
Foundation 1079.9 34.63 123.3 -61.58 153.13

Action Forces and Moments on C-10


Axial load (KN) Moments in Y-Z Moments in X-Z plane
Story Top Bottom Top Bottom
Fourth 55.6 13.61 -23.65 19.29 -44.88
Third 843.1 36.47 -36.86 65.25 -67.57
Second 1503.48 73.98 -72.86 108.53 -132.45
First 2119.21 80.21 -100.08 118.49 18.52
Groung 2975.08 93.08 53.49 135.86 60.89
Basement 3792.97 114.94 -159.07 97.1 -155.55
Foundation 3836.37 -43.27 117.65 -64.42 156.18

Table 7-3 axial force and moments


7.3 Determination of total eccentricity

According to EBCS 2-1995 section 4.4.10.2 total eccentricity to be used for the design
of columns contains cross section at the critical section is given by:

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 223


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Where:

 eo is equivalent constant first order eccentricity of the design axial load

There are two cases to compute the equivalent eccentricity

1. For first order eccentricity equal at both ends of a column eo


2. For first order moments varying linearly along the length, the equivalent
eccentricity is the higher of the following two values:
{

eo2 and eo1 are first order eccentricity at the ends eo2 being positive and greater in
magnitude than eo1.

 ea is the additional eccentricity allowance to account geometric imperfection

ea = Le/300 ≥ 20mm where Le is the effective length of isolated column.

 e2 is the second-order eccentricity.

For non-sway frames, the second order eccentricity e 2 of an isolated column may be
obtained as:

e2 =

Where: Le is the effective buckling length of the beam



k1 = for 15≤  ≤ 35

k1 = 1.0 for  > 35

1/r is the curvature at the critical section

( ) ( )

Where: d is the column dimension in the buckling plane less the cover to the center of
the longitudinal reinforcement

Md is the deign moment at he critical section including second order effects

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 224


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Mbal is the balanced moment capacity of the column.

For this typical project we select a column found in Axis C-1 and Axis B-2, designated
as C-19 and C-10 on the structural layout.

Analyzed moments:

Column 19

Axial load M 3-3 M 2-2

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 225


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Column 10

Axial load M 3-3 M 2-2

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 226


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Column 19

Determination of Total Ecentricity


X -direction
Level Nsd M1 M2 e01 e02 e0 ea e2 eTot Mx
Foundation 1079.9 -61.58 153.13 -0.06 0.14 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.10 111.14
Basement 1006.99 -61.32 100.86 -0.06 0.10 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.07 72.72
Ground 802.61 -63.52 84.69 -0.08 0.11 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.07 58.79
1st 611.6 -68.56 81.73 -0.11 0.13 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.08 46.27
nd
2 422.17 -67.81 67.63 -0.16 0.16 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.09 39.99
rd
3 288.23 -70.05 52.51 -0.24 0.18 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.09 26.77
th
4 45.1 -10.36 29.79 -0.23 0.66 0.30 0.02 0 0.32 14.63

Y -direction
Level Nsd M1 M2 e01 e02 e0 ea e2 eTot My
Foundation 1079.9 -34.63 123.30 -0.03 0.11 0.06 0.02 0.0385116 0.11 123.31
Basement 1006.99 -57.15 85.06 -0.06 0.08 0.03 0.03 0.0122532 0.08 80.88
Ground 802.61 -56.55 70.02 -0.07 0.09 0.03 0.03 0.0194504 0.08 65.46
1st 611.6 -62.73 68.83 -0.10 0.11 0.05 0.02 0 0.07 42.60
nd
2 422.17 -45.09 46.58 -0.11 0.11 0.04 0.02 0.0275569 0.09 39.92
rd
3 288.23 -60.27 63.12 -0.21 0.22 0.09 0.02 0 0.11 31.01
th
4 45.1 -8.84 10.33 -0.20 0.23 0.09 0.02 0 0.11 5.03

Column 10

X-Direction
Level P M1 M2 e o1 e o2 eo ea e2 etot Mx
Foundation 3836.37 -64.42 156.18 -0.01679 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.04 144.67
Basement 3792.97 -97.10 155.55 -0.03 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.04 147.83
Ground 2975.08 -135.86 159.20 -0.05 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.05 133.98
First 2119.21 -118.49 138.25 -0.06 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.05 99.46
Second 1503.48 -108.53 132.45 -0.07 0.09 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.06 83.05
Third 842.10 -65.25 67.57 -0.08 0.08 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.05 43.87
Fourth 55.60 -19.29 44.88 -0.35 0.81 0.35 0.02 0.00 0.37 20.32

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 227


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Y-Direction
Level P M1 M2 e o1 e o2 eo ea e2 etot My
Foundation 3836.37 -43.27 117.65 -0.01128 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.03 130.01
Basement 3792.97 -114.94 159.07 -0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.04 159.67
Ground 2975.08 -93.08 97.21 -0.03 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.04 110.63
First 2119.21 -80.21 100.08 -0.04 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.04 83.62
Second 1503.48 -72.86 73.98 -0.05 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.04 59.66
Third 842.10 -36.47 36.86 -0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.04 31.59
Fourth 55.60 -13.61 23.65 -0.24 0.43 0.17 0.02 0.00 0.19 10.57

Table 7-4 moment calculation


7.4 Reinforcement Design

Column 19

Level Nsd Mx My v μh μb ω As As min As provided Φ


Foundation 1079.9 111.14 123.31 0.48 0.10 0.14 0.23 1997.8533 1600.00 1997.85 6Φ20
Basement 1006.99 72.72 80.88 0.44 0.06 0.09 min 1600.00 1600.00 1600.00 6Φ20
Ground 802.61 58.79 65.46 0.44 0.08 0.09 0.06 521.18 1600.00 1600.00 6Φ20
1st 611.6 46.27 42.60 0.34 0.06 0.06 0.02 138.98 1280.00 1280.00 5Φ20
nd
2 422.17 39.99 39.92 0.23 0.06 0.06 0.01 69.49 1280.00 1280.00 5Φ20
rd
3 288.23 26.77 31.01 0.28 0.07 0.10 0.11 429.97 720.00 720.00 4Φ16
th
4 45.1 14.63 5.03 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.12 469.06 720.00 720.00 4Φ16

Column 10

Level Nsd Mx My mh mb w As As min As provided ɸ


Foundation 3836.37 144.67 130.01 1.69301 0.13 0.14 0.82 7122.78 1600.00 7122.78 16ɸ24
Basement 3792.97 147.83 159.67 1.18462 0.15 0.17 0.50 4343.16 1600.00 4343.16 10ɸ24
Ground 2975.08 133.98 110.63 1.31292 0.12 0.12 0.75 5211.79 1600.00 5211.79 12ɸ24
First 2119.21 99.46 83.62 1.16903 0.14 0.12 0.79 5489.75 1280.00 5489.75 12ɸ24
Second 1503.48 83.05 59.66 0.82937 0.11 0.08 0.15 1042.36 1280.00 1280.00 4ɸ20
Third 842.10 43.87 31.59 0.82583 0.14 0.10 0.41 1602.63 720.00 1602.63 6ɸ20
Fourth 55.60 20.32 10.57 0.05453 0.07 0.03 0.13 508.15 720.00 720.00 4ɸ20

Table 7-5 Reinforcement Design

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 228


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

7.5 Design of column for shear

Lateral reinforcement determination

Lateral reinforcements are provided to keep in check the shearing effects of loads
applied on the column.

According to EBCS 2 -1995 section 4.5 the critical section for shear is obtained as the
sum of the resistance of the web reinforcement and of the concrete section.

In order to prevent diagonal compression failure in the concrete, the shear resistance
VRd of a section is given by:

VRd = 0.25fcdbwd<Vsd

Where : bw is the minimum width of the web

Vsd is the applied shear force

Column on Axis 1-C

Section A - A

Dimension 40*50

Maximum shear force =62.38KN, it occurs at the foundation column with Nsd
=1006.96KN

VRd = 0.25fcdbwd

= 0.25*11.33*400*500

= 566.5KN >62.38KN

Shear resistance cross section:

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

fctd = 1.03Mpa

K1 = 1 + 50ρ ≤2

ρmin = 0.5/fyk = 0.5/300 = 0.0016

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 229


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

K1 = 1 + 50 ρ

= 1 + (50*0.0016) = 1.08 ≤2 ……………..safe

K2 = 1.6 – d >1 where d is in meter (column width – concrete cover – diameter of


bar/2) = 400-30-12

= 1.6 – 0.358 = 1.242 >1 ………………………….safe

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

= 0.25*1.03*1.08*1.242*400*500

=69.08KN

Additional shear capacity of concrete member subjected to significant axial


compression:

Vcn =

= 100.696KN

Vtot = 69.08 + 100.96

= 169.776KN >62.38KN

Hence nominal shear reinforcement is to be provided

For reinforcing the cross section to resist shear force ties are used as lateral
reinforcement. The diameter of ties shall not be less than 6mm or one quarter of the
longitudinal bars.

The center to center spacing of lateral reinforcement shall not exceed:

- 12 times the minimum diameter of longitudinal bars


- Least dimension of column
- 300mm

ɸ≥6mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 230


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Spacing s ≤ {

Thus provide ɸ10 c/c 285mm

Lap Length

According to EBCS 2 -1995 section 7.1.6.5 the length of lap lo shall be at least equal to :

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

Where: lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

or ≥200mm

The required anchorage length l b,net = alb ≥ lb,min

where: a1 is a function of percentage of the reinforcement lapped at any section.

As, cal = theoretical area of reinforcement required by the design

As, eff = the area of reinforcement actually provided

a =1 straight bar anchorage in tension or compression

= 0.7 for anchorage in tension with the standard hook

lb, min = the min. anchorage length

For bars in tension

lb,min = 0.3lb ≥ 10ɸ or ≥200mm

For bars in compression

lb,min = 0.6lb ≥ 10ɸ or ≥200mm

Basic anchorage length is embedment length required to develop the full design
strength of a straight reinforcing bar.

The basic anchorage length lb for a bar diameter ɸ is:

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 231


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

For good condition the design bond strength of deformed bars may be taken as twice
the value of plain bars:

fbd = 2fctd = 2*1.03 = 2.06MPa

The percentage of lapped bars in compression in any one section may be 100% of the
total steel cross section

Therefore, a1 = 1.4

a = 1 for straight anchorage

= 759.82mm

For bars in compression

lb,min = 0.6lb ≥ 10ɸ or ≥200mm

lb,min = 0.6*759.82 =455.89mm > 240mm

lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

lo,min = 0.3*1*1.4*759.82 = 319.12mm > 360mm

provide lo,min = 360mm

lb,net = alb ≥ lb,min

= 1*759.82*(1600/1884) ≥ lb,min

lb,net = 645.28 >455.89mm

The length of lap, l o

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

lo ≥ 1.4*645.28 = 903.4mm

Provide lap length l o = 900mm

Section C – C

Dimension 40*40

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 232


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Maximum shear force =53.67KN, it occurs at the foundation column with Nsd =611.6KN

VRd = 0.25fcdbwd

= 0.25*11.33*400*400

= 453.2KN >53.67KN

Shear resistance cross section:

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

fctd = 1.03Mpa

K1 = 1 + 50ρ ≤2

ρmin = 0.5/fyk = 0.5/300 = 0.0016

K1 = 1 + 50 ρ

= 1 + (50*0.0016) = 1.08 ≤2 ……………..safe

K2 = 1.6 – d >1 where d is in meter (column width – concrete cover – diameter of


bar/2) = 400-30-12

= 1.6 – 0.358 = 1.242 >1 ………………………….safe

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

= 0.25*1.03*1.08*1.242*400*400

= 55.264KN

Additional shear capacity of concrete member subjected to significant axial


compression:

Vcn =

= 61.16KN

Vtot = 55.264 + 61.16

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 233


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

= 116.424KN >53.67KN

Hence nominal shear reinforcement is to be provided

Spacing s ≤ {

Thus provide ɸ10 c/c 285mm

Lap Length

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

Where: lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

or ≥200mm

The basic anchorage length lb for a bar diameter ɸ is:

For good condition the design bond strength of deformed bars may be taken as twice
the value of plain bars:

fbd = 2fctd = 2*1.03 = 2.06MPa

The percentage of lapped bars in compression in any one section may be 100% of the
total steel cross section

Therefore, a1 = 1.4

a = 1 for straight anchorage

= 759.82mm

For bars in compression

lb,min = 0.6lb ≥ 10ɸ or ≥200mm

lb,min = 0.6*759.82 =455.89mm > 240mm

lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 234


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

lo,min = 0.3*1*1.4*759.82 = 319.12mm > 360mm

provide lo,min = 360mm

lb,net = alb ≥ lb,min

= 1*759.82*(1600/1884) ≥ lb,min

lb,net = 645.28 >455.89mm

The length of lap, l o

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

lo ≥ 1.4*645.28 = 903.4mm

Provide lap length l o = 900mm

Section E – E

Dimension 30*30

Maximum shear force =12.24KN, it occurs at the foundation column with Nsd =45.1KN

VRd = 0.25fcdbwd

= 0.25*11.33*300*300

= 254.9KN >12.24KN

Shear resistance cross section:

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

fctd = 1.03Mpa

K1 = 1 + 50ρ ≤2

ρmin = 0.5/fyk = 0.5/300 = 0.0016

K1 = 1 + 50 ρ

= 1 + (50*0.0016) = 1.08 ≤2 ……………..safe

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 235


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

K2 = 1.6 – d >1 where d is in meter (column width – concrete cover – diameter of


bar/2) = 400-30-12

= 1.6 – 0.358 = 1.242 >1 ………………………….safe

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

= 0.25*1.03*1.08*1.242*300*300

=31.086KN

Additional shear capacity of concrete member subjected to significant axial


compression:

Vcn =

= 4.51KN

Vtot = 31.086+4.51

= 35.6KN >12.24KN

Hence nominal shear reinforcement is to be provided

Spacing s ≤ {

Thus provide ɸ10 c/c 190mm

Lap Length

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

Where: lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

or ≥200mm

The required anchorage length l b,net = alb ≥ lb,min

The basic anchorage length l b for a bar diameter ɸ is:

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 236


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

fbd = 2fctd = 2*1.03 = 2.06MPa

a1 = 1.4

a=1

= 506.54mm

For bars in compression

lb,min = 0.6lb ≥ 10ɸ or ≥200mm

lb,min = 0.6*506.54 =303.92mm > 240mm

lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

lo,min = 0.3*1*1.4*506.54 = 212.75mm > 240mm

provide lo,min = 240mm

lb,net = alb ≥ lb,min

= 1*506.54*(720/803.84) ≥ lb,min

lb,net = 453.71 > 303.92mm

The length of lap, l o

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

lo ≥ 1.4*453.71 = 635.2mm

Provide lap length l o = 630mm

Column on Axis 2-B

Section A - A

Maximum shear force = 105.39KN, it occurs at the basement column with Nsd =
3792.97KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 237


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

VRd = 0.25fcdbwd

= 0.25*11.33*400*500

= 566.5KN >105.39KN

Shear resistance cross section:

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

fctd = 1.03Mpa

K1 = 1 + 50ρ ≤2

ρmin = 0.5/fyk = 0.5/300 = 0.0016

K1 = 1 + 50 ρ

= 1 + (50*0.0016) = 1.08 ≤2 ……………..safe

K2 = 1.6 – d >1 where d is in meter (column width – concrete cover – diameter of


bar/2) = 400-30-12

= 1.6 – 0.358 = 1.242 >1 ………………………….safe

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

= 0.25*1.03*1.08*1.242*400*500

=69.08KN

Additional shear capacity of concrete member subjected to significant axial


compression:

Vcn =

= 100.696KN

Vtot = 69.08 + 100.96

= 169.776KN >62.38KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 238


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Spacing s ≤ {

Thus provide ɸ10 c/c 285mm

Lap Length

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

Where: lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

or ≥200mm

lb,net = alb ≥ lb,min

fbd = 2fctd = 2*1.03 = 2.06MPa

The percentage of lapped bars in compression in any one section may be 100% of the
total steel cross section

Therefore, a1 = 1.4

a = 1 for straight anchorage

= 759.82mm

For bars in compression

lb,min = 0.6lb ≥ 10ɸ or ≥200mm

lb,min = 0.6*759.82 =455.89mm > 240mm

lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

lo,min = 0.3*1*1.4*759.82 = 319.12mm > 360mm

Provide lo,min = 360mm

lb,net = alb ≥ lb,min

= 1*759.82*(4951.2/4521.6) ≥ lb,min

lb,net = 832.01 >455.89mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 239


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

The length of lap, l o

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

lo ≥ 1.4*832.01 = 1164.8mm

Provide lap length lo = 1100mm

Section C – C

Dimension 40*40

Maximum shear force =91.69KN, it occurs at the foundation column with Nsd
=2119.21KN

VRd = 0.25fcdbwd

= 0.25*11.33*400*400

= 453.2KN >91.69KN

Shear resistance cross section:

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

fctd = 1.03Mpa

K1 = 1 + 50ρ ≤2

ρmin = 0.5/fyk = 0.5/300 = 0.0016

K1 = 1 + 50 ρ

= 1 + (50*0.0016) = 1.08 ≤2 ……………..safe

K2 = 1.6 – d >1 where d is in meter (column width – concrete cover – diameter of


bar/2) = 400-30-12

= 1.6 – 0.358 = 1.242 >1 ………………………….safe

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

= 0.25*1.03*1.08*1.242*400*400

=55.264KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 240


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Additional shear capacity of concrete member subjected to significant axial


compression:

Vcn =

= 211.92KN

Vtot = 55.264 + 211.92

= 267.185KN >91.69KN

Hence nominal shear reinforcement is to be provided

Spacing s ≤ {

Thus provide ɸ10 c/c 285mm

Lap Length

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

Where: lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

or ≥200mm

The required anchorage length l b,net = alb ≥ lb,min

The basic anchorage length l b for a bar diameter ɸ is:

fbd = 2fctd = 2*1.03 = 2.06MPa

a1 = 1.4

a=1

= 759.81mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 241


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

For bars in compression

lb,min = 0.6lb ≥ 10ɸ or ≥200mm

lb,min = 0.6*759.81 =455.89mm > 240mm

lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

lo,min = 0.3*1*1.4*759.81= 319.12mm > 240mm

provide lo,min = 319.12mm

lb,net = alb ≥ lb,min

= 1*759.81*(3617.28/3683) ≥ lb,min

lb,net = 746.25 > 455.89mm

The length of lap, l o

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

lo ≥ 1.4*746.25 = 1044.75mm

Provide lap length l o = 1040mm

Section F - F

Dimension: diameter = 500mm

Maximum shear force =105.39KN, it occurs at the foundation column with Nsd
=3792.97KN

VRd = 0.25fcdbwd

= 0.25*11.33*3.14*250*250

= 555.88KN >105.39KN

Shear resistance cross section:

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

fctd = 1.03Mpa

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 242


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

K1 = 1 + 50ρ ≤2

ρmin = 0.5/fyk = 0.5/300 = 0.0016

K1 = 1 + 50 ρ

= 1 + (50*0.0016) = 1.08 ≤2 ……………..safe

K2 = 1.6 – d >1 where d is in meter (column width – concrete cover – diameter of


bar/2) = 400-30-12

= 1.6 – 0.358 = 1.242 >1 ………………………….safe

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

= 0.25*1.03*1.08*1.242*3.14*250*250

=67.8KN

Additional shear capacity of concrete member subjected to significant axial


compression:

Vcn =

= 379.23KN

Vtot = 67.8 + 379.23

= 447.04KN >105.39KN

Hence nominal shear reinforcement is to be provided

Spacing s ≤ {

Thus provide ɸ10 c/c 285mm

Lap Length

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 243


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Where: lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

or ≥200mm

The required anchorage length l b,net = alb ≥ lb,min

The basic anchorage length l b for a bar diameter ɸ is:

fbd = 2fctd = 2*1.03 = 2.06MPa

a1 = 1.4

a=1

= 759.81mm

For bars in compression

lb,min = 0.6lb ≥ 10ɸ or ≥200mm

lb,min = 0.6*759.81 =455.89mm > 240mm

lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

lo,min = 0.3*1*1.4*759.81= 319.12mm > 360mm

provide lo,min = 360mm

lb,net = alb ≥ lb,min

= 1*759.81*(4347.16/4521.6) ≥ lb,min

lb,net = 730.5 > 455.89mm

The length of lap, l o

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

lo ≥ 1.4*730.5 = 1022.7mm

Provide lap length l o = 1020mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 244


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Section D-D

Dimension: diameter = 350mm*350mm

Maximum shear force =193KN, it occurs at the foundation column with Nsd
=1561.87KN

VRd = 0.25fcdbwd

= 0.25*11.33*350*350

= 346.98KN >193KN

Shear resistance cross section:

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

fctd = 1.03Mpa

K1 = 1 + 50ρ ≤2

ρmin = 0.5/fyk = 0.5/300 = 0.0016

K1 = 1 + 50 ρ

= 1 + (50*0.0016) = 1.08 ≤2 ……………..safe

K2 = 1.6 – d >1 where d is in meter (column width – concrete cover – diameter of


bar/2) = 400-30-12

= 1.6 – 0.358 = 1.242 >1 ………………………….safe

Vc = 0.25fctdk1k2bwd

= 0.25*1.03*1.08*1.242*350*350

=42.311KN

Additional shear capacity of concrete member subjected to significant axial


compression:

Vcn =

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 245


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

= 156.19KN

Vtot = 156.19 + 42.311

= 198.5KN >193KN

Hence nominal shear reinforcement is to be provided

Spacing s ≤ {

Thus provide ɸ8 c/c 240mm

Lap Length

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

Where: lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

or ≥200mm

The required anchorage length l b,net = alb ≥ lb,min

The basic anchorage length l b for a bar diameter ɸ is:

fbd = 2fctd = 2*1.03 = 2.06MPa

a1 = 1.4

a=1

= 633.2mm

For bars in compression

lb,min = 0.6lb ≥ 10ɸ or ≥200mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 246


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

lb,min = 0.6*633.2 =379.91mm > 200mm

lo,min = 0.3aa1lb ≥ 15 ɸ

lo,min = 0.3*1*1.4*633.2= 265.95mm > 300mm

provide lo,min = 300mm

lb,net = alb ≥ lb,min

= 1*633.2*(1842.85/1884) ≥ lb,min

lb,net = 619.4> 379.91mm

The length of lap, lo

lo ≥ a1lb,net ≥ lo,min

lo ≥ 1.4*619.4 = 867.1mm

Provide lap length l o = 860mm

The rest of columns are categorized and designed based on their loads and
dimension in the following table:

Section C-C Section D-D


0.4 0.35
0.5 Section A-A 0.5 Section B-B

0.4 0.35
0.4 0.4
Section F-F Section F-F

Section E-E 0.5 0.5


0.3

0.3

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 247


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CATEGORY 1 Lay out CATEGORY 2 Lay out


section no dia ID section no dia ID
footing A 8 24 footing A 8 24
basement A 8 24 basement F 10 20
ground F 10 20 ground F 10 20
first C 8 24 first C 8 24
C1 C2
second C 8 24 second C 8 24
third E 8 16 third E 8 16
fourth E 8 16 fourth E 8 16
roof - - - roof - - -

CATEGORY 3 Lay out CATEGORY 4 Lay out


section no dia ID section no dia ID
footing B 10 24 footing B 10 24
basement G 12 20 basementG 12 20
ground B 10 24 ground C 8 24
first C 8 24 first C 8 24
C3 C4
second C 8 24 second C 8 24
third E 8 16 third E 8 16
fourth E 8 16 fourth E 8 16
roof - - - roof E 8 16

CATEGORY 5 Lay out CATEGORY 6 Lay out


section no dia ID section no dia ID
footing B 10 24 footing A 8 24
basement G 12 20 basementA 8 24
ground B 10 24 ground A 8 24
first C 8 24 first C 8 24
C5 C6
second C 8 24 second C 8 24
third E 8 16 third E 8 16
fourth - - - fourth E 8 16
roof - - - roof - - -

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 248


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CATEGORY 7 Lay out CATEGORY 8 Lay out


section no dia ID section no dia ID
footing D 6 20 footing B 10 24
basement D 6 20 basementB 10 24
ground D 6 20 ground C 8 24
first D 6 20 first C 8 24
C7 C8
second E 8 16 second C 8 24
third E 8 16 third E 8 16
fourth E 8 16 fourth E 8 16
roof E 8 16 roof - - -

CATEGORY 9 Lay out CATEGORY 10 Lay out


section no dia ID section no dia ID
footing A 8 24 footing B 10 24
basement A 8 24 basementC 8 24
ground C 8 24 ground C 8 24
first C 8 24 first C 8 24
C9 C10
second C 8 24 second C 8 24
third E 8 16 third E 8 16
fourth E 8 16 fourth E 8 16
roof - - - roof - - -

CATEGORY 11 Lay out


section no dia ID
footing A 8 24
basement C 8 24
ground C 8 24
first C 8 24
C11
second C 8 24
third E 8 16
fourth E 8 16
roof - - -

Table 7-6 column category

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 249


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

After categorizing the column based on dimension and load the rest of columns are
designed using excel template.

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 250


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Section A-A (Loads <2500KN)


X- Direction

Top L. Top r. Bot L. Bot R. Top


Beam Beam Beam Beam Column Column Bot. Column
b 300 300 300 300 500 500 500
h 400 400 350 350 400 400 400
L 5000 6000 5000 6000 3200 3000 2500
I 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 1.07E+09 1.1E+09 2.7E+09 2666666667 2666666667
K 320000 266667 214375 178646 833333 888888.8889 1066666.67
ac1 2.94
ac2 1.00

Y- Direction
Check for slenderness of the column
top L. top r. L. bot. r. bot. top
beam beam Beam Beam column column bot. Column  Le/i
b 300 0 300 0 400 400 400 i= sqrt(I/A)
h 400 0 350 0 500 500 500 d= P/fcdAc
L 6500 5000 6500 6000 3200 3000 2500
I 1.6E+09 0 1.07E+09 0 4.2E+09 4166666667 4166666667 i= 115.47
K 246154 0 164903.8 0 1302083 1388888.889 1666666.67
ac1 10.93  50.26
ac2 1.00 d= 1.082480141
Consider second order effect
direction column ac1 ac2 acmin L Le=L[1+0.15(ac1+ac2) Le=1.15Le

Thelarger of
X 2.94 1.00 1.00 3 4.69 3.45 15/sqr/( d) 14.42 the two
Y 10.93 1.00 1.00 3 5.80 3.45 25.00

direction column Mu(KN-m) Nu(KN) Le Eo Ei E2 Etot Md(KN-M)


X -5.90 0 4.69 -0.024 0.02 0.03 0.02 55.80 55.80
Y 139.46 2452.9 5.80 0.033 0.02 0.05 0.10 253.15 253.15
2452.9

columnMx(KN-M)My(KN-M) N(KN) mx my n w As(mm2) No of bars provided


55.800 253.154 2452.900 0.04 0.24 0.933 0.43 3282.10 diameter No.
20 11 OR
x y 24 8
eo= -0.036 0.033 Mx My
eo= -0.024 0.023 smaller Larger smaller Larger
eo1= -0.002 -0.004 -5.898 -144.954 -8.75 139.458
eo2= -0.059 0.057
0.4 0.38
0.933 0.43
0.6 0.40

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 251


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Section A-A (Loads >2500KN)


X- Direction

Top L. Top r. Bot L. Bot R. Top Bot.


Beam Beam Beam Beam Column Column Column
b 300 300 300 300 500 500 0
h 400 400 400 350 400 400 0
L 6000 6000 6000 6000 3000 2500 2000
I 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 1.07E+09 2.67E+09 2666666667 0
K 266666.7 266666.7 266666.7 178645.8 888888.9 1066666.667 0
ac1 3.67
ac2 1.00

Y- Direction
Check for slenderness of the column
top L. top r. L. bot. r. bot. top bot.
beam beam Beam Beam column column Column  Le/i
b 300 300 300 300 500 400 0 i= sqrt(I/A)
h 400 400 350 350 400 500 0 d= P/fcdAc
L 5000 6500 5000 6500 3000 2500 2000
I 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 1.07E+09 1.07E+09 2.67E+09 4166666667 0 i= 115.47
K 320000 246153.8 214375 164903.8 888888.9 1666666.667 0
ac1 4.51  36.40
ac2 1.00 d= 1.774417
Consider second order effect
direction column ac1 ac2 acmin L Le=L[1+0.15(ac1+ac2) Le=1.15Le
X 3.67 1.00 1.00 2.5 4.06 2.88 15/sqr/( d) 11.26 The larger of the two
Y 4.51 1.00 1.00 2.5 4.20 2.88 25.00

direction column Mu(KN-m) Nu(KN) Le Eo Ei E2 Etot Md(KN-M)


X 153.88 0 4.06 0.028 0.02 0.02 0.07 272.77 272.77
Y -42.65 4020.83 4.20 -0.011 0.02 0.03 0.03 140.71 140.71
4020.83

column Mx(KN-M) My(KN-M) N(KN) mx my n w As(mm2) No of bars provided


272.766 140.708 4020.830 0.21 0.13 1.530 0.49 3733.96 diameter No.
20 12 OR
x y 24 9
eo= 0.028 -0.021 Mx My
eo= 0.015 -0.011 smaller Larger smaller Larger
eo1= 0.013 -0.011 51.562 153.878 -42.65 -115.592
eo2= 0.038 -0.029
0.4 0.38
1.530 0.49
0.6 0.40

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 252


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CHAPTER EIGHT

8 Design of shear wall

The shear wall acts as vertical cantilever beam fixed at their base carry earthquake
transfer to foundation and in providing lateral support is subjected to both bending and
shear forces.

It is necessary to provide both lateral horizontal and vertical shear reinforcing for shear
walls.

From Dan Techno craft Technical specification, standards lift shaft and car sizes for
center opening electrical traction.

We have selected:-

-capacity of lift = 480 kg

-number of person to accommodate =6

-shaft width= 1700mm

-shaft depth=1700mm

-car width = 1050mm

-clear opening 800x2000

-pit depth =1500mm

Overhead height =3600

Determination lateral and vertical load

Lateral load Determination

Earthquake govern the lateral load for frame system so,

Base shear Determination

fb = Sd (T1) W

where:-

fb = base shear

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 253


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

W= Total weight of the shear wall

Sd (T1) = ordinate of design spectrum at period T1 which is govern by

Sd (T1) = αβ

α = ratio of the design bed rock acceleration to the acceleration of gravity, which is
given by

α = αo I

where :-

αo = the bed rock acceleration ratio for the site and the seismic zone.

αo = 0.1 for zone 4 EBCS-8 , 1995, Table 1.1

I = important factor of the structure.

I = 1.2 ( Building whose seismic resistance is of importance in view of consequence


associated with a collapse ) EBCS -8, 1995, Table 2.4

α = 0.1 * 1.2 = 0.12

β = is the design response factor for the site and is given by

β= 2.5

where

S = site coefficient of soil characteristics

S =1.2 ( for sub soil class B ) EBCS – 8 ,1995 , Table 1.2

T1 = the fundamental period of vibration of the structure (in second ) for translational
motion in the direction of motion.

For building with height up to 80m the value of T 1 is

T1 =C1H3/4 ………….. Eq (2.3 ) EBCS -8 ,1995

Where

T1 = fundamental period of building

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 254


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

H = Height of building above the base in meter

C1 = the value of C1 for structure with concrete or Masonry shear wall


may be

taken as

C1 = 0.075/√

Ac =

Where

Ac = combined effective area of the shear wall in the first story of building in m2

Ai = cross – sectional area of the shear wall i in the first story of the building.

Lwi = length of the shear wall i in the first story in the direction parallel to applied
forces

Lwi/H shall not exceed 0.9

H = height of the shear wall =22m

Lwi/H =2.1/22= 0.09<0.9 . . . ok

 When the lateral force acting in the y-axis


A1= 0.15 *2.1 =0.315m2
A2= 0.15 *1.2= 0.18m2

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 255


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Ac =

Ac= 0.107m2

C1 = 0.075/√ = 0.23

T1 = 0.23 *223/4 =2.34

β= = 0.817 <25

 When the lateral force acting in the x- axis

A1 =A2 = 0.15 * 2.1 = 0.315m2

Ac =

Ac= 0.132

C1 = 0.075/√ = 0.206

T1 = 0.206 *223/4 = 2.093

β= = 0.88 ≤ 2.5

Hence we take maximum β value = 0.88

= is the behavioural factor to account for energy dissipation capacity.

= KD KR Kw 0.7

Where

= basic type of behavior factor, dependent on the structural type ( EBCS -8


,1995 Table 3.2)

= 0.3 ( for core system )

KD = factor reflecting the ductility class

KD = 2 for lower ductility class ….Eq ( 3.3) EBCS -8 ,1995

KR = reflecting the regularity in elevation

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 256


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

KR = 1 for regular structure .. . . . .Eq ( 3.4) EBCS-8,1995

Kw = factor reflecting the prevailing failure mode in the structures system.

Kw = 1.5 for core system

= 0.3 * 2 *1*1.5 = 0.9 0.7

So, we take = 0.7

Therefore , Sd (T1 = αβ = 0.12 *0.88 * 0.7 = 0.074

a) Distribution of horizontal seismic forces

W= seismic DL , obtained as the total permanent load plus 25% of the floor live load. (
by considering the elevator car as a storage occupancies to account the 25% allowance
for live load )

Ft = for T < 0.7

{ 0.07T1 fb 0.25 fb for T > 0.7

Ft = 0.07 * 2.1 * fb

Ft =0.147 fb

fb = Sd (T1) W

= 0.074 W

Level hi Wi Wihi fb – ft fi

Basement 2 54 108 41.25 0.51

Ground floor 5 81 405 41.25 1.91

First floor 8.2 86.4 708.5 41.25 3.33

Second floor 11.4 86.4 984.96 41.25 4.64

Third floor 14.6 86.4 1261.4 41.25 5.94

Fourth floor 17.8 86.4 1537.9 41.25 7.24

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 257


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Roof 21 86.4 1814.4 41.25 8.54

Access 24 81 1944 41.25 9.15

Sum =648 = 8764.16

W= + 25 % LL

= 648 + ( 0.25 * 2.1* 2.1 * 5 )

= 653.5 KN

fb = 0.074*W = 0.074 *653.5 = 48.36 KN

ft = 0.147 fb

ft = 7.11 KN

fi = ( ) Wi hi

8.1 Determination of vertical load

a. Cross beam design


One element of cross beam design

Assume b= 200mm , D= 250mm

ɸlong = 14 mm , ɸtransv =8mm

8.1.1 Depth determination

Minimum depth for deflection


d ≥ [0.4 +0.6*fyk/400] * Le/βa
Le = 2100mm, βa =20 . . . for simply supported beam.
d = 89.25mm
D = 89.25 +ɸ/2 +stirrups +concrete cover
D =124.25mm < 250mm (assumed) . . . ok ,
d= 207mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 258


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

8.1.2 Load calculation

Dead load (distributed load)

Self- weight = 0.2 *0.25 *24KN/m3 = 1.2KN/m2

Point load (PL)

From self- weight of elevated car = 2 * 480kg *10m/s2 =9.6KN

Total DL =1.2KN/m

Total PL =9.6KN

Design load

Pd (DL) =1.3*1.2KN/m = 1.56KN/m

Pd (PL) = 1.3 *9.6KN = 12.48 KN

I. Analysis

Md =Pd (DL) * L2 /8 + Pd (PL) *L/2

= 1.56 * 2.12/8 + 12.48 * 1.05

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 259


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Md =13.96 KN.m

8.1.3 Check depth required for strength

d √

fcd =11.33mpa
fyd = 260.87mpa

m= =28.78

C1 = 2.5/m = 0.087
C2 = 0.32m2fcd =3003

b= * = * = 0.0243

max = 0.75 * b = 0.0182

d √

d 136

d = 207 mm 136 mm . . . ok

8.1.4 Area of Reinforcement

= [ √ ]

1 = 0.007

2= 0.08

min = = 0.002

min < 0.007 < max

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 260


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

As = *b *d = 0.007 * 200 *207 = 289.8mm2

If we use ɸ =14mm = 1.88 2

Spacing =200 – (2*25) – (2*6) – (2*14) = 110mm

Therefore, we use 2 ɸ14 c/c 100mm

8.2 Design for shear

Concrete shear capacity ( Vc )

Vc = 0.25 fctd k1k2 bw d

d = 207 mm

k1 = 1 + 50 2

= 1 + (50 *0.0182) =1.91 2

k2 = 1.6 – d 1

= 1.6 – 0.207 = 1.4 1

fctd = 0.21 * ( )2/3 = 1.03

1.5

Vc = 0.25 * 1.03 *1.91 *1.4 * 200 * 207 = 28.51 KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 261


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Vd = ( 1.56 * 2.1)/2 + 12.48/2


Vd = 7.88 KN
VRd = diagonal compression capacity of concrete
VRd = 0.25 * fcd * b w * d
VRd = 117.26 KN
Vd < VRd . . . ok
Vs = Vd –Vc
Vs = ( remaining shear for stirrups ) Vd < Vc so, only minimum stirrups
provided
use = 6mm

Smax { }

Smax = 207mm
We use 6 c/c 200mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 262


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

8.2.1 Load transfer

The load from cross beam transfer to the shear wall


Total vertical loaded transferred at the top the wall = reaction from the beam
=7.88 KN
Total axial loading including self- weight at the bottom single wall
Nsd = 7.88 KN + 0.15m * 2.1m * 24m * 24KN/m3 = 189.32 KN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 263


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Figure 8.1 Axial, shear and BM dialgram

8.3 Design of shear wall (individual wall)

The maximum moment is Mmax = 2495.12 KN.M at the base


The axial load = Nsd = 189. 32

o d= 0.8L =0.8 * 2100 =1680mm . . ( EBCS-2 sec 6.2.1.2 a )


o
Maximum area of reinforcement = 0.04Ac = 0.04 *150 *2100 = 12600mm2
(EBCS-2 sec 7.2.5.5 )
o
Minimum area of reinforcement =0.004Ac =0.004 * 150 *2100 = 1260mm 2
(EBCS-2 sec 7.2.5.5 )
o Smax { }
Smax =300mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 264


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

8.3.1 Design the wall basement floor to ground floor

K-method
M = Mmax = 2495.12 KN.M

K= = = 5893.6kpa

Obtaining the limiting value of K for singly reinforced beam of C-25 & S-300 from
Table 2 Klim =3292kpa or alternatively from Table 6 as Klim =3300kpa since K >
Klim , compression reinforcement is required. Therefore must be designed as
doubly reinforced.
Assume ɸ =20 for compression section
d’ = 25 +20/2 = 35
= 35/1680 =0.021 but we use 0.05
Using Table 15 ESCP-1 , for = 0.05 , C-25 & S-300
P = 2.602 by interpolation
P’ = 1.042 by interpolation
 Tensile reinforcement
As = pbd/100 = 2.602 *150*1680/100 = 6557.04mm2
 Compression reinforcement
As = p’bd/100 =1.042 *150*1680 /100 = 2625.84mm2
So we don’t know which direction in compression or in tension therefore we take
maximum As ( tensile reinforcement ) to provide reinforcement in both direction
 As = 6557.04mm2
We use 20 ɸ 20

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 265


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

8.3.2 Design for shear

Shear wall are designed like a beam providing stirrups horizontal bars.

Concrete shear capacity ( Vc )

Vc = 0.25 fctd k1k2 bw d

d = 1680 mm

k1 = 1 + 50 2

= 1 + (50 *0.0182) =1.91 2

k2 = 1.6 – d 1

= 1.6 – 1.68 = -0.08 1 so, we take 1

fctd = 0.21 * ( )2/3 = 1.03

Vc = 0.25 * 1.03 *1.91 *1 * 150* 1680 = 123.94 KN

 Design of wall from basement to ground for shear


Vmax = Vd = 41.26 KN
Vs = Vd –Vc
Vs =( remaining shear for stirrups) Vd < Vc so, only minimum stirrups
provided
use =8 mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 266


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Smax { }

Smax = 500mm
We use 8 c/c 500mm

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 267


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

CHAPTER NINE

9 FOUNDATION DESIGN

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 268


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 269


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

9.1 Design of Isolated Footing

An isolated footing is a footing that carries a single column. The function of an isolated
footing is to spread the column load laterally to the soil so that the stress intensity is
reduced to a value that the soil can safely carry.

The approximate contact pressure under a given symmetrical foundation can be obtained
from the flexural formula, provided that the considered load lies within the kern of the footing

( )

The thickness of a given footing that determined by checking the thickness needed for
punching shear criteria and wide beam shear criteria. The greater of the two governs
the depth of the footing.

Check for Punching Shear

( ̀ (̀ ))

√ ⁄ √ ⁄

fcd = 0.67fcu/𝛄c=11.16

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 270


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Check for Wide Beam Shear

̀
( )

Design for flexure

̀
[ ]

From ETABS we found reaction at the base of the building used for foundation design

Then, we grouped the load in to 5 groups so we have 5 isolated footing .

footings Unf load Mx My No.


F1 2877.94 -2.743 -3.749 4
F2 2498.23 -2.837 6.615 4
F3 1883.02 -3.288 -1.85 6
F4 1466.04 -6.936 -8.501 5
F5 865.42 -8.439 6.572 4

Typical isolated footing design for category F1

Material data Soil data

c-25 qallowable=360Kpa
s-300Depth of footing = 2m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 271


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Analysis result

Q = 2877.94kN

Mx =-2.743KNm

My =-3.749 KN

1. Area proportioning

B=L=3.1m, D=0.7m

Column dimension=0.5m*0.4m

Cover page=50mm

Ø12,d=644mm

2. Load calculation

Total design load=Q+ own weight of footing + weight of soil above footing

Own weight of footing=1.3(3.1m*3.1*0.7*25kN/m3) = 218.6KN

The contact pressure at the 4-corners is:

( )

=0.001m

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 272


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

( )

3. Check depth for Punching Shear

The thickness of a given footing that determined by checking the thickness needed for
punching shear criteria and wide beam shear criteria. The greater of the two governs
the depth of the footing.

The critical section is at 1.5d (EBCS-2.1995, ARTICLE 4.7.6)

1.5d

1.5d 0.4 m
0.5 m

( ̀ (̀ ))

=344.4 KN⁄m2

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 273


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

….EBCS-2, 1995, article


4.7.6

√ ⁄ √ ⁄

:ρmin= 0.5/ =0.0017

U=2(0.4+3(0.64))+2(0.5+3(0.64))=

Vr= 1942KN > ….OK

4. Check for Wide Beam Shear

According to EBCS -2 1995 Article 4. 5.3 the shear force carried by the concrete

̀ ̀
( ) = ( )

= 753.75

> ….OK

5. Reinforcement

The critical section for moment is at the face of column (EBCS7,1995 SEC 6.5.1(1))

B
Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 274
q' Engineering
Department Of Civil Mmax
B-b
2
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

̀
[ ]

̀
[ ]

√ = 19.4, ks =3.95 (EBCS2.1995,design table 1a)

(use 14 )

100mm

Use ɸ 14 c/c 100mm

So, As provided =1539.3mm2

6. Development length

lb needed = , fbd = 2 fctd = 2* 1.17 =2.34

lb = = 334.4mm

lb net = ≥ lb min

a =0.7 . . . for hook

a = 1 for straight anchorage

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 275


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Assuming straight anchorage

lb net = =324mm

lb min = { }

lb net > lmin

lb available = [ ] =[ ] = 1300mm longer column size

lb available = [ ] = 1250 mm shorter column size

lb available > lb net . . . . provided straight anchorage

9.2 Combined Footing Design

KNm
1. Area Proportioning

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 276


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

⁄ ⁄

⁄ ⁄ ⁄

⁄ ⁄

⁄ ⁄ ⁄
2. Determine B.M.D and S.F.D

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 277


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Depth for flexure

√ ( )

Check ‘d’ for diagonal tension (wide beam shear)

Applied shear from singularity triangle

⁄ ⁄

3. Check adequacy of depth for punching shear

Acting shear will be


( )

Reinforcement

For longer direction

Top Bar

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 278


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

√ √

3.99

3.99*124.46/.48=1034.5mm2

Use 10Ø12 c/c 100mm

Bottom Bar

M=79.7KNm

Km=18.6

Ks=3.95

As=656.19mm2

Asmin=816mm2

Use 8Ø12 c/c 130mm

For shorter direction

For

⁄ ⁄ ⁄

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 279


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

⁄ ⁄

√ =15.6

3.95

Amin = 816mm2

Use 8Ø12 c/c 130mm

Anchorage Length

⁄ ⁄

Assuming straight anchorage a=1

=335*464.9/816=191.36mm <

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 280


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

lbavailable=(1.5-0.4/2-.5)=0.05mm<
For A2

⁄ ⁄( ⁄
)

⁄ =553.77*1(1.5-0.4)2/8=83.75kNm

√ =19

3.95

<Asmin

Use 8Ø12 c/c130mm

Anchorage Length

⁄ ⁄

lbavailable=(1.5-0.4/2-.5)=0.05mm<

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 281


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

9.3 Mat Foundation Design under shear wall

Representative Loading

Analysis

1) Total column load

Factored load from shear wall=189.6=94.5KN

S.F=1.3

unfactored load=72.69KN

Total column load=4(72.69KN) =290.76KN

2) Determine pressure on soil (q)

q= ⁄ ⁄ ⁄

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 282


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Moment in X’ and Y’ direction

290.76X’=2.1(2*72.6)

X’=1.05m

290.76Y’=2.1(2*72.6)

Y’=1.05m

⁄ ⁄

⁄ ⁄

⁄ ⁄ ⁄

points x y q(KN/m2)
1 -1.05 1.35 45.79
2 -1.35 1.05 33.96
3 1.05 1.35 87.23
4 1.35 1.05 87.23
5 -1.35 -1.05 -7.5
6 -1.05 -1.35 -7.5
7 1.35 -1.05 45.79
8 1.05 -1.35 33.96
All q are less than allowable stress

Design

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 283


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Design Load=94.8KN

Divide the mat into several stirrups in X & Y(all are the same with strip ABCD)

1) Total soil Reaction


2)Total column load on strip

Soil reaction is less than the column load thus some adjustment is needed
Average load

⁄ ⁄

Factor F

⁄ ⁄

Apply column load with factor

Average soil reaction

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 284


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

⁄ ⁄

67.44 KN 67.44 KN

q=49.95 KN/m
67.44 KN
3.5 KN.m 3.5 KN.m

Mmax = 22.3 KN.m

48.7 KN
18.7 KN

18.7 KN
48.7 KN

Shear force & bending moment diagram


Depth for flexure

√( )

Check adequacy of‘d’ for punching shear

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 285


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Column dimention = 0.5m*0.4m

Acting shear from similarity of triangle

⁄ ⁄

Check for wide beam shear

=0.25*11.16mpa*1.5m*0.29m=1213.65KN

Acting shear from similarity of triangles

Vd/51.19=1-d/.29

Vd=125.4Kn

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 286


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Vrd > vd…..ok!

Reinforcement design

Reinforcement on longer side (for all strips both direction)

Top Bar

3.95

ks*M/d=3.95*3.5kNm/.29m

As=47.65mm2

Asmin=ρmin*b*d=0.0017*1500m*290m=739.5mm2

Use7 Ø12 c/c 150mm

Bottom Bar

M= 22.3KNm (+ve)

3.95

As=220.6mm2< Asmin

Use 7Ø12 c/c 150mm

Anchorage Length

⁄ ⁄

lbavailable=(1.5-0.4/2-.5)=0.05mm<

The remaining footings are designed using Excel template

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 287


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Design of Isolated Footing, F-2

Fck 25 Fcd 11.33 fctd 1.20


Fyk 300 Fyd 260.87

qall (kPa)= 360.00


Column Section b (m) h (m)
0.4 0.5

Loading : Nunfactored, kN Mux Muy


3044.51 0.40 6.62

Nfactored, kN Mux Muy


2498.00 0.40 6.62
Design of Footing under Column 1;

Nunfactored = 3044.51 Area required Nunfactored /qall = 8.46


s corner 1= 339.84 Width provided L1 = 3.00
s corner 2= 336.90 Area provided A (m2) = 9.00
s corner 3= 339.66 Area provided is OK!
s corner 4= 336.72
s (avg.)= 338.28
--> Check for punching resistance, = 0.25 * fctd * k1 * k2 * bw * d, depth D (mm) = 650
d= 594
k1 = 1 + 50*  = 1.131
k2 = 1.6 - d = 1.006
bw = (b1+3*d)*2 + (h1 + 3*d)*2 = 8.928

Punching Resistance (kPa)= 1806.232

Vacting =P1 - s , available * (b1 + 3*d)*(h1 + 3*d) = 1115.961


Punching Res. > Vacting…the depth is OK! For punching.

--> Check for wide beam shear resistance, = 0.25 * fctd * k1 * k2 * bw * d,


depth D (mm) = 650
d (mm) = 594
k1 = 1 + 50*  = 1.131
k2 = 1.6 - d = 1.006
bw = 3.00

Shear resistance (kPa)= 606.9329

Vacting = s , available * (bw/2 - a/2 - d)*bw= 587.8627


…the depth is OK! For wide beam shear Resistance.

Moment at the bottom, M = 234.5344


= 0.0026

Area of required reinforcement (mm2) = 1560.747


= 14
c/c spacing of bars = 90 USE Ø 14 c/c 90

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 288


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

The remaining footing design is attached in the annex

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 289


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

ANNEX

Weight of structure

First Floor
Column
C1 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C2 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C3 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C4 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C5 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C6 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C7 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C8 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C9 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C10 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C11 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C12 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C13 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C14 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C15 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C16 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C17 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C18 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C19 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C20 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C21 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C22 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C23 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C24 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C25 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C26 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C27 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C28 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
sum 503.808

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 1


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

First Floor Beam


Axis
A 24 40 0.3 0.4 0.12 4.8 115.2
B 24 40 0.3 0.4 0.12 4.8 115.2
C 24 40 0.3 0.4 0.12 4.8 115.2
c' 24 6 0.3 0.4 0.12 0.72 17.28
1 24 11.5 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.38 33.12
2 24 11.5 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.38 33.12
3 24 11.5 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.38 33.12
4 24 11.5 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.38 33.12
5 24 11.5 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.38 33.12
6 24 11.5 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.38 33.12
7 24 13.6 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.632 39.168
8 24 13.6 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.632 39.168
sum 639.936
partition wall
GP1 Floor Area 460
Partition load 1.5KN/m2 690
sum 690
First Floor Slab
P1 24 0.16 5.15 6.6 33.99 5.4384 130.5216
P2 24 0.16 6 6.6 39.6 6.336 152.064
P3 24 0.16 6 6.6 39.6 6.336 152.064
P4 24 0.16 3.63 6 21.78 3.4848 83.6352
P5 24 0.16 6 6.6 39.6 6.336 152.064
P6 24 0.16 6 6.6 39.6 6.336 152.064
P7 24 0.16 5.15 6.6 33.99 5.4384 130.5216
P8 24 0.16 5.15 5.2 26.78 4.2848 102.8352
P9 24 0.16 5.2 6 31.2 4.992 119.808
P10 24 0.16 5.2 6 31.2 4.992 119.808
P11 24 0.16 5.2 6 31.2 4.992 119.808
P12 24 0.16 5.2 6 31.2 4.992 119.808
P13 24 0.16 5.2 6 31.2 4.992 119.808
P14 24 0.16 5.15 5.2 26.78 4.2848 102.8352
Sum 1757.6448
Shear wall
sw1 24 3.2 0.15 0.25 0.0375 0.12 2.88
sw2 24 3.2 0.15 2 0.3 0.96 23.04
sw3 24 3.2 0.15 2.1 0.315 1.008 24.192
sw4 24 3.2 0.15 2.15 0.3225 1.032 24.768
sw5 24 3.2 0.15 0.65 0.0975 0.312 7.488
sum 82.368

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 2


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Stair case
Flight 1 24 0.13 1.5 2.15 3.225 0.41925 10.062
Flight 2 24 0.2 1.5 2.1 3.15 0.63 15.12
Flight 3 24 0.21 1.5 2 3 0.63 15.12
Landing 1 24 0.2 1.4 1.6 2.24 0.448 10.752
Landing 2 24 0.21 1.5 1.56 2.34 0.4914 11.7936
sum 62.8476
Wall
W1 14 3.2 0.2 6 1.2 3.84 53.76
W2 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W3 14 3.2 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.944 41.216
W4 14 3.2 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.944 41.216
W5 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W8 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W10 14 3.2 0.2 1.7 0.34 1.088 15.232
W11 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W12 14 3.2 0.2 1.7 0.34 1.088 15.232
W13 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W15 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W16 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W20 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W21 14 3.2 0.2 6 1.2 3.84 53.76
W22 14 3.2 0.2 6 1.2 3.84 53.76
W24 14 3.2 0.2 2.3 0.46 1.472 20.608
W25 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W26 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W27 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W28 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W29 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W30 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W31 14 3.2 0.2 4.5 0.9 2.88 40.32
sum 789.824

total weight of First Floor 4526.4284

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 3


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Second Floor
Column
C1 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C2 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C3 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C4 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C5 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C6 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C7 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C8 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C9 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C10 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C11 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C12 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C13 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C14 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C15 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C16 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C17 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C18 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C19 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C20 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C21 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C22 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C23 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C24 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C25 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C26 24 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.24 0.768 18.432
C27 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C28 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
sum 503.808

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 4


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Second Floor Beam


Axis
A 24 40 0.3 0.4 0.12 4.8 115.2
B 24 40 0.3 0.4 0.12 4.8 115.2
C 24 40 0.3 0.4 0.12 4.8 115.2
c' 24 6 0.3 0.4 0.12 0.72 17.28
1 24 11.5 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.38 33.12
8 24 11.5 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.38 33.12
2 24 15.8 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.896 45.504
3 24 15.8 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.896 45.504
6 24 15.8 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.896 45.504
7 24 15.8 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.896 45.504
4 24 16.05 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.926 46.224
5 24 16.05 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.926 46.224
sum 703.584
partition wall
SP1 Floor Area 589
Partition load 1.5KN/m2 883.5
sum 883.5
Second Floor Slab
P1 24 0.17 5.15 6.6 33.99 5.7783 138.6792
P2 24 0.17 6 6.6 39.6 6.732 161.568
P3 24 0.17 6 6.6 39.6 6.732 161.568
P4 24 0.17 3.63 6 21.78 3.7026 88.8624
P5 24 0.17 6 6.6 39.6 6.732 161.568
P6 24 0.17 6 6.6 39.6 6.732 161.568
P7 24 0.17 5.15 6.6 33.99 5.7783 138.6792
P8 24 0.17 5.15 5.2 26.78 4.5526 109.2624
P9 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P10 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P11 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P12 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P13 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P14 24 0.17 5.15 5.2 26.78 4.5526 109.2624
Sum 1867.4976
Shear wall
sw1 24 3.2 0.15 0.25 0.0375 0.12 2.88
sw2 24 3.2 0.15 2 0.3 0.96 23.04
sw3 24 3.2 0.15 2.1 0.315 1.008 24.192
sw4 24 3.2 0.15 2.15 0.3225 1.032 24.768
sw5 24 3.2 0.15 0.65 0.0975 0.312 7.488
sum 82.368

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 5


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Stair case
Flight 1 24 0.13 1.5 2.15 3.225 0.41925 10.062
Flight 2 24 0.2 1.5 2.1 3.15 0.63 15.12
Flight 3 24 0.21 1.5 2 3 0.63 15.12
Landing 1 24 0.2 1.4 1.6 2.24 0.448 10.752
Landing 2 24 0.21 1.5 1.56 2.34 0.4914 11.7936
sum 62.8476
Wall
W1 14 3.2 0.2 6 1.2 3.84 53.76
W2 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W3 14 3.2 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.944 41.216
W4 14 3.2 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.944 41.216
W5 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W8 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W10 14 3.2 0.2 1.7 0.34 1.088 15.232
W11 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W12 14 3.2 0.2 1.7 0.34 1.088 15.232
W13 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W15 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W16 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W20 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W21 14 3.2 0.2 6 1.2 3.84 53.76
W22 14 3.2 0.2 6 1.2 3.84 53.76
W24 14 3.2 0.2 2.3 0.46 1.472 20.608
W25 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W26 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W27 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W28 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W29 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W30 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W31 14 3.2 0.2 4.5 0.9 2.88 40.32
sum 789.824

total weight of Second floor 4893.4292

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 6


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Third Floor
Column
C1 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C2 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C3 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C4 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C5 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C6 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C7 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C8 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C9 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C10 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C11 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C12 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C13 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C14 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C15 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C16 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C17 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C18 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C19 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C20 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C21 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C22 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C23 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C24 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C25 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C26 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C27 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C28 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
sum 430.08
Third Floor Beam
Axis
A 24 40 0.4 0.4 0.16 6.4 153.6
B 24 40 0.4 0.4 0.16 6.4 153.6
C 24 40 0.4 0.4 0.16 6.4 153.6
c' 24 6 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.96 23.04
1 24 11.5 0.4 0.4 0.16 1.84 44.16
8 24 11.5 0.4 0.4 0.16 1.84 44.16
2 24 15.8 0.4 0.4 0.16 2.528 60.672
3 24 15.8 0.4 0.4 0.16 2.528 60.672
6 24 15.8 0.4 0.4 0.16 2.528 60.672
7 24 15.8 0.4 0.4 0.16 2.528 60.672
4 24 16.05 0.4 0.4 0.16 2.568 61.632
5 24 16.05 0.4 0.4 0.16 2.568 61.632
sum 938.112

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 7


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

partition wall
TP1 Floor Area 589
Partition load 1.5KN/m2 883.5
sum 883.5
Third Floor Slab
P1 24 0.17 5.15 6.6 33.99 5.7783 138.6792
P2 24 0.17 6 6.6 39.6 6.732 161.568
P3 24 0.17 6 6.6 39.6 6.732 161.568
P4 24 0.17 3.63 6 21.78 3.7026 88.8624
P5 24 0.17 6 6.6 39.6 6.732 161.568
P6 24 0.17 6 6.6 39.6 6.732 161.568
P7 24 0.17 5.15 6.6 33.99 5.7783 138.6792
P8 24 0.17 5.15 5.2 26.78 4.5526 109.2624
P9 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P10 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P11 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P12 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P13 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P14 24 0.17 5.15 5.2 26.78 4.5526 109.2624
Sum 1867.4976
Shear wall
sw1 24 3.2 0.15 0.25 0.0375 0.12 2.88
sw2 24 3.2 0.15 2 0.3 0.96 23.04
sw3 24 3.2 0.15 2.1 0.315 1.008 24.192
sw4 24 3.2 0.15 2.15 0.3225 1.032 24.768
sw5 24 3.2 0.15 0.65 0.0975 0.312 7.488
sum 82.368
Stair case
Flight 1 24 0.13 1.5 2.15 3.225 0.41925 10.062
Flight 2 24 0.2 1.5 2.1 3.15 0.63 15.12
Flight 3 24 0.21 1.5 2 3 0.63 15.12
Landing 1 24 0.2 1.4 1.6 2.24 0.448 10.752
Landing 2 24 0.21 1.5 1.56 2.34 0.4914 11.7936
sum 62.8476

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 8


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Wall
W1 14 3.2 0.2 6 1.2 3.84 53.76
W2 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W3 14 3.2 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.944 41.216
W4 14 3.2 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.944 41.216
W5 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W8 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W10 14 3.2 0.2 1.7 0.34 1.088 15.232
W11 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W12 14 3.2 0.2 1.7 0.34 1.088 15.232
W13 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W15 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W16 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W20 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W21 14 3.2 0.2 6 1.2 3.84 53.76
W22 14 3.2 0.2 6 1.2 3.84 53.76
W24 14 3.2 0.2 2.3 0.46 1.472 20.608
W25 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W26 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W27 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W28 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W29 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W30 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W31 14 3.2 0.2 4.5 0.9 2.88 40.32
sum 789.824
5054.2292

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 9


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Fourth Floor
Column
C1 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C2 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C3 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C4 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C5 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C6 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C7 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C8 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C9 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C10 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C11 24 3.2 0.3 0.4 0.12 0.384 9.216
C12 24 3.2 0.3 0.4 0.12 0.384 9.216
C13 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C14 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C15 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C16 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C17 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C18 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C19 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C20 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C21 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C22 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C23 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C24 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C25 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
C26 24 3.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.64 15.36
sum 387.072
Fourth Floor Beam
Axis
A 24 40 0.3 0.4 0.12 4.8 115.2
B 24 40 0.3 0.4 0.12 4.8 115.2
C 24 40 0.3 0.4 0.12 4.8 115.2
c' 24 6 0.3 0.4 0.12 0.72 17.28
1 24 11.5 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.38 33.12
8 24 11.5 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.38 33.12
2 24 15.8 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.896 45.504
3 24 15.8 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.896 45.504
6 24 15.8 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.896 45.504
7 24 15.8 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.896 45.504
4 24 16.05 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.926 46.224
5 24 16.05 0.3 0.4 0.12 1.926 46.224
sum 703.584

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 10


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

partition wall
TP1 Floor Area 589
Partition load 1.5KN/m2 883.5
sum 883.5
Fourth Floor Slab
P1 24 0.17 5.15 6.6 33.99 5.7783 138.6792
P2 24 0.17 6 6.6 39.6 6.732 161.568
P3 24 0.17 6 6.6 39.6 6.732 161.568
P4 24 0.17 3.63 6 21.78 3.7026 88.8624
P5 24 0.17 6 6.6 39.6 6.732 161.568
P6 24 0.17 6 6.6 39.6 6.732 161.568
P7 24 0.17 5.15 6.6 33.99 5.7783 138.6792
P8 24 0.17 5.15 5.2 26.78 4.5526 109.2624
P9 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P10 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P11 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P12 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P13 24 0.17 5.2 6 31.2 5.304 127.296
P14 24 0.17 5.15 5.2 26.78 4.5526 109.2624
Sum 1867.4976
Shear wall
sw1 24 3.2 0.15 0.25 0.0375 0.12 2.88
sw2 24 3.2 0.15 2 0.3 0.96 23.04
sw3 24 3.2 0.15 2.1 0.315 1.008 24.192
sw4 24 3.2 0.15 2.15 0.3225 1.032 24.768
sw5 24 3.2 0.15 0.65 0.0975 0.312 7.488
sum 82.368
Stair case
Flight 1 24 0.13 1.5 2.15 3.225 0.41925 10.062
Flight 2 24 0.2 1.5 2.1 3.15 0.63 15.12
Flight 3 24 0.21 1.5 2 3 0.63 15.12
Landing 1 24 0.2 1.4 1.6 2.24 0.448 10.752
Landing 2 24 0.21 1.5 1.56 2.34 0.4914 11.7936
sum 62.8476

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 11


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Wall
W1 14 3.2 0.2 6 1.2 3.84 53.76
W2 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W3 14 3.2 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.944 41.216
W4 14 3.2 0.2 4.6 0.92 2.944 41.216
W5 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W8 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W10 14 3.2 0.2 1.7 0.34 1.088 15.232
W11 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W12 14 3.2 0.2 1.7 0.34 1.088 15.232
W13 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W15 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W16 14 3.2 0.15 6 0.9 2.88 40.32
W20 14 3.2 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.584 50.176
W21 14 3.2 0.2 6 1.2 3.84 53.76
W22 14 3.2 0.2 6 1.2 3.84 53.76
W24 14 3.2 0.2 2.3 0.46 1.472 20.608
W25 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W26 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W27 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W28 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W29 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W30 14 3.2 0.15 2.3 0.345 1.104 15.456
W31 14 3.2 0.2 4.5 0.9 2.88 40.32
sum 789.824
4776.6932

Access Room and Roof


Column
C1 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C2 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C3 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C4 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C5 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C6 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C7 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C8 24 3.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.62 14.88
C1 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C2 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C3 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C4 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C5 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C6 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C7 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C8 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C9 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 12
C10 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

C11 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68


C12 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C13 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C14 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C15 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C16 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C17 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
C18 24 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.32 7.68
sum 257.28
Top tie beam
TTB1 24 5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.525 12.6
TTB2 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB3 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB4 24 2.4 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.252 6.048
TTB5 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB6 24 2.4 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.252 6.048
TTB7 24 2.88 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.3024 7.2576
TTB8 24 2.88 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.3024 7.2576
TTB9 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB10 24 3.65 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.38325 9.198
TTB11 24 3.65 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.38325 9.198
TTB12 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB13 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB14 24 5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.525 12.6
TTB15 24 6.5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.6825 16.38
TTB16 24 6.5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.6825 16.38
TTB17 24 6.5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.6825 16.38
TTB18 24 6.5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.6825 16.38
TTB19 24 5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.525 12.6
TTB20 24 5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.525 12.6
TTB21 24 5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.525 12.6
TTB22 24 5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.525 12.6
TTB23 24 5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.525 12.6
TTB24 24 5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.525 12.6
TTB25 24 5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.525 12.6
TTB26 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB27 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB28 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB29 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB30 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB31 24 5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.525 12.6
TTB32 24 5 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.525 12.6
TTB33 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB34 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB35 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) sum 460.807213
Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Access room slab


P1 24 0.15 6.3 8.66 54.558 8.1837 196.4088
wall
w1 14 3 0.2 8.1 1.62 4.86 68.04
w2 14 3 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.36 47.04
w3 14 3 0.2 8.1 1.62 4.86 68.04
w4 14 3 0.2 5.6 1.12 3.36 47.04
sum 230.16

Total weight of access room and roof 1144.656


slab roof
column
C1 24 1.5 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.3 7.2
C2 24 1.5 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.3 7.2
C3 24 1.5 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.3 7.2
C4 24 1.5 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.3 7.2
C5 24 1.5 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.3 7.2
C6 24 1.5 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.3 7.2
sum 43.2
slab roof beam
TTB4 24 2.4 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.252 6.048
TTB5 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB6 24 2.4 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.252 6.048
TTB7 24 2.88 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.3024 7.2576
TTB8 24 2.88 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.3024 7.2576
TTB9 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
TTB10 24 3.65 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.38325 9.198
TTB11 24 3.65 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.38325 9.198
TTB35 24 6 0.3 0.35 0.105 0.63 15.12
SUM 90.3672
SLAB ROOF
P1 24 0.15 6.3 8.66 54.558 8.1837 196.4088

Total weight of slab roof 329.976

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 14


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Center of mass determination


Weight & Centroid of First Floor
Column
Length Thicknes Weigth Distance, Distance,
W*Xi W*Yi
Description (L) Width (D) s (H) (Wi) Xi Yi
FC1 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 0.2 11.85 3.6864 218.4192
FC2 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 5.2 11.85 95.8464 218.4192
FC3 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 11.2 11.85 206.4384 218.4192
FC4 3.2 0.5 0.4 15.36 17.2 11.85 264.192 182.016
FC5 3.2 0.5 0.4 15.36 23.2 13.95 13.95 214.272
FC6 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 35.5 0.25 654.336 4.608
FC7 3.2 0.5 0.4 18.432 40.2 0.25 740.9664 4.608
FC8 3.2 0.5 0.4 18.432 29 11.5 534.528 211.968
FC9 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 35.2 11.75 648.8064 216.576
FC10 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 40.2 11.85 740.9664 218.4192
FC11 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 0.2 5.3 3.6864 97.6896
FC12 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 5.2 5.25 95.8464 96.768
FC13 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 11.2 5.25 206.4384 96.768
FC14 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 17.2 5.25 317.0304 96.768
FC15 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 23.2 5.25 427.6224 96.768
FC16 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 29.2 5.25 538.2144 96.768
FC17 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 35.2 5.25 648.8064 96.768
FC18 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 40.2 5.3 740.9664 97.6896
FC19 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 0.2 0.25 3.6864 4.608
FC20 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 5.2 0.25 95.8464 4.608
FC21 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 11.5 0.25 211.968 4.608
FC22 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 17.2 0.25 317.0304 4.608
FC23 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 23.2 0.25 427.6224 4.608
FC24 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 29.2 0.25 538.2144 4.608
FC25 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 35.2 0.25 648.8064 4.608
FC26 3.2 0.6 0.4 18.432 40.2 0.25 740.9664 4.608
FC27 3.2 0.5 0.4 15.36 17.4185 8.86 267.5482 136.0896
FC28 3.2 0.5 0.4 15.36 23.0091 8.86 353.4198 136.0896
Total weight (KN)
503.808
Wi.Xi 10487.44
Wi.Yi 2792.755
First floor beam
A 40 0.3 0.4 115.2 20.2 0.2 2327.04 23.04
B 40 0.3 0.4 115.2 20.2 5.3 2327.04 610.56
B' 40 0.3 0.4 17.28 20.2 8.86 349.056 153.1008
C 35 0.3 0.4 115.2 20.2 11.9 2327.04 1370.88
c' 6 0.3 0.4 12.6 20.2 14 254.52 176.4
1 11.5 0.3 0.4 24.15 0.2 6.05 4.83 146.1075
2 11.5 0.3 0.4 24.15 5.2 6.05 125.58 146.1075
3 11.5 0.3 0.4 24.15 11.2 6.05 270.48 146.1075
4 11.5 0.3 0.4 24.15 29.2 5.85 705.18 141.2775
5 11.5 0.3 0.4 24.15 35.2 5.85 850.08 141.2775
6 11.5 0.3 0.4 24.15 40.2 6.05 970.83 146.1075
7 13.6 0.3 0.4 24.15 17.2 7.1 415.38 171.465
8 13.6 0.3 0.4 24.15 23.2 7.1 560.28 171.465
Total weight (KN)466.62
Wi.Xi 11487.34
Wi.Yi 3543.896

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 15


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

shear wall
sw1 3.2 0.15 0.15 2.88 18.97 11.45 54.6336 32.976
sw2 3.2 0.15 0.15 23.04 19.975 12.425 460.224 286.272
sw3 3.2 0.15 0.15 24.192 19.975 10.4751 483.2352 253.4136
sw4 3.2 0.15 0.15 24.768 20.975 12.225 519.5088 302.7888
sw5 3.2 0.15 0.15 7.488 20.975 10.8751 157.0608 81.43275
Total weight (KN)
82.368
Wi.Xi 1674.662
Wi.Yi 956.8832
partiotion load
GP1 1.5KN/m2 603.75 17.7 2.58 10686.38 1557.675
Total weight (KN)
603.75
Wi.Xi 10686.38
Wi.Yi 1557.675
Stair
Flight 1 2.15 1.5 0.13 10.062 19.9746 13.25 200.9844 133.3215
Flight 2 2.1 1.5 0.2 15.12 18.15 11.48 274.428 173.5776
Flight 3 2 1.5 0.21 15.12 19.84 9.65 299.9808 145.908
Landing 1 1.6 1.4 0.2 10.752 18.15 13.28 195.1488 142.7866
Landing 2 1.56 1.5 0.21 11.7936 18.12 9.65 213.7 113.8082
Total weight (KN)
62.8476
Wi.Xi 1184.242
Wi.Yi 709.4019
First Floor Slab
P1 6.65 5.13 0.16 130.5216 2.6358 8.6 344.0288 1122.486
P2 6.65 6 0.16 152.064 8.2 8.6 1246.925 1307.75
P3 6.65 6 0.16 152.064 14.2 8.6 2159.309 1307.75
P4 6 3.63 0.16 83.6352 20.1296 7.07 1683.543 591.3009
P5 6.65 6 0.16 152.064 26.1357 8.6 3974.299 1307.75
P6 6.65 6 0.16 152.064 32.3 8.6 4911.667 1307.75
P7 5.25 5.13 0.16 130.5216 2.6358 2.6257 344.0288 342.7106
P8 6 5.25 0.16 102.8352 8.2 2.6257 843.2486 270.0144
P9 6 5.25 0.16 119.808 14.2 2.6257 1701.274 314.5799
P10 6 5.25 0.16 119.808 20.2 2.6257 2420.122 314.5799
P11 6 5.25 0.16 119.808 26.2 2.6257 3138.97 314.5799
P12 6.15 5.25 0.16 119.808 32.2 2.6257 3857.818 314.5799
P13 6.65 5.13 0.16 119.808 37.78 8.625 4526.346 1033.344
P14 6.65 6 0.16 102.8352 37.7 2.8 3876.887 287.9386
Total weight 1757.645
(KN)
Wi.Xi 35028.46
Wi.Yi 10137.12
Wall
W1 3.2 6 0.2 53.76 0.221 8.5 11.88096 456.96
W2 3.2 6 0.15 40.32 5.22 8.5 210.4704 342.72
W3 3.2 4.6 0.2 41.216 2.7 11.7 111.2832 482.2272
W4 3.2 4.6 0.2 41.216 8.2 11.72 337.9712 483.0515
W5 3.2 5.6 0.2 50.176 14.22 11.7 713.5027 587.0592
W8 3.2 6 0.15 40.32 11.2 8.5 451.584 342.72
W10 3.2 1.7 0.2 15.232 17.22 12.85 262.295 195.7312
W11 3.2 5.6 0.2 50.176 20.12 13.9 1009.541 697.4464
W12 3.2 1.7 0.2 15.232 23.221 12.85 353.7023 195.7312
W13 3.2 5.6 0.2 50.176 26.185 11.75 1313.859 589.568
W15 3.2 6 0.15 40.32 17.22 8.5 694.3104 342.72
W16 3.2 6 0.15 40.32 23.22 8.5 936.2304 342.72
W20 3.2 5.6 0.2 50.176 32.2 11.75 1615.667 589.568

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 16


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

W21 3.2 6 0.2 53.76 35.2 8.5 1892.352 456.96


W22 3.2 6 0.2 53.76 40.2 8.5 2161.152 456.96
W24 3.2 2.3 0.2 20.608 0.22 3.73 4.53376 76.86784
W25 3.2 2.3 0.15 15.456 5.2 3.7 80.3712 57.1872
W26 3.2 2.3 0.15 15.456 11.2 3.7 173.1072 57.1872
W27 3.2 2.3 0.15 15.456 17.2 3.7 265.8432 57.1872
W28 3.2 2.3 0.15 15.456 23.2 3.7 358.5792 57.1872
W29 3.2 2.3 0.15 15.456 29.2 3.7 451.3152 57.1872
W30 3.2 2.3 0.15 15.456 35.2 3.7 544.0512 57.1872
W31 3.2 4.5 0.2 40.32 40.2 3.7 1620.864 149.184
Total weight (KN)
789.824
Wi.Xi 15574.47
Wi.Yi 7131.318

total weight 4266.862


Wi.Xi 86122.98
Wi.Yi 26829.04

center of mass
X(m) 20.18415
Y(m) 6.287769

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 17


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Weight & Centroid of S econd Floor


Column
Descripti Length Width Thickness Weigth Distance Distance,
W*Xi W*Yi
on (L) (D) (H) (Wi) , Xi Yi
SC1 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 0.20 11.85 3.07 182.02
SC2 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 5.20 11.85 79.87 182.02
SC3 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 11.20 11.85 172.03 182.02
SC4 3.20 0.40 0.50 9.22 17.20 11.85 158.52 109.21
SC5 3.20 0.40 0.50 9.22 23.20 13.95 13.95 128.56
SC6 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 35.50 0.25 545.28 3.84
SC7 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 40.20 0.25 617.47 3.84
SC8 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 29.00 11.50 445.44 176.64
SC9 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 35.20 11.75 540.67 180.48
SC10 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 40.20 11.85 617.47 182.02
SC11 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 0.20 5.30 3.07 81.41
SC12 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 5.20 5.25 79.87 80.64
SC13 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 11.20 5.25 172.03 80.64
SC14 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 17.20 5.25 264.19 80.64
SC15 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 23.20 5.25 356.35 80.64
SC16 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 29.20 5.25 448.51 80.64
SC17 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 35.20 5.25 540.67 80.64
SC18 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 40.20 5.30 617.47 81.41
SC19 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 0.20 0.25 3.07 3.84
SC20 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 5.20 0.25 79.87 3.84
SC21 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 11.50 0.25 176.64 3.84
SC22 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 17.20 0.25 264.19 3.84
SC23 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 23.20 0.25 356.35 3.84
SC24 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 29.20 0.25 448.51 3.84
SC25 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 35.20 0.25 540.67 3.84
SC26 3.20 0.40 0.60 15.36 40.20 0.25 617.47 3.84
SC27 3.20 0.30 0.60 9.22 17.42 8.86 160.53 81.65
SC28 3.20 0.30 0.60 9.22 23.01 8.86 212.05 81.65
Total weight (KN)
405.50
Wi.Xi 8535.32
Wi.Yi 2171.32
second floor beam
A 40.00 0.30 0.40 115.20 20.20 0.20 2327.04 23.04
B 40.00 0.30 0.40 115.20 20.20 5.30 2327.04 610.56
B' 6.30 0.30 0.40 17.28 20.20 8.86 349.06 153.10
C 40.00 0.30 0.40 115.20 20.20 11.90 2327.04 1370.88
c' 6.00 0.30 0.40 17.28 20.20 14.00 349.06 241.92
1.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 33.12 0.20 6.05 6.62 200.38
2.00 15.80 0.30 0.40 33.12 5.20 6.05 172.22 200.38
3.00 15.80 0.30 0.40 45.50 11.20 6.05 509.64 275.30
4.00 16.05 0.30 0.40 45.50 29.20 5.85 1328.72 266.20
5.00 16.05 0.30 0.40 45.50 35.20 5.85 1601.74 266.20
6.00 15.80 0.30 0.40 24.15 40.20 6.05 970.83 146.11
7.00 15.80 0.30 0.40 24.15 17.20 7.10 415.38 171.47
8.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 24.15 23.20 7.10 560.28 171.47
Total weight (KN)
655.36
Wi.Xi 13244.67
Wi.Yi 4096.99

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 18


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

shear wall
sw1 3.2 0.15 0.15 2.88 18.97 11.45 54.6336 32.976
sw2 3.2 0.15 0.15 23.04 19.975 12.425 460.224 286.272
sw3 3.2 0.15 0.15 24.192 19.975 10.4751 483.2352 253.4136
sw4 3.2 0.15 0.15 24.768 20.975 12.225 519.5088 302.7888
sw5 3.2 0.15 0.15 7.488 20.975 10.8751 157.0608 81.43275
Total weight (KN)
82.368
Wi.Xi 1674.662
Wi.Yi 956.8832
partiotion load
GP1 1.5KN/m2 603.75 17.7 2.58 10686.38 1557.675
Total weight (KN)
603.75
Wi.Xi 10686.38
Wi.Yi 1557.675
Stair
Flight 1 2.15 1.5 0.13 10.062 19.9746 13.25 200.9844 133.3215
Flight 2 2.1 1.5 0.2 15.12 18.15 11.48 274.428 173.5776
Flight 3 2 1.5 0.21 15.12 19.84 9.65 299.9808 145.908
Landing 1 1.6 1.4 0.2 10.752 18.15 13.28 195.1488 142.7866
Landing 2 1.56 1.5 0.21 11.7936 18.12 9.65 213.7 113.8082
Total weight (KN)
62.8476
Wi.Xi 1184.242
Wi.Yi 709.4019
Second floor slab Floor Slab
P1 6.65 5.13 0.17 138.679 2.6358 8.6 365.5306 1192.641
P2 6.65 6 0.17 161.568 8.2 8.6 1324.858 1389.485
P3 6.65 6 0.17 161.568 14.2 8.6 2294.266 1389.485
P4 6 3.63 0.17 88.8624 20.1296 7.07 1788.765 628.2572
P5 6.65 6 0.17 161.568 26.1357 8.6 4222.693 1389.485
P6 6.65 6 0.17 161.568 32.3 8.6 5218.646 1389.485
P7 5.25 5.13 0.17 138.679 2.6358 2.6257 365.5306 364.13
P8 6 5.25 0.17 109.262 8.2 2.6257 895.9517 286.8903
P9 6 5.25 0.17 127.296 14.2 2.6257 1807.603 334.2411
P10 6 5.25 0.17 127.296 20.2 2.6257 2571.379 334.2411
P11 6 5.25 0.17 127.296 26.2 2.6257 3335.155 334.2411
P12 6.15 5.25 0.17 127.296 32.2 2.6257 4098.931 334.2411
P13 6.65 5.13 0.17 127.296 37.78 8.625 4809.243 1097.928
P14 6.65 6 0.17 109.262 37.7 2.8 4119.192 305.9347
Total weight (KN)
1867.5
Wi.Xi 37217.74
Wi.Yi 10770.68
Wall
W1 3.2 6 0.2 53.76 0.221 8.5 11.88096 456.96
W2 3.2 6 0.15 40.32 5.22 8.5 210.4704 342.72
W3 3.2 4.6 0.2 41.216 2.7 11.7 111.2832 482.2272
W4 3.2 4.6 0.2 41.216 8.2 11.72 337.9712 483.0515
W5 3.2 5.6 0.2 50.176 14.22 11.7 713.5027 587.0592
W8 3.2 6 0.15 40.32 11.2 8.5 451.584 342.72
W10 3.2 1.7 0.2 15.232 17.22 12.85 262.295 195.7312
W11 3.2 5.6 0.2 50.176 20.12 13.9 1009.541 697.4464
W12 3.2 1.7 0.2 15.232 23.221 12.85 353.7023 195.7312
W13 3.2 5.6 0.2 50.176 26.185 11.75 1313.859 589.568
W15 3.2 6 0.15 40.32 17.22 8.5 694.3104 342.72
W16 3.2 6 0.15 40.32 23.22 8.5 936.2304 342.72
W20 3.2 5.6 0.2 50.176 32.2 11.75 1615.667 589.568

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 19


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

W21 3.2 6 0.2 53.76 35.2 8.5 1892.352 456.96


W22 3.2 6 0.2 53.76 40.2 8.5 2161.152 456.96
W24 3.2 2.3 0.2 20.608 0.22 3.73 4.53376 76.86784
W25 3.2 2.3 0.15 15.456 5.2 3.7 80.3712 57.1872
W26 3.2 2.3 0.15 15.456 11.2 3.7 173.1072 57.1872
W27 3.2 2.3 0.15 15.456 17.2 3.7 265.8432 57.1872
W28 3.2 2.3 0.15 15.456 23.2 3.7 358.5792 57.1872
W29 3.2 2.3 0.15 15.456 29.2 3.7 451.3152 57.1872
W30 3.2 2.3 0.15 15.456 35.2 3.7 544.0512 57.1872
W31 3.2 4.5 0.2 40.32 40.2 3.7 1620.864 149.184
Total weight (KN)
789.824
Wi.Xi 15574.47
Wi.Yi 7131.318

total weight
4467.1532
Wi.Xi 88117.48
Wi.Yi 27394.269

center ofX(m)
mass 19.7256
Y(m) 6.13238

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 20


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Weight & Centroid of Third Floor


Column
Descripti Length Thicknes Weigth Distance, Distance,
W*Xi W*Yi
on (L) Width (D) s (H) (Wi) Xi Yi
SC1 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 0.20 11.85 3.07 182.02
SC2 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 5.20 11.85 79.87 182.02
SC3 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 11.20 11.85 172.03 182.02
SC4 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 17.20 11.85 264.19 182.02
SC5 3.20 0.40 0.50 9.22 23.20 13.95 13.95 128.56
SC6 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 35.50 0.25 545.28 3.84
SC7 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 40.20 0.25 617.47 3.84
SC8 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 29.00 11.50 445.44 176.64
SC9 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 35.20 11.75 540.67 180.48
SC10 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 40.20 11.85 617.47 182.02
SC11 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 0.20 5.30 3.07 81.41
SC12 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 5.20 5.25 79.87 80.64
SC13 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 11.20 5.25 172.03 80.64
SC14 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 17.20 5.25 264.19 80.64
SC15 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 23.20 5.25 356.35 80.64
SC16 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 29.20 5.25 448.51 80.64
SC17 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 35.20 5.25 540.67 80.64
SC18 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 40.20 5.30 617.47 81.41
SC19 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 0.20 0.25 3.07 3.84
SC20 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 5.20 0.25 79.87 3.84
SC21 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 11.50 0.25 176.64 3.84
SC22 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 17.20 0.25 264.19 3.84
SC23 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 23.20 0.25 356.35 3.84
SC24 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 29.20 0.25 448.51 3.84
SC25 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 35.20 0.25 540.67 3.84
SC26 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 40.20 0.25 617.47 3.84
SC27 3.20 0.40 0.50 9.22 17.42 8.86 160.53 81.65
SC28 3.20 0.40 0.50 9.22 23.01 8.86 212.05 81.65
Total weight (KN)
411.65
Wi.Xi 8640.99
Wi.Yi 2244.13
second floor beam
A 40.00 0.30 0.40 153.60 20.20 0.20 3102.72 30.72
B 40.00 0.30 0.40 153.60 20.20 5.30 3102.72 814.08
B' 6.30 0.30 0.40 23.04 20.20 8.86 465.41 204.13
C 40.00 0.30 0.40 153.60 20.20 11.90 3102.72 1827.84
c' 6.00 0.30 0.40 12.60 20.20 14.00 254.52 176.40
1.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 44.16 0.20 6.05 8.83 267.17
2.00 15.80 0.30 0.40 60.67 5.20 6.05 315.49 367.07
3.00 15.80 0.30 0.40 60.67 11.20 6.05 679.53 367.07
4.00 16.05 0.30 0.40 61.63 29.20 5.85 1799.65 360.55
5.00 16.05 0.30 0.40 61.63 35.20 5.85 2169.45 360.55
6.00 15.80 0.30 0.40 60.67 40.20 6.05 2439.01 367.07
7.00 15.80 0.30 0.40 24.15 17.20 7.10 415.38 171.47
8.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 24.15 23.20 7.10 560.28 171.47
Total weight (KN)
894.18
Wi.Xi 18415.72
Wi.Yi 5485.56

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 21


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

W21 3.20 6.00 0.20 53.76


shear wall35.20 8.50 1892.35 456.96
sw1
W22 3.20
3.20 0.15
6.00 0.15
0.20 2.88
53.76 18.97
40.20 11.45
8.50 54.63
2161.15 32.98
456.96
sw2
W24 3.20
3.20 0.15
2.30 0.15
0.20 23.04
20.61 19.98
0.22 12.43
3.73 460.22
4.53 286.27
76.87
sw3
W25 3.20
3.20 0.15
2.30 0.15
0.15 24.19
15.46 19.98
5.20 10.48
3.70 483.24
80.37 253.41
57.19
sw4
W26 3.20
3.20 0.15
2.30 0.15
0.15 24.77
15.46 20.98
11.20 12.23
3.70 519.51
173.11 302.79
57.19
sw5 3.20 0.15 0.15 7.49 20.98 10.88 157.06 81.43
W27 3.20 2.30 0.15 15.46 17.20 3.70 265.84 57.19
Total weight (KN) 82.37
W28 3.20 2.30 0.15 15.46 23.20 3.70 358.58 57.19
Wi.Xi 1674.66
W29 3.20 2.30 0.15 15.46 29.20 3.70 451.32 57.19
Wi.Yi 956.88
W30 3.20 2.30 0.15partiotion
15.46load
35.20 3.70 544.05 57.19
W31 GP1 3.20 1.5KN/m2
4.50 0.20 40.32
603.75 40.20
17.70 3.70
2.58 1620.86
10686.38 149.18
1557.68
Total weight (KN)
789.82
Total weight (KN)
603.75
Wi.Xi
Wi.Xi 15574.47
10686.38
Wi.Yi
Wi.Yi 7131.32
1557.68
Stair
Flight 1 2.15 1.50 0.13 10.06 19.97 13.25 200.98 133.32
Flight 2 2.10 total weight
1.50 4712.120.20 15.12 18.15 11.48 274.43 173.58
Flight 3 2.00 Wi.Xi1.50 93394.200.21 15.12 19.84 9.65 299.98 145.91
Landing 1 1.60 Wi.Yi1.40 28855.650.20 10.75 18.15 13.28 195.15 142.79
Landing 2 1.56 1.50 0.21 11.79 18.12 9.65 213.70 113.81
Total
center of mass
X(m) weight (KN)
62.85
19.82
Wi.Xi 1184.24
Y(m) 6.12
Wi.Yi 709.40
Second floor slab Floor Slab
P1 6.65 5.13 0.17 138.68 2.64 8.60 365.53 1192.64
P2 6.65 6.00 0.17 161.57 8.20 8.60 1324.86 1389.48
P3 6.65 6.00 0.17 161.57 14.20 8.60 2294.27 1389.48
P4 6.00 3.63 0.17 88.86 20.13 7.07 1788.76 628.26
P5 6.65 6.00 0.17 161.57 26.14 8.60 4222.69 1389.48
P6 6.65 6.00 0.17 161.57 32.30 8.60 5218.65 1389.48
P7 5.25 5.13 0.17 138.68 2.64 2.63 365.53 364.13
P8 6.00 5.25 0.17 109.26 8.20 2.63 895.95 286.89
P9 6.00 5.25 0.17 127.30 14.20 2.63 1807.60 334.24
P10 6.00 5.25 0.17 127.30 20.20 2.63 2571.38 334.24
P11 6.00 5.25 0.17 127.30 26.20 2.63 3335.16 334.24
P12 6.15 5.25 0.17 127.30 32.20 2.63 4098.93 334.24
P13 6.65 5.13 0.17 127.30 37.78 8.63 4809.24 1097.93
P14 6.65 6.00 0.17 109.26 37.70 2.80 4119.19 305.93
Total weight (KN)
1867.50
Wi.Xi 37217.74
Wi.Yi 10770.68
Wall
W1 3.20 6.00 0.20 53.76 0.22 8.50 11.88 456.96
W2 3.20 6.00 0.15 40.32 5.22 8.50 210.47 342.72
W3 3.20 4.60 0.20 41.22 2.70 11.70 111.28 482.23
W4 3.20 4.60 0.20 41.22 8.20 11.72 337.97 483.05
W5 3.20 5.60 0.20 50.18 14.22 11.70 713.50 587.06
W8 3.20 6.00 0.15 40.32 11.20 8.50 451.58 342.72
W10 3.20 1.70 0.20 15.23 17.22 12.85 262.30 195.73
W11 3.20 5.60 0.20 50.18 20.12 13.90 1009.54 697.45
W12 3.20 1.70 0.20 15.23 23.22 12.85 353.70 195.73
W13 3.20 5.60 0.20 50.18 26.19 11.75 1313.86 589.57
W15 3.20 6.00 0.15 40.32 17.22 8.50 694.31 342.72
W16 3.20 6.00 0.15 40.32 23.22 8.50 936.23 342.72
W20 3.20 5.60 0.20 50.18 32.20 11.75 1615.67 589.57

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 22


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Weight & Centroid of Fourth Floor


Column
Length Width Thickness Weigth Distance, Distance
Description W*Xi W*Yi
(L) (D) (H) (Wi) Xi , Yi
FC1 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 0.20 11.85 3.07 182.02
FC2 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 5.20 11.85 79.87 182.02
FC3 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 11.20 11.85 172.03 182.02
FC4 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 17.20 11.85 264.19 182.02
FC5 3.20 0.40 0.50 9.22 23.20 13.95 13.95 128.56
FC6 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 35.50 0.25 545.28 3.84
FC7 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 40.20 0.25 617.47 3.84
FC8 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 29.00 11.50 445.44 176.64
FC9 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 35.20 11.75 540.67 180.48
FC10 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 40.20 11.85 617.47 182.02
FC11 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 0.20 5.30 3.07 81.41
FC12 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 5.20 5.25 79.87 80.64
FC13 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 11.20 5.25 172.03 80.64
FC14 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 17.20 5.25 264.19 80.64
FC15 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 23.20 5.25 356.35 80.64
FC16 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 29.20 5.25 448.51 80.64
FC17 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 35.20 5.25 540.67 80.64
FC18 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 40.20 5.30 617.47 81.41
FC19 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 0.20 0.25 3.07 3.84
FC20 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 5.20 0.25 79.87 3.84
FC21 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 11.50 0.25 176.64 3.84
FC22 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 17.20 0.25 264.19 3.84
FC23 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 23.20 0.25 356.35 3.84
FC24 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 29.20 0.25 448.51 3.84
FC25 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 35.20 0.25 540.67 3.84
FC26 3.20 0.40 0.50 15.36 40.20 0.25 617.47 3.84
FC27 3.20 0.00 0.50 9.22 17.42 8.86 160.53 81.65
FC28 3.20 0.40 0.50 9.22 23.01 8.86 212.05 81.65
Total weight (KN)
411.65
Wi.Xi 8640.99
Wi.Yi 2244.13
Fourth floor beam
A 40.00 0.30 0.40 115.20 20.20 0.20 2327.04 23.04
B 40.00 0.30 0.40 115.20 20.20 5.30 2327.04 610.56
B' 40.00 0.30 0.40 17.28 20.20 8.86 349.06 153.10
C 35.00 0.30 0.40 115.20 20.20 11.90 2327.04 1370.88
c' 6.00 0.30 0.40 12.60 20.20 14.00 254.52 176.40
1.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 33.12 0.20 6.05 6.62 200.38
2.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 24.15 5.20 6.05 125.58 146.11
3.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 24.15 11.20 6.05 270.48 146.11
4.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 24.15 29.20 5.85 705.18 141.28
5.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 24.15 35.20 5.85 850.08 141.28
6.00 11.50 0.30 0.40 24.15 40.20 6.05 970.83 146.11
7.00 16.05 0.30 0.40 46.22 17.20 7.10 795.05 328.19
8.00 16.05 0.30 0.40 46.22 23.20 7.10 1072.40 328.19
Total weight (KN)
466.62
Wi.Xi 12380.92
Wi.Yi 3911.62

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 23


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

W21 3.20 6.00 0.20 shear wall


53.76 35.20 8.50 1892.35 456.96
sw1
W22 3.20
3.20 0.15
6.00 0.15 53.76
0.20 2.88 18.97
40.20 11.452161.15
8.50 54.63 456.96
32.98
sw2
W24 3.20
3.20 0.15
2.30 0.15 20.61
0.20 23.04 19.98
0.22 12.43
3.73 460.22 76.87
4.53 286.27
sw3
W25 3.20
3.20 0.15
2.30 0.15 15.46
0.15 24.19 19.98
5.20 10.48 80.37
3.70 483.24 57.19
253.41
sw4
W26 3.20
3.20 0.15
2.30 0.15
0.15 24.77
15.46 20.98
11.20 12.23
3.70 519.51
173.11 302.79
57.19
sw5 3.20 0.15 0.15 7.49 20.98 10.88 157.06 81.43
W27 3.20 2.30 0.15 15.46 17.20 3.70 265.84 57.19
Total weight (KN) 82.37
W28 3.20 2.30 0.15 15.46 23.20 3.70 358.58 57.19
Wi.Xi 1674.66
W29 3.20 2.30 0.15 15.46 29.20 3.70 451.32 57.19
Wi.Yi 956.88
W30 3.20 2.30 0.15 15.46
partiotion load
35.20 3.70 544.05 57.19
W31 GP1 3.20 1.5KN/m2
4.50 0.20 40.32
603.75 40.20
17.70 3.70
2.581620.86
10686.38 149.18
1557.68
Total weight (KN)
789.82
Total weight (KN)603.75
Wi.Xi
Wi.Xi 15574.47
10686.38
Wi.Yi
Wi.Yi 7131.32
1557.68
Stair
Flight 1 2.15 1.50 0.13 10.06 19.97 13.25 200.98 133.32
Flight 2 2.10total 1.50 0.20
weight 5712.64 15.12 18.15 11.48 274.43 173.58
Flight 3 2.00Wi.Xi1.50 115820.03
0.21 15.12 19.84 9.65 299.98 145.91
Landing 1 1.60Wi.Yi1.40 35518.110.20 10.75 18.15 13.28 195.15 142.79
Landing 2 1.56 1.50 0.21 11.79 18.12 9.65 213.70 113.81
Total
center of X(m)
mass weight (KN)
62.85
20.27
Wi.Xi 1184.24
Y(m) 6.22
Wi.Yi 709.40
Fourth Floor Slab
P1 6.65 5.13 0.30 244.73 2.64 8.60 645.05 2104.66
P2 6.65 6.00 0.30 285.12 8.20 8.60 2337.98 2452.03
P3 6.65 6.00 0.30 285.12 14.20 8.60 4048.70 2452.03
P4 6.00 3.63 0.30 156.82 20.13 7.07 3156.64 1108.69
P5 6.65 6.00 0.30 285.12 26.14 8.60 7451.81 2452.03
P6 6.65 6.00 0.30 285.12 32.30 8.60 9209.38 2452.03
P7 5.25 5.13 0.30 244.73 2.64 2.63 645.05 642.58
P8 6.00 5.25 0.30 192.82 8.20 2.63 1581.09 506.28
P9 6.00 5.25 0.30 224.64 14.20 2.63 3189.89 589.84
P10 6.00 5.25 0.30 224.64 20.20 2.63 4537.73 589.84
P11 6.00 5.25 0.30 224.64 26.20 2.63 5885.57 589.84
P12 6.15 5.25 0.30 224.64 32.20 2.63 7233.41 589.84
P13 6.65 5.13 0.30 224.64 37.78 8.63 8486.90 1937.52
P14 6.65 6.00 0.30 192.82 37.70 2.80 7269.16 539.88
Total weight (KN)
3295.58
Wi.Xi 65678.37
Wi.Yi 19007.09
Wall
W1 3.20 6.00 0.20 53.76 0.22 8.50 11.88 456.96
W2 3.20 6.00 0.15 40.32 5.22 8.50 210.47 342.72
W3 3.20 4.60 0.20 41.22 2.70 11.70 111.28 482.23
W4 3.20 4.60 0.20 41.22 8.20 11.72 337.97 483.05
W5 3.20 5.60 0.20 50.18 14.22 11.70 713.50 587.06
W8 3.20 6.00 0.15 40.32 11.20 8.50 451.58 342.72
W10 3.20 1.70 0.20 15.23 17.22 12.85 262.30 195.73
W11 3.20 5.60 0.20 50.18 20.12 13.90 1009.54 697.45
W12 3.20 1.70 0.20 15.23 23.22 12.85 353.70 195.73
W13 3.20 5.60 0.20 50.18 26.19 11.75 1313.86 589.57
W15 3.20 6.00 0.15 40.32 17.22 8.50 694.31 342.72
W16 3.20 6.00 0.15 40.32 23.22 8.50 936.23 342.72
W20 3.20 5.60 0.20 50.18 32.20 11.75 1615.67 589.57

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 24


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Weight & Centroid of Access room and roof


Column
Descripti Length Width Thickness Weigth Distance, Distance,
W*Xi W*Yi
on (L) (D) (H) (Wi) Xi Yi
C1 3.10 0.50 0.40 14.88 0.50 0.25 7.44 3.72
C2 3.10 0.50 0.40 14.88 6.20 0.25 92.26 3.72
C3 3.10 0.50 0.40 14.88 0.22 3.79 3.27 56.40
C4 3.10 0.50 0.40 14.88 17.20 0.25 255.94 3.72
C5 3.10 0.50 0.40 14.88 6.20 3.79 92.26 56.40
C6 3.10 0.50 0.40 14.88 0.20 6.75 2.98 100.44
C7 3.10 0.50 0.40 14.88 6.20 6.75 92.26 100.44
C8 3.10 0.50 0.40 14.88 6.20 8.85 92.26 131.69
C1 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 0.16 11.70 1.21 89.86
C2 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 5.15 11.70 39.55 89.86
C3 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 11.15 11.70 85.63 89.86
C4 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 29.15 11.70 223.87 89.86
C5 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 35.15 11.70 269.95 89.86
C6 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 40.15 11.70 308.35 89.86
C7 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 0.16 5.18 1.23 39.79
C8 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 5.17 5.21 39.68 40.02
C9 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 11.17 5.20 85.76 39.94
C10 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 40.17 5.19 308.47 39.83
C11 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 0.18 0.20 1.34 1.54
C12 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 5.17 0.20 39.68 1.54
C13 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 11.16 0.20 85.68 1.55
C14 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 17.15 0.20 131.75 1.53
C15 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 23.15 0.20 177.83 1.54
C16 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 29.15 0.20 223.90 1.53
C17 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 35.15 0.20 269.98 1.53
C18 1.60 0.50 0.40 7.68 40.15 0.20 308.36 1.53
Total weight (KN)
257.28
Wi.Xi 3240.87
Wi.Yi 1167.51
ACCESS ROOM AND TOP TIE BEAM
TTB1 5.00 0.30 0.35 12.60 2.65 11.78 33.44 148.37
TTB2 6.00 0.30 0.35 15.12 8.15 11.78 123.23 178.04
TTB3 6.00 0.30 0.35 15.12 14.15 11.77 213.95 177.99
TTB4 2.40 0.30 0.35 6.05 17.15 13.00 103.72 78.62
TTB5 6.00 0.30 0.35 15.12 20.16 13.98 304.80 211.30
TTB6 2.40 0.30 0.35 15.12 23.20 13.00 350.81 196.54
TTB7 2.88 0.30 0.35 7.26 17.15 10.27 124.47 74.57
TTB8 2.88 0.30 0.35 7.26 23.15 10.28 168.01 74.62
TTB9 6.00 0.30 0.35 15.12 20.18 8.77 305.05 132.65
TTB10 3.65 0.30 0.35 9.20 17.15 7.02 157.75 64.61
TTB11 3.65 0.30 0.35 9.20 23.15 7.03 212.93 64.64
TTB12 6.00 0.30 0.35 15.12 26.15 11.78 395.41 178.04
TTB13 6.00 0.30 0.35 15.12 32.15 11.78 486.11 178.04
TTB14 5.00 0.30 0.35 12.60 37.65 11.78 474.39 148.37
TTB15 6.50 0.30 0.35 16.38 40.20 8.44 658.48 138.29
TTB16 6.50 0.30 0.35 16.38 0.15 8.44 2.46 138.26
TTB17 6.50 0.30 0.35 16.38 5.15 8.46 84.36 138.50

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 25


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

TTB18 6.50 0.30 0.35 16.38 11.15 8.45 182.64 138.41


TTB19 5.00 0.30 0.35 12.60 0.15 2.69 1.89 33.90
TTB20 5.00 0.30 0.35 12.60 5.15 2.70 64.89 34.02
TTB21 5.00 0.30 0.35 12.60 11.15 2.70 140.49 34.03
TTB22 5.00 0.30 0.35 12.60 17.15 2.70 216.09 34.02
TTB23 5.00 0.30 0.35 12.60 23.15 2.70 291.69 34.02
TTB24 5.00 0.30 0.35 12.60 40.20 2.69 506.52 33.92
TTB25 5.00 0.30 0.35 12.60 2.67 0.13 33.65 1.58
TTB26 6.00 0.30 0.35 15.12 8.16 0.13 123.40 1.90
TTB27 6.00 0.30 0.35 15.12 14.16 0.13 214.03 1.89
TTB28 6.00 0.30 0.35 15.12 20.15 0.12 304.73 1.88
TTB29 6.00 0.30 0.35 15.12 26.15 0.12 395.45 1.89
TTB30 6.00 0.30 0.35 15.12 32.15 0.12 486.16 1.88
TTB31 5.00 0.30 0.35 12.60 37.65 0.12 474.41 1.57
TTB32 5.00 0.25 0.30 12.60 2.66 5.13 33.56 64.58
TTB33 6.00 0.25 0.30 15.12 8.17 5.13 123.48 77.49
TTB34 6.00 0.25 0.30 15.12 14.17 5.13 214.21 77.49
TTB35 6.00 0.25 0.30 15.12 20.16 5.13 304.80 77.49
Total weight (KN)
469.88
Wi.Xi 8311.44
Wi.Yi 2973.40
shear wall
sw5 3.10 0.15 0.15 2.10 18.97 11.45 39.84 24.05
sw6 3.10 0.15 0.15 1.85 19.98 12.43 36.95 22.99
sw14 3.10 0.15 0.15 1.85 19.98 10.48 36.95 19.38
sw7 3.10 0.15 0.15 0.40 20.98 12.23 8.39 4.89
sw8 3.10 0.15 0.15 0.80 20.98 10.88 16.78 8.70
Total weight (KN)7.00
Wi.Xi 138.91
Wi.Yi 80.00
access roon slab
P1 6.10 6.30 0.20 261.88 3.54 1.20 926.53 314.25
Total weight (KN)
261.88
Wi.Xi 926.53
Wi.Yi 314.25
Wall
W1 3.00 9.00 0.20 68.04 0.25 4.55 17.01 309.58
W2 3.00 9.00 0.20 47.04 6.22 4.55 292.59 214.03
W3 3.00 6.00 0.20 68.04 3.20 0.20 217.73 13.61
W4 3.00 6.00 0.20 47.04 3.20 3.70 150.53 174.05
Total weight (KN)
230.16 3.20 8.90
Wi.Xi 677.85
Wi.Yi 711.27

total weight
1226.1976
Wi.Xi 13295.607
Wi.Yi 5246.4328

center of mass
X(m) 10.843
Y(m) 4.27862

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 26


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

TTB18 6.50 0.25 0.30 16.38 11.15 8.45 182.64 138.41


TTB19 5.00 0.25 0.30 12.60 0.15 2.69 1.89 33.90
TTB20 5.00 0.25 0.30 12.60 5.15 2.70 64.89 34.02
TTB21 5.00 0.25 0.30 12.60 11.15 2.70 140.49 34.03
TTB22 5.00 0.25 0.30 12.60 17.15 2.70 216.09 34.02
TTB23 5.00 0.25 0.30 12.60 23.15 2.70 291.69 34.02
TTB24 5.00 0.25 0.30 12.60 40.20 2.69 506.52 33.92
TTB25 5.00 0.25 0.30 12.60 2.67 0.13 33.65 1.58
TTB26 6.00 0.25 0.30 15.12 8.16 0.13 123.40 1.90
TTB27 6.00 0.25 0.30 15.12 14.16 0.13 214.03 1.89
TTB28 6.00 0.25 0.30 15.12 20.15 0.12 304.73 1.88
TTB29 6.00 0.25 0.30 15.12 26.15 0.12 395.45 1.89
TTB30 6.00 0.25 0.30 15.12 32.15 0.12 486.16 1.88
TTB31 5.00 0.25 0.30 12.60 37.65 0.12 474.41 1.57
TTB32 5.00 0.25 0.30 12.60 2.66 5.13 33.56 64.58
TTB33 6.00 0.25 0.30 15.12 8.17 5.13 123.48 77.49
TTB34 6.00 0.25 0.30 15.12 14.17 5.13 214.21 77.49
TTB35 6.00 0.25 0.30 15.12 20.16 5.13 304.80 77.49
Total weight (KN)
469.88
Wi.Xi 8311.44
Wi.Yi 2973.40
shear wall
sw5 3.10 0.15 0.15 2.10 18.97 11.45 39.84 24.05
sw6 3.10 0.15 0.15 1.85 19.98 12.43 36.95 22.99
sw14 3.10 0.15 0.15 1.85 19.98 10.48 36.95 19.38
sw7 3.10 0.15 0.15 0.40 20.98 12.23 8.39 4.89
sw8 3.10 0.15 0.15 0.80 20.98 10.88 16.78 8.70
Total weight (KN)7.00
Wi.Xi 138.91
Wi.Yi 80.00
access roon slab
P1 6.10 6.30 0.20 261.88 3.54 1.20 926.53 314.25
Total weight (KN)
261.88
Wi.Xi 926.53
Wi.Yi 314.25
Wall
W1 3.00 9.00 0.20 68.04 0.25 4.55 17.01 309.58
W2 3.00 9.00 0.20 47.04 6.22 4.55 292.59 214.03
W3 3.00 6.00 0.20 68.04 3.20 0.20 217.73 13.61
W4 3.00 6.00 0.20 47.04 3.20 3.70 150.53 174.05
Total weight (KN)
230.16 3.20 8.90
Wi.Xi 677.85
Wi.Yi 711.27

total weight
1226.1976
Wi.Xi 13295.607
Wi.Yi 5246.4328

center of mass
X(m) 10.843
Y(m) 4.27862

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 27


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Weight & Centroid of S lab roof


Column
Descripti Length Thicknes Weigth Distance, Distance,
W*Xi W*Yi
on (L) Width (D) s (H) (Wi) Xi Yi
AC1 1.50 0.35 0.40 7.20 0.50 0.25 3.60 1.80
AC2 1.50 0.35 0.40 7.20 6.20 0.25 44.64 1.80
AC3 1.50 0.35 0.40 7.20 0.22 3.79 1.58 27.29
AC4 1.50 0.35 0.40 7.20 17.20 0.25 123.84 1.80
AC5 1.50 0.35 0.40 7.20 6.20 3.79 0.25 27.29
AC6 1.50 0.35 0.40 7.20 0.20 6.75 1.44 48.60
AC7 1.50 0.35 0.40 7.20 6.20 6.75 44.64 48.60
AC8 1.50 0.35 0.40 7.20 6.20 8.85 44.64 63.72
Total weight (KN) 57.60
Wi.Xi 264.63
Wi.Yi 220.90
access roon slab
P1 6.10 6.30 0.20 261.88 3.54 1.20 926.53 314.25
Total weight (KN)261.88
Wi.Xi 926.53
Wi.Yi 314.25
Wall
W1 3.00 9.00 0.20 68.04 0.25 4.55 17.01 309.58
W2 3.00 9.00 0.20 47.04 6.22 4.55 292.59 214.03
W3 3.00 6.00 0.20 68.04 3.20 0.20 217.73 13.61
W4 3.00 6.00 0.20 47.04 3.20 3.70 150.53 174.05
Total weight (KN)230.16 3.20 8.90
Wi.Xi 677.85
Wi.Yi 711.27
slab roof beam
TTB4 2.40 0.30 0.35 6.05 17.15 13.00 103.72 78.62
TTB5 6.00 0.30 0.35 7.26 20.16 13.98 146.30 101.42
TTB6 2.40 0.30 0.35 7.26 23.20 13.00 168.39 94.34
TTB7 2.88 0.30 0.35 15.12 17.15 10.27 259.31 155.35
TTB8 2.88 0.30 0.35 9.20 23.15 10.28 212.93 94.57
TTB9 6.00 0.30 0.35 9.20 20.18 8.77 185.57 80.70
TTB10 3.65 0.30 0.35 15.12 17.15 7.02 259.31 106.21
TTB11 3.65 0.30 0.35 90.37 23.15 7.03 2092.00 635.06
TTB35 6.00 0.30 0.35 0.00 20.16 5.13 0.00 0.00
Total weight (KN)159.57
Wi.Xi 3427.53
Wi.Yi 1346.26

total weight 709.20


Wi.Xi 5296.55
Wi.Yi 2592.68

center of mass
X(m) 7.47
Y(m) 3.66

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 28


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Column Design Template


Section C-C
X- Direction

Top L. Top r. Bot L. Bot R. Top Bot.


Beam Beam Beam Beam Column Column Column
b 300 300 300 300 400 500 500
h 400 400 350 350 400 400 400
L 6000 6000 6000 6000 3200 3000 2500
I 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 1.07E+09 1.07E+09 2.13E+09 2666666667 2.667E+09
K 266666.7 266666.7 178645.8 178645.8 666666.7 888888.8889 1066666.7
ac1 2.92
ac2 1.00

Y- Direction
Check for slenderness of the column
top L. top r. L. bot. r. bot. top bot.
beam beam Beam Beam column column Column  Le/i
b 300 0 300 0 400 400 400 i= sqrt(I/A)
h 400 0 350 0 400 500 500 d= P/fcdAc
L 6500 6500 6500 6500 3200 3000 2500
I 1.6E+09 0 1.07E+09 0 2.13E+09 4166666667 4.167E+09 i= 115.47
K 246153.8 0 164903.8 0 666666.7 1388888.889 1666666.7
ac1 8.35  48.31
ac2 1.00 d= 1.053332
Consider second order effect
direction column ac1 ac2 acmin L Le=L[1+0.15(ac1+ac2) Le=1.15Le
X 2.92 1.00 1.00 3 4.68 3.45 15/sqr/( d) 14.62 The larger of the two
Y 8.35 1.00 1.00 3 5.58 3.45 25.00

direction column Mu(KN-m) Nu(KN) Le Eo Ei E2 Etot Md(KN-M)


X 161.11 0 4.68 0.040 0.02 0.03 0.09 205.91 205.91
Y 83.26 2386.85 5.58 0.023 0.02 0.05 0.09 213.19 213.19
2386.85

column Mx(KN-M) My(KN-M) N(KN) mx my n w As(mm2) No of bars provided


205.910 213.191 2386.850 0.16 0.20 0.908 0.43 3263.07 diameter No.
20 11 OR
x y 24 8
eo= 0.040 0.023 Mx My
eo= 0.027 0.014 smaller Larger smaller Larger
eo1= -0.001 0.004 -3.352 161.114 10.21 83.257
eo2= 0.068 0.035
0.4 0.38
0.908 0.43
0.6 0.40

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 29


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Section E-E
X- Direction

Top L. Top r. Bot L. Bot R. Top


Beam Beam Beam Beam Column Column Bot. Column
b 300 300 300 300 300 300 400
h 400 400 400 400 300 300 400
L 6000 6000 6000 6000 3200 3200 3200
I 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 6.75E+08 675000000 2133333333
K 266666.7 266666.7 266666.7 266666.7 210937.5 210937.5 666666.667
ac1 0.79
ac2 1.00

Y- Direction
Check for slenderness of the column
top L. top r. L. bot. r. bot. top
beam beam Beam Beam column column bot. Column  Le/i
b 300 300 300 300 300 300 400 i= sqrt(I/A)
h 400 400 400 400 300 300 400 d= P/fcdAc
L 5000 6500 5000 6500 3200 3200 3200
I 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 6.75E+08 675000000 2133333333 i= 86.60
K 320000 246153.8 320000 246153.8 210937.5 210937.5 666666.667
ac1 0.75  48.38
ac2 1.00 d= 0.877866
Consider second order effect
direction column ac1 ac2 acmin L Le=L[1+0.15(ac1+ac2) Le=1.15Le
X 0.79 1.00 0.79 3.2 4.19 3.68 15/sqr/( d) 16.01 The larger of the two
Y 0.75 1.00 0.75 3.2 4.17 3.68 25.00

direction column Mu(KN-m) Nu(KN) Le Eo Ei E2 Etot Md(KN-M)


X -0.32 0 4.19 -0.032 0.02 0.04 0.02 20.95 20.95
Y 26.81 895.16 4.17 0.018 0.02 0.03 0.07 65.04 65.04
895.16

column Mx(KN-M) My(KN-M) N(KN) mx my n w As(mm2) No of bars provided


20.946 65.038 895.160 0.06 0.18 0.757 0.42 1416.82 diameter No.
14 10 OR
x y 16 8
eo= -0.048 0.018 Mx My
eo= -0.032 0.012 smaller Larger smaller Larger
eo1= 0.000 0.000 -0.318 -70.973 -0.07 26.807
eo2= -0.079 0.030
0.4 0.38
0.757 0.42
0.6 0.40

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 30


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Section F-F
X- Direction

Top L. Top r. Bot L. Bot R. Top


Beam Beam Beam Beam Column Column Bot. Column
b 300 300 300 300 500 500
500
h 400 400 350 350 400 400
L 6000 6000 6000 6000 3200 3200 2500
I 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 1.07E+09 1071875000 2.67E+09 3066406250 2666666667
K 266666.7 266666.7 178645.8 178645.833 833333.3 958251.9531 1066666.667
ac1 3.36
ac2 1.00

Y- Direction
Check for slenderness of the column
top L. top r. L. bot. r. bot. top
beam beam Beam Beam column column bot. Column  Le/i
b 0 300 0 350 400 400 i= sqrt(I/A)
500
h 0 400 0 300 500 500 d= P/fcdAc
L 6500 5000 6500 6000 3200 3200 2500
I 0 1.6E+09 0 787500000 4.17E+09 3066406250 4166666667 i= 125000.00
K 0 320000 0 131250 1302083 958251.9531 1666666.667
ac1 7.06  0.05
ac2 1.00 d= 934921.7
Do not consider second order effect
direction column ac1 ac2 acmin L Le=L[1+0.15(ac1+ac2) Le=1.15Le
X 3.36 1.00 1.00 3.2 5.12 3.68 15/sqr/( d) 0.02 The larger of the two
Y 7.06 1.00 1.00 3.2 5.80 3.68 25.00

direction column Mu(KN-m) Nu(KN) Le Eo Ei E2 Etot Md(KN-M)


X -5.90 0 5.12 -0.028 0.02 0.00 -0.01 -5.90 -16.41
Y 139.46 2078.81 5.80 0.039 0.02 0.00 0.06 139.46 121.75
2078.81

column Mx(KN-M) My(KN-M) N(KN) mx my n w As(mm2) No of bars provided


-5.898 139.458 2078.810 0.00 13.49 0.806 0.42 3126.01 diameter No.
20 10 OR
x y 14 21
eo= -0.043 0.039 Mx My
eo= -0.028 0.027 smaller Larger smaller Larger
eo1= -0.003 -0.004 -5.898 -144.954 -8.75 139.458
eo2= -0.070 0.067
0.4 0.38
0.806 0.42
0.6 0.40

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 31


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Section G-G
X- Direction

Top L. Top r. Bot L. Bot R. Top Bot.


Beam Beam Beam Beam Column Column Column
b 300 300 300 300 500 500
500
h 400 400 350 350 400 400
L 6000 6000 6000 6000 3200 300 2500
I 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 1.072E+09 1.07E+09 2.67E+09 3.07E+09 2.67E+09
K 266666.7 266666.7 178645.83 178645.8 833333.3 10221354 1066667
ac1 20.73
ac2 1.00

Y- Direction
Check for slenderness of the column
top L. top r. L. bot. r. bot. top bot.
beam beam Beam Beam column column Column  Le/i
b 300 300 300 350 400 400 i= sqrt(I/A)
500
h 400 400 350 300 500 500 d= P/fcdAc
L 5000 6500 5000 6500 3200 3000 2500
I 1.6E+09 1.6E+09 1.072E+09 7.88E+08 4.17E+09 3.07E+09 4.17E+09 i= 125000.00
K 320000 246153.8 214375 121153.8 1302083 1022135 1666667
ac1 4.11  0.04
ac2 1.00 d= 1787266.768
Do not consider second order effect
direction column ac1 ac2 acmin L e=L[1+0.15(ac1+ac2)
Le=1.15Le
X 20.73 1.00 1.00 0.3 0.63 0.35 15/sqr/( d) 0.01 The larger of the two
Y 4.11 1.00 1.00 3 4.96 3.45 25.00

direction column Mu(KN-m) Nu(KN) Le Eo Ei E2 Etot Md(KN-M)


X -12.80 0 0.63 -0.016 0.02 0.00 0.00 17.21 17.21
Y 149.27 3974.01 4.96 0.025 0.02 0.00 0.05 180.39 180.39
3974.01

column Mx(KN-M) My(KN-M) N(KN) mx my n w As(mm2) No of bars provided


17.209 180.391 3974.010 0.01 17.45 1.541 0.49 3672.18 diameter No.
20 12 OR
x y 14 24
eo= -0.025 0.025 Mx My
eo= -0.016 0.015 smaller Larger smaller Larger
eo1= -0.003 0.007 -12.801 -155.677 28.37 149.274
eo2= -0.039 0.038
0.4 0.38
1.541 0.49
0.6 0.40

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 32


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Foundation design template


Design of Isolated Footing, F-3

Fck 25 Fcd 11.33 fctd 1.20


Fyk 300 Fyd 260.87

qall (kPa)= 360.00


Column Section b (m) h (m)
0.4 0.5

Loading : Nunfactored, kN Mux Muy


2229.27 2.30 -0.21

Nfactored, kN Mux Muy


1883.02 2.30 -0.21
Design of Footing under Column 1;

Nunfactored = 2229.27 Area required Nunfactored /qall = 6.19


s corner 1= 357.49 Width provided L1 = 2.50
s corner 2= 357.65 Area provided A (m2) = 6.25
s corner 3= 355.72 Area provided is OK!
s corner 4= 355.88
s (avg.)= 356.68
--> Check for punching resistance, = 0.25 * fctd * k1 * k2 * bw * d, depth D (mm) = 550
d= 494
k1 = 1 + 50*  = 1.135
k2 = 1.6 - d = 1.106
bw = (b1+3*d)*2 + (h1 + 3*d)*2 = 7.728
Punching Resistance (kPa)= 1433.59

Vacting =P1 - s , available * (b1 + 3*d)*(h1 + 3*d) = 759.1963


Punching Res. > Vacting…the depth is OK! For punching.
--> Check for wide beam shear resistance, = 0.25 * fctd * k1 * k2 * bw * d,
depth D (mm) = 550
d (mm) = 494
k1 = 1 + 50*  = 1.135
k2 = 1.6 - d = 1.106
bw = 2.50
Shear resistance (kPa)= 463.7648

Vacting = s , available * (bw/2 - a/2 - d)*bw= 418.7836


…the depth is OK! For wide beam shear Resistance.
Moment at the bottom, M = 166.0824
= 0.0027

Area of required reinforcement (mm2) = 1329.97248


= 14
c/c spacing of bars = 110 USE Ø 14 c/c 110

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 33


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Design of Isolated Footing, F-4

Fck 25 Fcd 11.33 fctd 1.20


Fyk 300 Fyd 260.87

qall (kPa)= 360.00


Column Section b (m) h (m)
0.4 0.5

Loading : Nunfactored, kN Mux Muy


1722.08 4.95 2.19

Nfactored, kN Mux Muy


1466.04 4.95 2.19
Design of Footing under Column 1;
Nunfactored = 1722.08 Area required Nunfactored /qall = 4.78
s corner 1= 359.82 Width provided L1 = 2.20
s corner 2= 357.36 Area provided A (m2) = 4.84
s corner 3= 354.24 Area provided is OK!
s corner 4= 351.78
s (avg.)= 355.80
--> Check for punching resistance, = 0.25 * fctd * k1 * k2 * bw * d, depth D (mm) = 450
d= 394
k1 = 1 + 50*  = 1.157
k2 = 1.6 - d = 1.206
bw = (b1+3*d)*2 + (h1 + 3*d)*2 = 6.528
Punching Resistance (kPa)= 1074.09

Vacting =P1 - s , available * (b1 + 3*d)*(h1 + 3*d) = 660.0439


Punching Res. > Vacting…the depth is OK! For punching.
--> Check for wide beam shear resistance, = 0.25 * fctd * k1 * k2 * bw * d,
depth D (mm) = 450
d (mm) = 394
k1 = 1 + 50*  = 1.157
k2 = 1.6 - d = 1.206
bw = 2.20
Shear resistance (kPa)= 361.979

Vacting = s , available * (bw/2 - a/2 - d)*bw= 337.1892


…the depth is OK! For wide beam shear Resistance.

Moment at the bottom, M = 122.6748


= 0.0031

Area of required reinforcement (mm2) = 1238.33012


= 14
c/c spacing of bars = 120 USE Ø 14 c/c 120

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 34


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Design of Isolated Footing, F-5

Fck 25 Fcd 11.33 fctd 1.20


Fyk 300 Fyd 260.87

qall (kPa)= 360.00


Column Section b (m) h (m)
0.4 0.5

Loading : Nunfactored, kN Mux Muy


1011.08 4.49 6.57

Nfactored, kN Mux Muy


865.42 4.49 6.57
Design of Footing under Column 1;

Nunfactored = 1011.08 Area required Nunfactored /qall = 2.81


s corner 1= 363.36 Width provided L1 = 1.70
s corner 2= 347.31 Area provided A (m2) = 2.89
s corner 3= 352.40 Area provided is OK!
s corner 4= 336.35
s (avg.)= 349.85
--> Check for punching resistance, = 0.25 * fctd * k1 * k2 * bw * d, depth D (mm) = 350
d= 294
k1 = 1 + 50*  = 1.145
k2 = 1.6 - d = 1.306
bw = (b1+3*d)*2 + (h1 + 3*d)*2 = 5.328
Punching Resistance (kPa)= 701.0266

Vacting =P1 - s , available * (b1 + 3*d)*(h1 + 3*d) = 334.8714


Punching Res. > Vacting…the depth is OK! For punching.

--> Check for wide beam shear resistance, = 0.25 * fctd * k1 * k2 * bw * d,


depth D (mm) = 350
d (mm) = 294
k1 = 1 + 50*  = 1.145
k2 = 1.6 - d = 1.306
bw = 1.70
Shear resistance (kPa)= 223.6759

Vacting = s , available * (bw/2 - a/2 - d)*bw= 181.2291


…the depth is OK! For wide beam shear Resistance.
Moment at the bottom, M = 63.25951
= 0.0029
Area of required reinforcement (mm2) = 853.316345
= 14
c/c spacing of bars = 180 USE Ø 14 c/c 180

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 35


Department Of Civil Engineering
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF G+4 MIXEDUSE BUILDING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT June, 2012

Adama Science &Technology University (ASTU) 36


Department Of Civil Engineering

You might also like