Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Electrostatics Project
Fundamentals of Electrical Engineering 3
1. Purpose:
The problem, with the help of the simulation program QuickField-Student will show us the behavior of two charge
points of opposite sign. Between them there is isolation and they are surrounded by 3 linear floating conductors,
then by a highly conductive dielectric environment and between the dielectric and the boundary, surrounded by
air. (This was the closest I could get to recreating this experiment in 2D and adapting to the fact I cannot overlay
a different dielectric environment, less conductive like glass, between the charge points and the conductive one.
Vertex:
• Positive charge q+ = 1 C (Coordinates: (0.75, 0))
• Negative charge q– = 1 C (Coordinates: (-0.75, 0))
Edges:
• “Positive pole”- the 3 red-colored bars: floating conductors
• “Negative pole”- the 3 blue-colored bars: floating conductors
• Boundary: U = 0V
Blocks:
• Air: εair = 1 (The entire surface between the green square and the dark-grey square)
• Dielectric 1: εi = 10 (insulator - “inside of the magnet”)
• Dielectric 2 and 3: εp = εn = 108 (highly conducting dielectric - “positive and negative pole”)
• Dielectric 4: εFe = 103 (conducting dielectric - “inside of the magnet”)
3. Points of Computation:
P1 (0.75, 0) P2 (1, 0.5) P3 (0, 0.55) P4 (1, 2.5) P5 (-1, - 2.5)
P6 (3, 0) P7 (-3, 0) P8 (0, 2.75) P9 (0, -2.75) P10 (-4.5, 0)
4. Procedure:
First, we will modify the problem, by adjusting to a finer mesh. Then, we will change the electric permittivity of
the 4th dielectric area.
5. Result Tables:
• Table 5.1 will be a Mesh test.
• Table 5.2 will be an Electrical permittivity test.
• Table 5.3 will be a Charge test.
Mesh 2 – Built mesh Mesh 2 – Electric Potential Mesh 2 – Electric field strength
Mesh 3 – Built mesh Mesh 3 – Electric Potential Mesh 3 – Electric field strength
Legend: Electric Potential Legend: Electric Field Strength
Mesh 3
q = ± 1C, εair = 1, εi = 10 εFe = 100 εFe = 103 εFe = 104
εp = εn = 108
V1 -3.4056 x 108 -36186000 -3642400
V2 -3.4056 x 108 -36185000 -3641900
V3 2625300 317530 31801
El. potential
Fi
Permittivity test 1 – Electric Potential Permittivity test 2 – Electric Potential Permittivity test 3 – Electric Potential
Permittivity test 1 – Electric Field Strength Permittivity test 2 – Electric Field Strength Permittivity test 3 – Electric Field Strength
Mesh 3
q+ = + 100 C q+ = + 10 -3 C q+ = 1 C
εair = 1, εi = 10, εFe =104
q- = - 100 C q- = - 10 -3 C q- = - 1 C
εp = εn = 108
V1 -3.6424 x 108 -3642.4 -3642400
V2 -3.6424 x 108 -3661.9 -3641900
V3 3180100 31.801 31801
El. potential
6.5979 x 108
E4 9.4551 x 109 94551 94551000
E5 9.3983 x 109 93983
[V/m]
93983000
E6 1.1957 x 1010 119570 1.1957 x 108
E7 1.2019 x 1010 120190 1.2019 x 108
E8 1.0859 x 1010 108590 1.0859 x 108
E9 1.0861 x 1010 108610 1.0861 x 108
E10 9.6002 x 109 96003 96002000
Charge test 1 – Electric Potential Charge test 2 – Electric Potential Charge test 3 – Electric Potential
\
Charge test 1 – Electric Field Strength Charge test 2 – Electric Field Strength Charge test 3 – Electric Field Strength
6. Overall conclusions:
During the last 2 months, while solving both the laboratories and working on this project for this particular
class, I have noticed first, how easy it is to notice the relationships between different physical measurements based
on „playing around” in this simulation program. By analyzing the data gathered in the tables, by looking at the
graphical interpretations, one does not need to know all of the the complex equations, that bring together
everything, in order to work with these experimental setups.
It was also made clear to me, that, while a precise and accurate measurement is the desired outcome, there is
value even in slightly off approximations. The information itself contains value, which can either be of use on its
own or can truely shine, when put in comparison with a different set of experimental data.
In conclusion, one can never have enough data to fully guarantee the outcome of an experiment, but one can
gather more than plenty, given a minimum level of knowledge, patience and a good resolve, to come up with a
well prepared hypothesis, or observation, regarding its behavior, thus proving the importance of experimental
data, experimental measurements in the world of research and of science itself.