University of Cebu – Banilad

College of Business Administration

HUM 103, TTH, 7:30 – 9:00

Assignment for March 11, 2021: Virtual Mumbaki

Submitted to:

Sir Nino Ardiza

Prepared by:

Anga, Bremt Cloyd R.

March 12, 2021

 FIGURE 1. VENN DIAGRAM OF MANUNNGUL JAR AND BULUL
DIFFERENCES SIMILARITIES DIFFERENCES

Palawan's
Tapayang Manunggul
Ifugao's Bulul

- Nature: Secondary Burial Jar - Both have Human-

- Origin: Palawan - Nature: Rice God figure
like figure - Origin: Ifugao
- Media category: Pottery
- Materials used: Clay - Both possess - Media
spiritscategory: Sculpture
- Belief: Afterworld - Both have unique
- Materials used: wood
- Appearance in Philippine money: Yes, in 1000 pesos beliefs - Belief: Sumptuous harvest
- Gestures of Human-like figures: Steering the boat - Both came -from
Appearance in Philippine money: No.
- Commerical presence: Scanty Philippine
- Gestures of Human-like figures: Plainm, usually standing
- Durability: Fragile, needs to be handled with care - Commercial presence: Bountiful
archipelago- Durability: Stronger the tapayang manunggul as it is made of wood
- Usual placement: Burried, hidden among the eyes of many - Both serves to
- Wave-like design: Yes - Usual Placement: In the rice granaries
pacify an
- Used for burial: Yes - Wave-like design: No
undertaking
- Human-like figure style: Has soft edges - Used for burial: No
- Part of Philippine
- Suppose gives comfort to the living: Not directly - Human-like figure style: Geometric edges, edgy
Culture
- Other historical significance: testament to our connection and common - Suppose gives comfort to the living: Yes, directly
heritage with other Austronesian-speaking countries, as well as the
importance of the sea to our ancestor in terms of trade and
communication

Sources:
http://www.artesdelasfilipinas.com/archives/50/the-manunggul-jar-as-a-vessel-of-history

https://philippineculturaleducation.com.ph/tapayang-manunggul/

https://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au/collection/works/219.2005/