MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: TEACHER I Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: CITY SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CALAMBA CITY Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT)
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheet/inter-
Services and content within and observer agreement form
Pedagogy across curriculum
teaching areas.

Basic 2. Ensured the Any supplementary material Quality

Education positive use of (in print/digital format) made
Services ICT to facilitate by the ratee and used in the
the teaching and lesson delivery
learning process • Activity sheet/s
• One lesson from a locally
crafted self-learning module
(SLM)
• Lesson plan (e.g., DLP,
DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
Lesson Exemplars, and the
likes)
• Video lesson
• Audio lesson
• Other learning materials in
print/digital format (please
specify and provide
annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Applied a range Any supplementary material Quality
Education of teaching (in print/digital format) made
Services strategies to by the ratee and used in the
develop critical lesson delivery
and creative • Activity sheet/s
thinking, as well • One lesson from a locally
as other higher-
crafted self-learning module
order thinking
(SLM)
skills
• Lesson plan (e.g., DLP,
DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
Lesson Exemplars, and the
likes)
• Video lesson
• Audio lesson
• Other learning materials in
print/digital format (please
specify and provide
annotations)

Basic 2. Learning 4. Established a 22.5% Any supplementary material Quality

Education Environment learner-centered (in print/digital format) made
Services and Diversity culture by using by the ratee and used in the
of Learners teaching lesson delivery
strategies that • Activity sheet/s
respond to their • One lesson from a locally
linguistic, cultural,
crafted self-learning module
socioeconomic
(SLM)
and religious
backgrounds • Lesson plan (e.g., DLP,
DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
Lesson Exemplars, and the
likes)
• Video lesson
• Audio lesson
• Other learning materials in
print/digital format (please
specify and provide
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
annotations)

Basic 5. Planned and COT rating sheet/inter-observer Quality

Education delivered teaching agreement form
Services strategies that are
responsive to the
special
educational needs
of learners in
difficult
circumstances,
including:
geographic
isolation; chronic
illness;
displacement due
to armed conflict,
urban
resettlement or
disasters; child
abuse and child
labor practices

Basic 6. Used strategies Evidence that highlights Quality

Education for providing providing accurate and
Services timely, accurate constructive feedback to
and constructive improve learner
feedback to performance and that shows
improve learner timeliness of feedback given
performance
to any of the following
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
• activity sheet Efficiency
• performance task
• portfolio
• quiz or test
• self-learning module

Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Selected, 22.5% 1. COT rating sheet/inter- Quality

Education and Planning developed, observer agreement form
Services organized and
used appropriate
teaching and
learning
resources,
including ICT, to
address learning
goals
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
8. Set achievable One lesson plan (e.g., DLP, Quality
and appropriate DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
learning Lesson Exemplars, and the
outcomes that are likes) or one lesson from a
aligned with self-learning module
learning prepared by the ratee with
competencies
achievable and appropriate
learning outcomes that are
aligned with the learning
competencies as shown in
any of the following:
• Lecture/discussion
• Activity/activity sheet
• Performance task
• Rubric for assessing
performance using criteria
that appropriately describe
the target output

Basic 9. Built 1. Proof of participation in any Quality

Education relationships with activity for improved access
Services parents/ to education such as, but not
guardians and the limited to the ff. activities
wider school • Distribution of learning
community to materials to learners/parents
facilitate
(e.g., receipt form/monitoring
involvement in the
form during distribution of
educative process
learning materials, etc.) •
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Brigada Eskwela (e.g., Efficiency
commitment form to
stakeholders, developed
advocacy materials,
certificate of participation
that involves
parents’/stakeholders’
engagement signed by the
school head, etc.)
• Home visitation (e.g., home
visitation form, etc.)
• Others (please specify and
provide annotations)
2. Parent-teacher log or proof
of other stakeholders
meeting (e.g., one-on-one
parent-teacher-learner
conference log; attendance
sheet with minutes of online
or face-to-face meeting;
proof of involvement in the
learners’/parents’ orientation,
etc.)

3. Any form of communication

to parents/stakeholders (e.g.,
notice of meeting; screenshot of
chat/text
message/communication with
parent/guardian [name or any
identifier removed]; digital/
printed copy of Learner
Enrollment Survey Form signed
by the ICT Coordinator/Focal
person and School Head)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. Participated in 22.5% • Certificate of completion in Quality
Education Assessment professional a course/training •
Services and networks to share Certificate of participation in
Reporting knowledge and to a webinar, retooling,
enhance practice upskilling, and other
training/ seminar/ workshop
with proof of implementation Efficiency
• Certificate of recognition/
speakership in a webinar,
retooling, upskilling, and
other training/ seminar/
workshop
• Any proof of participation
to a benchmarking activity
• Any proof of participation
in school LAC sessions
(online/face-to-face) certified
by the LAC Coordinator
• Others (please specify and
provide annotations)

Basic 11. Developed a Main MOV Quality

Education personal • Individual Performance
Services improvement plan and Commitment Review
based on Form Development Plan
reflection of one’s (IPCRF-DP)
practice and Supporting MOV
ongoing • Reflection of one’s practice
professional during on LAC sessions with
learning proof of attendance
• Reflection/Personal Notes Efficiency
on Coaching and Mentoring
and/or Midyear Review
• Personal notes journal on
division/school-led INSET
with proof of attendance
• Certificate of enrolment/
registration form/class card
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
in graduate/post-graduate
school/online courses
• Any learning material
highlighting the
improvement done based on
accomplished “reflection”
section
• Others (please specify and
provide annotations)

Basic 12. Performed Proof of: Quality

Education various related
Services works/activities • committee involvement
that contribute to • advisorship of co-curricular
the teaching- activities
learning process • involvement as
Efficiency
(Plus Factor) module/learning material
writer
.
• involvement as
module/learning material
validator
• participation in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV-/radio-based instruction
• book or journal authorship/
contributorship
• coordinatorship/
chairpersonship
• coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
• mentoring pre-service
teachers
• participation in
demonstration teaching
• participation as research
presenter in a
forum/conference
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal/MT) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
• others (please specify and
provide annotations)

Rater Ratee Approving Authority