In my shoot, I took photographs in my bedroom that captured me
using my laptop. I believe I was successful in communicating the meaning I wanted to (how easy it is to end up in a situation where you feel vulnerable in the digital age) as not only did I represent the vulnerability of someone, but I also went beyond that and explored someone’s distant relationship with society and how someone can begin to lose themselves. I used all the equipment I planned to, and it helped me complete my shoot as I was capturing self-portraiture photographs therefore, the tripod helped me keep my photographs straight and I was able to enable a self-timer on my digital camera. One successful photographic technique that I used throughout all photographs was contrast because it provided a darker tone to all my images which emphasised the mysterious atmosphere of the narrative as I was pictured talking to a stranger. Also, it helped create a juxtaposition between the bright lighting outside the window and dark lighting inside which could suggest that the “outside world” is a lot safer for me then being trapped with the gloomy “online world”. Interestingly, in the last photograph of the series, the artificial lighting and the low contrast created a vignette effect which highlighted how my fears and worries were closing in on me. Another photographic technique that was successful was leading lines, particular in the fifth and last photograph of the series, as it forced the audience to not only acknowledge the contrast of the yellow and orange, but it also helped lead them to the main focus point therefore, they could work out the context behind the photograph. However, I feel a photographic technique that was least successful was shot framing as I mainly took photographs using an over the shoulder shot which did add an element of enigma as the audience could work out if the photographs were being taken from another person’s perspective or not. On the other hand, I should have tried to explore with shot framing such as a POV shot as that would have not only communicated my perspective on the situation to the audience, but it also would have nicely contrasted with the over the shoulder shots as each narrative has two sides to it. Another technique that was not successful is the variety of camera angles used as throughout the series, I mainly used eye level angles which did force the audience to approach the images with a non- judgemental attitude however, I could have explored more with high and low angles to not only keep the audience more immersed within the narrative but also, it would contribute more perspectives to the story. For example, a high angle would have made me look vulnerable and potentially from the perspective of the stranger who seems to own a lot of control over me. For this photoshoot, I was influenced mainly by Duane Michals as I was inspired by the way he completed his sequences and made them look like a story by using a variety of photographic techniques such as shutter speed. I think you can identify that I was influenced by him as I did use different shot sizes such as an establishing shot, mid-shot and a close-up shot which is similar to what Michals did within his own work titled “Things Are Queer”. Another feature shared within my work and Michals’ work is the use of shutter speed as in the last image of this series, you can see that I ruffled my hair to make it look like I used a slow shutter speed compared to the rest of the photograph which represented me losing my sanity however, Michals used shutter speed in his work to represent movement. For example, in his series titled “Death Comes to the Old Lady”, the shutter speed intensifies as you go through the series as it slowly depicts the man killing the woman. Furthermore, I also completed research about Aaron Schuman which is less evident that I was influenced by him as, in this shoot, I have not written text to accompany my images however, I have incorporated text within the second, third and 4th image (more prominent in the 4th) which can be argued that it does provide context about the images. I think most of my drawings match up to the images as I included each aspect that I planned. However, the last drawing does not match up to the images as I planned to do a close up of my face to illustrate the pain in my face after the situation happened however, I ended up shooting a mid- shot of myself with distressed body language which I believe was more successful as I was able to contrast shutter speeds. Moreover, I did not use any Photoshop techniques however I did create a video that depicted the story as a whole which included some more context behind the 6 photographs. This was very successful as not only does it add context to the images, but it provides a visual representation for the narrative I want to communicate.
Overall, I believe that my use of photographic techniques such as
contrast and composition (leading lines) was very successful as they helped highlight the dark atmosphere surrounding the narrative and guided the audience to the main focal points whilst also depicting how I feel on the inside and the outside through the colours of the walls. These techniques have also been successful in making the audience sympathise with the person in the photographs. To improve, I feel I need to explore different camera angles and shot sizes to see if they would enhance any of the meanings I wanted to communicate and/or change how the audience feels. The next thing I am going to do relating to this project, is complete another shoot based on the theme of online predators however, I am going to focus more on a parent’s perspective about the situation.