Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TITLE:
PIPE NETWORK
FACULTY
FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILT
ENVIRONMENT (FKAAB)
SECTION 6
GROUP 4
NO CONTENTS PAGE
1 1.0 DECLARATION 1
ii
Task:
Analysis of discharge, Q is needed in every pipes for this water supply system in town A
(Figure 2) by using Hardy-Cross method with Darcy Weisbach equations as listed in
Table 1. The pipe diameter and length of pipe are stated in Figure 2. Meanwhile, Table 2
tabulates friction factor for pipe network according to pipeline and Table 3 lists inlet and
outlet discharge.
Figure 1. Pipe network in town A Figure 2. Schematic diagram of pipe network
Line P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9
Friction 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.003
factor, f
Line P10 P11 P12 P13 P14 P15 P16 P17 P18
Friction 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.003
factor, f
iii
Iv
1.0 DECLARATION
Pipe network analysis involves the determination of the pipe flow rates and pressure
heads at the outflows points of the network. The flow rates and pressure heads must satisfy
the continuity and energy equations.
Pipeline system used in water distribution, industrial application and in many
engineering systems may range from simple arrangement to extremely complex one.
• Problems regarding pipelines are usually tackled by the use of continuity and
energy equations.
• Major loses: The head loss due to friction, which is usually calculated using the
Darcy-Weisbach equation
Pipe Network
2.1 THEORY
The classical approach for solving these networks is to use the Hardy Cross method.
In this formulation, first you go through and create guess values for the flows in the network.
These initial guesses must satisfy the Kirchhoff laws (1). That is, if Q7 enters a junction and
Q6 and Q4 leave the same junction, then the initial guess must satisfy Q7 = Q6 + Q4. After
the initial guess is made, then, a loop is considered so that we can evaluate our second
condition. Given a starting node, we work our way around the loop in a clockwise fashion, as
illustrated by Loop 1. We add up the head losses according to the Darcy–Weisbach equation
for each pipe if Q is in the same direction as our loop like Q1, and subtract the head loss if
the flow is in the reverse direction, like Q4. In other words, we add the head losses around
the loop in the direction of the loop; depending on whether the flow is with or against the
loop, some pipes will have head losses and some will have head gains (negative losses).
To satisfy the Kirchhoff's second laws (2), we should end up with 0 about each loop
at the steady-state solution. If the actual sum of our head loss is not equal to 0, then we will
adjust all the flows in the loop by an amount given by the following formula, where a positive
adjustment is in the clockwise direction.
h kQ 2
Q f
h f n kQn1
Q
J. KROPE, D. DOBERSEK,
D. GORICANEC
Faculty of Chemistry and
Chemical Engineering
University of Maribor
Smetanova ul. 17, 2000
Maribor
SL
KROPE, D. DOBERSEK, D.
GORICANEC
Faculty of Chemistry and
Chemical Engineering
University of Maribor
Smetanova ul. 17, 2000
Maribor
SLOVE N
3.0 CONCLUSION
hydraulic engineering long before the computer age. Moment distributions in indeterminate
concrete structures described with differential equations were too complex for the time
before
computers. Hardy Cross later applied these finding from structural analysis to balancing of
Today, in engineering practice, the modified Hardy Cross method proposed by Epp and
Fowler
is used rather than the original version of the Hardy Cross method. Methods proposed by
Hamam and Brameller, as well as by Wood and Charles and Wood and Rayes, are used in
common practice, too. Moreover, the node-oriented method proposed by Shamir and
Howard
is also based on the Hardy Cross method. Professional engineers use a different kind of
looped pipeline in professional software, but. even today, engineers invoke the name of
Hardy
Cross with awe. When petroleum and natural gas or civil engineers have to figure out what is
happening in looped piping systems, they inevitably turn to what is generally known as the
Hardy Cross method. The original Hardy Cross method is still extensively used for teaching
and learning purpose. Here, we introduced into the Hardy Cross method the multi-point
iterative approach instead of the Newton–Raphson iterative approach, but it does not affect
the number of required iterations to reach the final solution in our case. The view of Hardy
Cross was that engineers lived in the real world with real problems and that it was their job to
come up with answers to questions in design tasks, even if initial approximations were
involved. After Hardy Cross, the essential idea which he wished to present involves no
mathematical relations except the simplest arithmetic. For example, ruptures of pipes with
leakage can be detected using the Hardy Cross method because every single-point
disturbance affects the general distribution of flow and pressure. This paper has the purpose
of illustrating the very beginning of modelling of gas or water pipe networks. As noted by
Todini
and Rossman, many new models have been developed since the time of Hardy Cross.
4.0 REFERENCES
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardy_Cross_method
2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331095044_Hardy_Cross_Method_for_Pipe_
Networks
3. https://www.ukessays.com/essays/physics/flow-pipe-network-analysed-using-hardy-
cross-3197.php
4. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/40737(2004)360
5. https://core.ac.uk/reader/144012924
6. J. KROPE, D. DOBERSEK, D. GORICANEC, ‘Flow Pressure Analysis of Pipe Networks
with Linear Theory Method’, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of
Maribor, Smetanova ul. 17, 2000 Maribor, SLOVENIA.
MINUTE OF MEETING 1
TOPIC : TASK DIVIDING
DAY : TUESDAY
DATE : 2 JUNE 2020
TIME : 12.00 PM TO 3.00 PM
MEDIA : WHATSAPP GROUP
ATTENDANCE:
NO SUBJECT ACTION BY
2.0 Each group member agree about the task All the group members
dividing.
6
MINUTE OF MEETING 2
TOPIC : DISCUSSION ABOUT BRIEFING VIDEO BY DR. ADILA
DAY : TUESDAY
DATE : 9 JUNE 2020
TIME : 11.00 AM TO 1.00 PM
MEDIA : WHATSAPP GROUP
ATTENDANCE:
NO SUBJECT ACTION BY
1.0 Lecturer explained about each and every detail All the group members
briefly by video via Padlet. All the group members
held a discussion and understood.
7
MINUTE OF MEETING 3
TOPIC : DISCUSSION ABOUT DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS
DAY : THURSDAY
DATE : 11 JUNE 2020
TIME : 12.00 PM TO 2.00 PM
MEDIA : WHATSAPP GROUP
ATTENDANCE:
NO SUBJECT ACTION BY
1.0 Everyone presented their loop drawings and All the group members
briefly explained to other group member, so that
all the member understood.
2.0 Further discussions on project report completion All the group members
were carried out.
8
6.0 APPENDIX
10