Professional Documents
Culture Documents
( )
Longitudinal tensile strength σ
T
1 ult
Apply σ1=(σ1T )ult , to a unidirectional lamina, then the lamina will fail. Hence,
Equation reduces to
(G 2 + G3)(σ ) T 2
1 ult =1
(G 2 + G3) σ12 +(G1+ G3) σ 22 +(G1+ G 2 ) σ 32 − 2 G3 σ1 σ 2 − 2 G 2 σ1 σ 3
− 2 G1 σ 2 σ 3 +2 G 4 τ 223 +2 G 5 τ13
2
+2 G 6 τ12
2
<1
Apply σ 2 =(σ T2 )ult , to a unidirectional lamina, then the lamina will fail. Hence,
Equation reduces to
(G1+ G3)(σ ) T 2
2 ult =1
(G 2 + G3) σ12 +(G1+ G3) σ 22 +(G1+ G 2 ) σ 32 − 2 G3 σ1 σ 2 − 2 G 2 σ1 σ 3
− 2 G1 σ 2 σ 3 +2 G 4 τ 223 +2 G 5 τ13
2
+2 G 6 τ12
2
<1
Apply σ 3 =(σ T2 )ult , to a unidirectional lamina, and assuming that the normal
tensile failure strength is the same in direction (2) and (3), then the lamina
will fail. Hence, Equation reduces to
(G1+ G 2 )(σ ) T 2
2 ult =1
(G 2 + G3) σ12 +(G1+ G3) σ 22 +(G1+ G 2 ) σ 32 − 2 G3 σ1 σ 2 − 2 G 2 σ1 σ 3
− 2 G1 σ 2 σ 3 +2 G 4 τ 223 +2 G 5 τ13
2
+2 G 6 τ12
2
<1
Apply τ12 =(τ12 )ult to a unidirectional lamina, then the lamina will fail.
Hence, Equation reduces to
2 G 6 (τ12 )ult =1
2
1 2 1
−
[ ] [ ]
G1 =
2 ( σ T2 ) 2 ( σ1T ) 2
ult ult
(G 2 + G3)(σ )
T 2
1 ult =1
1 1
G2= T
2 [( σ1 )ult ]
(G1+ G3)(σ )
2
T 2
2 ult =1
1
(G1+ G 2 )(σ )
T 2
2 ult =1 G3= T
1
2 [( σ1 )ult ]
2
2 G 6 (τ12 )ult =1
2
1 1
G6=
2 [( τ12 )ult ]
2
Because the unidirectional lamina is assumed to be under plane stress - that
is, σ 3 = τ 31 = τ 23 = 0 ,
2 2 2
σ1 σ1 σ 2 σ 2 τ12
T − T 2 + T + <1
(σ1 ) ult (σ 1 ) ult (σ 2 ) ult ( τ12) ult
Unlike the Maximum Strain and Maximum Stress Failure Theories, the
Tsai-Hill failure theory considers the interaction among the three
unidirectional lamina strength parameter.
σ 1 = 1.714 S,
σ 2 = - 2.714 S,
τ 12 = - 4.165S.
2 2 2
1.714S 1.714S - 2.714S - 2.714S - 4.165S
- + + <1
1500 × 10 1500 × 10 1500 × 10 40 × 10 68 × 10
6 6 6 6 6
S < 10.94.MPa
a) The Tsai-Hill failure theory considers the interaction between the three unidirectional lamina
strength parameters, unlike the Maximum Strain and Maximum Stress failure theories.
b) The Tsai-Hill failure theory does not distinguish between the compressive and tensile strengths in
its equations. This can result in underestimation of the maximum loads that can be applied when
compared to other failure theories. For the load of σ x = 2MPa, σ y = - 3 MPa and τ xy = 4 MPa
as found in Examples 2.15, 2.17 and 2.18, the strength ratios are given by
SR = 10.94 (Tsai-Hill failure theory),
Tsai-Hill failure theory underestimates the failure stress because the transverse tensile
strength of a unidirectional lamina is generally much less than its transverse compressive
strength. The compressive strengths are not used in the Tsai-Hill failure theory. The
σ 1 σ 1 σ 2 σ 2 τ 12
2 2 2
where
X1 = ( σ T1 )ult if σ1 > 0
= ( σ 1C )ult if σ1 < 0
X2 = ( σ T1 )ult if σ2 > 0
= ( σ 1C )ult if σ2 < 0
Y = ( σ T2 )ult if σ2 > 0
= ( σ C2 )ult if σ2 < 0
S = ( τ 12 )ult .
For Example 2.18, the modified Tsai-Hill failure theory given by Equation (2.151) now gives
- + + <1
1500 × 10 1500 × 10 1500 × 10 246 × 10 68 × 10
6 6 6 6 6
which implies that the strength ratio is SR = 16.06 (modified Tsai-Hill failure theory)
This value is closer to the values obtained using Maximum Stress and Maximum Strain failure
theories.
c) The Tsai-Hill failure theory is a unified theory and hence does not give the mode of failure like
However, you can make a reasonable guess of the failure mode by calculating | σ 1 /( σ T1 )ult |,
| σ 2 /( σ T2 )ult | and | τ 12 /( τ 12 )ult | . The maximum of these three values gives the associated mode
− + + < 1
X 1 X 2 X 2 Y S
( ) , if σ > 0
X 1 = σ 1T ult 1
= (σ ) , if σ < 0
C
1 ult 1
X = (σ ) , if σ > 0
2
T
1 ult 2
= (σ ) , if σ < 0
C
1 ult 2
Y = (σ ) , if σ > 0
T
2 ult 2
= (σ ) , if σ < 0
C
2 ult 2
S = (τ 12 )ult