LSD - Pile - Abutment - Pier Final Kerung

Recommendation from Hydraulic Analysis
Design Discharge ( Q50) m3/s

Bridge Span m
Bed Level of River at Abutment 100.48 m
Bed Level of River at Pier 100.48
High Flood level 105.85 m
Adopted Scour Level at Abutment 99.333 m
Adopted Scour Level at Pier 95.588 m
Recommendation from Soil Investigation
Type of Foundation
Safe Bearing Capacity
Unit weight of backfill soil g 16
Unit weight of dry sand w_sand 16
Unit weight of saturated sand ws_sand 18
Unit weight of submerged soil ω 18
Degree
Angle between the wall and earth a 0
Angle of internal friction of soil f 32
Angle of friction between soil and wall d 16
Based on these recommendation

For Superstructure:
T-Girder Bridge is proposed
Class of Loading: As per IRC
For Substructure
Type of Foundation will be Open, Well or Pile Foundation
inimum Bed Level:
High Flood Level= 105.85 m SN Parameter
Bed Level= 100.48 m 1 Maximum flow (Q100 )
Flow Depth= m 2 HFL (Q100 )
Scour Depth at Abutment= 1.147 m
3 Freeboard (Fb ) Clearance above HFL
Scour Depth at Pier= 4.892 m
4 Bottom of the bridge
5 Silt factor (f)
Level of Foundation:
For Abutment= 99.333 m 6 Scour depth (dsc) below HFL
For Pier= 95.588 m 7 Level of Maximum Scour Depth
8 Minimum River Bed Level
Maximum Scour Depth (m) below minimum
9
Abutment
Maximum Scour Depth (m) below minimum
10
Pier
11 Number of Span & Bridge Span Provided
Parameter Recommended Value
Q100 ) 348.07 m3/s
105.85 m
learance above HFL 1.5 m
dge 107.35 m
0.686174322
below HFL 6.517 m
m Scour Depth 99.33 m
ed Level 100.48 m
Depth (m) below minimum bed level
1.147 m
Depth (m) below minimum bed level
4.892 m
& Bridge Span Provided 3 No. of 25 m
Table B.1 Partial Safety Factor for Verification of Equilibrium
Basic Combination Accidental Combination Seismic Combination

Overturning or Overturning or Overturning or
Sliding or uplift Restoring or Sliding or uplift Restoring or Sliding or uplift Restoring or
Loads Effect Resisting Effect Effect Resisting Effect Effect Resisting Effect
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. Permanent Loads:
1.1 Dead Load, Snow load (if

present), SIDL except surfacing,
Backfill weight, settlement,
creep and shrinkage effect 1.1 0.9 1 1 1.1 0.9
1.2 Surfacing 1.35 1 1 1 1.35 1
1.3 Prestress and Secondary
effect of prestress Refer Note 5
1.4 Earth pressure 1.5 1 1 1 1 1
2. Variable Loads:
2.1 Carriageway Live load,
associated loads (braking,
tractive and centrifugal) and
pedestrian load
a) As leading load 1.5 0 0.75
b) As accompanying load 1.15 0 0.2 0 0.2
c) Construction live load 1.35 0 1 0 1
2.4 Live Load Surcharge effects
as accompanying load 1.2
2.2 Thermal Load
a) As leading load 1.5
b) As accompanying load 0.9 0 0.5 0 0.5
3. Accidental Effects:
3.1 Vehicle collision (or) 1
3.2 Barge Impact 1
3.3 Impact due to floating bodies 1

4. Seismic Effect
(a) During Service 1.5
(b) During Construction 0.75
5. Construction condition:
5.1 Counter Weights:
a) When density or self-weight is
well defined 0.9 1 1
b) When density or self-weight is
not well defined 0.8 1 1
5.2 Construction Dead Loads
(such as Wt. of launching girder,
truss or Cantilever Construction
Equipments) 1.05 0.95
5.3 Wind Load
a) As leading load 1.5
b) As accompanying load 1.2
6. Hydraulic Loads:
(Accompanying Load):
6.1 Water current forces 1 1 1
6.2 Wave Pressure 1 1 1
6.3 Hydrodynamic effect 1
6.4 Buoyancy 1 1 1
Notes:
1) During launching the counterweight position shall be allowed a variation of ± 1 m for steel bridges.
2) For Combination principles refer Para 3.
3) Thermal effects include restraints associated with expansion/contraction due to type of construction (Portal frame, arch and elastomeric bearings), frictional
restraint in metallic bearings and thermal gradients. This combination however, is not valid for the design of bearing and expansion joint.
4) Wind load and thermal load need not be taken simultaneously unless otherwise required to cater for local climatic condition,
5) Partial safety factor for prestress and secondary effect of prestress shall be as recommended in the relevant codes.
6) Wherever Snow Load is applicable, Clause 221 shall be referred for combination of snow load and live load.
7) For repair, rehabilitation and retrofitting, the load combination shall be project specific.
8) For calculation of time period and seismic force, dead load, SIDL and appropriate live load as defined in Clause 219.5.2, shall not be enhanced by
corresponding partial safety factor as given in Table B.1 and shall be calculated using unfactored loads.
9) For dynamic increment and decrements of lateral earth pressure under seismic condition Clause 214.1.2 shall be referred to.
Accidental forces such as vehicle collision load, barge impact due to floating bodies and accidental wheel load on mountable footway
EARTH PRESSURE
214.1 Lateral Earth Pressure
Structure designed to retain earth fills shall be proportioned to withstand pressure calculated in accordance with any rational theory. Coulomb’s theory shall be
acceptable for non-cohesive soils. For cohesive soil Coulomb’s theory is applicable with Bell’s correction. For calculating the earth pressure at rest Rankine’s
theory shall be used.
Point of Application: The centre of pressure exerted by the backfill, when considered dry, is located at an elevation of 0.42 of the height of the wall above the
base and 0.33 of height of wall when considered wet.
Table B.2 Partial Safety Factor for Verification of Structural Strength Table B.3 Partial Safety Factor for Verification of Serviceability Limit State
Quasi-
Basic Accidental Seismic Rare Frequent permanent
Loads Combination Combination Combination Loads Combination Combination Combination
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Permanent Loads: 1. Permanent Loads:
1.1 Dead Load, Snow load (if 1.1 Dead Load, Snow load (if
present), SIDL except surfacing, present), SIDL except surfacing, 1 1 1
a) Adding to the effect of
variable loads 1.35 1 1.35 1.2 Surfacing
b) Relieving the effect of a) Adding to the effect of
variable loads 1 1 1 variable loads 1.2 1.2 1.2
b) Relieving the effect of
1.2 Surfacing variable loads 1 1 1
a) Adding to the effect of
variable loads 1.75 1 1.75 1.3 Earth pressure 1 1 1
b) Relieving the effect of 1.4 Prestress and Secondary
variable loads 1 1 1 effect of prestress Refer Note 4
1.3 Prestress and Secondary
effect of prestress Refer Note 2 1.5 Shrinkage and Creep Effect 1 1 1
1.4 Back fill Weight 1.5 1 1 2. Settlement Effects
a) Adding to the permanent

1.5 Earth pressure loads 1 1 1
b) Opposing the permanent
a) Adding to the effect of loads 1.5 1 1 loads 0 0 0
b) Relieving the effect of loads 1 1 1 3. Variable Loads:
3.1 Carriageway load and
tractive and centrifugal forces)
2. Variable Loads: and footway live load
2.1 Carriageway Live load and
tractive and centrifugal) and
Footway live load a) Leading Load 1 0.75
a) As leading load 1.5 0.15 b) Accompanying Load 0.75 0.2
b) As accompanying load 1.15 0.2 0.2 3.2 Thermal Load
c) Construction live load 1.35 1 1 a) As leading load 1 0.75

2.2 Wind Load construction
during service b) As accompanying load 0.75 0.2
a) As leading load 1.5 3.3 Wind Load
b) As accompanying load 0.9 a) As leading load 1 0.6
2.3 Live Load Surcharge effects

(as accompanying load) 1.2 0.2 0.2 b) As accompanying load 0.6 0.5
2.4 Construction Dead Loads
truss or Cantilever Construction 3.4 Live Load surcharge as
Equipment) 1.35 1 1.35 accompanying load 0.8 0 0
4. Hydraulic Loads:
2.5 Thermal Load (Accompanying Load):
a) As leading load 1.5 4.1 Water current forces 1 1
b) As accompanying load 0.9 0.5 0.5 4.2 Wave Pressure 1 1
3. Accidental Effects: 4.3 Buoyancy 0.15 0.15 1
3.1 Vehicle collision (or) 1
3.2 Barge Impact 1
3.3 Impact due to floating bodies 1

4. Seismic Effect
(a) During Service 1.5
(b) During Construction 0.75
5. Hydraulic Loads:
(Accompanying Load):
5.1 Water current forces 1 1 1
5.2 Wave Pressure 1 1 1
5.3 Hydrodynamic effect 1
5.4 Buoyancy 0.15 0.15 1 Notes :
1) For Combination principles, refer Para 3.

Notes:
2) Thermal load includes restraints associated with expansion/ contraction due to type
of construction (Portal frame, arch and elastomeric bearings), frictional restraint in
1) For combination principles, refer Para 3.
metallic bearings and thermal gradients. This combination however, is not valid for the
design of bearing and expansion joint.
2) Partial safety factor for prestress and secondary effect of prestress shall be as
recommended in the relevant codes. IRC 112 Clause 7.9.5: "In case of bonded 3) Wind load and thermal load need not be taken simultaneously unless otherwise
tendons, for ultimate limit state of strength, the design value of prestressing force shall
required to cater for local climatic condition,
be based on the mean value acting at that time, with partial factor γp=1."
4) Partial safety factor for prestress and secondary effect of prestress shall be as
In verification of local effects γp.unfav =1.3 shall be used.
recommended in the relevant codes.
In serviceability limit state, two characteristic values of prestressing force shall be
3) Wherever Snow Load is applicable, Clause 221 shall be referred for combination of used.
snow load and live load.
Pk.sup = γsup. pm.(t) (x) Eq. 7.7
Pk.inf = γinf Pm (t) (x) Eq. 7.8
4) For calculation of time period and seismic force, dead load, SIDL and appropriate Where
live load as defined in Clause 219.5.2, shall not be enhanced by corresponding partial
pmt (x) is effective prestressing force at point ‘x’ at time ‘t’ and Pk.sup and Pk.inf are
safety factor as given in Table B.2 and shall be calculated using unfactored loads.
corresponding superior and inferior characteristic values. The values of γsup and γinf
shall be as follows:
5) Thermal loads indicated, consists of either restraint effect generated by portal
frame or arch or elastomeric bearing or frictional force generated by bearings as
- for post-tensioning with bonded tendons γsup =1.10 and γinf = 0.9.
applicable.
5) Where Snow Load is applicable, Clause 221 shall be referred for combination of
6) For dynamic increment and decrements of lateral earth pressure under seismic snow load and live load.
condition Clause 214.1.2 shall be referred to.
based on truss model.

redistribution of loads is possible.
Table B.4 Partial Safety Factor for Checking the Base Pressure and Design of Foundation
Combination Combination Seismic Accidental

Loads (1) (2) Combination Combination
1 2 3 4 5
1. Permanent Loads:
1.1 Dead Load, Snow load (if

present), SIDL except surfacing, 1.35 1 1.35 1
1.2 SIDL surfacing 1.75 1 1.75 1
1.3 Prestress Effect Refer Note 4
1.4 Settlement Effect 1.0 or 0 1.0 or 0 1.0 or 0 1.0 or 0
1.5 Earth Pressure
a) Adding to the effect of loads 1.5 1.3 1 1
b) Relieving the effect of loads 1 0.85 1 1

2. Variable Loads:
2.1 Carriageway load and
tractive and centrifugal forces)
and footway live load
a) Leading Load as 0.75 (if 0.75 (if
accompanying load 1.5 1.3 applicable) or 0 applicable) or 0
b) Accompanying Load 1.15 1 0.2 0.2
2.2 Thermal Load as

accompanying load 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5
2.3 Wind Load

a) As leading load 1.5 1.3
b) As accompanying load 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5
2.4 Live Load surcharge as
accompanying load 1.2 1 0.2 0.2
3. Accidental Effect or
Seismic Effect
a) During Service 1.5 1
b) During Construction 0.75 0.5
4. Construction Dead Loads
truss or Cantilever Construction
Equipments) 1.35 1 1 1
5. Hydraulic Loads:
5.1 Water current forces 1.0 or 0 1.0 or 0 1.0 or 0

5.2 Wave Pressure 1.0 or 0 1.0 or 0 1.0 or 0
5.3 Hydrodynamic effect 1.0 or 0
6. Buoyancy:
a) For Base Pressure 1 1 1
b) For Structural Design 0.15 0.15 0.15
Notes :
1) For combination principles, refer para 3.
2) Where two partial factors are indicated for loads, both these factors shall be considered for arriving at
the severe effect.
3) Wind load and thermal load need not be taken simultaneously unless otherwise required to cater for
local climatic condition.
4) Partial safety factor for prestress and secondary effect of prestress shall be as recommended in the
relevant codes.
5) Wherever Snow Load is applicable, Clause 221 shall be referred for combination of snow load and
live load.
6) For repair, rehabilitation and retrofitting the load combination shall be project specific.
7) For calculation of time period and seismic force, dead load, SIDL and appropriate live load as defined
in Clause 219.5.2. shall not be enhanced by corresponding partial safety factor as given in Table B.4
and shall be calculated using unfactored loads.
8) At present the combination of loads shown in Table B.4 shall be used for structural design of
foundation only. For checking the base pressure under foundation, load combination given in IRC:78
shall be used. Table B.4 shall be used for checking of base pressure under foundation only when
relevant material safety factor and resistance factor are introduced in IRC:78.
9) For dynamic increment and decrement, Clause 214.1.2 on lateral earth pressure under seismic
condition shall be referred to.
10) Thermal loads indicated, consists of either restraint effect generated by portal frame or arch or
elastomeric bearing or frictional force generated by bearings as applicable.
Density 25
Characteristic compressive cube strength of concrete at 28
days, fck 35
Mean value of concrete cube compressive strength, fcm 45
Mean value of axial tensile strength of concrete, fctm 2.8
Lower characteristic tensile strength fctk,0.05 1.9
Upper characteristic tensile strength fctk,0.95 3.6
Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete, Ecm 32.3
Compressive strain in the concrete at the peak stress fc 2.1
Ultimate compressive strain in the concrete 0.0035
Design Strength, fcd 16 (0.67 fck /1.5)
fy 415
Design value of modulus of elasticity of reinforcing steel, Es 200

Effective modulus of elasticity of concrete, Ec,eff 32.3
Modular ratio 6.2
Design Abutment Foundation Page 11
2.0 Design of Substructure
2.1 Design of Abutment

Section of Abutment 25 mSuperstructure
0.25 0.4 1.00
109.550 Deck Level
0.3 Concrete Grade
1.0 A6 A7 0.5 2.5 All Concrete M 35
0.301
A5 0.15
2.7 A2 1
3.5 0.00 105.9 HFL

A3
3.50
6.30
Y 0.8643 A1 -0.16 100.480 AGL
3.735 A4 100.480 LBL
x 0.4
A 99.600 SBL
1.00 0.80
1.50 A8
98.100 CTL
This prelimanry section is defined by considering T SBL = Stem Bottom Level
hydrological analysis and geotechnical recommendation CTL = Cap Top Level
AGL = Average Ground Level
Levels
High Flood Level 105.85 m
Average Ground Level 100.48 m
Total depth of longitudinal Girder including Slab 2.50 m
Provided Clear free board 1.20 m
Level of Deck Surface 109.550 m
Thickness of abutment cap 1.00 m
Top level of Footing/cap (SBL) 99.60 m
Thickness of Footing/Cap 1.50 m
Bottem level of Footing/Cap (FBL) 98.10 m
Thickness of Bearing 0.052 m
Thickness of Bearing concrete Pad 0.098 m
Hence the total height of abutment H= 9.95 m
Seismic Coefficient Determination :
Abutment_Design 542531715.xls
Ave.SPT 35
Superstructure DL+LL 2988.1 KN
Horizontal Force for 1mm def. of top pier/abutment 607 KN
Fundamental Time Period, T 0.140 sec
Ave. response acceleration coefficient for 5% Damping, Sa/g 2.5
Importance Factor, I 1.2
Zone Factor, Z : 0.36 Zone V
Response Reduction Factor 3
Horizantal Seismic Coefficient, Ah
0.180
Horizantal Seismic Coefficient, Av 0.135
Earth Pressure Coefficient Determination :
Ah 0.180
Av 0.135
Φ 35 0.61 rad
λ 0.16 0.21 rad
α 0 0.00 rad
β 0 0.00 rad
δ 22.5 0.39 rad
Ca 0.398 0.343
Ka 0.244
Ca :dynamic active earth pressure
Ka : Active Earthpressure
As per IRC : 6 for Equivqlent live load Surcharge 1.2 m soil wt.
Height of Abutment H= 9.80 m

Length of Abutment L= 7.2 m
Span Length 25 m
Approach Slab Diamensions
Thickness of approach slab 0.3 m
Length of Approach Slab 3.50 m
Width of Approach Slab 7.2 m
Ballast Wall
Width of Ballast wall 0.4 m
Length of Ballast wall 7.2 m
Wing Wall
Thickness of wing wall 0.4 m
Soil Data & Seismic Data
Unit weight of backfill soil g 18 kN/m³
Unit weight of concrete w_conc 25 kN/m³
Horizontal seismic coefficient AH 0.180
Vertical seismic coefficient Av 0.135
Analysis and Design of Abutment Stem

Area and C.G Calculation with respect to bottom of stem point A
Symbol Area (m2) CG-X CG-Y Weight (KN)

A1 1.46 0.20 4.98 262.80
A2 1.00 0.90 6.80 180.00
A3 6.300 0.88 3.15 1134.00
A4 2.52 1.67 2.10 453.60
A5 4.64 -1.17 8.07 46.38
A6 3.50 -1.75 9.45 35.00
A7 0.13 -0.13 9.40 22.50
Total 19.54 2134.28
C.G from A 0.864 3.735
Position of C.G From Superstructure Load Point -0.1633
Forces on the Abutment

Total Dead Load from superstructure 1972.94 KN
Total Critical Live load Excluding impact 1015.13 KN I.F 1.145
Total Critical Live load including impact 1162.5 KN
Earth Pressure force (Including live load surcharge) [IRC:6-2000, 217.1]

Load, KN LA,m Moment, KNm
Active Earth pressure 1521 4.116 6262 Clockwise
Live Load Surcharge 373 4.9 1826 Clockwise
Dynamic Active Earth Pressure 2480 6.533 16201 Clockwise
Dynamic LL Surcharge 607 6.468 3928 Clockwise
Backfill Dead Load 3611
Effect of buyoncy
Area of stem at top = 7.2 m²
Depth of submerged part of abutment = 6.25 m
Area of stem at base = 12.96 m²
Area of stem at HFL = 12.9142857 m²
Volume of submerged part of abutment = 80.8571429 m³
Taking 1/2 of the volume, Net upward force due to buyoncy = -404.28571 kN
Frictional force due to resistance of bearings
Vertical dead Load 657.64736 kN

Total No of Bearing Per Abutment 3
Length of main girders (L) 25000 mm
Width of girder (a) 500 mm
Assume width of elastomeric bearing (parallel to span) (b) 500 mm
Lateral force due to frictional resistance of bearings, 187.44 KN
Moment 1368.34 KNm
Breaking Force:
Braking force = 20% of the weight of the design vehicle
And this force acts along the bridge at 1.2m above the road level 3.85 m at bearing level
Total weight of the IRC Class A vehicle = 203.03 KN
Moment 781.65 KNm
Seismic Forces on Abutment

Seismic Forces Due to back fill and Approach Slab are also considered.
Horizontal seismic forces: Load,KN LA,m Moment,KNm
Superstructure: 355.1 7.300 2592
Abutment: 384.2 3.735 1435
Backfill soil mass 649.9 4.900 3185
Total 1389.2 7212.1
Vertical seismic forces: Load,KN
Superstructure: 266.35 kN
Abutment: 288.13 kN
Backfill soil mass 487.43856 kN
Total 1041.91 KN
The seismic force due to live load shall not be considered when acting in the direction of traffic
Summary of Loads and Moment

The transverce forces and moments are not calculated since it will not be critical due to high moment of inertia.
Vertical Moment,KN
Load Type Load,KN Horizontal Load,KN m
a) Permanent DL
Superstructure dead load 1972.94 -322.17
Abutment 2134.28 0.00
Soil mass 3610.66
Pile Cap 3718.50
Active Earth pressure 1521.47 6262.39
b) Variable Loads
Live load 1162.49 -189.83
Tractive/Braking force 203.03 781.65
Frictional force 187.44 1368.34
Live load surcharge 372.61 1825.77
c) Seismic Effect
Due to DL 1041.91 1389.22 7212.08
Due to DL (Pile Cap) 502.00 669.33 502.00
Active Earth Pressure 2479.76 16201.13
LL Surcharge 607.29 3927.95
d) Hydraulic Loads
Buoyancy -404.286
Verification of Structural Strength (Table B2 / IRC 112)
Basic Combination Seismic Combination
Abutment Stem Design
V, KN 6882 As flexural member 5777 As flexural member
H,KN 3132 4819
M,KNm 12995 Wall Criteria meets 28172 Wall Criteria meets
(Clause 7.6 /IRC 112)
Pile Cap and Pile Design
V, KN 16776 16724
H,KN 3132 5823
M,KNm 13062 28925
Verification of Serviceability Limit State (Table B3 / IRC 112)

Rare Combination (For Stress Check)
Abutment Stem Design
V, KN 5270
H,KN 2210
M,KNm 9361

V, KN 12599
H,KN 2210
M,KNm 9361
Design of Foundation(Pile) (Table B4 / IRC 112)

Combination (1) Combination (2) Seismic Combination
V, KN 17318 13682 16724

H,KN 3203 2764 5823
M,KNm 13335 11509 28925
A. Design of abutment stem Section Short Column
Abutment Stem will be designed as compression member with uniaxial moment.
Overall Thickness of Stem at base D= 1800 mm
Length of the abutment L= 7200 mm
Gross cross sectional area of the stem Ag = 12960000 mm²
percentage of longitudinal tensile reinforcement pst 0.27 %
the percentage of longitudinal compressive reifnrocement psc 0.11 %
Percentage of steel to be provided as per IRC:112/ Clause 16.3.1 0.24 %
Total percentage of longitudinal reinforcement = 0.38 % OK
Net area of concrete Ac = 12960000 mm²

Let the effective cover (referring to the CG of bars) cover (d')= 75 mm
Hence the effective depth d_eff = 1725 mm
Design BM 9361 KNm Serviceability Limit State

Provided overall depth 1800 mm
Clear Cover 75 mm
Available d eff. 1725 mm
SP 105 based design

β1 0.80952
β2 0.41597
fcd 15.633333 N.mm2
x 60 mm
x lim 827 mm
OK
z 1700 mm
Ast required 15253 OK
NA (x) 188 mm OK, Within x lim Ultimate Limit State
Main Reinforcement Calculation

Reinforcement Area (mm2) Bar dia (mm) Nos Spacing (mm) c/c Provided Nos
Tensile reinforcement (AS1+AS2) 34992 25 75 100 AS1 75
Compressive Reinforcement
(AS3+AS4) 14256 20 50 150 AS2 50
The distance between two adjacent vertical bars shall not exceed 200 mm.
Total area of tensile reinforcement Ast= 36816 mm² OK, Clause 16.3.1
Total area of compressive reinforcement Asc= 15708 mm² OK, Clause 16.3.1
Total provided area of longitudinal steel = 52524 mm² OK, Clause 16.3.1
0.405 % OK
Distribution Bar calculation

Let the percentage of distribution bars be 26 % of the total longitudinal reinforcement
Clause 16.3.2/ IRC 112, Min. 25% of TLR
Hence, area of distribution bars = 13656 mm²
Let's use bars of 16 mm Unit area = 201 mm²
Total number of distribution bars on each face of the stem = 34 nos
Spacing @ 190 mm c/c
Provided spacing 190 mm and bar dia is 16 mm (AS3)
No of Bar 47 on each face of stem
Development / Lap length to be provided where necessary = 0 mm
Check For Ultimate Shear

Maximum Shear Force 4819 KN
σcp 0.45 N/mm2 Axial Stress
fcd 15.63 N/mm2 (Partial FoS = 1.5)
fck 35 N/mm2
f ctd 1.94 N/mm2 (Partial FoS = 1.5)
Asl 36816 mm2
bw 7200 mm
d 1800 mm
Equation 10.1 /IRC 112

ρ1 0.003
K 1.33
V min 0.282 MPa
(V min +0.15* σcp ) bw . d 4526 KN
V RD.c 5177 KN Safe
Stress Check (Rare Combination Table B3./IRC 112)

Section Modulus 3.888E+09 mm3
σ1 2.8 N/mm2 Within Comprehensive Stress limit
σ2 -1.0 N/mm2 Within Tensile Stress limit
(Clause 12.1, 12.2.1 / IRC 112)
Limit State of Cracking (Frequent Combination Table B3. / IRC 112)
W max 0.3mm
12.3.6 Control of cracking without direct calculation
Bar Size 25 mm
Bar Spacing 100 mm
Bar Size limitation 25 mm OK

Bar max spacing 250 mm OK
xu 827
Steel in tension zone 36816
K1 0.8 (Deformed Bar)
K2 0.5 (Bending Case) LA 1312
As 36816 mm2 Moment,KNm 13335
Ac.eff 22500 Actual Stress(σsc) = 276 Mpa
ρ1,eff 1.636
S r,max 106
αe 6
εsm - εcm 0.0013267
Wk 0.14 mm OK
Summary of reinforcement of abutment stem Section
AS3 AS3
AS1 Ø 16 @ 190 c AS1 Ø 16 @ 190 c/c
Ø 25 @ 100 c/c AS2 Ø 25 @ 100 c/c AS2
Ø 20 @ 150 c/c Ø 20 @ 150 c/c
Above curtailment Below curtailment
AS2
AS1 Ø 20 @ 150 c/c
Ø 25 @ 100 c/c Height of curtailmnet
AS3 No Curtailment
Ø 16 @ 190 c/c AS2
AS1 Ø 20 @ 150 c/c
Ø 25 @ 100 c/c
B. Design of Abutment Cap

Calculation of Vertical Load
Superstructure Dead Load 1973 KN
Live Load Including Impact 1162 KN
Total Load 3135 KN
Total Load per Girder 1045 KN
No of Longitidunal Girder 3
Depth of Abutment Cap D= 1000 mm
Check For Punching Stress: Dispersed Dimension
Bearing Size provided L= 500 mm 2000 mm
B= 500 mm 1000 mm
uo 2000 mm
u1
Abutment_Design 6000 mm 542531715.xls
β 1
ν Ed 0.17 N/mm2 k 1.4
Design of Pier Cap and Stem 18
2.1 Design of Pier
Section of Pier
A C1 B 0.999 0.301
TPL 106.9
1 3.200 0.000 2.00
2.600
BPL 104.90
8.00
HFL 105.85
3.00 7.30
2.00
8.80 LBL 100.48
SBL 99.60
1.50 1.50
FBL 98.1
13.40 7.40
This prelimanry section is defined by considering SBL = Stem Bottom Level

hydrological analysis and geotechnical recommendation FBL = Footing Bottom Level
Levels
High Flood Level 105.85 m
Lowest Bed Level of pier 100.48 m
Level of Deck Surface 109.55 m
Thickness of Pier cap (overall Thickness) 2.00 m
Total depth of longitudinal Girder including Slab 2.50 m
Top level of pier cap (TPL) 106.90
Top level of Footing (SBL) 99.60 m
Thickness of Footing/Cap 1.50 m
Bottem level of Footing/Cap (FBL) 98.10 m
Thickness of Bearing 0.15 m
Hence the total height of Pier H= 8.80 m
Pier_CAP+STEM 542531715.xls
Seismic Coefficient Determination :
Ave.SPT 35
Superstructure DL+LL 5976.1 KN
Horizontal Force for 1mm def. of top pier/abutment 136 KN
Fundamental Time Period, T 0.42 sec
Ave. response acceleration coefficient for 5% Damping, Sa/g 2.4
Importance Factor, I 1
Zone Factor, Z : 0.36 Zone V
Response Reduction Factor 3
Horizantal Seismic Coefficient, Ah
0.143
Horizantal Seismic Coefficient, Av 0.107

Horizontal seismic coefficient aH 0.143
Vertical seismic coefficient an 0.107
A. Design of Pier Cap

Forces on the Pier at Point A B C1
Distance from center -3.20 3.20 0.00
Total Dead Load from superstructure (kN) 1315.29 1315.29 1315.29
Total Critical Live load excluding impact (kN) 676.75 676.75 676.75
Conservative value
Moment at the edge of the stem shaft
Due to dead load of the cap itself = 390.00 Kn-m
Due to dead load from superstructure = 4208.9 Kn-m
Due to live load excluding impact = 2165.6 Kn-m
Due to Impact load = 1082.8 Kn-m
Serviceability State Ultimate State
Total Moment 7847 9944 KNm
Shear Force 1992 2554 KN
Cap To be designed as Corbel

ac/hc 2.20 Case 16.7b / IRC 112
As 16871 mm2 (Detailed design : Separate sheet)

Dia. 32 mm
No. of Bar 20 For 2598 mm width
Spacing 135 mm AP1
AP6
Ah 7712
Dia. 16 mm
No. of Bar 6 For 2000 mm depth
Spacing 300 mm 6 legged AP4
Provide 20 mm bars at spacing 220 mm c/c, so nos of bars are 12
Provided area of tensile reinforcement = 3770 mm2 AP2
Check for Ultimate Shear
fck 35 N/mm2
Asl 16871 mm2
bw 2598 mm
d 2000 mm

ρ1 0.003 Strength reduction factor for concrete cracked in shear,ν 0.532
K 1.32 α cw 1.00
V min 0.277 MPa
(V min +0.15* σcp ) bw . d 1439 KN
V RD.c 1700 KN Need Shear Reinforcement
Shear Stress developed, tau = 0.49 N/mm²

Allowable Max. Shear Stress 4.19 N/mm2 OK
ϴ 0.059 3.4 deg
Providing 14 legs of 16 mm Ø bars Leg Gap 186 mm

The shear steel area Asv = 2814.87 mm²
Spacing of bars 200 mm c/c AP3
Shear Reinforcement Required 42 mm2
Shear Reinforcement Provided 2815 mm2 OK
Check for Eq. 16.12 : Minimum Shear Reinforcement (Corbel)

Shear Reinforcement within 'ac' distance 33778 mm2
Required reinforcement area 3537 mm2 OK
Skin reinforcement @ 0.1% of gross sectional area of the beam 3120 mm²
For each side = 1560 mm² each side
16 mm Ø bars
Spacing of bars 260 mm c/c AP6
Reinforcement below bearing 12 mm 5 layers AP5
Check for punching shear
Average depth of section at bearing, i.e. at 2.2 m from the stem face= 1733 mm
Vertical Load, KN 2554

Steel % in L-Direction 0.003
Steel % in T-Direction 0.001
Depth D= 2200 mm
uo 2000 mm
u1 3996 mm
β 1
ν Ed 0.29 N/mm2
v Rd.max 4.21 k 1.3
Permissible ν Ed 0.40 N/mm2 ρ1 0.00000
Safe a 318
Summary of reinforcement of Pier Cap

Ø 32 @ 270 mm c/c AP6 Ø 32 @ 270 mm c/c AP6
Ø 16 @ 300 mm 6 legged AP4 Ø 32 @ 135 mm c/c AP1
Ø 32 @ 135 mm c/c AP1
14 legged Ø 16 @ 200 mm c/c AP3
Ø 16 @ 300 mm 6 legged AP4

Ø 20 @ 220 mm c/c AP2 Ø 12 @ 5 layers AP5
Ø 20 @ 220 mm c/c AP2
B. Design of Pier Stem
Length of stem column (between the surfaces of the restrains) L= 7300 mm

Diameter of column D 2000 mm
Effective length of column (Table 11.1/IRC 112) Le = 9490 mm
[ effective length factor 1.3 ]
Impact Total Load Total Load CG of Load
Forces on the Pier at factor (absolute) (incl. impact) wrt center,
Point from superstructure A B C (excl. impact) m
Distance from center -3.2 3.2 0
Dead Load (kN) 1 1315.29 1315.29 1315.29 3945.88 3945.88 0.000
Live load (kN) 1.145 676.75 676.75 676.75 2030.26 2324.98 0.000
Analysis and Design of pier Stem
Dead Load
Dead Load From Superstructure 7891.8 kN
Dead Load due to pier cap 600.00 kN
Dead Load of Pier Stem 416.26 kN
Total Dead Load 8908 kN
Live Load
Live Load Excluding Impact = 4060.53 kN
which will act at eccentricity ('CG of Load wrt center) 0.000 m
Critical moment due to live load eccentricity 0 kN-m
Breaking Force:( As Per IRC:6-2000, 214.2)

Braking force = 20% of the weight of the design vehicle (Class A)
Height of deck surface from the pier cap= 2.552 m
And this force acts along the bridge at 1.2m above the road level 3.75 m at bearing level
Total weight of the IRC Class A vehicle = 700 kN
Therefore braking force length = 140 kN
Moment Due to Breaking Force 525.28 kN-m
Effect of buyoncy [IRC:6-2000, 216.4 (a)]

Area of stem at top = 3.142 m²
Depth of submerged part of Pier = 6.25 m
Volume of submerged part of pier = 19.63 m³
Net upward force due to buyoncy = -196.35 kN
Frictional force due to resistance of bearings (temperature effect)
Lateral force due to frictional resistance of bearings, 62.48 kN
And this force acts along the bridge at 7.30 m from base of stem
Moment due to temperature effect 456.11 kN-m
Force due to water current

Exposed height to water current 6.25 m
perimeter Area exposed 19.63 m
Maximum mean velocity m/sec 3
Maximum velocity, Sqrt(2)*V, (IRC:6-2000,213.3), V = 4.24
Shape factor for square end (IRC:6-2000, 213.2), K = 0.66
Pressure intensity =0.5KV² (IRC:6-2000, 213.2) = 5.94
Hence force due to water current = 77.75 kN
Moment due to water current 485.97 kN-m
Seismic Forces on
Horizontal seismic forces:

Forces (kN) Lever Arm (m) Moment (kN-m)
Superstructure: 1130.57 7.30 8253.16
Pier cap 85.96 6.30 541.52
Pier stem 59.63 2.65 158.03
Total 1276.16 8952.71
Vertical seismic forces:
Superstructure: 847.93
Pier cap 64.47
Pier stem 44.72
Total 957.12
The seismic force due to live load shall not be considered when acting in the direction of traffic
Loads and Moment Calculation

The transverce forces and moments are not calculated since it will not be critical due to high moment of inertia.
Vertical
Load Type Load,KN Horizontal Load,KN Moment,KNm
a) Permanent DL
Dead Load 8908.03 0.00
Pile Cap 3718.50
b) Variable Loads
Live load 4060.53 0.00
Tractive/Braking force 140.00 525.28
Frictional force 62.48 525.28
c) Seismic Effect
Due to DL 957.12 1276.16 8952.71
Due to DL (Pile Cap) 399.53 532.71 399.53
d) Hydraulic Loads
Buoyancy -196.350
Water Current Force 77.75 485.97
Verification of Structural Strength (Table B2 / IRC 112)
Basic Combination Seismic Combination
Pier Stem Design
V, KN 16695 14274
H,KN 295 2082
M,KNm 1563 14283

V, KN 21715 19893
H,KN 295 2850
M,KNm 1563 14882
Verification of Serviceability Limit State (Table B3 / IRC 112)

Rare Combination (For Stress Check)
Pier Stem Design
V, KN 12969
H,KN 265
M,KNm 1405

V, KN 16687
H,KN 265
M,KNm 1405
Design of Foundation(Pile) (Table B4 / IRC 112)

Combination (1) Combination (2) Seismic Combination
V, KN 21715 21106 19893

H,KN 217 190 2773
M,KNm 1077 1024 14396
Serveiceablity Case Ultimate Case

Actual maximum moment, M, KNm, 1405 14283
Maximum Axial Force (kN) 12969 14274
Sectional area = (Ag) 3141593 mm²

Let Provide main reinforcement 2.4 % of Sectional area OK
Total Area of reinforcement 75398 mm²
Let Provide 32 mm dia bars. Provided Number of Bar 94 (AP7)
Spacing between the bars = 132 mm Bundel of 2
Provide in one row
Spacing between the bars = 66 mm
Cover provided 75 mm
Let provided diameter of transverse reinforcement 16 mm
the diameter up to the line of reinforcement Dc 1999850 mm
So Area of Steel Provided (As) 75599 mm²
So Area of Concrete (Ac) 3141593 mm²
Stress Check (Rare Combination Table B3./IRC 112)
Section Modulus 7.85E+08 mm3
σ1 5.9 N/mm2 Within Comprehensive Stress limit
σ2 2.3 N/mm2 Within Tensile Stress limit
(Clause 12.1, 12.2.1 / IRC 112)
Limit State of Cracking (Frequent Combination Table B3. / IRC 112)
W max 0.3mm
12.3.6 Control of cracking without direct calculation
Bar Size 32 mm
Bar Spacing 66 mm
Steel stress 200 MPa

Bar Size limitation 25 mm Revise
Bar max spacing 250 mm OK
xu 632
Steel in tension zone 55102
K1 0.8 (Deformed Bar)
K2 0.5 (Bending Case) LA 1609
As 34569 mm2 Moment,KNm 1405
Ac.eff 66000 Actual Stress(σsc) = 16 Mpa
ρ1,eff 0.524
S r,max 335
αe 6
εsm - εcm 5.867E-05
Wk 0.02 mm OK
Ultimate State Check
B 0.0035
(εcu2)
857
2000
1925
C
A
0.00380
O 0.0020
(εc2)
Actual maximum moment, M, KNm, 14283

Maximum Axial Force (kN) 14274
Strain due to axial load 0.0001
Dia of Pier, D 2000.00 mm

Area of steel 75599 mm2
Assume nutral axis depth , X (mm) 1048 { TRIAL VALUE}
N, KN 14274 β1 0.80952
Pus(x), KN -9358 (-ve for Tensile Force) fcd 15.6
Puc(x), KN 23661
Balance -29
θ 3.24 Rad
Sin θ -0.10
Area of compression Zone 1666759 3141593
Area in Tension zone 1474833
Steel in Compression Zone 40109
Steel in Tension Zone 35490
fyd 361 Mpa
-0.005 -0.004 -0.003 -0.002 -0.001 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004

0
B
Tension
l
500 ca ain
oriti Str
e te
Th cre Line
Line 1000 C n
S train e Co
el Lin
Ste train Theoritical Strain in
lS 1500 Concrete in Axial
ee
cal St Compression
ti
ori
The 2000 Compression
A O
2500
Clause 8.2.2 / IRC 112 : Zone-2: Compressive load with eccentricity, having neutral axis within Section, and ultimate strength
governed by tensile steel. The maximum strain in the concrete is less than the limiting value of εcu2 thus the strength of the
concrete is not exhausted. The tensile strain at steel is at the upper design limit of εud .
Area of
Level Area,mm2 εs' fs', Mpa εs fs, MPa Nrd Mrd
Steel, mm2
21094 11809
75 38291 921 0.00325 361 333 308
150 107046 2576 0.00300 361 597 508
250 226656 5454 0.00267 361 1039 779
300 295499 7111 0.00250 361 598 419
1048 1666759 40109 0.00000 0 0 0
1223 2013852 8352 0.00059 117 -979 219
1399 2346719 16363 0.00117 234 -1877 748
1574 2652529 23722 0.00176 351 -2586 1485
1750 2914407 30023 0.00234 361 -2275 1706
1925 3103301 34569 0.00293 361 -1641 1518
(-ve for Tension Reinforcement ) Total 14303 19499
Safe Safe
Check For Ultimate Shear

fck 35 N/mm2
Asl 75599 mm2
bw 1000 mm
d 3142 mm

ρ1 0.020
K 1.25
V min 0.257 MPa
(V min +0.15* σcp ) bw . d 2948 KN
V RD.c 3923 KN Safe
Check For Punch Shear : Pier Stem - Pile Cap

Serviceablility Ultimate State
Vertical Load, KN 14581 16451
Net Vertical Load, KN 4569 6337
Steel % in L-Direction 0.54
Steel % in T-Direction 0.54
Depth of Pile Cap D= 1500 mm
uo 6283 mm
u1 23248 mm
β 1
ν Ed 0.131 N/mm2 0.182 N/mm2
v Rd.max 4.21
Permissible ν Ed 0.079 N/mm2 k 1.4
Safe ρ1 0.00003
a 2700
Provide Nominal Chair bar 10 dia @ 700 mm spacing PPC6
Summary of reinforcement of Pier Section

Provide 94 nos of 32 mm dia bars (AP7)
Lateral Ties
Clause 16.2.3/ IRC 112
Provide 16 mm circular rings @ 125 mm c/c Diameter of ring (mm) 2000
OK (AP8)
Provide 12 mm Support bar @ 500 mm c/c (AP9)
Ø 12 @ 500 mm c/c (AP9) Ø 32 @ 132 mm c/c (AP7)
Ø 32 @ 132 mm c/c (AP7)
Ø 16 @ 125 mm c/c (AP8)
Ø 16 @ 125 mm c/c (AP8) 6 no Ø 16 @ 125 mm c/c (AP8)
Ø 16 @ 125 mm c/c (AP8)

Ø 16 @ 125 mm c/c (AP6A)
Corbel Design Spreadsheet
(2/3 Avf + An)
Design Information
(e = 100 mm)-min.
Lp
fc' = 35 Mpa
fy = 415 Mpa
Vf = 2554 kN
Nf = 511 kN (Min. 0.2 Vf, Max. 1.0 Vf)
Lp = 3000 mm (Corbel Projection) (2/3) Avf =

a= 2200 mm (Typ. 0.75 Lp)
h= 2000 mm (Overall Corbel Height)
d= 1925 mm
b= 2598 mm (Corbel Width)
Lc = 2000 mm (Column Depth)
c= 50 mm (Cover to back of As bars)
fc = 0.70 e c
ag = 20 mm (Aggregate size, mm)
Lc
a/d = Use S-T (Should be < 1.0)
c
fy
Page 1 of 2
vr,max = 6.13 Mpa Vr,max = 31826 kN (Should be < Vf)
Af
Af = 10813 mm2 An = 1448 mm2 As = Af+An 12261 mm2
As = 16871 mm2
85 15M bars
57 20M bars
34 25M bars
25 30M bars
17 35M bars
- Make sure As bars fit
(See pg. 3 for min spcg)
Avf = -2664 mm2 An = 1448 mm2 As = Af+An -328 mm2

(2/3) Avf = -1776 mm2
As,min = 16871 mm2
Ah = 7712 mm2 (2/3)d = 1283 mm
Add 39 10M corbel ties within of the As steel (Equally spaced)

Page 2 of 2
Design of Pier Foundation 31
2.1 Design of Pier
Section of Pier
A C1 C2 B 0.301
TPL 106.9
1
3.200 0.000 2.00
2.60
BPL 104.90
8.00
HFL 105.85
3.00 7.30
2.00
8.80 LBL 100.48
SBL 99.60
1.50 1.50
FBL 98.1
13.40 7.40
21 MSL
95.588
FL
77.1
This prelimanry section is defined by considering SBL = Stem Bottom Level

hydrological analysis and geotechnical recommendation FBL = Footing Bottom Level
MSL = Maximum Scour Level
105.85 HFL
10.262
100.48 LBL
98.10 2.38 0.88
2.51
95.588 MSL
4.9 21
18.49
90.688 level of fixity
13.59
77.10 Foundation level
0.7
13 14 15
3.00 10 11 12
7 8 9 13.40
Pier_Foundation 542531715.xls
4 5 6
Traffic Direction
Design of Wing Wall 32
2.1.4 Design of Wing Wall
3.50 A
1.00 W1
W2
2.65
Thickness of Return wall 400 mm

Effective cover 65 mm
Material Properties
Concrete grade (fck) 20 N/mm²
Steel grade (fe) 500 N/mm²
Allowable stress of steel in tension and shear Sst = #REF! N/mm²
Allowable stress of steel in direct compression Ssc = #REF! N/mm²
Allowable compressive stress in concrete in flexure Scbc = 6.67 N/mm²
Allowable comp. stress in concrete in direct compres Scc = 5 N/mm²
Modular ratio (m) m= 10
Neutral axis factor k 0.32
j 0.89
The resisting moment coefficient R 0.95
IRC:21-2000, 303.2.1, Table 9,10
Unit weight of backfill soil g 16 kN/m³
Calculation of Load and Moment
Due to Dead Load
Symbol Area Distance from back face Weight kN

W1 3.5 1.75 33.60
W2 4.6375 1.17 44.52
Total 8.1375 78.12
C.G. of returnwall from A 1.418 m
Dead Load moment at face of abutment 110.74 Kn-m
Accidental live load on the edge of the wingwall = 114 Kn
So, Live Load Moment at the face of Abutment 598.5 Kn-m
Hence Total design mement Due to Live load and dead load 709.24 Kn-m
Due to Earth pressure
Wing wall+Bearing
Horizontal force due to earth pressure including Live load surcharge is given by
0.5* g * H² * tan²(45° - f/2)*L=
Total Height of wing wall including live load surcharge (1.2m) 4.85 m
So the horizontal pressure is 94.08 kN
Moment by earth pressure including live load surcharge = 191.64 Kn-m (acting from 0.42H)
Design For Vertical Load

Total Design moment due to Live and Dead Load 709.24 Kn-m
Area of steel required, Ast = M/j.d.Sst = #REF! mm²
Provide 4.00 nos of 20.00 mm bars (WL1)
So provided area of steel 1256.64 mm²
#REF!
Design for earth pressure
Total Moment due to earth presuure 191.64 Kn-m
Effedtive Depth 335.00 mm
Area of steel required, Ast = M/j.d.Sst = #REF! mm²
#REF! mm² per met height of wing wall
Provide 16 mm @ 150 mm c/c spacing (WL2)
Area of Steel Provided 1340 mm² #REF!
Summary of Reinforcement of Wing wall
no 4 @ 20 Ø WL1
Ø 20 WL6 Ø 16 @ 150 mm WL2
Ø 10 @ 250 mm WL5
no 4 @ 20 Ø WL3
Ø 16 @ 150 mm WL4
Wing wall+Bearing
Bar Bending Schedules of Wing Wall

Total wt.
Label Shape Dia Nos Length Unit wt. (Kg)
WL1 3825
1000 20.00 8 4.825 2.466 95.188
3750
WL2 150 150 16 32 4.05 1.579 204.638
WL3 200
925 20 8 5.520 2.466 108.899
4395
Average 2350
WL4 16 72 2.650 1.579 301.273
150 150
WL5 Average 1825.00 10 60 1.825 0.616 67.452
WL6 325 20 2 0.325 2.466 1.603
WL7 300 750

12 25 1.35 0.888 29.970
300
Total weight Per Abutment 809.023

Total Number of abutment 2
Total Weight 1618.05
Wing wall+Bearing
Determination of Load Carrying Capacity of Pile (Pier)
Deg. N_gamma N_q

25 10.88 10
30 22.4 20
35 48.03 50
40 109.4 120
Combo 3 5
Group Area 7 13
Total Effective Pile Length,m 21.000

Effective Pile Length,m
Angle of Friction, deg

Effective Density
Tip Capacity
Tip Capacity
Skin Friction
Skin Friction
Cohesion,C
Shaft Area
N_gamma
Layer No.
Soil Type
Tip Area
Pile Dia
G Shaft
Density
Alapha
G Tip
del
Nq
Nc
PDi
Ki
1 phi 18 8 2.00 1.0 6.3 30.5 22.875 1 20 22.4 8 21.2 80 270
2 phi 18 8 2.00 1.0 6.3 30.5 22.875 1 20 22.4 24 63.6 80 810
3 phi 18 8 2.00 1.0 6.3 30.5 22.875 1 20 22.4 40 106.0 80 1350
4 phi 18 8 2.00 1.0 6.3 30.5 22.875 1 20 22.4 56 148.4 80 1890
5 phi 18 8 13.00 1.0 40.8 0.79 30.5 22.875 1 20 22.4 116 1998.8 3430.37 520 91 25449 33987.3229
Total Ultimate Capacity 5768.5 63757
Safe Capacity (At FoS 2.5) 1700.2 1700
Total Safe Capacity (At FoS 2.5) 1700.2
Determination of Load Carrying Capacity of Pile ( Abutment)
Deg. N_gamma N_q

25 10.88 10
30 22.4 20
35 48.03 50
40 109.4 120
Combo 3 5
Group Area 7 13
Total Effective Pile Length,m 18.488

Effective Pile Length,m
Angle of Friction, deg

Effective Density
Tip Capacity
Tip Capacity
Skin Friction
Skin Friction
Cohesion,C
Shaft Area
N_gamma
Layer No.
Soil Type
Tip Area
Pile Dia
G Shaft
Density
Alapha
G Tip
del
Nq
Nc
PDi
Ki
1 phi 18 8 3.00 1.0 9.4 30.5 22.875 1 20 22.4 12 47.7 120 608
2 phi 18 8 2.00 1.0 6.3 30.5 22.875 1 20 22.4 32 84.8 80 1080
3 phi 18 8 2.00 1.0 6.3 30.5 22.875 1 20 22.4 48 127.2 80 1620
4 phi 18 8 2.00 1.0 6.3 30.5 22.875 1 20 22.4 64 169.7 80 2160
5 phi 18 8 9.49 1.0 29.8 0.79 30.5 22.875 1 20 22.4 109.952 1382.7 2470.37 380 91 17606 33987.3229
Total Ultimate Capacity 4282.6 57061
Safe Capacity (At FoS 2.5) 1521.6 1522
Bar Bending Schedule
Bar Bending Schedule of Abutment Cap

Spacing Unit Weight
Label Shape Dia Nos Length(m) Weight(Kg)
(mm) (Kg)/m
AC1 7050 16 40 100 7.050 1.578 445.091
1250
AC2 925 16 71 100 4.450 1.578 495.164
2x50
600
Pitch 75 mm
AC3 500 bothways, 8 6 - 16.000 0.395 37.880
2 layers
Total 978.134
No of Abutment 2 Total Weight 1956.269
Bar Bending Schedule of Abutment Stem

Unit
Spacing Length
Label Shape Dia Nos Weight Weight(Kg)
(mm) (m)
(Kg)/m
450
AS1 8650 25 75 100 9.550 3.853 2759.969
450
450
AS2 8650 20 50 150 9.55 2.466 1177.587
450
7050
AS3 900 900 16 47 190 15.900 1.578 1179.491
7050
Total 5117.046
Abutment Detailing 542531715.xls

Bar Bending Schedule of Abutment Back Wall

Unit
Spacing Length
(mm) (m)
(Kg)/m
250
AB1 3650 16 56 131 5.27 1.578 465.799
570
800
250
AB2
3850 16 56 131 4.67 1.578 412.766
570
7050
AB3
250 250 12 11 270 14.6 0.888 142.583
AB4 220 500 300 16 26 250 1.82 1.578 74.687
700
100
500
AB5
75 75 10 52 250 0.65 0.617 20.839
250
AB6 10 26 250 0.4 0.617 6.412
75 75
AB7 7050 20 1 - 7.05 2.466 17.386
AB8 7050 16 3 - 7.050 1.578 33.382
Total 1173.854

Bar Bending Schedule of Pile per Abutment / Pile Cap

Unit
Spacing Length
(mm) (m)
(Kg)/m
200
APL1
22350 20.00 525.00 - 22.6 2.466 29196.136
APL2
50 12.00 2700.00 125 3.24 0.888 7770.415
dia = 1000
APC1 850 850 32 135 100 9.0 6.313 7628.099

7250
APC2 850 850 32 75 100 14.9 6.313 7069.368

13230
APC3 850 7250 850 20 135 100 9.0 2.466 2979.726
APC4 850 13230 850 20 75 100 14.93 2.466 2761.472
7270
13230
0.617 77.314
APC5 10 3 - 41.8
200
18 nos
200 400 200
APC6 10 22 700 34.32 0.617 465.511
1316.0
400 19 nos
bothway @ spacing 700.00 mm c/c
Total 57948.040
No of Cap 2 Total Weight 115896.08

Bar Bending Schedule of Pier Cap

Unit
Spacing Weight(K
Label Shape Dia Nos Length Weight
(mm) g)
(Kg)/m
AP1 400 7850 400 32 20.0154 135 8.65 6.321 1094.44
AP2 400 400

20 12 220 9.12 2.469 270.37
2000 3162
2450
14 Legs
AP3 Average H= 16 30 200 23.80 1.580 1128.37
850 1850
AP4 Averaage 1920 7850 16 5 300 34.97 1.578 275.972
2520 10 nos
AP5 7850 12 45 370 7.85 0.888 313.620
AP6 7850 32 10 270 7.85 6.313 495.598
Total 3578.3737
No of Pier 1 Total Weight 3578.3737
Pier Detailing 542531715.xls

Bar Bending Schedule of Pier Stem

Unit
Spacing Weight(K
Label Shape Dia Nos Length Weight
(mm) g)
(Kg)/m
AP7 7800 32 94 132 8.2 6.321 4872.53

Bundel of 2
400
150
AP8 12 42 125 6.583 0.889 248.13

Dia = 2000
AP9 50 2024 12 22 500 2.124 0.889 41.54

Total 5162.1924

Bar Bending Schedule of Pile per Abutment / Pile Cap

Unit
Length Spacing Weight
Label Shape Dia Nos Weight
(m) (mm) (Kg)
(Kg)/m
200
PLP1
22360 25.00 480.00 22.6 83.0 3.853 41727.26
PLP2
50 12.00 2610.00 2.74 125.00 0.888 6346.652
dia = 840
PPC1 850 850 32 135 9.10 100.00 6.313 7755.94

7400
PPC2 850 850 32 75 15.08 100.00 6.313 7140.39

13380
PPC3 850 7400 850 25 135 9.10 100.00 3.853 4733.85
PPC4 850 13380 850 25 75 15.08 100.00 3.853 4358.15
7450
PPC5 10 3 42.16 375 0.617 77.98
13430
200
19 nos
200 400 200
APC6 10 22 34.32 700 0.617 465.51
1316
400 18 nos
bothway @ spacing 700.00 mm c/c
Total 72605.743

LSD - Pile - Abutment - Pier Final Kerung

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

LSD - Pile - Abutment - Pier Final Kerung

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Recommendation from Hydraulic Analysis

Design Discharge ( Q50) m3/s

Recommendation from Soil Investigation

Based on these recommendation

Basic Combination Accidental Combination Seismic Combination

1.1 Dead Load, Snow load (if

3.3 Impact due to floating bodies 1

2) For Combination principles refer Para 3.

a) Adding to the permanent

c) Construction live load 1.35 1 1 a) As leading load 1 0.75

2.3 Live Load Surcharge effects

3.3 Impact due to floating bodies 1

1) For Combination principles, refer Para 3.

based on truss model.

Combination Combination Seismic Accidental

1.1 Dead Load, Snow load (if

1.2 SIDL surfacing 1.75 1 1.75 1

1.3 Prestress Effect Refer Note 4

1.4 Settlement Effect 1.0 or 0 1.0 or 0 1.0 or 0 1.0 or 0

1.5 Earth Pressure

a) Adding to the effect of loads 1.5 1.3 1 1

b) Relieving the effect of loads 1 0.85 1 1

2.2 Thermal Load as

2.3 Wind Load

5.1 Water current forces 1.0 or 0 1.0 or 0 1.0 or 0

Design value of modulus of elasticity of reinforcing steel, Es 200

2.1 Design of Abutment

3.5 0.00 105.9 HFL

Horizantal Seismic Coefficient, Av 0.135

Earth Pressure Coefficient Determination :

Height of Abutment H= 9.80 m

Analysis and Design of Abutment Stem

Symbol Area (m2) CG-X CG-Y Weight (KN)

Forces on the Abutment

Earth Pressure force (Including live load surcharge) [IRC:6-2000, 217.1]

Vertical dead Load 657.64736 kN

Seismic Forces on Abutment

Summary of Loads and Moment

Verification of Serviceability Limit State (Table B3 / IRC 112)

Pile Cap and Pile Design

Design of Foundation(Pile) (Table B4 / IRC 112)

V, KN 17318 13682 16724

Net area of concrete Ac = 12960000 mm²

Design BM 9361 KNm Serviceability Limit State

SP 105 based design

Main Reinforcement Calculation

Distribution Bar calculation

Check For Ultimate Shear

Equation 10.1 /IRC 112

Stress Check (Rare Combination Table B3./IRC 112)

Bar Size limitation 25 mm OK

Summary of reinforcement of abutment stem Section

B. Design of Abutment Cap

1 3.200 0.000 2.00

This prelimanry section is defined by considering SBL = Stem Bottom Level

Horizantal Seismic Coefficient, Av 0.107

Unit weight of concrete w_conc 25 kN/m³

A. Design of Pier Cap

Cap To be designed as Corbel

As 16871 mm2 (Detailed design : Separate sheet)

Equation 10.1 /IRC 112

Shear Stress developed, tau = 0.49 N/mm²

Providing 14 legs of 16 mm Ø bars Leg Gap 186 mm