Ras Markaz Crude Oil Park Project (Phase1)

RAS MARKAZ CRUDE OIL PARK PROJECT (PHASE1)
TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY REPORT (ONSHORE)

Doc No: 9686-8310-RP-000-4501 Rev. A2 Doc. Class 2
RAS MARKAZ CRUDE OIL PARK
TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY REPORT

(ONSHORE)
Issued for Review / Muhammad Ramesh

A2 04 July 19 67 Yang Haifeng Li Chuanghua
Comments Usman Shanmugam
Issued to Company for Muhammad Ramesh

A1 19 May 19 35 Yang Haifeng Li Chuanghua
Review / Comments Usman Shanmugam
REV DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION PP CHK APP-1 APP-2
Page 1 of 67
Table of Contents
1 GENERAL ..................................................................................................................................................... 5
1.1 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................................ 5
1.2 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................... 5
1.2.1 Definitions............................................................................................................................................ 5
1.2.2 Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................... 6
1.3 UNITS OF MEASUREMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 6
1.4 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION................................................................................................................... 6
1.5 LANGUAGE ..................................................................................................................................................... 6
2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ........................................................................................................................ 7
2.1 ORDER OF PRECEDENCE................................................................................................................................... 7
2.2 PROJECT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ................................................................................................................... 7
2.3 INTERNATIONAL CODES, STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS.................................................................................. 8
3 SCOPE OF WORK ......................................................................................................................................10
3.1 SURVEY LIMITS .............................................................................................................................................. 10
3.2 SURVEY CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 10
3.3 SURVEY WORKLOAD...................................................................................................................................... 11
4 PROJECT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................13
4.1 PROJECT LOCATION....................................................................................................................................... 13
4.2 COORDINATE AND DATUM SYSTEM................................................................................................................ 13
4.3 PROJECT LOG ................................................................................................................................................ 14
4.4 BENCHMARK VERIFICATION ........................................................................................................................... 14
4.5 CONSTRUCTION OF NEW BENCHMARKS ......................................................................................................... 15
4.6 SURVEY METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................................ 16
4.6.1 Survey Control ................................................................................................................................... 16
4.6.2 Topographical Survey ....................................................................................................................... 17
4.6.3 Underground Utilities Detection ...................................................................................................... 18
4.6.4 Drawing and Document Schedule ................................................................................................... 19
5 SURVEY PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................21
5.1 PERSONNEL .................................................................................................................................................. 21
5.2 EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................................................................. 21
6 SURVEY RESULTS......................................................................................................................................22
6.1 GENERAL FEATURES OF THE AREA CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE SURVEY ......................................................... 22
6.2 TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY RESULTS ALONG THE PROJECT FACILITIES .................................................... 22
6.3 UNDERGROUND DETECTION SURVEY OUTCOME ............................................................................................. 22
6.4 DATA PROCESSING........................................................................................................................................ 22
6.5 GPS PROCESSING RESULTS............................................................................................................................ 23
6.6 CAD PROCESSING ........................................................................................................................................ 23
7 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................24
8 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................25
Page 2 of 67
ATTACHMENT-1 DESCRIPTION CARD FOR NEW BENCH MARKS ...........................................................26

ATTACHMENT-2 THE CONTROL NETWORK FIGURE .................................................................................39
ATTACHMENT-3 CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES ..........................................................................................41
ATTACHMENT-4 FINDINGS OF THE SUSPECTED ARCHAELOGY HERITAGE ..........................................49
ATTACHMENT-5 CASS2008 BROCHURE ......................................................................................................61
ATTACHMENT-6 SKETCH FOR TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY AREAS ..........................................................66
Page 3 of 67
REVISION CONTROL SHEET
REV. NO. DATE PAGE NO. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES

A1 19 May 19 All Pages First Issue
A2 04 July 19 All Pages Revised as per Company Comments
This page records the revision status of this document

NOTES:
Revisions after first issue are denoted as follows:
a) By a vertical line in the right-hand margin against the revised text and,
b) By a triangle symbol for graphics, the revision number being denoted within the symbol.
Revision symbols are positioned adjacent to the revision.
Page 4 of 67
1 GENERAL
1.1 Purpose
The Purpose is to present the outcome of topographical survey & underground detection
survey results including interface with other packages, the actual scope of work completed,
manpower and equipment input, survey processing description and method, and the
A2
precision assessment for the survey findings/results.
This document shall be read and construed in conjunction with other documents concerning
or affecting EPC Contractor’s execution of the Works.
1.2 Definitions and Abbreviations

1.2.1 Definitions
Company : Oman Tank Terminal Company L.L.C. (OTTCO)
Contract : The EPC Contract between Company and EPC Contractor
EPC Contractor : China Petroleum Pipeline Engineering Co., Ltd. (CPP)
Inspector : Nominated third party inspection agency
IPMT : Company Project Management Team comprising OTTCO and
Consultant personnel.
Project Location : Ras Markaz, Duqm, Sultanate of Oman
Purchaser : The organization issuing the purchase order for the supply of the
package/equipment and services
Sub-Contractor : Means any person or persons, firms, companies to whom any part
of the work has been subcontracted (directly or indirectly) by EPC
Contractor and the legal successors in title to each of these parties A2
Shall : Indicates Mandatory requirement
Should Indicates that the requirement is strongly recommended to be
adhered to
Third Party : Nominated third party inspection agency
Inspector
Vendor : Means a supplier of Goods and/or Equipment for the Facility
and/or the Works including related documentation and services,
where necessary, in connection with the installation, testing,
commissioning and start up support of any such Goods or A2
Equipment.
Page 5 of 67
1.2.2 Abbreviations
DTM : Digital Terrain Model
GPS : Global Position System
H : Horizontal
HSSE : Health, Safety, Security and Environment
IP : Intersection Point
MSL : Mean Sea Level
QA : Quality Assurance
QC : Quality Control
QMS : Quality Management System
ROW : Right of Way
RTK : Real -Time Kinematic
TIN : Triangulated Irregular Network
UTM : Universal Transverse Mercator
V : Vertical
WGS84 : World Geodetic System 1984
1.3 Units of Measurements

All documents, calculations and drawings shall be carried out using International System of
Units (SI), in accordance with 9686-8850-PS-000-9001 Engineering Design Data (EDD) shall be
followed.
1.4 Site Environmental Condition

The site environmental conditions are defined in Engineering Design Data doc. no. 9686-8850-
PS-000-9001. EPC Contractor shall comply with the requirements as defined in Engineering
Design Data. A2
1.5 Language
All documentation shall be in UK English. Where documents (test certificates, vendor data etc.)
are originally produced in a non-English language, an English translation must be provided,
and the English language version shall take precedence.
Page 6 of 67
2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
2.1 Order of Precedence

The following list of documents is used in descending order of precedence in establishing
applicable requirements for the project if and when a conflict with a specification arises:
1. Local Laws & Regulations of the Oman
2. National Standards
3. Project Specifications, data sheets, as applicable
4. Industry/ International Codes and Standards
5. Service Authority Standards
The information given in each of the above shall be used, in conjunction with all other above
listed documents.
In the event of an inconsistency, conflict or discrepancy between any of the standards,

specifications and regulation requirements, the most stringent and safest requirement
applicable to the project will prevail to the extent of the inconsistency, conflict or discrepancy.
In such cases, EPC Contractor shall provide its interpretation in writing of the most stringent
requirement for Company approval. In all such cases of conflict, Company’s decision will be
final.
2.2 Project Reference Documents

9686-8850-PS-000-9001 : Engineering Design Data
9686-8320-MS-000-4501 : Method Statement for Topographical Survey（Onshore）
AZD-OOC-ALS1550- : Topographical Survey Proposed Markaz Terminal
TOPO-RPT_2 Project Markaz, Duqm Final Report
9686-8310-41-000-4504 : Site Bench Marks
9686-8310-41-000-4505 : Overall Site Preparation Plan
9686-8310-41-000-4506 : Flood Protection Drain and Diversion Bund - Plan
9686-6150-PR-000-0001 : Project Quality Plan
9686-6160-PR-000-0001 : Project HSSE Plan A2
9686-6160-PR-000-0002 : Construction Environmental Management Plan
9686-6160-PR-000-0003 : Health Management Plan
9686-6160-PR-000-0004 : Security Management Plan
9686-6160-PR-000-0005 : Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan
Page 7 of 67
9686-6160-PR-000-0006 : Incident Reporting & Investigation Procedure

9686-6160-PR-000-0007 : Risk Assessment and Management Procedure
9686-6160-PR-000-0008 : Permit to Work Procedure
9686-6160-PR-000-0009 : Traffic Management Procedure
9686-6160-PR-000-0010 : HSSE Competence Assurance and Training Plan
9686-6160-PR-000-0011 : Personal protective Equipment Procedure
9686-6160-PR-000-0012 : Audit and Inspection Procedure
9686-6160-PR-000-0013 : Fire Protection/Fighting Plan
9686-6160-PR-000-0015 : HSSE Recognition & Incentive Program
9686-6160-PR-000-0016 : Waste Management Plan
9686-6160-PR-000-0017 : Environment Monitoring Plan
9686-6160-PR-000-0018 : First aid and operation procedure
9686-6160-PR-000-0019 : Hazardous Materials Control Procedure
9686-6160-PR-000-0024 : Job Safety Analysis Procedure
9686-6160-PR-000-0025 : Safety on Air/Land/Sea Transport guideline
9686-6160-PR-000-0026 : Construction Safety Plan
9686-6160-PR-000-0027 : Contractor Camp HSE Plan
9686-6110-PR-000-1006 : Permitting deliverable
9686-8320-RP-000-4503 : Limited Scope of Work for Topographical Survey (Onshore)
9686-8320-SP-000-4505 : Specification for Topographical Survey (Onshore)
9686-8230-01-000-5001 : Overall Onshore Site Plan - Sub Phase 1.1
9686-8230-01-000-5002 : Overall Site Plan - Sub Phase 1.1
A2
9686-8230-01-000-5003 : Overall Plot Plan for Sub Phase 1.1.2
2.3 International Codes, Standards and Regulations

The industry codes and standards referenced in and/or applicable to this document are listed
below. A reference, in this specification, to these documents, invokes the latest edition of the
code, specification or amendment, unless otherwise specifically stated.
EPC Contractor and Sub-Contractor shall comply with all applicable codes, specifications and
standards in accordance with the Contract. EPC Contractor and Sub-Contractor shall strictly
comply with all Company instructions and guidelines.
EPC Contractor and Sub-Contractor shall comply with Company standards, specifications and
shall notify Company of any conflicts or discrepancies between standards and shall provide its
interpretation in writing of the most stringent requirement for Company approval.
Page 8 of 67
The latest edition of the following codes and standards established the minimum standards
for the work.
1) “Geometric Geodetic Accuracy Standards and Specifications for using GPS Relative
Positioning Techniques’, Federal Geodetic Control Committee Version 5.0: May 11th
1988, or latest edition.
2) “Standards for Geodetic Networks, Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards”, Federal

Geographic Data Committee, 1 Jan 2002 or latest edition.
3) “United States National Map Accuracy Standards”, US Bureau of Budget, 1947 or latest
edition.
Page 9 of 67
3 SCOPE OF WORK
3.1 Survey Limits

Topographic survey has been carried out at the selected areas as indicated in the document
9686-8320-RP-000-4503, Limited Scope of Work for Topographical Survey (Onshore).
Now the new Topographical Survey has been performed for revalidation of the survey of the
below areas, but not limited to the following:
1. Administration Area
2. Fire Water Area
3. Water Treatment Area
4. Oil Recovery Area
5. Interconnecting Header Area
6. Waste Water Treatment Area
7. Seawater Intake Area
8. Booster Pump Station Area
9. Pipeline Corridor Area
10. Flood Diversion Drain & Bund Area
11. All Types of Crossings such as pipeline crossings, road crossings, waterway crossings
Apart from the above, the existing Archaeological survey data, findings near the proposed
Booster Pump station Area and Sea water intake facility areas has been studied and attached
as part of this Document (Refer Attachment 4- Findings Of The Suspected Archaeology
A2
Heritage).
3.2 Survey Contents

The site investigation survey has been performed with respect to 1.1.2 Package and a
comprehensive topographical survey data with underground detection survey information is A2
derived.
Respective the specification for survey, the main scope of topographic survey work includes:
 Verifying the existing GPS control points.
 Establishing of new horizontal and vertical control networks for the Project and tie back
to existing control networks.
Page 10 of 67
 Levelling survey for the new control points.
 Detailed topographic survey and underground detection for Ras Markaz Crude Oil Park
package-1.1.2, including booster pump station area, seawater intake area, administration
area, firewater area, water treatment area, oil recovery area, interconnecting header area,
proposed pipeline corridor and waste water treatment area.
 Profile map and Intersection point (IP) survey including underground detection for the
proposed pipelines.
 Topographic survey and underground detection for the flood protection.
3.3 Survey Workload

According to the survey limits and contents, the main topographic survey workload was listed
in the following table 3.3-1.
Table 3.3-1 Main Survey Workload

Item Specification Unit Quantity
Verification of Survey Control Point and GPS RTK or Static
Ind 4
Benchmarks Positioning
GPS Static
New GPS Control Network/ Benchmarks Ind 12
Positioning
Benchmarks /Control Points Levelling Level Instruments km 16
Detailed Topographic Survey for Ras- Markaz 2

1:500 km 1.3578
Crude Oil Park-1.1.2
Detailed Topographic Survey for Booster Pump 2
1:500 km 0.48836
Area
Detailed Topographic Survey for Seawater Intake 2
1:500 km 0.11408
Pump House Area
2
Pipeline Corridor Topographic Survey 1:1000 km 0.30935
Onshore Pipeline Profile Map for 48 Inch SPM1

H 1:1000 V 1:200 km 1.032
South Pipeline
Onshore Pipeline Profile Map for 48 Inch SPM-1.1

H 1:1000 V 1:200 km 1.034
North Pipeline
Onshore Pipeline Profile Map for 10 Inch Fire

H 1:1000 V 1:200 km 2.063
Water Pipeline
Onshore Pipeline Profile Map for Brine Outfall

H 1:1000 V 1:200 km 1.033
Pipeline
Page 11 of 67
Item Specification Unit Quantity

Onshore Pipeline Profile Map for 24 Inch
H 1:1000 V 1:200 km 1.946
Seawater Intake (Emergency Fire Water) Pipeline
Onshore Pipeline Profile Map for 4 Inch Seawater

H 1:1000 V 1:200 km 1.946
Intake (Desalination) Pipeline
IP Survey - km 9.054
2
Flood Diversion Drain & Bund Topographic Map 1:500 km 0.32
Page 12 of 67
4 PROJECT SUMMARY
4.1 Project Location

The proposed project location is located approximately 70 km south of DUQM. The site is
approximately 130m above the sea level and terminates at a cliff edge with little or no coastal
beach area at sea level. The size of the area available for terminal development is roughly 13
2
km .
A2
Figure 4.1 Proposed Project Location

4.2 Coordinate and Datum System
The geodetic parameters and map projection data which shall be used for the Ras Markaz
project is presented below. All final data shall be presented in the local datum geodetic
parameters.
Projection Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)

UTM Zone Zone 40
Central Meridian 57°East
Spheroid World Geodetic System 1984
Latitude of Origin 0° 00’ 00”
False Easting 500 000 m
False Northing 0m
Scale Factor 0.9996
Page 13 of 67
Semi-major axis 6 378 137.000

Datum EGM 2008
4.3 Project Log

The project log for the topographical survey as follows table:
Table 4.3-1 Project Log Table
28-12-2018 Mobilization
29-12-2018 to 10-03-2019 Survey Control, Topographical Survey
11-03-2019 Demobilization
12-03-2019 to 20-04-2019 Data Processing & Report Submission
4.4 Benchmark Verification

The survey team verified all existing benchmarks provided by the Company or the third party.
GPS RTK survey method was used for the verification procedure. And the verification results
(coordinates & levels) as the following table.
Table 4.4-1 The Results of Verification for the Existing Benchmarks
Point Name N(m) E(m) H(m) ΔN(m) ΔE(m) ΔH(m) Remark
1550-01 2120712.722 578362.471 90.572 - - - Base
2118718.683 578351.290 99.221 Known

1550-02 -0.017 -0.013 -0.013
2118718.666 578351.277 99.208 Survey
2116672.823 580268.394 131.691 Known

1550-03 -0.007 0.006 0.009
2116672.816 580268.400 131.700 Survey
2116928.903 578412.914 110.377 Known

1550-100 0.015 -0.003 -0.008
2116928.918 578412.911 110.369 Survey
The nominal accuracy for GPS RTK method is H (horizontal) ≤ ± 3cm, V (vertical) ≤ ± 3cm.
A2
Page 14 of 67
From the verification results table above, the survey team processed the survey data and
found the horizontal accuracy is better than 2 cm, and the vertical accuracy is better than 1.5
cm, which has a good precision and can meet the accuracy requirements of topographical
survey for the project.
A2
Figure 4.4-1 Verifying Existing Benchmarks
4.5 Construction of New Benchmarks

The survey team established new permanent benchmarks at plant areas & along the pipeline
routes as per standard benchmarks (BM) design.
The benchmarks are all in a convenient for survey observation place. The benchmark
established at plant areas out of construction area and Right of Way (R.O.W) of pipeline route
with properly marked and protected from the accidental displacement.
The horizontal coordinates and elevation were established from a combination of static
differential GPS observations using existing benchmarks.
All excavations for all establishment of benchmarks have been done manually using hand
tools and the area where new benchmarks to be installed has been scanned by radio
detection to make sure that no underground utilities would be hit/damaged during
excavation. Shovels were used for the excavation and mixing the cement and trowels for
concrete finishing.
Page 15 of 67
4.6 Survey Methodology

4.6.1 Survey Control
Four existing benchmarks 1550-01, 1550-02, 1550-03 and 1550-100 were used as the
reference survey controls for the project.
Twelve new benchmarks (BM01, BM02, BM04, BM05, BM06, BM07, BM08, BM09, BM10, BM11,
BM12 and BM13) were established on strategically chosen locations for the project.
A spirit levelling was carried out from the existing benchmarks to the new benchmarks.
New Controls surveyed using GPS static method to get the planimetric position. And software
of Hi-Target Geomatics Office was used for survey adjustment.
Figure 4.6.1-1 GPS Static Survey

The Description Card for New Bench Markers reference the ATTACHMENT-1.
The Control Network Figure reference the ATTACHMENT-2.

A2
The results of coordinates and elevations for the new benchmarks are listed below:
Table 4.6.1-1 The Results of the New Benchmarks
Name Northing(m) Easting(m) Elevation(m)
BM01 2120119.012 577955.006 92.936
BM02 2119712.002 579487.204 100.369
BM04 2120780.633 580104.161 4.398
Page 16 of 67
Name Northing(m) Easting(m) Elevation(m)
BM05 2120471.790 579709.2602 6.037
BM06 2120983.068 579764.8164 3.847
BM07 2119824.040 579068.132 99.100
BM08 2119848.686 578637.102 98.123
BM09 2120437.520 578546.7995 92.856
BM10 2119698.878 577966.6637 92.563
BM11 2118024.402 579055.0622 108.709
BM12 2120488.282 579395.8182 15.044
BM13 2121152.015 578230.1209 87.093
4.6.2 Topographical Survey

A detailed topographical survey was conducted over the whole site area.
Ground levels were captured from Real-Time Kinematic GPS techniques on an approximate 5-
10m grid basis with additional break lines and form lines measured where required to ensure
all significant changes in elevation are recorded to create an appropriate digital terrain model
(DTM) to simulate as closely as possible the land terrain form.
Planimetric details were surveyed by real-time kinematic (RTK), kinematic GPS and
tachometric techniques using Hi-Target dual-frequency GPS receivers for automatic recording
and downloading of coded observations. Prism-free Total Station used to collect hard-to-
reach terrain points.
All survey observations were computed based on control above and transformed into
AutoCAD digital drawing format.
Page 17 of 67
Figure 4.6.2-1 Total Station Survey

4.6.3 Underground Utilities Detection
Radio Detection RD8000 was used for detecting the presence of underground utilities within
the survey area. Underground utility mapping uses the principles of geophysics to detect,
locate, identify and investigate buried services. This solution is based on the techniques of
Radio-Detection (electromagnetic). The depth of investigation depends on the conditions of
the site. In general Radio-Detection technique detects services up to 3.0m below the ground
surface.
4.6.3.1 Radio Detection
Radio-Detection uses the principles of electromagnetic to detect underground utilities. This

principle works on the basis that a current flowing along a conductor creates a magnetic field
which extends around the conductor in concentric circles. A receiver coil can be used to
detect the amplitude of this magnetic field. The amplitude varies depending on the position
and orientation of the receiver within the field. The amplitude is at a maximum when the
receiver is in line with the field and directly above the conductor. Moving the receiver from
side to side it is possible to follow the maximum signal response and therefore, the line of the
buried service. A2
4.6.3.2 Methodology
Both active and passive methods are used to ensure all possible detectable services are
located. Utilities, that cannot be detected by either passive or direct induction i.e. PVC or
concrete pipes will not be captured and dead and fiber optic cables will only be connected or
shown through above ground evidence.
4.6.3.3 Active Methods
An active signal is a signal that has been artificially generated by an external source. Active
radio-detection methods can allow different services such as electric cables, telephone cables,
Page 18 of 67
metallic pipes etc to be individually identified. Active methods involve the use of a
transmitter. The transmitter can either be used for direct connection or for induction. Direct
connection involves the application of an active signal to a conductor using a clamp.
Induction involves a signal being radiated from the internal antenna of the transmitter which
is induced to any conductors in the vicinity and re-radiated. Generally, 8, 33 or 65 KHz
frequencies are used. It is often possible to determine the depth of the service in this mode
up to an accuracy of ±10 centimeters.
4.6.3.4 Passive Methods
A passive signal is a signal that occurs ‘naturally’ on a buried conductor. Passive radio
detection methods will provide an indication only that services are present underground.
Passive methods use that electromagnetic fields already present around the underground
utility to locate them.
4.6.3.5 Mode
Two modes are generally used: A2
Power – detects 50-60 Hz energy present on most buried conductors.
Radio – detects re-radiated radio energy often present on conductors – it is not possible to
determine depth in this mode.
GPS RTK method was applied to obtain the coordinates and elevations.
EPC Contractor use Radio-Detection to detect the entire survey limit, and inquired with the
local fishers and the operators in adjacent construction areas, that confirmed there haven’t
any underground pipelines or other underground facilities within the survey limit.
4.6.4 Drawing and Document Schedule

After field survey, the survey team prepared and submitted the drawings and document to
Company for approval as follows:
Table 4.6.4-1 The Drawings and Document for the Survey Product
Sr.
No of
No Drawing No. Description Scale
Sheets
.
9686-8310-45- Topographical Map for Main Site in EPC

1 34 (A1) 1:500
000-4552 Package 1.1.2
9686-8310-45- Topographical Map for Booster Pump

2 14 (A1) 1:500
000-4553 Station Area
9686-8310-45- Topographical Map for Seawater Intake

3 6 (A1) 1:500
000-4554 Area
Page 19 of 67
9686-8310-45-
4 4 (A1) Topographical Map for Pipeline Corridor 1:1000
000-4557
9686-8310-45- Topographic Map for Flood Diversion

5 13 (A1) 1:500
000-4558 Drain & Bund
9686-8310-41-
6 1 (A1) Site Bench Marks 1:10000
000-4504
9686-8310-45-
7 1 4(A1) Topographical Map for Access Road 1:500
000-4559
9686-8310-45- 1:500
8 12 (A1) Topographical Map for Cliff Road
000-4560
9686-8320-RP- Limited Scope of Work for Topographical

9 13(A1) A2
000-4503 Survey (Onshore)
9686-8310-RP-
10 67(A4) Survey Report
000-4501
Page 20 of 67
5 SURVEY PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT
5.1 Personnel
EPC Contractor utilized a combination of GPS, conventional surveying and electronic
detection techniques for the rapid acquisition of above and below ground data required for
the project.
A2
The following survey and related personnel were involved in this project:
Table 5.1-1Personnel
Name Function
Zhou Jianguo Site Survey Team Manager
Li Chuanghua Lead Civil Engineer
Yang Haifeng Lead Surveyor/ Party Chief
Yuan Xiaochuan Survey Engineer
Yuan Chunming Assistant Surveyor
Fan Chao CAD Supervisor
Cui xiaodong CAD Supervisor
5.2 Equipment
The following survey equipment was used during the execution of the survey:
Table 5.2 Equipment
Equipment
4 nos. Hi-target V90 Plus dual frequency GPS Receiver
2 nos. Hi-target Total Station
1 no. Nikon Auto Level
1 no. RadioDetection RD8000
The Calibration Certificates reference the ATTACHMENT-3.

A2
Page 21 of 67
6 SURVEY RESULTS
6.1 General Features of the Area Considered as Part of the Survey

The whole terrain of survey limit shows the trend of high in the west and low in the east. And
the survey limit is divided into five different levels by cliff, which decreases step by step from
west to east, with the highest elevation of 85 m to 101 m in Tank Farm area, and Booster
Pump Station Area and Seawater Intake Area with an average elevation of about 5 m to 10 m
near the Arabian Sea. The pipeline corridor area passes through the largest relative elevation
in the whole area, and the elevation rises from 5 meters to about 93 meters.
6.2 Topographical Survey Results along the Project Facilities

EPC Contractor measured and marked in the topographic map the area under construction of
the boundary near the survey limit (distinguished by whether there are construction marks on
the surface).
EPC Contractor found that there are few buildings available near the access road survey limit
A2
and have been marked in the topographical survey map. In addition, there are some
suspected graveyards/Tombs on the southeast side of the whole area. EPC contractor have
sorted out the findings, formed a report and submitted to the Company. For the detailed
information about these findings, refer to Attachment-4.
EPC contractor will contact with local Omani government authority to confirm all the findings
and provide proposal as per instruction of local Omani government authority.
The Drawings and Documents reference Table 4.6.4-1.
6.3 Underground Detection Survey Outcome

Through radio detection and inquired with the operators in adjacent construction areas and
local fishermen, consultation with the local government, No buried underground pipelines
and other subsurface facilities were found in the survey limits.
6.4 Data Processing

Hi-Target Geomatics Office processing software was used for reducing all GPS observations
to their final vector component dx, dy and dz.
All static post processing GPS vectors were input into the Hi-Target Geomatics Office
adjustment package, where a good result was obtained after a single iteration.
The veracity of each RTK GPS data session is confirmed by means of known check points,
observed during the session. These allow the operator to ensure on a daily basis that the
survey data being gathered is of sufficient quality to pass both the contractual requirements
of the job, and the QA/QC requirements of the company procedures.
Page 22 of 67
6.5 GPS Processing Results

For result of free adjust in WGS1984:
Weakest Baseline Relative Error is 1: 138803
Weakest Point Points Std. Dev(mm) is 5.0mm
For result of 2d constraint adjust in target system:
Weakest Baseline Relative Error is 1:43972
Weakest Point Points Std. Dev(mm) is 13.9mm
6.6 CAD Processing

A verification of the terrain was performed by CASS2008 (reference the ATTACHMENT-5)
software to generate the surface, calculating each ground levels point into a TIN. EPC
Contractor also utilized this software to create a new DTM and contouring at 0.5-meter
interval. A2
AutoCAD2018 software was used for preparing scaled drawings.
Page 23 of 67
7 SUMMARY
 The project was mobilized on 28th December 2018 and completed in 62 days.
A2
 GPS and Total Station equipment were used to perform the topographical survey.
 A total of 128286 points were surveyed and collected for the project.
 All existing above ground as well as underground features (where defined by surface
markers) within specified area were surveyed.
 Twelve new Benchmarks were established with reference to the existing Benchmarks.
 CASS2008 software was used to generate the Digital Terrain Model (DTM) for
contouring generation.
A2
 General visual terrain surface description is sand and gravel, undulated rolling terrain
with scattered humps ranging from 0.5m to 2.0m approximate height.
 EPC Contractor have checked and confirmed with EPC 1.1.3, determined the use of
consistent coordinate systems and elevation systems, and EPC Contractor required SUB
contractor who will undertake the offshore survey work and geotechnical work to use
A2
the same coordinate and elevation system with the onshore limit.
 Findings of the suspected archaeology heritage or tombs within survey limits.
 No HSSE incidents or accidents were recorded during the project.
Page 24 of 67
8 RECOMMENDATIONS
 As per the Archaeological survey findings, suspected archaeology heritage features or

tombs are observed at the proposed Booster Pump station, sea water Intake facility and
nearby areas. EPC Contractor will communicate with the local Omani government
authority with these findings to confirm and distinguish the nature of these Structures. If
these structures are confirmed as Archaeological structures, the EPC Contractor will
relocate the Project facilities such that these structures are not affected by the project
works.
 After underground utilities detection, EPC Contractor found no underground pipelines or

facilities at the site, but EPC Contractor do not rule out the installation of temporary
cables or other facilities by the other organization after the completion of the survey. So
A2
all the proposed project location shall be probed by METAL/CABLE detector again prior
to commencement of trench excavation or foundation construction to avoid destroy the
possible existing underground utilities.
 The Combined Distortion Scale Factor shall be considered in the design and construction
process in order to avoid the difference between the ground distance with the grid
distance in the follow-up work of design and construction.
 Due to the large relative elevation in the construction area of the pipeline corridor, it is
recommendation that the safety protection work should be done well in the subsequent
construction work, and the more suitable construction equipment should be selected for
the project terrain.
 Use of interphones is recommended in the project area for communication, due to

insufficient coverage of Mobile Phone Network.
Page 25 of 67
ATTACHMENT-1 DESCRIPTION CARD FOR NEW BENCH MARKS
(12 Pages)
Page 26 of 67
The Bench Marker ID card of BM01
Country: Oman Region: Ras Markaz Station Name: BM01 Client: OTTCO
Survey Method: Survey Date: Type of Marker: Concrete Contractor:

monument with stainless steel
GPS Static Survey 20.02.2019 plate，stainless steel bar CPP
COORDINATES IN HAND-HELD GPS DATUM
WGS-84 Ellipsoidal Height= 92.760m
Lat.= 19°10'22.35102"N Ellipsoid: WGS-84
Lon.= 57°44'29.12535"E Datum: WGS-84
COORDINATES IN LOCAL DATUM
Datum : 57°Zone 40N Projection: UTM
Northing: 2120119.012m Zone: 40N
Easting: 577955.006m Lat of Origin: 00°00'00.00000"N
Elevation:92.936m Lon of Origin: 57°00'00.00000"E
Ellipsoid: WGS-84 False Northing: 0
Semi-major: 6378137 meters False Easting: 500,000
Inv. Flat: 298.257223563 Ko: 0.9996
Page 27 of 67

Lon.= 57°45'21.52228"E Datum: WGS-84
Inv. Flat: 298.257223563 Ko: 0.9996
Page 28 of 67

Lon.= 57°45'42.80404"E Datum: WGS-84
Inv. Flat: 298.257223563 Ko: 0.9996
Page 29 of 67

Lon.= 57°45'29.23754"E Datum: WGS-84
Inv. Flat: 298.257223563 Ko: 0.9996
Page 30 of 67

Lon.= 57°45'31.21573"E Datum: WGS-84
Inv. Flat: 298.257223563 Ko: 0.9996
Page 31 of 67

Lon.= 57°45'07.19149"E Datum: WGS-84
Inv. Flat: 298.257223563 Ko: 0.9996
Page 32 of 67

Lon.= 57°44'52.43834"E Datum: WGS-84
Inv. Flat: 298.257223563 Ko: 0.9996
Page 33 of 67

Lon.= 57°44'49.43306"E Datum: WGS-84
Inv. Flat: 298.257223563 Ko: 0.9996
Page 34 of 67

Lon.= 57°44'29.46325"E Datum: WGS-84
Inv. Flat: 298.257223563 Ko: 0.9996
Page 35 of 67

Lon.= 57°45'06.47883"E Datum: WGS-84
Inv. Flat: 298.257223563 Ko: 0.9996
Page 36 of 67

Lon.= 57°45'18.50857"E Datum: WGS-84
Inv. Flat: 298.257223563 Ko: 0.9996
Page 37 of 67

Lon.= 57°44'38.69522"E Datum: WGS-84
Inv. Flat: 298.257223563 Ko: 0.9996
Page 38 of 67
ATTACHMENT-2 THE CONTROL NETWORK FIGURE
(1 Page) A2
Page 39 of 67
The Control Network Figure
A2
Page 40 of 67
ATTACHMENT-3 CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES
(7 Pages) A2
Page 41 of 67
Page 42 of 67
Page 43 of 67
Page 44 of 67
Page 45 of 67
Page 46 of 67
Page 47 of 67
Page 48 of 67
ATTACHMENT-4 FINDINGS OF THE SUSPECTED ARCHAELOGY

HERITAGE
A2
(11 Pages)
Page 49 of 67
The field Topographical survey is performed at the proposed Booster Pump station, Sea
water Intake facility areas and along the cliff road. One cemetery and several numbers of
suspected graves/tombs are found at this location. These kinds of structure are observed on
either side of the proposed utility corridor/access road between these two stations. Many A2
such structures are seen at different places in this area with similar signs & shapes near the
project area.
The below Figure 1 shows the overall view of all these 5 spots in the worksite area.
Figure 1: Marks for the suspected graves/tombs spots at the worksite area
 Spot 1.
A cemetery is found in this spot which is around 70m away from the proposed project
A2
facilities. EPC Contractor is studying this spot in line with the recommendation of the local
Omani government authority so that this existing structure will not be disturbed from the
ongoing site activities.
The below Site photos (Figure 2, 3) taken during the survey are presented below to visualize
the position of this structure.
Page 50 of 67
Figure 2: Spot 1
A2
Figure 3: Spot 1
 Spot 2.
Many suspected graves/tombs are found near the proposed cliff access road to the Sea
water intake facility area. The Figures 4 to 8 are presented below for easy visualization of
these structures. The coordinates of all these structures are depicted in the below table. A2
EPC Contractor will study the possibilities of relocating the proposed access road and the sea
water intake facility away from these observed structures. In this regard, the EPC Contractor
is coordinating with the local Oman government authorities to propose a compatible
infrastructure such that these existing structures are retained in their original position.
Page 51 of 67
SN Northing Easting SN Northing Easting
1 2121052.455 579574.2572 12 2120940.798 579588.4181
2 2121030.646 579664.3343 13 2121004.684 579631.3035
3 2121036.668 579686.9307 14 2121009.704 579624.9239
4 2120835.113 579722.7875 15 2121134.39 579624.5973
5 2120842.912 579711.7032 16 2121033.228 579611.1834
6 2120870.09 579727.431 17 2121040.475 579611.6879
7 2120878.228 579727.873 18 2121016.849 579643.1884
8 2120912.987 579701.6619 19 2121020.472 579632.1584
9 2120936.57 579709.6992 20 2121026.392 579630.8308
10 2120936.052 579569.4553 21 2121023.687 579631.5457
11 2120933.851 579592.1164 22 2121030.01 579640.4639
A2
Figure 4: Spot 2
Page 52 of 67
Figure 5: Spot 2
A2
Figure 6: Spot 2
A2
Page 53 of 67
Figure 7: Spot 2
Figure 8: Spot 2
 Spot 3.
The suspected graves or tombs in this area are found near the proposed access road
between the Sea water intake facility and the Booster Pump station. The nature and type of
this structure will be studied by the EPC Contractor with Oman Government authority. As per
the directions of the authority, the road layout will be proposed to the Company.
Figure 9 to 12 shows the photographs of these structures taken at site. The Coordinates of
these Structures are represented in the below table for further study;
Page 54 of 67
1 2121010.313 579744.1163 4 2120940.798 579588.4181
2 2120916.914 579757.2512 5 2121004.684 579631.3035
3 2121060.472 579574.4095
A2
Figure 9: Spot 3
Page 55 of 67
A2
Figure 10: Spot 3
Figure 11: Spot 3
Page 56 of 67
Figure12: Spot 3
A2
 Spot 4
These suspected graves or tombs are found within the Booster pump station area. Figure 13-
1, 13-2, 13-3 shows the images of these structures. The below table shows the position of
these structures with relevant coordinates for further reference.
The EPC Contractor is coordinating with the local Oman government authorities to find out
the kind of this structure and will propose a suitable solution in line with the
recommendation of the authorities.
1 2120377.871 580046.0807 7 2120321.483 580080.4154
2 2120370.606 580059.0696 8 2120321.587 580098.7207
3 2120310.103 580240.7685 9 2120312.296 580091.7818
4 2120341.986 580124.9747 10 2120269.451 580066.3995
5 2120315.578 580041.9408 11 2120300.102 580102.5494
6 2120320.239 580059.7335
Page 57 of 67
Figure 13-1: Spot 4
A2
Figure 13-2: Spot 4
Page 58 of 67
Figure 13-3: Spot 4
A2
 Spot 5
This spot 5 shown in the below figures is identified at the proposed Sea water intake area.
This structure appears like a newly built structure comparing to the other nearby
archaeological structures in this area like tombs or graves.
The EPC Contractor is coordinating with the local Oman government authorities to find out
the nature and type of this structure and will propose a suitable solution in line with the
recommendation of the authorities.
Figure 14-1, 14-2 shows the images taken at the field during the survey which shall be
referred for further study.
Page 59 of 67
Figure 14-1: Spot 5
A2
Figure 14-2: Spot 5
Page 60 of 67
ATTACHMENT-5 CASS2008 BROCHURE

A2
(4 Pages)
Page 61 of 67
DOC NO: 9686-8310-RP-000-4501 REV. A2 DOC. CLASS 2
A2
Page 62 of 67
A2
Page 63 of 67
A2
Page 64 of 67
A2
Page 65 of 67
RAS MARKAZ CRUDE OIL PARK PROJECT(PHASE1)
ATTACHMENT-6 SKETCH FOR TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY AREAS
(1 Page)
A2
Page 66 of 67
A2
Page 67 of 67

Ras Markaz Crude Oil Park Project (Phase1)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ras Markaz Crude Oil Park Project (Phase1)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RAS MARKAZ CRUDE OIL PARK PROJECT (PHASE1)

TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY REPORT (ONSHORE)

RAS MARKAZ CRUDE OIL PARK

TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY REPORT

Issued for Review / Muhammad Ramesh

Issued to Company for Muhammad Ramesh

REV DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION PP CHK APP-1 APP-2

ATTACHMENT-1 DESCRIPTION CARD FOR NEW BENCH MARKS ...........................................................26

REVISION CONTROL SHEET

REV. NO. DATE PAGE NO. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES

This page records the revision status of this document

1.2 Definitions and Abbreviations

1.3 Units of Measurements

1.4 Site Environmental Condition

2.1 Order of Precedence

1. Local Laws & Regulations of the Oman

3. Project Specifications, data sheets, as applicable

4. Industry/ International Codes and Standards

5. Service Authority Standards

In the event of an inconsistency, conflict or discrepancy between any of the standards,

2.2 Project Reference Documents

9686-6160-PR-000-0006 : Incident Reporting & Investigation Procedure

2.3 International Codes, Standards and Regulations

2) “Standards for Geodetic Networks, Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards”, Federal

3.1 Survey Limits

2. Fire Water Area

3. Water Treatment Area

4. Oil Recovery Area

5. Interconnecting Header Area

6. Waste Water Treatment Area

7. Seawater Intake Area

8. Booster Pump Station Area

9. Pipeline Corridor Area

10. Flood Diversion Drain & Bund Area

3.2 Survey Contents

 Verifying the existing GPS control points.

 Levelling survey for the new control points.

 Topographic survey and underground detection for the flood protection.

3.3 Survey Workload

Table 3.3-1 Main Survey Workload

Benchmarks /Control Points Levelling Level Instruments km 16

Detailed Topographic Survey for Ras- Markaz 2

Onshore Pipeline Profile Map for 48 Inch SPM1

Onshore Pipeline Profile Map for 48 Inch SPM-1.1

Onshore Pipeline Profile Map for 10 Inch Fire

Onshore Pipeline Profile Map for Brine Outfall

Item Specification Unit Quantity

Onshore Pipeline Profile Map for 4 Inch Seawater

4.1 Project Location

Figure 4.1 Proposed Project Location

Projection Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)

Semi-major axis 6 378 137.000

4.3 Project Log

Table 4.3-1 Project Log Table

29-12-2018 to 10-03-2019 Survey Control, Topographical Survey

12-03-2019 to 20-04-2019 Data Processing & Report Submission

4.4 Benchmark Verification

Table 4.4-1 The Results of Verification for the Existing Benchmarks

Point Name N(m) E(m) H(m) ΔN(m) ΔE(m) ΔH(m) Remark

1550-01 2120712.722 578362.471 90.572 - - - Base

2118718.683 578351.290 99.221 Known

2116672.823 580268.394 131.691 Known

2116928.903 578412.914 110.377 Known