Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microstructure Control: Shantanu K Behera
Microstructure Control: Shantanu K Behera
Shantanu K Behera
CR2016
1 Thermodynamics of Pores
3 Microstructural Maps
δE = Nδrγgb − 2πδrγsv
If the pore is surrounded by too many grains, then the increase in energy due
to the extension of the grain boundaries (into the pores) would be greater than
the decrease in free energy due to the reduction of the pore surface area. As
a results the pore should grow.
Pore Stability
Balancing the forces we can write:
hΨi
γgb = 2γsv Cos
2
Or, hΨi γgb
Cos =
2 2γsv
For a material systems the dihedral
angle (Ψ) is unique, therefore the
critical coordination number (Nc ) is
Figure: 2.4 from Rahaman, pg. 49. also unique. Pores with more than Nc
Equilibrium shape of the pore is number of grains coordinating it would
determined by the balance of the surficial tend to grow, and vice versa.
and interfacial tensions. γsv , γgb are
solid-vapor interface energy and grain
boundary energy, respectively. Ψ is the
dihedral angle.
Pore Stability
Consider a system with dihedral angle 120◦ . Therefore the Nc = 6. How the
shape of the pore changes with number of grains coordinating it can be
observed from the figure below.
Figure: Stability of pores with dihedral angle 120◦ , but with different grain coordination
number. Sintering, SJL Kang.
Pore Stability
Grain growth in porous solids can be split into two parts; GG in very porous
solids, and GG in less porous solids.
Grain growth in very porous solids (referring to the initial and a major part
of the intermediate sintering stage) is generally due to surface diffusion
and evaporation-condensation phenomena.
Strategies to control grain growth at this stage is to use additives or
dopants that would hinder the surface diffusion coefficient.
Additionally, ceramic systems with high vapor pressure would have a
pronounced effect of coarsening in this stage.
Grain growth during the less porous state (pertaining to the final stage
densification) can be understood and modeled by having spherical pores
at the grain boundaries or triple pockets (similar to the Zener analysis of
second phase precipitates in a microstructure).
If the pore imparts sufficient drag then the boundary migration may stop.
r
A limiting case can be defined as GL = 2α 3 P to design fabrication
parameters, where r is the pore radius, P is the porosity, α is a
geometrical factor.
If the drag is insufficient, the boundary will break away, leaving a trapped
pore inside the grain.
Pore Mobility
Surface curvature driven boundary
migration applies a force on the pore.
This force changes the shape of the pore:
the leading surface of the pore becomes
less strongly curved than the trailing
surface.
The difference in curvature leads to a
chemical potential difference that drives
matter transport from the leading surface
to the trailing surface.
Thence, the pore moves forward in the
direction of the boundary.
Various diffusion mechanisms are marked
on the figure: vapor transport, surface
Figure: Adapted from Sintering of diffusion, and lattice diffusion.
Ceramics, Rahaman, pg. 157
Pore Mobility
Pore Mobility
Like boundary mobility, we can also define pore mobility as follows:
vp = Mp Fp
where, vp is the pore velocity, Mp is the pore mobility, Fp is the driving force on
the pore.
Surface diffusion:
Ds δ s Ω
Mp =
kTπr4
Lattice diffusion:
Dl Ω
Mp =
fkTπr3
Vapor transport:
Dg dg Ω
Mp =
2kTds πr3
Shantanu Behera (NIT Rourkela) High Temperature Processes in Ceramics CR2016 11 / 21
Grain Growth in Porous Solids
Pore separation will occur when vp < vb , which can be written as:
Fp Mp < FMb
where, F is the effective driving force on the boundary. For a unit area it can
be written as: F = Fb − NFp .
Therefore,
Fp Mp < (Fb − NFp )Mb
Mp Mb
vb = Fb
NMb + Mp
dG Fb h Ds δs Ω i
vb = =
dt N kTπr4
dG K
= 3
dt G
Upon integration, we have
G4 = G40 + K0 t
Brook Model
Figure: Sir Brook’s Model: Pore boundary interaction on microstructural parameters for
pore migration by surface diffusion.
3 Ds δs γgb
Γ=
176 Dgb δgb γsv
This expression is for boundary
migration limited by surface diffusion
controlled pore drag, and sintering by
GB diffusion.
Harmer Model
Figure: Harmer Model: G ∼ ρ map for Al2 O3 , illustrating the effect of raising the surface
diffusion coefficient by 4 times, reducing the lattice diffusivity by 2 times, and boundary
mobility by 34 times. The G ∼ ρ trajectory has been flattened, and the separation
region has been shifted to larger grain size, thereby making it possible to achieve full
density.
Shantanu Behera (NIT Rourkela) High Temperature Processes in Ceramics CR2016 18 / 21
Fabrication Principles for Controlled µStructure
Hot Pressing
ρ˙hp ∝ Σ + Pa
ρ˙s ∝ Pa
where ρ˙hp , ρ˙s are the densification rates in hot pressing and pressureless
sintering, respectively, Σ is the pressure through Hot Press, Pa is the
sintering pressure. Since, generally, Σ >> Pa , we can say that
ρ˙hp ∝ Σ
Therefore, h ρ̇ i h ρ̇ i
>>
Ġ hp Ġ s
Fine, inert inclusions, when used, impact the rate of grain growth by
imposing a drag force on it, thus reducing boundary mobility. This
effectively increases densification rate than coarsening.
Uniform packing of fine particulates leads to small pores with low
coordination number (N < Nc ). As a result of sintering the pores shrink in
size and disappear.
Additionally, homogeneous distribution of powders with a narrow particle
size distribution help eliminate differential sintering and abnormal grain
growth, thus ensuring more uniform development of microstructure.
Shantanu Behera (NIT Rourkela) High Temperature Processes in Ceramics CR2016 20 / 21
Fabrication Principles for Controlled µStructure
Fast Firing
If, the activation energy of densification is higher than that of coarsening in a
ceramic system: fast firing can be an effective technique for consolidation to
full density.