HIGHWAY ENGINEERING LABORATORY

ECG344
OPEN-ENDED LAB OCTOBER
2021-FEBRUARY 2022

TITLE OF EXPERIMENT : AGGREGATE IMPACT TEST

DATE OF EXPERIMENT : 15/12/2021

GROUP : EC1105E
GROUP MEMBERS
1. AIYSHA NABEELA BT NOORAZLI (2019221018)
2. KHAIRIN MASTURAH BT ABDUL HADI (2019443668)
3. NUR NASUHA BT MOHD NASIR (2019238166)
4. NURUL ZAHIRA FITRIYAH BT ZAHARI (2019421348)

LECTURER : SIR MUHAMMAD ISHA BIN ISMAIL

LEVEL OF OPENESS : 0
FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
GROUP ASSESSMENT FOR REPORT
ECG344 – HIGHWAY ENGINEERING

INSTRUCTION: ASSESS THE STUDENT BASED ON THE RUBRIC GIVEN BELOW. ALL QUESTIONS ADDRESS CO2–PO10 (AFFECTIVE)
CO2 : Demonstrate effective communication skills in the design of pavement NO. STUDENT ID NAME GROUP MARK
and traffic study needs 1. 2019221018 AIYSHA NABEELA BT NOORAZLI EC1105E
PO10 : Communicate effectively on well-defined engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large, by being able to 2. 2019238166 NUR NASUHA BT MOHD NASIR EC1105E
comprehend the work of others, document their own work, and give and 3. 2019443668 KHAIRIN MASTURAH BT ABDUL HADI EC1105E 20
receive clear instructions. 4. 2019421348 NURUL ZAHIRA FITRIYAH BT ZAHARI EC1105E

Name of field work : AGGREGATE IMPACT TEST

:
LEVEL OF OPENNESS : 0
AFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE RUBRIC Full Obtaine
Marks d Marks

No CRITERIA PERFORMANCE SCALE

0 1 2 3 4 5
Able to
understand Able to
Unable to instruction and understand
Receiving
understand task given to instruction and
1 2
instruction or the group but task given to the
task given experienced group without
difficulty to delay.
start.
All members 1 or 2
were unable members were At least 1 member All members
Response to participate not able to was not able to participated
2 3
in group task participate. participate in actively in group
Late Late group task. task.
submission. submission
Able to
Able to organize
organize the Able to organize Able to organize the
Able to organize the content of
Unable to content of the content of content of report
the content of report correctly.
Organization organize the report but few report correctly. excellently. Creative 5
3 report but without Suitable data
report. important Use unsuitable and correct data
data. presentation
sublines are data presentation. presentation used
included.
missing.
FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

Able to write
Able to write Able to produce
Able to write relevant Able to produce
Unable to discussion/ excellent discussion
relevant discussion. a good
produce conclusion but and conclusion. Good
discussion. Conclusion is discussion and
discussion irrelevant to the recommendations
Conclusion is considered conclusion. 5
4 Generalization and task. Missing included with
considered enough to answer Relevant
conclusion of either references to other
enough to answer the objective. Few recommendation
the report. discussion or works in the
the objective. recommendations s are included
conclusion. literature.
are included.
TOTAL MARKS 15

Endorsed by Resource Person

10/10/2021
FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

LAB No Title OEL

1 Determination of vehicles speed - Running Speed Study 1

2 Determination of vehicles speed - Spot Speed Study 1

3 Traffic flow measurement and analysis- Traffic volume 2

4 Traffic flow measurement and analysis- Junction capacity 2

5 Determination of Aggregate properties- Aggregate Impact Value (AIV) Test 0

6 Determination of Aggregate properties- LA Abrasion Test 0

7 Determination of California Bearing Ratio- CBR Test 1

8 Determination of Bitumen Properties- Bitumen Penetration Test 1

9 Determination of Bitumen Properties - Softening Point Test 1

10 Pavement Assessment and Evaluation- Skid Resistance Test 1

11 Pavement Assessment and Evaluation- Sand Patch Test (micro texture test) 1

12 Pavement Assessment and Evaluation- Outflow Meter Test (surface drainage) 1

DATA & ANALYSIS

W1 = WEIGHT OF EMPTY SMALL CYLINDER STEEL

W2 = WEIGHT OF SMALL CYLINDER STEEL + AGGREGATES

No. W1 (kg) W2 (kg) Weight of pan (kg) Weight of pan +

aggregate (kg)
1 0.774 1.005 0.377 0.419
2 0.774 1.024 0.377 0.422
3 0.774 0.998 0.377 0.413

No. Weight Of Weight Of Aggregate Aggregate Impact

Aggregates (W2 – Passing 2.36 mm sieve Value ( B/A * 100%)
W1)(A) (B)
1. 0.234 0.042 18.18
2. 0.25 0.045 18
3 0.224 0.036 16.07
Average Value 17.42
 DISCUSSION

Aggregate impact value is to measure is to measure the toughness of aggregate that will be used
for road surface. The tougher the aggreagate, the more suitable it is to be used on a road surface.
Base on classification table, AIV should not be exceed above 30% as it is weak for road surfacing
and also the most suitable percentage is only from 10% - 30%. Based on the data,we get the result
for experiment 1 is also 18.80% for experiment 2 is 18% meanwhile for experiment 3 is 16.07%,
The average value for those 3 experiment is 17.42%. As we can see from the data, the classification
of aggregate impact value for the aggregate is strong as all the AIV percentage is in the average of
10% - 20%.

Aggregate Impact Value Classification

<10% Exceptionally strong
10-20% Strong
20-30% Satisfiactory for road surfacing
<35% Weak for road surfacing

CONCLUSION

From the experiment, we got the average value of aggregate impact test is 17.42%. Based on the
table classification of aggregate impact value,below 20% is strong. Aggregate physical property
must lower than 20% because is tougher and resistance to crushed. Lastly, we can conclude that the
aggregate been used are strong to be applied in construction road. These experiment are succesfull
because is still not exceed 30% for concrete used for for wearing surface such as road work or
airport.