CHAPTER IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents an analysis and interpretation based on the data

gathered. Its findings were based on the data gathered by the researcher to the

respondents through survey questionnaire. The data were carefully analyzed,

presented and interpreted.

Table 1.1 Level of Awareness of the BDRRMC in Disaster Risk Reduction in

terms of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation

INDICATORS MEAN DESCRIPTION

1. Are these maps available? (May magagamit ba na mapa?)
1.1 Hazard Maps ( Mapa para sa panganib) 1.24 Not Aware
1.2 Vulnerability maps ( Mapa para sa maaring mangyari) 1.24 Not Aware
1.3 Risk Maps ( Mapa para sa lugar na mapanganib) 1.24 Not Aware
1.4 Prominently displayed (mapa na ipinakita sa mga tao) 1.24 Not Aware
2. Conduct of Risk Assessment and Analysis ( Pagsasagawa
ng Pagsusuri sa Panganib)
2.1 Risk Assessment and Analysis? 3.87 Much Aware
( Nagawa ba ng mga LGU ang Pagsusuri sa Panganib)
2.2 Result of the risk assessment and analysis. ( Resulta ng 3.30 Aware
pagsusuri sa mga panganib na lugar)
3. Plans, Policies and Budget ( Mga Plano, Patakaran at
Budget)
3.1 Are there disaster prevention and mitigation measure
3.92 Much Aware
integrated/ mainstreamed in the local development plan?
( Mayroon bang pag-iwas sa kalamidad at pagpapagaan ng
panukala na isinama / pangunahing sa plano ng lokal na pag-
unlad?)
4.10 Much Aware
3.2 Are there funds appropriated and utilized for mitigation
measures?
( Mayroon bang mga pondo na inilaan at ginamit para sa mga
hakbang sa pagpapagaan?)
4. Early Warning System (EWS) ( Maagang Sistema ng
Babala)
2.94 Aware
4.1 Is there an established Early Warning Signs (EWS) for
specific hazards in the Barangay? ( Mayroon bang naitatag na
Early Warning Signs (EWS) para sa mga tiyak na panganib sa
Barangay?)

5. Environmental Management ( Pamamahala sa Kapaligiran)

5.1 Is/are there environmental ordinance/s? ( Mayroon bang / 3.70 Much Aware
mga ordenansa sa kapaligiran?)
3.70 Much Aware
5.2 Is/are there environmental program/s? ( Mayroon bang /
programa para sa kapaligiran?)
WEIGHTED MEAN 2.77 Aware
Legend:

4.50-5.00 Very Much Aware

3.50-4.49 Much Aware
2.50-3.49 Aware
1.50-2.49 Slightly Aware
1.00-1.49 Not Aware

Table 1.1 shows the level of awareness of the BDRRMC in disaster risk

reduction in terms of disaster prevention and mitigation. It was clear that indicator 3.2

got the highest mean of 4.10 which indicates that most of the respondents were much

aware that BDRMMC provided a fund appropriated and utilized for mitigation

measures. It was followed by indicator 3.1 which has a mean of 3.92. This means that

the respondents were much aware that BDRRMC provided a disaster prevention and

mitigation measure integrated/ mainstreamed in the local development plan. On the

other hand, indicator 1 got the lowest mean of 1.24 which indicates that most of the

respondents were not aware that BDRRMC provided a hazard maps, vulnerability, risk

maps, and prominently displayed.

Overall, it has a weighted mean of 2.77 which indicates that most of the

respondents were aware about the disaster prevention and mitigation provided by the

BDRRMC. The purpose of this thematic area is to limit the degree of human and
material damage caused by disasters, as well as to ensure that disasters or

emergencies are not caused by human activity or natural occurrences. To achieve this

goal, the barangay must also provide a map (Hazard maps, Vulnerability maps, hazard

maps, and prominently displayed maps) so that people are aware of which areas are

dangerous and should be avoided during a disaster. The early warning system must be

practiced and followed in accordance with the law that provided under the RA. 10121.

Table 1.2 Level of Awareness of the BDRRMC in Disaster Risk Reduction in

terms of Disaster Preparedness

INDICATORS MEAN DESCRIPTION

1. Established Barangay DRRM Committee ( Nagtatag ng
Komite sa DRRM ng Barangay)
1.90 Slightly Aware
1.1. DRRM Office/ Desk ( Opisina / Desk ng DRRM)
1.89 Slightly Aware
1.2. Organizational Chart (Tsart ng Organisasyon)
1.3. Equipage ( Kagamitan)
1.3.1. Search and Rescue and Medical ( Paghahanap 4.70 Very much aware
at Pagsagip at Medikal)
1.3.2. Transportation ( Transportasyon) 4.67 Very much aware
4.67 Very much aware
1.4. Operation center manned on a 24-hr basis ( Ang
sentro ng operasyon ay pinamahalaan nang 24-oras
na batayan) 4.69 Very much aware
1.5. Pre-positioned stockpiles of relief goods (food and
non-food) or negotiated agreement with local
suppliers ( Mga naka-posisyon na stockpile ng mga
relief goods (pagkain at di-pagkain) o
napagkasunduang kasunduan sa mga lokal na
tagapagtustos
2. Capacity development for the community and stake
holders
( Pagpapaunlad ng kapasidad para sa pamayanan at mga
may stakeholders)
2.1 Evacuation Camp Management ( Evacuation Camp 4.49 Much Aware
Management)
2.2 Community-based Disaster Risk Reduction 4.04 Much Aware
Management
( Pamamahala sa Pagbawas ng Peligro na batay sa
Pamayanan) 4.58 Very Much Aware
2.3 Search and Rescue ( Paghahanap at Pagsagip) 3.45 Aware
 2.4 Fire Suppression ( Pagpipigil sa Sunog)
2.5 Medical Services (Basic Life Support, First Aid) 4.38 Much Aware
( Serbisyong Medikal) (Pangunahing Suporta sa
Buhay, First Aid)
2.6 Family and Community- Based Disaster Preparedness 4.37 Much Aware
& Monitoring System ( Sistema ng Paghahanda at
Pagsubaybay na Batay sa Pamilya at Pamayanan)
WEIGHTED MEAN 3.99 Much Aware
Legend:

4.50-5.00 Very Much Aware

3.50-4.49 Much Aware
2.50-3.49 Aware
1.50-2.49 Slightly Aware
1.00-1.49 Not Aware

Table 1.2 shows the level of awareness of the BDRRMC in disaster risk

reduction in terms of disaster preparedness. It was clear that indicator 1.3.1 got the

highest mean of 4.70 which indicates that most of the respondents were very much

aware about the search and rescue and medical provided by the BDRRMC. It was

followed by indicator 1.5 which has a mean of 4.69 this means that the respondents

were aware that BDRRMC provided a pre-positioned stockpile of relief goods (food and

non-food) or negotiated agreement with local suppliers. On the other hand, indicator

1.2 got the lowest mean of 1.89 which indicates that most of the respondents were

slightly aware on the organizational chart provided by the BDRRMC.

Overall, it has a weighted mean of 3.99 which indicates that most of the

respondents were much aware about the disaster preparedness provided by the

BDRRMC. This thematic area is about community preparation and participation and the

participatory approach is the best way to make the community aware of how vulnerable

it is. Therefore, BDRRMC needs to encourage the participation of people to effectively

respond to disasters and emergencies. This is the essence of Republic Act 10121.
 Table 1.3 Level of Awareness of the BDRRMC in Disaster Risk Reduction in

terms of Disaster Response

INDICATORS MEAN DESCRIPTION

1. Demonstrated Capability ( Naipamalas ang Kakayahan)
1.1. Readiness to deploy functional Incident 3.83 Much Aware
Management Team by the first responder on site
( Ang kahandaang mag-deploy ng gumaganang
Koponan sa Pamamahala ng Insidente ng unang
tagatugon sa site)
1.2. Availability of timely, accurate and reliable response 3.57 Much Aware
( Ang pagkakaroon ng napapanahong, tumpak at
maaasahang tugon)
1.3. List of sites and centers for relief distribution 3.80 Much Aware
( Listahan ng mga site at sentro para sa
pamamahagi ng lunas)
1.4. Determination of clinics, hospitals and RHUs to 4.31 Much Aware
address any medical emergency ( Pagpapasiya ng
mga klinika, ospital at RHU upang matugunan ang
anumang emerhensiyang medikal)
3.44 Aware
1.5. List of sites and centers/maps for evacuation sites
( Listahan ng mga site at center / mapa para sa mga
site ng paglikas) 4.37 Much Aware
1.6. Readiness to provide transportation for Evacuation (
Kahandaang magbigay ng transportasyon para sa
Evacuation)
WEIGHTED MEAN 3.89 Much Aware
Legend:

4.50-5.00 Very Much Aware

3.50-4.49 Much Aware
2.50-3.49 Aware
1.50-2.49 Slightly Aware
1.00-1.49 Not Aware

Table 1.3 shows the level of awareness of the BDRRMC in disaster risk

reduction in terms of disaster response. It was clear that most of the indicators were

described as much aware. Among these indicators, indicator 1.6 got the highest mean

of 4.37 which indicates that most of the respondents were much aware that the

BDRRMC was ready to provide transportation for evacuation in case of disaster. It was
followed by indicator 1.4 which has a mean of 4.31. This means that the respondents

were much aware that the BDRRMC provided a determination of clinics, hospitals and

RHUs to address any medical emergency. On the other hand, indicator 1.5 has the

lowest mean of 3.44 this means that the respondents were aware that BDRRMC

provide a list of sites and centers/maps for evacuation sites.

Overall, it has a weighted mean of 3.89 which indicates that most of the

respondents were much aware about the disaster response provided by the BDRRMC.

This shows that they are equipped with barangays and can demonstrate their skills in

the event of a disaster. Based on those definitions and BDRRMC performance,

effective disaster response is implemented through an effective disaster or emergency

management system. This figure clearly shows that barangays work well in the event of

a disaster and practice what to do in the event of a disaster. As mentioned earlier,

community participation is required to effectively implement policies and programs. All

the decisions and actions that society makes make it more vulnerable or resilient to

disasters. Training on how to respond appropriately to emergencies can help

barangays be effective in disaster relief. This means that effective disaster risk

reduction leads to effective disaster response. Therefore, a successful response

measurement is an indicator of successful readiness. This demonstrates the

importance and interdependence of the individual subject areas. Barangay

performance in one area affects their performance in another. This also applies to

disaster relief. If people know what to do and follow prescribed early warning and

evacuation procedures (disaster preparedness), the need for emergency services and

public assistance in the event of a disaster will be reduced (disaster response).

 Table 1.4 Level of Awareness of the BDRRMC in Disaster Risk Reduction in

terms of Disaster Rehabilitation and Recovery

INDICATORS MEAN DESCRIPTION

1. Efforts that will mitigate the impact of future disaster. 3.31 Aware
( Mga pagsisikap na magpapagaan ng epekto ng
kalamidad sa hinaharap.)
2. Conduct of Damage and Needs Assessment 3.37 Aware
( Pagsasagawa ng Damage at Kailangan ng Pagsusuri)
3. Status of projects in the recovery plan ( Katayuan ng 3.32 Aware
mga proyekto sa plano sa pagbawi)
WEIGHTED MEAN 3.33 Aware
Legend:

4.50-5.00 Very Much Aware

3.50-4.49 Much Aware
2.50-3.49 Aware
1.50-2.49 Slightly Aware
1.00-1.49 Not Aware

Table 1.4 shows the level of awareness of the BDRRMC in disaster risk

reduction in terms of disaster rehabilitation and recovery. It was clear that all of the

indicators were described as aware. Among these indicators, indicator two (2) has the

highest mean of 3.37 this means that the respondents were aware that BDRRMC was

conducting damage and needs assessment. This was followed by indicator three (3)

which has a mean of 3.32 which indicates that most of the respondents were aware of

the status of projects in the recovery plan provided by the BDRRMC. On the other

hand, indicator one (1) has the lowest mean of 3.31. This means that the respondents

were aware that BDRRMC make an effort that will mitigate the impact of future disaster.

Overall, it has a weighted mean of 3.33 which indicates that most of the

respondents were aware about the disaster rehabilitation and mitigation provided by

the BDRRMC. Here, the ability of the barangay to return to normal is important for

whether the barangay's preparatory activities are sufficient to make the community

resilient. Therefore, rehabilitation and recovery requires not only the effectiveness of
BDRRMC, but also the resilience of the entire community. This is only achieved if

BDRRMC effectively carries out pre-disaster activities that are prioritized by law.

Table 2. Level of satisfaction in the implementation of BDRRMC

INDICATORS WEIGHTED STANDARD DESCRIPTION

MEAN DEVIATION
1. Disaster Prevention and 2.77 2.30 Satisfied
Mitigation
2. Disaster Preparedness 3.99 3.66 More than satisfied
3. Disaster Response 3.86 3.85 More than satisfied
4. Disaster Rehabilitation and 3.33 3.10 Satisfied
Recovery
Legend:

4.50-5.00 Extremely Satisfied

3.50-4.49 More than Satisfied
2.50-3.49 Satisfied
1.50-2.49 Partly Satisfied
1.00-1.49 Not at all Satisfied

Table 2 above shows the level of satisfaction in the implementation of barangay

risk reduction management council. It was clear that among the four indicators, disaster

preparedness has the highest weighted mean of 3.99, this means that the respondents

were more than satisfied in the implementation of BDRRMC. This further reveals that

respondents were much aware that the barangay established a DRRM committee and

capacity development for the community and stake holders. This was followed by

disaster response with a weighted mean of 3.86, this means that the respondents were

more than satisfied in the implementation of BDRRMC. The disaster rehabilitation and

recovery has a weighted mean of 3.33 this means that the respondents were satisfied

in the implementation of BDRRMC. On the other hand, disaster prevention and

mitigation has the lowest weighted mean of 2.77, this means that the respondents were

satisfied. Disaster prevention and mitigation also got the lowest standard deviation of
2.30, this means data are clustered around the mean. This also further reveals that

among the four indicators the barangay risk reduction management council should

focused on the disaster prevention and mitigation.

The results of this study clearly show that performance measurement is an

integral part of the successful operation of performance management in public services.

BDRRMC's performance in four subject areas is reflected in the effectiveness of the

organization, R.A. 10121. In order for a policy to be evaluated by the community,

sufficient public participation in decision-making at the local level is required to ensure

that the main purpose of the policy reflects the concerns of the community, is

necessary. This guarantees effective implementation and performance of the barangay.