CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE AT RASMOHNI TO BADAUDI 2+100

HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Computation of Lonqitudinal Slope

[A] Hydrological Analysis

Calculation of hydrological data of

[B] Salient Data

High Flood Level ( HFL) = 463.399 m
Lowest Bed Level = 461.324 m

[C] Methodology
Long Section of River/Nala along Lowest Bed

Bed Slope/Longitudinal slope/ Stream

S.No. Length LBL
1 0 464.46 m
2 67 464.02 m
3 133 463.59 m
4 200 463.15 m
5 267 462.72 m
6 333 462.28 m
7 400 461.85 m
8 467 461.41 m
9 533 460.98 m
10 600 460.54 m
11 667 460.11 m
12 733 459.67 m
13 800 459.24 m
14 867 458.80 m
15 933 458.37 m
16 1000 457.93 m

Slope = 0.00653
 CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE AT RASMOHNI TO BADAUDI 2+100

HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Bed Profile and River Cross Section

CASE 1: Chainage at 500 m U/S
HFL = 466.76 m
Distance
Point HFL 467.00 m
(m)
Reduced level of
1 -30.00 466.74 m 466.76 m 466.50 m
466.00 m
2 -20.00 466.01 m 466.76 m
Bed 465.50 m
3 -10.00 464.84 m 466.76 m
465.00 m
4 0.00 464.46 m 466.76 m
464.50 m
5 10.00 464.82 m 466.76 m
464.00 m
6 20.00 465.95 m 466.76
-40.00m -30.00 -20.00 -10.00 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00
7 30.00 466.75 m 466.76 m Distance

CASE 2: Chainage at 0 m
HFL = 463.40 m

Distance
Point Level (m) HFL
Reduced level of Bed

(m) 464.00 m
1 -30.00 463.39 m 463.40 m 463.50 m
2 -20.00 462.87 m 463.40 m 463.00 m
3 -10.00 461.65 m 463.40 m 462.50 m
4 0.00 461.32 m 463.40 m 462.00 m
5 10.00 461.64 m 463.40 m 461.50 m
6 20.00 462.76 m 463.40 m 461.00 m
7 30.00 463.38 m -40.00
463.40 m -30.00 -20.00 -10.00 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00
Distance

CASE 1: Chainage at 500m D/S

HFL = 462.13 m

Distance 462.50 m
Point Level (m) HFL
(m) 462.00 m
Reduced level of Bed

1 -30.00 462.11 m 462.13 461.50 m

2 -20.00 461.24 m 462.13 461.00 m
3 -10.00 460.14 m 462.13 460.50 m
460.00 m
4 0.00 459.56 m 462.13
459.50 m
5 10.00 460.11 m 462.13
459.00 m
6 20.00 461.12 m 462.13
-40.00 -30.00 -20.00 -10.00 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00
7 30.00 462.01 m 462.13 Distance
 CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE AT RASMOHNI TO BADAUDI 2+100
HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS
0

CALCULATION OF DISCHARGE BY AREA VELOCITY METHOD

CASE 1: Chainage at 500m U/S
High Flood Level 466.756 m

Avg. Water
Segment Watted
REF. POINT DIST. FROM LEVEL Level Difference Depth below Area of Cross section, A
Length L Perimeter, P
No. DATUM (m) (in m) with HFL HFL , hi (in sq meters)
(m) (in meters)
(in meters)

1 -30.00 466.74 m 0.016

2 -20.00 466.01 m 0.746 10.000 0.38 10.027 3.810
3 -10.00 464.84 m 1.916 10.000 1.33 10.068 13.310
4 0.00 464.46 m 2.296 10.000 2.11 10.007 21.060
5 10.00 464.82 m 1.936 10.000 2.12 10.006 21.160
6 20.00 465.95 m 0.804 10.000 1.37 10.064 13.700
7 30.00 466.75 m 0.006 10.000 0.40 10.032 4.050
TOTAL = 60.204 77.090

CASE 2: Chainage at 0m
High Flood Level 463.399 m
Avg. Water
Segment Watted
REF. POINT DIST. FROM LEVEL Level Difference Depth below Area of Cross section, A
Length L Perimeter, P
No. DATUM (m) (in m) with HFL HFL , hi (in sq meters)
(m) (in meters)
(in meters)
1 -30.00 463.39 m 0.009
2 -20.00 462.87 m 0.531 10.000 0.27 10.014 2.700
3 -10.00 461.65 m 1.753 10.000 1.14 10.074 11.420
4 0.00 461.32 m 2.075 10.000 1.91 10.005 19.140
5 10.00 461.64 m 1.756 10.000 1.92 10.005 19.157
6 20.00 462.76 m 0.638 10.000 1.20 10.062 11.970
7 30.00 463.38 m 0.019 10.000 0.33 10.019 3.283
TOTAL = 60.180 67.670

CASE 3: Chainage at 500m D/S

High Flood Level 462.130 m
Avg. Water
Segment Watted
REF. POINT DIST. FROM LEVEL Level Difference Depth below Area of Cross section, A
Length L Perimeter, P
No. DATUM (m) (in m) with HFL HFL , hi (in sq meters)
(m) (in meters)
(in meters)
1 -30.00 462.11 m 0.020
2 -20.00 461.24 m 0.890 10.000 0.46 10.038 4.550
3 -10.00 460.14 m 1.987 10.000 1.44 10.060 14.383
4 0.00 459.56 m 2.570 10.000 2.28 10.017 22.783
5 10.00 460.11 m 2.022 10.000 2.30 10.015 22.958
6 20.00 461.12 m 1.010 10.000 1.52 10.051 15.158
7 30.00 462.01 m 0.125 10.000 0.57 10.039 5.675
TOTAL = 60.220 85.507
 CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE AT RASMOHNI TO BADAUDI 2+100

HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS

CALCULATION OF DISCHARGE
Computation of discharge by different methods
a) Discharge from Catchment Area
By Dicken's Formula
Discharge Q = C*M^3/4

Where C = 19
The Catchment Area 'M' = 34.39 Sq. Km

Q = 269.82 Cum/Sec
b) Area velocity method
Discharge (Q) = AV
(Assumed as per Table : 5.1 of IRC: SP -13)
Nature of Surface Assumed - Widening, Some Pools and shoals, Clean, Lower Stages More Ineffective
Slope and some weeds and stony Section

n = Rugosity Coefficient = 0.040

S = Longitudinal Slope = 0.006

Case At Location Area A (m2) Perimeter P (m) Remark

Case 1 500.0 m U/S 77.090 60.204

Case 2 0.0 m 67.670 60.180
Case 3 500.0 m D/S 85.507 60.220

Area A Perimeter P Velocity, V (m/Sec) Discharge, Q

Case R=A/P
(m2) (m) =(1/n).R2/3.S1/2 = A x V (m3/sec)
Case 1 77.090 60.204 1.280 2.283 176.00
Case 2 67.670 60.180 1.124 2.093 141.60
Case 3 85.507 60.220 1.420 2.446 209.20
MAXIMUM 3.400 175.60

Design Discharge considered = 269.82

= 269.82 m3/Sec
Average Velocity = 3.400

Lacey's regime width { 4.8 X (Q)^0.5} = 78.52 m

Effective linear water
L =way
Q/VXD = 33.07 m
Clear waterway provided = 3 X 9.6 28.8 m
Overall Waterway Provided = 3 x 10 30 m
Actual Dis.Q through Opening = 244.80 m 3/sec
Provided Linear water way = 3 X 10 m
MAXIMUM depth = 2.400 m
Area before construction = 67.670 Sqm
Area after construction = 69.120 Sqm

AFFUX CALCULATION :
Average velocity of flow (V) = 3.400 m/sec.
Unobstructed area of flow (A) = 68 Sqm (Area of flow at proposed bridge location)
Obstructed area of flow (a) = 69.120 Sqm

Recommendation
Design Discharge = 269.82 m3/Sec
Design Affluxed HFL = 463.399 m
Provided Soffit Level = 464.449 m

Hence, Hydraulically = Adequate

FIXATION OF FORMATION LEVEL:
HFL = 463.399 m
VERTICAL CLEARENCE = 0.900 m
AFLUX = 0.150 m
DEPTH OF SUPERSTRUCTURE = 0.750 m
WEARING COURSE = 0.075 m
FORMATION LEVEL = 465.274 m
SCOUR DEPTH COMPUTATION FROM HFL
Design Discharge for Scour depth calculation = 366.72 Cumecs
Clear waterway after deduction of obustructions = 28.80 m
Min. clear waterway = 30 m
Discharge per metre width, Db = 12.733 cumec/m
Ksf at Pier Position (From Laboratory Test) = 22
Ksf at Abutment Position (From Laboratory Test) = 10
Normal Scour Depth at abutment location, dsmf
= 1.34(Db2/Ksf)1/3 = 3.39 m
Normal Scour Depth at pier location, dsmf
= 1.34(Db2/Ksf)1/3 = 2.61 m

Maximum Scour Depth at Pier Location 2.0 dsmf = 5.22 m

Maximum Scour Depth at Abutment Location 1.27 dsmf = 4.31 m
Maximum Scour Level at Pier Location (H.F.L. - 2.0 dsmf) = 458.179 m
Maximum Scour Level at Abutment Location (H.F.L. - 1.27= d 459.089 m
Abutment Faundation Level = 457.324 m
Piert Faundation Level = 457.324 m
Due To Hard Rock Scouring For Pier& Abutment Is Negligible