Managers must balance individual and community interests by setting strategic objectives, organizing resources, and motivating staff. Effective leadership considers cultural norms and adapts styles to tasks. Ethical leaders treat people well, encourage feedback, and prioritize integrity over personal gain.
Managers must balance individual and community interests by setting strategic objectives, organizing resources, and motivating staff. Effective leadership considers cultural norms and adapts styles to tasks. Ethical leaders treat people well, encourage feedback, and prioritize integrity over personal gain.
Managers must balance individual and community interests by setting strategic objectives, organizing resources, and motivating staff. Effective leadership considers cultural norms and adapts styles to tasks. Ethical leaders treat people well, encourage feedback, and prioritize integrity over personal gain.
individualists: strong, self-motivated A01197738 establish general strategic objectives translate to tactical objectives managers; max. personal gain 2. Organizing resources to preplan & prepare necesarry resources manager: person responsible meet the objectives leadership traits result from cultural norms & needs of task of setting objectives, NOT only give instructions organizing resources & leaders in diferent countries are admired for motivating staff ensure structure to allow division of tasks diferent qualitites each section organized to achieve objectives 3. Directing & motivating staff understand importance of their role & exercisit carefully guiding, leading & overseeing employees Cultural make ethical issues discussion part of the business culture encouragement of leadership in others Considerations & motivate staff to develop abilities at work Leadership Functions of business size increases need of coordination between parts willingness to encourage & consider feedback & opinions Management increase deal with & motivate ability to ignore personal interests 4. Coordinating activities weld together all divisions' objectives to achieve sense of staff at all levels the ways they treat people purpose Figurehead: symbolic leader indicators of ethical management by objectives allows to establish targets for all their attitudes to people & situations leadership Leader: motivate subordinates/ groups the ways they motivate 5. Controlling & measuring select & train staff appraise performance against targets 1. Interpersonal roles the direction in which they lead performance against targets Liaison: link with managers & take action if underperformance occurs leader of other divisions act as source, receiver & etichal leaders must lead ethically components transmitter of info. ethical leaders must act ethically Ethical Consideration & Monitor (receiver): collect relevant data to Leadership Styles managers undertake many roles operations degree of responsibility employees common roles 2. Informational roles Disseminator: send collected info. from are prepared to take on ext. & int. sources to relevant people training & experience of workforce ethical leadership: leading by Mintzberg's Spokesperson: communicate info. to amount of time available for participation knowing & doing what's right Leadership and Management Management Roles ext. groups management culture & business background main groups take decision & allocating confidence personality of managers depends on resources to meet objectives strenght of character Effectiveness of Leadership Styles Entrepreneur: looks for new importance of the issue opportunities to develop business take decisions on their own Disturbance handler : respond to changing situations of set objectives themselves keeps al decision-making at risk/ take responsibility when threatening factors develop 3. Decisional roles the center of organization Resource allocator: decide allocation of issue instructions to workers & ensure they financial, human & other resources are caried out Autocratic Leaders styles Negotiator: represent organizarion in all workers are dependant & won´t show iniciative important negotiations low motivation of staff Leadership Styles one-way communication (NO feedback) Differences Between leadership: act of motivating a group of leaders are naturally different Management & Leadership people towards common objective orders issued quickly (ex. police) from others in case of crisis desire to succeed & natural fatherly style used by dominant males where self-confidence that they will What Makes a power is used to control & protect employees ability to think beyond the obvious Good Leader pay more attention to social aspects of employees creative concerned with keeping them happy & motivated encourage others to do the same Leadership Management decisions with workers interests at heart Paternalistic Leaders feedback & morale imporvement multitalented final decisions taken by management Motivate & inspire others Direct & monior others higher loyalty & motivation understand wide range of issues Innovators who encourage others to Problem-solvers no true participation sense of frustration promotes the active incisive mind; identify heart of issue accept change participation of rather then unnecessary details Official position of Cares for personal traits engage in discution with workers before taking decision workers in decisions responsibility in organization & qualities two-way communication may lead to better final decisions Natural abilities & instincts Skilled & qualified to perform role workers ofer valuable work experience Democratic Leaders varies with the task, leaders Believes in the right thing Believes in doing things right rapid change leads to need to cunsult workers Situational Leaders adapt style to each situation Respected & trusted by Listened by others because more acceptable to change when everyone has been involved followers of status adapt to skills & experience of group reverse of autocratic style most of decisions left Creates & develops a to workforce, "hands- Accepts the norms translates to "let them do it" adapt to task or job culture of change off" approach little input from management effective in research or design teams experts in the field work better when not tightly supervised Laissez-Faire Leadership
may lead to lack of confidence, poor decisions & poor motivation
may be hard to know if what they are doing is right