SSZK2003 PENYELIDIKAN SAINS SOSIAL PJJ JA221

TUGASAN INDIVIDU : CADANGAN PROPOSAL RINGKAS (10%)

ARAHAN:

1. Tugasan ini hendaklah dibuat secara individu.

2. Setiap pelajar dikehendaki mengemukakan tajuk serta menyediakan rancangan
penyelidikan ringkas untuk kertas projek masing-masing.
3. Tajuk kajian adalah bebas dan mesti relevan dengan senario terkini.
4. Para pelajar dikehendaki mengisi jadual seperti template di LAMPIRAN B.
5. Tugasan hendaklah mengikut format berikut:
a. Jenis tulisan Times News Roman
b. Saiz tulisan 12
c. Saiz kertas A4
6. Rubrik pemarkahan adalah seperti dalam LAMPIRAN A.
7. Wajaran markah adalah 20% daripada markah keseluruhan kursus.
8. Cara mengisi template tersebut adalah disertakan di dalam LAMPIRAN C.
9. Tugasan individu ini hendaklah dihantar sebelum atau pada pertemuan ke-4.
10. Kelewatan menghantar sebarang tugasan adalah tertakluk pada BUDI BICARA
tenaga pengajar masing-masing.
SSZK2003 PENYELIDIKAN SAINS SOSIAL PJJ JA221

LAMPIRAN A
RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN
Kriteria Rubrik Markah Penuh
1. Pengenalan
• Permasalahan kajian 6
• Tujuan kajian 6
• Soalan kajian 6 24
• Hipotesis kajian 6
2. Ulasan Karya
• Teori 6
• Jurang kajian 6 12
(Research gap)

3. Metod Kajian
• Rekabentuk dan jenis 6
kajian 24
• Instrumen/ Alat ukur 6
kajian
• Kaedahpengumpulan 6
data dan persampelan
• Kaedah analisa data 6

JUMLAH KESELURUHAN 60 60

__ x 20 = __ __
60
SSZK2003 PENYELIDIKAN SAINS SOSIAL PJJ JA221

LAMPIRAN B

Name: Labu bin labi

Matrix Number: 99885
Research Title: gejala rasuah dalm kalangan penjawat awam.

Introduction Literature Review Research Methodology

Research Research Research Hypotheses Research Gap Theories Research Instrument Data Collection Data
Problems Objectives Questions (If there is any) Design & Sampling Analysis
a. a. 1.
b.

2.

b. b. 3.
SSZK2003 PENYELIDIKAN SAINS SOSIAL PJJ JA221

LAMPIRAN C
CONTOH

Title: LONELINESS AS A PREDICTOR OF ANXIETY AMONG UUM STRANDED STUDENTS DURING MOVEMENT CONTROL ORDER

Introduction Literature Research Methodology

Research Research Research Hypotheses Theories Data Collection Data Analysis Theories
Problems Objectives Questions (If there is any) Research Design
c. Isolation measures a. To identify the a. What is the rate None Research Sampling Strategy Descriptive
& delays in rate of anxiety of anxiety Theories Instrument -Population: UUM Analysis
opening and loneliness among UUM explaining Questionnaire students
educational among UUM stranded loneliness: -Population size:
Section A: 15231
institutions are students. students during
- The Cognitive Demography
risky for mental MCO?
Negative Triad Question 12427 non stranded
health of students. - Stranded (81.59%)
However, no Theory on anxiety Experience 2804 stranded
detailed study on - Tripartite Model - Gender (18.41%)
students' mental of Anxiety and - Family Income
health during a. What is the rate None Depression - Student Locality 95.5% (2678) local
MCO is yet of loneliness among (Clark - Internship stranded,
Quantitative
available (Cao et stranded students &&Watson,1991) Termination 4.5% (126)
Exploratory
al., 2020). during MCO in international
Cross-Sectional
UUM? stranded
Survey tmethod

Sampling strategy:
2)Media generally b. To compare the b. Is there any Ho1: There is no Stratified random Independent T-
significant sampling Test
predicts that social difference of significant
distance & anxiety rate difference of difference of
anxiety rate Section B: Sample Size:
isolation cause among UUM anxiety rate
between UUM UCLA Loneliness
loneliness and students based on among UUM 8-Item 375 students
students who are
psychosis stranded students who are (ULS-8) Scale 306 non-stranded
stranded and not
conditions such as experience, stranded and not stranded during students
anxiety. However, gender, family stranded during MCO. Reliability:
no empirical income, student MCO?
SSZK2003 PENYELIDIKAN SAINS SOSIAL PJJ JA221

evidence locality, and a. Is there any Ho2: There is no 0.815, Highly 69 stranded Independent T-
supported the internship significant significant Reliable (Xu, Qiu, students Test
argument, termination. difference of difference of Hahne, Zhao & 66 stranded local
specifically anxiety rate anxiety rate Hu, 2018) students (95.5%)
among student among female and between male and 3 stranded
female UUM international
population male UUM
stranded students students. (4.5%)
(Hajduk et stranded students during MCO.
al,2020) during MCO?

b. Is there any Ho3: There is no One-Way

significant significant ANOVA
difference of difference of Between
anxiety rate anxiety rate Subject
among B40, M40 between B40, M40
& T20 UUM
& T20 UUM
students who are
students who are stranded during
stranded during MCO.
MCO?

c. Is there any Ho4: There is no Independent T-

significant significant Test
difference in difference of
anxiety rate anxiety rate
between local and between local and
international international
students during stranded students
MCO in UUM? during MCO.
Section C:
Depression
d. Is there any Ho5: There is no Anxiety and Independent T-
significant significant Stress Scale Test.
difference in difference in (DASS 21) -
anxiety rate anxiety rate Anxiety
among UUM between UUM Dimension
stranded students stranded students Descriptive
who experienced who experienced Analysis
-0.86 (Gloster et
internship internship al, 2008)
termination and termination and
who did not who did not
experience experience
internship internship
termination during termination during
MCO? MCO.
SSZK2003 PENYELIDIKAN SAINS SOSIAL PJJ JA221

b. Is there any Independent T-

significant Test
difference of
loneliness rate
among UUM Ho6: There is no
significant
students who are
difference in
stranded and not loneliness rate
stranded during between UUM
MCO. students who are
stranded and not
stranded during
MCO.
Independent T-
c. Is there any Ho7: There is no Test
significant significant
difference of difference of
loneliness among loneliness between
female and male
female and male
UUM stranded
stranded students students during
during MCO in MCO in UUM.
UUM?

d. Is there any in Ho8: There is no ANOVA One

difference in significant Way Between
loneliness among difference in Subject.
B40, M40 and T20 loneliness between
income UUM B40, M40 and T20
income UUM
students who are
students who are
stranded during stranded during
MCO in UUM. MCO in UUM.
e. Is there any Ho9: There is no Independent T-
difference in significant Test
loneliness among difference in
international and loneliness between
international and
local stranded
local UUM
students during
stranded students
MCO in UUM? during MCO.
f. Is there any Ho10: There is no Independent T-
significant difference of Test
difference of loneliness between
loneliness among UUM stranded
students who
UUM stranded
experienced
students who
internship
experienced termination and
SSZK2003 PENYELIDIKAN SAINS SOSIAL PJJ JA221

internship who did not

termination and who experience
did not experience internship
internship termination during
termination during MCO.
MCO.
3)Students under e. To determine the a. Is there any Ho11: There is no Point Biserial
lockdown reported relationship significant significant Correlation
declining progress between relationship between relationship
in their mental loneliness and stranded experience between stranded
health. However, anxiety among and anxiety among experience and
the statistical stranded students anxiety among
stranded students
evidence from during MCO in stranded students
repeated measure during MCO in UUM? during MCO in
ANOVA is not UUM. UUM.
sufficient to make b. there any Ho12: There is no Point Biserial
causal claims. significant significant Correlation
Therefore, the relationship between relationship
relationship stranded experience between stranded
between and anxiety among experience and
lockdown, social stranded students anxiety among
network & mental during MCO in stranded students
health cannot be UUM? during MCO in
established UUM.
(Elmer, Mepham, c. Is there any Ho13: There is no Pearson
& Stadtfeld, significant significant Correlation
2020). relationship between relationship
loneliness and between loneliness
anxiety among and anxiety among
stranded students stranded students
during MCO in during MCO in
UUM? UUM.
To determine d. Can loneliness Ho14: Loneliness Linear
whether loneliness significantly predict cannot Regression
can predict anxiety anxiety among significantly
among stranded stranded students predict anxiety
students during during MCO in among stranded
MCO in UUM. UUM? students during
MCO in UUM.