Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash Tank

PT PERTAMINA EP
WELL, PRODUCTION & PROJECT DEPT.
Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash Tank
0 25 May 2022 Issued for Bid DH AW MRA/OMP

B 13 May 2022 Issued for Approval DH AW MRA/OMP
A 26 Apr 2022 Issued for Review DH AW MRA/OMP
PRE CHK APP CHK APP
REV DATE DESCRIPTION Consortium PT Bina Rekacipta Utama &
PT Tiga Inti Pilar
PERTAMINA EP
TOTAL OR PARTIAL REPRODUCTION AND/OR UTILIZATION OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE FORBIDDEN WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN
AUTHORIZATION OF PT PERTAMINA EP
JASA FEED & DED PERTAMINA EP (BLANKET ORDER)

DED PERBAIKAN TANGKI TIMBUN (14 UNIT)
Contract Number : 4650011247 SPMK No.: 001A/PPC92200/2022-SO
Document No.: Revision

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-201 0
PT PERTAMINA EP REGION 4 ZONA 14
Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash

Tank

TABULATION OF REVISION SHEET
REVISION REVISION REMAR
SHEET REMARKS SHEET
A B 0 1 2 3 A B 0 1 2 3 KS
1 46
2 47
3 48
4 49
5 50
6 51
7 52
8 53
9 54
10 55
11 56
12 57
13 58
14 59
15 60
16 61
17 62
18 63
19 64
20 65
21 66
22 67
23 68
24 69
25 70
26 71
27 72
28 73
29 74
30 75
31 76
32 77
33 78
34 79
35 80
36 ATTACHMENT
37 1
38 2
39 3
40 4
41 5
42 6
43 7
44 8
45 9
PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-201 – Rev- 0 Page 2 of 21


Tank

REVISION SHEET DESCRIPTION
REV DESCRIPTION DATE CONTRACTOR RESPONSE COMPANY REVIEW



Tank

Table of Contents
TABULATION OF REVISION SHEET ..................................................................................................................... 2
REVISION SHEET DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................... 3
1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 6
2. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................................. 7
3. DEFINITION ..................................................................................................................................................... 7
4. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................. 7
5. REFERENCE.................................................................................................................................................... 8
5.1. CODE DAN STANDARD ................................................................................................................................. 8
5.2. PROCEDURE AND COMPANY SPECIFICATION ................................................................................................. 9
5.3. REFERENCE PROJECT ................................................................................................................................. 9
6. MATERIAL UNIT WEIGHT ............................................................................................................................... 9
6.1. MATERIAL .................................................................................................................................................. 9
7. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................... 10
7.1. GENERAL ................................................................................................................................................. 10
7.2. SOIL PARAMETER DATA ............................................................................................................................ 10
7.3. PRIMARY LOADS ....................................................................................................................................... 10
7.4. LOAD COMBINATIONS................................................................................................................................ 12
7.5. PILE BEARING CAPACITY ........................................................................................................................... 12
7.6. PILE REACTIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 13
7.7. PILE LATERAL CAPACITY........................................................................................................................... 13
7.8. PILE CAP STEEL REINFORCEMENT ............................................................................................................. 14
8. RESULTS AND SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 15
8.1. PILE REACTION AND ALLOWABLE CAPACITY CHECKS ................................................................................. 15
8.2. ELASTIC SETTLEMENT CHECK ................................................................................................................... 15
8.3. STEEL REINFORCEMENT DESIGN RESULTS ................................................................................................. 16



Tank

List of Table
TABLE 5.1 CODE AND STANDARD .................................................................................................................. 8
TABLE 6.1 MATERIAL UNIT WEIGHT .............................................................................................................. 9
TABLE 7.1 LOAD COMBINATIONS USED FOR FOUNDATION STABILITY CHECK ................................................ 12
TABLE 7.2 LOAD COMBINATIONS FOR CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT DESIGN ................................................ 12
TABLE 8.1 PILE REACTION VS ALLOWABLE PILE CAPACITY .......................................................................... 15
TABLE 8.2 ELASTIC SETTLEMENT ................................................................................................................ 15
TABLE 8.3. PILE CAP DESIGN ..................................................................................................................... 16



Tank

1. INTRODUCTION

In regards with fax of President Director of PT. Pertamina (Persero), No.147/C00000/2021-SO, dated 07
April 2021, regarding the requirement to increase safety awareness, operation excellence, application of
standards and best practice, in Pertamina’s storage tanks infrastructure following the fire incident in
Storage Tank RU VI Balongan.
Also, following the Letter of Directorate of Development & Production sub holding Upstream No.
004/PHE2000/2021-SO, dated 2 July 2021, regarding the Implementation Team to Increase Awareness
of Safety and Operational Aspects in the storage tanks infrastructure in Pertamina's Upstream Sector.
Both letters became the basis for Pertamina sub holding upstream (SHU) team to conduct self-
assessment on some of the storage tanks infrastructure in the upstream sector.
The results of self-assessment show that there is a need for improvement of safety aspects in the
infrastructure. The determination of the priority scale of implementation of improving safety and operational
aspects in the storage tanks infrastructure in the Upstream – Pertamina sector has been carried out on 7
important elements, namely lightning protection system installation, overflow prevention, CCTV online
surveillance installation, availability of alarms or hazard sirens, early detection and firefighting systems,
external audits and improvement of operator competence.
PT. Pertamina EP Region 4 Zona 14 has conducted voluntary inspection and survey for area of SP
Klamumuk, SP-1 Klamono, SP-2 Klamono, SP-3 Klamono, SP-4 Klamono, SPU Klamono, SP Linda, SP
Sele, Salawati, SPU Salawati, Terminal Sorong & Walio Pump Station. Based on the results of voluntary
inspection and survey there are 40 tanks that need to be further improved.
Figure 1.1 Work Locations of PT Pertamina EP Region 4 Zona 14, Papua Field
In the first priority of handling and improving safety aspects in the storage tanks infra-structure in PT
Pertamina EP Field Papua area focused on 4 aspects:
 Lightning Protection System & Grounding System;
 Installation CCTV;
 Alarm System & Public Announcer (Siren Hazard);
 Overfill Protection;
The main result of the deliverable FEED Study Enhanced Tank Safety Protection (40 Units) is that the
design of tank protection against fire and overflow events will be able to be monitored by CCTV in real
monitoring and besides that, handling fire and overflow events is no longer manually, but has been
integrated into a system prevention and emergency response.

Tank

2. SCOPE

The purpose of this document is to provide engineering design calculation related to the foundation of
Produced Water/Wash Tank within Produced Water Tank Salawati Project located in PT Pertamina
EP Zone 14.
3. DEFINITION
Company : PT. PERTAMINA EP, Regional 4 Zona 14
Contractor : Consortium PT Bina Rekacipta Utama – PT Tiga Inti Pilar
JASA FEED & DED PERTAMINA EP (BLANKET ORDER)

Project :
DED Perbaikan Tangki Timbun (14 Unit)
4. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
A Area
c Soil Cohesion
CS Seismic Respond Coefficient
eX, eY, eZ Eccentricity
fC’ Concrete Compressive Strength
fy Steel Yield Strength
FX, FY, FZ Force
G Gust Effect in Wind
LC Load Combinations
MX, MY, MZ Moment
qall Allowable bearing capacity
 Unit weight
μ Friction Coefficients
σ Stress
ϕ Friction Angle
DL Dead Load
L Live Load
E(E) Equipment Empty Load


Tank

E(O) Equipment Operation Load
E(T) Equipment Test Load
S Seismic Load
WY Wind Load - Y direction
WX Wind Load - X direction
SF Safety Factor
N-SPT Number of blows of Standard Penetration Test
5. REFERENCE
5.1. Code dan Standard
Table 5.1 Code and Standard
No. Document Number Document Title

Building Code Requirements for Structural
1 ACI 318-19
Concrete and Commentary
2 AISC 360-16 Specification for Structural Steel Buildings
Minimum Design Loads for Building and
3 ASCE 7-10
Other Structures
American Welding Standard, Structural
4 AWS D1.1-15
Welding Code Steel
5 IBC 2015 International Building Code
Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan
6 SNI 1726-2019 Gempa Untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung
dan Non-Gedung
Beban Desain Minimum dan Kriteria
7 SNI 1727-2020 Terkait untuk Bangunan Gedung dan
Struktur Lain
Spesifikasi untuk Bangunan Gedung Baja
8 SNI 1729-2015
Struktural
9 SNI 2049-2015 Semen Portland
10 SNI 2052-2017 Baja Tulangan Beton
Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk
11. SNI 2847-2019
Bangunan Gedung dan Penjelasan


Tank

5.2. Procedure and Company Specification
Design basis and other specifications used in this document are in line with PT Pertamina EP Asset 5
Project documents.
1. PEP-00-A0-SP-0001 Civil and Structural Design Basis
1. PEP-00-A3-SP-0001 Specification for Foundation
1. PEP-00-A5-SP-0001 Specification for Steel Structure
5.3. Reference Project

1. PEP-SPT-PM-DBS-001 Project design basis
Foundation, Plan, Section and Detail for
2. PEP-SP-SAL-CV-DWG-201
Produced Water Tank
6. MATERIAL UNIT WEIGHT
6.1. Material
Material used for this project calculation as follows in table below:
Table 6.1 Material Unit Weight
No. Material Symbol Unit Weight Unit

1 Concrete bp 21.58 kN/m3
2 Reinforced concrete bt 23.54 kN/m3
3 Water w 9.81 kN/m3
4 Soil Soil 17.33 kN/m3
5 Asphaltic Concrete as 22.0 kN/m3


Tank

7. METHODOLOGY
7.1. General
This chapter presents foundation calculation for produced water tank. The detailed calculation is presented
in Attachment A.
The aspects analyzed in this document are as follows:

 Wind Load
 Earthquake Load
 Load Combinations
 Pile Arrangement
 Pile Reactions
 Pile Cap Reinforcement
 Pile Cap Punching Shear
 Pile Cap Beam Shear
 Pile Bearing Capacity
 Elastic Settlement
7.2. Soil Parameter Data
Soil data used in this document are derived from CPT Tests performed by UPTD Laboratory Sorong in
2017.
7.3. Primary Loads
7.3.1. Dead Load (DL)

Dead load considered in this calculation consists of concrete foundation and pile weights (23.54 kN/m3).
In addition, asphalt layer is also considered in this calculation ( = 22 kN/m3).
7.3.2. Live Load (LL)

Live load considered in this calculation is 5 kPa.
7.3.3. Equipment Loads (E(E), E(O), E(T))

Equipment loads considered in this calculation are as follows:
- E(E) = 20.39 MT
- E(O) = 210.11 MT
- E(T) = 233.90 MT
7.3.4. Wind Load (WX, WZ)

Wind speed used in the wind load generation is taken as 24 m/s. ASCE 7-10 is used to calculate wind
load on the structure.
7.3.5. Seismic Load

SNI 1726-2019 is used as the basis of seismic load generation on the structure. The following figures
show the Response Spectrum graph and seismic coefficients used in this calculation.


Tank

Figure 7.1 Response Spectrum Graph Salawati Area for Soft Soil
Figure 7.2 Seismic Coefficients for Salawati Area - Soft Soil


Tank

7.4. Load Combinations
Load Combinations used in this calculation are listed in Table 7.1 and Table 7.2
Table 7.1 Load Combinations used for Foundation Stability Check
LC Description
111 DL + E(E) + WX
112 DL + E(E) + WY
121 DL + E(O) + L
122 DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.75WX
123 DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.75WY
124 DL + E(O) + WX
125 DL + E(O) + WY
126 DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.525S
127 DL + E(O) + 0.7S
131 DL + E(T) + L
132 DL + E(T) + 0.75L + 0,25WX
133 DL + E(T) + 0.75L + 0,25WY
Table 7.2 Load Combinations for Concrete Reinforcement Design
LC Description
211 0.9DL + 0.9E(E) + S
212 0.9DL + 0.9E(E) + 0.8WX
213 0.9DL + 0.9E(E) + 0.8WY
221 1.2DL + 1.2E(O) + 1.6L
222 1.2DL + 1.2E(O) + L + 1.6WX
223 1.2DL + 1.2E(O) + L + 1.6WY
224 1,2DL + 1.2E(O) + L + S
231 1.2DL + 1.2E(T) + 1.6L
232 1.2DL + 1.2E(T) + L + 0,8WX
233 1.2DL + 1.2E(T) + L + 0,8WY
7.5. Pile Bearing Capacity

Pile Bearing Capacity is calculated using N-SPT based equations as follows:
Qall = (Qb+Qs) / SF
- Qb = qu. Ap (ton)
- qu =  15Np (t/m2) for Bored piles,  = 0.5
- qu = 30Np (t/m2) for driven piles
- Qs = fs. As (ton)
- fs = Ns/5 (t/m2) for Sand
- fs = Ns/2 (t/m2) for Clay
Limiting unit skin friction = 10 t/m2


Tank

Where:
- Ap = pile cross section area (m2)

- As = Shaft friction area (m2)
- Np = Average Nspt within 4Dia above pile tip & 1dia below the pile tip, max=50
- Ns = Average Nspt along the shaft
- SF1 = 3
7.6. Pile Reactions

Pile reactions are computed using the following equations:
V M * PCD1
- Maximum pile reactions = 
np 2 * Ip
- Minimum pile reactions = V M * PCD1


np 2 * Ip
n
- Ip =
 ni * (0.5 * PCDi) 2 * 0.5
1
Where:
- V = Vertical load applied

- M = Moment applied
- PCD = Pitch Centre Diameter
- np = number of piles
- Ip = Polar moment of inertia of pile group
- ni = nth pile
7.7. Pile Lateral Capacity

Pile lateral capacity is calculated using Broms’ Method with the following equations.
H = yo * kh * D / [ 2 *  * ( e *  + 1 ) ]
 = [ kh * D / ( 4 * Ec * Ic ) ]0.25
Where:
- yo = maximum pile deflection

- kh = horizontal subgrade modulus
- nh = horizontal subgrade modulus coefficient
-  = pile deflection coefficient
- Ic = moment inertia of the pile
- Ec = modulus elasticity of the pile
- e = horizontal load distance to pile
- D = Pile diameter

Tank

7.8. Pile Cap Steel Reinforcement
The reinforced concrete foundation is designed according to ACI 318-19 by considering the stresses and
the shear forces that occur at the base of the pile cap.


Tank

8. RESULTS AND SUMMARY
8.1. Pile Reaction and Allowable Capacity Checks
The following Table shows the results of Pile Reactions and Bearing Capacity checks
Table 8.1 Pile Reaction vs Allowable Pile Capacity
Allowable Pile
Reaction per Pile( tons ) Capacity Result
Load Combinations (tons)
Vmax Vmin Hmax V(comp) H(lateral)
DL + E(E) + Wx 4.7 4.6 0.035 51.6 4.7 OK

DL + E(E) + Wy 4.7 4.6 0.03 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(O) + L 16.7 16.7 0.00 38.7 3.6 OK
DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.75Wx 16.4 16.2 0.03 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.75Wy 16.4 16.2 0.03 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(O) + Wx 15.3 15.1 0.03 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(O) + Wy 15.3 15.1 0.03 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.525S 20.1 12.5 2.05 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(O) + 0.7S 20.2 10.1 2.74 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(T) + L 18.0 18.0 0.0 38.7 3.6 OK
DL + E(T) + 0.75L + 0,25WX 16.9 16.9 0.009 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(T) + 0.75L + 0,25WY 16.9 16.9 0.009 51.6 4.7 OK
8.2. Elastic Settlement Check

The following Table shows the results of bearing capacity and elastic settlement checks.
Table 8.2 Elastic Settlement
Design
Parameter Condition Limit Remarks
Results
Pile Settlement Elastic 0.81mm 25.40mm Ok


Tank

8.3. Steel Reinforcement Design Results
The Table presented below shows the design results of steel reinforcement calculation of the pile cap.
Table 8.3. Pile Cap Design
Structural Description
Unit Design
Element
Pile Cap Slab Length per m mm 1000
Thickness mm 450
Reinforcement - D16-150
2 layers both ways


Tank

Attachment – A
Tank Foundation Calculation

CALCULATION SHEET OF FOUNDATION
FOR T101 TANK SALAWATI
Revision : A
: 25-Apr-20
JASA FEED & DED PERTAMINA EP (BLANKET ORDER) Date
2. EXTERNAL LOAD
2.1. EMPTY ( ERECTION ) WEIGHT : E(E)

Dead weight of equipment during erection condition
E(E) = 20.39 T
2.2. OPERATION WEIGHT : E(O)

The total weight of equipment during normal operation condition.
E(O) = 210.11 T
2.3. TEST WEIGHT: E(T)

The total weight of equipment during hydrostatic test condition at field.
E(T) = 233.90 T
2.4. WIND LOAD ( W )
2.4.2. Based on specification
Pdesign = F / Af = qz G Cf (N / m2) (from ASCE 7 - 10)

= design wind pressure
qz = velocitiy pressure evaluated at height z of the centroid of area Af above the ground
qz = 0.613 Kz Kzt Kd V2 (N / m2)
Cf = force coefficient from fig. 6-21 through 6-23 of ASCE-7
Kd = The wind directionallity factor = 0.95 table 6-4 ASCE-7
Kz = The velocity presure exposure coeficien, from table 6-3 Exposure C of ASCE-7
Kzt = 1.0 The topographic factor
V= 24 m/s Basic wind speed
G = Gust effect factor
1. Calculating Velocity Pressure Exposure Coefficient (Kz) :

Table 1. Velocity Pressure Coefficient Kz
Height
above
Exposure C
ground
level, z
m Case 1 & 2
0 - 4.6 0.85
6.1 0.90
7.6 0.94
9.1 0.98
12.2 1.04
15.2 1.09
18 1.13
Revision : A
: 25-Apr-20
2. Calculating Velocity Pressure :

Table - Velocity Pressure for Hexagonal & Round
Height
above
ground
level, z qz = qh
m N / m2
0 - 4.6 285.12
6.1 301.89
7.6 315.31
9.1 328.72
12.2 348.85
15.2 365.62
18 379.04
From the table 2 above :

-Z= 7.615 (Height above ground level)
- qz = 315.31 N / m2
3. Calculating Gust Effect Factor

Gust effect factor:
gQ = 3.4 taken from clause 6.5.8.1 p. 26

gv = 3.4 taken from clause 6.5.8.1 p. 26
c= 0.2 taken from table 6-2 p. 78
Ź= 0.6 h taken from clause 6.5.8.1 p. 26
B= 6.096 m Varied based on Structure Dimension

h= height
έ= 0.2 taken from table 6-2 p. 78
l= 152.4 m taken from table 6-2 p. 78
Ź= 0.6 h taken from clause 6.5.8.1 p. 26
Table 3.1. Gust Factor

Height z Lz Q Iz G
m m
0.0 - 4.6 2.74 117.66 0.937 0.248 0.891

4.6 - 6.1 3.66 124.63 0.934 0.236 0.890
6.1 - 7.6 4.57 130.32 0.931 0.228 0.889
7.6 - 9.1 5.49 135.16 0.929 0.221 0.888
9.1 - 12.2 7.32 143.18 0.924 0.211 0.886
12.2 - 15.2 9.12 149.62 0.919 0.203 0.884
15.2 - 18.3 10.98 155.28 0.914 0.197 0.883
18.3 - 21.3 12.78 160.06 0.910 0.192 0.881
From the table 3.1 above

-Z= 7.615 (height above ground level)
-G= 0.8890
Revision : A
: 25-Apr-20
4. Calculating Force Coefficient

Table - Force Coefficient Table for Chimneys, Tanks, Rooftop, Equipment & Similar Structures, Cf
taken from ASCE-7, Figure 6-21, Page 74
Cf for h/D Values of:
Cross-Section Type of Surface 1 7 25
Square (wind normal to face) All 1.3 1.4 2.0

Square (wind along diagonal) All 1.0 1.1 1.5
Hexagonal or octagonal All 1.0 1.2 1.4
Round Moderately smooth 0.5 0.6 0.7
(D √qz > 5.3, D in m, qz in Rough (D'/D = 0.02) 0.7 0.8 0.9
N/m2) Very Rough (D'/D = 0.08) 0.8 1.0 0.2
Round
(D √qz ≤ 5.3, D in m, qz in All 0.7 0.8 1.2
N/m2)
-D sqrt(qz) = 108.246 > 5.3

- h/D = 1.249
- Cf = 0.504
For Fixed Cone Roof Tank

Equipment with cross-section type is Round (D√qz > 5.3, D in m, qz in N/m2) and Moderately Smooth :
Pdesign = qz G Cf (N / m2)
Pdesign
Height
h/D h/D = 0.933 h/D = 7 h/D = 25 h/D = 1 h/D = 7 h/D = 25
(m) 1.249 7 25 N / m2 N / m2 N / m2 kg / m2 kg / m2 kg / m2
0 4.6 0.504 0.6 0.7 128.03 152.37 177.76836 13.05 15.53 18.12
4.6 6.1 0.504 0.6 0.7 135.44 161.19 188.053857 13.81 16.43 19.17
6.1 7.6 0.504 0.6 0.7 141.31 168.18 196.210292 14.41 17.14 20.00
- h/D = 1.249
- Cf = 0.504
Equipment Data :
OD = 6096 mm
H1 = 7315 mm
Hs = 300 mm
Ht = 7615 mm
C.o.G = 3657.5 mm
Revision : A
: 25-Apr-20
H1 Ht
ID
TOP OF
FOUNDATION Hs
Calculation of wind load :
Table 5. Force and Moment of Wind Load
Height Area Shear Moment

Height (m) Pdesign h Af Sw Mw
kg/m2 m m2 ton tm
0 4.6 13.051 2.286 27.871 0.364 0.832

4.6 6.1 13.806 5.334 9.290 0.128 0.684
6.1 7.6 14.405 6.858 9.290 0.134 0.918
0.626 2.433
Usage for Design :

Shear, Hw = 0.626 ton
Moment, Mw = 2.433 ton m
2.5. SEISMIC LOAD ( EQ )
Seismic load from equipment derived from mechanical laoding data. Seismic load from selfweight of structure shall be calculated in
accordance with design spesification with reference to SNI-03-1726-2019.
Revision : A
: 25-Apr-20
Figure 3.1 Puskim Data for Spectrum Response
Equipment Unit
Using SNI 03-1726-2012 for calculate seismic load for equipment, which have parameter :
Cs = SDS x Ie
R
where ;
Importance Factor Ie = 1.25
Reduction factor R = 2.50
Acceleration respons spectrum SDS = 0.487
Coefficient of seismic Cs = 0.24
Lateral Forces
He1 = Cs.EO = 51.18 tonne
Moment at bottom of Foundation
Me1 = He1* H1/2 = 195 ton.m
Foundation
Using SNI 03-1726-2012 for calculate seismic load for foundation, which have parameter :
Cs = SDS x Ie
R
where ; Ie = 1.25
Importance Factor R = 2.00
Reduction factor SDS = 0.487
Acceleration respons spectrum Cs = 0.30
Coefficient of seismic
Lateral Forces He2= Cs.Wc = 19.20 tonne
Moment at bottom of Foundation

Me2 He2.(Hp+Hf) = 4.32 ton.m
Revision : A
: 25-Apr-20
Total Seismic Load

Lateral Forces : He = 70.39 tonne
Moment at bot. Of Foundation : Me = 199.2 ton.m
2.7 LOAD COMBINATION

Load Combination for and Stability check of Foundation
Erection + Wind LC 111 [ DL + E(E) + WX ]
LC 112 [ DL + E(E) + WY ]
Normal Operating LC 121 [ DL + E(O) + L ]
Operating + Wind LC 122 [ DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.75WX ]
LC 123 [ DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.75WY ]
LC 124 [ DL + E(O) + WX ]
LC 125 [ DL + E(O) + WY ]
Operating + Seismic LC 126 [ DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.525S ]
LC 127 [ DL + E(O) + 0.7S ]
Test + Wind LC 131 [ DL + E(T) + L ]
LC 132 [ DL + E(T) + 0.75L + 0,25WX ]
LC 133 [ DL + E(T) + 0.75L + 0,25WY ]
Load Combination for Reinforced Concrete

Erection + Seismic LC 211 [ 0.9DL + 0.9E(E) + S ]
Erection + Wind LC 212 [ 0.9DL + 0.9E(E) + 0.8WX ]
LC 213 [ 0.9DL + 0.9E(E) + 0.8WY ]
Normal Operating LC 221 [ 1.2DL + 1.2E(O) + 1.6L ]
Operating + Wind LC 222 [ 1.2DL + 1.2E(O) + L + 1.6WX ]
LC 223 [ 1.2DL + 1.2E(O) + L + 1.6WY ]
Operating + Seismic LC 224 [ 1,2DL + 1.2E(O) + L + S ]
Test LC 231 [ 1.2DL + 1.2E(T) + 1.6L ]
Test + Wind LC 232 [ 1.2DL + 1.2E(T) + L + 0,8WX ]
LC 233 [ 1.2DL + 1.2E(T) + L + 0,8WY ]
2.8 DESIGN FORCES

V Hx Hy Mx My
Load
( Ton ) (Ton) (Ton) ( Tm ) (Tm)
DL 63.06
L 27.01
E(E) 20.39
E(O) 210.11
E(T) 233.90
WX 0.63 2.72
WY 0.63 2.72
Sx 70.39 199
Sy 70.39 199
Revision : A
: 25-Apr-20
3. FOUNDATION & PILE ARRANGEMENT.

3.1. Size of Foundation
h1 = 0.450 (m)
h2 = 0.000 (m)
h3 = 0.000 (m)
h4 = 0.000 (m)
hf = 0.450 (m)
D1 = 8.000 (m) (shortest diagonal of footing) CL
D2 = 0.000 (m) (shortest diagonal of pedestal) S3
S3 = 1.500 (m)
CL
D1
D2
GL
h3 h4
h2
hf
3.2. Pile Arrangement.
h1
- TYPE = corner
- Diameter of pile : p = 0.4 m
- Length of pile : L = 4.4 m Pile Arrangement Ilustration
- Dist. between PCD = 6.75 
- Number of PCD (n) = 2

- PCD1 = 2.5 m
- Number of piles in PCD1 = 8 pcs
- PCD2 5.2 m
- Number of piles in PCD2 10 pcs
Revision : A
: 25-Apr-20
* PCD = Pile Circle Diameter - Total number of piles (np) = 18 pcs
Inertia Polar of Piles Group (Ip)

n
Ip =
 ni * (0.5 * PCDi) 2 * 0.5
1
= 40.05 m2
3.3. Computation of Foundation Weight

Density of concrete (c) = 2.4 t/m3
Density of asphalt (as) = 2.2 t/m3
Asphalt layer thickness (tas) = 50 mm
Weight of Pedestal (Wp) = 0.828 x D22 x h2 x c = 0.00 tons
Weight of Footing (Wft) = 0.828 x D12 x h1 x c = 57.23 tons
Weight of Asphalt layer (Ws) = 0.828 x (D12-D22) x tas x as = 5.83 tons
Weight of Foundation (Wf) = Wp + Wft + Ws = 63.06 tons
3.4. Computation of Overturning Moment.
3.4.1. Overturning Moment Caused by Wind Load (Mw)

Mw = M1 + H1 x hf = 2.72 (t-m)
3.4.2. Overturning Moment Caused by Seismic Load (Me)
Ms = M2 + H2 x hf = 230.88 (t-m) (operating condition)
4. CHECK ON PILE REACTIONS
4.1. Unfactor Loading Combination at Bottom of Footing.
Loading Combinations V H M
( Tons ) ( tons ) ( tm )
DL + E(E) + Wx 83.45 0.63 2.72

DL + E(E) + Wy 83.45 0.63 2.72
DL + E(O) + L 300.18 0.00 0.00
DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.75Wx 293.43 0.47 2.04
DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.75Wy 293.43 0.47 2.04
DL + E(O) + Wx 273.17 0.63 2.72
DL + E(O) + Wy 273.17 0.63 2.72
DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.525S 293.43 36.95 121
DL + E(O) + 0.7S 273.17 49.27 162
DL + E(T) + L 323.97 0.00 0.00
DL + E(T) + 0.75L + 0,25WX 303.71 0.16 0.68
DL + E(T) + 0.75L + 0,25WY 303.71 0.16 0.68
4.2. Pile Reaction.
Vmax = V + M * PCD1 Vmin = V - M * PCD1

 
np 2 * Ip np 2 * Ip
Hp = H / np
Revision : A
: 25-Apr-20
Allowable Pile
Reaction per Pile( tons ) Result
Load Combinations Capacity (tons)
Vmax Vmin Hmax V(comp) H(lateral)
DL + E(E) + Wx 4.7 4.6 0.035 51.6 4.7 OK

DL + E(E) + Wy 4.7 4.6 0.03 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(O) + L 16.7 16.7 0.00 38.7 3.6 OK
DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.75Wx 16.4 16.2 0.03 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.75Wy 16.4 16.2 0.03 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(O) + Wx 15.3 15.1 0.03 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(O) + Wy 15.3 15.1 0.03 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(O) + 0.75L + 0.525S 20.1 12.5 2.05 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(O) + 0.7S 20.2 10.1 2.74 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(T) + L 18.0 18.0 0.0 38.7 3.6 OK
DL + E(T) + 0.75L + 0,25WX 16.9 16.9 0.009 51.6 4.7 OK
DL + E(T) + 0.75L + 0,25WY 16.9 16.9 0.009 51.6 4.7 OK
5. REINFORCEMENT OF FOUNDATION.
5.1. Factored Loading Combination at Bottom of Footing.
Loading Combinations V H M
( kN ) ( kN ) ( kNm )
0.9DL + 0.9E(E) + S 736.06 689.79 2265

0.9DL + 0.9E(E) + 0.8WX 736.06 4.91 21.29
0.9DL + 0.9E(E) + 0.8WY 736.06 4.91 21.29
1.2DL + 1.2E(O) + 1.6L 3636.04 0.00 0.00
1.2DL + 1.2E(O) + L + 1.6WX 3477.22 9.81 42.57
1.2DL + 1.2E(O) + L + 1.6WY 3477.22 9.81 42.57
1,2DL + 1.2E(O) + L + S 3477.22 689.79 2265
1.2DL + 1.2E(T) + 1.6L 3477.22 0.00 0.00
1.2DL + 1.2E(T) + L + 0,8WX 3756.91 48.08 21.29
1.2DL + 1.2E(T) + L + 0,8WY 3756.91 48.08 21.29
5.2. Footing Reinforcement
Concrete : fc' = 19.0 MPa

Steel : fy = 400 MPa
Cover= 0.075 m
 max = 0.75 x 0.7225 x fc' / fy x 600 / (600 + fy) = 0.0155
 min = 0.0018 ( for shrinkage and temperature )
Revision : A
: 25-Apr-20
Equivalent width of pedestal & footing.
Df = = 7.280 m deff = h1 - conc.cover = 0.375 m

z1 = (Df - Dp) / 2 = 3.640 m
Dp = = 0.000 m z2 = z1 - deff = 3.265 m
5.2.1. Calculation of Mu and Qu
qss = z2 * Df * ( s * h3 + c * h1 ) = 25.667 kN ...( for shear )

qsm = z1 * Df * ( s * h3 + c * h1 ) = 28.616 kN ...( for moment )
Msc = 1.2 * 0.5 * qsm * z1 = 62.49 kNm

Mu = [Mub - Msc] = 822.1 kNm
Qu = Qub = 340.21 kN
Re-bar arrangement
m = fy / (0.85 x fc') = 24.72
Rn = Mu / (0.9 x Df x deff2) = 0.892 N/mm2
0.5
 = {1 -(1 - 2 x m x Rn / fy) } / m = 0.00230
4/3 = 0.00306108
req. = 0.00306108
2
Asmin. = D1 x h1 x  min/2 = 3240.00 mm ,(for shrinkage reinforcement)
2
Asreq. = D1 x deff x req. = 9183.24 mm ,(governed)
Use rebar Dia. = 16 mm
No. of rebar = 46
Rebar spacing (s) = 170 mm
Rebar spacing prov'd = 150 mm
No. of rebar prov'd = 54
As provided = 10857.34 mm2
===> provide : D16 @ 150 top and bottom, both direction
5.2.2. Calculation of Vupp ( punching shear due to pile)
L1 = p + deff
= 0.775 m
L2 = (D1 - Pcd1) * 0.5
= 2.75 m
bo = 2*L2 + 0.5 *  * L1
= 6.72 m
Maximum pile reaction:

Rp out max = 340.21 kN
Vupp = Rp out max
= 340 kN
0.5
Vppc = 0.85 x 1/3 x fc x bo x deff = 3114.31 kN > Vupp......OK..!
5.2.3. Shear check.

Qu = 340 kN
deff = 375.00 mm
b = Df = 7279.56 mm
Vc = 0.85 x 1/6 x fc'0.5x b x deff = 1985.27 kN > Qu......OK..!
ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN CALCULATION
T101 SALAWATI
ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN SUMMARY
The following anchor bolt design was found to be satiesfied all design requirement
Anchor Bolt Properties

A D Tb e L d
mm mm mm mm mm mm
200.00 125.00 8.00 22.00 355.00 20.00 M20
Anchor Bolt Material Spec.

ASTM A 307 Fy = 2528 kg/cm2 Fu = 4217 kg/cm2
Concrete Grade
K-225 equivalent with f c' = 186.75 kg/cm2
where,
fc' = Specified compressive strength of concrete
A = Embedment length/depth of anchor bolt
D = Projection length
Tb = Anchor bolt nut thickness
e = edge distance
L = Total anchor bolt length
d = Anchor bolt diameter
The unity check summary are as folow:
Description UC
Shear capacity due to anchor bolt material 0.228
Shear capacity due to concrete breakout strength 0.123
Shear capacity due to concrete pryout strength 0.012
Hence,
a single 20 mm diameter anchor at 200 embedment depth is adequate to resist the applied
service tension and shear loads of 35265 kg and 9296 kg, respectively.
T101 SALAWATI
1. ANCHOR BOLT LOADING DESIGN

1.1 Eksternal Load Design
Figure 1
H W dcg MT
kg kg m kgm
74369.00 386268.00 3.66 246510.00
where,
H = Maximum horizontal force, in this case, seismic is the governing condition
W = Gravity load
dcg = Distance from T.O.S base plate to the CoG of equipment
MT = Moment for anchor bolt design
1.2 Tension & Shear Forces Design at The Most Critical Anchor Bolt
Elastic stress distribution at the base plate can be calculated using the following formula:
(stress due to combined axial and moment)
W MT  c
σ  (Refer Roark's Formula for Stress and Strain, page 153, (8.7-1))
A bp I
where,
 = Elastic stress at base plate
Abp = Area of base plate
c = Outer fiber location of base plate
I = Base plate moment of inertia
Base plate properties :

OD = 6268.0 mm
ID = 6096.0 mm
Abp = 3.09E+07 mm2
I = 7.98E+12 mm4
c = 3134 mm
T101 SALAWATI
CL
1236
2983
Figure 2
Anchor Bolt Location :

D1 = 1236 mm > e = 405.32 mm This bolt in tension
W Abp MT c I C T e
kg mm2 kgm mm mm4 kgm kgm mm
386268.00 3.09E+07 246510.00 3134.00 7.98E+12 0.109 -0.084 405.32
Tension stress is occured
Where :
C = Maximum compression stress at base plate
T = Maximum tension stress at base plate
e = Neutral axis distance from ref. point
FT = Tension force which will be transferred to all bolts in the tension region
L = Distance from CoG of FT to neutral axis
M = FT.L ex
T
FT C
N/A CL
As a concervative approach for calculating maximum tension force in the most critical bolt
"M=FT*L" was considered as "MT" (Note: without any effect of "W"; MT will always > M=FT*L),
this moment shall be transferred to all bolts in the tension region
T101 SALAWATI
From Figure 2 above, it is found that the most critical bolts are:
Bolt No 2 & 3
di di2
i
mm mm2
1 1236.00 1.53E+06
2 2983.00 8.90E+06
3 2983.00 8.90E+06
4 1236.00 1.53E+06
5 0.00 0.00E+00
6 0.00 0.00E+00
2.09E+07
 d  i
2
Tension and Shear Forces for Anchor Bolt Design
MT d3 Σdi2 c T3 H n V
kgm mm mm2 mm kg kg nos kg
246510.00 2.98E+03 2.09E+07 3134.00 35264.74 74369.00 8.000 9296.125
Hence, the following tension and shear forces shall be considered for anchor bolt design
T V Comp/bolt
kg kg kg
35264.74 9296.125 48283.5 No Tension occurs
M di
Ti  k
T
 d 
2
i
1
Where :
T = Maximum tension force on Anchor Bolt
di = Location of anchor bolt w.r.t center line
Shear force at anchor bolt (V) was calculated considering

all bolts can take total shear force effectively, and computed using the following formula
H
V 
n
Where :
V = Maximum shear force at Anchor Bolt
n = Number of bolts (all bolts were considered can take shear forces effectively)
2.1. Steel capacity under shear loading D.6.1
Ф n d0 nt Ase futa Vsa ФVsa UC

kg kg/mm2 kg
0.65 8.00 20.00 8.00 310.34 42.17 62819 40832.20 0.23
Vsa  n0.6 Ase f uta

2
 0.9743 
Ase   d0  
4 nt 
where,
Vsa = steel capacity under shear loading
Ф = factor
n = number of anchor in the group
nt = number of threads per inchi
Vsa = nominal strength of a single anchor
ФVsa = factort nominal strength of a single anchor
UC = Ratio between steel capacity under shear loading and shear design loads
T101 SALAWATI
2.2. Concrete breakout capacity under shear loading :
le do f'c ca1 Vb
mm mm kg/mm2 mm kg
200.00 20.00 1.87 771.00 108246
ca1 = distance between bolt center diameter and edge of concrete
Vb = 124416.5 kg
Vb = 108246.4 kg
Avc Avco Ψed,v Ψc,v Vb Ф ФVcb UC

m mm2 kg kg
2674985 2674985 1.00 1.00 108246 0.700 75773 0.123
Vcb  Vua
Avc
Vcb   ed ,V  c ,v  Vb
Avco
where,
Avc = 2(1.5ca1)(1.5ca1)
Avco = 4.5 ca12
Ψed,v = 1.0 since ca2 > 1.5 ca1
Ψc,v = 1.0 assuming cracking at service loads ( ft > fr ) D.6.2.7
Ф = 0.7 for condition B
(no supplementary reinforcement provided)
UC = Ratio between concrete breakout capacity under shear loading and shear design loads
T101 SALAWATI
2.3. Concrete pryout strength : D.6.3
n kcp Ф Ncb ФVcp UC

kg kg
8.00 2.00 0.70 71043 795687 0.012
Vcp  kcp N cb
where,
Vcp = Concrete pryout strength of anchor in shear
UC = Ratio between concrete pryout capacity under shear loading and shear design loads
Check all failure modes under shear loading : D.4.1.2

Summary :
Steel capacity = 40832 kg
Concrete breakout capcacity = 75773 kg
Pryout capacity = 795687 kg
2.4. Concrete breakout capacity under tension loading D.5.2
kc f'c hef Nb
kg/mm2 mm kg
7.00 1.87 200.00 27057
N b  kc  f 'c  hef 1.5
where,
kc = koefficient
f'c = compressive strength
hef = Distance from T.O.S base plate to the end of anchor bolt
Nb = basic concrete breakout strength in tension in cracked concrete
hef ca1 ANco ANC Ψed,N Ψc,N Ψcp,N Nb

mm mm mm2 mm2 kg
200.00 771 360000 642600 1.47 1.00 1.00 27057
Ncb Ф ФNcb UC
kg kg
71043 0.65 46178 0.76
Ca ,min
 ed . N  0.7  0.3 when ca,min <1.5 hef D.5.2.7
1.5  hef
ANC
N cb   ed , N  c , N  cp , N  N b
ANCO
ANC
 N cb    ed , N  c , N  cp , N  kc  f 'c  hef 1.5
ANCO
where,
ca1 = distance between bolt center diameter and edge of concrete
Anco = 9  hef 2
Anc = (ca1  1.5hef )(2 1.5hef )

Ψcp,N = 1
Ψc,N = 1 assuming cracking at service loads (ft > fr) D.5.2.6
Ф = 0.65 for condition B (no suplementary reinforcement provided)
UC = Ratio between nominal concrete breakout strength and tension design loads

Tank

Attachment – B
Soil Data

Qall = (Qb + Qs)/SF1 (ton)
Allowable bearing capacity vs depth
Qb = qu. Ap (ton qu =  15Np (t/m2) for Bored piles,  = 0.5
2 Capacity (ton)
qu = 30Np (t/m ) for driven piles
0
Qs = fs. As (ton) fs = Ns/5 (t/m2) for Sand 0 20 40
-0.5
= Ns/2 (t/m2) for Clay
Limiting unit skin friction = 10 t/m2 -1
Ap = pile cross section area (m2) -1.5
As = Shaft friction area (m2) -2
Depth (m)
Qall vs depth
Np = Average Nspt within 4Dia above pile tip & 1dia below the pile tip, max=50
-2.5
Ns = Average Nspt along the shaft Nspt vs depth
-3
SF1 = 3
-3.5
Boring No. BH4
-4
Pile size D Area (m2) Perimeter (m) D = Driven piles
Square 0 0 0 B = Bored piles -4.5
Spun 400 0.125663706 1.256637061 -5
others
0.125663706 1.256637061
Soil Profile Bearing capacity (ton) Negative skin friction, Garlanger 1973 (empirical)
Depth Soil type Nspt h Ns fs Qs Np fb Qb Qall (ton) Qall (ton)GWL (m) Depth s Soil type 'v Coeff. NSFLocal Qall (ton)
0 C 0 0 C 0 0.25 0.0 0.0 0 0

0.2 C 1.4 0.2 0.7 0.35 0.1 0.9 28 3.5 1.2 1.2 0.2 C 0 0.25 0.0 1.2 -0.2 1.4
0.4 C 1.4 0.2 1.4 0.7 0.2 1.4 42 5.3 1.8 1.8 0.4 C 0 0.25 0.0 1.8 -0.4 1.4
0.6 C 1.4 0.2 1.4 0.7 0.2 1.4 42 5.3 1.9 1.9 0.6 C 0 0.25 0.0 1.9 -0.6 1.4
0.8 C 1.4 0.2 1.4 0.7 0.2 1.4 42 5.3 2.0 2.0 0.8 C 0 0.25 0.0 2.0 -0.8 1.4
1 C 1.4 0.2 1.4 0.7 0.2 1.4 42 5.3 2.0 2.0 1 C 0 0.25 0.0 2.0 -1 1.4
1.4 C 1.4 0.4 1.4 0.7 0.4 1.9 56 7.0 2.7 2.7 1.4 C 0 0.25 0.0 2.7 -1.4 1.4
2 C 2.8 0.6 2.1 1.05 0.8 1.9 56 7.0 3.0 3.0 2 C 0 0.25 0.0 3.0 -2 2.8
2.2 C 1.4 0.2 2.1 1.05 0.3 1.9 56 7.0 3.1 3.1 2.2 C 0 0.25 0.0 3.1 -2.2 1.4
2.4 C 1.4 0.2 1.4 0.7 0.2 2.8 84 10.6 4.3 4.3 2.4 C 0 0.25 0.0 4.3 -2.4 1.4
2.8 C 5.6 0.4 3.5 1.75 0.9 6.1 182 22.9 8.7 8.7 2.8 C 0 0.25 0.0 8.7 -2.8 5.6
3 C 11.2 0.2 8.4 4.2 1.1 9.3 280 35.2 13.2 13.2 3 C 0 0.25 0.0 13.2 -3 11.2
3.2 C 11.2 0.2 11.2 5.6 1.4 12.1 364 45.7 17.2 17.2 3.2 C 0 0.25 0.0 17.2 -3.2 11.2
3.4 C 14 0.2 12.6 6.3 1.6 13.5 406 51.0 19.4 19.4 3.4 C 0 0.25 0.0 19.4 -3.4 14
3.6 C 15.4 0.2 14.7 7.35 1.8 14.9 448 56.3 21.8 21.8 43.6 21.8 -3.6 15.4
3.8 C 15.4 0.2 15.4 7.7 1.9 16.8 504 63.3 24.8 24.8 49.6 24.8 -3.8 15.4
4 C 19.6 0.2 17.5 8.75 2.2 20.1 602 75.6 29.6 29.6 59.3 29.6 -4 19.6
4.2 C 25.2 0.2 22.4 10 2.5 24.3 728 91.5 35.8 35.8 71.5 35.8 -4.2 25.2
4.4 C 28 0.2 26.6 10 2.5 26.6 798 100.3 39.5 39.5 79.1 39.5 -4.4 28
Nett Bearing Capacity (after pile weight reduction) 38.7 77.4 38.7
0.0
0.0
0.0

elev qc fr
0 0 0
0.2 3.03 6.56
0.4 5.06 3.93
0.6 8.09 2.46
0.8 10.11 2.62
1 12.14 2.19
1.2 14.16 1.4
1.4 15.17 1.75
1.6 20.23 1.31
1.8 20.23 1.64
2 27.31 0.73
2.2 30.34 1.09
ave. 13.8225 2.14
 17.8 kN/m3

Tank

Attachment – C
Settlement Check

Revision: A
JASA FEED & DED PERTAMINA EP Date : 25-Apr-20
6. FOUNDATION SETTLEMENT
6.1 Immediate Settlement Modified Meyerhoff (1965)
Width of foundation, B= 8 m
Depth of embedment, D= 0.5 m
Groundwater table correction, C = 1
Cw = 1, Depth of water table below foundation

Cw = 2, Depth of water table on foundation
Depth of embedment correction, CD = 1 - (D / 4B) = 0.99

Service axial load/ pile, Pu = 196.83 kN
Pilecap area, A= 52.99 m2
Bearing pressure, qmax = Pu / A = 3.71 kPa
N-SPT Value, at depth N= 8.40
Elastic settlement, Se = 0.81 mm
For B ≤ 1.2, Se = Cw * CD * (1.25 * q / N)

For B > 1.22, Se = Cw * CD * (2 * q / N) * [B / (B + 0.3)]^2

Tank

Attachment – D
Pile Cap Drawings


Tank

Attachment – E
Tank Drawings

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash Tank

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash Tank

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PT PERTAMINA EP

WELL, PRODUCTION & PROJECT DEPT.

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash Tank

0 25 May 2022 Issued for Bid DH AW MRA/OMP

JASA FEED & DED PERTAMINA EP (BLANKET ORDER)

Document No.: Revision

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-201 – Rev- 0 Page 2 of 21

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-201 – Rev- 0 Page 3 of 21

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-201 – Rev- 0 Page 4 of 21

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-201 – Rev- 0 Page 5 of 21

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash

Company : PT. PERTAMINA EP, Regional 4 Zona 14

Contractor : Consortium PT Bina Rekacipta Utama – PT Tiga Inti Pilar

JASA FEED & DED PERTAMINA EP (BLANKET ORDER)

4. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

CS Seismic Respond Coefficient

eX, eY, eZ Eccentricity

fC’ Concrete Compressive Strength

fy Steel Yield Strength

FX, FY, FZ Force

G Gust Effect in Wind

MX, MY, MZ Moment

qall Allowable bearing capacity

E(E) Equipment Empty Load

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-201 – Rev- 0 Page 7 of 21

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash

E(T) Equipment Test Load

WY Wind Load - Y direction

WX Wind Load - X direction

N-SPT Number of blows of Standard Penetration Test

5.1. Code dan Standard

Table 5.1 Code and Standard

No. Document Number Document Title

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-201 – Rev- 0 Page 8 of 21

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash

5.3. Reference Project

No. Document Number Document Title

6. MATERIAL UNIT WEIGHT

No. Material Symbol Unit Weight Unit

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-201 – Rev- 0 Page 9 of 21

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash

The aspects analyzed in this document are as follows:

7.2. Soil Parameter Data

7.3. Primary Loads

7.3.1. Dead Load (DL)

7.3.2. Live Load (LL)

7.3.3. Equipment Loads (E(E), E(O), E(T))

7.3.4. Wind Load (WX, WZ)

7.3.5. Seismic Load

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-201 – Rev- 0 Page 10 of 21

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash

Figure 7.2 Seismic Coefficients for Salawati Area - Soft Soil

PEP-SP-SAL-CV-CAL-201 – Rev- 0 Page 11 of 21

Foundation Calculation for Produced Water/Wash

Table 7.2 Load Combinations for Concrete Reinforcement Design

7.5. Pile Bearing Capacity

Limiting unit skin friction = 10 t/m2