Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 2
Lecture 2
1
Design of columns
Warning: This is not a comprehensive list of all the ACI Sections needed in the design process of a column. For this, please
refer to the ACI Code directly.
Hugo Esquivel, Ph.D., M.Sc., Ing. Civil 5
Keep in mind that this is our first trial section. We may need to adjust it later.
Step 3: Check the slenderness of the column.
The radius of gyration for the selected cross section is (Section 6.2.5.2):
1
𝐼) U 12 𝑏ℎ,
𝑟=U = = 0.289ℎ ≈ 0.30ℎ = 0.30(0.40) = 0.120 m.
𝐴) 𝑏ℎ
Since the column ends are assumed to be hinged, 𝑘 = 1.0.
The slenderness ratio for this column is thereby:
𝑘𝑙! (1.0)(3.00)
= = 25.0.
𝑟 0.120
The critical slenderness ratio for a column braced against sidesway is (Section 6.2.5.1(b))
𝑘𝑙! 𝑀%
[ = min \34 + 12 ] ^ , 40_
𝑟 -. 𝑀&
= min{34 + 12(−0.50), 40} = 28.0.
Since
𝑘𝑙! 𝑘𝑙!
= 25.0 ≤ 28.0 = [ ,
𝑟 𝑟 -.
the slenderness effects can be neglected, and the column is indeed a short column.
Step 5: Use the parametric interaction diagrams (Figs. A-9a and A-9b of the textbook) to determine 𝜌) .
We note that 𝑓"# = 28 MPa ≈ 4 ksi, and 𝑓$ = 420 MPa ≈ 60 ksi. Moreover,
𝜙𝑃/ 𝑃! 2000 1 ksi
= = = 12500 kPa ] ^ = 1.81 ksi
𝐴) 𝐴) 0.40 ⋅ 0.40 6890 kPa
𝜙𝑀/ 𝑀! 160 1 ksi
= = = 2500 kPa ] ^ = 0.36 ksi
𝐴) ℎ 𝐴) ℎ (0.40 ⋅ 0.40)(0.40) 6890 kPa
𝜌) = 0.025
Hugo Esquivel, Ph.D., M.Sc., Ing. Civil 7
𝜌) = 0.020
Thus, we have:
(0.60, 0.025), (0.75, 0.020), (0.70, 𝜌) )
By interpolating, we get:
0.020 − 0.025 𝜌) − 0.025
= ⇒ 𝜌) = 0.0217
0.75 − 0.60 0.70 − 0.60
Note that: 0.01 ≤ 𝜌) ≤ 0.08 (ok!).
Step 6: Select the longitudinal reinforcement.
𝐴*+ ≥ 𝜌) 𝐴) = (0.0217)(0.40 ⋅ 0.40) = 0.00347 m& .
1st option: Use (12)#6.
Hugo Esquivel, Ph.D., M.Sc., Ing. Civil 8
For this rebar configuration,
𝐴*+ = 12 ⋅ 284 × 1001 = 0.00341 ≈ 0.00347 m& (ok!).
The clear spacing between longitudinal rebars must satisfy (Section 25.2.3):
𝑠 # ≥ maxi1.5𝑑2 , (4/3)𝑑'(( , 0.04j = max{1.5(0.0191), (4/3)(0.0191), 0.04} = 0.0400 m.
But the actual clear spacing is:
0.40 − 2 ⋅ 0.04 − 2 ⋅ 0.0095 − 4 ⋅ 0.0191
𝑠# = = 0.0749 ≥ 0.0400 m (ok!).
3
This value of 𝑠′ also satisfies Section 25.7.2.3(b). That is, 𝑠 # = 0.114 m ≤ 0.150 m (ok!).
2nd option: Use (4)#7 + (4)#8.
For this rebar configuration,
𝐴*+ = 4 ⋅ 387 × 1001 + 4 ⋅ 510 × 1001 = 0.00359 ≥ 0.00347 m& (ok!).
The clear spacing between longitudinal rebars must satisfy (Section 25.2.3):
𝑠 # ≥ maxi1.5𝑑2 , (4/3)𝑑'(( , 0.04j = max{1.5(0.0254), (4/3)(0.0191), 0.04} = 0.0400 m.
But the actual clear spacing is:
0.40 − 2 ⋅ 0.04 − 2 ⋅ 0.0095 − 1 ⋅ 0.0222 − 2 ⋅ 0.0254
𝑠# = = 0.114 ≥ 0.0400 m (ok!).
2
This value of 𝑠′ also satisfies Section 25.7.2.3(b). That is, 𝑠 # = 0.114 m ≤ 0.150 m (ok!).
Conclusion: Use the 2nd option for practical reasons. Since the number of rebars are fewer, they can be put in place faster.
Step 7: Design the lap splices for the longitudinal reinforcement.
From Figs. A-9a (R-4-60-0.6) and A-9b (R-4-60-0.75), we note that:
0 ≤ −𝑓* ≤ −0.5𝑓$ (tension).
Thus, Class A splices can be used if half or fewer of the longitudinal rebars are spliced at any section and alternate lap
splices are staggered at least by 𝑙3 (Table 10.7.5.2.2, Fig. R10.7.5.2 and Table 25.4.2.3). Otherwise, Class B splices are
required. For this design, we will ensure that the two conditions for Class A splices are met to save money.
As per Section 25.5.2, the lap splice lengths of rebars in tension is given by (Class A splices):
𝑓$ Ψ+ Ψ4 Ψ) (420)(1.0)(1.0)(1.0)
𝑙*+ = max{1.0𝑙3 , 0.300} = max mn r 𝑑2 , 0.300s = max mn r 𝑑2 , 0.300s = max{46.7𝑑2 , 0.300}.
1.7𝜆q𝑓"# 1.7(1.0)√28
Hugo Esquivel, Ph.D., M.Sc., Ing. Civil 9
The expression for 𝑙3 is only valid for #7-rebars or larger (our case); for #6-rebars or smaller, see Table 25.4.2.3. The
modification factors Ψ+ , Ψ4 and Ψ) are obtained from Table 25.4.2.5, and because concrete is normalweight, 𝜆 = 1.0 (Table
25.4.2.5 and Section 19.2.4.3).
Hence,
𝑙*+ = max{46.7(0.0222), 0.300} = 1.04 m for a #7-rebar
= max{46.7(0.0254), 0.300} = 1.19 m for a #8-rebar.
Step 8: Select the transverse reinforcement.
First, observe that #3-ties satisfies Section 25.7.2.2(a) (ok!).
The nominal shear strength provided by concrete is (Section 22.5.5)
𝑁!
𝑉" = min m0.17𝜆q𝑓"# + min m , 0.05𝑓"# s , 0.42𝜆q𝑓"# s 𝑏5 𝑑.
6𝐴)
Since 𝑁! = 𝑃! = 2000 kN = 2.00 MN, and 𝑑 = 0.40 − 0.04 − 0.0095 − 0.00254/2 = 0.338 m, then:
2.00
𝑉" = min \0.17(1.0)√28 + min \ , 0.05(28)_ , 0.42(1.0)√28_ (0.40)(0.338)
6(0.160)
= 0.157 MN = 157 kN.
Note that:
• If 𝑉! ≤ 0.5𝜙𝑉" , the ties must satisfy Section 25.7.2.
• If 0.5𝜙𝑉" < 𝑉! ≤ 𝜙𝑉" , the ties must satisfy Sections 10.6.2 and 25.7.2.
• If 𝑉! > 𝜙𝑉" , the ties must satisfy Sections 10.6.2, 10.7.6.5 and 25.7.2.
The strength reduction factor for shear is 𝜙 = 0.75 (Table 21.2.1, row b).
0.5𝜙𝑉" = 0.5(0.75)(157) = 58.9 kN
𝜙𝑉" = (0.75)(157) = 118 kN.
Since 𝑉! = 50 kN ≤ 0.5𝜙𝑉" , then the #3-ties must satisfy Section 25.7.2 only.
The lower and upper bounds for the center-to-center-spacing between ties are (Section 25.7.2.1):
〈𝑠〉678 = (4/3)𝑑'(( + 𝑑2+ = (4/3)(0.0191) + 0.0095 = 0.0349 m
〈𝑠〉9:; = min }16𝑑2< , 48𝑑2+ , min{𝑏, ℎ}~ = min }16(0.0254), 48(0.0095), min{0.40, 0.40}~ = 0.400 m.
Hence, for economy, choose: 𝑠 = 〈𝑠〉9:; = 0.40 m.
We also need to satisfy Section 10.6.2.2 because the 𝑉" expression shown above assumes that 𝐴= ≥ 𝐴=,?67 .
𝑏5 𝑠 (0.40)(0.40)
𝐴= ≥ maxi0.062q𝑓"# , 0.35j = maxi0.062√28, 0.35j = 133 × 1001 m& .
𝑓$+ 420
But, (2)#3-legs were provided in Step 6 (2nd option) for the transverse reinforcement. Thus,
𝐴= = 2 ⋅ 71 × 1001 = 142 × 1001 m& ≥ 133 × 1001 m& (ok!).