GE8 - 10938 - 330A-5E

Jaybie Endaya
Journal Prompt

After watching the webinar, I recognize that anyone can be a historian, despite
anyone being able to dig up information about the history, which can help to look up
some evidence if it’s credible to show that the sources are reliable. I learned that the
primary resources of history have a big impact on history, a kind of source that
analyzes by a historical method. As I observe the primary sources, it consists of two
criticism of the evidence that makes it true or a fake by collecting some shreds of
evidence from the historian. With the help of historians, the hidden artifacts and
documents may be answered by the evidence they examined. I learned what Sir “said
about the fact we can be a historian of public history if we explore, investigate and
verify the information that is interpreted”. You/we can be a historian by our role, can
apply. For example, being a “marites” happens on social media Tiktok, Facebook, or
any online platforms issue were due to the widespread of social media. However,
behind that issue, there may be a truth or falsification for which there is no evidence.
Being a historian means the interpretation is true, there are many processes to agree
on the findings. I found excitement and interest when the historical method of external
criticism was mentioned, the Code of Kalantiyaw that was led by Jose Marco, which
this passed down to the government and forged by William Henry Scott he believes
that the works of Jose Marco were a hoax (walang katotohanan) in significant events
that occur in history. And the KKK, the “KATILYA NG KATIPUNAN SA
KULTURA AT KASAYSAYAN” has the principle of being a leader responsible in
the country for leading the government and its people to prove its role. It is common
to dig up information about history that reveals with the help of professional
historians. In history, we should/must give attention and importance to the history of
its outbreaks, because in this generation we have to be careful about what information
we are gathering and find the credibility, reliability and the quality sources of the
information, thus it has a significant impact on history.
Ano ba ang papel ng kasaysayan? Paano ba binabaluktot ang kasaysayan? Ano ang mga halimbawa ng
pagbaluktot sa kasaysayan? Paano ito maitutuwid?

Para may katunguan ng direksyon para mapaunlad ang pilipinas dahil alam nating laganap ang korupsyon,
krimen, at iba pang suliranin na nakakaapekto sa bansang Pilipinas

PRIMARY SOURCES
- sinusuri sa pamamagitan ng historical method
Ang external criticism - ang authenticity ng source, tinitiyak dito na hindi peke o
huwad ang ebidensya sa mga pagsusuri. (palaeography) which ang pagsusuri ay inaaral ang kanilang
pagsusulat ang pagkakaiba

Internal criticism - sinusuri dito kung mapagkakatiwalaan ba ang nilalaman ng isang

sources o kaya ang REABILITY ng nilalaman ng isang sources
- MAY MOTIBO O LAYUNIN SA ISANG PAGSULAT
- MAY CORROBORATING EVIDENCE O EBIDENSYA PARA MAGING MALAKAS
ANG PAGBABATAYAN NG EBIDENSYA

PAANO SINISIKAP NG KASAYSAYAN NA ILAHAD ANG KATOTOHANAN NG NAKARAAN?

ANG KAIBAHAN NG katototohan at Katotohanan

katotohanan - masinop ang pagsusuri ng ebidensya at may matibay na batayan ukol sa
kanyang konklusyon (historial assertions) (PAST)
Katotohanan - isinusupil dito ang masalimuot na interprestasyon ng nakaraan (katotohanan).
hindi makatulong (PRESENT)

HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
(VS) - an essential part of the process which through history the posing of new problems and
investigation of new possibilities enlarges its perspectives and enriches its insights.
- bahagi dito ang normal na pagsusulat sa kasaysayan
- nagkakaroon ng bagong pagsusuri o muling suriin ang isang ebidensya sa kasaysayan, may
bagong interpretasyon na lumabas o facts

HISTORICAL NEGATIONISM/DISTORTION/DENIALISM
(VS) - form of illegitimate of revisionism (pagbabago). used forged documents, attributes false
conclusions to books and sources, manipulates the data and deliberately mistranslates texts.
Ex: HOLOCAUST DENIAL - ansabi ng mga manunulat ay hindi totoo (doesn’t exist)
walang katotohanan paniniwala ni (DAVID IRVING)……
- naglilikha ng mga bagong ebidensya (forgery of documents or fabricating the evidences)
- nagsasaulong ng hidden agenda

PARAAN GINAGAMIT NG MGA HISTORY NAGATIONIST

Paglilinlang o deception - sadyang pagbabaluktot ng katotohanan upang iayon ang isang
agenda pulitikal. Ex: GOLDEN AGE SA PANAHON NG MARTIAL LAW
Pagkakaila/pagtatanggi/pagtatakwil o denial - SADYANG PAGTATANGGI NG ISANG

KATOTOHANAN. Ex: WALANG HUMAN RIGHTS SA PANAHON NG MARTIAL LAW

PAGMAMALIIT O TRIVILIZATION NG KATOTOHANAN - mga salitang dika ayaaya paniwalaan
“past is past”, lets move on

CODE OF KALANTIYAW

NORMAL LANG ULIT ULITIN ANG KASAYSAYAN DAHIL MAY MGA BAGONG MANUNURI
Everyome can makes/pede manuri ng mga kasaysayan
KASAYSAYAN NG PANGMADLA - PAGKAKALAPIT NG SALAYSAY NA MAY SAYSAY NA GINAGAMIT NATIN
ANG WIKA KUNG SAN ANG PILINIO RIN AY NAKAKAINTINDI.
PINAPAKITA SA BAYAN METODO magtanong magimbestiga magkumpara

SA PAGSTORYA NG PANGKASAYSAYAN NG PAGKAKANGINGANLANG, PARA MATUTO SA NAKARAAN,

ANG KASAYSAYAN AY HINDI LANG HISTORYADOR DAPAT DIN ANG MADLANG PILIPINO.

ANG ISANG KASAYSAYAN DAPAT MABIGYANG PANSIN/TUON ANG PAGPAPALAGANAP NG ISANG

KASAYSAYAN. MADAMI NG ILLEGITEMATE NA LUMALABAS SA PANAHON NGAYON KAYA DAPAT AY
HIGPITAN ANG PAGLIKHA NG MGA MANUNURI O SINING NA MAY MATINONG EBIDENSYA O
MABISANG IMPACT SA PILINO.

3 LEARNED:

SURIIN ANG PRIMARY RESOURCES

DIFFERENCES INTERNAL & EXTERNAL CRITICISM

DIFFERENCES OF HISTORICAL REVISIONISM AND HISTORICAL DISTORTION

2 THINGS FOUND EXCITING:

CODE OF KALANTIYAW LED BY JOSE MARCO, and William Henry Scott reviewed that it was a
hoax a fake historical code by the law and government it was forged

KKK “KATILYA NG KATIPUNAN SA KULTURA AT KASAYSAYAN”

QUESTION

HOW DO WE STOP HISTORIAL