Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Prospective Assessment: Contractor Delay Employer Delay

    Uploaded by

    Post Your Feedback
    8 views3 pages
    The document contains 4 examples of prospective and retrospective assessments of extension of time (EOT) calculations for construction projects. Each example lists contractor delays, employer delays and the resulting prospective and retrospective EOT. The retrospective assessments reconsider which delays were critical by removing delays from either the contractor or employer. The examples demonstrate that the party whose delays were critical determines whether the prospective or retrospective EOT is correct.

    Original Description:

    KJHJKHJ

    Original Title

    1669128940526

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document contains 4 examples of prospective and retrospective assessments of extension of time (EOT) calculations for construction projects. Each example lists contractor delays, employer delays and the resulting prospective and retrospective EOT. The retrospective assessments reconsider which delays were critical by removing delays from either the contractor or employer. The examples demonstrate that the party whose delays were critical determines whether the prospective or retrospective EOT is correct.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views3 pages

    Prospective Assessment: Contractor Delay Employer Delay

    Uploaded by

    Post Your Feedback
    The document contains 4 examples of prospective and retrospective assessments of extension of time (EOT) calculations for construction projects. Each example lists contractor delays, employer delays and the resulting prospective and retrospective EOT. The retrospective assessments reconsider which delays were critical by removing delays from either the contractor or employer. The examples demonstrate that the party whose delays were critical determines whether the prospective or retrospective EOT is correct.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    PROSPECTIVE ASSESSMENT

    EXAMPLE 1
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Structure A
    Contractor delay
    Structure B
    Employer delay

    Contractor delays: 5 weeks

    Employer delays: 3 weeks + 4 weeks = 7 weeks

    EOT = 2 WEEKS

    EXAMPLE 2
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Structure A
    Contractor delay
    Structure B
    Employer delay

    Contractor delays: 3 weeks + 4 weeks = 7 weeks

    Employer delays: 5 weeks

    EOT = 5 WEEKS

    EXAMPLE 3
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Structure A
    Contractor delay
    Structure B
    Employer delay

    Contractor delays: 5 weeks

    Employer delays: 3 weeks + 4 weeks = 7 weeks

    EOT = 7 WEEKS

    EXAMPLE 4
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Structure A
    Contractor delay
    Structure B
    Employer delay

    Contractor delays: 3 weeks + 4 weeks = 7 weeks

    Employer delays: 5 weeks

    EOT = 0 WEEKS
    RETROSPECTIVE ASSESSMENT
    EXAMPLE 1
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Structure A
    Contractor delay
    Structure B
    Employer delay

    After 2 weeks Employer delay taken off, Employer delay no longer critical:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Structure A
    Contractor delay
    Structure B
    Employer delay

    Contractor delays: 5 weeks

    Employer delays: 3 weeks + 4 weeks = 7 weeks

    EOT = 2 WEEKS

    EXAMPLE 2
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Structure A
    Contractor delay
    Structure B
    Employer delay

    After 2 weeks Contractor delay taken off, Contractor delay no longer critical:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Structure A
    Contractor delay
    Structure B
    Employer delay

    Contractor delays: 3 weeks + 4 weeks = 7 weeks

    Employer delays: 5 weeks

    EOT = 5 WEEKS
    EXAMPLE 3
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Structure A
    Contractor delay
    Structure B
    Employer delay

    Contractor delay never critical.

    Contractor delays: 5 weeks

    Employer delays: 3 weeks + 4 weeks = 7 weeks

    EOT = 7 WEEKS

    EXAMPLE 4
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Structure A
    Contractor delay
    Structure B
    Employer delay

    Employer delay never critical:


    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Structure A
    Contractor delay
    Structure B
    Employer delay

    Contractor delays: 3 weeks + 4 weeks = 7 weeks

    Employer delays: 5 weeks

    EOT = 0 WEEKS

    RESULTS

    Total Employer Prospective Retrospective


    delay EOT EOT
    Example 1 Employer delay longer Contractor delay first 7 2 2
    Example 2 Contractor delay longer Employer delay first 5 5 5
    Example 3 Employer delay longer Employer delay first 7 7 7
    Example 4 Contractor delay longer Contractor delay first 5 0 0

    You might also like