The document presents data from an experiment comparing an experimental group (E) to a control group (C). The experimental group had 252 people recover and 92 people with events, while the control group had 115 recover and 60 with events. It then calculates the control event rate, experimental event rate, relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction, and number needed to treat using the data, finding a relative risk reduction of 23%, absolute risk reduction of 8%, and number needed to treat of 12.5.
The document presents data from an experiment comparing an experimental group (E) to a control group (C). The experimental group had 252 people recover and 92 people with events, while the control group had 115 recover and 60 with events. It then calculates the control event rate, experimental event rate, relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction, and number needed to treat using the data, finding a relative risk reduction of 23%, absolute risk reduction of 8%, and number needed to treat of 12.5.
The document presents data from an experiment comparing an experimental group (E) to a control group (C). The experimental group had 252 people recover and 92 people with events, while the control group had 115 recover and 60 with events. It then calculates the control event rate, experimental event rate, relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction, and number needed to treat using the data, finding a relative risk reduction of 23%, absolute risk reduction of 8%, and number needed to treat of 12.5.
The document presents data from an experiment comparing an experimental group (E) to a control group (C). The experimental group had 252 people recover and 92 people with events, while the control group had 115 recover and 60 with events. It then calculates the control event rate, experimental event rate, relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction, and number needed to treat using the data, finding a relative risk reduction of 23%, absolute risk reduction of 8%, and number needed to treat of 12.5.