Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DisMEA COMMITMENT FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (TA), POLICY DIRECTIONS, ETC. - FY 2022
(Report on the progress of CIGPS of the previos quarter)
Gains
Timeline/ Factors/Reasons Influencing
(target vs. Gaps
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Quarter for Physical TargetAccomplishment the Accomplishment/non Innovations/interventions
accomplishment
Presentation Accomplishment of Target
)
ACCESS
1 250 245
Total Enrolment 1st-4th Quarter 0 5 Abrupt transfer of residence
2
Total No. of ALS Learners with 100% Attendance
3 10 16 Home Visition
Total No. of SARDO/PARDO Saved 3rd Quarter 6 0 Teachers rigid follow up on learners
5
No. of learners with incidence of tardiness
6 No. of Learners with incidence of Habitual
Absenteeism
7 Total Number of Learners per Nutritional Status
Category 3rd Quarter 245 245 0 0 100% of learners had been assessed.
2
Percentage of Passing by Subject Area in Quarterly 100%- all subject 100%- all subject 0%- all subject 0%- all subject Conducted remediation in all subject
Academic Assessment (Based on SF 9) 3rd Quarter areas areas areas areas areas
2
No. of Teachers Attended LAC Session 3rd Quarter 12 12 0 0 100% of teachers attended LAC Session
3
No. of Teachers Attended INSET 3rd Quarter 12 12 0 0 100% of teachers attended INSET
6 No. of teachers with very satisfactory records 100% of teachers provided with very
management 3rd Quarter 11 11 0 0 satisfactory records
9
Number of Personnel with 100% Attendance 3rd Quarter 12 12 0 0 All of the personel had 100% attendance
10
Stakeholders Participation 3rd Quarter 236 236 0 0 100% of stakeholders participated
11
Stakeholders Donations 3rd Quarter 1% 1% 0 0 1% of stakeholders donated
21 Water Sanitation & Hygiene (WASH) in Schools No assessment conducted during 3rd
(WINS) Assessment Level 3rd Quarter 0 0 0 0 Quarter
22
DepEd Computerization Program (DCP) 3rd Quarter 0 0 0 0 No delivery for the specific quarter
Note: All PARTS of Templates A-E should be accomplished by all DISTRICTS.
Kindergarten
Learners
1.1 Beginning 15 13 12 14 10
1.2 Developing 9 7 8 6 15
1.3 Consistent 8 12 12 12 B-32%
7
B-47% B-40% B-37% B-44%
D- D- D- D- D-46%
28% C- 22% C- 26% C- 19% C-
Proficiency Level in all Domains 25% 38% 37% 37% C-22%
Domains
AVERAGE
KEY STAGE 1. GRADE 1-3
Mother Tongue
Learners 102 102 102 102 102
Proficiency Level 81.5 81.9 82.2 82.23 82.2
Filipino
Learners 78 78 102 102 102
Proficiency Level 81.05 81.6 82.5 82 81.96
English
Learners 78 78 78 102 102
Proficiency Level 79.5 79.9 80.5 81.05 80.9
Science
Learners 40 40 40 40 40
Proficiency Level 80 81 81 82 81.75
Mathematics
Learners 102 102 102 102 102
Proficiency Level 79.8 79.7 80.2 82 81.65
Aralin Panlipunan
Learners 102 102 102 102 102
Proficiency Level 82.1 82.3 82.5 83.12 82.34
MAPEH
Learners 102 102 102 102 102
Proficiency Level 82.78 83.17 83.3 84.01 83.3
Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao
Learners 102 102 102 102 102
Proficiency Level 81.3 81.5 81.95 83.02 82.19
AVERAGE 80.95 81.38 81.77 82.43 82.03625
Key Stage 2
Grades 4 – 6
EPP
Learners 116 116 115 115 115
Proficiency Level 81 81.08 82.08 82.1 82.1
Filipino
Learners 116 116 115 115 115
Proficiency Level 81.5 81.67 82.43 82.98 82.98
English
Learners 116 116 115 115 115
Proficiency Level 80 80.03 80.79 80.98 80.98
Science
Learners 116 116 115 115 115
Proficiency Level 80.7 80.98 81.48 81.55 81.55
Mathematics
Learners 116 116 115 115 115
Proficiency Level 80.05 80.13 80.85 80.98 80.98
Aralin Panlipunan
Learners 116 116 115 115 115
Proficiency Level 81.4 81.5 82.25 82.38 82.38
MAPEH
Learners 116 116 115 115 115
Proficiency Level 83.1 83.15 83.9 84 84
Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao
Learners 116 116 115 115 115
Proficiency Level 83.02 83.05 83.75 84.2 84.2
AVERAGE 83.05 81.45 82.19 82.4 82.4
Key Stage 3
Grades 7 – 10
TLE
Learners
Proficiency Level
Filipino
Learners
Proficiency Level
English
Learners
Proficiency Level
Science
Learners
Proficiency Level
Mathematics
Learners
Proficiency Level
Aralin Panlipunan
Learners
Proficiency Level
MAPEH
Learners
Proficiency Level
Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao
Learners
Proficiency Level
AVERAGE
Key Stage 4
Grades 11 – 12
TVL
Core Subjects
Learners
Proficiency Level
Applied Subjects
Learners
Proficiency Level
Specialized Subjects
Learners
Proficiency Level
ACADEMIC
Core Subjects
Learners
Proficiency Level
Applied Subjects
Learners
Proficiency Level
Specialized Subjects
Learners
Proficiency Level
ARTS and DESIGN
Core Subjects
Learners
Proficiency Level
Applied Subjects
Learners
Proficiency Level
Specialized Subjects
Learners
Proficiency Level
SPORTS
Core Subjects
Learners
Proficiency Level
Applied Subjects
Learners
Proficiency Level
Specialized Subjects
Learners
STRAT OB 2_95% of schools in the 11
SDOs haveLevel
Proficiency received, distributed, or
delivered
% a complete
of Elementary
AVERAGE Schools set of 11
in the learning
SDOs have
materials
received, to all learners
distributed, or across
delivered a all grade
complete set of
% of JHS
Curriculum
levels Schools
which in the
Management
manifested 11 SDOs have
the efficientreceived,
learning materials
distributed, or to
delivered all learners
a complete across
set all
of grade
learning
% of SHS
delivery
levels Schools in
of manifested
which the
basic education 11 SDOs have
services.received,
materials to or
distributed, learners the
alldelivered efficient
across delivery of
all grade
a complete set oflevels
learning
basic education
which manifested services.
the efficient delivery of basic CID c/o
materials to all learners across all grade levels
education services.the efficient delivery of basic LR
which manifested
STRAT
educationOB 3_100% of the Basic Education
services.
Research Funded studies are completed,
Strategic Leadership
presented in a Research andForum,
Management
and published
in a
STRATprofessional
OB 4_36% journal.
of the completed research
STRAT OB 5_10% policies (local) formulated PRME
All
used
were for policy development.
reviewed, adopted and issued to Function
RO/SDO/School.
STRAT OB 6_87% satisfactory feedback from al
clients on issued policies. Divisions
STRAT OB 7_99% of the elementary schools, in
the
STRAT11 SDOs have satisfied
OB 8_87% the 45:1 schools,
of the secondary standard in
pupil-teacher
the 11 SDOs ratio
have (PTR).the 45:1 standard
satisfied PRME
STRAT OB 9_87% of the Grades 1-10 schools, in
student-teacher
the 11 SDOs ratio
have (STR). the 45:1 standard
achieved PRME
STRAT OB 10_86% of the Grades 11-12 schools,
student-classroom
in the 11OB
SDOs ratio (STC). 45:1 standard
have achieved PRME
STRAT 11_98% retention the
rate is achieved in
student-classroom
elementary (STC)
the ratio. PRME
STRAT OBschools
12_94%inretention11 SDOs byachieved
rate is the end of
in
SY 2021-2022.
secondary PRME
STRAT OBschools
13_ 95% in the 11 SDOsrate
completion by the end of
is achieved
SY 2021-2022schools in the 11 SDOs by the end of
in elementary PRME
STRAT OB 14_85% participation rate is achieved
SY 2021-2022public and private schools in the 11
in elementary PRME
STRAT
STRAT OB 15_85%of participation rate11
is SDOs
achieved
SDOs byOB16_90%
the public
in secondary SY schools
end of and 2021-2022 in the PRME
have decreased of at leastprivate
2% ofschools
School in the 11
Leaver
SDOs by theofend
Rate (SLR) of SYacross
learners 2021-2022
all gradebeneficiary
levels by PRME
STRAT
STRAT OB
OB 17_80%
18_100% of the identified
of the Newly Created
the end of
learners SY
inand 2021-2022.
11 Non-teaching
SDOs have benefited from the PRME
SGOD
Teaching items/positions
School-Based
allocated Feeding
to SDOs Program.
are filled up and equitably c/o HNU
OSDS c/o
deployedOB
STRAT to the schools.
19_90% or more schools are provided HRMO
with equitable resources specifically on:
Div.
Physical
17.1. Classrooms Needs Facilities
17.2. Seats Coor
17.3. Teachers PRME
CID c/o
STRAT OB 20_STRAT 17_Percentage increased
17.4.
in theTextbooks
enrollment for Inclusive Education based on LR
indicative targets:
19.1. 3% SPED
19.2. 0.5% ALIVE/MADRASAH PRME
STRAT
19.3. 0.7%OBIPED
21_100% of the number of ESC and
SHS Voucher grantees across the 11 SDOs CID c/o
19.4. 5% ALS
validated by the PEAC were attested and ALS
recommended for processing of payment.
20.1. ESC CID
STRAT OB 22_100% of the number of JDVP
20.2. SHSacross
grantees Voucher
the 11ofSDOs were recommended
STRAT OB 23_25% schools across 11 SDOs is
for processing of payment.
classified as School Based Management (SBM) CID
SGOD
STRAT
STRAT OB 24_80% of the teachers
OB 25_90% of the ERF endorsed by
level 3 category. across grade
the c/o SBM
levels
11 in the
SDOs for 11
the SDOs were capacitated
reclassification of in were
items, multiple
People
distanceDevelopment
learning modalities (viavalidated,
virtual SGOD
efficiently processed, reviewed,
platforms/Face to face). to the next higher
approved, and reclassified c/o HRD
OSDS c/o
STRAT
STRAT OB
positions.OB 27_90%
26_90% of of the 11 SDOs
schools in thein11the Region
SDOs HRMO
have
have firmed-
conducted up/established
Learning Actionat least
Cell50(LAC).
partnerships CID
and engagements with stakeholders, corporate
STRAT OB 28_80%
Partnership
sector, groups,Building of the PPAs
and individuals in the WFP
to support have
identified SGOD
encapsulated
PPAs. gender-responsiveness where HGDG c/o SMN
will
STRATyield
OBa 29_100
minimum % score
of theof
1120 points
SDOs for each
have CID c/o
GAD/DRRM
program or with at least DRRM
5 % GAD
established a functional thatattribution
subscribedfor GAD
the total cost of theapproach
gender-responsive implementation. (2.5%) gender
and promoted Focal
DRRM
equality in its disaster preparedness.(2.5%) Focal
KRA 2.
CURRICULUM AND Leads in ensuring compliance to
INSTRUCTION quality standards and managing
MANAGEMENT programs for curricula
implementation, localization of
2.3 CID- LR
curricula, and teaching through
the CID
KRA 3. HUMAN
RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT
Approves appointments and
deployments, and evaluate and
KRA 3. HUMAN recommend personnel actions
RESOURCE (promotions, transfer,
MANAGEMENT AND 3.7 reassignments, and ADMIN/HR
reinstatements and dropping from
DEVELOPMENT rolls) on all personnel of the
Schools Division, except the ASDS
Commences administrative
proceedings motu propio in case
3.1 of non-teaching personnel within LEGAL
their jurisdiction
M&E Template 3 - Implementation Concerns, Issues, Gaps, & Problems (CIGPs) , Proposed Resolutions and Lessons Learned
Category
(Technical, if recurring,
Institutional, New or how many Proposed
Concerns, Issues, Gaps, Problems (CIGPs) Financial, Lessons Learned
Recurring quarters has Resolutions/Commitment
Political,
Infrastructure,
it occured?
Social, Gender)
Transfer to another internet provider
that can provide a faster internet
Slow internet connection Technical Recurring 4 connection