Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I (10–1–11 Edition)
616
VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jan 03, 2012 Jkt 223216 PO 00000 Frm 00628 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\223216.XXX 223216
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin., DOT § 199.105
(c) Random testing. (1) Except as pro- fying numbers. Under the selection
vided in paragraphs (c)(2) through (4) of process used, each covered employee
this section, the minimum annual per- shall have an equal chance of being
centage rate for random drug testing tested each time selections are made.
617
VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jan 03, 2012 Jkt 223216 PO 00000 Frm 00629 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\223216.XXX 223216
§ 199.107 49 CFR Ch. I (10–1–11 Edition)
(6) The operator shall randomly se- symptoms of drug use, shall substan-
lect a sufficient number of covered em- tiate and concur in the decision to test
ployees for testing during each cal- an employee. The concurrence between
endar year to equal an annual rate not the two supervisors may be by tele-
less than the minimum annual percent- phone. However, in the case of opera-
age rate for random drug testing deter- tors with 50 or fewer employees subject
mined by the Administrator. If the op- to testing under this part, only one su-
erator conducts random drug testing pervisor of the employee trained in de-
through a consortium, the number of tecting possible drug use symptoms
employees to be tested may be cal- shall substantiate the decision to test.
culated for each individual operator or (e) Return-to-duty testing. A covered
may be based on the total number of employee who refuses to take or has a
covered employees covered by the con- positive drug test may not return to
sortium who are subject to random duty in the covered function until the
drug testing at the same minimum an- covered employee has complied with
nual percentage rate under this sub- applicable provisions of DOT Proce-
part or any DOT drug testing rule. dures concerning substance abuse pro-
(7) Each operator shall ensure that fessionals and the return-to-duty proc-
random drug tests conducted under ess.
this subpart are unannounced and that (f) Follow-up testing. A covered em-
the dates for administering random ployee who refuses to take or has a
tests are spread reasonably throughout positive drug test shall be subject to
the calendar year. unannounced follow-up drug tests ad-
(8) If a given covered employee is ministered by the operator following
subject to random drug testing under the covered employee’s return to duty.
the drug testing rules of more than one The number and frequency of such fol-
DOT agency for the same operator, the low-up testing shall be determined by a
employee shall be subject to random
substance abuse professional, but shall
drug testing at the percentage rate es-
consist of at least six tests in the first
tablished for the calendar year by the
12 months following the covered em-
DOT agency regulating more than 50
ployee’s return to duty. In addition,
percent of the employee’s function.
follow-up testing may include testing
(9) If an operator is required to con-
for alcohol as directed by the substance
duct random drug testing under the
abuse professional, to be performed in
drug testing rules of more than one
accordance with 49 CFR part 40. Fol-
DOT agency, the operator may—
low-up testing shall not exceed 60
(i) Establish separate pools for ran-
dom selection, with each pool con- months from the date of the covered
taining the covered employees who are employee’s return to duty. The sub-
subject to testing at the same required stance abuse professional may termi-
rate; or nate the requirement for follow-up
(ii) Randomly select such employees testing at any time after the first six
for testing at the highest percentage tests have been administered, if the
rate established for the calendar year substance abuse professional deter-
by any DOT agency to which the oper- mines that such testing is no longer
ator is subject. necessary.
(d) Testing based on reasonable cause. [53 FR 47096, Nov. 21, 1988, as amended by
Each operator shall drug test each em- Amdt. 199–2, 54 FR 51850, Dec. 18, 1989; 59 FR
ployee when there is reasonable cause 62227, Dec. 2, 1994; Amdt. 199–15, 63 FR 13000,
to believe the employee is using a pro- Mar. 17, 1998; Amdt 199–15, 63 FR 36863, July
hibited drug. The decision to test must 8, 1998. Redesignated and amended by Amdt.
be based on a reasonable and 199–19, 66 FR 47118, Sept. 11, 2001]
articulable belief that the employee is
§ 199.107 Drug testing laboratory.
using a prohibited drug on the basis of
specific, contemporaneous physical, be- (a) Each operator shall use for the
wreier-aviles on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with CFR
618
VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jan 03, 2012 Jkt 223216 PO 00000 Frm 00630 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\223216.XXX 223216
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin., DOT § 199.111
(b) The drug testing laboratory must (1) A public agency, such as a State,
permit— county, or municipality;
(1) Inspections by the operator before (2) The operator or a person under
the laboratory is awarded a testing contract to provide treatment for drug
contract; and problems on behalf of the operator;
(2) Unannounced inspections, includ- (3) The sole source of therapeutically
ing examination of records, at any appropriate treatment under the em-
time, by the operator, the Adminis- ployee’s health insurance program; or
trator, and if the operator is subject to (4) The sole source of therapeutically
state agency jurisdiction, a representa- appropriate treatment reasonably ac-
tive of that state agency. cessible to the employee.
[53 FR 47096, Nov. 21, 1988. Redesignated by [53 FR 47096, Nov. 21, 1988, as amended by
Amdt. 199–19, 66 FR 47118, Sept. 11, 2001] Amdt. 199–2, 54 FR 51850, Dec. 18, 1989; Amdt.
199–15, 63 FR 13000, Mar. 17, 1998; Amdt. 199–
§ 199.109 Review of drug testing re- 15, 63 FR 36863, July 8, 1998. Redesignated and
sults. amended by Amdt. 199–19, 66 FR 47118, Sept.
(a) MRO appointment. Each operator 11, 2001]
shall designate or appoint a medical re-
view officer (MRO). If an operator does § 199.111 Retention of samples and ad-
ditional testing.
not have a qualified individual on staff
to serve as MRO, the operator may (a) Samples that yield positive re-
contract for the provision of MRO serv- sults on confirmation must be retained
ices as part of its anti-drug program. by the laboratory in properly secured,
(b) MRO qualifications. Each MRO long-term, frozen storage for at least
must be a licensed physician who has 365 days as required by the DOT Proce-
the qualifications required by DOT dures. Within this 365-day period, the
Procedures. employee or the employee’s representa-
(c) MRO duties. The MRO must per- tive, the operator, the Administrator,
form functions for the operator as re- or, if the operator is subject to the ju-
quired by DOT Procedures. risdiction of a state agency, the state
(d) MRO reports. The MRO must re- agency may request that the labora-
port all drug test results to the oper- tory retain the sample for an addi-
ator in accordance with DOT Proce- tional period. If, within the 365-day pe-
dures. riod, the laboratory has not received a
(e) Evaluation and rehabilitation proper written request to retain the
may be provided by the operator, by a sample for a further reasonable period
substance abuse professional under specified in the request, the sample
contract with the operator, or by a sub- may be discarded following the end of
stance abuse professional not affiliated the 365-day period.
with the operator. The choice of sub- (b) If the medical review officer
stance abuse professional and assign- (MRO) determines there is no legiti-
ment of costs shall be made in accord- mate medical explanation for a con-
ance with the operator/employee agree- firmed positive test result other than
ments and operator/employee policies. the unauthorized use of a prohibited
(f) The operator shall ensure that a drug, and if timely additional testing is
substance abuse professional, who de- requested by the employee according to
termines that a covered employee re- DOT Procedures, the split specimen
quires assistance in resolving problems must be tested. The employee may
with drug abuse, does not refer the cov- specify testing by the original labora-
ered employee to the substance abuse tory or by a second laboratory that is
professional’s private practice or to a certified by the Department of Health
person or organization from which the and Human Services. The operator may
substance abuse professional receives require the employee to pay in advance
remuneration or in which the sub- the cost of shipment (if any) and rea-
stance abuse professional has a finan- nalysis of the sample, but the employee
wreier-aviles on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with CFR
cial interest. This paragraph does not must be reimbursed for such expense if
prohibit a substance abuse professional the additional test is negative.
from referring a covered employee for (c) If the employee specifies testing
assistance provided through: by a second laboratory, the original
619
VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jan 03, 2012 Jkt 223216 PO 00000 Frm 00631 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\223216.XXX 223216
§ 199.113 49 CFR Ch. I (10–1–11 Edition)
laboratory must follow approved chain- part be carried out by the contractor
of-custody procedures in transferring a provided:
portion of the sample. (a) The operator remains responsible
(d) Since some analytes may deterio- for ensuring that the requirements of
rate during storage, detected levels of this part are complied with; and
the drug below the detection limits es- (b) The contractor allows access to
tablished in the DOT Procedures, but property and records by the operator,
equal to or greater than the estab-
the Administrator, and if the operator
lished sensitivity of the assay, must, as
is subject to the jurisdiction of a state
technically appropriate, be reported
and considered corroborative of the agency, a representative of the state
original positive results. agency for the purpose of monitoring
the operator’s compliance with the re-
[53 FR 47096, Nov. 21, 1988; 55 FR 797, Jan. 9, quirements of this part.
1990, as amended by Amdt. 199–17, 63 FR 7723,
Feb. 17, 1998. Redesignated and amended by [53 FR 47096, Nov. 21, 1988. Redesignated by
Amdt. 199–19, 66 FR 47118, Sept. 11, 2001] Amdt. 199–19, 66 FR 47118, Sept. 11, 2001]
620
VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jan 03, 2012 Jkt 223216 PO 00000 Frm 00632 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\223216.XXX 223216
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin., DOT § 199.202
621
VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jan 03, 2012 Jkt 223216 PO 00000 Frm 00633 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\223216.XXX 223216