Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effect of Electrode Materials
Effect of Electrode Materials
7,00E+010
Ni(cm )
-3
of etch rate and plasma characteristics on the 5,00E+010
[1], electrode material [2] and trace elements [3]; 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Vdc(V)
plasma parameters can also be affected by
secondary electron emission [4]. The secondary Figure 1 − Ar ion density as a function of DC bias
electron can be generated by incoming electrons voltage and pressure, as measured above the Cu and
and by incoming ions. It is very dependent on Al part of the mixed electrode.
particle type and energy, on surface material and
conditions. Al 50W
4000
Three different, 152 mm diameter electrodes Al 75W
Al 100w
Al 150W
were evaluated: a pure Cu, a pure Al and a mixed 3500 Cu 50W
Cu 75W
2500
mixed electrode is that the DC bias voltage on both
halves is always the same and that the only 2000
Cu electrode. The ion densities of these plasmas 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
above the center of the two pure electrodes and Figure 2 − Silicon etch rate as a function of
above the central part of both halves of the mixed pressure and applied RF power, for the pure Al and
electrodes. Fig. 1 shows that the plasma density Cu electrodes.
above the Al electrode is much higher than above References
the Cu electrode. It is our hypothesis that this is due [1] Fedynyshin et al.; J. Electroch. Soc.; 134; 206-
to the fact that the coefficient for secondary 9; 1987.
electron emission by incoming ions is [2] Fedynyshin et al.; J. Electroch. Soc.; 136; 1799-
approximately a factor two higher for Al than for 1804; 1989.
Cu [5]. For the pure Al electrode, the ion density is [3] Sebel et al; J. Vac. Sci Technol. A. ;17; 755-
higher than above the Al part of the mixed 62;1999.
electrode and for the pure Cu electrode, it is lower [4] Nöding et al.; Surf. Coating Technol.; 111; 51-
than above the Cu part of the mixed electrode. This 55; 1999.
indicates that the plasma for the mixed electrode [5] Cobine et al.; Dover Publications Inc. NY; 159;
becomes somewhat mixed, but the trends are easy 1958.
to recognize. Acknowledgements: The authors thank FAPESP
Fig. 2 shows the etch rate of silicon samples, and CNPq for financial support.
using a SiO2 mask, placed on top of the Al and of
the Cu halves of the mixed electrode, for several
SF6 plasmas. The etch rates on top of the Al part are
always at least 20% higher than the etch rates on
top of the Cu half. Again, this trend was confirmed
for the pure electrodes. The higher etch rate for the
Al is caused by a combination of three mechanisms:
higher secondary electron emission, higher fluorine
dissociation because of catalysis on the Al electrode
and consumption of fluorine by the Cu electrode.