Philippine Christian University

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION (CED)

Dasmarinas Campus

READINGS IN PHILIPPINE HISTORY (GNED1005)

Final Examination
Frist Semester - AY 2022-2023
February 1-8, 2023
Professor: Mr. Arnold P. Santos, LPT.

Student’s Name: Mariano, Lyka Mae E. Raw Score: /100

Course Program: BSA 2-B Date: _February 1-8, 2023 until 08:00pm_

FINAL EXAM (FINAL PROJECT)

Doing Local History thru Vlogs

Learning Outcomes:

• The exam is to gauge student’s ability to:

1. manifest interest in local history and the cultural heritage of their own community.
2. apply historiographic methods in the documentation of the data used in historical vlogs.
3. incorporate technology in the preparation of historical vlogs.
4. appreciate the value of doing history to the present day.
5. exhaust creativity in the preparation of a presentable historical vlog.
6. develop camaraderie and teamwork in accomplishing the task.

General Instructions:

a. The project can either be done individually or in team.

b. All individual or group vlogs should have a total running time of 15-20 minutes.
c. If you preferred to do it in team, create a group chat (GC) in whatever virtual platform you are
all convenient to meet and discuss your plans for the final project.
d. Each of the group members should contribute in the making of the project.
e. All groups should locate a certain place/spot found in their own local community (e.g. old bridge,
heritage house, church, archaeological remains, rice fields, legendary lakes/rivers, urban legends
concerning specific odd trees, mountains, etc.) which could provide historical value to the
community’s culture. The group can also opt and endeavor to do an oral interview with a witness
of a certain historical breakthrough/phenomenal event in the community like for instance: First
 Fiesta, The First Strong Typhoon, The First Teacher in the Oldest School, The First Parish Priest,
World War Veteran, etc.)

f. After deciding for the main subject matter of the local history vlogging task: Plan for a visit to
such historical site or to the prospect eyewitness of a historical event in community and
accomplish the following:

a. Video documentation of the credible/authentic historic spot/place of the interviewee’s

residence.
b. Prepare the materials you needed as you visit the place or meet up your interviewee/s.
c. Prepare the guide questions for your interviews and scripts which you will use in your
vlogging documentation.

For Historical Place

• Suggested guide questions for the script of vlogs narratives

✓ Survey as to when the structure was erected or could have been seen in the place?
✓ What could have been the most probable reasons behind its construction?
✓ Who are the credible people you talked to so as to gather reliable information and other
data which you included in the historical vlogs of the local community?
✓ How would such information you gathered be of use to the historical value of the
community?
✓ etc.

For an Eyewitness Interview

✓ Who is your interviewee as a reliable person to talk to as a witness for such a phenomenal
event/ breakthrough in your community. Look for his/her basic demographic background
profile like age, gender, religion, marital status, civic organization affiliation, etc.
✓ What are his /her noteworthy or interesting narratives (trivia) of the event that he/she was
recounting.
✓ etc.

g. Do the visit at your most convenient time and accomplish the documentation of your task.
Don’t forget to include yourself in all the video footages of the entire interview or vlogs.
h. Don’t forget to introduce yourself before you start your narratives.
i. Make sure that the audio and video are clear and audible for viewers to see and hear properly
your outputs which you will soon upload in the social media.
j. Do follow the minimum health protocol as you do the visit to the place or meet up your
interviewee.
k. Lastly, the group leader or anyone among the group members should do the final editing of the
accomplished task. Post your output in YouTube and share the link to our official GC as soon as
you are done and also to your Bluebook LMS within the file name: Final Examination.
l. Most importantly, submission will be on February 1-8, 2023 until 8:00pm only.
Rubrics:
• Group Collaboration
• Individual Contribution
• Narratives/Vlogs
• Sourcing
• Mechanics
(clarity, correct grammar, organization)
• Creativity (use of multimedia)
Total: 100
Rubrics for Group Collaboration/Teamwork
Criteria 30 points
Narratives Narrative is cohesive,
organized, and interesting:
depicts a believable and
relatable tale of human
experience but does not
sacrifice objectivity and
truth. Details are based on
cited sources.
Historical interpretation is
valid, plausible, and
convincing. Shows in-depth
evaluation and reflection.
May include interpretations
that show patterns like
causality, continuity, etc.
10 points
10 points
30 points
20 points
15 points
15 points
20 points
Narrative is cohesive and
organized; presents a
believable tale of human
experience. The narrative is
mostly objective but may
have some questionable or
half-baked statements that
stated sources do not
support. Some details are
not from cited sources.
Most historical
interpretation is valid, and
plausible but may have
loosed-ends that may not
convince the reader/viewer.
Shows adequate evaluation
and reflection.
10 points 0 points
Narrative is cohesive but Narrative is
may have some major haphazard and
points that are disjointed hard to follow.
to the whole. While There is evidence
some parts of the of use of sources,
narrative are relatable but they do not
and true, some contribute to a
statements are too single, relatable
simplistic or farfetched. narrative.
There are some traces of Historical
historical interpretation interpretation
but are not clear and does not exist—it
conclusive. The is just a sequence
reader/viewer may need of events.
to interpret.
There is an
attempt to
interpret but it is
inconclusive.
 Criterion 20 points 15 points 5 points 0 points

Sourcing Sources used are reliable, Most sources used are
useful, and varied enough to reliable, useful, and but
represent multiple tend to be repetitive in
perspectives. representation. Few
sources are questionable
and not very useful to the
Summary evaluation shows narrative.
the group’s superior grasp
on determining credibility
and authenticity of sources. Summary evaluation shows
the group’s understanding
about credibility and
authenticity of sources.
Most sources used are
questionable but is useful
to the narrative.
Representation and
variation are lacking.
Summary evaluation
shows the group’s basic
grasp on determining
credibility and
authenticity of sources.
All sources used
are questionable
and does not
contribute to the
narrative or no
sources were used.
Summary
evaluation shows
the group’s lack of
knowledge in
determining
credibility and
authenticity of
sources or no
summary was
presented.

Criterion 30 points 20 points 10 points 0 points

Creativity Presentation goes beyond Presentation is Presentation is simple There is no attempt to

Mechanics expectation; elements used
are refreshing, original, and
surprising.
Use of varied media
contributes to the impact of
the narrative and over-all
experience.
adequate and does the but solidifies the be creative and original.
job well. Attempts to narrative presentation. Presentation if flat and
be original are present. Originality is lacking. unimaginative. It is
Media used is varied Media used is obvious that the group
enough to create monotonous. just wanted to submit
interest in the something.
narrative.

Rubrics for individual contribution/group collaboration

Criterion 20 points 15 points 5 points 0 points

The student contributed The student contributed
significantly to the final output. adequately to the final
output.
Has Initiative
Supportive contribution
Main idea of the project
Improvement of the main
Leadership idea
Level of effort Independence in tasking
The student contributed The student did
slightly to the final not contribute
output. significantly to
the final output
Support is more on easy
tasks.
Only receives instruction.
Needs constant
supervision
Mariano, Lyka Mae E.
Accomplished by:

Group
Leader: Esguerra, John Aeron
Members:
1. Cruz, Kyla D.
2. Gurne, Iris V.
3. Hizon, Shyra May
4. Iso, Tracy
5. Mariano, Lyka

Prepared by:

Mr. Arnold P. Santos, LPT.

Professor

Checked by:

Nora L. Puenteblanca, LPT, Ed.D.

Department Head

Approved by:

Cherrie Lyn L. Casco, LPT, Ed.D.

Dean