COURSE CODE / COURSE NAME DCC10012 ENGINEERING DRAWING & CAD

PRESENTATION
COURSEWORK ASSESSMENT
(Topic 11)
SESSION SESI 2: 2022/2023

JABATAN KEJURUTERAAN AWAM

CLO2,P4 PLO5 ASSESSMENT TOOL (%) : PRESENTATION (20%)
DK3 : Engineering Fundamental
Apply appropriate techniques, DK4 : Specialist Knowledge
resources, and modern DK6 : Codified practical engineering
Build 2D plan in engineering drawing engineering and IT tools to well- Knowledge in recognized practice area.
appropriately. defined engineering problems,
with an awareness of the DP1 : Depths of knowledge.
limitations. (DK6) DP4 : Familiarity Issues
DP5 : Extensive Applicable Codes
F2F – 2
NAME
hours
DURATION CLO2 100
REGISTRATION NO. NF2F – 8
hours
PROGRAMME/SECTION TOTAL MARKS 100

TOPIC 11: CIVIL ENGINEERING CADD PROJECT

INSTRUCTION:

Each student is required to PRESENT the building drawing that has been made in Mini Project.
Item to be presented as follow (CLO 2, A3):

i. Explain about floor plan (wall thickness used, size of door & window, scale, etc.);
ii. The use of the draw command;
iii. The use of the modify command;
iv. Layer and;
v. Plot

Prepared by:
HAMIDAH BINTI MOHAMMAD YUNUS
PEGAWAI PENDIDIKAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI
JABATAN KEJURUTERAAN AWAM
POLITEKNIK KEJURUTERAAN AWAM
Course Lecturer
Date: 3.3.2023
Figure 1
~ END OF QUESTIONS ~
Reviewed by:
SITI ZUBAIDAH BINTI JANUDIN
PEGAWAI PENDIDIKAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI
JABATAN KEJURUTERAAN AWAM
POLITEKNIK KEJURUTERAAN AWAM
Course Coordinator/ Head of
Programme/ Head of Department
Date: 3.3.2023
(100 marks based on the rubric)
Endorsed by:
LEDIA ANAK ANGUL
KETUA PROGRAM
DIPLOMA KEJURUTERAAN AWAM
JABATAN KEJURUTERAAN AWAM
POLITEKNIK KEJURUTERAAN AWAM
Head of Programme/Head of
Department/TPA
Date: 3.3.2023
NAME: ____________________________
REG. NO: ____________________________
CLASS:
JABATAN KEJURUTERAAN AWAM
RUBRIC FOR ENGINEERING DRAWING & CADD (DCC10012)
RUBRICS FOR PRESENTATION SESSION 2 2022/2023
CLO3 : Present an understanding of drawing process in mini project presentation verbally.
PL010 :
RUBRIC SCALES
CLO PLO LEVEL DP/NA CRITERIA EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR WEAK VERY WEAK MARKS FULL MARKS
5 4 3 2 1
Ability to identify and describe briefly on the resources (information, technology, external stakeholders – public, client, authority, consultant etc.) meets the requirements of the assignment
Range of resources Invol ved more 4 res ources Invol ved 4 res ources Invol ved 3 res ources Invol ved onl y 2 res ources Invol ved onl y 1 res ourcecs
5 20

Ability to indicate interaction between limited resources (information, technology, external stakeholders – public, client, authority, consultant etc.) involved in the assignment

NA1 Hi gh l evel of i ntera cti ons
between techni ca l a nd
engi neeri ng i s s ues
Level of interactions
Hi gh a bi l i ty to fos ter good
rel a ti ons hi p a nd work together
CLO3 10 A3 effecti vel y towa rds goa l
a chi evement. Very GOOD i n
COOPERATION
Expl a i ni ng i dea s a nd
NA2 i nforma ti on i n dra wi ng a nd
del i ver dra wi ng effecti vel y
Familiarity of issue
Unders ta nd a nd ca n des cri bes
dra wi ng i nforma ti on whi l e
NA3 perform ta s ks a nd ca n expl a i n
ma i n i dea s effecti vel y
Good l evel of i ntera cti ons
between techni ca l a nd
engi neeri ng i s s ues
Abl e to fos ter rel a ti ons hi p a nd
work together towa rds goa l
a chi evement a nd requi re MINOR
i mprovements . Show effort i n
COOPERATION
Expl a i ni ng i dea s a nd
i nforma ti on i n dra wi ng a nd
del i ver dra wi ng modera tel y
Unders ta nd a nd des cri bes
dra wi ng i nforma ti on to perform
ta s ks a nd ca n expl a i n ma i n
i dea s modera tel y
Medi um l evel of i ntera cti ons
between techni ca l a nd
engi neeri ng i s s ues
Abl e to fos ter rel a ti ons hi p a nd
work together towa rds goa l
a chi evement a nd requi re MINOR
i mprovements .
Ability to explain information and work
Ha ve s ome di ffi cul ty i n
expl a i ni ng i dea s a nd
i nforma ti on
Ha ve s ome di ffi cul ty to des cri be
dra wi ng i nforma ti on duri ng
perform ta s ks a nd di ffi cul t to
expl a i n a ny ma i n i dea s .
Sma l l l evel of i ntera cti on
between techni ca l a nd No i ntera cti on 5 20
engi neeri ng i s s ues
Show LESS effort to fos ter good DIFFICULT to fos ter good
rel a ti ons hi p a nd work together rel a ti ons hi p a nd work together
effceti vel y towa rds goa l effceti vel y towa rds goa l 5 20
a chi evement. MINOR a chi evement. NO COOPERATION
COOPERATION
Di ffi cul t i n expl a i ni ng i dea s a nd Ca nnot expl a i n i dea s a nd
i nforma ti on i nforma ti on
5 20
Di ffi cul t to des cri be dra wi ng Ca nnot des cri be dra wi ng
i nforma ti on to perform ta s ks i nforma ti on duri ng performi ng
a nd di ffi cul t to i denti fy a ny ma i n ta s ks a nd ca nnot i denti fy a ny 5 20
i dea s . ma i n i dea s .

Total 25 100

Prepared by : Verified by:

(HAMIDAH BINTI MOHAMMAD YUNUS) (LEDIA ANAK ANGUL)

Course Coordinator Head Of Programme
Diploma Kejuruteraan Awam Diploma Kejuruteraan Awam
Politeknik Kuching Sarawak Politeknik Kuching Sarawak