‫‪Changing in distractions among college students‬‬

‫الطلبة‪:‬‬
‫إبراهيم محمد احمد‬
‫أبو الفضل عبد الواحد حميد‬
‫احمد زين العابدين ممدوح‬

‫مشرف البحث‪:‬‬
‫أ‪.‬د‪ .‬غسان ثابت سعيد‬
 i

Title: Changing in Distractions Among College Students

1. Background Justification:
In today's digital age, distractions have become increasingly prevalent and have a
profound impact on students' academic performance and well-being. With the rapid
advancement of technology and the widespread availability of mobile devices and
social media platforms, college students are exposed to numerous distractions that
hinder their focus and productivity. Understanding the changing nature of
distractions among students in different stages of college is crucial for developing
effective interventions to mitigate their negative consequences.
The proposed study aims to investigate the variations in distractions experienced
by students across different stages of college education, namely the freshman,
sophomore, junior, and senior years. By examining the changing patterns of
distractions, we can gain insights into the specific challenges faced by students at
each stage and identify potential strategies to support their academic success.
2. Objectives:
a. To identify the types of distractions prevalent among students in each stage of
college.
b. To examine the perceived impact of distractions on academic performance and
mental well-being across the different stages.
c. To explore the coping mechanisms employed by students to manage distractions
at each stage.
d. To assess the effectiveness of existing strategies and interventions aimed at
reducing distractions among college students.
e. To propose evidence-based recommendations for educational institutions to
help students combat distractions effectively.

Method:

1.Study Population:
The study population will consist of undergraduate college students from Baghdad
college . The target population will include students from various academic levels.
2.Inclusion Criteria:
a) Currently enrolled undergraduate college students.
b) Age between 18 and 25 years.
c) Willingness to participate in the study.
d) Able to provide informed consent.
e) Diverse representation across gender, and academic disciplines.
3.Exclusion Criteria:
a) Graduate students or students pursuing professional degrees.
b) Students below 18 or above 25 years of age.
c) Students who do not provide informed consent.
d) Students with visual impairments or other disabilities that may affect their
ability to engage in the study.
e) Students who are not regular users of electronic devices (e.g., smartphones,
laptops, tablets).
4.Study Design:
The study will employ a longitudinal design to examine changes in distraction
patterns among college students over a specific period, such as a semester or
academic year. The study will involve collecting data at multiple time points to
assess fluctuations in distraction levels.
5.Survey Questionnaire:
The survey questionnaire will capture information related to distraction patterns
and their impact on academic performance. The questionnaire will include sections
such as:
a) Demographic information: age, gender, ethnicity, academic discipline, year of
study, etc.
b) Device usage: frequency and duration of using electronic devices for academic
and non-academic purposes.
c) Distraction sources: identification of common distractions, such as social media,
online platforms, notifications, etc.
d) Perceived impact: participants' perception of how distractions affect their
concentration, focus, and academic performance.
e) Coping strategies: exploration of strategies participants employ to manage
distractions and enhance productivity.
6.Sampling Procedure:
A random sampling approach will be used to ensure representative data from
various academic disciplines. The list of undergraduate students will be obtained
from the university registrar's office, and a random sample of students will be
selected. Invitations to participate in the study will be sent to the selected students
through email or other communication channels.
7.Sample Size:
The sample size will be determined based on power analysis, considering an
estimated effect size, desired level of significance, and statistical power. A sample
size of at least 300 participants is targeted to ensure sufficient statistical power for
the analysis.

8.Data Collection:
Data will be collected using an online survey platform or a combination of online
and in-person surveys. Participants will be provided with a unique survey link or
invited to complete the survey during a designated session. Informed consent will
be obtained before participants begin the survey, and confidentiality of responses
will be ensured. For the longitudinal aspect of the study, participants will be
invited to complete follow-up surveys at subsequent time points to track changes in
distraction patterns.
3.Expected Outcomes:
The study aims to contribute to the existing literature by providing a
comprehensive understanding of changing distractions among college students.
The findings will inform educational institutions, policymakers, and student
support services about the specific challenges faced by students at different stages
and guide the development of tailored interventions to minimize distractions and
enhance academic success.
1 Junco, R., Merson, D., & Salter, D. W. (2010). The effect of online multitasking
on academic performance and working memory in college students. Computers &
Education, 59(1), 134-141.
2 Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting
made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in
Human Behavior, 29(3), 948-958.
3 Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2014). The relationship between
cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of US college students. Sage
Open, 4(1), 215824401452877.
4 Junco, R. (2015). Student class standing, Facebook use, and academic
performance. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 18-29.
5 Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2003). The laptop and the lecture: The effects of
multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education,
15(1), 46-64.
6 Kuznekoff, J. H., & Titsworth, S. (2013). The impact of mobile phone usage on
student learning. Communication Education, 62(3), 233-252.
7 Uncapher, M. R., & Wagner, A. D. (2018). Minds and brains of media
multitaskers: Current findings and future directions. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 115(40), 9889-9896.
8 Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., Rosen, L. D., Benitez, S., & Chang, J. (2009).
Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in
three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), .
9 Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2012). No A 4 U: The relationship between
multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education, 59.
10 Hadlington, L., & O’Hora, D. (2018). The effect of multitasking on the
academic performance of undergraduate students: An experimental study.
Computers in Human Behavior, 79,