Project/Thesis 2 Report Marking Rubric

Group No.: GROUP 7

Project: EVALUATION OF DIMETHYL KETONE (ACETONE) EXTRACTED FROM EGGSHELLS AS AN ALTERNATIVE ROCK DEGREASER
Assessor:
Project/Thesis 2
Thesis/Project Report (35%)
Total Weight- Actual Scoring
Area Criteria
Marks age Marks Band
English, 8 - 10 The report has all the sections presented in a neat and
Writing Style, 5-7 The report has most sections presented in a neat and tidy
ILO4 1.0 3-4 The report has most sections presented in a messy
Format and
Structure 0-2 Inadequate sections presented in a messy manner and
8 - 10 Very clear research background, statement of the
5-7 Somewhat clear research background, statement of the
ILO 4 Introduction 0.5 3-4 Somewhat clear research background, statement of the
0-2 Unclear research background, statement of the problem,
8 - 10 Literature reviewed is comprehensive, relevant and up to
Critical 5-7 Literature reviewed is relevant and up to date. Limited
ILO4 Literature 1.0 3-4 Student reported on the literature reviewed. Limited
Review 0-2 Student reported on the literature reviewed but there is
8 - 10 Methodology is completely aligned with objectives.
Research 5-7 Methodology is completely aligned with objectives.
ILO1 1.5 3-4 Methodology is aligned with objectives. Implementation
Methodology
0-2 Methodology is only slightly aligned with objectives.
8-10 Clear application of appropriate techniques, resources,
Application of 5 -7 Some application of appropriate techniques, resources,
ILO2 0.5 3-4 Minimal application of appropriate techniques, resources,
Techniques
0-2 No clear application of appropriate techniques,
8-10 Research/ results clearly explains the impact towards
Project 5-7 Some impact of research/ results towards societal,
ILO5 0.5 3-4 Limited indication of research/ results that explains the
Analysis
0-2 Unclear indication of research/ results that explains the
8-10 Impact of research towards societal, health, safety, legal,
Impact on 5-7 Informed reasoning and contextual knowledge on impact
ILO5 0.5 3-4 Informed reseasoning and contextual knowledge on
Society
0-2 Informed reseasoning and contextual knowledge on
8 - 10 Results are displayed clearly, in an organized manner
Results and 5-7 Results are displayed clearly using appropriate visuals.
ILO2 2.5 3-4 Results are displayed but visuals used are not
Discussion
0-2 Results are displayed but visuals used are not
8 - 10 Conclusion fully summarizes research findings, aligns with
Conclusions 5-7 Conclusion summarizes research findings, aligns with
ILO
and Future 1.0 3-4 Conclusion summarizes research findings, aligns with
2
Work 0-2 Conclusion is not an adequate summary.
8 - 10 All work from other researchers is properly cited and
Citations, 5-7 Most of the citations and referencing is presented in
ILO
References/ 1.0 3-4 The citations and referencing is presented in proper
4
Appendix 0-2 The citations and referencing is presented in wrong
Total
Total mark would be converted to 35%

*Please key into white coloured cells only

SUMMARY OF LO SCORES
ILO1
ILO2
ILO4
ILO5

CONVERTED MARKS (%)