Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HYDRAULICS LABORATORY
ECW437
OPEN-ENDED LAB
SEMESTER III
MARKS COMMENTS
INTRODUCTION
BASIC CONCEPTS
METHODOLOGY
RESULTS
DISCUSSION 1 2 3 4 5
CONCLUSION 1 2 3 4 5
ORGANIZATION 1 2 3 4 5
TOTAL MARKS
Introduction
Objectives
Learning Outcomes
Theoretical Background
For static equilibrium of the pontoon, the total weight, W (which acts
through the centre of gravity, G’) must be equal to the buoyancy force, F
which acts through the centre of buoyancy, B which is located at the
centroid of the immersed cross-section. When the pontoon heels through a
small angle, the metacentre, M is identified as the point of intersection
between the line of action of the buoyancy force (always vertical) and BG
extended. For stable equilibrium, M must be above G.
When the traversing weight is moved to one side, the centre of gravity, G
shifts to a new position, G' and the centre of buoyancy, B also shifts to
anew position, B'. Since the shift in the centre of gravity was caused by
moving the weigh, P through a distance X then:
P x X = W x GG' (i)
From Figure 1,
PX
GM = (iii)
W tan(θ)
Where
W = Total weight of the pontoon (N)
P = Weight of movable mass (N)
X = Distance between the movable mass and the mass of
the pontoon (m)
GM = BM – BG (iv)
BM = Ig / v
where Ig = LB3 / 12
V=LBdi (v)
dᵢ
BG = y− (vi)
2
W
V= (vii)
⍴g
Therefore from Eq. (v), the immersed depth of the floating pontoon is
given by:
V
dᵢ= (viii)
LB
Apparatus:
Procedures:
1. Weight the traversable mass, P used for traversing across the
pontoon width.
2. Assemble the pontoon mast and together with the traversable mass,
P and sliding mass, the total weight, W are measured using Weigh
Balance.
3. Position the sliding mass on the mast to give the location of the
centre of gravity, G for the whole assembly at the level of the top
of the pontoon. The position of G can be determined by:
a. Use of a knife-edge
b. Tying a fine string tightly around the mast and
RESULTS
Pontoon Pontoon Pontoon Traversa Total Centre Immersed
Length, Width, b Height, ble weight, of depth, di
L (m) (m) d(m) mass, W (kg) Gravity, (m)
P(kg) G(m)
0.35 0.2 0.075 0.3037 1.5221 0.11 0.02
1. GM = BM - BG
= 0.1664286 - 0.1
= 0.0664286m
2. BM = Ig / v
= (0.000233) / (0.0014)
=0.1664286
3. Ig = Lb3/12
= (0.35)(0.2)3/12
=0.000233
4. v = LBdi
=(0.35)(0.2)(0.02)
=0.0014
5. BG = y -(di/2)
= (0.11 ) - (0.02/2)
= 0.1
Metacentric Height,GM
0.07
0.07 f(x) = 0 x + 0.06
0.06
0.06
0.05
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Angle of Heel
At θ = 0 ,
GM = 0.0007θ + 0.06
GM = 0.0007(0)+0.06
GM = 0.06m
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that the position of metacentre of a floating body
decreases as the distance from the centre of gravity increases. This
shows that the stability of a floating body also decreases. The procedure
of determination of metacentric height, as well as application to the
stability of floating bodies has been discussed. For a stable equilibrium,
the metacentric height must be above of its centre of gravity.
DISCUSSION
Metacentre is the point of intersection of the buoyant force and the centre
of gravity. In order to verify the stability conditions of an immersed body,
it is necessary to locate its metacentric point. One of the conditions is that
the centre of buoyancy and centre of gravity are coincident, the body is
stable. It is indicated that the stability decreases with an increases in the
CG point. The lower values of metacentric heights result in larger list
angles for similar displacement of the traversable mass.
Based on the experiment, the result follows the theory as expected. The
traversable mass was changed individually from 0.01 – 0.07 m to obtain
different values of angles and GM. Although it became unstable as the
experiment carried on, it still was stable enough to produce a moment to
counter the action as the metacenter increases. From the result
obtained, a graph of metacentric height, GM against angle of heel was
drawn. A straight line was drawn to study the behavior of the graph. It
shows that the value of GM increases with increase of angle of heel.
There are possible sources of errors such as human error as the error of
parallax when taking measurements, as well as the error due to
inaccurate measuring equipment. In order to achieve a better accuracy
REFERENCES
Labmonk. (n.d). Determination of Metacentric Height and Application to Stability of
Floating Bodies. Retrieved from https://labmonk.com/determination-of-metacentric-
height-and-application-to-stability-of-floating-bodies
Coderogs. (2011). Stability and Metacentric Height. Retrieved from
https://www.codecogs.com/library/engineering/fluid_mechanics/floating_bodies/stability
-and-metacentric-height.php
Wikipedia. Metacentric Height. Retrieved from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacentric_height#:~:text=The%20metacentric%20height
%20(GM)%20is,a%20ship%20and%20its%20metacentre.