Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Course Overview
The business challenges amidst the turbulence require organizations to design and implement their structures,
processes, and systems around people. This in turn allows them to flourish-and spur a change and growth in the
competitive markets. An integral part of this would include a study of human behavior in organizations.
Organizational Behavior course is designed to shape personal and interpersonal dynamics for individual’s
effectiveness, to develop ability to work with others and understand organizational variables to make better decisions.
It is expected that after learning the various aspects of human behavior and organization dynamics as put together in
the course, individuals will undergo personal transformation and shall be able to deal effectively with complex
organizational scenarios like the recent pandemic. To do this, a variety of activities will be put to practice. Major
parts of the course will be delivered through instruments/tools, experiential exercises and cases. This will enhance
learning and problem-solving in organizations. Specific topics to be covered include: self-awareness, personality,
attitude, motivation, interpersonal relationships and handling conflict, team, and leadership
4. Prescribed Text
Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A. & Vohra, N. (2014). Organisational Behaviour. (16th ed.). New Delhi: Pearson.
5. Additional Resources:
Nelson, Quick & Khandelwal (2011), ORGB, 2nd Edition, Cengage Learning, New Delhi.
Parikh, Margie and Gupta, Rajen (2010) Organizational Behaviour, Tata McGraw Hill: New Delhi.
McShane, Steven L.; Von Glinow, Mary A. and Sharma, Radha R. (2005) Organizational Behavior, 5 th Edition,
Tata McGraw Hill: New Delhi
Internet Resources (as advised by the faculty during classroom sessions)
6. Session Plan
Session Session Topic Session Learning CLOs Reading / Pedagogy Flipped Videos /
No. Outcomes (SLOs) References Links
Module I: Individuals as Contributors to Organizational Effectiveness
1 Understanding To identify the 1 Text, Ch.1, Discussion Examples from
the relevance of relevance of human pp. 5-25 Contemporary
studying human behavior in the Organizations
behavior in the workplace
workplace
2 Self-concept To understand self- 1-2 Text, Ch.6, Instrument: https://
concept and pp. 163-165 Johari Window www.youtube.co
appreciate self in www.simplyp m/watch?
relation to others sychology.org v=griFNIlmEj4
/self-
concept.html
3 Demystifying To decode various 1-2 Text, Ch.5, Instrument: The https://
Personality dimensions of pp. 133-136 Big Five Model www.youtube.co
personality m/watch?
v=Ng1Ed_872O
4&t=62s
4 Beliefs, Values To identify dominant 1-2 Text Ch. 3 Instrument: https://
& Attitude values in self and pp. 68-72 Rokeach’s www.youtube.co
appreciate Value Survey m/watch?
differences in values http:// v=XUhsNIeIgpY
in others faculty.wwu.e &t=38s
du/tyrank/
To relate to the Rokeach
attitude formation %20Value
process %20Survey.pd
f
5 Perception & To develop the 2 Text Ch. 6 Discussion & https://
It’s Pitfalls ability to pp. 162-169 Exercise: Cave www.youtube.co
differentiate Rescue m/watch?
perception from v=X18YI592T_o
reality and its impact
on decision-making https://
www.youtube.co
m/watch?
v=vJG698U2Mv
o
Module II: Managing Self & Others
https://
hbr.org/
1992/05/the-
new-
boundaries-of-
the-
boundaryless-
company
17 Organization To understand the 1 Text Ch.16, Discussion &
Culture characteristics of 17
organisational Pp. 504-525
culture
Instrument:
Rate Your
Classroom
Culture
7. Assessment Tasks
Assessment Assessment Type Weightage CLO Week Due
1. Quiz Individual Task (Moodle-based) 20% 1 8th & 16th
Session
2. Personal Journal + Individual Task 20% + 2 13th Session
Reflection on Self-Assessment 10%
Measures
3. Metaphors of Organization Team Activity 20% 3 15th Session
4. Field Project Group Project (Viva-Voce + 30% 3 Session 18-20
Report)
Assessment 1: Quiz (10+10 Marks)
1) Assessment Detail: Two pre-announced quizzes will be conducted and both will be considered for the assessment.
2) Criteria used to grade this task: Individual
3) Task Assessor: Internal Faculty
4) Submission Detail: Moodle-based
5) Feedback: Feedback can be seen after quiz submission and would be discussed in subsequent session(s).
Assessment Task 2: Personal Journal + Reflection on Self-Assessment Measures (20+10 = 30 Marks)
1) Assessment Details: A personal journal detailing the journey in life/career so far followed by a Self-assessment
Portfolio to be prepared based on the instruments Johari Window, Big Five Model, Rokeach’s Value Survey, Cave
Rescue, Conflict Handling Style, Desert Survival, Leadership Style & Classroom Culture.
2) Criteria used to grade this task: Comprehension (40%), Reflection (50%), Plan of Action (10%)
3) Task Assessor: Internal Faculty
4) Suggested time to devote to this task: 8 hours
5) Submission details: Soft copy
6) Feedback and return of work: After the assessment, instruments will be returned.
Rubrics
Criterion Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectation
(Below 35%) (35%-below 70%) (Above 70%)
Clarity Not able to explain points Explains points clearly; Explains points explicitly with specific
clearly. Lacks focus and points relate to overall explanatory detail backed up with
points put forth do not argument. relevant research/information/examples;
relate to the overall/main points relate and support the overall
argument or idea. argument.
Organization Presents information in Presents information Presents information in a
a cluttered manner with no in a logical sequence. clear and logical order supported by
logical sequencing or relevant illustrations and examples.
progression of ideas. The final point is quite
clearly brought out. The final point/conclusion is well
The main point is obscured supported through a well- structured
and not visible from the set of arguments.
report.
Content Poor command over Good command over Excellent command over subject matter.
subject matter. subject matter.
Covers every dimension of the subject
Provides irrelevant and Is able substantiate the matter and uses relevant and
inadequate information to arguments with relevant comprehensive information to back up
support arguments. and adequate information the arguments.
reasonably well.
*To be used in writing AOL report
Rubrics
Criterion Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectation
(Below 35%) (35%-below 70%) (Above 70%)
Working with Rarely listens to, shares with, Usually listens to, shares, Almost always listens to,
others and supports the efforts of with, and supports the shares with, and supports the
others. Often is not a good efforts of others. efforts of others.
team player Tries to keep people working
well together.
Contribution Rarely provides useful ideas Usually provides useful Routinely provides useful
when participating in a group ideas when participating in ideas when participating in a
task. a group task. group task.
May refuse to participate A strong group member A leader who contributes a lot
who tries hard of effort
Attitude Is often publicly critical of the Is rarely publicly critical Is never publicly critical of the
project or the work of other of the project or the work project or the work of others.
members of the group. of others. Always has a positive attitude
Is often negative about the Often has a positive about the task(s)
task(s) attitude about the task(s)
LMS-Moodle/Impartus:
LMS-Moodle/Impartus is used to host course resources for all courses. Students can download Lecture, additional
reading materials, and tutorial notes to support class participation.
Late Submission
Assessment tasks submitted after the due date, without prior approval/arrangement, will be not be accepted.
Plagiarism:
Plagiarism is looked at as the presentation of the expressed thought or work of another person as though it is one's
own without properly acknowledging that person.
Cases of plagiarism will be dealt with according to Plagiarism Policy of the institute. It is advisable that students
should read Student Handbook for detailed guidelines. It is also advisable that students must not allow other students
to copy their work and must take care to safeguard against this happening. In cases of copying, normally all students
involved will be penalized equally; an exception will be if the student can demonstrate the work is their own and they
took reasonable care to safeguard against copying.
----