West African Exploration and Production Co.

Limited
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT SHEET

Comments Sheet Number: OM72-BVN-DCC-CMM-0024

OM72-BVN-CT23-FAC-RPT-0005-R01 Transmittal Number:

Document Number:
Reviewed By:
Structural In place Analysis Report for
Document Tittle: KCDP - A Felix Ajayi
Approved By:
Date: 30-10-2023
B
Submitted By: Return Code:

Item Section / para Comment Contractor Response Client’s Final Position

1 Section 2 – 1) Kindly include the DPR design regulation 1992 in the list of Noted. To be
Reference references. The only local regulation available implemented in the next
documents 2) For ease of reference, kindly number all documents and update.
state clearly the versions of the documents used
2 3.1 Platform Key 1) Riser – Risers are not modelled. How are riser loads simulated? Noted. To be
features. What are the sizes of the risers? implemented in the next
3) Jacket information is missing on this chart. Populate as we have update. However the
it for KCDP-B existing as-built was used
4) Pile penetration – Present the as-built pile penetration here for the design.

3 Table 4-1/7.1 Overstressed members should be highlighted (preferably in red Noted. To be

Page 1 of 5
 West African Exploration and Production Co. Limited
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT SHEET

Member UCs. fonts) implemented in the next

update.

4 4.2 Minimum Pile Pile summary results should include the UCs for the piles Noted. To be
Factor of Safety implemented in the next
update.

5 5.5 - Environmental 1) For extreme environmental conditions, it is an overkill to combine Noted. To be

Criteria all the 3 extreme conditions together. It is impossible for all 3 to act implemented in the next
together. Check Metocean vs 2.1 for guidance. (Chapter 2.3 update.
provides needed guidance)
6 5.7 Marine Provide a note on the source of the marine growth information. Are Noted. To be
Growth they consistent with the inspection reports? implemented in the next
update. It is consistent
with KCDP-A Inspection
report.

7 Section 5 – Analysis Member group table is missing. The table should display the Noted. To be
Model original sizes of tubular members and the reduced sizes used in the implemented in the next
analysis for corrosion simulation update.

8 5.10 Materials yield strength assumption here is not consistent with the Noted. To be
information on section 5.2. Reconcile. Yield strength should be implemented in the next
based on as-built documentation update.

9 6.1 Basic Load 1) Insert load diagrams for each load ID. On the main deck for Noted. To be
Cases instance, it is desirable to know where 500psf/350psf are applied implemented in the next
and why. update.

Page 2 of 5
 West African Exploration and Production Co. Limited
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT SHEET

2) Are there load factors applied on these loads? Present them.

3) Helideck operating load is missing in the consideration, include it
10 6.2 Environmental Based on comments 5, there should be 3 different layers of Noted. To be
Basic Load Cases extreme load combinations implemented in the next
a) 100-year wave with associated wind and current update.
b) 100-year wind with associated wave and current
c) 100-year current with associated wind and wave

11 6.3 Crane Basic Load TC30-40-70 has been assumed for the analysis. Noted. The new crane
Cases The crane size WAEP plans to install is T25-25-40. T25-25-40 is lighter and
If the heavier crane is not causing over stresses on the members, it so will be adopted. To be
can be retained, otherwise, we should revert to T25-25-40. implemented in the next
update.

12 6.4 Load The load factors here are not consistent with the BoA and other Noted. To be
Combinations documents already reviewed. Ensure the BoA drives this implemented in the next
update.

13 7.2 Pile Unity Check F.o.S for piles per DPR regulation is a minimum of 2.0 for all Noted. This was
and Factor of Safety conditions. Let this be among the considerations fulfilled considered for the design

14 CONCLUSION AND 1) Actual crane size is now available. (check comment 11) Noted. The new crane is
RECOMMENDATIO 2) The implications of the overstressed members (if any) need lighter and so will be
N to be stated in the recommendations. adopted. To be
3) Itemise and state all recommendations clearly implemented in the next
update.

15 A3.4 Pile 108m featured as the pile penetration. This was not mentioned Noted. To be

Page 3 of 5
 West African Exploration and Production Co. Limited
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT SHEET

Maximum Axial anywhere in the main document. implemented in the next

Capacity Summary What is the source of this info? update.

Page 4 of 5
 West African Exploration and Production Co. Limited
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT SHEET

DOCUMENT RETURN CODES:

CODE MEANING
A ACCEPTED- Do not resubmit unless document is modified: Operations may proceed.
B ACCEPTED AS NOTED- Revise to incorporate comments & resubmit: Operations may
proceed.
C NOT ACCEPTED- Revise to incorporate comments and resubmit: Operations must not
proceed
D INFORMATION ONLY- No impact on program

Page 5 of 5