Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KC 4706014
KC 4706014
1
ภาควิชาเทคโนโลยีการบรรจุ คณะอุตสาหกรรมเกษตร มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร วิทยาเขตบางเขน กรุงเทพมหานคร 10900
Department of Packaging Technology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Bangkhen Campus, Bangkok, 10900
INTRODUCTION
Oil palm fronds used in this study were obtained from a local oil palm mill in Chonburi
Province, Thailand in form of stalk. Prior to the pulping process, the raw material was cut to
approximately 5-10 cm in length and air dried. Cationic starch (TAPLINK-3) from Tapioca
Development Corp., Ltd., whose moisture content of 11.56%, pH of 6.24 and degree of substitution of
0.035 was used as dry strength agent. Alkyl ketene dimer size emulsion (AKD, EKA DR C221) with
solid containing of 12.5%, cationic charge, and pH ranging from 2.5-4.0 was supplied by Eka
Chemicals. Moreover, Granny Smith Apples (size 113) were used as fruit samples for vibration
testing.
Sulfate process was employed for oil palm frond pulping. The pulping condition was as
following: liquor-to-material ratio is 5:1, time for cooking 180 minutes under a controlled temperature
of 160 °C, sulfidity of 25%, and the active alkali equals 16%. Prior to blending additives with pulp,
cationic starch was first cooked under 95 °C with continuous agitation. Varied proportions of starch
and AKD in solution were added into the pulp stock. The 60 g/m2 of handsheets were prepared and
cured under 100 °C for 5 minutes and conditioned at 27 °C with 65 %RH for at least 24 hours before
testing. Mechanical and physical properties in terms of tensile, tear, burst and water resistances, and
contact angle at periods of 0, 30, and 60 second as well as surface analysis with scanning electron
microscope (SEM) were examined.
Vibration testing
The vibration testing was performed under the Lansmont's Model 1000 vibration test system.
Random vibration to simulate a truck vibration system level in accordance with ASTM 4169 was
selected. Bruising on sampled apples beheld in molded pulp packaging made from oil palm frond
compared to ones from recycled paper and foam accounted from vibration during transportation was
determined. Three damage parameters include percent bruised apples, average bruises per apple,
and average bruise area per apple.
Comparison of fiber dimensions and derived indices of oil palm portions are listed in Table 1.
Fibers from EFB and trunk appear much shorter yet narrower than ones from frond. This gives higher
slenderness ratio; hence better tearing resistance. Furthermore, frond fibers were stiffer and less
flexible, and then may cause bulkier paper than EFB and trunk according to higher Runkel ratio
(Walter, 1980). From this morphology, it is necessarily to add other agents for enhancing strength
properties of paper from oil palm frond.
Table 2. Mechanical and physical properties of handsheets after blending with cationic starch and
AKD
Blending proportion
Properties
(% OD weight)
Tensile index Tear index Burst index Water
Cationic starch AKD
(Nm/g) (Nm2/g) (Pa-m2/g) resistance (sec)
0.0 0.0 51.59a 0.0113ab 3820a 40a
1.0 0.4 52.17a 0.0103a 3570a 210a
1.0 0.5 51.97a 0.0106a 3700a 340a
1.2 0.4 54.30ab 0.0113ab 4160b 2740b
1.2 0.5 57.90ab 0.0111ab 3790a 2770b
1.4 0.4 62.45b 0.0102a 4220b 2800b
1.4 0.5 61.05b 0.0127b 4180b 4210c
abc
Means in the same column with different superscripts are statistically significantly different at the
5% level by DMRT ตร์ าส
ต ร ศ
Table 3. Contact angle of ัยliquidเ กษ drop reacted on pulp sheets with blending of cationic starch and
าล
AKD ิาวทย
ห
ัิทล ม (% OD weight)
Blending proportion Contact angle at various times (degree)
Cationic
ม ร ู้ดิจstarch AKD 0 second 30 second 60 second
คว า 0.0 0.0 40.31d 22.00e 0.00e
คลัง 1.0 0.4 78.79c 71.50d 70.00d
1.0 0.5 88.13bc 81.75cd 78.88cd
1.2 0.4 96.33ab 91.50bc 87.50bc
1.2 0.5 100.50ab 96.33ab 91.33b
1.4 0.4 102.33ab 99.50ab 94.83b
1.4 0.5 112.50a 108.17a 107.17a
abc
Means in the same column with different superscripts are statistically significantly different at the
5% level by DMRT
(a)
ต ร ์
าส
(e) ษตรศ (f) (g)
เก
ย าลัย
Fig 1. SEM micrograph า ว ิท (X500, 10keV) of pulp sheets with additive blending based on %OD fiber
ห
weight (a: control;ัิทล ม b: cationic starch 1.0%, AKD 0.4%; c: cationic starch 1.0%, AKD 0.5%; d: cationic
starch 1.2%,
ม ร ู้ดิจ AKD 0.4%; e: cationic starch 1.2%, AKD 0.5%; f: cationic starch 1.4%, AKD 0.4%; g:
คว า
คลัง
cationic starch 1.4%, AKD 0.5%)
Mechanical properties of the obtained molded pulp packaging are indicated in Table 4. The
compression testing showed that packaging using oil palm frond withstands greater compression
loads than the commercial ones using recycled paper and foam under both standard and cold
storage conditions. Based on the vibration results, damages in terms of percent bruised fruit, average
bruises per fruit, and average bruise area per fruit beheld in molded pulp packaging from oil palm
frond showed a greater extent (Table 5). This is caused by foam packaging has higher flexibility,
regarding its morphological properties as stated previously, hence reduces the greater impact of
apple and affects the lesser damage under the vibration testing.
Table 4. Comparison on compression strength between molded pulp packaging using oil palm frond
and commercial molded pulp packaging
Compression load at 15 mm deformation (N)
Packaging material types
Standard condition Cold storage condition
Oil palm frond 1894.45a 1679.05a
Commercial
- Recycled paper 1836.65a 1392.65b
- Foam 1161.85b 1168.4c
abc
Means in the same column with different superscripts are statistically significantly different at the
5% level by DMRT
Table 5. Comparison on damage toward apples in molded pulp packaging using oil palm frond and
commercial molded pulp packaging
Apple damage data
Packaging material
Percent bruised Average number of Average bruise
types
apple (%) bruises per apple area per fruit (mm2)
Oil palm frond 88.89a 3.84a 268.90a
Commercial
- Recycled paper 64.44aร์ 1.60b 53.74b
า ส ตb
- Foam 0.00
ศ 0.00c 0.00c
ษตร different superscripts are statistically significantly different at the
เก
abc
Means in the same column with
ล ย
ั
5% level by DMRT ยา
า ว ิท
มห
ัล
ิู้ดจิท CONCLUSION
ว า มร
คลังค This study shows the possibility of utilizing residue from oil palm plantation. Pulp from oil palm
frond was selected for making molded pulp packaging, intended to add values of such wastes.
Sulfate or kraft process was used for pulping, mechanical and physical properties in terms of tensile
tearing and bursting indices along with water resistance were improved by cationic starch and AKD.
From the results obtained, oil palm fronds are capable of being used for molded pulp packaging.
Upon the comparison on compression strength of molded pulp packaging using oil palm frond with
commercial molded pulp packaging using recycled paper and foam indicated that the oil palm frond
packaging is stronger than the commercial ones. Also, vibration testing simulating the transportation
system illustrated that the oil palm packaging performed higher stiffness, hence yielding greater
extent of damages on apples. By all means, it is necessarily that this dilemma should be restrained in
the further research to resolve if any similar agricultural product is handled in oil palm packaging.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to thank Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute
(KURDI) for their financial support under the project of Special Research Unit (SRU 4.48).
REFERENCES
Abusamah, A., T.H. Chin, R.N. Kumar and H.D. Rozman. 1994. Sheet Moulding Compounds Based
on Palm Fruit Pressed Fibre, National Seminar on Utilization of Palm Tree and other Palms,
Forest Research Institute of Malaysia, Malaysia.
Au, C.O. and I. Thorn. 1995. Application of wet-end paper chemistry. Chapman and Hall, London.
Chew, L.T. and C.L. Ong. 1985. Particleboard from Oil Palm Trunk. Proceeding of the Natural
Symposium on Oil Palm By-Products from Agro-Based Industries. Kuala Lumper, Malaysia.
Khoo, K.C. and T.W. Lee. 1991. Pulp and paper from the oil palm, Appita J., 44(6), 385-391.
Lim, W.J., Liang, Y.T. and P.A., Seib. 1992. Cationic oat starch: Preparation and effect on paper
strength. Cereal Chem. 69(3), 237-239.
ร์
Roberts, J.C. 1991. Paper chemistry.สตChapmann and Hall. London.
ศ า
Rowell, M.R., Young, R.Y. and ษJ.K., ตร Rowell. 1997. Paper and Composites from Agro-Based
Resources. CRCาลPress,ัยเก Florida.
ว ิทย Plants and Their Fibres as Building Materials. Chapman and Hall. USA.
Sobral, H.S. 1990. าVegetable
ห
Walter, I.B.1980.ัิทล มPulp and Paper : Chemistry and Chemical Technology. 3rd ed. Vol. 1. A Wiley-
า รู้ดิจ
มInterscience Publication, John Wiley and Son.
คว
คลัง