Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ID: G00380167
Previous Knowledge
Previous Skills
Students have marked out and cut the pins, tails and tenons. They have also marked out the
mortices.
2. LESSON RATIONALE
Brief outline of WHY this content is the basis of the lesson and why you have selected these KEY*
particular teaching, learning and assessment strategies- a justification for the lesson.
• Making the Paper Towel Holder will allow the students to learn about and become NL
more confident marking out, measuring, sawing, using a chisel, sanding, finishing
and assembly.
• These skills must be learned to complete their final third year Junior Certificate RL
project.
• I will use observation, questioning and self-assessment strategies. RL
45 – 50 mins
Reinforced learning - sanding
Recap
65 – 73 mins The teacher recaps on the lesson
by reinforcing the learning CL
Students listen to recap, and
intentions and has a question and MA
answer teachers’ questions and get
answering session.
involved in the discussion
GI
The teacher encourages students to
get involved in the discussion.
The teacher will ask the quieter
students questions.
O
1. Process mortise. The students will answer…
2. Sand the wood. CL
3. Complete work safely.
MA
The teacher will have a positive GI
comment. Well done class, looking
forward to next class… Thanks sir…………
CLOSURE (END)
*KEY: L=Literacy, N=Numeracy, O=Oracy, G=Graphicacy, SEN=Special Educational Needs, MA=Mixed Ability, CL=
Cooperative Learning, GI=Gender Inclusion & MI=Multicultural Inclusion.
Design
• The project is small (300mm x 150mm).
• Creative design that is quick to make, saving energy, time, and resources.
Hand tools
• 90 % of the project is completed with hand tools, which develops better skills.
Sandpaper box
• The sandpaper can be used again in the next class; students return sandpaper to the box.
Observation Type In-person visit / Live-streamed / Professional Dialogical Review (please highlight)
Reviewed lesson: NO. PUPILS: 18(5 girls) SUBJECT: Wood Tech Topic: Paper Towel Holder
Date: 15/11/23
REVIEWED LESSON(S): FEEDBACK ON CORE SKILLS (please tick or highlight)
Core Skills (as evidenced by the type of observation) Poor Fair Good Very Excellent
Good
Preparation & Planning: Knows pupils’ names; seating plan; SP files are fully X
up to date, detailed lesson plan, variety of professional original lesson resources
that are source referenced (author’s name).
Lesson Structure: 1. Set induction (orderly start, recap, learning intentions & X
plan for the lesson), 2. A planned series of new active learning activities & 3.
Closure (reinforcement of learning, active recap, homework, tidy, orderly exit).
Professional in appearance and approach. You are the standard bearer as far as I am concerned of how
student teacher should present:3rdyr standard upheld. Treoiraithe were most positive in their
comments and appraisal of your teaching, preparation and willingness to integrate into the of the life
school.
Preparation and detailed attention to all documentation. Lesson plans are well constructed and include
questions (L and H order to direct student activity). Active learning is the foundation of the lessons.
There is also a very clear emphasis on accuracy and respect for the materials. Timing and transitions
were excellent.
Demonstrations were very good with plenty of student involvement and challenging questioning. The
AR theme of sustainability was nicely integrated in the lesson.
You might consider the bench seating arrangements. Is it necessary for all the girls to sit together?
When you are using Cooperative Learning structures you will create different partnerships as the year
goes on.
We examined the core value of design in the curriculum. This is an area where you can show innovation and
creativity. Projects are too often simply presented as a working drawing with the concept of “design” included
with some minor addition at the end. Instead of this the alternatives of design can be explored. If this approach is
central to your teaching, then come JC design project students will be well prepared and I imagine will find
additional enjoyment in the subject.
We discussed the notion of looking for cross curricular opportunities in the projects being completed. This helps
promote the place of the practical subjects in the school curriculum and allows you to integrate in a professional
manner with teachers in other disciplines.
1. FORMATIVE FEEDBACK: The school placement evaluation is formative and intended for your
improvement during SP. It will also form the basis of SP Tutor Reviews, post-lesson. Student teachers
must take detailed notes during the post lesson review and implement suggestions.
2. SP ASSESSMENT REPORT: Tutors to upload the SP Assessment report to the student’s One Drive
reports folder, within three working days, and are to email the students, informing them that the
report is uploaded, and asking them to hyperlink to the Excel administration page.
3. SUMMATIVE GRADE: For equity, ALL students will be summatively graded by SP tutors AFTER
placement, in the same manner, with a particular focus on: 1) SP PLANNING FILES, 2) CLASSROOM
DELIVERY, 3) REFLECTIONS, & 4) POST-LESSON ASSESSMENT REPORTS, by tutors.
4. GENERAL PERFORMANCE INDICATOTOR. Following the SP lesson assessment, a general indicator of
performance is provided, to be seen as a tentative guide only:
5.
*NOTE: The above indicator of performance may be revised. This is merely an initial impression of
performance. In line with reflective practice, supervisors are subsequently required to reflect more deeply
upon the experience, analyse its components more thoroughly, and dialogue with other supervisors before
coming to a final assessment, which may or may not differ from the original.
WISHING YOU THE VERY BEST ON SCHOOL PLACEMENT!