Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
REGION III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CABANATUAN CITY
POLILLO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for IFCRF

Name of Employee : ___________________________ Name of Rater : PERLA C. GARCIA

Position : Teacher I Position : Master Teacher I

Bureau/ Center/ Service/ Division : Date of Review : January 24, 2024
Rating Period : S.Y. 2023 – 2024

MFOs DOMAIN OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Mid Year Review/ Rating MID-YEAR
PER PERF. Ratee Rater REVIEW
KRA TARGET RATING REMARKS RATING REMARKS RESULTS
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge Year 7% 5 - Demonstrated Level 7 in Objective 1 as Quality
Education Knowledge and of content within and Round shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
Services Pedagogy across curriculum
agreement forms
teaching areas.
(PPST 1.1.2) 4 - Demonstrated Level 6 in Objective 1 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
3 - Demonstrated Level 5 in Objective 1 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
2 – Demonstrated Level 4 in Objective 1 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
1 – Demonstrated Level 3 in Objective 1 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
5 - Objective was met within the allotted time Efficiency

2. Used a range of Year
teaching strategies Round
that enhance learner
achievement in literacy
and numeracy skills.
(PPST 1.4.2)
3. Applied a range of Year
teaching strategies Round
to develop critical
and creative
thinking, as well as
other
higher-order thinking
skills. (PPST 1.5.2)
3 - Objective was met but instruction
exceeded the allotted time
1 - No acceptable evidence was shown
Timelines
s
7% 5 - Demonstrated Level 7 in Objective 2 as Quality
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
4 - Demonstrated Level 6 in Objective 2 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
3 - Demonstrated Level 5 in Objective 2 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
2 – Demonstrated Level 4 in Objective 2 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
1 – Demonstrated Level 3 in Objective 2 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
5 - Objective was met within the allotted time Efficiency
3 - Objective was met but instruction
exceeded the allotted time
1 - No acceptable evidence was shown
Timelines
s
7% 5 - Demonstrated Level 7 in Objective 3 as Quality
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
4 - Demonstrated Level 6 in Objective 3 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
3 - Demonstrated Level 5 in Objective 3 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
2 – Demonstrated Level 4 in Objective 3 as
 shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
1 – Demonstrated Level 3 in Objective 3 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
5 - Objective was met within the allotted time Efficiency
3 - Objective was met but instruction
exceeded the allotted time
1 - No acceptable evidence was shown
Timelines
s
4. Displayed Year 7% 5 – Demonstrated Level 7 in Objective 4 as Quality
proficient of Mother Round shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
Tongue, Filipino and
agreement forms
English to facilitate
teaching and 4 – Demonstrated Level 6 in Objective 4 as
learning. shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
(PPST 1.6.2) agreement forms
3 – Demonstrated Level 5 in Objective 4 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
2 – Demonstrated Level 4 in Objective 4 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
1 – Demonstrated Level 3 in Objective 4 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
5 – Objective was met within the allotted time Efficiency
3 – Objective was met but instruction
exceeded the allotted time
1 – No acceptable evidence was shown
Timelines
s
2. Learning 5. Established safe Year 7% 5 – Demonstrated Level 7 in Objective 5 as Quality
Environment & and secure learning Round shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
Diversity of environments to
agreement forms
Learners enhance learning
through the 4 – Demonstrated Level 6 in Objective 5 as
consistent shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
implementation of agreement forms
policies, guidelines
3 – Demonstrated Level 5 in Objective 5 as
and procedures.
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
(PPST 2.1.2)
agreement forms
2 – Demonstrated Level 4 in Objective 5 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
1 – Demonstrated Level 3 in Objective 5 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
5 – Objective was met within the allotted time Efficiency
3 – Objective was met but instruction
exceeded the allotted time
1 – No acceptable evidence was shown
Timelines
s
6. Maintained Year 7% 5 – Demonstrated Level 7 in Objective 6 as Quality
learning Round shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
environments that
agreement forms
promote fairness,
respect and care to 4 – Demonstrated Level 6 in Objective 6 as
encourage learning. shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
(PPST 2.2.2) agreement forms
3 – Demonstrated Level 5 in Objective 6 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
2 – Demonstrated Level 4 in Objective 6 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
1 – Demonstrated Level 3 in Objective 6 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
5 – Objective was met within the allotted time
3 – Objective was met but instruction
Efficiency
exceeded the allotted time
1 – No acceptable evidence was shown
Timelines
 s
7. Established a Year 7% 5 – Demonstrated Level 7 in Objective 7 as Quality
learner-centered by Round shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
using teaching
agreement forms
strategies that
respond to their 4 – Demonstrated Level 6 in Objective 7 as
linguistic, cultural, shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
socio-economic and agreement forms
religious
3 – Demonstrated Level 5 in Objective 7 as
backgrounds.
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
(PPST 3.2.2)
agreement forms
2 – Demonstrated Level 4 in Objective 7 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
1 – Demonstrated Level 3 in Objective 7 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms

5 – Objective was met within the allotted time Efficiency

3 – Objective was met but instruction
exceeded the allotted time
1 – No acceptable evidence was shown
Timelines
s
8. Adapted and used Year 7% 5 – Demonstrated Level 7 in Objective 8 as Quality
culturally Round shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
appropriate teaching
agreement forms
strategies to address
the needs of learners 4 – Demonstrated Level 6 in Objective 8 as
from indigenous shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
groups. agreement forms
(PPST 3.5.2)
3 – Demonstrated Level 5 in Objective 8 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
2 – Demonstrated Level 4 in Objective 8 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
1 – Demonstrated Level 3 in Objective 8 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
 agreement forms
5 – Objective was met within the allotted time Efficiency
3 – Objective was met but instruction
exceeded the allotted time
1 – No acceptable evidence was shown
Timelines
s
3. 9. Set achievable and Year 7% 5 – Set learning outcomes were achievable Quality
Curriculum appropriate learning Round and appropriate, and led to the attainment
and Planning outcomes that are
if the next related competency as shown in
& aligned with learning
Assessment competencies. the MOV submitted
and (PPST 4.2.2) 4 – Set learning outcomes were achievable
Reporting and appropriate and contributed to the
understanding of the next related
competency as shown in the MOV
submitted
3 – Set learning outcomes were achievable
and appropriate and are aligned with the
learning competencies as shown in the
MOV submitted
2 – Set learning outcomes were not
achievable or appropriate, and were
partially aligned with the learning
competencies as shown in the MOV
submitted
1 – No acceptable evidence was shown
5 – All of the learning outcomes set were Efficiency
aligned with the learning competencies as shown
in the MOV submitted
4 – Majority if the learning outcomes set were
aligned with the learning competencies as shown
in the MOV submitted
3 – At least half of the learning outcomes set
were aligned with the learning competencies as
shown in the MOV submitted

2 – Less than half of the learning outcomes set

were aligned with the learning competencies as
 shown in the MOV submitted

1 - No acceptable evidence was shown

Timelines
s
10. Used strategies for Year 7% 5 – Demonstrated Level 7 in Objective 9 as Quality
providing timely, Round shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
accurate and
agreement forms
constructive feedback
to improve learner 4 – Demonstrated Level 6 in Objective 9 as
performance. (PPST shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
5.3.2) agreement forms
3 – Demonstrated Level 5 in Objective 9 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
2 – Demonstrated Level 4 in Objective 9 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms
1 – Demonstrated Level 3 in Objective 9 as
shown in COT rating sheets / inter-observer
agreement forms

5 – Objective was met within the allotted time

3 – Objective was met but instruction
Efficiency
exceeded the allotted time
1 – No acceptable evidence was shown
Timelines
s
11. Utilized Year 7% 5 - Implemented a teaching and learning
assessment data to Round strategy/ program using materials based on
inform the learners’ assessment data as evidenced by a list
modification of of identified least/ most mastered skills with
teaching and supporting MOV No. 1
learning practices
4 - Developed materials based on learners’
and programs
assessment data as evidence by a list of
(PPST 5.5.2)
identified least/ most mastered skills with
supporting MOV No. 2
3 - Planned for a teaching and learning strategy
and/ or program based on learners’ assessment
 data as evidenced by a list of identified least/
most mastered skills with supporting MOV No. 3
2 - Analyzed learners’ mastered skills based on
the frequency of errors and correct responses as
evidenced by a list of identified least and most
mastered skills
1 - No acceptable evidence was shown
Efficiency
5 - Submitted MOV/s show/s monitoring and Timelines
evaluation done across 4 quarters s
4 - Submitted MOV/s show/s monitoring and
evaluation done across 3 quarters
3 - Submitted MOV/s show/s monitoring and
evaluation done across 2 quarters
2 - Submitted MOV/s show/s monitoring and
evaluation done in only 1 quarter
1 - No acceptable evidence was shown
4. Personal 12. Build relationships Year 7% 5 – Sustained engagement through regular Quality
Growth and with parents/ guardians Round communication of learners’ needs, progress and
Professional and the wider school achievement to key stakeholders, including
Development community to facilitate parents/guardians as shown in the
involvement in the MOV submitted
educative process.
4 – Sustained engagement with parents/
(PPST 6.2.2)
guardians and/ or wider school community to
facilitate involvement in the educative process
as evidenced by 2 or more of MOV No. 1 or 2
3 – Secured collaboration with parents/
guardians and/ or wider school community to
facilitate involvement in the educative process
as evidenced by one MOV No. 1 or 2
2 – Communicated with and obtained
response from parents/ guardians and/or wider
school community to facilitate involvement in
the educative process as evidenced by MOV No.
3
1 – No acceptable evidence was shown
Efficiency
5 – Showed engagement with parents/ guardians Timelines
and the wider school community across 4 s

13. Participated in Year
professional networks Round
to share knowledge
and to enhance
practice. (PPST 7.3.2)
quarters
4 – Showed engagement with parents/ guardians
and the wider school community across 3
quarters
3 – Showed engagement with parents/ guardians
and the wider school community across 2
quarters
2 – Showed engagement with parents/ guardians
and the wider school community across 1
quarter
1 – No acceptable evidence was shown
7% 5 – Participated in any professional Quality
network/ activity that requires output
and proof of implementation within
the school to share knowledge and to
enhance practice as evidenced by the
submitted MOV
4 – Participated in any professional
network/ activity that required output
and proof of implementation within
the department/ grade level to share
knowledge and to enhance practice as
evidenced by the submitted MOV
3 – Participated in any professional
network/ activity that requires output
to share knowledge and to enhance
practice as evidenced by the submitted
MOV
2 – Participated in any professional
network/ activity that does not
require output to share knowledge
and to enhance practice as evidenced
by the submitted MOV
1 – No acceptable evidence was shown
Efficiency
5 – Participated in professional networks to share Timelines
knowledge and to enhance practice across 4 s
quarters
4 – Participated in professional networks to share
 knowledge and to enhance practice across 3
quarters
3 – Participated in professional networks to share
knowledge and to enhance practice across 2
quarters
2 – Participated in professional networks to share
knowledge and to enhance practice across 1
quarter
1 – No acceptable evidence was shown
14. Developed a Year 7% 5 – Updated professional development Quality
personal Round goals during Phase II of the RPMS Cycle as
improvement plan evidenced by MOV 4
based on reflection of
4 – Discussed progress on professional
one’s practice and
development goals with the rater during the
ongoing professional
mid-year review as evidenced by MOV 3
learning.
(PPST 7.4.2) 3 – Set professional development goals
based on e-SAT results as evidenced by MOV 2

2 – Accomplished the e-SAT at the beginning

of the school year as evidenced by MOV 1

1 – No acceptable evidence was shown

5 – Submitted 4 acceptable MOVs Efficiency
4 - Submitted 3 acceptable MOVs
3 – Submitted 2 acceptable MOVs
2 – Submitted 1 Acceptable MOV
1 – No acceptable evidence was shown
5 – All four (4) submitted MOVs were Timelines
accomplished within the prescribed RPMS s
Phase
4 – Three (3) of the submitted MOVs were
accomplished within the prescribed RPMS
Phase
3 – Two (2) of the submitted MOVs were
accomplished within the prescribed RPMS
Phase
2 – Only one (1) of the submitted MOVs was
accomplished within the prescribed RPMS
 Phase
1 – No acceptable evidence was shown
5. Plus 15. Performed various Year 2% 5 - Performed at least one (1) related work/ Quality
Factor related works / Round activity that contributed to the teaching
activities that learning process beyond the school /
contribute to the Community Learning Center (CLC) as
teaching- learning evidenced by the submitted MOV.
process.
4- Performed at least one (1) related work/
activity that contributed to the teaching-
learning process within the school /
Community Learning Center (CLC) as
evidenced by the submitted MOV.
3 - Performed at least one (1) related work/
activity that contributed to the teaching-learning
process within the learning area/department
as evidenced by the submitted MOV.
2 - Performed at least one (1) related work/
activity that contributed to the teaching-
learning process within the class as evidenced
by the submitted MOV.
1 - No acceptable evidence was shown
1- Submitted MOV that details the achieved Efficiency
positive contribution to the teaching-learning
process, as evidenced by the annotation
provided.
4 - Submitted MOV that details the perceived
positive contribution to the teaching-learning
process, as evidenced by the annotation
provided.
3 - Submitted MOV that shows reasonable
interlap with the actual teaching- learning
process, as evidenced by the annotation
provided.
2 - Submitted MOV that shows considerable
overlap with, hence significantly affecting
the performance of the actual teaching-
learning process.

1 - No acceptable evidence was shown

5 - Submitted MOVs were distributed across 4 Timelines
 quarters s
4 - Submitted MOVs were distributed across 3
quarters
3 - Submitted MOVs were distributed across 2
quarters

2 - Submitted MOV/s was/

were completed in only 1 quarter

1 - No acceptable evidence was shown

OVER-ALL RATING FOR MID YEAR REVIEW

PERLA C. GARCIA _________________________ ALMA VIDA B. SUNIO

Rater Ratee Approving Authority