Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Employer’s Representative:
07.08.2015
ERC AKH Railway Project
Project:
Employer:
Employer’s Representative:
Contractor:
www.ym.com.tr
Designer:
Report Name:
TYPICAL TERMINAL STATION STRUCTURAL DESIGN REPORT
Report No:
A K H - Y M I - D D - S T5 0 X - D - C E - R E P - 1 0 0 1 - 0
Project Organization Stage Location Category Discipline Type of Number Vers.
Document
Date: 07.08.2015
YM Senior Structural
Checked by E. Günal
Design Engineer
YM General Structural
Approved by Ö. Güzel
Design Manager
APPROVAL
APPROVED BY
2 STANDARDS .................................................................................................................................. 7
4 MATERIALS .................................................................................................................................... 8
4.1 CONCRETE............................................................................................................................. 8
4.2 REINFORCING STEEL ........................................................................................................... 9
4.3 STRUCTURAL STEEL .......................................................................................................... 10
5 SEISMIC PARAMETERS.............................................................................................................. 10
Where represents the structural forces obtained by the design and is the ultimate structural
resistance of the element.
The Ultimate Limit States are related with the safety of either persons or the structure itself. The forces
are obtained by increasing the characteristic value of the loads by means of partial safety coefficients.
The resistance of the elements is evaluated through their geometrical characteristics and material
properties reduced by the material partial safety factors.
During some of the stages of the design, computer programs such as SAP2000 will be used. The results
from the structural models will be justified by presenting graphics and/or tables with the most significant
values. Additionally, in some cases, hand calculations can be used to verify these structural models.
Horizontally braced system (M24/S460 Tension Rod) is used at roof plane and the bracings are only
working under tension loads by using tension only elements (compression limits=0) with nonlinear
analysis of SAP 2000. Also interstorey drifts, design forces are obtained from these nonlinear models.
Refer to “Station Buildings Design Manual” for further information about design principles.
EN 1992-1-1:2004 - Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and
rules for buildings
EN 1993-1-1:2005 - Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules
for buildings
3 LOAD ANALYSIS
Dead Loads of structural members (G1) are considered by analysis program (Sap2000) automatically.
35cm wide wall weight with plaster (both sides) = 6,2 kN/m2
0,35 14,4 2 0,028 20 6,2
Internal walls: 210 m2 x 4 =840 KN (the half weight of walls are taken into account at the top
of columns for seismic actions by being on the safe side)
External wall weight 200 m2 x 6,2 =1240 KN
Total wall weight ≈ 2100 kN
Cladding
aluminium cladding at z=8,40 height;
4 MATERIALS
4.1 CONCRETE
The principles and criteria for concrete will be according to chapter 3.1. EN 1992-1-1. The properties of
each concrete class are presented in the below table (Table 3.1 EN 1992-1-1):
The values of the design compressive and tensile strengths are defined as:
, .
Where is the partial safety factor for concrete. The recommended values are the following:
The steel class will be B500B for all elements. The yield strength of the reinforcing steel:
500
The recommended values for the partial safety factor of reinforcing steel are the following:
For bracings
The structural steel dilatation coefficient for steel structures is 1.2 10 , and for composite
concrete-steel structures is 10 according to EN 1993-1-1 chapter 3.2.6.
5 SEISMIC PARAMETERS
Refer to “Basic Design Report No: AWR-YM-X-BTR-GNRL-001-00, Section 3.6 Seismicity, pages 12-
14” for the Seicmicity. Ground type C is selected according to site conditions (compacted fill under
control). Type I elastic response spectra is sellected according to Eurocode8 Table 3.2 (MS>5,5).
,
: (EUROCODE 8 3.14 )
1,15
structural type is selected inverted pendulum and ductility class is selected DCM according to Table 6.2:
Upper limit of reference values of behaviour factors for systems regular in elevation, behaviour factor q
is selected 2.
,
: (EUROCODE 8 3.15 )
combination coefficient for variable action is taken 2 0,3. (EN 1990:2002Table A1.1)
Importance class is taken III and importance factor is taken 1,2 at projects (EUROCODE 8 Table 4.3)
1 (EUROCODE 8 4.5 )
1,82 1 1,2 18 kN
,
2,12 1 1,2 21 kN
,
18 1503 1521 kN
21 1750 1771 kN
In order to account for uncertainties in the location of masses and in the spatial variation of the seismic
motion, the calculated center of mass at each floor “i “ shall be considered as being displaced from its
nominal location in each direction by an accidental eccentricity:
= ±0,05.Li
Where
is the accidental eccentricity of story mass “i “ from its nominal location, applied in the same direction
at all floors;
is the floor-dimension perpendicular to the direction of the seismic action.
7 WIND LOADS
Wind forces will be calculated according to Section 6 of Ethiopian Standard Code of Practice for Loading
(ESCP1:1983). The wind loads are calculated for moderate climate condition with a total height of
buildings not greater than 18m.
Until 15 meters wind pressure can be taken 0,61 kN/m2 (ESCP1:1983, Ethiopian Standard). This value
is also in parallel with the Chapter 3 Wind Actions of EBCS-1:1995 Code which gives similar wind
pressure values.
Wg =c.q.A
According to EN 1991-1-4:2005 Section 7.2 the coefficients for “c” is presented below:
0,8
0,8 0,5
Wind
0,7
Wind
Each combination of actions should include: a leading variable action, or-an accidental action.
The combinations of actions should be in accordance with EN 1990 articles 6.4.3.2 to 6.4.3.4 .
UDSTL 23 1 G1+1 G2
For calculation of Bond Beams and Columns, defined load combinations are;
Combo 1 1,35 D
Combo 2 1,35D+1,50W
Combo 3 1D+1E
where:
Q = Live loads
T = Temperature loads
0,0075
Where;
is the reduction factor which takes into account the lower return period of the seismic action associated
with the damage limitation requirement.
Column Check
Hi, (mm) ∆i,max(mm) dr /h Limit value
Axes Control
1-1 4250 15 0,0028 0,0075 OK
Check
Column Axes Hi, (mm) ∆i,max(mm) dr /h Limit value
Control
All the columns are satisfied the story drift check according to Eurocode 8.
Check
Beam Axes Li, (mm) i,max(mm) L/ Limit value
Control
Bolt diameter 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 27 30
As(mm2) 36 58 84 115 157 192 245 303 353 459 561
∗ k1 2,5
Bearing Resistance For Plate , * ∗ ∗
αb 1
EN 1993‐1‐8:2005 Table 3.4 fu(N/mm2) s235 360
d diameter
t min(tw profil,tplate)
level 1
joint number 56
IPE360‐IPE 270 connection
c
Forces kN
Ned 1,13
Vedz 36,24 ab
Vedy 0,36 IPE 270
s235
t plate (mm) 10 tw IPE270 ( mm) 6,6
a mm (mm) 10 tmin ( mm) 6,6 IPE 360
b mm (mm) 40 a weld ( mm) 5
c mm (mm) 120
Bolt properties
numbers 2 For bolted shear connections, the design
diameter 12 shear resistance of the bolts should be
As 84 higher than 1,2 times the design bearing EN 1998‐1 :2004 6.5.5 (5)
class 10,9 resistance.
Resultant Force per Bolt
fx (kN) 0,565 fnet 23,95259 Fvrd kN 33,6 safe
fy (kN) 18,12 fnet*1,2 28,74311 Fbrd kN 57,024 safe
∆fx 15,1
n (numb.of bolts) 2
dh(mm) 13
d(mm) 150
fy steel(Mpa) 235
fu steel (Mpa) 360
x1top 40
x2bottom 40
h 200
case1‐2
Ver 162,813 γmo 1,1
case1‐2 safe
case 2
l1 33,5 Ant 221,1
l2 140,5 Anv 927,3
Veff, Rd 178,053
case 2 safe
case 3
l3 107
Ant 706,2
Anv 442,2
Veff, Rd 257,928
case 3 safe
Note:
/
/
∆ ∗ /
∆
n number of bolts
For weld connections,weld checks are ignored. And welds are used both
sides of plate thickness of 5 mm.
Bolt diameter 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 27 30
As(mm2) 36 58 84 115 157 192 245 303 353 459 561
∗ k1 2,5
Bearing Resistance For Plate , * ∗ ∗ αb 1
EN 1993‐1‐8:2005 Table 3.4 fu(N/mm2) s235 360
d diameter
t min(tw profil,tplate)
case1‐2
Ver 493,372 γmo 1,1
case1‐2 safe
case 2
l1 49,5 Ant 495
l2 307,5 Anv 3075
Veff, Rd 521,84
case 2 safe
case 3
l3 278
Ant 2780
Anv 990
Veff, Rd 922,75
case 3 safe
Note:
/
/
∆ ∗ /
n number of bolts
For weld connections,weld checks are ignored. And welds are used both
sides of plate thickness of 5 mm.
Bolt diameter 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 27 30
As(mm2) 36 58 84 115 157 192 245 303 353 459 561
∗ k1 2,5
Bearing Resistance For Plate , * ∗ ∗ αb 1
EN 1993‐1‐8:2005 Table 3.4 fu(N/mm2) s235 360
d diameter
t min(tw profil,tplate)
level 1
joint number 38
HE300B‐IPE 360 connection
Forces kN
Ned 6,27
Vedz 108,95
Vedy 0 a
s235 b
tw IPE 360 8 t angle 8 c
a (mm) 0 tmin 8 IPE 360
b (mm) 40
c (mm) 210
case 2
l1 33,5 Ant 268
l2 217,5 Anv 1740
Veff, Rd 291,8008
case 2 safe
case 3
l3 184
Ant 1472
Anv 536
Veff, Rd 490,0479
case 3 safe
Note: / /
/ *(a+b)/c/2
/ /
)
n number of bolts
For weld connections,weld checks are ignored. And welds are used
both sides of plate thickness of 5 mm.
Bolt diameter 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 27 30
As(mm2) 36 58 84 115 157 192 245 303 353 459 561
∗ k1 2,5
Bearing Resistance For Plate , * ∗ ∗ αb 1
EN 1993‐1‐8:2005 Table 3.4 fu(N/mm2) s235 360
d diameter
t min(tw profil,tplate)
case1‐2
Ver 493,372 γmo 1,1
case1‐2 safe
case 2
l1 39,5 Ant 395
l2 307,5 Anv 3075
Veff, Rd 493,04
case 2 safe
case 3
l3 278
Ant 2780
Anv 790
Veff, Rd 898,081
case 3 safe
Note:
/
/
∆ ∗ /
n number of bolts
For weld connections,weld checks are ignored. And welds are used both
sides of plate thickness of 5 mm.
Note:
Circular column and IPE 270 beam connection (A/31-B/7) details are not shown. Because
design forces are smaller than the forces for connection of B/8-B/29 Beam-Beam connections.
Circular column and IPE 360 beam connection (A/30-PL/22) or Circular column and IPE 500
beam connection (A/30-B/31) details are not shown. Because design forces are smaller than
the forces For C/32-B/13 Beam and Column connections(1);
Design seismic forces (q=1) for the column joint number 10 are presented at the table
Because of the capacity values are smaller then the forces (seismic combinations q=1); capacity design
will be used.
z
1056,55 kNm
638,60 kNm
164,9 kN
697,5
Figure 10.2: design forces for calculation of base plate of HD400/216 column
, , , ,
Tmax= =1455 kN,
,
T1bolt=1455/4=363,75 kN
, , , ,
Tmax= =856,2 kN,
,
22.5
25.3
,
0,793 /
K=0,793x25,3x22,5=451,4 kN
25,3/22,5≅1 → 1, k=4,25
M=451,4/4,25=106,21 kNcm/cm
22.5
39,4
K=0,793x39,4x22,5=703 kN
M=703/7,75=90,70 kNcm/cm
, 189 20 0,7 2646 / fw,Rd is the design resistance per unit length.
Lver.plate=781150/2646=295 mm (leg length of the fillet weld s=√2a=20 mm) Lstiffener=295+2x20=335 mm≅
350mm
Mver.plate=0,793x90x90/4x(26,3-90/8)x1/2=10283 kNcm
100 100
250
100
100
50
40
900
394 253
90
90
148
M30 10.9
262,5
172,50
243 mm
90
M20 10.9
900
375
HD 400 216
20 mm
plate thickness 20
mm
90
90
148
148
97 200 97 90
Selected system;
VRd= 123,3 /
√ , √
/√
fv,wd= (design shear strength of the weld.)
HE 160B
Compression zones
,
, 10,96 / 16,7 /
,
, 7,25 / 16,7 /
,
31,64 / 123,3 /
,
99,01 / 123,3 /
Ix,weld=30458277,83 mm4
Iy,weld=12199021,5 mm4
, ,
90,90 / 189 /
, ,
, ,
65,79 / 189 /
, ,
,
8,25 174,16 174,35 /
,
Design seismic forces (q=1) for the column joint number 22 are presented at the table
Because of the capacity values are larger then the forces (seismic combinations q=1); capacity design
will be used.
284,86/244,40 kN
960
Figure 10.5: design forces for calculation of base plate of Circular column
, , , ,
Tmax= =1976,9 kN,
,
T1bolt=1976,9/5=395,40 kN
Dmax=1946,5+284,86 kN=2231,4 kN
Plate thickness:5cm
1x5 21,5
122,15 77,70
4 1,1
Plate thickness:5cm
,
122,15 118,93
,
TYPICAL TERMINAL STATION
STRUCTURAL DESIGN REPORT AKH – YMI – DD – ST50X – D – CE – REP – 1001 – 0 07.08.2015
This report must not be either loaned, copied or otherwise reproduced in whole or in part or used for any Page: 45 /
purpose without the prior written permission of Yapı Merkezi. © Yapi Merkezi Insaat ve Sanayi A.Ş.,2015 142
ERC AKH Railway Project
Length of Vertical Plate
/√ /√
,
. 189 / fv,wd is the design shear strength of the weld.
, ,
, 189 10 0,7 1323 / fw,Rd is the design resistance per unit length.
Lver.plate=346770/1323=262 mm (leg length of the fillet weld s=√2a=10 mm) Lstiffener=262+2x10=282 mm≅
300mm
Mver.plate=D/5x0,15=2231,4/5x0,15=66,94kNm=6694 kNcm
1200
10
30 cm
30cm
36cm
10 cm
5cm
14 mm
4 cm
Selected system;
VRd= 123,3 /
√ , √
/√
fv,wd= (design shear strength of the weld.)
HE 220B
,
, 4,1 / 16,7 /
,
, 11,55 / 16,7 /
,
116,46 / 123,3 /
,
32,50 / 123,3 /
Ix,weld=35133333,33 mm4
Iy,weld=88496400 mm4
,
40,41 / 189 /
,
71,62 / 189 /
Design seismic forces (q=1) for the column joint number 9 are presented at the table
Because of the capacity values are larger then the forces (seismic combinations q=1); forces for q=1
will be used.
z
314,80 kNm
59,35 kNm
97,06 kN
75 225 225 75
450
Figure 10.8: design forces for calculation of base plate of HE300B column
, , , ,
Tmax= =655,8 kN,
,
T1bolt=655,8/4=163,96 kN
,
Tmax= =131,87 kN.
,
15
15
,
0,836 /
K=0,836x15x15=189 kN
25,3/22,5≅1 → 1, k=4,25
M=189/4,25=44,47 kNcm/cm
15
30
K=0,836x30x15=378 kN
M=378/6,67=56,67 kNcm/cm
/√
/√
,
. 189 / fv,wd is the design shear strength of the weld.
, ,
Mver.plate=0,836x60x15/4=2835 kNcm
10 cm 10cm
20 cm
20cm
10 cm
10cm
4cm
4 cm
300
150 75
15
70
75
300
130
120
HE 300B
70
75
Selected system;
VRd= 123,3 /
√ , √
/√
fv,wd= (design shear strength of the weld.)
HE 120B
,
, 7,9 / 16,7 /
,
, 8,46 / 16,7 /
,
17,98 / 123,3 /
,
92,66 / 123,3 /
Ix,weld=9554109,54 mm4
Iy,weld=3997243,83 mm4
, ,
60,96 / 189 /
, ,
, ,
62,48 / 189 /
, ,
,
4,87 181,36 181,42 /
,
Design seismic forces (q=1) for the column joint number 295 are presented at the table. (connection
bombo 5)
Because of the capacity values are larger then the forces (seismic combinations q=1); forces for q=1
will be used.
Figure 10.11: design forces for calculation of base plate of 250/250/10 box column
TYPICAL TERMINAL STATION
STRUCTURAL DESIGN REPORT AKH – YMI – DD – ST50X – D – CE – REP – 1001 – 0 07.08.2015
This report must not be either loaned, copied or otherwise reproduced in whole or in part or used for any Page: 54 /
purpose without the prior written permission of Yapı Merkezi. © Yapi Merkezi Insaat ve Sanayi A.Ş.,2015 142
ERC AKH Railway Project
For y-y direction; max tensile force Tmax is equal to;
FvRd =0,5x1000x245/1,25=98 kN
FbRd =2,5x1x0,36x20x30/1,25=432 kN
, , , ,
Tmax= =294,3 kN,
,
T1bolt=294/3=98,1kN
,
Tmax= =53,9 kN.
,
F1=23,32/3=7,77 kN
, , ,
1,00 → 0,55 1 it is safe.
, , , ,
Note= Welding must be applied with full penetration consistently between column and base plate.
Dmax=331,62 kN,
,
0,438 /
10
30
40
550
250.250.10
box column
550
60
60
3
4
2
Design seismic forces (q=1(envelope)) for the column joint number 229 are presented at the table.
Shear forces for a bolt due to shear forces Vedz and Vedy ,
F1=12,32/4=3,08 kN
F2=15,45/4=3,86 kN
FtEd=52,48/4=13,12 kN
, , , ,
1,00 → 0,16 1 it is safe.
, , , , ,
Design seismic forces (q=1(envelope)) for the column joint number 148 are presented at the table.
For bolted shear connections, the design shear resistance of the bolts should be higher than 1,2 times
the design bearing resistance.
Selected bolt: M16 10.9 FbRd= where FbRd is bearing resistance of bolts. Where;
0,784
, , ,
1,00 → 0,68 1 it is safe.
, , , , ,
Design seismic forces (q=1(envelope)) for the column joint number 155 are presented at the table.
Fh=18,25/2=9,13 kN,
, , , ,
1,00 → 0,20 1 it is safe.
, , , , ,
Wp=M/fy=4812/23500x1,1=0,225 cm3<Wp=0,92x9/4=1,82cm3
Weld thickness=3mm,
√ /√
.
189 N/mm2,
, ,
√ /√
.
3 3 189 567 N/mm,
, ,
Note:Weld checks are ignored for axial forces which has compression effect.
Detail 4 Pin connection calculation for Entrance shelter (See figure 10.21)
FvRd=0,6x2,45x100/1,25=117,6 kN>26,53 kN
FbRd=1,5x1,20x2x23,5/1,1=76,9 kN>26,53 kN
According to EN 1993-1-9:2005
, , ,
0,518 1,4 1,92
, ,
, , ,
1,22
, ,
, ,
0,7 0,7 0,78 12
,
FvRd=0,6x3,53x100/1,25=169,44 kN>63,15 kN
FbRd=1,5x1,50x2,4x23,5/1,1=115,36 kN>63,15 kN
According to EN 1993-1-9:2005
, , ,
0,98 1,66 2,65
, ,
, , ,
1,82
, ,
, ,
0,7 0,7 1,20 15
,
Figure 11.1: moment diagrams under uniform loading for multispan beam
K=bwd2/Md=1x0,0252/1,152=54,25x10-5 ks=2,95
As=ksMd/d=2,95x1,152/0,025=131 mm2=1,31cm2
K=0,63x0,0522/1,152=147,8x10-5 ks=2,85
W=5,03 cm3/cm
Between two purlins is equal to 1,2 m; continuous steel sheets allowable load bearing capacity is 536
kg/m2 ( =1200 kg/cm2)
TYPICAL TERMINAL STATION
STRUCTURAL DESIGN REPORT AKH – YMI – DD – ST50X – D – CE – REP – 1001 – 0 07.08.2015
This report must not be either loaned, copied or otherwise reproduced in whole or in part or used for any Page: 64 /
purpose without the prior written permission of Yapı Merkezi. © Yapi Merkezi Insaat ve Sanayi A.Ş.,2015 142
ERC AKH Railway Project
Trasmission of seismic forces:
Wseismic: (4+0,3x1)x6.0x6.0=154,80 kN
For 6x6 m2 area, (total 5 purlins and distance between two screws (equivalent bolts) is 20 cm)
=3 mm cross sectional area of a screw (equivalent bolts): As =5,03 mm2 /4.8 class
Bond force for Y direction=80290/(6x6)=2230 N/m2 = 0,2230 N/cm2 too small and ignored.
, , , ,
12,90
=6x0,62/4x23,5/1,1=11,54 kNcm
P=puxlh=0,895x6=5,37 kN
Required angle shear keys number (for purlins s= 1,2 m): n=80,29/(5x6,0x5,37)=0,5
Totally for 6x6 m2 area;15 angle shear keys will be used. 15x5,37=80,55 kN>80,29 kN.
Figure 11.4: Locations of angle shear keys at the beam - trapezoidal steel sheet contact surface
The necessary reinforcements are determined with the help of Sap2000 for the raft foundation.
The reinforcement intensity graphics are given below and the selected reinforcements are
presented in the detailed design drawings by considering the necessary reinforcement areas.
Foundation Design top rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 1
Foundation Design top rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 2
Foundation Design top rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 3
Foundation Design top rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 4
Foundation Design top rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 5
Foundation Design top rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 6
Foundation Design top rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 7
Foundation Design top rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 8
Foundation Design top rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 1
Foundation Design top rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 2
Foundation Design top rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 3
Foundation Design top rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 4
Foundation Design top rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 5
Foundation Design top rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 6
Foundation Design top rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 7
Foundation Design top rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 8
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 1
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 2
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 3
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 4
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 5
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 6
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 7
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for X direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 8
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 1
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 2
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 3
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 4
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 5
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 6
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 7
Foundation Design bottom rebar area for Y direction (m2/m x 10-3) – Foundation Combo 8
, , , / /
The additional checks and geotechnical design details for the bearing soil below the
foundation will be presented for each station separately in the Geotechnical Reports of
each station.
As a result of analysis, checks for pedestals under the circular columns are presented below.
1,165/2x4+0,33=2,66 kN/m
1,165/2x4+0,33=2,66 kN/m
1,165x4=4,66 kN/m
1,165/2x4+0,33=2,66 kN/m
Q Live Loads
1,165/2=0,59≅1kN/m
1,165/2x1=0,59≅1kN/m
1,165x1=1,16kN/m
1,165/2=0,59≅1kN/m
EY seismic loads
Wind loads WX
Wind loads WY
As a result of analysis most unfavorable beam and column’s controls will be shown.
Design Ratio
Frame DesignSect Status Ratio Combo Location ErrMsg WarnMsg
Type Type
Text Text Text Text Unitless Text Text cm Text Text
No No No
1 HE300B Column 0,579406 PMM UDSTL16 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
17 HE300B Column 0,576473 PMM UDSTL16 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
9 HE300B Column 0,586175 PMM UDSTL16 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
2 HE300B Column 0,609168 PMM UDSTL16 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
18 HE300B Column 0,62015 PMM UDSTL16 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
10 HE300B Column 0,618723 PMM UDSTL16 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
3 HE300B Column 0,630316 PMM UDSTL18 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
19 HE300B Column 0,633611 PMM UDSTL18 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
11 HE300B Column 0,632564 PMM UDSTL16 0
Messages Messages Messages
HD400 No No No
4 Column 0,854579 PMM UDSTL18 0
/216 Messages Messages Messages
No No No
20 HD400.187 Column 0,848919 PMM UDSTL16 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
12 HD400.187 Column 0,823771 PMM UDSTL16 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
8 HE300B Column 0,589295 PMM UDSTL17 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
24 HE300B Column 0,575951 PMM UDSTL17 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
16 HE300B Column 0,600825 PMM UDSTL17 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
7 HE300B Column 0,62443 PMM UDSTL17 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
23 HE300B Column 0,643052 PMM UDSTL17 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
15 HE300B Column 0,63429 PMM UDSTL17 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
6 HE300B Column 0,637499 PMM UDSTL17 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
22 HE300B Column 0,657041 PMM UDSTL17 0
Messages Messages Messages
No No No
14 HE300B Column 0,648152 PMM UDSTL17 0
Messages Messages Messages
HD400 No No No
5 Column 0,790829 PMM UDSTL17 0
/216 Messages Messages Messages