The document is a rubric for grading personal narratives in an English composition course. It evaluates narratives based on 10 criteria, including the hook, idea development, organization, voice, word choice, sensory details, and closing. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to define levels of competency from highly competent to inadequate. The rubric also evaluates mechanics in 6 areas for 30% of the grade, including sentence structure, paragraph placement, conventions, and verb tense consistency.
The document is a rubric for grading personal narratives in an English composition course. It evaluates narratives based on 10 criteria, including the hook, idea development, organization, voice, word choice, sensory details, and closing. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to define levels of competency from highly competent to inadequate. The rubric also evaluates mechanics in 6 areas for 30% of the grade, including sentence structure, paragraph placement, conventions, and verb tense consistency.
The document is a rubric for grading personal narratives in an English composition course. It evaluates narratives based on 10 criteria, including the hook, idea development, organization, voice, word choice, sensory details, and closing. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to define levels of competency from highly competent to inadequate. The rubric also evaluates mechanics in 6 areas for 30% of the grade, including sentence structure, paragraph placement, conventions, and verb tense consistency.
Your Name: Your Student ID Number (C#): Narrative Title: Criteria Highly Competent Competent Not Quite Competent Inadequate 7% 10% 8.5% 6% Total Hook (10%) Strong hook makes the Good hook but could be hook is unremarkable and hook is unimaginative reader want to find out altered though the reader needs some work or too obvious and more still wants to continue needs to be rewritten Idea Development Length of paper is A few instances of clutter Good ideas but at times Paper is far too (10%) appropriate and flows and/or not enough overshadowed by too long/short and loses smoothly from one idea elaboration, but for the much and/or too simplistic focus because of to the next most part flows evenly writing overwriting and or no elaboration Organization (10%) Paper has excellent Paper has structure and Paper has some structure Paper’s structure is structure and is well organization though evident but at times is hard greatly lacking, organized lacks unity because of to follow or is not well interfering with Content occasional confusing organized reader’s ability to (70%) details understand piece Voice (10%) Author’s voice is Author’s voice and Author’s voice is Author’s voice is not clearly evident and personality is evident and developing and shows evident and the entire piece is thoughtful and effort was clearly put into some effort but at times story needs more work well-written in a the piece making piece the piece needs more work sophisticated and enjoyable to read unique style Word Choice (10%) Paper uses rich word Paper uses good word Paper has simplistic word Paper has too simplistic choice and varied choice and some varied choice and some words word choice and is far language throughout wording are at times repetitive too repetitive Sensory Details (10%) Paper is rich in sensory Paper has some strong Paper has too few sensory Paper is lacking in details and shows sensory details making it details or far too many so sensory details and tells rather than tells enjoyable to read but the piece mainly tells rather than shows using creating a vivid picture there may be too few or rather than shows or use empty words and too without overloading the not enough details, at clichés causing reader to many clichés reader times telling rather than lose interest showing Closing (10%) The final sentences The ending is good but The ending is too There is no real ending clinch the piece well does not fully clinch the simple—it doesn’t fit the leaving the reader leaving the reader paper, leaving the reader flow of the story or unsatisfied
completely satisfied wanting more contains weak language
leaving the reader confused Criteria Highly Competent Competent Not Quite Competent Inadequate 4.2% 6% 5.1% 3.6% Total Format (6%) Paper has a proper Has most of the proper Missing most aspects of No regard for format. heading and centered formatting but wrong formatting but not all. title, typed @ 12 point font, or spacing, etc. Mechanics font, double spaced (30%) with proper margins. Sentence Structure Paper is well written Papers has a few Paper is beginning to be Paper is difficult to (6%) using a variety of sentence errors and/or is difficult to understand as read because of too simple and complex lacking in variety or there are many poorly simplistic sentence sentence structures complexity constructed sentences or structure and/or many creating a smooth fragments fragments rhythm to the piece Paragraph Placement Strong paragraph Paragraphs are generally Paragraphs are only Paragraph placement is (6%) placement throughout appropriate throughout somewhat evident almost entirely or paper though at times are too throughout paper lacking all together long and/or short Conventions— Paper is proofread well Paper has between 3 to 5 Paper has between 6 to 8 Paper has more than 9 spelling, punctuation, with only 1 or 2 errors errors errors as proofreading was errors and shows little grammar, and not done well to no evidence of capitalization (6%) proofreading Verb Tense Verb tense remains Verb tense is mainly Verb tenses are Verb tenses are so (6%) consistent throughout consistent, though inconsistent throughout, inconsistent, paper is sometimes moves from affecting reader’s difficult to understand past to present understanding of paper Comments: