SUBJECT: ART APPRECIATION

SY: 2023-2024
SELF AND PEER EVALUATION OF WORK ETHICS

Please assess your work and that of your group mates by using the following criteria. Your
evaluation will be used in assigning a portion of your grade for the given activity. Please try
to be as honest as possible. Edit this as you go according to your groupmates. If there are 8 of
you in your group, then you should rate 8 people as well, including yourself.

Rating Description
5 Excellent work, was crucial to the group’s success
4 Very Strong Work, contributed significantly to the group
3 Sufficient Effort; contributed adequately to the group
2 Insufficient effort; met minimal standards of the group
1 Little or weak effort, was detrimental to the group

Self Evaluation: Gador, Richemon A.

Participation in developing ideas and planning the project 5

Willing to discuss the ideas of others 5
Cooperated with other group members 5
Participated in leading/facilitating discussion 5
Was at ease and familiar with the research topic 5

Total Rating 25

Peer Evaluation:

Group Member 1: Asi, Al Radzmer

Participation in developing ideas and planning the project 5

Willing to discuss the ideas of others 5
Cooperated with other group members 5
Participated in leading/facilitating discussion 5
Was at ease and familiar with the research topic 5

Total Rating 25

Group Member 2: Cajes, Shane Heart

Participation in developing ideas and planning the project 5

Willing to discuss the ideas of others 5
Cooperated with other group members 5
Participated in leading/facilitating discussion 5
Was at ease and familiar with the research topic 5

Total Rating 25
Group Member 3: Laurente, Fredric Sam

Participation in developing ideas and planning the project 5

Willing to discuss the ideas of others 5
Cooperated with other group members 5
Participated in leading/facilitating discussion 5
Was at ease and familiar with the research topic 5

Total Rating 25

Group Member 4: Marquez, Raffy

Participation in developing ideas and planning the project 5

Willing to discuss the ideas of others 5
Cooperated with other group members 5
Participated in leading/facilitating discussion 5
Was at ease and familiar with the research topic 5

Total Rating 25

Group Member 5: Ragot, Chandie

Participation in developing ideas and planning the project 5

Willing to discuss the ideas of others 5
Cooperated with other group members 5
Participated in leading/facilitating discussion 5
Was at ease and familiar with the research topic 5

Total Rating 25

Group Member 6: Varquez, Arwin

Participation in developing ideas and planning the project 5

Willing to discuss the ideas of others 5
Cooperated with other group members 5
Participated in leading/facilitating discussion 5
Was at ease and familiar with the research topic 5

Total Rating 25

Group Member 7: Gica, Angel

Participation in developing ideas and planning the project 5

Willing to discuss the ideas of others 5
Cooperated with other group members 5
Participated in leading/facilitating discussion 5
Was at ease and familiar with the research topic 5

Total Rating 25
Group Member 8: Regala, Nheliza Argin

Participation in developing ideas and planning the project 5

Willing to discuss the ideas of others 5
Cooperated with other group members 5
Participated in leading/facilitating discussion 5
Was at ease and familiar with the research topic 5

Total Rating 25