Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 6
COMPUTATIONAL EXERCISES
1. (LO 1) Jane must include the $10,000 in gross income of the current tax year, but only to the extent of the
tax benefit in the previous year. Because Jane had capital gains of $5,000 in the previous year, the $50,000
bad debt could be used to the extent of $8,000 ($5,000 + $3,000) last year. Hence, Jane would have to
include $8,000 of the $10,000 received in gross income in the current year.
2. (LO 1) Bob has no bad debt deduction. Rather, he has a gain of $12,000 [$60,000 − $48,000 (basis in
the account receivable)].
3. (LO 2) It is possible to receive an ordinary loss deduction if the loss is sustained on small business
stock (§ 1244 stock). Only individuals who acquired the stock from the corporation are eligible to
receive ordinary loss treatment under § 1244. The ordinary loss treatment is limited to $50,000
6-1
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
6-2 2016 Essentials of Taxation/Solutions Manual
($100,000 for married individuals filing jointly) per year. Losses on § 1244 stock in excess of the
statutory limits receive capital loss treatment.
Therefore, Calvin’s total loss of $61,750 ($68,750 − $7,000) is treated as follows: $50,000 is ordinary
loss and the remaining $11,750 ($61,750 − $50,000) is long-term capital loss.
4. (LO 3) Mary should include the recovery as gross income in her 2015 tax return, but only to the extent of
the tax benefit in the prior year. Mary’s deduction in the prior year would have been $3,900 computed as
follows:
5. (LO 3) The amount of the loss is $600,000, the lesser of the decline in FMV $600,000 ($800,000 −
$200,000) or basis of $650,000.
6. (LO 6)
Beginning at-risk amount $ 0
Investment in partnership 30,000
Plus: Share of current partnership taxable income 2,000
Less: Withdrawals from the partnership (10,000)
Ending at-risk amount $22,000
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Losses and Loss Limitations 6-3
7. (LO 6)
Amount realized $330,000
Less: Adjusted basis (305,000)
Total gain $ 25,000
Less: Suspended losses (28,000)
Deductible loss (not passive) ($ 3,000)
The $3,000 loss may be deducted against ordinary and portfolio income.
8. (LO 8)
a. Beginning adjusted basis and at-risk amount $ 7,500
Less: Current loss allowable (7,500)
Ending adjusted basis and at-risk amount $ 0
b. The current passive loss is $12,000. Because $7,500 of the loss is used to reduce the at-risk
amount to $0, $4,500 is suspended under the at-risk rules ($12,000 − $7,500 = $4,500).
c. The $7,500 loss that is not limited by the at-risk rules is subject to the passive loss rules.
Because the taxpayer has not generated any passive income during the year, this $7,500 current-
year passive loss is suspended. Therefore, the total suspended passive loss carried forward to
subsequent years totals $9,000 ($7,500 current-year suspended loss + $1,500 prior year
suspended loss).
9. (LO 9)
Passive income $ 20,000
Real estate rental activity income $ 33,000
Less: Real estate rental activity losses (70,000)
Net loss from real estate rental activities (37,000)
Deductible loss ($ 17,000)
Because the losses arise from real estate rental activities in which Noah actively participates, up to
$25,000 of such losses may be deducted. In this case, the total amount of net real estate rental losses is
deducted, and no further restrictions apply because his AGI is below $100,000. The $17,000 deductible
loss may offset active and portfolio income.
10. (LO 10) When a transfer of a taxpayer’s interest occurs because of the taxpayer’s death, suspended
passive losses are allowed to the decedent to the extent they exceed the amount of the allowed step-up
in basis. At the time of Rose’s death, the property’s basis will be stepped up by $25,000—from $65,000
to its fair market value of $90,000. Because the suspended passive loss is $13,000 (i.e., below the
$25,000 step up in basis), none of the suspended loss is deductible. In addition, the beneficiary would
not be allowed to deduct the $13,000 suspended loss.
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
6-4 2016 Essentials of Taxation/Solutions Manual
PROBLEMS
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Losses and Loss Limitations 6-5
not constitute bad debts within the meaning of §166 for which a deduction for worthlessness may be
claimed.
15. (LO 1, 2)
Salary $120,000
§ 1244 ordinary loss (limit of $100,000) (100,000)
Short-term capital gain on § 1244 stock $ 20,000
Short-term capital loss (nonbusiness bad debt) (19,000)
Net short-term capital gain 1,000
Net long-term capital loss (remaining § 1244 loss) (5,000)
Net capital loss (limited to $3,000; $1,000 LTCL carryover) (3,000)
Adjusted gross income $ 17,000
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
6-6 2016 Essentials of Taxation/Solutions Manual
17. (LO 3) The amount of the loss before the 10%-of-AGI limitation is computed as follows:
Because the President declared the area a disaster area, Olaf and Anna could claim the loss on last
year’s return (2014) or on the current year’s return (2015).
If Olaf and Anna apply the loss to 2014, the benefit of the loss will be at a rate of 25% because taxable
income will be $78,100 ($140,000 − $61,900) and the loss falls entirely within the 25% tax bracket. If
the loss is applied to 2015, the benefit will be at a rate of 28% because taxable income will be $165,100
($215,000 − $49,900) and the loss falls entirely within the 28% tax bracket. The tax savings will be
$15,475 (25% $61,900) if the loss is taken in 2014 and $13,972 (28% $49,900) if the loss is taken
in 2015. Therefore, Olaf and Anna should include the loss on their 2014 return, because the tax savings
is $1,503 ($15,475 − $13,972) greater.
• Is the loss subject to either the personal loss limits ($100 floor and 10%-of-AGI floor) or the limits
on itemized deductions (2%-of-AGI floor)?
19. (LO 4)
a. Business receipts $ 144,000
Less: Business expenses (180,000)
Net business loss ($ 36,000)
Alimony received 22,000
Interest income 3,000
Adjusted gross income ($ 11,000)
Less: Itemized deductions (24,000)
Personal and dependency exemptions (3 × $4,000) (12,000)
Taxable income ($ 47,000)
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Losses and Loss Limitations 6-7
In calculating the NOL, the alimony received of $22,000 is not treated as business income.
20. (LO 6) The at-risk rules limit Fred’s deductions. He can deduct $35,000 in 2014, thereby reducing his
at-risk amount to $15,000 ($50,000 original investment − $35,000 deducted). He will be limited to a
$15,000 deduction in 2015 unless he increases his amount at risk. Fred’s share of the partnership losses
is not subject to the passive loss restrictions because his interest is not a passive activity.
If you have additional questions or need further clarification, please call me.
Sincerely,
John J. Jones, CPA
22. (LO 6) In 2014, Kay cannot deduct any of the passive loss because of the impact of the passive loss
rules (she has no passive income). The $35,000 loss is suspended and carried forward to 2015, where
$15,000 is deducted. After $15,000 is deducted, the remaining $20,000 of the 2014 passive loss remains
suspended.
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
6-8 2016 Essentials of Taxation/Solutions Manual
23. (LO 6)
If Activity A is sold in the current year, the following results:
In addition, the $30,000 loss (and the corresponding tax benefit of $8,400) from Activity B expected to
be incurred next year would be suspended until passive income is generated. The prospects of gaining
the use of the tax benefit at this time are nil.
Therefore, by deferring the sale until next year, Jorge is able to avoid the current payment of a $10,360
Federal tax liability. In addition, the expected gain from the sale can be offset by all of the suspended
passive loss from Activity B (including the expected $30,000 loss from next year). By deferring the
sale, Jorge’s short-term cash flow increases by $3,360.
In the current year, Sarah has a net gain of $10,000 from the sale of Activity D. She can offset the
$2,000 suspended loss from the activity and the current year’s loss of $1,500 from the activity against
the $10,000 gain. In addition, the remaining net gain of $6,500 ($10,000 − $2,000 − $1,500) from the
sale may be used to absorb passive losses from the other activities.
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Losses and Loss Limitations 6-9
25. (LO 6)
a. Net sales price $ 100,000
Less: Adjusted basis (35,000)
Total gain $ 65,000
Less: Suspended losses (40,000)
Taxable gain (passive) $ 25,000
The suspended passive losses are fully deductible. The suspended credits are lost forever
because the sale of the activity did not generate any tax.
26. (LO 6)
a. A personal service corporation is not allowed to offset passive losses against active or portfolio
income. Therefore, White’s taxable income is $436,000 ($400,000 income from operations +
$36,000 portfolio income).
b. A closely held, nonpersonal service corporation is allowed to offset passive losses against
active income, but not against portfolio income. Therefore, White’s taxable income is $396,000
($400,000 income from operations − $40,000 passive loss + $36,000 portfolio income).
27. (LO 7) John is entitled to treat the loss as active if his participation constitutes substantially all
of the participation in the activity of individuals (including nonowner employees) for the year. If
John is the only individual who participates in the activity, he would be entitled to an active loss
deduction.
28. (LO 7)
• The amount of Rene’s at-risk basis in the hardware business and whether the losses flowing from
the entity are limited by the at-risk rules.
• Whether the profits and losses from the public accounting firm are classified as passive or active.
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
6-10 2016 Essentials of Taxation/Solutions Manual
As you can see, the tax effects of the two options vary significantly due to the interplay of the at-risk
and the passive activity loss rules. This analysis should help you make a more informed investment
decision. If you need any further explanation, please contact me.
Sincerely,
30. (LO 8)
a. Maxine’s accountant was referring to the impact of the at-risk and passive activity loss rules
on the deductibility of the loss from the Teal investment. The at-risk rules are designed to
prevent taxpayers from deducting losses in excess of the actual economic investment in the
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Losses and Loss Limitations 6-11
activity. The passive loss rules prevent taxpayers from deducting passive losses in excess of
passive income. In Maxine’s current situation, she apparently has no other investments that
produce passive income (i.e., she previously sold such an interest).
b. Maxine’s current at-risk amount is $1,000, and she has no other investment activity that
produces passive income. Therefore, Maxine’s current-year deduction is limited by both the
at-risk and passive loss rules. The $13,000 loss reduces the at-risk basis to $0, and the $12,000
balance of the loss is suspended. However, the $1,000 loss not limited by the at-risk rules is
suspended under the passive loss rules because Maxine does not have any passive income.
Therefore, none of the $13,000 loss can be deducted.
31. (LO 8) Lee’s share of BlueSky’s loss in 2015 is $80,000 ($400,000 × 20%), and the entire loss is
suspended under the passive loss rules because he has no passive income. His share of the passive
income in 2016 is $40,000 ($200,000 × 20%). His at-risk amount is $80,000 ($120,000 − $80,000
passive loss in 2015 + $40,000 share of income in 2016). In 2016, he may deduct $40,000 of his $80,000
suspended loss against the passive income. This leaves a $40,000 suspended loss at the end of 2016.
32. (LO 6) Grace is allowed a $40,000 deduction. Because her at-risk basis is only $40,000, of the $50,000
loss, $10,000 is suspended. The available $40,000 loss is not subject to the passive activity loss rules
because she was a material participant. As the loss is treated as an active loss, Grace’s income for tax
purposes is $100,000 ($140,000 − $40,000).
33. (LO 5, 6, 8)
a. If Jonathan is not a material participant, $45,000 of his $60,000 loss ($300,000 loss
× 20% interest) is reclassified as a passive loss and disallowed under the passive loss limits.
The remaining $15,000 is disallowed by the at-risk limits. Therefore, Jonathan’s AGI is
$218,000 ($200,000 salary + 18,000 portfolio income).
b. If Jonathan is a material participant, $45,000 of his $60,000 loss is deductible as an active loss.
The remaining $15,000 is disallowed by the at-risk limits. Therefore, Jonathan’s AGI is
$173,000 ($200,000 salary + $18,000 portfolio income − $45,000 active loss).
34. (LO 5, 6, 8) If losses were limited only by the at-risk rules, Gerald would be able to deduct the following
amounts in 2014 and 2015.
Year Loss Allowed* Disallowed
2014 $40,000 $30,000 $10,000
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
6-12 2016 Essentials of Taxation/Solutions Manual
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Losses and Loss Limitations 6-13
37. (LO 9) Gene is considered a material participant in the tax practice but not in the apartment leasing
operation. However, because he actively participates in the real estate rental activity and owns at least
10%, $25,000 of the $30,000 loss is deductible in the current year against his tax practice income. The
remaining $5,000 loss from the rental activity is suspended as a passive activity loss.
38. (LO 9) Ida can utilize $20,000 of losses and $1,400 of credits as follows because of the real estate rental
activity exception:
Income (Loss): Activity A ($12,000)
Activity B (18,000)
Activity C 10,000
Net loss ($20,000)
Utilized loss 20,000
Suspended loss $ –0–
Utilized credit $ 1,400
Suspended credit $ 700
After deducting the loss of $20,000, Ida has available a deduction equivalent of $5,000 [$25,000
(maximum loss allowed) – $20,000 (utilized loss)]. Therefore, the maximum amount of credits Ida may
claim is $1,400 [$5,000 (deduction equivalent) × 28% (marginal tax bracket)].
39. (LO 9)
Rental loss ($105,000)
Rental income 25,000
Other passive income 32,000
Net passive rental loss ($ 48,000)
Deductible against other income 25,000
Suspended rental loss ($ 23,000)
40. (LO 5, 6, 10) In a disposition by gift of an interest in a passive activity, any suspended losses are added
to the basis of the property. Therefore, Andrea’s basis in the property is $16,000 [$13,000 (Abe’s
basis) + $3,000 (suspended passive losses)]. Abe is not allowed to deduct the suspended losses in the
year of disposition.
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
6-14 2016 Essentials of Taxation/Solutions Manual
b. The bad debt expense for tax purposes is $33,000, the amount of accounts receivable written off
during the current year.
c. The sole book/tax difference for Marketplace relates to the treatment for bad debts.
2. (LO 2, 11) Based on the following, Alternative 2’s benefit exceeds Alternative 1’s by $1,577 ($57,762
− $56,185), primarily because of the flow of the benefits and the effect of the at-risk rules on those
benefits.
Alternative 1
Tax cost/ After-tax 6% PV Present
Income benefit benefit factor value
Year 1 ($20,000) $ 5,000 $ 5,000 .9434 $ 4,717
Year 2 (28,000) 5,000 1 5,000 .8900 4,450
Year 3 72,000 (16,000)2 56,000 .8396 47,018
Total present value $56,185
Alternative 2
Tax cost/ After-tax 6% PV Present
Income benefit benefit factor value
Year 1 ($48,000) $10,000 3 $10,000 .9434 $ 9,434
Year 2 32,000 (6,000)4 26,000 .8900 23,140
Year 3 40,000 (10,000) 30,000 .8396 25,188
Total present value $57,762
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Losses and Loss Limitations 6-15
Footnotes
1 Because of the at-risk rules, Heather’s tax deduction in year 2 is limited to her remaining at-risk
basis of $20,000. The $8,000 loss that is not deductible in year 2 is suspended until her at-risk
basis increases. Therefore, her tax benefit from the deduction is $5,000 ($20,000 × 25%).
2 Heather’s $72,000 share of income increases her at-risk basis and provides the opportunity to
claim the $8,000 suspended loss from the previous year. Therefore, her taxable income for year
3 from this investment is $64,000 ($72,000 − $8,000) and the tax cost is $16,000 ($64,000 ×
25%).
3 Because of the at-risk rules, Heather’s tax deduction in year 1 is limited to her at-risk basis of
$40,000. The $8,000 loss that is not deductible in year 1 is suspended until her at-risk basis
increases. Therefore, her tax benefit from the deduction is $10,000 ($40,000 × 25%).
4 Heather’s $32,000 share of income increases her at-risk basis and provides the opportunity to
claim the $8,000 suspended loss from the previous year. Therefore, her taxable income from this
investment in year 2 is $24,000 ($32,000 − $8,000) and the tax cost is $6,000 ($24,000 × 25%).
3. (LO 3, 11) Option B’s benefit exceeds Option A’s by $7,144 ($21,987 − $14,843) primarily because of
the flow of the benefit and the ability to benefit from the passive loss deductions in years 1 and 2.
Option A
Tax cost/ After-tax 8% PV Present
Income benefit benefit factor value
Year 1 $8,000 ($2,240) $5,760 .92593 $ 5,333
Year 2 8,000 (2,240) 5,760 .85734 4,938
Year 3 8,000 (2,240) 5,760 .79383 4,572
Total present value $14,843
Option B
Tax cost/ After-tax 8% PV Present
Income benefit benefit factor value
Year 1 ($ 8,000) $ 2,240 $ 2,240 .92593 $ 2,074
Year 2 (2,000) 560 560 .85734 480
Year 3 34,000 (9,520) 24,480 .79383 19,433
Total present value $21,987
RESEARCH PROBLEMS
1. The key is to determine in which year the casualty was sustained. Reg. § 1.165–1(a) provides that a
casualty or theft loss is deductible in the year the loss was “actually sustained” but does not clarify what
actually sustained means. Thus, we look to case law for additional guidance. In Oregon Mesabi Corp.
v. CIR, 39 BTA 1033 (1939), appeal dismissed, Com'r v. Oregon Mesabi Corporation, 24 AFTR 458
(109 F2d 1014) (CA 9, 1940), fire killed trees in 1933. However, the timber was rendered worthless
when attacked by insects and fungi in 1934 and 1935. The court determined that a loss deduction was
not necessarily taken in the year of the fire, but in the years, as shown by the evidence, that
worthlessness occurred. As a result, Esther’s loss is deductible in 2015, the year in which the trees died
from disease. Despite the fact that the trees were weakened by the hurricane, they were not worthless
until they died of disease.
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
jokaisen on elettävä kaunein laulunsa todellisuudeksi, ja
mitä kauniimpi on laulu, sitä raskaampi on elämän arvan
lunastaminen.
ILTARUSKO
Veritas,
minä tahtoisin suudella sinua,
ja se suudelma olisi kuin iltarusko,
joka äsken kuvastui syviin vesiin.
Veritas,
minä tahtoisin olla sinulle iltarusko,
sillä sinä olet yksinäinen, voimakas ihminen,
joka elät syvää elämää
ja katsot hetken lapsiin alaspäin.
Minä tahtoisin kuin iltarusko
painaa oman vereni punaisen hehkun sinuun,
niin että se ulottuisi sisimpääsi asti
ja täyttäisi olemuksesi elämisen riemulla.
Veritas,
minä tahtoisin suudella sinua —
KIELONKUKKIA
SUUDELMA
Veritas, sinä suutelit minua
kuin ruumiinsa verille ruoskinut hurskas
Pyhää Neitsyttä:
kunnioittavin, aroin huulin.
Sinä suutelit minua uudelleen
kuin erakko,
joka luopuu maailmasta ja lähtee korpeen:
alistuen.
Ja minä otin suutelosi vastaan mitään ymmärtämättä,
mutta tuntien kaikki kuoleman edelliset kauhut.
Ystävä:
minussa kehittyy jokin, jolle en löydä nimeä,
jokin sanomattoman suloinen ja surullinen,
joka nostaa kyyneleet silmiini ja hymyn huulilleni,
jota en soisi kenenkään arvaavan
ja josta tahtoisin laulaa koko maailmalle,
jokin, josta en tiedä,
onko se Elämän vaiko Kuoleman lähetti.
YÖSSÄ
Yö tummuu ympärilläni.
LÄHTIESSÄ
KUVASTIN
RESIGNAATIO
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.