當代法律社會學：法律與社會理論

從古典社會學到當代社會學的研究之中，「法律」一直是社會學家關注的重
要社會現象。不論是在制度化的立法過程、法條解釋、司法判決，或是尚未制度
化的權利意識與日常習慣，我們都可以在「法律」所衍生的相關現象之中，發現
豐富的社會學想像與社會學批判的基礎。社會學對於法律的研究角度，主要關切
於經驗與實作的層次，而不是法律在概念體系或推理邏輯上的問題。因此，以法
律的社會生活各方面來說，20 世紀中出現的「法律與社會研究」運動（Law and
Society Study Movement）是首度大規模地、全面性地開始引起社會科學家對於
法律現象的注意。在當代英美社會學的學科體制中發展出來的法律社會學，也與
這個「法律與社會研究」運動有著緊密的關連。本課程的規劃即由此一學術關連
著手，在較廣泛的「法律與社會研究」之中刻畫出當代法律社會學的面貌。

一、課程規劃
本課程是以社會學系與法律系的高年級學生與碩士班學生為主要對象，但
是，對於相關系所於此主題有興趣的學生，並未設有預修課程或閱讀文獻上的
規定。「法律與社會研究」自 60 年代以來一直是個跨學科的研究領域，除了法律
學與社會學之外，也有政治學、心理學、人類學、歷史學等相關研究者參與其中。
對此，本課程仍然以法律學與社會學的文獻為主要素材為，並且藉由社會學理
論在其中可能產生的綜合作用為主要規劃原則。

1.1 課程目標與預期成效
本課程的主要目標有三：一，促使學生透過閱讀、討論與聽講來認識法律與
社會研究這個具有跨學科屬性的研究領域，並且熟悉法律社會學在其中的特性，
與當代社會學理論對於釐清且建立兩者的可能作用。二，讓學生以「權利爭議」
為研究主題，對於當代社會變遷中的各種法律現象進行參照性的理解，並且將
法律社會學的關鍵文獻與核心論題，由社會現象的質疑推進至社會理論的反思。
三，增進社會系高年級學生或碩士班學生，以法律社會學作為研究次領域的能
力，使學生於其中規畫相關議題的獨立研究，並嘗試著使自己的研究成果與既
有文獻有所對話。

1.2 課程內容簡介
本課程的內容主要分為三個部分，彼此之間負擔著不同的教學任務，並且
依序引導學生理解當代法律社會學的不同面向。第一部份介紹法律社會學的「學
科制度」，使學生理解法律與社會研究的制度發展特性；第二部分以「權利意
志」（指，當代西方社會高漲的權利文化）為研究主題，使學生理解相關研究之
中的社會學意涵；第三部分以「社會理論」為介紹主軸，使學生理解當代社會學

135
理論家如何拓深法律社會學研究。以下，將簡單地介紹各部分內容與彼此之關連

在第一週的導論之中，我們選擇了 R. Cotterrell 與 A. Hunt 的研究來確定本

課程的基本立場。他們兩人對於法律社會學的立場明顯地不同於大多數「法律與
社會研究」的學者，兩人皆認為「法律社會學」這門學科既具有社會學理論家
（古典至當代）的特定歷史關懷，也更關注法律生活周邊的相關社會脈絡。在
60 年代開始的「法律與社會研究」之中，雖然有不少社會科學家與法律學家進行
合作，Cotterrell 與 Hunt 在經歷半世紀的發展後，卻仍然呼籲當代法律社會學者
必須回歸社會學理論作為基本立場，才能依此讓社會學者與瑣碎的經驗研究保
持距離。基於這樣的基本立場，我們進入本課程的第一部份來初步刻畫「法律與
社會研究」在當代的各種發展。首先，在第二週我們先理解法律與社會研究的學
科制度背景：它是一個由法律學者與社會科學者所共同建立的跨學科研究領域，
也因此未能與兩種制度性學科的核心發展有所連結，甚至，在制度依存上仍然
是法律學為主。其次，在第三、四、五週我們將介紹當代法律與社會研究的幾個
重要取徑。「新法律唯實論」（New Legal Realism）近年來成為一個共同的趨勢，
其目的在於回到 20 世紀出的法律唯實論，卻將研究焦點由法律人轉向日常生活
的常民之上。這樣的呼籲在法律學院引起不少共鳴，因為研究者們開始在不同取
徑的經驗研究背後找到一個共同的理論立場：實用主義式的社會理論。相較之下
在社會學制度內的法律社會學研究，則無法避開 Donald Black 所建立的研究典
範。他的一系列研究被視為社會學界較具有完整立場的研究學派，但是，也引出
了不少法律學者與社會學者的批判。其中主要的爭議在於：對於 Black 僅聚焦在
法律生活之中的社會落差（例如：不同社會地位有著不同法律結果），相關論
者雖然基本上承認，卻有著不同方式的異議或詮釋。最後，我們將在第五週介紹
Amherst 學院所建立的人文社會科學式的研究取徑。學程建立於 80 年代後期，
研究成果則開花於 90 年代，以 A. Sarat 為首的 Amherst 研究群從日常生活之中
的法律意義著手，進一步去探索法律事務對於整體社會所產生的文化衝擊。也因
為此種文化轉向的研究立場，Amherst 學者的著作由實際法律案件的社會影響，
轉向了法律事務對社會意象與文化氛圍的影響。對於上述三種較為明確的研究取
徑有了初步認識之後，我們才更能理解如何發展一個更具有社會學意涵的當代
法律社會學。這樣的問題意識正是將學生帶入本課程的第二部分的重要前提。

在本課程的第二部分，我們將以當代英美社會所出現的「權利意志」現象，
作為整合不同法律社會學研究的主要論題。在當代英美社會之中，訴諸權利概念
並且爭取相關權益，似乎成為一個普遍的文化現象。不同的法律社會學研究卻陸
續引入不同的研究架構或解釋工具，但是，彼此之間卻仍然缺乏進一步整合的
機會。因此，我們在第六、七、八、九、十、十一週的課程之中，將分別以社會學的
不同分析層次（由微觀至鉅觀）來理解「爭取權利」的相關研究。首先，在第六
週的課程之中，我們介紹了 L. M. Friedman 對於當代法律文化的研究。他以「現

136
代社會進入後現代社會」為主要理論背景，深刻地描述了相映的法律轉型，亦即
權利的賦予與選擇的增加。接著，我們在第七週的課程中介紹近年來興起的「法
律意識」研究。這些研究不再是如過去研究者，僅關注民眾的法律教育程度與自
我權利意識，而是開始深思：一般民眾是如何有別於複雜的法律論述，進行自
己的權利覺醒與生活敘事。在第八週的課程中，我們介紹「法律動員」論題在近
年來如何開始與社會運動研究的整合。舊有的文獻重視法律改革在不同的政府制
度（指，行政、立法、司法）之間的相互關係，而新興的「法律動員」研究則開始
重視法律論述作為社會運動的象徵資源、法律制度作為政治機會結構的重要環節
在第九週的課程之中，我們將權利爭取放在正式組織的脈絡之下來看待。近年來
組織社會學對於「制度」概念的深化，開始重視法律作為規範結構的重要成分。
對於「組織」如何居中轉譯外在法律與內部規章，進而成為權利爭取的重要中介
因素，成為研究者們重視「法律內生性」概念的關鍵問題意識。在第十週的課程
之中，我們藉由「世界政體」（World Polity）理論的研究，指出「普世人權」在概
念與制度上雙面發展。一方面，人權概念的普世性引起非西方國家各種不同的繼
受方式，另一方面，人權制度的全球性推廣也引出不同區域之間的國際壓力。在
這種發展下，法律抗爭與權利意識則有了全球性制度同形(Isomorphism)的脈絡。
在第十一週的課程之中，我們則透過「象徵鬥爭」(Symbolic Struggle)與「法律場
域」(Legal Field)的分析工具，來看待權利概念作為特定(英美)文化之中的社會建
構產物。這樣的研究視角刻劃了，權利概念的相關社會承載者(例如：改革派律
師、經濟學家、民權運動者)，是如何在國際性流轉過程中發揮他們的象徵影響力
從以上各週的課程內容來看，我們可以發現：在不同研究層次所進行的法律社
會學研究，可以重新被整合在一個新的研究框架中。雖然這些研究可能散見於不
同的社會學研究取徑或研究論題（例如：後現代文化、日常生活敘事、社會運動
修辭、組織新制度論、世界政體理論、象徵支配與場域理論），但是，我們可以
由此發現，當代法律社會學仍然以這種較為分散的方式，在社會學發展之中吸
收新興的研究取徑或研究論題的啟發。

在本課程的第三部分，我們將從社會理論的層次來拓深當代法律社會學的
研究框架。正如本課程前兩部分所介紹的內容，我們可以發現當代法律社會學之
所以仍然有待發展與釐清，其關鍵既在於法律與社會研究的制度屬性，也在於
其中缺乏具有社會學理論意涵的研究立場。一方面，既有的法律與社會研究未能
提出一個整合性的研究框架，以致於研究者雖然專精於各種法律現象，卻無法
對其中的社會因素與層次具有整體觀。另一方面，各種當代法律社會學研究的新
發展，雖然可以被整合在一種「微觀/鉅觀」的研究框架之中，但是，社會學者仍
然因為注重法律所促成的社會效果，而忽略了法律的規範性論述本身作為社會
知識或社會理論的一面。依此，本課程的第三部分將透過四位不同的當代社會理
論家，與他們所衍生出的法律社會學研究，作為我們拓深當代法律社會學的理
論資源。因此，他們構成了本課程由第十二週至十七週的授課內容。首先，

137
Habermas 在 90 年代的巨著「規範與事實之間」，提供了當代法律社會學研究的
重要理論資源。他從「溝通行動」發展出的「論述倫理」概念，來重新看待當代法
律發展的關鍵困境（指，基本權利與法律體系之間的協調）。對此，我們可以一
方面在 A. Honneth 延伸出的「承認鬥爭」與 N. Fraser 與之進行的「承認或再分配」
爭論之中，發現他們對於 Habermas 在法律社會學上的理論資源的進一步延伸。
其次，Luhmann 在其系統理論的典範確認之後，重新撰寫的「社會的法」則是當
代法律社會學者無法迴避的關鍵資源。其中，涉及到法律系統與其他相關系統
（例如：政治系統）之間的共同演化，也涉及到法律系統自我觀察與自我描述
的「正義」語意。然而，面對著 Luhmann 浩瀚的理論體系對於當代法律社會學的
啟發，我們卻可以先在 G. Teubner 的系列研究之中，看見不少具有啟發性的應
用與轉化。最後，Foucault 在「規訓與懲罰」之後的著作中，陸續出現對於法律現
象的政治系譜學研究，並且成為當代法律社會學家亟欲整合的理論資源。其中，
出現了 Foucault 是否「以規範取代法律」爭議，也出現了「治理性到倫理性」的爭
議。依此，我們可以在當代英美社會學界聚集在「治理性」（Governmentality）研
究之下的法律社會學成果之中，發現 Foucault 理論的初步啟發與深究可能。

本課程將在最後一週之中，重整以上三個不同的部分的講授內容，並且回
到本課程的核心關懷：如何在既有的法律與社會研究之中，發展一個具有社會
學理論意涵的當代法律社會學。在本週我們藉由 Bourdieu「司法場域社會學」的
概念之中，發現討論其理論概念的當代應用（例如：場域的歷史生成、結構同形
的分析、社會慣習的刻畫）。法律社會學長期以來過度重視法律的社會經驗面向
而忽略了法律本身的理論論述面向。為了修正這樣的學科發展缺點，我們有必要
一方面藉由當代社會理論(指，Habermas、Luhmann、Foucault)的啟發，來提供回
應法律論述的重要研究架構，另一方面，回到 Bourdieu 對於場域形成歷史的分
析之中，重新深化社會承載者的象徵建構過程。

1.3 教學方式與評分標準
本課程的進行方式有講授、報告、討論三種不同的形式，相信修課學生可以
在不同教學形式的相互配合中，增進對於本課程內容的理解。對此，修習本課程
學生應盡之義務有三類：

一，課堂報告。修課學生經過分組後，在本課程的第二至十八周之中選出各
組負責報告的周數，並且將該周指定閱讀製作成書面報告，以小組為單位在該
周上課時於課堂中分發，並且進行口頭報告與討論引導。每周課程將先由授課教
師講授該周相關文獻的學術脈絡(包含指定閱讀與延伸閱讀)，之後由負責報告
的同學進行書面與口頭報告，最後由出席同學提出相關問題與討論，而負責報
告的該組同學則進行討論引導與回答。最後，由授課教師對於相關討論於疑惑進
行整理，並且提出回應與說明。

138
 二，學期報告。修課學生應以個人為單位獨力完成一份學期報告，報告的範
圍必須以本課程指定文獻為主要素材，學期報告的也主題必須在期中考周以前
確定。主題選擇的方式有二：一者為書面回答授課教師所列出的申論題，題目將
在學期最後一周發給，學生可在其中自行選擇四題回答，並於一周後繳交。二者
為學生自行擬定所欲進行申論的題目，在期中考周提出之後獲得授課教師認可，
之後即可開始撰寫並於學期結束前繳交。不論何種書面報告都須在內文中標示引
用出處與附上參考文獻，篇幅約一萬字。

三，指定作業。在本課程進行的過程中，授課教師將視課程討論情況為準，
對修課學生進行指定作業的分派。指定作業的形式不拘，可以是為全體同學針對
特定主題，進行圖書資源或期刊論文方面的查詢，也可以是針對特定社會議題，
進行新聞剪報或次級文獻的整理。修課學生在被指定作業的該周即可開始進行，
於之後的課程講授周，簡要地呈現為三至四頁 A4 的書面形式，並且以口頭報
告的方式分享給全體修課同學。此種不定期的指定作業，主要依照課程進行需要
與學生參與程度來分發，因而並非所有修課學生都會進行，也採額外加分的方
式作為鼓勵。

修課學生上述三種課程參與的評分方式如下：
1.課堂報告與出席討論，各占 25%
2.期中計畫與期末報告，各占 25%
3.不定期或隨堂指定作業，占 25%(加分用)。

二、課程教材
本課程所選用的教材分成不同的類別，其中主要目的在於幫助修課學生透
過不同層次的學術文獻，來理解本課程所欲傳遞的內容。如前所述，法律與社會
研究是一個跨學科的研究領域，而法律社會學既在其中與相關學科共享著一些
導論性書籍，也有著較為親近自己學科的相關書籍。我們初步說明將本課程的相
關教材分為三類，並且在以下的簡介之中說明它們各自的定位。

2.1 導論書籍
Calavita, Kitty. 2010. Invitation to law and society: an introduction to the study of real law.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cotterrell, Roger. 1992. The sociology of law: an introduction. London : Butterworths.
Deflem, Mathieu. 2008. Sociology of law: visions of a scholarly tradition. Cambridge, UK ;
New York : Cambridge University Press.
Sutton, John R. 2007. Law/Society. Newbury Park : Pine Forge Press March.

139
2.2 參考書籍
Banakar, Reza. & Travers, Max. (eds.) 2005. Theory and Method in Socio-legal Research.
Hart, Oxford.
Banakar, Reza. 2003. Merging law and sociology: beyond the dichotomies in socio-legal
research. Glienicke, Berlin ; Madison, Wisc. : Galda + Wilch Verlag.
Barkan, Steven E. 2009. Law and society: an introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ :
Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Clark, David S. 2007. Encyclopedia of law & society: American and global perspectives. Vol.
1-3. Los Angeles : Sage Publications.
Cotterrell, Roger. (ed.) 1994. Law and society. Aldershot : Dartmouth.
Cotterrell, Roger. (ed.) 2001. Sociological perspectives on law. vol.1-2. Aldershot ;
Brookfield USA : Ashgate/Dartmouth.
Cotterrell, Roger. (ed.) 2006. Law in social theory. Aldershot, Hants, England ;
Burlington, VT : Ashgate.
Freeman, Michael. (ed.) 2006. Law and sociology. Oxford ; New York : Oxford University
Press.
Galligan, D. James. 2007. Law in modern society. Oxford ; New York : Oxford University
Press.
Halliday, Simon. & Schmidt, Patrick. 2009. Conducting law and society research: reflections
on methods and practices. Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press.
Klein, Lloyd. (ed.) 2006. Sociology of law: a resource guide. Washington, D.C. : American
Sociological Association, 3rd ed.
Macaulay, Stewart. & Friedman, Lawrence M. & Mertz, Elizabeth. (ed.) 2007. Law in action:
a socio-legal reader. New York, N.Y. : Foundation Press; Thomson/West.
Mertz, Elizabeth. (ed.) 2008. The role of social science in law. Aldershot, England ;
Burlington, VT : Ashgate.
Morris, Lydia. (ed.) 2006. Rights: sociological perspectives. London ; New York : Routledge.
Rokumoto, Kahei. (ed.) 1994. Sociological Theories of Law. Hamsphire, England: Ashgate
Dartmouth Publishing Company.
Sarat, Austin. & Simon, Jonathan. (ed.) 2003. Cultural analysis, cultural studies, and the law:
moving beyond legal realism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Sarat, Austin. (ed.) 2004. The Blackwell companion to law and society. Malden, MA :
Blackwell Pub.
Seron, Carroll.(ed.) 2006. The Law and Society Canon. Hampshire, England: Ashgate
Publishing.
Travers, Max. 2010. Understanding law and society. Abingdon, Oxon, [England] ; New York,
NY : Routledge.
Treviño, A. Javier. (ed.) 2007. Classic writings in law and society: contemporary comments

140
 and criticisms. New Brunswick, N.J. : Transaction Publishers.
Treviño, A. Javier. (ed.) 2008. Talcott Parsons on law and the legal system. Newcastle:
Cambridge Scholars Pub.
Treviño, A. Javier. (ed.) 2008. The sociology of law: classical and contemporary perspectives.
with a new introduction by the author. New Brunswick, N.J. : Transaction Publishers.
Treviño, A. Javier. 2007. The sociology of law: an expanded bibliography of theoretical
literature, 2007. Lewiston : Edwin Mellen Press.
Vago, Steven. 2012. Law and society. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall.
Walsh, Anthony. & Hemmens, Craig. 2008. Law, justice, and society: a sociolegal
introduction. Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press.

三、課程進度
3.1 簡略目錄

周次 課程進度
1 導論
2 法律與社會研究的學科發展
3 新法律實在論(New Legal Realsim)
4 法律的運作行為(Donald Black)
5 法律的人文學研究(Amherst Seminar)
6 當代英美社會的權利革命
7 日常生活中的權利：法律意識（Legal Consciousness）
8 權利訴求與社會運動：法律動員（Legal Mobilization）
9 組織脈絡中的權利：法律內生性（Legal Endogeneity）
10 全球化脈絡的權利：普世人權
11 權利的象徵鬥爭：法律場域研究
12 Habermas
13 承認或再分配之爭(Honneth、Fraser)
14 Luhmann
15 Teunber：反身性與混雜性
16 Foucault
17 治理性研究
18 結論：Bourdieu 的司法場域社會學

3.2 詳細目錄

第一週 導論

141
指定閱讀
Cotterrell, Roger. 2006. Law, culture and society: legal ideas in the mirror of social theory.
Aldershot, England ; Burlington, VT : Ashgate Pub. Co. 節選
Hunt, Alan. 1993. Explorations in law and society: towards a constitutive theory of law. New
York : Routledge. 節選
Scheppele, K. Lane. 1994. Legal Theory and Social Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 20,
383-406.

延伸閱讀
Cotterrell, Roger. 1995. Law's community: legal theory in sociological perspective. Oxford:
Clarendon Press ; New York : Oxford University Press.
Cotterrell, Roger. 2003. The politics of jurisprudence: a critical introduction to legal
philosophy. London: Oxford university press.
Cotterrell, Roger. 2008. Living law: studies in legal and social theory. Aldershot, England
: Dartmouth Pub. ; Burlington, Vt. : Ashgate Pub.
Hunt, Alan. 1978. The sociological movement in law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Nelken, David. 2009. Beyond law in context: developing a sociological understanding of law.
Farnham, Surrey, England ; Burlington, VT : Ashgate.

第一部份 法律社會學的學科制度特性

第二週 法律與社會研究的學科發展
指定閱讀
Simon. Jonathan. 1999. Law after Society. Law & Social Inquiry, 24, 1, 143–194.
Garth, Bryant. & Sterling, Joyce. 1998. From Legal Realism to Law and Society: Reshaping
Law for the Last Stages of the Social Activist State. Law & Society Review, 32, 2, 409-472.

延伸閱讀
Abel, Richard. 2010. Law and Society: Project and Practice. Annual Review of Law and
Social Science, 6, 1-23.
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1986. The Law and Society Movement. Stanford Law Review, 38, 3,
763-780.
Friedman, Lawrence. 2005. Coming Of Age: Law and Society Enters an Exclusive Club.
Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 1-16.
Galanter, Marc. 2006. In the Winter of Our Discontent--Law, Anti-Law, and Social Science.
Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 1–16.

142
Scheingold, Stuart A. 2008. Home Away from Home--Collaborative Research Networks and
Interdisciplinary Socio-Legal Scholarship. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 4, 1–
12.
Symposium. 2001. The Sociology of Law in the world. The American Sociologist, 32, 2.
Tomlins, Christopher. 2000. Framing the Field of Law's Disciplinary Encounters: A Historical
Narrative. Law & Society Review, 34, 4, , 911-972.
Travers, Max. 1993. Putting Sociology Back into the Sociology of Law. Journal of Law and
Society, 20, 4, 438-451.

第三週 新法律實在論
指定閱讀
Erlanger, Howard, et al.Is It Time for a New Legal Realism? Wisconsin Law Review 2005:
339 (2005)
Tamanaha, Brian. 1997. Realistic Socio-Legal Theory: Pragmatism and a Social Theory of
Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 節選

延伸閱讀
Cross, Frank B. 1997. Political Science and the New Legal Realism: A Case of Unfortunate
Interdisciplinary Ignorance. Northwestern University Law Review, 92, 251-.
Nourse, Victoria. & Shaffer, Gregory. 2009.Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New
World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory? Cornell Law Review, 95, 62-.
Suchman, Mark. & Mertz, Elizabeth. 2010. Toward a New Legal Empiricism? Empirical
Legal Studies and New Legal Realism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6, 555-
579.
Symposium. 2005. Is It Time For a New Legal Realism? Wisconsin Law Review, 2005, 2.
Symposium. 2006. New Legal Realism. Law & Social Inquiry, 31, 4.
Symposium. 2009. New Legal Realism. Cornell Law Review, 95, 1.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2001. A general jurisprudence of law and society. Oxford ; New York :
Oxford University Press.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2004. On the rule of law: history, politics, theory. Cambridge ; New York
: Cambridge University Press.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2006. Law as a means to an end: threat to the rule of law. Cambridge ;
New York : Cambridge University Press.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2006. The perils of pervasive legal instrumentalism. Nijmegen : Wolf
Legal Publishers.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2010. Beyond the formalist-realist divide: the role of politics in judging.
Princeton : Princeton University Press.

143
第四週 法律的運作行為
指定閱讀
Black, Donald. 1976. The behavior of law. New York: Academic Press. (中譯，唐‧布莱
克著；唐越,苏力译，1994，《法律的運作行為》，北京市：中國政法大學出版)

延伸閱讀
Black, Donald. & Mileski, Maureen. (ed.) 1973. The social organization of law. New
York: Seminar Press.
Black, Donald. 1989. Sociological justice. New York: Oxford University Press. (中譯，
唐‧布莱克著；郭星华等译，2002，《社會學視野中的司法》，北京市：法律出版社)
Black, Donald. 1993. The social structure of right and wrong. San Diego: Academic
Press. (中譯，唐‧布莱克著；徐昕,田璐译，2009，《正義的純粹社會學》，杭州市：
浙江人民出版社)
Black, Donald. 1995. Black's Theory on the Behavior of Law Revisited. International Journal
of the Sociology of Law, 23, 189-232.
Black, Donald. 2000. Dreams of Pure Sociology. Sociological Theory, 18, 3, 343-367.
Black, Donald. 2002. The Geometry of Law: An Interview with Donald Black. by Aaron Bell.
International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 30, 101-129.
Symposium. 2002. "A Continuities Symposium on Donald Black's The Behavior of
Law" Contemporary Sociology, 31,6, 641-674.
Symposium. 2008. The Sociological Quarterly, 49, 2, 209-235.
Greenberg, David F. 1983. Donald Black's Sociology of Law: A Critque. Law and Society
Review, 17, 337-368.
Horwitz, Allan. 1983. Resistance to Innovation in the Sociology of Law: A Response to
Greenberg. Law and Society Review, 17, 369-384.
Hunt, Alan. 1983. Behavioral Sociology of Law: A Critique of Donald Black. Journal of Law
and Society, 10, 1, 19-46
Cooney, Mark. 1986. Behavioural Sociology of Law: A Defence. The Modern Law Review,
49, 262-271.
Sarat, Austin. 1989. Donald Black Discovers Legal Realism: From Pure Science to Policy
Science in the Sociology of Law. Law & Social Inquiry, 14, 4, 765-785.
Sciulli, David. 1995. Donald Black's Positivism in Law and Social Control. Law & Social
Inquiry, 20, 3, 805-828.

第五週 法律的人文學科研究

144
指定閱讀
Sarat, Austin. & Simon, Jonathan. 2001. Beyond Legal Realism? Cultural Analysis, Cultural
Studies, and The Situation of Legal Scholarship. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities,
13, 3. 3-32.
Sarat, Austin. 1990. Off to Meet the Wizard: Beyond Validity and Reliability in the Search for
a Post-Empiricist Sociology of Law. Law & Social Inquiry, 15, 1, 155-170.
Harrington, Christine B. & Yngvesson, Barbara. 1990. Interpretive Sociolegal Research. Law
& Social Inquiry,15, 1,135-148.
Esser, John P; Trubek, David M. 1990. From "Scientism without Determinism" to
"Interpretation without Politics": A Reply to Sarat, Harrington & Yngvesson. Law & Social
Inquiry, 15, 1, 171-180.
Trubek, David M & Esser, John. 1989. "Critical Empiricism" in American Legal Studies:
Paradox, Program, or Pandora's Box? Law & Social Inquiry, 14, 1, 3-52.

延伸閱讀
Silbey, Susan. & Sarat, Austin. 1987. Critical Traditions in Law and Society Research. Law
and Society Review, 21, 1, 165-174.
Kahn, Paul W. 1999. The cultural study of law : reconstructing legal scholarship. Chicago :
University of Chicago Press.
Symposium. 2003. The Amherst Seminar and the Everyday Life of the Law. International
Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 16, 4.
Weaton, Nancy. A. 1997. The Fate, Violence, and Rhetoric of Contemporary Legal Thought:
Reflections on The Amherst Series, the Loss of Truth, and Law. Law & Social Inquiry, 22,
3, 733-808.
(Amherst 系列研究：The Amherst series in law, jurisprudence, and social thought)
Sarat, Austin. & Douglas, Lawrence. & Umphrey, Martha Merrill. (ed.) 2007. Law and
catastrophe. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press.
Sarat, Austin. & Douglas, Lawrence. & Umphrey, Martha Merrill. (ed.) 2007. Law and the
sacred. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press.
Sarat, Austin. & Douglas, Lawrence. & Umphrey, Martha Merrill. (ed.) 2007. How law
knows. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press.
Sarat, Austin. & Douglas, Lawrence. & Umphrey, Martha Merrill. (ed.) 2005. The limits of
law. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press.
Sarat, Austin. & Kearns,Thomas R. (ed.) 2004. Human rights: concepts, contests,
contingencies. Ann Arbor, MI : University of Michigan Press.
Sarat, Austin. & Douglas, Lawrence. & Umphrey, Martha Merrill. (ed.) 2003. Law's madness.
Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
Sarat, Austin. & Douglas, Lawrence. & Umphrey, Martha Merrill. (ed.) 2003. The place of

145
 law. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
Sarat, Austin. & Douglas, Lawrence. & Umphrey, Martha Merrill. (ed.) 2002. Lives in the
law. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.

第二部分 權利意志

第六週 當代英美社會的權利革命

指定閱讀
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1990. The republic of choice: law, authority, and culture. Cambridge,
Mass. : Harvard University Press. (中譯，弗里德曼著；高鴻鈞譯，2005，《選擇的共和
國：法律、權威與文化》，北京市：清華大學出版社)

延伸閱讀
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The rights revolution: lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in
comparative perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Epp, Charles R. 2009. Making rights real: activists, bureaucrats, and the creation of the
legalistic state. Chicago ; London : University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1985. Total justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1999. The horizontal society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1991. Rights talk: the impoverishment of political discourse. New York :
Free Press ; New York : Maxwell Macmillan. (中譯，瑪麗.安.格倫頓著;周威譯，2006，
《權利話語：窮途末路的政治言詞》，北京市：北京大學出版社)
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1994. A nation under lawyers: how the crisis in the legal profession is
transforming American society. New York : Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Glendon, Mary Ann. 2001. A world made new: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights. New York : Random House.
Ignatieff, Michael. 2000. The rights revolution. Toronto : House of Anansi Press.
Ignatieff, Michael. 2001. Human rights as politics and idolatry. Princeton ; Oxford :
Princeton University Press.
Skrentny, John David. 1996. The ironies of affirmative action: politics, culture, and justice in
America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Skrentny, John David. 2002. The minority rights revolution. Cambridge, Mass. : Belknap
Press of Harvard University Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. & Holmes, Stephen. 1999. The cost of rights: why liberty depends on taxes.
New York : W.W. Norton.
Sunstein, Cass R. 1990. After the rights revolution: reconceiving the regulatory state.

146
 Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.
Walker, Samuel. 1998. The rights revolution: rights and community in modern America. New
York : Oxford University Press.

第七週 日常生活中的權利：法律意識（Legal Consciousness）

指定閱讀
Ewick, Patricia. & Silbey, Susan S. 1998. The common place of law: stories from everyday
life. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. (中譯，帕特里夏.尤伊克,蘇珊.S.西爾貝著；
陸益龍譯，2005，《法律的公共空間：日常生活中的故事》，北京市：商務出版) 節選
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting justice and getting even: legal consciousness among
working-class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (中譯，薩利.安格爾.梅
麗著；郭星華,王曉蓓,王平譯，2007，《訴訟的話語：生活在美國社會底層人的法律
意識》，北京市：北京大學出版) 節選

延伸閱讀
Ewick, Patricia. & Silbey, Susan S. 1992. Conformity, Contestation and Resistance: An
Account of Legal Consciousness. New England Law Review, 26, 731-749.
Ewick, Patricia. & Silbey, Susan S. 2003. Narrating Social Structure: Stories of Resistance to
Legal Authority. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 6, 1328-1372 .
Marshall, Anna-Maria. 2006. Communities and Culture: Enriching Legal Consciousness and
Legal Culture. Law & Social Inquiry, 31, 1, 229-249.
McCann, Michael W & March, Tracey. 1995. Law and Everyday Forms of Resistance: A
Socio-Political Assessment. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 15. 1, 207-236.
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006. Human rights and gender violence: translating international law
into local justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merry, Sally. 2006. New Legal Realism and the Ethnography of Transnational Law. Law &
Social Inquiry, 31, 4, 975-995.
Mertz, Elizabeth. 1992. Review Essay: Language, Law, and Social Meanings:
Linguistic/Anthropological Contributions to the Study of Law. Law and Society Review,
26, 2, 413-445.
Nielsen, Laura. 2000. Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary
Citizens about Law and Street Harassment. Law and Society Review, 34, 4, 1055-1090.
Silbey, Susan. 2005. After Legal Consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1,
323-368.
Skrentny, John. 2006. Law and the American State. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 213-244.

147
第八週 權利訴求與社會運動：法律動員（Legal Mobilization）

指定閱讀
McCann, Michael. 2006. Law and Social Movements. Annual Review of Law and Social
Science,2, 17-38.
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at work: pay equity reform and the politics of legal
mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 節選

延伸閱讀
Burstein, Paul. 1991. Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for
Equal Employment Opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 5, 1201-1225.
Goldberg-Hiller, Jonathan. 2003. "Subjectivity Is a Citizen": Representation, Recognition,
and the Deconstruction of Civil Rights. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 28, 139-188.
Kinsey, Karyl A & Stalans, Loretta J. 1999. Which "Haves" Come Out Ahead and Why?
Cultural Capital and Legal Mobilization in Frontline Law Enforcement. Law and Society
Review, 33, 4, 993-1023.
McCann, Michael. (ed.) 2006. Law and social movements. Aldershot, Hants, England ;
Burlington, VT : Ashgate.
McCann, Michael. 1986. Taking reform seriously: perspectives on public interest liberalism.
Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
McCann, Michael. 1991. Legal Mobilization and Social Reform Movements: Notes on
Theory and Its Application. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 11, 225-254.
McCann, Michael. 1996. Causal versus Constitutive Explanations (or, On the Difficulty of
Being So Positive...). Law & Social Inquiry, 21, 2, 457-482.
NeJaime, Douglas. 2011. Convincing elites, controlling elites. Studies in Law, Politics, and
Society, 54, 175-211.
Steinman, Erich. 2005. Legitimizing American Indian Sovereignty: Mobilizing the
Constitutive Power of Law through Institutional Entrepreneurship. Law & Society Review,
39, 4, 759-792.
Vanhala, Lisa. 2009. Disability Rights Activists in the Supreme Court of Canada: Legal
Mobilization Theory and Accommodating Social Movements. Canadian Journal of
Political Science, 42, 4, 981-1002.

第九週 組織脈絡中的權利：法律內生性（Legal Endogeneity）

指定閱讀
Suchman, Mark C. & Edelman, Lauren B. 1996. Legal Rational Myths: The New

148
 Institutionalism and the Law and Society Tradition. Law & Social Inquiry, 21, 4, 903-941.
Edelman, Lauren B. & Uggen, Christopher. & Erlanger, Howard S. 1999. The Endogeneity of
Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth. American Journal of Sociology,
105, 2, 406-454.
Edelman, Lauren B. & Suchman, Mark C. 1997. The Legal Environments of Organizations.
Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 479-515.

延伸閱讀
Edelman, Lauren B. & Leachman, Gwendolyn. & McAdam, Doug. 2010. On Law,
Organizations, and Social Movements. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6, 653-
685.
Edelman, Lauren. 2004. Rivers of Law and Contested Terrain: A Law and Society Approach
to Economic Rationality. Law & Society Review, 38, 2, 181-197
Edelman, Lauren B. & Suchman, Mark C. (ed.) 2007. The legal lives of private organizations.
Aldershot, England ; Burlington, VT : Ashgate.
Edelman, Lauren B. & Suchman, Mark C. 1999. When the "Haves" Hold Court: Speculations
on the Organizational Internalization of Law. Law and Society Review, 33, 4, 941-991.
Symposium. 1995. The Law and the New Institutionalism. Studies in Law, Politics, & Society,
1995, 15, 1.
Symposium. 1996. Law and Institutional Analysis. Law & Social Inquiry, 21, 4, 903-966.
Edelman, Lauren B, Howard S Erlanger, and John Lande. 1993. Internal Dispute Resolution:
The Transformation of Civil Rights in the Workplace. Law & Society Review, 27, 497-534.
Edelman, Lauren B. 1992. Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational
Mediation of Civil Rights Law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 6, 1531-1576.

第十週 全球化脈絡的權利：普世人權
指定閱讀
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. & Ron, James. 2009. SEEING DOUBLE: Human Rights Impact
through Qualitative and Quantitative Eyes. World Politics, 61, 2, 360-401.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. & Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2005. Human Rights in a Globalizing World:
The Paradox of Empty Promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 5, 1373-1411.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Kiyoteru Tsutsui, and John W. Meyer. 2008. International Human
Rights Law and the Politics of Legitimation. International Sociology, 23, 1, 115-141.
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2008. From Pariah State to Global Protagonist: Argentina and the Struggle
for International Human Rights. Latin American Politics and Society, 50, 1, 1-29.
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. & Shin, Hwa Ji. 2008. Global Norms, Local Activism, and Social
Movement Outcomes: Global Human Rights and Resident Koreans in Japan. Social

149
 Problems, 55, 3, 391-418.

延伸閱讀
Cole, Wade. 2005. Sovereignty Relinquished? Explaining Commitment to the International
Human Rights Covenants, 1966-1999. American Sociological Review, 70, 3, 472-495.
Dobbin, Frank. & Sutton, John R. The strength of a weak state: The rights revolution and the
rise of human resources management divisions. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 2,
441-476.
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. Norms, culture, and world politics: Insights from sociology's
institutionalism. International Organization, 50, 2, 325.
Hasselbladh, Hans. & Kalinikos, Jannis. 2000. The project of rationalization: A critique and
reappraisal of neo-institutionalism in organization studies. Organization Studies, 21, 4,
697-720.
Koenig, Matthias. 2008. Institutional Change in the World Polity. International Sociology, 23,
1, 95-114.
Koenig, Matthias. 2011. Conflict in the world polity - neo-institutional perspectives. Acta
Sociologica, 54, 1, 5-25
Meyer, John W. & Boli, John. & Thomas, George M. & Ramirez, Francisco O. 1997. World
Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1, 144-181.
Meyer, John W. 2000. Globalization: Sources and Effects on National States and Societies.
International Sociology, 15, 2, 233-248.
Meyer, John W. 2007. Globalization. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, vol.
48, no. 4, 261-273.
Nee, Victor. 1992. Organizational Dynamics of Market Transition: Hybrid Forms, Property
Rights, and Mixed Economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 1, 1-27.
Pedriana, Nicholas. & Stryker, Robin. 2004. The Strength of a Weak Agency: Enforcement of
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Expansion of State Capacity, 1965-1971.
American Journal of Sociology, 110, 3, 709-760.
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. & Wotipka, Christine Min. 2004. Global Civil Society and the International
Human Rights Movement: Citizen Participation in Human Rights International
Nongovernmental Organizations. Social Forces, 83, 2, 587-620.
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2006. Redressing Past Human Rights Violations: Global Dimensions of
Contemporary Social Movements. Social Forces, 85, 1, 331-354.
Wotipka, Christine Min. & Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2008. Global human rights and state
sovereignty: State ratification of international human rights treaties, 1965-2001.
Sociological Forum, 23, 4, 724-754.

150
第十一週 權利的象徵鬥爭：法律場域研究

指定閱讀
Dezalay, Yves. M. & Garth, Bryant G. 1996. Dealing in virtue: international commercial
arbitration and the construction of a transnational legal order. foreword by Pierre
Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 節選
Dezalay, Yves. M. & Garth, Bryant G. 2002. The internationalization of palace wars:
lawyers, economists, and the contest to transform Latin American states. Chicago;
London : University of Chicago Press. 節選
Mahoney, John. 2007. The challenge of human rights: origin, development, and significance.
Malden, Mass. : Blackwell.

延伸閱讀
Dezalay, Yves. M. 1986. From Mediation to Pure Law: Practice and Scholarly Representation
within the Legal Sphere. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 14, 2, 89-107.
Dezalay, Yves. M. 2007. From a Symbolic Boom to a Marketing Bust: Genesis and
Reconstruction of a Field of Legal and Political Expertise at the Crossroads of a Europe
Opening to the Atlantic. Law & Social Inquiry, 32, 1, 161-181.
Dezalay, Yves. M. & Garth, Bryant G. 1995. Merchants of Law as Moral Entrepreneurs:
Constructing International Justice from Competition for Transnational Business Disputes.
Law and Society Review, 29, 1, 27-64.
Dezalay, Yves. M. & Garth, Bryant G. 1997. Law, Lawyers and Social Capital: "Rule of Law"
versus Relational Capitalism. Social & Legal Studies, 6, 1, 109-141.
Dezalay, Yves. M. & Garth, Bryant G. (ed.) 2002. Global prescriptions: the production,
exportation, and importation of a new legal orthodoxy. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan
Press. (中譯，伊夫斯.德扎雷、布賴恩特.加思主编；陸幸福,王煜宇,趙明譯，2006，
《全球性解决方案：新法律正统性的產生、輸出與輸入》，北京市：法律出版社)
Dezalay, Yves. M. & Garth, Bryant G. 2004. The Confrontation between the Big Five and Big
Law: Turf Battles and Ethical Debates as Contests for Professional Credibility. Law &
Social Inquiry, 29, 3, 615-638.
Dezalay, Yves. M. & Garth, Bryant G. 2006. From the Cold War to Kosovo: The Rise and
Renewal of the Field of International Human Rights. Annual Review of Law and Social
Science, 2, 231-255.

第三部分 社會理論的回歸

151
第十二週 Habermas
指定閱讀
Habermas, Jurgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: Lifeworld and
System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston, MA:
Beacon Press. 節選
Habermas, Jürgen 1988. “Law and Morality” in S. M. McMurrin (ed.) The Tanner Lectures
on Human Values, Volume 8. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of
Law and Democracy. trans.William Rehg. Cambridge: MIT Press. 節選 (中譯：哈伯瑪斯
著，童世駿譯，2003，《事實與格式》，臺北市：臺灣商務。)
Deflem, Mathieu. 1996. “Law in Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action.” Pp. 1-20. in
Habermas, modernity and law. London ; Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications.

延伸閱讀
Eder, Klaus. 1988. Critique of Habermas's Contribution to the Sociology of Law. Law &
Society Review, 22, 931-944.
Fine, Bob. 1984/2002. Democracy and the rule of law: liberal ideals and Marxist critiques.
Caldwell, N.J. : Blackburn Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a
category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.
Hirst, Paul Q. 1979. On law and ideology. London : Macmillan.
Hirst, Paul Q. 1986. Law, socialism, and democracy. London : Allen & Unwin.
Orjiako, Chin L. 2004. Jürgen Habermas and the project of discourse theory of law: from
internal justification of rights to a global human rights. London: London Press.
Rehg, William. 1996. “Translators Introduction” pp. ix-xxxiv in J. Habermas, Between Facts
and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT
Press.
Salter, Michael. 1997. Habermas' New Contribution to Legal Scholarship. Journal of Law and
Society, 24, 2, 285-305.
Scheuerman, William. (ed.) 1996. The rule of law under siege: selected essays of Franz L.
Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Scheuerman, William. 1994. Between the norm and the exception: the Frankfurt school and
the rule of law. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.
Scheuerman, William. 2008. Frankfurt school perspectives on globalization, democracy, and
the law. New York: Routledge.
Tweedy, John and Alan Hunt. 1994. The Future of the Welfare State and Social Rights:
Reflections on Habermas. Journal of Law and Society, 21, 3, 288-316.

152
第十三週 承認與再分配之爭(Honneth 與 Fraser)

指定閱讀
Honneth, Axel. 1995. The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts.
translated by Joel Anderson. Cambridge, Mass. : Polity Press. (中譯：克塞爾‧霍耐特著，
胡繼華譯，2005，《為承認而鬥爭》，上海：上海人民出版社。)
Honneth, Axel. 2000. Suffering from indeterminacy: an attempt at a reactualization of Hegel's
Philosophy of right: two lectures. with an introduction by Beate Rössler ; translated by Jack
Ben-Levi. Assen : Van Gorcum. 節選
Fraser, Nancy. & Honneth, Axel. 2003. Redistribution or recognition? a political-
philosophical exchange. translated by Joel Golb, James Ingram, and Christiane Wilke.
London ; New York : Verso. 節選
Fraser, Nancy. 2009. Scales of justice: reimagining political space in a globalizing world.
New York: Columbia University Press. (中譯：南茜.弗雷澤著; 歐陽英譯，2009，《正義
的尺度：全球化世界中政治空間的再認識》，上海：上海人民出版社。) 節選

延伸閱讀
Brink, Bert van den. & Owen, David. (ed.) 2007. Recognition and power : Axel Honneth and
the tradition of critical social theory. Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press.
Deranty, J.-P. & Petherbridge, D. & Rundell, J. & Sinnerbrink, R. (ed.) 2007. Recognition,
Work, Politics: New Directions in French Critical Theory. Leiden ; Boston : Brill.
Hobson, B. (ed.) 2003. Recognition Struggles and Social Movements – Contested Identities,
Agency and Power . Cambridge University Press.
Honneth, Axel. 2008. Reification: a new look at an old idea. with commentaries by Judith
Butler, Raymond Geuss, Jonathan Lear ; edited and introduced by Martin Jay. Oxford ;
New York : Oxford University Press.
McNay, L. (2008). Against Recognition. Polity Press.

第十四週 Luhmann
指定閱讀
Luhmann, Niklas. 2004. Law as a social system. translated by Klaus A. Ziegert ; edited by
Fatima Kastner. [et al.] ; with an introduction by Richard Nobles and David Schiff.
Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press. (中譯：尼可拉斯.魯曼著; 國立編譯館主
譯; 李君韜譯，2009，《社會中的法》，臺北市：五南出版) 節選

延伸閱讀

153
King, Michael. & Thornhill, Cris. (ed.) 2006. Luhmann on law and politics: critical
appraisals and applications. Oxford ; Portland, Or. : Hart.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1985. A sociological theory of law. translated by Elizabeth King and
Martin Albrow ; edited by Martin Albrow. London ; Boston : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1985. The Self-Reproduction of Law and Its Limits. pp. 111-127 in G.
Teubner (ed.), Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin:De Gruyter.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1987. The Unity of the Legal System. pp. 12-35 in G. Teubner (ed.),
Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin:De Gruyter.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1990. Political theory in the welfare state. translated and introduced by
John Bednarz, Jr. Berlin ; New York : W. de Gruyter.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas. 2010. Niklas Luhmann: law, justice, society.
Abingdon, Oxen, [England] New York : Routledge.
Teubner, Gunther. 1983. Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law. Law and
Society Review, 17, 2, 239-285.
Zumbansen, Peer. & Perez, Oren. (eds.) 2011. Law After Luhmann: Legal Sociology in the
World Society. Hart, Oxford.

第十五週 Teubner：反身性與混雜性
指定閱讀
Teubner, Gunther. 2009. Self-subversive Justice: Contingency or Transcendence Formula of
Law? Modern Law Review, 72, 1-23.
Teubner, Gunther. 2006. In the Blind Spot: The Hybridization of Contract. Theoretical
Inquiries in Law 7, 5-71.
Teubner, Gunther. 2002. Hybrid Laws: Constitutionalizing Private Governance Networks. Pp.
311-331. In: Robert Kagan and Kenneth Winston (eds.), Legality and Community: On the
Intellectual Legacy of Philip Selznick. Berkeley Public Policy Press, Berkeley.
Teubner, Gunther. 1998. Changing Maps: Empirical Legal Autopoiesis. Social and Legal
Studies, 7, 451-486.

延伸閱讀
Teubner, Gunther. 1998. Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law Or How Unifying Law
Ends Up in New Differences. Modern Law Review, 61, 11-32.
Teubner, Gunther. 1989. How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law.
Law and Society Review, 23, 727-757.
Teubner, Gunther. 1993. Law as an Autopoietic System. Blackwells, London.
Teubner, Gunther. (ed.) 1997. Global Law without a State. Aldershot, Dartmouth.
Teubner, Gunther. (ed.) 1988. Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society.

154
 European Universtiy Institute Series, Florence. De Gruyter, Berlin/New York.
Teubner, Gunther. (ed.) 1986. Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. European University
Institute Series, Florence. De Gruyter, Berlin/New York.

第十六週 Foucault

指定閱讀
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. trans. by Alan
Sheridan. New York: Random House. 節選 (中譯：傅柯著，劉北成、楊遠嬰譯，1992，
《規訓與懲罰：監獄的誕生》，台北：桂冠出版。)
Foucault, Michel. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College de France,
1975. trans. David Macey. New York: Picador. (中譯，米歇爾‧福柯，钱翰譯，
2010，《必須保衛社會》，上海人民出版) 節選
Foucault, Michel. 2003. Abnormal: lectures at the Collège de France, 1974-1975. edited
by Valerio Marchetti and Antonella Salomoni ; translated by Graham Burchell. New
York : Picador. (中譯，米歇爾‧福柯，錢翰譯，2010，《不正常的人》，上海人
民出版) 節選
Foucault, Michel. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de
France, 1977-78. edited by Michel Senellart ; translated by Graham Burchell.
Basingstoke ; New York : Palgrave Macmillan : République Française. (中譯，米歇
爾‧福柯，錢翰、陳曉徑譯，2010，《安全、領土與人口》，上海人民出版) 節選
Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France,
1978-79. edited by Michel Senellart ; translated by Graham Burchell. Basingstoke,
[England] ; New York : Palgrave Macmillan. (中譯，米歇爾‧福柯，莫偉民、趙偉
譯，2010，《生命政治的誕生 1978-1979》，上海人民出版) 節選

延伸閱讀
Gros, Frederic. 2006. 何乏筆，楊凱麟，龔卓軍譯。《傅柯考》。臺北市：麥田出版 : 城邦
文化發行。
Baxter, Hugh. 1996. Review: Bringing Foucault into Law and Law into Foucault. Stanford
Law Review, 48, 2, 449-479.
Beck, Anthony. 1996. Foucault and Law: the Collapse of Law's Empire. Oxford J Legal
Studies, 16, 3, 489-502.
Ewald, François. 1990. Norms, Discipline, and the Law. Representations, 30, 1, 138–161.
Leonard, Jerry. D. 1990. Foucault: Genealogy, Law, Praxis. Legal Studies Forum, 14, 1, 3-26.
Leonard, Jerry. D. 1995. “Foucault and (the Ideology of) Genealogical. Legal Theory” Pp.
133-151. in Legal Studies as Cultural Studies: a reader in (post) modern critical theory.

155
 edited by Jerry Leonard. Albany : State University of New York Press.
Tadros, Victor. 1998. Between governance and discipline: The law and Michel Foucault.
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 75–103.
Simon, Jonathan. 1992. In Another Kind of Wood: Michel Foucault and Sociolegal Studies.
Law and Social Inquiry, 17, 1, 49-55.
Hunt, Alan. 1992. Law and the Condensation of Power. Law and Social Inquiry, 17, 1, 57-62.
Golder, Ben. & Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2009. Foucault's law. Milton Park, Abingdon ; New York :
Routledge.
Wickham, G.ary. 2002. “Foucault and Law” Pp.249-265. in R. Banakar & M. Travers (eds.),
An Introduction to Law and Social Theory. Oxford : Hart.
Wickham, G.ary. 2006. Foucault, Law, and Power: A Reassessment. Journal of Law and
Society, 33, 596-614.
Wickham, Gary. & Pavlich, George. (ed.) 2001. Rethinking law, society and governance:
Foucault's bequest. Oxford [England] ; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub.

第十七週 治理性研究
指定閱讀
Hunt, Alan. & Wickham, G.ary. 1994. Foucault and Law: Towards a Sociology of Law as
Governance. London ; Boulder, Colo. : Pluto Press.
Rose, Nikolas. & O'Malley, Pat. & Valverde, Mariana. 2006. Governmentality. Annual
Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83-104.
Rose, Nikolas. & Valverde, Mariana. 1998. Governed By Law? Social & Legal Studies, 7, 4,
541-551.
Valverde, Mariana. 2003. Law's dream of a common knowledge. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton
University Press.

延伸閱讀
Bartholomew, Amy. & Hunt, Alan. 1990. What's Wrong with Rights? Journal of Law and
Inequality, 9, 1- 58.
Hunt, Alan. 1996. The Governance of Consumption: Sumptuary Laws and Shifting Forms of
Regulation. Economy and Society, 25, 3, 410-427.
Hunt, Alan. 1999. Governing Morals: A Social History of Moral Regulation Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
O'Malley, Pat. 1999. Governmentality and the Risk Society. Economy and Society, 28, 1, 138-
148.
O'Malley, Pat & Weir, Lorna. & Shearing, Clifford. 1997. Governmentality, Criticism,
Politics. Economy and Society, 26, 4, 501-517.

156
Valverde, Mariana. 1998b. Governing Out of Habit. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 18,
217-242.
Valverde, Mariana. 1999. Derrida's justice and foucault's freedom: Ethics, history, and social
movements. Law & Social Inquiry, 24, 3, 655-676.
Valverde, Mariana. 2007. Genealogies of European States: Foucauldian Reflections. Economy
and Society, 36, 1, 159-178.

第十八週 結語：Bourdieu 的司法場域社會學

指定閱讀
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.
Hastings Law Journal, 38, July, 805-53.

延伸閱讀
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; Stanford, Calif.
: Stanford University Press.
Lenoir, Remi. 2006. Pierre Bourdieu and the Law: An Intellectual and Personal Encounter.
Retfærd: The Nordic Journal of Law and Justice, 29, 7-22.
Madsen, Mikael. R. (ed.) 2006. Pierre Bourdieu: from law to legal field. Copenhagen: Jurist
og-Økonomforbundets Forlag.
Madsen, Mikael. R. & Dezalay, Yves. M. 2002. "The Power of Legal Field: Pierre Bourdieu
and the Law" Pp. 189-204. in An introduction to law and social theory. edited by Reza
Banakar and Max Travers. Oxford : Hart.

157